Commentary on "Belloc in 1936 on the Return of Islam" by Steve Sailer

https://www.unz.com/isteve/belloc-in-1936-on-the-return-of-islam/

Hilaire Belloc:

We have seen how the material political power of Islam declined very rapidly during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.

Did it decline or fail to keep up with the West? Maybe the Muslim remained where it was while the West advanced technologically. If someone stands still while you walk forward, he's not moving backward even though he will increasingly fall back behind you.

Hilaire Belloc:

Cultures spring from religions; ultimately the vital force which maintains any culture is its philosophy, its attitude toward the universe; the decay of a religion involves the decay of the culture corresponding to it – we see that most clearly in the breakdown of Christendom today. The bad work begun at the Reformation is bearing its final fruit in the dissolution of our ancestral doctrines – the very structure of our society is dissolving.

But the real benefit of Christianity was not that Western culture sprung from it but that the culture had something to fall back on when things went south. Christian moralism has stood in the way of cultural inspiration and creativity. Even though Renaissance artists created many religious works, the true spark and inspiration were neo-pagan. But paganism has a way of becoming decadent, nihilistic, and idolatrous, a narcissism of power and beauty. Christianity provided some balance to such tendencies. The main creative source of Western Civilization is Greco-Roman and even Germanic imaginations. But creativity isn't necessarily moral; it is also elitist and belongs to a few. As such, it can't for long serve as the basis of a stable civilization. Morality must be the core values of a people, and that is where Christianity proved most valuable. Not because culture sprung from it — Western Civilization was already great and accomplished before its conversion to Christianity. As for the Reformation, it was a response to the corruption and decay of the Catholic Church that came to overly rely on rituals and idols than on creed and conviction. For awhile, Reformation restored Christian passion.

Hilaire Belloc:

In the place of the old Christian enthusiasms of Europe there came, for a time, the enthusiasm for nationality, the religion of patriotism. But self-worship is not enough, and the forces which are making for the destruction of our culture, notably the Jewish Communist propaganda from Moscow, have a likelier future before them than our old-fashioned patriotism.

But patriotism is not about self-worship. It's not about worship at all. It's about pride and preservation of heritage. It is not a religion in and of itself. Also, spirituality can be made a part of patriotism and nationalism. This is most evident in Judaism and its Covenant that fuses tribalism with spiritualism. In a similar vein, Christianity can be made part of national heritage, i.e. while Christianity is for all the world, each people can stress their own story of how they came to the Faith, and that particularity within universality should have been stressed. Consider the Russian Orthodox Church. It is Christian and Nationalist. Likewise, Buddhism has a nationalist element among Tibetans, Vietnamese, Burmese, and etc.

In the end, Jewish capitalism turned out to be far more damaging to Western Man. Though Jews were heavily involved in communism, its triumph came to suppress Jewish power that relies on individual enterprise, tribal networking, and meritocracy to realize its full potential. In all communist nations, the Jews eventually lost out to the non-Jewish majority as communism is about The People and Mass Mediocrity.

The reason why nationalism came more naturally to Europeans is because European societies developed from agriculture. In contrast, Arabs were nomadic and generally didn't put down roots in any part of the desert. They were movers, traders, and raiders. Of course, in time, Nationalism began to fade among Europeans with increasing urbanization and globalism that made it easy for Europeans to move abroad and for non-Europeans to move into Europe. Nomadism is intrinsic to globalism. Wings rule over the feet.

Steve Sailer: 

History often turns upon unexpected personalities. The West has been fairly lucky that no outstanding man has arisen in Islamic world. Since 1936, probably the two most remarkable personalities have been Nasser, who was more of a Bonapartist modernizer demagogue than an Islamist, and the Ayatollah Khomeini.

This may be true of past history when Muslims had a chance of literally conquering the West like the Mongols also nearly did. But in the modern era, why would the emergence of a great Muslim leader be bad for the West? Did Ayatollah call for invasion of the West? No, all the stuff about 'great satan' was mostly rhetorical. Kemal Ataturk wanted peace with the West and Westernization for Turks.

The main reason why Gamal Nasser and other notable Arab/Muslim leaders lost out is because Jews gained power in the West and used West as a proxy against the Arab/Muslim World. Israel was a Western creation of Jews and whites who supported, defended, and supplied Zionism at every turn.

The West, under Jewish Power, also crushed Saddam Hussein who, though a horrid person, did much to modernize Iraq. Living standards for most Iraqis were pretty decent prior to the Gulf War.
For all the problems among Arabs, their societies would be far more accomplished if not for Jewish control of the West and use of Western power as proxy of Jewish agenda. Iraq today would be formidable if not for the Gulf War, semi-genocidal sanctions, and the invasion. Iraq was also building nuclear power plants before they were bombed by Israeli jets with US support. Syria would be in much better straits if not for Neocon agenda of sending and aiding terrorists. Gaddafi made real gains in Libya before Jewish-ruled West destroyed it. And Iranian economy would be much stronger if not for sanctions forced by Jewish-controlled US. If it came down to Jews vs Muslims, Jews would not necessarily win even though, pound for pound, they are smarter than Arabs/Muslims. The real secret to Israel's success and Muslim world's failure is that the Jews control the West that does the bidding of Zion. But suppose a Muslim-controlled West sanctioned Israel for its war crimes and dropped bombs to kill Israel leaders and figures. Where would Israel be?

Hilaire Belloc, Muslims, Arabs, Muslim World, Iraq, Turkey, Israel, Steve Sailer, nomadism, Western Support of Zion,

The National Core of a People is Revealed with the Loss of Empire — Feminism’s War on Mutual Empowerment

The French Empire unraveled after WWII. But it was not a total loss. The French colonialists reconnected with the National Core. They returned home to France. Back then, French colonialists had a place to go back to. But what is France today? It is a demographic colony of Muslims, sexual colony of Africa, and political colony of the Jews. And Netherlands doesn't lift a finger to save White Boer Farmers in South Africa. New Holland's identity is 'multi-culturalism', which means that it belongs more to Africans and Muslims than to the Dutch themselves. It is now a crime for the Dutch to say, "My country belongs to my people", but it is wonderful for Africans and Muslims to say "We have a right to colonize and take over Dutch lands and wombs."

In the end, true nationalism is defined by Core Nationalism. National identity, interests, and territory become confused and muddled with imperialism. As a people gain dominance of other peoples and their lands, their sense of national destiny becomes entwined with that of other peoples. Thus, distinctions between the National and Imperial become unsure and contradictory. As Amy Chua discussed in her concept of hyper-powers, the conquering/ruling people must be 'tolerant' and 'diverse' in order to maintain a great empire. While a determined people can use brute force to conquer weaker peoples, it is nearly impossible to rule over, with brute force alone, such vast lands inhabited by different peoples. In the case of American History, white people could just remove the relatively small number of native folks and create a White empire-nation. But most empires were about one people ruling over others who vastly outnumbered the ruling/conquering people. Also, even though the conquered peoples were relatively lacking in technology and organization, they were not hopeless primitives like the American Indians who had no chance against whites. So, to have an empire, the ruling people must be reasonably 'tolerant' and pro-'diversity' over the conquered peoples. Empires are inherently diverse since they are about a people conquering and ruling over other peoples of different races, cultures, and religions. Also, in order to win over collaborators(or, better yet, converts at least in religion or ideology), the ruling people must be reasonably 'tolerant' and offer carrots along with the sticks. Nazi Empire was doomed in the East because its plan was extermination/enslavement. But in a sick way, even Hitler understood historical truths. An empire can survive in only two ways: Via 'diversity' & 'tolerance' OR eradication & homogeneity. He understood that while D&T method was useful and effective, it was ultimately doomed. All D&T empires eventually faded from history. The only kind of permanently successful empire is where one people take over, effectively exterminate or crush the natives, and become the ruling majority. Anglos could achieve this in North America & Australia and Russians could accomplish this in Siberia because they were met with only sparsely populated primitive opposition. But it was a tall order for Germans to pull off such a campaign against the Soviet Union that, in 1941, had 170 million people and advanced civilization. Easier to kill a gopher than a bear. So, if the German Empire were to become permanent and last a 1000 yrs(in Hitler's prophetic dream), the German Empire had to effectively be a Big German Nation. Not so much Germans ruling over others but Germans as both rulers and ruled in the vast Eastern territories. D&T method, while effective, usually led to the conquerors being either expelled or absorbed by the larger native populations. Mongols were absorbed into non-Mongol peoples or, in time, driven out by native folks. Alexander's Macedonian and Greek rulers eventually faded into the local domains that they conquered. The Aryan Conquerors in India may have used an extreme and elaborate system of race-separation ideology to perpetuate rule over the natives permanently. But despite DNA studies showing lingering differences among the various castes, lots of Brahmins in India look dark like the natives. Over 1000 yrs, they've been absorbed far more than they'd like to admit. Libido will do that over time.

Anyway, under the policy of 'diversity' and 'tolerance', an empire can grow and flourish. Initially, the ruling people nevertheless maintain a sense of 'us' over 'them'. While the conquered 'them' are offered carrots, they are still in an inferior position vis-a-vis the conquering 'us'. But as time passes, the conquerors come to rely more on the conquered for materials and manpower. Also, among the conquered, some perform their duties so loyally that they are accepted into the conquering tribe. There have been some cases where, over time, the conquerors and conquered merged into one people. This was especially true IF the either the conquering people or conquered people(or both) had weak cultural identity. Mongols were fierce and aggressive but had a barbarian culture. As such, they could be absorbed into more complex cultures. Or when an elaborate culture conquers a weak/primitive culture, the latter joins the former. Christendom and Islamic World converted and absorbed many peoples. And long ago, a few gentile tribes were absorbed into the Jewish Tribe with a most powerful sense of culture rooted in the Covenant. The merge is usually doable IF the conquerors and conquered are of the same race despite cultural differences. Plenty of Germanic and Slavic barbarians became 'Romans' or 'Greeks'.
But when a powerful culture conquers powerful cultures, neither side is willing to be fully absorbed into the other culture. This is even truer if the peoples differ in race as well as in culture. Latin America is an interesting case. Because the natives mostly had weak cultures, they were absorbed into the conquering Latin Culture. They took on Spanish names and language. And they accepted Christianity. Now, if the natives of Central and South America were white, they might have just become ONE with the Spanish. But as they were brown, strong distinctions and separations remain between the conquerors and conquered despite the effective cultural 'latinization' of the whole continent.
At any rate, empire eventually confuses the distinctions between the conquerors and the conquered. This confusion is a double-edged sword. In some ways, it facilitates further integration between conquerors and conquered. If the conquerors come to identify more with imperial glory than with the national core, then they are bound to feel a closer bond with the conquered folks who've come to serve the empire. And if the conquered folks come to share in the pride of imperial glory, they are bound to look to conquerors not so much as foreign tyrants but rightful rulers. But this confusion also leads to all kinds of anxieties, paranoia, tensions, distrust, and resentment. Also, both sides realize that there has to be a limit to the merging of the two realms because there is the real danger of losing one's identity and culture forever. Then, it is hardly surprising that most empires faded in time. Latin America is in a strange kind of limbo state. In one way, it seems like a successful and permanent merging of conquerors and conquered. In other ways, it looks like an ongoing imperial project where something BIG might happen with drastic transformations in power politics.

Where nationalism becomes most vital and vivid is when empires fall apart. Such collapse finally decides what is Core Nationalism and Expansive Imperialism. It's like separating wheat from the chaff, the gold from the sand. Core Nationalism is muscular and lean, Expansive Imperialism is fat and round. An empire is like a person with excessive fat. He has eaten too much, and it has made him bigger. He carries a lot of weight, and can push others around. BUT, all that fat also serves as a burden. There are advantages to be sure. After all, a sumo wrestler gets a lot of leverage with the fat. But, he tires easily and has to keep eating and eating to maintain his size. Now, when a fatso decides to exercise and lose weight, does he shrink to nothingness? No, he will lose the fat, but he will reach a point where he is mostly lean muscle. That is the Core Person. Without all the fat, he may look diminished and won't win something like sumo matches, but he will feel healthier and lighter. So, if one wants to know what a fatso really looks like, the fatso must lose the weight. All the flab makes the fatso look like other fatsos. They are defined by fat that covers their body. But with exercise and healthy eating, a fatso will lose weight, and then he will really look like his true self.

This also goes for empire. Empire confuses the identity of a people. The conquering people may come to identify so much with the empire that they forget what they really are at the ethnic, cultural, and territorial core. Indeed, because they've come to covet the empire so much, they may feel that loss of empire will be the end of the world, the end of everything. But not so. Losing the empire finally reveals the Core Essence of the People and Culture. It is not total loss but loss of Imperial fat in exchange of re-emergence of the National musculature.
So, when the British lost their empire, they had their core in Great Britain. It still remained. After the French lost their empire, they had Core France, the land to which the French colonialists returned. When the Turks lost the Ottoman Empire, they no longer ruled over Arabs and Balkan folks, but they had the National Core in what is now Turkey. When the Japanese Empire collapsed in Continental Asia, there was still Core Japan. Austrians lost the empire, but they still had the Austrian Core. Russians lost the Soviet Empire but still have Core National Russia. And Germans lost their empire in WWII but still had the German national core.

And for the conquered peoples, the National Core remains even under Imperial Waters. Polish people and civilization were long submerged under Russian and Prussian Imperialism, but they remained as a steady rock that re-emerged once the empire subsided and receded from history. This was also true of the Greeks whose ethno-rock was long submerged under the Ottoman Imperial Sea.

So, true nationalism is Core Nationalism, and it reappears when a people lose the empire. They may be frightened that the loss of empire is loss of everything, but it's actually a realization of and a re-connection with the National Core. In the end, was it so tragic that the French in Indochina returned to France or the British in Kenya returned to Great Britain? Even with loss of Imperial Glory, there was National Integrity.

What is truly ominous and tragic about globalism is it is an attack on the Core itself. Apparently, it wasn't enough for the Brits and the French to lose their far-flung empires. They must lose their national cores as well. And not just them. According to PC, George Soros, and the UN, the attack on the Core must be universal. Even though Swedes and Poles didn't have overseas empires, they too must lose their cores. According to this article, even though Polish Conservatives mouth patriotic platitudes, they are collaborating with globo-homo capitalists to import tons of non-whites and spread Homomania everywhere. https://www.amren.com/features/2018/11/a-frank-assessment-of-nationalism-in-poland/ Also, rise of deracinating Pop Culture, anti-ethno-PC, and anti-life feminism have led to Child Dearth all over the Modern World. Women take jobs from men and then wonder why there aren't enough marriageable men around. It's because women took their jobs. Feminism is narrowly focused on female careerist empowerment while overlooking the fact that this leads to overall weakening of a people. While relative freedom for women was an advantage to the West, the West's greatest rise came when there was a balance between the ideal of equality and the reality of biology. Thus, Western women enjoyed more freedom and rights than women in other cultures, BUT they still performed their crucial biological functions as wives and mothers. This led to the triumph of the West. (If modern feminism had hit the West in the 18th century, there would have been no Rise of the West.) There was a sense of All-Empowerment for the entire society, and this required a complementary relationship between men and women. But materialistic feminism led to women seeing themselves as a separate and independent group apart from men. Instead of working with men to create a powerful society for all, women opted for the narrowest goals of personal/sexual entitlement. Of course, most women lost out in this order as only a handful women are going to succeed in the most glamorous fields coveted by most women addicted to celebrity and vanity. But the toxic mindset infected most women, and they lost all sense of what is GOOD FOR ALL or Mutual Empowerment. They just opted for the narrow empowerment of themselves as a separate group.

There was a time when even the loss of empire meant that a people would not lose all. Fall of empire meant that the conquered peoples regained(or conceived of) their own nationhood while the conquering peoples withdrew into their national core. Both sides got something. Liberation for the conquered, Re-connection for the conquerors. Imperialists returned home and reconnected with nation and kin... like Lawrence(of Arabia) who had enough of imperial ventures and returns home to Britain. Or the guys in THE DEER HUNTER who want to say goodbye to all that(imperialism) and return home where family and friends are. Fall of empire was like declaring bankruptcy. You lost lots of stuff, but you got to keep your core house and property. So, if you speculated in lots of bad real estate deals and got burned, you needn't lose your core home. But globalism says even the Core possession of a people/culture must be placed on the auction block or turned into something like a brothel. The culture and ideology of current UK is a whorehouse or a house-party. It is not a home where anyone would feel safe. In DUNKIRK, we see how the soldiers feel safe 'at home' as they make it across the channel. Today, London has been colonized by the Other. British Police looked the other way when girls were turned into sex slaves in Rotherham(or Brothelham). And yet, this is the the New Centrism, and anyone who calls for Core Nationalism is 'far right'... unless he happens to be an Israeli.

We are told endlessly that Global Warming will raise sea levels and submerge sea coasts all around the world. But even more alarming is the prospect of Global Swarming that may well submerge all the First World under the rising tides of Third World invasion egged on by globalist Jews.

White American Elites represent the Worst Template for All the World — The Fable of the Gulping Hippo — When Elites no longer lead the Masses of their own kind, it’s Game Over for that People... unless Another Elite rises to represent, defend, and lead the Masses to Independence and Sovereignty

The Fable of the Gulping Hippo

The World Beware. White American Elites are the worst elites in the world, and all nations should be wary of the ways of such an elite. It’s a historical truth that a people are like a shapeless mass and can’t rule themselves. As the Founding Fathers knew, concentration of power may be evil but it’s a necessary evil. The power is like the watchtower. Its elevated and vaunted position allows those on top to see, hear, know, and reach more than the masses of individuals who make up the People. Imagine a village where most people are at ground level. In contrast, a few have access to the top of the tower and can see further than most people. Seeing more and knowing more, those atop the power can warn the people below of the dangers or fortunes far yonder. If an enemy tribe is coming toward the village, those atop the tower can see the threat before anyone on the ground. If a herd of deer or other prey animals appear in the horizon that can feed the village, those atop the tower can spot the good fortune before anyone on the ground.
Indeed, if not for the vision afforded by the tower, the people of the village may not even know of the herd that had passed by near the village. Also, those atop the tower can see everyone in the village, and everyone in the village can see in unison those on the top. At ground level at a gathering or rally, a villager can only see those in close proximity, and these people block all the others behind them. But from the tower, one can see the whole crowd. Those on the tower feel a sense of authority and privilege. And those below are likely to see those on top with a certain respect, even awe.
Now, those atop the tower can try to use their advantageous position for their own self-aggrandizement, and many elites have been like that through the ages. Or, they can be mindful of others in the village and use their elevation and greater reach in vision to serve the community. Thus, they become like the eyes, ears, lips, and brains of a the community that is the body. They speak to the community, they speak for the community, the listen to what the community has to say, and they plan for the community. After all, whatever special gifts those atop the tower may possess, they didn’t build the tower alone. All the community took part in laboring to erect such a tall edifice. And they surely didn’t do it just so the fortunate few could enjoy the cool breeze up above.

In the past, the American elites understood how much their good fortune depended on the people. After all, the elites alone couldn’t chop down trees, plow the fields, reap the harvests, lay down roads, build towns and cities, and etc. The fortunes of the elites relied on the labor of the masses. Of course, this was true of all societies around the world, but the ideal of the Modern West was that the elites must be mindful of those who do much of the hard work. When American economy was mainly agricultural and/or industrial, the elites understood the value of Labor and the Working Man. But as globalism changed so much of the US economy into a game of finance, high tech, and information-sharing(or intelligence-gathering), more and more of the American Labor force became obsolete, not least because (1) globalism could use cheaper foreign labor by outsourcing or mass-immigration (2) much of American Labor degraded under Union corruption, hedonism, & degeneracy(from drug use, family breakdown, feminism, declining white birthrates, and youth culture) and (3) rise of yuppie vanity & homo narcissism led to loss of respect for entire sectors of the economy as suitable only for ‘losers’ or ‘Mexicans’.
But perhaps, most crucial of all, the White American Elites came under the power of the Jewish globalists. Some might say the Jews are now the New Elites of America, but this isn't really true. While it’s true that Jews constitute the most powerful force in the US, they can’t be characterized as ‘American Elites’, no more than the British were really Indian Elites(in British ruled South Asia that once incorporated India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh) or Chinese Elites(in Hong Kong) for that matter. Rather, the British Elites in India and Hong Kong were Imperial Elites who ruled over the native masses via local ‘comprador’ elites who willingly collaborated with foreign overlords for self-gain. (To be sure, there could be mass support for foreign rule IF such was deemed far saner and more productive than native rule. It appears most Chinese in Hong Kong preferred British rule to that of Mainland China ruled by madman Mao.) In a similar vein, Jewish elites in the US are not really American Elites as they’re part of a vast worldwide network of power that could be called the Empire of Judea or EOJ. Jewish overlords and elites in the US don’t feel primarily as Americans. They feel as Jews, and they feel closer to fellow Jews around the world than with fellow Americans of non-Jewish stock. Jews in NY and LA feel closer to Jews in London, Paris, and Tel Aviv than to non-Jewish Americans in Idaho, West Virginia, Utah, Iowa, Tennessee, and etc. Indeed, the very fact that Jews want to flood the US with endless immigration-invasion goes to show their outlook is global than national. Jews don’t value any population that could be deemed as Core America. Jews don’t care about the history of Core America that was white, European(non-Jewish), and Christian. If they feel any sense of connection to that America, they would try to defend and preserve it. But they not only feel no love for it but feel much hatred and resentment. For Jews, Wasps will always be associated with better-looking and taller Anglos who didn’t let their grandpas into Golf-n-Country Clubs or didn’t let their pretty shikse daughters marry Jewish boys. And Jews will always associate White Ethnics with the big Polish Catholic lunkhead who called Jewish kids ‘Christ-killer’ and maybe stole some lunch money from nerdy neurotic kids named Isaac.
Of course, Jews see Mexicans as just losers who should pick tomatoes and shut up. Jews do prize blacks to the extent that blacks are lucrative in sports and music, two industries controlled by Jews, but Jews don’t worry too much about the Negroes because most Negroes can’t rise very high, even with ‘affirmative action’ wind behind their backs. (The main black threat to Jews is that Jewish girls are creating a new ‘covenant’ centered around their vaginas on the basis of ‘what does my pooter want’, and for many Jewish girls, it’s big Negro dong. So, perhaps, Jewish power will really be brought down by black dongs. As Jewish girls turn into wild skanks chasing after Negro dongs, Jewish boys will go with more Asian women, and their kids will be born with mellow yellow genes that are lacking in the chutzpah that's been so integral to Jewish power. After all, intelligence alone without the rocket boosters of pushiness lacks motivation to go very far. Indeed, consider the fall of the Episcopalians who had the intelligence but not the pushy drive to have it all and crush all competition.)

Jews never really became Americans. They never assimilated into the Core America as founded and developed by Anglo-Americans. It was too ‘gentile’ and too ‘Christian’ for the Jews with their strong individual egos and ethnocentric identity. Indeed, if later whites from Eastern and Southern parts of Europe came with sense of ethnicity, Jews came with a sense of ethnocentrism. Ethnicity can dissolve into the Larger Identity of a nation, but ethnocentrism resists being absorbed into something else. So, if most white ethnic groups were digested into White Anglo-America, Jews remained apart as a people and culture. If white Christians had long ago adopted a religion that arose in the Near East, Jews have always had a direct cultural and genetic link with the Near East. If whites adopted a heretical variant of Judaism, Jews founded a community 1500 yrs before Christ. As far as Jews were concerned, Christianity was the biggest ‘cultural appropriation’ of all time. It is a Stolen Religion as far as Jews are concerned. (It is no wonder than Martin Bernal the Jewish scholar goes even further and says that even the pagan core of Western Civilization was stolen from Africa and Near East in his book ‘Black Athena’, which was originally titled ‘African Athena’.)
Also, if whites have genetic roots in Europe, Ashkenazi Jews have been half-European and half-Semitic. So, Jews have always been somewhat ‘Zeligish’ and dualistic about their racial identity. They were both whites and Semites, a perception shared by Jews and all-whites alike. Then, it is not surprising that Jews didn’t feel like assimilating like other white ethnic groups in the US. Granted, some Jews did become racially and culturally mixed with whites. They Anglo-ized their names and took on Wasp manners and attitudes. But as more and more Jews arrived, especially from Eastern Europe, a distinct Immigrant-Jewish-Identity formed that overtook the earlier mode of Jewishness that leaned more toward assimilation. Yet, Jews knew they couldn’t get very far with mere isolation in their own ghettos. To rise in wealth and power, they had to work with whites and peoples around the world. So, Jews developed a powerful ethnocentric core and an adaptive cosmopolitan shell. For a time, certain Jewish scholars were especially fascinated with the Japanese who seemed to handle modernity in a similar way: Acting Western with foreigners but keeping it very Japanese at home and within their own community. But if Japanese could remain meaningfully Japanese only in Japan, Jews managed this even outside as minorities in other nations. After all, Japanese-Americans are utterly deracinated and deculturalized; they are cucky-san like Francis Fukuyama. Paradoxically, Jewish ethno-centrism strengthened Jewish cosmopolitanism and vice versa. Because cosmopolitanism tends to weaken and erase identity and culture, secular Jews felt they had to make an extra-effort to preserve and pass down their Jewishness. (In a truly inspired scene in A SERIOUS MAN by the Coen Brothers, it’s the Jewish ritual that keeps the community together and the culture intact because, without it, the formative culture for the children would be TV shows, drugs, rock music, and etc. Despite all such deracinating and degenerative forces, the father manages to pass down something ethnic, cultural, and spiritual through the ritual of the Bar Mitzvah.) And because Jews were so ethno-centric, they had to make an extra effort to be ‘liberal’ and ‘open-minded’ with other peoples. Because Jews needed both modes for success and power(and sometimes for survival) and because the modes were opposites, Jews had to work against ethnocentrism for cosmopolitanism(in dealing with goyim) and work against cosmopolitanism for ethnocentrism(in their own hearts). Granted, Jews eventually managed to persuade a lot of Americans that Jewishness-Zionism-Israel is as American as Apple Pie. Therefore, Jews can now be openly ethnocentric and cosmopolitan at the same time. But how long can this serious contradiction last?


To better understand the Jew, consider The Fable of the Gulping Hippo. Whatever the Gulping Hippo eats turns into the Hippo. This shouldn’t surprise us as this is true of all of organisms. When we eat carrots, we don't turn into carrots, e.g. our fingers sprout into carrots and our skin turns orange. When we eat beef or fish, we don’t turn cow-like or fish-like. We can eat 100 fish over several months, but we remain human. We don’t develop gills or scales or want to live in water. We can eat lots of steaks, but we won’t suddenly go ‘moo’ like cows or grow horns or develop an appetite for hay. Instead, whatever we eat turns into us. The proteins and vitamins are broken down and absorbed into our body. They become digested and processed into our bodily systems. And it’s the same with the Gulping Hippo. Whatever the Hippo eats turns into it. Now, this Gulping Hippo is an enviable beast. It is big and strong. And other creatures admire the Hippo so much that they want to be part of it. So, one day, the Gulping Hippo tells the other creatures that they are welcome to enter its mouth to its stomach. The Hippo’s melting-pot stomach will digest all of them and turn them into parts of the hippo. Other creatures like this idea of becoming one with the hippo. So, when the Gulping Hippo opens its mouth wide, other animals come onboard. Rabbits, badgers, raccoons, chipmunks, squirrels, lizards, frogs, skunks, opossums, gophers, ducks, sparrows, and etc. all head into the Hippo’s mouth. The Hippo chomps on all of them and gulps them down. Its stomach processes and digests them, and they are absorbed by the hippo’s body. So, it doesn’t matter how many kinds of animals the hippo eats. It remains hippo while growing larger. Just because the hippo ate a dozen rabbits doesn’t make it rabbity. Just because the hippo ate a bear doesn’t make it a bear. To be sure, there is one creature the hippo has failed to digest all these years, and it’s a gorilla. Yes, sometime back, the Hippo had this idea of swallowing a gorilla thinking the ghastly ape would be nutritious, but indigestible simian has been stuck in the digestive tract since. But the Gulping Hippo has been able to eat other creatures and process them in its melting-pot-stomach into nutrients for its body. So, Hippo eats all sorts of creatures and uses them as nutritious building blocks to grow bigger and stronger as a hippo.
But one day, the Hippo came upon the hook worm. Hippo thought, "this doesn’t look very tasty", but the hookworm told the Hippo, "You should eat me. I would be most happy to be processed by your melting-pot-stomach and become a part of you... just like all the other creatures." But the Hippo eyed the hookworm and thought, "But this fella looks rather odd." The hookworm asked the Hippo why it’s so afraid. After all, the hookworm is smaller than other creatures that the hippo ate, such as racoons, rabbits, owls, wombats, gophers, bears, and hogs. I mean, what is a tiny hookworm? Is the big and mighty hippo too chicken to try a little hookworm? Thus assured, the Hippo decides to swallow a bunch of hookworms. The hookworms went into the stomach of the hippo, but instead of being digested like earlier creatures, it sank its hooks into the stomach of the hippo and began to suck on its blood. The hippo thought the hookworms were digested and became part of the hippo, but the hookworms refused to surrender their hookworm-ness and be digested by the Hippo. Hookworms clung to their hookworminess and, if anything, felt that the Hippo existed to feed the hookworms, the best organisms in the world. The hippo began to feel strange. It felt more drained of strength. Also, it began to notice blood in its stools. Because the hippo felt weaker, it felt the need to swallow more and more creatures, but its digestion was no longer working like it used to. So, the new creatures the hippo ate were only half-digested and caused all sorts of stomach-aches. Also, the hookworms released certain viruses that traveled to the brains of the hippo and began to take over the functions. The viruses told the brains to just lay the hippo body down and not defend itself from other creatures. Until then, the hippo was a powerful beast that devoured other creatures but made sure no other creature was able to devour it. So, the hippo digested other creatures to turn them into part of hippo-nes but wouldn’t allow other animals to take a bite of the hippo. If anything, when a Japanese monkey chucked a spear at the hippo’s butt once, the hippo got so mad that it stampeded over the hapless monkey and turned it into a pancake. Indeed, the hippo’s hide was thick and tough, like a wall between Israel and West Bank. But the viruses in the Hippo’s brains whispered that it’s wrong for the hippo to be hostile to other creatures that just want to play with the hippo. The hippo should stop fighting or fending off other creatures that seem to have a taste for hippo meat. If anything, the hippo should be flattered that such creatures love hippo flesh. The hippo should be ‘tolerant’ and ‘inclusive’ of the would-be-eaters-of-hippo. Also, the hookworms release certain chemicals that agitate the gorilla in the Hippo’s belly into acting wild and crazy. So, the Gulping Hippo increasingly feels weak from loss of blood to the hookworms, increasingly perturbed by some crazy-ass gorilla beating its chest, and increasingly deluded that it should stop defending itself from predators & scavengers and just lie down and rest. So, what happens? Lions, hyenas, jackals, wild dogs, leopards, weasels, fire ants, badgers, and etc. move towards the Hippo and begin to devour it like a helpless beached whale. And that’s how the Gulping Hippo died. What happened to the Hookworms? When the other creatures at the hippo’s innards, the hookworms entered their stomached and caused new havoc.

So, you understand how Jews destroyed America. Until 1965, the US mostly took in assimilate-able fellow whites. Though Southern and Eastern Europeans posed some problems, they were fellow whites and once they adopted the American Way, they were more or less like the original white Americans. They were digested into Anglo-Germanic America. But Jews were different. They remained Jewish first and American second. They didn’t see America as something to melt into. They saw America as a trove of goy treasures to be melted down into gold for Jewish pockets. If Anglos thought Jews would be digestible like Poles, Lithuanians, Slavic Russians, Greeks, French, and etc., they were dead wrong. Jews were like hookworms that resisted digestion and, if anything, sucked on the blood of the host. Also, Jews took over the Anglo-American mind and reprogrammed Core Americanism into some ‘propositional’ and ‘open borders’ ideology whereupon White America would no longer have the right or means to defend and preserve itself. Thus, America went from a strong white hippo that pushed away invaders to a hapless hippo(as beached whale) that welcomes all manner of creatures to come and devour it in the name of ‘diversity’. (Whites have been told that Diversity is good because of More Restaurants, but the real menu of globalism is white nations fed to non-whites of the world who are steered into white nations by Jewish globalists.)
The Hippo once used to devour digestible creatures to make itself bigger and stronger. The creatures were digested to add to Hippo-ness. But now, the hippo is devoured by others to become parts of other creatures. It’s like the American Southwest is now being devoured by Mexicans to make it more Mexican. And parts of Minnesota and Maine are now being devoured by Somalians to make them more like Somalia. This is what happens when you swallow Jewish hookworms.

In the Current US, the white elites are not only useless but dangerous as a template for the rest of the world. White elites no longer exist to represent, lead, serve, and defend the white masses. They no longer play the Moses-role and David-role for whites. As power and means are concentrated in the elites, a people cannot do anything without them. It’s like a military cannot function without hierarchy and chain of command. A good army has generals who remain loyal to their own side and care about the men. If generals just go off the play golf and tell the soldiers to fight on their own, the army will lose. Individual soldiers may be tough, but they cannot coordinate battle plans as individuals. They need leaders and chain of command that allows for larger strategy, communication, coordination, and logistics. Take the film SEVEN SAMURAI. The seven swordsmen on their own cannot defend the village from 40 bandits, some of whom have guns. The battle will ultimately have to depend on the peasants learning to fight and showing courage. So, why do the peasants need the samurai so much? Because the peasants, though numerous, don’t know anything about organization, leadership, fighting, and strategy. So, in hiring samurai, they hired elites to lead them. In the Old Testament, the Jews are initially without kings. But as their numbers swell and their enemies multiply, Jews are in need of more organization and strategy. They need kings and ruling elites. This is why a people cannot do without elites. It’s like a headless chicken. And today, white people are like a headless chicken. Jews took over America, but they feel no great unity with white people. Indeed, Jews see themselves as globalist supremacist masters. If they feel any real love for any nation, it is Israel. If anything, Jews are hellbent on destroying Europe with massive African and Muslim immigration-invasion. Only Israel is given Pass-Over rights from the plague of Afro-Islamo Mass Invasion, just like only Jewish sons were protected from God’s Wrath when Moses returned to Egypt.

White elites are no longer the ruling class in America. Many of them still have lots of wealth, but they morally cuck out to Jews, blacks, and Diversity because of the change in the Official Narrative that made whites mainly responsible, indeed ‘guilty’, for the ‘sins’ and problems of America. Jews not only have wealth and power to out-match those of white elites but they occupy the ‘sacerdotal’ positions of society. As the Holocaust People, they strut around and sermonize as if each and every Jew is the new messiah. If white elites are cursed with the sin of ‘white guilt’, it means their wealth and advantages are morally illegitimate due to ‘crimes’ of their ancestors or their ‘white privilege’. Therefore, they mustn’t be proud or positive about their identity, heritage, and culture. Since white consciousness is out of the question, white elites cannot be the leaders of white people or the white race. If anything, they must cut ties to fellow whites on the political and cultural level. To justify their white wealth despite the burden of ‘white guilt’, they can use their power and wealth to lend aid or support only to non-whites. It’s like Bill Gates Foundation offers NOTHING to whites, no matter how poor, needy, and lost they are.
If white elites don’t particularly want to do favors for blacks, browns, or Diversity, they can partially redeem themselves by sucking up to the Jewish Globalist Overlords of the Empire of Judea, of which the US is now a colony. How things have changed. There was a time when white elites ruled the US, felt positive about whiteness, and represented, led, and defended white Americans(from foreign threats and from the tougher and stronger blacks). But today, white elites don’t rule the US, feel negative about whiteness, snub & insult fellow white brethren, only offer comfort to blacks & non-whites, and suck up to Jews(and even homos).

Such being the status of the White Elites in the US, The Way of the American White Elites is the most terrible template for national elites of any nation. Take Turkey. Suppose Turks decide to follow the American White Elite Way. Suppose Turks allow Jews or some minority to gain dominant power in Turkey. Suppose Turks allow this new elite to emphasize only the darkest and most tragic aspects of Turkish history and instill Turkish elites with guilt and shame about being Turk. So, no matter how much wealth and privilege a Turk gains, he feels shame and rejects the idea that Turkish elites should defend Turkishness and represent/defend fellow Turks in the middle and bottom. So, there is no unity and connection Turkish elites and masses. If anything, Turkish elites they must care more about non-Turks like the Kurds and even welcome massive immigration-invasion of non-Turks into Turkey with the hope of turning Turks into a minority in their own nation. And the Turkish elites shower praise and adoration on the non-Turks while heaping abuse on Turkish patriots who call for the demographic, cultural, and territorial preservation of Turkey. Indeed, the patriots are caricatured as the 'far right'. And, most of all, the Turkish elites don’t see themselves as the rulers of Turkey but cuck-collaborators to the globo-minority overlords who’ve gained real power in Turkey through control of finance, media, entertainment, education, vice industries, and much else. And the Turkish elites allow the globo-minority elites to replace Islam with Homomania and to teach kids from a young age that nothing is more sacred in the world than the homo anus, the Negro booty-and-dong, and Jewish soul. Well, what would happen to Turkey in a matter of decades? The total fading of a civilization from history, that’s what.

Now, let’s apply the White American Elite Template to Vietnam. What would happen to that country if the Vietnamese Elites were to emulate White American Elites? They would allow a foreign globalist elite to take the real power in Vietnam. This minority would take over Vietnamese banking, media, academia, and government(by buying up all the whore politicians). And this minority will change the Narrative and instill Vietnamese with ‘yellow guilt’. Feeling guilt and shame, the Vietnamese elites would no longer believe in the feasibility of promoting Vietnamese pride or self-respect. Indeed, Vietnamese identity and consciousness would be seen as ‘racist’, ‘hateful’, ‘ugly’, and ‘reactionary’. So, even though Vietnamese can still get rich and gain elite status, the Viet elites can no longer feel pride in their identity or feel a sense of unity and solidarity with their own people. Indeed, the elites come to see the Vietnamese masses as ‘deplorables’ for clinging to their Vietnamese identity. And then, the Vietnamese elites believe their own ‘deplorable’ people must be replaced by Diversity from all over the world. Since Vietnamese-ness is associated with ‘guilt’, the only redemption is for Vietnam to De-Vietnamize itself. And Vietnamese elites must see themselves as ‘global citizens’ than as Vietnamese patriots and leaders. They no longer represent, serve, and defend their own people. They only care about their own wealth and privilege that, under the New Narrative, can be morally justified ONLY BY the Viet support of mass immigration-invasion and Homomania. The Vietnamese masses feel lost as there is no longer an elite to lead them. And many of them come under PC brainwashing as the elites, taking their cue from globalist overlords, replace patriotic education with PC, anti-national self-hatred, and Homomania. How long would Vietnam last as a nation? Not long.

Indeed, if any nation’s elites follow in the footsteps of the white American elites(who are putty in the hands of Jews), it will spell doom for their nation. There are lots of great things about America, but by far the worst element of Current America is the Way of the White Elites. It is the worst kind of Elite Behavior in the world, but it has become the template for nearly all Western European nations and even possibly nations like Japan that remain under the thumb of the US. Whatever may be wrong with China, Russia, Iran, Turkey, and Israel, they still have national elites who feel a direct connection to their own people, feel pride and self-respect about their identity and culture, and believe the main duty of the national elites is to serve and defend their own people. Typical members of the US elites are Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Paul Ryan, Bill Gates, John Brennan, Mitt Romney, Jeff Bezos, Andrew Cuomo, Anderson Cooper(the Pooper), and etc. Now, what do all such goy white elites have in common? They feel no positivity about whiteness or European-ness. They have no connection with their own race and culture. They suck up to Jewish globalist overlords. Their definition of ‘American’ has more to do with ‘New Americans to shop for from around the world’ than with Historic White Americans who founded and built the nation. And they care more about Homomania as new religion than about Christianity. And they repeat the mantra, ‘Diversity Is Our Strength’ to justify their total abandonment of their own race and ethnic kin. Of course, they are all zealously committed to Israel being a Jewish state, but then, such hypocrisy is to be expected from decadent, degenerate, corrupted, and craven elites who, having lost moral legitimacy in terms of identity, believe they can keep their loot only by baptizing their whiteness in a tub of PC and Diversity.

It is precisely because the White American Elites got so useless that Jews thought they won for all time. Jews figured that the white elites would cuck out to Jews. And the white masses, being no longer represented and defended by white elites, would lose heart, lose their minds, lose their senses, become addicted to drugs, race-mix with Negroes, and be replaced by endless tides of Diversity that would make any united humanity against Jews nearly impossible. Indeed, Jewish globalist elites believe that the ONLY thing standing between Jews and total-eternal power is the white majority. Even if most white Americans weren't anti-Jewish, there is the possibility that they could be, especially as Jews get richer, nastier, and more supremacist. With Jewish power in hyper-drive, the ONLY guarantee for permanent Jewish supremacy is Diversity because a people divided along ethnic and cultural lines cannot come together to form a united bloc. This is why Jews also pushed Diversity on Europe. But Donald Trump won.

Now, Trump may very well fail in the end, and Jews may get what they want. But what Trump and the Alt Right represented was the awakening realization that the White American Elites are utterly useless to White People, many of whom are hungry for a true elite that can inspire and lead white people into Emancipation from the Tyranny of the Empire of Judea.
This is why Jews are so committed to stamping out the Alt Right and destroying Donald Trump anyway they can. Jews fear the emergence of a Real White Elite that believes in leading and defending white people. Such White Unity would mean the end of Jewish Supremacism because white head would serve the white body and white body would serve the white head. Mind and body would be one. In order for Jews to maintain their supremacism, they must make sure that the white mind serves the Jewish super-mind and that the white body has no white mind to lead it, thereby growing weak and dying.

Jews fear that Trump is secretly using Putinism as his personal template. What is the Putinist template? It is that Putin as son of Russia and leader of Russians must put the interest of his people, culture, and land above all else. Such nationalism is threatening to Jewish globalist supremacism that says all nations exist to primarily to serve Jews as the superior god-like race.

Play a Simple Children’s Game to Demonstrate that Maximum Homogeneity is Best and Maximum Diversity is Worst for Nations

A simple children's game can easily demonstrate the ideal conditions for World Peace: More Homogeneity or More Diversity? To find the answer, just get yourself a World Map.

The game is played thus:

Take a good look at Europe on the map. Now, erase all national borders until all of Europe is one landmass without divisions. Then, redraw national borders to either...

(1) Maximize homogeneity

or

(2) Maximize diversity.

You can draw borders around where the bulk of Polish people live to maximize Polish Homogeneity OR you can draw borders so that what is now Poland is broken up into 5 parts, each of which is included with OTHER nations that are also made diverse.

If you go for Maximizing Homogeneity, your newly drawn Poland will be mostly Polish.

But if you go for Maximizing Diversity, your nation will include a part of Poland, part of Germany, part of Hungary, part of Czech Rep, part of Ukraine. Polish people, instead of having a nation in which they are the solid super-majority, will become like the Kurdish people who are scattered among other nations.
You might do the same with Germany until there is no single Germany in which most Germans are situated. Instead, Germany would be divided into five or six parts and joined with other nations made up of diverse peoples, not unlike the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

Now, which will be more socially peaceful, culturally meaningful, and politically more stable? A Poland where Polish people and culture are maximally homogenized or an entity where Polish people are divided and included as minorities in six other nations(in which no people are a majority)?
I think the answer is pretty obvious. Polish people with a nation of their own are likely to feel far more content, secure, and happy than if Polish nation is dissolved and if Polish people are divided and included as minorities into a bunch of nations filled with diversity of Germans, Hungarians, Czechs, Ukrainians, Slovenians, Croatians, etc.

A nation may gain something by having minorities, but it’s always good to have a super-majority who define the identity, character, culture, and heritage of a nation and people. After all, don’t we pity the Kurds because they don’t have a nation in which they are the solid majority and can feel at home? Instead, they are scattered in nations like Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan. As a minority in each country, they always feel oppressed or marginalized. And other people look upon them with suspicion and hostility. Indeed, let’s play this game in the Middle East where much of the problem stems from maps(drawn by Western Imperialists) that maximized diversity than homogeneity. Was that a good idea? Well, just ask the Kurds who are a thorn on the side of every nation in which they constitute a sizable minority and to whom every nation seems like a boot pressed upon their face.

Anyway, let's suppose we are back in 1918 after World War I. Suppose we have the chance to draw borders in the Middle East to create new nation-states. We have two choices. We can draw borders to

(1) Maximize Homogeneity in every nation

or

(2) Maximize Diversity in every nation.

Which would be the wiser option? To draw the borders on the map so as to give Kurds their own nation(or at least one where they are the overwhelming majority) OR to break up Kurdish-populated areas to be included into other nations designed for maximum diversity?

When we look at the current mess in the Middle East, the answer is pretty obvious. If the map of the Middle East had been drawn to maximize homogeneity after WWI, much of the political problems, at least pertaining to ethnic and/or sectarian conflicts, could have been avoided or at least greatly reduced. Take Iraq. If the imperialists had allowed a separate Kurdish nation, had united Sunni Arabs in Iraq with Sunnis in Syria, and if Shia Arabs in Iraq had been given their own nation, there would have been far greater stability. Instead, imperialists created nations like modern Syria, modern Iraq, modern Afghanistan, and etc. to be excessively diverse. As such, only an iron-fisted strongman could keep the peace as democratic experimentation would have led to divisions along ethnic lines.

How things might have been different if, following WWI, the Europeans had carefully surveyed the demographic reality of the entire region and drawn national maps to ensure that one particular group would be the overwhelming majority of every new nations. If Kurds in what is now Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, and maybe even Turkey(if Turkish resistance could have been overcome) would have been given a nation of their own, they would be far happier and securer. They would be causing far less trouble to their neighbors and vice versa.

Now, let’s play this game in crazy-quilt region of Southeast Asia. Suppose we erase the current map and draw new borders to either

(1) Maximize Homogeneity

or

(2) Maximize Diversity.

Would it be better to draw maps to create a maximally homogeneous nation for Vietnamese, a maximally homogeneous nation for Cambodians, maximally homogeneous nation for Laotians, maximally homogeneous nation for Thais, maximally homogeneous nation for Burmese, OR would it be better to draw arbitrary borders so that one nation(shaped like a longitudinal snake) is created that is demographically 1/5 Vietnamese, 1/5 Cambodia, 1/5 Thai, 1/5 Burmese, etc.
Which would be the wiser option? A nation that is as homogeneous as possible for each people OR a bunch of nations that is made of maximally diverse populations?
Would it be better for Vietnamese to have Vietnam, Cambodians to have Cambodia, Thais to have Thailand, Laotians to have Laos, and etc., OR would it better for there to be several nations in which every group is a minority? So, instead of the Vietnamese having a nation to call their own, Vietnamese people would be dispersed, like Kurds, among other nations filled with diversity?

We can also play this game with Northeast Asia. Currently, Korea is divided in half because the US, after Japanese defeat, split the nation with the Soviet Empire. If European imperialists forced different peoples into a single nation in the Middle East and Africa, Americans divided one people into two peoples in Korea.
But suppose there is a chance for great change on the peninsula. What would make more sense? To erase the border between North Korea and South Korea and form one nation composed of people of shared ethnos, language, and history... OR to join North Korea with Manchuria and to join South Korea with Japan? If we want to maximize homogeneity, North Korea and South Korea should merge. But if we want to maximize Diversity, North Korea should be added to Manchuria and South Korea should be added to Japan(like Ireland used to be joined to Great Britain). What would be better? To maximize homogeneity or to maximize diversity?

What does history tell us? I think even a child would figure this out. Maximizing Homogeneity wherever possible has been the best formula for peace within nation and with other nations. The threat to world peace usually happens when nationalism is violated in favor of imperialism. Imperialism causes diversity by invading other nations or by turning one’s nation into some cosmopolitan center welcome to all... in which case foreigners arrive to take advantage and eventually take over demographically, which is exactly what has happened in many cities and towns in France, UK, Sweden, and Germany.

Finally, let’s play this game with Israel and neighboring nations. Suppose we erase all existing borders and draw new ones. We can draw borders to maximize homogeneity or to maximize diversity for each people. Now, what would be better? To draw borders to maximize, say, Jewish homogeneity in Israel or to break up Israel into three parts and include each with other geo-political entities for the purpose of more diversity?
Now, suppose northern third of Israel is joined with Lebanon and parts of Syria. The middle third of Israel is joined with Jordan and a part of Saudi Arabia. And the southern third of Israel is joined with a part of Egypt and a part of Libya.

So, would it be better to draw maps to maximize Homogeneity of Jews within a nation to call their own OR to divide up Israel and Jews(like Kurds) and turn them into minorities in diverse nations?

Now, isn’t the main problem facing Israel due to diversity caused by Occupation of West Bank?

The answer is SO OBVIOUS, but Jewish globalist elites pressure the entire world to maximize diversity(except for Israel where Jews support JEWS-ONLY immigration to maximize homogeneity). Why do Jews give such bad advice when it’s bad for gentile nations? Because it is good for the designs of Jewish Globalist Supremacism. When nations turn overly diverse, it’s easier for Jews to manipulate in divide-and-conquer fashion. Also, a diverse nation hardly has any useful nationalism. Because the various groups don’t trust one another, they tend not to unite as ONE PEOPLE but forge alliances with foreigners and imperialists to gain an advantage.
This is why Jews find homos so useful. Because homos feel alienated in many nations, they will gladly collaborate with World Jewry that showers them with money and favors. As such, homos around the world have effectively become the proxies of Jewish supremacism.
This is why truly independent and autonomous nations like Russia, Iran, China, and now Turkey do NOT allow the US(the primary tool of Judea or World Jewry) to force Homomania on them. Turkey used to allow ‘gay pride’ parades but finally stood up to World Jewry and said NO. But puppet-whore nations of the US, such as Germany-UK-Italy-Japan-Mexico-Ukraine-S. Korea-Taiwan-UK-etc. all put on massive Homomania festivals. If Uncle Samowicz tell them they better, they better.

Jews know that a patriotic and unified people can stand together against Jewish infiltration. That’s why Jews do everything to weaken and dilute gentile national identity. Jews do this by spreading Homomania that says Minority Privilege must take precedence over Majority Values. Jews also use Afromania to make people all over the world addicted to rap music, black sports, and jungle fever. Afromania destroys the manhood of non-black gentiles around the world because black rappers sing louder, black athletes got more muscle, and black hustlers got bigger dongs.

And of course, Jews try to promote Holocaustianity as a neo-religion all over the world so that every people will feel sorry and ‘guilty’ about Jews. And then, once a nation’s identity and patriotism have been weakened, Jews use their immense power of media, academia, and finance to brainwash the gentile elites into believing that DIVERSITY is not only a great boon but a moral necessity.
The result is something like the disastrous experiment taking place in Sweden, a nation where hideous feminists rule, where men are castrated cucks, and where endless streams of invaders are ‘welcomed’ as adding more wonderful Diversity to the nation. Well, goodbye to Sweden. With Jews, You Lose.

Fast-and-Easy Path to American Citizenship Has Universalized Treason around the World

Hegel and Marx expounded on the dialectics of history. It seems ‘digestics’ is what animates America. A hyper-materialist society, America has turned consumerism as a metaphor for everything. According to Americanism, not only do people primarily exist to consume-dispose-consume-dispose-consume-some-more but they themselves are to be consumed and disposed with ceaseless intakes of new peoples of different races and cultures. The elites don’t see rooted, established, and existing Americans as a special people with history, heritage, and meaning. They see existing Americans as stale old masses to be replaced by endless servings of New Americans. So, historic European-Americans are just pieces of meat in a melting pot to be digested and excreted to make room for servings of New Americans.

Especially since individualist-materialist consumerism fixates Western attention on hedonism and vanity, it is assumed that white peoples in the West cannot sustain themselves. They are too much into fun & feasting to prioritize family & future. So, let white people have a good time and then make way for New Arrivals since white people (1) don’t have enough kids and (2) no longer care for their roots and heritage anyway.
Of course, in time, even immigrant groups and their children will be 'Westernized' and experience plummeting birthrates as their main priority will be short-term self-interest than racial-cultural survival. In time, even non-whites in the West will go the way of whites. (Such a view would indicate that the modernity is a success in creating things but a failure in creating life. Since modern nations can make things but can’t make life, they rely on non-modern nations to produce life for export to the modern world. But then, immigrant groups, upon being modernized, will also become deficient in creating life and will have to be replaced by waves of newer arrivals. To be sure, there’s a good chance that non-whites, due to lower IQ and other problems, won’t become properly modernized, in which case they will either continue to produce life but not things or fail to produce both life and things.) On that basis, the elites insist that the only way to sustain the population is to bring in more New Peoples. The message for Europeans and Americans, especially white ones, is that they shouldn’t bother about marriage and children if such get in the way of fun, career, or self-fulfillment in tune with latest fashions. White women should fixate on careers, make money, and blow it all on themselves on shoes, travel, fancy food, and loose sex. Men should forever remain boys hooked on video games, hobbies, and recreation. The main purpose of jobs is to make money to spend, spend, and spend. And nothing has any lasting value. New items are soon old items to be tossed out to make room for newer items.
And what goes for TVs, appliances, and clothes also goes for peoples. Americans no longer have any identity or history. (If there is a historical narrative, the message is 'America is all about immigration', i.e. American history is about replacing existing peoples with new ones. This history is not remembrance of things worth preserving but reminder that everything must be replaced or reinvented.) They are just consumers who live for fun, work for fun. Old people are warehoused in nursing homes while the grandchildren grow up identifying with pop idols and celebrities as ‘role models’ or demi-gods. For spirituality and uplift, there is Homomania or Queertianity. For truth and ‘poetry’, there is Rap music and Magic Negro cult. For ideas, there are PC slogans to chant for the hive-minded.

When it comes to consumerism, of course we want things to be fast-and-easy. Who wants to stand in long lines for ice cream or hamburgers? Who wants to go through hassles and complications to buy a TV or a car? But at some point in American history, the consumerism went from convenience(a good) to compulsion. (Consider the shopping habits or rituals of Americans during Black Friday sales.) People have to have it NOW and more of it. If you don’t have the money, use credit. Borrow and buy more. And don’t buy things because you really need or want them but simply for the thrill of buying. The ideal American according to the globalist formula is the shopoholic who shops until she drops and then shops some more. A shopoholic is addicted to the rush of acquiring new things. The things themselves matter less than the excitement of acquiring things. It doesn’t matter that what were bought goes unused, neglected, or forgotten. They are either pushed back in the closet and forgotten or tossed out to make room for new stuff and then newer stuff.

This kind of consumerism is vapid and shallow. It may be ‘good’ for the economy, at least if people can really afford the stuff instead of borrowing and spending what they can’t pay back. But it can’t be good for the soul because it’s a life fixated on flash and fashion. If rampant consumerism is bad for the soul, it is immeasurably worse when applied to people themselves? It’s one thing to regard Americans as insatiable consumers but quite another to see them as consumer items than as a people with a culture and history, which are priceless than about price tags. The current elites have a shopoholic attitude about the core European peoples of America. They see established or existing Americans as stale Americans. They are enthralled only with the prospect of acquiring ‘fresh’ peoples. Elites are no longer interested in established groups of Americans. Indeed, what need for groups and collective identities/memories when everyone is seen as an atomized individual disconnected and unbound to anything related to ethnos, history, or culture? A people are no longer unique; they are just units, like the 1's and 0's of digital coding. There’s no longer any nobility and passion in representing, defending, and preserving white Americans as a people-and-culture since they are seen as meaningless units and the same-old-same-old, just like a shopoholic woman has lost interest in shoes already stacked away in the closet. Her mind obsesses on getting New Pairs. Likewise, elites feel excitement only when salivating over New Americans to acquire.

The idea that there once was nothing but then something with the founding and construction of America, a magnificent creation deserving to be preserved in its essence, has faded from the narrative. European-America that had been envisioned and maintained was to be utterly transformed by endless waves of non-whites from around the world with the passage of the insane 1965 immigration law that handed over the keys of America to vicious Jews. That was the Trojan Horse moment in American History.

Statue of Liberty that used to represent (1) sharing of the light of freedom with the world and (2) offering opportunity to Europeans & Jews in the 19th century has come to represent the shopoholic mania of a soulless vapid America. There’s also the tear-jerking mendacity about ‘huddled masses’ and ‘refugees’.
After all, most immigrants today are not desperate people. They were not starving in their homelands. And many from Asia are well-educated and had decent jobs there. Also, as democracy has become dime-a-dozen around the world, most immigrants come from nations with free elections and basic human rights. They are not running from tyrants. And most of these nations have sufficient freedom for peoples there to fix problems and make progress.
But then, why would these people go through the hassle of improving their own nations when they can just get on a plane and fly to America for instant material improvement? Even if they overstay their visas, they can find ‘sanctuary’ in Treason Cities.

And why would the elites care about ‘tired and boring’ existing Americans when they snort New Americans like cocaine. The elites say the non-white immigrants are the Future, as if America can’t have a future without Future Peoples. I guess the elites have forgotten that new life can be created from wombs of existing Americans. Even with zero immigration, existing Americans have a future ahead of them if they are encouraged to favor family and life.
But then, women as mothers will work less and spend more on babies than on themselves. And men as fathers will save more for the family than spend and spend. Bad for consumerism as far as the elites are concerned. Besides, the cult of Diversity has infected elite minds with the notion that nothing is more fabulous than more colors and odors. Since most of the immigrants are non-white, it’s like elites shopping for different-colored shoes. And remember, more restaurants!!

Now, if the ‘naturalization’ process in America were a long and arduous, the elites wouldn’t be so thrilled in their shopo-demo-holism. It’s like consumers wouldn’t turn into shopoholics if it were difficult and painstaking to purchase items. It is because it’s so fun and easy to shop that people become addicted to shopping.
Likewise, it’s because the path to citizenship has been made so easy that the elites have become addicted to shopping for more immigrants, especially since the Current Year reverberates with chants of ‘Diversity is our strength, diversity is our strength, etc’. If diversity is indeed our strength, then nothing is more fab than for politicians and elites to ‘shop’ for New Americans. It’s like buying new stocks. The elite’s socio-political and moral status rises with their competitive bidding for more New Americans. With Diversity as the highest value, one can burnish one's reputation by advertising for more New Americans. After 9/11, America was all about shopping for more stuff and shopping for more New Americans. Cult of Diversity made the Yet-to-be-Americans more valuable than stale Been-here-done-that-Americans.
And this bug also infects Canada where elites compete to gush about how they welcome diversity more than the next guy does. Justin Trudeau isn’t a leader of his people. He’s a shopoholic for New Canadians. Canadians, as they’d come into existence since the founding, no longer matter. They are regarded as old, boring, and tired. It doesn’t matter if they’re young. All white people are deemed ‘old and boring’, and they have no right to defend their identity and territory. With Diversity as the religion of the land, the only purpose of whites is to increase Diversity like a dairy farm is to increase the production of milk.

Now, what makes sense in one realm doesn’t for another. We all want ease and convenience in commerce. We want stores and services to be quick and efficient. But when the same logic is applied to humans themselves, it spells doom for culture and civilization. Consider the film KOYAANISQATSI where people as consumers seem indistinct from what they consume. A society so obsessed with cycles of consumption and disposal comes to regard consumerism as metaphor for everything, even everyone. As Americans are now regarded mainly as consumers and disposers, eaters and shitters, they too have no meaning outside such processes. As such, they themselves are regarded as existing to be consumed and disposed. As far as the elites are concerned, the ‘old and tired’ white Americans had their turn. They are not people with culture and heritage worth defending and prolonging. They are like people at McDonalds or a movie theater who must clear the seats so that new customers or audience will take their place. They are like burgers being digested into fecal matter to be shat out. As the logic goes, if hamburgers have no right to stay in the stomach forever and must pass through the bunghole to make way for future burgers, why should white Americans hold onto America as their homeland? Elites just see it as clogging the system. Globalism says whites had their fun, the jig is up, and it's time for others to take their place. Or whites are to be distracted with mindless fun while they’re replaced by New Americans who supposedly deserve their turn at careers and leisure until they too are replaced by Newer Americans and so forth and so on.

For Globo-America to run smoothly, amnesia is crucial. If Americans don’t know or care about their history and heritage, they won’t feel that they have anything worth defending or preserving. As for basic historical lesson, just poison the well of memory and invalidate the white saga so indispensable to America’s founding and development. Thus, whites feel guilt than pride about their history, resigning themselves to collective suicide to redeem the legacy of ‘white privilege’.
Needless to say, Jews don’t feel this way about their own identity, history, and heritage. Jews do retain a sense of history linked to a sense of prophecy. The reason why Jews push amnesia onto white goyim is to control them. After all, humans with memory control animals without memory. Why is the devious detective able to run circles around the tragic hero in Chris Nolan’s MEMENTO? Because the cop has a functioning memory whereas the hapless hero couldn’t store new memory since his wife’s murder. Granted, some Jews are getting high on their own supply and may end up self-destructing like the rest. But as of now, Jews have the advantage because they insist on identity, heritage, and history. Even as Jews urge gentiles to become a globalized mass of zombie-like consumers(or consumbies), they guard their blood-narrative, soil of Zion, and seal of Covenant.
Indeed, the reason why Jews push amnesia on gentiles is because any people with autonomy of identity and narrative will define and defend their own sense of history, urgency, and destiny. Imagine if cows had intelligence and memory of their own. Would they take orders from ranchers who use them as cattle? Cows don’t know whence they came and where they’re going. Likewise, would so many white people act like cattle if they weren’t spellbound with amnesia(via pop culture) and ‘white guilt’(via Political Correctness)? White masses are corn-fed on mindless pleasure and cattle-prodded with PC. Fixated on fun and guilt, they fail to see the big picture.
It’s also paradoxical that Jews would push so much fun and pleasure on a people deemed so guilty and undeserving. If indeed whites must atone and be punished for their sins, why should they be encouraged to indulge themselves at movies, concerts, casinos, malls, eateries, etc.? Shouldn’t the People of Guilt be punished with pain and deprivation, like criminal convicts in prison? And yet, Jews tell whites to have as much fun as possible.
Why? For two reasons. One is white consumption makes Jews richer because Jews control much of finance, commerce, and vice industries like gambling and drugs. The other reason is a people addicted to revelry and pleasure are like stupid children primed for manipulation. If white people were sober, disciplined, and moral — as Anglo-Americans once were — , they might unite and stand as a brick wall against Jewish filth and deviousness. But if white people are given to debauchery like Lola in BLUE ANGEL, they can be bought and sold with money. And those tempted by the seductress will succumb to disrepute and even end up destitute, with Jews holding all the cards in the end. Consider what happens to the professor in the Josef von Sternberg's film.

But the negative effect of mass replacement by endless immigration isn’t only on white Americans. After all, the New Americans will, in turn, become Old Americans when their time is up and then be chewed out and replaced by Yet Newer Americans. Furthermore, because the US is the land of amnesia and hedonism, the children of the New Americans will grow up as soulless zombies who favor leisure of the now over longevity between past and future. They will treat sex like fast food. Also, the New Americans, in speedy exchange of their own identity for the soulless neo-American consumerism, will be relinquishing their roots and culture for naked material interests, albeit masked with the faux-culture and pseudo-values of PC.

Now, let us imagine how things might have been more meaningful for everyone IF the process of ‘naturalization’ had been arduous, demanding, challenging, and difficult. It would have been better for the pride and security of white Americans as the founders and builders. And it would have been better for non-white wanna-be-Americans since they would have been made conscious of the full implications of their decision to abandon their own lands, peoples, and cultures for America.

Suppose the path to citizenship required 20 yrs than mere 5 years. And suppose every would-be immigrant, prior to arriving in the US, must answer 10 questions pertaining to their born identities & loyalties and new identity and loyalty as ‘Americans’.

These Questions would be devised to make the would-be-immigrant think twice about emigration. After all, permanently moving to another nation is essentially an Act of Treason. You’re basically abandoning and rejecting your original/born identity, culture, lineage, and loyalty to take on a new identity and pledge new loyalties. Especially if you’re moving from a nation/civilization with deep culture and tradition, you’re surrendering something so rich and meaningful to adopt a new identity of a wholly different nation. In the case of the US and the modern West, the only theme is the Cult of Fashion(of the New) than Concern for Tradition. The Current Americanism requires all peoples to favor amnesia over memory. The only exception is the Jews, who’ve manipulated the system so that all goyim will be turned into blank slates while they themselves remain a people of the written scroll that reaches back into ancient times.

When people do trivial things, it doesn’t require much thought. For instance, if you want to buy an ice cream cone or watch a movie, it doesn’t much matter because you’re just seeking momentary pleasure. But in deciding to permanently move to another nation where your descendants will be born and dissolve into a 'melting pot', one has think deep and hard about the move. It’s like people should really think twice about having an abortion or getting tattoos. An abortion is far more serious than getting a haircut or having nails clipped. You’re killing a human life growing inside you, and there may be emotional scars later, that is if you’re a person of conscience. And getting a tattoo means you are stuck with that ugly stuff forever. Do you really want to do something that will mark or define you for life? Or consider gender-assignment surgeries. It’s such a drastic undertaking that the patient must be absolutely sure what he or she is getting into. It isn’t a decision to make lightly. Or it’s like changing religions. Surely, if a Christian wants to become a Muslim or vice versa, he should really think hard about what he is doing. It’s not just a mind game but a fundamental shift in spiritual beliefs, commitments, and loyalties. It should never be done lightly. This is why Evangelicals who push Jesus onto others like candy are shallow idiots, not unlike the globalists who want to pass out American Citizenship like flyers. While we can understand why Evangelicals want to save souls and bring others to the love of Jesus, they should also be mindful of the fact that there are other rich, deep, and meaningful spiritual systems. So, if non-Christians are to convert to Christianity, Evangelicals should at the very least inform potential converts of the profound changes that will follow. It’s like marriage or divorce is not something to be handled lightly. Marriage means you are committed to the person for life. And divorce could mean emotional scars, legal complications, and worst of all, trauma for the children.
Some things don’t require fundamental shifts or change of commitments. Deciding to buy a new music CD is nothing compared to, say, deciding to join the military. The latter requires tough training, years of duty, and the possibility of killing other people and being killed or being crippled for life. Some decisions should not be made lightly. And yet, immigration is now treated like the most easy, fun, painless, and natural thing. Not only are globalist Western elites calling on non-whites to come in droves but non-white elites are telling their own people to flock to other nations. Now, if the elites of a nation are proud of their identity and tradition, why would they encourage their own people to give up their own nations, move to other nations, and pledge loyalty to other governments(that could even be enemies)?

For the longest time, neither China nor Japan allowed foreigners to enter or their own people to leave. They saw foreigners as invaders, and they didn’t want their own people to go to other lands and work for the enemies/rivals. Japanese didn’t want their own people to become New Chinese and possibly serve China against Japan. And Chinese felt the same way. But then, Western Powers forced China and Japan open, and both nations realized that they must learn new ideas from the West and build their own technologies to defend themselves. So, ideas and goods should move freely, but the nation-states should still maintain border controls. But this wasn’t so easy, especially as imperialist nations began to carve up China. With China being unable to keep foreigners out, they got into the habit of moving to foreign lands. Also, due to pressures of increasing population, there was the temptation to dump the poor folks to the wide open spaces of the New World.

The modern world gave rise to both nationalism and anti-nationalism. With centralized state power, mass communication, and public education, more people could be brought together under a shared national identity. Thus, Russian peasants who’d only known their local village and customs began to think more in terms of their shared Russian-ness with other Russians. And the rise of Turkey owed to modern political influences from the West. So, more people than ever before gained shared/collective pride as member of a nation.

But modernity also facilitated movements of peoples via ships and then airplanes. The world grew smaller. And people being organisms, they were tempted to move to other places IF they could have better material lives. Modern Turkey is very nationalist, and yet, so many Turks have left Turkey for Germany and other European nations because they want more money and welfare. And the Turkish government, like the Mexican government, promotes both nationalism and immigrationism, a great irony. If indeed Turkish elites are so proud of being Turks, why would they want Turks to abandon their own nations and move, often permanently, to other nations? Won’t these Turkish emigrants be abandoning their own identity and culture? If indeed Turks become ‘New Germans’ and if Germany and Turkey end up in a war, won’t the Germanized Turks be fighting against Turkey? But then, Turks may feel that Turks who emigrate to Europe will likely retain their identity. In other words, they aren’t so much immigrants in Germany but colonizers. As white Europe is aging, dying, and losing faith in God and nation, why shouldn’t the more virile and vital Muslim folks move and take over?

Same kind of double-think may operate among Mexican elites. In a way, it makes little sense for proud Mexicans to encourage Mexicans to move to Gringo-Land and serve goddamn Gringos. But, Mexicans can smell the blood that Gringo has lost his mojo-ez. Gringo is cucked out and decadent. So, Mexicans who move to the US aren’t so much switching loyalties and siding with Gringos against Mexico but carrying out Reconquista of the lands back from Gringos who’d humiliated the ‘tacoheads’ in the Mexican-American War and been making Westerns were Mexicans are usually ridiculous, albeit endearing, characters like Ramon in THE BIG COUNTRY and Pedro in RIO BRAVO.

Anyway, moving to another nation is not something to be taken lightly. The reason why it’s become a New Normal is because globalism has undermined nationalism and patriotism. It has severed identity from its roots. Globalism says no people, except Jews, have an organic connection to their ancestors, lands, cultures, and traditions. All identities are just like baseball cards to be traded back and forth. Identities are to be traded like currencies or bought and sold on the demographic stock market. We don’t trade in slaves anymore but in entire peoples. Even though people feel free in having easier access to other parts of the world, they’ve become a new kind of 'slaves' because they’ve lost the meaning of who they are really are. They’ve been cut off from their roots and chained to migratory patterns where the ONLY consideration is material interest, hedonism, and self-indulgence. So, if you live in Nation A and if moving to Nation B will make you richer, your identity and loyalty easily shift to Nation B.

Paradoxically, the only people who resist such mindset, the Jews, are the ones who are pushing it most fervently on other peoples. Why? Because Jews want gentiles to be adrift as rootless economic units whose loyalties can be sold to the highest bidder. Since Jews got the most money, they can buy the loyalties of most people. Look at the minions of George Soros al over the world. With their mega-stash of gold, Jews can dish out thirty pieces of silver to so many gentiles who, having been culturally hollowed out by Pop Culture and intellectually reprogrammed by PC, are easily sold to the money changers.

Now, let’s consider a hypothetical where every would-be-immigrant is fully warned of what he is committing to IF he decides upon permanent emigration to another nation. He would be informed of the profound implications of his decisions on the political, cultural, and even spiritual level. And it wouldn’t be just about him but his ancestors and descendants. After all, if he adopts the identity and narrative of another nation, his descendants will likely drift from his identity & culture and forget his ancestors in the ‘old country’.

So, what would the questions posed to the would-be-immigrant be? As follows.

1. Are you proud of your people, culture, and history? Do you feel a deep attachment to your people and land? If so, why do you want to abandon your nation and come to live in America where your culture and identity won’t be central and will likely be rejected, neglected, or forgotten by your children and grandchildren? If you’re non-white, do you find white people to be superior? Why do you want to move to a nation envisioned and built by white pioneers? Do you believe white people do everything better, whereas your people, being inferior and hopeless, will never achieve the levels of wealth and success found in Anglo-built America?

2. What is your main motivation for wanting to permanently move to another nation and replace your existing deeply rooted identity with a new one based largely on consumerism, careerism, and recreation? Are you motivated by idealism or materialism? Are you willing to abandon your own identity, people, and culture just to have better material life in America?
Or do you value individualism and freedom that you believe are enshrined by Rule of Law in America? But if you long for more freedom and individualism, why don’t you struggle for them in your own nation? Are you and your people incapable of working together for greater liberty and rule of law? Are you and your ilk so lazy, cowardly, craven, and stupid that you people can’t attain those things on your own and must move to white-founded-and-built nation to enjoy them?
Or if your nation is free and democratic but saddled with rampant corruption, why don’t you get together with your countrymen to organize movements for reform? Why do you shirk your responsibilities at home while you seek to shunt off to America to enjoy the fruits of what other peoples, especially whites, have accomplished? If you admire the American Way, why don’t you do something to realize similar improvements in your own nation? A true idealist doesn’t run away from the problems of his own people to enjoy paradise built by another people. He rolls up his sleeves and struggles to make things better for his own nation and people. The West didn’t become rich and successful because white people ran to success created by others. It was because men and women of values and ideals acted on their convictions to construct something out of nothing, thus transforming a wilderness into a civilization. But you don’t want to serve or improve your own nation. You just want to run from problems to easy solutions in America created by other peoples. You don’t want to do the homework for your own people in your own nation. You want to go to America and live off the homework done by whites. Are you ashamed of yourself? What kind of shameless craven tard are you anyway?

3. Are you aware that America was created by taking land from the native populations? If childish Indian savages were the original owners of America, then why do you want to join the white race in furthering the conquest of America and render Indians into yet a smaller minority. If it was tragic for Indians to lose their lands to Europeans, isn’t it doubly tragic for Indians to lose their land to peoples from all over the world? If whites took land from Indians, isn’t the moral obligation of whites to take good care of Indians than open up the New World to yet more invasions from all over?

There’s a good chance that your people had also been colonized by Europeans although not ethnically pogrom-ed off the land as Indian were. Aren’t you relieved that your people regained your homeland and were liberated of foreign imperialism. As it stands, Indians lost their land and will forever live under ‘foreign’ white rule. So, why would your kind want to move to America and participate in an Eurocentric race-ist order that has permanently extinguished the hope of Indian Liberation?

Furthermore, even though our official creed is now ‘Diversity Is Our Strength’, the fact is Diversity is really the product of imperialism, conquest, mass rape, slave trade, and waves of invasive immigration. In North and South Americas, Diversity was forced on the natives by imperialists. And the presence of blacks to further the Diversity was the result of centuries of Slave Trade. So, if you come here to celebrate Diversity, you are participating in the Imperialist Saga.

4. Are you aware that the US not only developed as an imperialist power across the American continent but expanded its imperial reach overseas as well? Do you know that US imperialism and intervention in world affairs led to the deaths of millions in Asia and Middle East? Consider the US support of Japanese imperialism before the two empires butted heads in World War II. Think of US invasion of Philippines, US wars in Korea and Vietnam. Think of US actions in Guatemala and Iran. The invasion of Panama. Think of US colonial grab of Puerto Rico. Think of how the CIA and US mafia ran Cuba before Castro liberated it from Hyman Roth. And have you already forgotten the US invasion of Iraq and Libya that led to destruction of entire cities and deaths of 100,000s of lives? The US also aided terrorists in Syria to either topple or cripple the secular modern Assad regime. The US, being controlled by Jews, also supports the seemingly never-ending Zionist oppression and dispossession of Palestinians. Given the history and direction of US power and its imperialism, why do you want to move to America, work for the US economy, raise your kids to serve in the US military, and pay taxes to the US government when the US will use the added might(of immigrant labor and revenues) to expand its empire to terrorize and destroy more peoples and nations all over the world? Do you want to participate in American Imperialism? Do you want to work and pay taxes to fund the US empire that has caused so much harm in every corner of the world? Are you some kind of amoral freak? Haven’t you read Paul Craig Roberts? Or are you the kind of tard who got all your information from Jew-run CNN?

5. Are you a decadent or degenerate freak? If not, why would you want to come to America? Don’t you know that the current religion of the US is Homomania and Queertianity? Don’t you know that Americans now celebrate fecal penetration among homos? Don’t you know that America now fires, fines, and blacklists people who won’t acknowledge Bruce ‘Caitlyn’ Jenner as a ‘woman’? Don’t you know that US companies are obliged to use 50 gender pronouns? Don’t you know that Washington D.C., the capital of the US, is 10% homo and virtually all politicians are shills of heinous Jewish globalists? Why do you want to bring your children to America to be indoctrinated in public schools and by mass media(all controlled by Jewish globalists and their homo proxies) to praise, celebrate, and even worship homos and trannies? What kind of parent are you that you are willing to turn your children’s hearts, minds, and souls over to the devil of decadent and degenerate globalism just because you want to make more money, drive a fancy car, and live in a McMansion? You must be some kind of turd to expose your children to such filth. And do you know what American pop culture is? It is about keeping men boys forever, addicted to video-games and comic book culture. And it’s about turning girls into whores or ‘thots’ at the youngest age possible. The US influence will turn your son into an immature dork or a fruitkin. And your daughter will likely throw away her virginity at 15 and screw around like the disgusting Lena Dunham and Emma Sulkowicz. You must be some kind of degenerate freak yourself to want to come to America and expose your children to that kind of filth.
Aren’t you proud of your own history, culture, and values? Or are you already ersatz-Americanized via globalist media that are beamed into homes all across the world? Are you already a tard whose idea of culture is tattoos, piercings, and the umpteenth comic book movie? Are your kids already into rap or some other trashy music? Is your son already an Americanized idiot who imitates rappers and demented celebrities? Is your daughter already a thot-in-progress? You must be one lowlife shithead of a father. So, you couldn’t resist the worst aspects of American Pop Culture even in your nation and you want to come to America to wallow whole hog in degeneracy and filth. US may be rich, but it has a shithole culture, and you want to eat from it like a pig. Apparently, you have no feeling or connection to your own culture and history because, if you did, you would want to preserve it and defend it from the foulness of globalist US influence that is spreading like a plague all over the world. If you come to the US, a nutjob like Michio Kaku will just see you as a worker-consumer-tax-payer whose only purpose is to keep the economy running so that megalomaniacal geeks like him can invent technology to turn themselves into ‘gods’, like how Mason became Largo in BUBBLEGUM CRISIS.

6. Despite all the official crap about ‘equality’, do you know that the US is really about the royalty of the holy three: Jews, blacks, and homos? Both political parties must honor and praise Jews no matter what they do. Jews are the most powerful people in America and must be obeyed at every turn. And we must turn a blind eye to Zionist oppression of Palestinians. We must not protest our tax payer money going to Zionist tyranny. Do you want to take part in this evil? Don’t you have any sympathy for Palestinians? No? Why you dirty heartless bastard. Crazy Jews run the US, and moving to the US to serve Jews is like moving to Nazi Germany to lend support to the Wehrmacht. If Jews want more Wars for Israel, America must deliver. If Jews want to wreck the economies of Iran and Russia, all Americans must comply because all politicians are shills for Zion. Why would you want to participate in this monstrous system? Not only was the US created by ‘racist’ imperialism against childish Indian savages and not only did it develop by slave labor, but the US continues to be an aggressive nation hellbent on world domination. If anything, it is worse today because at least the Anglo-American elites of yesteryear had some conscience, some sense of honor, some sense of limits, some sense of magnanimity, some sense of Christian grace. Also, they didn’t deny their power and listened to criticism and were self-critical. In contrast, the current Jewish elites are utterly neurotic, psychopathic, sociopathic, megalomaniacal, egotistical, chutzpahlsy, and delirious. Even though they cause the most harm around the world, they pontificate like they’re moral paragons or eternal victims of the Shoah. If you come to the US, you will be serving this evil power. Do you even know WHY the Jews are ‘welcoming’ non-white folks like you? They just want to set goyim against goyim. If you’re Muslim, you know Jews are making White Christians in the military bomb your nation and make your life hell. But these same Jews then ‘invite’ your kind to America and make you hate White Christians. It’s pure misdirection. It’s the Jews who make whites hate, invade, and destroy Muslim nations. Jews run Hollywood and made all these movies and TV shows with ‘Muzzie’ baddies. But when you come to America, Jews will pretend to love you and set you against white gentiles as 'Islamophobes'. Why do you want to be played and manipulated by Jews? You must be a freaking idiot to want to come to America and be used as globots by the heinous Jewish imperialists.
And then, there are the blacks or Negroes. They are the other people deemed holy by the American Narrative. But in fact, blacks commit the most crime, destroy entire cities, degrade academic standards, holler like lunatics, and tell lies upon lies. Even though most blacks have most to fear from other blacks, the insane BLM movement made believe that innocent law-abiding blacks were being gunned down by ‘racist’ white supremacist police. If you want to run some store in a big city, there’s a good chance some crazy ‘groids’ will loot it like they did in Ferguson in the name of justice for Michael Brown, a fat thug who got shot for charging a police officer who was only doing his duty. As blacks are revered as ‘kangz’ in America, rappers are treated like poet laureates and prophets. But all they yammer about is ‘biatches’, ‘muh gun’, ‘muh bling’, ‘muh dick’, ‘muh attitude’. Why would you want to bring your kids to a nation and raise them to imitate crazed blacks who imitate drunken apes?
And then, there’s the Homos. Maybe you know that some people are born homo and like to do ‘gay’ stuff. Okay, live and let live, I guess. But in the US, Jews via control of media-academia-finance-entertainment, have turned homos into the angels and saints of America. Even though HIV epidemic spread because homos were buggering one another in bathhouses from coast to coast, Americans are forced to believe that homos were just hapless and innocent victims, oh boo hoo hoo. And if you open a pastry shop, you better bake a cake to service a ‘gay wedding’. If you don’t, you will be sued and destroyed financially. And Antifa thugs will attack you in the streets while hideous Jews giggle with glee like the demon girl in Fellini’s TOBY DAMMIT. Do you still want to come to America? If yes, you must be some kind of disgusting freak yourself.

7. Do you care about the environment? If you do, why do you want to come to America, consume more energy than you are now, and add to the carbon footprint to the planet? Studies show that when people come to America, they drive bigger cars like SUV’s and live in McMansions. They use more energy of all kinds and add more CO2 into the air. Don’t you care about the planet? Also, as an American, you will likely eat a lot of beef, and that means more cattle, and that means more cow fart which adds lots of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Why would you want to become a stupid fat American eating all those burgers, driving an SUV, and living in a McMansion? It’s bad enough we have enough stupid Americans messing up the planet. Why would you want to be yet another fat stupid American? Why don’t you do us a favor and stay in your nation and live within your means and be more environmentally-minded. We have enough gross fat Americans who use excessive energy and befoul the planet with auto exhausts and cow flatulence.

8. Do you know that financial sector is the biggest share of the US economy? The US has manipulated, abused, and fleeced the world with Wall Street fraud and Dollar supremacism. If you come to America and if your kids do well in school, there’s a good chance they too will work in the financial sector and facilitate more predatory fraud around the world. Why don’t you stay in your own nation and make money the honest way than coming to America and goading your kids to go to business school, join Wall Street, learn dirty tricks, and make lots of money by making or producing nothing? The last thing the US needs is more financial sharks. It needs more Real Economy. The problem is immigrants come to the US and work to expand stupid bubbles that distort the economy for everyone. Consider all the Hindu dotkins who played a key role in the Dot.com Bubble in the 1990s. And the Housing Bubble that nearly KO’ed the world economy owed much to providing easy loans to tons of immigrants and even illegal aliens who bought houses they couldn’t really afford. The US economy is seriously distorted and, in turn, distorts the entire world. The fact that you want to join this bubble economy means you’re sick in the head. Why don’t you want to stay in your own nation and build up some honest industries?

9. Do you want to aid and abet in Jewish Supremacism and oppression of Palestinians? While the US has many groups, some are more equal than others, and no group is as ‘more equal’ than the Jews. Jews use their great power to force all groups to support the Zionist Occupation and Oppression of Palestinians. What kind of lowlife sicko are you that you want to come to the US and aid in the oppression of Palestinians and other peoples? Why do you hate the Palestinians? Why do you want to work in the US and pay taxes into the system that funds the terrible Zionist tyranny over Palestinians. You must be a sadistic bully with a hole where there should be a soul. So, you’re the kind of lowlife who’s willing to come to America and pay taxes to support the oppression of Palestinians just because you want your SUV, McMansion, and 5 burgers per serving. Have you seen a spiritual counselor recently? You should because you are willing to take thirty pieces of silver and oppress Palestinians.

10. Why do you want to kill your own people? If you’re Chinese, there’s a chance that US and China will be at war. If that happens, you will have to support the US as it drops bombs and murders countless innocent dog-eaters and cat-torturers. Are you a Muslim? Then, you must surely know that Jewish-run America uses its military and economic sanctions to target, subvert, and destroy any Muslim or Arab nation hated by Israel. Are you some lowlife Muslim cuck(with brains rotted from too much cousin-mating) who takes pleasure in coming to America and paying taxes to support a system that drops bombs on Muslims, forcing them into refugee status?
Or if you’re from Latin America, you must know of the long US history of exploitation of nations and peoples south of the border. Look what Hyman Roth did to Havana in THE GODFATHER PART 2. Jews and Anglo-Americans have been using Latin America as their backyard. They’ve been invading, bullying, and exploiting Latin America. And yet, your dream is to come to the US and work for gringo and pay taxes into the Yanqui Empire so that the US will continue pushing around Latin American nations? Are you loco?
And if you’re African, why do you want to run from fellow blacks and come to a white-built nation? Are you a ‘racist’? In America, ‘racist’ whites take flight or white flight from black areas. That is deemed discriminatory or bigoted. And yet, you want to take flight from fellow blacks and come to white Europe or white-founded America. Are you a self-loathing black ‘racist’ who runs from fellow blacks and come to live with ‘whitey’? Are you really that disgustingly ‘racist’? If you got talent and brains, why don’t you work to improve and fix your ‘shithole’ nation? If you got shit all over, clean it up. Don’t run from your own shit. Are you too lazy to fix your own problems? Then, you are reinforcing ‘racist’ stereotypes of blacks being lazy, indolent, and irresponsible. There’s a ‘racist’ stereotype that black men are prone to getting women pregnant and then shirking their duties and running off to hump more whores. Do you see your own nation as a ‘whore’ to run from? Do you want to confirm the ‘racist’ stereotype of blacks as carefree ‘groids’ who won’t be their brothers’ keepers?

*Bonus Question. If you believe that white Americans should be replaced by non-white New Americans, do you support the same fate for your own nation? Should foreigners take over your own nation and fundamentally change its demography? Do you mind if that happens? What? You’re not worried about that since your nation sucks and no one wants to come to it anyway?

Anyway, if after considering all the above questions, if your answer is still, "Yes, I want to come to America", then our decision is NO, YOU CAN’T COME because the fact that you still want to come to America after being so warned means that you’re a trashy, shallow, and disgusting person. As the US has enough trashy, shallow, and disgusting people, it doesn’t need MORE.
So, stay home and fix up your own nation.