If the Homo-Tranny Community goes by the Acronym LGBT or LGBTQ, the Straight-Moral Community should go by NSMF or NSMFR: Normal-Straight-Male-Female-Real

It's comical that the Homo(and Tranny) Community should be called LGBT or LGBTQ considering that only 2.5% of the population is genuinely homosexual(and trans-gender). L is for Lesbian, G is for Gay, B is for Bi-Sexual, and T is for Trans-gender. Some even add Q for Queer, which is even more redundant. But why do they need L and G when H(for Homosexual) will do just fine? After all, 'Homosexual' comprises both lesbians and male homos, aka 'gays'. As for 'bisexual', they should just be counted as 'homosexual' since they do homo stuff. After all, if someone is both criminal and cop, he is essentially a criminal. A crooked cop has lost the right to be considered a cop, an upholder of law and order. As for trannies, they are such a small fraction of the population that it's ridiculous to treat them like some important social group. The current Tranny-mania is all due to mass hype by the Jewish-controlled Media. Take away the delirious promotion of trannies as the new 'angels', and no one would notice or care about those clowns. Furthermore, some trannies seem to be just extra-twisted homos while the rest are more demento-sexual than anything else. In a sane world, most people would agree that Bruce 'Caitlyn' Jenner has lost his marbles. As for Q, it's just another name for 'homosexual'; the only difference is Q-types tend to be more culturally & intellectually oriented and more willing to make a BIG deal of their homo-ness. So, the a 4-or-5 letter acronym to describe a tiny percentage of the population doesn't make much sense. Granted, I suppose it could be worse as some 'scholars' in so-called Gender Studies insist that there are maybe 50 or more genders to choose from. If you've ever looked at the list, all of them are just quirky synonyms for straight, homo, or gender-trollish. Indeed, if the trolls at 4chan wanted to mock Gender Studies, they couldn't have done it any better because universities are now unwittingly into self-parody(and gets awfully triggered when exposed).

Why all this hair-splitting over a mere 2.5% of the population? Granted, Americans are so stupid and misinformed(not least due to brainwashing by the Jew-run media, academia, and entertainment) that many Americans think that up to 25% of Americans are 'gay' or LGBTQ or whatever. Also, because of the Globo-Homo Jewish Pavlovian trick of associating 'gays' with cleanliness, kindliness, smiles-and-sunshine, lace and linen, the 'new normal', and even holiness(what with homo-colors now being displayed in churches & important occasions and with homo casualties of AIDS being canonized like saints), the majority of Americans now think there is nothing holier and more sacred than 'gayness'. Jews want it this way because Homomania is really Jewish-concocted, Jewish-funded, and Jewish-promoted proxy for Jewish globalist supremacism. Jews value homos as allies because both groups are ambitious, arrogant, and high-achievement(in many of the same sectors of vice, entertainment, narcissism, elitism, gangsterism, and intellectualism). Also, Jews want to normalize the idea that a minority elite should rule over a servile and cuckish majority. So, vast majority of non-Jews sucking up to the Jews = elite minority supremacism = vast majority of straights sucking up to Homos(and trannies).
But the fact remains that the Homo or H-Community is only 2.5% of the population, if that. Granted, some estimates put the percentage of LGBTQ folks at around 3.5% of the population, but even that is a small number. Why do we need L and G and B and T and Q(though some activists want to tag on even more letters) to name such a small community that could easily be summed up as HOMO or H is beyond common sense? One reason is Homos, the most powerful of whom are men, want to distract us from the biological fact of what homo-men do. They don't want us to focus on their being Ass-boys, or guys who stick their dongs up the arseholes of other men. They don't want us to ass-ociate homosexuality with fecal penetration among men. Even as they insist that homosexuality is BIOLOGICAL(and even genetic), they want us to regard homosexuality as essentially a cultural, creative, or even spiritual endeavor. So, we should look at the cultural manifestations and expressions of the Homo Community than focus on what homos do for 'sex'. (This is rather self-defeating because so much of homo expressions are lurid, erotic, and even downright pornographic. After all, most of what happens at 'gay pride' festivals are not reminders that Andre Gide and Marcel Proust were homos but that 'gays' are wild & crazy and want to have orgies in bathhouses.) Even if it's true that homos are disproportionately represented in the arts, culture, fashion, design, and entertainment -- the 'creative' domains -- , the fact is most homos aren't all that talented, and some have no sense for art. If homoness = creativity, it would follow that non-creative homos are not homo or 'gay'. But the fact is even the dumbest and least creative assboy is still a homo because he wants to indulge in penis-sucking and fecal penetration. If there is a common denominator among rich homos, poor homos, smart homos, dumb homos, creative homos, and un-creative homos, it's the fact that, when it comes to 'sexual' pleasure, they are all assboys, assniks, or asskins. Furthermore, there are plenty of non-homos even in fields commonly associated with homos. A lot of women work in fashion, and if there aren't more of them, it's because the 'Gay Mafia' conspire to keep the choicest positions for themselves. Some women grumble about this, but most dare not press the issue for the same reason that most non-Jews remain silent about crooked Jews in Hollywood. Homos, like Jews, are seen as sacred objects, and complaining about 'too many gays' or 'gay collusion' could lead to charges of 'homophobia'. And, that is why fashion has become more homo-heavy than it really needs to be. Also, there are plenty of straight men in arts and design. While homos are clearly disproportionately represented in such fields, they are far from being the exclusive domains of 'gay creativity'. Besides, there could be more non-homo men in certain fields IF such weren't so carefully guarded by the 'gay mafia' as their own. Homos are bitchy-shameless in working together behind-the-scenes and under-the-table to rig things in their favor. They are just like Jews and Asian-Indians in networking and intra-favoritism, if not more so. And because they have powerful allies among Jews, they can get away with a lot of things. Consider how so many homo perverts like Ed Buck got away with so much bad behavior because the corrupt Law was on his side. Rule of Law is for the birds, as far as the elites are concerned. The well-connected, esp if Jewish or homo, can get away with lots of stuff that we can't even imagine.

One reason why many non-homos steer free of homo-dominated fields and industries is because there is little recourse to being abused. If a homo grabs your ass or crotch and if you complain(and the matter turns into one of 'he said, he said'), the homo will have the edge because the Law and Media(both controlled by Jews) will side with the homo. Any media person or lawyer(or law firm) that takes a tough stance against corrupt & powerful Jews or homos knows that he will be targeted for destruction. (When Jews or homos fall, they are usually brought down by other Jews or homos. It's like only blacks can call black people 'nigger'.) Jews and Homos act like mafia goons. As far as they're concerned, Rule of Law is for the little guy. They use every dirty trick in the book to get theirs, and because of the Jew Taboo(the tripwire of 'antisemitism') and Gay Rites(the fear of blaspheming the Holy Homo with 'homophobia'), they can easily silence anyone left and right as they're backed with media power and mob passion(as tons of PC idiots can be relied upon to foam at the mouth and bark rabidly like deranged hounds in online forums or real-life protests; their lives and souls are so hollow that their main mode of feeling righteous is worshiping the Holy Homo and Tranny Angel). So, Jewish bad boys(and bad girls) and Homo perverts have gotten away with so much rotten behavior, all the while playing 'victim' against any criticism that is characterized as 'antisemitic' or 'homophobic'.

Anyway, if the H-Community insists on labeling itself as LGBT or LGBTQ, then the straight community should follow suit. After all, the straight community has more reasons to do so because there are so many more straight and normal people than homo and queer ones. Surely, if a mere 2.5% of the population gets to claim 4 or 5 letters to form an acronym, then the 97.5% of the population has even more justification for doing so. Then, what should be the acronym for the straight community? Well, there is N for Normal. There is S for Straight. There is M for male and F for female. That would be NSMF, but we may add R to mean Real: NSMFR. Why 'real'? Because unlike the LGBTQ pseudo-intellectualism that prefers to play with notions of 'gender', NSMFR-thought prefers the reality of Sex. Gender means socio-cultural constructions of sexual roles, whereas Sex means the biological reality of male and female. Now, used wisely, both terms are meaningful. After all, while it's biologically true that there are two sexes, male and female, the truth is different cultures and periods define manhood and womanhood somewhat differently. Some cultures believe it's okay for men to show their emotions and even cry, while other cultures say that's sissy behavior only suitable for womenfolk. Also, culture changes over time. At one time, it was common in the West for men to have long hair. And then, long hair was almost exclusively for women while men had short hair. But in the 1960s, it was vogue for men to grow their hair long again. So, gender is a useful notion in understanding that different cultures and different periods define manhood and womanhood differently. The problem is when notions of gender turn into a full-blown ideology and claim that maleness and femaleness themselves are social constructs than biological realities. That is surely crazy. Consider: Different cultures defined childhood and adulthood differently. What is deemed childish in one culture is acceptable among adults in another culture. So, society goes a long way in defining the ways of childhood and adulthood. However, it'd be crazy to conclude that, because culture plays a key role in defining the perimeters of the various stages of life, childhood and adulthood must totally be social constructs and have no basis in biological reality. That would mean puberty is a social than a biological process. While there is a grey area between childhood and adulthood, there is clearly a stage known as childhood and a state known as adulthood. (Maybe the rise of gender-confusion has something to do with arrested development, a perennial teenage-mentality among so many adults. After all, while there is obvious childhood and obvious adulthood, it is difficult to discern exactly when a child becomes an adult. It is a dramatic but gradual process whereupon children undergo hormonal changes to 'metamorphose' from kid to grown-up. But for several years, they have attributes of both children and adults, and they are very confused during this process. But eventually, the childhood phase is gone for good, and who was once a child and then a child-adult is fully an adult. Or, it used to be like that. But with the rise of Youth Culture, so many people are still stuck with teenage-mentalities[or even lower]. Whether it's adult males in the US hooked to comic book movies, Japanese women hooked to Hello Kitty, or even the cultural class seriously pontificating about silly Pop-Idol music, it's like so many adults failed to psycho-emotionally make it to adulthood even if their bodies did. The vile pop star madonna is still stuck on teenage-mentality. We have middle-aged women getting green or purple hair like they're Cyndi Lauper of "Girls Just Wanna Fun" fame. Many people, especially women, seem to be mentally aging backward when they reach their late 30s, trying ever more desperately to regain their youth. And consider Michael Jackson who was infected with a serious case of Peter-Pan-ism. Of course, Peter Pan character is both androgynous and 'agingynous', a creature between male and female, between childhood and adulthood. On Broadway, he was always played by a female for some reason.)

By using the acronym LGBTQ, the H-Community has created the impression that it is much bigger than it really is. It's like birds puff up their plumage to seem larger and more intimidating or attractive. Homos have exaggerated their power by 'Political/Cultural Plumaging'. With the backing of powerful Jewish globalists and their soulless cuck-collaborators, Homos have been allowed to take over entire downtown areas for parades, grab an entire month for themselves, claim 'gay' and 'pride' as almost exclusively homo-related terms, festoon places secular and religious with homo 'rainbow' colors, and grab token roles in even in movies and TV shows that have nothing to do with homosexuality. The cult of Gay Rites is such that a shortcut to righteousness is to recite Holy Homo sacraments. After all, Associative Morality is so much easier than active morality. It's much more challenging to actually do a good deed than score righteous Pokemon points by mouthing PC platitudes or waving the Homo flag. Christians, especially Catholics, were masters of Associative Morality over the centuries. So, never mind all the un-Christian, greedy, and nasty things they did. As long as they repeated certain rituals and recitations of faith, they were on the side of the Good. How easier to justify yourself with blessed chants and holy symbols than to actually go out there and DO SOMETHING to make the world a better place. And PC morons are just a secular version of Catholic Associative-Moralists. As long as they gesture 'correctly' with 'gay' colors and chant about 'diversity' & 'inclusion', they are on the side of the 'good' because the Power says so.

Just like a peacock exaggerates its size with grandiose display of feathers, the Homo Community uses globo-homo pageantry to fool the world into thinking it is much bigger than it really is.

In fact, despite all the hype, promotion, and marketing, the H-Community is only 2.5% of the entire population. Granted, the Homomaniacal propaganda beginning with kids(who are so naive, impressionable, and eager-to-please) is such that one report from Britain shows that nearly half the boys identify as something other than straight and male. In a world where kids are raised with 'gay' colors(as the holiest symbol) and reminded that homos-and-trannies deserve the most love and adoration, naturally a lot of silly children(for whom PC is the dominant ideology and Pop Culture is the only culture) don't want to be thought of as someone tagged with 'toxic masculinity'. Craziness can become the social norm by distortion fields of corrupt power. Consider how foot-binding had once become the norm among Chinese women. Look at the spread of tattoos or body graffiti(and uglier piercing) in today's degenerate society where most people know only PC and/or Pop Culture(now totally defined by nasty Jews, homo perverts, numbnut skanks, black thugs, and pathetic cucky-wucks).


The undeniable truth is the straight community is totally essential and much larger than the H-community. After all, even homos(and trannies) were created by real sex by men and women. (We are now told that 'men' can have kids too, but such people are merely women pretending to be 'men'. One thing for sure, men who pretend to be 'women' cannot have kids. Funny that if indeed 'sex is just a social construct called gender'.) So, 'gay pride' is really False Pride. Besides, how can any real pride be based on fecal penetration and penis-sucking among men or vaginal-grinding among women, neither of which has ANY biological purpose or meaning? But then, at least vaginal grinding is relatively clean, whereas homo fecal penetration among men is downright gross, sickening, unhealthy, and disease-spreading. It is Homo-Factual, not 'homophobic', to state the obvious physical facts associated with assboys and their putrid behavior. In a free society, we can accept the right or freedom of homo men to do as they please, but such people have no right to forbid us from speaking the truth. Homo fecal penetration is objectively gross and disgusting. Just how is it good and sound for a male sex organ to enter a poopchute? And how is it healthy for an anus to be pummeled by penises? It's only good for spreading germs and diseases. So, all this talk of 'gay pride' is based on falsehoods that became rampant only because the academia, media, courts, finance, and whore-politicians are owned and controlled by Jews who are most closely allied with homos. And many elite non-Jewish cucks went along because they realized that homos are on their side socio-economically and because, being soulless and craven, their substitute for both Christianity and Enlightenment has come to be Homomania, a perverse neo-spiritualization of secular decadence. (As for conservatives who are privately repulsed by Homomania, they kept silent because of the fear of Jewish Power that threatened anyone who overtly opposes the Agenda with excommunication and exile from elite circles.) If 'gay pride' is false pride, then REAL PRIDE is about the truth of love between men and women that is the foundation of life and meaning. So, let homos yammer about the false pride of 'gay pride'. Normal-Straight-Male-Female-Realists or NSMFR's should own REAL PRIDE. And the 'gay rainbow' of the LGBTQ freaks should be countered with the True Rainbow of the NSMFR. Though I've never been a Believer, I can appreciate the symbolism of the rainbow in the story of Noah and the Ark. How did Noah save life on Earth? He took one male and one female of each species, and upon finding land, the animals in Noah's ship embarked to replenish the world with life once again. That is the truth of life. It is created through the union of male and female. It is as true as 2 + 2 = 4 and the fact that the Earth is round and revolves around the Sun. But, Jews who've gained control of media, academia, finance, courts, and government would have us believe that homosexuality is just as biologically viable and normal(or new normal) as Real Sexuality between Man and Woman. Jews have fooled the dummies and the shallows. Dumb people can be made to believe anything, and shallow people, even if smart, are slaves of fads and fashion in their conceit of being 'cutting edge' or 'more evolved'. Their eyes are focused on what trinkets are hung on trees than on how the tree is alive only because of its deep roots in the soil. The truth of life is like a tree. And yet, there is a mystery to life that makes it seem a miracle. And that miracle is the creation of life from the love between man and woman. Then, it is fitting that in the Noah Story, the rainbow is associated with rebirth of life and re-population of the Earth by the mating of male and female. But in our deranged age, Jews have associated the rainbow with homo fecal penetration, lesbian poon-grinding, and tranny dick-and-ball-cutting-to-get-fake-vaginas.
Now, not all Jews are so demented as to support such foulness, but the great majority of Jews are totally supportive of Homomania, mainly because they see it as a proxy of Jewish globo-homo supremacism. We must reclaim the rainbow, the True Rainbow. Let homos have their 'gay rainbow' that is associated with buggery and penis-cutting. The True Rainbow must be associated with Noah and the truth of life, as either gift of God or product of evolutionary process. God or nature, the fact of life is that all complex animals and humans are born of male and female involving the proper use of sexual organs.

We hear so much about the hate and intolerance toward the LGBTQ community, but the fact is the Jew-run West is now all about hate and intolerance of the NSMFR Community, which is 97.5% of humanity. Just like Jews who are 2% of America push around the 98% that is gentile, Homos and Trannies(who are 2.5% of the population) push the rest of us around. Homos and even Trannies act in such manner because they have the backing of Jews. Just like the Tattaglias in THE GODFATHER got cocky because Barzini had their back, Homos know they can gay-whip the rest of us as long as all-powerful Jews keep them as the #1 ally.

This is why Homos are so hellbent on serving Jewish Globo-Homo power. Wherever Jewish Hegemony spreads, the priority is given to Homomania. Indeed, given the cult of Gay Rites, Jews can 'pink-wash' all their crimes around thew world by sticking Gay Victory Flags all over. So, Jewish financial gangsters on Wall Street and Zionist-globalist warmongers have been able to justify their deeds as being in service of spreading Holy Homomania. Just like so many morally-minded Westerners once supported imperialism as a vehicle of Christianity, so many proggies support globo-homo imperialism as a spreader of Holy Homo Faith. If Pentagon paints 'gay' colors on a bomb, most proggies will not protest even if it kills many innocents in the Middle East and Ukraine. After all, it'd be a holy homo bomb. Because homos are naturally arrogant, snobby, and narcissistic, the notion of 'enough' is not in their vocabulary. They want to be cheered and praised by all the world. They want to own the entire world as their stage, strut around like fashion models, and wave their sassy-assy homo colors at everyone. If Jews have chutzpah that makes them insatiable with power-lust, egomania, and greed, Homos have poopchutzpah that makes them preen like globo-neo-aristocrats over the unwashed masses. Jews whine about 'antisemitism'(and homos nag about 'homophobia'), but the Current West is all about Jewish globalists robbing us blind, addicting us to opioids, feeding us cultural slop, and hooking us to gambling. It is also about Jews riding the White Horse to wage Hate Campaigns around the world at Russia, Iran, Syria, Libya, Yemen, and Palestinians. Jews bitch about 'hate', but it's hard to think of another people as hate-filled and murderous as Jews. Jews insist that we must keep bombing nations hated by Israel. Jews insist we must hate Russia and Iran even though it's the Jews, not Russians or Iranians, who robbed us financially and are taking away our freedom, rights, guns, pride, and border security. Chutzpahistic Jews are great at projection. They hate and hate, but when we say NO MORE to their hatred and demand liberation from Jewish Supremacism, they accuse Us of hate. Imagine that. It's like a master blaming a slave-who-wants-to-be-free-of-the-master of 'slavery'. So, if we no longer want to hate Russia, Iran, Syria, Libya, & Palestinians and if we no longer want to take part in Wars for Israel, Jews say WE are guilty of 'hate' and 'antisemitism'. What a vile disgusting bunch of people. Granted, not all Jews are this demented, and there are courageous Jewish voices who see the injustice of what Jewish globalist-supremacists are doing, but they are too few and far between, and the depressing fact is that nearly all powerful Jews are globo-homo supremacists and warmongers and the vast majority of Jews support the globo-homo hegemonic imperialism of monsters like Sheldon Adelson and Chuck Schumer. Scratch the surface of Jewishness, and there is little difference between Jewish Liberals and Jewish Conservatives. Both are just veiling themselves behind convenient ideologies to push forth what is essentially a Tribal-Supremacist Agenda.

As for homos and trannies of the LGBTQ community, we know how hissy, bitchy, nasty, and vicious these preening, sneering, snobby, snotty, narcissistic, neo-aristocratic, and hyper-elitist pricks can be. Homos were never going to be content with mere tolerance because, as with Jews and Negroes, there is something ultra-egomaniacal and megalomaniacal about their character. There is a reason why so many homos gravitate toward fashion, entertainment, vice industries, and elite sectors. This is especially true of homo men. They have the combination of male aggression and female vanity. Imagine combining James Cagney with the Queen in SNOW WHITE, and there you have the basic homo character. (What makes homo men especially neurotic is they are obsessive about order, neatness, and cleanliness BUT they indulge in gross acts like fecal penetration. Homos are germ-freaks who smear their puds with fecal matter. Homos are more sensitive of odors but stick their dongs in the most malodorous part of the body. It's no wonder they are so twisted in the head. But because so many homos are so fastidious in public demeanor, they are regarded as cleaner-than-clean, even though their public image hides so much that is gross about their 'sexual' behavior. Indeed, because of people are so besotted with the fancy-pants public image of homos, they get upset when reminded that homos actually indulge in gross acts like bung-donging. It's like triggering a snob at a fancy restaurant that his dish is the product of slaughter of animals OR some oligarch that his fortune owed to the military-industrial-complex that destroyed countless innocent lives in the Middle East.) So, once society decided to let homos run around footloose, dickloose, and buttloose, they were likely to act in wretched ways. In a way, the trajectory of homos paralleled that of Counterculture. The truly wild & crazy mavericks burned out in the 60s and 70s with excessive drugs, sex, and/or violence. In the end, the real winners were the less reckless radicals who hit the books and gained access to institutions. Likewise, the truly wild homos dropped like flies in the 80s in the AIDS epidemic because they couldn't resist going from bathhouse to bathhouse to bugger as many bungs as possible. They burned out or were burned by HIV. In the long run, the rise of homo supremacy owed to homos with a modicum of self-control to go for the bigger pie than the easy fudge. The self-restrained homos were just as subversive deep down inside, but they favored long-term power, prestige, and privilege over short-term debauchery and revelry. Paradoxically, the 'conservative'-styled homos were more dangerous in the long run because they could suppress their homo-lust and work patiently to gain access to the kind of people who mattered most. The kind of homo in the movie NO WAY OUT gained the most power by making themselves useful(even indispensable) to the powers-that-be. And being so close to power, they had the dirt on everyone, so if they went down, they could take others down with them. So, they came to be protected by the Power.


Anyway, just consider how the Homos(and even Trannies) wield their power in the Current Order. They bitch about 'intolerance' and 'hate', but they act queenie-meanie with neo-aristocratic airs. With the crucial help of Jews and craven cucks, they pushed through 'Gay Marriage' that would have us believe that the time-honored and bio-morally meaningful institution of marriage should be extended to guys who bugger each other in the butt or to go doctors and say, "Doc, cut off my dick and give me a fake pussy." It's not enough that they managed to push this degeneracy; they must go about acting like Cultural-Terminators hunting and mowing down anyone who refuses to swallow the validity of 'gay marriage'. These homos weren't content to be tolerated and free. They weren't content to push through 'gay marriage'. They aren't even content with destroying(with the help of Jews, of course) those who find 'gay marriage' and homo fecal-penetration to be gross. They now even demand that all churches(and even mosques) fly 'gay' colors and worship the homo butt with a pink dildo stuck inside.
In other words, LGBTQ agenda is an act of hate, intolerance, defamation, and desecration against the true values and symbols of the Normal-Straight-Male-Female-Realist or NSMFR community. It is time that the NSMFR community came together and spoke truth to power. It's about time they waved their symbols of the True Rainbow. It's about time they dug in their heels as to the facts of Real Sexuality. Truth and Reality are something we can't have enough of. In a world where Jews and the H-community push the sexuality of 2 + 2 = 5, the NSMFR community must come forth, take to the streets, and storm the institutions with the truth of 2 + 2 = 4 sexuality.
Truth is always true but can't assert itself. It has to be asserted by courageous and conscientious individuals. In a world where so many liars and lunatics insist that the World-is-Flat, the fact that the World-is-Round will not assert itself. It can only be asserted by people with courage and integrity who value truth over falsehood. Truth, no matter how true, cannot make itself known. It can only be known through those willing to tell the truth. Thus, anyone who dares to speak the truth in a world of lies is a revolutionary... like the boy in the story "Emperor's New Clothes". If you know the truth but keep silent while another person lies, most people will go with the lie because you haven't spoken the truth. Just like the police department can't know of a crime that is not reported, people cannot know of the truth unless there is someone willing to speak it.
And it is about time the NSMFR community came together and forth to speak the truth and push back against the decadence, degeneracy, hatred, and intolerance of the LGBTQ community that knows no bounds in shameless contempt for all that is true, sane, and healthy.

Of Needles and Balloons - Two Kinds of Ideologies & Two Kinds of Sensibilities

The Current Discourse can be characterized as a contest between needles and balloons. Guess which will win when needles meet balloons. Needles of course. Needles are steely and sharp. Balloons may be bigger, but they are full of hot air and soft on the outside. Truth is like a needle, and lie is like a balloon. Integrity and honesty are like a needle, and deception and falsehood are like a balloon. Needles do not fear balloons. If anything, they are eager to pop and expose them as mostly inflated rubber holding nothing but hot air. In contrast, balloons are deathly afraid of needles because even the slightest prick can expose their emptiness.

Granted, a discourse could be between needle and needle or between balloon and balloon. Certainly, the ideological debate between Democrats and Republicans is one of balloon vs balloon. It’s a contest of hot air of empty rhetoric pre-scripted and pre-packaged by the oligarchs, the network, and the handlers. It’s about paid politician as streetwalkers for globalist oligarchic pimps. But the contest could be between needle vs needle. After all, two opposing sides could be equal in intelligence, honesty, and integrity even if they see things differently. Or both sides may be sincere in their conviction that truth is really on their side. After all, we can never know the whole truth. We can only know some of the truth, and we are all affected by some degree of subjective bias or personal passion.

Also, virtue is no guarantee for verity. A person may have all the integrity, ability, and courage, but his knowledge of truth is limited to his access to education and information. Furthermore, human character is less about known facts than about one’s ethos and values. A person can be virtuous within the context of Hindu customs or within the framework of Islamic culture. All True Believers, even of false doctrines or dubious ideologies, can be men of integrity and character if they are sincere in their conviction and courageous in their principles.
This is why basic virtues aren't sufficient to make people strive for the truth. Every thought system makes demands on people to be serious, committed, and loyal. Through obedience and adherence to core values, people can be virtuous.
But a higher value can only be attained by an individual quest for truth. A person mustn’t only receive and revere the Truth handed down to him but question its assumptions, meaning, implications, and validity. This is a higher kind of integrity than sincere devotion to the Order.

It is that combination of curiosity and courage that makes for a needle. A ‘conservative’ or a ‘liberal’ who merely conforms to what he’s been told by the Authority or the Official Narrative cannot be a needle. Such people are filled with varying amounts of air or limp without air, but they are essentially passive in their submissiveness to the Order. They are dogs and teachers’ pets of the world. Or, being just plain lazy, all their ideas come from Pop Culture that is controlled by Jews, homos, and cucky-wucks.
To be a needle, one needs to step outside the box. The truth is not in being ‘left’ or ‘hard left’ or ‘right’ or ‘hard right’ but in the individual will to ask questions and understand the deeper layers of power.

Also necessary is a kind of personal sensibility that favors sobriety and probity over frivolity and insipidity. The Power knows this all too well. It fears the Needles, and that is why the 2 PC’s — Political Correctness and Pop Culture — are geared toward making us shallow, immature, infantile, delusional, escapist, and stupid. When one’s primary ideology revolves around LGBTQ fantasies of 50 genders, Afromania of BLM & Rap, mindless mantras about Diversity, porny version of feminism with pussy-costumes, tattoos-piercings-hair-color, and etc., you can never be a serious person asking serious questions and seeking serious truths. Style has value but only as an accent on substance. Style cannot substitute substance, especially if it happens to be demented and stupid, as so many styles are today.

The needles are serious people who are not afraid to ask the essential questions about the Power and the Way of the World. Needles are not afraid to connect the dots in ways that deviate from the official dictates of the Power. Needles have something of the Greek Hero in them. Something inside them want to challenge the gods and know of their secret. They want to discover the truth behind the Wizard in the World of Oz. And this is why the Power fears and hates the needles the most.

And yet, the System needs needles because only needles can probe for the truth. Yet, needles are dangerous because they can pop the Official Balloon at the center of any system, left and right. So, the System tries to allow the freedom of needles in most areas EXCEPT against the Core Balloon that holds the hot air of Dogma. The Catholic Church, for instance, allowed and encouraged needles in many scientific endeavors but wanted to protect the balloon of the Geo-centric Universe that was deemed to be essential to the spiritual premise of Church and Faith. Every system seeks to maximize the power of truth because truth is more useful than falsehoods. Try building a rocket with false calculations or assumptions. Every scientific discovery or mathematic solution is a needle. They can be used to further the power of the system. But what about the political justification for the system? For communism to survive, Marxism-Leninism could not be doubted or questioned. Though it began as a sharp instrument aimed at the hot balloon of the Tsarist and then Social-Democratic system, it turned into a big balloon once the New Order was firmly ensconced with its own myths, symbols, and slogans. Communism became a big balloon with hammer & sickle painted on it. But despite its grandiose size, it could easily be busted with a prick of a needle. And this is why the balloon had to be protected from critical/skeptical/analytical needles by a vast apparatus of brass knuckles. The balloon needed a safe space from needles. Since balloon can’t stand up to the pricks of needles, it had to rely on the power of fists. It’s like the game of scissors-paper-and-hammer. Papers can’t stand up to sharp scissors, but the blunt hammer can bash the scissors.

And the world we live in is very much one of balloons, needles, and iron fists. Jews used to represent the needles of America when they spoke truth(or clever lies) to power. Jews were like a skillful acupuncturist probing into all parts of Wasp America to find how the system works. Its strengths and weaknesses. Its reactions to the needles. Even though Anglos were called Wasps, all the stinging was done by Jews. Some Jews needled the power for the truth or justice. But others just wanted to deflate the Wasp balloon so that they could take over as the new masters of America.

But a system cannot be sustained with search for truth alone. It has to be filled with a Narrative with the stuff of myth, vision, and holiness. There has to be a quasi-spiritual faith in the system as something more than a realm of facts. It had promote itself as a realm of sanctity. So, Jews created a new balloon with the Narrative air of Shoah, Afromania, Diversity(via Lazarus-ian mass immigration), and etc.

It wasn’t enough that Jews won by meritocracy in intellect and drive. After all, superiority in intelligence and wealth doesn’t necessarily mean justification for power and control. A people can be intelligent and influential but vile and wicked. Talent means more ability, not more morality. After all, Jews had gained lots of financial success in Europe and were regarded as smart/clever, but that didn’t make the gentiles love the Jews any better. In order for Jewish Power to be protected, it needed to be inflated and shrouded with a Narrative. And Jews found the Shoah Narrative highly effective in making Jews out to be the greatest victims of all time and in instilling ‘guilt’ among white goyim.
Some may regard the ‘holocaust deniers’ as courageous needles, but they are more like idiots cutting their own flesh. While there can be serious and probing revision of Shoah, most of what goes by ‘Holocaust Denial’ is truly moronic stuff. Incidentally, the real danger of the Shoah Narrative isn't in the suppression of free speech but in the ‘sacralization’ of Jews into a holy race. Such deification of a group of humanity can be dangerous IF the people become very powerful. If we all deified Eskimos, it can’t do us much harm because Eskimos have little power. But if, as the result of Shoah Narrative, we were to regard Jews as wise, wonderful, perfect, and noble, it means we won’t be properly alert to the nature of Jewish power. Also, because of the ‘sacralization’ via the Shoah Narrative, we’ve effectively been banned from taking a cold hard look at Jewish history and learn of Jewish perfidy, abuses, corruptions, and ‘historical crimes’. So, while we regard most peoples’ histories as a mix of good and bad, noble and ignoble, we tend to see all of Jewish history as one of wise, wonderful, and blameless Jews having been set upon by wicked gentiles who never had a rational reason for feeling animus toward the Jews.
Indeed, what Jews fear most is not ‘Holocaust Denial’ but serious discussion and criticism of Jewish history and power. The main purpose of the Shoah Narrative isn’t to suppress the ‘denial of Holocaust’ but to keep alive the aura of Jewish sanctity that maintains the Jew Taboo that forbids honest discussion of Jewish history and power.

In a way, both Jews and blacks triumphed and won in the West due to meritocracy though in different fields. When faced with a superior rival, only social race-ism will protect a people. We understand this in mankind's relation to animals. If we struggled with animals on the meritocratic basis of brute strength, animals would crush us. So, we ‘cheat’ via social species-ism that says species exist, species are different, and we-as-humans need to be conscious of our species and do whatever is necessary to secure our survival and advantage over animals. If humans were to compete with animals on the basis of natural species-ism, many animals would gain advantage over humans because, in the contest of tooth and claw, humans cannot win against bears, wolves, buffaloes, elephants, hippos, etc. Humans could only win via social species-ism that allowed for ‘cheating’ with spears, arrows, barriers, and shelters. So, we’ve created an artificial world that keeps animals out.
Likewise, white people could only maintain a secure place for themselves against Jews and blacks only through social race-ism. As Jews are smarter than whites and as blacks are more muscular than whites, there was no way whites could win against Jews in a contest of natural race-ist contest of wits. And there was no way whites could win against blacks in a contest of natural race-ist contest of fists.
The Natural is race-ist in that it created different races with different abilities. So, natural race-ism made Jews smarter than blacks, and it made blacks stronger than Jews. And it made Jews smarter than whites, and it made blacks tougher than whites.
Whites understood the ramifications of natural race-ism via-a-via Jews and blacks. So, whites instituted quotas against Jews in elite colleges and barred Jews from certain clubs. It was the ONLY way to maintain the order of white power. Natural-meritocratic competition with Jews would not lead to equality or parity but to Jewish supremacism over whites. Now, this might not have been so bad IF whites could speak truth to Jewish Power once Jews became King of the Hill, but Jews cleverly denied this possibility by pushing the Shoah Narrative that sanctified Jews into a quasi-holy race. So, Jews not only won with meritocracy but were protected from criticism by sanctimonious taboos. And much of the problems of America and the World can be traced to the sanctification of Jews.
It allowed leeway for Jewish power to become especially corrupt and megalomaniacal. Too many Jews are now intoxicated not only with power and hubris but with moral and pseudo-spiritual vanity. They are full of themselves. This is dangerous because Jews, as the masters of the Empire of Judea(or EOJ), are now the most powerful people on Earth with too much hatreds for too many peoples: Russians, Iranians, Syrians, Palestinians, White gentiles, etc.
Anyway, the lesson from the rise of Jewish supremacist power is that natural race-ism leads to hierarchy and domination, not equality. Meritocracy for Jews led not to Jewish equality with gentiles but Jewish supremacist domination over gentiles who are seen as cattle and dogs by Jews.

Whites suffered the same fate with blacks, albeit in the realm of physicality. Natural race-ist competition between whites and blacks could only lead to black supremacism than racial equality. Having more fast-twitch muscles, stronger bones, and faster reflexes, blacks were bound to dominate sports if whites and blacks were made to compete on an equal footing. Therefore, whites needed social race-ism to create a secure space for white manhood and pride. Whites, especially white men, were totally justified in fearing the stronger, tougher, and meaner Negro. If whites dropped social race-ism, the future wasn’t racial equality or parity but black physical domination, black destruction of white manhood, and black colonization of white wombs(and pathetic cucky-wuckery for white men). So, why didn’t whites speak out on this? D.W. Griffith did try with THE BIRTH OF A NATION, but even he failed because the Wasp character was into either white pride or gentlemanly ideal. White pride led many whites into denial. They continued to believe in the Great White Hope or pretend that whites were tougher and could beat up blacks. Such pride was hollowed out when blacks totally came to dominate sports and conquer millions of white wombs. Now, white males are cuck-dorks who kneel before blacks. If the white priders were too full of themselves to admit to their fear of the Negro and sound the racial alarm, the gentlemanly types felt it was beneath contempt to speak of vulgar biological realities. They preferred the world of rules and agreements. Since ‘may the best man win’ is a gentlemanly value, they eventually decided the fair and honorable thing was to let the Negro compete equally in sports with the white man. The result was predictable. Blacks totally crushed whites. Worse, even the gentlemanly hope that the dignity of sportsmanship would rub off on the ‘groids’ didn’t come to pass. Black nature being wilder and funkier, blacks intoxicated with pride of sports domination just acted like jungle warrior and showered whitey with nothing but contempt and derision. White gentlemanly delusions about blacks didn’t pan out. Blacks soon reverted to their jungleman ways. (Whites would have been better off if more of them spoke of racial matters like Howard Stern or Tom Buchanan of THE GREAT GATSBY. Buchanan is uber-wasp but oddly fully of grubby chutzpah when it comes to matters of race. His talk isn't gentlemanly but more blunt and candid.)

But as with Jews, it was worse than that. Just as Jews were ‘sacralized’ by the Shoah Narrative, blacks were ‘sacralized’ with slavery-Jim-Crow-and-MLK narrative. So, blacks not only physically kicked white butt but were seen as black jesuses and even black god. Now, if blacks had won athletically and physically(especially through crime and thuggery) and if whites could call out on black abuses and bad behavior, there would be some push-back against the threatening and destructive power of blacks. But because of the sacralization of blacks, whites not only got clobbered by blacks in the stadiums and streets but they couldn’t even honestly voice criticism of bad black behavior. Indeed, the Official Narrative of America now says whites must praise, admire, and worship the very people who rob them of manhood and/or property. So, if a black guy whups a white guy and humps white women, the proper thing for the white guy is to be a white boy like CucKen Burns and praise the Negro to high heaven as the sacred master race. This is why a people cannot survive and secure their existence without an intelligent use of social race-ism. As the first true race-ist, Aristotle said so himself.

And of course, Homos complete the Holy Three along with Jews and blacks. As such, the three groups have immense power in the West. And for that reason, it is incumbent upon honest critics and observers to be needles and prick the balloons of falsehood and sanctimony about the three powerful groups.
The truth is that Jews are indeed smarter, blacks are indeed tougher, and homos are more creative in certain areas. But the other truth is that these advantages also lead to lots of abuses. Jews use their domination of finance, law, and high-tech to pull all sorts of dirty tricks. Bernie Madoff was one of the worst but not alone. Now, Jews threaten to engulf the world with war just to further their ambition for global domination.
And too many blacks act like thugs and louts because they think "We can whup people’s ass". The blend of black vanity and thuggery has led to a very ugly culture in America. And homos have used their great power to elevate themselves as a race of angels even though the main distinction between normal straight people and homos is that the latter are into gross fecal penetration. Homos have done much to degrade moral norms and to impose degeneracy as the New Decency. Also, all the lies we’ve been forced to swallow about homos have led to a culture of lies where truth has become as murky as biological sex in a gender studies program. And so, the responsible thing is for us to speak truth to Jewish power, black power, and homo power. We need to bust their bubbles.
After all, they initially gained power by pricking the bubbles of white lies, hypocrisy, and betrayal of principles. White Americans said the US is about equality of man and rule of law. But slavery gave lie to such an ideal. And white gentiles said US is about opportunity based on merit. But there were quotas against Jews in elite colleges. And traditional society and even psychology used to insist that homosexuality is a mental disease when, in fact, some people are naturally born with such deviant orientation.

So, the needles that pricked the false balloons in the past had value in advancing the truth. But that was then, this is now. We now live in a world where Jews themselves use quotas to favor their own kind over others in elite colleges. Also, Jewish power isn’t only about merit but (1) tribal and race-ist networking a (2) use of Jew Taboo to silence dissent and (3) White Submissivism that has made whites feel that they must deny their own identity and interests in favor of Jewish identity and interests. And blacks are out of control as criminals and thugs in so many communities. Jim Crow is ancient history in an America where black thuggery is not only tolerated but worshiped as ‘cool’, especially in the Rap realm. And homos, with the backing of Jewish Power, replaced Christianity with Homomania or Queertianity as the neo-religion of the West.

In other words, Jewish power, black power, and homo power have now reached a point that exceeds the bounds of merit. Jews did gain much by meritocracy, but once they got the power, they used the Shoah Narrative to browbeat any prospective critic of Jewish Power and to implement any scheme, no matter how ugly and demented, to further Jewish supremacism. The sight of tiny little Israel creates the false impression that Jews are merely worried about the security and survival of that tiny little state. In fact, the main obsession of Jews isn’t Israel but the Empire of Judea, of which Israel is the Temple, NY is the bank, LA is the myth factory, Las Vegas is the cash cow, and Pentagon is the hammer. The Empire of Judea has tentacles all over the globe though, of course, Jews project their octopus-like nature on others, currently on Putin.

As for blacks, they are no longer in the age of TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD. Indeed, assigning school children with the book MANDINGO would be closer to the mark of where we are. Civil Rights Era is long gone. Blacks are in thug and beast mode. They feel arrogance and contempt toward other races. (But there is a GROUNDHOG DAY mentality that always resets the clock to the twilight of the Jim Crow. We are stuck in the conundrum of TO KILL A GROUNDHOG.)
And millions and millions of black Africans now believe that the West and white world exist only to serve and put out to blacks, not least because the world has become saturated with Hollywood images of noble blacks bestowing wisdom and coolness on the pale and vapid white race that can only be redeemed by Jewish genius, Negro cool, and homo radiance.

This is sheer cultishness and very dangerous because Jews, Negroes, and homos are now very powerful, albeit in different areas for different reasons. And this may prove to be even a bigger problem for EU. If whites everywhere are supposed to revere and worship blacks and if millions of black Africans wash ashore in Europe and cause so many troubles, are white people supposed to shut up and just keep praising blacks to high heaven? How is that any different from how Germans behaved during WWII? Instead of needling Hitler’s megalomania, too many Germans worshiped him and served him loyally to the end that saw the total ruination of Germany. Even though Diversity is sold as redemption for ‘white supremacism’ and ‘racism’, it has the same logic as the lunacy that engulfed Nazi Germany. It has Taboos and Sacraments that cannot be questioned despite all the facts to the contrary.
It’s a fact that blacks are tougher, more aggressive, and less intelligent. They are more psychopathic. Too many of them will destroy white manhood, and when white manhood goes, so does white womanhood as white women will become infected with jungle fever. And then, as Europe gets overtaken by wild black junglemen, it will be the fall of the West. But this truth cannot be spoken because it’s... uh... ‘racist’! We are supposed to tremble with fear before that bogus PC term that is meant to have the effect of ‘bad doggy’!

We need to speak the truth. It is time for needles. We need to prick the balloons of Jewish supremacism, black supremacism, and homo supremacism. These balloons are protected from the needles of truth by the iron fist of deep state, Jewish financial blackmail, the police that is controlled by ZOG, and Antifa Janissary(that is protected by the police).
The balloons are well-protected, but nothing can be completely protected. Just like Michael Corleone found a way to get Sollozzo and Captain McClusky in THE GODFATHER and Hyman Roth in THE GODFATHER PART 2, there are smart ways to use the needle against balloons. And then, it will be GOOOOAAAAAAL.

Will China’s Rise be as Problematic as the Rise of Germany and Japan? What about Jewish Supremacist Power and the Problems of White Submissivism?

Some geopolitical strategists fear that China’s rise in the 21st century will mirror the dramatic rise of Germany and Japan in the late 19th century and first half of the 20th century. Perhaps, it’s a misplaced fear. Such assurance may seem counter-intuitive because China is so much bigger and more populous than Germany and Japan. Paradoxically, however, China might be less dangerous than Japan and Germany precisely because it is a bigger nation. Being huge in land mass and population in its own right, China may be satisfied with what it has. It surely wants to expand trade with the world, but China doesn’t need to conquer or control other nations to be a great power. It doesn’t need an empire because it is an empire-sized nation.

Same could be said for Russia. Its gigantic size and limitless resources ensure its place in the world as an important player. While Russians are underachievers, Russia doesn’t need more territory to be one of the great powers of the world.

In contrast, the reason why Japan and Germany became so problematic was the discrepancy between their ambitions(in will and ability) and their limitations(in land and resources). If both had been content to be normal nations, they would have accepted their prescribed place in the world. But modern Germany looked to Great Britain and France as models, moderate-sized nations that became world powers by amassing empires. Unlike the US and Russia that could be great on their own due to abundant geography and sizable & growing demography, France and Great Britain couldn’t be great on their own. They needed to control the seas and other lands.
Germans perceived themselves to be a capable, even superior, people, and felt deserving of greatness too, and that meant Germany needed an empire of its own.
As for Japan, its rapid rise filled them with confidence and then hubris. Especially after the great naval victory in the Russo-Japanese War, they began to feel they could overcome all odds. But like Germany, Japan had limited land mass and resources that could feed and supply only so many people. On its own, it could be a regional power but not a great power. Especially after observing the miserable failures of China, Japan saw itself as the rightful master-ruler of Asia.
Now, if China had modernized at the same time and at the same pace as Japan in the 19th century, then it would also have developed as an industrial power, and then, Japan would have had no choice but to acknowledge China as the dominant power in Asia. It would have been less likely for Japan to develop an over-sized national ego from the perception of China as the Sick Man of Asia. In its encounter with the West, China was slow to modernize whereas Japan did so almost overnight. Flush with power and success, Japan was determined to remain ahead of China as the main power of Asia. Back then, Japan was much smaller than China but much stronger, and China was much bigger than Japan but much weaker. This contradiction led to the great war between the two nations. It was like a fit and feisty small guy taking on a flabby and feeble big guy. Japan as the tough small guy was the better fighter but couldn’t deliver a KO blow to a guy who was too big despite his sickness. At any rate, because Japan could only be a great power by having an empire, it was desperate to gain more territory and clashed with other empires and eventually was crushed by the combined might of the Allies.

Well that was then, this is now. China now has both a bigger economy and bigger military than Japan. The bigger nation has the bigger power, and so, the geopolitical dynamics in Asia is more normal as it’s only natural that the bigger nation should be more powerful. Indeed, for most of Asian history, Japan had always acknowledged China as the main power in the region, and that recognition had been the basis of peace between them as well as with other Asian nations.

Now, will the newly risen China feel tempted to act like Japan in the first half of the 20th century? Flush with wealth and might, will it aggressively seek to gain hegemony over all of Asia and maybe the world? Will it be like Militarist Japan x 10? It’s unlikely because China doesn’t need more land and more people to be a great power. China can be a great power with what it has within its borders. Thus, its ambitions are limited to coastal areas. China has no territorial ambitions in other parts of the world. Also, it has enough problems within its own borders, especially with Tibetans and Uighurs. The last thing it needs is more ethnic conflicts.

So, which people will be the main menace to world peace and geopolitical stability? The main problem lies with the Jews because their Contradiction of Power is the most radioactive by far. What is the essence of this contradiction? Jews are rich in money and influence but poor in numbers(demographics). The result is a Jewish neurosis composed of equal measures of megalomania and paranoia.
Just think. Jews are more powerful than the Chinese, Hindus, Russians, Anglos, Germans, Japanese, French, and Iranians, but there are far fewer Jews than the populations of major gentile nations. Japan has over 110 million, Germany has 80 million, Russia has 125 million, etc. In contrast, there are only 13 million Jews in the world. And their nation, Israel, is a tiny speck in the Middle East. Jewish super-power owes to Jews controlling US(the most powerful nation on earth), UK, Canada, and the EU, but their influence hangs in the balance of White Submissivism, i.e. unless white gentiles continue to remain servile and defer to Jews, Jewish Power can collapse overnight.

This is why Jews are so fearful of the slightest whiff of White Identity & Interest and hysterically defame any sign of white consciousness as ‘white supremacism’. Without white gentiles putting Jewish interests before their own, Jewish supremacism cannot be sustained because Jews simply don’t have the numbers. It’s like a mind is useless if it can’t control the body. A cowboy is in trouble if he can’t control the steers. A shepherd is lost if the sheepdogs and sheep decide to do their own thing.

This is why Jews hate nationalism in all its manifestations except in Israel. Nationalism makes the people of a nation think mainly of their own kind, their own race and culture. Also, universal nationalism — national autonomy and sovereignty for each people and culture — means greater peace and stability among gentile nations as each nation will expect other nations to respect its sovereignty as it respects the sovereignties of other nations in turn. And then, there will be easier facilitation of trade and communication among nations. Also, if every nation is sovereign, it will find its own ways to deal with other nations. It won’t need a middleman power to get involved as the ultimate arbiter of what is doable and undoable, what is or isn’t right. In other words, there will be less reason for Jews to stick their noses into everything. There will be less need for Jews, period.

Therefore, it’s in the interest of Jewish Supremacism to have a turbulent world of gentiles vs. gentiles: US vs Muslims, EU vs Russia, US vs China, Saudis vs Iran, etc. This way, gentiles will be too busy hating one another to focus on what is best for their own nation. When gentiles hate gentiles, Jews can squeeze in between the cracks and manipulate all sides. Consider how American Jews declared New Cold War on Russia while Netanyahu and Jews-in-Russia assured Putin that they are doing their best to improve Russia’s standing in the world. Jews play good cop/bad cop.

Now, gentile peoples can create havoc around the world all on their own without Jews. Indeed, history in all five continents is a testament of how people can be warlike and brutal, and most human conflicts had little or nothing to do with Jews. Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan didn’t invade other peoples at the behest of Jews.
Still, there was a golden opportunity for world peace after the Cold War when the final great ideological/imperial conflict came to an end. There could have been good relations among US, EU, Russia, China, and other parts of the world as nations committed to mutual respect and rational restraint. The golden opportunity was lost because Jews knew that world peace would be 'bad' for the Jews or, more precisely, for the purposes of Jewish Supremacism. (Jews were no longer content with the good life and wanted to rule the world. Jews saw the entire world as a casino that must be controlled by themselves.) There were too many nations in the Middle East that Jews wanted destroyed. Since Jews themselves couldn’t do it, they manipulated American Power to wage Wars for Israel. And when Russia failed to fall completely into the hands of Jewish globalists and when Jews feared that the Russian resistance to Jewish supremacism might spread to EU and even the US, Jews concocted the so-called ‘New Cold War’ against Russia that actually wanted peaceful ties and trade with EU and the US. Jews simply couldn’t stand the idea of white Russian gentiles getting along with white Europeans and white Americans. By turning US and EU against Russia, Jews got to play one side against the other and vice versa.

If most peoples think in terms of their own national sovereignty, they will see no point in supporting Jewish supremacism. Why should they favor the interests of an alien people over their own? (The problem is not Jews per se but Jewish insistence on their supremacist domination of other peoples. Jews denounce gentiles-serving-gentile-interests as 'supremacist', but Jews not only serve their own interests but demand that gentiles serve Jewish interests. That is the essence of supremacism.) So many people are so confused and lost because they’ve been misled by Jews to think globally than nationally. After all, if they can’t be for their own kind, whom should they be for? Individuals have a natural longing to serve something bigger than their lone selves. But if white people have been taught that it’s evil and wrong for them to care about their own identity and serve their own interests, what about their need to serve something bigger than themselves?
This is where Jews step in as consultants to all those confused and alienated whites. Yes, whites are told they must serve something bigger than individual interest, and it happens to be Jewish interests. Or, if fanatical Zionism isn’t your cup of tea, then you must serve Homomania(which is just another way of serving Jewish power since the Homo agenda has been a proxy of Jewish power from day one). So, we have the odd spectacle in the US of White Conservatives worshiping the 2% of the population that is Jewish(even though most Jews despise white conservatives) and of White Liberals worshiping the 2% of the population that is homo(and closely allied with Jewish supremacist power).

But despite all the hysterical euphoria of praising Israel and Homos, the Jewish advice unto white goyim ultimately spirals into more confusion because a people will continue to lose out by serving another people(especially one as contemptuous as the Jews) than by serving their own interests. Imagine what would happen to Jewish power if Jews decided to serve Palestinian, Iranian, Russian, and Anglo interests but never their own. It’d be Game Over for Jews soon enough.

Because whites have been led to believe Jews are so wise and wonderful, they want to believe that the Jewish advice is the best and noblest in the world. In their childlike and sheeplike state, they believe that serving Jews is as good as serving themselves because, in return for their devotion and support, Jews will do what is best for all mankind. Whites would never be so easily hoodwinked by Chinese, Iranians, or Hindus because there is no Taboo that forbids skepticism about them. But the notion of ‘antisemitism’ has made any skepticism or criticism of Jewish power and agenda a Taboo. Any negative view of Jews is deemed a ‘rabid’ and ‘virulent’ ‘canard’. So, when Jews give advice, white people believe it’s their duty to trust and obey, just like Christians are supposed to blindly worship God and Jesus.
But when things keep getting worse as the result of heeding the Jewish advice, a complex is bound to form within white minds. One side of them says they must trust Jews because Jews are so holy & wise, and besides, it’d be ‘antisemitic’ to cast aspersions on Jews. But as the world crumbles around them, there is a growing sense that maybe Jews are not only up to no good but are no good at their very core. Russians sure found out in the 1990s when Jewish advice led to mass poverty and/or mass death for so many people. And people in the EU are beginning to notice that the Jewish push for ‘multi-culturalism’ is leading to their racial and cultural demise. According to Jewish advice, Europeans must import millions more non-whites in order for Europe to ‘survive’. Imagine the loopy logic of this Jewish advice. In order for Europe to survive, Europeans must be invaded and replaced by non-Europeans as ‘New Europeans’. Now, such an advice would sound totally nuts to a sane person, but alas, the Holocaust Cult has instilled white gentiles with mindless Jewish Worship and even more mindless ‘White Guilt’.

It’s no wonder then that Jewish supremacists can use the US & EU to wage Wars for Israel to smash the Muslim World and then steer tons of ‘refugees’(aided by George Soros & his cabal) to flood into Europe. And all those cucked-out Germans think their duty as Europeans is to serve ‘refugees’, Muslims, and Africans on the advice of World Jewry. When Germans and others put the interests of the Other above their own kind, it means White Submissivism to Jewish Supremacism is their main mode of existence.

Why Jews Turned Diversity into a Hate Cult & Why the Jew Taboo Preempts European Resistance to the Real Power behind Diversity

Jews, whites, and Diversity. A conundrum.

Jews use the Diversity Card to secure their Tribal Supremacist Power. Jews have elite power but are weak in numbers. As only 2% of the population, they feel vulnerable against the 98% that is gentile. So, Jewish rely on growing Diversity to create divisions among gentiles and to use non-whites against the diminishing white majority.

But there is a problem. Jews have a hard time making Diversity(masses of non-whites) love Jews. Mexicans and Asians are indifferent to Jews. Blacks tend to be hostile. Muslims even more so. Hindus will play every which way.
So, Diversity cannot side with Jews on the basis of love. Many non-whites see Jews as too rich, too powerful, or too corrupt. Many see the GOP as the bigger Israel First party.

So, if Jews can’t get Diversity on-board the Jewish train on the basis of love for Jews, the only option is on the basis of hatred toward whites. So, notice how PC made Nancy Pelosi’s grandchild feel ashamed of his whiteness. He wants to be of another race. Whites are made to hate their own kind, and non-whites are made to envy, resent, and hate whites, even as they want to be with whites and get stuff from whites.

Diversity is a Hate Cult. If Jews could have made non-whites love Jews, it might have been a sunnier cult. But Jews have failed to make most non-whites care much about Jews. If anything, plenty of non-whites just see Jews as the richest whites. Also, growing numbers of non-whites favor BDS over ADL.

So, the only way Diversity can be an effective tool of Jews is by making it into a hate campaign against whites. Unite non-whites under the banner of hatred against whites if it's impossible to unite them under the banner of love for Jews.

Anyone who knows anything should know that Jews use Diversity as a weapon against whites.
That being the case, the most natural thing for whites would be to call out on Jews for their anti-white hostility.
But, whites can’t because there’s this thing called the Jew Taboo.
The Jew Taboo decrees that Jews can never be accused or judged because Jews can never do wrong(and even if they do wrong, they are still right because they are above the law like God over man). The Jew Taboo assumes that Jews are a perfect people, always so wise, angelic, or tragic(as innocent victims of ‘rabid’ and ‘virulent’ ‘anti-Semites’).

So, given the pervasive, omnipresent power of the Jew Taboo, whites cannot call out on Jewish hostility toward whites. The Jew Taboo says Jews are incapable of doing anything vile, ugly, hateful, or evil. So, if whites feel that Jews are being hostile, the problem is in the minds of whites, and it is their obligation to purge their ‘paranoid’ minds of ‘nazi’-like suspicions. And if on occasion Jews do admit to their hostility, whites fully deserve the animus because whites are still the primary source of all the problems that plague the world. So, most times when Jews spit in the faces of whites, whites must make believe that Jews didn’t do it because accusing Jews of such dastardly deed would be ‘antisemitic’. And in the few cases when Jews do admit to spitting on white people’s faces, they were well-deserved because white people still have so much to atone for.

Since Jews are deemed holy and untouchable, whites can only say and do things that are complimentary of and beneficial to Jews. So, if Jews use Diversity — massive colonization of the West by non-whites who are taught to hate whites the moment they get off the boat — to undermine white power, pride, property, & heritage AND if whites are alarmed about the radical transformation of their lands, whites must never blame Jews and instead frame their complaint in such a way as to exonerate Jews. So, even when Jews are the main culprits and whites feel compelled to vent their anger, whites must always be mindful that Jews cannot be named as the villain.
Imagine if a Jew punches you in the nose, and you are allowed to blame anything in the room except the Jew. So, you hurl your rage at chairs, tables, walls, various objects, and etc. as the reason why you have a bloody nose when, in fact, it was the Jew who smashed your nose. But the Jew Taboo prohibits you from naming the Jew. Doing so would be ‘antisemitic’, and then, you’d be a ‘nazi’. So, you try to convince yourself that you will be safer if you replace or dispose of the various objects in the room. But then, even after the room is transformed, you are punched in the nose again by the Jew, but again, you can’t name the Jew, so you once again repeat the cycle of blaming the anything in the room but the Jew. Or if indeed the Jew admits he punched you, it was surely your fault for standing in the way, in which case you most richly deserved it.

Since whites cannot blame Jews for the Diversity that is leading to Eurocalypse, what can whites do about the mounting threat to their race, culture, and lands?
The most that whites can do is argue against Diversity on grounds that it may harm or endanger Jews. Since the Jew Taboo says Jews are holy, the primary concern of whites must be the well-being of Jews. Whites must put Jewish interests and well-being before their own. It’s like Jews bitching about why white people weren’t so eager to sacrifice their own kids to save Jewish kids during WWII. Now, if a bunch of gentiles were being butchered by Nazis who, hypothetically speaking, had decided to leave Jews alone, does anyone think Jews would have been willing to sacrifice their own children to save the children of goyim? Did American Jews volunteer to save Ukrainians being slaughtered by the Bolshevik killing machine? If anything, a whole bunch of Jews were pro-communist and supported the oppression and mass killing of Christian Slavs. Jews don’t care about gentile lives, but Jews milked ‘Holocaust Guilt’ to make whites feel that they mainly exist as cattle to serve Jews, protect Jews, and even sacrifice themselves and their children for Jews. So, the relationship between whites and Jews is as follows: Jews have a right to put Jewish identity & interests first and foremost, and Jews are right to expect that gentiles will always be mindful to watch out for Jewish needs and wants, BUT whites have no right to put white identity & interests first, and if anything, they must be ready and willing to serve and even sacrifice themselves for Jews and on demand. This is why, even when Jews use Diversity against whites, whites can only oppose Diversity on the basis of protecting Jews from non-whites who may be less sympathetic to Jews and even ‘antisemitic’. And since it’s now well-known that Jews are wild about Homomania or Queertianity(as replacement for Christianity), whites must frame their anti-Diversity argument on the basis that non-whites, especially Muslims, may do harm not only to Jews but to homos. Never mind that Jews and Homos dominate the political power that calls for More Diversity.

Now, it may well be that certain elements of Diversity do indeed harm and even, on occasion, murder Jews. After all, there have been outbreaks of anti-Jewish violence in parts of France.
But overall, Jews see Diversity as a net advantage because it divides the gentile masses into warring factions, all the easier to manipulate and control the goyim via divide-and-rule. All said and done, most Jews came to the conclusion that Diversity is indispensable as a weapon to undermine white power so as to permanently secure Jewish supremacism in the West.

Because of the Jew Taboo, this obvious truth cannot be spelled out. The most that white people can do is try to justify their anti-Diversity position on the basis of working desperately to save Jews from non-white ‘anti-Semites’ who might bring upon the New Holocaust. Of course, Jews are laughing at the stupid, pathetic white goyim.

To better illustrate the point above, imagine a Jewish guy grabbing a mallet and clobbering a white guy in the head. The most obvious thing would be for the white guy to call foul on the Jewish guy hitting him on the head. But that simply isn’t an option because the Jew Taboo says Jews are always holy and innocent. So, the only recourse for the white guy is to condemn the mallet on grounds that it may sprain the Jew’s precious wrist. Never mind his own aching skull from being hit on the head by the Jewish guy. Never mind the Jewish guy hit him with malice and contempt. Never mind the Jewish guy sadistically gloats over the harm done to the white guy. Despite the virulent hatred felt by the Jewish guy toward the white guy, the latter’s main concern must be for the well-being of the Jew because, of course, Jews are so holy. So, instead of accusing the Jew, the white guy condemns the mallet, and not so much for the harm it did to his head but the harm it might do to the Jewish guy’s wrist(in hitting him many more times). Of course, the white guy gets hit harder and harder by the Jewish guy because no one, especially a vicious Jew, respects a cowardly craven stupid servile cuck.