Why Most Journalists are Essentially 'Spiritual' and Incapable of True Rationalism — How the 'Sacralization' of Jews, Blacks, and Homos has led to the Megalomania among them and Mimimi-mania among the Rest — Man and Matter must not be revered as Holy and Sacred

The role of journalists should be excavation, not burial or concealment. But too many journos use the shovel to bury than to dig. These shills should really work for the Ministry of Propaganda, which is what most of MSM really is.

One problem is most of MSM is in the pocket of Jewish gangster oligarchs, and big media companies favor Zionist-centrists and Jewish supremacists for hiring and promotion. And even among many talented Jewish reporters and journalists, there is a wink-wink understanding that the #1 mindset among them must be “Is it good for Jews?” Jewish Power is enshrined in their hearts and is tantamount to the the highest good imaginable. They were raised that way and think that way in what has been the most tribal culture in world history. So, even though they can be good and honest journalists on matters not pertaining to Jewish interests, they become quasi-Talmudic first and foremost on anything that touches directly or indirectly on Jewish-related matters. This is why most Jewish journalists, left or right, are on the same boat on Russia, Syria, and Iran. Their reporting, commentary, and narrative revolve around the core consideration of "Is it good for the Jews?"

Next, there are those who enter journalism for the glam factor. Maybe they grew up watching ALL THE PRESIDENT’S MEN(the Watergate movie) or have a Hollywood view of journalism as where the action is(in terms of activism, adventure, truth, justice, and celebrity). If Washington is Hollywood for ugly people, journalism is Hollywood for 'caring' and smart people though, to be sure, many in journalism tend not to be very smart; they just think they are. They don’t have the intellect/patience to be academics and don’t have advanced skills to be a leader or game-changer in anything — one thing for sure, science journalists know a hell of a lot less than scientists. So, they serve as scribes on the run. It’s like “Those who can’t, teach”: “Those who can’t, report.” At any rate, as this kind of journalists entered the field for the glam factor, their main concern is status and the buzz. So, if they have to stick with PC to be hired and promoted, they will do just that. They are like Peter Keating in THE FOUNTAINHEAD.

Now, what about goy journalists of integrity and honesty? Why are so many of them almost as useless as the Jewish Firsters and Paparrazi with pens? Because Political Correctness instilled them with quasi-spiritual thinking. To understand how this works, consider the psychology of the devoutly religious. They can speak and think freely on lots of things. They can even speak honestly about the failings of church elders and corruption in the highest echelons of authority. They can pore through financial dealings of the church to find fault. But they cannot talk badly or even think bad thoughts about God or Jesus.
There is a dividing line between what is man & matter and what is holy & sacred. Even the pope is part of the world of man & matter, but God and Jesus are supreme above all. Therefore, even in personal conversation or private thought, one dares not speak or think ill of God or Jesus. One can accuse the church of failing to live up to its mission or standards, but one cannot be critical of God, the Lord of all, and Jesus, who is believed to be perfect.
But such sacramental thinking operates among secular people as well because human psychology is profoundly 'spiritual'. This was evident in communist nations that were officially atheist but rooted in dogmas of godlike Marx and Lenin, the holy icons of the system. So, even though one might discuss and report on the various failings of the communist system, one better not dare cast doubt on the core foundation of Marxism-Leninism. Such mentality was so strong among true believers that even private thoughts skeptical of the basic principles of Marxism-Leninism made one feel 'sinful' and unworthy. The problem with communist systems was that, for too long, no one dared to question if the ideological underpinning itself was the real problem. While communists could, at times, criticize the outward practices of communism, they could not question the core principles. When things went wrong, the blame fell on the misapplication of dogma than on the dogma itself. It’d be like finding faults with certain calculations of geocentrism without challenging its core validity, esp in light of a seemingly better system of the heliocentric model.

We have a similar kind of problem, even among journalists of honesty and integrity? Never mind the Jewish Firsters and Paparazzis with pens. The more important question is, why are so many non-Jewish journalists of intelligence and integrity so full of nonsense or so unwilling to GO THERE? It’s because even most secular people have a spiritual side to their mentality. Just like smart and serious communist journalists were too ‘spiritually’ beholden to Marxism-Leninism to ask the deeper question — could it be that the insurmountable problems of communist societies emanate from communist fundamentals themselves? — , today’s PC-indoctrinated journalists are too emotionally and ‘spiritually’ beholden to idolatrous or iconic cults of the Magic Negro, Shoah-Worship, and Globo-Homo-mania to ask the bigger questions.

Magic Negro worship means ‘racism’ is all bad. Shoah-Worship means ‘antisemitism’ is the worst thing ever. Globo-Homo worship means we must be vigilant against ‘homophobia’. Blacks-Jews-homos are to PC journos what God & Jesus are to the devoutly faithful — unfortunately, virtually all journalists, even those of Conservatism Inc., have succumbed to PC, what with the two sides yammering, "Conservatives are 'racists'" and "Liberals are the 'real racists'." And just like the faithful may find fault with the church, church leaders, and church community but NEVER with God or Jesus, PC journos may find problems in the black community, Jewish community, and homo community(and critique some of the leaders and managers), but they feel they mustn't find any fault with the holy cult of the Magic Negro, Super Jew, and Holy Homo. So, most black problems must be blamed on whites or few bad apples among blacks. But BLACKNESS itself is magical and wonderful. Get on your knees before the portrait of MLK-Mandela(or even Obama) or twerk in veneration of the Great Negro. Same goes with the Jews. Scandals involving Bernie Madoff, Anthony Weiner, and Harvey Weinstein have shown that journalists can report on some Jewish bad apples. But never ever think that such examples reflect on or reveal something about the Jewish Community in general — indeed, one of the main media narratives associated with the Madoff case was that his crimes caused harm to some high-profile Jews and, furthermore, might fuel 'antisemitic' stereotypes, i.e. when Jews do bad, let us worry about Jews-in-general as potential victims than about the actual victims. All generalizations about Jews must be positive, never negative. The bad Jews are outliers than manifestations of something seriously wrong in the Jewish community. So, even as journalists can expose some individual bad Jews, they are never to question the essential nobility and wisdom of the Jewish People. (It'd be like pretending that there is NO LINK between the mafia and Italian culture attitudes. Of course, Jews never tire of telling the world that there is an indisputable connection between bad white deeds and the white community in general.)
And as this mentality has been instilled in the minds of journalists from cradle, they truly do revere the Jews and would feel guilt/shame if they thought ill of the Jewish community even in private behind closed doors. It’s like a religious person dares not think ill of God or Jesus even when no one is watching or listening. Their religiosity isn’t merely a response to external factors, a matter of shame, but an internal reality, a matter of guilt. Even if no one knew of their ill begotten words or thoughts about God and Jesus, they themselves would feel terrible for having entertained them. One feels free to think and say anything about the world of man and matter, but one’s mind better tread carefully about reverential, spiritual, or holy matters. Among many secular folks, Jews-blacks-homos are their highest objects of ‘spirituality’, and they can no more venture to question the sanctity of Jewishness, blackness, and homo-ness than communists could doubt the holy writ of Marxism-Leninism.

So much of what is wrong with the West is due to Jewishness, blackness, and homo-ness, but these problems cannot be honestly addressed because even the best-and-brightest are under the spell of Jew-Negro-Homo rapture, just like even the best-and-brightest under communism were beholden to the ‘scientific’ dialectical-materialist dogma of Marxism. (Ironic how, by naming something as ‘scientific’, it became holy and beyond rational discussion and critique.) While certain features of communist society could be criticized, it had to be done from the perspective of Marxo-centrism. In other words, communists could be criticized for failing communism, but communism could not be criticized for failing the communists.

Likewise, certain Jewish individuals can be criticized for making the Jewish community look bad or giving ammo to evil ‘anti-Semites’, but no one dares to ask if there is something fundamentally wrong, problematic, hypocritical, or rotten in the Jewish community, culture, or mindset. No one dares to wonder if the so-called ‘Anti-Semites’ were right on certain features of Jewishness, Jewish personality, or Jewish worldview. Rather, it is assumed Jews are holy while ‘Anti-Semites’ are evil, and therefore, any sign of Jewish abuse/criminality is lamented not as evidence of Jewish rottenness but as ammo for those evil ‘Anti-Semites’.
Imagine an order where Bob is said to be so good while Bill is said to be so bad, mainly because he said bad things about Bob. Now, if Bob often acts bad, it would seem Bob is a bad kid or has some serious issues that needs to be addressed. But because it is assumed Bob is good while anti-Bob Bill is bad, Bob’s bad deeds are blamed not on Bob’s lack of character but for having lent credence to Bill who is bad, bad, bad. Now, why would such an order feel this way about Bob and Bill? Because Bob has been sacralized while Bill has been demonized. Therefore, rational thinking is impossible regarding the two. Bob has been placed in the domain of spirit and sanctity than of man and matter(whereas Bill has been placed in the domain of devil and damnation than man and matter). Thus, even Bob’s bad deeds can’t reflect badly on him. If anything, there is even more hatred for Bill because Bob’s bad deeds have given cred to Bill’s Anti-Bob-ism, and we simply can’t have that in an order where Bob is holy while Bill is unholy.

The same logic applies to Negroes. We are told blacks are holy and magical. In contrast, there is almost nothing worse than White ‘racism’. Such ‘spiritual’ thinking dominates among even smart and serious journalists because humans are naturally spiritual, which means even secular types must BELIEVE in something. So, if too many blacks act badly, rational and critical thinking on the matter is nearly impossible. Reason wilts before the heat of spirituality. So, what is to be done when too many blacks act badly? First, the facts themselves are problematic because they go against the Sacred Narrative. Instead of pondering those facts and asking if the Official Narrative itself is fundamentally flawed, most people stick with the Narrative and either try to suppress the evidence or spin it to maintain the aura of Negro holiness while blaming it all on ‘racists’. So, if too many blacks act badly, the main problem is not with black behavior but with ceding credence to the claims of evil ‘racists’ that undermines the Sacro-Narrative. Therefore, if blacks steal too much, we shouldn’t pressure blacks to change their ways but lament how such deeds are tarnishing the Magic Negro image while giving ammo to evil ‘racists’ who’ve long maintained that blacks are more prone to violent, criminal, and transgressive behavior resulting from evolution.

A rational and critical order would formulate its general views and impressions of reality based on facts and evidence, but most social orders have sacro-narratives than hard facts as foundations of self-perception and worldview. The US Narrative, especially the one arising after WWII, says noble and magical blacks were enslaved and mistreated by evil white ‘racists’, and therefore, the US can be redeemed only by the ascension of the Negro. One can understand the appeal of such a Narrative given US history, but facts say black aggression and criminality are rooted in black genetics that formed over 100,000s of years of evolution. But as the Narrative > Facts, most of bad black behavior is blamed on history of ‘racism’ without the slightest inkling that maybe the ‘racists’, while wrong and extreme about some things, were indeed right about some other things.

And then, there are the holy homos. What was the main cause of the HIV crisis? We know why. Facts say homos bung-donged each other in bathhouses all over the West(and the Rest) and spread HIV like a wildfire. In other words, sodomy is one helluva way to spread disease and, furthermore, homos tend to be impulsive and excessive in their lusts and lewd behavior. Facts say homos are born homo and that we should accept this fact. But facts also say homos are weird and tutti-fruity, often vain and narcissistic to a pathological degree, and whoopity-poopity-doo, and such ‘gay’ sensibility can lead to lots of social problems and cultural decadence.
But no, the current dogma says homos are holy, and the HIV thing must be remembered as something akin to the 'Homocaust' where homos were just pure angelic innocent victims of an uncaring society. Young ones have been told, "It was hate and lack of compassion(than overly ripe 'love' among homos) that spread AIDS far and wide and killed all those homos." Yeah, never mind all the dongs up bungs. It’s incredible that homos, who did most to spread HIV and kill other homos, have been least blamed for the disease that has been, if anything, blamed on ‘uncaring’ conservatives. The current media are downright neo-victorian-repressive of certain facts just like Old Victorians were about sex. It’s as if all those homos died of some mysterious ‘homophobic’ disease that targeted holy homos for no reason. The biggest fairy-tale of all time. Once homo-worship became bigger than god and jesus in US culture and media, even so-called ‘conservatives’ dared not stand up to the ‘gay’ lobby. If anything, even churches began to cave and bend over to Anno Sodomini.

Now, does this mean that Jews, blacks, and homos are all bad or necessarily worse than others? No, it means that they, like all other human groups, have problems, serious failings, and dark tendencies. Same case can be made of Russians, Muslims, Japanese, Chinese, Anglos, Germans, and etc. After all, there is much about Germans and Japanese that are respected and admired the world over, but those positives don’t prevent us from looking at historical facts of German evil or Japanese lunacy. Every people can go bad, crazy, or evil. That’s why their darker tendencies need to be aired, exposed, and criticized. The German soul led to both Beethoven and Hitler. The Russian soul led to both deep spirituality and lazy barbarism. It’s fair game to contemplate the darker sides of the Russian national character, the German cult of the will, and the Japanese hive-mind. And Jews have spoken countless times about the hypocritical aspects of the Anglo character and the like. Without such push-back, a people are likely to grow more rotten and arrogant.

It’s like the prince-ling phenomenon. Inside every boy is an angel, a child, and a spoiled rotten brat. There is the good side, the all-too-human side, and nasty-vicious side. Some kids are naturally nicer than others, but no child is born perfect or holy. But suppose a child is treated like a prince-ling and doted on as the most wonderful kid in the whole wide world regardless of what he does. Suppose he’s treated like he’s something near-divine, like Puyi kid in THE LAST EMPEROR. What happens to the mind of that child? He turns into a spoiled brat and becomes utterly blind to how totally rotten he is… as with the kid in THE MAGNIFICENT AMBERSONS who surely deserved comeuppance. Now, suppose adults around the kid look upon him as such a darling and angel, and therefore, everything he does is seen as either wonderful or somehow the fault of others(or the world) but never of the child. And if anyone just about had enough and calls out on it, he is seen as the villain for pricking the balloon of magic air. The result is like scenario in "It's a Good Life" of THE TWILIGHT ZONE.

Now, it may be that Jews, blacks, and homos are especially problematic for the 'extreme' innate qualities. Jews, with their higher IQ, pushier personality, acute neurosis, and Covenant-based worldview, have a tendency to be subversive, supremacist, and contemptuous. And blacks, due to their naturally thug-like tendencies and stronger muscles, are more prone to become criminals or bad boys or skankass biatches. And fruitkins, due to their tootsy ways, tend to be more vain, narcissistic, egotistical, and amoral than others. Still, one could name a host of positive characteristics of those groups as well, and besides, every human group has its pros and cons.

Then, the proper thing would be to have a honest fact-based discourse on Jewish Power, Black Problems, and Homo Predilections. At the very least, such fact-based discussion would counter or forestall the ‘sacralization’ of man and matter(of which Jews, blacks, and homos are a part), a stupid and dangerous thing to do as people and things should not be elevated to the status of gods or angels. Why did mankind get rid of monarchy? Because the king wasn’t just a leader but some kind of quasi-divine being whose power could not be questioned. Whether it was the old king or the new king(like Hitler or Stalin), such cult of personality led to megalomania among the rulers and ‘minimi-mania’ among the masses, who as sheep-like minions, were happy to love Big Brother.

So, if Jewish Power could be honestly criticized and countered when it goes wrong, it could do a lot of good in the world. Jews would come under pressure to be better and curtail the worse. But, the current cult of the Holy Jew prevents this. The result is ever greater megalomania among Jews and ever more ‘minimi-mania’ among goy sheeple. Just look at both Democrats and Republicans sucking up to Jews like minions before an emperor. As for homos, they've contributed much to human civilization with their creative gifts in arts and culture, and as homos will always be with us, they can go on doing much that is good for humanity. But with the current globo-homo madness, homo megalomania or homogalomania has gotten totally out of control. Instead of ‘gay’ creativity adding to human culture, we have excessive homo vanity and degeneracy defining what is left of Western Civilization, and it is an ugly sight.

But even the best journalists, because they’ve been indoctrinated since cradle with Holy-Schmoly Jew-Negro-Homo worship, are unwilling to ponder the real sources of the problems facing the West: The rot and decay emanating from Jews-blacks-homos gone bad due to the ‘sacralization’ of their identities. A person or a people are at their worst when he or they get everything he or they want. Look what happened to Michael Jackson when he could do whatever he pleased. Same with Elvis before him. Look at the Nazis at their height of power. And look what’s become of the US as the lone superpower, the thug-scum a**hole of the world. But same applies within any order. Consider ridiculous Kim clan of North Korea. All that cult of power and worship went to their heads and have done incalculable harm to the nation.

Even though the West is still politically and socially free in many respects, it isn’t ‘spiritually’ free because the cult of Jew-Negro-Homo worship has imprisoned the Western mind/soul in blind worship of certain groups as if they’re divine and holy. It’s like one can be physically free but mentally owned by another. A man can be under the spell of a woman he adores so much that he acts like her dog and obeys all her commands. In time, such mental imprisonment eventually turns into physical imprisonment as well because the woman can tell him to go to the basement, hand over the key, and lock the door. Being a mental slave, he will likely obey even though not physically forced to. And then, when he's locked up and hands over the keys, his mental enslavement has turned into physical enslavement.

Indeed, consider how the mental imprisonment of the white race is leading to its physical imprisonment. While Jews don’t own whites as chattel-slaves, Jews do own the minds/souls of whites via the cult of Shoah Worship, 'white guilt', and the like. As whites are so mentally beholden to Jews, they just nod along and go along at every turn even as every Jewish request chips away at white freedoms and security. More mass-immigration and more Diversity? If Jews want it, it must be holy, so never mind that it’s leading to White Nakba. Jews want more ‘hate speech’ laws to shut down BDS and ‘white supremacist’ defiance of Jewish Power? Well then, the FBI must be called to track down sentiments such as “It’s Okay to be White”, and the courts must allow more and more prohibition of free speech. With less and less free speech and more and more non-white immigrants who vote Democratic and support gun-control and speech-suppression, white people will go from mental prisoners to physical prisoners.

How Jewish Bagel Brains Came to Own Irish Potatoheads — How Jews Manipulated the Mis-Alignment of Self-Preservation and Self-Righteousness in Irish Politics, Values, and Spirituality.

There are two ways of responding to the world around us, two ways of feeling about who we are and how we relate to others, near and far. They define much of our lives as a constant struggle and/or exertion(and even excitement). One is about self-preservation and the other is about self-justification(that can easily turn into self-righteousness). Most ideal is when self-preservation is aligned with self-justification. Most dangerous is when self-justification comes to malign self-preservation. Consider Body and Soul(or Spirit). Consider Health and Sensation. Though the soul/spirit is an extension of the body, excessive indulgence of the body or excessive purification of the spirit can lead to misalignment of the two. A person who prioritizes only the needs of the body will neglect the spirit, and a person who seeks spiritual perfection will neglect the body. The narcissism of the body will conflate physical beauty with sanctity itself. The purist strains of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Christianity have led to problematic, even pathological, rejection of the needs of the body. And even though sensations exist to preserve life and health — hunger makes us eat, cold leads us to warmth, pain alerts us to seek relief, sexual desire leads to birth of new life to perpetuate the species, etc — , they can take on a life of their own and deviate from their original/main purpose. Normally, pain and strain alert us that something is wrong, and pleasure assures us that health has been restored. Hunger is a kind of strain/pain and makes the organism seek out food that provides pleasure and ensures its preservation. But what if the organism overly fixates on pleasure of eating and keeps eating beyond what is necessary for health and preservation? Consider all the fatsos who keep eating and eating when they don’t need all that food. They’ve fallen into the Pleasure Trap where pleasure no longer serves its primary purpose of preservation but exists for its own sake. We see such behavior with sex, drugs, and leisure of all kinds. These kinds of pleasures aren’t correctives to Pain Alarms that something is wrong but sensations that demand more and more stimulation, titillation, and scintillation for an organism that has become addicted to excessive jolts of intense pleasure. This is most problematic with drugs such as crack, meth, and heroin. Pleasure offered by such drugs do NOTHING for preservation of health of the organism, but it is sought out by the organism that finds itself increasingly divorced from reality. It’s like the 1980s commercial of the monkey that became so addicted to cocaine that it neglected everything else to get more highs from the drug... even unto death. Same could be said of pleasures offered by vice industries such as gambling and prostitution, real-life or electronic(aka video-pornography).


Ideally, body and soul are united in purpose. Though body and soul are different, they must be complementary, like negative and positive charges of electricity. Likewise, pleasure associated with eating should primarily be associated with needs of health. When hungry, people should seek out good food and consume essential calories and nutrients. While a bit of junk food snacks like cookies and ice cream are okay in small amounts, they should be avoided as main course or staple diet. (Consider that much of the obesity and diabetes problem in the West has to do with people constantly munching on snacks of all kinds away from the meal table.) Even healthy activity such as exercise must be in sound coordination with the needs and limits of the body. Consider all the people who end up with chronic aches(or even debilitating injuries) because they pushed their bodies too hard in search of pathological narcissism or egotistical glory. Unless one is a professional athlete or adventurer, one should never push too hard. No sense in pushing oneself to become tougher and stronger only to end up crippled or dead.

The same rule applies to self-preservation and self-justification. They must be balanced and aligned with one another. One must serve the other with an understanding that they aren't synonymous. Just as it’s wrong to conflate self-preservation with self-justification, it’s wrong to risk self-preservation for sake of self-justification(morphed into self-righteousness). Nazi German soldiers fought to preserve themselves in Russia, and to that extent, they were working in the mode of self-preservation. But were they in the right to invade and terrorize another nation? At least on Russian soil, didn’t Russians have the priority of self-preservation against the German invaders. Thus, Russian self-preservation was aligned with Russian self-justification whereas, by normal standards of universal nationalism, German presence in Russia was not justified. Of course, there were Nazi radicals who argued that Germans had the racial right to invade and conquer Slavic territories since ‘Aryans’ are the superior and more deserving race. To be sure, it’s been a common justification all through the ages. For example, Latinos and Anglos certainly felt justified in conquering and taking the New World from the natives who were seen as savage, primitive, backward, inferior, or satanic(especially with the massive human sacrifices in South America and Mexico). Nazi Germans felt likewise justified in their invasion of Russia to create lebensraum for the Teutonic ubermensch. Humans certainly feel this way about animals and nature in general. Human races the world over have wiped out entire floras and faunas to create safer and securer habitats for themselves as the premium and more deserving species. And the West says the Jews were justified in carrying out Nakba Pogroms against lowly Arab Palestinians who were colonized, conquered, and expelled from their ancient homeland.
Still, while mankind has always been invasive, the defenders of blood & soil were always more justified in protection of homeland from invaders. And in cases where invaders did take over and put down roots, they went into defensive mode to protect their acquired territory from further invasion. And after many years passed, the descendants of the invaders came to regard the land they were born on as their homeland of blood and soil. History has always been complicated in this respect. Invaders become defenders, and defenders can become expansive and invade territories defended by others. History of imperialism has been like a football game where the only meaningful boundary is the latest scrimmage line. That said, the persistence of homeland often survived despite the anarchy of borders. For instance, even under Roman Imperial rule, the Jews regarded Jerusalem as their sacred city. And even after Poland was effectively wiped off the map, most Poles between Prussia/Germany and Russia had a general sense of their heritage and territory, which is why it was relatively easy to reconstitute Poland once Russian and German empires fell in World War I. And despite the vastness of the Soviet Empire, various ethnic groups maintained a sense of territorial integrity that emerged into full-fledged nationhood once USSR came to an end.

A people are most justified when their sense of self-preservation is paired with a powerful sense of self-justification. Indeed, such a people tend to be the fiercest fighters with the highest morale and determination. Take the Vietnamese under Ho Chi Minh. They believed in Vietnam as their motherland to take back from foreigners, be they French or Americans, and this sense of national self-preservation(or self-restoration) was almost synonymous with their sense of self-justification. They felt 100% justified in fighting for defense of their homeland. Justification = Preservation. They felt this so powerfully that they were willing to fight the French and then the Americans against all odds and despite losses of millions of lives. The Irish too were a fierce people at one time because their sense of self-preservation was one with their self-justification. They believed in national liberation and independence of Ireland from British Imperial rule. Their sense of nationhood was justification enough. Their sense of national memory & territoriality was powerfully wedded to their sense of political morality, historical necessity, and ideological commitment. Ireland for the Irish, the Irish for Ireland. Thus, despite the great military advantage of the British Empire, the greatest in the world at the time, the Irish independence struggle remained a major thorn on its side.
And of course, the reason why Jewish Power and Israel/Zionism are so mighty has to do with the complementary relation between Jewish self-preservation and Jewish self-justification. Jews don’t need to invoke GDP numbers or variety of -isms(and catchphrases and mantras about ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’) to justify the existence of Israel. The fact that it is the homeland of the Jews is justification enough for Jewish national self-preservation. Jews don’t need to ideologically defend their identity and territory. The mere fact of preserving Jewishness and Jewish homeland is more than sufficient. Then, it’s no wonder that Israel is so powerful and confident. (Granted, Israel was created by destroying Palestine. Indeed, Jewish-European imperialism kicked into gear just when Christo-European imperialism was beginning to recede from the Third World following the end of WWII, but Jews do have ancient roots in the land, the holiness of which wouldn’t make sense apart from Jewish ethno-spiritual narratives.) In a way, Israelis today feel as Irish did a century ago. Or, as the Vietnamese did as they struggled against the French & Americans. Algerians and Cubans also had a unity of self-preservation and self-justification in their struggles against imperialism/colonialism, respectively, of the French and Anglo-Jewish-Italo-Americans. And both Algerians and Cubans prevailed.

Still, it seems national identities have been fading all over the world, that is except for Jewish Identity. Part of the reason is Jewish Globalist agenda of weakening goy identities to make it harder for various goyim to unite into particular nationalities against Jewish globalist-imperialism. After all, even though Jews prize Israel as their sacred homeland, they also operate in neo-imperialist mode and derive most of their wealth and power from manipulating and exploiting goyim. Jews seek to flood the entire goy world with mass global migration while Israel alone remains afloat like Noah’s Ark in a mixed sea of miscegenationist confusion that shall engulf all goyim like the Sea of Reeds crashed upon Pharaoh’s chariots. Jews keep the crown and the rest of us drown. But, there is another reason for the fading of goy national identities. Many goyim around the world have artificial constructed identities, and ironically enough, their sense of nationality wouldn’t exist if not for European imperialism. After all, what is an ‘Indian’ or ‘Indonesian’? How did some Arabs end up as ‘Syrians’ while others ended up as ‘Saudis’ or ‘Iraqis’? How did some Kurds become ‘Iraqis’ while others became ‘Turks’, ‘Iranians’, or ‘Syrians’? While Arabs and Kurds pre-existed the coming of European Imperialism, they ended up in nation-states that resulted from often arbitrary lines drawn on the sand by the imperialists. To be sure, the line in the sand in the Middle East wasn’t certain even prior to European Imperialism.

What is the crucial difference between Israel and Ireland today? In Israel, there is virtual synthesis of Self-Preservation and Self-Justification whereas in Ireland the passion of Self-Justification has come unglued from Self-Preservation. There was a time when nothing was more just, necessary, and sacred in Irish hearts and minds than the independence and self-preservation of Irish people, land, and culture. But the great majority of Irish no longer feel that way. Indeed, many feel that the notion of Irish Self-Preservation is offensive, immoral, ‘racist’, ‘xenophobic’, and even downright evil. Their primary sense of Self-Justification comes from raving about Globo-Homomania, celebrating Diversity, welcoming ‘immigrants’(who are really invader-colonizers), Afro-worship(as Irish women got jungle fever, Irish men worship black athletes, and all Irish regard black music as the highest and deepest expression of soulful truth), and Jew-worship. (Many Irish still tend to be pro-Palestinian as legacy of past struggles when IRA and PLO were allies, but their anti-Zionist stance is ironically the consequence of their mindless Jew Worship. The Irish are so morally awed by Jews as the greatest victims of all time — the holy holocaust people — that it bothers their sensitivities to see wonderful Jews acting like a bunch of bullies against a powerless people such as Palestinians. Indeed, many Europeans have similar views. They are so committed to worshiping Jews as a holy people, the new christs who died for the sins of white folks, that they simply can’t digest the fact that powerful Jews in US and Israel are acting rather like Nazis.)

Because of the divergence between self-preservation and self-justification, the Irish are now a very schizo people. At the gut level, all organisms(which includes humans) instinctively want to secure their existence and ensure their continuance. So, even among Irish progs, there is some buried organismic want for survival. This side of them, no matter how repressed, is present in their drives and passion. But as Irish self-preservation has been ideologically and ‘idologically’ pathologized as ‘racist’, ‘far-right’, ‘exclusive’, and ‘xenophobic’, the majority of Irish now feel ashamed to harbor such nationalist passions. But because the feeling is there(as it’s natural), the Irish go out of their way to condemn it with even greater fury. If society deems something as sinful and if this sinful something happens to be ineradicable(as all natural feelings are no matter how repressed), extra measures must be taken to attack and condemn it day in and day out. It’s like the vilification of sexuality led to especially hysterical attempts to suppress natural passions in the witch-hunts of the Middle Ages. And communist societies had to be endlessly vigilant and alarmist about ‘greed’ precisely because self-interest is a permanent feature of human nature, even in the so-called New Man of Marxism-Leninism. Repressive hyper-virtue that runs against nature wants to be rid of all temptations and anything that reminds them of temptations. Then, it’s no wonder that campaigns against nationalism are so hysterical, relentless, fervent, and dogmatic. (Granted, human nature comprise opposites. Just as nationalism is natural, so is internationalism. Human nature is both naturally conservative and liberal, both cautious & wary and open & exploratory. Though the term ‘xenophobia’ is thrown around a lot, it should really apply only to societies where the order hysterically tries to suppress the natural inclination of humans to be curious, adventurous, and open to new experiences. North Korea would truly be a xenophobic nation. It is the mirror opposite of current Ireland. If North Korea ruthlessly suppresses the natural tendency of a people to look beyond their own domain, New Ireland fervently suppresses the natural tendency of a people to protect and preserve their own domain. Both are out of balance.) When people are pressured to do what goes against their nature, they must be drummed with constant reminders that the inquisition or purging is most necessary, desirable, and justified. Take the ritual of Seppuku in Japan, aka Harakiri. Suicide goes against organismic nature since life wants to live. People dread not only death but the pain involved. So, if samurai listened to their nature, they would have run like a mothafuc*a if expected to rip open their bellies. In order to counter such natural reaction, Japanese society devised an elaborate rules of duty and redemption whereby one’s honor could be restored ONLY BY MEANS of ritual suicide. To make the unnatural seem most natural and necessary(if circumstances demanded it), samurai from a young age were conditioned and tasked with an outlook that reminded them day in and day out that it was glorious to die an honorable death and that they must have absolutely no fear of it. The unnatural was made palatable through poetics and spirituality.

There is this sense in the death of Jesus as well. According to Christian mythology, the human side of Jesus feared pain and torture of Crucifixion as any man would. It went against human nature for Jesus not to be like a Negro and run like a mothafuc*a. More human/natural would have been for Jesus to go with the ‘last temptation’ of Martin Scorsese’s film. So, why was Jesus willing to surrender His body to such agony, humiliation, and death? He spun a myth about Himself whereby self-justification demanded His body be sacrificed for the redemption/salvation of mankind. A powerful sense of mission for humanity. And there was the matter of His massive Jewish ego. Still, He agonized all night, even panicking at moments and bewailing God for having putting Him in a bad situation. Finally, He was able to go through with the plan because His sense of self-justification overpowered His sense of self-preservation. His spiritual sense convinced Him that His physical demise would open a way for spiritual resurrection and everlasting glory. He needed an elaborate mythology of spiritual justification to overpower the physical demand for self-preservation.
And something similar happens in wars too. Every soldier knows he could get killed or horribly wounded in battle, and a part of his human nature tells him to take flight than fight, especially if the war happens to be imperialist in nature and has nothing to do with national defense or survival. (No wonder so many Americans were demoralized in Vietnam. Why did they need to fight rice-eaters to protect the American Way? While most didn't desert, few felt eagerness to put their lives on the line for the sake of foreigners.) Still, most soldiers pick up their guns and charge into battle because there is also the fear of court-martial and/or contempt as a coward(and being killed by the other side of course). As humans are social animals sensitive to how others feel about them, their natural fear in one area could be overcome by natural fear of social opprobrium or legal sanction(that could even lead to execution. e.g. Soviet troops who retreated in WWII were summarily shot by commissars — more honorable to be killed a hero by the Germans than killed a coward by one’s own side).

In a similar way, there is a natural Irish will to survive. It wants to preserve the people, culture, and land of Ireland for the Irish. But the elite Irish powers-that-be, especially the media and academia that take cues from the US as the metropole of the Empire of Judea, have inculcated generations of Irish children that the highest goods are Diversity(created by mass-immigration), Homomania, Afromania, and Jew-Worship. Now, some degree of cosmopolitanism is good and natural — as humans are naturally expansive as they’re naturally defensive — , but current Political Correctness goes far beyond a healthy balance of nationalism and internationalism. Rather, it calls for total eradication of traditional nationalism in favor of turning one’s own nation into an interchangeable bloc in the World of Glob, world where globalism runs rampant like the broomsticks in SORCERER'S APPRENTICE with Mickey Mouse. As current globalism is utterly radical and crazy, the natural response among the Irish should be for More Nationalism and efforts at Self-Preservation. But this is proving difficult and even near-impossible as the ‘Poz’ has utterly disconnected Irish sense of Self-Justification from Self-Preservation. So, if past Irish felt most justified in struggling for preservation, they now feel most justified in working against it. And precisely because the current National Suicide(or Irish Harakiri) goes against human nature, the delusional Irish must make an especially rabid effort to convince themselves that it’s ALL FOR THE GOOD to turn Ireland into New Africa-India-Arabia. (It's like whites cheer with artificially heightened enthusiasm for the Great Replacement to drown out their natural fears that it will turn out to be disastrous as the 'evil racists' have warned. Or, it's like gamblers get especially excited as they place big bets to suppress the very natural fear that they will lose everything. Consider Julie Hagerty's delirium in LOST IN AMERICA as she hangs all her hopes on '22'. It's like the globalist whites are collectively betting and shouting for '22' while the odds are totally against them. Crash-22 here it comes.)

Just like a samurai on the eve of Seppuku mustered all his energy to convince himself he felt no fear and welcomed this most honorable death, the Irish are forcing themselves to believe they’re having the grandest time in utterly transforming their nation into the Third World. This is all very ironic considering that Ireland was once one of the poorest nations in Europe, indeed its own little bit of ‘third world’. Irish had to work extra hard to turn poor Ireland into a genuine First World Nation, but they now seem hellbent on turning it literally into a Third World nation by importing tons of blacks, Hindus, and Muslims at the behest of globalist intellectual elites who take their cues from Jews. And yet, it all makes sense in a way. Due to centuries of deprivation and backwardness, the Irish had always felt an inferiority complex vis-a-vis the most advanced nations of Europe, and once they really began to make money, they(like the Spaniards) went out of their way to prove that they are just as intellectually, culturally, and politically advanced as the most modernized nations. So, a mindset developed whereby status-seeking Irish elites came to crave, above all, the approval of the elites of nations like Germany, Sweden, France, Canada, the US, and even UK, its old enemy. If Irish Celtics and British Anglos now have one thing in common, it’s that they are both neo-colonial subjects of the Empire of Judea and, as such, desire nothing more than to win the approval of Jewish overlords and super-elites who rule the world. So, if Jews say Globo-Homo and Diversity are the highest goods for white goy nations, both Anglo and Celtic cuck-elites are eager to prove that they are more ‘pozzed’ than the other. It’s a race among dogs before the Jewish Master.
But then, the Irish mindset was always compromised as the Irish were both the biggest victims and biggest beneficiaries of Anglo Imperialism. They were the first victims of British expansionism and often treated harshly, not least because the British were appalled by all the drinking, wife-beating, and brawling among the ‘micks’. But, no non-Anglo people benefited for as long and as much as the Irish in sharing the spoils of Anglo imperialism. Wherever Anglos went, the Irish followed along as soldiers, traders, adventurers, and pillagers. The Irish sure gained a tremendous deal from the US, essentially the product of Anglo Imperialism and Colonization. So, the Irish were both tough resisters against and happy collaborators with the worldwide Anglo Empire. Then, maybe it’s not so difficult to understand why UK and Ireland are going down at the same time in the same manner for the same reasons. The Irish and Anglos have been more joined at the hip than any Irish or Briton would like to admit.

Any nation of people, culture, memory, and territory must have unity of self-preservation and self-justification if it is to secure any long-term survival strategy. It is simply not possible for a people to preserve themselves as a nation IF their main sense of self-justification is at odds with the demands of self-preservation. The danger could be spiritual, ideological, or ‘idological’. While spirituality lends deeper/higher meaning to a people, it can also divorce them from worldly demands of survival. Consider all the Hindu yogis who dropped out of society to beg for alms while they stuck needles into their noses and arses. If one takes Buddhism to its logical conclusion, he should cut all his ties, duties, & attachments and just meditate to reach Nirvana. This is why Buddhist societies that survived restricted the scope of Buddhist influence or somehow managed to associate Buddhism with tribalism, like the Tibetans. Likewise, if Christians decided to become spiritual purists and live by every letter of Jesus, they will end up dead like the hero-priest in Roland Joffe’s THE MISSION. Without spirituality, life becomes too mundane, but excessive spirituality can lead to loss of reality. This is why Judaism is favorable in many ways to Christianity. Its universalist spiritual content is balanced by the tribal element of the Covenant, and its moral concerns are tempered by demands of the real world is understood not to be a place for saints. Judaism is about conviction and commitment but not about sainthood that came with Christianity. It is moralistic but not sanctimonious, the element that makes Christianity insufferable at times in its holier-than-thou piousness.

Of course, even as Jews feared the power of Christianity, they closely examined its psycho-spiritual anatomy for its Achilles Heel and found it. Jews realized how they could own and manipulate the Guilt Complex of Christianity for their own ends. Manipulating the nerve centers of Christian Guilt was as effective as toying with erogenous zones as a means to gain sensory control over goyim. Is it any wonder that Jews are both masters of Holocaustianity and Pornography? Jews understood that there is a kind of spiritual-erogenous or ‘spirogenous’ zone within Christian Psychology, not least because Christianity, far more than Judaism and certainly more than Paganism, was repressive about sexual matters, what with the Catholic Church even saying you will burn in purgatory if you masturbate. So, sexually repressed Christians had to transfer their repressed sensual passions over to the the spiritual realm, and this explains why so many churches developed services where people go into fits of rapture that are like spiritual orgasms. Rapturous Christian bliss results from friction of guilt and redemption. The faithful arrive at church and feel as sinners who need saving. To be washed of their sins for the week, they holler and shake their bodies to be rid of the Devil, and they feel joy when the angels shower them with God’s glory. It’s about connecting with God, but it doesn’t work without the element of guilt, the sense that one’s body is filled with Devilish temptations.
Likewise, sexuality gains its power from friction of shame and release. If all people were naked all the time and could have sex with anyone anywhere anytime, sex would be nothing special. It’d be about as interesting as eating a bag of potato chips. But even in a libertine society, there is the fear of rejection, shame of reputation, suspicion of betrayal, and the reality of exclusion, especially by the most desirable members of society. So, when an average person finally arrives at a sexual union of sufficient quality, the sense of release is far greater than if sex were so easy all the time for all people. Jews understand the usefulness of controlling the ‘spirogenous’ and erogenous zones, and that’s why they pushed for Globo-Homo and Pornificaition of society. Via Globo-Homo, they’ve replaced inherently ‘antisemitic’ Christianity with Queertianity where one feels redeemed and most justified for having washed oneself of ‘homophobia’ and ‘transophobia’. Also Homomania is far easier than Christianity because it makes no arduous demands for sanctity other than waving the ‘gay’ flag and regarding trannies as new angels. And via pornography(and pornification of society in general), Jews gained direct control of erogenous zones of countless goyim. Also, by peddling stuff about incest and the like, Jews charge sexuality with that potent combination of shame and release. While pornography has been made readily available(even to young ones), it still maintains the aura of being forbidden fruit filled with dark themes of humiliation, incest, and miscegenation.

This is where the neo-spiritual meets the ‘idological’ where idolatry eclipses ideology. Idols can be either beneficial or harmful to the self-preservation of a people. Ideally, the idols of a people will feature heroic or vaunted members of the tribe. Greeks had Achilles as their hero. And Greek Olympics were limited to Greeks who became champions among the Greeks. When white people have white champions who become the basis for white idols, idolatry can become a potent symbol for the nation. But if, say, black idols replace white idols in a white nation, it will undermine self-preservation as white people will come to admire and even worship blacks as their heroes, champions, and top studs. It will lead to cuckery among white men and spread jungle fever among white women, and THIS is precisely what is happening all over the West under the hegemony of Jews who regard blackness as their surrogate body conjoined to the Jewish head. Jews could outwit whites but couldn’t beat them physically to win top trophy of manhood, but Jews could use blacks to beat down white manhood. Thus, whiteness could be both outwitted and out-muscled by a combination of Jewish brains and black brawn.

https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/01/thanks-jews-black-violence-now-stains-the-emerald-isle/

We’ve been told endlessly that blacks need BLACK role models in prestigious areas because people identify with their own kind. If this is true of blacks, it must be no less true of whites. When white idols are replaced with black ones, it leads to white demoralization and white death, which has now reached near-genocidal levels in the West. In order for whites to feel self-justification in the name of self-preservation, they must write their own ideology that rejects the mindless mantras of ‘Diversity’ handed down by Jews as would-be-overlords. Whites must have their own idols in a world of their own that excludes other races, especially blacks who can beat up white men in sports and streets in an integrated social order. Just like human physical pride can exist only apart from wild animals — as humans are no match for wild boars, bears, tigers, rhinos, hippos, crocodiles, etc in physical confrontations — , white pride of manhood can ONLY EXIST apart from blackness that will defeat and humiliate white men because black men got longer limbs, harder muscles, faster reflexes, and bigger dongs. The world is truly diverse in that there are different races with different attributes and advantages. And every race should be wary of other races that pose a potential threat to them. This mania for Diversity is leading to a world of Universal Imperialism where every people, even the imperialists, are being drowned in non-stop floods of invasion, confusion, and alienation. But then, it all happened before with the Romans long long ago. The greatest conquerors the world had ever seen were overwhelmed by those they conquered, and in time, the empire was about every people conquering and being conquered by every other people until finally it all fell apart. If Jews get their wish, all nationalisms will be washed away EXCEPT for their own as the Noah’s Ark nationalism of all eternity. The US used to be a nation where white imperialists conquered others and then demanded that newcomers assimilate into Anglo-Americanism or accept its authority. There was once a sense of who the real masters and owners of America were. But now, non-whites come to America to lose their identities and heritages along with white American cucks who’ve lost all sense of identity, roots, and heritage. Indeed, their only concern regarding nationalism is "Muh Israel". What did Nancy Pelosi say? Even if the walls of Congress come tumbling down, the US will always be there for Israel! How pathetic can you get?

Limits of Putinism in Russia and the Need for Themocracy — Duality of Human Nature to be Free and to Serve Something — Why Russia must become a Fascist-Democracy like Israel as National Entity

Vladimir Putin can only do so much and stick around for only so long.
Russian people must mature and learn to become great on their own.
Russia has huge advantages. If Germans or Japanese(or past Anglos) had open access to all that land and resources, Russia would be the #2 or #3 economy in the world in no time.

Russia has:

1. Large enough population with decent enough IQ.

2. Lots of land.

3. Tremendous resources.

4. National pride(something lacking in most white nations).

5. Moral capital(as victors over Nazis, survivors of communism, and resisters of Globo-Homo-mania).

But its economy is on par with that of Spain or Italy and only because of its resources in gas, oil, and minerals. Without those, Russian economy would be that of some third rate Middle Eastern nation. This simply isn't tolerable. Russians need to get their act together, and no leader, however great, is going to do it for them.

So, what do Russians need?

Culture of discipline
Culture of individuality
Culture of accountability
Culture of conscience
Culture of restraint(especially from vodka)
Culture of maturity(such as refraining from wrestling with bears, dancing on tables, and catching fish with penis)


Russia needs a cultural revolution. The Orthodox Church needs to develop an activist wing that trains people like Jesuit cadres to spread and instill values of conscience, diligence, responsibility, and patriotism to ALL Russians.

Russia needs something like Protestant-Work-Ethic cultivation. Its rich elites need to be less lavish and corrupt, and its people need to be more enterprising and less dependent on statism.

A people can be statist and still be productive. Germans were always statist but economically highly productive. The state was always a big feature of France under monarchy and republican rule, but France made great strides just the same. While excessive statism can complicate things with too much red tape & regulations, there have many examples of nations failing despite their lack of 'big government'. The sudden lack of statism surely didn't do wonders for Russia in the 1990s.

In the end, the character of a people will be of paramount importance. Putin has been a good leader(given the alternatives), but he cannot do for Russians what Russians must learn to do for themselves. Granted, a truly great leader can alter the character of his people, but such a man must have vision and iron will. Putin is an able manager and serious statesman, but he's no visionary or prophet. He isn't the Russian Moses... or even a Russian Frederick the Great. A leader who changes the political course of his nation controls the winds. A leader who transforms the national character of his people moves mountains.

In the absence of a Russian Moses, Russians must learn to tell themselves... "WE can do it." For one thing, Russia is one of the few nations that could go it alone if it were forced too. Now, it's good for Russia to trade with the world, but even if Russia were hit by sanctions by the entire world, it could survive because it has enough land and resources. This is not an option for Japan, Germany, Italy, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and most nations. Germans have human capital but no energy. Saudis have energy but poor human capital and lots of desert.
Russia has people, land, and resources. It could develop great industries.
But there's too much corruption and lack of direction, and so, too many talented Russians prefer to move to other nations, especially in the EU and US. Unless Russian entrepreneurs can be assured of rule of law and a capable work force, they will be reluctant to invest fully in their own nation. For ambitious people, enough is not enough. They want to grow bigger and expand the economy, and this requires a support system of law, work ethic, and reliability. Naturally, we can understand why talented people anywhere would want to move to the US to make a quick buck in Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and etc. Even though the US is culturally and morally decrepit, its Anglo-German-Dutch-American legacy of Rule of Law still allows for the kind of property rights and assurances that attract much capital. (But, it's unlikely that American Rule of Law will last very long given the look of California as the future of All America. With each passing year, the Golden State is looking more like a patchwork of Jewish oligarchy, Asian mandarin drones, white freaks & homo degenerates, and Third World serfdom.)

So, in order for Russia to keep its best talent, it has to ensure that the ideas and investments of the most ambitious/ingenious/industrious Russians will be protected and profitable. Also, Russia must appeal to their sense of patriotism, i.e. that, as patriots, they ultimately owe something to the motherland because, all said and done, dollars and rubles don't constitute the highest meaning of life. Furthermore, since smart people like creative stuff, Russians must create a counter-creative culture that defies the globo-homo-dominant fashions & trends of the West that are poisoning the world, not least by fooling so many that they're 'most evolved' for waving the 'gay rainbow' flags.

Putin was a necessary figure, but, especially as there doesn't seem to be a Russian Moses on the horizon, the next stage in Russian development must come from the Russian people themselves. They mustn't look to Putin as mother-bird who forever feeds the chicks in the big nest. Russians must go beyond nest-mentality and build Russia into a real aviary where every Russian can stand alone as well as together. Indeed, the best collective is one of strong individuals. While a collective of weak-willed people might have advantages over disunity among strong-willed-but-atomized individuals, the ideal is a unity of strong-willed individuals. Anglo-America of the 19th century and first half of the 20th century had both strong individualism and powerful sense of racial-national solidarity.

All Russians should tell themselves... "If Germans or Japanese had our land, they'd do great things. Then, why have we Russians have done so much less with all our blessings and advantages? Why isn't Russia a giant Prussia?" Indeed, if tiny Prussia with all its disadvantages could become so powerful, why has Russia always lagged so far behind? Granted, Russia achieved great things under Josef Stalin, but if a people must be whipped like horses and cattle to do great things, they will more cattle than human. The real question is, "Can Russians do great things as FREE people with a sense of agency and accountability?" That is the million ruble question.

Russians should also remind themselves... "A bunch of Anglos arrived on the East Coast of a wilderness called America. After independence, within a century and half, the US became the most powerful and richest nation on Earth. We have even more land and resources, but we achieved so much less. Why?"

By asking such questions, Russians can identify and fix the flaws of Russian character.

For much of Russian history, there was Tsarism and Orthodox culture that crushed individual initiative. Also, Russian elites, so into French and German culture, sought approval from foreign elites while treating their own people like dirt. Many preferred to speak French while regarding their mother tongue as vulgar and barbarian.
Communism was the great hope of uniting Russian elites and Russian masses, but communism crushed individual initiative and enterprise, and so, communism became like modern Tsarism. Furthermore, as non-Russians were dominant in the original Bolshevik Regime, Russian-ness was suppressed for a time in the USSR.

Because Russians lacked individual initiative and enterprising spirit, they were like deer in the headlight when communism ended. Instead of seeing the new order as a great opportunity for fresh possibilities, most Russians were just dazed and confused as they'd grown accustomed to jobs and benefits from the state. In the ensuing chaos, sharp-eyed globalists easily targeted and looted Russia, a nation where most people were clueless as to what to do, especially under the tutelage of the inept Boris Yeltsin. Implosion of statism didn't lead to the emergence of sturdy & sober individualism but bewilderment and nihilism. For many youths, freedom meant revelry and thuggery. For Jews and gangsters, it meant a fire-sale to grab all the good stuff. Among the decent and honorable, everything seemed hopeless as the new elites were utterly crooked while the masses mishandled freedom like children playing with fire. The end of communism was like the second end of serfdom in Russia, but the result was vagrancy than vibrancy. Especially as Jews grabbed so much of Russian resources, it was as if Russians lost not only their private wealth but national property. If Russians after communism had been more like enterprising Chinese(who were governed by strong leaders), they would have jumped at the chance of new opportunities.

Vladimir Putin and his cohorts restored some degree of political, social, and economic order, and that was for the good. But in the end, Putinism can only be a form of transitionalism. It can only provide a temporary respite during which Russians could take hold of their own future. It is a window of opportunity. But how many Russians have the foresight and fortitude to take advantage of the situation that won't last forever? How many want to step forward and take charge, as opposed to all those who are accustomed to having OTHERS fix the problems for them? As of now, most Russians are faced with two possibilities: The Western Model and the Russian Model. Both are bad.

The Western Model is, at least for now, good for innovation, creativity(except in PC-taboo areas), and initiative. Most of the innovations are coming out of the West and Westernized parts of the East. But the Western Model is too divorced from cultural roots, identity, and meaning. It cannot be sustained because Homomania, Afromania, and feminism cannot be the basis of any healthy civilization. Homomania leads to decadence with fecal penetration and tranny-dick-cutting as new rites. Feminism turns women into bitches or sluts who won't have kids.. or become single mothers. Afromania promotes Negro thuggery and megalomania and egotism. And yet, the current Russian model is too lethargic, turgid, and static to encourage and invigorate the creative, enterprising, and innovative spirit that is so crucial to competition in the modern world.

What Russia needs is a kind of Themocracy, or theme-based-democracy. A kind of fascist-democracy... akin to what Israel has. National Zionism is fascism + democracy — of course, its evil twin, Imperialist Zionism that violates the national sovereignty of other nations is hardly praiseworthy. The fascist-democracy of National Zionism must serve the higher themes of Israel: Jewish state, Jewish power, Jewish destiny. Israel is not some abstract propositional nation but a democracy linked with a certain key theme. Iran is like that too. Iran is a democracy with elections, but its theme of Islamism cannot be violated. Now, I'm not so sure about the wisdom of religion serving as the main theme of a democracy. I prefer the thematics of Israel: Blood and Soil. Israel is open to religious Jews, secular Jews, any kind of Jews AS LONG AS they defend Jewish ethnicity and territory. So, the Jewish mind is free to pursue anything as long as it serves the Jewish body on Jewish land.
In contrast, if all Iranians must bow down to Islam, it restrains what can be thought, debated, and explored. (One advantage of Islam is that it has been an effective bulwark against the new religion of homomania, which is a kind of neo-theocracy of idolatry. And to the extent that moral Jews in Israel have been utterly ineffective in preventing decadent Jews from spreading homomania and turning whole parts of Israel into Sodom and Gomorrah does make us wonder about the legitimacy of Israel.)

Anyway, Russia needs more spirit of freedom and enterprise. More individuality. It needs more democracy. More rule of law. However, these freedoms must be anchored to higher(yet also deeper) themes of blood, soil, and history or identity/inheritance, territory, and narrative. While democracy can be good and useful, it must not be the highest theme.
Any Jew in Israel understands this. If you were to ask a Jew, "Which would you prefer? In scenario A, Israel turns autocratic and rejects democracy but remains a Jewish state for Jewish people. In scenario B, Israel becomes 75% non-Jewish but remains a democracy. Do you go with A or B?"
Any Jew will say he will go with A. After all, even if Israel turns autocratic but remains Jewish, it could one day revert back to democracy(as it's not all that difficult or uncommon for political systems to change). But if Israel becomes majority non-Jewish, it is no longer and will never again be a Jewish state even if democracy lasts forever; indeed, even return of dictatorship will not make Israel Jewish again as the overwhelming majority will be non-Jewish."
Indeed, worship of 'liberal democracy' as the highest good is the disease of the West. By placing democracy, hedonism, libertarianism, money, and economic growth ABOVE ALL OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, they've lost the will and means to preserve blood, soil, and history. By rules of 'proposition nation', any transformation is 'good', 'necessary', and 'imperative' IF it leads to higher GDP, more celebration of vanity(esp via homommania, Afromania, or slut culture), more 'diversity'(a virtual religion in the West), and etc. So, themes of identity, history, and territory take a backseat to themes of atomization, political correctness, and 'tolerance' & 'inclusion' which comes down to invasion by foreign hordes. Of course, Jews get passover rights as even the most fanatical diehard libertarian or globalist will say Jews and Israel get waivers from what is demanded and expected of all other groups.

What Russians must say is, "We want and need more freedom and liberty, BUT the highest themes of Russia are blood, soil, and territory." After all, even without liberal democracy under the Tsars and Commie-tsars, Russia remained Russia, the homeland of the Russian people.
The trick is to fuse themes of blood, soil, and history with freedom.
That was the source of European and American greatness in the past. At one time, more freedom meant more freedom for the ethnos to do great things for their own people. But over time, the idea of freedom came to be divorced from ethnos and came to be centered around the individual. In traditional myths, the hero was an individual who did extraordinary things for his tribe, his people. In contrast, the modern individualism increasingly came to be about reaching the stars only for self-aggrandizement. And then, it came to see ethnos as an enemy of freedom since radical libertarians don't want to feel restrained/constrained by any obligation to any people, culture, or territory. Libertarians are like bird-folks. They see themselves as having evolved away from land-creatures who are wedded to a territory as their homeland. For globalist bird-people with wings of cosmopolitan-privilege, the notion of walls and borders is antiquated and irrelevant. They want to fly from globo-city to globo-city. Their worldview is migratory. They see every nation as anachronistic nest that must be abandoned in the globalized world where everyone should have wings to fly around all over. No wonder that the migratory globo-bird-people feel most affinity with mass migrations of peoples. Globo-elites see themselves as birds-of-privilege and they see Third World migrants as fish-of-need. (Also, by sentimentally latching onto the poor migratory masses, the rich migratory elites justify their own winged privilege of flying all over and shi**ing on everyone below. Of course, Jewish birds insist on having their iron nest in Israel.) These globo-elites put their individual privilege at the center of everything. Sure, they act like they're for 'social justice' and 'progress', but that's mostly empty talk by people like Carlos Slim, Jeff Bezos, George Soros, and the like who live in an Elysium Sky world safe from troubles on the ground.
For most people, their land really matters to their well-being. It matters economically and psychologically, culturally and historically. Since they don't have much in the way of private property, they feel 'rich' in the knowledge of at least having a place to call their (sacred)homeland. So, when Third World masses pour into their nations, the effect is like attack of winged monkeys in Wizard of Oz. This is why Polish and Hungarian patriots don't want their nations to be monkey-invaded by Turd World hordes. To patriots, Soros and his ilk are like the Wicked Witch, and the third world masses are like flying monkeys(or sea monkeys as they come by boat to Europe).


The result is massive chaos, but since the main themes of globalism are individuality, 'inclusion', and diversity, the elites don't care what they are doing to the world. And of course, they got their privileges and goodies and remain above the ground on which all hell is breaking loose. Also, they rigged the narrative and ideology so as to have the moral high-ground against patriots. So, if patriots say they want to defend the homeland, the piggish winged elites call them 'far right' and 'neo-nazi'. Elites denounce the patriots for not being 'inclusive' while ignoring the fact that the elite world is the most exclusive domain reserved only for those who 'belong'. While the elite world is also 'diverse', it is the diversity of the moneyed class. In contrast, diversity for the masses means that white people in the West must be pushed aside by grubby morons from Algeria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, China, Guatemala, and worst of all, the ghastly continent of Africa with all those crazy Negroes with muscles and aggression. (Look how Africans act in Australia. Ugabuglobalism is the worst.)

Russia must lead the way with its brand of Themocracy that is for more freedom and rule of law BUT in service of the ultimate themes of Russian identity, territory, and history. So, freedom must serve something higher. Freedom serving Freedom is like cannibalism. Freedom needs to serve deeper themes, those with lasting value, like blood and soil.
After all, what is Chinese-ness? Chinese had different religions and cults(Buddhism, Taoism, Maoism), but in the end, what binds all of Chinese history and culture together is a sense of blood ancestry and territory. The deepest themes of Chinese-ness isn't about political systems, economic ideology, or individualist fashions. After all, China no longer has emperors or the concept of Mandate of Heaven. But it's still China because it's the land of Chinese who remember their own history. Now, most people are agreed that capitalism is the most productive system, rule of law & private property are most useful, and republican/democratic system of government tends to be most just. So, it'd be good for peoples to adopt them BUT with the knowledge that those cannot be the highest or deepest themes, which must be blood, soil, and history. Capitalism, democracy, and rule of law must serve something more lasting and deeper in meaning.

Indeed, there are two sides to human nature. One side longs for freedom, but another side longs to serve something. It's like that Bob Dylan song, "Gotta Serve Somebody". This is why even globalists with privilege come to feel empty and hollow and eventually become neo-religious and search for something 'higher' to serve. Clever Jews understand this and urge globalized gentiles to serve holy homos, Magic Negroes, and Israel as the highest goods. Globalists feel this craving to serve something so badly that they go with the officially approved neo-religions that deify Jews, Negroes, and homos. (Why don't they serve their own race, culture, and history? Because globalism has infected their minds that gentiles, especially white ones, who primarily serve their own people, culture, territory, and narrative are 'far right', 'racist', and 'neo-nazi').
People need to serve something. This is why even Libertarians get all weepy about MLK. Even Rand Paul go boo hoo and wets his pants over the thug puncher of women. To serve something is part of human nature, no less than the desire to be free. After all, being free just to be free feels good for awhile but gets vapid and pointless. It's like a novelist or film-maker wants the freedom to express himself but also to serve a story, idea, message, meaning, or cause. Sergei Eisenstein was a great film-maker, but he didn't just make movies to show off his talent. He served the Revolution. SEVEN SAMURAI shows how warriors gain meaning by serving a cause, a noble one of protecting farmers from bandits.
Jews understood this aspect of human nature and came up with the idea of Covenant. It means Jews must serve God. This was a brilliant move because if Jews didn't serve God, their human-nature-desire-to-serve-something might have led to serving another tribe or kingdom more powerful than the Jews(as people tend to worship the powerful). By making Jews serve God, they were immune to serving another tribe or people. And to incentivize Jews to serve God, Jews made God the most powerful and only God in the world. After all, if the Jewish God were a weakling god or just one of the many other gods, Jews might feel tempted to worship the gods of a more powerful people. But by making their God the only God, Jews could only serve God. And through the Covenant, Jews were told that they have a duty to serve this God. But more clever yet, the Covenant meant that God, the ultimate power, had a special duty to help the Jews. So, Jews were to serve God who was to 'serve' Jews, and that meant Jews must serve Jews. Very ingenious arrangement.
When we compare Jews and East Asians in the West, we see how Jews serve their own identity and power because they have this covenant mindset. In contrast, East Asians outside East Asia easily come to serve OTHER peoples, especially Jews, homos, and Negroes, since they have no concept comparable to the Covenant. So, their human-nature-need-to-serve-something can easily be directed to serve the 'new gods' of Jews, homos, and Negroes.

Anyway, Russia needs to ditch the notion of Third Rome. It must think in terms of Second Israel or Zion for Russians.
So-called 'liberal democracy' of the West says the white folks of the West must sacrifice everything for the 'propositions' of globalism. So, even identity/inheritance, culture, history, and territory must be sacrificed or surrendered IF doing so furthers the proposition of 'liberal democracy' that has become all about 'diversity', 'inclusion', and GDP(that, btw, mainly benefits the top 1%). This is an inversion of the old principle that all freedoms must ultimately serve the nation, people/ethnos, culture, and history. This principle still exists ONLY IN ISRAEL. Outside Israel, Jewish elites fear and loathe it as promoting solidarity among gentile majorities of nations that can serve as bulwark against Jewish supremacist penetration. So, Jews rigged the globalist narrative so as to make gentiles feel that their serving their own kind is 'evil'. But Jews love it in Israel because it means consolidation of Jewish power and preservation of Jewish pride of identity.

What Russia must do is promote an order that is democratic, enterprising, and individualist BUT where the highest themes are nation, culture, and territory. Russian human nature is like that of rest of humanity. One part of Russians want to be free. Another part of Russians want to serve something. The magic formula is for Russians to be free to serve their people, culture, and homeland.

Elementary Truth about Black Nature and Character — Evolution and the Negro — NFL and the Knee-Gro

The main thing we need to understand about blacks is their reactions/responses tend to be brutally elementary. They evolved in close proximity with wild animals, and their mode of being is survival than existence, let alone the meaning of existence. Blacks don’t think, “To be or not to be, that is the question” or “I think, therefore I am.” They sense, “I be if I outrun a hippo, I not be if it done catch my ass and stomp me upside my head.” They feel, “I run(like a mothafuc*a), therefore I be.”

For many thousands of yrs, white folks evolved in environments with reduced contacts with direct threats and dangers. So, there was more room for thinking and pondering. More space for security that favored a calmer disposition.
In contrast, blacks evolved in a world of constant struggle for survival against lions, hyenas, baboons, buffaloes, elephants, crocodiles, hippos, warthogs, leopards, gorillas, cobras, mambas, tse-tse flies, and etc. And because this mode of survival made blacks savage and wild, it was aggravating for Negroes to rub shoulders with other Negroes.

So, black emotions and responses tend to be very elemental and ill-suited for reflection, contemplation, introspection, empathy, and self-awareness. Wrapped tightly in their own egotism, blacks are rarely willing to consider other or opposing points of views. In order for blacks to have survived in harsh Africa, they had to obsess about numero uno or ‘my ass’. And such attitude also fueled a lascivious sexual culture that had black males and females calling most attention to themselves to attract the most mates. It’s no wonder that much of black dance forms have degenerated into stuff like bumping-and-grinding and ‘twerking’. In the black African world, survival depended more on fast-twitch reactions against threats and dangers. It was about instantaneous responses to ‘save my ass’ or ‘kick your ass’. Such emphasis on self-preservation led to self-centrism that, in social expression, came to be all about ‘muh bling’, ‘muh booty’, and ‘muh dick’.

Imagine an antelope or some animal in Africa. Suppose it sees something threatening, which could indeed turn out to be fatal. If it ‘thinks’ or ruminates about the problem, it could end up dead, killed by the predator that lunges at it without mercy. So, its survival depends on the immediate response of fight or flight, not momentary hesitation and earnest curiosity. Blacks developed much the same survivalist modes as other creatures of the African wild. If they saw a lion or hippo, it was about fight or flight. Chuck a spear or chuck your ass out of there. There was no time for calm assessment of the situation, let alone contemplation or meditation.

So, there developed a kind of brutally primitive ‘wisdom’ in black emotional reactions. It’s like Beavis and Butthead are ‘wise’ in an idiot-savant way precisely because they are so dumb. Lacking intellect and penchant for reflection, they opt for the occam’s razor of what seems most obvious, like ‘boing’. And they are right half the time with such simple rule of thumb.


Likewise, there’s an elemental truth in how blacks see the world. It may not be deep or profound, but it immediately gauges the brutal stakes of survival… like ‘run like a mothafuc*a’ upon catching the first whiff of danger: "Don’t think about it. Just run and save your ass." Or "the nigga’s craaaazy!" There is no need to psychoanalyze the Negro. Just ‘jungloanalyze’ him.

So, blacks are very adept at elemental survival… but when it comes to complex issues of history, society, ethics, morality, and such, their elemental reactions and responses fall short. Their responses to such matters are uselessly fight-or-flight. Many of them fail to grasp that complex mental tasks cannot be performed if one remains in hunting or playing-basketball mode.

Indeed, the black habit of yelling ‘racist, racist, racist’ is just a verbal form of spear-chucking. It isn’t real thought. It’s “Here’s a spear for your ass, whitey. I wants more gibs-me-dat.” It’s a manifestation of the hunting instinct. Or, it’s a form of flight-panic when blacks are caught doing bad stuff. Unable to morally justify their behavior when found out, they just go into baboon-ish panic mode and holler ‘racist, racist, racist’. The response is essentially same as apes or baboons freaking out when caught in a tough or dangerous situation.

https://www.facebook.com/Fox32Chicago/videos/10157012464860348/



In the black mind, the core of existence is about a b/w stark struggle of fight or flight. To the 'groids', the world is less a stage(let alone a classroom) than a boxing ring. When it comes to white power, a lot of blacks feel, “If we don’t keep chucking more spears at the big white elephant, it will charge and stomp our ass and turn us into slaves again.” The world is not about compromises and contracts but confrontations of win all or lose all.

Some say blacks fail at complexity because of lower IQ, but blacks with higher IQ have similar attitudes and the same ‘moral’ failing. Why? Their emotions outrun or out-ape their intelligence. So, even if certain blacks are just as smart as whites or even smarter, their emotions remain stuck in ‘chuck a spear’ or ‘run like a mothafuc*a’ mentality. This is why even smart blacks like Cornel West and Michael Dyson tend to emote like rappers. Indeed, rap music is useless as a vehicle of meaning because its meanness tramples all over meaning. And in black churches, sheer volume trumps the content of the sermon.

White and black history in the US is highly complex. There was much tragedy for blacks, but there was also much triumph due to contact with white civilization, the most advanced in the world. Indeed, what would blacks have achieved if not for contact with whites? Even today, if there are to be solutions for blacks and Africa, such will have to be devised and developed by whites as blacks lack the necessary temperament to emerge from the primitive mindset of fight-or-flight. Blacks generally lack the emotional qualities that can handle complexity(that call for empathy).

Whites are far more adept at dealing with complex issues. But whites also have their own pathologies that may prevent them from dealing with reality in a truthful way.
One is intellectualism. Sometimes, the danger is so obvious and palpable, but many whites prefer intellectual interaction over decisive action to deal with the pressing problem. Intellect can suppress or deny the urgent needs of the body. The preference for higher intellect has its counterparts in the conceit of higher morality or spirituality. If misapplied, higher morality can favor sanctimony over survival. It’s no wonder that so many whites will risk the very survival of the West just to attain some illusory ‘higher state of being’.

Consider the creature in Howard Hawks’ THE THING, the original movie. The alien monster is clearly a danger to mankind, but the scientist-guy is willing to risk everything to communicate with it(as a higher being) than working with fellow humans to kill the damn thing. And he even turns higher-moralist and believes that, given the choice between saving inferior humanity by killing the superior creature AND saving superior creature by sacrificing inferior humanity, the right course of action is to favor the creature. Today, many whites are willing to sacrifice the West just to appease blacks as the magical god-race. In other words, even if the Africanization of Europe will lead to downfall of Western Civilization, it'd be worth it as a tribute to Black Greatness. White tragedy in service of the Great Negro is to be favored over White triumph in defense of the West against the ghastly 'groids'.


See how foolishly a ‘liberal’ white scientist could act in such a situation? In such a scenario, an elementary-minded Negro would more likely do the right thing: Chuck a spear or run like a mothafuc*a.

*********

https://twitter.com/v_of_europe/status/913455534505897985



Look how the weaker white man is being mauled in his own homeland(Italy) by the stronger and tougher Negro from black Africa. Look how black thugs beat up weaker whites in America.

All white folks must understand the BAMMAMA Factor, or Blacks Are More Muscular And More Aggressive. Knowing that truth, whites must ask, "Why allow a stronger & more savage race of people into our nation?"

In the video above, white onlookers are afraid to intervene because they know blacks are tougher and will kick their butts. If they try to save the white guy from the black guy, they too could end up being beaten by the black guy.

BAMMAMA leads to ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. As blacks beat white guys, white women lose respect for white men and lust after black thugs. White manhood cannot co-exist with black thuggery.

This is why it made good sense to support the KNEE-GROES: Negro athletes who took the knee and alienated their white fanbase. NFL should be about Knee-groes run amok as such will antagonize and alienate whites and hopefully wake them from their cuck stupor. There is no reason white males should be watching NFL that is about BAMMAMA and ACOWW. It is anti-white, and whites need to wake up. So, I support Negro hostility that wakens whites into Race-ism, aka Race Realism.