The Opposition to the Homo Agenda should have been Secular and Rational at the Core — The General Impression that the Opposition to Homomania was Mainly Religious created the Illusion that the Homo Agenda was Rational and backed by Science

Unfortunately, there was hardly any non-religious opposition to the Homo Agenda except on willy-nilly libertarian or legalistic grounds. Hardly anyone mentioned the facts of biological hierarchy, i.e. real sexuality is meaningful, purposeful, and essential whereas homosexuality is a deviance in organic terms and perversion in moral terms. The secular and rational counter-homo arguments were heartless and bloodless, utterly failing to recognize the Homo Agenda as a war on biology and morality that it really was. As for the religious component of the opposition, which had long predated the half-hearted secular opposition(not least because the Bible adamantly commands that homosexuality is a sin), it simply didn’t have the means to summon up the kind of arguments that could persuade modern educated people. (Perhaps, the secular opposition to the homo agenda was weak because it was so unprepared for such a challenge. After all, most of human history, religious or not, had taken as granted the wrongness of homosexuality. There was no need to argue against it since it was understood that EVERYONE knew it was sick and gross even if not wicked and sinful. Perhaps then, it will take some time for a truly effective secular opposition and immune system to the homo agenda, which has metastasized into full-blown Homomania, to develop. As things stand, Homomania is the HIV of Western morality and culture. It is eating away at everything.)

At any rate, nothing in a republic/democracy like ours can be based primarily on religious doctrine or dogma. We can’t say “Evolution must be banned because it is an affront to God’s Creation.” Likewise, we can’t let religion decide matters on law and sexuality. We can’t ban or deny something on the basis of "God said so".

But then, opposition to the homo agenda didn’t need God on its side. Upon close scrutiny, it should have been obvious that a merely secular opposition had not only sufficient truth but all the truth on its side. What is this truth?
Truth is that some people are born homo and can’t being what they are. Therefore, okay, let homos be homos and do their own thing in their own spaces. However, homosexuality cannot some kind of ‘new normal’ but will always be a deviance that has no biological meaning or sexual purpose. That is also the truth about homosexuality. Among men, homosexual acts are downright gross and putrid. It’s about homo fecal penetration.
That said, we can acknowledge certain cultural benefits of homosexuality. Not in what homo do ‘sexually’ but in how they see and feel things that opens up new creative possibilities. Homosexual sensibility has certainly left its mark on arts & culture.

But homosexuality has no value in biology and family. Homosexuality cannot produce life. That is a truth. Marriage is a fusion of biology and morality. It must be based on the truth of life and the necessity of moral values. ‘Gay marriage’ is based on a lie. It makes believes that homosexuality has equal value with real sexuality. It makes believes that Tim Cook’s anus has the same value as his mother’s vagina that birthed him. Another observable and undeniable fact about homosexuality is that ‘gays’ tend to be vain, narcissistic, and self-centered in their ego. So, they have no sense of limits in terms of ‘sexual’ excess or self-aggrandizement. Homos have even pushed ‘gay rights’ into Gay Rites. They went from secular demand for ‘equal right’ to a quasi-spiritual demand to be worshiped as new angels and saints. Homos have even made ‘pride’ synonymous with homosexuality. They are so vain that they want to claim and own entire terms for themselves. And their chosen symbol hogs all the colors and associates homo fecal penetration and tranny penis-cutting with the miraculous rainbow that used to be primarily associated with the story of Noah where life is preserved by saving male/female pair for each animal.

Indeed, the Homo Agenda won not by rational argument but by the irrational appeal of sensual-sacro-propaganda. TV shows and Movies featured an endless parade of saintly homos were so well-groomed and more-normal-than-normal. Even as Progs generally mock 1950s culture of FATHER KNOWS BEST and the DONNA REED SHOW, homos were given a GAYS-KNOW-BEST make-over.
Homos won by having at their disposal the power of advertising, fanfare, spectacle, parades, and etc. It’s like communism mainly cast its spell with songs, music, pageantry, rallies, and etc. Its success owed more to the appeal of the irrational. It is no wonder that homos soon targeted churches and sought to associate everything holy & sacred with homo colors, which are intrinsically ridiculous since what does the rainbow have to do with homo fecal penetration or lesbian poon-mooshing? Or tranny penis-and-testicle mutilation?

Most importantly, the main reason the Right failed to oppose the Homo Agenda was due to its slavishness to Jews and the Rich. As many homos became rich, powerful, and well-connected, more and more money-worshiping members of Conservative Inc. began to suck up to Homo Lobby. It became a status-thing to be pro-homo in elite circles. Consider how S.E. Cupp broke down with tears of joy when ‘gay marriage’ was forced on the entire nation. Look how the kids of the Bush family are all crazy for homo, homo, homo. It’s what fancy elites go for, so anyone who aspires for higher status must follow along and flash the same cues. (Also, homos built up a network of spying, gossip, and blackmail. If anyone opposed their agenda, they would be ‘outed’ and scandalized. Look how the homos and their allies in the media dragged Carrie Prejean’s name through the mud when she opposed ‘gay marriage’ at a beauty pageant. They dug up all the dirt on her and attacked her to send a warning to all women what will be done to them unless they comply with Homomania. Homo men are especially foul in personality. They have male aggression plus female bitchiness and hysterics, like with the homo guy in MEAN STREETS.)

As the GOP became slavish to everything Jewish, Conservatives dared not voice any real opposition to homosexuality lest Jews get upset. Jews sent out a message, “the homo agenda is OUR baby, and we’ll be very very displeased if YOU oppose. Saying NO to the Homo Agenda is saying NO to us wonderful super-Jews”. So, Conservatives only pretended to sort-of-oppose it while effectively doing NOTHING to expose and condemn the sick, perverse, and evil agenda of Homomania. Look how even Ross Douthat(the so-called Catholic) and Charles Murray caved. That bald-headed lowlife bent over to Tinkerbell Curve.

The failure was due to the lack of courage to handle truth and facts on a rational and moral basis. After all, marriage is a primarily a Moral Institution rooted in proper biology. Morality must be based on truth and justice, and it is neither truthful nor just to pretend that what homos do to each other has equal biological purpose and moral value as what men and women do in their practice of proper sexuality. Or that what trannies constitute health of mind and body. Since when is using Frankenstein medicine to remove perfectly healthy organs to be replaced with fake organs of the opposite sex a sane or moral act?

We have spineless idiots on the Right. But then, the Evangelicals and Mormons are so eager to suck up to Jews and Money that they’ve also muted their opposition to Homomania. Mormons will do ANYTHING to have Goldman Sachs build more office in Salt Lake City. And Evangelicals will do ANYTHING to please Zionists and prove it is not filled with ‘hate’. Since Jews say, "If you’re not with homos, then you are against us Jews", the craven Mormons and childish Evangelicals have decided to add Homo-Worship to their liturgy.

Why We Need to be Vigilant of the Power of the TEMPLATE

Some on the Patriotic Right fret about the corrosive effects of Cult of White Guilt, but it’s actually a secondary problem flowing from a much bigger one, namely the power of the TEMPLATE.

The Template decides who are approved & who can accuse as opposed to who are accused & who must atone.

But once the Template is smashed, it doesn’t matter what people believe as individuals. The personal consciences of individuals matter only in relation to the condemnation or consecration by the Template held by the Power. Why does one’s personal views and feelings about Jews matter in America but one’s views and feelings about Buddhists don’t? It’s because the Template protects and favors Jews but is utterly indifferent about Buddhists. So, a person can love or hate Buddhists, and it wouldn’t matter one way or the other. Neither loving nor hating Buddhists is either an advantage or a disadvantage. The Template just doesn’t care. But if one’s feelings about Jews were made known, it’d have serious consequences on the social, economic, and political level because Jews are so central to the Template.

Take communism in East Germany. As long as the System was in place, the Template was “Marxism-Leninism is the eternal truth, and good communists are on the side of angels, and it is their right and duty to accuse and expose anti-communist heretics.”
Under the System, the pro-communists could accuse and condemn anyone deemed anti-communist. They didn’t need to explain or justify their feelings and actions. The System ensured its supporters to take for granted the infallibility of Marxism-Leninism. All they had to do was point fingers and accuse. Destroy the enemy and feel justified as good comrades. As for the accused, they had to either deny the charges of anti-communism or defy the system with all the courage they could muster(and almost invariably pay a heavy price). The System enforced the Marxist-Leninist Template. Even if we were to suppose everyone in East Germany, communist and anti-communist alike, was motivated by the purest ideals and principles, what ultimately decided their fate was not their individual consciences but the Template that had the power to choose winners and losers.

But once the System came tumbling down in East Germany, it no longer mattered if there remained hardline communists or Marxist true believers. The System no longer existed to protect and favor them. Whether few or many, they were now all alone to make their case without the System enforcing the Template in their favor.

Also, their accusations no longer carried any weight. They suddenly lacked the power to affect the lives of others because the Template no longer existed to lend them support against others. If anything, there was the sudden realization that their power had been illusory. Because they could destroy other lives under communism, they’d been lulled into believing that their personal sense of righteousness, in and of itself, had the force of history. But in fact, it had been the systemic wind behind their backs that had created the impression of having agency in history.
It’s like Christians in a Christian Order may feel empowered by Faith alone. After all, the Christian Faithful feel blessed in a Christian system that favors their kind. One could easily overlook the crucial role of the system and believe in God as the source of one’s blessed position in society. But one’s favored status really owes to the power of the Church that endorses and ensures the privilege of the true believers. If the power of the Church were to fade, their faith alone wouldn’t amount to a plate of beans. Today, American Christians have begun to realize this. Because core institutions of America are now effectively post-Christian(and even anti-Christian), what with the Template consecrating Jews-Negroes-Homos above all others, being a Christian today has little resonance within the domains of power. If anything, it could be a liability in many key areas.

Anyway, the fall of East German communism meant that anti-communists no longer needed to fear informers or cower before their accusers. They no longer needed to deny their anti-communism. They no longer needed to defend or justify their anti-Leninism. They could freely express their disdain for communism.
And as long as the New Template favored those who called out against communists of the prior regime, their anti-communism had value as a token of power. But once the New Template lost interest in making an example of former communists, even anti-communism came to mean nothing. In time, neither having served communism nor having resisted communism carried any water in the New Order where the Template was devised and enforced by globalists.

Same logic applies to the cult of ‘white guilt’. It’s not the feeling itself that is most worrisome. Same goes for the cult of Diversity and Homomania. Before Diversity and Homomania were promoted as part of the Official Template, it didn’t matter if one espoused nationalism or anti-homo sentiments. One could openly question or mock Diversity or the Homo agenda prior to their consecration into the Template. And it didn’t matter if some people were pro-homo-agenda or pro-mass-invasion. They lacked the backing of the Template and could therefore be pushed back because they stood alone with their own convictions.

But once Diversity was canonized into the Template, its advocates had the blessings of the System. And its opponents were effectively excommunicated by the System. If an idea isn’t yet canonical, opposing it cannot be heretical. Thus, while opposing it may lead to heated arguments with its advocates, one cannot be destroyed by the System for harboring such views because the System has yet to canonize the idea that would render such views heretical.

Once elite institutions canonized the tenets of PC, opposing views were no longer regarded as mere disagreements or dissent but as heresies of ‘hate’. So, with the full spectrum of elite opinion from left to right chanting the sacred mantra of ‘Diversity is our strength, the message was loud and clear that Diversity now has the full blessing of the Template. It was no longer a position among other possible positions but The Position, the Only Position.

So, the key issue isn’t White Guilt per se. Such sentiments always exist because any society(even non-white ones) will have its share of self-loathing types who love to make a spectacle of their higher virtue via atonement and redemption.
What gave Self-Loathing Whites or SLW’s the moral and political advantage is that the Globalist elites used their immense power to push the Iron Template of Diversity and Homomania. So, SLW’s are now favored in the way that communist zealots, communist toadies, and communist hacks were favored in Stasi-dominated East Germany. But notice how the commies in all walks of life lost their advantage overnight when the System came down. Being communist in a system tailored to Marxism-Leninism was like having an anti-gravity belt. But once the system’s power was shut down, those hovering in the air all came crashing down. Tragicomically, while they were up in the air, they thought their power of levitation emanated from within their own souls. They learned the truth the hard way when the system no longer supplied power to their belts. It's like a soldier has the power to kill other people as long as he is consecrated as a 'hero' by the System. But back in civilian life, he realizes his 'power' of 'heroism' totally depended on the System.

So, the problem isn’t so much the existence of SLW’s, annoyingly unbearable as they may be. Rather, it’s that they are blessed by the System that calls for Open Season on White Heretics, aka the Patriots. Once the Template is smashed, the Patriots can fight back with the full force of facts, logic, and passion, and then, SLW’s will have to stand on their own legs in the fight that they will inevitably lose. After all, those who hate their own kind will lose to those who love their own kind. Also, the support of the Template made the SLW’s spoiled and lazy. Their reliance on anti-gravity belts powered by the Template made their bones weak.

We must smash the Template, or the Tabernacle.