J-WOW or Jewish War on White is behind the Arson of the West — Without Naming Jewish Supremacist Power as the Cancer Afflicting the White Race, there is No Hope — Complex History vs Cartoon History — Triversity over Diversity

What is to be done?

Push back against the main enemy. Jewish Supremacist Power or JSP.

This latest fiasco sweeping across the US and even EU is more of the same old Jewish War on White or J-WOW.

Naturally then, the most sensible thing is for whites to seek White Emancipation or White Liberation from Jewish Supremacism. A call for White Liberation from Jewish Supremacism will be most effective in dispelling the myth of 'White Privilege'. If people scoff and ask, "White Liberation? What do whites gotta be liberated from?", one need only say, "From Jewish Supremacist Power that makes white people fight Wars for Israel, makes white people support Zionist 'genocide' of Palestinians, makes white people cheer on the Jewish War of Hatred against Syrians, Iranians, Russians, among others. White Liberation from Jewish Supremacist control of predatory financial looting. White Liberation from Jewish Supremacist promotion of degeneracy and decadence as the stuff of neo-spirituality. White Liberation from Jewish Supremacist encouragement of more Drugs on the populace, which by the way, led to mass white deaths. White Lives Matter, and no white life is 'white trash'."

The problem began when whites didn't only cede power but moral(and even spiritual) authority to Jews. It's one thing for power to go from one people to another. It happens all the time. And in a democracy, the power goes back and forth among various parties. But suppose one party not only cedes power to the other party but totally surrenders to it as the fount of all truth, wisdom, and nobility. In other words, the other party that now has total power cannot even be criticized. But suppose it gets even crazier than that. Suppose the other party that has the power and the moral authority cannot even be said to have the power. Even though the other party pretty much rules everything, it must be characterized as 'for the little guy and the underdog, a party of helpless victims in need of eternal protection and special sensitivity'. Suppose Tiny Tim becomes Titan Tom but we go on pretending he's tiny and timmy. This is why Jewish Power is so utterly toxic in the US(and West in general). Jewish Power is like a black hole. It wields immense power and force but cannot be seen. It sucks in the light that could illuminate it.

When white people, especially Anglo-American Christians, ruled America in the past, they were sometimes good, sometimes bad, but one always knew WHO held the power. Indeed, the so-called Wasps were proud of their power. And because everyone knew they had it, they could be criticized and corrected. They could be pushed back from within and without. Wasp reformers pushed for progress for a more just society. And non-Wasps, especially Jews, critiqued and often satirized the negative aspects of Wasp rule. Thus, white power was out in the open, and as such, could be analyzed, criticized, and reformed. Also, there was an element of self-criticism and magnanimity among Wasps. Sure, Anglo-Americans could play dirty like everyone else, but there is no denying that Anglos and Northern Europeans made the best and most law-abiding(and reformist) societies because of the cultural(and possibly racial) character of those peoples. (Compare them with the social orders created by Muslims, Hindus, Chinese, or Southern Europeans & Eastern Europeans. If some people were too hot-tempered & contentious to maintain a just and orderly society, others, especially the East Asians and Tacoans were too passive and subservient to challenge corruption and tyranny.)
Jews posed a special threat to the American Order because they were (1) smarter than Wasps, thereby on the up and up and (2) lacking in cultural character. While Jews drone on and on about Tikkun Olam, it's just self-serving BS, ethno-propaganda. After all, if Jews CARE so much about the well-being of humanity, why haven't they done anything about the Palestinian Problem? How could they blithely allow current Jewish Power to do what it's doing in Syria, Iran, and Libya? How could they cover up what Jewish globo-capital did to Russia in the 1990s? While non-Jewish minorities were also lacking in cultural character, they were less dangerous because they were either less intelligent & capable than Wasps or only equally intelligent. In contrast, Jews, being smarter by one standard deviation than whites, could rise above them. Also, being pushy and crypto-supremacist in outlook, they were going for the jugular in the American power game. Now, if Jews had cultural character, maybe they would have made decent and even better elites. But being devious and vicious like Alan Dershowitz(and he's not the worst of them as there's even bigger scum like Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler), they want all the power and all the moral authority without any accountability and responsibility. Indeed, look what Jews have made of the Shoah. A genuine tragedy, it's been turned into shameless shoah-business.

Power is always dangerous but not so much when it's out in the open for examination and criticism. Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin would have been far less dangerous if they could have been publicly scrutinized. Also, power shouldn't be synonymous with moral authority. Power is only as good as it behaves. This is how democracy works. People get sick of Party A and hang their hopes on Party B. If Party B messes up, the people go back to Party A or go with Party C. So, the power has moral authority only as long as it delivers. It doesn't get to have the power and authority just because it is what it is. But that is the state of affairs with Jewish control of the US. With Wasps, we could see the good and the bad. We could look back on Wasp history and see the triumphs, the tragedies, the evils. But with Jews, we must pretend they don't have the power when they control just about everything. We must pretend Jewishness = moral authority from the beginning of time to the end of time. We must pretend everything about Jews and Jewishness is the noblest thing. Even when it's clear that Jews have wronged Palestinians, all we hear from US politicians and elites is 'Muh Israel'. Meanwhile, there is ZERO sympathy or even acknowledgement for the countless victims of Jewish-Zionist globalist supremacism in Russia, Middle East, and around the world. That vile harridan Madeleine Albright, the murderess of countless Arab children, is still given the podium to pontificate about the dangers of 'fascism'. The vile Cass Sunstein, the ardent Zionist and pro-Deep-State war-monger, sounds the alarm on the coming of 'fascism' to America. Jewish Control of the US has led to Wars for Israel that have destroyed so many lives. Jewish Power acts like Judeo-Nazis, but what do we get from TV shows? Stuff like NAZI-HUNTERS and PLOT AGAINST AMERICA.

These are truly a shameless and awful people. These people who've done most to defame the white race and desecrate white monuments(via their proxies, of course) are the ones who are most revered by idiot whites. That being the case, whites DESERVE all the horrors awaiting them as monumental stupidity can't be helped. But then, in many ways, white cuckery to Jews is more the product of white elite cravenness than stupidity. Surely, many white elites KNOW who has the real power. To keep their own status and privilege, they must suck up to Jews. And since white elites serve as the brains of the white masses, their attitude serves as the template for the rest of the white population. Look how GOP's cucking to globo-homo-mania has led to so many white 'conservative' normies, even Evangelicals, embracing Lady Maga and other lunacies. Even Orthodox Christians are over 50% for 'gay marriage'. But Jewish Power, so immense in media and mass entertainment, not only control white masses through the elites but through Hollywood, advertising, and propaganda. Why are so many white youths even from working class and lower middle class backgrounds joining Antifa or marching down streets chanting Black Lives Matter? What were their formative influences? Endless TV ads showing blacks radiating with wisdom while whites are shallow shits. So many movies like 12 YEARS A SLAVE, DJANGO UNCHAINED, THE HELP, GREEN BOOK, SHAPE OF WATER, SELMA, BLACK PANTHER, and so on and so on. Meanwhile, the worst villains and vermin are whites, even more so than the 'Muslim Terrorists'. Most people are pretty shallow, dumb, or childish, and of course, most white idiots who have TV, movies, pop music, and advertising for their MAIN CULTURE will be mentally molded by Jewish Media Monopoly.
Now, certain works about the black tragic past are warranted. After all, there is a dark side to US history. But even an art film like 12 YEARS A SLAVE is suspect in the larger context because Hollywood's moral conscience and outrage are so selective and tribalistically distorted. Indeed, if Jews really care about the truth and justice for all, why hasn't there been a single movie about the horrors faced by whites in South Africa? Why not a single movie about Nakba and the plight of Palestinians? Why not a movie about the Jewish role in Communism and the deaths of millions in the Great Famine? Or the turbo-gangster-capitalist rape of Russia in the 90s? Or how about USS Liberty? 12 YEARS A SLAVE was produced by Arnon Milchan, the arch-Zionist who is totally okay with Jim Crowitz in the West Bank. He once worked to steal US nuclear material and then negotiated with Apartheid South Africa. Yet, THIS JEW dares to lecture whites on the evils of their 'racist' past. Okay, there were evils in White History, but where are the movies about evils of Jewish History? Or about black brutality that has taken so many lives in American Life? Or how Israel supports ISIS terrorists in Syria? This is why Jewish Moralism works in bad faith, indeed worst faith. It's not true morality where the rules apply to all but cheap(but effective) weaponized moralism meant to increase Jewish Power at the expense of others. If White Christians have some degree of guilt-conscience about the Other, it appears the core of Jewish Power has no such consciousness. It's really merchant-morality where Jews invoke the shackles to collect more shekels.

Jews have not only poisoned the minds of so many white youths but those of blacks as well. Now, blacks were bound to be problematic due to genetics. They evolved to be tougher, wilder, more muscular, and more aggressive. The very hunter-warrior traits that were generally weeded out among most other races were favored in black evolution. Also, hot Africa favored lean muscle and impulsiveness. In contrast, the northern savages, such as Eskimos, American Indians, and the Lapps, developed more fatty tissues and even temperaments during long cold months. As for Australian Aborigines, they evolved alongside kangaroos and wombats, animals less dangerous than lions, hyenas, cape buffaloes, hippos, rhinos, elephants, and other beasts that just couldn't stand the Negroes and tried to stomp them out, which made blacks run faster and jump higher. So, blacks would have been problematic regardless.
But Jews, with their control of media and academia, emphasized Negro Nobility and White Culpability. The new Narrative made far less sense than the old one. The Anglo-American Narrative on the Negroes was more judicious. Yes, slavery went against American Principles, blacks toiled on the farms, and the suffering of blacks must be recognized and addressed. That said, blacks did make great strides in the US compared to what they'd been in the Dark Continent: spear-chucking savages beating on bongo drums and driving hippos crazy. Under whites, blacks adopted a great religion, learned work ethic & civilized behavior, gained access to modernizing amenities. Also, blacks gained higher morality. Indeed, even when black Americans argued against oppression and for liberty, they were using the white man's values. By African 'values', there was nothing wrong with slavery. The Bantu Way was "if you kick the ass, you keep the ass." That was it. If Frederick Douglas had decolonized his mind of white influence and thought like a black African, he would have thought, "Sheeeeeeiiiiit, dem honkeys deserve to rule over us ni**ers cuz they's badass and gots da power." So, the Anglo-American view of blacks in America was balanced. Whites had clearly done wrong to practice slavery in the US and sometimes treated blacks in terrible ways, but blacks did go from savagery to some semblance of civilization in the New World under whites. But then, Jewish Power pushed the Narrative where whites were totally wrong and blacks were pure as snow. And even though the number of lynchings of blacks(most of them thugs and criminals) wasn't all that high throughout US history, Jews created the myth that just about every other Negro was hanging on a rope from a tree. Lynchings became Lynchocaust. But compare lynchings of blacks in the US with violence around the world, and they hardly qualify as among the greatest horrors in human history. In many parts of the world, many more people died in one year or even a single month than all the blacks killed by lynching in all of US history. Indeed, Jews have killed more Palestinians since 1948 than whites killed blacks with lynching. And how many Arabs/Muslims died as the result of Zionist-led sanctions on nations like Iraq, Syria, and Iran? Too many to count.

Jews have pushed a cartoon history were the Confederacy was merely about slavery. But it was much more, as any society is about much more than its economic institution. Back then, the Confederacy wasn't merely defending the slave system but their own kind of civilization and way of life distinct from those in the North. Besides, the real catalyst for the Civil War was more 'genocide' than slavery. It was westward expansion(that led to massacres of American Indians) that pushed the slavery issue to the front. As the North added another more state, the South insisted on adding another as well to balance things out. It was Manifest Destiny and destruction of the American Indians(in which the North was even more involved than the South) that made the slavery issue more contentious. But notice how we almost never hear anything about that. Characterizing the Confederacy as nothing-but-slavery is utterly disingenuous. In truth, every social order, every civilization, has sought to defend itself despite its problems of oppression or 'human rights'. American Indians were savages and practiced all sorts of horrors, but we honor their fight against the white man because they were trying to preserve their way of life, the only one they knew. True, Indians had slavery and some of them even practiced cannibalism and sadistic torture, but they had a culture of their own. When the West arrived on Japanese shores, the West was bringing lots of progress, but the Japanese still resisted and tried to maintain their independence. Should we boil it all down to 'Jappers were trying to maintain an oppressive caste system and slavery of the peasants?' When the French invaded Russia, it's true they were coming with more advanced ideas about liberty and dignity of man, but was it wrong for Russia to resist and fight back? Would it make sense to characterize the Russian defense of the motherland as merely 'trying to preserve serfdom'? Only a puritanical moralistic fool thinks like that. Even when a civilization practices slavery or things we may disapprove of, it is MUCH MORE than that single institution.

And even though the KKK degenerated into a kind of nihilism, it arose to defend whites from blacks who'd been encouraged by Northerners to act up. To merely call it 'terrorist' is hilarious coming from Jews who created Israel through use of much terror. Surely, Jews know of Irgun. Indeed, Jews revolutionized the modern use of terror as Bolsheviks and Zionists. And Jews have no problem aiding terrorism all across the Middle East to make Arabs fight Arabs, make Muslims fight Muslims. And speaking of terror, what of US military in WWII? Weren't the willful mass-bombings of civilian targets in Germany and Japan a form of mass terror? A single such bombing killed more innocent civilians than all the killings done by the KKK. And what are sanctions but a form of terror-by-disease-and-starvation? This isn't to defend the KKK, which became a sinister outfit, but it is hardly unique in having used terror to gain certain objectives. And today, blacks are even worse. Their riots, lootings, rampages, random attacks on whites, arson, and etc. are all forms of racial terror meant make others cower to their neo-savage demands. In some respects, blackkk rampage is worse than KKK violence. Whites in hoods, though violent, were trying to maintain or restore order. Black rioters and looters, in contrast, are using terror to spread disorder and mayhem as the New Normal of America. Also, KKK was closer to the truth than BLM is. It's been true that blacks are a natural threat to whites because they are more aggressive and tougher. In contrast, BLM is based on the utter BS that countless innocent blacks are being mowed down by the white police. If the KKK over-reacted to the grim truth of black thuggery, BLM lunatics are basing their actions on utter fantasy. The truth is black lives are killed by black lives, which also kill non-black lives all across America.

With American Indians, there is a more nuanced and complicated understanding. Yes, no one would deny that American Indians were proud peoples(though bloody savages as well) with deep and rich roots in the American Land. And there was real tragedy in their defeat at the hands of whites. It was especially tragic as most subject peoples of white colonization regained control over their lands. With American Indians, this became impossible as they weren't too many in number to begin with, too many were wiped out by diseases, and the mass-immigration from the Old World never ended. So, there is that tragic side to American Indian History. But there is also the other side of America, that a great rich and free nation was founded on where there had been only wilderness and Red Savagery. And in time, even American Indians benefited from the New Order. So, we can see both the tragedy and triumph of the American Indian narrative.
And such a narrative used to prevail with blacks as well. Both Northern and Southern scholars acknowledged how blacks had gained as well as lost in their American experience. But why is there still a nuanced perspective on the story of American Indians(even though they suffered 'genocide', far graver than slavery) while no such exists with blacks? For one thing, Jews gained too much from immigration to associate mass immigration with imperialist invasion that led to the great replacement of natives, especially because they pulled something similar with the Palestinians. But the main reason why Jews have promoted the cult of the Noble Negro is that their supremacist rule over the West relies on white submission and white obedience, and THIS means making whites feel shame and guilty about their own identity and interests. NO UPPITY WHITES. Whites must have their heads bowed low. In Europe, Shoah Guilt was enough to cower people's heads over there, but in the US, it was the stuff about blacks. Jews also figured that blacks are especially useful in this because whites will tend to feel most guilty about whom they look up to as 'cool', 'awesome', and 'superior'. Whites may feel bad about all those dead Vietnamese, Central Americans(killed by US-backed right-wing death squads), and Arabs, but they are, visibly at least, mediocre peoples, and whites can't get to excited over them. But whites were bound to feel a special guilt regarding blacks, the race of athletes, studs, orators, singers, and etc. And so, there could be no nuance or complexity about white-black relations. Whites could not say something sensible like, "Hey, it's too bad that our ancestors whipped your kind and made them pick cotton, and I'm sorry if I ever said 'ni**ger', but you gotta admit you blacks were a bunch of jungle/savanna savages without written word, the wheel, higher spirituality & ethics, and it was through us white folks that you were elevated from savagery to civilization." And once upon a time, prominent blacks like Zora Neale Hurston and Booker T. Washington admitted as much. While harshly critical of the institution of slavery, they also realized that the Negro was uplifted from savagery thanks to contact with whites. But such nuance has been banned over the years. Blacks are all good and were living in Edenic paradise, and it was them evil 'racist' whites who ruined black utopia. Today, many fools, blacks and whites, think all of Africa would be one big Wakanda if not for white colonialism, which is ROTFL. Righteous Negro Pastor Manning speaks the truth: https://twitter.com/RaquelM19661184/status/1277300519707516929

Lmfao, I’m crying. Who remembers this classic? He talks about the kangs. I’m dead. pic.twitter.com/gHYpelsOK6

— “R??????” ???????????? ???????????? (@RaquelM19661184) June 28, 2020

With a more nuanced view of history, whites could correct their ways but so could blacks. But once the New Narrative became Black Angel and White Devil — oddly similar to one pushed by Black Muslims, albeit with Jews included among the White Devils — , whites were responsible for everything while blacks were responsible for nothing. Even when blacks failed, the blame wasn't on them. Rather, it was said whites failed them. So, if black students failed, they didn't fail on their own, but white society failed them. If blacks rioted and looted, they were acting in the name of vigilante justice because whites failed them in justice. George Floyd likely died more from drugs than the police restraint, but never mind his criminality and pathology and just blame the white knee... and white everything. Is it any wonder that we now live in a nation where blacks rampage around like animals but are revered as angels? Blacks murder each other, but the narrative is 'whites must stop killing blacks'. Never mind many more whites are killed by blacks in any given year. When one side is totally right no matter what while the other side is totally wrong no matter what, it's not politics or morality but a demented form of theology. It's like gods are right no matter what they do because they are gods and therefore must be appeased by humans, even if gods cause terror on mankind. Nothing good can come out of this Negrocracy or Afrocracy, but Jews pushed it as effective weapon against white identity.

But then, Jews enjoy the same kind of 'spiritual' nihilism for themselves over whites. No matter what Jews do, they are right. If Jews got too much power and privilege, it must be blamed on whites as 'white privilege'. Jews can use media to criticize, condemn, and lambaste White Christians, Russians, Iranians, Chinese, Turks, French, Germans, Anglos, and etc., but no matter what Jews do — spread wars, financially loot the world, mess with elections, spread degeneracy, promote drug culture, and etc. — , you better NOT name the JEW in the abuse of power, corruption, and decrepitude. Even now, many in the US don't know that it was the Jewish oligarchs who raped Russia in the 1990s. (Indeed, even Russian leaders are afraid of speaking this truth.) Even now, most Americans don't know that these crazy wars were essentially Wars for Israel.
This is why Jewish Power is infinitely more dangerous than Anglo-American power of old. Wasps could be jerks, a**holes, stinkers, and lowlifes, but you could call out on them. And many groups did. Jews, Italian-Americans, Irish-Americans, black-Americans, and etc. all called out on Wasp Power and, as such, pressured Wasps to mend their ways. But with Jews, it's impossible. It may partly be because Jews feel more anxiety and paranoia as a minority elite, but it's also a matter of personality. Jerry Nadler is a rather typical personality type among Jews. You see it in Abe Foxman and Neumann(on SEINFELD) as well. It's a vileness, viciousness, mendacity, and obnoxiousness beyond human imagination. All combined with utter shamelessness, the kind that led Ron Jeremy to suck his own dic*.


You see this personality type in Sarah Silverman and Howard Stern as well, but at least certain Jewish comedians, like Don Rickles, had the saving grace of brazen Jewish irascibility, which at least dropped all inhibitions and said it like it is, as with Mel Brooks. But when Jews like Nadler go into moralistic mode, it is beyond repulsive because they lack the requisite character for speaking about truth and justice. Howard Stern being trashy and vulgar in his shamelessness is one thing, but when loathsome Jews like Anthony Weiner, Jerry Nadler, and Adam Schiff pretend to be the moral arbiters of US politics, it's total pukesville, all the more so because they have no qualms about promoting Jewish Supremacist wars all over the Middle East.

So, it's about time to expose the real power behind the Wizard of Globoz. It's Jewish Power. All these Antifa and BLM riots are part of the Jewish War on White. Now, most Antifa and BLM clowns surely don't know that they are tools of Jewish Power. They really believe they are on the right side of history. But who made them feel such cartoonish emotions that reduces the world into a comic book of heroes and villains, angels and demons? Who financed stuff like GREEN BOOK and other movies that ONLY focus on white moral failings or white bigotry while presenting blacks as the flawless breed? Who were behind PC education that sanctified Jews, blacks, and homos as angels while whites were scapegoated for all that is wrong? Who funds groups like Antifa and provides lawfare to free them after new rounds of vandalism? Who controls the media that gives gushing coverage to BLM mayhem and Antifa thuggery? Who created all those TV shows and devised public education that made so many whites into sappy, silly, and stupid cucks who kneel at the feet of Negro thugs and cheer on Antifa vandals & hoodlums? Who pushed Russia Collusion Hoax? Sure, Deep State did it, but who gave the go-ahead? And regardless of how serious Covid is or isn't, who politicized it to shut down the whole economy to bring down Donald Trump and to send a message to the whole nation, "If you re-elect Trump, we will mess up the economy for all of you!!"? It's JSP or Jewish Supremacist Power. (Indeed, if Hillary were president, all these panics and hysteria would have been kept under lid by Jewish Power. Though Trump is a shill of Zion, the mere perception of him as a tough-talking white guy with balls has been sufficient for Jews to smear him and humiliate him to send a loud-and-clear message that whites deserve no identity and must only kneel as cucky-wucks. Once again, Trump was caught in a vice. If he took hard action, he would be blasted as a 'fascist tyrant' by the deep state and Jewish-run Media. If he did little or nothing, he would look weak and his tough-guy exterior would be exposed for its utter hollowness.)

Trace the puppet-strings to the puppet-master, and this is yet another Jewish War on White. But idiot white MAGA-tards will cheer Trump as he declares West Bank as part of Israel. Jewish Power defames and destroys whites, but whites just can't cuck enough before the holy holocaust Judeo-Nazis. Indeed, what is the #1 rule of American Politics? Thou Shalt Not Offend Jews. Why did GOP cuck to 'gay marriage'? Main reason was it was afraid to offend Jews who wanted it. Why haven't Trump and Barr taken serious measures against Big Tech monopoly and Antifa thuggery? Because Jews would be very displeased.
Incredibly, Jews who practice apartheid and enforce Jim Crowitz policies in West Bank are lecturing White Southerners about the evils of 'racism' and the bad ole Jim Crow days. Even as Neocons call for the erasure of Southern Heritage, they call on Southern Whites to support Zionist tyranny over Palestinians. The truly sickening thing is whites fall for this Every Single Time.

If in recent years, blacks have reason to be pissed, it's because globalists pushed mass immigration that led to more competitive pressures on blacks. Also, it was urban 'liberal' Democrats and their homo allies who spearheaded gentrification that removed many blacks from big cities. And if blacks got incarcerated at higher numbers, it was because the New Democrats under Bill Clinton decided to get tough on crime. And in overwhelmingly 'liberal' cities like NY, the voters elected Rudy Giuliani twice and Michael Bloomberg three times to bring down crime, mostly black. And Jews also used globo-homo to push black issues to the back of the bus. And US police was trained with Israeli strong-arm tactics under the auspices of ADL and other Jewish groups. And it was the Jewish-run music industry that promoted and spread gangsta rap that encouraged blacks to murder each other. But now, these Jews and so-called 'progressives' try to pin all the racial problems regarding blacks on Trump and his voters. And so many whites are so cucked that they fall for this slime tactic and get on their knees. It's beyond pathetic. And it goes to show that Jewish Power is utterly shameless in its sham moral pornographics to push any narrative, no matter how false and ludicrous, to get what it wants.

Unless whites call for White Liberation from Jewish Supremacism and side with Palestinians and wave the Palestinian Flag(if Confederate Flag is banned), they have no hope. Whites can bitch about Antifa, BLM, crime, and diversity, but if they don't Name the Jew, it'd be like a cancer patient and his doctor discussing all the symptoms of cancer without ever naming the cancer. Such a doctor is useless, and such a patient is sure to die. If there's a dead rat stinking up the house, find the decaying rat. No amount of removing objects from the house will deal with the smell. And air sprays and opening the windows will only be temporary fixes. You must find the dead rotting rat.

Also, anyone who still uses the term 'racist' as an epithet is part of the problem. It doesn't matter how 'based' you are. Using the term 'racist' to mean the worst of all evils is to give into the terms of the enemy. The fact is Ism means belief, and race + ism should mean belief in the reality of race and racial differences. Thus, yes, America is race-ist because races exist and the races are different. Blacks do what they do because they are more muscular and more aggressive. That is a race-ist truth, and it has to be addressed honestly. Against lies, only truth is the real weapon.

****************************

In a way, the current lunacy has blown the Cult of Diversity out of the water.We’ve been told on and on about the wonders of Diversity, but most groups in the US don’t matter. Blacks and Antifa have harmed so many groups, but there is total silence about their plight from both 'left' and 'right'.

In the US, only Jews, blacks, and homo matter. PC is really about Tri-versity than Diversity.
It’s been said the US has so many ethnic and national groups who should be appreciated and celebrated, but no one cares about them. They are all just extras, backdrop, or at best supporting actors in the National Drama hogged by Jews, blacks, and homos. But then, why shouldn't it be so? After all, what is post-war Americanism but an amnesia-ism(with no memory of ‘boring’ histories and cultures) and idol-worship of winners and contempt for losers. Such is the logic of late-stage consumer-capitalism. Sure, there’s the usual rigamarole about equal opportunity, but the dog-eat-dog competition produces just a handful of big winners. Jews win in finance, verbal IQ, and high tech. Homos win in fashion and celebrity. Blacks win in sports and pop music.
And so, according to the logic of Cultural Capitalism, only those three winner-groups matter, and the rest are just backdrop. Whites do win in the beauty department, but as whites are denied identity and autonomy, white beauty is now seen as a commodity that belongs to others. In other words, white women belong to Jewish men and Negro men, and white guys belong to immigrant women of all stripes. The idea of whiteness belonging to whites is anathema. (Still, it’s weird that in a world that denies whiteness as an identity and quality, most peoples everywhere still notice whiteness as most appealing and gravitate toward it via immigration or fantasy.)

So, it’s time to talk of the Triversity than Diversity. Here’s some proof. This Iranian man’s livelihood has been destroyed, but no one cares. Why should they? He’s part of Diversity, not Triversity(of Jews, homos, and blacks).

I’m in Minneapolis. First place I stop, most of the block is still boarded up. This grocery and tobacco store is owned by an Iranian, neighbor tells me. “They took everything.” Owner is deliberating whether to permanently close after the riots pic.twitter.com/RzgNrbeogv

— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) June 28, 2020

The Crisis of Power and Moral Authority in the West? What is to be done when Whites got the Power but No Moral Authority while Blacks got the Moral Authority but No Power?

The two kinds of power. Power-as-means-of-force. Power as moral authority. Ideally, the existing Power has both. It controls the apparatus of violence, which is 'inherent' in any system. After all, there has to be the threat of force, coercion, or violence in case people, especially criminals and radicals, get out of hand. Ideal power would also possess moral authority, and most people would look upon the Power as just, valid, and legitimate.

If there is only power-as-means-of-force, the system can be maintained but only by brutal repression and/or bread-and-circus mass-bribery(which is costly and effective only for the duration of good times). The right-wing militarist regimes that ruled with 'death squads' in Central America had the power of means(especially with the backing of the US), but they lacked moral authority. Same could be said of the Shah of Iran. He had the ruthless means of keeping power by brutality and mass torture. He also had the backing of the US, and there was economic growth that pacified a sector of the population. But most Iranians saw him as illegitimate, and he got no respect.

In contrast, the Castroite Regime of Cuba had, at least for a time(and perhaps even now to some degree), the combination of the means of force and moral authority. It not only set up a ruthless system of control but came to power with the mandate of the people who welcomed the revolution as national liberation from a puppet tyrant backed by the CIA and the Mafia. During the Cold War, massive Soviet support made life in Cuba better than in most Latin American nations. There was less freedom, but many Cubans accepted it as the cost for independence from Yanqui Imperialismo.

Now, from the perspective of moral reasoning, what may be deemed morally justified in a particular time and place may not pass muster. We may say communism is a bad idea and a dead end, and History has indeed passed such judgement on the ideology. And we may look upon the Iranian Revolution of 1979 as ultimately tragic because it led to theocratic tyranny. Still, even if a bad(or even evil) system comes to power, it may be regarded as morally legitimate to the people of the time and place. This was certainly true among many Germans who, at least before things began to go south during World War II, regarded Adolf Hitler's regime as justified, indeed the savior of the German volk, nation, and honor. And plenty of Chinese, despite the horrors of the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, have continued to regard the CCP as the legitimate authority in China. And for all his brutality and violence, Stalin had plenty of admirers in the USSR when he was alive(and even after his death).
Moral authority can derive from various sources or reasons. It could be that the new power is a marked improvement over the earlier one. For many Germans, things were much better in National Socialist Germany than in Weimar Germany. Many Russians feel that things got much better under Vladimir Putin than when Russia was ruled by Jewish globalist oligarchs and their stooge Boris Yeltsin. (The Putin legitimacy cannot be understood apart from the hellish 1990s.) But moral authority could also be the product of mass propaganda. Mao Zedong remained legitimate in China despite the massive failure of the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution because CCP controlled all media and education. Even if Mao made things worse, the young ones were only taught one thing, and everyone got the news from a single source. So, moral authority isn't the same as true morality. In a system, the majority of people can support a cult of immorality as having moral authority while condemning true morality as the work of the Devil. We have that in the US, where so many people, even 'conservatives', now support 'gay marriage' and worship globo-homo-mania while howling with rage at defenders of true marriage and sanity on sexual reality.

If some systems have the power-as-means-of-force but lack moral authority, some groups have the power of moral authority but lack the means of force. In time, the latter can struggle to gain hard power and triumph. In Iran, the revolutionaries gained moral authority among the people, and mass unrest eventually led to Shah's dethronement and the rise of the Ayatollahs in government. In Vietnam, the national-communists who waved the Ho Chi Minh banner were legitimate in the eyes of many whereas the regime in the South was regarded as a puppet of US imperialism. Granted, plenty of Vietnamese didn't want to be ruled by the communists and would have preferred national independence/liberation minus the Leninism-Stalinism. But the southern regime was so lacking in authority and legitimacy that it failed to muster real support, the kind that might have led to a successful defense of the south. Eventually, the Vietnamese in the north, with more legitimacy and discipline, prevailed over the southern regime that could only maintain power with backing of US imperialism and bribery through bread-and-circuses(or rice-and-blackmarket) made possible by foreign cash infusions.

Speaking of the problems of power-as-means-of-force and power as moral authority, we are witnessing something surreal in the West. Even now in the US, Canada, Australia, and Europe, the power-as-means-of-force is still controlled mostly by whites. Look at most of the upper echelons in the military, government, law firms & courts, police departments, intelligence services, and the like, and most of the members are white(or Jewish). There are prominent non-whites, usually blacks, but they are mostly tokens presented to the public as the FACE of the power that is still mostly white in actual operation.
But the problem is, due to endless PC and anti-white propaganda, whites no longer have much in the way of moral authority. In some ways, they have something close to NEGATIVE moral authority; they might as well be the Devil Incarnate. When the Evil Race controls most of the power-as-means-of-force, the moral implication is they must give it up OR use their power ONLY to redeem their evil white selves or rectify the evil conditions resulting from 'white supremacy' or 'white privilege', i.e. whites must use power to negate white power. We saw in the recent riots the result of such thinking. White people-of-power had the material means to shut down the violence and restore order, but many of them thought that they, as Evil People, had no moral authority to use the power in such manner. (To be sure, the 'paralysis' was also cynical and calculated, a means for the Deep State to make Donald Trump look either too weak, impotent, and incapable to rule OR too tyrannical in calling on the military to restore order.) Initially, it seemed New York would be spared the worst of the rioting because Jews are just too powerful there, but the 'moral logic' spread there as well. Mayor Bill DeBlasio's shtick has been as an Apologetic and Atoning white man, i.e. since whites lack the power of moral authority, DeBlasio felt compelled to use his political authority in support of blacks and against whites(or anyone disregarded by blacks).

If whites got power-as-means-of-force but hardly any moral authority left, blacks don't have much in the way of power-as-means-of-force but have come to dominate power as moral authority. While there are plenty of blacks in government, military, and even in some police departments, most of the upper command structure is still dominated by whites(and of course, most elite blacks are in the pocket of Jewish oligarchs, as has been so obvious with the likes of Barack Obama and Susan Rice). During the Civil Rights Era, blacks gained moral authority over whites because of the Struggle-against-Oppression Narrative. But it was far from total moral authority or moral apotheosis; MLK was a controversial figure in the eyes of many, most Americans opposed race-mixing, and George Wallace found much popularity. But since then, the MLK cult has become the new religion. Nelson Mandela has been lionized as the second greatest man ever. Most American kids think the story of Harriet Tubman is 50% of US history. Hollywood gave us the Magic Negro in stuff like GREEN MILE. And as blacks are into ego-tripping self-worship, they've promoted nothing but themselves. Ironically, the rise of black nihilism also fed into black moral authority. After all, while one aspect of Americanism is the preening moralism — the City on the Hill vision — , the other is the cult of the winner and disdain for losers. People dream of coming to the US to win as Tony Montanas, not to be losers. So, even though most blacks in sports and pop culture have been demented, stupid, lecherous, immoral, or imbecile, the successes made blacks seem ultra-badass-cool in the American(and global) imagination. As Americanist winner-takes-all nihilism has infected the world, the black rapper and black athlete idolatry have made people the world over especially reverential about blackness. Indeed, the reason why the American Indians, though theoretically of even greater moral authority as the Ultimate Victims of American History, are neglected by Americans and the World is because they score low in the game of winner-takes-all nihilism that defines Americanism. In an Americanized world that prizes idolatry over humanism, nihilist points adds to moral authority. Blacks-as-thugs get more hugs.

We are now at the crossroads in history where whites still got most of the power-as-means-of-force but don't know what to do with it during times of crisis as they lack moral authority to act, especially against blacks who commit the most violence. And blacks got the most moral authority, but they are frustrated because they don't control the power-as-means-of-force. Why not? Blacks will say it's due to the history of 'racism', but it's due to black ineptitude, criminality, laziness, stupidity, and irresponsibility. After all, whether one has moral authority or not, the proper way to rise up the ladder of power-as-means-of-force is to master skills, finish school, gain credentials, and demonstrate ability & accountability. Many blacks utterly fail in this. So, even though whites are more than eager to hand over their illegitimate power to blacks who now hog moral authority, the process of power-transference is undermined by the fact that too many blacks remain unqualified to gain and hold any lever of power. The problem isn't White Discrimination but Black Incrimination. Black performance or behavior too often incriminates them as foolish, stupid, violent, inept, irresponsible, demented, and/or jive-ass.
At this juncture in history, many whites are more than willing to hand over power-as-means-of-force to non-whites, especially blacks. But the people they favor most, blacks, are least adept at working in the current system to gain the credentials to take the power from whites. Whites, as redemptive devil incarnate, are telling blacks, "Look we are worthless, and you blacks are holy. We don't deserve what we have, and it should all go to you. So, if you just finish school, act half-way decent and responsible, you can have my job and my status. You can marry my daughter and even do my wife. I will cuck before you and wash your feet and kiss your ass. Just finish college and earn the credentials, and everything I have is YOURS. Look how we made Obama the president simply because he smiled and said nice things." So, whites are willing to hand over all power to blacks as the true master race because blacks are deemed superior in body and soul. But every time whites try to hand over the silver platter, blacks knock it down and mess it all up. (Look what blacks have made of Zimbabwe and South Africa, but let's just pretend blacks are natural saints.)

This is all very confusing. It's further confused because whites claim to be in atonement mode but feel zero moral guilt about what they did to Palestinians and Arabs in their mindless support of Zionist supremacism. And blacks seem to be of two minds as well. On the one hand, blacks pretend to be allies with all the oppressed of the world against white supremacism and white privilege. At the same time, blacks seem most eager to take over the Power created by whites and act as the new imperialist masters of the world. After all, if blacks are truly appalled by supremacism, why don't they denounce blacks in the military? Aren't black military men participating in the US imperialist domination over other parts of the world? Aren't blacks taking part in the Zionist Wars that have killed so many Arabs and Muslims? Didn't Obama wreck entire nations? But blacks don't seem to be bothered by any of that AS LONG AS they perceive the US military as an empowerment vehicle for blacks. So, do blacks really want to resist and end the Power System created by whites or do they just want to take over as New Masters of it? Is supremacism okay with blacks as long as THEY get to dominate the power-as-means-of-force? Is black consciousness like that of Jews? We know from the Jewish Experience that Jewish criticism of Wasp Power wasn't to destroy the power itself but to take it over so that the US empire would be controlled by Jews. The very Jews who'd once denounced US militarism and imperialism in the 60s were later the biggest cheerleaders of US global power once their tribe was at the helm.

Indeed, how do Jews fit into the current crisis? Are Jews also white and lacking in moral authority? Or, as Holocaust Whites, are they exempt from the label of Whites-as-Devil-Incarnate? But what of New York Jews having employed heavy-handed white police to cut down on black crime? And what of Jews having urged white police across the US to take pointers from Israel in controlling the black criminal elements? As yet, Jews still have a lot of moral authority as the Shoah Narrative has been baked into the Western Consciousness, but when so much of Jewish Privilege seems like ultra-white-privilege to blacks and non-whites, how long can Jews sustain this? In the recent riots, Jews publicly sided with black rioters who've been granted moral authority to 'protest against racism', but they seem very nervous and uncomfortable because Jewish Urban Well-being owes so much to white policemen controlling the unruly blacks. Jews are mixing oil & water and getting violent reactions from the melting pot turned frying pan.

Again, moral authority isn't the same as true morality. That blacks got so much moral authority is absolutely scandalous. True, blacks were enslaved and faced discrimination through much of American History, but history is never static. It's ridiculous to regard blacks NOW on the basis of blacks THEN. It's like it'd be stupid to regard Chinese NOW on basis of how Chinese were 100 yrs ago. Back then, China was the Sick Man of Asia. Today, it is a rising or even risen power. Germanic Barbarians were once victims of Roman conquerors. Later, they were rulers over the Romans. And sometimes, history changes fast. Jews were on the ropes in Europe during World War II, but they are now rulers of the West. Also, black behavior owes more to evolution over 100,000 yrs than 200 yrs of slavery. Besides, black conditions in America were hardly all that oppressive by world/historical standards as most of human history has been about oppression, wars, empires, slavery, and etc. The real problem with blacks is they evolved to be the thug-hunter-warrior race. Blame evolution in Africa where black traits were selected for mastery in chucking spears at hippos and beating on bongo drums and shaking booty. That's why blacks succeed in sports and funky music while often failing with books and math.
So, black moral authority is really a joke(but then 'woke' is a joke, or joke that no one gets). It is more the product of Jewish propaganda, white gullibility, black megalomania, American nihilism, and Jungle Fever/Jungle Faith. Jews pushed black holiness to bait whites with 'white guilt', thereby making them subservient to Jews(as 'fellow victim' allies of blacks). In the post-Christian world, white imagination hungered for a new god, and the Magic Negro filled the void(along with globo-homo, it seems). Blacks just can't get enough of themselves, and the American Obsession with sports and pop music turned blacks into demi-gods. So many Americans look to Jay-Z and Ice-Cube's twitter feed for 'moral instruction' and 'spiritual guidance'. This is why even a lowlife moron like George Floyd, who died more from bad drugs than a white knee, is now suddenly bigger than even Michael Jackson.
But then, moral authority can even be held by the Devil, as homos and trannies have so well illustrated. Most people are incapable of moral reasoning, and their sense of good-and-evil really derives from manipulation of idolatry, iconography, and mantras. Just chant 'black lives matter' a bunch of times while envisioning George Floyd as some angel, and that's Moral Authority in the Current Year. Donald Trump says St. George is looking down upon us from heaven. More likely, an angel has a knee on the ghastly Negro's neck and is about to cast his stupid black ass down to hell.

In the past, whites had both power-as-means-of-force and much moral authority. Look back 100 yrs ago to 1920, and it was a proud white nation. Look back 50 yrs to 1970, and it was still a nation where whites had material power and moral power, though slipping. But now, the US is a Jewish-controlled world. Jewish Power is real as both means-of-force and moral authority. Jews do control most of the top institutions and many top industries. Jews not only hog Deep State power but use Antifa as paramilitary goon force to terrorize white patriots. Antifa is their 'Luca Brasi'.
Jews also have moral power as the Shoah People. But because Jews are nervous about being perceived as powerful, their power-as-means-of-force is mostly hidden. If Jews said, "We rule America with material power backed by moral authority", things would be somewhat less confusing. But while Jews make a big deal of their moral authority, they try to hide their actual means of power. As a result, many people are confused as to who really rules America. Jews rule America, but Jews say "White Privilege Rules America"(which would suggest American Power is illegitimate). Jewish Power is the uppermost of White Privilege, but Jews position themselves as allies of Diversity against White Privilege.
Now, things might be clearer if white goyim spelled it all out and said, "No, Jewish-White Privilege rules America, and we white goyim are now just cuck-collaborators of Jews who hold the supreme power. We whites do as Jews tell us to, like waging Wars for Israel, hating on Russia & Iran, supporting Zionist 'genocide' of Palestinians, and arresting more blacks to make cities safer for Jews and homos." But as whites who say such would be condemned of 'Antisemitism' and hounded out of their positions, whites just go on with the charade that THEY rule America while Jews are saintly allies of blacks and Diversity oppressed by White Privilege. But such a grand narrative means that the Existing Power System in the US is utterly lacking in moral legitimacy and undeserving of moral authority. If indeed US is ruled by White Privilege, then it is ruled by Evil because White Privilege is, as we've all been told over and over, an ill-gotten product of history of white supremacy.
Current Power would seem legitimate if Jews said they got the power since they do have moral authority(as the noble and tragic Shoah People). But Jews are too nervous about being blamed for all the problems IF they were to openly admit their dominant position in the US. After all, admission of power has a way of eroding moral authority as most people tend to blame those in power for whatever goes wrong. (Wasps admitted they ruled America, and guess what happened? They got blamed for everything and lost legitimacy.) It's like the Castroite regime in Cuba and the Ayatollahs in Iran began with lots of moral authority but much of the respect has eroded away over the years. So, if Jews want to maintain their identity as Holy Holocaust People in pristine condition, it's not wise to admit that they now have the power and, as such, are responsible for all that go wrong in the US and the world. (Netanyahu's arrogant style of "I rule the goyim" has undermined the moral authority of Zion in the eyes of the world.)

Anyway, whites are cucks of Jews, but the Jewish Narrative says White Privilege(of the goy kind mostly) rules America. The notion of 'white privilege' implies that the power held by whites is illegitimate. Then, the ONLY way to make the power legitimate is by handing it over to those with moral authority. Jews got the moral authority but don't want to admit they got the power. How about to homos? Jewish Media and Academia imbued homos with great deal of moral and 'spiritual' capital, and so many Americans now eagerly vote for any 'gay' candidate on grounds that homos got moral authority. And for awhile, it seemed homos would spearhead gentrification and make big cities safe of the Negro Criminal Menace. Also, as Obama belonged to Jews and homos, he spent most of his presidency pushing the Section 8 line, or More Gentrification. But then, Obama had to prove his street cred with blacks and dabbled with BLM, not knowing it would blow up big time. And then Donald Trump happened, and Jews got desperate with various means to unseat him. They tried the Russia Collusion hoax, the Ukraine Impeachment, the Covid Crisis, and then black riots. Riling up black rage was deemed especially necessary as Jews began to fear that Trumpism might make blacks think twice about supporting the Democratic Party that seemed more about globo-homo and immigration than conditions for blacks. If Trump offered more jobs to blacks, the Democrats could at least offer them free loot in the form of riots. But the riots are also blowing up in Jewish faces as blacks tend to be rather unruly and strike out in every direction, especially in blue cities. While Jews could handle homos like well-trained dogs, unleashing black rage is like letting pit-bulls run loose. You never quite know whom they will maul next. Homos march in parades, blacks loot in riots. Homos raise property values for yuppies, blacks drive down values and drive out businesses. (Another reason why the Democrats may be pandering more to blacks is that immigration decreased under Trump. Perhaps, Democrats hoped that MORE IMMIGRATION would eventually make black votes less essential to the Party. After all, California would be comfortably Democratic even without the black vote as all those yellows and browns vote Democratic. But if immigration continues to ebb, Democrats will have to shore up black votes.)

Still, we all got the memo: (1) Blacks got supreme moral authority and have the right to rule but don't rule. (2) Whites got no moral authority and don't deserve to rule but rule with all their ill-gotten white privilege. Then, what is to be done? Hand over power to blacks? But how many blacks are well-schooled and ready for such task? The Current West says the unruly blacks should rule over whites who have no right to rule but rule anyway due to legacy of 'racism', the greatest evil of all time in the whole universe, but it has no means of bringing about the necessary transference of power because whites continue to be better-credentialed while blacks continue to fail.
Besides, the Jews who really do rule choose to remain in the shadows while blaming White Privilege, thus spreading the impression that the West is ruled illegitimately by whites who are utterly lacking in moral authority. White apologetics makes for poor authority of power. Then, it's no wonder that Jews and whites were, for a time, so happy with globo-homo as the face of US power. For Jews, homos were useful and loyal proxies of Jewish Supremacist Power, and for deracinated and cucked whites, homo power seemed white-friendly and imbued with moral authority(in a world where decadence was the New Normal in righteousness). But there was something so shallow and hollow about homos(and then trannies) as the stalwart face of moral authority in the West, especially as so many homos were affluent and working so chummily with the Deep State, Las Vegas, Hollywood, and Wall Street. In time, it just seemed like a deviant form of White Privilege. It's so much more compelling to run with a narrative that involves slavery, whipping, lynchings, police brutality, and 'innocent' black men being killed in the streets by 'racism'. But how long will it take for blacks to earn the credentials and gain the skills to receive the power that is being handed to them on a silver platter by cucky-wuck whites?