Notes on Matthew Yglesias' Call for a Billion Americans via Mass Immigration-Invasion

For Steve Sailer's criticism of Matthew Yglesias' book One Billion Americans: The Case for Thinking Bigger, click the following link:

https://www.takimag.com/article/666666666-immigrants/ 

Billionaires for one billion Americans or a billion minions for billionaire oligarchs. It all depends on the perspective. To a cattle rancher, what matters is how many heads of cows, not how they fare in ever more crowded conditions. Does a pig farmer care about the well-being of his pigs? No, he doesn't care if they're crowded together and can hardly move as long as it means more profits for him. Same with chicken farmers. So, for billionaires, a 'billion Americans' just means more livestock. Matthew Yglesias is their scribe and spokesman, especially because many billionaires are Jewish and he is one too.

Yglesias’ main argument for adding 666,666,666 immigrants is that this would help us compete with populous China.

China's main advantage isn't population per se but relative homogeneity(as even non-Han Chinese are mostly East Asian). India has a population equal to China's but is deeply divided and ineffective. Why? Far greater diversity and caste mentality. US has increasing diversity and the rise of a caste-mentality due to both economic and ideological factors. Economics favor Jews, Asians, and elite whites, whereas ideology favors the consecration of blacks, many of whom are mired in socio-economic problems. Jews and homos enjoy both economic success and ideology-idolatry, whereas many whites do well economically but are vilified ideologically while many blacks, though placed on the pedestal, are stuck with the panhandle. China's capitalism encourages enterprise, and its communist legacy ensures some degree of 'national socialism' to sustain a sense of unity and equal justice. Still, this is easier to pull off in a nation that is more than 90% Han Chinese and nearly 97% Asian(of the yellow variety). If MORE PEOPLE is the formula for China's success, then India and Africa should be major players in the global power game. But India would probably do better with a population of around 500 million, and MORE PEOPLE in Africa have only led to desperate scramble for other parts of the world. For sure, the US has benefited from brain-drain immigration, taking in smart people from around the world; this is where China can't hope to compete with the US. It seems the best of the Greeks and Irish came to the US. Greece and Ireland now seem to be run and inhabited by second-raters. US has also taken in lots of smart Chinese and Hindus. Quality trumps quantity. No wonder Japan has a bigger economy than India or all of Africa. But the danger of new quality is it may take over as the new elites, and that is precisely what happened with Jews in America. If the US hadn't taken in Jews, most likely Christian Anglo/Germans would still be ruling the place. Now, why are Jews not threatened by New Quality? They correctly see Chinese and other East Asians as essentially weak in identity once separated from their homelands. They regard Hindus as more identity-oriented, but Asian-Indians are a divided lot. Also, Jewish Power relies on support of Whites and Christians who, for reasons of Holocaust Cult and Biblical Prophecy, feel okay with Jews. They don't feel the same for Chinese or Hindus. So-called White Guilt is almost entirely about Jews and blacks. Even American Indians don't much count(as their tragedy is a lesson in the dangers of mass-immigration-invasion, as with the case of the Palestinians). In a way, 'white guilt' is more a social and political construct than the product of white conscience or 'pathological altruism'. If indeed whites are more conscientious by nature, why aren't they ashamed of what they've done to the Palestinians and other Arabs/Muslims by their support of Zionism and Wars for Israel? Why aren't whites as guilt-ridden over American Indians as over blacks? It's because white minds are molded by academia and media to weep and atone for certain groups but not for others. If indeed white conscience was genuine, it would follow its own moral logic than be led by the nose by the Power. Anyway, Jewish elites figure East Asians are too mellow to challenge Jews. Hindus are too divided and distrusting of one another. Unlike Judaism that binds Jews together, Hinduism has always divided Indians along caste/color lines. As for the teeming masses of immigrants without elite prospects, they are just more serfs, peons, consumers, foot-soldiers for empire, cattle.

In short, Yglesias seems to imply, America must invite the world in order to invade the world. Just think of the possibilities! If we had two-thirds of a billion more immigrants, we could conscript a humongous army and militarily conquer the world…which would finally give us some place to dump all the teeming masses of immigrants.

I doubt he has such in mind. After all, most immigrants are coming for jobs and stuff, not to join the US military. As the military relies mostly on high-tech, manpower is far less important. Unless the US is planning to invade Russia or fight a long bloody war with China, manpower in the military isn't an issue. Besides, Americans have no stomach for wars with high casualties. Iraq War killed only a fraction of lives lost in the Vietnam War but upset a lot of people. As many Americans have few or just one child, they don't want them dead in combat. The only effective way to increase military personnel would be with the draft but no one wants it, especially the elites. Many elites, especially Jews, protested against the Vietnam War because they might be drafted and sent into steaming jungles infested with Viet Cong guerrillas. But once Richard Nixon ended the draft, the protests faded fast. The elites don't much care as long as they aren't the ones to end up in body bags. Americans are now are lured into the military with money and benefits, which has made the military far more expensive, but that also means the military cannot have too many people. As for INVADE THE WORLD, the plan is not for the US to invade the world but to steer the Third World to invade the First World with the exception of Israel. Jews have the mindset of 'nationalism for me, not for thee'. Jewish Power sees national unity of any gentile nation as an obstacle to Jewish penetration and influence. So, it seeks to increase Diversity in both Poland and Japan. Any kind of Diversity is okay as long as it allows Jewish Globalists and their minions to play divide-and-rule, especially by guilt-baiting the native majority with charges of 'racism' against the immigrant/migrant communities. And as the elites of Japan, Poland, and other nations are influenced by US media and academia, they go along with the suicidal nonsense. US leads, others follow. Look how Canada, UK, and Sweden all accepted their own form of 'Americanization' by reformulating their nations as those of 'immigrants'. So, Yglesias' plan isn't to make the US literally invade the world. Rather, it is for the US to serve as the role model for all other First World gentile nations to open up and invite diversity. That means, while Israel gets ever more Jewish, other First World Nations get more Diverse. So, the greater unity of Jews shall exploit the greater divisions among the goyim. Yglesias mentions China, but he thinks more like the British Imperialists in India. As a small minority-elite, the Brits often found Indian diversity useful in playing region against region, Islam against Hindus, caste against caste, that is until Gandhi and Jinnah, at least for awhile, banded together to oust the British.

Seriously, Yglesias argues, we couldn’t have won WWII or the Cold War without a big population.

If US already had a big enough population during WWII, why did it need more? Why does the US need a billion? Of course, 'big' is relative. China now has 1.3 billion, but its population was considered super-big when it was half that 50 yrs ago. Also, modern technology in agriculture has made it possible to feed many more people. Who would have thought India could sustain a population of 1.3 billion that is poised to take over China's(if it hasn't already). And some say African population will be in the billions in coming decades. Still, one crucial difference between US and China/India is the former developed as a Big Land for a growing population. There was bigness as empty space to be filled. Also, US population grew along with technological development that made life easier despite bigger numbers. In contrast, Chinese and Indian populations expanded in a Malthusian trap that wasn't solved or half-solved before the coming of modern technology to those parts. Mechanization of agriculture means that a nation doesn't need tons of laborers to produce food. Only 2% of US population works in agriculture. The value of More People to the modern world is as producers and consumers. But unless Yglesias and his ilk are willing to promote economic nationalism and bring back factory jobs(and slow down advancement in mechanization), more people will not mean more production. A lot of people who come to Europe just end up living on the dole. Still, don't More People have value as More Consumers? But More Consumers without More Production sounds like an economy based on More Debt. (If consumption is key, why not create robots that consume? Have robots to go some fast food joint and order burger and fries.)

Of course, mid-20th-century USA was far more unified, due to the immigration shutdown in the 1920s that wisely ruled that no interest groups would be allowed to use immigration to change the country’s ethnic balance. Hence, the political system was more cooperative and functional than today...

But in retrospect, maybe immigration-restriction wasn't such a good idea in the 1920s. As race was a factor in immigration, more immigration would have meant more White Immigrants. It would have made the US whiter. And as the immigrants came from different parts of Europe, their only hope of unity and assimilation was by learning English and adopting the Anglo-American model. Also, European emigration to the US might have alleviated economic conditions in Europe, thereby lessening the threats of both communism and fascism. In a way, a billion Americans isn't a totally terrible idea. Ideally, the US should have stopped at 250 million, if only for nature's sake. But US can easily accommodate a billion people as it has the best land in the world. If India, a nation 1/3 the size of the US, can hold 1.3 billion that is still growing, the US can hold a billion. The habitable space in Japan is only that of Indiana, but it has over 100 million people. There are still lots of empty spaces in the US. If US could have a billion people who are mostly white, it might be doable, even a worthy goal. But of course, a Billion Americans means 250 million whites being outnumbered by 750 million non-whites. It'd be like Afro-Latin-America on a super-scale. Now, Jews don't mind because they'd be rulers at the top. Also, as Jews were a tiny majority throughout US history, they have no majority-status to lose. Besides, Jewish Power has relied on money and pulling-the-strings, not electoral numbers. They buy off and control the politicians who are voted by the dummy masses. Now, if Jews were to identify strongly as whites, they might fret about losing their white majority to non-whites. But Jews primarily identify as Jews and regard whites as the Other, even the Enemy. Therefore, More Diversity among Goyim is regarded as Jews as good for their power.

Now Democrats envision using immigration to alter the racial balance to achieve perpetual one-party rule.

The problem isn't one-party rule per se. Japan pretty much had one-party rule since end of WWII. China has one-party rule, and it's nationalist. Putin's Russia is a semi-autocracy with one dominant party, but it looks out for Russian interests. The problem with one-party Democratic Rule in the US is it is essentially Judeo-centric than concerned with majority interests. But then, given the slavishness of the GOP to Jews and Israel, the US is already a two-party-as-one-party-state, at least when it comes to total obeisance to Jewish Power. Consider the spectacle of Jews calling Trump a Nazi but Trump going to hell and back for Jews. In a way, democracy is bad because it divides a populace and pits one group against another. White 'liberals' vs white 'conservatives'. Indeed, one-party groups have gained so much against two-party groups. Jews are a one-party group as most are Democrats. In contrast, whites are a two-party group as roughly one half votes GOP and the other half votes Democrat. In the past, the Irish in big cities gained big against Anglos because, unlike the divided Anglos, the Irish were mostly a one-party group whose power was centered around Democratic Machines. Blacks fail in so many areas, but their one-party mentality has led to great gains against the divided two-party whites. One-party groups are united, two-party groups are divided. The tragedy for whites in the US is they are the ONLY two-party group in America... and even the whiter party, the GOP, is usually making more noises about being good to Jews, blacks, browns, etc.

One obvious problem with this plan, however, is that all the immigrant ethnicities would then turn on each other in a struggle to control the capital of the world.

Not true. Most immigrant groups come with weak identities and just become globo-Americans. They hardly care about their nations of origin, cultural heritage, or ethnic loyalty. Black African immigrants soon become like rapping black Americans. Asians turn into globo-homo advocates and, if anything, berate their nations of origin for 'racism' and relative lack of diversity. They all support Zionism and give speeches at AIPAC. Also, non-white groups gain currency only with the support/sympathy of the white community. As Jewish Power has steered whites to care mainly about Jews, blacks, and homos, most other groups receive no special sympathy. Therefore, they realize they must join with the idolized-identities that matter. So, they become shills of AIPAC, wave the homo banner, or chant BLM slogans. Take Muslims. As most whites don't care for Islam or Arabs, many Arab-Americans feel their only chance of gaining favor is by displaying their globo-homo bona-fides. But as globo-homo is really a tool of Jewish Power, they unwittingly become dupes of Zion. Palestinian-Americans who wave both the Palestinian and Homo flags put themselves at a moral disadvantage because Israel is more pro-'gay' than Palestinians and Arabs are.

Why compete with the United State militarily if you can use your co-ethnic immigrants to simply subvert the USA from within (such as this week’s example of an immigrant NYPD officer arrested for spying for China on Tibetan exiles), especially if Washington were so foolish as to invite in two-thirds of a billion immigrants?

Except he didn't subvert US interests. Tibet has nothing to do with the US, that is UNLESS the US intends to interfere in Tibetan affairs. It is precisely because US interferes in Tibet(and other problem spots in China) that some Chinese in the US spy for China on the matter of Tibetans-in-American working with the US. There are Chinese spies who carry out corporate espionage or funnel secrets from the US government, but Chinese keeping an eye on Tibetans in US seems more like Chinese Politics by other means precisely because US interferes with Chinese affairs. Also, it is nothing compared to American Jews doing all they can to suppress BDS, Palestinian-American voices, and critics of Zion. Some Chinese NYPD spying on some Tibetans is kid-stuff compared to Jewish campaigns on college campuses, industries, and government to shut down any effective criticism of Zionism and Wars for Israel. So, if the big fear is about China or some foreign nation taking over and subverting American Interests, it has already happened under Jewish Rule. Perhaps, whites are still under the delusion that Jews are white and working for 'white interests'. Or maybe some whites regard Jews as Prodigal Whites who will finally return home and side with whites. This is like battered wife syndrome with no basis in fact.

Germany would have liked to do that using German immigrants in 1917, but the self-righteous WASP ruling class proactively crushed any German-American resistance with heavy-handed assimilation methods, such as banning Beethoven concerts.

It's too bad Germany failed to. US had no business interfering in WWI. It only ensured Germany's defeat and all the hell that followed. US intervention in WWI had nothing to do with American Interests but with Banker Interests and Jewish interests. Indeed, even UK had no business entering the war. Without Brits in the fight, Germany would have won within a year or two. But UK got involved and ultimately dragged the US into the war, turning a continental war into a World War that led to many more millions of white deaths. A strong anti-war movement by German-Americans might have kept the US out of the war. It would have been better for US and Europe, but US got dragged in. It's a shame that German-America caved under pressure to Anglo-America. US would have been better as an equal partnership of Anglos and Germans. Such a nation might have been a fairer broker between UK and Germany. But as German-Americans assimilated fully into Anglo-America, they became foot-soldiers of the Anglo/American Empire. Though the Anglo/American Narrative depicts Germans as militarist aggressors, the fact is World Conquest was spearheaded and dominated by Anglos, British and American. Germans fought WWI to secure its place in continental Europe, not to take over the world. In retrospect, Anglo paranoia about Germany proved disastrous. If Germany had been given a place in the sun alongside UK and France, so many disasters could have been avoided. An Anglo-German alliance would have been better for the West than the eventual Anglo-Zionist one. Of course, Anglo-German amity was impossible by Adolf Hitler came along, but there would have been no Hitler if UK and US hadn't intervened in WWI. Indeed, without UK and especially US intervention, it wouldn't have been a world war but just a continental one in Europe.

But these days the Chinese are slowly learning how to play the White Guilt card against America.

But when Asians play the 'white guilt' card, it's usually not about Asian victim-hood but Jewish, black, or some other victim-hood. Chinese know they are 'uncool' and disliked by whites(and other peoples), and so, they seek to gain 'woke' points with BLM slogans or 'taking the knee'. The history of Southeast Asia suggests that, even as Chinese know how to get rich, they aren't really into ideological or political domination. And despite so many Chinese having settled in Canada, they are mostly spineless imitators of white 'wokeness'. If anything, they adopt 'white guilt' as their own and imitate white 'virtue-signaling'. Perhaps, some immigrant Chinese feel loyalty to the motherland, but this isn't the case at all with most born outside China, especially with all the race-mixing. All this China-bashing seems so much like Russia-bashing, the product of an unwillingness to face the fact that Jewish Power has done most to subvert and destroy traditional Americanism and sensible patriotism. The 1619 Project and TV shows calling for Mitzvah murders of 'white supremacists' are the products of the Jewish Media and Imagination(that stokes of flames of black rage, not least to use the black-Jewish alliance card to cover up Jewish Segregation and 'Jim Crow' antics in the West Bank). Also, I don't see much in the way of the 'circular firing squad'. It's more like The-Good-the-Bad-and-the-Ugly style, with Blondie and Tuco understanding, wink wink, 'get Angel Eyes'. Now, there are problems between blacks and non-black POC, but blacks cause problems for everyone. There is some disagreement between browns and yellows on Affirmative Action, but as yellows tend to be rather sheepish and servile to prevailing ideology, their elites seem to be pro-diversity and pro-affirmative action. Asians are not supportive of Trump's noises about anti-Asian discrimination. Muslims and 'Latinos' don't seem hostile to one another. As for Jewish-Muslim tensions, it's hardly a thing because Muslims have little chance of making it to elite ranks. Also, the kind of Muslims who do gain prominence tend not to care about the Palestinian issue. Fareed Zakaria is only to happy to work with Zionists and cheer on the bombing of Syria. More immigration is the main issue for Muslim groups, and they will work with any group, even Jews, to secure more immigration. If all those Muslims in North Africa and Middle East have been so ineffective in working together on behalf of Palestinians, what hope is there for Muslim-Americans who come from all over the world?

Indeed, one reason for this summer’s mania over whites supposedly oppressing blacks is because blacks vaguely realize that the white man’s days are numbered due to immigration. Once the immigrants take over, nobody will take seriously anymore African-Americans’ sad stories about George Floyd, redlining, and Emmett Till.

Perhaps. I think black rage politics is more in competition with globo-homo, the designated celebratory item in June. True, not all blacks are enthused about immigration. Still, blacks, especially elite ones, care less about immigration because their power is invested in the Democratic Party and more immigrants mean more power to Democrats, and that means more power to blacks-who-matter. On some level, blacks know that they've become the sacred cows of the US due to Slavery Narrative, Jim Crow Narrative, Lynching Narrative, Civil Rights Narrative, MLK cult, and black prominence in sports and pop music. It's like blacks are lionized and celebrated all over Europe, even in Poland with few blacks. Anatoly Karlin says even Russian TV is filled with blacks. So, while most immigrants remain faceless masses and minions, blacks will dominate the celebrity of Americanism. That means an endless tug-of-war between whites and non-whites in laying claim to fealty to Noble Negro-hood. Why wouldn't that be possible? After all, just about all groups in the US are now into Globo-Homo as the new spiritual theme. So, when push comes to shove, blacks feel more empowered than emasculated by mass immigration. It will mean whites and other groups bidding for black blessing. If people used to bid for black slaves long ago, the new auctioneering is about bidding for blessings by black godhood.

The better part of One Billion Americans is about how to reverse the declining fertility of American citizens... The total fertility rate for American women was dropping even during the Trump Boom before the pandemic, down to a below replacement rate of 1.72 children per woman in 2018. And yet when asked how many children they’d like to have, women and men both average about 2.6.

Too many women in the workforce, and too many women with elite aspirations. After all, even nations with traditionally low or no immigration are cratering in child birth. Japan didn't have much immigration for decades but is so sterile that it has no choice but to take in immigrants. There is immigration to a nation with healthy fertility to bring down wages. That is bad stuff. But in the case of Japan, immigration is becoming necessary because birthrate is around 1 child per woman. And Russian birthrates are still far below what it should be. American women may want 2.6 kids, but of course, their expectations run pretty high, especially among the college graduates. This means MOST MEN are not good enough for them. And many men may have higher expectations for the women as well. If most women want successful men, most men want supportive women. But if more women take jobs from men, there are fewer successful men. Also, if women have been instilled with bitchy feminism and trashy slut mentality, they are far less likely to 'stand by your man'; even Tammy Wynette didn't stand by hers and went through D.I.V.O.R.C.E. Even without overt feminism, education and work for women are going to lower birthrates. While most women may want man and family, they would prefer to be single than be stuck with an inferior man and/or low-IQ children. Their attitude is the Moon or Bust. They want the Best or Nothing at all. Such attitudes are as common in Iran and Japan as in Germany and UK. Educated Iranian women are less likely to get married and have children. Many choose to be single and self-supporting. Many Japanese men are ashamed to work at 'dirty jobs', and Japanese women only want to find 'winners'. Unless society turns away from individualism and adopts a more organic function of life, nothing can be done about the problem of birth dearth in the developed world... that is unless future of mankind is Brave-New-World-like. Lab-created people.

Why does Yglesias want to make the U.S. three times as crowded, especially at a time of infectious pandemic, riots, urban looting, and wildfires? The most likely reason is that he doesn’t, really, but taking an extremist stance on immigration, calling for an order of magnitude more than the 52 million immigrants expected under Joe Biden’s plan, inoculates him from getting canceled...

No, he probably does really want it. He likes crowded America. He knows Covid is utter BS and just part of the coup to wreck Trump's economy. He figures more immigrants in cities will mean less rioting by blacks and Antifa ne'er-do-wells. Most immigrants groups don't indulge in rioting and looting, the expertise of blacks and Antifa thugs, the Janissary of Jewish Supremacists. And maybe more immigrants will lead to less forest fires as more forests will be cut down for building communities or for fuel.

As he admits on page 256, “I am not personally a nature lover or an outdoorsy person…”

He should know nature exists for its own good, not to serve us. I don't much care about the bottom of the ocean, but that doesn't mean it should be destroyed. I don't much care to visit the jungles, but rain-forests should be preserved. He's sounding like Woody Allen.

GLENN BECK SLAMMED AFTER CALLING FOR ONE BILLION IMMIGRANTS TO COME TO AMERICA

A Most Useful Slogan: "West Bank and Gaza are America’s Greatest Ally" or "Palestine is America’s Closest Ally" — An Effective Way to Expose the Most Important Fact of America: It is a Jewish-Supremacist Colony

The Left-Right(aka National Humanists or Neo-Fascists) should oft-repeat a message for all to hear: "Palestine is America’s Greatest Ally" or "West Bank and Gaza are America’s Closest Ally". What for, one may ask? For the simple reason that, before anything is possible, we must expose and examine the fundamental truth about the current state of the US, namely that it is essentially a Jewish-Supremacist colony. If politics is a struggle for influence, authority, and power, then one must clearly identify the nature of the power. It is like a doctor treating a patient. Unless the doctor correctly and honestly diagnoses the disease, he won't save the patient. Imagine if someone is dying of cancer, but the doctor treats him for everything but cancer. No matter how much money and medicine go into the treatment, the patient will surely die. Indeed, less money spent based on the correct diagnosis will be more effective than all-the-money-in-the-world spent on the wrong diagnosis. Suppose someone is suffering from a heart disease that can be treated relatively easily and inexpensively. But suppose the doctor comes up with a series of diagnoses that call for expensive treatments that never get to the core of the problem. Now, if the doctor is truly incompetent, his diagnoses may at the very least be the result of ‘honest mistakes’. He may have made the patient sicker or even killed him but didn't meant to do any harm. But suppose the doctor is a wicked creature who willfully mis-diagnosed the problem? He’d be like a crooked auto mechanic who could fix a minor problem at small cost but informs the owner of the vehicle that a lot more work needs to be done. Now, if the crooked doctor or auto mechanic did identify and fix the actual problem despite the overall fraudulence, at the very least the problem would have been dealt with. But what if a truly wicked doctor willfully mis-diagnosed the patient and made lots of money by carrying out elaborate and expensive procedures(that overlooked the real sickness) that ultimately did nothing to save the patient? It would really be a form of murder. What goes for medicine also goes for politics. A nation or society is like the human body. It is always in a state of birth and death, growth and decay, health and sickness. Just like the body regulates itself, nation or society has internal mechanisms that make sure things run right. Farmers produce food, truckers transport materials, factories make products, disposal services remove waste, fresh water is brought to residents and foul water is sent to sewage-treatment plants. But when the system breaks down, then people-with-power must take the extra-step to identify what is wrong and fix them. Every society has criminals. Every society has accidents, mistakes, and natural disasters. Every society has the problem of corruption. So, even though we prefer most problems to be solved by socio-economic factors that maintain equilibrium, there are times when the system breaks down and requires the strong hand of the government as the national physician. Think of the problems following the Great Depression of 1929. Or following the financial crisis of 2008.

The main problem of the US is that most people have no idea what kind of people has the real power. Unless people come to realize this, they won’t understand why there are certain serious problems that never go away and, if anything, get worse... just like, if you don’t know the disease, you won’t know why you’re getting sicker and sicker(despite your best efforts to regain health). It’s like Future America of IDIOCRACY couldn’t fix the crop failure because everyone from top to bottom was so convinced that Brawndo(an energy drink), being all-around elixir, couldn’t possibly do any harm to anything. So, even the crops were watered with the stuff.

So many Americans have a Brawndo-mentality. Just like the mindless confidence(bordering on faith) in Brawndo prevented people in IDIOCRACY from realizing that it is not a fixer-upper for all problems, most Americans have their own ‘brawndos’ that keep them from waking up and seeing the real truth. Many Americans believe the US is a ‘liberal democracy’ based on Rule of Law and rights protected by the Constitution. Or, if they find much that is wrong with the US, they believe that the solution to all problems is the ‘brawndo’ of Diversity and Inclusion. And they believe that Evil resides in the neo-Satan of Hate(or Hatan) that supposedly infects only the hearts of white people or right-wingers. So, even though the implosion of much of California clearly owes to Mass Invasion by non-whites, too many Americans fail to see the obvious problem as the real problem because Diversity and Inclusion are ‘brawndo’ to their ears.
There has also been horrible cultural and moral degradation of America, much of it owing to decadence of Homomania, neurosis of Jewish culture, and savagery of black culture. But, how can they be problems when we’ve all been told, day in and day out, that Homos are wonderful angels, Jews are eternal saints, and blacks are Magic Negroes? We don’t have real morality in the US that is about individuals with conscience learning to be self-critical, self-aware, and self-reforming. True morality is about personal integrity of choosing moderation, balance, and restraint over greed, gluttony, lust, pride, envy, wrath, and laziness. But capitalism, especially in the expansive US where everything seemed possible, made a mockery of favoring virtue over vice. In a world of rags-to-riches fantasies, dreams of celebrity, and universalization of pleasure, why hold anything back? Even if you are capable of delaying gratification to win the bigger prize, you are expected to indulge yourself once you are awash in money and power. So, we have shameless rich or powerful people who indulge themselves. ‘Greed is good’ because it fuels ambition. And why not go for El Dorado in the nation of Hollywood, Disneyland, and Las Vegas? Make more money, buy more, indulge more. And why not enjoy food to the fullest? So what if you grow fat. Be body-positive or sue your doctor if he tells you that you need to lose weight to regain health. And why restrain your sexuality? Lose your virginity as fast as possible like it’s a disease. Go to Spring Break and have sex with lots of strangers. Don’t worry. There are birth-control pills, contraceptives, day-after pills, penicillin, and abortion. Why deny yourself anything? You must eat and have sex to the fullest. And who said laziness is a sin? Why not be like a pothead and use lots of drugs and be like Brad Pitt’s character in TRUE ROMANCE? It’s ‘cool’. And who says anger must be checked? Be like Antifa and just attack anyone whom you deem a ‘nazi’. Or be a rapper or punk rocker and spew endless filth like degenerates. As for sin of pride, not only is it good but it can apply to any vice. So, sluts and prostitutes deserve pride. And homos into fecal penetration and trannies into penis-cutting might as own the term itself. In such a cultural climate that urges everyone to indulge shamelessly to excess, personal integrity and morality are no longer possible. If anything, vice is the New Virtue. We even have ‘mainstream’ journals and news outlets urging people to commit adultery in ‘open marriages’ or take up ‘cuckolding’. Wall Street sharks not only got to keep their vast stolen wealth after 2008 but were allowed to rake in billions more. They say fish rots from the head, and the three most exalted groups in the US are Jews, blacks, and Homos. They wallow in Vice-as-New-Virtue. With a culture that tells people that you’re a ‘loser’ unless you are having the most fun, it’s no wonder that most people watched THE WOLF OF WALL STREET not as a cautionary tale but a celebration of greed, lust, pride, envy, gluttony, sloth, and wrath all rolled into one. American Culture is now all about the Grasshopper. Even people who still work in the mode of Ants believe in Grasshopper values, i.e. they believe they must make the money to have the means to live like Grasshoppers. Even though Counterculture boomers loved to blame it all on the Reagan Yuppie 80s, the attitude really began in the 1960s when even radical leftist politics became inseparable from Sex, Drugs, and Rock & Roll. Even though the hippies claimed to be for ‘love and peace’, they were selfish jerks who thought it was their birthright to party all day and night long, while mooching off others. It’s like what Albert Brooks said of the guys in EASY RIDER. They sold cocaine to pay for their carefree self-indulgences. In time, the flaky pretensions faded away from the 60s Youth Culture, leaving only hedonism and shamelessness for later generations. Already in the bicentennial year of DAZED AND CONFUSED, the Richard Linklater film, the young ones are into partying and having a good time with little concern for ideals. As Americanism came to be about shameless hedonism and self-indulgence, personal integrity(the only basis for real morality) was no longer possible and was replaced with bogus group-idolatry and ideo-fanaticism. As Jews, blacks, and homos were sanctified the most, they were deemed to be good simply on the basis of their identities. Whatever Jews did, no matter how foul, they could invoke the Holocaust as get-out-of-jail card. And blacks only needed to cry ‘racism’ and do the Magic Negro BS. And Homos merely needed to wave the ‘rainbow’ flag and claim ‘pride’ as their own. As for the others, their primary sense of goodness derived from PC fanaticism. Being fanatical, they didn’t need to contemplate or question anything. They simply needed to drink the Kool-Aid and chant favored slogans about ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’, about ‘racism’ and ‘homophobia’. They came to be about as stupid as Red Guards mindlessly quoting from Mao’s Little Red Book.

Now, being quiet inside a library is a virtue. It’s about being mindful and respectful of others who are reading or studying. It takes self-awareness and respect for knowledge. It’s about mutuality. Others respect you and you respect others in the spirit of learning and good manners. But such real morality means nothing to blacks and the PC mob. Blacks, for the simple ‘virtue’ of being black, think they have the right to disrupt a library and howl like gorillas because they, as blacks, be so sacred, magical, cool, badass, and shit. And non-black PC idiots will join along and feel so holier-than-thou because they always claim to be fighting ‘racism’ or some other ‘evil’(and are rubbing shoulders with the sacred Magic Negroes). It’s a hysterical and hyped War Morality. In war, military-morality works differently from civilian morality. In order to win the war by beating the ‘bad guys’(the other side is, of course, deemed ‘evil’), the military-morality allows all sorts of mayhem and mass-killing of even innocents that would be unthinkable in peace-time. We were led to believe that Shock and Awe in Iraq and other mass bombings were ‘justified’(even though many innocents died or were wounded) because the US was working toward the higher good of removing an evil tyrant and planting a democracy in the Middle East. PC tells its foot-soldiers that, because history is on their side against the forces of Evil, whatever they do is justified by the delusional nobility of the cause itself. These people really have mass-murder in their hearts, and they must be countered accordingly.


Anyway, the main fact of American Power is that Jews control just about everything that matters. Indeed, one could even say the US is a Jewish-Supremacist colony. How? In so many respects depending on how we define ‘supremacism’. If we define supremacism as ‘wildly disproportionate power’ held by a certain group, then Jewish Power is indeed supremacist because no group comes near Jews in having power, wealth, and influence that far exceed their share of the population. Recent census shows that Jews make up 1.7% of the US population. Now, suppose Jews controlled 10% of Wall Street, Hollywood, Las Vegas, Silicon Valley, Real Estate, Top Law Firms, Ivy League schools, Big Media, Deep State, and etc. Jews would be vastly over-represented with the 10% figure. But in fact, Jews control 95% of media and almost all of Hollywood and Las Vegas. Jews control most of the biggest players in Silicon Valley. And Jews control at least half of Wall Street. Jews control the Ivies. Jews control Deep State and foreign policy. Jews control most politicians who’ve been bought and sold by Jewish money and know that Jewish media can make or break them. Jews control most of the top law firms that even engage in Lawfare against dissident voices. And not only do Jews have all this power and wealth, but they interact and coordinate with one another across the industries and institutions. After all, look how people like Richard Spencer and Jared Taylor have not only been deplatformed and sued but denied financial services by monopoly industries controlled by Jews. In the current USA, American citizens are denied basic services of communication and consumption(of products and services) by globalist-imperialist Jews who’ve occupied much of America. And Jewish media work with Jewish Deep State and Jewish finance to ‘dox’ and destroy the livelihoods of anyone who cares about his own people. So, while a total scumbag like Marc Rich was pardoned by Bill Clinton and a lowlife weasel like Jonathan Pollard was pardoned by Obama and handed a plush job upon release, good decent patriotic white Americans who refuse to serve Jewish Supremacism get labeled as ‘white supremacist Nazis’ who aren’t allowed to enact financial transactions or communicate with people freely.
In theory, anyone can be fired for his ideological views, but in truth, it doesn’t work this way. After all, if someone is fired for being Alt Right or ‘white nationalist’, the employer suffers no consequences. But suppose a company fires someone for being Zionist or a Neocon supporter of Wars for Israel. Suppose the employer finds the person’s views to be Judeo-Nazi. Or suppose Twitter has a new policy(of working with BDS than with ADL) that favors Palestinians and denounces & bans Zionist speech as ‘hate speech’. In theory, it'd be allowed, but the Power will come down so hard on the employer or Twitter that neither would dare take any actions against Zionists EVEN IF he/it sincerely believed Zionism is evil or that Jewish Power around the world is murderous and supremacist.

To continue, Jews can be said to be ‘supremacist’ in more ways than one. Jews certainly have disproportionate power way beyond what their demographics would warrant. But suppose we argue that Jewish over-representation owes strictly to meritocracy. In other words, Jews haven’t sought supreme power but accidently ended up with it because they are naturally smarter and more studious. Still, by rules of PC, that doesn’t cut the mustard. After all, even the argument that whites do better than Sub-Saharan-West-African-Americans(or SWAA) and Meso-Americans on merit isn’t good enough. What matters is Results according to the theory of Disparate Impact. So, it doesn’t matter if whites, blacks, and browns all agreed that the tests are fair. If whites do considerably better than blacks and browns, it is an act of ‘injustice’ that perpetuates ‘white supremacy’. So, following that logic, Jewish Power would have to be condemned as ‘supremacist’ EVEN IF it was entirely based on individual merit.

But of course, Jewish Power isn’t just the result of individual talent. While many highly talented Jews did gain great success through intelligence and ability, less bright Jews have also gained lots of traction in academia, business, law, government, and other areas due to Tribal Networking. In other words, smart powerful Jews have worked together to favor their less-bright tribal brethren over more deserving non-Jews, especially European-Americans and Asians. Also, when equally smart Jew and non-Jew must go head-to-head, the Power will favor the Jew. There’s little doubt that Jewish entrepreneurs got favorable funding from banks on big projects. Also, Jews are advantaged because they have the Moral Shield. As a Holocaust People, they can’t be disgraced or destroyed no matter what they do or say(unless they offend blacks, who are deemed equally holy, as Donald Sterling learned), whereas non-Jews, especially whites, must always be careful. Furthermore, it’s far easier for non-Jews than Jews to be destroyed for this very reason. Suppose some Jewish guy said awful things about Iran, Russia, Syria, Palestinians, or whatever. Suppose he said something as crazy as Sheldon Adelson’s proposal of nuking Iran. A Jew can openly justify the Israeli death squad’s killing of Palestinian protesters. He will not lose his job, standing, or wealth. But what would happen to any goy politician, businessman, or some such IF it’s revealed that he once said something mildly critical of blacks or Israel? He could be fired, demoted, or denied funding. Rick Sanchez and Helen Thomas were gone in no time for mouthing criticism of Jewish power or Zionism. So, while goys, especially whites, must walk on eggshells and live in fear of being outed as an ‘anti-Semite’ or ‘racist’, Jews can spew any kind of filth about Palestinians, Russians, Iranians, Arabs, whites, Christians, and etc. The only people Jews must be careful about are blacks(and to a lesser degree, Homosexuals). So, there’s clearly no equality at work in how the power operates in the US. If we look into the ‘kitchen’ of power, what really happens is so different from what is presented in the dining area. Just like Anthony Bourdain’s book KITCHEN CONFIDENTIAL detailed what really happens among the chefs and owners, the more inquisitive journalists and maverick ex-insiders have been trying to inform the public about the Power Kitchen Confidential. John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt even wrote a book called THE ISRAEL LOBBY. But even among journalists and whistle-blowers with more spine, there’s been a tendency not to rock the boat on the Jewish issue. Even Wikileaks was most restrained in spilling the beans on Jewish or Israeli secrets. I guess Julian Assange knows something about what Jewish power could really do to him if it wanted to.

There is yet another layer of Jewish Supremacism. Not only are Jews vastly over-represented in elite industries & institutions and working in cahoots with one another to favor the Tribe over other groups but the sum of Jewish Power is hyper-actively working in supremacist mode in the West and the Rest(especially pertaining to the Middle East and Russia). The so-called ‘new cold war’ is Jewish War on Russia III. (Bolshevik Revolution was Jewish War on Russia I, and the Jewish economic looting of Russia in the 1990s was Jewish War on Russia II.) Jew Matthew Yglesias says American conservatives, who’d been fiercely anti-Soviet, are warming up to Russia because it’s become the center of White Nationalist Politics. The real reason is Russia managed to regain some degree of national sovereignty from Jewish supremacist domination. According to Jews like Yglesias, it is outrageous that Russians should own and control their own nation. Jews must control Russia even though they make up only 0.2% of the population. Even with such a small number, 20% of the richest people in Russia are Jewish, and they are well-protected by Putin and Russian government. If anything, they are favored over most groups. But even that isn’t enough for Jews who seek total domination. Also, American conservatives once feared the Soviet Union because it was expansive. It supported communist movements all over the world. Also, in the 40s and 50s, lots of Soviet spies in the US(many of them Jews) sent bushels of top secret material to the USSR. Jews even sent to mass-killer tyrant Stalin the secret of the Bomb. Why did Jews do this? Back then, Jewish-Americans saw the Soviet Union as the main base of Jewish Power as the so-called Russian Revolution had largely been a Jewish Revolution. And even though Stalin won out over Trotsky, there were still many Jews in the upper echelons of power in the USSR that also defeated Nazi Germany. Jewish-American support of the USSR wasn’t purely ideological or idealistic. It was tribal, especially as Stalin was initially a more fervent backer of the Zionist project. Before there was the Space Race, there was the Jew Race between USSR and the US. Stalin hoped to gain the support of World Jewry by backing Zionism, but when Israel was founded, the Jewish state threw its lot with the US that was richer and more promising in the long run as capitalist hog-heaven for Jews. That is when Stalin really turned against Jews and Zionism, and relations gradually worsened between the USSR and Jews as years passed.
At any rate, why do we need a new ‘cold war’? Unlike Jewish-Americans who actively aided and abetted the USSR, American conservatives just want peace and better relations with Russia. That’s it. All this Russian Collusion is the fetid fever-dream of Jews who are prone to projecting their own conspiratorial madness onto other peoples. According to Jews, the hunt for REAL Soviet spies in the US was a ‘witch-hunt’ and ‘Red Scare hysteria’ — Rosenbergs and Morton Sobell really were agents of Stalin — ,but the utterly bogus Trump-Russia collusion fantasy warrants each and every one of us to look under our bed for Russians, Russians, Russians. Also, Putin’s Russia is less about whiteness than about Christianity, traditionalism, and nationalism. Also, unlike the US that goes around claiming to be ‘indispensable’ and ‘exceptional’ nation that has some God-given right to invade, sanction, and destroy any nation, Russian foreign policy isn’t so ambitious. Russia didn’t lift a finger while the Jew-run US was ravaging the Middle East. Russia had to swallow the fact that Jewish-Americans colluded with Russian Jews to economically rape Russia in the 1990s. Russia stood by helplessly as the US and allies reduced Libya to a rubble. And it is Jew-run US that is aiding Saudi Arabia’s destruction of poor Yemen. Putin finally came to the rescue of Syria because the Jew-run US was using Alqaeda and ISIS to take down secular Assad. Also, Putin reacted to the US-funded coup in Ukraine that even recruited neo-Nazi elements. Imagine that, Jewish-Americans working with neo-Nazi elements to bring down a government. These ‘progressive’ types used to lament what the US did to Salvador Allende, but they have no problem with US backing forces to take down democratically elected governments in Ukraine and Egypt(that is once again ruled by the military). There’s a saying, "Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you." No truer words have been spoken. It is not Russia that has the missionary complex. It is the Jew-run US that has the crusader-missionary aggression to remake the world in its image. Russia is building Churches, but it’s not trying to force its Orthodox Faith on other nations. If anything, it’s the Jews and post-Christian Americans who are trying to spread Homomania as Jewish-Satanic-substitute-christianity around the world. Russia doesn’t try to force US cities to have Orthodox Church processions. It is the Jew-run US that tries to turn every national capital into Victory March grounds for Globo-Homomania as new religion of the West. Jews now control the West and decided to replace Christianity with a new faith of their own making. But Yglesias the Jew strikes out in pain as he punches Russia and American conservatives who simply want peace and mutual respect. Peace between US and Russia is triggering to Jewish supremacists like Yglesias who fear that the Russian example may spread to other white-majority nations. Is Putin’s Russia trying to spread ‘white supremacy’? Well, Putin has a strange way of carrying out such agenda. In Russia, neo-Nazi speech is strictly curtailed. If anything, it’s the Jewish globalists who are allied with neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine. Also, Putin has gone out of his way to maintain good relations with Muslims, and he’s been especially protective of Jews. Indeed, just about any Jew can travel to and invest in Russia, but many Alt Right figures would be banned there. Also, Putin’s Russia has good relations with non-white nations like China, Iran, and Syria. If anything, all the virulent anti-Arab and anti-Persian sentiments are coming from the Jewish community. But then, of course, THAT is the problem. Russia supports Syria and Iran. That is why Jews hate Putin. So much for Putin’s ‘white nationalism’. When the Jew-run West decided to sanction Russia, Putin moved closer to China and Iran. How is that ‘white nationalism’? Also, keep in mind that Poland and Hungary chose on their own to say NO to ‘refugees’ who were uprooted by the millions due to Wars for Israel instigated by Jew-run US. Jews are devious in using their bogus sympathy for ‘refugees’ to mask the fact that Wars for Israel created those ‘refugees’ in the first place. Imagine a Jew who burns down someone’s house and then feigns sympathy for the destitute family; then, the Jew insists that YOU take in the family-made-homeless by Jewish arson. And if you say NO, the Jew calls you a heartless ‘nazi’ or ‘supremacist’. Israel and its rabid backers in the US have been most instrumental in spreading wars and mayhem in the Muslim World that led to so many ‘refugees’, but notice how no one expects the Jewish nation to take in any ‘refugees’. Indeed, Israelis still illegally occupy Golan Heights and West Bank where Arabs live under Apartheid conditions. But you won’t hear much about that from Matthew Yglesias who is just another devious Jew. It’s no wonder Jews were hated universally all over the world. What is most disgusting about Jews is they bitch on and on about ‘white supremacism’, but all their favored immigration destinations have been places made by ‘white supremacism’. Indeed, Jews have supported ‘white supremacism’ when it was to their benefit. Consider how Jews celebrate the US as a ‘Nation of Immigrants’. Now, from the vantage point of American Indians, all those ‘immigrants’ were invaders whose arrival meant more westward expansion and more loss of territory to newcomers. But Jews only care about their interests. Since Jews arrived as immigrants and grew rich and fat off what the white man conquered from the Red Man, Jews celebrate the history of invasion-immigration in the US. Anyway, the reason why Jewish Supremacists like Yglesias hate Russia and American conservatives so much is because both peoples are nationalist than imperialist. Russia is for Russian national interests, and American conservatives are for American national interests. But both sides understand how they can co-exist in peace, trade, and respect one another. Jews hate national sovereignty among goy nations because it means resistance to Jewish globalist neo-imperialism. Jews believe that they, as the supreme race, should have the right to stick their noses into the affairs of all nations. Jews now see themselves as god. Just as God was said to see and know everyone and everything in the world that all belongs to Him, Jews feel they have some divine right to penetrate anywhere, lay claim to anything, and decide what is right for anyone. (Jews say Homo-Worship is compulsory for all peoples now.) What Jews once regarded as the outlook of God has become their own outlook because they no longer believe in God. There's no more need to project Jewish personality onto God. By outsourcing their neurosis to God, Ancient Jews had gained a measure of humility. (God was like a scapegod. Jewish arrogance and megalomania were pushed onto God who burned brightly with Jewish fury. Worshiping their own megalomania as a collective spiritual entity, Jews found a measure of peace. But in the absence of belief in God, Jewish arrogance remains within the Jewish soul and burns out of control.)

Jews are now a self-worshiping bunch of a**holes who thinks all nations and peoples exist to serve Jews. This is why Jews hate American conservatives and Russia. American and Russian nationalisms, though humbler, are more resilient and stronger because they know their limits and duties. American nationalism is supposed to serve Americans, and Russian nationalism is supposed to serve Russians. Why does this idea trigger Jews? Because Jews think Americans and Russians ought to serve Jews. This is why Jews spread Homomania all around. Homos are the proxies of Jews who favor the New Normal of elite minority supremacism. And this is why Jews say existing Americans are less American than Americans-yet-to-be by never-ending waves of Mass Invasion-Immigration. If existing Americans really felt they owned the nation, they would have a clearer sense of what is good for most Americans who are not Jewish. Jews hate the idea of Russians, Americans, or white people caring primarily about themselves. It’d mean they would put their own interests above those of Jews. So, Jews push any mentality and outlook among goyim to make them think less about themselves than of the Other. And since Jews are the most powerful group among the Other, they take the lion’s share of the white cucking out for the Other. One thing for sure, white Christian American concern for the Other sure favors Jews over Palestinians.

There is no doubt that Jewish power is nakedly supremacist. Jews surely control the Narrative with their ownership of the World Media. That is why, to this day, so many Americans have no idea that Jewish communists carried out mass-killings in the USSR and ruled over goyim-as-cattle. They have no idea that it was Jews who raped Russia in the 90s and led millions to die of destitution. Jews also carried out massive White Slavery by turning countless Slavic girls into sex-slaves in Israel and other parts of world networked by the Jewish mafia. Also, the wars of Bush II and Obama/Hillary were all Wars for Israel. Isn’t it funny how Jews say it’s all about spreading ‘human rights’ and ‘democracy’, but Jews have no problem working with Saudi Arabia, hiring neo-Nazis in Ukraine, and aiding Alqaeda and ISIS in Syria. Surely, the likes of Matthew Yglesias know all this, but their vile Jewish personality and tribalism apparently trump everything. Their Jewish-supremacist imperialism simply cannot tolerate the humble nationalism of nations that want to retain or regain their national sovereignty and work with other similar nations in a spirit of truce and respect. It’s like Russia and China. There’s mutual respect and sense of limits. Russia doesn’t interfere in Chinese affairs, and vice versa. Each seeks its own national interest but finds areas in which they have mutual interests. And they learned to get along. And we can have the same between US and Russia. But nasty Jews won’t have it because they want all nations to serve Jews. Jews bitch and lie about how Trump is servile to Russia when, in fact, they are really pissed because he isn’t wholly servile to Jewish Globalist Power. According to Jewish Logic, US wanting good peaceful relations with Russia is ‘appeasement’. These vile Jews invoke the language of 1939 even though they are the ones who are allied with real neo-Nazis in Ukraine, practice Apartheid in West Bank, and use IDF death squads to kill Palestinian women and children who want to see their stole homeland again. Not being servile to Jews is being servile to Russia. Any honest observer would note that if the US government is servile to one thing, it’s is Jewish Power and Israel that now operates as a vicious Judeo-Nazi state that guns down innocent Palestinians who were forced into refugees status by the Nakba Pogroms in 1948. As if that wasn’t tragic enough, Jews instigated a war in 1967 and stole West Bank and Golan Heights as well. And of course, Jews expect Americans to support their acts of warmongering and imperialism. The real servility is to Jewish Supremacism, but the likes of Yglesias are either blind or dishonest in their refusal to call out reality like it is.

Anyway, the reason why we should spread the ‘meme’ of "Palestine is our greatest ally" or "West Bank and Gaza are our greatest ally" is it makes the scales fall from our eyes and make us realize how duped and brainwashed by Jews we are. Initially, those who hear the utterance will find it absurd. They’ll think, "What? Palestine our greatest ally? West Bank and Gaza our best friends?" But then, it will provoke people to consider the slogan, "Israel is our greatest/closest ally." After all, isn’t the sentiment just as ludicrous as "Palestine is our greatest ally?" Besides, WHO said Israel is our greatest ally? Most Americans are not Jewish. So, what does Israel matter to us? Why should the passion of 1.7% of Americans be the passion of all Americans? Perhaps, Greek-Americans love Greece, but do they make us say, "Greece is our greatest ally?" Do Turkish-Americans make us say, "Turkey is our greatest friend or closest ally?" If the US and Israel are very close, it has nothing to do with what most of us really feel. It’s because Jews rule the US and used their supremacist power to favor Israeli and Jewish-globalist interests over all others. In other words, this ‘closeness’ narrative between US and Israel has been imposed by Jews. Imagine if Iranian-Americans had control of 95% of media, owned Wall Street and Hollywood, dominated Ivy League, and bought up most politicians. Suppose they tell us over and over and over through puppet politicians and front-men, "Iran is our closest ally, greatest friend, and etc." For that to be the case, Iranian-American would have to have supremacist control over us. After all, most of us being non-Iranian, there would be no reason for us to be ecstatic about globalist Iranians and their wildly out-of-proportion interests.

Granted, there is widespread American support for Jews and Israel, but then why? This also owes to Jewish supremacism. It was Jewish control of media and academia that filled so many minds with the notion of Good Jews and Evil Arabs. Hollywood gave us all those Arabs-as-terrorists movies. Hollywood has yet to make a film about the Nakba pogroms, just like it has never made a movie about the murderous Jewish role in communism or about how Jewish-American agents sent Bomb secrets to Stalin. Instead, we get stuff like ANGELS IN AMERICA where Ethel Rosenberg is some saint while anti-communists are scum. It’s all tribal. Jews defended communist agents and vilified anti-communism because so many Jews were on the radical left back then. Of course, Christianity itself spread the supremacism of the Jewish Narrative. Even though Christianity was often anti-Jewish, it disseminated the Bible, the Old along with the New, all over the world, and this came to favor the Jewish Narrative over all others when it came to the Holy Land. So, many Christians supported Zionism as a kind of neo-crusade to take back the Holy Land from the Muslims. Jews were seen as the proxy. But the kind of American Christian Zionism is really disgusting and ultimately pathetic and pitiful. It’s really about low-IQ ignoramus white Evangelicals being hoodwinked into supporting Israel despite the fact that most American Jews despise and hate Evangelical Christians. A poll few yrs back revealed that most Jews prefer even Muslims over Evangelicals. So, those white Christian dummies are being taken for a ride. They are being manipulated by Jewish money that bought up these whore politician who never shut up about ‘muh Israel, muh Israel’.

Jews constitute the most supremacist power in the US but, via their control of the media and academia(and whore politicians), they’ve created the impression that they are the main force of resistance against ‘white supremacism’. Of course, what Jews deem as ‘white supremacism’ is really just White Emancipation from White Submissivism to Jewish supremacism. Jewish masters find it incredibly uppity for whites to say NO to Jewish demands. So, if whites no longer want a ‘new cold war’ with Russia that only perpetuates Jewish supremacism, that is deemed as ‘white supremacism’ by Jews. If whites no longer want to fight more Wars for Israel and kill Muslims or get killed, that is ‘white supremacism’. No more Wars for Israel will surely end the ‘refugee crisis’, but what do Jews care? They only pretend to care about ‘refugees’ without ever addressing the fact that their Zio-supremacist wars led to the violence that uprooted so many peoples. If white people say NO to Homomania, the proxy neo-satanic-christian religion concocted by Jews, that too is ‘white supremacism’ because, for some reason, it is ‘nazi’ to feel that homo fecal penetration and tranny penis-cutting don’t have the same biological value and moral pedigree as real sex and real love & marriage. Using Jewish moral logic, the US must have been a ‘nazi’ nation before Jews made ‘gay marriage’ law of the land. People weren't truly human prior to becoming 'more evolved' by associating homo fecal penetration and tranny penis-cutting with rainbows and marriage. What a truly gross, disgusting, and vile people, these Jewish supremacists.

Even more outrageously, these Jews, who constantly berate white Americans for having favored their own kind over others in the past, zealously insist that Jewish and Israeli interests must take front seat over all others. Should Israel and Iran be treated equally? After all, if the US favored Iranian interests over Israeli interests, wouldn’t that be supremacist? If US is to be a totally fair global power, it would treat all nations and peoples equally. It would not play favorites. If the US were to favor one nation over another, the ONLY justification would be national interest. Now, what national interest does Israel have for the US? Does the well-being, security, survival, or prosperity of the US depend on the existence of Israel? Suppose Israel had not been founded in 1948. Would the US today be less wealthy or powerful? If anything, US relations with all of the Middle East might be much better. So, if anything, US sacrificed much of its national interest to favor Israel, the ethno-megalomanical project of Zionist Jews.

Another proof of Jewish supremacism is that Israel and only Israel among ‘Western Nations’ has sovereignty and full control of its borders. All other Western nations have no such authority. Hungary and Poland have decided to protect their borders, but they’ve come under tremendous pressure and denunciation from the Jew-run EU. But hardly anyone mentions that Israel has the toughest border walls in the world. When we look back on the imperialist histories of Britain, France, Nazi Germany, and the USSR, it’s obvious that the supreme power had the ‘right’ to go anywhere and also to keep Others/Foreigners out of the home-nation. So, the British imperialists could freely move into India, Africa, and Asia. And they could move millions of people from one place to another. They could ship blacks from Africa to West Indies. They could colonize a million Asian Indians in Africa and other parts of Asia. And Indians couldn’t say NO to British intrusion into India, and Africans couldn’t say NO to British relocation-migration of many Hindus to work as coolie labor. But, the British could keep non-British out of Britain itself. Brits could protect their home-base like Jews protect Israel from the rabble of the world. But today, both the US and EU have come under the power of the Empire of Judea, or EOJ. The US and EU are to the EOJ what India and Africa were once to the British Empire. As such, Americans and Europeans cannot say NO to the mass-migration-invasions of peoples. Indeed, their so-called leaders are not real leaders but cuck-collaborators of Jewish globalism. And via the media and academia, the Jewish Empire has even convinced the masses that ‘Diversity’ and ‘Inclusion’(another word for Invasion) are holy and healing for them. It’s like Puerto Ricans have been convinced that they should totally give up on national independence and just be part of the US empire.
But Israel is allowed the full right to accept JEWISH IMMIGRATION ONLY and to strictly patrol the borders and keep out ‘infiltrators’.
So, who has the real power? Those who have control over their own destiny have power. If they have control over their own destiny and over the destines of others, they have supremacist power. Jews not only have control over Israel but have control over US and EU. In Israel, Jews do everything to keep Israel a Jewish State. In US and EU, Jews do everything to turn them into polyglot properties of the Empire of Judea. Jews want to own those imperial possessions forever, and they know Diversity and race-mixing are the key. After all, what ended European imperialism in Africa and Asia? A united people rose up against the imperialists. Blacks united to kick out whites. Browns in India united to kick out Brits. Yellows united in Vietnam to kick out the French. In contrast, why are the white elites still in power in Latin America? Because the extensive race-mixing led to confused identities that can’t unite. Mestizos don’t identify with native folks. Also, the arrival of black slaves led to even more diversity and mixture. So, whites still rule in Latin America.
This is why Jews hate goy unity and goy nationalism. It may rise up against the EOJ and say NO to stuff like Sorosism. Just like the British moved tons of Hindus into Africa to mix things up and dominate via divide-and-rule, Jews are now pushing mass-migrations all over the world to mix up populations so that they won’t be able to unite against Jewish globo-infiltration and takeover. This is obviously a form of Jewish supremacism.

So, to wake people up to reality, we should say to everyone, "West Bank and Gaza are America’s greatest ally" or "Palestine is America’s closest ally." It’s a way of triggering people. By making them conscious of the ludicrousness of the statement, they can be led to deal with the slogan repeated by politicians and pundits, "Israel is our greatest/closest ally." Well, who said so? And just how is it more valid than "Palestine is our greatest ally?" Are Palestinians less human than Jews. Are Jews superior to other peoples? Are Jewish lives more precious than Palestinian lives?

And if the US is a ‘nation of immigrants’ that is equally open and friendly to all peoples and nations, why does it favor Jews and Israel over all others? If it was wrong for white Americans to favor fellow white nations & peoples in the past, how is it any better for the current US to favor Jews over Arabs and Iranians?
Also, if the US is about ‘human rights’ and the ‘poor huddled masses yearning to be free’, why does it favor the Judeo-Nazi state of Israel that uses IDF death squads to gun down Palestinians yearning to be free? And if Jews claim to be about justice and concern for the oppressed, why don’t Jews use Hollywood to make movies about the Nakba pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map?
Also, given the Jewish globalist project of trying to Palestinianize the White Race and other peoples, it’s about time white goyim said, "We are all Palestinians now". Jews raped the Russian economy in the 90s and palestinianized the Russians. Jews used Clinton to force sanctions on Iraq that killed 100,000s of women and children. Iraqis were palestinianized. Jews used 9/11 as excuse to invade Iraq and bring about a massive civil war. More palestinianization. Jews used Obama and Hillary to destroy Libya, once the best nation in Africa, now a nation in total tatters. Libyans were also palestinianized. And Jews used Obama/Hillary to arm Jihadis and terrorists in Syria to turn that place upside down. 400,000 were killed, many more were wounded, and millions were displaced. Syrians were palestinianized. And then, Jewish power pushed all these ‘refugees’ into Europe so that Europeans would lose their ancient homelands to mass invaders. They too would be palestinianized. When we look at the doings of Jews, it’s obvious why most peoples didn’t want to take in Jews. And those that took them in soon regretted it. Jews are arrogant, megalomaniacal, and supremacist. No matter where they go, they try to take over and lord over others. They try to make others serve them while they live and eat like Effendi.

So, say it over and over and over: "West Bank and Gaza are America’s greatest and closest ally."