How the Nexus of Jewish-Dominated Media and Jewish-Led or Jewish-Funded Watchdog Groups Really Operate - Paul Nehlen and Kevin MacDonald

Consider this news story. Wisconsin candidate Paul Nehlen has recruited Kevin MacDonald to be a spokesman for his campaign. Nehlen is a Christian patriot and a free-enterpriser. But he also loves his own race, culture, and history... just like Jews love their own. Recently, Nehlen learned of the true nature of Power in the US. Thanks to open sharing of information on the internet, he was able to draw his own conclusions about what’s really going on. After all, it must be pretty strange for a White Conservative in America to make sense of GOP logic. Republicans say white Americans, indeed ALL Americans, must stand with Israel(unshakeably too) and praise Jewish people, culture, and history to high heaven... but the fact is most Jews are Democrats, anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-morality(at least for gentiles who are to be turned into cattle), and scapegoat white gentiles all the time. While Jews sometimes tell their non-white allies(of convenience) that they, as Jews, aren’t really white-white, they blame gentile whites for all the power, privilege, and abuses of Jewish whites. Jews push causes like #OscarSoWhite because it distracts people from the fact that Hollywood is really totally Jewish. Jews also run Wall Street, Las Vegas, Silicon Valley, Ivy League universities, the Legal institutions, and the Deep State, but if anything goes wrong or if people complain about too much concentration of Power, Jews just blame it all on ‘white privilege’.

Paul Nehlen may not be the brightest bulb in town, but he has what most politicians don’t have: Curiosity and courage. It wasn’t enough for Nehlen to just make money and get along with the Power. He asked questions and drew his own conclusions. And he arrived at the irrefutable fact that the US is controlled by Jews, that Jews are tribal & loyal mainly to Judea(aka World Jewry) than to fellow Americans, and that Jews are a hostile minority that seeks to usurp power from the majority via (1) control of media, propaganda, and the narrative (2) vilifying and dehumanizing the gentile majority and, if possible, instilling them with ‘guilt’ or self-loathing (3) gaining financial monopoly and cutting off funds and loans to groups counter-hostile to Jewish nastiness (4) Diversity by mass immigration-invasion that turns the majority population into a minority. "With Jews, We Lose."
Indeed, the destruction of Palestine was a dress rehearsal for what Jews have in store for all white people. There was a time when Palestine was mostly Arab-Palestinian. Initially, a few Jews trickled into Palestine here and there, and they hardly seemed like a threat. But rich and powerful Jews bought off politicians of great powers like the British Empire. With the backing of imperialist might, Jews undermined Palestinian resistance against further invasive-immigration. As more and more Jews arrived, Arabs grew alarmed and beseeched the British to stop letting Jews in. Arabs got so angry that the British felt compelled to restrain the Jewish invasion somewhat. How did Jews respond? They used ultra-violence to attack the British and indeed pioneered modern terrorism. And when the British Empire was exhausted by WWII, the Jews went to the Americans and Soviets to back the Zionist project. Against the will of the Palestinians(who were still the much bigger majority), Palestine was cut in two and one-half was given to the Jewish minority. Naturally, the Arabs rose up, but Jews had it all planned out to carry out massive ethnic cleansing of the Arab population known as Nakba to the Palestinians. Thus, Jews(who bitch about other peoples trying to ‘wipe Israel off the map’) wiped Palestine off the map. To this day, there is no Right of Return for Palestinians whereas any Jew can move to Israel. And Jews continue to occupy West Bank and use forced segregation(or apartheid policies) to keep the ‘peace’ through threat of violence. What Jews did to Palestinians, they are now doing to the West. If Jews themselves could take over Palestine, Jews don’t have the numbers(enough of their own kind) to take over the West. So, they use non-white invader-immigrants. Since Jews let them in, these non-whites side with Jewish globalism even though they don’t much like Jews. Some, especially Arabs and Muslims, hate Jews, but they still side with Jewish globalists(even though Jews destroy Muslim nations) because their main dream is to gain access to the West for material advantage. In the end, most people are organisms above all, and they will do anything(even betray principles or their own kind) for more comfort and convenience. Since white gentiles(especially people of Northern European stock) made the nicest societies, non-whites want access to them as shortcut to the Good Life. Since Jewish elites control the whore-cuck-politicians who let them in, the non-white immigrants(even anti-Jewish ones) vote for globalist candidates.

Some people argue that because non-whites have less guilt about Shoah and don’t care for Jews as much as whites do, the rise of non-white demographics will be bad for Jews in the long run. This may be somewhat valid in European nations that are filling up with too many Muslims. But Muslims will never be a major force in the US. They will always be dwarfed by other peoples, and most Muslims don’t have the brains to rise very high to challenge Jewish power. Also, even if non-Muslim minorities aren’t particularly reverential toward Shoah and Jews, they tend to see White People as the main enemy, especially as Jews control the media, academia, and whore politicians. (Non-whites hate whites because they love white societies. They want to live in nice white nations built by whites, but in order to do so, white defenses must be lowered, and this is done by vilifying whites and instilling them with 'white guilt'. It is ironic that the main purpose of anti-white rhetoric is to bring non-whites closer to whites than away from whites.)
California is full of Diversity, but the academia and media raise kids of all color to hate white people. Jews manipulate blacks, browns, yellows, Hindus, and Muslims to hate white people uber alles. And because most people are stupid sheeple, they just go along with the Jew-run Narrative. And of course, whore politicians, Jewish or non-Jewish, play along too. Jews are for Jews and non-Jewish politicians are for Jews. Since every society needs a scapegoat, Jews have made the White Majority the voodoo doll to stick needles into by all groups.

Also, even if we were to suppose that all the diverse groups were anti-Jewish, they are also likely to be anti-each-other. Thus, they won’t be able to unite to challenge and topple the supremacist power of Judea that has sunk its claws into America. Jews remember the Austro-Hungarian Empire in which many groups distrusted and disliked Jews but they couldn’t unite against the Jews since they were divided among their own kind.

Now, most white people have been friendly and supportive of Jews in the US, especially after WWII and double-especially since the 1960s when whites were made to feel especially guilty for ‘racism’ and ‘atone’ for their 'historical sins'. So, most white people became especially mindful of black and Jewish demands. And both political parties made it taboo to say anything critical about Jews. Virtually all Christian Churches praised Jews and pledged total support of Israel, Israel, Israel. White Christians slobber over Jews like dogs over their masters.

But Jews are nothing if not prophetic and forward-looking. Jews figure this pro-Jewish sympathy may not last forever. Why not? Because excessive Jewish success, power, and privilege may lead to whites noticing who the real masters are. But the bigger reason is that Jews know of their own insatiable greed and hideous nastiness. Jews know they can’t help being arrogant, abrasive, contemptuous, and vicious jerks. The likes of Albert Brooks, Jordan Belfort, Anthony Weiner, Sarah Silverman, Tim Wise, Bernie Madoff, James Toback, Bill Maher, Howard Stern, and etc. can’t stop being what they are. It’s just too much a part of their DNA. So, Jews figure that no matter how much white people try to like Jews and no matter how much sober Jews like David Brooks try to admonish his Tribesmen to act less obnoxiously, too many Jews will act like appalling a**holes and alienate everyone. Also, because Jewish DNA evolved as merchants and hustlers, one side of Jewish DNA tends to be craven and cowardly despite all the chutzpah. Even though Jews are aggressive and pushy to get things their way, when their whole scheme blows up, as with Wall Street or Iraq War, they blame everyone and everything but themselves. It’s like Dark Helmut blaming the other guy for the accident in SPACEBALLS. Jews simply don’t have a honor culture that defined the European gentile aristocrats. Of course, there were plenty of aristocrats who were heinous, nasty, dishonest, corrupt, vile, and craven, BUT, it was part of the aristocratic culture to maintain a good reputation and a sense of honor... and be willing to put one's life on the line to defend one's honor, which is why duels were so important among them. If a man was dishonored, he had to defend his honor. (Granted, proving one’s honor by shooting or stabbing is kind of stupid, but it still required courage and nerves.) Another reason why white gentiles had a higher sense of ideal was Christianity, the moral teachings of which were simple, pure, and consistent.

In contrast, Jews evolved as merchants, and those with haggly-waggly merchant-like genes were favored over those without. Also, Jewish theology was different from the Christian kind. Even though there were plenty of Christian liars, apologists, and propagandists, it preached sincerity, honesty, and earnestness as the highest virtues. Indeed, the fact that Christians failed to live up to these principles is what continues to haunt their conscience. In contrast, Jewish theology was about Jewish chauvinism and "Is it good for the Jews?" Also, like Arabs, Jews in the Middle East evolved in a far more tribal and clannish environment than people did in Northern Europe. So, Jewish theology didn’t instill Jews with virtues of sincerity and purity-of-heart. Rather, the Talmudic-minded Jews learned to twist logic, play word games, and use whatever tricks available to fool the goyim. And over time, Jews with such intellectual personalities were favored as Rabbis, and they came to define the Jewish Way. Though honesty is ideal in Judaism, it is permissible to harm other groups through deception and trickery IF it is good for the Jews. Thus, Jews feel no guilt about having used morally dubious means to get the better of goyim. Jews are like high-IQ gypsies in some ways.

Because of the Jewish Way and its tendency toward deceit, trickery, corruption, and nastiness, Jews fear that it will only be a matter of time before whites tire of Jews and even come to hate them. After all, deep down inside, Jews must know that Jewish expulsions from so many places couldn't have been entirely the fault of gentiles. Of course, the Official Narrative of the Jews is that Jews were guiltless and goyim were entirely to blame, but among themselves, Jews must know that simply can’t be true. It’s like adults will tell children one thing, but among themselves they know the truth isn’t so simple. Jews must know that they have a natural tendency to be obnoxious, abrasive, insulting, and exploitative. It partly owes to the tradition of the Covenant that said Jews have a special contract with God. But in modern times, it has to do with the combination of Jewish intelligence, Jewish spark/brilliance, and Jewish chutzpah/neurosis that led to tremendous amounts of wealth, prestige, and power. Objectively speaking, it’s fair to say Jews have been, pound for pound, the most accomplished people on Earth in the past 150 yrs. Now, Jews feeling pride over this is no problem. But pride can turn into arrogance and, worse, contempt for the less accomplished. Such arrogance can be self-defeating because those who are snubbed and made to feel inferior will hate the snotty a**holes. And this is why Jews pretend to care for the poor ‘victims’ around the world. Paradoxically, because Jews win so much as the Top Victors, they need to associate themselves with the Biggest Losers. That way, Jews launder their supremacist arrogance with ‘good work’, made all the easier by making the LGBTQ community, which is joined at the hip with Jewish Power, the favorite ‘victim group’. If Jews were high IQ but had personalities of Episcopalians, they would just be seen as rich people. But because of their nastiness and contempt, Jews could eventually come to be seen as something like super-rich Puerto Ricans. A people with all the money but no honor. Imagine Representative Luis Guiterrez with the IQ of Episcopalians, and there you have Anthony Weiner, the repulsive a**hole whose excessive behavior was so out of control that even Jews had no choice but to dump him. Or consider Lena Dunham and Emma Sulkowicz, both of whom are half-Jewish and utterly blind to their utter foulness. And even gentiles who come under Jewish management turn out crazy. Consider Miley Cyrus, a goy girl raised more by her Jewish handlers than by her trashy father who’s bad enough, by the way.

Jews no longer believe they can control their behavior. Their chutzpah is out of the bag and running wild. Jews pioneered pornography in the US, and Jewish porn-performers like Ron Jeremy saw America as just a white pussy. Oliver Stone, half-Jewish, projected the Jewish feelings about America on Tony Montana who says it is like a ‘big fat pussy just waiting to get fuc*ed’. To Jews and their black allies, white women are just pussies waiting to get fuc*ed by their dongs and white wombs exist to hatch Jewish or black babies.

And that is why Jews need Massive Immigration-Invasion of Diverse Non-Whites from all over the world. Without Diversity that Jews can manipulate with divide-and-rule strategy, a majority population will eventually rise up against Jews because Jewish attitudes and behavior are too appalling, indeed so much so that even Jews carried out a holocaust against other Jews like the Edward G. Robinson character in TEN COMMANDMENTS.

Of course, non-whites will come to hate Jews too, but they come from all over the world, and as such, they won’t be able to unite against the Jews either. Indeed, what do Mexicans, Hindus, Chinese, Turks, Iranians, Filipinos, Guatemalans, Colombians, Brazilians, Palestinians, and etc have in common? Nothing. Now, if ONLY the Muslims poured into the US, Jews might think twice. After all, plenty of Jews in EU are wondering if it was wise to support Muslim immigration, especially as the European Left is forging an alliance with the Muslim community to hate on Israel and Zionism. But American Jews have no such fears because most immigrant-invaders to the US are NOT Muslim, indeed far from it.

Anyway, Paul Nehlen noticed mounting evidence of Jewish BS, and after awhile, he did his own research and came to the OBVIOUSLY true conclusion that (1) Jews are the real ruling elites of America (2) Jews despise white goyim as cattle (3) Jews are carrying out massive ethnic-cleansing of whites in EU and US via endless invasive-immigration (4) Jews promote ACOWW(or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs) on the premise that white wombs don’t belong to the white race but to blacks and Jews (5) Jews use massive censorship to shut down dissident voices willing to speak truth to power.

Nehlen sticks out because he is so different from the cuck white politicians who fill up elite institutions. Because Jews rule the US and because Jews dictate the terms of admittance to the Elysium club, whites with craven and cowardly genes are favored. In time, white elites will grow ever more craven and cowardly due to genetic selection. Whites who tend to have courage and conviction will be shut out by Jews. Jews will ban Courage genes and favor Cuck genes. So, those with Cuck genes will be allowed into the elite world, and they will marry others with cuck genes and their kids will be born with cuck genes. In contrast, whites with Courage genes(like Nehlen) will be kept on the outside. Richard Spencer and Paul Nehlen have too much Courage genes in their DNA to take the thirty pieces of silver and sell out... like that fake former-southern-avenger Jack Hunter the dork whose career choice is wussier than his squeaky cuck voice. Jews weed out the cocky and favor only the cucky. Men like Joe Biden, Bill Clinton, Jeb Bush, and Lindsey Graham will say and do anything to get ‘what is mine’. They are useful to Jews as cucky-wucks. But Jews hate, hate, and hate Donald Trump because he’s cocky than cucky. But given the immense Power of Jews, even the Donald has to suck Jewish cock(though he only pretends to swallow). Jews know that the Donald spits out the Jew cum after sucking the Jewish Cock... unlike guys like Clinton, Biden, Bush, and Graham who not only swallow but plead, "Can I have a little more?" like Oliver Twist. And then, you have super-cucks like Paul Ryan who not only sucks and swallows but pleads, "Can you please fuc* me in the ass to Hava Nagila?" (There are four kinds of goyim in relation to Jewish Power. There are the Swallowers who not only suck the Jewish Penis but swallow the cum. Most goyim in high position are Swallowers. John McCain, Paul Ryan, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Jeb Bush, and etc not only suck but swallow. Then, there are Spitters who suck the Jewish Cock and pretend to swallow but spit it out. They are like Randall McMurphy in ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO’S NEST who takes the pill only to spit it out later. Jews get awful antsy with Spitters who are, however, tolerated as long as they don’t rise up too high in the ranks. Jews are angry with Trump because a Spitter became president. Trump does a lot of sucking of Jewish cock, but he later spits out the jism. And then you got the Swatters who swat the Jewish Cock away and refuse to suck it. Jews hate these people like a Pimp hates a whore who won’t do as told and suck. Just like pimps beat up prostitutes to make them suck, swallow, and spread, Jewish Power uses all its muscle to punish those who swat the Jewish dick away and won't suck. This is why Jewish Power punches hard at Swatters like Paul Nehlen who slaps the Jewish cock away and says, "Ewww, gross, I ain’t sucking it." And then, there are the Slicers. Slicers feel that it’s not enough to say NO and swat the Jewish cock away. Jews will never stop coming after goyim, just like Harvey Weinstein wouldn’t say NO to women who rebuffed him. They had to watch him, suck him, and fuc* him. He had the power, and this ‘god’[according to Meryl Street] demanded that women around him be suckers and Swallowers. And for that reason, Slicers believe that Swatters aren’t enough to deal with the Jewish Cockuestion. Just like Zeus dealt with Cronus by cutting off his balls, the Slicers believe that the Evil Scrotum of Jewish Power must be sliced open. Nehlen isn’t yet a Slicer but he is an adamant Swatter.)


Anyway, Nehlen, with the aid of scholars like Kevin MacDonald, felt the scales fall from his eyes, and he saw the truth of Jewish Power. So, he recruited MacDonald to be his spokesman. Nehlen won’t back down even though he was censored and then even banned by Twitter that works with Zionist-imperialist Jewish-supremacist organization ADL to shut down patriotic voices. (Granted, what Jews fear most isn’t someone like David Duke whose reputation has been sullied long time ago by association with the KKK but someone more mainstream and respectable like Jared Taylor and Nehlen who don’t have that ‘white supremacist’ baggage. Jews target such people and then hang the label of ‘white supremacist’ on them. Unlike Jared Taylor who totally cucks out on Jews despite being dehumanized and deplatformed by the Tribe, Nehlen will name the Jew.) Though one may disagree with certain details or theories of MacDonald’s thesis, it is no longer tenable to deny the fact that Judea, aka World Jewry, controls the US(that controls the world) and that Jews are working overtime to destroy white identity, white pride, white power, and white unity... all the while brainwashing or coercing whites to support Jewish supremacism, Jewish identity & interests, and Jewish-Zionist imperialism over Palestinians and across the Middle East. Jews are also behind the ‘new cold war’ with Russia, all the sicker since Jews financially raped Russia in the 90s and bought-and-sold countless Russian and Ukrainian women as whores in a vast White Slavery ring all around the world.

So, how do the media react to Paul Nehlen’s partnership with Macdonald? The Talking Points Meme article linked below is an prime example of Jewish-Supremacist mendacity and perfidy made possible by their incestuous nexus between Jewish-run media and Jewish-funded-or-controlled ‘watchdog’ groups. Since the Jewish media cannot refute the factual claims of MacDonald and Nehlen, they try to discredit them by appealing to the ‘expertise’ and knowledge of ADL. In other words, Jews in media outsource final judgement to Jews who run a watchdog group lavishly funded by Jews. Imagine if Arab-Americans ran the Media and, faced with controversy that might undermine Arab-American power, just call on some Arab-funded organization to provide Final Say on the matter. It’d be ludicrous, right? But that is exactly what the Jewish Nexus of Power does. Jews in media collude with Jews in organizations funded by Jews. It’s Jews talking to Jews talking to Jews. Now, these Jews will hire cuck gentiles, aka shabbos goyim, to break the news, but then, these gentile journalists hired by Jews better report the news as Jews demand... or else they are OUT. The media are supposed to be skeptical, but on key racial issues, the media just call on SPLC(aka $PLC) and ADL, both mostly funded by Jews, to act as the final arbiters on the truth. Just like Jews fixed the World Series in 1919, Jews fix Free Speech with three-strikes-you're-out on Youtube. Of course, Jews get to play referee in calling strikes. They never call strikes on Jewish supremacism and go after whites who reject White Submissivism to Jews.

Now, what can be said about Nehlan and MacDonald? And what about MacDonald’s claims about Jewish agenda and power? Since looking into the claims of men like Nehlen and MacDonald might uncover inconvenient truths, the media just call on ADL(or SPLC) to offer their ‘expert’ opinion. Now, since ADL is a blatantly Zionist-supremacist group and since SPLC is funded mainly by Jews, what do you think their ‘advice’ and views will be? Of course, the usual platitudes about ‘antisemitism’, ‘white supremacism’, ‘hate’, and etc. In other words, if whites don’t go into White Submissive mode before their Jewish masters, they are ‘white supremacists’.

Consider this article in Talking Points Memo: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/paul-ryan-challenger-hires-anti-semite-spox

It says:

A controversial Republican candidate challenging House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) announced Friday that his campaign hired Kevin MacDonald as its spokesperson, a former professor at California State University, Long Beach who is widely recognized as an anti-Semite.

Widely? By whom? Oh yeah, the Jews who control the media and academia who see gentiles as dogs to train than as individuals with independent minds. It’s all the funnier since Jewish media people and academic personnel are filled with all kinds of hatred, hostility, and vitriol against whites. But if someone notices Jewish viciousness toward whites(and a long history of it), he is an ‘anti-Semite’. Of course, Kevin Macdonald didn’t just wake up one day to ‘hate’ Jews. Rather, he couldn’t help noticing social and political trends wherein increasing Jewish power piled on more and more hatred on the white race. MacDonald noticed that Jews act as a tribe with a group strategy. ADL is supposed to be ‘anti-defamation’ but it is actually a PRO-defamation league. It defames any white patriot, Russia, Iran, Palestinians, or any people who won’t bend over backward to Jews. Also, its definition of ‘antisemitism’ is a complete joke. Anyone who notices Jewish power and realizes that what-is-good-for-Jews can be bad-for-my-people is an ‘anti-Semite’. Anyone who notices that Jews have power far beyond their numbers is an ‘anti-Semite’.

Now, Jews may argue that Jewish success and wealth owes to hard work and intelligence, but then, it’s ‘antisemitic’ to surmise that Jews may have higher IQ. Also, Jews who defend meritocracy for Jews excoriate whites for having too much power and wealth. Worse, ‘white privilege’ is invoked to mask what is really Jewish privilege. Do ‘whites’ really run Hollywood? According to ADL, America is ‘antisemitic’ unless it agrees 100% that American Interests are exactly the same as Jewish and Zionist interests. Jews claim to be ‘progressive’ and side with the underdogs against the Power, but they refuse to admit that they have The Power in the US, and they smear as ‘antisemitic’ anyone who notices the truth of Jewish power and realizes that what-is-good-for-Jews could be harmful to his own people. So, a Palestinian is also an ‘anti-Semite’ for realizing that Zionism led to Nakba pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map and reduced Palestinians into a permanent refugee population living under IDF terror and Jewish apartheid. And a white person who realizes that the Jewish Agenda is Ethnic Cleansing for whites in the US and EU is also an ‘anti-Semite’. A more accurate term would be Anti-PhiloSemite. Philosemitism is blind and childish worship and admiration of anything Jewish. A Philo-Semite looks upon Jews like a dog looks upon his master. A Philo-Semite acts toward Jews like the servant to his master in TWELVE CHAIRS.

Kevin MacDonald is an Anti-Philosemite, and that is why Jews hate him so. MacDonald has expressed admiration for Jewish intelligence and achievements, but he is not is fetishist of ability or the Other. Macdonald believes that white people's positiveness toward Jews should be conditional. If Jews are good to whites, whites should be good to Jews. But if Jews do bad to whites, whites should reciprocate in kind. White-Jewish relations mustn't be unconditional like between dog and master. But Jews demand exactly that kind of dynamics. Even when Jews beat on the goy dog, the latter is supposed to honor Jews.
We are supposed to revere Jews as a superior breed because of their great achievements, but power, wealth, and ability don’t necessarily mean truth, meaning, morality, and honor. Nazi Germany was a powerful nation with many men of talent and ability, but it was evil just the same. George Soros is a wizard at making money, but wealth doesn’t make him better or wiser as a human being.

Philosemites worship Jews for their wealth and power. It has little to do with Shoah or ‘guilt’. If Jews have an average IQ of 90 and achieved precious little since WWII, how many white Americans would be mindless Philosemites worshiping Jews? All this Jew-worship is really a nihilistic fandom of money and power. To be sure, Jews have cleverly used the Shoah narrative to fend off any criticism or challenge to their power. Jews just say, ‘Nazi’ or ‘anti-Semite’ as they do to MacDonald and Nehlen.

Unfortunately, this Jew worship is found on the White Right as well. Jared Taylor is so enamored of Jewish money and power that his dream is to have Jews come over to his side. Bill Buckley gave Neocons everything they demanded but Jews still didn’t come over to the American Conservatism. So, what chance is there that Jews will join with Jared Taylor? Taylor is like Sal in THE GODFATHER who hangs his hopes on Barzini whose power threatens to eclipse the Corleones'. Because Taylor knows a few Jewish HBD individuals, he seems to think some kind of Jewish-White alliance is possible. But it’s comical because Jews used all their might to smear Taylor, kick him off Twitter, ban him from Paypal, and etc. Jews can smell weakness. A chutzpah-istic people, they can only be dealt with counter-chutzpah. Any good will on the part of gentile is seen by Jews as a vulnerability, a hole through which Jews can worm in and take over. Also, Jews can spot craven opportunism when they see it. Jews know that most politicians praise Israel, Israel, Israel out of careerism than conviction. They know that these goy politicians are a bunch of cucks. Politicians are their whores. Even as Jews take care of such people, they feel utter contempt for them. What Jew respects a total wussy boy like Mitt Romney or Lindsey Graham? Or Paul Ryan? They are total wussy cucks who suck and swallow for doggy biscuits from Jews. They are like goy actors and crew in Hollywood who work for Jewish bosses.

Talking Point Memo cannot refute anything Nehlen or MacDonald have said, so it does what the rest of the media do: It refers to ADL:

According to the Anti-Defamation League, MacDonald was first recognized for his anti-Semitic views when he wrote a series of books arguing that Jews are “a hostile elite” in the U.S. whose goal is to undermine America’s European ties and “destroy Europeans.” He is also the leader of the American Freedom Party, a white supremacist group whose goal is to “to restore and preserve the legitimacy of White identity, White heritage, and expressions of White interests,” according to the ADL.

That’s how journalism works in the US. On any issue or subject that involves Jewish Power and their critics, just ask the ADL and it’s sure to give an unbiased opinion, right? And notice how white identity and white interests are conflated with ‘white supremacism’. According to Jew-run media, any white person who refuses to kowtow to Jewish Supremacism, i.e. rejects White Submissivism, is a ‘white supremacist’. This is how the Smear Media, or Smedia, operates. Jew-run US journalism is just a Jew-run operation that consults Jew-run ‘watchdog groups’ for 'expertise' and opinion. (Jew-run media and Jew-run watchdogs scratch each other's back. As the go-to-voice by Big Media, groups like ADL gain prestige as a 'respectable' organization. And since such 'esteemed' organizations cater to Big Media, the media is bestowed with respectability in turn. It's mutual reinforcement society. It's like how the financial bubble began in the US with all these Jew-run-institutions and organizations patting each other on the back. This is also how Jews get to say a certain view is 'widely discredited'. They create all these dummy front organizations that mutually reinforce each other's biases and interests. So, there's no need to actually think about Kevin Macdonald's thesis. Just have all these Jews and cucks in their front-organizations spout the same line and fire anyone who refuses to do so. And it is also how Jews make something 'valuable', like those financial derivatives during the Housing Bubble. Since Jews control so many industries and financial rating firms, they all wink-wink reinforced one another. Same thing with Russia-Hacking nonsense. Jews had no truth but created the illusion of collusion by having all the institutions that they control to spout the same Narrative points. Jews really colluded to create the illusion of collusion between Trump and Russia. And Jews also did this with BLACK PANTHER, creating a climate where ALL critics were obligated to praise it to high heaven. Well, if so many 'experts' say it is super, it must be. Jews just create an echo chamber where only their voices reverberate and are heard. Now, it's not like Jews call everyone up to tell them what to do. Because Jews control so much of media and academia, they cultivated and conditioned everyone to pick up the Correct Signals and act accordingly.)

Now, imagine if the Media on a host of controversial issues just called on the American Freedom Party(instead of ADL) for its views, advice, and expertise? How fair and objective would that be? Not very.
And yet, the media see no problem in just relying on ADL and SPLC to offer the final say on a host of matters. ADL and SPLC are the High Priesthood of Jew-run Political Correctness. Indeed, the media don’t even provide the reader with a disclaimer that ADL is a Zionist-imperialist organization funded by Jewish globalist supremacists. But then, if the media were truly honest, they would also remind readers and watchers on a daily basis as to WHO really own and control the media operation. But if they did, we would wake up to the fact that Jewish supremacists control the US.

Jews Galore in the Jew-run media

Yes, that is how the corrupt Jew-run Media operate. Jews bitch about how Russia, Iran, and China don’t have free press, but the US doesn’t either. All the media and platforms are owned and run by Jews. Jewish publishers and moguls hire Jews to run the operations, and if gentiles want to be part of the team, they better serve Israel and say NO to BDS. Don't be like Rick Sanchez who noticed Jewish domination at CNN, and don't be like Helen Thomas who called on Zionists as European Jews who stole land from Palestinians.
So, as with politicians, the Courage & Conviction genes will be weeded out among media gentiles. Only those who are Craven & Cowardly will be hired and promoted, and those Craven & Cowardly gentiles will produce the cuck-elites of the future. The US has freedom of speech as enshrined in the Constitution, but the only speech and expression that really matter are Power Speech that is EXPENSIVE as hell. It takes billions of dollars to own media operations.

Jews rigged the game so that they can work for Jewish identity, interests, and power. Consider AIPAC. Judeo-Nazis can have Nuremberg Rallies for Israel. Look at ADL. Jews can unite to oppose criticism of Jewish power. And no matter how disproportionately Jews are represented in elite institutions and industries, you better not say anything lest you be labeled as an ‘anti-Semite’. If you’re a gentile and want IN to the elite institutions that Jews control, you better be like Nikki Haley or Amy Chua. Even Jordan Peterson, who has courage to stand up to trans-gender freaks and Marxists, goes weak in the knees at the mere mention of Jews.

Jewish censorship, paranoia, and hysteria have grown only worse for two reasons: Donald Trump’s presidency and internet open forum. Trump sucks Jewish cocks, but Jews know he’s a spitter than a swallower. And this makes Jews angry as hell. They demand total subservience to Jewish supremacist power from goyim. Jews demand that white elites serve Judea’s globalism and morally ‘identify’ with People of Color. It’s like Bill Clinton, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Jeb Bush, and John McCain praise Jewish oligarchs and speak for Diversity but NEVER EVER speak for the white middle class, white working class, and white poor. NEVER! Jews fear that if white elites connect with white masses, the organic reunion will constitute a force that will weaken white elite’s submission to the Jews. Consider what happened to Moses in TEN COMMANDMENTS when he reconnected with Jews. He no longer served the Egyptians and returned from exile to save and lead the Jewish people from bondage. Jews are the Pharaohs of the US, and white people are, ironically, the New Hebrews waiting for a savior and prophet to lead them to the Promised Land. This is why Jews hate Trump. Even though Trump is no white Moses, Jews see him as awakening something in White America... just like Napoleon feared the awakening of the Chinese dragon: 'China is a sleeping giant. Let her sleep, for when she wakes she will move the world.' Jews feel the same way about White People. Jews want white people doped out on TV, drugs, porn, and pop culture. Jews want white elites to grovel for thirty pieces of silver. It is to keep white elites as compradore-cuck-collaborators of Jews. And if white elites serve Jews, they won’t lead the white masses. And the masses on their own without leadership will always dissipate and decay and lose their way. That's what Jews want, and white masses are to be replaced by Diversity Helots or Helottery.

The other reason why Jews are freaked is that Open Internet empowered independent voices. Suddenly, an ordinary middle class person could offer his views on Youtube and gain an audience as big or even bigger than those for Jew-run mega-media conglomerates. Though Pewdiepie is not an ideas or news person, his super-success with a simple Youtube channel demonstrated the power of the internet. Jews also fear that these independent voices have one key advantage over hired journalists. They don’t have Big Jew looking over their shoulder. While many journalists in the profession are smart, experienced, and have impressive credentials, the fact is they must stick to the Narrative dictated by their Jewish supremacist globalist masters. As such, much of their intelligence and research go to waste because their editors will say NO. Worse, they can’t have any real integrity as reporters of truth.

In contrast, independent voices on the internet may be less credentialed, less experienced, and less erudite, but they have integrity in speaking their minds on issues they care about. This is why Jews began to freak and shut down & censor content on the internet. As Jews control most of the platforms and have the support of Media, Wall Street, and Deep State, they can get away with it. Some people blame the ‘left’ for the censorship, but Jews also go after BDS Movement that is generally associated with the Left. Also, Ryan Dawson is not part of the Alt Right, but his Youtube channel has also been nixed because Jews at Google work with ADL Zionist supremacists to shut down dissident pro-Palestinian voices. As for craven academics like George Hee-Hawley, he’s too busy bitching about ‘white supremacism’ and ‘racism’ to notice that it’s Jews who have supremacist power in the US. America doesn’t face a threat from Neo-Nazis but from Judeo-Nazis as it’s the Jews who now act like Nazis and have Nazi-like Powers. GAP, or Go Ask the Palestinians.

Granted, just because Jews act like Judeo-Nazis doesn’t mean the White Right should condone Neo-Nazism or some such. It’s true enough that Kevin Macdonald has been associated with such people, but then, losers can’t be choosers. When your voice is shut down and your kind are exiled, the chances are you’re going to make common cause with other exiles, even if they’re extreme. So, it’s true enough that MacDonald has regrettably been associated with certain despicable Neo-Nazi elements. Robert Griffin who writes for OCCIDENTAL OBSERVER is especially contemptible as a soft-Hitler-apologist. Furthermore, Occidental Observer can be pretty censorious too. When I tried to post the following comment to rebut Griffin's fanboy article on Adolf Hitler, it was rejected.


Hitler can't be understood apart from his temperament, character, and personality.
Some of Hitler's ideas were valid, some were invalid, some were nutty. Granted, even many of the ideas and attitudes of the Progressives of the time would be appalling to many people today. Woodrow Wilson, the icon of post-WWI reconstruction, had no love for blacks. Winston Churchill was a bigot about Hindus. Eugenics caught the imagination of many Liberals and progressives. The US media ran anti-Japanese propaganda as a Race War. The Yellow Folks were totally dehumanized... as the Japanese had dehumanized Americans.
So, not everything that seems extreme about Hitler was so extreme within the context of his times.
Then, why did Hitler cause so much trouble?
It was his personality, character, and temperament.
I would wager a man with sound personality, character, and temperament with BAD ideas is less dangerous than a man with foul personality, character, and temperament with GOOD ideas. Notice demented people made foul use of even a loving religion like Christianity. Jim Jones for instance.
In contrast, had National Socialist Germany been led by someone more sound and stable like Albert Speer, I don't think it would have led to WWII and Shoah. Speer was a not a psychopath. He took up National Socialist ideology but wasn't a pathological gambler who would have played fire with history.
Same in China. Mao had a crazy personality and used communism to tear China apart. Deng also grew up believing in communism, but he had a more moderate and cooperative personality. He was willing to compromise and go easy. So, Mao used communism to wreck China. Deng used communism to restore China and even adopted other ideas in a spirit of pragmatism.
Some of Hitler's ideas were horrible. But if Hitler had the character and temperament of someone like Kemal Ataturk or Franco, he wouldn't have gambled so recklessly. He would have acted more cautiously and soberly.
And he wouldn't have been so utterly heartless in his wars of conquests that were meant to ultimately raze Moscow to the ground, kill tens of millions of Slavs, and turn all surviving Slavs into slave helots for the German master race.
Problem with Hitler was he not only had some bad ideas but a crazy personality that was willing to gamble everything. It was classic megalomania. Also, Hitler's grand vision was beyond crazy.
In war, every side does crazy things. UK and US bombed entire cities in Germany. Japan was nuked. All sides committed horrible atrocities. But the US, upon winning the war, used peace to restore order and sanity in the world. Soviets were more brutal in their victory over Germans, especially in the mass rapes. But when the dust settled, Soviets regarded Germans as fellow comrades. Soviets didn't deny the humanity of Germans, Poles, Czechs, and etc. The Iron curtain was repressive, but the governing ideology regarded all peoples are comrades and fellow humans.
In contrast, had Hitler won in Russia, the Peace would have been total genocide and enslavement for the Russians. Unlike Italian Fascism and Spanish Fascism, the German variant of fascism had some truly insane ideas about race that envisioned and justified mass extermination and enslavement of entire peoples.
And that makes Hitler a very evil man.
Now, one could argue that Hitler had some good sides. And there were wonderful things about National Socialism that surely would have worked HAD it remained national and not turned imperialist.
But because his pathological side was so dark and because his crimes were so heinous, the evil totally overshadows whatever was good.
Imagine if someone comes to your house, rapes and murders your entire family after torturing them. But then, suppose he pets and feeds the dog and waters plants in the garden. Sure, he's nice with the dog and good with gardening. So, is he 50/50 good and bad?
But those are irrelevant considerations when compared to the gravity of the crime.
Hitler loved animals and appreciated nature. But he had a murderous contempt for Slavs. And even though he began as a German patriot, he came to regard himself as bigger than Germany. He saw himself as God. As Hess says in TRIUMPH OF THE WILL, Germany is Hitler and Hitler is Germany. In other words, German people exist to serve him, glorify him, obey him. And when Germany was falling in the end, did Hitler blame himself? Did he apologize to the Germans who'd followed him like dogs? No, he blamed them for failing him. He ordered Albert Speer to blow up everything. He wanted Germans to be wiped out for their failure to fulfill his vision. Hitler's punishment for the Germans went far beyond the Morgenthau Plan. Hitler also ordered Paris to be blown up. But thankfully, Speer disobeyed him. And his officers in Paris also disobeyed him. Maybe they shared his ideology but they didn't share is pathology. Personality matters, and from childhood, Hitler was born 'evil'. In that sense, can we really blame him? If a child is born with extreme pathological personality, is it his fault?
Today, it's the Jews who've gone pathological. Any people have its share of extremist personalities. And any people can be misled by lunatics. It happened with Germany and Japan in WWII.
Now, Jews are intoxicated with power and going nuts, restarting a new cold war with Russia and using US power to wage Wars for Israel that have destroyed millions of lives. And Jews are engineering total lebensraum for the West whereupon white nations will be flooded with non-whites to be used as Janissary by Jewish lunatics.
Jews suffered greatly under Hitler, but they are the new Hitlers.

But then, let’s not forget Barack Obama was chum-chummy with Louis Farrakhan, Bill Ayers, and Zionist supremacists, but that was no disqualification for him to be President. And let’s keep in mind CNN hired avowed communist Van Jones. And Howard Zinn was good friends with Bob Avakian who, to this day, admires mass-killers Stalin and Mao. So, MacDonald is hardly alone in having some extreme associates. If anything, it’s no big deal for those on the ‘left’ to be associated with all sorts of extremists. NYU hired a professor who was fired from Drexel university for calling for ‘white genocide’. And Nikki Haley and Amy Chua are cheerleaders for Jewish globalist power that have destroyed millions of lives in the Middle East and crushes the hopes of Palestinians. So, for globalist snakes to accuse people like MacDonald of ‘extremism’ is disingenuous to say the least. If the elites don't want extremism, maybe they shouldn't have let the colleges be taken over by insane Jewish Supremacists, Homo degenerates, and anti-white lunatics.

Paradoxically, the Best Way to Defend Free Speech is to Deny It to Your Enemy — Then, Your Enemy will Work Hard to Defend Free Speech — Call for Hate Speech Legislation against Zionist 'Hate Speech' against Palestinians and Anti-White Defamation emanating mainly from Jewish Supremacism

Jews who monopolize social and video platforms like Facebook and Youtube are at it again. They are purging entire accounts and deleting 100,000s of videos. Some say internet companies are implementing this policy under duress from organizations like ADL but that’s neither there nor here as both ADL and the monopolists of those internet companies are Jewish and arch-Zionist. The wretched hag Susan Wojcicki, who was given control over Youtube, may pretend to care about free speech, but it’s all phony hand-wringing. Her ilk would like for us to believe they are defenders of free speech but are forced to act under pressure from ADL and the like. But this is nonsense. Google that owns Youtube is one of the richest companies in the world. It doesn’t have to listen to ADL. It can do as it wants, which is, of course, what it does. And what it chooses to do is work closely with ADL to push Terms of Services that are conducive to the Only Rule that matters to Tribe: "Is it good for Jews?" or more precisely, "Is it great for Jewish Supremacism?" And it’s not a left vs right issue because Jews on both sides of the political aisle work tirelessly to shut down BDS by means of both business and the state. Incidentally, BDS is mostly aligned with the American Left, but it’s given no latitude by the Zionist monopolists of Google and Facebook who are less ideological and more tribal-supremacist.

Google and Facebook(and other companies) yammer about Terms of Services, but it is THEY who have violated the Terms and Promises. When they were getting started, they wanted to draw everyone in because they wanted to be monopolies. If they had honestly stated from the get-go that they’d favor the Democrats, Globalists, Zionist-Supremacists, Homomania, and etc. at the expense of others, many many people would not have used those services and instead would have sought out alternative services. The ONLY reason why ALL OF US decided to use those services was because Google, Facebook, and the like more-or-less promised us neutrality, fairness, and balance. Google even boasted early on that it would not do ‘evil’. Because people of all stripes trusted Google and Facebook, they signed up for those services on a massive scale, thereby turning them into mega-monopolies that pushed out all competition. But now that they have amassed monopoly powers, what are they doing? They are using their muscle to favor and promote certain voices and viewpoints while suppressing, censoring, and banning others. This is called the Jewish Hustle. It’s like what a pool shark does. He plays the first few games not so well and even loses a few to lure suckers into more games with higher stakes. Google and Facebook Jews conned us. They became monopolies but sucking ALL OF US in on the basis of fairness and neutrality, but once they gained great fortune and power, they decided to use their monopoly muscle to favor certain voices over others.

Furthermore, they’ve betrayed the entire spirit of Youtube and Facebook. Youtube became a thing because, for the first time, ordinary people could become part of the media than mere passive observers. Prior to the internet and effective video-platforms, most people watched TV news and shows made by a handful of corporations, but there was no effective way for them to offer feedback or create their own content. But with advancing video-streaming technology, millions of people were able to become content-creators and share their views. And in some ways, they were advantaged over media ‘mavens’ because they didn’t have a boss telling them what they could or couldn’t say. This freedom made some of the commentary downright loony, but it also meant more freedom for people to speak freely, something that is impossible in ‘mainstream media’ where any reporter or personality who spouts wrongthink can summarily be fired. So, on a host of issues and subjects, the personalities on Youtube and Facebook began to share their views with genuine sincerity. This element of sincerity and courageousness made certain Youtube, Facebook, and Twitter personalities very popular(or notorious), regularly drawing a larger share of the audience than ‘mainstream’ media where most news people and opinion-makers couldn’t step beyond the boundaries set by corporations and official narrative.
That was the whole point of Youtube's appeal. If we should just watch and listen to Corporate News and Shows made by a handful of mega-corporations, why bother with a platform like Youtube or Facebook where the DIFFERENCE is you can gain access to things OUTSIDE the perimeters of corporate and state control? Youtube began as a place where you could upload videos and share your views and share in the views of others just like you who had something to say and could do by making videos. But, what has Youtube been doing lately? It’s rigged search results so that, on any hot, controversial, or contentious topic, just about the only search results it will show are those by corporate news and bogus ‘independent’ content-creators(like the Young Turks) who’ve been tamed by massive funding by the super-rich Jews. Again, what is the point of using Youtube if it’s going to operate just like the Old TV. YOUtube has turned into WEtube, the ‘we’ in this case being oligarchic Zionists and mega-corporations that hog ownership and control of most of the media. They now say, ‘WE’ got the power, and ‘WE’ Zionist oligarchs will work with other Zionist monopolists of the media to control the Platform, Megaphone, and the Narrative. When push comes to shove, Jews prove to be tribalists first and ideologues second. All this stuff about ‘free speech’ and ‘First Amendment’ means nothing to Jews if free exchange of facts, analysis, and opinions threatens the Jewish lock on power.

Of course, the problem isn’t merely Jewish but Cuck-Wasp. Anglo-Americans who once used to rule America handed over power to the Jews so thoroughly and completely that Jewish Power has no effective opposition. When the Founding Fathers formed the new republic, they were careful to implement a system of checks and balances where no person, sector, or branch of government could have total power. But when Wasps handed over power to the Bugs(Busy Urban Globalist Semites, aka Jewish elites), they implemented no standards and methods by which the New Power could be counter-balanced and critiqued. But then, this massive quasi-revolutionary transference of power took place almost stealthily without declaration. It could be a Silent Revolution, Silent Coup, Silent Surrender, and Silent Betrayal because it didn’t happen overnight but over a decade or two. It was dramatic, indeed seismic, but gradual enough for people not to notice, especially when the Jew-run media created the impression that Whites were still in control, not least by using Wasp figureheads & mouthpieces and by getting young people all worked up about ‘white privilege’.
It’s incredible that the Founders were more concerned about the future of the American republic than the late-stage Wasps who handed power to Jews without putting any safety locks in place. To be sure, it would have been risky for late-stage Wasps to sound the alarm as Jews had such control of media and academia when the transference of power happened. Back in the early days of America’s founding, all the organs were controlled by Anglo-Americans who could freely debate the nature of power. But when Jews were taking over, they had near-total monopoly of the media, academia, and the deep state, and it would have been risky for anyone to raise questions about the character of ascendant Jewish Power. Even in the early 70s when Wasps still held the power, Richard Nixon and Billy Graham had to speak secretively about the Jews.

Even though Jews could loudly voice their issues with Wasps, it became deeply contentious and then downright taboo to discuss the problem of Jewish power, personality, and pathologies. Jews could psychoanalyze men like Nixon and raise alarms about the ‘authoritarian personality’(of white goyim, of course), but no one better say anything about Jewish neuroses and pathologies. One thing for sure, late-stage Wasps were most derelict in their duties. Perhaps, it was inevitable that the power would pass over to smarter and more driven Jews, but Wasps, in losing power, could still have created a Culture of Critique(of their own) to scrutinize and expose the dark side of Jewish Power. After all, if Anglo/Germanic Americans(especially those on the Right) were infected with the ‘authoritarian personality’, then one could say Jews carried within them the germ of the radical will(though a compliment in Susan Sontag’s vocabulary) that has caused so many problems around the world(while also leading interesting ideas and propositions).

Anyway, in order to face the rise of censorship in the West, we need to expose and discuss its core source. We need to remind ourselves that it’s not mainly ideological but identito-centric. Essentially, it’s about Jews shutting down any voice they find threatening to Jewish supremacist power. Those who say the ‘left’ or ‘woke capital’ is behind the Culture of Censorship are focusing on the dogs, not on the dog-owner; on the puppets, not on the puppet-master; on the ‘buffers’, not on the guy who is ‘pushing the button’. Besides, the Real Left is deader than the Right. As I’ve said many times before, today’s so-called ‘left’ is just an ‘idological’(idolatry as ideology) front of Jewish Supremacism and Global Capitalism. Big Money and Big Institutions pushed bratty and insipid inanity, triviality, and decadence as the hallmarks of ‘new leftism’ so that Jewish Superpower and Global Capital would NOT come under any real pressure from the populace.
As history has shown, the most effective counterbalance against Big Capital is nationalism and working-class consciousness. Nationalism pressures Big Money to be patriotic and prioritize what is good for the nation-as-a-whole than "what’s in it for ME?" Nationalism binds the elites to a place and people. And worker-consciousness can organize for higher wages and more concessions from the Big Capital class. This is why Big Capital has come to dislike nationalism and worker-consciousness. By undermining nationalism, Big Capital can make more profits by outsourcing jobs and ‘insourcing’ cheaper foreign labor. Furthermore, to erode nationalism even further, the elites say the foreigners must be accepted as ‘New Nationals’ or else it’s ‘racist’ or ‘xenophobic’. Thus, the rich elites, who’d been morally defensive against the demands of nationalists and workers positioned themselves on the moral offensive as the ‘inclusive’ and ‘welcoming’ Good People at odds with ‘closed-minded’ nationalists and ‘petty-minded’ working class folks.
Of course, the rich elites don’t have to bear the brunt of mass Diversity as they, with increasing profits via globalism, can afford to live in the nicest and safest areas. And even if they rub shoulders with Diversity, it is with the quality kind — the most educated and high-earning POC(people of color) — than with the worst dregs of society. Just like rich whites get the Obamas whereas poor whites have to deal with the Mike-Tysons of the world, rich whites(and Jews) rub shoulders with affluent Asians and Hindus(and white Latinos), whereas the poorer whites must deal with the worst elements among the new arrivals. The elites claim to reject nationalism as too small-minded and petty because their hearts and minds are BIG ENOUGH for all the world and all of humanity. But this is utter nonsense because, even as they destroy national walls, they are busy building economic walls of privilege for themselves that are among the most exclusive habitats on Earth. Also, while elitism on a national level is realistic, elitism on a global scale is merely rhetorical. Elites can lead nations, not the world. Thus, those who claim to care about the whole world end up doing nothing for anyone... but themselves. It's like parents who neglect their own kids in the name of helping ALL THE CHILDREN of the world end up doing nothing for anyone; by focusing on all the children, they neglect their own kids, but then, they do nothing for all the children since it's impossible; it just becomes empty pretty talk. This Elysium World of Globosphere was sharply presented in Woody Allen’s BLUE JASMINE.

All these people put on airs of being open-minded even as they live in the most enclosed places on Earth. Their residences are not necessarily gated or walled of physically, but the costs are forbidding enough to keep most people out. Now, if these people were only about piggery and privilege, it wouldn’t be so bad. What makes them insufferable and ultimately intolerable is they have a bogus and conceited air about them. Ooh lala, they are not only rich and privileged but are MORALLY better than the hoi polloi because they are soooooo open-minded and tolerant(especially of fancy-pants homos). It’s really like Marie Antoinette play-pretending to be a shepherdess. It’s like the jerks at Google and Facebook. They rake in all the money from globalism, live in their ultra-posh neighborhoods that exclude most people, and send their kids to the most expensive schools, but they act like they’re so ‘progressive’ because they are so ‘tolerant’ and into ‘diversity’.

And of course, they are into the Holy Three of Jew Worship, Negro Worship(from a safe distance), and Homo Worship. If these people were truly ideological in the leftist sense, they would favor no particular group over others UNLESS the favored group happens to be the masses of workers, the ordinary folks. Leftism was about the People against the Rulers, not about One Particular Group over Other Groups. Now, some may argue that Jews, blacks, and homos had been victimized in history, and therefore, they are deserving of leftist sympathy as ‘oppressed groups’. But if we look back in history, EVERY PEOPLE had been oppressed at one time or other. Also, blacks were big players in the slave trade and did all the capturing and selling to whites(and Arabs). As for Jews, they were as often victimizers as victims. In the 20th century, they were among the greatest victims under Nazism, but they were also among the biggest villains as communists, Zionist-imperialists, finance capitalists, and cultural subversives. As for homosexuality, even though it was repressed for most of human history(and for good reason), homos never constituted a valid social group because a homo could be BORN INTO any family, any nationality, or any class. A homo could be born into a slave-owning family or into a slave family. Also, given their vanity and natural narcissism, homos have often sidled up to the Power in its exploitation of the masses. In this, both Jews and homos have something in common as historic ‘minority collaborators’ with the Ruling Elites that squeezed their own peoples. And today, globalist homos work with Jewish globalist supremacists for World Hegemony, what with Jews as the King and Homos as the Queen.

So, all would-be truth-tellers need to stop calling the Globalists the ‘left’. As I’ve said many times before, it’s giving them too much credit. It only creates the impression that the current Globalist Elites who rule the West and much of the world are on the side of ‘progress’ when their ideology is really but the Regression to the Greed. How can globo-homo issues be ‘leftist’ when homos and trannies make up just a tiny fraction of society, especially a haughty, fussy, arrogant, and ooh-lala one at that. These homos cater to the rich and powerful. To understand homo psychology, watch THE TALENTED MR. RIPLEY(with Elizabeth-Warren-lookalike Matt Damon as the homokin) or the psycho-homo played to perfection by Will Patton in NO WAY OUT.

Now, some might argue that being pro-mass-immigration is leftist because it pits the poor(or poorer) masses of the Third World against the richer and ‘more privileged’ whites of the First World. But, in fact, the Diversity of the newcomers make it impossible for them to unite as a bloc against the ruling power that remains Jewish, Homo, and white-cuck-collaborationists. Also, as the newcomers mainly compete with the white hoi polloi, the elites can exploit the tensions of the lower orders while grabbing most of the loot for themselves. The elites know that white-and-nationalist people, out of racial solidarity, will not side with People of Color against Jewish/white elites; they also know that the POC will not rise against the Jewish/white elites who are for mass-immigration. If anything, POC generally side with Jewish/white elites against the white hoi polloi. Also, even if POC,-as-new-nationals, vote for so-called ‘progressive’ politicians, the fact is they don’t get to decide policy. They only supply votes for politicians handpicked by Jewish supremacist elites who make sure their paid-for-whores shill for Jewish interests and Israel uber alles. If ideology really matters in the US, why is there no difference between the GOP and the Democrats in the mindless support for Israel and endless hosannas to Jews? While more of the grassroots Democrats may be sympathetic to Palestinians and BDS Movement, those concerns are NEVER addressed at the upper echelons of the Party where all the key decisions are made. So, the rank-and-file just supply the votes for the puppet-politicians vetted by Jewish Power to be servile to Zion and Jewish globo-homo supremacism. BDS is usually associated with the Left, but it gets ZERO protection from high-powered Democrats. Even Tulsi Gabbard supported the Anti-BDS bill.

The ‘Idology’ of Jews matter more than any ideology in American ‘progressivism’ or ‘leftism’, which is now totally bogus. Now, it may well be that many so-called ‘progressives’ are passionate and sincere in their hysterics, but they are utterly lacking in agency. They have no clue as to who really rules the world, and their minds are so easily molded by the Jewish Hand that has monopoly control of media, academia, deep state, and finance. If ‘progressives’ are so independent-minded, how did they so suddenly lose interest in the working class and become so obsessed over globo-homo issues? It’s because their silly little heads are hardly different from TV sets. Their antennas pick up signal from the Central Command System. So, if TV shows say ‘homo is holy’, the progs are thus programmed. So-called ‘progressives’ really ought to be called ‘programmives’. They are like chorus characters in a Jewish-Homo musical play. If progs lack true agency, Negroes are mostly about URGENCY; they are masterful slaves of their basest instincts for hollering and ‘twerking’. Dominance of urgency essentially robs blacks of real agency because their instincts, sensations, and emotions override any rational and/or reflective understanding of the world. Black soul is a pool of narcissism that blacks endlessly stare into to feed their junglomania. Even a fat, ugly, and stupid black woman has the diva-complex of thinking she be ‘queen of the Nile and shit’.

Now, what would be the most effective way to combat the rise of censorship? First, we must focus on the main source behind it. All honest observers will notice it is Jewish Power. Then, we must fight fire with fire against Jewish Power. We must direct all or at least most of our fire on the Jews. Next, we must ask, "What means are Jews using to shut down free speech?" It is the moral passion of combating ‘hate speech’, speech that is SO BEYOND THE PALE that it mustn’t air freely lest it poison the social ecology. As emotions override reason among many people, especially in relation to sacrosanct matters, there has been a growing number of people who are willing to sacrifice free speech 'absolutism’ in favor of Approved Free Speech(which is really free-speech-in-name-only). Especially among Millennials, a generation raised under PC in schools and pop culture from cradle to school to work, there is a willingness to shut down ‘hate speech’ that supposedly defiles the Holy Three of Jew-Worship, Negro-Worship, and Homo-Worship. Indeed, there are SPECIAL TERMS to defame any view that dares to speak truth to Jews, blacks, and homos: ‘Antisemitism’, ‘racism’, and ‘homophobia’. Granted, ‘racism’ can mean any kind of racial or ethnic bigotry, but it has bite ONLY in relation to blacks because Pop Culture and PC Narrative have instilled so many folks with images of the Magic Negro. Because blacks have been presented as especially tragic and ‘spiritual’, people are more triggered by heresy against Black Worship than by negative things said about most other racial or ethnic groups. Consider how Hollywood got away with all those movies that stereotyped Arabs/Muslims as subhuman terrorists. Or, consider how it’s perfectly okay for Hollywood to stereotype Russians as vile thugs or fan the flames of yellow peril where the Chinese are presented as especially villainous. Thus, so many Millennials grew up with images of holiness that favor blacks over others. Because Millennials and self-righteous PC types(whose minds have been so thoroughly warped by TV and/or academic indoctrination) are so weepy-eyed and holy-schmoly about Jews, blacks, and homos, they would rather sacrifice free speech in the name of banning ‘hate speech’, which is to them what devil-talk was to Christians in the Middle Ages. Even the rational side of man often caves to the power of taboos that is out to snuff the blasphemous. This aspect of progs is often overlooked because of the conceit that ‘liberalism’ is secular and rationalist, therefore opposed to religious dogma. But ideology, especially when laced with ‘idology’, is just a secular variant of theocracy. Whether it was the mass reverence for Marx, Lenin, Stalin, or Mao OR it is the virtual worship of Jews(as Shoah People), blacks(as Magic Negroes), or homos(as fairy-angels of the new era), the same psychological dynamics come into play. The emotional commitment is so powerful that the faculty of reason and true secular/liberal principles break down. Also, such emotions tend to simplify and ‘dichotomize’ any issue that pertains to their notion of the holy. Just like for the true believers of religion, there is God and the Devil, there is for the PC-indoctrinated minions a worldview where the Good is pitted against the Evil. Because of such Manicheanism, even moderate and slightly deviant views could be denounced as wicked. Just like the Pod People in THE INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS cannot tolerate any human — each and every person must be made into a Pod Person! — , PC minions believe they are on the ‘right side of history’ and that anyone who disagrees must either be converted soon enough or condemned as hopelessly ‘hateful’. This is why even moderate ‘rightist’ thinkers like Charles Murray and Heather MacDonald have been hounded by PC loons. In their pathetic but passionate little minds, there is Good and Evil, and they are on the side of the Good. The Evil is lack of reverence for Jews, blacks, and homos. Because the Holy Three is SO IMPORTANT to them, even mildly critical or neutral feelings toward the trinity are deeply suspect and to be condemned. It’s like, for true believers in Religion, there can be no middle ground between Faith and Devil-Worship. To the true believer, the moderate non-believer is hardly different from an outright Devil Worshiper. Because he believes God is so true and holy, those who stand outside the light, even if not vociferously anti-God, must be agents of the Devil. Likewise, PC minions’ faith in Jew Worship, Negro Worship, and Homo Worship is so total as the fashion-passion of the moment that they simply cannot conceive of any goodness or decency outside their vision of the Light. To be on the side of angels, one must condemn any critic of Jews as ‘nazi’, any skeptic of LGBTQ nonsense as ‘homophobic’, and any speaker of truth about blacks as ‘racist’. PC isn’t merely about hostility against what it deems as evil but about rage & exasperation over any lack of requisite enthusiasm for the Holy Three. Middle-ground is not acceptable for PC. You must believe! One mustn’t let facts, reason, and skepticism color one’s views about Jews, MLK & Mandela, BLM(even though blacks usually kill blacks), and globo-homo fruitkins(who are now so holy that ‘gay colors’ now routinely adorn Mainline churches.) Just like narcissists are blind to the world in their obsessive self-worship, moral narcissists of PC are blind to all of reality that don’t conform to their self-esteem as holy-schmoly(if Jews, blacks, or homos) or properly-redemptive-and-atoning(if white and cucky-wuck). Take Ken Burns, aka CucKen Burns, an insufferable dweeb who is so into Negro Worship that he is totally blind to all the trouble blacks make for whites. But then, rich and privileged whites like him can choose to rub shoulders with the Nicer Negroes.
Also, blacks tend to treat rich whites differently from poor ones. The poor ones, they beat up and terrorize, but the rich ones, they flatter and schmooze. This is why rich whites, Democratic or Republican, have a totally different experience of blacks. Not only do they rub shoulders with better kind of blacks but blacks, even lowly ones, tend to behave better around rich ones. After all, if a black guy is a limo driver or receptionist, he is bound to treat rich ‘honkeys’ with respect he would never show to a lowly ‘honkey’. So, the rich ‘honkey’, being accustomed to being treated with respect by blacks, has a far more positive view of blacks than lowly whites do who are disrespected and humiliated. Also, the rich ‘honkey’ feels a certain anxiety complex because he is superior to the Negro in social status but below him in ‘moral status’(according to PC that posits Jews, Negroes, and Homos as the holy three); the reason why so many rich whites, including ‘conzos’, took so quickly to Homos is because homos are ‘holy’ and high-status. When a socially superior rich ‘honkey’ is served by a ‘morally superior’ ‘groid’, the former feels his ‘white guilt’ compounded because, even after all these years, he the whitey is being served by the blacky. So, he feels an added urge to be nice to the Negro and entertain friendly thoughts about blacks in general. In contrast, when a rich white guy is with a rich homo, their social parity makes things a bit smoother.

Anyway, once we have identified the main source that threatens the principle of Free Speech, we need to go on the offensive as well as play defense. No one ever won a war purely by playing defense alone. Even the toughest boxer will eventually be KO’ed by an inferior boxer if he only plays defense. This is why Jews keep winning. They play defense and offense. They defend Israel as their national homeland while attacking the nationalism of goyim. They defend their own identity, legacy, and heritage while impugning the identities, legacies, and heritages of other groups. Jews defend their own right to free speech while denouncing the uses of free speech by their enemies or rivals, real or perceived. When Jewish radicals were hounded by anti-communists in the early 50s, Jews lavishly funded ACLU to defend even anti-American and pro-communist speech(or silence as in taking the fifth) as a means to defend Jewish speech(as so many of the leftist radicals were Jews). Even as Jews were going out on a limb to defend their own liberty and speech rights in the US, many of them were supporting Stalinism in Eastern Europe even though people over there were being denied basic democratic rights and even being imprisoned or executed. Why? Because many of those Stalinist agents were Jewish, and Western Jewry regarded them as fellow tribal brethren. This is how Jews play the game. Nationalism for me but not for thee. Free Speech for me but not for thee. Jews also support gun rights in Israel because a well-armed populace means Jews with Guns. But in the US, Jews oppose gun rights because most guns are in the hands of goyim, especially white conservatives and patriots who tend to be more opposed to Jewish agendas of deracination and degeneracy. So, there you go: Guns for me but not for thee. Jews play defense and offense. They defend what is theirs but go on the offensive against what the Other has.

Now, some may argue that it’s not just the Jews. Non-whites are also opposed to Free Speech and Gun Rights, but then, ask yourself, why this is so. It’s because they’ve come under the influence of Jewish media and academia that tell non-whites that white people’s speech is ‘hate speech’ and that an armed white populace are ‘nazis’. Non-whites, just like so many cucky-wuck whites, are mental clay in Jewish Hands. The source of anti-free-speech-ism is not non-whites but Jews who mold so many minds via their control of institutions and industries. Also, Jews are especially dominant in the Democratic Party, and their main strategy for keeping the diverse and divergent coalition together has been by vilifying whiteness. And that is why so many non-whites have come to regard free speech and gun-rights for whites as problematic. Because Jews told them to see whites as the White Devil, they’ve come to regard white speech as devil-talk and white gun-ownership as the Wehrmacht or the KKK. The real source of white problems is the Jews.

Almost always, your enemy will give you bad advice. He will tell you to do what you shouldn’t do while he himself doesn’t do it, indeed does the very opposite. It’s like the British/Jews told the Chinese to use opium while they banned it in their own domains. You would have to be stupid to give your enemy good advice, which would be like feeding him key information. Now, if Jews regarded whites as allies and friends(as whites have come to see Jews), then Jewish advice might be of value. But the truth is Jews regard whites as the enemy(or main rival), and therefore, it doesn’t matter what whites think of Jews. If Bob sees Bill as a friend but Bill sees Bob as an enemy, Bob’s hospitality and trust will be completely wasted because Bill is committed to bringing Bob down. In the end, what YOU think matters less than what HE thinks of YOU. If HE thinks you suck and should be brought down, no amount of YOUR positive view of him will change the fact that he’s out to get you. Likewise, it doesn’t matter what whites think of Jews. The truth is most Jews see whites as either enemies or rivals... or at best lackeys and servants, certainly not as equals. In the present, whites are so trusting and servile to Jews that they will gladly take on the roles of servants out of their total awe of Jews as brilliant rich folks and Holy Holocaust People. For many whites, Jewishness epitomizes Materiality(money) and Morality. If you’re such a white person, you’re a hopeless and pathetic. Your message to Jews is, "Please don’t hate me, please don’t treat me like an enemy or rival, because all I ever want to do is praise, worship, and serve Jews, Jews, Jews, Israel, Israel, Israel." Such cucks are not even hoping for equality with Jews. They are happy to play the subservient role. It’s like the Charlie Kirks of the world whose big ambition is to be the next John McCain the Cuckaine or Mitt the Shit Romney.

Because the enemy will give you bad advice, indeed quite often the exact opposite of what it does, white people should always have the following rule in mind when dealing with Jews: Do as the Jews do, Disobey what They say. If Jews push ‘white guilt’ on whites, whites must push ‘Jewish Guilt’ on Jews. If Jews push ‘diversity’ on white nations, whites must push ‘diversity’ on Israel. If Jews work with non-whites against whites, whites must work with non-whites, especially Palestinians, against Jews. If Jews shut down white speech as ‘hate speech’, whites must attack Jewish speech as ‘hate speech’. If Jews say ‘antisemitism’ is just horrible, whites must say anti-whitism(the favorite pastime of vile and venal Jews) is totally terrible. Unless whites identify Jews as the main enemy and fight fire with fire, they will lose... as certainly as the Byzantines lost to the Turks. Whites need to go into Reconquista mode that took back Spain from the Moorish invaders. Whites must reconquer what is theirs, and in order to do this, they must seek White National Liberation from Jewish Supremacism.

To fight fire with fire, White Liberation(or White Emancipation or White Independence) from Jewish Supremacism must adopt a Speech Policy that is akin to the Jewish Strategy. Whites must demand a speech code that forbids the defaming or dehumanizing of whites. After all, Turkey has a law that bans insult to Turkey-ness, and Russia has a law that bans denigrating the memory of Russians in World War II. Whites must demand a speech code that forbids any insult to whiteness, any impugning of white memory. Of course, whites will be free to criticize, condemn, and disparage other groups. Whites should call for ‘hate speech laws’ that favor white identity and interests, just like Jews push for ‘hate speech laws’ that favor Jewish identity, Zionism, and their interests. From the Jewish POV, any criticism of Jewish power is ‘hate’. Harsh condemnation of Zionist tyranny over Palestinians is ‘hate’ or ‘antisemitism’, which is why Jews insist that BDS be muted, shut down, and railroaded.
What this shows is that ‘hate speech’ is never a neutral concept. ‘Hate’ is defined by those who control the law. In Turkey, those who insult Turkey-ness are labeled as ‘hateful’, which is why it’s illegal to discuss the Turkish mass-killing of Armenians following World War I. Jews mold the meaning of ‘hate’ to suit their needs. So, all their anti-Wasp and anti-white screeds are not ‘hate’. Jews can defame, dehumanize, and scapegoat whites for all the problems of the world. Indeed, Jews can smear whites much like how Nazis once smeared Jews. All that is not ‘hate’ as far as Jews are concerned. But if any white person shows the slightest hint of white pride or speaks even a bit of truth against Jewish power, that is HATE, say the Jews. This is how Jews play the game. Then, whites must play the same game. Whites must say it must be illegal to insult whiteness. Sure, whites have a checkered history, but then, SO DO ALL OTHER PEOPLES. Why single out the white race as especially guilty or blameworthy for all the problems of the world? This is bigotry and maggotry. Also, what about all the positive contributions that the white race has made for the world? Why not balance the bad with the good? Why dwell so much on white wrongs while never giving credit for white contributions? Such lack of balance goes to show that anti-white dehumanization has become de rigueur in the global debate dominated by Jews. Jews do to whites exactly what they blame the Nazis of having done to them. Jews smear whites as intolerable scum of the Earth UNLESS whites get on their knees and grovel before Jewish Supremacist Power as its cuck-servants. Then and only then are whites tolerated as House Honkeys(if members of the elite) or Field Honkeys(if part of the white hoi polloi). In other words, Jews will not accept whites on an equal basis as a people with sense of identity, illustrious history, and right of destiny. No, Jews regard whites as untermensch, a people who are tolerable only as a slave race. It’s like Nazi German plan for the Russian Slavs was as a race of helots. If allowed to survive, their existence must revolve around serving German ‘Aryan’ interests. Now, there is no need for bad blood between Jews and whites. Both groups could get along, BUT as long as Jews insist on acting the way they do at the moment, whites must push back in kind because otherwise is to risk their survival for all the future. Use the Jewish Way against the Jews. If Jews say, "We believe in free speech but not in ‘hate speech’", say likewise but define ‘hate’ in way that suits white interests. Define ‘hate’ primarily in terms of defaming and dehumanizing whites and furthermore denying the right of pride for all the great achievements made by whites. Also, define ‘hate’ as the neo-imperialist insistence that white people don’t have right of territoriality over their ancient homelands and over nations they built virtually from scratch in North America and Australia. Also, even white self-loathing must be deemed as ‘hate speech’, and the blame must primarily go to the group that did most to instill whites with self-hatred, and of course, the main peddlers of Hate-Whitey Ideology have been the Jews.

Now, some may argue that such ploy would go against the principles of Free Speech, but principles are useless when the Other Side only cares about Power and will do ANYTHING to get what it wants. Principles matter only when (1) all sides commit to the same set of rules and standards or (2) a certain group has the power to enforce the principles on all groups. But the current US is not that kind of country. It’s a nation ruled by Jews whose only ‘principle’ is "Is it good for Jews?" or more accurately, "Is it great for Jewish Supremacism?" Jews violate both rules 1 and 2 of Principle-ism. They don’t care about principles, and they don’t use their dominant power to enforce the same set of principles on all groups, including themselves. Rather, Jews are always busy moving the goal posts to the extent that the US has become a Kafkaesque nation, and ironically enough, the goyim are now like a bunch of Joseph K’s who are toyed around by Jews who control the Castle of Power.

It is only by putting Jews on the moral defensive and threatening their anti-white speech that they will come around to defending free speech(like they once used to when their radical/communist speech was threatened and when they sought to legalize pornography). Why should Jews defend free speech when they have control over the levers of media & academia and when their anti-white speech is not only protected but part of official dogma? Generations of kids, white and non-white, have been raised to the catechism of Blame-Whitey-for-Everything. And white elites, out of craven cowardice and/or outdated sense of magnanimity, put up with all the anti-white garbage. They sense that they must go along with anti-white dogma in order to keep their privileged positions under Jews as the ‘good whites’. Also, old habits die hard. Just like it took time for it to sink in among aristocrats that their days are numbered, white elites(especially the Wasps) had been so used to having the power that many still carry on with the illusion that they are the ruling class of America. Of course, Jews like to sustain such illusions to (1) to hide their power behind the facade of Wasp privilege, thereby making whites the magnet of most criticism(as in "Hollywood-So-White") and (2) to flatter white cuck-collaborators who, having lost their power, have little left but to cling to their title as the Ruling Class. Because white cuck-collaborators still have a lot of money and privilege(if not much influence and real power), they have a bad habit of conflating their own white privilege with the condition of all whites who are NOT privileged; indeed, many whites are now suffering terribly from loss of work, drug addiction, integration with thuggish Negroes, and mass replacement by foreigners.

We need a new movement that is not for the principle of free speech but for shutting down ‘hate speech’ that defames and dehumanizes whites. The position should be, "While it's fair to criticize wrongs and abuses committed by whites, it is NOT ACCEPTABLE to speak of whites as especially burdened with guilt and blame." After all, such is the Jewish line. Jews will say it’s okay for people to criticize Zionism and Jewish abuses, but it’s wrong to say everything Jewish is bad or to blame everything on Jews. (Of course, Jews even denounce mild criticism of Jewish bad behavior as ‘antisemitic’.) What’s good enough for Jews should be good enough for whites. Also, whites must put Jews on the moral defensive by decrying Zionism as ‘hate speech’ that led to the destruction and ‘genocide’ of the Palestinians by means of immigration-invasion. Whites should balance the good/great elements of Jewish history/culture with the dark side, such as Jewish role in communism, radicalism, subversion, criminality, and financial theft. And if Jews bitch about evil white history, whites should point out how Jewish finance played its part in the Western Imperialist ventures. Jewish History is inseparable from 'white supremacism' because Jews were co-partners in the Western Conquest of the World, even going so far as to play a key role in the Latin American slave trade and selling opium to the Chinese under British Imperialist protection. Also, to the extent that Jewish immigrants worked alongside white immigrants to eradicate the American Indians from the Great Plains, Jews also took part in ‘genocide’ of the natives. And to the extent that Jews and their money played some role in the making of the new empires and nations of the New World, Jews are no less ‘guilty’ of the slave trade. Despite Jewish kvetching about ‘white supremacism’, Jews have been tailing ‘white supremacists’ all over the world to make their fortunes. Jews tagged behind Anglos to make tons of money in the diamond mines of South Africa. Wherever Anglo, Spanish, Portuguese, and French imperialists went, Jews followed as financiers, merchants, and investors. Jews exploited every opportunity made possible by ‘white supremacist’ conquerors of the world. And Jews pressured and bribed ‘white supremacist’ Great Britain and Europe in general to aid in the Zionist project that targeted the brown Palestinians for destruction, replacement, and erasure. It isn't very difficult to push Jews into a morally defensive posture. And if Jews bitch about the Shoah(aka Holocaust), remind the world of how Jews played a key role in communism that led to the deaths of millions all over the world. Only when the pushy Jews are pushed back and their rights of speech are threatened, only then will Jews come around to defending free speech. When Jews defended free speech in the past, some thought it was out of principle. But it was just opportunism. When dealing with such people, we need to shelve principles and fight fire with fire.