In 2020 Jewish Power & Democrats bid up the Value of the Black Vote to Ludicrous Levels because They Feared Trump might shave off Enough Black Votes to Win Re-Election — The Problem for Jews and Democrats wasn't that Trump was Anti-Black but Too Pro-Black — To Compete with Trump's Appeals to Blacks, the Jewish-run Democratic Party pulled all the stops and elevated Blacks to god-status to keep them on their side

CHAUVIN'S WHITE GUILT - Brother Nathanael

BLM got totally crazy in 2020 because of the bidding war for holy blackness.

Usually, Jews and Libby-Dibs needed not worry about the black vote because it was reliably Democratic. And the kind of bland generic white candidates put up by the GOP had no appeal to blacks. Even though the great majority of blacks voted Democratic in 2016 and 2020, Trump was the GOP candidate in a long long time with any appeal to a segment of the black population. If Billy Boy Clinton was the 'first black president', Donald Trump was the 'first ni**a president'. Clinton was a jazz man, but Trump rubbed shoulders with rappers and had a rapport with the likes of Mike Tyson. For Democrats to win in some states, black support has to be HUGE. So, even a slight shaving off of black votes can mean electoral loss for Democrats. If GOP relies on whites voting 60% Republican, Democrats rely on blacks voting way over 90% Democratic. Democrats took the black vote for granted, just like they did with white working class and ethnics in the past, especially following the Great Depression and New Deal.

But eventually, the Democrats began to lose the white working class, the ethnics, and the Southern whites. A lot of this had to do with blacks. When the Democrats were about 'class justice', many have-lesser whites voted for the Democratic Party. Working class, ethnic whites, and southern whites were reliably Democratic for a long time. But when the Democrats moved more toward 'racial justice' rhetoric, followed by black pathology and crime unloosed on the nation, many whites began to move to the GOP. Also, with booming times, many children of working class parents rose up the ranks to become middle class and higher, and back then, money and success were associated with WASP-heavy GOP. It's like Italian-Americans became more Republican with socio-economic improvement.
Back then, the GOP stood for tradition and respectability, concerns that still mattered. Today, no one cares for tradition. Also, respectability means nothing in a degraded culture where even adults have green hair and tattoos.
What matters now is the cachet of being faddish and fashionable; that's what appeals to the successful, and today's affluent and educated are far more likely to be Democratic, especially as the Party is now shamelessly pro-money and pro-success. Democrats lost the white working class but gained something far more valuable: the white educated and elite classes who hold the more valuable cards. Also, globalism is geared to favor the urban rich and has little room for white working class unless one is a truck driver(that is until self-driving cars become a thing). So, Democrats won over the useful kinds of whites whereas the GOP hasn't a clue what to do with the 'loser' white working class that voted for Donald Trump as the Party's been for so long a wing of the Chamber of Commerce. As for Trump, he got their votes and they showed up at his rallies in droves, but his presidency has been about 'Muh Israel' and 'Muh Negroes'.

In the foreseeable future, the Democrats may no longer need the black votes so much. In California, for example, the black vote is meaningless. But in places like Atlanta, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and etc., black votes can tip the scale. So, for the time being, the Democrats need all the black votes they can get. Before Trump, this wasn't much of a concern as it's difficult to imagine blacks voting for the likes of Mitt Romney or Jeb Bush. But Trump struck a nerve with a segment of the black population.

And in a way, the Democrats do have a reason to worry about the black vote. The Obama presidency blindsided Jews and Democrats to this fact. Blacks overwhelmingly voted for Obama, and it seemed like Democrats had an effortless lock on the black vote. And yet, it's possible that black support for the Democrats actually eroded from 2008 to 2016 despite their record support for Obama. After all, the Democrats increasingly became the party of the rich, the privileged, the gentrifiers, the great replacers(with mass immigration replacing not only whites but black Americans), and globo-homo. Indeed, but for his race, the Obama presidency was most memorable for its globo-homo glitz. In a way, Obama was the 'first gay president'. And even more than Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, he was a tool and invention of Jews, therefore the 'first Jewish president'. He tried to salvage his black credentials with BLM near the end of his second term, but Michael Brown was too much of a hard sell and the craziness led to Dallas shootings of white policemen. (Of course, no one took a knee for the dead cops.)

In 2016, Hillary lost narrowly largely because the black vote wasn't out in force for her. And Biden, the favorite of the Establishment(along with Kamala), got the nomination because of black votes in the South. So, 2020 victory hinged heavily on the black vote and black complicity in election rigging. And this time, Jews felt they needed to enter into a real bidding war for black loyalty. In the past against milquetoast GOP candidates, the Democrats need not worry too much about the black vote. But there was the chance that Trump might shave off just enough black vote to push him over the top. If Jews and Democrats took the black vote for granted, they had to jealously guard it and bribe it with lavish prizes in 2020. And that's why the George Floyd and BLM thing got so out of control. Of course, Jews hate Trump because his swaggering style had an awakening effect on White America, and BLM & Floyd Cult were also to reinforce the 'white guilt' mechanism.

Anyway, as the saying goes, "Why pay for something when you can get it for free?" And that's how Jews and Democrats had come to feel about the black vote. As blacks were so resolutely pro-Democratic and anti-GOP, it didn't require much effort to keep blacks voting for the Party. Black votes were essentially free, and of course, it was even more so with Obama. Even if Obama didn't do much for blacks, his blackness had blacks voting for him as a 'bro'.
But post-Obama was like a rude awakening for blacks. They were happy to have a brotha in the White House for eight years, but when the jig was up, blacks were feeling like Janet Jackson singing, "What have you done for me lately?" Obama yrs were mostly about gentrification, more mass immigration, more globo-homo, and etc. Indeed, it seemed as if black issues were pushed to the rear in favor of not only homos but freaking trannies. Also, Obama didn't say anything about policies like Stop-and-Frisk and, if anything, mostly seemed in be in cahoots with the urban yuppie gentrifier class. In a way, all this BLM hysteria is about Jews and libby-dib elites trying to distract blacks from the fact that THEY did most to lock up record number of blacks, replace blacks with immigrants, favor globo-homo over black issues, and have the IDF teach US police a few tricks on how to control the colored folks.
Obama years to blacks were, in a way, sort of like Reagan years to True Conservatives and the Clinton years to True Liberals. Because Reagan was president for 8 yrs(and George H.W. Bush for 4 more yrs), it seemed as if Conservatism really won, but during that period, the US became more soulless and less socially conservative. And while the Clinton years seemed like the triumph of Good Ole Liberalism and boomer idealism, it was actually a time of hyper-capitalism and massive deregulation. It took the passing of the Reagan-Bush era for conservatives to finally wake up and realize nothing had been conserved. And it took the end of the Clinton Era for liberals to realize how Clinton had been the tool of the chamber of commerce and the rise of the oligarchs. And it took the end of the Obama era for blacks to wake up and realize, "Sheeeeeeeiiiit, we ain't got nothing in them eight fa**oty years."

And this explains why certain segments of the black population were receptive to Trump in 2016. Obamagic had had a sandman effect on them. They were asleep thinking a brotha was in charge when, in fact, the trends during the Obama years favored the urban yuppie class, the Wall Street oligarchs, and globo-homo types. In a way, this is the danger of having 'your guy' in office. His position creates the impression that your side is on top when, very likely, it is losing out to other forces obfuscated by the false comfort of 'your guy' being on top. Blacks felt a post-Obama funk as his presidency wound down. After Obama, blacks were no longer interested in a white leader. Also, there wasn't another black candidate around that could appeal to white voters, which were crucial to Obama's wins as a Nice Negro. Then, it's understandable why Trump's message of America First had a certain appeal to blacks who feel they themselves should be favored over immigrants, and this sentiment goes back to Booker T. Washington who appealed to American elites to end immigration and hire blacks for jobs.

So, in a long while, Jews and Democrats actually had to fight for black votes and hearts & minds. While they could rest assured that the great majority of blacks would still vote Democratic, they feared that Trump might shave off just enough black votes to win a second term. Or not enough blacks might show up to vote, which is why Covid hysteria was useful to carry out election fraud on an unprecedented scale.
Anyway, to win over blacks in 2020, Jews went crazy in the bidding war. For a long time, it was understood that the GOP wouldn't even try to win over black votes. GOP would do the bare minimum to look 'un-racist', and Democrats could be assured of the black vote. But Trump made a real play for the black vote, and this meant that the Democrats couldn't rely on the old tricks once again and rest on their laurels. They had to bid up higher and higher in the Afro-auction. Jews took no chances. What they did for Michael Brown wasn't enough. And BLM-as-movement wasn't enough. George Floyd had to be sanctified. Not merely a victim but a saint. And BLM was transformed from righteous rage to rapturous religion. Jews and Democrats pulled all the stops in showering blacks with glittering prizes.

So, if the Black Vote would have fetched $1,000 in past auctions, the bidding wars in 2020 raised it to about a million dollars. Jews did for BLM what some people did for Bitcoin. Made it rise through the roof. If Hillary had won in 2016 and if she ran for re-election against someone like Jeb Bush or Rick Santorum, none of this would have been necessary. Jews and Democrats could have rested assured that the black votes would be there. Also, it wouldn't be the end of the world if Jeb Bush or his ilk won because he's such a total wussy cuck. But Jews truly hated Trump and what he stood for, and they were willing to DO ANYTHING to unseat him. Indeed, what Jews pulled off in 2020 is like what South Korea did with the steal in the 1988 Olympics. It was obvious Roy Jones clearly won the match, but SK wanted the gold. People always knew there was corruption in the Olympics, but they thought there's no way South Korea would pull something so low, so obvious, so foul IN FRONT OF THE WHOLE WORLD. But yep, their provincial pride overrode sense and decency, and so, the steal happened right in front of eyes of the world.
Approaching 2020, many wondered what Jews would do to beat Trump. After all, they pulled all sorts of dirty tricks with 'Russia Collusion', 'Ukraine scandal', and other BS. But few people thought Jews would go totally crazy and pull off Covid nuttery and BLM lunacy just to win an election. But they did just that in front of the whole world. Jews have no sense of limits in having their way. But because Jews control the media and top institutions, they fooled just enough people and got away with it. Unlike South Korea that fooled no one, Jews were able to fool so much of the world with their utter BS. But then, even people who were not fooled nevertheless gladly went along with it because they've been led to think they're the 'best and the brightest', therefore ANYTHING is justified in wresting back control from Trump the Nazi and the Deplorables(even though the people in charge in the Trump White House were the same Israel-Firsters).

In a way, blacks have much to thank Trump. Thanks to Trump, Jews and Democrats went all in to win back the blacks. Even Covid hysteria was put aside to let BLM run riot. Blacks got both the spiritual prize as the holiest race and the material prize as they got to run wild and loot and steal. Indeed, even as their stores were being stripped clean by crazy Negroes, the 'woke' companies were singing paeans to BLM under the guidance of Jews who control the gods. The Jewish Mind uses the Black Body to attack whites, body and soul.

If not for Trump, all this attention and adulation wouldn't have been showered upon blacks. Blacks became especially precious in 2020 precisely because Jews feared that record number of blacks might vote for the Orange Man. Of course, Jews know the real truth. They know George Floyd was just a scumbag who died of drug overdose(like so many white working class), and they know Derek Chauvin is a victim of legal lynching. It's like Jews knew Russia Collusion thing was a hoax but pushed it just the same. And they attacked Trump on the Ukraine scandal because it was really ruinous to Biden, the real crook involved with regime in Ukraine installed by US-instigated coup. The real problem for Jews wasn't that Trump was 'racist' but that he came across as least 'racist', at least when it came to blacks. (When it came to Mexicans and Chinese, it was a different story.)

In a way, we see a pattern here. Jews are a 'jealous god' and didn't want Trump to take any credit. They didn't want Trump to take credit for ending the war in Afghanistan, so they delayed it... until Biden could take credit. And notice how Jews are now talking with Russians to arrive to some agreement. The very Jews who howled about Trump being a puppet of Putin are now dealing with Russia. Again, Jews didn't want Trump to take any credit in world affairs. What they shamed Trump for doing, they are doing it themselves. It's like the Kate Beckinsdale character in THE LAST DAYS OF DISCO. She says she could never date a guy in advertising but it's really to dissuade a friend from dating a guy that SHE wants. Jews will tell you not to do something, but when you choose not to, they do it and reap the rewards for themselves.

American culture and politics have devolved into a ritual of appeasing Jews, homos, and blacks. Wall Street bailouts, Wars for Israel, globo-homo mania, tranny nuttery, BLM riots, Floyd cult, and etc. This is no way to have a healthy society. But as the fish rots from the head, Jews deserve the most blame for leading America by the nose into the abyss. And yet, all we get from conzos is 'Muh Israel' and "Please don't call me 'racist-wacist'."

BIDEN'S SLEW OF JEWS - Brother Nathanael

A Message to Patriotic White Men in the US Military: Is Current America worth Killing and Dying for in the Service of Israel and Empire of Judea?

Iraq War happened in 2003, and back then, the US was still recognizably a normal country. In retrospect, it should be obvious to any sane, moral, and responsible person that it was a criminal enterprise cooked up by Zionist-supremacists, Deep State, and the Military-Industrial Complex. In truth, the people most responsible for 9/11 were the US, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and their proxy terrorists. The US and its allies had built up terrorist Jihadis in the hope of using them against secular Arab nations, Iran, and Russia, but there was blow-back, whereupon the terrorists turned their fury on the Metropole of the US itself. But then, it turns out that the Israeli Intelligence knew there was a plot among Muslim extremists and nudged & guided them to carry out 9/11 attacks. Zionist agents thought the attack would be good for Israel and the Jewish Empire. Using 9/11 as justification, the US(then led by George W. Bush and Neocon Zionists) decided to invade & occupy Afghanistan indefinitely and to cook up bogus excuses to invade & occupy Iraq. It was all a pile of manure, but many Americans bought the lie and supported the war. Majorities in both political parties gave Bush II a blank check to invade another nation on false pretext.

Still, we can understand why so many white/conservative Americans were then willing to fight for America. Not only did they feel that the US had been attacked by Muslim terrorist-extremists but that the US was a sane, sound, and normal nation that deserved defending. Turn back the clock to 2003, and there was no 'gay marriage'. There was no trannies reading books to children at libraries and kindergartens. No all-out Jewish Agenda to confiscate guns from White Americans. There was no revelation about Jeffrey Epstein. There was considerably less promotion of Jungle Fever and Cuckery. There were no explicit TV Shows calling for the culling and mass-murder of whites-as-Nazis as in recent shows like THE HUNT. Hollywood had yet to make movies like DJANGO UNCHAINED and GET OUT. Tattoos and piercings were, as yet, not so common. While the silently lethal opioid crisis had already begun, it had yet to claim over 100,000s of more lives. American churches were not desecrated and culturally vandalized with globo-homo 'gay' victory banners. Bakeries weren't destroyed for refusing to bake 'gay wedding' cakes. Businesses were not threatened with lawsuits, bankruptcy, or curtailment for not supporting the 'gay' agenda. Hate Hoaxes had yet to go totally out of control. Universities didn't yet have 'safe spaces' and explicitly shut down free speech. Big Tech had yet to show its true Zionist-supremacist face and use monopoly power to shut down white patriots and Palestinian Rights activists. Though there were plenty of skanks in pop music, twerking had yet to appear on the scene. And Miley Cyrus and worse were yet to arrive on the horizon as 'role models' for young white girls. There were no trannies in washrooms, and there were still only two 'genders' or sexes. There were movies like BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN, but globo-homo had yet to saturate popular culture. And shameless Jewish moguls in sex culture and pornography had yet to make so explicit the New Ideal of Black Male and White Female to push ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. Also, Barack Obama, the product of ACOWW, had yet to become president as an interracist symbol celebrating white wombs being colonized by black seeds. TV shows still weren't as deranged as Lena Dunham's quasi-porn GIRLS. Not every other character in TV and movies was homo or black. Jewish Power hadn't as yet OPENLY declared demographic war against whites with hideous glee. The financial collapse of 2008 hadn't yet happened, what with Jewish Wall Street getting bailed out to the tune of $1 trillion plus. US had yet to declare new cold war with Russia on account of its saying NO to globo-homo 'gay pride' parades and 'gay marriage'. The US had yet to cook up more BS to destroy Libya(despite Gaddafi's peace overtures), pull off a coup in Ukraine, and use terrorists to rip Syria apart. BLM lunacy had yet to grip the US. And it would have been hard to imagine something like the Pussy Hat March in 2003. Back then, anti-war marches against Bush II were on point. And so on and so on.

Trends weren't looking good in 2003, but the US back then still looked like a normal nation with ties to the tradition and values. But consider all the things that happened since 2003. The implosion of Bush II's idiotic presidency(thus disgracing all of conservatism by association) and the degenerate acceleration of culture, values, and ideas in the Obama years. US is now a totally transformed nation, one in which the Vile Jewish Cat has come out of the bag to scratch out the eyes of White America. Current America is beyond sick.
Americans may denounce Iran as a theocracy, but the US is allied with a worse theocracy of Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, the US itself, far from being genuinely secular, liberal, and free, is really a new kind of theocracy or a neocracy. Or a Idolacracy, a nation that worships certain groups and figures as the new idols. US is a idolacracy where it’s mandatory to worship Jews & Shoah, Magic Negroes & MLK, and Globo-Homos. MLK cult is the religion of the US. We must worship MLK as a saint, perfect man, the true founding father, bigger than god and jesus rolled into one. If you question or deconstruct the promises of Diversity, you shall be hounded and un-personed. If you take moral action against globo-homo desecration of churches festooned with ‘gay victory’ banners, you will be tried and sentenced to 16 yrs in jail.

Even a mega-company like Chick Fil A is forbidden under Jewish/homo pressure from donating to Salvation Army and other Christian groups. Any politician who doesn’t agree that Israel is America’s greatest ally is targeted for the purge. So much for liberal democratic liberty and secular values. PC or wokeness, like Marxism-Leninism in communist nations, is merely the basis of a new set of sacrosanct symbols and catechisms. Iranian theocracy may be bad, but at least it doesn’t equate spirituality with celebration of twerking blacks, psychopathic Jewish supremacists, and shameless sodomites. At the 1992 GOP convention, Pat Buchanan called the US "God's Country". Given all the political, social, and cultural transformations whereby sodomy became the highest value among even so many so-called christians and Mormons, it's fair to say the New America is Satan's Country. Iran has called the US the 'Great Satan', and it proved prophetic. A country that worships idolatry and degeneracy will become just that. When Americans worshiped God, they believed in a power beyond anything of, by, and for Man with all his flaws. But once America came to worship identity groups(mainly Jews, blacks, & homos) and certain individuals(esp. Mandela, MLK, Oprah, Harvey Milk, Netanyahu, & Anne Frank) as the holiest of the holy, the ultimate power was invested in identity-politics and cult of personality. So, the new heresies are 'antisemitism'(or daring to question/criticize Jewish Power), 'racism'(noticing facts about blacks), and 'homophobia'(or the idea that you're mentally sick and morally decrepit if you don't see sodomy as a wonderful rainbow). Thus, certain groups and individuals are now bigger than God, the Truth, and the Cosmos. Everything revolves around the megalomania and egotism of Jews, blacks, and homos as the Holy Three. A people who worship such false gods are living in Satan's Country.

Given the current state of the US where Jews routinely smear and insult the white race and, furthermore, encourage anti-white hatred among blacks and other non-white groups, do white men in the US military really want to fight for Jewish globalist interests and Israel? By the way, what have Jews done to the Holy Land? They turned it into Sodom and Gomorrah. Some say Israel is the 'gayest country in the world'. If you think Sharia is bad, think of Gayria that spreads and enforces degeneracy as not only the New Normal but the New Sacred. Jewish Power even says a sentiment like "It's Okay to be White" is 'hate speech' and gets the FBI to look into the matter. Jews fund ADL and SPLC to spread libel and slander about white patriots and Christian groups. Anyone who doesn't totally toe the Jewish line is attacked as 'nazi', 'white supremacist', or whatever. Think of what Jewish Power did to Nick Sandman and the Covington Catholic kids. Consider how the Jew-run media suppress stories of black-on-white violence & crime and instead use Hollywood and TV to spread the false impression that innocent blacks are being hunted by evil cops.
Indeed, why should white cops go out on a limb to protect Jews from black criminals when Jews in media and entertainment always blame white police and idealize blacks as precious darlings(even when they are depicted as criminals)? It makes no sense for white cops to protect Jews from blacks, and it makes no sense for white soldiers to fight for Jewish interests when one of those interests happen to be War on Whites. Jews are hellbent on Afro-colonizing white wombs and Globo-colonizing white lands with Diversity. Even as Jews promote their identity and interests, they deny any such to whites on the grounds that anything with even a whiff of white consciousness is 'nazi'. Unless you're a dog, cuck, or Janissary moron, why would you serve such a people? Why would you kill or die for the mortal enemy of your race? It's bad enough that whites do nothing against Jews who are waging War on White. But it's truly atrocious that white men sign up for the military and do the fighting, killing, and dying for the aggrandizement of this most vicious Tribe. It's like working for a gangster thug who kills your father, rapes your mother, addicts your brother to drugs, and turns your sister & daughter into hookers.
White men need to wake up. Arabs, Muslims, and Iranians are far from perfect and have their failings, but they are NOT the enemy. They are not the ones who control the West and engineer White Nakba. Also, if Jews ally with Diversity against whites, whites should return the favor and side with elements of Diversity against Jews. But, pathetically enough, even as Jews use Diversity against whites, whites vow to protect Jews from Diversity. If someone comes at you with a knife, would you then try to protect him from that very knife? The fact is whites in the West and Iranians have one thing in common. Both groups are targeted for defeat and destruction by the Jews. Jews intended to carry out White Nakba and turn all white nations into non-white majority countries. Jews intend to desecrate Christianity and true morality among non-Jews with globo-homo filth and Afro-jive idolatry. Jews intend to demonize whites and scapegoat them for all the problems in the world, not least to distract people from the fact that Jews got the ultimate power. When Jews regard and abuse whites in such manner, should the attitude of whites be the cuckish dream of, "Gosh, gee, maybe if we do this favor for the Jews, they will finally love us and hug us." What kind of sappy shit is that? And if Jews call you an 'Anti-Semite', tell them that you're a Anti-Supremite because the Semites are now Supremites or supremacist Semites who seek world hegemony. Sure, Jews will deny it as conspiracy theory, but the cat is out of the bag. There is so much evidence of Jewish supremacist agenda and power. And Jewish arrogance sometimes blurts out that White Nakba is happening, Jews are behind it, and Jews are celebrating total victory over whites.

The current reality is truly incredible. Jews use media to make some of the most rabid and virulent movies and shows about whites. Some of these are near-genocidal, portraying MAGA-rians as subhuman filth that must be eradicated. In other words, White Patriots are the new Kulaks or KKKulaks. When both whites and Iranians are equally dehumanized by Jewish power, one would expect them to unite against Jews. But white morons in the US are sucking up to Jews in the hope that, gee whiz, maybe just maybe, if they root for Jews and against Iran just ONE MORE TIME, the Jews will finally be nice to whites. What dummies.

One key difference between Iranians and White Americans is this:

When Jews/Zionists dehumanize and undermine Iranians, Iranians defy the Jews and push back.
When Jews/Zionists dehumanize and undermine white, whites cuck even harder and serve the Jews.

When Jews belittle Iranians, Iranians stand up to Jews and vow to resist.
When Jews belittle whites, whites kneel before Jews and vow to serve.

Still, the end result is goyim vs goyim as the Jews wish.

This is why White Liberation is so essential and will save the world.
Iran doesn’t endanger the world because it says NO to Jewish supremacist power and hegemonic agenda. In contrast, whites endanger the world because they say YES-YES-YES to Jewish supremacist power and serve it most loyally like dogs. If whites were to look to Iran for inspiration and gain white liberation, independence, autonomy, and emancipation from Jewish Supremacist Power(JSP), then Jews wouldn’t be able to wage more wars(and more cold wars). Without the compliant white horse and saddle, the Jewish rider couldn’t go very far. The world would be a safer and better place. Indeed, this very reason is why Jews are so hellbent on vilifying Russia and Iran as two major nations that remain independent of JSP. What Jewish Supremacist Power fears most is that whites in the West might do what the Russians and Iranians have done. Gain true autonomy. After all, why should whites serve the Jews when the Jewish Agenda is the Great Replacement, Jungle Fever and Afro-Colonization of White Wombs, anti-white propaganda & scape-whiting(or scapegoating of whites), globo-homomania as replacement for Christianity, and etc? Whites must be the dumbest people on Earth as they go about serving the very people who mean them the most harm. It’d be like Poles serving the Nazis during WWII or Hungarians welcoming Soviet tanks in 1956. Jews have harassed Trump from day one, but he serves them. How pathetic.

In a way, Iran is fighting for all of us goyim. Just like the French were once under Nazi Occupation, we are under Globo-Homo-Shlomo Occupation. Americans need to be shaken out of the Jewish Media hypnosis. They need to be liberated from the Occupation. The West is currently just one big West Bank. US military is just a Janissary force doing the bidding of Jewish supremacists and LGBTQ degenerate neo-aristos. Say NO to White Nakba. Say NO to the cuck-traitor comprador elites of GOP and Democratic Party. Go Iran, No Zion.

US invaded Iraq and removed Hussein, the obstacle between Iran and Syria. Without Hussein, Iraq joins the Shia crescent. Jews didn't like that, so the US took on the role of Hussein. What irony. US has become the ‘New Hussein’. We must ask, ‘who sane?’

Should Conservatives Give Liberals 'Gay Marriage'?

I think the idea of 'gay marriage' is sick, demented, and ridiculous. On principle, I would oppose it forever. But tactically, it may be a plus for conservatives if liberals got their wish with the 'same-sex marriage' business. Though the sheer intensity of this issue given the impression of liberalism powerfully on the march, it may well be that the 'gay marriage' issue is really a sign of liberal political desperation and ideological exhaustion.

One main difference between conservatism and liberalism is the former has meaning even if it sits still whereas the latter has meaning only in restless movement. A conservative is like someone who stays put on his land and takes care of the garden. He doesn't have to venture to new territories to find meaning. He can find meaning by tending his own garden.
In contrast, liberalism is premised on the notion of change and adventurousness. It has to search for new things, new meanings, new values, and etc. An artistic traditionalist or conservative can find meaning and beauty in classical art and older forms of representational art. An artistic liberal or experimentalist favors something like modernism and post-modernism. He or she needs new expressions.

There is an advantage to the liberal spirit as long as there are meaningfully new things to find and do. But once liberals run out of new adventures and new crusades, it sort of becomes useless. Look at the state of modernism and post-modernism in art today. It is at an utter deadend. Modernism, as a rebellion against traditionalism, had great meaning and potential in the late 19th and the first half of the 20th century. But in painting, sculpture, and music, modernism and then post-modernism pretty much burned themselves out. And modernism in cinema lasted to up about the early 1970s.  Nowadays, 'radicalism' in art is something of a joke. No one really cares, and the art world is essentially a zone of insider trading among rich collectors who have nothing better to do with their money and cynical 'artists' who try to be the new Warhol in making pseudo-art or anti-art for big bucks and fabricated 'notoriety', which too has become something of a brand. (Indeed, Ai Wei Wei is blessed because he has to deal with censorship. It gives him the cachet of being a true dissenter. Western artists aren't so lucky.) In other words, too much of a good thing has led to its own demise. It's like yeast eventually kills itself in the wine. They feast on the grapes but the alcohol produced by the fermentation kills the yeast. Similarly, the indulgence of modernism and post-modernism killed those movements. What had once been 'different', 'subversive', 'radical', and 'revolutionary' became dime-a-dozen mannerisms in every art school. When even teenagers at community colleges make 'surreal' collages with various junk, who cares anymore? Similarly, sex and violence in films have lost their edge and meaning. Whatever controversy and meaningful discussion were stirred up by films like STRAW DOGS, DIRTY HARRY, and A CLOCKWORK ORANGE, no one is shocked by violence and sex in movies anymore. What had once been a great cultural crusade came to a deadend.

Now, let's consider politics and culture. There was the golden age of liberalism that took off with the rise of FDR. Like him or not, he connected with many Americans and laid the foundations of the modern America we are living in today. As America was becoming bigger, more complex, and more industrialized--and as most Americans could no longer live self-sufficiently off the land as in the past--, a whole new bureaucracy was created to manage and oversee the new order. And in time, Republicans came to adopt this model too. Though conservative purists like Buckley in the 50s opposed even the government role in building highways, more pragmatic conservatives like Eisenhower understood the new reality. Having fought in the biggest war in world history, Eisenhower appreciated the advantages of modern management and organization. And in a way, he understood American progress as a kind of peaceful constructive war. Thus, army engineers built dams and bridges. For a vast new America to be built, private enterprise couldn't do it alone. Governments had to play a bigger role in educating children, in building infrastructure, and etc.

This was a boom time for the American working classes, and the great majority of Americans embraced FDR's vision of new America, and despite all the conservative gripes, they too accepted the new system. Eisenhower built the great highways. Kennedy would start a program to send men to the moon. Public universities were expanded so that many more eager young men could attend college. These were great times, and liberalism had a muscular role to play in the creation of the new order.
And then, there was the Civil Rights Movement. Today, we know that the black problem is much more serious since so much of it is rooted in biology than in history or social reality. But many people didn't know this in the 1950s, and liberalism stepped into to bring legal justice to blacks. If the US Constitution calls for equality for all men regardless of race, creed, or color, then it wasn't right for blacks to be discriminated because of the 'color of their skin'. Many whites were naive back then--as they still are today due to politically correct education--, but they sincerely believed that the racial problem could be solved by offering equality and a helping hand to blacks. In RIGHT FROM THE BEGINNING, even Pat Buchanan says that as a young man, he was deeply impressed by MLK's speech in the Mall in the early 60s; he called it the golden age of liberalism. That was great boon for liberalism, and Johnson was re-elected in 1964 in a sweeping landslide.

But then, things began to go wrong due to the Vietnam War, the true nature of blacks, and youthful hedonism. Vietnam War pitted patriotic anti-communist liberals against radicals, progressives, and peace liberals. The true nature of blacks showed them to be aggressive, wild, and dangerous. Crime begin to skyrocket once blacks(who turned out be physically tougher and more aggressive) got freedom and equality. Even white liberals began to run from integrating neighborhoods; Howard Stern says even his ultra-liberal Jewish mother soon wanted OUT of the blackening neighborhood.
As for youthful hedonism, it turned to drugs and excess.

To be sure, there was silver linings in all three of these problems. Anti-War movement gave birth to a whole new kind of liberal idealism that defined a generation. And black rage and black politics gave meaning to black identity politics. And youthful hedonism produced some great popular music and styles & modes of life that seemed 'groovy' and 'far out' as long as the music, drugs, and youth lasted.
But black rage could only go so far. Eventually, even sympathetic white liberals got annoyed(and scared) with blacks howling all the time. And the anti-war vibes evaporated the minute Nixon got rid of the Draft. And there were soon too many bad trips with excessive music, sex, and drugs among 60s youth. As Peter Fonda said in EASY RIDER, 'we blew it'.

As black rage, youth hedonism, and anti-war rhetoric began to fade, liberalism sought new meaning in feminism and environmentalism. Those causes also had some great themes to them. Though feminism soon became stupid, there was meaning to women wanting equal opportunities. And through feminism, many women began to question and critique what it meant to be a woman in her own right than merely in relation to men. And despite some of its excesses and mania, environmentalism did clean up many rivers and the air. It also had great themes and meaning. But as women gained equality and EPA became national policy, they all began to lose the element of thrill and excitement. In time, even conservatives were for stuff like "women's rights", "cleaner air", and all the other nice-sounding stuff that liberalism put on the table. What had once been urgently new issues became part of the same old same old landscape.
If conservatives had one great issue during this period, it was anti-communism, and Reagan ran with it to victory and triumph.

Anyway, that was then, and this is now. Are there any great liberal themes or causes left? With a black guy as president and president-re-elect, with gays in the military, with open borders and Mexicanization of California, with the permanent demise of the GOP as a national party, and etc, etc. what is left for liberals?

There's 'affirmative action' and 'disparate impact' on the books. Wasp power is gone, and liberal Jews pretty much own the nation along with the gay cabal. Even big tobacco was defeated in the 90s. So, what is there left for liberals?  Liberals, with their slogan 'Forward', need something to look forward to and get excited about. So, what is it? There is 'gay marriage', but suppose 'gay marriage' becomes law of the land in all 50 states. Then what?

Liberals are now scraping the bottom of the barrel. They had their great period, but they got nothing left that is meaningful anymore(though, I suppose there is "let's elect a woman president", "a Hispanic president", "gay president", "lesbian president", "cross-dressing president", "a mental retard"). Unlike conservatives, they lack core values with which they can feel at peace. Liberals always have to find new things to get all worked up about.  With FDR, it was jobs for Americans. With Obama, it's more food stamps. With Eisenhower and Kennedy, it was equality for blacks. Now, it's the silly notion that Obama is 'black gay jesus' who sends thrills up some white news anchor's legs. Media tell us that gays are angels, and Americans now seem to love gays. And Fluke and other silly sluts got their free birth control pills. And feminists are proud to be 'sluts' and shout 'vagina' out in the streets. Golly gee, they finally defeated the evil 'war against women'. They even got socialized healthcare and amnesty with Obama.
I mean it's getting pretty desperate for liberals to find new things to get excited about. Even creatively, liberals are at a deadend in literature, cinema, and music.  The fight for 'gay marriage' is the last big thing they got going for them. So, suppose we let them have it. They'll be celebrating like crazy for one night.. and then realize they got nothing more to fight for. Sure, they cook up more crises, but you can cry wolf only so many times. It's like conservatives got to cry "MUSLIM TERRORISM" after the Cold War, but it soon got stale. Especially with the looming deficits, the whole house of cards may come tumbling down for liberals, and all their silly new conceits may come to naught. And in time, many liberal causes that once sounded meaningful will be exposed as decadent, trivial, and trashy.  Liberalism is the victim of its own success. So was anti-communism. Once conservatives won the Cold War, they were at a loss as to what great crusade to find next. George H. W. Bush thought war with Iraq would get the patriotic juices flowing again, but it wasn't long-lasting. Conservatives had a silver platter handed to them with 9/11, but Bush II botched it real bad.

But liberalism is also at a deadend. I mean a movement is scraping the bottom of the barrel when the great moral crusade it can come up with is 'gay marriage'. It's so silly that like the housing bubble, it's supported not by substance but hype about gays as perfect angels and darlings whose blessing you must earn if you wanna go to Cool Heaven. It's MTV liberalism. But once liberals have it, what is the next big cause? Diversity? But it's here already. The re-election of Obama means the tipping point has been reached, and it's the end of 'evil racist white America'.  Since the evil white GOP has been defeated, what is there to hold the Democrats together? The great war against Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan held the coalition of Nationalist China, Soviet Union, UK, and US together. With the defeat of the Axis, how could those nations stay in the same camp? Their alliance became the victim of its very success.

Conservatism may have lost, but it still has core meaning for conservatives because conservatives find meaning in their hearts. Liberals have to find meaning in new stuff. It's the difference between a person who's content with clothes in her closet and a woman who has to keep buying new stuff. After all the fashions have been purchased and tried on, what is there for the liberal ideological shopper to buy anymore? Liberalism too is at an end. The real End of History is not some happy final destination. Such is impossible with liberals since they need new kicks and thrills. But when there is nothing new that's meaningful to be found, liberals will settle for trivial issues and causes, and they will lead to decadence and ridiculousness, to self-parody and comedy. The party of FDR now swoons over  Obama as 'gay black jesus' and think 'gay marriage' is the biggest moral issue of the day--and they're blind to how ridiculous they've become. If they get 'gay marriage', they'll have a "what's next?" moment, and the fact is there's nothing more left but gimmicks. Indeed, 'gay marriage' itself is a gimmick.

One thing that should be clear to all conservatives. The alliance with Jews is over. It should have been seen as hopeless from the start.