A Preliminary Argument: WHITE LIBERATION(from Jewish Supremacism) WILL SAVE THE WORLD

https://counter-currents.com/2020/11/stolen-election-redpill/

Why is 'white liberation' a better term than 'white nationalism'? Fairly or unfairly, people associate 'white nationalism' with aggression and conceit of superiority. It gives the impression that whites got the power and want to show it off by rattling their sabers.

But the West is now under Jewish control like India was under British control, like Algeria and Vietnam were under French control. So, the emphasis must be on the need for whites to free themselves from Jewish Power. The theme of liberation is more appealing and justified than theme of mere power. After all, the great theme of the post WWII era was NATIONAL LIBERATION all across Asia, Africa, Middle East, and Latin America from European Imperialism or American Hegemony. And as the theme of WWII was the 'free world' vs the aggressive imperialism of Germany and Japan, it was difficult for the great powers after the war to justify their rule over others.

So, 'white liberation' is preferable to 'white nationalism', at least for the time being. Now, if skeptics ask, 'liberation from what?', whites can say from Jewish Supremacist Power, which can be amply demonstrated with data and facts. Jews do control the West. Jews not only got money power but made themselves into the new messiah-race. It's one thing to remember the Shoah as a great tragedy but quite another to permanently affix Jewish Identity with that event. Such implies Jews are always a race of 'holocaust victims' no matter what they do. So, even if Jews act like Nazis toward Palestinians, we are supposed to see them as a bunch of poor poor Anne Franks.

Anyway, 'white liberation' will highlight the fact of Jewish Power, an absolute must for real change to take place. (How can there be any reform if the most powerful group is not identified and criticized? Can a cancer victim be properly treated without acknowledging the cancer?) 'White Nationalism' can mean the need for white unity & power. Or it can mean white power as the basis for world domination. Nationalism need not be imperialist but often took an imperialist turn in the past when a nation became very powerful.
In contrast, 'liberation' emphasizes the need for whites to seek emancipation from the current power that dominates the West and the World... which is Jewish Power. (Even 'white national liberation' sounds better than mere 'white nationalism'.) White Politics that only focuses on whites and white power is less likely to be appealing than White Politics that seeks freedom from the actual tyranny that rules the world: Jewish Supremacist Power or JSP.

Also, whites can argue that White Liberation will lead not only to white emancipation from Jewish Evil but will save the world. Why? Because Jewish Supremacist Power would dwindle overnight if white folks chose WGTOW or whites going their own way. If whites refused to serve the Jews, no more Wars for Israel against Arabs and Muslims. No more support for Zionist 'genocide' of Palestinians. No more 'new cold war' with Russia. No more whites acting like dumb dogs who bark and bite whatever their Jewish Masters hate. When whites say NO to Jewish Supremacism, peace will prevail around the world as whites will no longer do the bidding of hateful supremacist-imperialist Zionist Jews. And far less need for 'yellow peril' hysteria about China-China-China to distract Americans from the fact that Jews are the main enemy of the white race and goyim in general. Just ask the Palestinians about the nature of Jewish Power.

Think of 'Israelis' and 'Palestinians' as meta-memes. 'Israelis' would be the winners and tyrants, and 'Palestinians' would be the losers and the tyrannized. It is the dream of many whites to be 'Israelis', fellow winners alongside rich and powerful Jews. Jewish identity/pride united with white identity/pride. But this is a dumb dream. Jews will NEVER accept whites as equals. Even as white praise and acknowledge Jewish identity & pride, Jews will denounce white identity and promote white shame/guilt. Thus, the ONLY way whites can rise in the Jew World Order is by turning race-traitor and cucking as collaberals or cuckservatives. All the Bidens and Romneys of the world. And Jared Taylor the deluded fool isn't much better.

Given that Jews regard whites as 'Palestinians' than fellow 'Israelis', whites should identify with Palestinians, that is unless they enjoy being race-traitor cuck-collaborators. (There are, of course, Palestinian collaborators who get rich while serving Zionists.) While Jews are free to gain power as an identity and group, whites can only gain riches as individuals, ones that cravenly collaborate with Jewish Supremacists. No white man with any self-respect and dignity should choose this path.

Now, the key to the success of White Liberation will be the emphasis on humanism & justice than nihilism & supremacism. (Kurosawa Way than Mishima Way.) The problem with people like Greg Johnson and Richard Spencer is they oppose Jewish Supremacism by associating themselves with forms of White Supremacism. Johnson wrote glowing things about Adolf Hitler who brought upon unprecedented disaster for the white race with his Aryan-Germanic supremacism, and Spencer blabbered endlessly about his vision of a new world-white empire. How stupid is that? You get zero moral points by opposing one form of supremacism in defense of another. It's like denouncing a robber just so you could steal yourself. The only convincing argument is NO ONE should steal — indeed, the dirtiest secret of Jewish Power is that it denounces white supremacism not as a principle against supremacism per se but to make browbeaten whites serve Jewish supremacism, a bait-and-switch; this is the dirty secret that needs to be exposed by the White Liberationist Project.
Unfortunately, David Duke, Greg Johnson, and Richard Spencer all soiled themselves with association with KKK, Neo-Nazism, or Anglo-Imperialism. (Of course, it should be acknowledged that imperialism has long been a part of human history, and it did good as well as bad, spreading ideas and expanding trade routes along with the violence and tyranny. So, to the extent that Western Imperialism united the world and spread modernity all over, it did a lot of good that balances out the bad. However, as the world has been so thoroughly united via technology, there should be no reason for further imperialism and supremacism. And it seemed all the world was agreed, except that American triumphalism and Jewish ascendancy after the Cold War led to a new age of empire, one that has been utterly worthless except as conduits for Zionist madness, Afromania, Globo-Homo and mass deaths across the Middle East and North Africa, as well as mass migration into the West from the Third World.)

David Duke could have done so much more without his KKK association. He will forever be smeared as a former-KKK member. Greg Johnson of late seems to reject Hitlerism in his personal formulation of 'white nationalism', but the Hitler-stain is like the Mark of Cain. Spencer is proof that smarts isn't enough. Lack of character, emotional imbalance, and megalomania(personal and racial) spell disaster.

This is why white liberation or white national liberation should be founded on humanism and justice. Universal Nationalism is justice because it acknowledges that all peoples deserve their rightful portions of history, heritage, and territory. Globalism wages war on this sense of justice EXCEPT WHEN IT COMES TO ISRAEL — Jewish Exceptionalism as always. According to Jewish-controlled globalism, all the world should support Jewish-Israel's right to exist BUT every goy nation should be remade with mass-migration and mass-miscegenation, especially with the Negro.

Too often, 'white nationalism' has been associated with neo-nazis, skinheads, KKK, and overly paranoid militia movement types. (True, whites have much to worry about, but more guns are not the solution when most of the culture war, idol war, and ideological war are done with the pen, mikes, and cameras than with guns and bullets. Militia movement emphasizes guns than lenses.) 'White Liberation' can be associated with humanism that acknowledges the worth of all races and groups.

And even though White Liberation would mostly be about freedom from Jewish Supremacism, it should also address the need for white independence from black supremacism. The problem with white folks who opposed the Civil Rights Movement was they spoke and acted as if blacks were not good enough for whites. A far more effective argument would have been that blacks are superior in certain attributes, and these make blacks arrogant and aggressive against whites, the weaker and slower race who, upon racial integration, often fall victim to black supremacist thuggery; and white men get jack-johnsoned into wussy cucks as tougher blacks kick their butts, and that means the white race loses its human right to manhood, its right to have its own heroes and idols. And this argument is something that other non-black races may understand as well, as most interracial violence is not only black on white but black on brown, black on Asian, black on Muslim, black on etc. Even black on Jew despite all the money Jews give to blacks to hate on whitey.

White Liberation should also argue against non-white mass-immigration into white lands as a perverse form of non-white white-supremacism. Why would it be non-white white-supremacism? Because mass migration of non-whites from their own nations to white nations implies that non-whites see whites as superior and prefer to live with and under whites than with their own kind. This is bad for whites and non-whites. It's bad for whites as it leads to the Great Replacement and violates the right of white folks to have their own homelands. But it's also bad for non-whites because, instead of using their energies and abilities to improve their own nations, they just run off to white nations to leech off whites as short-cut to success. It's especially bad as it leads to brain drain from non-white world to white world. This is why White Liberation will save the world.

"MY FELLOW JEWS" by Brother Nathanael

White People Tolerate, Accept, and even Praise Jewish Hatred & Black Violence against Whites because they regard Jews & Blacks as God-Men while regarding themselves as Irredeemable Sinners — Judgement Day Mentality can Doom the White Race

Maggoty White Cuck worships Negro-as-god. He also plays 'new jesus' washing the feet of the 'Wretched'. Thanks, Jews.

It's been said when General Douglas MacArthur was running for the presidency back in the US, Japanese who came to revere him put up a sign, "We play for MacArthur's erection." They got the 'l' and 'r' confused.
In the US, the only politics in town is goyim playing for Jewish Supremacist erections. US politics is just Viagra for the Jewish Pud. Even when Donald Trump, much loathed by Jews, became president, all we got was more 'Muh Israel' and playing for Jewish hard-ons. It's a Portnoic World.

It's beyond Jews as godhead. They are godpud as well. Jewish Power constitutes the god-mind of America. But mind without hysteria and violence can only go so far. So, Jews have groomed 'woke' whites as the furies and black thuggery & Antifa goonery as the fist. But there has to be some sweetness in the mix, and homos play the role of angel-fairies. How often have we seen BLM and globo-homo signs side by side?

Now, given that the Jewish Mind directs 'woke' hysteria and black violence at the white community(and rest of middle America), why does it get away with such foulness? Shouldn't most Americans be furious with the Jewish Mind, white self-loathing hysteria, and black thuggery? After all, if someone spews hatred and threatens/attacks you with violence, you would naturally hate that person and push back. But then, maybe not when the aggressive force comes with the aura of divinity.

It's like the stories in the Bible. God does lots of violence to humanity. He sends plagues, floods, fires, pestilence, and etc. And yet, the Biblical message is not to hate or oppose God but to get on your knees, apologize, beg forgiveness, and seek atonement/redemption before God. As the Bible says God is righteous and true while humans are sinful and bogus, it doesn't matter what horrors God visits upon mankind. God has the right to judge and punish, and humanity deserves to get kicked in the butt. So, God could destroy your community. He could smash your property. He could wipe out your kinfolks. He could whup your ass. But He is right, and You are wrong and deserved all the misfortunes because of your systemic sinfulness. Pagans thought likewise. Aztec gods were fearsome and monstrous. Aztecs believed the gods often acted violently toward people. So, did the Aztecs hate the gods and curse them out? Did they unite to wage war on the gods? No, they groveled before the gods. Gods were super beings, and whatever their motives, they were greater than mankind and could sit in judgement and punish as they wished. Aztecs even offered human sacrifice to the gods.

So, even though it's generally true that people hate whatever force that does them harm, the dynamics plays out differently IF the people (1) believe that the fearsome power is divine or morally superior by some degrees and (2) believe that their own side is especially foul and disgusting. It is why Germans today feel hardly any hatred and rage toward the Allies that smashed their nation and killed millions. Germans, rightly or wrongly, believe that they were so awful, vile, disgusting, scummy, loathsome, and worst-ever that they deserved to be smashed/punished and were, if anything, saved by Allies from their own diseased German souls that led to Wagner and Hitler, even if the 'saving' entailed millions of deaths and raped womenfolk. So, if you were to point out that Allies firebombed Hamburg & Dresden and killed a lot of innocent people, the German response will be, more often than not, "Oh, we deserved it, so thank you, thank you very much for kicking our vile and sinful Germanic butts."

And a similar mentality explains why so many white people in US and EU are supportive of Jewish Power and BLM even after the alliance of Jewish Mind and Black Fist led to so many eruptions of violence that paralyzed entire areas of US and Europe(and parts of Canada as well). Given that Jewish Power called for mass hysteria all across the West and that blacks & self-loathing white Antifa took up the challenge by looting, pillaging, burning, and attacking ordinary people, one would think most people would be totally livid with anger toward Jews and blacks. But as they've been brainwashed and browbeaten by academia, news media, and entertainment(as well as 'acceptable' political discourse), their mentality is neo-biblical. They don't see it as virulent Jews and violent blacks acting like scumbags and destroying peace & stability in the West. They see Jews and blacks as divine forces of historical justice and spiritual sanctity. Jews are the holy Holocaust people, and blacks are the MLK people who are also good at rapping and playing basketball. And in an age when 'twerking' is the most celebrated expression of 'Western Values', it's an added bonus that blacks are very sexual with dongs and buns. Thus, Jewish Mind and the Black Fist are seen as divine. Therefore, their hatred and violence come with spiritual pedigree. It's the violence of righteous judgement.
In contrast, whites have internalized the notion that their race is especially guilty, foul, lowdown, disgusting, putrid, and irredeemably sinful, mainly because it committed wrongs against holy Jews and noble Negroes in the past. (After all, whites need not feel 'white guilt' about what they did to Arabs, Muslims, and Palestinians. Indeed, Muslims matter ONLY AS a immigrant-minority that can be used by Jews against 'white supremacist' nativists in the West.) So, just like Biblical Jews only blamed themselves more when God hurled brimstone and hellfire at them, whites-as-sinners grovel even more when the Jewish Mind and Black Fist concoct another round of Kick-Whitey's-Ass. Or to put it in the pagan context, when the Jewish Mind and Black Fist are angry and do violence, whites offer White Human Sacrifice in the form of more sucking up to Jews, more sucking up to blacks, more purging of whites, more promises of promotions for blacks, more support for Israel, and etc.

It's all satanic because when one group of people worships other groups as godly and divine, it is worship of man-as-god. Jews are not gods. Black feet don't come with divine toes worthy of kissing. Homos are not angels, and true worship isn't celebration of sodomy and tranny-penis-cutting.

But that's where we are in the Sicko West. 

THE Z MAN - REACHING THE TIPPING POINT (MYTH20C - EP141) - Myth of the 20th Century

How 'Facts' are Spun to Make Whites serve Jews and the Other — Spin than the Fact is More Crucial to Political Control, i.e. anything can be spun to push anything

The spin is more important than the fact in political control. Thus, the 'facts' of white superiority, white equality, and white inferiority can all be used to make white people tolerate, welcome, celebrate, 'include', and serve the Other. The current order manipulates all three modes among whites to make them serve Jews and/or non-whites(usually as proxies of Jews).

1. How white superiority is used to make whites serve Jews and non-whites. Whites are made to feel special, rich, powerful, and accomplished. They are great whereas so many other peoples are pathetic, especially those starving or diseased black Africans. Therefore, superior white people should be decent and take care of all those non-whites by allowing mass-immigration and providing endless super-aid. The White Knight Syndrome. Jews play on this psychology too. Jews paint themselves as forever Holocaust Victims, and great-good whites must step up to the plate to save Jews from 'new nazis', such as Iranians and anyone who dares to criticize Jewish Power or Zionism. There is also an aspect of white superiority in LGBT stuff, i.e. whites are 'more evolved' than the rest of humanity because they are most enthusiastic about queer culture, therefore whites should guide the world to celebrate homosexuality and trannies. So, feelings of white superiority are made to serve non-whites or to spread Jewish-concocted 'Western Values' via globo-imperialism. (Globo-Homomania is totally the brainchild of Jewish supremacists.) Of course, no one explicitly says whites are superior, but the implication of White-Knight-ism is based on feelings of enlightened superiority. Even 'white guilt' is intrinsically white superiorist in that it judges whites by a higher standard. All of humanity practiced slavery and waged murderous wars. So, why are whites judged more harshly? Because they deemed as higher beings and should have known better. "Oh, how could the white race have done such a thing?" If Arabs, Africans, and Asians did it, oh well, that was because they didn't know any better. But whites? As higher beings, they should have known better.

2. How white equality is used to make whites serve Jews and non-whites. Whites are told that all races are equal or that race is just a fantasy. There is just common humanity, and therefore, it doesn't matter if white world is demographically taken over by non-whites or if whites mix with other races. Whites and non-whites, they are not only equal but virtually the same. It's just humans and more humans. So, whites should welcome mass immigration and be either demographically replaced or miscegenated out of existence; it doesn't matter because whatever happens, it's just humans replacing or mixing with humans. As whites are the global minority, such an attitude would make white world subordinate to or supplanted by non-whites in the long run. What will happen to Europe if 100 millions of black Africans go there? Anyway, white equality as currently understood doesn't bestow white people the equal right to survive as race and culture(as Jews in Israel do). It's not about universal nationalism. Rather, whites must be erased like Palestinians and accept it as a 'good thing' in the name of equality.

3. How white inferiority is used to make whites serve Jews and non-whites. Whites are made to feel that the Other, especially Jews and blacks, are so awesome that whites should worship and serve them. If we go by images than ideas(or idolatry than ideology), the current Western Culture is totally racial supremacist in entertainment and emphasis. Sports, sex entertainment, and music are heavily about black dominance, black power, black prowess, and black whatever. Blacks are so highly prized that even black lies are favored over truth. Take BLM, based on a total lie but a quasi-religion among so many foolish whites. When it comes to sports, diversity has led to something like 'monoversity', or monopolization by one group in a diversified world. California is very diverse with a white minority population, lots of Asians and many more browns, but its sports teams are heavily black. Europe celebrates diversity and has many more Muslims and Asians than in the past, but its sports are turning more and more black, with France leading the way. So, diversity doesn't lead to more diversity at the top but to domination by one group. Today, the typical European Sprint Events have nearly all blacks(representing France, UK, Holland, etc.) 'Monoversity' also results in brainy fields. Technology is an open field in welcoming diverse talents from all over the world, but the top are dominated by Jews/whites, Hindus, and yellows. And finance sector around much of the world is dominated by Jews. It's not about more people having equal possession and control of wealth but about Jews gaining more financial access/control over other nations. Across Southeast Asia, diaspora Chinese dominate much of finance and economics. So, the promise of diversity hasn't led to diversity at the top but a kind of 'monoversity' where more diverse peoples come under the domination of a single or few groups. Globalism promotes diversity as equal opportunity for more diverse peoples, but even if it were truly meritocratic, innate genetic differences turns meritocracy into 'monoversity' of one group or few groups hogging most of the trophies or prizes. But it's actually worse because Jewish Power at the center of globalism rigs the game to favor Jews and their allies/puppets over much of the world(Russia, Iran, Syria, Venezuela, 'uppity' whites who believe whiteness is okay). Domination by meritocracy isn't enough for Jews. They must also rig the game by having the US sanction Russia and Iran(and any nation that does business with them). Also, Jews, who once used to take pride as champions of civil liberties, now use media monopoly, platform monopoly, financial service monopoly, and all kinds of lawyer tricks to shut down speech and discussion that goes against Jewish power and its favored Narratives. At this point, ACLU is just a wing of AIPAC. In a way, equality of opportunity allows for even greater manifestations of racial superiority. Allowing equal opportunity in sports led to black supremacy. Allowing equal opportunity in academia, media, and finance led to Jewish domination. Even as 'anti-racist' whites so often point to black success in sports and music as proof of 'progressive' triumph over white supremacy, they overlook the implications of black supremacy. After all, if blacks totally beat whites in sports, it may disprove white or 'Aryan' supremacy but it also suggests black supremacy, at least in sports. And if blacks are more 'athletic' and rhythmic in their music that excites people, then blacks must have certain advantages in sound & sensuality. What is 'liberal' rock culture but an idolization and imitation of blacks? It's about white sensibility under the spell of black sensuality. Dave Marsh the famous critic always posed as a 'liberal' or even 'leftist' who denounces white 'racism', but his entire worldview can be boiled down to whites should revere blacks because blacks are so much more awesome than whites. There's a book called GOOD BOOTY(by Ann Powers) that seems to be about how whites gained so much from the bouncing black butt. And what is all this Philosemitism about? It's a case of Heil Hillel. If the West is about equality and 'anti-racism', why is its current sacred law, "Thou shalt serve Jews and Zion uber alles, especially Palestinians and Arabs?" It's based on the notion that Jews are so awesome as businessmen, thinkers, entertainers, and etc. that white people should get on their knees and worship and serve the REAL SUPERIOR RACE. In other words, inferior whites should serve superior Jews. Now, how is it possible that white superiority, white equality, and white inferiority, though contradictory with one another, all serve the same purpose? Because 'facts' or assumptions are secondary to the spin they are given. Under current dogma and narrative control, all three modes have been spun to make whites serve the Other, especially Jews and blacks. Heads I win, tails you lose. It's like the story of the Talmudic Rabbi, the goy, and the chimney. Regardless of the scenario or situation, the Jewish guy comes out on top. Different 'facts', but same spin: "Jew is right, goy is wrong" https://aleph.org/resources/the-rabbi-is-in-two-men-come-down-the-same-chimney In Ryunosuke Akutagawa's short story "In the Forest"(basis for Akira Kurosawa's RASHOMON), three people tell three different accounts of the same murder, but in a way, they're telling the same tale as each is driven by ego and vanity. In a similar vein, current whiteness, whether spun as 'superior', 'equal', or 'inferior', is spun to serve Jews and the Other. Whether it's a white knight, white man, or white slave, he exists to protect, welcome, or serve Jews(and their favored allies). Lawyers and pundits know this trick. Whatever the fact, no matter how irrefutable, they spin it to suit their agendas. Whether the truth is white superiority, white equality, or white inferiority, the power of spin is with Jews who spin whiteness around and around to serve Jewish Power. ZIOBOLSHEVIK TAKEOVER; SURVIVAL OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION

Jews are Hypocritical as Universal Moralists but Consistent as Tribal-Nihilist-Supremacists — Jewish Supremacism = Black Supremacism — Palestinian Nakba = White Nakba

https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/hypocrisy-thy-name-is-zion/

Jewish Behavior is hypocritical or consistent depending on how one looks at it.

IF Jewish attitudes claim to be anti-supremacist and if Jews contend that they are championing the cause of downtrodden blacks against White Supremacism, especially as embodied by White Police Brutality, then they are indeed hypocritical, not to mention anti-factual, as there is no white supremacist 'genocide' being carried out against blacks and, furthermore, the racial violence and animus in the US is mainly black-on-white, black-on-non-black, and yes, black-on-black. Still, supposing that most Jews in the US are indeed 'liberal' and 'progressive' and that they're truly invested in the well-being of blacks as a historically oppressed group, one would think they'd have similar sympathies about other unfortunate groups all around the world. You'd think Jews would oppose the West's cruel sanctions against Iran and Syria that have cost so many lives and livelihoods. You'd think Jews would call on the West to distance itself from Saudi Arabia's truly genocidal war in Yemen.
But we don't see or hear any such. Though there are Jewish individuals who condemn Jewish/Zionist abuses, the bulk of Jewish Power and Population are indifferent or even downright hostile to the aforementioned nations and groups that are being destroyed by machinations of the West. Also, most Jews seem oblivious to or totally supportive of Zionism's cruelty and violence toward Palestinians. How could this be IF INDEED most Jews are 'liberal' and 'progressive', for the little guy, the underdog, the wretched of the earth? How could Jews claim to care so much for blacks in the US but then be so uncaring about other non-whites around the world who are truly crushed by the weight of Western Neo-Imperialism? How many unarmed blacks are killed in the US every year? A mere handful, and most of them provoked the police. By comparison, how many Arabs/Muslims have died in the Middle East and North Africa due to Western invasions, occupations, sanctions, and unconditional support for Israel? Too many to count. According to Madeleine Albright, even killing 500,000 Iraqi children was 'worth it'. Where is the Jewish sadness and despair? So, on those grounds, Jews would seem hypocritical. If indeed we conflate the Palestinians with blacks while conflating Jews/Zionists with whites(as the privileged and powerful folks), then Moral Logic would dictate that Jews condemn both White Supremacy over blacks and Jewish Supremacy over Palestinians. The Jewish hypocrisy should be most blatant and blaring.

And yet, Jewish attitude and behavior are consistent if seen within a different context. If we regard Jews as supremacists, then they are being totally consistent, even if publicly dishonest(as they claim to be 'liberal' — in a way, Jewish Liberalism, even where it exists, is founded on a basis totally different from White Liberalism. If White Liberalism is an outgrowth of white power, privilege, security, generosity, conscience, and magnanimity, Jewish Liberalism is an outgrowth of Jewish insecurity, anxiety, paranoia, defensiveness, and tribalism. White Liberalism is based on, "We whites are secure, powerful, and rich enough to make things more equal and fair with other groups", whereas Jewish Liberalism is based on "We Jews must stick together and work to undermine the solidarity of OTHER groups so that we Jews can prosper and gain more power." White Liberalism is about letting go of 'too much' white power, whereas Jewish Liberalism is about accumulating and consolidating more Jewish Power, which is never enough. Same goes for so-called Black Liberalism. Jews and Blacks are fixated on "What's in it for us?" whereas White Liberalism is about "What's in it for OTHER groups?" Now, this was understandable at one time as Christian White Power was truly dominant and there were discriminatory policies, often official in nature, for non-whites. Ideally, the powerful use liberalism to be more fair-minded and generous whereas, naturally, the weak look to liberalism to get a larger share of the pie. But things aren't so simple in our world where Jews are the MOST POWERFUL group in the West and when blacks enjoy so many legal favoritism and are nearly worshiped as a god-race. Indeed, White Liberalism went from one of generosity to one of obeisance. Jewish Demands destroyed whatever had been noble-if-naive about White Liberalism. It used to be White Liberalism tried to be fair to ALL non-white groups, and that included not just blacks and Jews but also Arabs, browns, yellows, and etc. There was a time when America tried to be fairer with the Palestinians. Even though the US fatally threw in its lot with Zionism in 1948, there were attempts by John F. Kennedy, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton to broker some kind of deal for Palestinians. And there was a time when whites were as concerned about the plight of American Indians as about blacks. But as the Power in America shifted from whites to Jews and their main political allies, blacks and homos, the New Dominant Liberalism was less about white fairness to all than white/goy obeisance to Jewish demands, black megalomania, and homo vanity. Liberalism went from ideology based on principles to idolatry based on special identity. As Nancy Pelosi said, even if Washington D.C. burns to the ground, US will be there for Israel. As so many GOP cucks have pledged to AIPAC, they eat, drink, and think for Israel, Israel, Israel. And even as Jewish Power rams Donald Trump in the ass, his main plea is, "Can I suck your dic* that's been up my arse?" It's truly a sad state of affairs.) The CONSISTENCY of the Jewish position on BLM becomes clear when we regard Jewish power as supremacist. What fails as moralism succeeds as nihilism. Indeed, what Jews value about BLM is not that it is a genuine movement for black justice, which it most certainly is not, but that it is a black supremacist position partnered with the supremacist positions of Jews and homos.

Jews control the media and invert the truth into lies. Even though Blacks and Antifa minions, as allies of Jewish Power, destroy the cities, the Jew-run media and outlets push the Narrative of 'White Supremacist' Violence. It goes to show that Jewish Power is ugly and has no sense of honor or integrity. Jews as like gangster-lawyers.

Now, what do all three groups have in common despite their great differences? (Jews and blacks are very different, and if the two groups were placed on an island, they would not get along.) The commonality is their dependence on White Submissivism for them to get their goodies. Without white submission and support, Jews cannot use the West as the vessel for Jewish Hegemony. Without white submission and support, blacks can't have it so good. Indeed, compare blacks in the US with blacks in Africa. Why do all those blacks intend to move to US or EU? Because living with whites is an instant-ticket to a better life. But if, in the past, blacks just hoped to live UNDER whites, they now love lording OVER whites. Even though majority of blacks are economically below that of majority of whites, they enjoy superiority over whites in key ways. As top athletes, they are seen as 'heroes'. As music stars, they are seen as 'divas'. As sexual objects, they are seen as super-studs or super-ho's. And the historical narrative of black slavery, Jim Crow, and etc. makes blacks out to be the only equals of Jews in the White Guilt sweepstakes. (Of course, one could argue that blacks gained more under whites in a few centuries than on their own through the eons and, furthermore, other groups suffered even more under whites — especially the American Indians who lost their homelands forever and experienced something like 'genocide' — , but 'narratives' are not objective accounts but subjective and highly politicized storytelling to push a specific agenda.) So, both Jewish Supremacism and Black Supremacism are invested in belittling, berating, insulting, degrading, threatening, intimidating, and attacking any sign of white identity, white interests, white consciousness, white pride, and white okay-ness as UPPITY.

In a way, the current Jewish-Black attitude toward whites is not unlike that of white slave-masters over black slaves. Blacks were not supposed to be assertive; any black with a noticeable sense of self was deemed 'uppity'. At one time, Jews and blacks may have hoped for white kindness under white domination. Then, they may have hoped for equality with whites. But over the years, they've grown accustomed and addicted to supremacy over whites. In the past, Jews and blacks denounced white supremacist attitudes. Today, they demean ANY kind of white consciousness as 'nazi' or 'supremacist' or something to do with 'white fragility' borne of 'white privilege'. In other words, it's not enough for whites to call for equality among the races. Instead, whites must accept an inferior role vis-a-vis Jews and blacks(and homos). This is why even "It's Okay to be White" or "All Lives Matter" is threatening to Jewish and Black power. (One thing for sure, even most 'liberal' Jews do NOT want white Americans to be equal in their feelings toward Jews and Palestinians or toward Israel and Iran. For Jews, Zionist Lives Matter infinitely more than Arab/Muslim lives, as Madeleine Albright made so clear so eloquently.) Even white call for equality-for-all is deemed as 'uppity' from the perspective of Jewish/Black master-mentality. Whites must accept and celebrate their INFERIORITY before Jews and blacks.

Of course, it's complicated by history. Many Jews and blacks may sincerely believe they are for 'progress' and 'justice' because they'd been historically wronged by the White Christian/Gentile community. Even though things are so different now, the official narrative colors how people see the world around them. It's like Christians took over Europe and did horrible things to pagan heretics, but they kept with their official narrative of Christians being fed to the lions by the Roman pagans. The moral narrative of pagans killing Christians made Christians morally blind to their killing of pagans. (In our time, Antifa goons are blind to their own 'fascistic' behavior because they hunt down 'nazis'.) And even though Christian Europe often kept Jews down, the official Christian Narrative fixated on Jesus, the Son of God, murdered by Jews as a bunch of Judases. People live in the present but 'feel' in the past, or the Official Past as kept alive by the Narrative.
Indeed, this was also why whites in the past were more accepting of black slavery. Even though they knew that slavery went against American Principles, the official narrative of blacks-as-savages-being-elevated-by-white-stewardship sweetened the existence of the ignoble institution. It wasn't merely a case of People A enslaving and exploiting People B but a case of People B being elevated by enlightened enforcement by People A who knew better. Even in the 1960s, the National Review and William F. Buckley opposed the Civil Rights Movement on those grounds: Blacks were NOT READY for full participation in US power because they still had some ways to go in social and cultural advancement. Because Christians fixated on their own history of victimization under Jews and Romans, they became blind to their own supremacist oppression of others. And because of the American Narrative that white folks were creating a new and better world, even the 'genocide' of the American Indians and slavery of blacks seemed partly justified as contributing to the creation of the City on the Hill. Ends would justify the Means. Sure, the Indians had to be pushed aside and blacks would have to pick cotton, but all would benefit from white triumph in the end as, on their own, non-whites would be mired in their own savagery, backwardness, or childishness.

Do white goyim have minds of their own? Jews lead, goyim follow. To be 'educated' and 'informed' in a world of Jewish academia/media control means your minds are just clay to Jewish Hands. So, if Jews say 'gender' is 'fluid', and anyone can be anything, all these rootless and deracinated whites just go along like a bunch of kids believing in Santa and the Tooth Fairy. We laugh at the Middle Ages for ignorance and superstition, but the current era is truly ridiculous. Education = Indoctrination into Jewish Fantasies. 

Incidentally, the power-neuroses of Jews and blacks are different vis-a-vis whites because Jews got too much power whereas blacks feel they got too little. Paradoxically, Jews are more anxious and paranoid especially because they are richer and more powerful than ever. In some ways, such power makes Jews arrogant and confident, but it also makes them fearful that they will be found out and seen(and criticized) as the New Ruling Elites of the US and Empire. Jews want the dominant role but want to remain behind the curtains, much like Jewish Hollywood moguls run the place but use mostly goy actors as the Face of Hollywood. Most of Washington D.C. is like Jewish-run Hollywood with goy politicians as 'actors' reading scripts written by Jewish handlers. The excessive power of Jews has made them both paranoid and arrogant or 'parrogant'. Jews got so much money, control media and big tech, dominate finance, own Las Vegas, and control much of real estate. They dominate elite academia and think tanks that mold both elite minds and mass mentalities.

In contrast, blacks are especially bitter because they feel they don't have the wealth, power, and privilege that should be rightfully theirs as the superior race. Blacks don't care about equality and justice for all. If they did, why would they burn down the businesses and properties of immigrant groups, many of whom are not white, whenever "there's a riot going on"? Why do blacks join the US military when it invades and destroys other nations? How many blacks are like Muhammad Ali during the Vietnam War when he said, "Viet Cong didn't call me no ni**er"? Most blacks don't mind serving in the US military as long as they get money and promotions. Blacks don't care about non-blacks, and blacks don't care for socialism. Blacks make 'socialist' noises not because they want equality but because they are resentful that not all blacks can live like Obama, Oprah, and rich rappers. Blacks feel that they be the kangz, and therefore, everything should be given to them-as-natural-royalty. Blacks got the Meghan Markle Mentality. Even as she makes noises about 'justice', she married a prince and lives like a pig. If blacks are truly socialist, they should be denouncing rich blacks, but they can't get enough of other blacks having all the blings, mansions with swimming pools, limos, and the like. The problem is blacks succeed most in fields where ONLY A FEW can win. Sports is winner-takes-all. In pop entertainment, only a handful make all the dough while the rest barely make a living performing at small clubs. For every successful rapper or actor, there are countless others with nothing. Blacks have done well in government, but at the uppermost echelons, they serve as tokens to Jews, homos, and even white cucks.
The childish black mentality, being fixated on song-dong-strong-wrong, feels that blackness is the greatest thing in the world that should be revered and served by all other races, but black weakness in brainy fields keeps them far behind others who succeed in science, math, law, technology, medicine, business, and etc. ('Song-dong-strong-wrong' or SDSW refers to black fixation on rappers, sex, sports, and the narrative.) Now, the reasons for black failures in certain key fields is due to genetics and culture. Blacks are generally less intelligent and more impulsive. Also, black culture emphasizes acting the fool. But, black egotism or Negrotism makes it difficult for most blacks to be like Jesse Lee Peterson and reflect on the possibility that maybe not all black problems are due to 'dem honk*y-ass mothafuc*az'. So, even though most blacks die from black violence, everything is blamed on whitey. And of course, Jews encourage this by coming up with terms like 'systemic racism' — never mind the biggest form of 'systemic racism' in US is the unconditional support of Israel and turning a blind eye to every black degeneracy; black problem is more endemic than systemic, i.e. blackity-ness is inherent in blacks and makes them more impulsive, aggressive, funky, and jivey in a manner that isn't conducive to modern society. Something in the black gene pool makes them feel more along the lines of 'sheeeeeeeiiiiiit'.

In the Current West, the group that is most criminal and destructive, the blacks, are revered as paragons of  justice. The group that is most vapid and vain, the homos, are worshiped as 'spiritual' agents. And the group that is most supremacist and corrupt, the Jews, are praised as wise men. But then, in a world when men can claim to be 'women' and where marriage is a celebration of homo-fecal penetration and tranny-penis cutting, what else is new? 

Now, why do Jews encourage such blackity-ness? Why do Jews tell blacks to blame it all on whitey? Is it because Jews really care about blacks? Now, some Jewish women got jungle fever, and some Jewish guys make big bucks off black sports, music, sex, and comedy. But, privately, many Jews fear blacks and know the 'schvartzes are crazy'. But Jews go along with the Jewish-Black alliance charade because it's good for the Narrative and Maintenance of Jewish Supremacism over whites. While there is the Holocaust Narrative, which is mostly about 'white guilt', it is bolstered by White Guilt about Blacks. Besides, having blacks as symbolic allies gives moral cover to what Jews have done to Arabs and Muslims. As Jews love to say, MLK was pro-Zionist and friends with Jews. So, that settles it! Ironically, the more Jews treat Palestinians the way whites once treated blacks in the past in the US South and South Africa, the more they cling to blacks as symbolic allies. Jim Crowitz in West Bank and neo-imperialist violence in Gaza are given moral cover by Jews emoting about Emmett Till for the umpteenth time.

Though the Narrative is victimological in nature, it is to give moral support to Jewish Supremacism in the Present. By making Jews and their black allies into Eternal Moral Paragons who suffered under 'antisemitism' and 'racism', it has become nearly impossible to criticize those two groups and put them under any kind of fair-minded scrutiny. Why, that would be 'antisemitic' or 'racist', the two greatest sins in the present(along with 'homophobia')!! Just like the peons couldn't criticize kings and noblemen, whites as neo-peons cannot criticize Jews and blacks. When a group cannot be criticized, it is enjoying a supremacist position in society. Of course, Jews get richer while many blacks become even poorer, but Power isn't about most people but about the elites exploiting symbolism to gain more power for themselves. It's like the communist 'dictatorship of the proletariat' didn't mean the actual proles got the power. They remained peons while the intellectual class ruled as representatives of the Workers of the World; they were like the pigs in ANIMAL FARM. So, Jews don't care about most blacks. Deep down inside, most Jews know that black problems are intractable because of black genetics. The only thing that matters is Jews preserving their own supremacist power by radicalizing the politics of 'white guilt'. By blaming 'systemic racism', Jews make blacks and white cucky-wucks fixate on White Evil as the source of all problems. This means blacks(and Jews and homos) get to make more demands on whites while whites must keep groveling and wash/kiss the stinking feet of Negroes. Jews and blacks make-believe that Fentanyl Floyd was some kind of a saint, and white cucks get on their knees and go boo-hoo-hoo and cry like babies while babbling, "Saint George, I wish you were alive so I could kiss your sacred black ass."

In the Current West where Jews control the media, whore-politicians, think-tanks, and internet platforms(that censor people for speaking the truth), 'reality' is whatever Jews say it is. We are all like Palestinians trapped in a Jewish Supremacist version of Alice in Wonderland.

Of course, unlike the situation of Palestinians, blacks in the US are not facing any kind of racial violence. If anything, the police, especially white ones, are extra-mindful not to mistreat blacks lest there be another riot. Also, if blacks are getting gunned down, it's by other blacks who are into gangsta culture, egotism, and drug trade. As blacks know they are stronger and tougher than other races, the interracial violence is usually black-on-non-black, even against Jews, but Jewish Power overlooks black-on-Jewish violence to maintain what they deem to be far more crucial to the perpetuation of Jewish Supremacism: White Obeisance fueled by 'white guilt', especially regarding blacks. So, it's the Jewish Gambit: Indulge black stupidity and destructiveness, which even harms Jews on occasion, to make blacks blame Evil Whitey, therefore keeping whites morally ashamed and browbeaten(and redemptive and 'saved' ONLY WHEN they revere and serve the Other).
If Jews and whites were to pool their resources to be honest about the Black Problem, blacks might come under pressure to behave better and wreak less havoc, but it would also mean the ebbing away of 'white guilt', and that would mean whites would be more assertive of their own identity, leading to whites asking, "Why should we whites be subservient to Jewish identity and interests when we have our own?" That is what Jews fear most, and so, they carry on with the politics of black lunacy and stuff like 1619 Project, Emmett-Till-Forever, and BLM propaganda to keep whites feeling morally paralyzed with 'guilt'. Of course, such has the added advantage of steering black rage from Jewish Power to 'white privilege'. It's like Jewish Power pushed the Russia-Russia-Russia Narrative to distract Americans from the fact that the main 'alien' interference in US politics is Jewish Globalist Power.

Many on the Real Left tend to think in terms of Blacks = Palestinians / Whites = Zionist Jews. But most Jews in supremacist mode see it differently: Whites = Palestinians / Jews = Blacks.
Just like the existence of Israel as a Jewish-Supremacist State depends on Jewish domination over Palestinians and Arabs/Muslims cowering in fear or accepting of inferior roles, the continuation of Jewish Supremacism in the West depends on white submission, obeisance, and inferiority.
In the Middle East, Jews send a clear message to Palestinians that the latter is a subject people who must do as the Jews say. Jews constantly bomb Syria and threaten Iran. And Jews use their control of the US to pressure key Arab nations like Saudi Arabia and UAE to suck up to Israel. And of course, the Arabs/Muslims are too divided among themselves to unite against Jewish Supremacism. Saudi Arabia is anti-Iran, not anti-Israel.
In the West, Jews use their media, legal, financial, and political power to send a message to whites, "If you don't kiss our Jewish ass, you are toast." Also, Jews use the 'spiritual' power of the Narrative to tag whiteness with forever-holocaust-guilt and forever-slavery-guilt. Whites who strive for individual success and status play along and go along. And their children come under Jewish influence via media and academia. No wonder then that so many young whites are going boo-hoo about Fentanyl Floyd as one of the greatest saints of all time. And like the Arabs/Muslims, whites are so divided along 'liberal' and 'conservative' lines, though to be sure, the feckless and craven 'conservatives' are useless while the 'liberal' ones, for all their anti-supremacist rhetoric, seem invested in the elevation of only three groups at the expense of all else: Jews, blacks, and homos. Has any bunch of 'liberals' painted their streets with 'Palestinian Lives Matter' or held up placards with 'End Wars for Israel and Say NO to Zionist Genocide of Palestinians'?

Of course, in the Age of PC, to be 'educated' means to be indoctrinated in the superstitious voodoo of Holy Jew-Worship, Globo-Homo Celebration, and Magic Negro Idolatry. Critical Thinking is dead in media and academia. There is only mindless regurgitation of 'woke' cliches.

Jews and blacks share in their supremacist attitudes toward whites, and that's why, despite essential differences between them, they are natural allies AS LONG AS they live in a white majority nation. In an island with only Jews and blacks, they would NOT get along. Jews feel superior for being brainier than whites, blacks feel superior for being brawnier than whites. And both have staked their collective identities on the Narrative of Evil Whitey. Polls show that for most Jews, the Shoah is what defines them most in the 'spiritual' sense. And blacks, increasingly even in Europe and Africa, center their identity on the American Experience(as if savagery, slavery, and other horrors didn't exist in black Africa). Black African Immigrants in the US immediately adopt the Black American attitude of victimization(even though their own ancestors captured and sold black slaves to whites and Arabs); black African actors take up roles as historic American blacks. Black Africans listen to rap and pick up Black American attitudes about Whitey. And blacks in Europe assimilate less to European values and culture than to Black American ones based on rap music, gangsta culture, and the evil of 'white racism', esp of the KKK kind. But then, even white European values of late are parallels or reflections of white American cuckery to blacks, homos, and Jews. The current Irish are like a bunch of globo-homo 'whiggers' invested in remaking Ireland into Afro-Homo-Diversitopia. They have little sense of Irish history, culture, or values except for being lame. U2 songs might as well be anthems of New Ireland.

So, when Jews feel that both whites and Palestinians must be morally browbeaten and even physically beaten to keep them intimidated and submissive to Jewish Domination, there is great consistency in the Art of Jewish Supremacism. The truly outrageous hypocrisy and even greater stupidity are with whites who are treated like Palestinians by Jewish Power but identify far more with Jews than with Palestinians. Likewise, so many white 'conservatives' are so anti-socialist and pro-capitalist when it is the Jewish-dominated capitalist class that is so heavily invested in anti-white vitriol, anti-white campaigns, anti-nationalism, anti-populism, anti-tradition, anti-morality, anti-normality, and etc. While whites should reject communism, it would make more sense than ever for whites to adopt a nationalist version of social-democracy. White 'conservatives' are so dumb because they (1) abandoned all socialist principles and (2) were abandoned by the capitalist class that is for LGBT, BLM, ADL, and SPLC. If at least white conzos gave up all vestiges of socialism in exchange for support from the capitalist rich, it wouldn't be so bad. But whites gave up social-democracy and state power only to be insulted, demeaned, deplatformed, and blacklisted by Big Capital also. Given the nature of Jewish Power and its influence on Big Capital and Elite Institutions, the vast majority of whites would have done better with a nationalist version of social-democracy — without the nationalist element, Social-Democracy turns into worthless cuckery of Sweden and Minnesota — and with identifying with Palestinians who've been resisting Jewish Power since the great tragedy of Nakba. But even as whites face White Nakba, the great majority of them from Donald Trump to some MAGA-hat wearing 'white trash' are into "Muh Israel" and "Socialism sucks".

Behind the facade of Jewish Moral Hypocrisy, there is the consistency of Jewish Supremacism. And it plays it smart, which is why it wins against the Great White Stupidity that still favors capitalism over socialism and favors Jews/Zionists over Palestinians/Syrians/Iranians.

Jews as moralists are a total fraud. Jewish morality, unlike white morality, is almost never about "Did we do something wrong to others?" but invariably about "How OTHERS wronged us." True morality is about both being wronged and doing wrong. Jews only fixate on being wronged, all the while fixating on what wrongs whites and Arabs/Muslims did to Jews. Same with Russian History. Jews will go on and on about the pogroms and 'antisemitism' but hardly discuss Jewish role in Bolshevism and 1990s pirate-capitalism that destroyed countless Slavic and other lives. True morality requires consistency. If group A does something and if it is bad, it is also bad when group B does it. But according to Jewish morality, apartheid policy was wrong in South Africa but is A-Okay in West Bank. Israeli Police can use any amount of brute force against Palestinians, but the US police is to be condemned for 'racism' even when blacks are in the wrong. Also, when Stop-and-Frisk was used in Jewish-dominated NY to bring down crime rates, Jews were hardly outraged. But the same Jews were throwing fits about what happened to Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, even though it was 'gentle giant' Brown who attacked the white police officer. Jewish morality is that of crooked lawyers and card sharks. It is worthless.

But Jews aren't realists either. Realism has problems, and some see it as a form of gangsterism in its Machiavellian extremes. But in a world where so many nations and peoples, the West included, often overlook or violate the rules(or where agreed-upon enforceable rules hardly exist), people must be pragmatic and realistic on grounds of "what's in it for us?" For example, US foreign policy should forsake utopian dreams for the world, especially when US itself has tons of failings and problems. But to play this game of realism, the US must be honest with itself and the world. Honest, that is the saving grace of realism. Oftentimes, a honest gangster is easier to deal with than a hypocritical sermonizer. But even that isn't possible in the US because national interest and the majority no longer matter. The question is never about what is good for America as a nation or for Most Americans because US is Jewish Supremacist and Jews make up only 2% of US population. Just like India under British Imperialism could not be about "What is good for most Indians?" as the priority was "What was good for the British Empire?", the US cannot hope for any kind of realist policy as the politics, finance, and military are all fixated on "Is it great for Jewish Supremacist Power?"

Under this conditions, any white person, even if on the Dissident Right, is useless UNLESS he makes White Liberation from Jewish Supremacism the primary goal of white folks, especially by exposing the true extent of Jewish Power and condemning all forms of Jewish supremacist hatred, arrogance, and murderousness, especially against Palestinians, Syrians, and Iranians. What has cucking to Jewish Power ever done for White Americans? "Cuck! What is it good for? Absolutely Nothing." Denazification will end when whites push for De-Zionazification. Whites must push back and dig into all the dirty laundry of the Jews and their history. Fight fire with Fire. Against White Nakba, whites need the policy of White Mitzvah. Hunt down Jewish criminals, Jewish gangsters, Jewish supremacist killers. And expose all that is evil and dirty about Jewish Power.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/1LjdeEnFOt1b/

Unlike Classic Marxism, the Current 'Socialism' is NOT about Class Conflict but about the Special Primacy of Jews, Blacks, and Homos — Current 'Socialism' is more about Resentment of the Educated Class than Needs of the Workers of the World

Political Correctness and 'wokeness' have been associated with socialism-communism, but they are now more like Judeo-Nazism with Maoist hysterics about the supremacy of blacks and sanctity of homos. Under communism, the worst possible label was 'bourgeois', and so, anything deemed bad, heretical, or false was deemed 'bourgeois' even if it had nothing to do with the actual historical bourgeoisie. When communists attacked other communists, they accused the other being 'bourgeois'. During the Sino-Soviet Rift, the Soviets belittled Maoism as a 'petite-bourgeois' theory, and the Chinese predictably denounced Soviet Union as 'bourgeois revisionist'. (Marxists also dismissed the Iranian Revolution as 'bourgeois'.) So, 'bourgeois' became an all-encompassing term of excoriation against anything deemed undesirable or threatening to the ruling regime or communist hack-intellectuals. It was like all sides in Christian Europe accused their enemies of being agents of the Devil. "God was on OUR side" while the Other Side was tainted with Devil-worship EVEN IF they all worshiped the same God.

Still, the emphasis on the 'bourgeoisie' as the source of all evils — even Fascism and National Socialism were theorized as mere byproducts of bourgeois capitalism, i.e. the rich class recruited faux-revolutionary thugs to protect its property from the communists and workers as vanguards of the True Revolution — makes it clear that Marxism believed class conflict to be the central issue deciding history and morality. The worst evil in the world was class oppression because it was diagnosed to be the source of all other evils. As Karl Marx said, so-called antisemitism is the cause of class conflict: Because Jews are so maniacal about money, capitalism fuels their insatiable greed, and this leads to Jews acting badly and goyim feeling resentful of Jewish wealth and abuses. Therefore, the ONLY way to get rid of 'antisemitism' and other forms of bigotry is to bring about a communist revolution that would make for a classless society of equality. That way, Jews and Goyim will be comrades, brothers and sisters, under the sun. According to classic Marxism, as long as capitalism exists and bourgeois factors create class divisions, it will lead to other forms of divisions as well. One reason will owe to some groups being more adept at business and extraction; they are more clever that way and gain dominance over other less acquisitive groups. The other reason will be the rich and powerful will exploit racial and cultural differences as a divide-and-rule mechanism. Yet, another reason will be that the masses of proles will be too overworked, under-educated, and beastly in a system of dog-eat-dog capitalism to rise above crude tribalism. Ultimately, the real source of all such bigotries was economic injustice. Make people equal in property and education, and they will appreciate one another more as fellow humans. Marx was convinced that, while Jews may gain great wealth under capitalism, they will always be hated. (Ironically, Jews came to be regarded with greater suspicion in the Soviet Union while they came to be much praised in the capitalist US. American Capitalism, having a less darker history than the European counterpart, may have been a factor. American cult of freedom has been more meritocratic and extols the Winner, especially because of the mythos that ANYONE can succeed. Jews certainly won big. But it also owes to the fact that Jews took over much of the academia and media & entertainment and elevated the Shoah to a quasi-religion and made 'racism', especially against Jews and blacks, the worst possible sin — badmouthing Arabs, Iranians, and Palestinians is perfectly fine.)

Anyway, if capitalism said ANYONE, regardless of race or creed, can become gloriously rich, communism said ANYONE, regardless of race or culture, can be made evil by greed and money. Capitalism said it's great that a Jew or a Christian can become rich. Communism said it's sad that both a Jew and a Christian can be corrupted by money. Marxism didn't spare the Jews. While Marx lamented antisemitism, he didn't regard Jews as innocent pure-as-snow angels who were hated for irrational reasons. He believed they were hated for rational and material reasons: Capitalism brought out the worst aspects of Jewish Character as molded through history(of money-making). So, the only workable compromise between Goyim and Jews was for goyim to drop their resentment on grounds that Jews will forsake their greed. Only then as comrades could Jews and all kinds of goyim get along.

Because Antifa types and other so-called 'leftists' claim to be socialist or even communist — and because so many on the Right love to draw parallels between Marxism/Maoism and current PC madness in the West — , one would think Old Communism is back in force. But actually, so-called Antifa, though claiming to be anti-fascist, is oddly closer in spirit to Nazism that put Race at the center of its worldview. Unlike Marxism that said ANY PEOPLE, both Jews and Goyim, can become corrupted by money and power, the current PC insists that the problems of power is almost always about 'white supremacism'. So, it doesn't matter how rich Jews are, how successful blacks are, how well-off non-whites are. The problem is always about 'whiteness'. If some whites are exempted from total abuse, it is only because they funnel lots of money toward PC to appease the beast. According to PC, a poor white person who holds an American flag and doesn't hate himself & his race is a greater evildoer than super-rich whites like Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates who fund PC causes.
As for Jews, blacks, homos, and certain non-white groups, it doesn't matter how rich they are. (Latin American whites are also exempt from the worst of abuse.) You are GOOD simply because you're Jewish, black, homo, or etc. But if you're white(and straight), it doesn't matter how many hardships you face. It doesn't matter if you've been attacked by blacks or fleeced by Jews. You SUCK because you're white.

The notion of 'racism' change from one's attitudes to one's innate character. It went from mutable to immutable. It went from an attitude that anyone can have, borne of ignorance and meanness, to a condition that certain groups are born with, regardless of their attitude. So, you can be a hateful Jew or nasty Negro, but you're hardly 'racist'. You can be a Zionist Jew pushing all kinds of wars in the Middle East to destroy countless Arab/Muslim lives, but that's okay. Jews can dehumanize Russians and white Christians, and that's cool too. And, blacks can do thug-talk, threaten other races, attack other groups, and indulge in all sorts of hateful rhetoric. But no matter what they do, it's always contextualized as 'resistance against systemic racism', that is UNLESS blacks badmouth Jews and homos.
In contrast, if you're white, you are 'racist'(or tainted with the white mark of cain) no matter how much you try to be fair with rest of humanity. Indeed, the reason why white Antifa types are so soul-damaged is they indulge in an insane kind of self-hatred. They've internalized Jewish PC so much that they believe it's no longer sufficient for whites to reject 'racist' hatred against non-whites. Rather, whites must actively hate their own race as innately tainted with the 'original sin' of 'racism'. Thus, White Antifa is less about anti-hatred than pro-hatred-against-the-self. (Of course, Jewish leaders of Antifa happily promote such attitude among their white dolt comrades.)
If Antifa is truly communist, socialist, or Marxist, it should focus mostly on economic issues. In regarding the 'bourgeois' elements as the source of all inequality and evil, they would condemn ALL forms of power, wealth, and privilege. They would hate Barack Obama who's approaching a billion dollars in personal wealth. They should be denouncing Tim Cook and other fancy-pants homos who do the bidding of oligarchs and the deep state. Karl Marx did just this. Though of Jewish origin, he lambasted Jewish capitalists as among the worst bourgeois elements. But no such is heard from current Antifa and of course BLM. Their worldview is essentially racial-supremacist in that good or evil is really a matter of one's identity. So, it doesn't matter what Jews, blacks, or homos do or how much wealth they have and how much privilege they enjoy. They are wonderful and good simply because of their vaunted identities. In contrast, it doesn't matter how difficult one's situation is as a white person; it doesn't matter how much he or she tries to be good and fair-minded. He or she is bad, even 'white supremacist', simply because he or she is white or, worse, refuses to hate himself/herself.

How ironic that Jews who support Antifa as anti-fascist and anti-'racist', a means to expose and hunt down 'nazis' and 'white supremacists', are now the main purveyors of something like a Neo-Nazi outlook. Jewish Power pushes a certain racial essentialism. Jews are forever to be 'essentialized' as the Holocaust People, or Holochs. So, even when Jews act like Nazis and abuse Palestinians, Jews are a bunch of Anne Franks while Palestinians might as well be the 'nazis'. In the most perverse way, Jews have used the narrative of victimization under supremacist Nazis to justify a kind of moral nihilism for Jews, i.e. because Jews suffered so much, they are forever wise, and therefore, everything done by Jews must be grand! In other words, Jews invoke 'Never Again' against the evils of Nazism to act like a bunch of Judeo-Nazis. Just ask the Palestinians.
And blacks are to be 'essentialized' forever as a bunch of Emmett Tills when, in fact, so many black thugs roam the streets and terrorize people worse than the KKK ever did. If Jews really care about humanity, why are they most angry with Donald Trump when he wants to de-escalate wars in the Middle East? Why have the likes of Thomas Friedman praised ISIS as the wreckers of Assad's Syria? If Jews are really against 'racism', why are they perfectly fine with Trump and Pompeo's most blatant form of racial bigotry: the mindless support of Zionist imperialism against Palestinians and other Arabs? And if Jews are opposed to racial essentialism, why do they create TV shows that feature Jews and blacks as noble simply for what they are, whereas whites are villains because it's in the nature of whites to be 'racist' and 'supremacist'?
Jews fool a lot of people by claiming to condemn 'white supremacism', but the notion that some groups are incorrigibly 'racist' whereas other groups, such as Jews and blacks, are always 'anti-racist' is essentially supremacist. A truly anti-supremacist view would argue that ANY group, given the circumstances, could be supremacist. It was certainly the case with Romans and Germanic barbarians. When Romans were on top, they could lord over the Germanics with supremacist arrogance. But when the empire fell apart and the Germanic barbarians rampaged through Rome, who were the supremacist overlords?

Any honest person would admit the current US is animated by Jewish Supremacism, especially in foreign policy and historical memory. When Jews are remembered only as victims of the Shoah but not as perpetrators of mass killings of others, it's like remembering white history only in terms of what American Indian savages did to white settlers but not what the white invaders did to the Native Tribes. And how can BLM be anything but a form of supremacism when it pretends that even obvious black thugs and degenerates are saintly victims of white supremacism while totally overlooking all the anti-white violence carried out by deranged blacks? When blacks rioted and looted, carrying out modern-day pogroms, the Jewish-run media didn't care about the victims because they were white or non-blacks. (While some Jews were negatively affected too, Jewish Power saw it as a gambit to bring down Trump America. One step backward for Jews for three steps forward for Jewish Power.) Indeed, the Jewish PC Narrative mirrors the peculiar manner of Jewish remembrance of Russian History. Jews never let us forget about the Slavic pogroms against Jews but suppress all discussion of Jewish role in Bolshevik violence that literally destroyed millions of lives. In other words, pogroms were worse because thousands of Jews were affected because, of course, a single Jewish life has more value than a million Slavic lives. It's a form of JLM or "Jewish Lives Matter MORE than Slavic lives", especially if the Slavs were slaughtered at the behest of Jewish communist henchmen.

At the very least, because communism identified economic injustice and class oppression as the true source of evil, any group could be condemned for being 'bourgeois'. While the Soviet Union forbade antisemitism, an ethno-racial animus against Jews, it attacked Jewish capital as well as goy capital. So, even though Jews were protected as communists, they could be destroyed like anyone else as capitalists. So, Jews could be good(communist) or bad(capitalist). But according to current Identity Politics of PC ideology, Jews are never bad or wrong. Jews can be Liberal Zionists or Neocons; both are great. Jews can be socialist or capitalist; both are super. Jews are great no matter what they do. Both GOP and Democratic Party expend most of their energies in flattering and appeasing Jews. Democrats will denounce white conservatism but praise Neocons. Republicans will denounce white liberalism but praise Liberal Zionists. Jews are exempt from all blame. Donald Trump was dragged through the mud by Jewish Power, but his main message is "I Luv Israel, and I Kiss Jewish Butt." And in the recent riots, black thuggery and violence were celebrated by Democrats and unopposed by Republicans. Even as cities burned, Trump was sucking up to blacks and making Fentanyl Floyd into a saint-angel.

This is so unlike Marxism or communism where any group, any nationality, or any race could face moral censure and condemnation for evils. Current PC is more like Nazism because it's about the racial supremacism of Jews and blacks(with special honors for Homos). It says certain groups(Jews, blacks, and homos) are infallible, while whites are intrinsically tainted(no matter what they do or say). Sadly, whites brought this upon themselves because they've enabled the current state of affairs. Whites grovel to Jews who demean them most. Whites also hurt those who face the same kind of hatred from Jews. Given Jewish vitriol and venom against whites, the logical thing would be for whites to side with other targets of Jewish hatred. Whites should be main allies with Russia and Iran; whites should be shouting, "Palestine is our greatest ally." But whites, as politicians, preachers, tax-payers, and soldiers, go out of their way to do the bidding of Jews in destroying other victims of Jewish Power. So, even as Jewish Power clobbers Trump and his white Christian Base, they are enabling the total destruction of Palestine. It'd be like Poles sucking up to Nazi Germany even as Germans push them around. It's truly a disgusting sight.

Whatever socialism that remains among the American 'Left' is NOT about the workers. If American 'leftists' really cared about the Power of Labor, it would call for end of immigration which has a scab-effect on Big Labor. They would also support policies that encourage more blacks toward productive work. But the American 'left' condemned welfare reform under Billy Boy Clinton because it 'heartlessly' put conditions on blacks to find some kind of useful employment. American 'left' doesn't care for workers or labor. What goes by the name of 'socialism' in most places is the demand for more freebies for parasites. Indeed, most 'leftists' and so-called 'progressives' look down on most jobs as demeaning and dirty for 'losers'. They don't want to pick up the shovel. They want to use pens. They want the government to produce more 'clean' jobs for bureaucrats, officials, operatives, instructors, activists, coordinators, managers, and the like. They want to be busy doing nothing in bogus jobs that make them feel they are 'saving the planet', 'working for progress', 'raising consciousness', 'fighting hatred', and etc. Over the years, more people got college degrees, but most degrees outside practical fields like science, technology, medicine, and the like are pretty useless. What good are most 'liberal arts' degrees or 'humanities' degrees, let alone degrees in Women's Studies, Black Studies, Gender Studies, and most social sciences? Out of college, all these people with fancy-pants college degrees realize their future is working for Starbucks and serving coffee to people who make lots of money in high tech, medicine, entertainment, finance, and the like. (And those with secure government jobs do pretty well.) And this breeds resentment among many of the educated. Thus, current 'socialism' is not about the proletariat or the working class at war with the rich; rather, it's about college-educated Starbucks workers feeling resentful about having to serve expensive coffee to their much more successful peers who specialized in practical fields like technology or money management. These 'socialists' don't feel any sense of camaraderie with the Workers of the World whom they regard as 'losers of the world'. They don't lose sleep over wage-slaves toiling in Asia to make Nike shoes. If anything, they want the hip and fashionable lifestyles enjoyed by the yupsters, or yuppie-hipsters who work for companies like Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Wall Street firms. In a way, they feel more deserving of the good life because they majored in more 'meaningful' fields like arts, culture, and ideas whereas their more successful 'shallow' peers only care about making money. And yet, they are gravitated to the world of privilege; their dream is to live in a fancy condo, be surrounded by books and music, and attend cocktail parties. But only a handful of people who majored in arts/culture/ideas get to attain privileged slots in society.

Still, given the resentment against the successful, you'd think the current 'socialists' would be most passionately anti-rich. But despite their rhetoric about the 99% vs the 1%, their main passions are for the holy three of Jews, blacks, and homos(and sometimes 'diversity'), while their main ire is directed at 'white supremacism', 'racism'(that means speaking truthfully about blacks), 'homophobia'(that means refusal to celebrate 'gay pride'), and 'nazism'(that means anyone hated by Jews is a 'nazi' who must be punched and destroyed).
Of course, being anti-rich while being mindlessly pro-Jewish makes no sense because Jews are, by far, the richest people in the world. For one to say that excess wealth is evil but then claim that Jews are above criticism is, for all practical purposes, anti-socialist. If Jews, the richest people on Earth, cannot be condemned, it means Jewish Wealth must be protected. And being pro-'gay' is also antithetical to socialism because homos are naturally vain, narcissistic, elitist, and fancy-pants aristo. While there have been some homos on the Real Left, homo nature tends toward catering to the rich, privileged, and the fancy crowd. Once 'socialism' is associated with homo-celebration, Mayday turns into Gayday, which is precisely why rich Jews and the oligarchy(even in the GOP) pushed the homo agenda so far.
Also, celebration of Jews and homos can only be a kind of elite-minority-supremacism. While some minorities are poor and powerless, some are rich and powerful, much more so than the great majority. In the US, almost nothing is said of the plight of American Indians or Muslim-Americans(especially of Palestinian backgrounds), the powerless minorities. Jews and homos, as minority-ruling-elites, count for much more; they are akin to the British Imperialist minority elites in India or the white-Jewish minority elite in Old South Africa.
As for blacks, yes, it's true that many are mired in poverty and backwardness. But blacks are also oppressors as street thugs, predators, criminals, and bullies. It's been said that comedians should punch up than down, but it's not like all members of the group are either up or down. While some whites are above blacks, some whites are below blacks. While rich whites live in communities totally safe from black criminality, other whites are constantly attacked by black thuggery. Just because one bunch of whites are above blacks doesn't mean ALL blacks are above them. Some whites are below blacks. But in Jewish-controlled US, there is this crazy notion that ALL whites are privileged with supremacist power while ALL blacks are oppressed. It's like ALL Jews are forever Holocaust Survivors or something whereas ALL Russians, despite having suffered tragically from Jewish Bolshevism and Jewish gangster-capitalism(in the 1990s and even today under international sanctions), are forever tagged with blame for the pogroms.

What can be done to save the West? It must go Cold Turkey with the truth. And white people have no one to blame but themselves unless they speak the obvious truth: That the West is now Jewish Supremacist and that 'white supremacism' is just smoke-and-mirrors cooked up by Jewish Power to distract people from the fact that the modus operandi is "Is it great for Jewish Supremacism?" Then and only then can whites work toward White Liberation whereupon whites will be telling Jewish Power, "I don't want to work on Maggie's Farm no more." This will not only be great for whites but for all victim peoples of Jews, such as the Palestinians, Iranians, and Russians. White Racial Disobedience and Resistance to Jewish Supremacism will mean No More Wars for Israel & Zion and no more use of white energies to spread the 'ghaspel'(the ghastly gospel) of Globo-Homo and Afro-Mania around the world. The White Bridges used to spread Jewish Supremacism(and its proxies) around the world must be blown up. If whites resist, the rest of the world will take inspiration and follow suit. If whites cuck and submit to Jewish Supremacism, the rest of the world will do the same. This is the special place whites have in the world. Though the West is Jewish-supremacist and Jewish-dominated, Jewish Power feeds on white submission and obedience. White behavior vis-a-vis Jewish Power serves as the template for all the world. So, if whites suck up to Jews and worship globo-homo-BLM craziness, other races will do likewise. But if whites finally say NO and stand up to Jewish supremacist perfidy, others around the world will also get the message and toss away the shackles. Whites no longer have the power of rule, but they still have the choice between submission and liberation to the rule. And what whites do will determine the direction of history.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lQzSILxdgCOq/

Commentary on "John Wayne Did Nothing Wrong"(by Jim Goad)

https://www.takimag.com/article/john-wayne-did-nothing-wrong/

Judging by today’s crazy standards on ‘gender’ issues, just about every actor, artist, director, and etc. in the not-too-distant past was a ‘homophobe’ and definitely a ‘transphobe’. Or, more accurately, 'homo-disdainer' and 'trans-ridiculer'. Even 90% of Liberals in the 60s thought homosexuality was deeply problematic. Even most Liberal publications dared not to broach the subject. Psychology department was convinced homosexuality is a mental disorder. Susan Sontag's piece on Camp was controversial(even in an ultra-liberal magazine like PARTISAN REVIEW) because it discussed homosexuality. So, there was nothing strange about what John Wayne said on that issue.

As for Wayne’s ‘white supremacist’ view that blacks need to undergo further civilizational process before fully partaking of democracy, is it really all that outrageous? After all, how is it all that different from Samuel Huntington's theory that Third World nations would do better to undergo process of modernization under iron-fisted Enlightened Autocrats before gradually transforming into functional democracies? If anything, even many Liberal political scholars came to the same conclusion. Many social scientists and political scholars came to believe that sudden democratization can actually do more harm than good among peoples who are as yet culturally and economically unprepared to take on burdens of electoral politics(that can only work with rule of law and civic responsibility). Such dictator-supremacist theory became quite vogue in political science departments. That is why many came to appreciate Deng over Gorbachev following the implosion of the Soviet Union. Deng maintained Party supremacy and worked on economic development, whereas Gorbachev favored political reforms. Russia did even worse in the 90s when it fully went ‘liberal democratic’ without the institutions and attitudes necessary for a functional liberal democracy. And after the Rwandan disaster, the West enthusiastically supported the iron-fisted autocrat that kept tight order in that troubled nation.
Denial of democracy in such nations doesn’t seem to bother Westerners. Indeed, Obama aided Egyptian military against democracy headed by Muslim Brotherhood. The idea was that Military supremacism was better than democracy in a nation that was, as yet, not ready for democracy and freedom. Also, after the debacles of Iraq and Libya, many(on both left and right) came to the conclusion that some nations are better off under the supremacism of an Iron-fisted leader than with experiments in ‘liberal democracy’. While democracy may be ideal for modern nations, not all nations and peoples have the values, habits, knowledge, and developmental levels to make democracy work. They just aren't cut out for it. In such cases, iron rule is often preferable to democracy. Indeed, that was precisely why Fidel Castro’s Cuba got favorable press from American Progressives during the Cold War. They admitted he was a dictator and that Cuban politics was about One-Party Supremacy, but they also emphasized that Cubans were better off under a tough ruler than many people in willy-nilly Latin American democracies where ‘leaders’ are are little more than shills of transnational corporations and organized crime. It’s oft-been duly noted that blacks in Cuba lived healthier lives than blacks in freer Latin American nations(and even in the US).

So, John Wayne’s views were along similar lines. There was not ONE America but TWO Americas. White America was sufficiently advanced for full democracy, but blacks had yet to attain full civilizational outlook to function properly in a free and democratic society. They had to undergo a process of modernization, not unlike peoples in pre-democratic developing nations, before they could take part in democracy.
Granted, this line of argument was somewhat disingenuous because whites had had lots of time to civilize blacks since the end of the Civil War but mainly used political muscle to keep blacks down and marginalized. But then, as we’ve witnessed since the 1960s, even with best intentions of progressive whites, liberated blacks tend to use their freedom to act wild and destructive than sound and constructive. With blacks, you can’t win. If you keep them in line with an iron hand, you are the oppressor. But if you give them freedom, they run wild and degrade society.
Indeed, even Wayne’s civilize-the-blacks idea wouldn’t have worked in the long run because black problems are less cultural than biological. Blacks evolved in Africa over 100,000s of years to be warriors, hunters, and jivers. With freedom, even civilized blacks eventually revert to their ugabugery.

Now, there may have been another reason why Wayne argued for denying blacks full freedom. Though he didn’t say it, he surely noticed that blacks are more muscular, more macho, and got bigger dongs. As a famous tough guy, he couldn’t honestly say, “We white guys will lose our manhood and our white women to the muscular and bigger-donged Negroes if we give them full freedom.” He had too much pride. But in fact, his ‘white supremacism’ was really a crutch against the threat of black supremacism. The 1970s movie MANDINGO with Ken Norton shows that black men are tougher than white guys, and white women get jungle fever the moment their eyes set upon some big Negro with more muscle and bigger dong. So, biology is black supremacist when it comes to raw manhood. Nature favors black manhood over white manhood in the thumping-and-humping department. But Wayne, like most white men of his period, had too much pride to speak honestly and say, “What I’m really freaked out is about black supremacism over us white guys. Did you see Woody Strode? I’m a big strong guy, but he’s twice as muscled and probably has a dong twice the size as mine. And that’s why we need segregation cuz integration will mean black supremacist manhood turning us white guys into a bunch of wussy white boy cucks.”

But it would have been better for the white race and the truth if he had said as much. All stable and lasting orders are based on truth, not fantasy.