If Whiteness has no Validity or Meaning, then Whites cannot lay claim to anything, and there is No Common White Property — The Political Art of White Dispossession by Jewish Supremacism, especially by pushing ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs

What secures the survival and well-being of a people? What keeps them healthy in body and spirit? What provides them with a sense of meaning and purpose, even destiny? What fills them with a sense of distinctness, a special quality that makes them rise above mere genericity, rise above the occasion?

A people must have a sense of their evolutionary origins and understand what makes them different from other races. If of a spiritual bent, a people must be bound by the conviction that God created different peoples, and each group is unique in its own way. A people must have a sense of history. Just like every individual has his own unique biography and every family has its own story, every people need to keep with their own history with its origins, myths, tales, and heroes & villains. Just like it's tragic for an amnesiac or an Alzheimer patient robbed of memory, a people without historical memory and a deep sense of roots & mythic bonds are truly lost, like a confounded hiker or navigator without a compass, no sense of where he came from and no sense of where he's going and why.
For security-sake, it's essential that a people lay claim to certain territories as rightfully theirs. A people without a country are like a man without a home: Doomed to wander as nomads. There's a difference between a traveler and a nomad. A traveler has a home to return to in the end, like Odysseus. In contrast, a nomad is a chronic wanderer. Steve Martin's character in PLANES, TRAINS, AND AUTOMOBILES has a home and a family waiting for him. John Candy's character is always on the road, condemned to drift from place to place.
Furthermore, as one lives forever, a people must produce new generations, and this requires the union of man and woman. To preserve the unique features of form and beauty of a people, most of the sexual unions must be among the men and women of the group. Excessive miscegenation leads to something like the mulatto-mestizos of Latin America, confused populations with weak sense of who or what they are.
In addition, to ensure the synthesis of identity, history, and territory, there must be proper authority, a concentration of power, that works to lead, represent, defend, and preserve the people and culture. Without these supports, a people's long-term survival comes into question. It's like there's no guarantee that a chair with four wobbly legs will remain standing. If a horse with one broken leg is useless, imagine one with four broken legs. What happens to a building when its columns or support beams are broken? The whole thing may well crumble to the ground. Indeed, bigger the structure, stronger its support system must be. Bigger they are, firmer they must stand... or else harder they fall.

Now, it's possible for a people/culture to survive without all the supports. Jews certainly did for nearly two thousand years without a homeland to call their own, and Kurds continue as a people & culture despite being dispersed among several non-Kurd-majority nations like Turkey, Syria, Iran, Iraq, and etc. In the case of the Jews, their magic formula was the Covenant, which went beyond mere identity, territory, and history. The Covenant created a spiritual bond between Jewish Blood and Heavenly Spirit. It meant that wherever Jews may be, whatever straits they were in, and however downtrodden they may be, they are the Chosen People favored by the one and only true God. The fact that Jews survived over the millennia despite so many setbacks(and even loss of territory) is a testament to the power of bonding blood with spirit. At any rate, Jews are an exception in history.
Furthermore, while there's much to learn from the Jewish Example, one should never heed Jewish advice as the essence of Jewishness is to maximize its own tribal power, wealth, influence, and control at the expense of goyim. If something works great for Jews, Jews will recommend the very opposite for the goyim. But then, Jews are being smart in their deviousness. If gold is buried in spot A, of course it makes sense for Jews to tell others it's buried in spot B... or C or D or E. It's like the Vikings who settled in Iceland wanted it for themselves. So, they gave it the forbidding name of 'Iceland' to keep others away while naming a far less hospitable land mass 'Greenland'. Likewise, Jews want to hoard their own 'Iceland' for themselves while recommending the metaphorical 'Greenland' for goyim. Iceland is really green whereas Greenland is frozen.

For most peoples, the failure to secure one of the pillars of peoplehood is like being a Paralympian than an Olympian. It's like competing with a missing arm or leg or with a broken spine. Such peoples must hobble through history and are always at a disadvantage vis-a-vis others with sturdier, sounder, and more complete support systems. An engine running on all six cylinders has more kick than one running on three. A plane with four working propellers is preferable to one with only two working. Jews are like someone using both arms and both legs urging others to tie one hand behind the back and jump around on one foot. Some Jews go even further and urge upon goyim to cut off all limbs. Jews would have goyim, especially white goyim, turn into Boxing Helena.

Still, a people with one or two cylinders working are better off than a people with all the cylinders out of order. The rule of history is that a people with essential support systems, no matter how poor and backward, are better positioned to survive into the future than a people who, no matter how well-fed and affluent, have been robbed of theirs. Indeed, compare the Palestinians and Anglo-Canadians. The latter enjoy much better living standards than the tragic Arabs living under Zionist occupation and tyranny. But, whereas Palestinians doggedly cling to their pride of identity and sense of history(and totally believe in the rightness of their cause and see Jews for what they are) despite their loss of territory, Anglo-whites in Canada have no pride of identity, no sense of history, and no claim of territory. Indeed, for Anglo-whites nothing is conceivably more evil than the idea of white authority/power in service of white interests. Even as a defeated people, Palestinians know what they are and do what they must to survive. Despite their affluence and privileges, Anglo-whites of Canada have zero defense systems against the Great Replacement(or White Nakba) and, if anything, believe the evil of whiteness must be erased by Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity, or D.I.E.
So, whereas Palestinians struggle to remain Palestinians with each passing year, Anglo-whites lose out ever more in Canada(and it's the same in all of Anglosphere and Germanosphere as Northern European whites are now totally mind-controlled by Jews). Of course, Jews sought to mind-trick the Palestinians as well. Zionists argued there's no such thing as the Palestinian people, Palestinian culture, or Palestinian history. Jews said it's all just a 'social construct'(but for some reason, we are to believe Zionism is so natural and real that it has the right to destroy the natives of Palestine to make room for Euro-Israel dominated by Ashkenazim). If Palestinians didn't take the vile Jewish bait, whites not only took it but swallowed the whole thing as good medicine... only to have the hook stuck inside their intestines which are now fatally wounded and bleeding.

Jews rule the world and seek to undermine and invalidate any concept of White Property or White Possession. White Dispossession is the name of the game. This is why Jews attack the very notion of whiteness. If whiteness is a valid category, then whites would have reasons to defend their identity, heritage, history, territory, wealth, authority, and power. But if whiteness is invalid, just some ‘racist’ construct or at best a figment of the imagination, then whites have no unique, special, and/or commanding claim to anything. Minus such conviction, whites don't deserve to own anything as a people, not least because even their peoplehood lacks legitimacy.
Of course, whites as individuals can own stuff, even lots of stuff(like Bill Gates or Warren Buffett), but there is nothing that whites as a race, culture, or people can have, defend, and preserve as their own. The politically correct mantra of Diversity really means that anything white can be claimed and taken by nonwhites? (It's like Asian-Indians as individuals could gain wealth under British Imperialism, but they, as a people, could not claim India as a national entity independent of Rule Britannia).
It's akin to conditions of slavery, at least on the legal and psychological level(even if whites aren't literally slaves). Consider blacks in the American South when slavery still existed. Not all blacks had to pick cotton from sunup to sundown. Some black slaves could learn a craft and earn money(even save enough to purchase their own freedom). But no matter how much they earned(and even upon gaining freedom), it was virtually forbidden for them to think that they deserved or owned anything as a collective, as a people. For blacks, wealth and freedom were just individual matters. Some blacks could do pretty well as individuals and some could be legally free, but they couldn't be empowered as an united people.

Today, Jews have done the same to whites who are but soul-slaves of the Zionic Tribe. Jeff Bezos and Tim Cook are among the richest whites in the world, but their wealth is purely an individual matter. They can spend it on themselves and their close ones but never ever for white interests. But then, as people aren't mere individuals but part of a larger community, what can rich whites do to show they aren't just in it for themselves? There are three choices: (1) Libertarianism, a soulless ideology about 'muh freedom' that only further atomizes the white race and separates rich whites from those with less (2) The Approved Tribalism or Idolatry of Jews, blacks, and homos — even though Identity is generally denied to most groups, especially whites and Palestinians, it is not only tolerated but celebrated among Jews, blacks, and homos as the three magical groups (3) Mania for Diversity and Inclusion, which means rich whites should care about nonwhites around the world and welcome them into the West, not least to snub and replace 'racist' whites.

Is it any wonder that Jews(who are only 2% of the US population), blacks(who are 13% of the population), and homos(who are only 2.5% of the population) have more authority than whites? All Jews can coordinate together for Jewish Power. Blackness has been made sacred, i.e. blacks, just by being black, are deemed holy. Globo-Homo is now celebrated, and an entire month is reserved for Limp-Wristianity or Queertianity as replacement for Christianity. And even though the identities of Mestizos, Asians, Arabs, and etc. aren't especially regarded in the West, they have prestige as 'immigrants' bearing the wonderful gift of Diversity, further pushing whites to the back of the bus. (Of course, no one asks why people from Latin America must come to the US for a better life when their own countries are plenty diverse. Why has Diversity failed to do its magic for Latin America? Does Diversity become magic only when whites in the West are on the verge of losing their majority status? Odd how that works.)

Anyway, War-on-Whiteness(or WOW) and the ensuing White Dispossession allow Jews to lay claim to and gain possession of just about anything that once belonged to the white world. Nothing white is deemed sacred or priceless. Jews look upon the white world as a Jewish pawnbroker looks upon property. They are all trinkets for his taking. Everything white has a price tag and can be bought or sold or just taken by Jews or nonwhites.
Of course, Syrians aren't so lucky either. Jewish-controlled US foreign policy led to the military occupation of entire swaths of Syrian territory. The way Jews see it, Syria doesn't belong to Syrians, and Jews can use their goy military puppets to invade and occupy any piece of Syrian territory at whim. Currently, Syrians don't even have access to their own oil due to Jewish-guided US occupation. And of course, Palestinians in West Bank are silenced by the Jew-run media while yet another piece of their territory is swallowed up by Jewish invader-settlers. Jews look upon all the goy world as their oyster or goyster.

Since whiteness is an evil notion, the idea of White Territory is intolerable. Whites have no territory to call their own. All of the West must be on the auction block. It is to be sold and bought. Worse, any bunch of nonwhites can trample into white lands because Jewish-controlled globalism(the current ideology of the West) says Europeans don't even own the identity or meaning of European-ness. Anyone can become 'European' because globalism defines 'European-ness' as the celebration of Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity.
So, while white individuals can own lots of private property, there isn’t a single square inch in the world to designate as White Territory. Jewish supremacists who rule the West insist that whiteness is an evil that must be eradicated, and therefore, nothing can be claimed in the name of whiteness. White people must live merely as generic people or deracinated individuals in service to Jewish Identity, globo-homo-afro idolatry, and globalist ideology. Of course, Viktor Orban disagrees and says Hungary is sacred birth-and-burial ground for Hungarians. Jews cannot tolerate this. Not because Hungary itself is an important and consequential nation in the literal sense — a middle-income country with population of mere ten million, it isn't — but because its European-and-Christian-centered nationalism, in rejecting the entire paradigm of the Jew World Order, may inspire whites around the world to think outside the Jewish Box and say NO to Jewish Supremacism in the name of White Liberation. To Jewish Supremacists, the Hungarian example is akin to Palestinians saying Palestine is their homeland on the basis of pride of identity, resilience of history, and claim of territory. Well, at least Jews also have historical roots in the Holy Land, but it is outrageous how they lay claim to all the West that rightfully and racially belongs to whites.

For Jewish supremacists, the idea that white women belong to white men to have white kids with in order to preserve the white race is also evil. As whiteness is just a figment of ‘racist’ fantasy, white women are mere commodity for other races. They are whores for Jewish merchants and ho’s for black men. Jews say there is no deep and meaningful bond between white men and white women because whiteness is just garbage cooked up by ‘racists’. This is what Jews push. Jews want white wombs to be colonized by black men.
But it's rather odd if one thinks about it. On the one hand, Jews and blacks impugn whiteness as just worthless garbage, but they seem obsessed with white beauty that is the product of tens of thousands of evolution whereby white men mated with white women. If Jews and blacks see nothing special about whiteness, why do THEY lay claim to beauty that is unique to whites? Of course, the black threat is especially damaging to whites because of the Jungle Fever factor. Even with anti-whiteness in full force in media and academia, most white women won't sexually venture outside whiteness as they don't feel much attraction to most nonwhite men. But it's different with white women and Negroes because black men are better at sports, can holler & sing louder, and have bigger dongs. Indeed, even when the West was 'racist' and enforced taboos against miscegenation in the past, some white women went with black men because of the sheer pull of jungle fever. In our times when Jews control ideology(propaganda) & idolatry(marketing) and outright promote Jungle Fever and encourage millions of black Africans to move to the West, ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs is an existential threat to the white race. It effectively turns white women into 'mudsharks' and reduces white men into wussy cucks, resulting in the erasure of European uniqueness in form and beauty as the white race will be mulatto-ized and claimed by blackness that, contra whiteness, is much celebrated and even sacralized in the Jew World Order.
The way Jews see it, Jewish Supremacism depends on white submission, and there is no better way to effect permanent white obeisance than by breaking the sacred bond between white men and white women with Jungle Fever. Today, cuckenized white men celebrate the very fact that white women reject them and go with blacks. Jews brainwashed white males into believing that black sexual imperialism and white sexual defeat are synonymous with 'anti-racism' when, in fact, it's premised on black men being superior men to white men. Of course, it could be just a case of White Male Cope. Since they are losing white women to black men and can't do anything about it, they pretend they are letting it happen of their own accord out of racial magnanimity or commitment to combating 'racism'. So, even though white women are being taken away from white men, white men pretend they are giving their women away out of free will. It's like the landlord in THE GODFATHER PART 2 who complies with Vito Corleoene's request out of fear but pretends it's out of the goodness of his heart.

In the Jew World Order, there can be no such thing as White History, yet another essential pillar or support system lost for the white race. Indeed, Jews insist White History never existed because whiteness was always a fantasy of ignorance + supremacism and nothing else. Kids nowadays are told Greeks and Romans weren’t white. Iceland and Sweden were always 'multicultural', meaning multi-racial. Blacks always roamed around Britain and France. So, why not fill up all new movies about European lore and history with blacks and nonwhites? And even if some parts of Europe were indeed all-white, how terrible indeed and in need of being remedied with the wonders of Diversity. It's as if such whites lived inside a cave without the sun and must be brought out into the light. Shame on such history for its lack of diversity. As diversity is so wondrous, all Europeans must fantasize that their ancestors and heroes were black even if such weren't the case.

As for the politics of white authority or white power, NO WAY insist the Jews. Whiteness is ‘racist’, therefore any power or authority centered on serving white identity and interests is totally anathema to all that is good. So, while white individuals can make lots of money and work for powerful institutions, they must never think white or serve white interests. They must serve lofty ideals such as ‘diversity’, ‘inclusion’, and ‘equity’…. though for some reason, they must also serve Jews and blacks and homos as the Holy Three even though we’ve been told tribalism is wrong.

This is why whites are so powerless. Even though whites are still numerous in the West, have lots of wealth, desired for their looks, and are well-represented in elite institutions, whites are powerless as a race because even the most successful white individuals can never ever serve or defend whiteness but must serve ‘woke’ ideology or the idolatry of the holy three: Jews, blacks, and homos. If Bill Gates were to donate a measly $100 to Jared Taylor's American Renaissance, the full force of Jewish Supremacism and its white cuck-collaborators, what with their total grip on elite power, will pounce on him at once and destroy his reputation, connections, and wealth. Also, the courts will dig up anything to bring him down as so-called 'justice' is just a gangsterist lawfare arm of the Jews.

Whites today are like all those horses. Horses are big powerful beasts, but whatever their number, they are powerless as horses because they’ve been trained to serve humans. No matter how powerfully they run and do their horsey things, it’s never for horse-sake but for human-sake. Whites are now essentially saddled horses of Jewish cowboys.

The REAL Pandemic : "HATE CRIMES" On The Rise! - Nick Fuentes

Jewish Power Strategy contra Chinese Power Strategy — The Jewish Advantage of Using both the STRONG HORSE and the SACRED COW — US Dollar Supremacy in Money and Jewgromo Shekel Supremacy in Morality

Jews know that money power isn't enough. And military power isn't enough either. Jews have plenty of money, and the Jewish-controlled US military is by far the most powerful — Jews control the whore-politicians who order the generals to threaten or attack nations hated by Zionists. Jews have the Strong Horse of money and military power. But to seal the deal, Jews know they also need the Sacred Cow of holiness and righteousness. Indeed, this is where China has failed. China has built up a modern military. Though still dwarfed by US military might, it is a great regional power and growing stronger. Also, China has spread a lot of money around, like Japan in the 1980s. So, China has been growing in Strong Horse capacity. But recently, the Chinese are discovering it's not enough as they're coming under even more condemnation that befell the Japanese in the 80s.

It's true enough that people tend to go with the Strong Horse. But Strong Horse alone offers no moral protections unless matched with the Sacred Cow. If forced to choose between Money Power and Moral Prestige, one will generally choose the latter. (Of course, Moral Prestige is usually associated with Money Power. Would Jews enjoy so much moral sanctity if not for their vast wealth and influence? Besides, Moral Prestige isn't the same as true morality. Rather, it is the advantage of officially sanctioned ethos. In communist nations, Marxism-Leninism had moral prestige. So, even as China can wield money power, its lack of moral prestige can lose friends who dread damage to their reputations by association. Chinese money is nice but not so much if tainted with what is hyped as Chinese vice. It's like the Corleones in THE GODFATHER were tempted with narcotics trade but said NO because of the risk to their reputation. As Vito Corleone said, the politicians would not be his friends if he traded in drugs than merely controlled gambling and the unions. If China is made the bogeyman in a New Cold War, US politicians who'd been chummy with the Chinese will wash their hands and join in the chorus of anti-Chinese rhetoric. If it could be done to Japan, a US ally in the 1980s, it can be done with far greater magnitude against 'communist' China.)

This is where Jewish Power and Chinese Power are different. Jewish Power grew dominant in money and politics, but if Jews learned one thing from history, it's that they need the protection of Sacred Cow power. When Europe was proudly Christian, the Sacred Cow was with Jesus and His flock. If anything, Jews were seen as the Killers of Christ. They were dirty rats than sacred cows. So, even as Jews gained Money Power as merchants, they had little moral protection. The Jewish Strong Horse of big money could win over goy aristocrats, but there was no guarantee of deep loyalty. Suddenly, Jews could be exiled by treacherous goy elites(who couldn't pay back loans to Jews) or attacked by mobs who felt exploited by Jews. And so, especially after World War II, Jews made sure that their Strong Horse of money and privilege would have the moral protection of the Sacred Cow: Shoah-Worship or Holocaustianity as the new faith of the West. In the US, we can berate the rich and condemn the 1% in the name of the 99%, but Jewish power cannot be named. Why? Jews are well-represented in the 1%, but we must pretend they're just rich WHITE people. So, even as rich people and 'white privilege' can be targeted, Jews mustn't be mentioned no matter how rich they are. Thus, the Jewish Strong Horse has Sacred Cow protection. If you dare mention Jewish Power and its dark implications, you are purged as an 'Anti-Semite' and potential 'Nazi', a total no-no.

In contrast, look how Japan and China fared in the American debate. Japan was on the up-and-up in the 1980s. It was flush with cash, and Shintaro Ishihara boasted of a "Japan That Can Say No". Japan seemed a Strong Horse then and attracted much attention, admiration and anxiety. But it also came under heavy criticism and scrutiny, even condemnation. Japan had no Sacred Cow protection, so it was fair game to bash the Japanese. Indeed, Strong Horse power paradoxically undermines itself. While influence and favors can be bought with lotsa money, they also draw negative attention, criticism, and hostility. The more money is used to buy influence, the more suspicion it arouses.

Furthermore, influence bought with money is purely a matter of 'business'. Any partnership based on 'business' can vanish overnight. It used to be a national pastime in goy nations to call attention to Jewish Power buying favors from turncoat gentiles. The more money Jews spent, the more they were called out as financial manipulators. So, buying influence and favors was like a double-edged sword. Jews bought off goy elites but could also be called out as 'dirty Jews'. Also, even goy elites who were bought off felt dirty & compromised and might turn on the Jew at any opportune moment. It was only with the Holocaust Theology following World War II that the Jewish Strong Horse of money had the protection of the Sacred Cow of holy victimhood. Today, Jews are more corrupt than ever, but NO ONE dares to call out on the Jews. Jews ram Donald Trump in the arse, but his response is, "Can I suck your d*** stained with my own shi*?"

Compared to the Jews, Chinese are rank amateurs. Global Hillbillies really. Chinese made some serious cash in the past two decades, and they are now going about it like the Japanese in the 1980s. They brazenly seek influence by throwing money around. Of course, it often goes a long way as people all over the world are eager to take money. It's like the guy in IDIOCRACY says, "I like money."

So, money should never be underestimated. But partnerships based on money are shaky and unstable. It's not like the bond within the family. Chinese nationalists feel a sense of unity and loyalty that goes beyond money. While plenty of Chinese are selfish enough to sell their own nation for thirty pieces of silver — Hong Kong Chinese collaborated with 'foreign devils' in the subjugation and exploitation of China — , there are Chinese patriots whose relation to the motherland isn't simply about money or self-interest. It's like there's a difference between 'personal'/'family' bonds and 'business' interests in THE GODFATHER. It's why Michael Corleone feels especially betrayed by Fredo, a family member.

Chinese got to thinking that they could spread lots of cash around and buy influence in the West. They didn't learn the lesson of Japan in the 1980s. The more influence the Japanese bought, the more they were exposed as alien influence-peddlers. Westerners who took Japanese money were derided as 'Japanhandlers'. When public opinion turned against Japan, one's reputation suffered as a 'Japanhandler'. Being bought off by the Japanese led to short-term gain but could mean long-term loss. The money was good but at the risk of being castigated as a whore of yellow peril. Jewish Hollywood even made RISING SUN based on Michael Crichton's novel. (It was like JAP SUSS modeled on Veit Harlan's JEW SUSS.)

JEW SUSS by Veit Harlan

And now, we are seeing a similar implosion of Chinese influence in the West, especially in the Anglosphere of US, UK, Canada, and Australia. Chinese used big money to gain influence, but it only exposed them to China-bashers calling out on the 'Chi-Coms'. (East Asians, not a very verbal people, often settle issues with money, and this comes across as underhanded in Western eyes. In contrast, Jews not only pay but have much to say, thereby coming across as more justified and righteous in what they do. Chinese only bribe, whereas Jews follow up the bribe with the diatribe to morally intimidate potential critics of Jews.)
There is a limit to what the Strong Horse of money can do. It can gain entry but is resented as a usurper. Besides, even as China has the Strong Horse of money, its military capability is still far behind that of US that virtually owns Taiwan and other 'Asian Tiger' nations as neo-protectorates. US got both the bigger carrot and the bigger stick. So far, Chinese can only buy influence with money, and it goes a long way but not all the way. Indeed, the Chinese Strong Horse is now being exposed as a Trojan Horse.

In the case of Australia, all the influence-peddling with money seems to have done more harm than good. Initially, China gained key access down under, but it also drew negative attention from the US(that can tolerate China as an economic power but not as a world player) and ordinary Aussies who feel their nation is being sold out to the Chinese. Furthermore, anti-Chinese bashing serves as an outlet for growing white frustration resulting from Politically Correct taboos against criticism of Jews and blacks(and homos). Therefore, because whites must always suck up to Jewish Power(that is hostile to white identity & interests), grovel before blacks(who commit lots of crime and violence against whites), and homos(who degrade culture and morality), they are desperate to release their frustrations on something. As there is no taboo against bashing China, many whites blame the 'Chi-Coms' for everything. It's like Alex Jones in the US got deplatformed by Jews but howls about the Chinese 24/7. And even as Rush Limbaugh praised Walmart as a model of American Enterprise, he dumped on the 'Chi-Coms'. Never mind Walmart's success owes to its contract with China. Go easy on US corporations and just blame the Chinese.

The Covid Hysteria seems largely the result of Chinese and Jews. The virus might have originated in China, maybe due to government neglect. But, it was blown all out of proportion by the Western Media and governments because Jewish Power found it useful to undermine Trump's economy(thereby ruining his prospect for re-election) and to grab statist power to suppress populist movements and political activism(unless it happened to be Jewish-favored ones like BLM marches and Antifa mayhem). Nazis associated with germs & pathogens with Jewish influence, and Jewish Power's use of Covid Hysteria has created the illusion that Trumpism & Era of Nationalist Populism = Disease and Plague. 

So, both China and Jewish Power are responsible for Covid being hyped as a 'pandemic'. But, notice China is getting all the blame. Even Biden-voters blame China for Covid. China gets all the blame while Jews get no blame(even though Jewish Power blocked early attempts by Donald Trump to restrict travel between China and US and also hyped it all out of proportion to shut down entire sectors). Jews remain blameless whereas China is blamed for the 'China Virus'. So, even though Chinese played the junior partner alongside Jews against Trump and his supporters, they are getting almost all the blame. 

At any rate, the terms of the Jewish-Chinese alliances is such that the Chinese do the bidding of Jews but also serve as the Fall Guy while the Jew goes unblamed. If a Jew and a Chinese plotted to steal honey from bees, the Jew would tell the Chinese to go at the bee hive. Both would get the honey, but the Chinese guy would also get the stings while the Jew would only get the honey. Chinese seem to think that their partnership with Jews will lead to Jews defending China, but that's naivete on their part. Japan during WWII treated Jews well in the hope that Jewish-Americans would feel grateful and intercede on its behalf, but it was misplaced hope. Jews invented the atomic bomb that blew up Japan. Likewise, Chinese are foolish if they think Jews will offer them protection in exchange for Chinese helping out the Jews. No, even as Jews take full advantage of the Jewish-Chinese partnership against whites, they expose China as the culprit because the bulk of Western anger at globalism will be directed toward the Chinese than to the Jews(who are its real architects and captains).

Basic strategy seems as follows. So-called 'Liberal' Jews work with Chinese to undermine American Nationalism. Of course, Jews support their own nationalism, Zionism, and their own tribal identity/interests, but they detest and subvert goy national identities and interests. So, nationalism is all very well for Israel(and the West is compelled to support the Jewish State, or else be accused of 'antisemitism', as Jeremy Corbyn of UK found out), but any desire on the part of goyim to preserve national identity and borders is denounced as 'far right' or 'xenophobic'. So, Jews say the West must support ultra-nationalist Israel but condemn Hungary for wanting to preserve its people and culture. Just like Jews believe their God is the only true God while all other gods are false, they believe their own identity is the only true identity whereas soulless and faceless goyim exist only to serve Jews. (Notice that children of Jews and Chinese are Jews first and Chinese second. Chinese-ness is subservient and secondary to Jewishness. Just ask Amy Chua who used her Chinese womb to create Jewish kids.) As the US has been majority white Christian, Jews have made alliances with ANY group to weaken white identity & unity and Christian Culture. Chinese have played along with the Jews to make gains in the West because Chinese believe Jews are the true boss of the West.

The Chinese Believe That the Jews Control America. Is That a Good Thing?

But even as 'liberal' Jews push this agenda in cahoots with the Chinese, 'conservative' Jews rant about how China is taking over the world and has spies all over America. So, China gets ALL THE BLAME for globalism's impact on America. And one senses that 'liberal' Jews and 'conservative' Jews are working together behind the scenes. After all, 'liberal' Jews control the media and academia in the West, but they never condemn 'conservative' Jews for ramping up 'yellow peril' hysteria. People like Ezra Levant in Canada and Michael Savage in the US are given free rein to sound the alarm about 'Chinese are coming, Chinese are coming'. So, 'liberal' Jews work with Chinese to subvert American Nationalism but also enable 'conservative' Jews who blame China but never Jews for the globalist agenda. Consider the two articles below: One shows how 'liberal' Wall Street Jews have long worked with China against the US. In contrast, Jews like Ezra Levant and Zionist-controlled Breitbart News spread alarm about how Chinese are taking over everything. 

Chinese Official: We Subvert America Through Wall Street Jews

Documents Reveal Canada Planned Winter Training with Chinese Troops; Canceled After U.S. Request

There are many more Chinese than Jews, but quantity isn't everything. In a way, Jews always had a Sacred Cow mentality along with the Strong Horse Strategy; the Sacred Cow among Jews was the Covenant, the sense of the Chosen. So, when it came to the Strong Horse Strategy, Jews only pretended to go with the goy Strong Horse. Even as the Jewish body was serving the goy Strong Horse(be it Anglo, German, Russian, French, or whatever), the Jewish soul remained loyal to the Sacred Cow of Jewish Identity. In other words, even as Jewish eyes and ears could be impressed by Gentile power, the Jewish Soul didn't surrender to the Other. If anything, Jews served the goy Strong Horse to gain more power for themselves and grow their own Strong Horse to be trained to eventually outrace the Goy Strong Horse(like in BEN-HUR) and serve the Jewish Soul. In time, Jews would make goyim serve the Jewish Strong Horse as well. Today, goyim in the US are total servants to Jewish Supremacist Power.

TRIBUTE TO THE 'GREAT AMERICAN PATRIOT' SHELDON ADELSON

In contrast, Chinese only have a Strong Horse strategy. There is no sacred cow mentality. (Chinese were feng-shui superstitious about the world around them but didn't develop a sacred sense of the Chinese soul.) Ideally, they'd like to be the Strong Horse and have others revolve around the Chinese(as the Middle Kingdom). But if they can't be the Strong Horse, they'd rather follow whatever happens to be the Strong Horse, even if it isn't Chinese. Now, Chinese Culture, steeped in Confucian tradition, has a sense of goodness apart from power and wealth, but it's mostly about manners than about ethno-spiritual identity, which is what Jews have. Manners are not strong enough to hold an identity together. If anything, it tends to divide a people along class lines: Snobs and slobs. Chinese also have Taoism, but it's about man's ego yielding to the Way. It is an emasculating kind of spirituality. If the Jewish Covenant concentrates the power of the universe in Jewish Identity as the Chosen of God, the creator and ruler of all, Taoism tends to dissolve Chinese ego in vague musings about the 'harmony'. At any rate, in Confucian vs the Covenant, the Covenant wins.

Because Jews have both Strong Horse Strategy and Sacred Cow Mentality, even their service to the goy Strong Horse eventually serves Jewish Identity, which is sacred to Jews. Also, Jews are BORN with the Covenant. It is innate. In contrast, Confucian-based sense of the higher good isn't something one is born with but must attain through education and refinement. Thus, it doesn't apply to all Chinese but only to those with the good fortune of higher education and social elevation. Also, this East Asian emphasis on education-as-the-path-to-respectability means that the Chinese are easily molded by whomever is doing the educating. So, under the Old Order, they strove to be proper Confucians. Under Mao, they were fervent communists. And Chinese in the Current West become servile students of globo-homo, BLM nonsense, and Jew-worship, the new holy trinity of the West. Because their own identity isn't prized as a sacred cow(like Jewish identity is for Jews who are steeped in Covenant Mentality), Chinese are likely to go along with whatever happens to be the Strong Horse. Plenty of Chinese who see the West as the Strong Horse and Sacred Cow(or the 'shining city on the hill') will gladly work for the West against their ancestral nation. Indeed, consider all those Chinese women who use their Chinese wombs to produce Jewish babies for Jewish men. Chinese bodies not only work for Jews but function to produce new life for Jews than for Chinese.

So, whereas Jews in disadvantageous situations may submit their bodies to the goy Strong Horse but never surrender their souls, Chinese will submit their bodies and surrender their souls to the Strong Horse even if it is non-Chinese or anti-Chinese. Look at all the Chinese cucks sucking up to the West in Hong Kong and Taiwan. They are like the worthless Dumb Polacks who'd gladly sell out Poland because they adulate the Jewish-run West as the Strong Horse.
Though the first Chinese arrivals in the West might feel some loyalty to the Mother Country, their children are destined to become agents of Globo-Homo, Jewish Power, and Negro-worship because their parents raise them to follow, obey, and serve the Strong Horse, which currently happens to be owned by Jews. (The Chinese sense of loyalty to family works only in close-knit local communities. In the mobile modern world, people need a powerful sense of ethnic solidarity or national identity to maintain a lasting sense of loyalty. But as East Asians favor class over race, they are more likely to betray their own kind for personal gain. In contrast, the Jewish Covenant is about race/blood than about class. A Jew, rich or poor, is equally holy within the Covenant. A successful Jew doesn't despise a less fortunate Jew like a successful East Asian looks down on the less fortunate among his own kind. It's why Israel's suicide rate is far lower than that of East Asia where the less successful are made to feel worthless.)
As long as Jews control the West, Chinese and Asians in general will serve as anti-white agents to gain approval from their Jewish Masters. Jews love to use 'diversity' against whites. When White Christians controlled the West long ago, many Chinese in the West converted to Christianity and emulated white power. But as whites now cuck to Jews, Chinese in the West also cuck to Jews. And if Jews tell Chinese to be anti-white, Chinese will be anti-white. This is useful to Jews as they then go to whites and say, "Look at all those anti-white Chinese", which makes whites bark back at the Chinese but never at the Jews who encourage anti-white attitude among the Chinese(and other non-white groups).

If Chinese were cleverer, they would have pushed both the Strong Horse and the Sacred Cow strategies on the West, much like what the Jews did, especially after World War II. Jews used lots of dollars but also placed Holocaust at the center of Western Conscience. As China came under Western Aggression, the Chinese could have balanced Money Power with Moral Narrative of China's degradation at the hands of the West. Thus, Chinese Suffering might have gained a degree of Sacred Cow status.
But, Chinese chose to morally target the Japanese, especially concerning the Nanking Massacre. Even Chinese in the West made more fuss about evil Japanese than about Western Aggression. Iris Chang in the US wrote a book about Japanese killing bushels of Chinese. And Jung Chang, married to some Briton and authoress of MAO, seems most hateful toward Mainland China than anything else. As such, the Chinese failed to exploit the cult of Chinese-victimhood. Notice China hasn't made any big movie about its humiliation by Western Imperialists. China made a movie called CITY OF LIFE AND DEATH about Japanese atrocities in Nanking but did nothing to promote 'Western Guilt' in China's tragedy in the 20th century. And even the guilt-baiting of Japan didn't work as Japan could reliably look to the West to back it up against China. In contrast, Germans can't rely on the West to back it up against Jews because Jews control the West. When Chinese say to Japanese, "You Japs no good", the US will side with Japan against China. But when Jews say, "You Krauts suck", the Jewish-ruled US will also tell Germans, "Yeah, you Krauts suck, so pony up and pay more shekels to Jews, or else!"

Jews can use their Strong Horse to trample on the West, but they are protected by the Sacred Cow of Shoah Narrative and 'white guilt' about Jews. In contrast, when Chinese use their Strong Horse of newly minted Money Power, they have no similar recourse to suppress anti-Chinese criticism as there is zero Western guilt about the Chinese. Most people in the West know nothing of the Chinese Tragedy in the past 200 yrs, and they're more likely to think of Chinese as dog-eating & cat-boiling sadists who got whupped by 'Japs' who were then crushed by the Americans in the Good War. Because the US beat Japan that battered China, most Americans think Chinese owe everything to Americans. Americans overlook the part about how Europeans and Americans emboldened and built up Modern Japan and invited it into the Imperialist Club. And of course, Jews say nothing about how the Jewish Sassoon Dynasty sold the bulk of opium to the Chinese, but then the Chinese don't press this point either as they are so eager to work with Jews as the Strongest Horse. If anything, Jews now fund 'libertarian' thinkers who say China's opium problem was vastly exaggerated. They are like the paid shills who downplay the harm done to white working class by opioids peddled by the Jewish Sackler Family.

It goes to show that Financial Currency isn't enough. The Sacred Cow of Moral Currency is also crucial. There's been some talk of the Euro, the Yuan, or the combination of Yuan and other currencies challenging the supremacy of the Dollar, but the Dollar is still supreme and will be for the foreseeable future. So, even nations with troubled relations with the US must accumulate dollars to do business around the world. They need dollars to buy oil and other essential goods and materials. This is a case of Strong Horse power. Money Supremacy by the US. But, financial power is not a Sacred Cow. So, even as peoples around the world must take part in Dollar Domination, they can express resentment and denounce it as unfair and unjust.

In contrast, the currency of Moral Supremacism has Sacred Cow power. It comes with taboos attached. Jews, as the masters of the US, not only enjoy Dollar Supremacism over the world but, as masters of media and academia, also enjoy the supremacy of their own chosen Moral Currency, which revolves around Sacred Jews, Holy Homos, and Magic Negroes. One reason why Jews seek to fill the world with Holocaust Narratives, Globo-Homo 'pride' parades, and BLM agit-prop is to unify the world under a single Moral Currency of Tri-Supremacism of the Holy Three who matter most: Jews, blacks, and homos. 

This way, most people's moral currencies(based on their own tragic narratives) don't go very far, just like most national currencies have limited use value. Local currencies must be exchanged into dollars to have global worth. Likewise, local folks must obtain Tri-Supremacist moral-shekels to curry favor with the US Empire that rules the world. For instance, Armenians won't get far by griping about victimhood under Turks and Azerbaijanis. They are better off putting on a 'gay pride' parade or putting up BLM signs. Or, building a Holocaust Memorial even though Armenians had nothing to do with the Shoah. The fact is Armenians don't matter much in the moral constellation configured by Jews. Indeed, it was no problem when Obama reneged on the pledge to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide in favor of maintaining good relations between the US and Turkey. If any people want to gain globo-'moral worth', they are better off spouting off about the Holocaust, wonders of homosexuality, and how BLM is so important(even though they had nothing to do with the African Slave Trade) because those three obsessions have the most value as moral currency in the West controlled by Jews.
Global Morality is really about the Imperialism of Western Consciousness and White Guilt. So, if the West feels special sympathy or reverence for Jews, blacks, and homos, then the rest of the world must also strive to gain moral credence by earning 'woke' shekels minted on notions of Sacred Jews, Holy Homos, and Magic Negroes. Such shekels are to World Morality what the US Dollar is to World Currency. Not all is fair and equal in the Moral Exchange Rate. Why is Mandela treated like a saint-prophet while Arafat has been memory-holed even though their struggles were so similar? Why was apartheid so evil in South Africa, but it's okay when Jews do it to Palestinians in the West Bank? It's because Jews and blacks morally count for more than Arabs and Palestinians. Indeed, many Arabs in the Emirates are now cutting a deal with Israel because the world doesn't care about the plight of Arabs or Muslims.

Pakistani-American kid got admitted to an elite college by writing nothing but 'Black Lives Matter' a hundred times on the admissions essay. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/teen-accepted-stanford-after-writing-blacklivesmatter-100-times-application-n742586 He didn't write "Muslim Lives Matter" or "Pakistani Lives Matter" even though he is of Muslim background and from a region in which US power has done so much damage — after all, while the US police kills a handful of black criminals every year, the US military kills many thousands of Arabs/Muslims for the sake of Zionist Supremacy. So, shouldn't the kid have pressed on the matter of "Muslim Lives Matter"? Alas, such wouldn't have gotten him very far because Muslim or Pakistani identity doesn't have much exchange value in the Moral Marketplace. But even if you're not black, saying "black lives matter" can earn you some 'moral' credit because blacks are part of the Tri-Supremacist Holy Three.

Likewise, white politicians get nowhere by extolling the tragic histories of the Irish, Polish, Italians, Latvians, or whatever. And one's sure to go morally bankrupt if he dares to spout morally-charged narratives about gentiles exploited by Jews or mass-killed by Jewish Bolsheviks. If white politicians want some 'woke' currency, the best bet is to gush about Jewish wonderfulness, 'Muh Israel', and, of course, the Holocaust as the worst thing that ever happened since the Big Bang. 

White Supremacism is out, but White SAPremacism is in. Whites must be saps before Jews and their chosen allies, homos and blacks. And this SAPremacism serves as the template for the rest of the world. So, if you want to succeed as a Hindu or Chinese in the West, don't bother griping about Hindu tragedy or Chinese suffering. No one cares about Hindu or Chinese lives, which have little moral exchange value. You must trade the tragic narratives of your own folks with the Tri-Supremacist shekels of Jew-Negro-Homo or Jewgromo Worship. Whites must act as saps before Jews, blacks, and homos to climb the ladder, and the rest of the world has to emulate White Sappery. Look at those Asians in Canada waving the homo flag and speaking/gesticulating in black lingo & 'attitude' to gain moral currency. As they matter little as Asians, they invoke blackness and homo vanity. And if they want to rise up in elite institutions, they are obligated to pay respect to Jewish Tragedy and Homo wonderfulness because their own identities and narratives have little value in the Tri-Supremacist Moral Currency System. A Chinese goes nowhere saying, "I love China and am proud to be Chinese", but he or she might get somewhere by exclaiming, "I revere Jews", "I love blacks", and "I worship homos".

CHINA AND AUSTRALIA FACE OFF IN ESCALATING TRADE WAR - The Duran: News - Video - Analysis2020: THE ESTABLISHMENT STRIKES BACK by Black Pigeon Speaks

Notes on "THE GREATEST JEWISH JOKE EVER TOLD" by Spencer Quinn

https://counter-currents.com/2020/11/the-greatest-jewish-joke-ever-told/

In this joke, we are transported to a world in which Jews are the majority and can afford to make fun of gentiles (whom we know are really whites). Jews do this for the same reason whites make fun of Jews in the real world — they violate our sense of normalcy. Only, in this inverted world of the Jewish comedian, it’s Jewish normalcy which gets violated. And what Jewish norms are we talking about?
...In reality, we are laughing at the Jews who are laughing at the whites who are behaving abnormally when they are really behaving normally because it is really the Jews who are abnormal and don’t have the self-awareness to realize it. Only, because it’s a Jew who’s telling the joke in the first place (Alper and Seinfeld), they kind of do. Get it? Anyway, the takeaway here is not merely how sophisticated a joke can be and still crack a smile. The takeaway is also that white people own what’s normal. We are the sane people in the room. 

This is an interesting article with a good deal of truth. But Spencer Quinn isn't getting the complete joke. He surmises that The Joke assumes that Jews are in the MAJORITY, but that misses the essence of Jewish Power. Jews don't need to be in the majority to gain power and influence over others and implement the New Normal. After all, Jews have always been a small minority in the US, but they still managed to invert the value system of mainstream society. Take 'gay marriage' and globo-homo madness. Consider all the post-Christian churches flying the 'gay' flag, not least due to Jewish influence. Consider all those seemingly strait-laced middle class people turning out in huge crowds to cheer for 'gay pride' parades as if sodomy is next to godliness. Consider all the 'normal' white middle class people in the suburbs who kneel down to BLM and weep about the Magic Negro(a trope spread by Jewish Hollywood). So, The Joke doesn't necessarily transport us to a world where Jews are the majority because Jews don't need great numerical strength to gain influence over goyim, especially whites of Northern European lineage. Mitt Romney is a very normal kind of guy — Mormonism is a strange kind of Christian cult, but its prescribed lifestyle is of the 1950s FATHER KNOWS BEST variety — , but he assents to whatever crazy scheme cooked up by Jews. And all those firebrand Evangelicals have little to say but 'Muh Israel' and seem to be warming up to 'gay marriage'. 

Another thing. Jewish Jokes were most likely created by Jews themselves and, in that sense, were not really about whites laughing at Jews. The cultural fingerprints on Jewish Jokes are similar to those on 'Polack Jokes', nearly all of which were concocted by Jews. Also, Jews found it therapeutic to laugh at themselves. Jews were also responsible for most Holocaust jokes. Woody Allen and Mel Brooks were masters of comedy that often poked fun at Jews. Still, Jews laughed because the jokes mocked goyim(more) along with the Jews. At any rate, as long as Jews were the entertainers and making others laugh, they were in control. Don Rickles made fun of Jews along with everyone else, but the fact is he was the honcho on stage whereas the audience were mere passive participants. So, even when whites are laughing at Jews via Jewish Jokes, the chances are the jokes were created by Jews, and that means, even when whites find Jews to be ridiculous, it is on Jewish terms because Jews have the wit and will to come up with jokes that produce belly-laughs among stiffy & stuffy, dimwit and/or thick-skulled goyim. Also, by making Jews funny to whites, they are rendered endearing than threatening.

Spencer Quinn seems to believe that The Joke betrays Jewish Neurosis in contrast to healthy White Normalcy. Thus, contrary to Jewish conceits, The Joke is really on them because, if anything, it reveals that whites are sane, sound, and normal whereas Jews are gross, obnoxious, and thorny. That is surely true to some extent, but he is overlooking the finer points of The Joke. It suggests at the unique source of Jewish Power, a combination of egotism and ethnic unity. Generally, the assumption is that a people must surrender or suppress their egos in order to work well with others in a Trust Society. They must prioritize the common good over individual pride. Consider Italians vs Nordics. Italians are more emotional and brash in their egotism, therefore lacking in trust and unity. In contrast, Nordics are less expressive and more conscientious. Less egotism means more trust and greater social order. Japanese lack egotism but maintain an orderly society where people are mindful of one another. 

But Jews are strange. On the one hand, they are emotional, expressive, and pushy like Italians or Greeks. They are full of egotism. And yet, they are also extremely talented at cooperation and networking over great distances. Jewish Power wouldn't be what it is without the aptitude to work together. Yet, egotism usually works against group cooperation. So, how come Jews are so egotistical and yet so collectively effective in amassing power, wealth, and influence?

It seems Jews came upon an odd formula of egotism that translated into ethnic trust among themselves. This probably owes to the Covenant, the spiritual pact that informed every Jew regardless of wealth or station that he is equally dear in the eyes of God. Thus, every Jew, rich or poor, feels special as the chosen child of God. On one level, it is an egotistic view of life: God chose Me. And yet, it is an egotism rounded out by humility and sense of togetherness. After all, even though one may feel individual pride in being one of the Chosen, he is nevertheless a servant of God, the Lord of All. Furthermore, each and every Jew is Chosen, and that means each Jew shares in the egotism. So, Jewish egotism is both individual and shared. This perhaps makes Jews a unique people. Thus, unlike most peoples who must choose between egotism and unity, Jews can have egotism and unity. Jews don't have to surrender egotism to have unity and trust among Jews. Jews don't have to surrender unity in order to have pride of ego. Jews can have both. 

Now, Northern Europeans are another unique people in a way. Southern Italians and Greeks are peoples who've chosen egotism over unity. They are often loud, brash, and aggressive, but this means they hardly trust one another in any meaningful fashion. In contrast, Japanese have been known for order, trust, and cooperation, but it also means they are weak in individualism and egotism. 

In contrast, Northern European types, especially the Anglos, found a way to be both individualistic and cooperative. Traditional British Society was known for manners and liberty. One was mindful of the social good and niceties but also stood on his own two feet and believed in individuality, privacy, and property. And yet, in order to create this balance, the Anglos crafted an individualism without egotism and cooperation without collectivism. So, even as one's individuality was held precious, it had to be mindful not to trample on other individualities. And even though social cooperation was key, there wasn't a powerful passion for tribal unity. The result was a mild individualism and moderate cooperation. It was a pretty good formula for modernity. But it also exposed fatal chinks-in-the-armor to the Jews who are about egotistical individualism and collective tribal passion. Anglos lose to Italians in egotist aggression but beat them in ethical cooperation. In contrast, Jews not only work well together but each Jew is possessed of a powerful will fueled by egotism. Consider the Jew in GLITTERING PRIZES.

So, even though The Joke, on the one hand, presents white people as normal and balanced, it also hints as to why they lost out to Jews despite being in the majority. Whites have no real fight in them, at least vis-a-vis feisty and relentless Jews. A big animal without fighting spirit can retreat from or even lose to a smaller animal with fighting spirit. In The Joke, every white person comes across as yielding or detached. So, when the son tells the mother that he won't come for dinner, she doesn't complain. She'd rather keep things calm and cool between them then press her case and demand he keep his promise. Or, maybe, despite familial ties, she is actually relieved that her son won't visit because she prefers individual space over personal ties, i.e. she prefers it dry than wet. It's an individuality without insistence. In contrast, Jews are nothing without insistence and persistence. Nothing comes to those who are yielding and assume "you can't fight city hall." One must fight city hall to the end and then even take over. Whites went from white fight to white flight. Jews are still into Jew Screw.

Furthermore, the Jewish Way of angst & anxiety is one of memory whereas the white way of 'normalcy' is one of amnesia. Jews have long remembered history as a non-stop struggle for survival, success, power, and domination. So, even when things go well for them, they don't become like the hare(vis-a-vis the tortoise). They don't take things for granted or rest on their laurels. They know their fortunes can vanish overnight. History is the saga of struggle. It hasn't been 'normal' but nightmarish. And whites who are into the conceit of 'normalcy' have forgotten the way of history. After all, how was the US created? It was created through violent struggle and ruthless competition. It wasn't as if some 'normal' manna from heaven fell from the sky to provide for everyone. White people had to toil in the fields and factories to create a new nation. US was engaged in bloody conflicts to expand territory. Like other nations, US committed mass atrocities in war. For much of American and Western History, most people couldn't take things for granted. Consider the millions that starved in Ireland. Consider the bloody wars that led to the rise of unified nation-states in Europe. Indeed, what we consider to be 'normal'(aka middle class values and standards) took hold for the majority of white people only after World War II with the rapid expansion of prosperity; all of sudden, people in the West never had it so good. But it was something NEW, not something that Western Man had taken for granted across the eons. The good times made whites choose niceness as the norm, disarming themselves of the passion for struggle.

Indeed, postwar prosperity was ABNORMAL in the annals of history. And yet, so many white people became amnesiac and adopted modernity + prosperity as the end-all of history and the meaning of life. La Dolce Vita. In earlier times, people were compelled to see life as a struggle and obligation, like with George Bailey in IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE. He has family and there are needy people in Bedford Falls. So, he can't just run off to do his thing. People relied on one another. It was with greatly expanded productivity and the rise of the welfare state(with Social Security perhaps being the most important) that people could be freer as individuals to pursue their own interests. People became less reliant on one another. Retired people had Social Security and a host of government benefits. And with TV in every home, people felt less lonely as they could follow fantasy narratives of fictional characters. There was nothing like this in the history of mankind. What we take for 'normal' is really a historical anomaly. So many people can live pretty well without struggle, without insistence. It made them complacent, apathetic, too 'nice, even a bit decadent. They forgot that history has mostly been about struggle. Like in Charles Dickens novels. You had beg for or fight for a 'little more'. Even the so-called middle class back in those days often just scraped by. And as there were no safety nets, an affluent family could end up in the streets by a simple twist of fate. 

In our world, Jews are the richest and most affluent. So, one would think they should take it easy and just be 'nice'. But many of them are still in semi-paranoid mode. This makes them seem neurotic and extreme(and indeed many Jews are insufferable), but, on the positive side, Jews have not forgotten. They know the order and prosperity today can vanish into the thin air, and History with a capital 'H' can return. Also, didn't the Wasps lose out to Jews precisely because they forgot about the nature of struggle and began to take their privilege and affluence for granted as 'the normals'? They developed a Country Club mentality, and even though their children were raised to succeed, they weren't instilled with hunger that had driven their ancestors to power and greatness. Having been 'normalized', whites began to wince at the bloody stories of struggle of their ancestors, who were actually more in keeping with historical norms. America wasn't created by people being 'nice' and 'normal'. Rather, the white man was filled with hatred and wiped out the Red Man. And for most of US history, farmers and factory workers labored from sunup to sundown. They were hard men driven by hunger and haunted by fears. It was about God, country, community, family, customs, and mutual reliance. Back then, family mattered. If your mother spent hours cooking a meal, you better have a GOOD reason for skipping out. Blowing off your mother who stood over a hot stove all day would be no easy matter. It would not be 'normal'. Things are different today because it's so much more convenient than ever to purchase and prepare food. Indeed, many meals come pre-cooked. So, in our time, far less work goes into making a meal. And food is plentiful. But through most of history, food was never taken for granted. And a woman spent the whole day procuring the necessary ingredients for the family meal. That was the normal way for most of history. What we consider to be 'normal' in our time is abnormal in historical context.
As for the man in The Joke who buys the suit with trust and without complaint, that also owes to social change under modern rules and regulation. For much of history, there was little trust because all you had to go on was the word of the seller. Before there was government regulation and enforcement of rule of law, there were so many snake oil salesmen who peddled poison as panacea all across America. P.T. Barnum once said there's a sucker born every minute. And before there was food inspection, one couldn't be sure how something was processed. Many people got sick from eating tainted food. It was with the rise of the regulatory state that most people became more trusting of products and services. The consumer came to be protected. Therefore, it's not natural or normal to just trust people. Oftentimes, people do the right thing mainly due to the threat of fine and penalty, even imprisonment. 

So, what does The Joke tell us? It offers a glimpse as to why Jews gained power over whites. Whites forgot history. In good times of peace and prosperity, they took to the New Order as a kind of Ur-Normality when it was a rather unnatural and abnormal product of postwar prosperity. Against a people grown complacent and amnesiac, a people who remain contentious and memory-based will win. Indeed, the best way for Jews to lose their power is to go the way of White Americans and just become 'nice' and 'trusting', or 'normal'. Of course, whites wouldn't be in the state they're in IF they lived in an all-white world where everyone is 'nice'. It's like tortoises on an island have little to fear as long as egg-devouring rats don't appear on the scene. But the story of life, or evolution, teaches us that the survival or well-being of any organism can never be taken for granted. You never know when an invasive organism might pose a threat or when the environment might suddenly change. As long as white Americans opened the immigration gates to the wider world, they should have been more vigilant. And to be sure, white Americans once were, at least far more than they are today. They had fears of the strong savage Negro. They had anxieties about the Yellow Rise of Color. And during the westward expansion, whites had few illusions about the Red Man who could be savage and cruel. But whites were triumphant over a vast territory, the best and most fertile and resource-rich in the world. They forgot that they attained this triumph with much blood and toil, through much stiff competition(not least among whites themselves). Once things got well, they became 'nice' and assumed that the New Normal of Peace and Prosperity was here to stay forever as a given. They pretended that milk and toast than blood and sweat are the true norms of history.
Jews were less likely to harbor such illusions. The concept of the Covenant made them feel special and Chosen through the ages. Their evolution as merchants and rabbis led to a feisty and radical personality. And their status as a minority in foreign lands always reminded them that nothing is for certain or forever. Things could be great one day, but tomorrow could be exile or worse. In the movie EXCALIBUR, why does Merlin worry so much? Because he remembers, and the lessons of the past fill him with dark portents of the future. Meanwhile, the knights easily forget and take things merrily when times are good. 

There are three kinds of animals. Wild ones with aggressive and difficult natures. Shaped by brutal nature, they are extremely anxious, fearful, and aggressive. Then, there are domesticated animals who make good companions or livestock for mankind. Whether dogs or cats in the home OR cows or pigs on the farm, they are easily manageable. While domesticated animals are easier for man to handle, this very quality makes them easily exploitable as well. Even when mankind intends to kill millions of cows and pigs, those beasts march along without anxiety and suspicion to their slaughter. Both kinds of animals have advantages and disadvantages. Wild animals are well-suited for nature, but nature is brutal and dangerous. Due to their wild nature, they live apart from man, and that means they don't enjoy the easier and more pleasant lives of cats and dogs. On the other hand, they aren't exploited like cows and pigs, raised only to be slaughtered by the millions.
The third kind of animal is domesticated but bred to possess special traits that makes them, in certain respects, more formidable than man. Jews are like this third kind of animal. They are a civilized people, unlike black Africans or Australian Aborigines. They evolved to live in civilization. However, they were selected for special traits of high intelligence, egotism, and duality(& duplicity). Jews were bred for constructive contradiction. A tribal people who wander around the world as 'cosmopolitans'. But this contradiction goes back to the heart of Judaism: A religion with the universal God who chose one Tribe over all others. Jews are the most adaptive and assimilationist people but also the most resilient and separate. Jews developed the most moralistic religion but mastered the art of radical immorality in dealing with goyim. Jews are extremely distrustful of goyim, but this shared distrust among Jews makes for trust among themselves. Even a capitalist Jew and communist Jew trust one another more than either trusts the goy ideological counterpart. In current America, blacks are like wild animals that are nearly impossible to domesticate. 200 yrs of slavery did little to weed out the savage gene. Whites are like domesticated dogs that are predictable and reliable. In the past, white dogs had to struggle and had some 'hunt' in them, but most of them are now complacent. Jews are like domesticated weasels or owls whose special traits were, if anything, magnified for maximum efficiency. They weren't bred to be nice but to hunt, kill, and dominate. 

Also, Spencer Quinn is wrong to see this as a white vs non-white(Jews included) thing. He writes: 

This is one reason non-whites are so desperate to come to and stay in traditionally white nations. Whites may not be the funniest people in the world, but at least we’re normal.

It's true enough that whites, especially those of Northern European stock, created the most livable societies, and it goes a long way to explain immigration patterns. But the more important lesson is that most non-whites are like whites in their tendency to forget and settle into the Norm of Niceness. Is it any wonder why deracination has spread so far and wide among most goy groups? Most Asians and Latin Americans in the US and Canada are just as clueless, faceless, and rootless as the whites. They lead the life of the Modern Consumer. Also, most non-whites are far less funny than whites. Mexico and China aren't exactly comedy centrals, whereas the British and Italians have been among the funniest people in history. What most goyim have in common is the tendency to fall into the Normality Trap and grow complacent. (Blacks are the exception because they are so naturally savage and crazy. They belong in a category all their own.) Does this mean that we should be as neurotic and nasty as the Jews? No, but there is something to learn from their Culture of Critique and anxiety as there is no End of History. History goes on, and it is an endless struggle. Francis Fukuyama, upon the end of the Cold War, envisioned a future of eternal normality with the triumph of individualism, democracy, and free markets. Apparently, the good and right ideas won, and rest of history would be about the spread and implementation of those 'values'. But in fact, power doesn't work that way. The complacent will always lose to the contentious. 

Another lesson to take from The Joke is that 'Normal' People lack the fire. They range from lukewarm to cool. They would rather be part of the approved Norm and not ruffle any feathers than boldly envision and insist on something powerful and impassioned. In The Joke, the whites are yielding and mainly want to get along without stirring up 'controversy'. It makes for a nice and calm order among their own kind but no strong personality to re-imagine society. It explains why so many whites fell under the sway of Jewish Influence. For good or ill, Jews with stronger personalities think bigger. They think beyond the normal and staid. Thus, whites are impressed by such power of vision. After all, it was abnormal Stanley Kubrick who impressed the normal Ron Howard, not the other way around. So, while it makes for a pleasant society when most people are nice-and-normal, the people who change the trajectory of history will always be a people-apart. If whites don't want to fall under the sway of Jews, they must create powerful personalities of their own, the ones with goy-chutzpah. (Jews feared Germans up to World War II and hate Donald Trump because, unlike most other Northern European types, the Germans and the Don have big personalities to rival those of Jews.) Why did so many 'normal' whites fall under the sway of not only Jews but of homo and Negroes? Homos are nuts but audacious in their vanity and self-celebration and Negroes break down normal boundaries and excite and titillate white folks.

Those smug with 'normalcy' will lose to those who smuggle the secrets of power.

Some Observations on Jewsteronomy — What are the relations between Jewish Power Elites and Ordinary Jewish Masses — Jews compared to Japanese — To Own and to be Owned

Notes in Reply to GGAllin's comments on the Saker's ruminations on Russians and Jews:

https://www.unz.com/tsaker/our-fundamental-disagreement-about-wwii-hitler-jews-and-race/#comment-3706681

Since I began earning over $20/hour late in life, I’m not nearly a billionaire. Have little to no influence other than if I write something in an online forum or Tweets. It’s weird to read about “me” as an existential threat, but it’s interesting to grasp the context, of past harms done by “my people” who I pretty much don’t know any other than immediate siblings. It makes more sense than “irrational hate”.

It's not about YOU per se, though an average Jew, with an income of nearly 100,000, does make more than $20 an hour. The fact is powerful Jews will likely look down you as a 'dumb Jew'. That said, rich Jews do care about lesser Jews more than rich whites care about lesser whites, and that's something. We goyim don't see YOU, an individual, as an 'existential threat'. Indeed, if all or most Jews were like you, whites and Jews would likely get along. Most people want to peacefully co-exist with others, even folks of different ethnicity, in a sound and stable system. Even under Nazi rule, most German individuals were like you. They were not fire-breathing Nazi monsters. They were working stiffs who got up every morning, went to work, returned home to family, and relaxed, then did the same the next day. But Germany was then under Hitler's rule, and Hitler could be batshit crazy. National Socialist elites guided Germanic energies towards dark ends. In a typical socio-political order, most individuals are powerless and end up serving the agenda of the rulers. So, even anti-Nazi Germans ended up working and paying taxes to support Nazism. And most Jewish individuals end up supporting Jewish Power. One reason is relative powerlessness of the masses(who are like herds of cattle without control of levers and steering wheel of power), but the other reason is most people, with free will and left to their own devices, will choose their own side(as the devil they know or feel familiar with) over the other side. Even as they know their cabal of elites are plenty flawed and even rotten, they figure its rule is preferable to being conquered and/or controlled by the other side. Even Jewish Israelis who are deeply critical of Zionist rule would rather be ruled by Jewish elites than by Arab overlords. And this is why many Jewish individuals continue to support Jewish power. Furthermore, even as they know much of it is rotten, they nevertheless feel a pride of power — the incredible fact of Jews as 2% of America controlling the greatest power in the world — and a paranoia for the Other, the potential new pogromites or 'nazis', if goyim were to regain elite power. Indeed, this is why Germans and Japanese also supported their regimes to the very end in WWII. What if the conquering Russians kill or rape all Germans? What if victorious Americans wipe out all Japanese?

Also, even though a single German was like most other 'ordinary individual' around the world, there was a certain tendency within Germanic Teutonism to push things too far. It's like one straw on a camel's back is nothing, but enough of them will break its back. Even though Nazism and its horrors were not inevitable and could have been avoided(without defeat in WWI and the ensuing economic depression), there was still something powerful and irrational in German national character that, under certain circumstances, could cast a dark shadow over the world. It's like one little flame is nothing, but if you combine the flames together, it can form into ag massive pyre that can burn down a forest.
Same was true of Japan during WWII. Your average Japanese guy was a nice person. But there was something extreme and insane in Japanese national character that, under certain circumstances, could unleash a hellish kind of madness. It's like there is the sane side of Yonoi in MERRY CHRISTMAS MR LAWRENCE but also the obsessive side driven by dark national mythos.
Same with Negroes. One Negro isn't much of a problem(though, to be sure, problem enough), but too many Negroes leads to a critical mass or critical badass of jivery, criminality, and madness.

If a single Jew was dropped into any goy community, he would likely just get along. Much the same if just a few were dropped. But with sufficient numbers, Jews tend to go into Judeo-centric solar mode: They feel goyim must revolve around them than vice versa. They alter the gravitational dynamics between Jews and goyim. Though much smaller in number, the Jewish Covenant-mentality and pride-of-intellect provide Jews with a super-gravity-pack that can warp the relativity of political power.
Even as a minority, they feel like they own the place and should set the agenda and tell others what to do. Look at Jewish behavior under early Bolshevism. Look at Jewish behavior in 'capitalist' Russia of the 1990s. Granted, Jewish chutzpah wouldn't be so effective if not for goy goopery. Jewish culture taught Jews to be resilient and tenacious, even at the genetic level via selective mating that favored merchants and scholars. In contrast, Russian Orthodox culture and agro-centrism bred a race of people who were passive, witless, and expended most of their energies on useless diversions like swilling vodka, wrestling with bears, and dancing in such manner to blow the knees. While Jews were singing with their minds, Russians were dancing with their bodies. Guess which side gained advantage over the other?



So, while it's inconceivable that a tiny number of Russians could ever gain control over a vast majority Jewish population, even a small number of Jews could gain power over Russians. It's like a horse can't own a man, but a man can own a horse and ride it. Indeed, Jews even gained power over Anglos, the mightiest people that ever lived, so they naturally could so easily toy with Russians. Yet, there is a certain paradox here when we consider Jews-and-Anglos and Jews-and-Slavs. How strange that, in the end, Jewish power over Anglos was more total than power over Russians(or Italians). Why would this be if Russians and Greasers have been far less impressive and competent than the Anglos? This is where corruption and lack of scruples are almost an advantage for the goyim. Anglos, being more committed to Rule of Law, meritocracy, and fair play, were bound to be more sensitive to charges of hypocrisy and dirty tricks. Also, Anglos came to revere Rule of Law as a cornerstone of their might. So, Jews could exploit Anglo Ethos and Rule of Law to gain total power over Anglos on legal and ethical grounds. But among Russkies and Greasers, legality counts for less than machinations of power. So, despite being less impressive than Anglos, Russkies have been more adept at wresting power back from the Jews by dirty means(but then Jews also used dirty means to gain power over Russians).

Even though an average Jew is just an ordinary person, doesn't he share the values and worldview of powerful globo-homo Jews? After all, Jews, more than any other people, support globo-homo. Jews, more than most white groups, support Diversity. If all powerful/rich Jews were to die of some disease today, and if they were replaced by average Jews as new elites, would things really be all that different? I think not. Look at Max Boot, Julia Ioffe, and the Vindman Brothers. They came to the US with little or nothing. They began as ordinary Jews. But once they gained elite positions, they've been working with rest of World Jewry to mess things up for white goyim. A new batch of Jewish elites would likely push for mass immigration, great replacement, White Nakba, wars for Israel, cold war on Russia, hate-war on Iran, promotion of 'white guilt', total blind support for Israel, and etc. Now, YOU yourself may be an atypical Jew of a more pro-white and 'conservative' bent. But most ORDINARY Jews voted for Obama and Hillary. Most Jews hate Trump, and even most of those on his side are merely using him to serve Zionism 200% than merely 100%. Alan Dershowitz hasn't any good will toward Trump and Deplorables. He's such a fanatical Zionist that he figures Trump is more useful to the Israeli agenda.

Since middle school, I grew up in a suburb with many Jews, and most of them were nice people. As individuals, I'd say they were generally better, or preferable(and conscientious on the personal level), than most other groups, such as Scotch-Irish hillbillies, 'dumb Polacks', messy Mexicans, haggly Hindus, trashy Irish, doglike yellows, and of course, the ghastly Negroes. As individuals they are nice people, but over the years I've learned most of them are for globalism, great replacement of white goyim, exploiting collective 'white guilt', pushing jungle fever, and the like. Also, their hypocrisy on political matters amazes me. Most are staunch Zionist nationalists, but they denigrate nationalist feeling among goyim. They incessantly yammer about 'white guilt' about blacks but expect whites to support Zionist tyranny over Palestinians. They go on and on about Shoah but never face up to Jewish role in 20th century historical 'crimes'. And they push globo-homo. Most voted for Obama and think pushing jungle fever on white women is the greatest thing while they talk about Arabs and Palestinians as near-animals who should be pushed out of Greater Israel. I know this from personal conversations. So, even though a Jewish individual can be a nice person, associate, or friend, his political attitudes, combined with those of other Jews, signal danger to the well-being of goyim. I mean, isn't there something truly rotten in how Jews, the most privileged and powerful(and over-represented people in elite circles), berate whites for 'white privilege'? Isn't it lowdown for Jews to say Americanism is about colorblindness but then insisting ALL Americans must support Zionist-Israelis over Palestinians and Iranians? If the US must be a colorblind nation and fair broker among all peoples, why this supremacist outlook that favors Jews uber alles?

Even though your average person, Jew or otherwise, is different from members of the elite, the fact is elite outlooks don't come from nowhere. Often, they spring from the national character of the people. After all, Jews didn't land on American shores as elites. Many of them came with little or nothing. So, most members of today's Jewish elites have humble origins and rose from the bottom. So, that means their elite attitudes are, to a large extent, an expression of something intrinsic to Jewishness. Same with blacks. If all elite blacks were to die this moment and be replaced by ordinary blacks, the result would be much the same because black jiggity-ness has roots in core blackness. Blacks who write for the New York Times just offer a fancier and more haute version of, "Yo, I want all the blings and shit."

I never read the Talmud.

I believe you, but you don't have to read the thing to be affected by it. Talmudic attitudes and outlook have seeped into so much of Jewish life that, even without having read it, many Jews live it in so many Jews(and this true of secular as well as religious Jews). It's like most communists never read Das Kapital but its ideas defined so much of communist life. And plenty of Christians, incredible as it may sound, never read all(or any) of the New Testament, not least because so many goyim were illiterate over the ages. But its tenets still colored many aspects of their lives.

In a way, the problem now is less with Jews than with goyim. Instead of trying to make Jews be like goyim, we should try to make goyim be like Jews. Why should Jews want to be like goyim when so many goyim are so stupid and pathetic? Arabs can't get their act together. Japanese have tentacle porn as culture. Russians are lazy drunkards. Mexicans are garbage-tossing tards. Even the once great Germans and Anglos are castrated cucks. So, why should Jews try to be like them? No, we should all strive to be like Jews. Now, this isn't easy because most goyim don't have Jewish intelligence. But they can still emulate the next most potent thing about Jews: Chutzpah and covenant. Whites must think like Sean Connery in UNTOUCHABLES, written by Jewish David Mamet no less. If the enemy brings a knife to a fight, you bring a gun. If they push, you push back harder.



The problem is goyim hasn't been pushing back against Jews. When Jews push, goyim must push back. Also, Jews got the Covenant that says they have a special contract with the ultimate power. The problem with Christianity and Islam is their versions of the 'covenant' are too bland and broad, shared with too large a population. I mean how can whites preserve their unique identity and power if their Christo-Covenant must be shared with Negroes, yellows, browns, and etc? No, just like Jews have a JEWISH covenant, whites must have a WHITE covenant, and this will require a white man of prophetic power who communes with the ultimate power and then brings this truth to his people. (Imagine what Hitler might have been capable of if he'd spoken for all whites, Germanics and Slavs and Latins and even pro-white Jews, instead of just for the Nordics and 'Aryans'.) He must be a river to his people. But do whites have a prophetic soul? Maybe the Germans once did. After all, unlike Greeks and Romans who lacked the Big Picture and emphasized individualism — on grounds that after you died, you just ended up in Hades and that was that — , Germanic mythology had a grand vision of fate and destiny whereby all the great warriors of Valhalla would unite once again to fight the final battle. It was such bigness of vision that made impassioned Germans the greatest musical composers. And it's no wonder that Richard Wagner and Nietzsche were both Germans. And it was Jews in Germanosphere who developed the most powerful ideas, even if dangerous. Could French or Italian culture have produced a Marx? (Also, it was the German quasi-prophet Martin Luther who altered the history of Christianity with a defiant vision of his own.) Jews have long had prophetic power, but this was magnified under Germanic influence. Granted, the problem with Germanic prophecy was its excessive doom-and-gloom, a fatalistic nihilism that unsurprisingly led to the hyper-Wagnerian excesses of Hitler. The awesome side of Hitler couldn't have been possible if he were moderate, but a bit of moderation could have saved National Socialism from itself.

Now, goyim can't be smart like Jews just because they want to be. But even the un-smart can work on chutzpah and covenant. After all, even the idiot Arabs produced a great prophet in the figure of Muhammad. White folks need a White Muhammad who attains the covenant for his people. As Meat Loaf said, two out of three ain't bad. Blacks are proof that chutzpah goes a long way(and homos are proof of the power of Poopchutespah). Even though blacks don't make much sense, they always push back when they are criticized. Jews easily run roughshod over apologetic whites, but even a bunch of angry Jews can't make Al Sharpton budge because the wildass Negro hollers back. And look how Ace Rothstein is frozen with fear when Nicky Santoro uses greaser-chutzpah on him. Anglos were never up for that kind of push-back. This is why Jews run circles around Anglo-types in Marx Brothers movies. But imagine what would happen if Groucho and Chico tried to do a number on Nicky Santoro or Tommy(in GOODFELLAS). If Anglo elites had talked to Jews like Nicky does with Ace Rothstein, they'd still have the power. But they had to keep their 'dignity' at all costs. Now, dignity, or true dignity, is about standing your ground with integrity and pushing back against BS. It's not about staying 'clean' by the art of 'reputation'. For Anglos, 'dignity' really means haute status, and that's why they focus on perception than conviction. So, if the New Normal says globo-homo is the New Dignity, Anglos immediately go along with that to maintain their conceit of 'dignity'. They regard 'dignity' as dress and gown than body and soul. Look how Charles Murray the bald-headed cuck-fool supported 'gay marriage' when it became the fashionable thing among elites. In contrast, even though blacks are dumber and poorer than whites, they hold their own against Jews because they push back and possess a special sense of black covenant called FOABP, or Fear of a Black Planet to scare 'honkeys' with, though one might call it POTA or Planet of the Africans.




There are two kinds of people in the world. Owners and the owned. Masters and Slaves. Masters own, slaves are owned. When we consider the Jewish Worldview, it is to be owners of the world. But before you own others, you must own yourself. You must see yourself as special, not a commodity to be traded. And your people must treat others of the tribe as fellow owners. Jews developed this sense via the Covenant that said even the lowest humble Jew was equally precious in the eyes of God the Almighty who didn't favor some Jew simply because he was richer than others. Thus, every Jew, even a lowly Jew, felt that he owned himself as a human. He wasn't owned by others. The only power that owns him is God. In contrast, goy orders were made of masters and slaves. Masters owned the slaves, the minions, the rabble who had no autonomous self-worth. (Also, the elites felt as owners ONLY IF they retained political/military power over the minions. Without worldly power, they felt as worthless.) So, only the elites felt as owners whereas the masses felt as the owned. This was Russia under the Tsars. The Tsar was the master, albeit supposedly a benevolent patriarch, over the masses of Russians who were deemed childlike and cattle-like. Most Russians felt owned by the Tsar and the nobility, and this mentality lingered even after serfdom was abolished. It is then hardly surprising that a single Jew in Russia had 100x the confidence and will-power of an average Russian. Communism didn't help matters. Though it spoke of liberation, Russians just became owned by the Iron State ruled by the likes of Lenin and Stalin as new master-owners.

In contrast to Russia/USSR, the US imbued its citizens with the sense of ownership. And yet, even this couldn't stand up to Jewish power because Anglo-American concept of ownership was centered on individuality, dry letter of the law, property rights, and opportunity. In other words, it was bound to lead to atomization and the Coming Apart along class lines. Also, the excessive emphasis on property rights meant that consumers obsessed with commodities could themselves become human commodities whose only value is economic or GDP-related. No wonder we hear stuff like, "Great Replacement is okay as long as economic activity goes up." Also, excessive materialist-individualism meant that rich Americans would feel as winners or uber-masters, while poorer Americans would feel as abject 'losers' or servant-class.
If whites had a Jewishy concept of ownership that was essentially tribal, cultural, historical, and spiritual, they would be in a much better shape. For one thing, they would be united as a people on grounds that all whites, regardless of class, would be considered as brethren within the white family with shared destiny. Such a rich cultural sense of ownership would mean that even a poor white owns something of great historical-spiritual value, something that cannot be priced with dollars. But the soulless materialist concept of ownership in the US means that the haves feel like masters(as long as they keep on 'having') while have-nots feel like slaves or 'losers'. It's like what Kurt Vonnegut said.

Jews are owners twofold in the US. As the wealthiest group, they own so much of America. But as Covenant-ists, they feel that they own themselves. They are their own people with a deep and rich history. Indeed, even when Jewish immigrants arrived on American soil with little or nothing, they still felt that they owned themselves, not by goyim no matter how richer the goyim may have been. You see this in the Bible too. Even when Hebrews are held captive by more powerful groups, Jews feel they own their own souls. If any Being owns them, it's God and only Him. This is in stark contrast to the Japanese Way where nearly everyone felt he was owned by someone higher. The essence of Japanese-ness was to serve. To serve the master than be a master. And besides, even being a master meant one had to serve a higher master with absolute devotion. 'Bushi', the term for samurai, means 'to serve'. So, when we compare Jews and Japanese in the US, the difference couldn't be starker. Jews feel they own themselves(and even feel that they should own the silly inferior goyim). But Japanese-Americans are happy to be owned by the dominant power. Look at Francis Fukuyama, that worthless spineless cuck-servant before the Jewish globo-homo masters. He's like the Japanese after World War II who groveled at the feet of General MacArthur as the New Shogun. Of course, it was right for Japan to surrender as they couldn't continue with the war effort, but did they have to grovel before the power that had so utterly crushed them? Even if Israel were to face defeat and be conquered by the Other, Jews won't grovel. They will smile, shake hands, and pretend to go along, but they will not surrender their sense of ownership to the Other. Indeed, even after Exile in Roman Times, Jews never lost their sense of spiritual ownership of the Holy Land. That is the difference between Jews and Japanese. This is why, even though Israel is a much smaller nation than Japan, it is getting stronger while Japan is dying. Even as Jews spread globalization to goy nations to destroy them, they maintain total Jewish ownership of Jewish homeland, Jewish bodies, and Jewish history. In contrast, the hapless Japanese cucks, in total obeisance to their globalist overlords, are committing massive harakiri, also true of other East Asian nations with the possible exception of China. Japanese surrendered their Narrative to the West, and Japanese regard their women as sex toys as pornography is a big feature of their 'culture'. It's a nation of plastic toys than soulful humans.

White people used to feel as owners in America. They owned their bodies and souls. They owned their narratives, icons & idols, and the land. They conquered it, they claimed it, they built it, and they kept it. They sometimes owned other peoples, especially the blacks as slaves, but the idea of white folks being owned by the Other, or White Slavery, was anathema to white pride and dignity. And this was due to White Race-ism, the greatest thing in American history. White Race-ism was the glue, the bond, and a kind of emotional sub-covenant that held white folks together.
But the over-emphasis on individualism, materialism, and universalism eventually frayed this sense of white unity of ownership of body, soul, and land. Individualism led to atomization, an excessive focus on me-as-winner than we-as-owners. So, if a white individualist could betray his own kind and cut a deal to make money, he did just that. So many whites became a bunch of Mitt Romneys. Materialism meant that the essence of life was to buy stuff. So, one's value was tied to consumer goods and services. That meant one had no value unless attached to some hedonistic-economic activity. In other words, if electricity were to go out, a white person would have no value, no reason to live. And all this talk of universalism meant that white bodies, white lands, white wealth, and even white history could be owned by others. So, we got jungle fever and Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs. We have white-built sports taken over by blacks who now reign as heroes and idols of whites; this means whites are owned by black demigods in fantasy, recreation, and entertainment. Whites used to protect their heroes from the Other. So, white sports kept out blacks, the tougher race. But individualism and universalism undermined white race-ism and paved the way for black supremacism. This has been crucial because the most impressionable things in peoples memories are the peak moments of thrill. People ignore or forget most things in their daily lives and remember only the most exciting moments. It's like we look at peaks of mountains than at slopes or valleys. As blacks took over the peaks of sports, pop music, and sexualized culture, most whites conflate blackness with peak thrills of life. Whites don't even own their heroes. As the demigod heroes are of the Other, it's like blacks own the sensations of whites. And as black entertainers and athletes are owned by Jewish moguls, it's like Jews own whites two-fold. They own the blacks who own the whites-as-hapless-cucky-wucks.
With the fading of white race-ism, whites can no longer claim ownership of white lands, even in Europe. Whites are not owners but mere commodities. White lands can be claimed by anyone, and white people can be declared obsolete or 'antique' and replaced by new people as new cattle, new pets, or new furniture. The rise of pornification of society means whites have gone from owners to the owned. Look at Miley Cyrus and other creatures of Jewish-run Disney, now a shikse-whore-factory. They are not humans but commodities, sex dolls. And white people accept this because they don't even own their minds. Indeed, white minds are now mere extensions of Jewish-owned electronic media. If Jews say 'gay marriage is holy', white minds hooked to Jewish-owned TV nod along. Even the white religion of Christianity has been owned and altered by Jews into worship of Globo-Homo as so many churches now are essentially about worship of Sodomy and tranny-penis-cutting than anything else. (But then, the fact that whites had been converted in such huge numbers to Christianity, a religion originating from the Other, suggests whites are easily owned. Incapable of creating a prophetic vision of their own, they surrendered their souls to a Jew as Son of God.)

Now, imagine Arabs in Israel controlling prostitution & pornography and using Jewish women as sex meat for Arab men, Palestinian men, and Negro men. Jews would be outraged that another group is treating Jewish women as objects to be owned and exploited. They would see it as Arabs treating Jews like commodities. But Jews apparently see nothing wrong with treating whites that way. Worse, if whites a hundred years ago would have been shocked and offended by Jews using whites in such manner, white cuck-maggots of today are sheepishly resigned to the fate of existing to be owned, bought/sold, and ordered around by Jewish Power. Even Donald Trump, who'd been harassed by Jewish Power from day one, is totally owned by Jews and do their bidding, like killing Soleimani, a proud man who is NOT owned by Jews. (And of course, young white men in the US military don't fight to defend America as a nation they own. No, they are mere mercenary goons owned by Jewish Power that sends them to slaughter Arabs and Muslims for the glory of Zion that owns almost all US politicians who are worthless toadies.) Indeed, it seems as if owned white fools like Trump and John McCain are envious of goyim who are not owned. No wonder McCain barked so loudly at Vladimir Putin. No wonder Trump took out Soleimani, a painful reminder to cuck-dogs like The Donald that indeed a goy can be his own master and not be owned by Jewish supremacists.
Under Sorosian Jewish Supremacism, a white man in Europe who says his nation belongs to his own people is now a 'far rightist', but at the same time, all European elites are expected to say Israel belongs to Jews and Jews only. So, Jews are to be admired and supported as Owners whereas whites must resign themselves to Owned status. Indeed, it's gotten to the point where whites can't even own their own history as justification for owning their lands. Under Jewish control, white narratives are being taken away from white hands and rewritten by Jews, white cuck-scribes, and blacks into a 'Diversity' narrative. In other words, Swedes have no ownership of historical narrative to buttress territorial ownership of their land because... uh... the Vikings were black and shit. Right, and because some European merchants visited China and India, those Asian lands belong just as much to whites as to yellows and browns. Can you imagine anyone in China or India falling for that bull? But then, Japan seems falling for it as it's just a cuck-wussy colony of the US that is a cuck-wussy colony of the Empire of Judea.