Relativity of Treason — How Donald Trump is both a Traitor and a Patriot

Following the summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, the Jew-run Mass Media have gone bonkers in smearing Trump as some kind of unprecedented traitor. This was to be expected because the entire Russia-Collusion-Hysteria had been engineered from the get-go to prevent the meeting of Trump and Putin. But Trump being Trump, he decided to meet with Putin and discuss important matters as World Leaders. Trump knows(and we know and even enemies of Trump know deep in their hearts) that the Russian Collusion thing is the biggest hoax in US history. It was essentially concocted by Jews and MIC(military-industrial-complex) to prevent a rapprochement between the US and Russia. There are reasons why Jews and MIC want to antagonize Russia. For Jews, it’s ethnic hostility rooted in historical animus and tribal greed. As Jews control the media and Deep State, they control the Narrative and get to define ‘American Interests’ which essentially comes to "Is it good for Jewish supremacism?" and "All Americans must like whatever Jews like and hate whatever Jews hate." Jews get to decide our loves and hates, and that means we are to be denied Emotional Autonomy. We must be like dogs that take emotional cues from their master. As for the MIC, they need Russia as the Evil Enemy in order to justify their budget for warmongering. There are other anti-Russian elements too. Globo-Homo degenerates hate Russia because of its restoration of nationalism and traditionalism. Pathologically vain self-worshiping Homos and Trannies want all the world to honor, celebrate, and praise their fussy-fancy ilk. And power-porn elite-educated mafia just love the game of power, and they figure Russia is the most credible rival in the world, especially as Jews have given green light to hate and revile Russia. For them, what counts is the sheer nihilism of playing The Game.

Anyway, the question of Treason is never a simple one because the logic of Treason and Loyalty is always relative. Consider the film CHARIOTS OF FIRE. The Olympic runner must choose between God and King. In choosing God, he is seen by some as snubbing and disrespecting the king. But to the sprinter, it is a higher loyalty. Similar conflict unfolds in the film BECKET where Richard Burton as the eponymous character must choose between loyalty to his friend & king AND a higher sense of duty.


James Comey himself reiterated the problem of treason with his book HIGHER LOYALTY. Comey violated FBI rules and conspired against the President. As such, he is a traitor to the Bureau and to the President. But Comey insists he acted out of a higher loyalty. To what? Truth and justice? To globo-homo agenda? Or to the nihilism of Deep State wrapped in bogus moralizing? In the film THE WILD BUNCH, Pike Bishop(William Holden) defends his estranged ex-friend Deke Thorton(Robert Ryan). Though Thorton is on the hunt for his former outlaw partners, he’d given his word to the Law. Dutch Angstrom(Ernest Borgnine) counters Bishop’s defense of his old friend by insisting that the ‘word’ isn’t enough; it’s whom you give it to.

In RAN by Akira Kurosawa, there are multiple layers of meaning whereby apparent treason might be a deeper loyalty and seeming loyalty could be concealed treachery. The youngest son who’d spoken bluntly against his father was the loyal one. The older sons who spoke with devotion and respect were out for their own power and even willing to destroy their own father. The biggest traitor may be Lady Kaeda who conspires to have the (Hidetora) Ichimonji clan destroyed from within. But in another way, she is also the most loyal character as she’d remained true to her own clan that had been vanquished by the Ichimonjis. As the wife of lord of the Ichimonji clan, her machinations were clearly treasonous. But she’d never forgotten or forgiven the fact that the clan she’d married into destroyed her own family.

And in NIXON, Oliver Stone dramatizes how there are competing factions behind any politician, and each faction represents its own vision of what America should be. And as a politician relies on support from various factions with conflicting interests, his loyalty to one can easily appear as betrayals to others. Especially a nation as big and complex as the US cannot have a single easily definable formula of ‘America’ or ‘American Interests’. Usually, those at the Top(especially in media, academia, law, and politics) get to decide what America is all about. Indeed, Americans cannot even agree on the heroes and villains of history. If Jews can help it, all the monuments to White Southerners will be torn down while all white people must be made to worship MLK, the Negro who sold out the Palestinians because Jews filled his pocket with money.


So, what is Treason? What is Loyalty? It’s all relative. Take Benedict Arnold, denounced as the biggest traitor of the American Revolution. But couldn’t one argue that the Revolution itself was an act of treason against the Mother Country of Britain and to the King? From that perspective, Arnold's treason was an act of loyalty to the Crown. (The Spanish Civil War was especially confused because the Leftists who were 'loyal' to the Power were radicals hellbent on turning Spain upside down with communism and anarchism, whereas the rebel forces were committed to maintaining Spanish Tradition.) Of course, the Founding Fathers argued that their higher loyalty was to independence, freedom, and dignity of man. Some have argued such were mere rosy words to cosmeticize what was essentially a naked power grab by the landed gentry of the Colonies who wanted supreme power in their own hands. Granted, the example of George Washington shows that the Founders weren't out to be the New King. Rather, what they envisioned was a new kind of aristocracy, the ‘natural aristocracy’, that would be made up mostly of themselves and their descendants who were deemed to be superior in intellect and knowledge. Though Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson are usually seen as ideological opposites, both were elitist in their own unique ways. The difference was Jefferson’s style was that of an agrarian aristocrat whereas Hamilton was more urban in his disposition and preference. Jefferson thought more like a nobleman whereas Hamilton thought more like a monarch. (Oddly enough, the two styles would be wedded together by Andrew Jackson, a crude man of low origin.)
The rise of modernity and rapidity of change made the issue of loyalty and treason increasingly more difficult to resolve. It's difficult to be loyal to anything when so much is changing so fast all around you. Constancy became obsolete.
The French Revolution was a rebellion against the King. Obviously, the Revolutionaries were traitors to the monarch, the nobility, and the Church that had defined France and French culture for so long. But the Revolution argued that the rulers no longer possessed the right to rule. The Enlightenment had revealed a higher form of justice. Also, rulers must serve the people than vice versa. To the extent that the Tradition made the French people serve the king, aristocrats, and the church(that were unresponsive to the needs of the people), it was in violation of the true Theory of Justice. Thus, treason against the Old System was necessary to bring forth a New System that was worthy of the loyalty of the people who were to be liberated and elevated. They would no longer be subjects and instead become free citizens of a republic. And then, of course the Revolutionaries fell into the lethal habit of accusing one another of treason to the spirit of the Revolution, a tragedy avoided by American Revolutionaries who were less radical and less threatened by foreign powers. Later, Russian Revolution would lead to tragedies that made the French Revolution’s failures look like a picnic.

Anyway, it isn't easy to ascertain who is traitorous or loyal because it depends on one’s perspective. Indeed, everyone could be said to be both traitorous and loyal. One’s loyalty to the Old Order is treason against the New Order, and one’s loyalty to the New Order is treason against the Old Order. And as the New Order soon becomes the Old Order, it also insists on blind loyalty and commitment. The issues of loyalty and treason have still not been resolved around the American Civil War. Though the North won the war, many in the South never accepted the Northern Narrative. Also, there had been a prolonged period when the North decided to effectively bury the hatchet and make cultural peace with the South, i.e. the North would maintain its favored Narrative and the South would its own. Live and let live. Let the North honor Lincoln and Grant. Let the South accept the fact of the Union but still honor men like Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson. This noble understanding was subverted by Jews who, in seeking to totally cuck-castrate the white race into submission, have waged Total War on the Southern Narrative(which is ironic since Jews in the South had been mostly pro-Confederate).

So, what about Donald Trump? Is he a patriot or a traitor? If he is a traitor, we need to ask what he is a traitor to? Which America? After all, there is no single America. Surely, Palestinian-America differs from Jewish-America. Jewish-America sees BDS as traitorous, but Palestinian-America sees US support of Zionism as a betrayal of what 'America' should be about. And black-America hardly sees eye-to-eye with white America that has much at odds with Mexican-America. Many blacks revere men like Malcolm X who had harsh words for White America. And many whites in the South still feel affection for the Confederate flag that symbolized the South's rebellion against the Union. And whites and Mexicans(even Mexican-Americans) will remember the Alamo differently. Feminists, with the backing of Jew-run media, claim to represent Women's Interests. So, if women speak, act, or vote against the policies favored by Feminism Inc, they are said to be traitors to womynkind. Feminists say women must be more loyal to the Sisterhood than to their families. In reality, Power Feminists(like Elizabeth Holmes and Sheryl Sandberg) have more in common with Elite Men(especially Jews and globo-hustlers) than with lower class women without fancy careers, wealth, and privilege. The real conflict is between elite men/women and mass men/women. Feminists aren't out for equality. They want to rise high to be with and marry elite men.
And even within the same racial or ethnic community, there can be a wide divergence of interests. This is especially true among whites, among whom 59% generally vote Republican while the rest vote Democratic.Some white Republicans might see white Democrats as traitors to the race, while many white Democrats might see white Republicans as traitors to 'history' that will end when every corner of the world has been globalized with diversity and made Homo-Mulatto. Also, even though the US is a nation of 325 million people, only a relatively tiny share of the population has control over the media, academia, upper echelons of government, and the like. And they are the ones who usually get to decide what is what. They decide what ‘American Interests’ are. And they theorize what ‘America’ or ‘American values’ or ‘Western values’ are all about, and then they foist this formulation on all Americans via the mass media that are controlled mostly by Jews. Indeed, so much of the 'American' label is just a stamp or sticker for JEWISH power, privilege, and passions.
When we consider the people with the most power in the US(the Jews and Homos) and how they choose to define ‘America’, Trump is indeed a traitor to that ‘America’. The globo-homo elites are bored with nationhood. It's too petty and small for them. They want to play with and own all the world. They want the US to be not a fortress but an aircraft carrier. For them, Manifest Destiny continues with new wars, new propaganda, Homomania as the new missionary-crusade, Afro-worship as the New Cool, demographic imperialism, and spread of Jewish hegemony(with Anglos and Homos as favored sidekicks). Globalist elites of many nations pool their resources to gain control over the world, and all the masses of the world become mixed-up peons and helots with no right of identity, territory, or history. (Only Jews, especially in Israel, are to have that right.) The elites don't need a specified identity, territory, or history because they got what gives them the most jollies: Wealth, connections, privilege, and VIP status wherever they go. The elites speak of 'equality' and 'inclusion', but it's really just 'elititude', an invocation game of certain agreed-upon symbolism not unlike the practice of Christianity in aristocratic Europe; all those kings and noblemen hardly led lives that could be construed as genuinely Christian, but they didn't have to because they carried on with the symbolic rituals of sanctimony that shrouded them with the aura of piety. Elititude. Today, all those Western elites don't have to give up their wealth and rub shoulders with the wretched of the earth to be 'progressive'. They merely need to take selfies at a ceremony commemorating Nelson Mandela. How do you like them photo-ops by Bono with African children? After playing Pop Christ, he goes back to live in his mansion.

This ‘America’ that is favored by the Mass Media is not a sovereign nation but a jewel-in-the-crown of the real superpower in the world, the Empire of Judea(or EOJ) that has neo-imperialist globo-homo networks all over the world. Jewish power is connected via New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Atlanta, Chicago, San Francisco, Boston, London, Paris, Berlin, Warsaw, Moscow, Buenos Aires, Mexico City, Tel Aviv, and etc. Jews have powerful presence even in nations that are deemed as the enemies of the US. Jews are so powerful that even Russia, a nation that is constantly defamed by vicious Jews, must allow a bunch of Jews to hold great wealth and power. (Russians are spectacular underachievers who are so lazy, stupid, and incompetent that a handful of Jews have run circles around them time and time again. Indeed, consider the difference between the Russian Revolution and the German Revolution. Both turned out to be evil, but German Revolution of the National Socialists gained power for Germans against the Semites whereas the Russian Revolution led to the Semitic & non-Russian minority domination over vast numbers of Russian Slavs. Germans, being more capable, outmaneuvered the Jews, whereas Russians, being drunk and stupid, came under the rule of Jews who made up a tiny cabal. Alas, even though Germans were more capable, their recklessness led to WWII and their downfall, and Germans have never been able to regain their footing since. In a way, German conscientiousness came to be a thorn on its side. Though conscientiousness is generally a good thing, the relative lack of such among Russians seems to maintain their resistance to the Jews. Ironically, both Germany’s choice of National Socialism and Shoah-Guilt[or National Shame-ism] were the product of German conscientiousness. Overwhelmed by mounting poverty and degradation during the Great Depression, National Socialism seemed to offer an opportunity for Germans to rise up and do something hard and constructive to repair and rebuild the nation. It was National Will in action, and a people without conscientiousness couldn’t have chosen such a path. Germans, unlike stupid and lazy Greeks in the financial crisis several years back, were not bitching and asking for easy fix. They were willing to unite and work hard to restore German greatness again. This called for lots of work, unity, and collective sacrifice, and Germans were up to the challenge. So far so good. But then, the man the Germans put in charge, Adolf Hitler, turned out to be a mad visionary and degenerate gambler with history. Hitler exploited the conscientiousness of the Germans. He promised them a New Beginning based on hard work, sacrifice, and unity. Germans trusted him, and things seemed to be going well... until Hitler decided on imperialism, and then all hell broke loose. After the war, Germans chose the path of conscientiousness once again. They came to realize that their blind trust in Hitler-as-savior-of-Germany had led to a catastrophic war that not only destroyed millions of German lives but millions of non-German lives as well. Among the great horrors was Shoah, the killing of millions of Jews. So, Germans decided to be mindful and redeem themselves. If in the 1930s they’d put all their trust in Hitler, after WWII Germans increasingly put their trust in Jews as a holy people. When Jews didn’t rule the world, it didn’t much matter, but as Jews increasingly became the masters of the US, the most powerful nation in the world, Germans came under greater pressure to prostrate themselves before Jews as the Holy Holocaust Race that must be obeyed and worshiped like gods. And as Jews gained even more power, they went from rulers of the US to the rulers of the Empire of Judea, of which the US was the main prize. Flush with all this power, Jews are now in supremacist Judeo-Nazi mode, and they’re rabid with power.)

Given who really rules America and gets to decide what is ‘American’ or what are ‘Western values’, one could say Trump is indeed a traitor to this ‘America’. In the Brother Nathanael video above, it’s obvious that many anti-Trump voices in the media are Jewish. But then, the media are owned mostly by Jews. It’s an incestuous and inbred Jew-owned-and-run Media that hire lots of Jews to tell us that whatever Jews hate, we must hate too. Whatever Jews like, we must like to. Jews dictate to us what to hate, what to love. If Jews say it is American-as-apple-pie to support IDF death squad's killing of Palestinian protesters(calling attention to the fact that 2018 is the 70th anniversary of Nakba Pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map thanks to Jewish mass migration-invasion), then cheering for Zionist killers must be red, white, and blue(or red, white, and Jew). The so-called Mass Media offer us endless ‘two-minutes of hatred’, and according to Jews, Putin is the New Goldstein or Goldputin. According to the PC Narrative, one's willful deviance from this Agenda constitutes 'treason'. It's like a master shaming a dog as 'bad doggy' for refusing to fetch the ball or fight another dog.

Basically, the Mass Media is Hate News against whatever Jews hate and is Love Media for whatever Jews love(or thinks is useful to their supremacist power). All this Russia brouhaha is so much nonsense, and the ONLY reason it exists is because Jewish globo-homo imperialism hates nationalism or national autonomy/independence/sovereignty of goy peoples, especially whites. Jews are viciously hostile toward white Americans whereas Putin & Russia feel no such hostility. Jews are also hostile toward Russians. Because Russia refuses to obey Jewish Supremacists, Jews feel that Russia is 'hostile' to the Jewish Agenda; therefore, all of us(as obedient dogs) are also supposed to see Russia as hostile to us. According to Jewish logic, refusal to obey the Jewish globo-homo agenda is 'hateful' and 'hostile'. It's like Harvey Weinstein's sexual logic. Any woman who said NO to him was offending him than he was offending her. Like they say, "Jews cry out in pain as he strikes you." Jews lie about Russian Collusion when, in fact, they are the ones who colluded with Deep State and EU to get Hillary, their bitch-whore, elected. According to Jews, the only approved 'allies' of the US are its bitch-whore puppets like Japan, Canada, UK, France, Sweden, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and etc. Any nation outside the orbit of US hegemony is friend or enemy depending on how JEWS feel about it. Jews are the final judge of which nations the US can be friendly with. Jews say Israel is America's closest ally, and that must be true because... Jews say so. Jews say Russia is the #1 enemy, and it must be so because... Jews say so. Jews are masters, we are dogs. Woof. Imagine someone who says he gets to decide who gets to be your friends or enemies. If you decided to find your own friends, he calls you a traitor to yourself. Jews are like the insane jealous lover in PLAY MISTY FOR ME who tries to claim the Clint Eastwood character all to herself. A truly vile people. Jews need to own the white race in order to sustain Jewish supremacism.

After all, Jewish supremacism depends on whites serving as horsey to the Jewish rider. Jews are to serve as the mind, and whites are to serve as the obedient body. Though Russia isn’t free of malevolent Jewish influence, it is freer than the US is. Paradoxically, Russians both fell under and resisted Jewish power more fully than White America did. If German conscientiousness made Germans both radically anti-Jewish under National Socialism and excessively pro-Jewish after WWII — in both cases, the Germans were trying so very hard to do the Right Thing — , the Russian lack of conscientiousness made them easily fall under Jewish Bolsheviks and later bluntly irreverent to Jewish power. After the fall of the Tsar and under the rule of the Provisional Government, the only thing Russians cared about was ‘land, bread, and peace’, or ‘what is in it for me?’ Most had no idea what was happening or didn’t care. They just wanted ‘my little thing’. So, Russian masses were willing to throw their lot with the Bolsheviks even though the latter was calling for national defeat to the Germans. Russian masses couldn't care less. They just wanted "what’s mine". Russian moral and intellectual laziness led to this morass, something that energetic and radical Jewish Bolsheviks took advantage of. Lack of Russian conscientiousness could be manipulated by Jews. But then later, this very trait worked against Jews. Upon Stalin's outmaneuvering the Jews and later when his heirs promised More Stuff to the Russians at the expense of Jews, the Russians readily accepted the bargain. Russians didn’t care if Soviet version of ‘affirmative action’ hurt smarter Jews. They were into "What’s mine?" than for higher principles and meritocratic fair play. Also, being less conscientious, Russians are harder to guilt-bait. Besides, communism made it difficult to guilt-bait most Russians. After all, communism said capitalism is evil. Most Russians never got to practice capitalism. If anything, even communist Jews had more savvy for enterprise and came to be associated with stuff like black markets. Also, WWII meant Soviet/Russian victory over Nazism. So, that meant Russians deserved moral pride over having defeated Nazi Germany. Against such mule-headed bluntness, it was difficult for Jews to guilt-bait and manipulate. It’s more constructive to work with ‘conscientious’ dogs than with boorish bears.
Post-Soviet Russia repeated this pattern once again. Because Russians were so lazy, stupid, and slovenly, clever and greedy Jews found it easy to manipulate the Russian economy and loot much of it in the 1990s while too many Russians were drunk on vodka or imitating American pop culture. If Russians had been more conscientious, like Germans or Japanese after WWII, it would have been more difficult for Jews to pull off such a stunt. But then, Russian boorishness and crudity turned into an advantage beginning in the 2000s. Emotionally gruff and rough-n-tumble in sensibility, Russians decided to say hell with Jews and their homo puppets. They said hell to 'liberal democracy' and what the globalists were hailing as the New Normal in the 'most evolved' progress. (Paradoxically, Anglos and Germanic types can fall for immorality-as-the-new-morality more easily because they are more conscientious. Most people don't think hard about right-and-wrong. They outsource such meanings to the elites and are mainly concerned with seeming to do the right thing in the eyes of the official power. They are more concerned with Moral Approval than Moral Thought. So, if the Power says 'gay marriage' is 'more evolved', Anglos and Germanic types try so very hard to appear More Moral and win status approval. In contrast, Russians, being less conscientious, are less concerned about seeming More Moral. So, they tend to be more oblivious to the latest Official Line. And yet, this outlook maintains genuine morality because it is less sensitive about keeping-up-with-the-joneses of morality-as-fashionable-virtue-signaling.) Russian rejection of globo-homo agenda was a morally important decision but not one that was made morally. Russians stumbled into moral action because things got so bad with Jews at the helm. They wanted a strong hand to rein in the oligarchs and gangsters, and that man was Vladimir Putin. Most Russians didn’t care what Putin did as long as he made things better. Lucky for them, Putin turned out to be rather sane and sound leader with good sense for things. Anyway, because Russians tend to be neanderthal in their ways and emotions, they are harder to psychologically or morally manipulate. Jews found it easier to gain power over lazy and stupid Russians but also more difficult to maintain control over them for the long haul because Russians are so disorganized, lazy, incompetent, and lacking in conscience. In contrast, Jews found it far more difficult to gain power over Anglos and Germans, a talented hardworking people with strong sense of moral pride. But once Jews gained an edge over them, they found it easier to manipulate them psychologically and morally because Anglos and Germans really care about the principles of right and wrong(or are obsessed about seeming to care about such things as a matter of status). In the short run, it was easier for Jews to take power in Russia but, in the long run, it was harder for Jews to keep the power because Russians just wouldn't play along as they’re too lazy, childish, boorish, and difficult. In contrast, Jews were met with truly stiff competition from talented Anglos and Germans. Thus, Jews required far more energy to gain dominance in their world. Jews gained supreme power in Russia in 1917. Jews gained comparable power only in the 1980s in the US. But once Jews gained power in the US, it was easier to keep because Anglos and Anglo-ized whites did a very good job of keeping things running for their Jewish masters.
After all, the very craziness of Russia in the 90s that enabled Jews to steal so much also led to the downfall or exile of many Jews. It’s one thing to grab a lot of loot, but unless there is law and order, it’s difficult for the looters to keep all their loot. Certain Jewish oligarchs of the 1990s met a fate similar to that of Jewish Bolsheviks in the 1930s in the Great Purge. Even though Jews grabbed so much power so fast in Russia following the October Revolution, the sheer lack of Rule of Law meant that what the Jews took violently and unscrupulously could be taken from them in the same manner by someone even more cunning and ruthless than them, and that man happened to be Josef Stalin the Georgian. Russia has always been a land of bandits, peasants, gamblers, and bear-wrestlers. Jews could get such people drunk and steal their wealth, but drunken mobs can easily turn on the very people who supplied them with the drink. Jews always played on lack of conscientiousness among Russians to gain power over Russians. Jews always saw Russians as idiots and boors to whom to sell vodka, either literally or metaphorically in the intoxication of the Revolution(communism) or Riches(privatization). But the danger was that Russians-as-boors might get pissed and go 'pogrom' on the nasty Jews.
In contrast, the US was the nation that once came up with Prohibition. And the Brits, even as they allowed the Jew David Sassoon to sell opium to China, banned the sale of opium in Britain itself. Therefore, if Jews played on lack of control and conscientiousness among Russians, they played on the strong sense of self-control and conscientiousness among Anglos and Anglo-Americans. Jews did the hustle on the Anglos. Initially, Jews were full of praise for White Anglo America. Jews flattered the Anglo-Americans for having created a nation better and more just than any in Europe. But that was a bait. After all, if the US was supposed to be so wonderful and great, why did it have such-and-such problems and why did US fail to live up to all its promises? So, what began as Jewish praise turned increasingly into Jewish condemnation of White America's failure to fulfill its true 'proposition'. And Anglo-Americans, especially the Episcopalian elites, being so conscientious and sensitive about their self-image as Good People, turned into moral putty in the hands of Jews(who rarely applied similar kind of critique on their own kind and power). Anyway, even though it was far more difficult climb for Jews to take over the US(than a nation like Russia), the victory has been more complete and total because (1) white Americans can maintain a system of Rule of Law that Jews can manipulate to their own advantage and (2) white Americans are earnest about their conscientious redemption and atonement to be ‘good people’ as, of course, to be defined by Jews who control the academia, media, and pop culture(which is the only remaining culture).

When we consider the US as a vassal of the real superpower in the world, the Empire of Judea, Trump is indeed a traitor. His rapport with Putin was an act of Treason to the ‘America’ as a prized colony of the Empire of Judea(or EOJ). While there are plenty of non-Jews who also denounce Trump’s summit with Putin, most of them take their talking points from Jews. In other words, Jews lead, others follow. If Jews were to change their tune tomorrow and say Russia is no longer a problem, most of these non-Jewish dogs will stop barking. In any power system, we must distinguish who’s the master and who’s the dog. In Stalin’s Soviet Union, it would have seemed that Stalin and all his men were equally united in their passion for or against something. But was it really a consensus? Or was it Stalin’s hatred that others had to agree with. So, if Stalin hated A, his henchmen also had to hate A. If Stalin then decided to love A and hate B, his henchmen would do likewise. Same logic applies to the US. Don’t mind the barking dogs. They lack agency. They will bark to the tune of their masters. As Jews rule the US, they get to decide what is to be hated. Jews hate Russia and Putin at the moment, so ALL OF US are supposed to hate along. And because most non-Jews in the Deep State and Mass Media won’t have a career unless they obey Jews, they also spout along. Sure, they sound sincere in their hatred, but so did the henchmen of Stalin and Mao. And of Hitler. Whatever the Fuhrer said, the Nazi henchmen had to go along with. Just about everyone in the American Deep State and Media has to APPEASE their Jewish Masters if he wants to have career, reputation, and status.

The rise of Russian Nationalism led to the slipping of Jewish monopoly power in Russia. The Russian masses decided to support Putin and Russian nationalism. Putin then lent special support to the Russian Church. Jews were alarmed by this and sought to counter the development with Pussy Riot and Homomania, but Russia said Nyet. This infuriated the Jews. In contrast, Jews were able to guilt-bait, castrate, browbeat, brainwash, and heart-worm American whites(and Western Europeans) into worshiping Magic Negroes, embracing cuckery, rejecting their own racial/cultural identity, remembering Holocaustianity, and celebrating Homomania. American Whites were told they have no identity or culture of their own, and even if they did, it must be bad because whiteness is ‘racist’ and must be destroyed. But Donald Trump, the Alt Right, and Populism began to turn the tide on the Jewish Supremacist Power. More Americans began to wake up to the Globo-Homo agenda. They came to be more aware of Jewish power. And even conservative white Americans who continue to have warm feelings for Jews and Israel increasingly said NO to social and political agendas favored by Jewish elites. And this is why Jews are all panicked about Russia. Jews are no longer worried about survival. They are addicted to supremacism. After all, Russia is friendly to Jews, and lots of Jews are fabulously rich there. Even as Jews denigrate Russia and spit on Putin, Russia and Putin have been nice, welcoming, and protective of Jews. While Putin moved against the nastiest Jewish oligarchs, he kept some of them around, and if anything, he’s come down hard on outspoken anti-Jewish elements in Russia. But that’s not enough for Jews who must have supremacism. Jews believe non-Jewish nations belong to them. Since Jews cannot take them over demographically like they took over Palestine, Jews promote mass invasion-immigration on all goy nations so that the native peoples will, under the Diversity regimen, lose their sense of identity, territory, and history. And then, Jewish globalist elites will find it much easier to penetrate and take over nation after nation, not least by exploiting the art of divide-and-rule among Diversity created by mass invasion-immigration.

While Trump is clearly a traitor to the Empire of Judea, he could be seen as a patriot to America that has been envisioned as a sovereign nation with a specific history, core demography, core cultural themes(mostly rooted in Europe), and well-established borders. According to this view, the Core Americans are the European settlers who conquered, founded, and built the nation. While non-whites did their part in the development of the US, America is essentially an extension of European Civilization, and in order for the US to remain that way, its core must be white-European, especially Northern European. Patriots believe that this America must be preserved. After all, America was not founded and built by the world. Rather, it was founded by a specific group of Europeans, and later, other kinds of Europeans adapted and assimilated to this Core America that was essentially Anglo-Germanic. It has been this success story that made the US a magnet for the rest of the world that was far less successful in creating nice societies. If indeed the US belongs to all the world and must become all the world, why should people of the world have to come to the US? If the US is not a specific nation but The World, then people around the world should just stay put because US, as the World, would hardly be different from the rest of the world. On the one hand, the globo-homo-pushers say the US is an ‘exceptional’ nation, but then they say the US must become like the rest of the world. If US is so exceptional, why must it become so much like the rest of the world? Or are they saying the world is made better if they come to the US and become ‘Americans’? But what would this ‘American’ be? If US no longer has a core demography, no core culture, and no core anything and if US is always reinventing itself with more and more Mass Immigration, what would make it so ‘exceptional’? Indeed, the US narrative went from 'immigrants from the world must assimilate to American-ness' to 'American-ness must assimilate to the world'.
Of course, Jews have it all figured out. The reason why Jews welcome more Mass Invasion-Immigration is because they believe themselves to the be smartest people. If Jews really believed that newcomers could take power from them, they would say NO to more Mass Immigration. Suppose Mexicans and Muslims have an average IQ of 130 and very pushy personalities. Suppose they were to come to the US, outsmart the Jews, and take over as New Elites. Would Jews really want More Immigration then? Of course not. Jews welcome more Mass Invasion-Immigration because they know the newcomers will only be their helots, servants, and new voters. Jews know the newcomers won’t be able to compete with Jews. Asians are smarter than most immigrant groups, but East Asians are too dull-in-personality to win against Jews-with-chutzpah. And Hindus are too exotic and weird for most Americans to accept as the New Elites. Indeed, Jewish Power works a perverse duality vis-a-vis whites. On the one hand, Jews berate and shame whiteness. Jews tell whites to know their place and not act uppity. But Jews also count as ‘white’, and that means they are more acceptable to whites as elites than other groups are. So, even though many whites may increasingly sense that Jews are pretty nasty toward them, they still regard Jews-in-power as whites-in-power since Jews officially count as whites. But many whites wouldn't feel likewise if a bunch of Hindus took elite power in the US. Hindus are just too exotic. And of course, Jews understand this psychology, which is why they don’t fear Hindus very much. And Hindus understand this too. They know that whites(and blacks and browns) are less likely to accept the 'dotkins' as New Elites. For one thing, it would be seen as cutting in front of the line as most Hindus in the US are relative newcomers. So, Hindus stick close to Jews in their attainment of power and privilege. They dare not try to gain the upper-hand over Jews. In this Jewish vision of America, more and more ‘immigrants’ means more underlings of Jews. While Mexicans can out-compete ‘white trash’ and Asians can out-compete white middle class, neither will be able to out-compete Jews. Jews are too smart. They are too well-connected. They are too tribal and viciously chutzpahstic. Also, even if they shit all over whites, whites would still prefer Jewish masters than non-white masters. At the very least, white Christians can remind themselves of Judeo-Christian Values and go on pretending that Jews and White Christians are brothers-under-the-skin even though Jews continue to kick them in the balls. Jews as New Elites seem like an alien power but not entirely because Jews and white Christians go back a long time. But if the US were to come under the power of non-whites, there would be far less support for the new elites among whites. Whites will take shit from Jews(and from blacks as Magic Negroes) but not from any other people. Even as Jews berate whites for not being sufficiently welcoming to MORE non-white immigration, they aren’t looking for to parity and equality between Jews and non-white immigrants. As far as Jews are concerned, the non-whites are merely Diversity army to be used against whites. Now, what if whites side with non-whites against Jews? Jews figure that won’t happen because whites, especially white conservatives, will always favor white Jews(no matter how nasty they are) to non-whites. This is the conundrum facing the American Right. Its racial consciousness leads to preference of ‘fellow white’ Jews over non-whites, but no group is as hostile and vicious toward whites in the West than Jews are. It’s like black bears siding with brown bears in the spirit of fellowship-of-the-bear against wolves and coyotes but being attacked most by brown bears that also welcome coyotes and wolves to beat on black bears too. Jews denounce white-consciousness as 'racist' but also rely on this 'racism' as it makes whites favor Jews over others. After all, most white conservatives tend to see Israelis as WHITE Jews and Palestinians as BROWN 'ragheads'. And it is why whites generally favor Jewish power over other kinds of power. Whites aren't bothered by College admission policies that favor Jews over Asians because Jews are seen as fellow whites. So, Jews are playing a contradictory game. They revile white consciousness as 'racist' but also subtly appeal to it to keep whites favoring Jews over non-whites(such as Palestinians in the Middle East and Asians in competition for colleges).

One thing for sure, Trump’s meeting with Putin sure smoked out the true nature of the Deep State. It is so totally Jewish or cucky-wuck. All this alarm about ‘evil Putin’ and Trump’s treason is about Jewish Supremacists demanding that the US remain as part of Empire of Judea than regain independence as a sovereign nation, like Russia and Iran. Jewish supergroup supremacist imperialism hates Russian nationalism and American nationalism because nationalism is anti-imperialist. Nationalism seeks autonomy and independence from imperialist domination. The Thirteen Colonies once belonged to the British Empire. When the Colonies declared independence, the British Crown and Parliament howled TREASON. The Colonies relied on the aid of the French to fight the British. (If Russia wants to help American patriots like the France aided the American Revolutionaries, why should we care? Did the Founding Fathers say NO to French aid on the basis that France was a monarchy?) At this point, the US is no longer a free nation. After the Cold War, Jews cemented their power as the supremacist element in the US, and they steadily and surely incorporated the US into the Worldwide Network of Jewish Supremacist Power. The US is now a colony of the Empire of Judea just as the Thirteen Colonies were once the possession of the British Empire. Just as the British Empire was furious with the uppity daring of the American Revolutionaries who declared independence, Jewish supremacists are freaking out over the fact that Trump and patriotic Americans(who’ve emerged from Jewish hypnosis) are effectively demanding independence and emancipation from the Jewish Supremacist Imperialism. According to Jews, ‘America’ must remain in the Image of Jewish Power. America must obey Jews. And especially White Americans must hate their own race & culture and cuck out to blacks and be ‘inclusive’ of unceasing non-white mass invasion that will reduce the historic core population of the US into a permanent minority. This is the Jewish vision of America, and it can only see Trump’s effort at rapprochement with Russia as a threat to Jewish domination. After all, Russia was once a part of the Empire of Judea but managed to tear itself free(though not entirely) from Jewish claws. If Russia could do it, why not the US? Why not the nations of the EU? If Russia is no longer a part of EOJ, why should the US remain a vassal? EOJ, more than NATO and EU, is the real curse of the world. Though Trump is coming under lots of fire, the sheer hysteria of the Jews is giving us a clear picture of who really rules America and what their real agenda is.
All patriots must be willing to be treasonous to the Empire of Judea. To be loyal to one's nation and people requires one to commit treason against the alien overlords. For Gandhi and Nehru to be loyal to the idea of Indian Independence, they had to be treasonous to the British Empire and refuse to serve as subjects and agents of British Imperialism.

Indeed, imagine the chutzpah of these Jews who make up 2% of the US population but deign to define what is 'America' and shove this concoction down our throats and up our anuses. These Jews, so nasty and lacking in self-awareness, seem to believe that America exists to serve Jewish vanity. Any vision of America that says NO THANKS to Jewish domination is deemed as 'treason'. Well, loyalty to nation calls for treason against globo-homo empire. Such is true patriotism. And we must praise Donald Trump for having tried against all odds against the vile and vicious Jews. He is wrong on many things, but his counter-chutzpah can be amazing.

A Most Useful Slogan: "West Bank and Gaza are America’s Greatest Ally" or "Palestine is America’s Closest Ally" — An Effective Way to Expose the Most Important Fact of America: It is a Jewish-Supremacist Colony

The Left-Right(aka National Humanists or Neo-Fascists) should oft-repeat a message for all to hear: "Palestine is America’s Greatest Ally" or "West Bank and Gaza are America’s Closest Ally". What for, one may ask? For the simple reason that, before anything is possible, we must expose and examine the fundamental truth about the current state of the US, namely that it is essentially a Jewish-Supremacist colony. If politics is a struggle for influence, authority, and power, then one must clearly identify the nature of the power. It is like a doctor treating a patient. Unless the doctor correctly and honestly diagnoses the disease, he won't save the patient. Imagine if someone is dying of cancer, but the doctor treats him for everything but cancer. No matter how much money and medicine go into the treatment, the patient will surely die. Indeed, less money spent based on the correct diagnosis will be more effective than all-the-money-in-the-world spent on the wrong diagnosis. Suppose someone is suffering from a heart disease that can be treated relatively easily and inexpensively. But suppose the doctor comes up with a series of diagnoses that call for expensive treatments that never get to the core of the problem. Now, if the doctor is truly incompetent, his diagnoses may at the very least be the result of ‘honest mistakes’. He may have made the patient sicker or even killed him but didn't meant to do any harm. But suppose the doctor is a wicked creature who willfully mis-diagnosed the problem? He’d be like a crooked auto mechanic who could fix a minor problem at small cost but informs the owner of the vehicle that a lot more work needs to be done. Now, if the crooked doctor or auto mechanic did identify and fix the actual problem despite the overall fraudulence, at the very least the problem would have been dealt with. But what if a truly wicked doctor willfully mis-diagnosed the patient and made lots of money by carrying out elaborate and expensive procedures(that overlooked the real sickness) that ultimately did nothing to save the patient? It would really be a form of murder. What goes for medicine also goes for politics. A nation or society is like the human body. It is always in a state of birth and death, growth and decay, health and sickness. Just like the body regulates itself, nation or society has internal mechanisms that make sure things run right. Farmers produce food, truckers transport materials, factories make products, disposal services remove waste, fresh water is brought to residents and foul water is sent to sewage-treatment plants. But when the system breaks down, then people-with-power must take the extra-step to identify what is wrong and fix them. Every society has criminals. Every society has accidents, mistakes, and natural disasters. Every society has the problem of corruption. So, even though we prefer most problems to be solved by socio-economic factors that maintain equilibrium, there are times when the system breaks down and requires the strong hand of the government as the national physician. Think of the problems following the Great Depression of 1929. Or following the financial crisis of 2008.

The main problem of the US is that most people have no idea what kind of people has the real power. Unless people come to realize this, they won’t understand why there are certain serious problems that never go away and, if anything, get worse... just like, if you don’t know the disease, you won’t know why you’re getting sicker and sicker(despite your best efforts to regain health). It’s like Future America of IDIOCRACY couldn’t fix the crop failure because everyone from top to bottom was so convinced that Brawndo(an energy drink), being all-around elixir, couldn’t possibly do any harm to anything. So, even the crops were watered with the stuff.

So many Americans have a Brawndo-mentality. Just like the mindless confidence(bordering on faith) in Brawndo prevented people in IDIOCRACY from realizing that it is not a fixer-upper for all problems, most Americans have their own ‘brawndos’ that keep them from waking up and seeing the real truth. Many Americans believe the US is a ‘liberal democracy’ based on Rule of Law and rights protected by the Constitution. Or, if they find much that is wrong with the US, they believe that the solution to all problems is the ‘brawndo’ of Diversity and Inclusion. And they believe that Evil resides in the neo-Satan of Hate(or Hatan) that supposedly infects only the hearts of white people or right-wingers. So, even though the implosion of much of California clearly owes to Mass Invasion by non-whites, too many Americans fail to see the obvious problem as the real problem because Diversity and Inclusion are ‘brawndo’ to their ears.
There has also been horrible cultural and moral degradation of America, much of it owing to decadence of Homomania, neurosis of Jewish culture, and savagery of black culture. But, how can they be problems when we’ve all been told, day in and day out, that Homos are wonderful angels, Jews are eternal saints, and blacks are Magic Negroes? We don’t have real morality in the US that is about individuals with conscience learning to be self-critical, self-aware, and self-reforming. True morality is about personal integrity of choosing moderation, balance, and restraint over greed, gluttony, lust, pride, envy, wrath, and laziness. But capitalism, especially in the expansive US where everything seemed possible, made a mockery of favoring virtue over vice. In a world of rags-to-riches fantasies, dreams of celebrity, and universalization of pleasure, why hold anything back? Even if you are capable of delaying gratification to win the bigger prize, you are expected to indulge yourself once you are awash in money and power. So, we have shameless rich or powerful people who indulge themselves. ‘Greed is good’ because it fuels ambition. And why not go for El Dorado in the nation of Hollywood, Disneyland, and Las Vegas? Make more money, buy more, indulge more. And why not enjoy food to the fullest? So what if you grow fat. Be body-positive or sue your doctor if he tells you that you need to lose weight to regain health. And why restrain your sexuality? Lose your virginity as fast as possible like it’s a disease. Go to Spring Break and have sex with lots of strangers. Don’t worry. There are birth-control pills, contraceptives, day-after pills, penicillin, and abortion. Why deny yourself anything? You must eat and have sex to the fullest. And who said laziness is a sin? Why not be like a pothead and use lots of drugs and be like Brad Pitt’s character in TRUE ROMANCE? It’s ‘cool’. And who says anger must be checked? Be like Antifa and just attack anyone whom you deem a ‘nazi’. Or be a rapper or punk rocker and spew endless filth like degenerates. As for sin of pride, not only is it good but it can apply to any vice. So, sluts and prostitutes deserve pride. And homos into fecal penetration and trannies into penis-cutting might as own the term itself. In such a cultural climate that urges everyone to indulge shamelessly to excess, personal integrity and morality are no longer possible. If anything, vice is the New Virtue. We even have ‘mainstream’ journals and news outlets urging people to commit adultery in ‘open marriages’ or take up ‘cuckolding’. Wall Street sharks not only got to keep their vast stolen wealth after 2008 but were allowed to rake in billions more. They say fish rots from the head, and the three most exalted groups in the US are Jews, blacks, and Homos. They wallow in Vice-as-New-Virtue. With a culture that tells people that you’re a ‘loser’ unless you are having the most fun, it’s no wonder that most people watched THE WOLF OF WALL STREET not as a cautionary tale but a celebration of greed, lust, pride, envy, gluttony, sloth, and wrath all rolled into one. American Culture is now all about the Grasshopper. Even people who still work in the mode of Ants believe in Grasshopper values, i.e. they believe they must make the money to have the means to live like Grasshoppers. Even though Counterculture boomers loved to blame it all on the Reagan Yuppie 80s, the attitude really began in the 1960s when even radical leftist politics became inseparable from Sex, Drugs, and Rock & Roll. Even though the hippies claimed to be for ‘love and peace’, they were selfish jerks who thought it was their birthright to party all day and night long, while mooching off others. It’s like what Albert Brooks said of the guys in EASY RIDER. They sold cocaine to pay for their carefree self-indulgences. In time, the flaky pretensions faded away from the 60s Youth Culture, leaving only hedonism and shamelessness for later generations. Already in the bicentennial year of DAZED AND CONFUSED, the Richard Linklater film, the young ones are into partying and having a good time with little concern for ideals. As Americanism came to be about shameless hedonism and self-indulgence, personal integrity(the only basis for real morality) was no longer possible and was replaced with bogus group-idolatry and ideo-fanaticism. As Jews, blacks, and homos were sanctified the most, they were deemed to be good simply on the basis of their identities. Whatever Jews did, no matter how foul, they could invoke the Holocaust as get-out-of-jail card. And blacks only needed to cry ‘racism’ and do the Magic Negro BS. And Homos merely needed to wave the ‘rainbow’ flag and claim ‘pride’ as their own. As for the others, their primary sense of goodness derived from PC fanaticism. Being fanatical, they didn’t need to contemplate or question anything. They simply needed to drink the Kool-Aid and chant favored slogans about ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’, about ‘racism’ and ‘homophobia’. They came to be about as stupid as Red Guards mindlessly quoting from Mao’s Little Red Book.

Now, being quiet inside a library is a virtue. It’s about being mindful and respectful of others who are reading or studying. It takes self-awareness and respect for knowledge. It’s about mutuality. Others respect you and you respect others in the spirit of learning and good manners. But such real morality means nothing to blacks and the PC mob. Blacks, for the simple ‘virtue’ of being black, think they have the right to disrupt a library and howl like gorillas because they, as blacks, be so sacred, magical, cool, badass, and shit. And non-black PC idiots will join along and feel so holier-than-thou because they always claim to be fighting ‘racism’ or some other ‘evil’(and are rubbing shoulders with the sacred Magic Negroes). It’s a hysterical and hyped War Morality. In war, military-morality works differently from civilian morality. In order to win the war by beating the ‘bad guys’(the other side is, of course, deemed ‘evil’), the military-morality allows all sorts of mayhem and mass-killing of even innocents that would be unthinkable in peace-time. We were led to believe that Shock and Awe in Iraq and other mass bombings were ‘justified’(even though many innocents died or were wounded) because the US was working toward the higher good of removing an evil tyrant and planting a democracy in the Middle East. PC tells its foot-soldiers that, because history is on their side against the forces of Evil, whatever they do is justified by the delusional nobility of the cause itself. These people really have mass-murder in their hearts, and they must be countered accordingly.


Anyway, the main fact of American Power is that Jews control just about everything that matters. Indeed, one could even say the US is a Jewish-Supremacist colony. How? In so many respects depending on how we define ‘supremacism’. If we define supremacism as ‘wildly disproportionate power’ held by a certain group, then Jewish Power is indeed supremacist because no group comes near Jews in having power, wealth, and influence that far exceed their share of the population. Recent census shows that Jews make up 1.7% of the US population. Now, suppose Jews controlled 10% of Wall Street, Hollywood, Las Vegas, Silicon Valley, Real Estate, Top Law Firms, Ivy League schools, Big Media, Deep State, and etc. Jews would be vastly over-represented with the 10% figure. But in fact, Jews control 95% of media and almost all of Hollywood and Las Vegas. Jews control most of the biggest players in Silicon Valley. And Jews control at least half of Wall Street. Jews control the Ivies. Jews control Deep State and foreign policy. Jews control most politicians who’ve been bought and sold by Jewish money and know that Jewish media can make or break them. Jews control most of the top law firms that even engage in Lawfare against dissident voices. And not only do Jews have all this power and wealth, but they interact and coordinate with one another across the industries and institutions. After all, look how people like Richard Spencer and Jared Taylor have not only been deplatformed and sued but denied financial services by monopoly industries controlled by Jews. In the current USA, American citizens are denied basic services of communication and consumption(of products and services) by globalist-imperialist Jews who’ve occupied much of America. And Jewish media work with Jewish Deep State and Jewish finance to ‘dox’ and destroy the livelihoods of anyone who cares about his own people. So, while a total scumbag like Marc Rich was pardoned by Bill Clinton and a lowlife weasel like Jonathan Pollard was pardoned by Obama and handed a plush job upon release, good decent patriotic white Americans who refuse to serve Jewish Supremacism get labeled as ‘white supremacist Nazis’ who aren’t allowed to enact financial transactions or communicate with people freely.
In theory, anyone can be fired for his ideological views, but in truth, it doesn’t work this way. After all, if someone is fired for being Alt Right or ‘white nationalist’, the employer suffers no consequences. But suppose a company fires someone for being Zionist or a Neocon supporter of Wars for Israel. Suppose the employer finds the person’s views to be Judeo-Nazi. Or suppose Twitter has a new policy(of working with BDS than with ADL) that favors Palestinians and denounces & bans Zionist speech as ‘hate speech’. In theory, it'd be allowed, but the Power will come down so hard on the employer or Twitter that neither would dare take any actions against Zionists EVEN IF he/it sincerely believed Zionism is evil or that Jewish Power around the world is murderous and supremacist.

To continue, Jews can be said to be ‘supremacist’ in more ways than one. Jews certainly have disproportionate power way beyond what their demographics would warrant. But suppose we argue that Jewish over-representation owes strictly to meritocracy. In other words, Jews haven’t sought supreme power but accidently ended up with it because they are naturally smarter and more studious. Still, by rules of PC, that doesn’t cut the mustard. After all, even the argument that whites do better than Sub-Saharan-West-African-Americans(or SWAA) and Meso-Americans on merit isn’t good enough. What matters is Results according to the theory of Disparate Impact. So, it doesn’t matter if whites, blacks, and browns all agreed that the tests are fair. If whites do considerably better than blacks and browns, it is an act of ‘injustice’ that perpetuates ‘white supremacy’. So, following that logic, Jewish Power would have to be condemned as ‘supremacist’ EVEN IF it was entirely based on individual merit.

But of course, Jewish Power isn’t just the result of individual talent. While many highly talented Jews did gain great success through intelligence and ability, less bright Jews have also gained lots of traction in academia, business, law, government, and other areas due to Tribal Networking. In other words, smart powerful Jews have worked together to favor their less-bright tribal brethren over more deserving non-Jews, especially European-Americans and Asians. Also, when equally smart Jew and non-Jew must go head-to-head, the Power will favor the Jew. There’s little doubt that Jewish entrepreneurs got favorable funding from banks on big projects. Also, Jews are advantaged because they have the Moral Shield. As a Holocaust People, they can’t be disgraced or destroyed no matter what they do or say(unless they offend blacks, who are deemed equally holy, as Donald Sterling learned), whereas non-Jews, especially whites, must always be careful. Furthermore, it’s far easier for non-Jews than Jews to be destroyed for this very reason. Suppose some Jewish guy said awful things about Iran, Russia, Syria, Palestinians, or whatever. Suppose he said something as crazy as Sheldon Adelson’s proposal of nuking Iran. A Jew can openly justify the Israeli death squad’s killing of Palestinian protesters. He will not lose his job, standing, or wealth. But what would happen to any goy politician, businessman, or some such IF it’s revealed that he once said something mildly critical of blacks or Israel? He could be fired, demoted, or denied funding. Rick Sanchez and Helen Thomas were gone in no time for mouthing criticism of Jewish power or Zionism. So, while goys, especially whites, must walk on eggshells and live in fear of being outed as an ‘anti-Semite’ or ‘racist’, Jews can spew any kind of filth about Palestinians, Russians, Iranians, Arabs, whites, Christians, and etc. The only people Jews must be careful about are blacks(and to a lesser degree, Homosexuals). So, there’s clearly no equality at work in how the power operates in the US. If we look into the ‘kitchen’ of power, what really happens is so different from what is presented in the dining area. Just like Anthony Bourdain’s book KITCHEN CONFIDENTIAL detailed what really happens among the chefs and owners, the more inquisitive journalists and maverick ex-insiders have been trying to inform the public about the Power Kitchen Confidential. John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt even wrote a book called THE ISRAEL LOBBY. But even among journalists and whistle-blowers with more spine, there’s been a tendency not to rock the boat on the Jewish issue. Even Wikileaks was most restrained in spilling the beans on Jewish or Israeli secrets. I guess Julian Assange knows something about what Jewish power could really do to him if it wanted to.

There is yet another layer of Jewish Supremacism. Not only are Jews vastly over-represented in elite industries & institutions and working in cahoots with one another to favor the Tribe over other groups but the sum of Jewish Power is hyper-actively working in supremacist mode in the West and the Rest(especially pertaining to the Middle East and Russia). The so-called ‘new cold war’ is Jewish War on Russia III. (Bolshevik Revolution was Jewish War on Russia I, and the Jewish economic looting of Russia in the 1990s was Jewish War on Russia II.) Jew Matthew Yglesias says American conservatives, who’d been fiercely anti-Soviet, are warming up to Russia because it’s become the center of White Nationalist Politics. The real reason is Russia managed to regain some degree of national sovereignty from Jewish supremacist domination. According to Jews like Yglesias, it is outrageous that Russians should own and control their own nation. Jews must control Russia even though they make up only 0.2% of the population. Even with such a small number, 20% of the richest people in Russia are Jewish, and they are well-protected by Putin and Russian government. If anything, they are favored over most groups. But even that isn’t enough for Jews who seek total domination. Also, American conservatives once feared the Soviet Union because it was expansive. It supported communist movements all over the world. Also, in the 40s and 50s, lots of Soviet spies in the US(many of them Jews) sent bushels of top secret material to the USSR. Jews even sent to mass-killer tyrant Stalin the secret of the Bomb. Why did Jews do this? Back then, Jewish-Americans saw the Soviet Union as the main base of Jewish Power as the so-called Russian Revolution had largely been a Jewish Revolution. And even though Stalin won out over Trotsky, there were still many Jews in the upper echelons of power in the USSR that also defeated Nazi Germany. Jewish-American support of the USSR wasn’t purely ideological or idealistic. It was tribal, especially as Stalin was initially a more fervent backer of the Zionist project. Before there was the Space Race, there was the Jew Race between USSR and the US. Stalin hoped to gain the support of World Jewry by backing Zionism, but when Israel was founded, the Jewish state threw its lot with the US that was richer and more promising in the long run as capitalist hog-heaven for Jews. That is when Stalin really turned against Jews and Zionism, and relations gradually worsened between the USSR and Jews as years passed.
At any rate, why do we need a new ‘cold war’? Unlike Jewish-Americans who actively aided and abetted the USSR, American conservatives just want peace and better relations with Russia. That’s it. All this Russian Collusion is the fetid fever-dream of Jews who are prone to projecting their own conspiratorial madness onto other peoples. According to Jews, the hunt for REAL Soviet spies in the US was a ‘witch-hunt’ and ‘Red Scare hysteria’ — Rosenbergs and Morton Sobell really were agents of Stalin — ,but the utterly bogus Trump-Russia collusion fantasy warrants each and every one of us to look under our bed for Russians, Russians, Russians. Also, Putin’s Russia is less about whiteness than about Christianity, traditionalism, and nationalism. Also, unlike the US that goes around claiming to be ‘indispensable’ and ‘exceptional’ nation that has some God-given right to invade, sanction, and destroy any nation, Russian foreign policy isn’t so ambitious. Russia didn’t lift a finger while the Jew-run US was ravaging the Middle East. Russia had to swallow the fact that Jewish-Americans colluded with Russian Jews to economically rape Russia in the 1990s. Russia stood by helplessly as the US and allies reduced Libya to a rubble. And it is Jew-run US that is aiding Saudi Arabia’s destruction of poor Yemen. Putin finally came to the rescue of Syria because the Jew-run US was using Alqaeda and ISIS to take down secular Assad. Also, Putin reacted to the US-funded coup in Ukraine that even recruited neo-Nazi elements. Imagine that, Jewish-Americans working with neo-Nazi elements to bring down a government. These ‘progressive’ types used to lament what the US did to Salvador Allende, but they have no problem with US backing forces to take down democratically elected governments in Ukraine and Egypt(that is once again ruled by the military). There’s a saying, "Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you." No truer words have been spoken. It is not Russia that has the missionary complex. It is the Jew-run US that has the crusader-missionary aggression to remake the world in its image. Russia is building Churches, but it’s not trying to force its Orthodox Faith on other nations. If anything, it’s the Jews and post-Christian Americans who are trying to spread Homomania as Jewish-Satanic-substitute-christianity around the world. Russia doesn’t try to force US cities to have Orthodox Church processions. It is the Jew-run US that tries to turn every national capital into Victory March grounds for Globo-Homomania as new religion of the West. Jews now control the West and decided to replace Christianity with a new faith of their own making. But Yglesias the Jew strikes out in pain as he punches Russia and American conservatives who simply want peace and mutual respect. Peace between US and Russia is triggering to Jewish supremacists like Yglesias who fear that the Russian example may spread to other white-majority nations. Is Putin’s Russia trying to spread ‘white supremacy’? Well, Putin has a strange way of carrying out such agenda. In Russia, neo-Nazi speech is strictly curtailed. If anything, it’s the Jewish globalists who are allied with neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine. Also, Putin has gone out of his way to maintain good relations with Muslims, and he’s been especially protective of Jews. Indeed, just about any Jew can travel to and invest in Russia, but many Alt Right figures would be banned there. Also, Putin’s Russia has good relations with non-white nations like China, Iran, and Syria. If anything, all the virulent anti-Arab and anti-Persian sentiments are coming from the Jewish community. But then, of course, THAT is the problem. Russia supports Syria and Iran. That is why Jews hate Putin. So much for Putin’s ‘white nationalism’. When the Jew-run West decided to sanction Russia, Putin moved closer to China and Iran. How is that ‘white nationalism’? Also, keep in mind that Poland and Hungary chose on their own to say NO to ‘refugees’ who were uprooted by the millions due to Wars for Israel instigated by Jew-run US. Jews are devious in using their bogus sympathy for ‘refugees’ to mask the fact that Wars for Israel created those ‘refugees’ in the first place. Imagine a Jew who burns down someone’s house and then feigns sympathy for the destitute family; then, the Jew insists that YOU take in the family-made-homeless by Jewish arson. And if you say NO, the Jew calls you a heartless ‘nazi’ or ‘supremacist’. Israel and its rabid backers in the US have been most instrumental in spreading wars and mayhem in the Muslim World that led to so many ‘refugees’, but notice how no one expects the Jewish nation to take in any ‘refugees’. Indeed, Israelis still illegally occupy Golan Heights and West Bank where Arabs live under Apartheid conditions. But you won’t hear much about that from Matthew Yglesias who is just another devious Jew. It’s no wonder Jews were hated universally all over the world. What is most disgusting about Jews is they bitch on and on about ‘white supremacism’, but all their favored immigration destinations have been places made by ‘white supremacism’. Indeed, Jews have supported ‘white supremacism’ when it was to their benefit. Consider how Jews celebrate the US as a ‘Nation of Immigrants’. Now, from the vantage point of American Indians, all those ‘immigrants’ were invaders whose arrival meant more westward expansion and more loss of territory to newcomers. But Jews only care about their interests. Since Jews arrived as immigrants and grew rich and fat off what the white man conquered from the Red Man, Jews celebrate the history of invasion-immigration in the US. Anyway, the reason why Jewish Supremacists like Yglesias hate Russia and American conservatives so much is because both peoples are nationalist than imperialist. Russia is for Russian national interests, and American conservatives are for American national interests. But both sides understand how they can co-exist in peace, trade, and respect one another. Jews hate national sovereignty among goy nations because it means resistance to Jewish globalist neo-imperialism. Jews believe that they, as the supreme race, should have the right to stick their noses into the affairs of all nations. Jews now see themselves as god. Just as God was said to see and know everyone and everything in the world that all belongs to Him, Jews feel they have some divine right to penetrate anywhere, lay claim to anything, and decide what is right for anyone. (Jews say Homo-Worship is compulsory for all peoples now.) What Jews once regarded as the outlook of God has become their own outlook because they no longer believe in God. There's no more need to project Jewish personality onto God. By outsourcing their neurosis to God, Ancient Jews had gained a measure of humility. (God was like a scapegod. Jewish arrogance and megalomania were pushed onto God who burned brightly with Jewish fury. Worshiping their own megalomania as a collective spiritual entity, Jews found a measure of peace. But in the absence of belief in God, Jewish arrogance remains within the Jewish soul and burns out of control.)

Jews are now a self-worshiping bunch of a**holes who thinks all nations and peoples exist to serve Jews. This is why Jews hate American conservatives and Russia. American and Russian nationalisms, though humbler, are more resilient and stronger because they know their limits and duties. American nationalism is supposed to serve Americans, and Russian nationalism is supposed to serve Russians. Why does this idea trigger Jews? Because Jews think Americans and Russians ought to serve Jews. This is why Jews spread Homomania all around. Homos are the proxies of Jews who favor the New Normal of elite minority supremacism. And this is why Jews say existing Americans are less American than Americans-yet-to-be by never-ending waves of Mass Invasion-Immigration. If existing Americans really felt they owned the nation, they would have a clearer sense of what is good for most Americans who are not Jewish. Jews hate the idea of Russians, Americans, or white people caring primarily about themselves. It’d mean they would put their own interests above those of Jews. So, Jews push any mentality and outlook among goyim to make them think less about themselves than of the Other. And since Jews are the most powerful group among the Other, they take the lion’s share of the white cucking out for the Other. One thing for sure, white Christian American concern for the Other sure favors Jews over Palestinians.

There is no doubt that Jewish power is nakedly supremacist. Jews surely control the Narrative with their ownership of the World Media. That is why, to this day, so many Americans have no idea that Jewish communists carried out mass-killings in the USSR and ruled over goyim-as-cattle. They have no idea that it was Jews who raped Russia in the 90s and led millions to die of destitution. Jews also carried out massive White Slavery by turning countless Slavic girls into sex-slaves in Israel and other parts of world networked by the Jewish mafia. Also, the wars of Bush II and Obama/Hillary were all Wars for Israel. Isn’t it funny how Jews say it’s all about spreading ‘human rights’ and ‘democracy’, but Jews have no problem working with Saudi Arabia, hiring neo-Nazis in Ukraine, and aiding Alqaeda and ISIS in Syria. Surely, the likes of Matthew Yglesias know all this, but their vile Jewish personality and tribalism apparently trump everything. Their Jewish-supremacist imperialism simply cannot tolerate the humble nationalism of nations that want to retain or regain their national sovereignty and work with other similar nations in a spirit of truce and respect. It’s like Russia and China. There’s mutual respect and sense of limits. Russia doesn’t interfere in Chinese affairs, and vice versa. Each seeks its own national interest but finds areas in which they have mutual interests. And they learned to get along. And we can have the same between US and Russia. But nasty Jews won’t have it because they want all nations to serve Jews. Jews bitch and lie about how Trump is servile to Russia when, in fact, they are really pissed because he isn’t wholly servile to Jewish Globalist Power. According to Jewish Logic, US wanting good peaceful relations with Russia is ‘appeasement’. These vile Jews invoke the language of 1939 even though they are the ones who are allied with real neo-Nazis in Ukraine, practice Apartheid in West Bank, and use IDF death squads to kill Palestinian women and children who want to see their stole homeland again. Not being servile to Jews is being servile to Russia. Any honest observer would note that if the US government is servile to one thing, it’s is Jewish Power and Israel that now operates as a vicious Judeo-Nazi state that guns down innocent Palestinians who were forced into refugees status by the Nakba Pogroms in 1948. As if that wasn’t tragic enough, Jews instigated a war in 1967 and stole West Bank and Golan Heights as well. And of course, Jews expect Americans to support their acts of warmongering and imperialism. The real servility is to Jewish Supremacism, but the likes of Yglesias are either blind or dishonest in their refusal to call out reality like it is.

Anyway, the reason why we should spread the ‘meme’ of "Palestine is our greatest ally" or "West Bank and Gaza are our greatest ally" is it makes the scales fall from our eyes and make us realize how duped and brainwashed by Jews we are. Initially, those who hear the utterance will find it absurd. They’ll think, "What? Palestine our greatest ally? West Bank and Gaza our best friends?" But then, it will provoke people to consider the slogan, "Israel is our greatest/closest ally." After all, isn’t the sentiment just as ludicrous as "Palestine is our greatest ally?" Besides, WHO said Israel is our greatest ally? Most Americans are not Jewish. So, what does Israel matter to us? Why should the passion of 1.7% of Americans be the passion of all Americans? Perhaps, Greek-Americans love Greece, but do they make us say, "Greece is our greatest ally?" Do Turkish-Americans make us say, "Turkey is our greatest friend or closest ally?" If the US and Israel are very close, it has nothing to do with what most of us really feel. It’s because Jews rule the US and used their supremacist power to favor Israeli and Jewish-globalist interests over all others. In other words, this ‘closeness’ narrative between US and Israel has been imposed by Jews. Imagine if Iranian-Americans had control of 95% of media, owned Wall Street and Hollywood, dominated Ivy League, and bought up most politicians. Suppose they tell us over and over and over through puppet politicians and front-men, "Iran is our closest ally, greatest friend, and etc." For that to be the case, Iranian-American would have to have supremacist control over us. After all, most of us being non-Iranian, there would be no reason for us to be ecstatic about globalist Iranians and their wildly out-of-proportion interests.

Granted, there is widespread American support for Jews and Israel, but then why? This also owes to Jewish supremacism. It was Jewish control of media and academia that filled so many minds with the notion of Good Jews and Evil Arabs. Hollywood gave us all those Arabs-as-terrorists movies. Hollywood has yet to make a film about the Nakba pogroms, just like it has never made a movie about the murderous Jewish role in communism or about how Jewish-American agents sent Bomb secrets to Stalin. Instead, we get stuff like ANGELS IN AMERICA where Ethel Rosenberg is some saint while anti-communists are scum. It’s all tribal. Jews defended communist agents and vilified anti-communism because so many Jews were on the radical left back then. Of course, Christianity itself spread the supremacism of the Jewish Narrative. Even though Christianity was often anti-Jewish, it disseminated the Bible, the Old along with the New, all over the world, and this came to favor the Jewish Narrative over all others when it came to the Holy Land. So, many Christians supported Zionism as a kind of neo-crusade to take back the Holy Land from the Muslims. Jews were seen as the proxy. But the kind of American Christian Zionism is really disgusting and ultimately pathetic and pitiful. It’s really about low-IQ ignoramus white Evangelicals being hoodwinked into supporting Israel despite the fact that most American Jews despise and hate Evangelical Christians. A poll few yrs back revealed that most Jews prefer even Muslims over Evangelicals. So, those white Christian dummies are being taken for a ride. They are being manipulated by Jewish money that bought up these whore politician who never shut up about ‘muh Israel, muh Israel’.

Jews constitute the most supremacist power in the US but, via their control of the media and academia(and whore politicians), they’ve created the impression that they are the main force of resistance against ‘white supremacism’. Of course, what Jews deem as ‘white supremacism’ is really just White Emancipation from White Submissivism to Jewish supremacism. Jewish masters find it incredibly uppity for whites to say NO to Jewish demands. So, if whites no longer want a ‘new cold war’ with Russia that only perpetuates Jewish supremacism, that is deemed as ‘white supremacism’ by Jews. If whites no longer want to fight more Wars for Israel and kill Muslims or get killed, that is ‘white supremacism’. No more Wars for Israel will surely end the ‘refugee crisis’, but what do Jews care? They only pretend to care about ‘refugees’ without ever addressing the fact that their Zio-supremacist wars led to the violence that uprooted so many peoples. If white people say NO to Homomania, the proxy neo-satanic-christian religion concocted by Jews, that too is ‘white supremacism’ because, for some reason, it is ‘nazi’ to feel that homo fecal penetration and tranny penis-cutting don’t have the same biological value and moral pedigree as real sex and real love & marriage. Using Jewish moral logic, the US must have been a ‘nazi’ nation before Jews made ‘gay marriage’ law of the land. People weren't truly human prior to becoming 'more evolved' by associating homo fecal penetration and tranny penis-cutting with rainbows and marriage. What a truly gross, disgusting, and vile people, these Jewish supremacists.

Even more outrageously, these Jews, who constantly berate white Americans for having favored their own kind over others in the past, zealously insist that Jewish and Israeli interests must take front seat over all others. Should Israel and Iran be treated equally? After all, if the US favored Iranian interests over Israeli interests, wouldn’t that be supremacist? If US is to be a totally fair global power, it would treat all nations and peoples equally. It would not play favorites. If the US were to favor one nation over another, the ONLY justification would be national interest. Now, what national interest does Israel have for the US? Does the well-being, security, survival, or prosperity of the US depend on the existence of Israel? Suppose Israel had not been founded in 1948. Would the US today be less wealthy or powerful? If anything, US relations with all of the Middle East might be much better. So, if anything, US sacrificed much of its national interest to favor Israel, the ethno-megalomanical project of Zionist Jews.

Another proof of Jewish supremacism is that Israel and only Israel among ‘Western Nations’ has sovereignty and full control of its borders. All other Western nations have no such authority. Hungary and Poland have decided to protect their borders, but they’ve come under tremendous pressure and denunciation from the Jew-run EU. But hardly anyone mentions that Israel has the toughest border walls in the world. When we look back on the imperialist histories of Britain, France, Nazi Germany, and the USSR, it’s obvious that the supreme power had the ‘right’ to go anywhere and also to keep Others/Foreigners out of the home-nation. So, the British imperialists could freely move into India, Africa, and Asia. And they could move millions of people from one place to another. They could ship blacks from Africa to West Indies. They could colonize a million Asian Indians in Africa and other parts of Asia. And Indians couldn’t say NO to British intrusion into India, and Africans couldn’t say NO to British relocation-migration of many Hindus to work as coolie labor. But, the British could keep non-British out of Britain itself. Brits could protect their home-base like Jews protect Israel from the rabble of the world. But today, both the US and EU have come under the power of the Empire of Judea, or EOJ. The US and EU are to the EOJ what India and Africa were once to the British Empire. As such, Americans and Europeans cannot say NO to the mass-migration-invasions of peoples. Indeed, their so-called leaders are not real leaders but cuck-collaborators of Jewish globalism. And via the media and academia, the Jewish Empire has even convinced the masses that ‘Diversity’ and ‘Inclusion’(another word for Invasion) are holy and healing for them. It’s like Puerto Ricans have been convinced that they should totally give up on national independence and just be part of the US empire.
But Israel is allowed the full right to accept JEWISH IMMIGRATION ONLY and to strictly patrol the borders and keep out ‘infiltrators’.
So, who has the real power? Those who have control over their own destiny have power. If they have control over their own destiny and over the destines of others, they have supremacist power. Jews not only have control over Israel but have control over US and EU. In Israel, Jews do everything to keep Israel a Jewish State. In US and EU, Jews do everything to turn them into polyglot properties of the Empire of Judea. Jews want to own those imperial possessions forever, and they know Diversity and race-mixing are the key. After all, what ended European imperialism in Africa and Asia? A united people rose up against the imperialists. Blacks united to kick out whites. Browns in India united to kick out Brits. Yellows united in Vietnam to kick out the French. In contrast, why are the white elites still in power in Latin America? Because the extensive race-mixing led to confused identities that can’t unite. Mestizos don’t identify with native folks. Also, the arrival of black slaves led to even more diversity and mixture. So, whites still rule in Latin America.
This is why Jews hate goy unity and goy nationalism. It may rise up against the EOJ and say NO to stuff like Sorosism. Just like the British moved tons of Hindus into Africa to mix things up and dominate via divide-and-rule, Jews are now pushing mass-migrations all over the world to mix up populations so that they won’t be able to unite against Jewish globo-infiltration and takeover. This is obviously a form of Jewish supremacism.

So, to wake people up to reality, we should say to everyone, "West Bank and Gaza are America’s greatest ally" or "Palestine is America’s closest ally." It’s a way of triggering people. By making them conscious of the ludicrousness of the statement, they can be led to deal with the slogan repeated by politicians and pundits, "Israel is our greatest/closest ally." Well, who said so? And just how is it more valid than "Palestine is our greatest ally?" Are Palestinians less human than Jews. Are Jews superior to other peoples? Are Jewish lives more precious than Palestinian lives?

And if the US is a ‘nation of immigrants’ that is equally open and friendly to all peoples and nations, why does it favor Jews and Israel over all others? If it was wrong for white Americans to favor fellow white nations & peoples in the past, how is it any better for the current US to favor Jews over Arabs and Iranians?
Also, if the US is about ‘human rights’ and the ‘poor huddled masses yearning to be free’, why does it favor the Judeo-Nazi state of Israel that uses IDF death squads to gun down Palestinians yearning to be free? And if Jews claim to be about justice and concern for the oppressed, why don’t Jews use Hollywood to make movies about the Nakba pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map?
Also, given the Jewish globalist project of trying to Palestinianize the White Race and other peoples, it’s about time white goyim said, "We are all Palestinians now". Jews raped the Russian economy in the 90s and palestinianized the Russians. Jews used Clinton to force sanctions on Iraq that killed 100,000s of women and children. Iraqis were palestinianized. Jews used 9/11 as excuse to invade Iraq and bring about a massive civil war. More palestinianization. Jews used Obama and Hillary to destroy Libya, once the best nation in Africa, now a nation in total tatters. Libyans were also palestinianized. And Jews used Obama/Hillary to arm Jihadis and terrorists in Syria to turn that place upside down. 400,000 were killed, many more were wounded, and millions were displaced. Syrians were palestinianized. And then, Jewish power pushed all these ‘refugees’ into Europe so that Europeans would lose their ancient homelands to mass invaders. They too would be palestinianized. When we look at the doings of Jews, it’s obvious why most peoples didn’t want to take in Jews. And those that took them in soon regretted it. Jews are arrogant, megalomaniacal, and supremacist. No matter where they go, they try to take over and lord over others. They try to make others serve them while they live and eat like Effendi.

So, say it over and over and over: "West Bank and Gaza are America’s greatest and closest ally."

Diagnosing Diversity as a Disease — Diversititis vs Diversinoma — Coping with Diversititis — Surviving & Overcoming Diversinoma

We’ve all heard the mantra "Diversity is our strength" or DIOS countless times. We’ve heard it from the media, academia, politicians, and officials. We’ve heard it from high and low, from the richest people and the most powerful people, and from the average Joe on the street. This is hardly surprising because most people are sheeple and merely repeat the talking points that come from above. Most people just chant slogans than think about anything carefully or critically. Most 'conservatives' and 'liberals' need others to do the defining and deciding for them. While they may have naturally conservative or liberal instincts, they lack ideological deftness to formulate their own positions. They must be told what is worth 'conserving' or what is worth 'changing'.
As DIOS is the official chant of the hour, so many people just follow along.

But DIOS has been especially ubiquitous because BOTH sides chant the mantra despite the fact that it undermines the interests of many segments of both political parties. For the GOP, Diversity in the form of cheaper ‘immigrant’ labor may be good for business, big and small, but as most non-white mass-invaders vote Democratic, it spells doom for the Republican Party in the long run. Also, if the US becomes overpopulated with non-whites, it will no longer be the historically European-American nation that it was founded and developed to be.
As for the Democratic Party, more mass-invaders is an electoral plus. However, it has been devastating to the American Working Class as endless pools of cheap labor depress wages and the power of Organized Labor. Also, blacks come under increased competition from mass-invaders who find it easy to outperform blacks in everything except sports, rapping, and government jobs(for which blacks get special hiring preferences).
And even though non-white mass-invaders will gain materially from America in the short-run, they will eventually become race-mixed, deracinated, and confused mass of consumers with no sense of history or culture.

The fact is most gentiles don’t have a strong sense of identity and heritage. The only reason they have a sense of who they are is because they happen to be surrounded by people of similar race and culture in a particular piece of land. It’s more an identity based on condition than consciousness. For example, a Japanese in Japan feels Japanese because he is surrounded by people who look like him, speak the same language, and share the same manners & habits. Being Japanese is not something he thinks about or defines him. It is conditional to his existence in a nation called Japan. But if he were to move to another nation in which he is a minority, he will be surrounded by new conditions and gradually adapt to those until his sense of Japanese-ness is virutally gone.
It may well be true that Jews are the only people with a conscious, as opposed to merely conditional, identity. After all, most ethnic groups who came to the US soon became just ‘Americans’. Most Americans of German ancestry don’t know German language or much about German history. They are just ‘Americans’. This also goes for most Americans of Polish, Hungarian, Italian, Greek, Japanese, or etc. ancestry. Their ancestral identity has no meaning in America because they think and feel conditionally than consciously. Indeed, even Anglo-Americans, the very people who founded and developed the US, have lost their conscious sense of who they are... and this bug has spread to Great Britain itself, where the New Normal of National Identity is to ‘include’ Africans, Pakistanis, Arabs, and Chinese as fellow Britons.

In contrast, the Covenant instilled Jews with a conscious sense of identity. Their identity has been conceptualized, made portable, and spiritualized. Thus, the primal sense of Jewish blood has been linked to ancient history, continuity, and destiny. And this is why Jews have maintained their identity against the greatest odds even in exile surrounded by gentiles. Despite the fundamental changes in social conditions that Jews faced in the Diaspora, Jews maintained their sense of who they were, are, and must be because their identity has been made conscious. And this is why Jews are bound to be less negatively affected by Diversity than other groups. While most gentile groups in the US just become deracinated, soulless, and confused consumers and materialists, the Jewish community(at least enough of them) will maintain their powerful sense of who they are on the conscious level.

Some might argue that Muslims and Hindus also have powerful identities, but Islam is not specific to a people. After all, anyone can convert to Islam. Thus, it lacks an ethnic core and consistency of Jewishness. As for Hindus, they are too much a people divided among themselves. This is why Jews feel more confident in navigating through a sea of diversity. While other groups grow more diluted and diffuse in identity amidst diversity, Jews possess a CONSCIOUS WILL to stick to their identity. Indeed, even as many Jews mix with other peoples, they ‘convert’ their spouses to Jewishness and raise the kids as Jews. Also, Jews don’t mix with low-IQ rabble but with high-IQ gentiles, and thus higher intelligence among gentiles is absorbed into the Jewish Power Network.

History of Jews demonstrates the power of Consciously Willed Identity, as opposed to mere Conditional Identity. An Hungarian surrounded by Hungarians feels Hungarian, but when is surrounded by non-Hungarians, he loses his Hungarian-ness and melds in with the new majority. In contrast, even when a Jew is removed from a Jewish environment and placed in a non-Jewish one, he is likely to retain his sense of who he is, where he came from, and why he must preserve his identity. Also, this Consciously Willed Identity is ‘democratic’ in the sense that it equally belongs to EVERY JEW, from the richest to the poorest. Jewish identity wasn’t owned by kings or elites but envisioned by Prophets and absorbed into the heart and mind of every Jew. In contrast, most gentiles relied on elites to define who they are. So, if the elites said, "We are all Christians now", the masses just followed. Or, if the elites said, "Britishness now means any African or Muslim who wants to feed off the fat of UK", the masses go along. In contrast, Jews don’t let the Jewish elites define what Jewishness is. Each Jew has a Consciously Willed Identity that is independent of elite formulations and manipulations. Alone among peoples and tribes, Jews gained in the power of identity when they were surrounded by gentiles. If the natural mode of history was for a people to become absorbed into the majority population, the Jews swam against this natural tide. Jews were like salmon that swims up against the stream to produce the next generation.

As Jews were a minority in most places, they could not have survived as a people & culture without an immense consciously willed identity. And this is why the Covenant was so crucial. It made Jewish identity not just ancestral, tribal, and territorial but spiritual. It was the sense that, wherever a Jew was in the world, he was blessed because of a unique connection to God, the maker of all the past, present, and future. So, if any people want to survive in the world awash in the tides of globalism, they need to formulate their own covenant. Without it, they will be conquered, absorbed, dispersed, and dissolved.

Anyway, it is now time to consider Diversity as a Disease. Such diagnosis wasn’t necessary in the past because diversity was limited and restricted in most of the West. Back then, a bit of diversity was seen as good for adding color, flavor, and stimulation. After all, what harm could a small number of Indians, Africans, or Arabs do in Paris or London? It added a bit of spice, a bit of variety and difference. And if diversity had been kept to such minimum, it would have been no problem. It would have been appreciated for adding a bit of accent to what is largely a united and ‘homogeneous’ society. It’s like a birthmark or even a scar can add a bit of character. Or even a tattoo, though I personally can’t stand them. The thing is, they don’t keep growing. A birthmark doesn’t get bigger and bigger. Scar doesn’t expand.
In contrast, the current Radical Diversity(or Inclusion) that has gripped the West is essentially cancerous. It keeps growing and growing. Just like cancer cells devour precious blood and spread to other parts of the body, Radical Diversity demands more and then more. There is no self-restraining mechanism that halts the process when it has reached a certain level. No, Radical Diversity insists on growing and growing until the original nation is forever dead and gone. In other words, Radical Diversity is hellbent on turning UK, France, Sweden, Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, Spain, Italy, and etc. into New Afro-Islamica.
Also, once something has been set in motion on a grand scale, its momentum is such that it can no longer be stopped even if elites want to stop them. Imagine poking more and more holes into the dam until the dam finally breaks. Then, there is no way to stop the torrent even if one wants to. On the matter of history, it’s not just a matter of material power but moral will. If the wall of Moral Will has been fatally compromised and broken, Material Power is useless to push against the hostile forces. And this is the problem of the West. In terms of manpower and material force, the West can still easily push back against the invasive tide from Africa and Muslim nations. White people have more than enough material power to take down the Jewish globalists who are orchestrating the Demise of the West. But the Moral Will is no longer there. The Moral Dam has been busted. The cult of ‘white guilt’ instilled into every white boy and girl by media, academia, and the state has rendered most white people wussy and weak in the face of invasion.
Also, as ‘white guilt’ has encouraged whites to hate whites, there is no white unity or solidarity against non-whites.

Moral Will is crucial. Why is it that in traditional societies, the bigger and stronger son takes the beating from the weaker and older father or patriarch? It’s because the advantage of Moral Will is with the elder. So, the younger man, though stronger, would feel ashamed and guilty to strike a blow against the older man. Jews know how this psychology works. They know that guilt-ridden whites dare not strike against the Jewish minority and non-whites. White people who fear being called ‘racist’ or ‘anti-Semite’ would rather take a beating from their Moral Superiors — Jews, blacks, ‘immigrants’, and homos according to PC — than fight back. So, Jews, blacks, homos, and non-whites have been able to get away with so much bad behavior in the West.
But Jews know that morality alone is boring. It’s not ‘cool’. So, they other way they used to break down the White Wall was with Funky Booty and Afro-Ramrod. Jews promote black female funky-booty-call to shake and bring down the White Jericho Wall. And the Negro Dong is promoted to turn white men into a white cucks and white women into ‘mudsharks’. In current France, UK, Sweden, and Germany, white women are so into jungle fever and white men are into such cuckish admiration of black manhood that whites ecstatically welcome ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. Emmanuel Macron says the future of Europe must be Eurafrica, whereby black Africans arrive to beat up weaker white men and hump white women and use white wombs to produce black babies.

Je suis un cuck. J'accueille les Africains à venir coloniser les utérus blancs.

Supposedly, white men should accept this because blacks are the Master Race. One might find this logic a bit weird since PC often says ‘race is a social construct’ and calls for equality. But always judge people and movements by what they DO than what they SAY. In terms of what is really happening, the future dynamics is Africa is the Male/Penis and Europe is the Female/Vagina. The current culture says white women should emulate black women and shake their buttocks as mating calls to black men.

So, the Western Wall against Diversity has been destroyed by both Moral manipulation and Sensual assault. Even though things are pretty dire in UK and France, white people still have the numbers and necessary materials to drive out the invaders and restore racial, cultural, and territorial integrity. But they are helpless to do anything about it because their Moral Will has been paralyzed.
In contrast, the Vietnamese and Algerians were materially disadvantaged vis-a-vis the French Colonists in their struggle for independence, but they fought on and eventually triumphed because they had Moral Will. They felt utterly righteous and justified in resisting and pushing back against the white imperialist-colonists. As such, they felt no qualms about using ANY MEANS NECESSARY(even assassinations and terrorism) to drive out the enemy. They understood the Maoist dictum, "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." All orders seek peace and stability but were founded with Willed Violence.
Then, what is necessary in UK and France is for white natives to fight BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY to drive out the foreigners and Third World colonists. Also, it will be easier than it was for the Algerians and Viet Minh(and later Viet Cong) because whites have great material advantage over the foreigners in the West. The problem is lack of Moral Will because the West is no longer ruled by native elites but managed by cuck-collaborators of the EOJ or Empire of Judea. Jewish Globalists control the US that controls the EU, and they use European ‘leaders’ as comprador-collaborators to push what is essentially the Sorosian Plan of White Demise.

Europeans have been Puerto-Ricanized. They no longer feel any sense of national identity or unity. They just see themselves as faceless, colorless, and bloodless consumers of a vast empire of ‘diversity’, ‘inclusion’, ‘tolerance’, and other baby-talk charm-words. It is only when the native masses realize that they are not represented, defended, and served by genuine national elites but hoodwinked, manipulated, and led astray(to their own demise) by cuck-puppets of globalism that they many begin to wake up as scales fall from their eyes. The main responsibility of national leaders is to preserve and serve the people of the nation, not to have them invaded and replaced by foreigners. But look at Theresa May, Emmanuel Macros, and Angela Merkel. They all serve Jews who call on Europe to welcome Mass Invasion by Muslims & Africans and to be replaced by them. Imagine if Ho Chi Minh had been a lowlife puppet of the French, suppressed patriotic Vietnamese voices, and welcomed millions of Africans and Muslims to take over Vietnam. He would have been a lowlife piece of turd. Well, the ‘leaders’ of Current Europe are little more than pathetic cuck-dogs of the Empire of Judea.

Jews are master manipulators and know that it’s difficult to change a nation by brute force. If Jews had sent arms to Africans & Muslims and encouraged them to invade Europe, all of White Europe would have risen up and pushed back the invasion. So, how did Jews go about engineering the invasion of Europe? Jews spread Jungle Fever so that white women would be hankering for black men. And white boys, addicted to ‘black heroes’ in sports and rap, would come to believe that the ‘better men’, the Negroes, are more deserving of white women than white men are. Also, Jews gained control of media & academia and manipulated educated gentiles into believing that nothing is worse than ‘racism’. According to Jewish-controlled PC, ‘racism’ for whites could be ANY sense of identity, pride, and unity. Indeed, not only did Jews associate non-white Diversity with holiness but ‘pathologized’ any positive white feelings about being white as evil, sick, and ‘nazi’. If you can’t invade an Order with brute force, weaken it from the inside. Then, its defense mechanism will have been neutralized, and it can be easily invaded even by weak foreign bodies.

It’s like HIV. If the immune system goes, even minor germs can invade the body in huge numbers and bring about demise. The West is suffering from Civilizational AIDS. Judeo-Nazis buggered the West in the ass and transmitted the PC germ of anti-white HIV. Thus infected, the White National Polity is paralyzed of white identity, solidarity, territoriality, and pride. The very elites who should be, like Viktor Orban, working to defend and preserve the nation are working to favor the invasion of foreign bodies. It’s like a father of the house refusing to defend the home and his daughter but welcoming intruders and helping them hold down his daughter as she is raped. But Jews didn’t just target the elites but the masses. If Jews controlled elite minds through higher education, they controlled the masses through jungle fever. So, even if the white father tried to defend the house from marauders, the white daughter wants to open the backdoor to let them in so they can beat up her father and have orgies with her.
This is why the West is currently so hopeless. They still have the numbers and materials to hold back the Third World tide if they want to, but there is (1) No Moral Will to push back against the tide and (2) too much Sensual Addiction to Diversity(more restaurants) and Jungle Fever.

There are few things more frightening than Diversity-as-Cancer or Diversinoma. It is far worse than Diversititis, a condition that afflicts many nations with excessive diversity. The difference is a nation with Diversititis isn’t necessarily into having MORE diversity. It isn’t their national policy or something people worship as an ideal. Rather, it is a chronic condition that must be dealt with. Take Egypt, Indonesia, and India. All three suffer from Diversititis as there is too much diversity of races, tribes, clans, ethnic groups. But these nations are not calling for MORE Diversity. They have enough, and the main emphasis is making the best of a troubled and messy situation. Same goes for Iraq and Syria. Both nations have been torn asunder by diversity. Diversity-as-chronic-problem or Diversititis need not be fatal, but it’s one big headache. It’s like chronic backache. It won’t go away but with care can be managed. Or, it’s like Diabetes. It can’t be cured, but if one takes good care of oneself, a pretty decent life is possible. A person with backache doesn’t think MORE backache is good. A person with diabetes isn’t told to devour lots of sugar. Rather, they are told to manage it as a problem.
In contrast, the West is told that Diversinoma, the metastasizing cancer of Diversity, is the greatest thing in the world. Indeed, the fatal disease is sold by PC quacks as the magic cure. So, if the West is overcome with problems of Diversity, the PC cure is to have even MORE Diversity. It’s like telling a fat person that the cure to fatness is eating more food because the body burns calories to digest food. Never mind that all those digested calories add to more fat.

Well, it is time for us to say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. We must call out the quack social doctors of PC and properly diagnose Diversinoma as a fatal disease for ANY nation. Any nation that is committed to endless ‘immigration’ by foreigners will die. It’s pure and simple. The process may be fast or slow, but if foreigners keep coming and coming(especially when natives aren’t having many kids), the natives will be overrun by foreigners who will take over the land. It is simple math that any elementary school student can understand. If you keep pouring prune juice into a beaker of orange juice, the orange juice will eventually be altered and replaced by prune juice. Indeed, we need look no further than the fate of Palestine. Initially, a few Jews trickled in, and it seemed like restricted diversity that hardly posed a threat to Arabs/Palestinians. But as more and more Jews arrived, it began to dawn on Palestinians that they could be replaced and reduced to minority status living under the power of Jews. Control of demography is the #1 responsibility of a nation. The example of Palestine(that was turned into Israel) is textbook case of this. Today, Jews see all the West as just a big West Bank. If West Bank is to be taken over by Jews, the West is to be taken over by non-whites so that Jews can play divide-and-rule among goyim while they themselves hog most of the power, wealth, and narrative.

There are many nations around the world dealing with the problem of Diversititis. There is excessive diversity, and there are many divisions along racial, ethnic, or religious lines. But things may be tolerable if Diversity is maintained as a chronic condition. After all, longevity breeds familiarity even among different peoples. So, if a nation has a diverse population, but the various peoples have been there for a long while and have learned how to tolerate, interact, and even interbreed with one another, a kind of balance can be maintained. Switzerland, for instance, has three major groups, but they’ve co-existed in the same nation for so long that they know how to get along. Same with Flemish and Walloons in Belgium. But if large numbers of new peoples enter the nation, the balance could be upset. Same in nature. An eco-system has competing organisms, but over time, a kind of balance has resulted among the surviving species. But suppose a wholly new set of organism invade the system. Then, it may take a long time for a new balance will be attained(that may well lead to the demise of previously existing organisms).

Diversititis, though not ideal, can maintain a certain equilibrium. To be sure, even if new peoples don’t enter the system, the balance among various groups could be lost if one group outbreeds the other. Consider how blacks in South Africa vastly outbred the whites. And Muslims outbred Christians in Lebanon, thereby turning a once largely Christian Arab nation into a majority Muslim one. Thus, even Diversititis is always problematic.
In some cases, Diversititis can be resolved by breakup of the nation into smaller units. The breakup of the Soviet Union was perhaps the most spectacular version of this. Breakup of Yugoslavia, far more violent, was a smaller version of resolution to Diversititis by national breakup into smaller national units.

Initially, Diversinoma may hardly seem a problem. After all, non-white immigration seemed negligible and easily manageable in Europe in the 1950s and 1960s. One could also argue that immigration policy back then were not in Diversinoma mode. In other words, there wasn’t, as yet, an ideology that elevated endless non-white immigration as a moral imperative. Immigrants were allowed on two basic grounds: (1) to fill in for native labor shortage (2) non-white collaborators of the empire seeking sanctuary from violent reprisals by national liberators, e.g. Algerians who’d collaborated with the French feared persecution following Algerian Independence.
With the fading of European empires and economic stagnation by the early 70s, there was no more need for immigration from non-white nations. But it was at this point that the moral and cultural paradigm began to shift. Non-white immigrants came to be championed as having the moral right to enter the West. They were given the moral high ground over the natives. Why?
One reason was the rapid rise in the prestige of Jews. The idea of Jews as a Holy Holocaust People began to take hold in the 70s. While Nazism was vilified almost universally after WWII, there had been the useful myth of National Resistance against the Nazis. The idea was that, despite the despicable phenomena of collaboration in every Nazi-occupied nation, most people had nobly suffered or resisted, in ways big and small, against the great evil. But Jews finally blew up this ‘myth’ in the early 70s, most notably with Marcel Ophul’s THE SORROW AND THE PITY. More than anything, it was this shift that instilled ‘white guilt’ in the European Soul. Europeans had maintained that, while some people collaborated, most had resisted. Thus, Europeans could regard themselves as fellow victims, along with Jews, of the Nazis. The new paradigm reversed the narrative and argued, while some people(especially communists) had courageously resisted, MOST had either collaborated in ways big or small. Or, if they didn’t collaborate, they were apathetic and uncaring, refusing to lift a finger to save Jews. Thus, European pride of victimhood soon vanished. Only Jews could claim to be the true victims of Nazis, and all Europeans had to share in the guilt of WWII for having collaborated with Nazis or not having done enough to contain or defeat Nazism. Thereafter, year after year, Shoah became ever more the new religion of Europe. Thus, each European nation was no longer seen as a homeland justified by blood and soil but a land of shame soiled by blood of Jews who were murdered by Nazis aided by heinous collaborators.
This mindset came to affect the issue of immigration as well. Just like black slavery and Indian ‘genocide’ in America were conflated with plight of Jews beginning in the late 60s and 70s, European imperialism and colonization were conflated with Nazi crimes. (European leftists even associated American military involvement in Vietnam as akin to Nazi genocide. Ironically, some European leftists even took up the Palestinian cause in the idea that Zionists had become like the new Nazis. They got so used to regarding Jews as noble-and-helpless-victims-for-all-eternity that the idea of militant Jews waging wars and defeating Arabs violated their much cherished Cult of the Holy Holocaust Jew.) Because of the Narrative that the imperialist(and even genocidal) West had ravaged the Third World and kept it in forced poverty — in other words, all of the West had acted like Nazis around the world — , something was owed to the darky folks. But foreign aid and investment were not enough. Non-whites had to be brought to the West and given jobs, education, and welfare. Jewish minorities found such people useful. They deflected attention from the Jewish minority, and also Jews could use them as Moral Shield by making a big fuss about how the White Majority is ‘racist’ and ‘bigoted’ against poor immigrant groups. Also, it was deemed unjust to bring only single workers. What if they had families and relatives in the Old Country? The humane thing seemed to unite families by bringing their relatives to the West as well. After some yrs, one might think the Guilt Factor would fade away. One thing for sure, the high unemployment rates no longer necessitated mass arrival of foreign workers. But by then, the argument for more immigration(turned into Mass Invasion) had less to do with redressing historical-moral deficit than affirming the notion that Diversity is good and wonderful in and of itself. Diversity was just good. So good that there was need for more and more of it. It didn’t matter if Diversity caused problems. The solution was More Diversity and more training for the native populations to try harder at accommodating Diversity. Diversity was so good and holy that even problems caused by Diversity could not be blamed on it. Rather, the blame was always to be found in the native white folks for not having done enough to make it work. So, they needed even more Diversity as both punishment and redemptive blessing. Once this cancerous logic took hold, Europe was in the grip of full-blown Diversinoma.

Could Diversinoma have been checked and reversed early on? There was Enoch Powell and his ‘River of Blood’ speech. Just like cancer need not be fatal if spotted and treated early, the problem of Immigration-turning-into-Mass-Invasion could have been stopped and reversed with the proper will and resolve. But there were few doctors in the house to sound the alarm and call for radiation treatment, chemo, and surgery to remove the tumor. And even if some people knew of the dangers, they were fearful to speak out because of the Narrative following WWII. The overwhelming intellectual and cultural climate of Europe was leftist for understandable reasons. Europe in the 20th century had been decimated by the vain ambitions of Imperial Powers in WWI and the mad ambition of radical racist Nazis in WWII that was also accompanied by ghastly Shoah. And then, the post-war violence of Resistance and Liberation in the Third World made even European nations that had been at war with Germany seem like the Other Nazis. Especially because the main Moral Narrative arising from WWII was that Good Peoples had come together to defeat ‘racism’(of the Nazis) as the greatest evil in the world, any whiff of ‘racism’ on their part became anathema. So, even if British, French, and others may not have carried out killings on the scale of Nazis, they also felt tainted by their history of ‘racism’, which, in moral terms, made them sin-cousins of the Nazis. Thus, anything unfavorably associated with immigration could be denounced as ‘Nazi’. If anyone voiced fear of non-white immigration, that was ‘racist’ therefore ‘crypto-nazi’. If anyone didn’t like race-mixing, that was ‘racist’ therefore ‘crypto-nazi’. If anyone feared being overwhelmed or outbred by non-whites, that was ‘racist’ therefore ‘crypto-nazi’. In short, whites no longer had any moral grounds to judge non-whites because whiteness had been so tainted, corrupted, and compromised by history of ‘racism’ that culminated in Nazism.

In such a moral climate, how could there be honest critics of Mass Invasion? They were quickly denounced as ‘racist’, therefore ‘crypto-nazi’. The only acceptable position for whites was to welcome non-whites, embrace non-whites, praise non-whites, provide for non-whites, understand non-whites, apologize to non-whites, forgive non-whites(even when they mess up), and etc. It followed the same pattern that made it nearly impossible to speak honestly-negatively about Jewish power. As ‘antisemitism’ came to regarded as a great sin, even the most honest assessment or criticism of Jewish power or history was taboo. Therefore, white Europeans had only one option left. They had to keep proving that they are not ‘racist’ by welcoming endless Mass Invasions by non-whites. Even though this was Demographic Imperialism and Mass Invasion, whites had to pretend as though they were providing sanctuary for ‘refugees’ not unlike Jewish victims seeking shelter from the Nazis.

Of course, it never made any sense. After all, the non-whites were not fleeing from Nazis or White Supremacists but from their own people. In some cases, especially after end of the Cold War, many of the refugees had been uprooted by Wars for Israel, which would indicate that Jewish Globalists are the New Nazis or Judeo-Nazis. Also, ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs would indicate an ideology of racial supremacy. After all, the New European Ideal of beautiful white women going with Negro men is premised on the ‘racist’ notion that black men are superior to white men in manhood department because they got louder voices, harder muscles, and bigger dongs. It suggests that white men need to step aside and give up their women in the spirit of ‘may the best man win’. Since Negro men are deemed by globalism to be better men than white men, the current ACOWW ideology is ‘racist’. But then, there never was consistent logic in PC.

Perhaps, it would have been better if men like Enoch Powell had talked more like Gandhi and Ho Chi Minh, arguing for national independence from foreign invasion. But this was difficult to pull off. After all, if Europeans invaded the Third World with guns and bombs, the non-white Mass Invaders mostly arrived poor, pitiful, and penniless. So, it seemed laughable and mean-spirited to many decent white folks for anyone to sound the alarm about how those poor sods were going to take over Europe. The novel THE CAMP OF THE SAINTS by Jean Raspail addressed this insidious threat. Though I haven’t read the book, it’s about how Europeans drop their guard because the invaders seem so poor, desperate, and pitiable. (For some reason, Raspail made the invaders a bunch of Hindus when, surely, he knew that Africans and Muslims posed the biggest demographic threat to Europe.) In a way, a full-blown military occupation is less dangerous than demographic invasion. The latter happens gradually but steadily, eventually threatening to displace the native population or disgrace it through race-mixing. Consider how the natives of Latin America are forever a disgraced people who’d been mass-‘raped’ by Latin invaders. And ACOWW is a total war on white manhood. As black men colonize white wombs, white men can only be sappy, wussy, benchwarming cucks to Negro men as the New Masters of the West. The way things are going in UK and France, all their great glories are on the verge of being appropriated by blacks. BBC is filled with historical epics and dramas that feature black men as kings, warriors, sages, and saints. Anglo-Saxons are turning into Junglo-Saxons. Megalomaniac blacks are made to feel entitled to take over the roles of white historical figures. Not only do UK and France encourage Afro-Colonization of White Wombs for the future but they retro-alter past history so that many great white heroes and heroines are turned into Negroes. Of course, Negroes see no injustice in any of this because their very nature is to feel entitled to take stuff from other races. Blacks feel entitled to steal and loot even the graves of other races. Blacks are both womb-raiders and tomb-raiders, and the cucky white males and jungle-feverish white females are encouraging this all over Europe.
And if you don’t comply with this New Normal? You are denounced as ‘far right’ or ‘racist’. It’s as if whiteness is a pathology or disease that can only be healed by blackness. Now, upon taking one good look at Africa, one is liable to think that blackness is the real pathology and disease where maintaining civilization is concerned. But black poverty in Africa only brings out sympathy and/or guilt among Europeans. Oh, those poor Negroes must be saved from poverty, or maybe they are poor and don’t have Wakanda because of past history of white imperialist exploitation. Thus, Negro poverty in Africa is either a reason to feel sorry for blacks or a reason for whites to feel guilty.
Also, there is a kind of attraction to the primal element of the Negro. Current Europeans feel soulless, shallow, and materialistic. They feel as IKEA-ans than blood-n-flesh humans. So, the only way they can feel re-connection with the juice of life is to have Negroes in the West shake their booties, hump everything that move, and infect white women with jungle fever.

It’s like the Apathetics in ZARDOZ have lost the vitality of life. Too much peace, complacency, and safety have made life dull and boring. So, when Zed(Sean Connery) is among them, they draw sustenance from him. Of course, he has really been sent into the Vortex to bring it down. But then, even the denizens of the Vortex come to see that the Order must fall because it is at odds with the way of nature. Thus, barbarian invasion, horrible as it is, does serve a purpose is smashing a secure but lifeless order.

Long ago, an overly civilized, ossified, or decadent orders were brought down by barbarians of same or similar race. So, the sacking of Rome wasn’t such a bad thing. Germanic Barbarians came to dominate, and Europe remained white. But the people who will play the most decisive role in the smashing of the lifeless and decadent Current Western Order are black Africans. Thus, the blacking of Europe will have far greater impact than the sacking of Rome. It will not be a case of white barbarians bringing down a decadent and sick white civilization and, in time, creating something even better. Rather, it will be about Western Civilization being brought down by black savages whose takeover will mean the end of civilization for good because black DNA is the most antithetical to order, philosophy, and civilization. Black culture has always been centered around the buns and dongs.

The West moved from Order to Decadence because the latter seemed liberating from traditional constraints and bourgeois manners. So, when British youths listened to Jazz and Rock n Roll in the 1940s and 1950s, they felt liberated and grateful to Negroes. And Modern Art loosened up cultural conventions and allowed for new possibilities. Back then, a bit of decadence seemed healthy and productive. After all, TOO MUCH of anything is bad. But at some point, decadence turned into the degenerative excesses of Punk Culture, family breakdown, gluttony, shameless ‘sluttony’, mainstreaming of porno-sensibility, and rise of Trash as Main Culture. Worse, it combined with neo-puritanical PC. This makes UK one of the sickest and strangest nations on Earth. It is one of the most infantile, beastly, trashy, shameless, dissolute, and ugly — barbarism turning into savagery — , but it doesn’t even have the primal virtue of vulgarism: Candid and forthright talk. Even if barbarians have no manners, they can be refreshing in speaking freely and laying it all out like it is. It’s like a vulgarian belching and breaking wind. Unpleasant but, at the very least, honest and open about what his body must do. And indeed, one of the few virtues of rise of Counterculture and Punk Culture was the spirit of anarchy, freedom, and uninhibited expression. Consider the sheer zaniness and irreverence of Monty Python.
But something happened. The System decided to maintain the neo-barbarism — the elites also found it too fun, and of course, the entertainment industry found it too profitable — but curtail certain tendencies and restrict free expression that mocked certain new sacred cows, especially Jew-Worship(aka Judeovah, or Jews-as-jehovah), Black Reverence(aka Afroyalty, or black Africans as new natural royalty of the West), and Homo Celebration(aka Fairitocracy, or fruitkin fairies as the new aristocracy of the globalized West). Those are the Permanent Holy Three, but other groups can get some sympathy, on and off, depending on the political climate and expediency. Because Muslims aren’t very bright & rich, not dominant in sports & music, and not famous for creativity(esp in fashion and pop culture), there is no special feeling for them in the hedonistic, narcissistic, and megalomaniacal West. But there are many of them in the EU, and they must sometimes be heard. (It could be that Muslims resort to Terror in the West because they usually go ignored UNLESS they commit acts of violence. After all, Jews are always important because of their elite power, wealth, and of course Shoah Cult. And blacks always get jungle-feverish-and-cuckish love from whites because they dominate sports and pop music. And homos are at the center of Pop Culture because so many gravitate to Vice-and-Vanity Industry.
In contrast, Muslims, despite their rising numbers, get no love and respect from the white community. Therefore, the only way they can get some attention is by blowing up stuff or mowing people down with trucks. It just goes to show that Diversity doesn’t guarantee equal affection to all peoples. Some groups must do something really outlandish to appear on the social-cultural radar. It’s like kids in a family. Suppose out of five kids, four get the love for being either smart, pretty, funny, or athletic. But the fifth kid is ignored and made to feel insignificant. Then, the ONLY way he can get attention is by doing something crazy like burning down the house.)

Anyway, current UK is a totally debased society of foul and shameless behavior on so many social and cultural fronts. There’s been so much family breakdown, so much rise of degeneracy. And yet, it can’t even enjoy the benefit of the primal virtue of vulgarism. Consider the figure of Count Dankula, a truly gross figure splattered with tattoos and piercings. He represents everything that is ugly and demented about new Britain. And yet, one real(if lowly) advantage of vulgarism is the spirit of freedom, irreverence, and the uninhibited middle-finger to stuffy social conventions. Or so Count Dankula thought when he made infantile videos about making his pug do the ‘Nazi salute’ to commands of ‘Heil Hitler’ and ‘Gas the Jews’. It was the sort of thing Sid Vicious might have done in the 1970s just to provoke people or be a jerk. But no, the State went after Dankula for ‘hate speech’. So, UK now allows and encourages the most demented, ugly, stupid, trashy, porny, and infantile speech and expression — much of pop culture revolves around black thuggery, jungle fever, homo degeneracy, feminist vaginal obsessions, slut pride, anti-white vitriol, and etc — BUT it won’t allow ‘hate speech’ that is to be defined and determined by neo-Victorian stuff-shirts in the institutions of academia, media, and government. It reminds me of that Onion satire that complains about foul language in pornography by ‘Maggie Lehman’: https://entertainment.theonion.com/why-do-porn-actors-have-to-use-such-foul-language-1819583928#_ga=2.218135578.2072781814.1524769152-1002042756.1524769152
Thus, UK has managed to be both hoity-toity and porny-horny at the same time. In the past, the hoity-toiters used snobbery and repression to control the barbarian energies of the masses and to defend the homeland from foreigners. Back then, even fellow European Germans were considered as barbaric ‘Huns’. Today, the hoity-toiters still put on doopity-pippy-poo manner and sip tea and nibble on crumpets BUT they praise spread of barbarism and savagery(as long as they don’t mock Judeovah, Afroyalty, Fairistocracy, and intermittently Angry Muslims threatening to blow something else up unless they get some love), welcome mass invasion from backward and even truly savage nations of Africa, and dismantle all the national mechanisms of patriotism, pride, and normalcy that can save Britain. And with fading of religion — the Anglican Church is now just a nest of Homomania-pushers — , decline of the family, loss of culture, and fading of history(or vilification of white history or vindication of white history ONLY BY retro-blackening white historical characters), the only Culture left standing for the majority of Britons is Pop Culture. Worse, if Pop Culture of yesteryear represented Britishness, maturity, and morality(like in the films of David Lean and Carol Reed), the new Pop Culture is all about promotion of Homo degeneracy, Jungle Fever & ACOWW, the endless cult of Holocaust, Slut Pride, feminist vaginal pseudo-covenant or ‘cuntinant’, and mindless faith in Diversinoma as the best cure and Inclusion as morally necessary invasion.

So, the British people have been turned into beasts without even the liberation of being free like wild animals. Rather, British people are now like a horse ridden by Jews, Homos, and blacks. Or, it’s like a cow that was promised freedom but has a ring stuck through its nose to be dragged around by PC commissars. George Orwell wrote ANIMAL FARM as satire on Stalinist totalitarianism, but UK today is more like THE ISLAND OF DR. MOREAU. People have been turned into animals(made even more so by promotion of ACOWW that will turn Anglo-Saxons into Junglo-Saxons and make UK look like Morocco) but also trained to obey. The long-term result of this will be Jungle vs Jihad. As white people are now so decadent, soulless, vapid, and demoralized, they have no means to say NO to the African power of the Jungle. If anything, they are addicted to blackness as the heat-drug as whiteness, they’ve been told, is cold, dull, frigid, and lifeless without sucking vitality from other races. So, whites can’t hold back the demented influence of the Jungle. The ONLY people with the spine, courage, will, and pride to say NO to the Jungle is the Jihad, the power of Muslims. Currently, Jungle and Jihad are in a crude and uneasy alliance as both share the common interest of gaining access to the West. And Jungle and Jihad are also in uneasy alliance with Jude because Jews push Diversity to create gentile-divisions that they can exploit and manipulate. In the long run, it will be a war among Jungle, Jihad, and Judea. Whites, castrated and cucked, haven’t the spine to say NO to Judea as it’d be ‘antisemitic’, to Jungle as it’d be ‘racist’, and to Jihad as it’d be ‘Islamophobic’. So, with each year, white power will dwindle as its puts out to Jewish brains, black muscle & dongs, and Muslim threats. Can Judea, Jungle, and Jihad co-exist once white power is totally gone? Unlikely. In Africa, there is either the rule of Jungle(in most of Sub-Saharan Africa) or Jihad(mainly in North Africa where Arabs and even black Arabs use ruthless violence to keep the Jungle at bay).

When it comes to Diversititis, the chronic condition of problematic Diversity, there is no permanent fix or cure in the absence of massive civil war that leads to a bloody breakup of the existing national entity in separate parts. This is exceedingly difficult if the diverse populations are dispersed and mixed throughout the land. But a breakup of a diverse nation can be reasonably simple IF the various peoples occupy and dominate their own regions. This is why the breakup of the Soviet Union was relatively painless. Lithuania was mostly made up of Lithuanians, Georgia was mostly made up of Georgians, Armenia was mostly made up of Armenians, and etc. Even though there had been extensive population transfers during the Soviet era, most of the non-Russian Republicans had a solid ethnic majority. Some violence did flare up in border areas among republics with mixed populations, as with the case with Armenians and Azerbaijanis. In the case of Yugoslavia, the breakup ranged from painless to painful. Slovenia’s independence from Yugoslavia was relatively painless, not unlike the voluntary decision among Czechs and Slovaks to go separate ways. As most of Slovenia was made up of Slovenians, its withdrawal from Yugoslavia went smoothly. The biggest problem was in Bosnia that had large numbers of Croatians, Serbs, and Muslims who were, furthermore, interspersed throughout the region. Even to this day, the problems in Bosnia have not been fully resolved, and a very uneasy truce remains. Anyway, Bosnia is a case of permanent Diversititis. No single group can come to dominate as the majority in the foreseeable future. So, the best option is for the various groups to find ways to tolerate one another, respect each other’s spaces, restrain one’s own resentments, and develop better ways of inter-group communication and cooperation. Bosnia is an obvious case that Diversity sows seeds of discord. Still, it’s my understanding that it is in a state of Diversititis than Diversinoma. After all, the people there already know of the problems of Diversity. Why would they believe it’d be a good thing to bring in MORE Diversity when enough is enough?

In a society chronically infected or overcome with Diversititis, the only option is the coping mechanism. People must learn to cope with the tensions and conflicts. If they can’t, there will be violence and counter-violence and endless cycles of vendetta. A society racked with Diversititis will never be a Trust Society or an orderly one, but if the various peoples arrive at modicum ways to respect one another and even appreciate each other’s differences and find ways to complement one another by trading in good and services of ethnic niche specialties — for example, suppose one group is better at running restaurants while another group is better at white collar work — , then tensions can be minimized and relative peace can prevail. Diversititis generally undermines the Rule of Law as groups tend to favor ‘my group’ over common interests, but in some cases, it can boost Rule of Law because the Law is the only thing that the various groups can agree on as they differ so much in customs, manners, and attitudes. Lacking cultural consensus, there is only recourse to legal consensus, at least if the various peoples are willing to submit to the letter of the Law that has been sincerely agreed upon by all sides as being fair and balanced.
Even so, outcomes can upset the legal balance. Consider the Fireman Promotion Exam that had been approved by whites, blacks, and browns as fair prior to the test-taking but was immediately denounced as ‘racist’ when blacks and browns performed far below their white counterparts. Diversititis will always lead to headaches, frustrations, and recriminations. This is why no society should push for more Diversity.
But many parts of the world have become irreversibly and irreparably diverse due to imperialism, invasion, or careless drawing of maps. Every Latin American nation is the product of European imperialism, Atlantic Slave Trade, and Mass Immigration-invasion. And Europeans did a reckless job of drawing crazy maps in the Middle East that maximized diversity than homogeneity. Absent massive wars that lead to profound movements of peoples or redrawing of maps, the peoples of all such nations must learn to cope with Diversititis.

But coping isn’t enough with Diversinoma. It’s like one cannot cope with cancer. It has to be stopped and reversed OR the patient will surely die. If UK were to halt all further Mass Invasion, it might be able to cope with its already considerable Diversititis. Whites are still the majority, and they might be able to accept the long-term presence of non-whites who may or may not assimilate into the white cultural fabric.
Of course, the problem is British obsession with manners and politeness renders it bad form for the Brits to ‘rudely’ demand that the foreigners assimilate to British ways. To be sure, past Brits had pride of chauvinism and felt justified in berating the inferior ‘darkies’ to try to live up to superior white standards. It wasn’t considered bad form for whites to express their sense of cultural and even racial superiority and exert pressure on non-whites to improve themselves to act less like stupid ‘wogs’ and more like ‘Englishmen’. But such attitudes are simply no longer allowed among whites in the UK, so the only thing left is the good manners, which, without the backing of gruff pride or haughty honor, come across as weakness. Today, non-whites in the UK see White Culture as either HARRY POTTER-ish childishness or Benedict-Cumberbatchy wussiness. The sickening-looking Cumberbatch profusely apologized for having said ‘colored people’ than ‘people of color’. They get no respect because they don’t exude power. People, especially non-whites from brutish societies, only respect signs of might. When they see white people looking stricken, apologetic, and racked with guilt-and-doubt, they don’t feel respect or gratitude. They just feel contempt for the weak wussy white boy, especially because their peoples had, for so long, believe in the Great White Man. Sure, whiteys were the Big Bad Imperialists, but they were also the Magnificent Warriors and Administrators who’d once conquered and ruled the world. But now, non-whites see all these sorry-ass cucky-wuck boys in the UK. What passes for British Conservatism is Milo the ‘gay’ Jew and Andrew Sullivan taking black dongs up their bungs. Or, it’s that harridan witch Theresa May whose toxicity is aimed ONLY at the white native population.

Anyway, it’s worse than that because what the UK has is not a bad condition of Diversititis but a full-blown case of Diversinoma. As if things aren't bad enough already, the Official Ideology of the UK calls for MORE Mass Invasion to be followed by yet MORE Mass Invasion and more and more. Jewish globalists and their cuck-collaborators have convinced so many white British that the UK had been a ‘nation of immigrants’ from the beginning. Also, so many white Brits are so bored with themselves that they want color, flavor, and distractions of Diversity. The more the better, like people addicted to drugs must have more and more even when the drugs are killing them.
Also, ‘white guilt’ about past imperialism has produced a Narrative that says non-whites have a moral right to invade and take over UK as historical revenge/justice. And there is also Jungle Fever among white women that want sex with big-donged Negro men and ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. And there are plenty of cucky British men who welcome this because, in a way, servility has been one of the characteristics of Britishness. After all, the British could not have come to dominate the world if they were all Alpha-male warriors. No, the bulk of the British people had to be drilled and disciplined to obey, follow orders, and tip their hats and say "aye guv’nor" when a social superior passed by. In the past, most Brits were cultivated to regard higher-class members, clergy, and officers as superior people worthy of respect. But White Prestige, especially of white males, faded long ago, and the new gods of British neo-royalty is Diversity, Inclusion, White Guilt, Afromania, and Homomania. (Among Conservatives, it is Jew-Worship above all.) So, British culture of disciplined servility that had served the British Empire so well is now in the service of other gods. Especially due to influence of black pop music and black domination in sports, many Brits now revere blacks as the natural royalty. Afroyalty is their new gods and kinds, which is why BBC shows feature British historical figures played by blacks. White Brits worship blacks so much that they believe the great heroes and legends of their own history must be cast with blacks who are superior in raw power.

Also, Diversity has a moral appeal to both the white have-nots and white have-mores. Among the have-nots and Leftist intellectuals, hugging Diversity is an easy way of virtue-signaling against the rich whites. Resentful of privileged whites and Jews who hog most of the wealth and privilege, the poorer whites and leftist intellectuals claim greater moral treasure by parading their ‘compassion’ for the darkies. But then, the rich whites play a similar kind of game. By hugging Diversity(from a distance, of course), they snobbily claim moral superiority over the ‘racist’ and ‘xenophobic’ white working class that is none-too-happy to see their hometown communities colonized by a bunch of bloody ‘wogs’. So, both the ‘left’ and the ‘right’, the ‘upper’ and the ‘lower’ weaponize Diversity for its own purposes. Because whiteness has been so disgraced and discredited, white Britons of any ideological faction must wave the Diversity flag to earn righteous Pokemon points. At the very least, especially if one isn’t to keen on Diversity, one has to cling to Jews(and homos) and argue that one’s opposition to continued Mass Invasion is to save Jews and Homos from Muslim Terrorists. But this is not a winning strategy because Jewish Power is fully behind Mass Invasion and Diversity. And the great majority of Homos are into Diversity. Even if Mass Invasion may not be good for homos in the long run, the very nature of homos tends to favor colorful diversions than deep-rooted sense of belonging. Homo nature is innately disloyal because, after all, homosexuality itself is a betrayal of nature and the way of life.

Unlike Diversititis, there is no way to cope with Diversinoma. It has to be identified. It has to be diagnosed as the most fatal disease that can afflict a nation. It portends and promotes the total destruction of the nation. It is immeasurably worse than the spread of bad ideology or destruction by war. Both Russia and China suffered under the ideology of communism, but they recovered. Ideology eventually blows away. Russia remained Russia after communism. China is still China.
Also, nations recovered from the most horrible destruction by war. Japan and Germany rebounded quickly. Britain recovered as well following WWII. Poland, which had been steamrolled by every great power, recovered.

But Diversinoma will lead to the total and permanent transformation of a nation, and the effects will be irreversible. There is no way Palestinians can ever take back their lost homeland again. There is no way Serbians can have Kosovo again. And if things go on as they are, the Brits, the French, Germans, and Swedes will lose their ancient homelands for good.
Now, the newly transformed nation may still have a working economy or even a bigger one, BUT the original and core ethnos, identity, and culture will be lost forever. They will survive in pockets and fragments but will be much degraded and, at any rate, will not command the center of what the nation is about. Suppose 10 million Chinese were to move to Nepal. The economy may greatly expand, but it will never be Nepal as unique people-and-culture ever again.

Because humans are organisms and because organisms are invasive, there are invasions afoot all over the world, especially from poor to rich nations. That, in and of itself, doesn’t constitute Diversinoma. Likewise, the human body experiences invasion by germs and toxicity at all times, and some cells act irregular and weird. The body is always under threat from something, internal and external. But the body manages to fend off most germs and restore equilibrium to maintain health. Cancer happens when this balance is lost. For some reason, the body fails to limit the growth of a malignant tumor. The tumor keeps growing and growing, and cancer cells begin multiplying and multiplying. And the body feeds the cancer cells with blood. Even as white blood cells continue to wage a valiant war on cancer cells, other parts of the body help cancer cells to grow. The bloodstream is carrying them all over the body.
Now, the body is no longer able to regulate itself to control or reverse the cancer. It has taken hold of the body, and its colony of cells keep multiplying and spreading to other parts of the body. Indeed, much of the body is mistaken in treating cancer cells as welcome parts of the body. Over time, more of the body assents to the spread of cancer cells than cooperates with white blood cells to fight the spread of cancer. And then, even the lymph nodes that are supposed to serve as a immune system are taken over by cancer cells, and it becomes hopeless. Diversinoma works the same way.

This is why Diversinoma has to be diagnosed and identified as soon as possible. And the nation-as-patient must be warned right away as to what must be done to reverse the process. Since the regular functions of the nation can no longer fend off Diversinoma — just like a cancer-stricken body can no longer fight off cancer on its own — , a special draconian treatment is necessary to save the patient-nation.
Consider the UK. It’d be nice if the elites and the people were woke to what is happening to their nation, call an end to Mass Invasion, restore white pride(as white blood cells of the nation), expose Jewish globalist wickedness, denounce ACOWW, and began the process of sending the non-white colonizers back to their nations of origin, just like non-white nations had once expelled European colonizers from their own lands.
But the cancer has spread to the elites and to so many people. The elites are cuck-collaborators of wicked Jewish globalist masters who rule EOJ or Empire of Judea, the most powerful world empire, of which even the US is a vassal. As for the British masses, so many of them have been turned by the 2 PCs — Pop Culture and Political Correctness — into Negro-worshiping, Homo-worshiping, and Diversity-worshiping dogs and sheeple. Their bodies and souls have been drained of patriotism and noble race-ism. Their passions are roused ONLY WHEN they listen to black jungle music, get hysterical at homo parades, or spot a ‘nazi’ or ‘racist’, which is ANY white person who is a patriot and doesn’t want Britain to be invaded and colonized by non-white hordes. Patriots are attacked by Parrots.

Therefore, the only way to save a nation like UK is by extraordinary means. At this point, the patriots must learn from the Algerians who resisted French colonization, the Viet Minh & Viet Cong that fought against French Imperialists and American Occupiers. As the UK is ruled by Jews and cuck-collaborators and as the UK media & academia are controlled by ideological quacks who keep assuring the British people that cancer is the cure(!), the savior and the medicine must come from extraordinary individuals form unexpected places.

In the coming decades, the stakes will be super-high. It will decide if the UK can be cured of the hideous cancer of Diversinoma or succumb to it totally and become just an European version of Paki-Africa.
What Winston Churchill and the British people underwent in WWII was nothing compared to the dangers that the Brits face now. In the past, even in the case of worst possible scenario of Germans having invaded Britain, it wouldn’t have been so bad. As Germans respected Anglos as fellow-brethren, most Britons would have been treated nicely. And in time, the Germans would have left after setting up a friendly regime(just like the US Occupation of Japan and Germany ended after it installed pliable governments). Germans had no plan to racially or culturally destroy Core Britain. But that is exactly the plan of Jews, Africans, and Muslims. Jews seek to maximize Diversity to play divide-and-rule. It is also revenge for all those yrs of Anglo prejudice and snobbery, subtle if not always blatant, toward Jews. Jews want to see Anglo men humiliated by having to watch their daughters turn into shameless sluts whose wombs produce black babies. And of course, Africans love to leech off whites in the UK. They also love to beat up weaker whites and colonize white wombs. They feel as the physical champions of New Britain. And Muslims seek to keep coming and take over entire streets and spread Sharia in a nation that they deem to be decadent and lost.

If current demographic and cultural trends continue, it will truly be the fall of Britain. While the Nazis did pose a genuinely genocidal threat to Russians and other Slavs, they only demanded compliance and alliance from the UK. Indeed, the UK would have done better to ally with Germany in WWII if its only interest was narrow self-interest. Now, given the radical evil of Nazi Germany, the Brits were right to forge alliances even with the USSR to defeat Nazi Germany. Still, it must be stressed over and over that Germany posed no real threat to the survival of the British people, culture, and nation EVEN IF the UK had fallen to the Germans. The real threat of replacement, colonization, and extinction of Britain comes from EOJ or the Empire of Judea, the agenda of which is to turn UK into Othellonia. Unless a significant number of Brits wake up to the danger of Diversinoma and commit themselves fully to the struggle as Ho Chi Minh had done to the national independence of Vietnam, the UK will lost be lost forever in the coming decades. If the future is to be won and secured, there must be men like Noah, Moses, Samson, and King David. There must be heroes like Arthur and Perceval. There must be prophets like Enoch Powell. There must be barbarian lords willing to lay down their lives in the war against the decadent cuck elites who serve not the people & nation but the evil Soros-like sorcerers of EOJ. British patriots must wake up everyday reminding themselves, "Once a nation is lost demographically, it is lost forever."