We've all heard of stories from around the world where hills stripped of trees surrender their soil to mudslides. Without roots to hold the dirt in place and without leaves to soften the pummel of rain, hills without trees invariably wash away in mudslides that do great damage to outlying areas. This is why, since childhood, we've all been instructed of the importance of nature and forests. If nature is despoiled for short-term gain, the damage can be irreparable as the loss of trees unleashes a chain-reaction of destruction. Not only are the trees gone but all the animals, plants, and other organisms that depend on them. And then, other organisms that depend on those organisms also become endangered, and many perish. As humans ultimately rely on nature, what had been short-term gain turns into long-term loss, even destruction for mankind. Indeed, entire civilizations perished because of their short-sighted exploitation of nature.
What goes for nature also goes for the mind. Human souls can be destroyed just like nature. When something essential, fundamental, and true is removed from the life of the mind, it sets off a series of 'mental events' that reverberate far and wide. The impact is not limited to the initial loss but gradually or even dramatically expands to other dimensions of the mind. It's like the removal of an organ affects the entire body, which begins to fall apart like dominoes. What is true of body is also of mind. When the mind is 'deforested' of what makes us essentially human, moral, philosophical, spiritual, and/or cultural, the human soul doesn't hold together. Having no deep meaning, sound standard, richness of reference, and true conviction, the mind turns into mud and can be molded into anything. The mind goes from precious metal to malleable plastic. Such fluidity of mind is rarely, if ever, the facilitator of true freedom and individuality. Mud-minds and plastic-brains are almost always molded by the Power that, in our world, favors fashion over tradition because slaves to fashion are so easy to manipulate with the latest craze or outrage. Because their conscious(and subconscious) spaces are not held together by forests of the mind with roots in family, culture, history, and spirituality, their thoughts, feelings, and actions are like so many mudslides or mental diarrhea. A properly cultured mind is not only about education. Indeed, if education turns into indoctrination dishing out the latest 'intellectual' fads, especially to impressionable young ones with single-mothers or soulless parents whose idea of culture is Pop Culture and whose idea of values come from the corrupt Jewish-monopoly media(elite and mass), then it can do more harm than good. Given the sheer mindlessness and mendacity that pass themselves off as intellectual thought or ideological commitment in the Current West, it's quite evident that intelligence and knowledge alone won't save anyone's mind and soul. Intelligence is merely a tool and often caves to emotions. Intelligence seeks the truth only when directed towards it. When people with intelligence are instilled, especially at impressionable times in their lives, with strong emotions in relation to falsehoods or disingenuous narratives, the element of sheer passion overrides facts and reason. For example, just how did so many intelligent people come to believe in the divinity of Jesus for so many years? Because Christianity had such emotional, cultural, and spiritual power over them. Why did so many highly intelligent people become so swept up with Marxism/Communism? It wasn't only the conceit of partaking of an ideology that supposedly figured everything out and unified all relevant knowledge but the radical conviction that one was on the side of angels or historical justice. And yet, given the nobility and depth of Jesus' teachings and the power of Karl Marx's vision, those who wholeheartedly accepted the Christian Faith or Communist Destiny were not necessarily deforested of mind, at least not entirely so. Whatever harm the religion of Christianity or ideology of Communism may have done to the human psyche, it also planted new seeds that could grow into new trees of meaning, understanding, redemption, and/or justice. Neither was animated by nihilism, hedonism, or degeneracy.
But take a look at our world. We see women with green, purple, or pink hair. And, they are not merely silly teens trying to be 'different' but women who are middle-aged, even old. Why would an adult do that to her hair? If a 10 yr old girl did funny stuff to her hair to look like Cyndi Lauper or some anime figure, it might be 'cute'. But why would full-grown women, especially one with college degrees and professional responsibilities(and with family and children) go about doing stupid things to their hair? (Granted, such ladies tend to be 'cat ladies' than family women, but then, there are plenty of stupid mothers.) Why would so many people, parents and children, besmirch and sully their bodies with ugly tattoos? What goes on in their minds when they decide on such acts of folly? Don't they have a larger sense of life, i.e. what is 'cool' today maybe 'fool' tomorrow. And even if they are capable of only thinking of the Moment, why would anyone with sense believe that he or she looks better with body graffiti that are invariably ugly, vulgar, and trashy? Now, I can understand some primitive tribes where tattoos have some cultural significance. Or I can tolerate someone who's been to hell and back in war and got a tattoo to signal his camaraderie with his band of brothers. But what exactly is the meaning of tattoos to the fools who decide to splatter their bodies with in-erasable ugliness? While such is done to the body, it is decided by the mind, and one wonders why so many people in the West(and their cultural colonies) have fallen into the habit of harboring dumb thoughts and preferences that lead to disastrous results. (What tattoos are to skin, meth is to inner organs. Substitute kicks and highs for those with no sense of meaning.)
Obviously, both stupid 'cat ladies' with funny-colored hair and morons addicted to tattoos have mud-minds. They are putty in the hands of globalist Jews because their minds can be washed away so easily with the latest fads and fashions. Unlike status-anxious whore-politicians who just go along with the latest Official Line decided by the power(the Jews) out of opportunism, so many of so-called 'woke' community really seem to hysterically believe in the latest crusade or outrage with zero awareness that, only a few years or even moments ago, they hadn't a care or a clue on the subject or issue. Their ex-lax minds seem to slide and flow with whatever BS is cooked up by the Media Machine. In their formative years, their minds were not seeded and planted with meaningful trees providing them with a lifetime worth of meaning. Instead, PC uprooted what was nascent & normal, decent, and healthy in them and 'seeded' their mental soil with ideological salt(that prevents organic growth) and planted plastic saplings that has the semblance of trees but no means to spread its roots. ('Gay marriage' is to real marriage what a plastic tomato is to a real tomato. No, 'love is love' is not true love. Homo fecal-penetration is not equal in worth, meaning, and purpose to true sexuality that produced all the life in the world.) As such, the generations especially from the Boomers(and gone full-retard with the Millennials) have the kinds of minds that can be mud-slid away with ease. Nothing that is deep, meaningful, and true seems to stick with them. Their minds seem vulnerable & defenseless, so very gullible, and elope with the latest stupidity. (Today's 'liberals' might as well be called 'gulliberals'.) How else can one explain monstrosities such as 'gay marriage', dementia of Afrophilia(as if blacks, the most criminal race, is the most angelic race), ludicrousness of Jew-Worship(as if Zionists need protection from the countless Palestinians and Muslims Jews have terrorized and killed), and the clown-world notion that a man is a 'woman' simply because he feels like it.
What are the elements that hold a mind together and keep it resistant to the decadent, even degenerate, fads and fashions that now define so much of the 2 PC's, pop culture and political correctness? What allows for a healthy eco-system of the mind, a kind of psycho-system, one that can weather and survive the winds, rain, and hailstorms of the Corrupt and Venal Power? A strong sense of individuality is surely one but not in the libertarian sense that each individual should consider himself/herself as the center of the universe. No, every individual is part of a link, an inheritor of a legacy. After all, most of our lives are filled with things that we, as individuals, didn't create. While we are more than ants in a colony, we are like ants in that we are nothing all by oneself. We need individuality, but as individuals, we need to understand and appreciate that we are part of a family, culture, history, spirituality, and a sense of place. Even for the non-religious, certain spiritual notions can be beneficial in restraining excesses of hubris or hysteria. For the intellectuals and brainiacs with a know-it-all tendency, the concept of God can be like a contract among them that there is a power and truth beyond their capacity for discovery and understanding in their all-too-short lifetimes. The concept of God can also be beneficial to those who with heavy tendency toward sensualism: A contract among sensualists that there must be something more meaningful and deep than the pleasures of the flesh and tingles of sensory nerves. Without the concept of God or something equivalent, too many people are prone to self-worship, arrogance, mammon, or fervor of the moment(aka the Current Year). Global Warming Hysteria is one such example. While global warming caused by CO2 may indeed be a real problem, the sheer absolute certainty bordering on quasi-millenarianism among its proselytizers is truly a sight to behold. Instead of offering up better science and data with cool minds, they act as though they are 100% certain that UNLESS things go their way, it's End of the World for sure in a few decades. If anything is heating up real fast, it's their self-righteousness. While serious concern for the environment is laudable, especially as humans have despoiled the planet enough, the sheer arrogance of certitude bordering on megalomania(or 'megalogaia') among the save-the-worlders who spout the most hysterical and self-serving form of global-warming mania suggests that what is sadly lacking in their lives is a true sense of spirituality.
The forest of the mind needs real connection to family(even bordering on sentimentality as it is only within the family that one is allowed unabashed emotions that are essential to life), and this means having a man who knows what it is to be a father and a woman who knows what it is to be a mother. And this familial sense must be expansive as the concept of the nuclear family, though useful in the modern setting, tends to over-emphasize one's own family's separateness than relatedness to kinfolk. The nuclear family is convenient and desirable in that each family wants its free space and agency. Just like we, as individuals, want our private spaces, every family wants to mind its own business. Still, family bonds within and without are much richer when there is a larger sense of connection and communication among relatives including grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, nephews, and nieces. There need be ways of communication, meetings, gatherings, rituals, and remembrance that remind everyone that he or she isn't alone in the world or primarily part of some faddish subculture but part of a deep lineage. This used to be taken for granted in the past, but with so many children being only-child-ren, raised by single-parents(or even grandmothers or foster homes), and addicted to pop culture(and deracinated by PC), we can no longer take for granted the sense of belonging and obligations that come with Familial-Consciousness.
The forest of the mind also needs true spirituality. There are several true religions of great reach and depth. If one finds it impossible to literally believe in God or gods in the modern era(and this would include myself), we can still appreciate the old religions and mythologies for their imagination, searching, meaning, revelation, and lessons. One doesn't have to be Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, or Greco-paganist to draw inspiration from the faiths and fables that served as the visionary and spiritual bedrock of entire civilizations. While it is only natural to seek new meanings in our world of rapid change, one mustn't confuse the latest fad or fervor as worthy substitutes for the great religions and myths of the past. While it's possible that there will be new prophets and revelations in times to come, they most certainly won't be the products of the Current Power whose main(even sole) priority is to hog all the wealth and privilege for itself. Then, it's no wonder that the Power has been so hard at work in deforesting the minds of modern people so that their hearts-and-soul will wash away like mudslide under the barrage of globalist PC and Pop Culture.
The forest of the mind also needs real culture and true sensibility, just like the body needs real food with real nutrients. While we may enjoy candy, doughnuts, and ice-cream once a while as snack, we know we cannot survive on them for long. We need real food with proteins and vitamins. Similarly, a civilization with pop culture as its main culture is like someone who mainly gorges on junk food and candy as his/her main food. Why is our culture so sick(and sickly), fatuous, disgusting, imbecile, retarded, infantile, and/or excessive? It's due to the decline in sensibility, indeed to the point where even or especially the (so-called) experts can't tell what real culture is anymore. Consider the rise of Pop Art in the art world. Consider how superhero comic book movies have come to dominate the discourse about cinema. Consider how the biggest literary events are stuff like HARRY POTTER, HUNGER GAMES, TWILIGHT, FIFTY SHADES OF GREY, or some teen or teen-inspired fiction. A people who don't know real culture from junk culture have lost the forest of the mind. Their minds are like the hills of Haiti that's been stripped of trees and flows with mud whenever it rains.
Much more can be said on this subject, and this is only a start. But one thing for sure, we need an Arbor's Day for the mind. We must spread the seeds of truth, meaning, culture, and justice within our psyche. And by 'truth', I don't mean the Narrative foisted upon us by the capitalist-globalist Jewish-monopoly media. And by 'justice', I don't mean the official dogma of the Holy Three that elevates Jews, Homos, and Negroes as the only sacred groups whom all others must worship and serve. What is SJW(social justice warrior) or JJ(Justice Junkie) dogma really about? It's not about justice based on truth, facts, reason, and reciprocity but about hysteria based on idol-worshiping of certain groups(Jews, blacks, and homos) as the sole fountains of wisdom and holiness. It's a form of inverted supremacism that, while denouncing 'white supremacism', goes full blast in promoting Jews, blacks, and homos as more worthy than other groups. Just ask the Palestinians.
We must desalinize our minds of the poison salt of PC. We must remove the fake plastic plants of pop culture. And in their place, we must plant the trees of true wisdom, depth, meaning, passion, and connection. Otherwise, our minds will just be piles of mud that will not hold firm against the deluge of globalist pap and rot. And we need self-realization and self-actualization more than ever because even the institutions of true religions are now in the hands of globalist agents, witting or unwitting, who are aiding and abetting in the deforestation of the mind to turn all our minds into one collective mud-flood flowing into the nowhere land of mammonite idolatry of Jews, homos, and Negroes. Donald Trump may be useful as a wrecker of globalism, but he too is a depraved creature of depraved times, one where even the majority of so-called 'conservatives' are okay with 'gay marriage' and pander to the worship of the Holy Three. In the age of mud, we have 'gulliberals' and 'cuckservatives'. We need a garden of true liberals and true conservatives who need each other for both preservation and progress of a sane and sound society. And such a mind garden can only be created out of a true forest with real trees of knowledge and remembrance. In this age of degenerates, we need the re-emergence of the regenerates.
Nick is wrong to pinpoint the French Revolution as the beginning of the Decline of the West. French Revolution and American Revolution(that shared similar ideals) opened up new possibilities and paved the way for Western greatness and domination. From the time of the French Revolution to World War I, the West saw rising numbers, wealth, might, and influence. There was advancement in every field of science and technology. More people became educated, ate better, and lived longer. The historical trajectory of Western Might was on the up and up for the West until 1914 when World War I destroyed much of Europe. Still, consider the rapid recovery of Germany in the 1930s. Had Europe avoided WWII, things might have been great all around. But Hitler sunk Europe into WWII and tens of millions died. EVEN SO, the fact is that most Europeans never had it so good as during the post-WWII era. All European economies recovered quickly, living standards rose, and most people were better off than ever. And in the US, the majority entered the middle class. Even communist Eastern European nations saw considerable rise in living standards from end of WWII to the 1960s -- though behind the Capitalist West, they were better than any other part of the world. The West was mostly riding high after WWII. For example, France became a real industrial power only AFTER World War II. Prior to the war, 1/3 of Frenchmen were farmers. It was in the 50s and 60s that France became truly industrial and modern. Living standards improved markedly after the war. Also, the loss of empires didn't hurt the European economy at all. For one thing, nations like Sweden and Norway, which never had overseas empires, did very well. And France and UK saw their economies rise higher just as they were letting their empires go.
So, why did things begin to fall apart for Western Man?
1. Jews took over the US that controls the rest of the West. Jewish Supremacists, filled with virulent resentment against whites, used media power to fill whites with Guilt and Fever. 'White Guilt' paralyzed white pride and confidence. Whites were told that their history was one of oppression of others, and therefore, any notion of collective white identity and interest must be denounced and suppressed. To atone for 'white guilt', whites must serve OTHER peoples, beginning with the Holy Holocaust Jews. And 'White Fever' made white boys and girls addicted to black music, black sex, and black cool. Today, white boys imitate rappers, and white girls want to have mulatto babies with black guys who are seen as superior studs. If the black race didn't exist in the West, white decline would have been far less dramatic. It was blacks who destroyed white male pride and confidence by kicking white ass and conquering white pussy. Blacks have been especially threatening to whites because blacks win so much in the areas that give whites the biggest collective orgasms: sports, pop music, oratory, and sex culture. Faceless white crowds cheer like mad for black sports heroes. White guys act like cucks before black athletes who hump 100,000s of white women. And white butts and groins pump and grind to black music whose message is "white girl, suck my big black dick". And because blacks have louder deeper voices, whites react to Negro speech like it's the voice of god. Would MLK cult exist if King didn't have a bellowing voice?
2. Good times and youth culture led to decadence and degeneracy. When times are good, people take things for granted. They lose the fighting spirit and survival instinct. Americans got soft and flabby in their post-nationalist affluence. A people who feel secure and well-fed don't care about nationalism. And young people lost respect for tradition and old people. They got addicted to new fashions in youth culture that were all about 'me, me, me', and 'admire the Negro singers'. Young people's idea of culture became loose sex, drugs, and imitating trashy celebrities(marketed by Jews). Look at Miley Cyrus and other shikse cunts pulled by Jewish puppet-strings. Jewish globalists want white girls to be turned into sluts for portnoic Jewish and black men.
3. Rising economy meant more jobs, and that meant more women at work. As more women found work, they grew more independent and spent much of their spare time and money on having fun than raising family. Also, when women take good jobs from men, there are fewer men with good jobs to afford family formation. So, they have a hard time getting married. And women with good jobs have a hard time finding mates because they want to find men with good jobs. But if women take good jobs from men, there are fewer men with good jobs. Also, as women became sexually freer, they had tons of premarital sex, and this made them less appealing to men who want marriage. Most guys don't want to marry some 'ho' who's been at spring breaks and been sprayed upon by lots of frat boys and wild Negroes.
4. Pop Culture in general. Prior to electronic media, people felt lonely unless they were with other people. So, they wanted to get married to be with other people and have a sense of belonging. And they joined local communities to feel human connection and warmth. But with TV in every home, even lonely individuals could just turn on the TV and live with substitute family members and friends(who were prettier and cooler) on TV. This affected old and the young. Check the last scene of Barry Levinson's AVALON where the kid just stares at the TV.
5. Spread of universal-elitism. As more people got college education, they came to value only fancy jobs and higher status. This is a problem in the East as well as in the West. In the past, people had kids just to have kids. Today, people don't want to have kids unless they feel assured that their kids will grow up to go to good college and get fancy jobs. So, both whites in the West and Asians in the East have fewer kids. This socio-demographic trend leads to labor shortage, and that means FOREIGNERS must be brought in to do all the 'dirty, dangerous, and demeaning' jobs. Even Japan finally decided to let in hundreds of thousands of foreigners to fill up jobs because Japanese don't have kids. Why don't Japanese want to have kids? Japanese don't want to have 'loser children' who may not attend good schools and get fancy jobs. When a people come to despise labor, they are doomed. This is why we all need a bit of socialist mindset. Socialism respects the working class, the laborers. But in today's globalist world, whites and yellows only respect white-collar professional jobs. They see working class jobs as 'dirty'. So, they figure they should bring in foreigners to do the lowly dirty jobs.
Finally, French Revolution and American Revolution were actually good for the West. The theme of both was nationalism, the idea that the national elites should represent and serve the national masses. Prior to the French Revolution, the French aristocratic elites looked upon their own people as subjects. If anything, fancy elites identified more with aristocrats of OTHER kingdoms than with their own French folk. It was like a network of elites, all of whom regarded their own folks as lowly subjects. In contrast, the French Revolution said that the people matter too, and that the main role of the national elites is to represent and lead the national folk. The populist-nationalism we see today is very much in the spirit of the French Revolution. The globalist rhetoric is neo-aristocratic and much like the elitist worldview PRIOR to the French Revolution. Globalism says the elites of the world should link up together in their own cloud castle realm and look down all the masses as 'deplorables' to exploit. Yellow Vests represent the French Revolutionary Spirit. Emmanuel Macron represents neo-aristocratism. Aristocrats were fancy-pants and dressed like fruits because they recruited haute-homos to make fancy things for them, like those puffy wigs that the French aristos wore. Is it any wonder that the globalist neo-aristos promote Homo Stuff as the 'new progressivism'? It's really just neo-aristocratism. What the West needs is to recapture the national-revolutionary spirit of the American and French Revolution. It must break free of the globo-homo neo-aristocratic rule of Jewish Hegemonists. (Notice that Jews, even as they undermine the unity of elites and masses among goyim, insist on the unity of Jewish elites and Jewish masses, esp in Israel. When Jewish masses in Israel demand a wall to keep out Arabs and Africans, Jewish elites listen and deliver. That's why Israel is so sturdy; it is founded on the unity of elites and masses. But when Viktor Orban in Hungary tries to serve his own people the same way, Jews shriek with horror because they see goy nationalism as a barrier to Jewish penetration and total takeover. Jews know nationalism means ethnic solidarity and power. That is why they guard nationalism for themselves but denounce it among other peoples. And they bribe goy-cuck-collaborators to do their bidding.)
According to Nick Fuentes, the heart of the matter is the European Man lost the sense of spiritual authority, and THAT began the process of inexorable decline. But notice that Byzantine, French, and Russian Monarchies all fell to foreign armies, popular revolt, or minority-subversion DESPITE their adherence to tradition. If traditionalist spiritual authority is such an effective bulwark against degeneration and destruction, why didn't the Byzantine Empire go from strength to strength despite its arch-spiritualism? Why was the French Monarchy, despite blessings of the Catholic Church, unable to stem the revolutionary tide? Why was the Russian Czar, despite the backing of conservative Russian Church, fail to stave off the Socialist Revolution? While there is something to be said for spiritual roots and guidance, history shows us that church authority, like any other kind of authority, tends to grow corrupt, stagnant, and dull over time. But then, this problem goes back to the very moment when Early Christians joined with the Roman Empire. A religion founded on peace, forgiveness, and brotherly love made a pact with the 'devil', the very imperialist power that sacked Jerusalem and used ruthless violence to maintain military hegemony over much of the known world. Once politicized, religion turns into just another arm of Power Politics and Insider-Privilege, and then, especially in times of severe duress(when people are desperate) or happy affluence(when people are decadent), traditional religious authority seems either supportive of 'tyranny' or obstacle to good times(aka party poopers, like when Moses returned from Mt. Sinai and said NO MORE to the festivities with the Golden Calf).
The real moral outrage should be this: Why use 'Latino' or 'Latinx'(or Latin-whatever) to designate so many people of Mexico, Central America, and South America who are NOT of Latin identity, history, or heritage? Latin-whatever is an IMPOSED identity in Mexico-Central-America-South-America UNLESS one happens to be of European Conquistador or Immigration-Invader origin(or have substantial white blood). In truth, the native peoples of those regions had an existence going back 10,000s of yrs. And some of them had histories and unique cultures going back 1,000s of yrs. So, they had an identity BEFORE the arrival of the Europeans who came as imperialists and conquerors. And under Latin-American rule, they were not co-masters of Mexico-Central-America-South-America but, more often than not, subjects and slaves of the European Conquerors. So, referring to ALL the people of that region as 'Latino' or 'Latin-whatever' is deeply insulting. Imagine if we call Filipinos 'Latin-Asians' because they were ruled by the Spanish for centuries. Suppose we refer to Asian Indians as Anglo-Asians because of 250 yrs of British domination. And supposed we refer to black Africans as Latin-Africans, Gallic-Africans, Anglo-Africans, Dutch-Africans, Belgian-Africans, and etc. because much of Africa had been ruled by various European colonizers at one time. It is simply wrong to refer to the indigenous Meso-'Americans' as 'Hispanics' or 'Latinos'(or the utterly ridiculous and decadent 'Latinx', which sounds like Latin-Dominatrix).
At the very least in the US, we don't refer to blacks and American Indians as 'Anglo'. Even though they came under Anglo power and learned to speak English, they are still referred to as 'African' or 'Indian' or 'Native American'. That much of their true identity is respected. They are not labeled with the generic term of Anglo or Anglx. But for some reason, everyone( regardless of racial or cultural origin) in Mexico-Central-America-South-America is called 'Latino' and now 'Latinx' even if he or she(or 'they'?) has no white blood or little white blood. The deep identity of the indigenous folks are disregarded, and they are merely labeled with the identity of the European imperialists who conquered them. It's as if they had no history, identity, and culture prior to the arrival of Europeans. And blacks in and from that part of the world are also referred to as 'Latino' and now 'Latinx' even though they are really African in origin and were enslaved and brought by force by the Latin-European and Latin-Jewish slavers. Using this logic, I suppose Palestinians living under Jewish rule should be called Judeo-Arabs. (Slavery under Jews was especially tragic. If European Christian slavers and Muslim slavers were at least willing to share God and Jesus/Muhammad with the slave population, Jews didn't share the Covenant with their slaves. Via Conversion to Christianity or Islam, the slave was made the equal of the master at least in spiritual matters. But the Jewish Covenant was only for Jews, and Jewish masters never regarded the goy slaves as their spiritual equal.)
Another thing. This gender-bender ideology is just the latest in Western Cultural Imperialism(now gone decadent and degenerate under Jewish-capitalist globo-homo nuttery). Indeed, gender-ideology, Homomania, and LGBTQ-ism are essentially proxy forms of Judeo-globalism. It is the Jewish Imperialist equivalent of Christianity. Since Jews hate Christianity and no longer believe in something like Marxism, they need a neo-'spiritual' and missionary ideological agenda to unite all elites around the world. And their 'spiritual' weapon is Globo-Homomania. Why? Because gender-bender-ism poses no economic challenge to the ruling elites. After all, homos and trannies are naturally vain and narcissistic and suck up to the rich and powerful. Also, because homos and trannies everywhere are favored, lionized, and elevated by the power of the globalist elites, they become the most loyal servants of globo-homo world domination. 'Gay rights' turned into Gay Rites, the consecration of the homos and trannies by the Gay Ray of the sodomy 'rainbow'. Also, as every nation has its share of homos with grievances, those homos make ideal fifth-columnists who will be most willing to collaborate with globalist Jewish power. Jews and homos see eye-to-eye in favoring elite-minority rule over goyim and straights. Most Chinese are patriotic and stand with China, and most Iranians are patriotic and stand with Iran. But homos & trannies in China and Iran are likely to be disgruntled because they don't get the adoration & adulation that homos(and increasingly trannies) receive in the Jewish controlled West. So, they will be most likely to collaborate with Jewish globalists to subvert their own nations. After all, if Jewish globo-homo ideology takes over China and Iran, the homos there will be elevated and celebrated as saints, angels, and even gods. So, this 'Latinx' business is a double-assault on the indigenous folks of what is called 'Latin America'. Their true indigenous identity is (1) buried under the imperialist identity of the European conquerors and (2) pasted over with the decadent & degenerate consumer-capitalist cultism of Jewish globo-homo world order. It is total BS.
A real movement for a truer sense of identity for all the indigenous folks in 'Latin America' should call for the rejection of the term 'Latin' altogether. 'Latino' or 'Latin-whatever' should ONLY apply to people in 'Latin America' who are white or mostly white of Spanish or Portuguese origin(and maybe Italian origin). People who are brown or mostly indigenous should recover & revive their own indigenous identities and insist that they be referred to as such than being labeled with the imperialist identity of the very people who conquered them, 'genocided' them, enslaved them, and 'raped' them(to create the mixed-race Mestizo).
What is called 'Latin America' is the most tragic part of the world. At least in North America and Australia(and Siberia), the native populations were small enough to be easily conquered and pacified. In contrast, it is estimated that there were 60 million people(with reasonably advanced and complex civilizations) in what is now referred to as 'Latin America'. And around 55 million of them were killed, mostly by disease but also by guns and greed. At the very least, Asians, Middle Easterners, and Africans were immune to the diseases brought by Europeans. (If anything, a disease that began in Asia came to wipe out 1/3 of Europeans in the Bubonic Plague.) So, in time, Africans, Asians, and Middle Easterners all regained their territories and independence from the Europeans. But the indigenous peoples and cultures of Mexico-Central-America-South-America came under permanent domination by the European Imperialist elites. And this takeover wasn't merely political or economic but even in the area of cultural identity. By calling the indigenous brown people of Mexico-Central-America-South-America as 'Latino', 'Latinx' or 'Latin-whatever', they've been denied not only political independence(from European Conquistadoreans) but their own cultural and racial identity.
Sadly however, browns must be awful stupid because, instead of seeing the big picture, they think they won some great Culture War by being suckered by Jewish imperialism into embracing the globo-homo 'Latinx' idiocy as their true identity. No wonder they were so easily and permanently conquered by the Spanish and Conquistadors. They are estupidx.
Finally, it goes without saying that most Latin-Americans(of European background) prefer the vague and confused terminology of ‘Latino’(or ‘Latinx’) that obfuscates the identities of whites, browns, and blacks(and all the mixed-raced mestizos and mulattos). This way, white Latinos(of Conquistador background) can posture as ‘people of color’ and pretend to be ‘victims of gringo imperialismo’ and demand ‘affirmative action’. By posturing as people-of-color, they can pretend to have much in common with browns(whom they conquered and raped) and blacks(whom they enslaved and exploited). There are few things more disgusting than the sight of all those white Latin Americans(who still dominate most of ‘Latin America’ politically and economically) pretending that "race doesn’t matter in ‘Latin America’ because everyone is totally mixed" when, in fact, there are many color barriers and hierarchies in Mexico-Central-America-South-America. The loose terminology of ‘Latino’ allows white Latin Americans of Conquistador or Immigrant-Imperialist backgrounds to wash their hands clean of all their invasions, genocides, and acts of enslavement. After all, if a white Latin American and a indigenous brown person are both equally ‘Latino’(or ‘Latinx’), then it means they are one and the same or interchangeable. ROTFL. Most Latin Americans who gain favoritism via Affirmative Action in elite institutions are white or mostly white. Their ancestors pioneered the conquest of the Americas and carried out the first ‘genocides’ and mass-rapes of the natives. But now, they go around pretending to be ‘people of color’, poor victims of Yanqui Imperialismo, and take advantage of Affirmative Action programs that were designed to help black Americans and American Indians. Such a shameless people without an ounce of honor. Look at Guillermo Del Toro and Marco Rubio. They are white-as-can-be, but they pretend to be spokesmen for the People of Color. They call for mass-migration as a human right when, in fact, it was the mass-migration of European Conquistadors into the New World that set off the worst mass deaths and exploitation in human history. The story of mass migration has been about Human Might, not Human Right. The more powerful people migrated into other lands and took them over. Just ask the Palestinians what mass migration of Jews did to that part of the world. If people like Guillermo Del Toro and Marco Rubio really believe in mass-migration as a good, how about all the white Latinos in Mexico-Central-America-South-America migrating back to Europe and handing over the lands back to the indigenous peoples who were destroyed by the Imperialism? Restore indigeneity by removing diversity.
Guillermo Del Toro of European Conquistador background is a Latino.
This indigenous brown woman is a 'Latina'. ROTFL.
Cubano Marco Rubio of Conquistador background is a Latino.
Evo Morales of Indigenous Blood is also 'Latino'. ROTFL.
