Why are the Ruling Rich and Radical Mobs on the Same Page? Both are in sync with Jewish Supremacist Power — Wall Street and Street Politics are Calibrated to serve the Empire of Judea — White Identity and White Consciousness lack unity, thus vulnerable to Jewish Manipulation

How phony the progs are? They had a chance to go with a different kind of candidate in 2020, especially with Bernie Sanders and Tulsi Gabbard. But not even grassroots Democrats were interested in peace-candidate Gabbard. And it turned out Sanders didn't have much support after all. So, who did they pick? Career insider Joe Biden.
At least there were sufficient elements within the GOP to choose a maverick candidate in Donald Trump in 2016(though he turned out to be a stupid ass). Democrats make such noise about being so 'progressive' and for change, but the best they can come up with are establishment shills like Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. Obama got away with 'hope and change' thing, but anyone seeing through the hype could tell he was just another shill of the ruling class.

What does it say that both Wall Street and Antifa types are on the same page? How could super-rich capitalists and street radicals have anything in common? It goes to show that both the rich and the radical are controlled by Jews. Both Wall Street and Street Politics exist to serve Jewish Power. Wall Street means financial monopoly for Jews to rake in ever bigger bucks. And the politics of Street Theater is mostly Identity Politics designed to vilify and intimidate any sense of white identity and interests. If there was a true Left in the US, most of street politics would be aimed at the super-rich. There was a hint of that in Occupy Wall Street movement that directed its ire at the 1%, but what with all the globo-homo lunacy, anti-white invective, diversity-mania, and BLM nuttery, the so-called 'left' has mainly been obsessed with smoking out and punching 'nazis', or uppity whites.
Rich Jews would fear the real left because Jews are the richest people in the US. The most privileged and most powerful. True Leftism would direct its energies against the richest and the most powerful. It would wage war on corruption at the top, and we know Jews are very corrupt. True leftism would be threatening to Jewish Power. In the past, many Jews were far from affluent. There were working class Jews and struggling Jews. And uppermost power was held by Christian Wasps. So, back then, there was genuine Jewish Leftism allied with the working class and the like. But why would today's rich ruling elite Jews want to wrestle with true leftism when they are so powerful, privileged, well-connected, corrupt, and 'made'? They benefited so much from globalism and 'free trade' that undermined the bargaining chip of the American Worker. Labor without nationalism is finished as the business class can access cheap labor abroad and import limitless supplies of new ones.
If there was a True Left, Jewish Power and capitalist oligarchs would be genuinely worried. But they happily ally with the existing 'left' because it's mostly bogus. It's not about the people or the workers. It's not about the people vs the elites. It's about BLM symbolism and Antifa nuttery, and both black rage and Antifa dementia are directed mainly at 'white supremacists' who don't even exist as a power. But then, in a culture defined by hysteria and sensationalism, anyone will do as a 'nazi'. So, Trump is 'literally Hitler'(when he's not Putin's Puppet), and anyone with a MAGA hat must be a 'white supremacist'. With a ridiculous 'left' chasing after fantasy KKK, why would Wall Street Jews fear the 'left'? If anything, it only does the bidding of Jews. Wall Street makes Jews richer, and 'leftist' street theater directs radical rage at white goyim.
Jewish Supremacist Power needs white identity/interests to be browbeaten if whites are to snuff their own agency/agenda and cuck to their Jewish masters. Even though Jews are at the very top and work in supremacist mode(not least in foreign policy that has destroyed so many lives in the Middle East and elsewhere), the so-called 'left' doesn't call out on Jewish Power but unwittingly does its bidding. Idiot 'left' hasn't a clue that Jews demean any whiff of white identity as 'white supremacist' in order to make guilt-ridden whites cater to Jewish Supremacism. Idiot 'left' is so dumb that it only associates 'supremacism' with whites even though the most supremacist group in the West is the Jews by far. Notice Chris Wallace never asked Trump to condemn the Jewish Supremacist policies of his administration. Wallace is fine with US favoring Zionists over Palestinians and any other bunch of Arabs or Muslims. Wallace's message is 'no white identity and pride so that whites will serve Jews, the only people deserving of pride and power.' The fact that Jews always cry about 'white supremacism' while whites never mention 'Jewish Supremacism'(and instead pledge to kiss Jewish ass even more) is the main reason for the demise of the white race in the West. It's utterly perverse. Jews, who not only indulge in shameless supremacism but compel whites to lend them support, have the gall to accuse whites of 'supremacism'. It'd be like Nazi Germans condemning Poles of 'Polish Supremacism' for not fully cooperating with Nazi domination of Poland. The fact of Nazi Supremacism made people overlook that Jews too were in supremacist mode. Nazis vs Jews was a case of supremacism vs supremacism, not supremacism vs humanism. (The problem with Alt Right idiots like Richard Spencer is they opposed Jewish Supremacism with their own supremacism than with humanism. Same mistake as with Hitler.)

As for Trump Dementia among 'liberals' and 'leftists', it could be of two varieties. One is the shame of having been out-lefted by a 'Nazi'. According to the agreed-upon script, the Democrats are supposed to make noises about 'social justice' while Republicans are supposed to make noises about 'muh liberty'. Republicans are supposed to be about Big Money and the Military. Even though Democrats are just as much into money and war(if not more so), they are the ones who are supposed to make bleating noises about the 'little guy'. But then, Trump comes along and condemns the War State and blames Wall Street for selling out the US worker. It may have been just a ploy on Trump's part, but it embarrassed the 'left' who went along with Obama's cozy relations with Wall Street and his policy of more wars and destruction. Therefore, one reason for all this dementia about Trump is the repressed shame that the 'left' feels about its own betrayals. Imagine being out-lefted by someone like Trump and his MAGA 'rednecks'. How embarrassing that Trump and his 'white supremacists' are on the side of peace and the American Worker. But at least that kind of dementia owes to some degree of self-awareness even if repressed. It's about the difficulty of facing up to the shame of one's own betrayals.

But the other kind of dementia is just plain dumb. These are 'leftists' who genuinely believe in all the propaganda pushed by Jewish media moguls. They truly swallowed the Russia Collusion BS. They truly believe Trump is 'literally Hitler'. They really believe that MAGA people are KKK and Nazis. When Jews scream 'Nazi', they know they're lying but do it to control the minds of stupid whites, and most whites are stupid(as are most people everywhere). Jews made sure there's a difference between white identity and white consciousness. With Jews, identity and consciousness are one. Jews are proudly conscious of Jewish identity. "I'm Jewish, and that makes me feel wonderful and proud." In contrast, Jewish Power insists that white identity is evil, and ONLY white consciousness is permitted. As white consciousness is separate from white identity, it cannot be about white pride or white interests. It must be about white conscious awareness of all the guilt, shame, atonement, redemption, and obligations that whites must weigh every day of their lives in order to be Good People. This is why the Sailer Strategy cannot be very effective. If most whites were like Jews & blacks and had the unity of identity and consciousness, it could work. But too many whites have white consciousness severed from and at odds with white identity. So, their sense of whiteness isn't about "what is good for whites?" but "what can I do to be a good person?" And as Zionists control media and academia, the Jewish Hand molds white clay minds to be 'woke' and cuck to Jews, blacks, and homos. (Of course, even white 'liberals' and 'leftists' do act in self-interest. They want more money and good things in life. But the success must be only as individuals, never as whites. White consciousness may operate in the mode of "what is good for me?" and "what is good for the holy three of Jews, blacks, and homos?" but never of "What is good for whites?" This is why so many rich and successful whites are anti-white. They succeeded as individuals, but they feel offended by the notion that their success or power has anything to do with white identity or interests. Therefore, Sailer Strategy would be most offensive to their white consciousness.)

Even though Antifa and BLM mobs have done their share of damage to blue cities and posh businesses, the ruling elites don't fear them in the long run. Unlike the Labor Movement that had real legs and shaped American Politics/Economics for generations, BLM and Antifa actions are come-and-go. Blacks riot now and then, but there is no concerted effort to riot all the time. And Antifa will have their fun and then go home to take a shower and watch TV. It's like a hippie happening. Too immature, disorganized, confused, and ridiculous to coalesce into a real movement and power bloc. As such, they mainly have symbolic value. Big Corporations and Deep State wave the BLM banner and support Antifa to direct the politics of rage away from Big Money toward 'racists' and 'rednecks'. If anything, super corporations can claim to be on the side of angels because they fund BLM and bless Antifa. And Jews love it because BLM and Antifa blame 'white supremacism' for everything. They serve to browbeat whites into moral shame and compliance, and white cuckery is most useful to Jewish Supremacism.
It's also an extortion racket. Jews are hinting to white people, "Unless you give us what we want and do as we command, we will keep unleashing violence in the streets and carrying out inquisitions in the work place." If whites had sense and courage, they would call out on the Jews, but they don't. Indeed, even Trump and his MAGA minions are always sucking up to Jews EVEN THOUGH Jews are the main force behind anti-white hysteria. So, if you can't push back against Jews, you must bow down and give them what they want to have any return to modicum of normality.

#KILLSTREAM E. MICHAEL JONES LIVE

15 Questions for the Groypers to Gribbit at the Cuckservatives or Con-servants that make up the So-Called ‘American Right’

Of late, some say there’s an internecine battle brewing within the American Right between Charlie Kirk camp and Nick Fuentes camp. In fact, the Kirk camp doesn’t stand for any kind of real right or real conservatism. Kirk is essentially a bought-and-paid-for shill, a shabbos goy of JSP or Jewish Supremacist Power. He is the ‘acceptable’ face of ‘conservatism’, toothless, gutless, and ball-less. His idea of ‘conservatism’ and ‘American values’ is forever malleable and mutable. It is whatever JSP says it is. This kind of Americanism has only one ‘bill of rights’, and it goes like this: Jews say ‘We win, you lose.’ Whatever the Jews want, they eventually get by any means necessary. Jews wanted open borders and got it. Jews wanted ‘free trade’ and got it. Jews wanted to rape the Russian economy in the 90s, and they got to do so. Jews wanted gambling to spread like a virus, and now it’s everywhere. Jews wanted pornography for children, and now there is easy access to porn by kids. Jews wanted ‘gay marriage’ and got it. Jews wanted Wars for Israel, and Middle East now lies in ruins.
Kirk stands for nothing but "I obey my Jewish masters." He is not a conservative but a con-servant of JSP. He is a CILO, or conservative-in-label-only. This is why the Kirk camp gets so triggered and antsy about the so-called ‘Groypers’(generally allied with Nicholas J. Fuentes) asking inconvenient questions. When confronted with tough questions by independent minds, the con-servants and cucks squirm like worm under a hot sun and demand what amounts to SJW-like ‘safe spaces’ from those courageous individuals who refuse to read from the preordained script. Anyway, what follows are some suggestions for ‘Groypers’ to consider in their formulation of questions in future TPUSA and other such cuckservative events.

1. When Big Banks faced financial doom in the 2008 crisis, they were bailed out by all taxpayers regardless of ideology. Right or Left, up or down, we all had to contribute taxes that bailed out Wall Street. Then, do Big Banks have the right to deny service to people based on creed or ideology? If they are bailed out by everyone, shouldn't they serve everyone?

2. Conservatives and Libertarians say private companies have the right to deny service to anyone. Does this apply even when companies are virtual monopolies and serve as de facto public space for all? Does Google, a virtual monopoly as Search Engine, have the right to rig results to favor Democrats and the Deep State over Populists and Republicans? If your answer is ‘yes’, should phone companies have the right to deny service based on creed or ideology?

Also, didn't companies like Google and Facebook become monopolies precisely because they started out by promising neutrality and fairness to all sides? After all, if Google or Facebook had declared their ideological biases from the outset and stated policies that would favor one political party over another, most conservatives would have rejected them and opted for another platform. But everyone, regardless of ideology, signed up to use Google and Facebook on the promise of fairness. So, when these companies now use their monopoly muscle to favor one side over another, it is a total breach of their terms of promise to us. They come up with ever-shifting 'terms of services', but it is they who violated the biggest term of all, that of fairness that attracted so many people to their sites on assurance of neutrality. If I gained market dominance in the ice cream industry by promising quality ice cream to everyone and then used my monopoly position to deny ice cream to certain groups, I would have violated the very principle that made me become the king of ice cream. After all, had I started my company by stating my intention of denying ice cream to certain groups, many people would never have bought ice cream from me, and my company would never have gained monopoly position. It seems Google and Facebook hustled us. They became monopolies by promising fairness to all sides, but once they had the muscle, they decided to favor one side over others. Big Tech companies treat us like Zionists treat Palestinians in Occupied West Bank where Jews get the best land and most water while Palestinians get far less or none at all.

3. When true conservatives and dissident rightists are deplatformed or denied service by monopolies, the reply of cuckservatives is, "They’re private companies, and they can do whatever they want." But if monopolies were to deny service to Zionists on grounds that Zionism is about the destruction of Palestinian nation and culture, would people like you and Charlie Kirk just shrug your shoulders and say private companies can do as they wish? I’d wager people like you will insist that the state must step in to make sure every private firm is open to business with Israel. If the private sector can do as it wishes, why do cuckservatives support state-sanctioned suppression of BDS that calls for justice for Palestinians who are living under apartheid conditions in West Bank and being mowed down by IDF death squads in Gaza? Why shouldn't private individuals and companies choose not to do business with Israel for the same reason that many chose not to do business with Apartheid South Africa in the 1980s? It's funny that cuckservatives defend the right of mega-corporations to sanction little people but never defend the right of private individuals and small businesses to reject business with Israel on account of its international crimes. There is a definite pattern here. Cuckservatism is about corporate domination over little individuals. Its position is monopoly companies can deny service to little individuals, but little individuals cannot say NO to business with the gangster state of Israel.

4. Mass Immigration of peoples from Europe into the New World led to what some call the ‘genocide’ of the American Indians. Also, mass-immigration of whites, blacks, and Asians led to the native people of Hawaii being reduced to a minority in their own ancestral homeland. Mass-immigration of Jews into Palestine led to the Nakba Pogroms that reduced Palestinians to a minority in Israel and an occupied people in West Bank, which continues to be colonized by caravans of Zionist invaders. And Serbs lost their historical homeland of Kosovo permanently to Albanians because of massive Muslim migration under Ottoman Rule. While it’s true that immigration led to rise of new civilizations, there is no doubt it also led to tragedies of natives and indigenous folks losing their land and culture to others. Thus, isn’t it about time to admit the connection between mass immigration, a form of demographic imperialism, with what is tantamount to ‘genocide’ in the long run? Just ask the Palestinians. By the way, since white people took the New World from the indigenous folks, they have a moral obligation to those native people but to peoples all over the world whose lands were NOT taken by whites. And if whites really care about the American Indians, the most tragic people of the New World, then they will stop mass-immigration and do their utmost to revive and restore American Indian communities.

5. We’ve been told by the Mass Media and Mass Education/Indoctrination that ‘Diversity Is Our Strength’? First, isn’t Diversity in the New World the product of imperialism, conquest, genocide, and slave trade? Native reds and browns were conquered by whites. That led to Diversity #1. Then, Latin whites, Anglos, and Jews brought over black African slaves. That led to Diversity #2. Then, white elites called on more mass-immigration to pan out and take all the lands from the native peoples. That was Diversity #3.
Second, if Diversity is a panacea for all problems and if it is no problem for the US to become a white-minority nation, then how come white-minority nations of Latin America with so much racial diversity are relative failures, and why are people in those nations running away from their own diversity to come to the US or Canada that are still majority white? Also, we are told that India is a very diverse place. If so, it must be a wonderful, magical place. And yet, it seems countless Indians want to flee from the Diversity in India and come to UK, US, Australia, and Canada that are white majority nations. What gives? It seems people in very diverse nations want to flee from the chaos of diversity and come to white majority nations that are, as yet, less corrupt and better-managed.

6. It’s been said that white people who want to maintain the racial and cultural integrity of their own nations are ‘white supremacists’. But why are they so characterized when they only want to preserve what is theirs and have no interest in ruling over other peoples? Aren’t the real ‘white supremacists’ all those non-whites who want to run away from their own people, culture, and nation to go live in white-majority nations? It seems those non-white immigrants prefer white people as rulers, neighbors, friends, associates, lovers, and mates OVER their own kind. If non-whites want to permanently flee their own peoples and cultures to come to live in white majority nations, don’t they prefer whites over their own kind? Thus, aren’t they the ‘white supremacists’ because they see whites as preferable and superior to their own kind and other non-white folks? After all, non-whites don’t want to move to non-white nations, especially black ones.

7. Jews in the academia and media bitch and whine about whites all the time. They even created something called ‘whiteness studies’. Most Jews are globalists and push for globo-homo, replacist immigration in goy nations, and vice industries such as gambling, pornography, and drugs. Jewish Hollywood routinely features whites as villains and evildoers, the ones to blame for all the problems of the world. If Jews feel this way about whites and if they insist that Diversity is so great, why have Jews historically followed after whites and chosen to live in white-majority nations? Who’s stopping Jews from moving to more diverse nations of Latin America or India? Why don’t Jews in white nations all move to black Africa or Muslim nations if they have so many issues with whites while claiming to just love non-whites? If Jews prefer non-whites and love immigration, how about they become immigrants to non-white nations. They can have the cake and eat it too. They get to be immigrants again and can forever live with non-whites than with baddy bad whites.

8. Jews often invoke the history of Europeans and Christianity to guilt-bait whites into a position of moral inferiority vis-a-vis Jews. Now, it’s true that Europeans and Christianity have had a blood history, but then, so have all other peoples. If whites must be reminded of their bloody history, isn’t it about time to remind Jews of their genocidal role in Bolshevik communism, their prominent role in the Atlantic Slave Trade(especially to Latin America), their financial funding of Western Imperialism, their selling of opium to the Chinese, their looting of the Russian economy in the 90s(that led to the rise of Putin who put an end to it), and their mass pogroms against the Palestinians that led to Nakba?

9. If people like you and Charlie Kirk believe in equal justice for all, how come you're so silent about how people like Arnon Milchan, who freely admitted that he spied and stole for Israel, can visit the US and walk freely without consequences? How come so many of the crooks pardoned by presidents have been Jewish ones? Think of Marc Rich and Jonathan Pollard. Think of the Jewish crook(who facilitated illegal immigration and exploited workers) pardoned by Trump. It seems Jews are above the law and have a license to steal and kill. Also, if people like you and Kirk believe in colorblind justice for all of humanity, why do you favor Zionist occupiers over Palestinian occupied in the West Bank? Palestinians lost the bulk of their homeland in the Nakba Pogroms of 1948, and Zionist caravans continue to steal land & water from Palestinians in the West Bank, but US politicians only praise and serve Israel.

10. If diversity is so important that we need Affirmative Action for less qualified blacks in higher education, why doesn’t anyone make the same case for sports? NBA and NFL are black-dominated even though blacks are 13% of US population. There are some whites but virtually no brown Mexicans, Asians, and Muslims. Sports are a national pastime and a hugely symbolic part of Americanism, and yet, there isn’t much diversity in sports. Should there be affirmative action for sports for the sake of 'diversity'? And do you think NBA and NFL teams will be better if they added more Asians, Hindus, Muslims, and Mexicans to the mix? After all, we are told ‘diversity is our strength.’

11. Charlie Kirk and others like him have said America is an idea. They say 'gay marriage' is American Ideal. Then, does that mean America was not America prior to the rise of globo-homo values? They say America is about freedom and democracy. Then, was America not 'America' when it had slavery? They say America is about respect for life. Then, was America not 'America' when American Indians were being wiped off the Great Plains to make way for endless waves of immigrant-invaders? Was America not 'America' when women didn't have the vote?
If the military were to take power in America tomorrow, would America no longer be 'America' because of demise of democracy? If so, what would America be? Isn't a nation what it is regardless of ideology, e.g. Russia was Russian prior to communism, during communism, and after communism. Likewise, America is America regardless of ideology or 'ideas' as long as its historic people make up its core populace.

Also, if America is about democracy and individual liberty, is any nation with democracy and individual liberty also 'America'? If America is an idea, then surely any people and place that practices the same ideas must also be 'America'. Mexican constitution is virtually identical to the US Constitution, and Mexico has democratic elections. So, is it also 'America'?

Finally, if America is an idea, then surely you know that ideas can go from place to place. People don't need to come to America to have American values and ideas since they can adopt and practice those ideas in their own nations. If someone invents a way to make fire, you don't need to stand where he is at to have the fire. You can learn the trick and make fire in your own place. So, if America is an idea, that idea can be adopted by any people anywhere around the world, and there is no need for all of them to come to America to enjoy 'American Ideas'. Ideas can come to you; you don't have to come to the place where the idea originated.

12. Can you repeat these historical truths? American Indians were wiped out by mass immigration. Blacks were once slaves in America. Jewish communists played a key role in Bolshevism that led to deaths of tens of millions of Christian Slavs. US aided Zionists in the Nakba pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map even though Palestinians did no harm to America.

13. Do you believe that American ideas and values are so outstanding that they should be adopted by all peoples around the world? Should they be the beacon of hope for all mankind? Does this include Israel? Should it also have 'gay marriage', deracination, and inclusive-invasive mass-immigration from all over the world?

14. People like you and Charlie Kirk say that we should support Israel because it tolerates and even celebrates homos and trannies. People like you say neighboring Muslim nations throw homos off roofs. But facts say otherwise. Israel is closely allied with Saudis that execute homosexuals. Also, Israel lent support to ISIS fighters in Syria who really do throw homos off roof-tops. Israel aided ISIS and Alqaeda against the Assad regime that is a tolerant, secular, and modernizing force in the Arab world. How do you square these contradictions?

15. Given that Jewish takeover of Palestine led to some of the biggest 'gay' & 'tranny' parades, orgies, and celebrations in the world, do you think Israel should now be called 'Sodom and Gomorrah'? Jews turned the Holy Land into Sodom and Gomorrah. Is that something Christian Zionists should celebrate? Did Jews really need to retake the Holy Land because having mass homosexual orgies there is the spiritual and moral priority of Christian Zionists?

Jews have often said "My Jewish Relatives Died in the Holocaust" — We must ask, "What Else Did Your Jewish Relatives Do?" — Let’s Consider the Historical Record

Margaret Hodge, the Vile Vicious Jewess: "My relatives were murdered in the gas chamber’: Jewish Labour MP defends calling Corbyn a ‘f***ing anti-Semite" 

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/07/28/labours-gas-chamber-blues-pink-berets-vs-fing-anti-semites/

The above is a very instructive article about the nature of Jewish Power, Duplicity, and Mendacity in the UK, but the article could apply to just about any nation in which Ashkenazi Jews have gained prominence. As a more self-aware Jew Yossi Sarid has said, “In these very moments, the protocols are being rewritten. Rich Jews are writing them in their own handwriting. They, in their wealth, are confirming with their own signatures what anti-Semites used to slander them with in days gone by: We, the elders of Zion, pull the strings of Congress, and the congressmen are nothing but marionettes who do our will. If they don’t understand our words, they’ll understand our threats. And if in the past, we ran the show from behind the scenes, now we’re doing it openly, from center stage. And if you forget our donations, the wellspring will run dry.” For much of my life, I thought ‘antisemitism’ was mostly a canard, and to be sure, there have been many anti-Jewish cranks and fantasists over the years. But upon observing Jewish Power in the here-and-now all around the world, I’ve been led to conclude that, all said and done, the ‘anti-Semites’ tended to be more right than wrong. They understood the character of Jewish Psychology and Culture and why Jews act the way they do. As these ethnic patterns have re-emerged over and over regardless of ideology — Jewish Leftists or Jewish Rights are equally subversive of the essential interests of non-Jewish populations — , critics and enemies of Jewish Power through the ages were more about facts than fantasy. And in a way, precisely because Jews have gained dominance in the US, the most powerful nation on Earth, and can’t restrain their chutzpah with too-much-money-and-power, more and more people everyday are waking up to the toxic impacts of Jewish arrogance, greed, venality, hatred, contempt, and supremacism. (That is precisely why Jews now HATE FREE SPEECH. Any honest discussion in an open forum will expose the ugly and pathological nature of Current Jewish Power. This is why Jews rig all search engines and platforms to favor Jew-concocted narratives. This is why Jews dumb-down and infantilize even elite culture because a thinking people who ask hard questions will come to see Jewish Power for what it is. Better for Jewish Power to turn Elites into Homo-Worshipers who stick with Jewish Power because it is seen as most homo-friendly.) It seems all the more perverse and weird because these Judeo-Nazis still(albeit increasingly comically) invoke the Shoah to cover up for their utter vileness. It’s like Madeleine Albright, the butcher of Iraq, giving us sermons about the dangers of ‘fascism’ taking over the US. These Jews got some nerves.


Anyway, one oft-repeated shtick pulled by Jews is to remind people that their RELATIVES died in the Shoah or were ‘Holocaust Survivors’, a term that has become nearly meaningless as it could apply to just about any Jew who lived in areas under German control during the war. When most people hear ‘Holocaust Survivor’, they think of people like in SCHINDLER’S LIST, men, women, and children who managed to make it out alive of Nazi Concentration Camps. But the term is so broadly defined that it could mean even Jews who lived with relative comfort in areas of German Occupation. While we can acknowledge that all Jews under German Occupation lived under severe duress and anxiety, it’s ridiculous to label as ‘Holocaust Survivor’ someone who was not even in the notorious Labor or Death Camps devised by the Nazis. In some nations, where the hunt for Jews was so extensive, such as in Poland and Hungary, one could argue that the entire Jewish population there were Holocaust Survivors. But the term becomes a stretch in nations where the great majority of Jews not only survived, not least because the local population resisted collaboration with the Germans. Even in Occupied France where Collaboration was commonplace, the fact is 75% of French Jews managed to survive the war.

Anyway, when Jews say "My relatives survived or died in the Holocaust", it gives a very skewed view of history. It implicitly surveys the world where Jews have been nothing but innocent victims of malevolent forces. It ignores context and other narratives. It’s like Japanese saying "My relatives survived Hiroshima or Nagasaki or Tokyo firebombing" while totally ignoring what their OTHER relatives may have done in China, Indonesia, and against the US naval fleet in Pearl Harbor. While many ‘innocent’ or ‘civilian’ Japanese were cruelly killed in WWII at the hands of the US Air Force, there was ANOTHER side to Japan’s role in the war. Japan was also an imperialist aggressor that visited unimaginable horrors upon China, Philippines, Indonesia, and etc. Also, Japan attacked the US first. So, while a Japanese wouldn’t be wrong to say that he or she knows relatives who were cruelly killed in the war, it’s also probably true that he or she has relatives who took part in the horrific Japanese Imperialist aggressions against other nations. He or she has relatives who were victims but also those who were villains(and in some cases, people can be villains and victims at the same time; surely Japanese colonists who were attacked by Chinese patriots were both villains[as imperialist migrants] and victims[of local acts of terror]).

While it may well be true that many Jews can claim to know relatives who were killed in the Holocaust or barely survived it, it’s no less true that many Jews have relatives who took part in some of the great crimes of the 20th century. When Jews say, "My relatives died in the Holocaust", we need to ask them, "What did your relatives do in Soviet Union? How many Christian Slavs did they kill? How many Christian Churches did they smash?" It’s now largely agreed that in the first two decades of Soviet Rule, close to 10 million people perished. Before Nazi Germany edged out the Soviet Union in industrial slaughter, the USSR was the international kingpin when it came to mass mayhem and destruction. And Jewish Bolsheviks played a huge role in the use of terror, slavery, and execution to bring about this so-called Workers’ Paradise. Many Jews took part in this State ruled by Fear and Terror. Many Jews were directly involved in the running of this state at the highest levels. But there were also many Jews in the West who indirectly aided the Soviet project, totally oblivious and indifferent to the death and destruction caused by Soviet Jews on the Slavic and other populations. Not only did millions die of starvation in Ukraine, but it’s estimated that a quarter of the population perished in Kazakhstan. And even for ones who didn’t die, there was the culture of tyranny and conformism, of total censorship and obedience, perhaps most powerfully satirized by George Orwell in 1984. If Soviet Jews in the USSR were controlling the media to spread propaganda to justify the Terror, Western Jews in the media did their best to deny that the Terror was even taking place. When millions of Slavic peasants were dying in the Great Famine, the great majority of Jews in the USSR and the West felt NOTHING. No pity, no heartache, no remorse. Indeed, Jews began to notice something wrong only with the Great Purge that targeted Soviet intellectuals and commissars. The Great Famine that killed millions had been about dirty goy peasants, so good riddance to them, thought the Jews. But the Great Purge targeted the class in which Jews were prominent. Even though the Great Purge, in killing around 450,000, was far less deadly than the Great Famine, it was the first time Jews began to wonder about the wisdom of the Soviet system. (But then, it’s always "Is it good for the Jews?" when it comes to Jewish ‘ethics’. We saw the same pattern in the US. For the longest time, Americans were led to believe that the Red Scare was the worst violation of civil liberties in the US when, in fact, it only led to the blacklisting of some Hollywood writers and folk singers for a few yrs. In contrast, the ‘internment’ of Japanese-in-America led to dispossession and relocation of over 100,000 people. So, why did the Jew-run media and academia care more about the victims of the Red Scare? It affected areas in which Jews were prominent.) As it turned out, the Great Purge didn’t end Jewish Power in the USSR. While Stalin removed most Jews from the highest echelons of power, many Jews(way disproportionate to their overall population) remained in the Soviet apparatus and continued to serve Stalin in his use of terror and mass executions to deal with ‘class enemies’.

At any rate, we need to stop playing the Jewish Game. When Jews bitch and whine ever so predictably, "My relatives blah blah blah...", we need to counter with the question, "What did your relatives do as commissars in the Soviet Union? What did your relatives do as Zionist Imperialists who wiped Palestine off the map?" And don’t let Jews bait you about ‘white racism’. Jews played a huge role in the Atlantic Slave Trade. And Jewish merchants sold guns to whites to kill Indians with on the Western frontier. So, if whites are guilty of American Slavery and American Genocide, so are the Jews. Also, so much of Western Imperialism was funded by Jewish bankers. And wherever whites conquered, Jews followed and profited. When the British Empire made inroads into China, the Jews were there to peddle opium to the Chinese. And in recent times, you bet that many relatives of Jews were involved in promoting Wars for Israel via the academia, media, Deep State, and finance. If you know a Jew, he will likely have Jewish relatives who took part in the Nakba pogroms, the Zionist occupation of West Bank, Neocon Wars for Israel(that killed close to a million people and reduced millions more to ‘refugee’ status), Jewish Rape of Russia in the 1990s that destroyed millions of lives, global White Slavery(in which Jews cajole mostly poor Slavic women into becoming sex slaves), Jewish control of Porn(where mostly white women are turned into ‘cumbuckets’ and sex meat for Negro men), and Cuck-castration of white men that has gelded white males into a bunch of wussy-pussified ‘white boys’ who suck up to Negroes who beat them up and hump their women. So, whenever some smarmy Jew bleats about "my relative blah blah Holocaust blah blah", you ask him about his OTHER relatives and what role they played in Soviet terror, Rape of Russia, Nakba pogroms, Opium trade, Slave trade, funding of imperialism, Wall Street mass theft, Las Vegas robbery, Opioid epidemic, pornification of society, cuck-castration of whites into wussy-boys who don’t even have the balls to stand up for their own people, land, and culture. According to Jews, whites own nothing that is their own. Everything white exists to serve Jews. So, if there is a white nation, the white people have no right to think, "We are white, this is our nation, this is our culture, and it belongs to us." No, they must think, "We whites have no culture and no identity. We exist to make Jews happy and must do anything to facilitate this... or else, we are Nazis or ‘anti-Semites’. And since we exist to serve the Other, the Jews, we must also put All the Others before our own interest. So, the UK is no longer the land of Britons, the real White Britons but must prioritize itself as a welcome mat for endless migration-invasions of Africans, Muslims, and Asians. Accordingly, white Britons exist only to make the rest of the world happy by welcoming them to take over white lands, white institutions, and even white women so that Negro men can colonize white wombs to create mulattos who identify as ‘black’ and accuse white people of ‘racism’. Yes, this is what the Relatives of Jews are up to.

So, next time you meet a Jew who whines about how his or her ‘relatives died in the Holocaust’, you ask him or her about what his or her OTHER relatives have done to the world. Here’s a sample of what the OTHER Jewish relatives have done:

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

Of course, as Jewish ethno-monopoly controls the internet, if you search for Jewish malfeasance, you mostly get search results that lead to Jewish-owned media outlets bitching about how it is ‘antisemitic’ to connect the dots between Jewish Power and Jewish abuses, such as the Financial Crisis.

https://www.google.com/search?q=jews+and+wall+street+finanical+crisis&rlz=1C1AOHY_enUS768US768&oq=jews+and+wall+street+finanical+crisis&aqs=chrome..69i57.14211j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Having turned ‘antisemitism’ into a taboo word, Jews can deflect responsibility for anything they do just by invoking the magic term. So, if a bunch of Jews beat up a Palestinian child to death and if you report what you saw, you can are denounced as an ‘anti-Semite’ for having mouthed an ‘antisemitic’ stereotype of Jews as exploitative oppressors. The way ‘antisemitism’ is employed, it means any observation or view that is critical of Jewish power and its abuses. According to this logic, Jews have always been pure as snow and blameless, and that means every negative aspersion about Jews all through the ages was wrong, wrong, and wrong, merely paranoia cooked up by ‘rabid and virulent’ looneys. So, if Jews were always right and ‘anti-Semites’ were always wrong, then it means that if YOU notice something bad about Jews in the here-and-now, YOU too are an ‘anti-Semite’ who is perpetuating the old ‘canard’ about blameless and pure-as-snow Jews. Of course, the Jew-run media are more than happy to prop up the Jewish Myth of Jewish Nobility even as Jewish elites collude behind the scenes to rake in everything for their own Tribe.
Even when Jews rob the entire world and cause havoc for all of mankind, the Jew-run media will tell us that Jews are saving the World. What a truly vile and wretched people.

Finally, Jews need to stop bitching about how OTHER nations didn't do enough to save Jews from the Shoah. Jews need to be more self-aware and ask themselves why (1) Germans came to hate Jews so much and (2) why other nations didn't care much about Jews.
The answer is obvious. Jews built up a reputation over the ages of being a vile, nasty, and subversive people. If Jews hadn't been such rapacious financial exploiters(on the capitalist side), such ruthless radicals(on the socialist side), and such degenerates(on the cultural front), there never would have been much in the way of 'antisemitism'. Just because Jews suffered the horrible Shoah doesn't cleanse Jews of their foulness, just like the horrific nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki doesn't expunge Japanese of their crimes in WWII. After the war, Japanese came to realize that they'd done terrible things but also came to be terribly victimized. There was some balance in Japan's remembrance of the war. But Jews remember 20th century only as 'We pure-as-snow Jews wronged by the world'. Jews think they have some divine right to mess up any part of the world, and if the local population rise up against Jews, OTHER nations must offer Jews refuge so that Jews can start the foul pattern of subversion all over again.
Even when the Soviet Experiment went badly for Jews in the end, Jews lacked the self-awareness to admit that THEIR project had failed them(and led to deaths of millions of Slavs and others). Instead, the Jew-run media spun it into SAVE SOVIET JEWS as if the Jews were always the main victims of Soviet Communism. Such lack of self-awareness. A hideous people. And yet, they rule the US and the world.

A Response to (((Jonathan Weisman)))'s Judeo-Nazi Hegemonic Neo-Imperialism

http://www.unz.com/isteve/sailer-on-semitism-by-jonathan-weisman/

(((Jonathan Weisman))) says:

"The Jew flourishes when borders come down, when boundaries blur, when walls are destroyed, not erected…. Again, we see, national borders and walls, wherever they rise, tend to trap Jews, not liberate them."

So, why were Jews fleeing from the Nazis? Nazis broke down borders all across Europe. They could access France and the vast fields for Russia for several yrs. Hmmm, funny that open borders under Nazism were bad for Jews back then. Open Borders meant Open Season on Jews.

When Nazis were on the rise, it seems Jews were seeking sanctuary in nations with working borders against Germany.

The great irony.

Under Nazi Open Borders policy, Jews were desperately fleeing as refugees to other parts of the world.

Today, it's Zionist Hegemonic Open Borders policy, and millions of Arabs and Muslims have been uprooted by Wars for Israel and forced to flee their own homelands.
Israel certainly doesn't want Syria to regain border control and keep out foreign Jihadis. Zionists want Syria to remain invaded by foreign terrorists and US mercenary troops. US pretends to remain to fight ISIS but is really there to aid 'moderate rebels' and Kurds against the central government. Why? All because Jewish supremacists control US foreign policy and don't want Syria to recover and recoup as a rival of Israel as Lone regional superpower.

At the height of their power, Nazis were for open borders in Europe because it meant Nazi power could go ANYWHERE. Jews feared this the most. After all, Jews who fled Germany for France were praying that France defend its borders against the German pan-European empire.

The fact that Jews are now so enthusiastic about destroying borders in EU and nations like Syria is proof that they are the main imperialists and hegemonists around the world. Open Borders means invasion by Jewish Power in every corner of the globe.

Imperialists flourish with open borders because they get to invade and 'include'. China certainly includes Tibet, like Japan once included Manchuria and Taiwan.

Nationalists protect and exclude.
Imperialists invade and include.

Anti-Imperialists flourish with secure borders because they can stop invasion and forcible inclusion by the world order. Palestine as a nation would still exist if Arabs had had the means to secure their borders and stop Zionist invasion that came to include Palestine as part of Jewish Empire. Jewish immigration eventually turned into Nakba Pogroms, of which 2018 is the 70th anniversary(but we hear nothing from the Jewish-dominant media), that wiped Palestine off the map.

Jews were not always for open borders. Many Jews had hoped to remain in one city and put down roots. But they were expelled to OTHER PLACES because of ethnic conflicts. And in the case of Old Jerusalem, the Open Borders and Open Invasion Policy sure didn't do much for the Jewish kingdom-state... that was wiped off the map by the invasive-inclusive Romans just like Palestine was later wiped off the map in the 20th century. For much of history, Jewish movements weren't about free trade and opportunity but expulsion and exile.

Eventually, Jews came to appreciate Open Borders because they piggybacked on Western Imperialism. Under protection and reach of British Imperialism, Jews plied the opium trade in China that had been forced open, invaded, and carved up China along the coasts. Because Jewish power has become so synonymous with Western Imperialism(much of which was funded by Jewish capital) and now American Global hegemony(dominated by Wall Street, Harvard, Hollywood, and Pentagon), Jews seek to weaken every gentile nation to gain influence over them. When Russia was opened up to US hegemony in the 90s, it was a grand opportunity for globalist Jews to gain control of policy and totally loot the place.

Also, Iraqi, Libyan, and Syrian borders were destabilized so that Jewish-controlled Foreign Policy could invade and weaken them for the interests of Israel. But these Jews who now call for the destruction of Iranian borders as well are always telling us that we must support and protect the ethnic integrity of Israel. I smell a weasel.

Imperialists and hegemonists want Open Borders. For Jews, this means financial, military, and cultural domination of all the world through Wall Street, Hollywood, Harvard, and Pentagon. And these Jews made a pact with Third World Demographic Imperialists who seek to invade white lands and leech off white wealth. Invade-Invite policy has adherents among Third Worlders. Consider the 'gold star dad' of Hillary's campaign. "You can threaten or invade my country militarily as long as you allow us to demographically invade your country." His family had access to the West, and his son, though Muslim, fought in an anti-Muslim war for the Empire of Judea, of which the US is the Jewel in the Crown. Fareed Zakaria and Nikki Haley are big adherents of this. Bomb Syria! And Let them in.

--------------------------

Ironically, the worst thing for Jews would be for white gentiles to listen to the advice of Jews: Whites should just forgo their white identity and join with rest of humanity and fight against privilege and hierarchy?

OKAY. The main targets will be Jews. Look at UK. Labour whites have given up white identity and joined with POC(people of color) against the Power. And Jews are freaking out because they got so much of it. In the UK, white 'progressives' and socialists side with Muslim immigrants who hate, hate, and hate Jewish-Zionist Power that pushes for Wars for Israel that have already killed over a million Muslims and turned so many into refugees. Jews feign sympathy for refugees but overlook the fact millions were forced into refugee-hood by Wars for Israel.

(((Weisman))) calls other people Nazis, but he is a Judeo-Nazi. Today, Jewish supremacists are the New Nazis.
US is not a democracy but an oligarchy ruled by Judeo-Nazis. Jews hate Trump not because he's a Nazi but because many of his statements were anti-Judeo-Nazi. Trump wants good relations with Russia. In contrast, Judeo-Nazis hate Russia just like Hitler hated Russia. Hitler wanted to take over Russia and reduce Slavs into slaves. Jewish power wants to take over Russia, spread Homomania, destroy Russian churches and values, and reduce Russians into deracinated consumer-slaves of Hollywood and Porn.

Trump called for end to Wars in the Middle East during the campaign. In contrast, Jews want more Wars for Israel. Crazy Netanyahu keeps bombing Syria and wants to drag US into a war with Iran. Indeed, one thing that Jews never criticize Trump for is his intermittent saber-rattling(mostly to APPEASE Judeo-Nazis) at Russia, Syria, and Iran. Judeo-Nazis want Trump to be warmongering, hostile, and chauvinist against any people or nation hated by Jews. After all, what is most of media but Judeo-Nazi hate campaign and propaganda against Russia, Iran, Syria, Palestinians(now gunned down at whim by Judeo-Nazis), and white gentiles.

Just ask yourself who the real nazis are. Richard Spencer or Jewish supremacists?

1. Who killed 500,000 Iraqi kids? Spencer or Jewish supremacist Albright?



2. Who guns down unarmed Palestinians who are living under apartheid in West Bank and Warsaw Ghetto-like conditions in Gaza? Spencer or the Judeo-Nazis of the IDF?



3. Who financially raped Russia in the 90s and reduced so many Slavic women as sex slaves in a vast white slavery ring? Spencer or Jewish globalists?

https://isteve.blogspot.com/2013/06/marc-rich.html

https://www.timesofisrael.com/thousands-of-slaves-in-israel-global-study-finds/

4. Who used Wall Street to rape Main Street in the bubble speculations under Clinton and Bush? Spencer or Jewish finance-capitalists?

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-20100405

5. Who made all those Hollywood movies that dehumanized Arabs and Muslims as subhuman terrorists? Spencer or Jewish moguls?



6. Who keeps agitating for more hate, fear, paranoia, and hostility against Russia? Spencer or Jewish hegemonists?

7. Who recruited Neo-Nazis in Ukraine to pull off a Coup? Spencer or Jewish neo-imperialists?

https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mess-that-nuland-made-the-consequences-of-ukraines-regime-change/5462392

8. Who says Israel can have 200 nukes and receive endless aid from US while Iran is constantly threatened even though it has no nukes and allows inspections? Spencer or Jewish warmongers?



9. Who controls entertainment and pornified mainstream culture to the extent that your average girl in the US is raised to be a mindless slut consumer pig? Spencer or Jewish producers?

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/05/05/mind-pollution-the-promotion-of-sexual-perversion-on-national-tv-the-case-of-jenji-kohan/

10. Who controls Big Pharma that addicted so many white Americans to opoids just like David Sassoon the Jews addicted so many Chinese to opium? Spencer or Jewish oligarchs?

https://www.change.org/p/hold-the-sackler-family-and-purdue-pharma-accountable-for-the-opioid-crisis

11. Who monopolizes media and platforms and uses censorship and repression to control the flow of information because they cannot win a fair debate? Spencer or Jewish tyrants?



12. Who holds AIPAC Nuremberg-like rallies to buy off whore gentile politicians to support Jewish supremacists interests over Palestinian national liberation aspirations in the Jewish-Palestinian conflict? Spencer or Jewish chauvinists? If Jews really are for equality, how come NYT won't hire Palestinian-American columnists? How come Jews insist that the US favor Jews over Palestinians just like Nazis favored 'Aryans' over Slavs?



It seems to me the real nazis of today are Judeo-Nazis. (((Weisman))) is just projecting his supremacist-imperialist-hegemonism on Trump and Spencer and other whites who want to respect the national sovereignty of other nations, serve their own national interest, and find ways for the world to get along on the basis that fences make for good neighbors.
Jews who are in neo-imperialist mode hate this for the same reason Hitler hated borders that prevented him access to other lands that he wanted to control for the sake of German supremacism. The real enemy of all of humanity is Judeo-Nazism.

Anyway, Weissman is to be thanked for letting the cat, or weasel, out of the bag.
He made it so plain as day what it’s all about.

-----------------------------

Weisman:

The borders were still blurred. Nationalism and chauvinism were in check. Undocumented immigrants marched in the streets of Washington and Los Angeles demanding rights. The polyglot nation recovered…. The Jew thrived.

Jews are what percentage of the world population? Yet, all the world must be turned upside down with mass invasion(of course Israel gets Passover rights) just to profiteth the Tribe?

Of course, Weisman's formula applies ONLY AS LONG AS Jews can play non-whites against whites in the game of Divide-and-Rule.
But what would happen if indeed ALL whites did go SJW? Then, they would side with POC against Zionism and Jewish privilege. BDS is spreading among SJW whites like wildfire.

So, it's a kind of paradox. In order for Jewish divide-and-rule strategy to work, there must always be 'racist' whites. If whites were to all lose their 'racism' and mix with POC and just become a polyglot people, they could all turn SJW. Then, Jews won't be able to play divide-and-rule among 'racist' whites and non-whites. The polyglot of POC and SJW whites will come after Jews... like the British Labour Party is a mix of Whites-gone-SJW teaming up with Muslims and Africans against Jewish power.

Also, it is the 'racist' whites who are most supportive of Israel as 'western outpost' in the Middle East. It is precisely because white conservatives have been tainted with 'white guilt' that they cling to Israel First to show that they'd been redeemed from 'antisemitism' and 'racism'. It's their get-out-of-white-guilt-jail card to prove that they are no longer 'racist' when, in fact, they still cling to whiteness, even if in an implicit way.

But if white conservatives really did lose their 'racism' and decided to become SJW, they'd no longer need to cling to Israel or profusely flatter Jews for moral credit. They could just hug Diversity to get all the moral cred they need.
Indeed, this is why proggy whites aren't so pro-Israel. As they are pro-POC, they don't need to hug Jews and Israel to be 'redeemed'. Just by screaming BLM or championing 'dreamers', their 'white guilt' gets cleansed.

In contrast, because white conservatives tends to be less charitable to blacks and browns, their 'white guilt' washing station remains Israel First. But if white conservatives were to drop their racial interests and embrace blacks, browns, and POC, then there would no longer be a need for them to worship Israel to ritual-cleansing of 'white guilt' as it would be washed constantly by their support of POC such as Muslims and Palestinians.

North Korea’s Survival Strategy and Its Parallels with the Jewish Strategy

North Korea’s survival strategy is brutally simple: “If you invade us, we will blow up South Korea and maybe even Tokyo.” North Korea is ruled by a vile regime, but its concern for survival is politically rational even if it has no moral right to exist. But then, South Korea, the perennial puppet whore of US globalist empire, is hardly better. Though an advanced democratic state, it is demographically dying and culturally decayed.
Now, if North Korea were ruled by wiser people, it could have made an intelligent argument for possessing nuclear weapons: To ensure national defense & survival, given the recent American record in the Middle East and North Africa. Especially in Libya, the US took out the regime despite Gaddafi’s having caved to Western demands on development of WMD. Gaddafi was led to believe in a new dawn of good relations with the West, only to see the Zionist-controlled West cook up some excuse to decapitate his regime and cackle over his lynching. So, given the US record as a neo-imperialist power, the North Korea could have made a sane and sober argument in justification for nuclear defense against potential US invasion, especially since the US keeps staging more military drills with South Korea to intimidate the North.
Alas, North Korea is ruled by an egotistical brat whose idea of culture is imitating the style of basketball and rap thugs of America. His idea of good relations with the US is fawning over a freak like Dennis Rodman. Kim Jong-Un just acts like Bam-Bam of Flinstones and gives the impression he wants nukes as personal toys to have fun playing a 007 villain.

Interestingly enough, as different as North Korea and Jewish Power are, they have one thing in common: WGYG or We Go, You Go. The idea is that if they are destroyed, they will take others down with them.

Jewish Power employed this threat in 2008. When the government didn’t bail out Lehman Brothers, Wall Street pushed the ‘too big to fail’ scheme and threatened Total Collapse of the Economy UNLESS it was showered with super bailouts, which eventually came to enrich the banks and investment firms even further during a severe recession in which so many Americans had to tighten their belts around their fat waists.
George W. Bush couldn’t do anything but go along. Obama promised something radical and different in his campaign but just bailed out Wall Street once he got in office. And McCain would have done the same had he won. Jewish Wall Street power held a gun to the head of the entire US economy and said ‘Give us money, OR we will take you down with us.’

The system has been rigged with explosives so that a major collapse of Jewish Power will set off total collapse of the whole economy. The fuse runs through the entire system. The whole edifice will come tumbling down like the Philistine Temple when Samson toppled the pillars. And, if anyone tries to cut the wire of Jewish explosives, kaboom, the whole thing blows up, and everyone dies. Gentiles must carry Jewish Power like a crate of nitroglycerin. One false step and it’s Kingdom Come.

Even Israel has a similar mindset. Though Israel’s main reasons for nukes is to intimidate Muslim nations, they are also meant as a global threat lest Israel were to fall due to insufficient Western support. In other words, Israel will take down Europe along with it. So, unless Europe does everything possible to prop up Israel against its enemies, it could expect nuclear missiles from Israel if Zion were to fall. In other words, Israel will not go down alone. It will take the world down with it. Even if Europeans aren't the ones to destroy Israel, they will be nuked just the same IF Jerusalem were to fall once again.
So, Europeans damn well better make sure that Israel is secure forever. Otherwise, Jews will not experience the next holocaust alone. They will spread and share it with the world.

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/destroycaps.html