The Dark Ramifications of Jews Controlling the Gods — Control of the Gods leads to Control of All Money & Power — Why Jews Have the Power to Control the Gods

As Jesus said, man doesn’t live on bread alone, whether bread means food or money.
People need to feel justified, good, and decent. Even the worst of us want to be seen as ‘respectable’, even righteous. The Corleones in THE GODFATHER don’t just kill and rake in profits but give to the church and do good work to burnish(and launder) their reputation.

Now, the operative morality in the business world isn’t one of personal conviction or true principles. Rather, it’s a status-based morality and quasi-spirituality. Most businessmen lack core morality or spiritual conviction to guide them. Indeed, men of true conviction are generally unfit for business that is about wheeling-dealing and handshakes. So, business morality flows not from deep personal conviction but from anxiety of reputation. How others regard you counts for more than how you feel from within. So, if BLM or Globo-Homo is the latest fad in the righteous sweepstakes, most businessmen will enthusiastically support it or go along with the least resistance. It’s like Democrats are loudly globo-homo and the Republicans keep their heads low as Jews made it the New Normal in the West to celebrate and revere homos and trannies as quasi-spiritual superiors.

If indeed the business world is without deep conviction and genuine principles, WHO determines their ethos and morality, their quasi-spirituality? Who controls the gods?
The control of gods leads to the control of all money.
Jews control the gods, and this is why even the richest goyim bow down to Jews and their favored icons. Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, and Jeff Bezos are stinking rich, but they don’t control the gods. Jews do, and Jews can destroy them overnight by accusing them of 'ungodliness', which these days means not being sufficiently deferential to Jews, blacks, and homos. If Buffett were denounced as ‘racist’, ‘antisemitic’, or ‘homophobic'(quasi-godly matters in our time), he would lose his partners, supporters, friends, and top employees who will go work for another firm that is ‘godly’ than ‘evil’. No matter how rich you are in the US, you better go with globo-homo, which is now a 'godly' matter. If you don’t, you can no longer be part of the game as a player. Jews understand the dynamics of 'sacronicity', the electronic idolization of what are currently deemed most holy-schmoly. If Jews determine what is 'sacronic', they control the empty deracinated neon-souls of the modern 'consumerian'.

While money = power, it is only a base kind of power. You can buy favors, services, and lots of things. You can hire people to do things. But it doesn’t mean you are good and justified. Money as money lacks sanctity. It’s like a rich guy can buy sex but can’t buy love. It's like a rich guy can buy a lot of toadies and flunkies but can't buy genuine friendship. He can buy fawning obedience but not real respect.

This is what libertarians don’t understand about capitalism and about themselves. They talk of liberty, individualism, and success, and those are good things, but a ‘spiritual’ sense of righteousness doesn’t arise from those qualities. Being successful means you’re better off, it doesn’t mean you’re on the side of angels, let alone the gods. Even Ayn Rand’s mythic cult of the individual failed in the creation of gods.
It is then no wonder that even libertarians worship the gods controlled by Jews. For all their talk of liberty and individuality over they years, they've feel empty without some sense of sanctity and righteousness that transcend issue of mere freedom. So, they glom onto globo-homo worship and MLK cult and even support ‘hate speech’ laws and monopolist suppression of freedom and liberty. Supporting free speech is just a matter of freedom, whereas suppressing 'hate speech' makes one feel self-righteous, on the side of the gods against the devils. And they dare not support BDS even though its suppression is a clear violation of the Constitution and libertarian principles. Soul-empty libertarians are so taken with the godly thrills of worshiping Jews and celebrating globo-homo that there is a limit to their commitment to their soulless freedom. Their quasi-spiritual worship of Jews is more emotionally satisfying than a rational commitment to liberty.

Capitalism can generate wealth but it cannot create gods. At most, it can create idols, mostly in the form of celebrities of music, entertainment, and sports. But even mere idolatry, as popular as it is, doesn’t come with righteousness. Compare Muhammad Ali and Mike Tyson. Both were top champions, but why did Ali get more respect? Not only was he more colorful and entertaining but became associated with spiritualized themes. He turned to Islam as his new conviction at a time when it was exciting for a black man to go in that direction. And as he came to prominence during the Civil Rights Era, he became a symbol of a righteous cause. And when he refused to serve in Vietnam over personal conviction, that too elevated in the radical era. In contrast, Mike Tyson was only about power and money, unassociated with anything higher than his self-aggrandizement. Ali would have been a popular idol without ‘godly’ matters, but they made him much more than a mere celebrity.

It’s then not surprising that so many black athletes got to ‘taking the knee’. As successful athletes, they got the money and the blings. But that only means fame and fortune, sensationalizing them but not elevating them. They want to be associated with something higher, the ‘godly’. This sacredness could be based on something legit or something bogus. It doesn’t matter as long as it has the approval of the current gods. Most celebrity idols and businessmen are shallow and don’t care about the truth. They care about reputation and what offers them instant joy of being on the side of angels. Still, they themselves don’t generate the gods and angels.

Who does? Obviously, those who construct/control the gods need money and the means. But they need something more. They need ambition, prophetic vision, ruthless megalomania, and the sheer will to control and dominate. The radical will. And Jews are tops in this. Why? Jewishness is built on a massive neurosis. There are three possible spiritual visions:

1. Every group has its god, and there are many groups, each with its own god. So, if there are 100 groups, there are 100 gods, with each group having special claim on its own god. This was how paganism worked. Greeks had their own gods but didn’t deny Egyptians or Hindus their own gods. This way is consistently particularist.

2. There is one God, and as there is only one, He belongs to all peoples, and all peoples are equally loved by Him. He favors no particular tribe and loves the good and righteous among all peoples. This is Christianity and Islam. This way is consistently universalist.

3. There is only one God, and for some reason, He favors one people over all others. This is an inconsistent combination of universalism and particularism. The only-one-God part is universalist, as He is the ruler of all. But then, it says this one and only God favors Jews over all others. So, Jews have an expansive imagination of God that claims mastery over all the world and all humans, BUT Jews insist God favors their tribe as special and deserving to rule over the inferior goyim.
This way makes Jews highly moralistic(as the Tribe that received the laws from God) but also emotionally stingy as they claim special relationship to the one and only God. Secular Jews replaced God with History or Self-worship. Notice how Jews incessantly pontificate about combating supremacism and related evils, but, at the end of the day, it all boils down to all non-Jews having to suck up to Jews as the master race(though masquerading as the forever victim race — the forever victim-master-race).

With such a radical will, it's no wonder Jews are so obsessed with controlling the ‘spirituality’ or the 'gods' of any society. Especially as they are well-represented in academia, media, history, the arts/entertainment, and advertising, they are powerfully positioned to create the narratives, idols, saints, angels, and passions that constitute the ‘gods’. So, while others are just making money, Jews create and control the gods. Jews promote them via Hollywood as the new secular vatican and the elite colleges as the new seminaries.

Unlike mere money-power that is base and crude, god-power feels holy and redeeming. And this means that once the gods take hold in the public imagination, even the richest goy must obey them as the new faith of the mob demands it. (But then, even before the 'gods' have spread to the mob-majority, there is tremendous pressure upon the elites to submit once the 'gods' have become 'canonical' in the uppermost realm. After all, elite vanity has less to do with approval from the mob than from one's peers and superiors. Also, as elites hold all the cards, it's understood that whatever the elites adopt will soon spread to the masses of sheeple as well. It's only a matter of time, like with mantras about 'diversity' and 'inclusion'.) Military men and mere rationalist thinkers don't create or control the gods. Notice how Jews create and control the gods of 'globo-homo', which has resulted in the US military men fighting for gods of sodomy and tranny-penis-cutting. Those with guns fight under the auspices of those with the 'holy' scepter. Mere historians don't control the gods either; if anything, most historians are mere scribes in service to the gods created by others, e.g. 'Muh Holocaust'. Controllers of the gods are those with the will and imagination to cobble together the stories, images, and emotions into overwhelming narratives for the mind, the heart, and the senses in communion. Jews wrote the Bible, and it proves they've long mastered the art of controlling the gods. They know how to combine ideas + stories + themes + emotions + passion + redemption + deliverance into Law & Lore. No wonder the Bible has come to be The Book, the Complete Volume, for countless peoples. In the modern era, the great Jewish dream(of vengeance) was to replace Christianity with something other, and Christianity has shown itself to be weak before the full assault of Jews with their new batch of 'gods'.

Also, as the 'gods' are holy, they are favored even over the principles of secular liberal democracy. As Jews are the holy holocaust people according to the gods, free speech must be sacrificed at the altar of Jewish Feelings, which are holy. Holy compulsion > Devilish liberty. And facts about black criminality must be ignored because MLK is god and blackness is holy. We can't hurt holy black feelings. So, even though blacks kill blacks and non-blacks, we must get on our knees and pretend innocent holy blacks are being targeted and destroyed by ‘systemic racism’. Even the life of a thug like George Floyd must be held more precious than all the lives killed by blacks. And as the gods say sodomy is holy, government buildings and businesses must fly the homo flag, and politicians must show up at ‘gay pride’ parades, OR ELSE! We are told we can't have God in school and the courts due to separation of church and state, but we must have the 'gods' in all of them. Though these 'gods' aren't technically part of a religion, they function in the same manner because 'sacrosanct' passions override secular facts and rights. (You can't have a honest and rational debate about matters that might offend and 'desecrate' the holy feelings of Jews, blacks, and homos.) And now, even churches fly globo-homo symbols and BLM ones too. As Jews control the gods, BLM and globo-homo are now holier than Christianity. Today, Christians feel they must justify their faith before the judgement of blacks and homos than insist that all-people-as-sinners justify their souls before God and Jesus. Christianity must prove itself worthy of blessing by homo vanity and black megalomania. The newly imagined god seeks approval from homos and blacks, not the other way around.

Jake Tapper can tweet as he did precisely because Jews control the gods. If Tapper were truly honest about ‘hate groups’, he should name ADL and AIPAC as the premier candidates as they pressure US whore-politicians into supporting terrorist and supremacist Israel that continues to occupy West Bank and mow down people in Gaza. ADL and AIPAC work to ensure that US politicians of both parties shall never criticize Israel but support more Wars for Zion regardless of the human cost.

The Jewish-run media are a hate organization because so much hatred is spewed against Russia, Iran, or any other nation that refuses to get on with the Jewish Globo-Homo program. But Tapper ignores all that and lists a bunch of 'white nationalist' groups. Like many other Jews, he is more offended by the white aspiration for agency and liberty from Jewish Supremacism than by Jewish Supremacism itself.
For Tapper, Jewish Supremacism is just the way of the world. Indeed, it isn’t supremacism because it’s only right that Jews should rule and be on top. It’s just the natural, spiritual, and righteous way of things as far as Tapper and his ilk are concerned. As Jews control the gods(and feel as gods themselves), why should they be troubled by their own supreme authority?

The way Jews see it, it is ‘supremacism’ only when an inferior people elevate themselves as better than others. It’s like it’s perfectly natural for God to feel above humanity. It’s natural, cosmic, and holy, not to be questioned. The problem occurs only when man dares to challenge God or decides to go his own way. According to God, mankind that challenges God(as in the story of the Tower of Babel) must be ruthlessly destroyed. But, man cannot humbly walk away from God either. Man can never be independent of God and must bow down before Him.

Jews feel the same way in relation to goyim, especially white goyim. Jews should be on top, and this is such a natural and spiritual law of the universe that it shouldn’t even count as supremacism. It is only right because Jews are holy and deserve adulation. Jews are supreme but not supremacist. Jewish supreme-ness is just the way of the world. It is a matter of 'is' than 'ism'. It's like humans are supreme over all animals not because they believe so but because they be so. So, Jewish supremacy mustn't be regarded as supremac-IST because it's not based on Jewish beliefs but Jewish knowledge of being superior, either God-given or natural. In contrast, when an inferior people dare to challenge the Jews, it is a case of supremacism because it is based on belief than on being. So, despite the reality of Jews BEING superior, the Nazis BELIEVED that they themselves were superior. BEING SUPERIOR > BELIEVING IN SUPERIORITY. That means anyone who challenges the Jews for supremacism must be crushed.

But what about whites who have no supremacist ambitions and just want to be left alone and independent of Jewish demands & meddling? No, that can’t be allowed either because goyim exist to serve Jews. It's just the natural way of the world. Inferior must serve the superior. Besides, how could the Jew World Order function without white agents, experts, and managers doing the bidding of Jews? It’d be like British trying to rule India without the collaboration of brown native elites and others. Gandhi’s civil disobedience showed the Brits couldn’t maintain order without the collaboration of the Indians themselves.

Anyway, in the Jewish mind, their own supremacism is never supremacism but just a spiritual fact: Jews are holy and should rule. And because Jews are the sun of humanity, the rest of mankind must never challenge Jewish power and also remain within the gravitational orbit of Jewish Power.
So, if whites show any sign of identity, agency, and territoriality, they are labeled as ‘supremacist’ even though their only desire is to stop sucking up to Jewish Supremacist Power and doing its bidding of wars, terror, and rapacity. It’s like the master in the uppermost stratum denigrating a slave as ‘uppity’ for looking up at him. Even though the master is in the upper realm, he tags the ‘uppity’ label on someone below merely looking up. So, when Jewish supremacists on top call whites ‘supremacist’, it’s just the master calling a slave ‘uppity’.

Human nature is essentially spiritual, and power is essentially theocratic, so when God is taken out of the institution, other/false gods are easily installed for inspiration. This is why secular education in time became quasi-spiritual and neo-theocratic. Education isn’t merely about skills and knowledge but about moral guidance, and in the absence of God and the difficulty of philosophy, there is the idolatry of the ‘woke’. What about rationality and critical thinking? The Power eventually comes to suppress secular criticality in favor of sacrosanct correctness. Wasp elites succumbed to the rise of Jewish Power because Jewish criticality was so incessant and relentless against Wasp-imposed correctness. Jews eventually gnawed at the legs of the wasp throne until it was toppled. But with Jews in control and with the imposition of their brand of Correctness, there is no other group to mount a culture war of unrelenting criticality. And why would Jews want a truly critical education when it may well lead to criticism of Jewish Power? So, Jews, who'd once championed secularism and the separation of Church and State, stuffed the new discourse with quasi-spirituality of gods of 'wokeness' and 'Muh Israel', both of which they control. Yes, Jews control the gods, and that is the biggest challenge in our time.

Jewish Power has used Toohey-ism in fusing Money Power and Morality Cult into Absolute Power — What Ellsworth Toohey of Ayn Rand's THE FOUNTAINHEAD tells us about the Nature of Power — Why Chinese Power will fail in the West: It's all Money Power without Moral Protection

It's been said the Chinese have invested heavily in the US, buying up all sorts of properties and spreading the cash around to people in various industries and politicians. They are doing what the Japanese did in the 1980s. And yet, we see the weakness of this approach, the over-reliance of money without gaining power over the morality, or moral narrative. It reminds us of the power dynamics in THE FOUNTAINHEAD. Gail Wynand is the tycoon while mid-cult Ellsworth Toohey isn't stinking rich. And yet, Toohey gains the upperhand against Wynand because he has cornered the market on public morality and opinion.

This is why Jews were smart to push the Holocaust Narrative to prevent any moral criticism/condemnation of Jewish behavior. By spiritualizing the historical tragedy of Jews as a world-shaking event, the greatest evil in history that transformed every Jew into a little christ and every critic of Jews into an 'anti-Semite' or 'nazi', Jews made it nearly impossible to criticize Jewish Power. Money Power goes a long way, but it's a double-edged sword. While money can buy influence, it also naturally attracts criticism as the People like to blame the rich, privileged, and powerful. Thus, Money Power is a disadvantage as well an advantage. Moral Power, on the other hand, can be righteous and shielded from criticism but, without the backing of money, can only go so far. But money combined with morality is formidable. Even though Ellsworth Toohey in THE FOUNTAINHEAD isn't himself stinking rich, he has created a name for himself as the voice of 'public conscience', built up a loyal cult-like following, and formed networks with oligarchs all over the city. So, even when Gail Wynand fires him, others at the newspaper follow him than continue to work for Wynand. And Toohey joins forces with Wynand's competitors. Wynand the tycoon was about buying people left and right. It was only about the money. In contrast, Toohey, though a power-hungry operator, was always careful to wrap his words with concern for public morality, decency, justice, and etc. Initially, he did this under Wynand who assumed that Toohey was just a whore who said whatever to please his boss. Actually, Toohey, though acting the flunky of Wynand, was building up his own cult, his own army of devotees, and taking control of public opinion. While his loyalty to Wynand was based on money, the loyalty of those under him was based on fanaticism and his cult of personality. His minions regarded him as the voice of decency, justice, morality, and truth. Though a cold-blooded Machiavellian who resents the power of originality and brilliance(as truly great individuals would see right through his BS), he honed his skills as a public intellectual and moralist. He created an image of himself as a man deeply committed to the public good.

Jews gained power as Wynands of the world, but they also played Toohey, or Joohey. They cleverly used the Holocaust Narrative as a global cult that got so many people, especially in the West, feeling that NO PEOPLE suffered as much as Jews. And on that basis, there must be something wrong, wicked, evil, and irrational about disliking Jews. Only pathological nuts like the Nazis could possibly hate and murder Jews. Therefore, ANY expression that is critical of Jews must be sick, demented, dark, and irrational. If Wynand and Toohey became enemies(until Wynand finally caved and became a 'spiritual' slave of Toohey despite his own riches), the Jewish Wynand and Jewish Toohey worked hand in glove to use Money Power and Morality Cult to gain near-total control of the US and the West. Indeed, what with all this BLM nonsense, we can see how the Power of Money often feels intimidated by the Cult of Morality. Cult of Morality doesn't have to be real morality. It could be sham-morality, utterly false, and even downright evil. While there is true morality, the fact is anything can be 'moralized', especially as, for most people, emotional and sensory manipulation often overrides moral reasoning. Thus, falsehood or evil can be moralized by any side. Ruthless men can invoke God and Jesus to justify wars for gold. Scum rulers can invoke Patriotism to justify imperialist wars. Adolf Hitler could iconize the Aryan Myth to justify wars. Mao Zedong could stir up the social justice of class struggle to unleash demonic energies. Neocons could scaremonger about the threat of terrorism to invade and destroy nations that had nothing to do with 9/11. Madeleine Albright could claim it's 'worth it' to kill 500,000 Arab children as a lesser evil than letting Hussein's Iraq return to normal. Moralize wars for Israel into sham talk of international ethics. And how many evil deeds have been justified on account of spreading 'liberal democracy'?


Still, there's a difference between right-and-wrong and holy-and-unholy. At the very least, right-and-wrong issues can be debated. For instance, one may be deemed wrong for opposing 'war on terror' foreign policy but isn't necessarily deemed evil. In contrast, on matters that are holy, it is deemed downright unholy and evil to say or act in ways that seem to go against its spirit. For instance, MLK isn't a matter for debate. He is now bigger than god and jesus, and any rational discussion of the man is not possible. You are either on the side of angels or with the devil. Same goes for Jews whose main identification is not with religion or heritage but with the Shoah. As such, to be anti-Jewish means you're a 'nazi' who wants to gas Jews. You can only be evil to be anti-Jewish or even anti-Zionist as the combo of Jewish Money Power and Jewish Morality Cult now insists that to be anti-Israel is tantamount to being 'antisemitic'. Thus, Jewish power/money is shielded. Generations of people in the West were raised with official dogma associating Jews with the Holy Holocaust. For most of Christo-European history, goyim felt moral/spirituality over Jews on the basis that, (1) whereas goyim did real work(like grow food and make things), Jews made their fortunes with usury and other parasitic practices and (2) whereas goyim worshiped Jesus as Son of God, Jews were unrepentant of having killed the Messiah and refusing to convert to the universal faith. So, no matter how rich Jews became and used their money to buy favors & influence, the goyim(elites and masses) felt free to criticize and even condemn Jews. But it began to change with the rise of the Holocaust Cult. Just when the power of religion was waning big time all over the West, Jewish Money Power did all it could to push the Holocaust as the new faith. But Jews didn't end there but also pushed White Guilt about blacks. Thus, whites were doubly paralyzed from the moral standpoint. They needed to atone forever for Holocaust and Slavery — never mind that genocides and slavery were nothing new in history. Though Ellsworth Toohey is the villain of THE FOUNTAINHEAD, he is the most useful and instructive figure on the art/science of real power in the world. While Howard Roark is a shining ideal that can only exist in fiction, the Tooheys of the world do amass tremendous power in the world. Just like the rich and powerful through European history had to seek approval of the Church on moral and spiritual matters, the rich and powerful today must 'take the knee' to the dominant Narrative that often originates from media and academia, the hives of Tooheys. Robin DiAngelo's WHITE FRAGILITY is the latest example of Tooheyism. It's nonsense but promoted as the New Morality. People like Amy Harmon also serve as the new tooheys. They are not after the truth but push the Narrative by moralizing endlessly about 'racism' and 'white supremacism', the equivalent of 'bourgeois' in communist nations. (Even when BLM and Antifa thugs burn down cities, city leaders often blame 'white supremacists', which is blaming witches for whatever goes wrong.)

Chick-Fil-A owner washes the feet of an amused Negro as holy saint

Now, Tooheyism isn't about total domination of Morality Cult over Money Power. After all, Toohey couldn't have done much if he didn't have the backing of other oligarchs and bigshots when Wynand canned him. Rather, Tooheyism is the compromise between Money Power and Morality Cult whereby the money flows to the moralizers in exchange for the moralizers devising the rules so that those doling out the money will be spared the brunt of the abuse. It's a way of buying indulgences like in the old Catholic days. Indeed, consider the Tooheic contract between Big Capital and 'Progressivism' in the creation of 'woke capital'. As Big Capital supplies the Money, the Progs have replaced class conflict with Ass Politics of globo-homo, something that Big Business can embrace as homos tend to be vain, narcissistic, and oh-so-cozy with the rich & famous. Replacing Mayday with Gayday was a huge boon for Big Capital. But then, the Old Church played similar games. They rather spent more time denouncing the poor and the wretched while sucking up to the rich and powerful. The rich provided the funds for the clergy, and the clergy, even though committed to a religion that spoke of the virtues of the meek and poor, favored the rich and went easy on them. It's no wonder why so many of the poor in Russia felt no particular sadness when the revolutionaries who burned down churches. They could recall Orthodox priests admonishing the poor and wretched to stop complaining and accept their lot in life while catering to the rich and powerful who wallowed in luxury and ate like pigs. In current America, the Mainline churches are just globo-homo centers catering to the elites, and the major Evangelical churches are dominated by disgusting fatsos who whore themselves out to Neocons and Zion. Tooheyism is alive and well.
Some say BLM is like a new religion, and it's certainly useful for big corporations. Since blacks have the cool factor as rappers & athletes and carry the aura of nobility in association with MLK & Civil Rights Movement, it is so easy for crass profit-oriented corporations to burnishing their image by invoking BLM symbolism. Nike is a cutthroat company that exploits cheap labor abroad, and what an easy way to 'moralize' its image by paying big bucks to the likes of Colin Kaepernick. And of course, the people who take the money from Big Capital get the message and focus their ire than anything but their sugardaddies. Antifa is purportedly communist, but its main obsessions are globo-homo and tranny-stuff, both favored by Big Capital as replacement for themes of class struggle. And instead of attacking Big Capital, Antifa leaders direct the rage of their drug-addled minions toward attacking Trump supporters, white Americans, and patriots.

This is why the Chinese are foolish. They think they will gain more power and influence in the West by throwing more money around. But paradoxically, the more money they spend to gain influence, the less power they will have at the end of the day. Because there is no moral taboo against China-bashing, the increase of Chinese influence-buying-and-peddling will simply provide more ammo to the China-bashers. Same happened with Japan in the 1980s. As there was no taboo against Japan-bashing, the more money Japan poured into the US, the more the media and various talking heads warned of the Japan menace. "The Japs are buying everything." Ironically, the Jewish media treated Japanese Power like Christian Goyim used to regard Jewish Power: All Money and No Morality. Because Jews experienced this, they were careful to morally launder their money power in the post-war period. Jews did it by pretending to push socialism against greedy capitalism. Thus, even though Jewish power was growing by leaps and bounds through capitalism, there was the impression that Jews were mostly socialist and committed to 'equality' than to greed. Also, they pushed Western/White Guilt via Holocaust Cult and Slavery Narrative. Jews mastered a Tooheic method of fusing Money and Morality to gain near-absolute power over the West. Jews even sham-'moralized' homosexuality and tranny-stuff into something next to godliness. Again, anything can be 'moralized'. And anything can be 'immoralized'. Wickedness can be 'moralized', as 'gay marriage' was by the power of TV shows and news/education as propaganda. And virtue can be 'immoralized'. Christian bakers who would rather face financial ruin than bake cakes to honor satanism have been vilified as 'homophobic' and 'bigots'. And women who insist on biological womanhood and believe trannies are not real women are denounced as 'transphobic' TERFS. Most people respond to the sensory-manipulative idolatry and emotional manipulation of propaganda than rely on truth and moral reasoning.

This is why China will lose everything in the end in the West. The more money they pour into the US and the West, the louder will be the outcry that the 'Chicoms' are taking over and buying up everything. Money Power without Moral Protection is vulnerable. After all, one can attack George Soros as a billionaire but NOT as a Jew. One can denounce the abstract 1% but not the tribal 2%(the Jews). If Chinese really wanted to gain greater foothold in the West, they should have found Tooheic ways to promote Western/White Guilt about the history between East and West. The history of imperialism, Opium Wars, West's partnership with Japan in carving up China, and US neo-imperialist wars in Asia. And the sad story of Chinese railroad workers in US and Canada. Whether such guilt-tripping would have worked or not, it is foolish for China to invest big money in the West without moral protection. China-bashers can have a field day with 'Communist China is buying up America' narrative, and the ruling elites can cook up some 'human rights' excuse to freeze and grab all of Chinese assets in the West and renege on all debts. It goes to show that the Chinese are still amateurs when it comes to the psychological dynamics of power.