Response to "When Hollywood Rode Right: American Western Cinema as an Expression of Older Virtues" by Boyd Cathey — Dilemma of Gun & Morality in the Western — Can the Good Guy be Honorable and Win?

When Hollywood Rode Right:American Western Cinema as an Expression of Older Virtues - https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/when-hollywood-rode-right/

Indeed, most of Hollywood’s leading Western and cowboy actors have been politically conservative, and quite a few have been Southerners.

But actors serve the story, and a good number of writers for Westerns were Liberals and even Leftists. Gary Cooper may have been conservative, but his role in HIGH NOON was written by Liberals. Not uncommonly, the directors were conservative but the writers were leftist. Unless the director is 'auteur' enough to rework the material, he will be realizing the vision of his ideological opposite. Of course, the ideology was only implied in many such Westerns. A story of white injustice against the Indians could be a sly dig at the mistreatment of blacks.

Also, we need to keep in mind that, as Paul Gottfried noted, leftism in them days was not what goes by its name these days. Leftists back then dealt with real issues. Maybe their solutions were misguided or misconceived, but they addressed real world problems faced by real people.

Today, most of what goes by 'leftism' is mindless capitalist celebration of globo-homo vanity, which has NOTHING to do with classic leftism. Globo-Homo, like much of what falls into the category of 'wokeness', is about neo-aristo egomania of narcissistic homos and even trannies. It is also a proxy of ultra-rightist Jewish Supremacism. Jews seek to kill two birds with one stone: Kill both classic leftism and white pride. Jews now hate classic leftism that strove for equal justice for all. Jews don't want equal treatment for Palestinians and white goyim. Jews want to lord over them as cattle. So, Jews have no use for classic leftism, which also happens to be anti-capitalist. Why would Jews want radical socialism when they got the most money?
One may say there's a strain of leftism in BLM & 1619 because blacks are socio-economically poorer, therefore 'equity' is about making things fairer or more equal between blacks and whites(and non-blacks). But this too is bogus. BLM is about ultra-right black supremacism. It's about howling about injustice even when some lowlife black thug is justifiably killed by the police while all the hapless victims of black thugs are totally ignored by the media. There is no equal justice in BLM. It's about blacks being given carte blanche to do as they please. Blacks can carry out massive pogroms and burn down cities and loot, but BLM tells us to pretend it's not happening(or to be justified as 'social revolution'). And even though there's all this hair-pulling about black under-representation in various fields, it's perfectly fine for blacks to be over-represented in pop music, sports, and government jobs.

BLM got so much traction because ultra-right Jewish supremacists find blacks useful to guilt-bait whites. That's it. If Jews really cared about equal justice for all, why do they shut down BDS? If anything, what Palestinians face in West Bank is 1000x worse than what blacks face in the US. If anything, blacks are the one who prey on non-blacks. And, virtually every black killed by the police deserved to die as they not only resisted arrest but did so violently. Like black-on-white violence is tolerated and even justified, US power looks the other way while Zionist settler-invaders continue to take land from Palestinians in West Bank. And IDF, the Israel Death Squad, is given leeway to mow Palestinians down like animals.

So, how about dropping the BS of calling the other side the 'left'? Firstly, today's 'left' isn't the real left. Furthermore, the left did its share of creating the Modern West. After all, the default position of civilizations throughout history was conservatism, i.e. to preserve the existing power system. Then, what set the West apart from the Rest. Unlike the Rest that was mired only in conservatism, the West broke free with a new spirit of progress, change, and even revolution(at times). These energies, growing in the West from the Renaissance onward, culminated in the French Revolution where leftism got overly radical and bloody. The lesson from the whole affair was one cannot change the world overnight, as Edmund Burke explained. Burke, by the way, was a gradualist liberal, not a conservative. He only seemed conservative relative to the hot-blooded French radicals. He was actually on the side of change and progress.
This is what set the West from the Rest that only knew conservatism. Now, there is great value in conservatism because civilization, even in 'liberal democracies', must be 90% conservative in its daily operations. Even if a society is open to new things, most of what it does must be familiar and established. When you order a hamburger, you don't want to be served an experiment every time. Also, there is a great heritage in the conservation of arts, culture, philosophy, history, and spirituality. Non-Western history is proof that the concept of progress and revolution aren't integral to the rise of great civilizations. Persia, India, China, and etc. were great civilizations without the cult of progress or revolutionary fire. But it was Western Modernity that brought mankind to new heights and even sent men to the Moon, and that adventurous spirit of curiosity and daring couldn't have come from conservatism alone.

And the Western genre's appeal is as much liberal as conservative. There is surely the timeless themes of heroism and good vs evil, but there is also the thrill of breaking free, being adventurous, taking risks, and trying new things in a new land. The conservative person is more likely to stick close to home, with familiar sights and sounds. The liberal person is more likely to venture to new places, even if it means never seeing home again, which is largely the story of American Immigration. How many Americans have gone back to visit their ancestral homelands?

The very nature of the Western sub-genre has had a significant influence in attracting certain types of actors to it. Westerns traditionally expressed the purest form of “good vs. evil.” Even in the more conflicted, morally blurred years of the later 1960s and 1970s, the few Westerns that were made seemed to never lose sight of that essential conflict.

Most Westerns are not about good vs evil. That would be THE EXORCIST where noble priests battle the Devil that makes a girl masturbate and puke too much. The Southern is also about good vs evil: Rednecks are totally evil, Negroes are totally good. Certain war movies, especially with Nazis, are about good vs evil. The Germans weren't always featured as monsters in movies like THE YOUNG LIONS, ENEMY BELOW, PATTON, and CROSS OF IRON, but they increasingly became Evil Incarnate as Jewish Power grew more confident in Hollywood.

The Western would lose part of its appeal if it were about Good vs Evil. For the Western to work, the good guys need rough edges, and the bad guys must have some appeal, if only to tempt us — after all, the outlaw embodies the freedom of the Wild West more than the lawman does; indeed, many Westerns are about the lawman figuratively killing himself by killing the outlaw, the death of whom no longer requires the lawman's tough guy ways.
For the Western to really work, good guys mustn't be goody-two-shoes, and bad guys must have a certain 'bad boy' allure — it's like how Leonard DiCaprio's role as heavy in ONCE UPON A TIME... IN HOLLYWOOD spices up the TV Western episode. So, even though Jack Palance casts a dark shadow in SHANE, he sure is magnificent. And James Stewart in Anthony Mann Westerns is a troubled figure. And Budd Boetticher's Westerns have the Randolph Scott character partnering for long stretches with questionable types who we aren't sure will turn out 'good' or 'bad', a kind of existential element to take shape in the journey. Shane is as much fighting his inner demons as the ranchers; he too was a hired killer. And THE SEARCHERS is riveting not only for its action-adventure but the inner turmoil of Ethan(John Wayne).

Still, many Westerns are indeed about Good Guys vs Bad Guys, and it's almost always about the Good prevailing over the Bad. However, this poses a moral dilemma for the genre. The triumph of the Good over the Bad in the Western is decided by a Single Factor: Which side has more guns and/or which side has the quicker draw. It's a matter of skill and luck, but where's the guarantee that the Good will always be better with the gun than the Bad? After all, chance is 50/50, heads half the time, tails half the time. So, logic would dictate that the Bad would win at least half the time in the Western.
But the Good or the Better almost always wins. It's as if the Good plays with a loaded dice or has an Ace up its sleeve. It has to be 'cheating' in the game of chance. We must believe that chance favors the Good like some cosmic force looking out for Forrest Gump(or Simple Jack) because he is so very good.

But, that's a childish fantasy like Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy. If anything, the Bad should have the edge because bad types are more likely to gained experience with guns. Also, the good has more on its mind. It's like conscience sometimes gets in the way of Superman in Part II against the villains who have zero inhibitions in their fight. And, even if the Bad Guy loses, it's not the end of the world for badness because anarchy and chaos are the natural state of the world. Badness will always threaten society. But if the Good Guy loses, it feels like the End of the World because most good folks are rather timid and cowardly; they are more like herbivores than carnivores. So, if the tough Good Guy falls to the tough Bad Guys, most good folks will be like sheep without the sheep dog to protect them from wolves and coyotes. Bad is bold and aggressive. But goodness is mostly peaceable and wimpy, and it is the rare person who is both Good and Tough. So, the loss of the Good Tough guy is incalculable.

And yet, in all these Westerns, the Good almost always wins over the Bad. The Western is about tough guys, wilderness, and frontier, but it pushes a reassuring morality fairytale where
the Good will somehow come out on top because, for reasons unknown, it reliably manages to outdraw the Bad in the final showdown.

But then, how reassuring is a moral universe where good vs bad is decided by trigger fingers? Imagine if the fate of social morality, good or bad, hanged in the balance of who won the football match or boxing match? Sports determines which side is tougher or more skilled; it doesn't say what is good, what is bad, let alone evil. The shoot-out is about the faster gun winning, not about the faster gun being the good guy. While the Good Guy has courage and conviction, the moral outcome is simply a matter of who can shoot faster, which is hardly reassuring. This is why duels were so stupid. While it was ostensibly about honor, it boiled down who was better with pistol or saber. So, plenty of duels were won by people who really deserved to lose. Now, we know this about dueling, and it's one of the reasons for its eventual disrepute.

But, the Western perpetuated the myth that the Good invariably wins over the Bad even though the only determinant is who can shoot faster. When two men face off against one another over honor in a classic due, there's 50/50 chance of either winning, or losing. But when two men face off in the Western, the good almost always wins?
Sure, we get it, people want happy endings where good guys win and ride into the sunset, but it's really a child's fantasy for adults, especially as the quickdraw was the invention of Western as fiction. The real gunslingers approached gunfights more like gangsters, with caution and dread, to come out alive by any means necessary. Gunfights were more like the confrontation in John Sayles' MATEWAN, not a Western but where guns prove decisive between capital and labor. Though set up like a classic showdown, it quickly turns into a bloodbath for both sides.

To the best of my knowledge, the only Western where the good guy loses to the bad guy is in THE BIG SILENCE(aka THE GREAT SILENCE), unsurprisingly a Spaghetti Western by Sergio Corbucci. Italians were far more nihilistic or radical in their treatment of the genre. The last man standing was simply the best shot, not necessarily a 'good' guy. Or the violence was a condemnation of the brutality of the Anglo order.
The ending of THE BIG SILENCE is traumatic precisely because we've grown so accustomed to the Good guy ultimately coming out on top... even if by something akin to a miracle(just like the classic anti-hero of the gangster genre invariably is killed at the end). The upright lawman(Brian Keith) is also felled tragically in CENTENNIAL, but it's a TV mini-series, a pretty good one, than a classic Western. The leftist Corbucci was out to dismantle the myth of the Western. CENTENNIAL strove to be a historically accurate saga of the West in a state of transformation from the world of the Indians & frontiersmen to the Modern World.

At any rate, the Western perpetuated the myth that chance, which is 50/50, will miraculously almost 100/0 favor the Good over the Bad when it comes to a contest of guns. It encouraged fallacious thinking bordering on fairytale. It also explains why John Ford made THE MAN WHO SHOT LIVERTY VALANCE as his last significant statement on the West(ern).
The 'legend' in the movie is that the Good Guy Stoddard(James Stewart) killed the Bad Guy Valance(Lee Marvin), and it went a long way in taming the West. But unbeknownst to the Good Guy on the night of the showdown, the Bad Guy was really felled by John Wayne's character lurking in the shadows. The Good Guy was slipped an Ace. The dice was loaded in his favor. The 'legend' in the movie is especially remarkable because the Good Guy didn't even have a 50/50 chance against the Bad Guy, a natural born killer. All he had was a prayer, a Hail Mary that miraculously became a touchdown. But in fact, an 'angel' was watching over him, much like Tuco has Blondie(Clint Eastwood) to save his neck in THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY.

In the Western Genre, where good vs bad is decided by gunplay, how could it be that the good almost always wins, especially if the good guy fights honorably without cheating? Under those conditions, the bad guy has the equal chance of winning. For the good to usually or almost always win, it cannot fight fair, but that would mean good cannot be honorable. The Western formula of "Honor + Good Triumphant" simply doesn't compute. It can have one or the other but not both. This is the point of David Mamet's screenplay of THE UNTOUCHABLES. Elliott Ness tries to fight fair, but he simply cannot win that way. Sean Connery's character coaches him that you must not only fight dirty but dirtier. If they bring a knife, you bring a gun. If they beat up one of yours, you kill one of theirs. No wonder Jews won over the Anglos. Ugly Winning beats Beautiful Losing.

Especially if the Western good guy is upright and honorable(which implies he disdains cheating to win and offers an even chance to the bad guy), the main reason he always wins is because the contest is rigged in his favor by none other than the author. Of course, he is unaware of this, like the James Stewart character in THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE is unaware, at least initially, that Valance was actually killed by someone else. If a Western author is really fair, he would flip a coin to see who wins at the end, good guy or bad guy? But people like happy endings.

In reality, black boxers beat the white ones, but in ROCKY II and III, the Italian Stallion manages to whup the Negroes in the era of Muhammad Ali and Larry Holmes. But the implication extends beyond storytelling. It's about history. For all the talk of principles and meritocracy, white Americans rigged things in their favor. At one time, blacks were kept out of sports, which ensured that all the champions were white. Anglo-Americans favored one another over the ethnics. And this has been the case with every society. Jews rigged it for Jews, Italians rigged it for Italians, Japanese rigged it for Japanese.
After all, in a pure meritocracy, your kind has as much chance of losing as winning. So, for your group to win as a whole, the system must be rigged, at least in part. This is why intra-meritocracy makes more sense than inter-meritocracy. Anglo-Americans adopted inter-meritocracy and lost so much. Jews, in contrast, still play the game of intra-meritocracy, i.e. Jews fiercely compete with other Jews, but they also work together to rig the system against non-Jews. Just ask the Palestinians and the BDS movement. Incidentally, Jews use BLM as moral cover against what they do to BDS.

Indeed, the paucity of films in the genre during the last thirty years is the clearest indication that the Western as a clear-sighted vehicle for representing society’s conception of itself and its frontier past has fallen on hard times. Too many heroes in white hats and too strong an identification with a triumphant—and white—country, subduing all before it, doesn’t offer the best medium for representing the morally conflicted and self-loathing America of the 21st century.

I don't think it has much to do with Indians. After all, most Westerns were about lawmen vs outlaws than Cowboys vs Indians. Many more Westerns were like SHANE, HIGH NOON, and BIG COUNTRY than THE SEARCHERS. Even in STAGECOACH, which has a thrilling chase and shootout with the Indians, Ringo's(John Wayne) ultimate enemy is a band of white guys. And MY DARLING CLEMENTINE is about Wyatt Earp and Doc Holliday vs the Clanton Gang. So, the Western can easily skirt around the Indian issue. I recall there was a popular long-running foul-mouthed TV Western series called DEADWOOD. Its popularity was proof that the Western could be revived with generous servings of violence and vulgarity.

Besides, the 'woke' community could have a field day with the 'genocide' of the Native Americans, and indeed, some anti-Westerns of the late 60s and early 70s ran on that very topic, like SOLDIER BLUE with its over-the-top scene of whites butchering helpless Indians. And there was LITTLE BIG MAN, a much better movie. Oddly enough, it was in this period that JEREMIAH JOHNSON was a pretty big hit. It was made by 'liberal' Jewish Sydney Pollack and starred 'ultra-liberal' Robert Redford, but it's really a celebration of tough white guy battling and whupping Indians. It shows the importance of the writer.

Anyway, 'woke' Hollywood has no problem making these Southerns about white 'racism', evil rednecks, angelic blacks, monstrous KKK, and etc. In a way, DJANGO UNCHAINED was as much a Southern as a Western, somewhat similar to the movies about Jesse James and Younger Gang(and RIDE WITH THE DEVIL). If Jewish Hollywood loves to rub the white nose in Slavery and Jim Crow, why not rub the white nose in the 'genocide' of the so-called 'Native Americans', though 'Pre-Americans' would be more accurate?

The reasons are threefold. Even though Jews in the past did occasionally compare the demise of the Indians with the Jewish Holocaust, it also has similarities with what Jews have done to Palestinians. Some Palestinian-American activist have made that very point. Also, Jews push the pro-immigration line of Great Replacement or White Nakba, and guess which people were 'replaced' first in America? The American Indians, of course, and the whole process was accelerated by mass immigration.
Yes, Indians are bad for the pro-immigration narrative. Plenty of immigrants arrived in the New Land to displace the Indians. Chinese laborers laid down railroad tracks that hastened the total erasure of Plain-Indians-America. Also, Jewish merchants sold guns and ammo to the cowboys to kill the Indians, i.e. Jews took part in the 'American Holocaust', and it is a sign of Jewish obnoxiousness the Holocaust Museum occupies the prominent moral space in Washington D.C. Yes, the Shoah was a horror, but it didn't happen in the US, and Americans didn't do it. In contrast, the destruction of Indians happened HERE IN AMERICA. And yet, Jews hold the vaunted position as the top victimological icons in American Politics. So vile.

A JEW IS ASKED WHY NO REMEMBRANCE OF THE HOLOCAUST OF AMERICAN INDIAN?

At any rate, the Jewish logic of Zionism is now also applied to the US, i.e. while Jewish mass immigration to Palestine to replace the Arabs was a great thing, Israel must now remain a Jewish State and non-Jewish immigration must be prohibited or kept to a bare minimum.
Guess how Jews see white goyim, as akin to Jews in Israel with the right to homeland or akin to Palestinians who deserve to be replaced?
The way Jews see the US, it's one big Palestine, and Jews welcome masses of non-white immigrants whose children are indoctrinated with 'wokeness' to blame everything on whitey and to worship Jews, blacks, and homos(as the Tri-Idolatry) over all else, even their own identities and cultures, and this madness is even exported abroad.

https://twitter.com/fbfsubstack/status/1475855433537662976

Furthermore, Indians simply don't have much market value for current 'wokeness'. While the tragedy of Cowboys-killing-Indians may be morally charged for some, it just doesn't have the kind of power of Southerners-lynching-Negroes. At the very least, the American Indians fought back and did kill and/or torture a fair amount of whites. In contrast, especially because people don't know about black thuggery in the Old South, people have this image of neanderthal rednecks randomly killing helpless angelic Negroes. But there's an even bigger factor, and it's about black stardom in sports and pop music, which makes whites feel more sensitive and sorry for what was done to 'cool' blacks than to 'cold' Indians.
Notice the Noble Indian in ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST hardly says anything, whereas mammy in GONE WITH THE WIND is always hollering up a storm. Silence may be golden, but noise takes the cake. It's like Tommy gets more 'respect' than Henry in GOODFELLAS. Tommy never shuts up whereas Henry doesn't say much. Don Rickles certainly didn't get where he did by being a stone-faced Indian.

NICK FUENTES: THE TRUTH ABOUT WARS IN THE MIDDLE EAST

US Politicians who bark madly at Russia or China are not really crazy; it's calculated shtick to win approval from Jewish Supremacist Rulers of America — When Zionic US accuses China of 'genocide' against Uighurs, why doesn't China point out US Support of Zionist 'genocide' of Palestinians?

What Putin really told Biden - Russian and US leaders dropped their respective rhetorical gauntlets but nobody really expects Russia to invade Ukraine

Tucker Carlson on the Jewish Supremacist War Campaign against Russia in Ukraine

Tulsi Gabbard speaks out against US whore politicians shilling for Nuclear War against Russia

Some say the (Jewish-manufactured) crisis in Ukraine has nothing to do with US national interest, but that is to miss the point. The current US has no and can have no National Interest because it operates as a GLOBALIST entity ruled by World Jewry. As the metropole of globo-Jewish-Supremacism, the role of US is to serve global interests(not talk of national interests), and Ukraine has fallen under the shadow of Jewish imperial ambition that eventually eyes the takeover of Russia, a vast territory that Jews regard as a world of drunken slavs whose destiny is to serve Jews. After all, if Jews conquered and soul-enslaved the great Anglos, who the hell are the lowly backward Slavs to say NO to Jewish Dominance? Of course, Anglo-Cuck or Angluck dogs serve Jewish power in the War on Russia.

If US operated on the basis of National Interests, it would have strong borders. Rather, US domestic border policy is much like its imperial policy. Non-white masses are encouraged to invade across US borders, and US power tramples around the world with military bases and war games, even where they are not invited, like Syria.
Jews rule the US, and their agenda goes as follows: "Hey, hordes of nonwhites, come across US borders and replace the white population", and "White cuck soldiers, go overseas and violate the borders of other countries to spread Zio-globo-homo hegemony, Afro-savagery, and Jewish financial terrorism." There can't be any American National Interest in this madness. It's just Imperial Interest devised by Jewish Globalist Supremacists to prioritize Zion.

Tucker Carlson, Tulsi Gabbard, and some others critical of the current regime's saber-rattling against Russia are calling it ‘lunatic’ and ‘crazy’, 'sadistic' and 'cruel', but the real problem is actually a lot simpler.

The GOP cuck senator Roger Wicker isn’t really crazy. It’s not really about Nuclear Armageddon because NO ONE believes in such a war nor desires it. It’s just a pathetic case of cucking to Jews by making noises they want to hear. Wicker knows Jews got the power and Jews hate Russia(for whatever reasons), and the easiest way to receive more donor money and win favors is by making the kind of noises that’s music to Zio-Globo ears.

That's pretty much it. It's calculated and rational(as cuck behavior) than genuinely crazy(as warmonger). It’s like dogs barking to win the approval of masters. “Look, master, I’m barking, I’m barking, to show I’m a good dog always on your side.”

The problem with politics isn't genuine craziness among goyim such as Roger Wicker and all the anti-Russia barking dogs, Ted Cruz included. None of them would be making such noises if Jews didn’t rule. It’s just a sign of pathetic cravenness and cuckery than mental lunacy.

But Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard would rather pretend that politicians just went batshit crazy out of the blue. It's because, when push comes to shove, they too are afraid to name the Jewish Power. But if by some miracle they could muster the courage to name the real power, they could explain current events honestly as a case of Jewish power-grab for world hegemony and of goy cucks in US government making ANY NOISE, however ludicrous, to please and appease their Jewish masters.

The game of politics is like this all over the world, so why would it be any different in the US where Jewish Supremacists are the pimps and the goy politicians are the prostitutes? In any country, most politicians learn to make the right noises. Under Saddam Hussein, Iraqi politics was about loving whatever he loved, hating whatever he hated. In North Korea, it’s about loving whatever Kim seems to love at the moment and hating whatever he seems to hate at the moment. Whatever Big Brother loves, we must love. Whatever he hates, we must hate. There's little individual or moral agency in US politics that is dominated by big donor money(much of it Jewish), deep state shenanigans(orchestrated by Jews), and big media(monopolized by Jews). In the US, the politics is mostly about goy cucks loving whatever Jews love — "Muh Israel!" — and hating on whatever Jews hate. It’s politics of canine behavior. If Jews were to lose their hatred of Russia tomorrow, goy dogs would no longer be barking mad at it. It's really that simple. To gain Jewish favoritism and support, Roger Wicker just decided to bark the loudest. It makes him look tough, but it's just servile canine behavior as dogs have no agency and only look to please their master.

Jewish Supremacists who rule the US not only push the anti-Russia but the anti-China line.

The JAB(Jews around Biden) are pushing the Anti-China line for two reasons.

1. To darken rising China’s place in the world and subvert its relations with Muslim nations.

2. To distract Americans from the fact of Jewish Power(that really rules the US) by making them fixate on Yellow Peril.

This leads to an interesting question. Why don’t the Chinese(who know full well Jews control the US) return the favor and call out on Jewish-run US as the sponsor of ‘genocide’ in West Bank(against Palestinians) and the Middle East(against Arabs/Muslims in general)? When Jews kick China in the shin, why don’t China respond in kind? How come JAB(Jews-around-Biden) can denounce China of ethnic cleansing, but China cannot do the same to Jews on the Palestinian question? Similarly, JAB(Jews-around-Biden) accuse Putin of aggression in Ukraine, but Russia never calls Israel out on its crime against Palestinians.

Of course, it’s been pointed out China and Russia maintain good relations with Israel. But if so, why don’t Israeli Jews ever stand up for China and Russia against American Jews who shit on Russia and China?

Have Jews come to be so holy and almighty in 'world opinion'(90% of which is, of course, Western) that Russia and China feel they must be careful to steer clear of ‘antisemitism’ and have some Jewish friends on their side as 'moral insurance'? So, even when JAB(Jews-around-Biden) smear China and Russia with horrible accusations, the only thing China and Russia can hope for is to fall back on their close ties with Israel to show that they’re on good terms with the Tribe?

But really, what do China and Russia get out of their ties with Israel? When have Israeli Jews ever intervened on behalf of China & Russia and pressured US Jews to knock it off? Donald Trump went out on a limb for Israel, but did Israeli Jews do anything to calm down Jewish American hostility against him? No, never. (And recall Apartheid South Africa's closest ally was Apartheid Israel, but this didn't prevent Jews in US and EU from doing all they could to undermine white rule in South Africa. Apartheid Israel gained all the favors from its alliance with Apartheid South Africa but did nothing to influence World Jewry to go easy on Apartheid South Africa.) It seems Jewish Americans and Israeli Jews are working in tandem when it comes to Russia, China, and Americans like Donald Trump.
The 'good cop and bad cop' shtick goes like this: Jewish Americans shit on Russia, China, Trump, or whatever. Given the Jewish hostility, the first instinct of Russia, China, or Trump is sling the mud back at Jews, but they can’t because Jews are too holy schmoly on the world stage as the Eternal Holy Holocaust People(as Holocaustianity replaced Christianity while Anne Frank replaced the Madonna in Western Spiritual Hierarchy). So, they seek to improve relations with Israel in the desperate hope that this will somehow mitigate their Jewish Problem. This way, Israeli Jews actually benefit from Jewish Americans hating on Russia, China, or Trump. In his four yrs, the more American Jews shat on Trump, the more he groveled at the feet of Israeli Jews to prove he’s not ‘antisemitic’. But did it do him any good with the Jewish American community? No.

Russia, China, Trump, or whatever entity/person must break out of this toxic trap. This use of Israel as insurance against being called ‘antisemitic’ or horrible names has proven to be bogus. Israel exploits it in full but offers nothing in return. When has it ever intervened on behalf of Russia or China to calm down Jewish Imperial Supremacy that governs the US? Russia and China should give the middle finger to Israel and call out on Jewish Americans as the real masters of the US, the real wreckers of the world and the real leeches, as well as monsters carrying out 'genocide' against Palestinians. Only then will things start to change.

What can finally start the healing process is to NAME THE JEWISH POWER behind the US that controls EU as its puppet and whore. Unless Jewish Power is named, this madness will go on. Jews will continue to aggravate Russia over Ukraine or some other piece of territory. Or, consider how Jewish-run US blames China of ‘genocide’ against Uighurs but China doesn’t blame US for sponsoring ‘genocide’ in West Bank. Jews are arrogant toward China, but China is afraid of Jews. This fear must be overcome. First off, US is no longer US. It’s just one big aircraft carrier for the Zionic Mafia. Of course, Jewish Power derives from Anglo-cucking(or Anglucking) to Jewish Power. You’d think Jews would be nice to whites because whites support Jewish hegemonism against Russia and China, but actually no. Paradoxically, Jews are even more hostile to White America(that totally loves and obeys Jewish America) in order to guilt-bait it into total submission and obedience to Jewish Power. Jews know that white pride may lead to white agency and liberation, and free-thinking whites may not always serve or side with Jews. So, they must beat down whites psychologically and morally with guilt-feelings. No pride for whites, just self-loathing guilt. Jews must turn whites into mentally-beaten-down dogs with guilt-look on their faces, dogs who can be in good graces with their master only by barking at whatever the Master hates.

It could be the US is provoking military action from Russia mainly to undermine the Nordstream deal. Force Russia's hand in Ukraine and use it as excuse to pressure Germany and other nations to nix their deals on Russian gas. “Look, Russia is the aggressor! How can you EU nations trade with Russia! An infamy!”

American Jews, who once fancied themselves as anti-war ‘liberals’ aghast at the Military-Industrial Complex in movies like DR. STRANGELOVE, FAIL SAFE, and SEVEN DAYS IN MAY, are now going all in with their media power and deep state goons to stir up truly insane war hysteria against Russia.
Why? Is it because Russia still has a globalist ideology of world conquest? No, simply because Russia said no to Jewish supremacism and globo-homo, and because it wants to secure its borders by keeping the US war machine(NATO) out of Ukraine. Unless Jewish Power is called out, nothing will change. Bunch of cucks among Democrats and GOP are pushing the same old garbage to appease the Zion King.

People need to stop talking of Joe Biden as if he has the power. They should talk of Jews-around-Biden or JAB. Yes, JAB is what rules the West. White Americans and Anglucks(Anglo Cucks) are the biggest dummies in the world. In 2020, Jews(who never stop kvetching about pogroms they suffered long ago in Ukraine) orchestrated the biggest pogrom against White America, wrecking entire communities, but now… all these white dummies(whummies) are cheerleading for Jewish orchestration of total mayhem in Ukraine. It's Stockholm Syndrome on steroids. Whummies are so beholden to Jewish Power that they mentally block out the true nature of the 2020 horror and seek approval by volunteering for what is hyped as righteous apocalypse in Ukraine.

THE FLAG WAVERS ARE GONE - RAMZPAUL

If Whiteness has no Validity or Meaning, then Whites cannot lay claim to anything, and there is No Common White Property — The Political Art of White Dispossession by Jewish Supremacism, especially by pushing ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs

What secures the survival and well-being of a people? What keeps them healthy in body and spirit? What provides them with a sense of meaning and purpose, even destiny? What fills them with a sense of distinctness, a special quality that makes them rise above mere genericity, rise above the occasion?

A people must have a sense of their evolutionary origins and understand what makes them different from other races. If of a spiritual bent, a people must be bound by the conviction that God created different peoples, and each group is unique in its own way. A people must have a sense of history. Just like every individual has his own unique biography and every family has its own story, every people need to keep with their own history with its origins, myths, tales, and heroes & villains. Just like it's tragic for an amnesiac or an Alzheimer patient robbed of memory, a people without historical memory and a deep sense of roots & mythic bonds are truly lost, like a confounded hiker or navigator without a compass, no sense of where he came from and no sense of where he's going and why.
For security-sake, it's essential that a people lay claim to certain territories as rightfully theirs. A people without a country are like a man without a home: Doomed to wander as nomads. There's a difference between a traveler and a nomad. A traveler has a home to return to in the end, like Odysseus. In contrast, a nomad is a chronic wanderer. Steve Martin's character in PLANES, TRAINS, AND AUTOMOBILES has a home and a family waiting for him. John Candy's character is always on the road, condemned to drift from place to place.
Furthermore, as one lives forever, a people must produce new generations, and this requires the union of man and woman. To preserve the unique features of form and beauty of a people, most of the sexual unions must be among the men and women of the group. Excessive miscegenation leads to something like the mulatto-mestizos of Latin America, confused populations with weak sense of who or what they are.
In addition, to ensure the synthesis of identity, history, and territory, there must be proper authority, a concentration of power, that works to lead, represent, defend, and preserve the people and culture. Without these supports, a people's long-term survival comes into question. It's like there's no guarantee that a chair with four wobbly legs will remain standing. If a horse with one broken leg is useless, imagine one with four broken legs. What happens to a building when its columns or support beams are broken? The whole thing may well crumble to the ground. Indeed, bigger the structure, stronger its support system must be. Bigger they are, firmer they must stand... or else harder they fall.

Now, it's possible for a people/culture to survive without all the supports. Jews certainly did for nearly two thousand years without a homeland to call their own, and Kurds continue as a people & culture despite being dispersed among several non-Kurd-majority nations like Turkey, Syria, Iran, Iraq, and etc. In the case of the Jews, their magic formula was the Covenant, which went beyond mere identity, territory, and history. The Covenant created a spiritual bond between Jewish Blood and Heavenly Spirit. It meant that wherever Jews may be, whatever straits they were in, and however downtrodden they may be, they are the Chosen People favored by the one and only true God. The fact that Jews survived over the millennia despite so many setbacks(and even loss of territory) is a testament to the power of bonding blood with spirit. At any rate, Jews are an exception in history.
Furthermore, while there's much to learn from the Jewish Example, one should never heed Jewish advice as the essence of Jewishness is to maximize its own tribal power, wealth, influence, and control at the expense of goyim. If something works great for Jews, Jews will recommend the very opposite for the goyim. But then, Jews are being smart in their deviousness. If gold is buried in spot A, of course it makes sense for Jews to tell others it's buried in spot B... or C or D or E. It's like the Vikings who settled in Iceland wanted it for themselves. So, they gave it the forbidding name of 'Iceland' to keep others away while naming a far less hospitable land mass 'Greenland'. Likewise, Jews want to hoard their own 'Iceland' for themselves while recommending the metaphorical 'Greenland' for goyim. Iceland is really green whereas Greenland is frozen.

For most peoples, the failure to secure one of the pillars of peoplehood is like being a Paralympian than an Olympian. It's like competing with a missing arm or leg or with a broken spine. Such peoples must hobble through history and are always at a disadvantage vis-a-vis others with sturdier, sounder, and more complete support systems. An engine running on all six cylinders has more kick than one running on three. A plane with four working propellers is preferable to one with only two working. Jews are like someone using both arms and both legs urging others to tie one hand behind the back and jump around on one foot. Some Jews go even further and urge upon goyim to cut off all limbs. Jews would have goyim, especially white goyim, turn into Boxing Helena.

Still, a people with one or two cylinders working are better off than a people with all the cylinders out of order. The rule of history is that a people with essential support systems, no matter how poor and backward, are better positioned to survive into the future than a people who, no matter how well-fed and affluent, have been robbed of theirs. Indeed, compare the Palestinians and Anglo-Canadians. The latter enjoy much better living standards than the tragic Arabs living under Zionist occupation and tyranny. But, whereas Palestinians doggedly cling to their pride of identity and sense of history(and totally believe in the rightness of their cause and see Jews for what they are) despite their loss of territory, Anglo-whites in Canada have no pride of identity, no sense of history, and no claim of territory. Indeed, for Anglo-whites nothing is conceivably more evil than the idea of white authority/power in service of white interests. Even as a defeated people, Palestinians know what they are and do what they must to survive. Despite their affluence and privileges, Anglo-whites of Canada have zero defense systems against the Great Replacement(or White Nakba) and, if anything, believe the evil of whiteness must be erased by Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity, or D.I.E.
So, whereas Palestinians struggle to remain Palestinians with each passing year, Anglo-whites lose out ever more in Canada(and it's the same in all of Anglosphere and Germanosphere as Northern European whites are now totally mind-controlled by Jews). Of course, Jews sought to mind-trick the Palestinians as well. Zionists argued there's no such thing as the Palestinian people, Palestinian culture, or Palestinian history. Jews said it's all just a 'social construct'(but for some reason, we are to believe Zionism is so natural and real that it has the right to destroy the natives of Palestine to make room for Euro-Israel dominated by Ashkenazim). If Palestinians didn't take the vile Jewish bait, whites not only took it but swallowed the whole thing as good medicine... only to have the hook stuck inside their intestines which are now fatally wounded and bleeding.

Jews rule the world and seek to undermine and invalidate any concept of White Property or White Possession. White Dispossession is the name of the game. This is why Jews attack the very notion of whiteness. If whiteness is a valid category, then whites would have reasons to defend their identity, heritage, history, territory, wealth, authority, and power. But if whiteness is invalid, just some ‘racist’ construct or at best a figment of the imagination, then whites have no unique, special, and/or commanding claim to anything. Minus such conviction, whites don't deserve to own anything as a people, not least because even their peoplehood lacks legitimacy.
Of course, whites as individuals can own stuff, even lots of stuff(like Bill Gates or Warren Buffett), but there is nothing that whites as a race, culture, or people can have, defend, and preserve as their own. The politically correct mantra of Diversity really means that anything white can be claimed and taken by nonwhites? (It's like Asian-Indians as individuals could gain wealth under British Imperialism, but they, as a people, could not claim India as a national entity independent of Rule Britannia).
It's akin to conditions of slavery, at least on the legal and psychological level(even if whites aren't literally slaves). Consider blacks in the American South when slavery still existed. Not all blacks had to pick cotton from sunup to sundown. Some black slaves could learn a craft and earn money(even save enough to purchase their own freedom). But no matter how much they earned(and even upon gaining freedom), it was virtually forbidden for them to think that they deserved or owned anything as a collective, as a people. For blacks, wealth and freedom were just individual matters. Some blacks could do pretty well as individuals and some could be legally free, but they couldn't be empowered as an united people.

Today, Jews have done the same to whites who are but soul-slaves of the Zionic Tribe. Jeff Bezos and Tim Cook are among the richest whites in the world, but their wealth is purely an individual matter. They can spend it on themselves and their close ones but never ever for white interests. But then, as people aren't mere individuals but part of a larger community, what can rich whites do to show they aren't just in it for themselves? There are three choices: (1) Libertarianism, a soulless ideology about 'muh freedom' that only further atomizes the white race and separates rich whites from those with less (2) The Approved Tribalism or Idolatry of Jews, blacks, and homos — even though Identity is generally denied to most groups, especially whites and Palestinians, it is not only tolerated but celebrated among Jews, blacks, and homos as the three magical groups (3) Mania for Diversity and Inclusion, which means rich whites should care about nonwhites around the world and welcome them into the West, not least to snub and replace 'racist' whites.

Is it any wonder that Jews(who are only 2% of the US population), blacks(who are 13% of the population), and homos(who are only 2.5% of the population) have more authority than whites? All Jews can coordinate together for Jewish Power. Blackness has been made sacred, i.e. blacks, just by being black, are deemed holy. Globo-Homo is now celebrated, and an entire month is reserved for Limp-Wristianity or Queertianity as replacement for Christianity. And even though the identities of Mestizos, Asians, Arabs, and etc. aren't especially regarded in the West, they have prestige as 'immigrants' bearing the wonderful gift of Diversity, further pushing whites to the back of the bus. (Of course, no one asks why people from Latin America must come to the US for a better life when their own countries are plenty diverse. Why has Diversity failed to do its magic for Latin America? Does Diversity become magic only when whites in the West are on the verge of losing their majority status? Odd how that works.)

Anyway, War-on-Whiteness(or WOW) and the ensuing White Dispossession allow Jews to lay claim to and gain possession of just about anything that once belonged to the white world. Nothing white is deemed sacred or priceless. Jews look upon the white world as a Jewish pawnbroker looks upon property. They are all trinkets for his taking. Everything white has a price tag and can be bought or sold or just taken by Jews or nonwhites.
Of course, Syrians aren't so lucky either. Jewish-controlled US foreign policy led to the military occupation of entire swaths of Syrian territory. The way Jews see it, Syria doesn't belong to Syrians, and Jews can use their goy military puppets to invade and occupy any piece of Syrian territory at whim. Currently, Syrians don't even have access to their own oil due to Jewish-guided US occupation. And of course, Palestinians in West Bank are silenced by the Jew-run media while yet another piece of their territory is swallowed up by Jewish invader-settlers. Jews look upon all the goy world as their oyster or goyster.

Since whiteness is an evil notion, the idea of White Territory is intolerable. Whites have no territory to call their own. All of the West must be on the auction block. It is to be sold and bought. Worse, any bunch of nonwhites can trample into white lands because Jewish-controlled globalism(the current ideology of the West) says Europeans don't even own the identity or meaning of European-ness. Anyone can become 'European' because globalism defines 'European-ness' as the celebration of Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity.
So, while white individuals can own lots of private property, there isn’t a single square inch in the world to designate as White Territory. Jewish supremacists who rule the West insist that whiteness is an evil that must be eradicated, and therefore, nothing can be claimed in the name of whiteness. White people must live merely as generic people or deracinated individuals in service to Jewish Identity, globo-homo-afro idolatry, and globalist ideology. Of course, Viktor Orban disagrees and says Hungary is sacred birth-and-burial ground for Hungarians. Jews cannot tolerate this. Not because Hungary itself is an important and consequential nation in the literal sense — a middle-income country with population of mere ten million, it isn't — but because its European-and-Christian-centered nationalism, in rejecting the entire paradigm of the Jew World Order, may inspire whites around the world to think outside the Jewish Box and say NO to Jewish Supremacism in the name of White Liberation. To Jewish Supremacists, the Hungarian example is akin to Palestinians saying Palestine is their homeland on the basis of pride of identity, resilience of history, and claim of territory. Well, at least Jews also have historical roots in the Holy Land, but it is outrageous how they lay claim to all the West that rightfully and racially belongs to whites.

For Jewish supremacists, the idea that white women belong to white men to have white kids with in order to preserve the white race is also evil. As whiteness is just a figment of ‘racist’ fantasy, white women are mere commodity for other races. They are whores for Jewish merchants and ho’s for black men. Jews say there is no deep and meaningful bond between white men and white women because whiteness is just garbage cooked up by ‘racists’. This is what Jews push. Jews want white wombs to be colonized by black men.
But it's rather odd if one thinks about it. On the one hand, Jews and blacks impugn whiteness as just worthless garbage, but they seem obsessed with white beauty that is the product of tens of thousands of evolution whereby white men mated with white women. If Jews and blacks see nothing special about whiteness, why do THEY lay claim to beauty that is unique to whites? Of course, the black threat is especially damaging to whites because of the Jungle Fever factor. Even with anti-whiteness in full force in media and academia, most white women won't sexually venture outside whiteness as they don't feel much attraction to most nonwhite men. But it's different with white women and Negroes because black men are better at sports, can holler & sing louder, and have bigger dongs. Indeed, even when the West was 'racist' and enforced taboos against miscegenation in the past, some white women went with black men because of the sheer pull of jungle fever. In our times when Jews control ideology(propaganda) & idolatry(marketing) and outright promote Jungle Fever and encourage millions of black Africans to move to the West, ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs is an existential threat to the white race. It effectively turns white women into 'mudsharks' and reduces white men into wussy cucks, resulting in the erasure of European uniqueness in form and beauty as the white race will be mulatto-ized and claimed by blackness that, contra whiteness, is much celebrated and even sacralized in the Jew World Order.
The way Jews see it, Jewish Supremacism depends on white submission, and there is no better way to effect permanent white obeisance than by breaking the sacred bond between white men and white women with Jungle Fever. Today, cuckenized white men celebrate the very fact that white women reject them and go with blacks. Jews brainwashed white males into believing that black sexual imperialism and white sexual defeat are synonymous with 'anti-racism' when, in fact, it's premised on black men being superior men to white men. Of course, it could be just a case of White Male Cope. Since they are losing white women to black men and can't do anything about it, they pretend they are letting it happen of their own accord out of racial magnanimity or commitment to combating 'racism'. So, even though white women are being taken away from white men, white men pretend they are giving their women away out of free will. It's like the landlord in THE GODFATHER PART 2 who complies with Vito Corleoene's request out of fear but pretends it's out of the goodness of his heart.

In the Jew World Order, there can be no such thing as White History, yet another essential pillar or support system lost for the white race. Indeed, Jews insist White History never existed because whiteness was always a fantasy of ignorance + supremacism and nothing else. Kids nowadays are told Greeks and Romans weren’t white. Iceland and Sweden were always 'multicultural', meaning multi-racial. Blacks always roamed around Britain and France. So, why not fill up all new movies about European lore and history with blacks and nonwhites? And even if some parts of Europe were indeed all-white, how terrible indeed and in need of being remedied with the wonders of Diversity. It's as if such whites lived inside a cave without the sun and must be brought out into the light. Shame on such history for its lack of diversity. As diversity is so wondrous, all Europeans must fantasize that their ancestors and heroes were black even if such weren't the case.

As for the politics of white authority or white power, NO WAY insist the Jews. Whiteness is ‘racist’, therefore any power or authority centered on serving white identity and interests is totally anathema to all that is good. So, while white individuals can make lots of money and work for powerful institutions, they must never think white or serve white interests. They must serve lofty ideals such as ‘diversity’, ‘inclusion’, and ‘equity’…. though for some reason, they must also serve Jews and blacks and homos as the Holy Three even though we’ve been told tribalism is wrong.

This is why whites are so powerless. Even though whites are still numerous in the West, have lots of wealth, desired for their looks, and are well-represented in elite institutions, whites are powerless as a race because even the most successful white individuals can never ever serve or defend whiteness but must serve ‘woke’ ideology or the idolatry of the holy three: Jews, blacks, and homos. If Bill Gates were to donate a measly $100 to Jared Taylor's American Renaissance, the full force of Jewish Supremacism and its white cuck-collaborators, what with their total grip on elite power, will pounce on him at once and destroy his reputation, connections, and wealth. Also, the courts will dig up anything to bring him down as so-called 'justice' is just a gangsterist lawfare arm of the Jews.

Whites today are like all those horses. Horses are big powerful beasts, but whatever their number, they are powerless as horses because they’ve been trained to serve humans. No matter how powerfully they run and do their horsey things, it’s never for horse-sake but for human-sake. Whites are now essentially saddled horses of Jewish cowboys.

The REAL Pandemic : "HATE CRIMES" On The Rise! - Nick Fuentes

How Jewish Power rewarded Black Collusion in the 2020 Coup against Trump with a variation of ROLL THE DRUNK: "Roll the Chink" or "Eggroll the Drunk" — How both whites and yellows in the US are now worthless cucks of Jews

THE TRUTH ABOUT ASIAN ATTACKS AND THE MASSAGE PARLOR SHOOTING

The Jewish-Black attack on Asians is like the game of ROLL THE DRUNK in Sergio Leone's ONCE UPON A TIME IN AMERICA. In the movie, the young delinquents do a job for the local boss, and they are allowed to ‘roll a drunk’, i.e rob him of his belongings.

The unspoken agreement between Jewish elites and black thugs was something like ‘Roll the Chink’ or maybe it should be called ‘Eggroll the Drunk’. Jews needed special black activism and collusion in 2020 to defeat Trump, and blacks delivered with massive corruption at the polls. Also, with BLM rallies and riots, Trump’s America was made to look like a failed state. Blacks delivered the goods for the Jews, and so, as a reward, they got to ‘roll the drunk’ as Jewish Power, which controls the institutions, instructed the police to stand down and let blacks loot and pillage as they pleased, especially from immigrant groups. Chinese were bound to be one of the primary victims because they’ve been one of the main immigrant groups in urban areas like New York and San Francisco for some time. While some Chinese became rich in America, many remain still relatively poor and reside in run-down urban areas in close proximity to blacks. As they are a smaller and weaker people, they are easy prey for black predators. Also, as China/Chinese have been vilified by both the globalists and the nationalists(and as Chinese aren’t articulate or forceful voices in the media — Andrew Yang, what a joke), they don’t have much in the way of moral defense or vocal presence. Though the attacks are mostly by blacks, the powers-that-be conveniently blame ‘white supremacism’ and let blacks(and Jews) off the hook. But then, Asian-American elites conform to the bogus narrative as most of them are little more than roasted Peking Cuck, aka yellow dogs who go along with the Power.

This BLM stuff has been great for Jews. It’s been like killing three birds with one stone.

1. By riling up black rage, Jews energized blacks against Donald Trump and motivated the white ‘virtue-signalers’ to hate the Deplorables even more. Also, by funding and promoting BLM, Jews effectively silenced black gripes against Jews who led gentrification, increased policing, and mass-immigration to push blacks out prior to 2020.

2. By making blacks go nuts once again, Jews effectively weakened America’s opposition to mass immigration. Many Americans now look at black violence of the past year and think, ‘better immigrants than these crazy blacks’.

3. By associating Jewish Power with BLM, Jews created the impression that Jews are the biggest champions of social justice and human rights(as blacks have been idolized as a holy people). Via the association, Jews gained a free hand against Palestinians and Arabs. Jews can destroy countless Arab and/or Muslim lives but say, “BLM is our friend, so how can we be ‘racist’?”

No wonder people used the term ‘dirty Jews’.

This is why the prospect of a white-yellow alliance will always be just a pipe-dream. It may work between Russia and China because they act as sovereign nation-states. But it can’t work in the US because both whites and yellows lack agency and independence. Both are worthless cucks. Whites suck up to Jews and revere blacks. This is true even of white conzos. Trumpsters scapegoat Chinese for everything, and white conzos resent Asian gains in education and jobs. As for yellows, they are a bunch of status-hungry turdy dorks who look over their shoulders and cater to whomever has the most power and prestige. So, most yellows are puppets of Jews and globo-homo. Utterly worthless. Asians in US are willing to serve the Power and be good dogs. Chinese in China act with some degree of pride and agency. Not so with yellows in the West(or in the satellite states like Japan, S Korea, and Taiwan. Utterly cucky wucky to US power that is now about Jews using globo-homo and BLM.)

In a nutshell, Jews have been using mass immigration to weaken both whites and blacks. Mass immigration of non-whites, especially from Latin America, Asia, and Middle East, have been undermining the power of GOP as the white party. Also, mass immigration meant cities filling up with peoples far less violent than blacks, who got pushed aside. But in 2020, Jews needed black help, and so, they reversed their favoritism and allowed blacks to run riot and carry out pogroms against immmigrant communities in exchange for black collusion in favor of the Democrats. That's how Jews play the game. Dirty Jews. Jews play all sides against one another. When Jews say 'diversity is our strength', they really mean it's to their advantage to play divide-and-rule among the diverse goy populations.

The Fact that White Americans bawl about BLM but feel Zero Pity for Palestinian-Lives-Matter(PLM) is Proof that Jews Control the Gods — True Conscience cannot be Imposed from Above — The Paradox of how 'White Guilt' under Jewish Manipulation turned into White Evil in support of Jewish Supremacism

American(and Western by extension) morality is utterly bogus because Jews control the gods and most Western folks are pretty hollow inside. They have no internal engine of conscience. Their moral engines are usually dormant or in hibernation mode UNLESS switched on by some outside force. If some people are totally hollow, others are totally partisan in their morality, and this goes for both sides. So, Democrats who were okay with Obama doing A were suddenly enraged that Trump was doing the same. Okay if my guy does it, Nokay if your guy does it. Bogus morality. Or Republicans who were okay with Trump doing B are suddenly outraged that Biden is doing it. Thus, morality is just a partisan tool. Moral hollowness and moral opportunism are, as the cliche goes, old as the hills, and Americans, for all their conceit of 'exceptionalism' and 'indispensability', are no different.

Take BLM for instance. If indeed good, decent, and wonderful American 'Liberals' are so weepy-poo about the Black Problem, where were they on the issue until the media promoted BLM? Why were these people who were hunky dory with Bill Clinton locking up tons of Negroes, Obama prioritizing Globo-Homo over black concerns, Bloomberg using stop-and-frisk on blacks, Democrats using mass immigration to replace blacks, and real estate moguls using gentrification to drive blacks out of cities? They were fine with all that but suddenly they were prostrating themselves before BLM in 2020. Are they so hollow that their souls must be poured with moral content by an outside force for them to feel any sense of injustice? Interestingly enough, they weren't fully onboard with BLM even in 2016 when Obama was in office. There are two reasons for this. The Jewish-run media pushed BLM whole hog in 2020 whereas only half-heartedly in 2016. So, the hollow souls were filled to the brim with BLM outrage in 2020, and that accounts for their sudden rush of 'conscience'. Also, there was the Trump Factor. All the Trump-haters saw an opportunity to virtue-signal, especially with the hope that it would bring defector blacks back to the fold if the Democratic Party knelt before Negroes. In either case, it was Jews calling the shots and goyim following along. Jews lead, goyim follow.

If Americans had true morality, they wouldn't need the Power telling them to wave the BLM flag and wash Negro feet. They would have been doing it all these years. So, why did so many people become so obsessed with BLM all of a sudden? They are like children who must be told by adults what to think, how to feel, and what to say. Furthermore, they have no autonomous sense of facts or truth. BLM is based on a lie. White cops are NOT mowing down innocent blacks all across America. But many people refuse to accept the truth because they, like children, prefer the Narrative from the so-called 'adults in the room'. Their moral sense is tied to authority and who has it. And there are others who know BLM is founded on a lie BUT still go along because Negrolatry is central to their lives. As the result of all those Magic Negro movies, blacks sports-music domination, and 'white guilt' narrative about Slavery, many whites kneel before blackness as the holy of holies. Just like some people know God doesn't exist but still belong to a church because they love the idea and tradition, many whites know the facts of black crime & violence but stick with the faith in the Noble Negro. Emotions > Motions.

Also, notice the total lack of consistency in their moral outrage. If indeed human lives mattered, American 'liberals' would be MOST OUTRAGED by the countless Arab/Muslim lives destroyed by Wars for Israel pushed by Evil Zionist Hegemonists. If American 'liberals' had true moral sense, they'd respond to BLM with, "But the number of innocent blacks killed by bad cops is piddling compared to all the innocent Arabs and Muslims killed by the US war machine and US support for terrorists, aka 'moderate rebels'." During the Trump term, most 'liberals' were outraged(instigated by the Jewish-run media, of course, as most white 'liberals' utterly lack moral agency) by Trump's attempts to draw down troops in the Middle East. And they were utterly silent about what Obama did to Libya and Syria. Also, for all their conceit of 'knowledge' and 'critical thinking', most 'liberals' swallowed whole hog the Jewish Media Narrative that the US was working with decent rebels to overthrow bloody tyrant Assad. Or, the Jewish-run media pushed bogus nonsense about US troops having to remain in Syria to protect the Kurds from the Turks. Never mind it was the US that encouraged Turkey, along with other nations, to intervene in Syria and stir up trouble. So-called 'liberals' might as well be called Gulliberals. Of course, many conzos are gullible in their own way, what with the nonsense they swallowed about China-China-China and Iran-Iran-Iran when, in fact, their main enemy is Jew, Jew, Jew.

All these 'liberals' who were denouncing cops as killers and calling for defunding the police NEVER called out the US military as a killing machine when, in fact, it is far more so than cops. If anything should be defunded for its crimes against humanity, it is Pentagon. Apparently, a single life of a black criminal has more value than a million Arab lives. (Surreally enough, perverted US imperialism even spun American Shame into American Self-Righteousness. If BLM is true and the US is really an evil nation where innocent blacks are routinely murdered by 'systemic racism', shouldn't it undermine America's role in the world? Surely, a country that murders its own citizens shouldn't be preaching to the rest of the world, let alone pushing them around with its military might. But US foreign policy spun BLM as a point of pride, i.e. "Because we in the Foreign Service denounce Donald Trump and 'white supremacism', we are the Good Guys with the right to tell the world what's what."
While some bad cops do end up killing innocent people(more whites than blacks), the number of innocent people killed by US cops in any given year can be counted on two hands. In contrast, 100,000s of Arabs and Muslims have been killed by wars, sanctions, and support of terrorism by the Jewish-controlled West. And millions have been displaced from their homes. If anything, the US military deserves all the vitriol, but notice how gulliberals, just like conzos, have no problem with the stupid cult of Veteran-Worship. US military invades and destroys other nations, BUT we hear the endless tripe about how they are fighting to defend our freedom. What does occupying the oil-rich regions of Syria have to do with the freedom of Americans? If US generals and soldiers really want to defend freedom in the US, they should attack Wall Street banks that deny service to US citizens. They should attack Big Tech that denies free speech to people who dare speak truth to power. Cops only go after criminals whereas US soldiers invade OTHER nations and drop bombs and destroy civilian lives, but has there been calls to Take the Knee about all those dead Arabs and Muslims? Has any US corporation donated millions to BDS in solidarity with Palestinian lives and rights? Has any US street been painted with PLM or Palestinian Lives Matter sign?

What good is morality as approval by authority(a kind of 'morauthority') or partisan opportunism? And what is the authority and who calls the shots on the moral opportunism? Jewish Power. So, Jews essentially have the lock on what is moral and 'spiritual' in America. Jews control the gods, and it's no wonder all these goyim are such hapless idiots. But are conzos any better with their 'Muh Israel' and 'We Bless Jews' antics despite Jews doing the most to destroy true patriotism? It goes to show no genuine conservative or patriotic movement is possible unless it calls for white liberation or goy emancipation from Jewish Supremacism.

What's truly perverse is the paradox of how White Morality has been used to actually make whites less moral under Jewish Control. Jews are baiting 'white guilt' not to make whites more moral and conscientious. The last thing Jews want is a white person who is morally consistent. While Jeremy Corbyn's support of Open Borders and Diversity is nuts, he is at least consistent in his denunciation of both white and Jewish evils. So, if it was wrong for whites to practice apartheid in South Africa, it is wrong for Jews as well in Israel and West Bank. But oh no, Jews couldn't accept that and did everything to bring down Jeremy Corbyn and install a total Zio-Cuck in the Labour Party.

So, what are Jews really after when they bait 'white guilt' if it isn't to make whites more moral, more principled, more conscientious, and more consistent in their application of justice? It is to rob whites of pride, dignity, and worth as a race. It is to psychologically paralyze whites and castrate their sense of righteousness. Thus beaten and robbed of autonomy, whites are left without agency, independence, and liberty. Whites are made to look to the Holy Other for guidance, approval, and redemption. And who would this Other be? All the various diverse groups? Of course not. Imagine what would happen to Jewish Power IF whites heeded the calls for justice for Palestinians. No, the Holy Other is to be Jewish, and Jews use all their money power, media power, and state power to make sure the white mind is bound to Jewish Authority. As Jews control the media and academia(as well as the whores who run government), no white person grows up without worshiping the Holy Holocaust that associates all Jews since time immemorial with tragic sanctity(contra White 'Antisemitic' Evil). And because the Shoah happened in Europe and white Americans aren't culpable(except in the indirect sense that White America is an outgrowth of Europe), Jews make a big fuss about 'white guilt' in relation to blacks, and then tie the 'racism' toward blacks with 'racism' toward Jews in Europe — never mind Jews were co-partners with European Imperialists in invading and exploiting the world.

Now, one would think all this browbeating would make whites more moral and conscientious, but not so. It just makes them more servile and slavish to Jews, at whose feet they worship and beg forgiveness. This means Jews can manipulate 'white guilt' to support anything Jews wish. After all, if whites are stained with sin whereas Jews are aglow with sanctity, how dare whites dare to say NO to any Jewish demand. Then, it's no wonder that whites, burdened with 'white guilt', are totally onboard with Jewish supremacist madness all over the world. This is true of whites in Europe and the US. Germans have nothing to say about all the Wars for Israel. If indeed Germans were truly conscientious and morally redemptive in light of what happened in WWII, they would be denouncing Jewish Supremacism and Zionist Imperialism on grounds of "It was wrong for us Germans to be Nazis, then it's wrong for Jews to act like Nazis." But no, 'German Guilt' means Germans must look the other way while Jews push Zion Uber Alles across the Middle East and North Africa. So, 'German Guilt' hasn't made Germans more moral but made them more subservient to Jewish Evil.

In the end, any supposed guilt matters less than WHO is doing the guilt-baiting. For example, Germans in WWII led to the deaths of 20 million Soviets(or maybe more). Millions of Poles perished as the result of German aggression and occupation. And yet, Germans seem to have no conscience in regard to Russians and Poles. Germans have acquiesced to Jew-American 'new cold war' against Russia. And Germans pressured Poles to open their borders and allow their nation to be flooded with Africans and Muslims(many of whom were displaced by Wars for Israel). Considering what German invasion did to Poland in WWII, you'd think Germans would be the last ones to throw their weight around with the Poles(and call for demographic erasure of Poland), but Germans don't care. Their 'morality' is bogus and essentially comes down to sucking up to Jews as a holy people and obeying Jews no matter how evil the act.
And it's no different among White Americans. There is no genuine morality or conscience. While a sense of guilt can lead to higher morality, it is only so when the guilt is genuine, internal, and has agency. After all, we've all done something wrong, felt remorse, and wished to make amends. But 'white guilt' doesn't work like that. Rather, it was concocted by Jews who took advantage of the moral component in Americanism. America was founded as a Christian and Enlightenment Civilization, and there's been a running thread in American History to make progress and make amends. And that was all for the good. But Jews exploited this aspect of Americanism and turned in it into moral pornography. The Jewish Narrative wasn't about flawed whites who could be better(along with the rest of humanity) but about whiteness being the absolute worst. Instead of prodding the white conscience to be better, Jewish guilt-baiting was about sodomizing the white soul with total humiliation. It was to turn the white soul into a 'bitch' of the Jews. "You're my bitch!" Thus broken and robbed of pride and dignity, 'white guilt' only knows one thing: To seek the approval of the Master, the Jews. As the Narrative says "whites are the devil, and Jews are the god", whites have been led to believe their moral value is incumbent on sucking up to divine Jews, but it's the Jews who are the real devils in the current world order.

And it is in this sense that BLM is indirectly related to the mass mayhem in the Middle East and North Africa. After all, what is the real purpose of BLM? Sure, it is in part a Jewish way of flattering black megalomania to keep the alliance. But the other and bigger reason is to paralyze white pride and dignity. It is to burden whites with so much 'white guilt' that whites are reduced to cucky browbeaten saps. Do saps have agency? No, how can there be agency without pride and dignity? Thus robbed of agency by the cult of 'white guilt', white 'morality' is no real morality because saps always look to the Holy Other for benediction. And as this Other is Jewish Authority, the end-result is whites slavishly going out on a limb to appease Jews to win their approval. So, if Jews want to destroy the Middle East to further the Yinonist Plan, whites just go along. Thus, white pseudo-morality has been calibrated to serve Jewish Evil. 'White Guilt' is like the kind of 'guilt' shown by dogs that anxiously crave the approval and affection of their master uber alles.

The sheer 'bogosity' of 'white guilt' easily proves that Jews control the gods. If Jews did not and if white conscience was for real, whites would be mindful not only of injustice done to blacks but injustice done by blacks to non-blacks. Furthermore, whites would be mindful about the evils of Jewish-controlled foreign policy that destroyed so many lives in the Middle East and North Africa. Whites would be condemning Jews working with quasi-Nazis in Ukraine. Whites would call out all those homos working in the US deep state to spread terror and promote neo-imperialism. But no, 'white morality' is totally under the spell of the gods controlled by Jews, and as such, it totally supports all the crazy Jewish schemes(no matter the body count) and vilifies whatever Jews hate.

This is why nothing is possible without White Liberation from Jewish Supremacism.

But then, we are now living in a time where mere support of Free Speech gets you banned from banking and financial services. All of us pay taxes to bail out banks, but banks can deny us service merely for the fact that any of us might support free speech. Just ask GAB, a platform open to all. Because free speech leads to real discussion, speaking truth to power, and development of true conscience, it cannot be tolerated by Jewish Supremacist Power. For Jews, only Controlled Conscience is tolerable, with Jews doing the controlling. But of course, 'controlled conscience' is an oxymoron as no true conscience is directed from the outside. True conscience is what you feel from within, like with the soldier in HACKSAW RIDGE.

What Jews are pushing in AmeriKa is Konscience. And the so-called 'woke' are really hypnotized or dazed. Just about everything they 'think' and say has been instilled and ordered by Jewish Power, but of course, they don't know it because they were brainwashed from cradle. As children accept things uncritically and unconditionally and as current Western Society encourages infantilization, many white folks never developed critical thinking or true conscience. Also, the Jewish promotion of rampant sexualization further served to stunt the maturation of white minds. Sexualized at a young age, white kids became slaves of sensations and sensualism as transmitted through the electronic media controlled by Jews. They become animalized without the critical brakes that distinguish man from beast. In a way, animals are wild and out-of-control, but in another way, they are easier to control because they have simple minds. Look at all those idiot crowds screaming as one at rock concerts. As Jews control the means of titillation, they can associate the pleasures in Pavlovian manner with whatever agendas they hold dear. Have people scream out of control at a rock concert and then pull out a massive homo flag, and the screams will follow along. There is the abortion of killing unborn kids, but there is also the mental abortion of preventing the emergence of adult mentalities among goyim.

REGIME CHANGE 2021 by Brother Nathanael

Jews say America went from a 'White Supremacist' Nation to a World of Diversity, Inclusion, & Equity, but Current America is really a Jewish Supremacist Empire with Diversity used to serve Jewish Hegemonism Uber Alles

What is America supposed to be?

We are told it went from a 'white supremacist' nation to an inclusive empire of diversity, inclusion, and equity. But if so, why are Jewish Interests at the front and center of American Policy?

It seems US went from 'white supremacy' to 'Jewish supremacy' but with Jews having hoodwinked everyone that it's a whole new ball game. But just ask the Palestinians. If you support BDS, you can't rise up the ladder(or even hold a low-level job). Palestinian interests are not regarded on the same level with Jewish interests. It's the difference between heaven and earth.

It's true that US institutions and industries are open to more people than ever before and meritocracy counts for more(unless you're black, in which case, a B- counts as an A+), but mere ability doesn't ensure elevation to the top. As Jews control the gods, you have to prove yourself worthy before what Jews hold as sacred.

One is globo-homo. As Jews have the most control over globo-homo(and as homos are happy to work with Jews for power and privilege), one's submission to globo-homo is pretty much submission to Jewish Power by other means. Also, by accepting globo-homo, you are agreeing to the power arrangement whereby the majority bows down before the elite minority.
Another is BLM. Negrolatry undermines your own ethnic identity and power. You must put blackkness above your own identity, and this also serves Jewish Power because Jews pretty much control blacks. While blacks don't particularly like Jews, they know that Jews find blacks useful and as long as blacks play along, Jewish money and power go a long way toward favoring blacks as idols and heroes. So, there is a Jewish-Black alliance, and this means sucking up to blackness comes down to sucking up to Jewishness by other means. Take Al Sharpton. He got started by bashing Jews, but Jews bought him off, and so, he hollers about 'white supremacy' but never denounces Jewishness or stick up for Palestinians or all those Arabs murdered by Wars for Israel. Blacks are really into "what's mine", and if you pay them enough and stoke their vanity, their principles go out the window. They are like Scatman Crothers in ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST saying, "I'm on my knees, brother, I'm on my knees."
So, by putting globo-homo or Negrolatry before one's own ethnicity & origins, Identity Politics doesn't go very far for the POD or People of Diversity. Whether you're Hindu, Mexican, Chinese, Iranian, Arab, Turk, or whatever, you must put globo-homo and Negrolatry before your people, your culture, and your identity. So, while meritocracy will lead you up the ladder, you are stopped at the gates to the top unless you put globo-homo and Negrolatry before your own identity.
And of course, there is the Big Kahuna of Holocaust Worship and mindless support for Zionism. If you fail that test, forget about reaching higher. No matter how talented, intelligent, or well-credentialed you are, you will be stopped at the gates if you don't put globo-homo, Negrolatry, and Jew-Worship at the top of your concerns. Jew-Worship directly serves the Jews, and GloboHomo and Negrolatry indirectly serve the Jews as Jews pretty much own and manipulate both.

Homos eagerly work with Jews because Jews favor them as allies. And blacks know that, on their own, they haven't the money and the talent to amass much power or prestige. Blacks know Jews are using them, but they also get to use Jews. So, there is a symbiotic relationship, with both groups sticking it to Whitey to grab more for themselves.
If you only want to work in the engine room, you may rely on your merit alone. But if you want to reach any higher and come near the captain's cabin, you must pass the Smell Test, meaning you must reek of Globo-Homo, Negrolatry, and Jew-Worship.

How clever Jews played the game. Their Narrative has people believing that the US went from 'white supremacism' to the happy empire of D.I.E or Diversity-Inclusion-Equity, but the rules of the game is such that Jews remain at the top and rig the entrance exam whereby ability alone isn't enough for YOU to enter the upper echelons of power. If you want a place alongside the Jewish Masters, you better support globo-homo, Negrolatry, and Jew Worship. Otherwise, it's back to the engine room. You can work the machinery but you won't be anywhere near the captain's wheel. Jews own the wheel.
Because you must pass the Jewish Smell Test(rigged to favor Jewish Power uber alles), all this talk of D.I.E is just a big fat lie. In other words, the US didn't go from White-centrism to World-centrism but went to Jewish-centrism with the World being made to serve the Jews. Sure, many more diverse peoples now live in the US and can rise up the ladder, but if they really want to reach high, they must put globo-homo, Negrolatry, and Jew Worship before and above their own identity, ethnicity, culture, and values. After all, it is the elites at the very top who decide how all the money, military, and resources of America will be used. Most of us just work and pay taxes. We pay but don't have a say. Only Jews and their minions who passed the Smell Test have the say to use the wealth and power generated by all Americans to their favored ends.

So, for all the talk of 'multi-culturalism', you better not bring your Muslim, Hindu, or Confucian values if you want to reach high up the ladder. You must put them in the closet and instead wave the homo flag, chant BLM slogans, and kneel at the feet of Jews. Thus, the current order has the LOOK OF DIVERSITY but works according to the rule of "Is it Great for Jews?" There are many Hindus placed highly in Silicon Valley, but what are they all about? They are about Jew Worship and Globo-Homo. Even though Hindus remember the 'bad ole days' of British Imperialism, they don't say or do anything for Palestinians living under White Jewish Zionist oppression. Rather, they work with Jews and pledge total commitment to globo-homo and BLM. And look at Andrew Yang in New York defaming BDS by smearing it with the Nazi label. The yellow dog will say and do anything to be in good graces with the Jews who run NY. So, outwardly, it seems like Diversity is making gains over White America, but the diverse minions only serve the supremacism of Jews.

To reach the top, you can be critical of the Russian nation, culture, and people. You can be critical of the Chinese nation, culture, and people. You can be critical of the Iranian nation, culture, and people. You can be critical of the Mexican nation, culture, and people. You can be critical of the Turkish nation, culture, and people. You can be critical of Arab nations, cultures, and peoples. And of course, you MUST BE critical and even condemnatory of Western White Folks.
But you may NOT be critical of the Jewish nation, culture, and people. You may not be critical of blacks in any shape or form. You may not be critical of homos and trannies. What does that tell you? There is no equality within Diversity. Some groups are more equal than others. A Jew or black or homo doesn't have to praise Muslims, Chinese, Russians, Turks, or Iranians to reach the top BUT people who aren't black, Jewish, or homo must prostrate themselves before Negrolatry, Jew Worship, and Globo-Homo if they want in. And as they get in by totally cucking before Jewish Power, their only option is to slavishly serve Jews with the gratitude of having been let in.

So, America went from 'white supremacism' to 'Jewish supremacism', but so many people fail to see this because of the cover of D.I.E. People think, "Hey, look at the blacks and Asians in government!" Never mind that whether it's Nikki Haley or Kamala Harris, it's all about whoredom to Jews and sticking it to the Palestinians.
And given the nature of the Smell Test, no person of any conscience, integrity, or decency may apply. There's no chance that anyone like Ron Paul or Tulsi Gabbard will rise very high. While far from perfect, Ron Paul has stood by his libertarian principles, and Gabbard is sincerely committed to world peace. That simply won't do. No wonder the government is filled with shameless snakes like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Mitt Romney, Mike Pompeo, Susan Rice, James Clapper, and the like who will sell their souls to the devil to be part of the In-Club.