Yes, PC Wokeness Is Mostly about Blacks but Primarily because Jews Control Media-Academia-Finance-State, i.e. Jews Need Blacks as Allies & Moral Cattle-Prods against Whites — Uncertainty Craves Certainty, or Secularism Breeds Dogma of New Gods & Idols — Paradox of Fools Being Harder to Fool and Smarties Being Easier to Outsmart

THE POX THAT HAS NO NAME by Robert Weissberg - https://www.unz.com/article/the-pox-that-has-no-name/

Much of what Robert Weissberg says is true and interesting.

But he left out the J-factor. Why do people think they way they do? What controls mass consciousness, especially in the age of electronica when TV, radios, and internet matter most?

Whites suck up to blacks because Jews want it that way. Jewish Power relies on white submission, and Jews fear nothing more than the idea that whites may gain sense of autonomy and agency. Autonomy comes by way of pride. So, to control whites, white pride must be pushed back into the jail cell. Without awesome race-ism, whites are doomed. Whites must be paralyzed with guilt. This way, would-be white leaders become afraid to call on the white masses. He hopes to lead whites(like Moses led the Jews), but he’s rejected and reviled ‘racist’ & ‘white supremacist’ because white masses too have been conditioned by media and academia to believe nothing is worse than ‘racism'(that now includes anything positively white). After all, schools now teach courses on how ‘whiteness’ is at best a delusion and at worst an absolute evil.

Of course, WGTOW or whites-going-their-own-way need not be dangerous to Jews. After all, whites are not beholden to the folks of Thailand but still mean them no harm. Just because whites break free of submissive to Jews doesn’t mean whites will hate or attack Jews, though the very notion of having broken free of Jewish Power will remind whites that they’d been soul-slaves of Zion. But, it still means whites won’t be doing the bidding of Jews, like Wars for Israel. And even if whites don’t become virulently anti-Jewish, they may oppose certain Jewish agendas for fairness sake, like lending a helping hand to Palestinians and Syrians, both of which have been terrorized by Zionists. Also, if whites support fairness and justice, Jews would get away with less with financial crimes, media mendacity, funding of Antifa, and etc. Free whites may not be out to get Jews, but their adherence to equal justice would undermine Jews-uber-alles. Whites may come to see BDS as partly justified, given Jews are trying to gobble up remaining parts of West Bank.
Of course, if Jews continue to act badly, white freedom can lead to white anti-Jewishness. After all, it’s only natural for one people to push back against and/or hate another people who do them harm or cause problems all over the world. Because Jewish Power is now so obnoxious and psycho beyond belief, white freedom may turn whites against Jews. Not because whites want to hate Jews(or any other people) for the hell of it but because bad behavior of one people offends other peoples.

Jews know that, unless one people by worshipped by another people, there’s no guarantee that the former will be shielded from the latter. Consider. White people didn’t think much about Syria. White Americans for the most part have neither loved or hated Syrians. Indeed, majority of Americans probably can’t even find the nation on the map. But even if whites don’t particularly hate Syrians, they don’t love or worship them either. So, when Jewish Power used the US military to invade Syria and lend aid to terrorists(or ‘moderate rebels’), most Americans said and did nothing.
Now, imagine what would happen if a politician or some deep state official said US should bomb Israel and invade parts of it to support ‘moderate rebels’ against the Zionist regime. There would have been a HUGE outcry. Jewish media would have howled with fury. Democratic politicians would have fumed, Nancy Pelosi would have wept like a baby. Republicans would have sobbed along with Pelosi and called fo total cancellation of the monster who proposed such. And all those conservative evangelical Christians would have marched and carried banners in support of Israel. Because of the cultish worship of Jews and Israel among whites especially, it’s inconceivable that the US can act against Jews, even when Jews act badly. But because Americans feel neutral about Syria, they could live with being peaceful toward Syria or blow it to smithereens. Even without hatred, a people can be indifferent to the suffering of others. Jews don’t want white neutrality toward Jews. Neutrality could mean whites being peaceful with Jews, but it could also mean whites not lifting a finger to come to the aid of Jews and Israel. After all, even parts of the West that despised Hitler and feared Germany did precious little to save Jews from destruction because they felt indifferent. Even if many whites in America didn’t hate Jews, they didn’t love them either. To Jews, ‘silence is violence’. Jewish Supremacist Power must have vocal support.

This is why Jews must control whites, especially those of northern European extraction, as they are the most capable people in the world. While Jews do the leading, much of the heavy-lifting in managerial positions must be done by goyim, and who are better than this than white folks(though increasingly Asians are useful to Jews also)? To control whites, Jews must paralyze white pride and fill whites with redemptive submissive ‘guilt’. And blackness is the main weapon of Jews. Why? Why don’t Jews use American Indians? After all, whites wiped out the Indians in what some call the ‘American Holocaust’. Or how about Vietnamese who were killed by the bushel by US bombs? Vietnam War left a huge scar in the American soul. Or how about all those dead Arabs and Muslims as the result of US invasions? Or, what about browns of Latin America as the story of the New World was largely about whites, Anglo and Latin, invading and spreading disease and raping and plundering, leading to mass deaths of the natives? Why don’t Jews use those to guilt-bait white Americans? Why do Jews use blacks?
It’s due to the song-dong-wrong-strong factor. Jews know whites are most prone to feel guilty about what they are in most awe of. Whites believe all they had was lame polka music and Lawrence Welk before black rhythm & beat liberated white souls from lameness. For many whites, there was no music before Rock. British whites believe their culture was hopelessly frigid and repressed, but the black sun smiled its fat luscious lips upon Albion, which finally thawed from the funkiss. And in our sexualized age, white women got jungle fever and white men got cuck-syndrome because black men got bigger dongs. This would have mattered less when sexual propriety was a thing, but in our pornified age(and Jews not only control porn but use their ownership of Disney to spread pornification, negro and homo, even to kiddie stuff). The novel Mandingo is like the new bible of white mentality. Even blacks notice this: the movie GET OUT. And blacks dominate sports, and the modern world looks up to black athletes as heroes and champions. So, whites are far more sensitive about what they may have done to Negroes. Look how the news about all those dead Afghanis hardly moved anyone in the US, but the entire West had conniptions over St. George Floyd, a lowlife pile of crap who actually died of overdose than under a white policeman’s knee, a technique taught to US police by IDF under a program brokered by ADL. And because blacks got boom box voices that soulfully bellow ‘Ole Man River’, whites almost hear it like it’s the lamenting voice of God saying, “Repent Honkey, and wash the Negro’s feet.” Even Archie Bunker did.

So, it’s not really about morality but idolatry. If anything is absolutist, it is the idolatry of PC that elevates Jews, homos, and blacks uber alles. Everything revolves around that trinity.

‘Absolutist’ implies powerful conviction in a set of immutable truths or timeless wisdom. Or an iron dogma, like Marxism’s emphasis on class struggle. And this truth has higher authority than political authority. In Christianity, Jesus is King, and even political authorities dared not alter the teachings and the lesson of Jesus(though it is now possible to drag Christianity through the mud as anti-Christian Jews are on top).

The strange feature of the Current Year is globalists are so sure about what is so unsure. Their way of thinking and feeling is closer to toeing the party line than adherence to dogma. Under communism, there was the absolutist dogma about class struggle and capitalism supplanted by socialism then by communism, but there was always the ever-changing party line along Orwellian lines: ____ has always been at war with ____. In the novel, people are emotionally impassioned and sure about things that are ever ‘evolving’.

While communism-as-dogma couldn’t tolerate fascism, the Moscow Line during the Nazi-Soviet Pact was about how all good comrades must support the partnership and anyone who disagreed should be purged. But when war broke out between Germany and Soviet Union, it was as if USSR and US had been friends all along, until they weren’t after the war ended.
At one time, China said its bond with USSR was unbreakable. But when the Sino-Soviet rift happened, Russia was the worst country for all times, and China was talking with the capitalist US. Indeed, precisely because the political authority of the communist party was absolute, the party line was anything but. It changed according to the whims of those in power. The strange thing, however, is that so many mindless minions went along without thought, just like a dog can be made to cuddle up to a bunny or chomp it to death. Either way, affection or assault, the overriding factor in the dog is approval from the master. Maybe the dog really wants to kill and devour the bunny, but if the master demands it be nice, the dog’s emotion follows the master. Or, maybe the dog really wants to make nice with the bunny and play, but if the master orders ‘kill’, it will maul the bunny. The overriding factor is obedience to the master.

Emotions can be powerful but never absolutist because, on their own, they aren’t about anything particular. A strong sense of nationalism can be for any nation. One can feel strongly about communism or capitalism, about monarchy or democracy. The current woke-types have strong emotions, but their ideology, if it can be called that, is always shifting and mutating. Theirs is a kind of emotional-moralism, or ’emoralism’. But as emotions alone have no ideological content, the themes have to be supplied by another, and who would that be? The controllers of the elite centers government, culture, information, entertainment, and the like. In the current West, it’s the Jews.

In a way, fever-pitch eagerness bordering on hysteria may be deemed necessary precisely because the current ideology is so unsure and changing. When status relies so heavily on fashion, one must be on the lookout at all times to know what’s in and what’s out. The worst thing one can imagine is to be out-of-fashion, like a hippie in the era of disco, or disco-diva in the era of new wave music. When you’re ‘in’, you’re with the hottest thing in town. But if you’re ‘out’, you’re a total laughing stock, though what people are laughing at was, not long ago, the hottest thing around. To keep with the fashion, one is more anxious, more observant, more eager to jump on the bandwagon. Especially because political correctness suppressed critical thinking and discouraged personal conscience, entire generations grew up with something like mental-soul-slavery. They rely upon others(as the masters) to tell them what’s what, what to love, what to hate, what to celebrate, what to revile. Without a core conviction in a canonical set of values and a firm sense of reality, one’s sense of worth isn’t foundational(with roots and base) but navigational(in accordance to the prevailing winds).

Of course, Jewish Power wants it this way because it fears consistency in ideology. After all, principles intrinsic to ideology may stand in the way of Jewish Power: If ‘racism’ is bad, then Zionism must be bad also. This is why Jews prefer idolatry over ideology. This way, ‘racism’ is bad when it’s by whites, but the same rules don’t apply to blacks and Jews because they are deemed holy-schmoly. Idolatry > ideology. ‘Ethnocracy’ overrides ethos-cratic or ‘ethocratic’ principles. If truth is fixed, Jewish Power would also have to bow to it, and truth may be harmful to Jews. This is why Jews would have us believe, truth is soft but conviction is hard. Simply put, Truth is whatever Jews say it is. For example… Covid 19 came from nature, and yes, you better believe it and shut up about it or else be censored, so say the Jews, and the prog-minions all agree and repeat the mantra and call for censorship of naysayers who say it could have come from a lab or may be a bio-weapon. But then, Jews say, it could have come from the Wuhan Lab, and all of sudden, the minions who were 100% committed to the the natural origin theory now say the lab theory may be correct. To win approval and be favored in the New Order, one must always be up to date with the Current Year or Current Month or Current Week or Current Day or Current Minute or Current Second. It’s like one big game of Simon Says where everyone fears to slip up and do the wrong thing. So, everyone’s on edge and so loud in his show of loyalty and denunciation of the mis-steppers. After all, while other PC wokies are comrades, they are also the competition, and it’s always to your advantage to have some of them purged or at least penalize and sent few steps back while you remain ahead of the pack just behind the master.

Uncertainty craves certainty, and when there are no certain truths or principles, the only certainty is being in step with the fashion and/or toeing the party line. Paradoxically, more the world is made uncertain, more the people flock to what seems certain(at the moment).
Truth and principles are like an island. Big or small, it is solid and you can stand firm and straight on it. It won’t sink into the ocean. In contrast, wokery is like a log or raft in the middle of the ocean. It has no solid footing. It is always afloat, and indeed, the name of the game is keeping your head above the sea of uncertainty.
Then, it’s no wonder so many eagerly and desperately cling to the rafts and logs. And they better cling for dear life because there are no firm grounds to stand on. The current order is like Jews in their powerful ark and goyim on rafts or clinging to logs. Everyone else goes under water. In the Bob Dylan song “It’s All Over Now, Baby Blue”, there a sense of the Uncertainty Principle. The carpet is being pulled from under you, and the bottom drops off, and you don’t know anything for sure anymore. But human nature craves something to believe, something to hang on to, and this is where Jews use their wokery-idolatry. To those who feel lost and adrift, wokery is the lifeline to some kind of ‘meaning’ and ‘purpose’. Another Bob Dylan song, “The Times They Are A Changing” paints a portrait of a world in flux, where things are always changing, and what is right and wrong anymore? Same sense of uncertainty in “My Back Pages” with the memorable line “I’m younger than that now.”

In a way, the new order was supposed to be about rebellion against authority, but in the absence of certainty, people in the new order became desperate to find the ‘real’ meaning, but they couldn’t on their own. And so, in the end, the generation that had defined itself by rebellion spawned future generations of conformity. In the darkness, people fear bumping into things or falling into holes, and so, when they see the light, they flock to it. But suppose the light is ever moving. In a way, it seems to be in the same place because all one can see is the light in the vast darkness. So, even if the light moves from point A to point B to point R to point X to point Z, for those chasing after the light it seems fixed in one place because it is the ONLY thing visible. Because Jewish-controlled wokery is about canceling and purging all incorrect ideas(which can be anything on account of “Is it good for Jews in the here and now?”), it’s the only game in town, especially in elite and wanna-be-elite realms(and among the hoi polloi that wants to feel superior to other hoi polloi by status-imitation; this way, even a graduate of a community college, by parroting the elites, can feel he or she is superior to the rabble of deplorables even though he or she isn’t socioeconomically above them).

In the current order, whites get ‘canceled’ for saying “It’s Okay to be White” but BDS is canceled even worse even though it calls for justice for Palestinians who are being crushed by Jewish racial supremacism. So much for PC being ‘anti-racist’. And blacks can steal, rape, murder, and do whatever and always be forgiven or even praised for their law-breaking. It’s like they are racially superior and above the law. Fish rots from the head, and there is a link between black nihilism and Jewish nihilism. As the new elites, Jews set the template of certain favored groups being above the law. No matter what Jews do, they get away scot-free. Jonathan Pollard is somewhere in Israel giving a big fat middle finger to America, and both political parties look the other way. Jews are the nihilists of the upper realm and blacks are of the lower realm.

Here is a good example of ’emorality’ or emotional-morality without firm foundation:

Notice how something that almost NO ONE cared about or believed in becomes the New Certainty(at least for the time being) because the megaphonic fashion-makers say it’s the hot item. Everyone knew women got pregnant — uh duh! — , but now, the correct term is ‘pregnant people’ because women who claim to be ‘men’ can become pregnant. Now, some in elite realms may personally find this absurd, but they know the rules: “It was always pregnant people who had babies”, just like “Oceania was always at war with EastAsia”. Otherwise, their careers will be jeopardized. But for everyone who just goes along for career-sake, there are others(especially among the impressionable young) who really come to swallow that stuff whole hog, especially because their parents are either shallow decadents or the ‘helicopter’ type who urge their kids to toe the line for future-sake.

Feeble-minded fools believe it because they’re dumb enough to believe anything, but then, why do plenty of smart people believe that stuff? Because of the conceit that they understand something that is beyond the simple-minded common sense of ‘deplorables’. It also gains traction because the Power associates the new nuttery with quasi-sacral slogans like ‘love’, ‘equality’, ‘stop hate’, and ‘inclusion’. So, saying that a man with penis and balls is a ‘woman’ and deserves to play in women’s sports is about ‘equality’, ‘stopping hatred of trans people’, and ‘including’ them. Unfortunately, Dumb Slogans Matter. Take Black-Lives-Matter that has no bearing on reality as blacks are killed by blacks, not by ‘racist’ whites, but as Jews control media and academia(and the whores in federal, state, and local government), the idiot mantra has spread everywhere, and plenty of fools feel holier-than-thou in chanting them. In a world without God, people seek certainty in new gods, and in the US, they are Noble Negroes, Holy Homos, and Sacred Semites.

In a way, things are more convoluted than ever because modern-day persecution isn’t bloody and violent. Long ago, heresy could mean torture and execution. When Galileo finally toed the line, it was under extreme pressure. Whether one stuck with one’s conviction/conscience and paid the ultimate price OR folded under pressure and caved, others could feel sympathy. People feel admiration for courageous martyrs, and people understand why some people were broken by threat of torture or death. People admire Socrates who chose death. And people don’t hold it against Galileo that he finally relented under great pressure.

But the current power doesn’t torture or kill people. Or even send them to Gulags. Rather, people are ‘canceled’, and even though it’s unpleasant and even career-destroying, it’s not the end of the world. Because ‘canceling’ isn’t an extreme form of persecution, the ‘cancelled’ lack the aura of noble victimhood. (Granted, the powers-that-be CAN turn molehill into a mountain, like how the Jewish-controlled media and academia once did for Jewish communists and fellow-travelers who were blacklisted for several years during the ‘Red Scare’. Even though Jewish commies and other such ilk couldn’t get gigs for several years — hardly the end of the world — , they were sainted as victims on par with those during the Inquisition.) Furthermore, because of wokery’s hysteria, anyone not up-to-date with the program must be a bad evil witch who is all about ‘hate’ and therefore undeserving of free speech that cannot tolerate ‘hate speech’.

In the current order, the purged cannot claim the mantle of noble victimhood because ‘canceling’ is mild compared to past punishments involving imprisonment, forced exile, torture, and even execution.
Also, as big business and the deep state work hand in glove, Jewish Power can use the state to do the bidding of business and make business do the bidding of the state. Because the First Amendment protects free speech, the government cannot outright censor speech. But as the state works in cahoots with the media and big tech(‘private companies’), big business can effectively shut down free speech in the main square of public discourse. And companies like Gab cannot even access payment systems and banking services.

So, people are left feeling both free and unfree and must navigate in an unsure world. The academia is, at once, a bastion of free inquiry(as there is still sufficient freedom in many fields) but also a place where careers can be cut short in an instant. But because they won’t shoot you or send you to a gulag, you can’t really claim nobility of martyrdom. You just lost your job. As for those who caved, because they folded under less-than-terrifying pressure, their craven submission cannot generate the kind of sympathy that Galileo got.

Because nothing is certain, especially as PC changes goal posts ever so often — it went FROM stop-and-frisking even law-abiding black males in New York and pushing black issues to the back of the bus in favor of globo-homo TO the anointing of the loathsome George Floyd as the saint of our age and fanning riots & looting in his name — , the game is really about self-censorship.
So, even though one’s logic ends up being contorted beyond recognition, one convinces oneself that the PC-approved conclusion came by way of free discourse and attention to facts. Even though the result is the product of convolution under pressure, one must pretend it offers a solution based on truth and freedom. How else can we explain tards like Kathryn Paige Harden and their multi-layered BS. She is obviously a product of academic and media pressure trying to navigate through the harbor laden with mines, but she pretends she freely rowed her way to the truth.

The current order is especially confusing due to paradoxes of “the hoi polloi are harder to fool because they’re easier to fool” and “the elites(or 'haute pollaute') are easier to fool because they’re harder to fool.”

The hoi polloi are easier to fool because they hardly use their brains and have limited capacity for reason and interest in facts. It’s no wonder they are such easy suckers for blockbuster movies and silly pop songs. And junk food. They like what hits them right away, what makes them feel good.
This means they are less likely to appreciate things of complexity, higher value, or deeper meaning that aren’t always evident on the surface, on first impression.
But their simplemindedness and/or preference for common sense means they are less likely to fall for convoluted BS. While some things of deeper value aren’t immediately apparent(and shall always remain inaccessible to the hoi polloi), lots of highfalutin nonsense and ridiculousness will also. After all, not everything of ‘complexity’ and ‘sophistication’ have real value or innate worth. The hoi polloi may miss out on a lot of great classical music but they also miss out on Serial Music, which has almost no value. Or much of what passes itself as ‘fine art’ these days.

In contrast, elite-minded people are less easier to manipulate with hoary tricks. They are more likely to see through the BS of Hollywood movies and TV shows. If elite people make such tripe for the masses, it’s not because they themselves believe in the stuff but because it’s effective as control mechanism over the masses.

Elite people like to believe they’ve risen higher and become ‘more evolved’, i.e. they are ‘advanced’ in their thinking and understanding of reality, like physicists have gone beyond classical physics into quantum theory and the like. They think they’ve broken through the sound barrier. They are out in space intellectually. Whereas the hoi polloi are still gravitationally bound to the old ways of thinking, the elites make their own centers of gravity unbound from earth gravity. (Nationalism is about gravitational bond to homeland, globalism is about floating in space.) They believe they’ve cleared the hurdle and left behind ‘childish things’. They believe they have a higher mindset that is ready, prepared, and willing to accept new and higher truths.

But, here’s the rub: While attainment of complexity does require going beyond common sense, tradition, and conventionality, it can also be a conceit of superiority based on fashions. And this attitude has made the elites into easy suckers for every cockamamie nonsense that comes down the line. ‘Pregnant people’ than ‘women’ indeed. That’s what counts as ‘science’ among the elites these days. They’ve risen not to higher truth but just a higher form of sucker-dom, but their conceit blinds them to this fact. And because this conceit relies on the pride of going against conventionality, it’s difficult to tell what has value and what doesn’t, and this is where the ‘experts’ step in. To the hoi polloi, a film like Chantal Akermann's JEANNE DIELMANN is just excruciating boredom. And truth be told, most elite-types naturally feel the same way… but they believe themselves to have jumped the hurdle of conventional thinking and are thus open to other, more sophisticated, interpretations. And the ‘experts’ can exploit such eagerness and make the elites believe in just about anything.

Robert Weissberg: "Will Exhibiting Art by Black Artists End Rioting and Looting?"

Maybe the purpose isn’t to end the rioting and looting but to justify(and romanticize) them.

There’s an element of the battered-wife syndrome and (homo) rough trade in the abuse that whites take from blacks(and Jews of course).

In the battered-wife syndrome, the woman is either so dependent on or so besotted with her man that she keeps making excuses for the ongoing abuse. Oh, it must have been something she did. Oh, he didn’t really mean it and just flies off the handle sometimes. Moreover, she may feel it’s her duty to stand by her man, therefore guilty about any thought of abandoning or turning against him. And it could be that the guy isn’t always abusive but sometimes fun and endearing. It’s like Connie loves Carlo despite all his infidelities and brutality towards her in THE GODFATHER. More disturbingly, even as the wife fears the violence, a part of her may be turned on by the rages of the 'Real Man' who puts his ‘bitch’ in her place. Furthermore, it could be she is so dependent on him that she can’t conceive of a life without him. Of course, the dependency factor is more instrumental in white attitude towards Jews than blacks. Whites are so dependent on Jewish Money that they, especially the politicians, cannot conceive of any prospect without Jewish favors, approval, and backing. In D.C., Wall Street, Silicon Valley, Las Vegas, and etc., Jewish Money is the only game in town.

The wussified white race exhibits signs similar to the battered-wife syndrome. It always makes excuses for blacks. And just like the abusive husband/boyfriend can be charming at times, blacks can be fun and entertaining as pop stars and athletes. (After blacks loot and rob, whites always come around to rooting for blacks in the Rose Bowl and the Super Bowl. Blacks can act the thug, but whites will always return to swooning about them as gods, idols, and heroes.) Also, 'white guilt' means abandoning blacks is nearly inconceivable to the white psyche. (If anything, as if US and EU aren’t plagued enough by too-many-blacks, they are welcoming millions more from Africa and the Caribbean.) White Guilt has instilled whites with the sense that, whatever they achieve and how much money they make, their ULTIMATE meaning in life derives from serving the black race materially because only the black race(along with Jews) can spiritually redeem whites from ‘racism’. Whites saying NO to blacks is akin to Peter denying Jesus three times. Also, whites feel a sense of thrill and excitement in black thuggery and criminality. While most races are like lame farmers, blacks are still like hunters. Just like farm boys looked up to cowboys on horseback, law-abiding whites admire the black outlaw who be ‘badass’. Blacks are like the new Jesse James and Billy the Kid.

There are also similarities between how whites regard black violence and how homos used to feel about Rough Trade. On the one hand, homos wanted to meet up with other homos and have fun. However, especially in the past, homos felt a degree of self-loathing because society deemed homosexuality as either a sin or sickness or both. So, even as a part of them wanted to revel in homo behavior, another part of them wanted to be punished. It’s like the homo business man in MIDNIGHT COWBOY says, “I deserve it” when Joe Buck beats him up for money. Also, the more effeminate homos want to be dominated by tougher homos. White Race has been reduced to the homo businessman in MIDNIGHT COWBOY. Blacks kick white butt, and all whites can do is whimper, “I deserve it.”

Because blacks are tougher and more aggressive, the white race feels either wussified or homo-ized in relation to them. Then, it’s hardly a surprise that whites exhibit signs of battered-wife syndrome and rough trade masochism. Especially because Jews control media/academia and have long instilled whites with pathological guilt feelings about blacks, one side of the white psyche feels deserving of punishment at the hands(and fists) of ‘rightfully’ angry blacks, but another side of whiteness finds masochistic thrill in being pushed around by the alpha race, or the ‘real man’ race because of black domination in sports and pop music. Also, Jews push jungle fever to the max. Why do Jews show images of black men and white women in TV shows, movies, and commercials? Jews are saying Black Men are the REAL MEN, so white women should welcome ACOWW or Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs while white men might as well accept their lot as wussified cuck-dorks and maybe become trannies and compete in women’s sports(because they can’t win against black athletes).

MANUFACTURED DISTRACTIONS EP.02 | FALL OF SOUTH AFRICA - Black Pigeon Speaks

Gaysterics surrounding the Toronto Chick-Fil-A Opening exposes Gaysteria for what It's Really About: Hysterical 'Gays' push Compulsory Worship of Globo-Homo-Mania: Obey the Gay — Homo Hysterics and Nastiness suggest Homos should be called 'Vicious' than 'Gay', but then, those who are most Delicate and Precious tend to be Most Intolerant of Those who Refuse to bow before them — A form of Neo-Aristocratism as Mix of Pop Culture and Preening PC

The mentality behind Globo-Homomania is on full display in Toronto's opening of a Chick-Fil-A restaurant. Homos, trannies, and the deracinated straight worshipers of Homomania, aka Queertianity, are out in full force throwing tantrums and hysterics like it's the end of the world. Now, why would this be? Does Chick-Fil-A include in the orders of Chicken Sandwiches messages such as "Kill All Faggots" or "Queers Are Subhuman"? Do they have a policy of not hiring people because they happen to be homo? Will they not sell chicken sandwiches to assboys who indulge in fecal-penetration or to trannies who are planning to undergo penis-cutting to get fake 'vaginas'? No, it's none of the above. The great 'sin' or transgression of Chick-Fil-A in the eyes of the rapturous beholders of Dick-Fill-Ass is that it is (1) owned and operated by devout Christians and (2) believes in the true meaning of marriage as being between a man and a woman, one where real biology intersects with moral obligations.
The sheer hysteria of the reaction is a sure sign that the West is sick beyond belief. It's problematic enough for a society to tolerate excessive decadence and degeneracy, but as long as such are only being tolerated, there is at least the understanding that those aren't the standard-bearers of public morality. Instead, there's an understanding that a modern democracy must make for freedoms even if they aren't particularly moral or decent. But when the very agents of immorality, deviance, irresponsibility, self-indulgence, vanity, narcissism, perversion, and lunacy are allowed the moral high ground and righteous rage, there is something truly wrong at the core of society. Worse yet, when perversion is even consecrated as a matter of sanctity, then society has gone utterly batshit crazy, and that's where US, Canada, and EU are at this moment... largely thanks to the Power of Jews as objects of worship.

What is the Jewish connection in all this? When white people decided Jews, as the Holy Holocaust People, are infinitely wise, moral, spiritual, and all-knowing, it became virtually taboo to question Jewish proposals and agendas. Whatever the Jews wanted, they got, and as Jews kept on pushing for Queertianity to replace Christianity and for the abnormal to serve as the New Normal, whites just went along because, of course, Jews Know Best. After all, questioning Jews might be 'antisemitic', and that must mean you're a damned crypto-Nazi. Of course, it also helped that Jews have shitloads of money and control the academia/media. With money, they can buy any number of cuck-goy-whores to do their bidding. With control of academia, they shape the minds of young ones; Jews need not control all universities as 99% of academia take their marching orders from a few elite ones. With control of Media, Jews decide who gets to work in the information-and-communications industry, and invariably, it's the globo-homo-brainwashed whores of Zion. One thing for sure, when a people become deracinated, de-spiritualized, and hollowed out, they become so EASY. Easy to dupe, easy to manipulate, easy to control, easy to use like dogs. White people, having lost their sense of roots, spirituality, and morality, are now so EASY, mere putty in the hands of Jews. It's so pathetic.

Now, what is most insane about Gaysterics or 'gay' hysteria is its rabid and delirious tendency to hyperventilate about ANY argument or position that isn't totally conducive to their demands as the End of the World. Ironically, the very people who condemn binary-thinking in 'gender' are super-binary in their conception of Good and Bad. Indeed, they believe themselves to be not only Good but oh-so-very-great and holy-shmoly. And the other side that refuses to an unconditional surrender to all their demands isn't merely bad or wrong but downright evil. They think in 'Good War' terms of World War II where the Bad Guys were so bad that they deserved to be literally annihilated unless they agreed to total unconditional surrender. These rabid homos want to politically, morally, and spiritually nuke anything that won't bend over to their deviance and perversion as the New Normal. So, there can be no compromise or mutual understanding. Tolerance and legal protections to be homo and do homo things in their own space aren't enough for them. No, there must be compulsory proselytization of Globo-Homo-mania and Queertianity as the Neo-Religion or Mass Cult for all the peoples of the world.
In some ways, such worldview makes sense given that trashy and shallow Pop Culture has become the core culture of most people in the West. Having grown up idolizing vapid celebrities who adore homos who fashion their hair and airbrush their image, nothing matters more to current Western Culture than vanity, narcissism, hedonism, and self-indulgence. Then, it's hardly surprising that homos, who are well-known for their shameless flamboyance and precious glamour-strutting, should become the Face of the West. Homos are so full of flagrant self-worship as well as fragile self-pity — but then the two things go together as the self-worshipful are 'triggered' by those who won't join in the worship of them — that they throw a fit if people don't agree that what they do is the greatest thing since sliced bread(or baked buns). Imagine a fat ugly woman with a diva mentality. She thinks herself so hot & gorgeous, and simply cannot tolerate anyone who speaks the truth that she is fat and ugly. Homos are that way, and it seems trannies are even worse. Tranny men(or men-pretending-to-be-women) seem truly baffled as to why men are not attracted to them. The idea that men don't like fake 'women' who look masculine and have dongs or fake vaginas never comes up their radar because their pathological narcissism jams any view or notion that runs counter to their diva-like self-worship. Then, it's not so difficult to understand why homos and trannies are flipping out in Toronto. It's not about feeling threatened for their lives or losing their individual rights in a modern democracy. It's about being outraged that a business and its customers dare to espouse the view that homos are not holy, true marriage and real family shouldn't be associated with homo-fecal-penetration & tranny-penis-cutting, and that a healthy & decent society should not be promoting and pushing Globo-Homo-Mania, aka LGBTQXYZ as some kind of mass cult or neo-religion.

The fact that homos are now pushing 'gay' colors into churches and even mosques goes to show that the Homo Agenda hasn't merely been a secular struggle for individual rights for homos. Homos, like Jews and blacks, are especially self-centered, self-worshiping, self-pitying, and megalomaniacal. Just like it's not enough for Jews to be equal with goyim, it's not enough for homos to have the same legal protections as everyone else. No, homos and trannies demand that entire rules and laws be altered and perverted so that they will be favored over other peoples. Seriously, if homos are all about 'equality', why don't we shut down entire streets to celebrate real sexuality and straight people, aka NSMFR(Normal, Straight, Male, Female, Real). Or how about having massive street parades celebrating incest or same-family-sex? Why aren't people ragging about 'incestophobia'? Why don't we have massive S&M pride marches? Why is our society so fixated on homos(and trannies who are protected by homos who are, in turn, protected by Jews)? It's not about equality but homo supremacy. It's like Jews bitch about white identity and do everything to shut down BDS, but all politicians and Americans-of-status must bow before Zion and sing hosannas to Jews/Israel at AIPAC Conferences. Jews and Homos are NOT about equality but hegemony and supremacy. Indeed, one reason why Jews pushed the homo agenda was because they believe that homo minority-elite-supremacism will complement Jewish minority-elite-supremacism. You see, Jews are always thinking and strategizing in terms of "Is it good for Jews?" or "Is it Great for Jewish Supremacism?" This is why homo vanity is especially out of control. It is the spoiled brat princeling of the Jewish king. It knows it has the protection of Jews, the most powerful people in the world.

While it's true that homos in the past unduly faced persecution as the result of misunderstanding of homosexuality as a Mental Illness(by the medical-psychological community), overt religious hostility, and/or bullies picking on 'faggots' as easy targets, we mustn't lose sight of the fact that there is something about homo-personality and tranny-personality that makes many, even most, homos and trannies very problematic in their attitude and behaviors. Even though homos and trannies made social gains by spewing forth about 'equality', the thing is homos and trannies feel special, even superior to the rest. Homos see themselves as whoopity-doo natural aristocrats; they are so vain that the likes of Tim Cook thinks that his homo-fecal-penetrative behavior is blessed by god. So, bung-donging is not a sin but a win. As for trannies, it seems many, indeed most of them, consider themselves 'more woman' than real women. If homos have a combination of aggressive masculine traits and bitchy 'mirror mirror on the wall' air about them, trannies have a combination of female diva-ism and male conquer-ism. There is the homo god complex.

Furthermore, the reason why so many straight people and 'normies' have come to revere, even worship, homos and trannies was not out of regard for social equality but out of fascination with what appears to be superior. After all, the great contradiction of the so-called Liberal Democracy is that it claims to be about equality of individual rights but happens to be most obsessed with uppermost winners of dog-eat-dog competition. In other words, most people in a Liberal Democracy are disregarded as 'losers' while all the attention go to the Winners. Because of the homos' favored proximity to elite power, their success in fashion & entertainment, and representation in Deep State, many people look up to homos as a superior breed(even though they don't breed). Seriously, would homos be getting all this adulation if most of them weren't involved in media, entertainment, fashion, and elite institutions? If they weren't such servile suckups to the powerful and privileged, like the Will Patton character in NO WAY OUT? Homos gained power the old-fashioned way. They kissed the asses of the powerful so that their asses would be kissed one day. Okay fine, but let's not pretend this is all about equality. If most homos were living in trailers and drinking moonshine, no one would give a damn about them. It's like, if Jews were mostly low IQ and dumb, no one would much care about the Shoah, aka Holocaust, and all those whore-politicians would not be singing hosannas for Zionists to beat up on Palestinians.

Liberal Democracy has one thing in common with communism. Ultimately, both aren't about equality but about being 'more equal than others'. Both ideologies are obsessed with hierarchy yet wrap their power-worship with mostly empty talk of 'equality'. In a way, modern politics is the art of masking hierarchy with 'equality', like what the elites who graduate from Harvard and Yale do. They all gravitate toward power, privilege, status, and wealth, but they veil what they really DO with what they love to SAY, which is the usual rigmarole about fighting 'white privilege'. Imagine that, all those Jews, Hindus, yellows, mulattoes, and white cuck-collaborators striving for status and privilege(to gain, keep, or expand), but whining endlessly about how they are all about ending 'privilege'. But given capitalism is about winners and losers, it will always be about the privileged ruling over the unprivileged. Communism was anti-capitalist but turned into George Orwell's Animal Farm. In a way, the sheer hysteria so common among Jews and homos owes to the worrying fact that they are having a harder time justifying their power, privilege, and control over society on the basis of 'equality'. They need to shout and holler about EQUALITY to drown out the fact that they are the most powerful and privileged members of society, and if anything, they've been doing everything to expand their power and privilege even further. Notice how enough is never enough for Jews. They want more money, more power, more control. And homos were never satisfied with compromises and concessions; the way the fruitkins are going, they clearly want to be worshiped as the new gods of demento-neo-pagan Queertianity.

The current age is downright demented because it not only insists homosexuality has equal value & validity as real-sexuality but has an even greater claim on our respect and admiration. Now, it's bad enough to pretend equal value. While one can argue that homos as individuals should have the 'equal right' to do their own thing, what sane person would say homosexuality has equal value as real sexuality? Name one life that was created through ass-buggery or lesbian poon-rubbing. Since when is a male anus a sex organ? What would be the purpose of sperm ejaculated into a poopchute? All of life, even homo life, has been created by real sexuality, not by homo-fecal-penetration, and yet, we are supposed to believe that homosexuality has equal value as real sexuality? It's crazier than believing that Hannukah is as American or Western as Christmas.
But then, it has gotten even crazier, what with the dogmatic conviction among so many that a fake tranny 'vagina' is just as much a poon as the real vagina or that a hairy guy with wig and penis/balls is just as much a 'woman' as a real woman because... he just feels like it. It's bad enough to pretend ass-buggery and penis-cutting have equal value as real sexuality that creates life, but it's far far worse to elevate them above real sexuality, even to the extent of hoisting 'gay' colors inside and outside of churches. Don't these cucky-wuck morons realize that Jews regard the 'gay' banner as their Victory Flag over goyim? Haven't they figured it out yet that the Globo-Homo stuff is essentially the proxy arm of Jewish supremacist hegemonism? Apparently not. Or maybe so many deracinated and emasculated whites are now so worshipful of Jews and homos that they are only too happy to roll out the red carpet to the Jewish King and Homo princeling brat. After all, most of humanity is more about Will to Cower than Will to Power. Most people prefer to bow down before the Power. It's like, whites have become so awed by black prowess in sports, rap, and sex that they are now happy to surrender their manhood, womenfolks, and lands to blacks. It's no wonder so many whites in Europe are resigned to their nations being Africanized. They figure blacks deserve to win and take over because they got more muscle, louder voices, more aggressive personalities, bigger dongs, and bouncier buns. In our electronic-pop-cultural world, 'viscerality' counts for a lot, and the race that comes across with the most sensual power is the object of most celebration or worship. This is why blacks are especially dangerous to any non-black nation saturated with pop culture and sports mania. If many many Mexicans or Hindus move to a white nation, the chances are they won't gain success as athletes and pop stars. As such, they may do okay or even pretty well economically, but they will not captivate the imagination of white folks. But even if a few blacks enter a white society, there's a good chance that some of them will succeed in the upper echelons of sports and pop music. And word will get around white women that black men got bigger dongs. With such visceral prowess, blacks will become the much idolized celebrities of a white nation. Consider Japan, a nation with few blacks. But despite their fewness in number, they are taking over Japanese sports, and Japanese women are already into massive jungle fever and Japanese men are happy to be cucky-wucks to finish off whatever manhood was left after the total humiliation to the white man in World War II.

Anyway, if homos really do believe that their 'sexuality' is equally valid and valuable as real sexuality, why do they demand and take so much from real sexuality? Notice how whenever homos want to have a 'gay family', they filch children created by real sexuality. The children of 'two mommies' or 'two daddies' are not the product of homo ass-buggery or lesbian-poon-grinding. They are all the products of male sperm and female eggs. If homos really believe in the biological validity of their deviant 'sexual' acts, they should create life by 'inseminating' feces with sperm up the poopchute. And maybe two lesbians can create a child by rubbing their clitorises together. Of course, homosexuality cannot produce life. And no matter how much a tranny tells himself that he's a 'woman', he has no real vagina and no uterus. That why, if homos want to have a 'gay family', they must filch children created by real sexuality. Our culture is familiar with Margaret Atwood's HANDMAID'S TALE, but if anything in our world resembles it, it's the notion of the 'gay family'. Homos take children created by real sexuality and PRETEND that they themselves 'had' the kids through homo-fecal-penetration or lesbian-poon-grinding. It'd be like a communist who, knowing his system cannot produce the Mercedes, takes the car from the capitalist but then pretends it's a communist car by labeling it with hammer and sickle.

Now, why is it so important for Jews and Homos to compel us to believe in their nonsense? It's like the twisted totalitarian logic in George Orwell's 1984. Real power is not about forcing people to believe in the truth. After all, with reason and/or facts, people can be led to believe that, yes, 2 + 2 = 4. Even if people are forced to accept that truth, they can come around to believing that it is indeed true. Thus, truth would be the ultimate power. Power would serve the truth than vice versa.
In contrast, the most awesome kind of power is in compelling people to believe what is NOT true, or 2 + 2 = 5. Because reason, facts, and senses militate against such falsehood, it takes a special kind of power to force people to believe, and by 'believe', I mean really believe. After all, anyone can pretend to believe 2 + 2 = 5 under pressure or duress. Lying comes naturally to people in a tyrannical order. But what if the Power can really and truly make people believe that 2 + 2 = 5? Now, that is some serious power. In Orwell's 1984, such belief in nonsense is realized by use of physical and psychological torture, ultimately by making Winston Smith come face to face with his greatest phobia. But, taking cues from Aldous Huxley's BRAVE NEW WORLD and Edward Bernays notions about the power of advertising(rooted in Pavlovianism), capitalist Jews found out that people can be led to believe, truly believe, in nonsense via psychological and physical titillation. Associate 'gay' stuff with fun, thrills, joy, happiness, radiance, rainbow colors, festivity, celebration, consumerism, food & drink, white picket fence, sitcom humor, 'spiritual' rapture, and etc. (In contrast, associate anything or anyone opposed to the 'gay agenda' as 'repressed', irrational, ignorant, and/or ugly... like the Westboro church.) Such associations persuade people that 'gay' is as essential as fresh air and clean water. The implication is that No 'gay', then no fun, no sun, no meaning, no celebration, no life, no righteousness, no 'spirituality'. Such titillation and sensory-override work like the magic of music, overriding reason, sense, and reality. When the Power can make people believe, especially with passion, what is not true, it has tremendous sway over the masses. It's a much greater(and darker) achievement than forcing people to believe and accept what is true and real.
But then, there is a side of humanity that wants to believe in fantasy over fact because the former has more to do with hope. It's been duly noted by scientists and laymen alike that spirituality or mythicism comes naturally to humanity. As important as facts are, they are what they are, grim and limiting. So, we like to believe in God, gods, angels, spirits... even witchcraft and crystals. In our Godless age, the Power sold us Globo-Homo-mania(along with Magic-Negro-Worship and Holocaustianity) as the 'spiritual' answer for mankind. Believe in tootkins as angels and wave the 'gay' banner like it has magical powers. It's no wonder homos have been called 'fairies' because 'gay' and tranny culture is like a fairy-tale. As if by magic, two men who bung-dong each other can be 'two daddies' and 'have children'. Or, as if by some miracle, a man can become a 'woman', much like how a frog can become a prince or the Beast can turn into a handsome feller. In a culture where so many people obsess over comic-book superheroes, Harry Potter stories, and the Force(in STAR WARS), is it any surprise that so many proved to be so EASY in manipulating with globo-homo nonsense?
Of course, this may be said of all religions as there is no factual evidence of God, Jesus as the Son of God, Muhammad as last Prophet, angels, or miracles. But plenty of people choose to believe them because the notion that SOMETHING can override reality and make dreams come true gives them hope. It's like David in A.I.: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE can never be a real boy but, being more-human-than-human in his programming, he hopes, prays, and believes in the impossible, the fantastical. Still, there is surely a difference between the great religions with their depth of meaning & richness of mythic symbolism AND the tawdry & trashy spectacle of Globo-Homo-mania with its self-indulgence, vanity, vapidity, childishness, & ugliness. Even among the fantastical, certain visions carry greater meaning than others. Just like THE ILIAD and THE ODYSSEY are more than MY LITTLE PONY, the great religions are more than homo-and-tranny self-celebration of ass-buggery and penis-mutilation as akin to the miracle of the rainbow. Ridiculous but true, so many people who've fallen under the spell of globo-homo really believe they found THE meaning of life, but they have no idea that THE JEW IS LAUGHING AT YOU, just like a drug-pusher is amused by the junkie who thinks he's found heaven when, if anything, he's just become a mental slave of the pusher.

In a way, the relation between homos and straights is like between gods and mortals. Gods worship themselves whereas humans worship gods. Gods are intoxicated in their own greatness, superiority, and/or holiness, whereas humans are dazzled by the awesomeness of gods. Thus, Globo-Homo works differently for homos and straights. It's about homos worshiping themselves and about straights worshiping homos. The relation between Jews and white goyim are much the same. Jews worship themselves while white goy cucks worship the Jews. Just like mass adulation warps the minds of celebrities whose narcissism goes through the roof, all the 'gay' celebration from the straight community has really intoxicated their minds of homos. There was a time when homos and trannies used to worship themselves in their own communities. It was a game they played in a world of their own, in their ghettohomo. To the straight community, 'gay' vanity could only be sold as 'camp' as it was understood that most straights couldn't keep a straight face looking at all that tooty-fruity behavior. LA CAGE AUX FOLLES is hardly TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD. But with Jewish control of media, academia, and deep state, homo stuff was aggressively promoted as the New Normal, or even the New Conservatism(for the National Review cuck crowd). Thus, what was camp turned into champ, what with stuff like PHILADELPHIA and BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN marketed as grand moral statements of our era. So, one of the birthplaces of American Democracy became the center of homo holiness, and the American West became the land of cowpokes poking each other's ass. Now, I'm sure there were cowboy homos who did their homo things, but Ang Lee's movie was less honest story-telling than myth-making propaganda. With all the crossover appeal, many straight folks began to buy into globo-homo nonsense. Also, with the demise of Old Religion, the sheer stupidity of Modern Conservatism, and absence of Old Liberal Issues(the last great one being the Civil Rights Movement), so many straight people gravitated towards globo-homo as the new frontier in 'moral' crusade, 'spiritual' salvation, and the hipster culture of 'creativity'. Once straights began to praise and revere the homos, the naturally narcissistic and vain homos went nuts with self-regard that soon turned into highfalutin self-worship. Thus, homos went from struggle for Tolerance to demand for Reverence. And that is why homos get triggered so gingerly over what they deem to be the teensiest slight. It's like a king or prince will be outraged by the slightest sign of disrespect from the inferiors. How dare they! "Do you know who I am!?!" So, even as homos play the 'victim', they display all the signs of wanna-be gods, neo-aristos, globo-monarchs, or spoiled-brat princelings.

After all, what is it about Chick-Fil-A that is SO offensive to the Dick-Fill-Ass crowd? Did Chick-Fil-A publicly say homos are less than human? Did they say homos should be rounded up and shot? Did they say homos should be fired from work? Did they say homos should be denied individual rights to be 'gay'? No, the only thing Chick-Fil-A has stated is that it's run by devout Christians who believe in True Marriage, the definition of marriage as understood by all of humanity until Jews came around and decided 'gay marriage' is a 'human right'. But then, if homos are so self-confident and sure of themselves, why would they need validation by being included into an institution that makes biological and moral sense ONLY AMONG real-sexuals? After all, what is the point of homos getting 'married' when fidelity is the last thing on most homos' minds? Also, why associate a moral institution with gross and deviant pseudo-sexual acts such as homo-fecal-penetration, lesbian-poon-grinding, and tranny penis-cutting? And if marriage is about production of family, what biological sense does it make to associate marriage with ass-buggery, lesbian-poon-mashing, and/or trannies-getting-fake-'vaginas'? On the one hand, homos say they are so proud to be 'gay' and stand apart from the straight community, yet, at the same time, they demand that homo behavior be accepted and legitimized by institutions that came into existence to specifically serve the needs of the real-sexual NSMFR(Normal-Straight-Male-Female-Real) community. What a bunch of half-assed louts and punks.

But being blind with preening self-regard and self-worship — indulging naturally narcissistic homos is like giving alcoholics more alcohol — , homos react to any difference of opinion or lack of respect for what they do and are about with extreme hysteria. It's like gods raging over how the mortals won't offer sacrifices to them. It's like kings and princes being outraged that the peons won't work even harder so that the effete elites could enjoy their lives even more. "I mean, how dare they!?" So, any sentiment that isn't ardently pro-homo is regarded as infamy. Then, if the owners and operators of Chick-Fil-A hold forth that homo behavior isn't dignified in the eyes of God, homos think in terms of "Why do you want to kill us?" or "Why don't you regard us as human?" If people say homo-fecal-penetration is gross, unhealthy, and dangerous, homos think, "Why do you want to round us up and throw us in concentration camps?" Gaysteria is much like all the nuttery about illegal immigration. Mere border security is denounced as Nazi-like! If someone says he believes in true marriage, one that grounds the most important social institution on real biology and true morality, homos freak out and say, "Why do you want take away our freedom and lock us up in dungeons?" Gaysteria is totally bonkers. Imagine if Bill tells Bob, "I don't respect what you're doing", and Bob reacts by freaking out and saying, "Why do you deny my humanity, why do you want to destroy me, why do you want to kill me?" Overreaction, right? Well, homos and trannies are all about overreaction, and they can get away with such loutish behavior(as when some crazy tranny trashed a store because the store clerk called him 'sir') because they have the backing of powerful Jews who use homo-horsewhip and tranny-tyranny to terrorize much of society with the notion that the great majority must accommodate the wishes and demands of elite minority elites, be they homo or Jewish.

Now, why are homos so obsessed with food. I suppose food has played a meaningful role in all cultures. Foods were offered to the gods on altars. Some cultures had taboos against eating specific foods because certain animals were deemed 'sacred'(as with cows in Hinduism) or filthy(as with pigs among Jews and Muslims). For most of human existence, few people could take food for granted and most of their activity was devoted to procuring food by hunting or agriculture. It's been said some Americans Indians apologized to the animals they killed.
Modern man no longer believes in hocus-pocus about food — even though many Jews, Hindus, and Muslims continue to observe their dietary laws — , but so many people obsess over nutrition and health, seeking advice from mystic sources, often from the Orient. But for most Americans and Westerners, food is what they associate mostly with easy pleasure. While not everyone can enjoy sex, fancy lifestyles, travel, and the like, even poor people can pig out and have a good time with burgers, fries, hot dogs, chicken, cakes, ice cream, donuts, sodapop, and etc. Enjoyment of food, especially fast food and sugary drink, has become the universal 'privilege' for all Americans(and even in poor nations as obesity is now a problem even in the Third World). Because so many people associate pleasure with fast food, it has been politicized and associated with certain agendas and idols. What other explanation is there for associating so much of fast food and drink with homo stuff? I mean, what does 'gayness' have to do with cookies, hotdogs, pastry, sugary drink, ice cream, and etc? Why are homos so adamant about targeting bakeries and cake shops? How did 'culture war' turn into a Food Fight?

In a way, what the homos are doing is akin to what Jews have been pulling forever with the Kosher label. Even though most people in US and Canada are not Jewish, they are forced to pay the kosher tax on almost all food items. Why should they? Even if this tax is negligible in monetary terms, who are these Jews to force goyim to buy foods that have been kosherized? Via kosher taxation, it's like Jews are laying 'spiritual' claim over all food. Likewise, homos(with the full backing of Jews) are pushing something like the 'homosher' tax. Food companies are made to pay lavish sums to advertising firms(run by Jews and homos) who associate pleasurable foods with 'gay' stuff. Because advertising is part of the cost, we are all being made to pay the homosher tax. This is why no self-respecting person should buy any product that is associated with homosherism. They are being forced to pay what is essentially a 'gay tax'.

HomOreo cookies because when you bite into a cookie, the first thing that comes to your mind is a bunch of assboys doing homo fecal-penetration on one another. Or maybe you think of a penis being mutilated to make way for fake 'vagina'. 

Campbell Soup advertises its soup by showing two 'gay daddies'. Where is the mother, and what is her role in the life of her child? If the kid is an orphan, why not place him in a house that resembles a Real Family? Anyway, I suppose when we eat soup, what comes to our mind is 'two daddies' fecal-penetrating each other and sucking each other's dongs.

Burger King or Bugger King advertising. It says "We Are All Same Inside", but how about "We Are All Shame Inside"? I suppose the inside of a vagina is the same as the inside of a bunghole full of fecal bacteria. Even if straight men and homo men have the same organs inside, they sure use them differently. Homo men take dongs up their bungs, a good way to spread disease and illness. If the Ad meant that we are all the same spiritually inside, there is a huge difference between true morality based on facts, reason, & health and fake morality based on fantasy, deviance, & decadence.

The power of association is incredible when we consider the uses of homosher-ism. After all, why would any consumer of fast food or drink soda-pop want his or her goodies to be associated with homo-fecal-penetration, tranny-penis-cutting, or fat hairy men with balls beating real women in sports? Who wants to eat fried chicken or a burger thinking of ugly butch lesbian bitches? This is where the power of association comes in. Due to Jewish control of the media, many people no longer associate homosexuality with such things. Indeed, the term 'homosexuality' is rarely used in public discourse that favors 'gay'(even though so many 'gays' are grumps, or g-rumps) or LGBT or LGBTQ though it keeps on gathering new letters, what with there being 50 or so 'genders' and all. So, we are not supposed to think about what homos really do to one another or what trannies must undergo in order to alter their 'genders'. No, we are just supposed to associate homos and trannies with pronouns or the 'rainbow'. Since everyone is dazzled by rainbow colors and since homos & trannies have been associated with the rainbow, so many people have come to ass-ociate homos and trannies with childlike wonderment. It's like if a homo passes you, the street you walk upon has been sprinkled with magic. And it's because homos have been associated with such things that so many people have become welcoming of homos. This is why even idiot churches now adorn homo colors. No church would hang pictures of homos buggering one another or trannies getting their penises mutilated. Such would be profane in churches. Now, that is what homosexuality and tranny stuff are REALLY about, but because they've been associated with 'rainbows', so many institutions are willing to fly the 'gay flag'. Oh, it looks so dazzling and colorful! And then, the rot spreads further. Since the most powerful institutions and biggest industries fly the 'gay flag', countless status-seeking people all over the world come to associate success, respectability, and prestige with 'gay'-ness. First, homosexuality was associated with 'rainbow' colors, and then those colors were associated with power and wealth. Thus, anyone who strives for success or wealth(or to be admitted into such a community) comes to feel that there is nothing fancier and precious than 'gay' stuff. It's incredible that despite humans being many times more intelligent and knowing than dogs, their minds are just as easily manipulated via the power of association. Dogs can be led to associate the sound of bell with food, and humans can be made to associate homosexuality & tranny-stuff with the 'rainbow' and then to associate 'gayness'(what the 'rainbow' stands for) with success, power, and privilege.

As for the hoi polloi, all that matters to the elites is that such fools are made to associate their favorite pig-out foods and sugary drinks with 'gay'. Every time they eat a whopper from Burger King(or Bugger King) and see it advertised with homo colors, they are likely to associate satisfaction with homo stuff. Thus, stuffing food down one's throat becomes associated with stuffing dong up the bung. It's like "yummy-yummy-yummy-I-got-gay-in-my-tummy". And this is precisely why Chick-Fil-A is so threatening to the Dick-Fill-Ass crowd. Because its chicken sandwiches are so popular and delicious(according to many, as I've never tried it myself), there is the fear among homos that many people will come to associate yummy-pleasure with conservative values, Christianity, and tradition. In the politics of pleasure, homos demand that all the goody stuff be associated with their symbols and agendas. Come to think of it, the chutzpah or poopchutzpah of the homo community is truly incredible. Even though Chick-Fil-A is a Christian operation, it doesn't promote God, Jesus, and Old Time Religion as gushingly as so many other food companies proselytize holy homo stuff. In the 80s, Dominos Pizza chain was owned by some Catholic man who donated some of his profits toward Pro-Life causes. The thing is he did it on his own time. He didn't push his belief or conviction on the consumers or advertise his pizza as being about Pro-Life or Catholicism. In contrast, we have all these homos working in advertising and media who endlessly promote gay-gay-gay by associating it with things that have NOTHING to do with homosexuality or trannies. I mean, when you sit down to eat soup, do you think of two homos fuc*ing each other in the ass? Do you think of some fat guy in a wig making an appointment to have his penis cut off to make way for a fake 'vagina'? Do you think of 'two daddies' raising a kid who grows up in a home where one of his 'daddy' buggers his other 'daddy'? These homos are worse than Jehovah's Witnesses who go from door to door pestering everyone. These homos, in partnership with their Jewish masters,
spread their 'gay' shit all over the world via advertising, entertainment, media, and even churches, as if Jesus died on the Cross so as to honor guys who bugger each other or to bless men who beat up women in sports and aspire to have their dicks cut off to make way for fake pooters(or cooters as the case may be). Just imagine the nerves of these homos who insist that every time we consume our favorite take-outs, we think of sodomy and tranny-penis-cutting as magical 'rainbows'. It's as if homos are telling us, "When you drink coke, just tell yourself that me and my boyfriend fuc*ing each other in the ass is what the fizz is all about." "When you take a munch of that delicious fried chicken, think of the Pride of having one's penis cut off to make way for a 'vagina'." 'Gay Pride' should really be called Poo-Ride. Of course, homos are so arrogant that they now just call it 'pride' as if they now own the entire term. Homos are doing with terminology what Jews did with Palestine. Carving and claiming it one piece at a time. It is Verbal Nakba. When we drink cola, are we to think of homos urinating on each other at bathhouses? Be that as it may, we must never lose sight of the fact that all this homo shit is the proxy of Jewish supremacist power. JATE or Jews Are The Enemy.

In the past, homos were at least known for their creativity and aesthetic sense. As there was no massive displays of 'gay pride' back then, homos had to channel their creative energies and expressions toward more worthy goals and endeavors. But ever since homos have been allowed to wallow in their narcissism and self-worship, their creativity has spiraled into a funnel of preening self-absorption. It's like what happened to Federico Fellini after 8 ½ or Terrence Malick since his much vaunted return with THIN RED LINE. Even with their eyes wide open, all they could see was the bubble of their self-inflated egos. One might say something similar happened with blacks since the advent of rap. Why bother to write good songs when you can just rap endlessly about 'muh gun', 'muh dick', 'muh dough', 'muh bitchass ho', and etc? If Negroes are lost in their childish rhymes, homos & trannies(and the like) are lost in their pronouns.
Also, homos no longer need to do or achieve anything to be worthy. Homos feel that they are special and superior in some way for the simple fact that they take dongs up their bungs. And even so-called 'conservatives' have caught this bug, which is why so many were delighted that Milo the 'gay Jew who takes it up the bung from a Negro' was on their side. Wow, the jackpot of holiness in Milo: Jewish, homo, and taking it up the ass from a Magic Negro. When homos bask in 'pride' merely for being 'gay', they've grown lazy and corrupt. And such laziness doesn't foster originality. Indeed, all this pronoun-silliness is sham intellectualism. If anything, the fact that so many people are willing to jump on the pronoun bandwagon is proof that they are utterly lacking in ideas, thought, or sense. They are likw dogs who play fetch with whatever the master throws in the air. Since Jews control the academia & media and recruit homo pseudo-intellectuals to come up with stupid shit, all the idiot minions run and play with whatever is tossed their way. Is it then any wonder that the utterly dull and boring fruiter singer Sam Smith came out as 'they'? I guess it is now too easy and boring to come out of the closet as 'gay'. Too many have done that to death, and as too many homos get affection and adulation just for being 'gay', they have to add another element to their identity to feel even more special... and for the moron Sam Smith, it is to declare himself 'they'. Yeah, his soul must be so big that it must be made up of millions of 'me's.

The Paradox of Equality’s Origin in Oppression — George Orwell’s ANIMAL FARM as HBD Tale — Jewish Supremacism and Jewish Resentment of Aesthetic Injustice

We are accustomed to thinking in terms of oppression versus equality. We resist oppression to be free, and freedom allows for equality. Thus, oppression is the enemy of equality. People throughout history have rebelled against oppression for equality. Overthrow of oppression means freedom, and freedom must mean equality, right? There is much truth in this in that an oppressive order is obviously unequal. Those with the Power use the means at their disposal to perpetuate a system whereby some are on the top and keep the rest on the bottom. So, naturally, an oppressive order is unequal. What could be gained by opposing and challenging oppression? Is it the hope that the oppressed will be equal with the oppressors? But this is impossible because resistance and overthrow means that the oppressors will be destroyed or expelled. What if the goal of the rebellion was for ALL people to become equal with the oppressors? But how could this be possible? If peasants rise up against the noblemen, could both sides arrive at a compromise where EVERYONE will be equal as a nobleman? But how can a society be made up entirely of noblemen? Who will do the hard work out in the fields? Who will do the heavy-lifting and the drudgery necessary to keep society going? If everyone cannot become like the privileged oppressors, should the goal be to get rid of the oppressive element altogether? Without oppressors, will all the people, in their newfound freedom, become equal with one another? But without oppressors to hold down the people, won’t some use their freedom and smarts to rise above others? And in time, won’t they become the New Oppressors?

Paradoxically, it appears that the concept of equality couldn’t have been possible without oppression. Even though an oppressive order throughout history has been inherently unequal, it forced a kind of collective equality for most people. For most of history, only a few people were part of the royalty, nobility, and elite clergy. Just about everyone else was more or less equal as slaves, serfs, servants, toilers, peons, peasants, soldiers(whose lives were all-too-expendable), or worse. Even though various classes or castes existed that perpetuated a complex hierarchy, it wasn’t much of an exaggeration to say most societies were divided between the 1% and the 99%. For most of history for most human communities, there was hardly anything that could be called a ‘middle class’. Rather, it was the elite oppressors and the unwashed rabble. And because the elite oppressors had most of the power & wealth and threatened & terrorized the rest of the population into compliance and obedience, there was a coercive kind of mass equality. It wasn’t an equality of freedom but of tyranny. But the perverse truth has been that NOTHING is more effective in enforcing equality than tyranny. While the tyrants are far more powerful and privileged than the rabble, they use their power to force the masses to hunker down, bow their heads, and just accept life as it is. One of the most egalitarian orders is the prison, and why? It is essentially tyrannical. The prisoners, regardless of their ability or background, are given the same clothes, fed the same meals, and must deal with the same conditions. It is one place where a lawyer with high IQ convicted of murder must share the same cell with a derelict with low IQ convicted of murder. It is in prison that people who’d known privilege and power all their lives come face-to-face with brute equality. And they realize that equality is essentially the product of repression and coercion.

Imagine an order made up of high-IQ Jewish geeks, low-IQ black thugs, capable Germans, mediocre Mexicans, unimaginative & earnest Chinese, thieving Gypsies, stilted American Indians, haggly Arabs, boorish Russians, and etc. Suppose they are all placed on a giant tanker in the middle of the ocean. The ship is closely guarded by a ultra-repressive force that metes out ruthless violence to anyone who messes around. All people on the ship, regardless of identity or background, are made to eat the same food, do the same kind of work, and own the same minimum property. They are all prisoners, and they must all comply with the rules. There is no opportunity to rise higher or do much of anything. They must all toil and perform similar basic tasks regardless of their innate ability. So, it doesn’t matter if someone has the brains of Albert Einstein or the physical might of Mike Tyson. They must all mop floors and do their share of daily drudgery. While this order is clearly oppressive and even though there is great inequality between the oppressors on ship and the oppressed prisoners, the fact is most people on the ship, being prisoners, find themselves to be equal with the others. Shared oppression and the suppression of their innate abilities are the great equalizers in terms of status and condition. Now, would such sense of equality and shared experience have been possible IF NOT for the oppression? Suppose all these various groups had encountered one another without coming under the equalizing force of the oppressors. Would the concept of equality ever have passed through their minds? Did humanity discover the meaning of equality only under shared oppression? Was equality the product of oppression? Then, how ironic that mankind came up with the idea of overthrowing oppression in the name of equality. After all, if oppressors are overthrown, there will no longer be a power that forces people to be equal. Some will rise higher and come to rule over others. This is why communism could only exist as Theory of Tyrannical Justice. If the oppressors are overthrown and if the people are allowed to do as they please, their freedom will lead to the rise of all kinds of hierarchies where some will be on the top, some in the middle, some on the bottom. Equality must be maintained by force by the dictatorship of the proletariat. The difference between the Old Order and New Order would be that while the masses were forced to be equal as exploited peons under the Old Order, they would be equal as protected workers in the New Order. If people in the Old Order were equal in having been used as human cattle, the people of the New Order would be equal in being forced NOT to exploit one's fellow man. But if the New Order has anything in common with the Old Order, it'd be that the people would be forced to be equal as members of the Working Class.

Take George Orwell’s ANIMAL FARM. Under human oppression, all animals are more-or-less equal. Even though some animals are much smarter and far more capable than others, they are all equal in the sense that their main value to the farmer is as livestock and cattle. Humans are not interested in their intelligence or ability. Pigs may be much smarter than ducks, chicken, and sheep, but as far as humans are concerned, pigs exist to be slaughtered to make bacon, ham, and other stuff. So, if animals come to value equality as any kind of virtue, it’s only because human oppression forced all animals to be more-or-less equal. Even the magnificent horse is raised mainly to serve human needs, and when the time comes, it too will be slaughtered for profit. Humans think of animals in terms of profit-or-pleasure value. So, what does it matter if pigs are far more intelligent than sheep. If people want bacon, they will kill the pigs just like they kill the sheep... or chicken or ducks or whatever. There is a huge difference in intelligence and ability between the smart pig and the dumb hens, but they’ve all been equalized by human oppression. Pigs have been forced to be equal with all the other animals that are far dumber and far less capable. And even though the horse is a more impressive creature than other animals, its worth is assessed in the same manner: "What value does it have for humans?" So, the horse has no intrinsic, individual, or independent value as far as humans are concerned. Its only value is to be assessed in terms of its usefulness or profitability to humans. It's like Jews believe that goyim have no value other than to serve Jews. (This means that Jews would have innate value even if not a single goy existed in the world. But if Jews were to vanish from the world, goyim would have no reason to exist because the only value for their existence is to serve Jews. Without Jews to serve, they might as well just die.)
All animals are equal as peripheral planets that must revolve around human need and ‘greed’. If the animals come to value equality, it is only because they share the equality of oppression under humans. It’s like the scene in THE FUGITIVE. Harrison Ford plays this rich doctor with a nice house and beautiful wife. But when he is falsely convicted of murdering his own wife, he is made equal with all the losers, derelicts, and lunatics on death row. And if Gandhi truly tasted equality for the first time in his life, it was when the whites called him a ‘coolie’ and forced him off the train in South Africa. It was oppression that made Gandhi look around and feel equal with the rest of the downtrodden colored folks. When Gandhi had experienced freedom and privilege as a law student, he wasn’t looking to be equal with anyone. He wanted to rise high and be with the privileged folks, white or colored. It was only through oppression that he tasted equality with the masses he never really thought about until then.


In ANIMAL FARM, what happens to equality when the humans are overthrown? Initially, the idea is that equality will go from a condition to an ideal. As properties of humans, most of the animals were more-or-less equal under condition of human oppression. Equality had been imposed on them. In their shared misery under human ‘greed’, they came to value equality as a kind of camaraderie. It went from a condition to an ideal. And the dream was that once the humans were overthrown, animal equality would be sustained and strengthened through mutual respect. But without the flattening effect of human oppression, pigs realize that they are much smarter than other animals. Being so smart, they figure they should lead and take charge. Initially, they say they deserve the power because they will use their smarts for the good of all animal-kind. But as time passes, pigs begin to feel contempt for the lesser and dumber animals. They find it insulting to pig-hood that they must remain equal with animals such as chicken, ducks, horse, and the like. Even as they invoke equality as an ideal, they feel that equality was something that had been forced on them by humans who, in their narrow-minded greed, regarded pigs as no more valuable than the dumber animals. As far as humans were concerned, chickens existed to provide eggs and pigs existed to provide bacon and ham. Deep down inside, pigs resented having been forced to be equal with the rest of the dumb animals. They were actually special. Because they couldn’t prevail over humans all on their own, they forged an alliance with the other animals. The full force of the beast rebellion ousted the human oppressor, the farmer. Because pigs gained power with the help of other animals, they had to keep the grand bargain. Despite their higher intelligence, they pledged to devote their ability toward serving the common good of all animals. But due to their gluttonous porcine instincts and the natural contempt of intelligence for dumbness, pigs weave an elaborate web of lies whereby they become more and more powerful and less equal but in the Name of Equality.

Though George Orwell was a socialist and ANIMAL FARM is a satire on Stalinism, it can now be read more as a tale of HBD(human bio-diversity) than ideology. It’s essentially about how biology reasserts itself in a state of freedom and creates a natural hierarchy that favors the clever and devious over the earnest, naive, and dumb. Once humans are gone from the farm, ideology bends to biology. Despite the collective ideal of equality, the fact is biology comes to determine who gains the power. Smart win over the dumb. The ruthless and devious win out over the naive and childlike. Higher intelligence and personality-of-cunning win out.
While 1984 is the greater work, indeed Orwell’s masterpiece, it is more particular to a certain time and place. Though many observations of 1984 are still applicable today, it is very much a satirical indictment of Stalinism. Though ANIMAL FARM was intended as an allegory of what happened to the Soviet Revolution, its larger implications are more relevant than ever. Indeed, it now says more about what happened to Russia AFTER the fall of communism than under Stalinism. For starters, even though it could be said that the Bolsheviks, especially Stalin and his henchmen, betrayed the ideals of Marx(and perhaps Lenin), they were genuine ideologues. Stalin was a serious communist, as were those around him. And even though they gained great power and privilege, they were still committed to the Revolution and weren’t mainly focused on material wealth. Even though they lived better than most people in the USSR, they were not obsessed with riches and good times. They were committed to creating a new kind of society. If Stalin really wanted to live lavishly like Gaddafi, Kim Il Sung, Shah of Iran, and etc., he certainly could have. But in fact, he didn’t wallow in luxury and essentially led the life of a bureaucrat. Also, even though smart and cunning people took power under Bolshevism, Stalinism was not about the triumph of HBD. Indeed, unlike most of the smart Bolsheviks, Stalin was not Jewish. He was a Georgian, and he surrounded himself with mostly non-Jews at the highest levels of power. In ANIMAL FARM, Napoleon(Stalin) the pig wins out over Snowball(Trotsky) the pig. Napoleon wins mainly by raising puppies to grow up to be his attack force. He doesn’t have to go through the trouble of outwitting the other pigs or win arguments because the dogs around him have been raised to be loyal to him and to obey him. He has power beyond mind and wit. He has the power of blind loyalty. The dogs will maul anyone who disagrees with him, and Terror and Fear Factor become the ultimate arbiters of policy. Napoleon wields the dogs like Jews in the US use Antifa to attack and silence any opposition. Orwell was right to illustrate how Stalin prevailed over Trotsky by the use of Blind Loyalty and Terror, but I wonder if it was accurate to portray Stalin and his henchmen also as pigs. Though Stalin was pretty bright and recruited some men of considerable intelligence like cretinous Beria, triumph of Stalinism was ultimately not the victory of intelligence and ability but of mediocrity based on loyalty, fear, and discipline. Perhaps Stalin in ANIMAL FARM should have been portrayed as a wolf pretending to be farm animal that surrounds itself with loyal dogs.

If any period in Russian history truly resembled what happens in ANIMAL FARM, it was the post-communist heyday of the 1990s when Jews gained control of Russia and could do pretty much as they pleased. That truly was a Time of the Pigs. Whatever may be said of Stalin faction vs Trotsky faction, both sides were genuinely committed to the Revolution and Communism. Trotsky could be cunning and headstrong, and Stalin could be ruthless and manipulative, but there was no doubt that they were committed to the Revolution. So, what happens at the end of ANIMAL FARM doesn’t really apply to Stalinism. Stalin’s USSR was a brutal place of terror and fright, but it remained, from top to bottom, a system committed to Marxism-Leninism. It was after the death of Stalin that the elites of the USSR grew more cynical and apathetic. But these elites were more like mules than pigs. Men like Brezhnev took the helm for their utter lack of imagination. The system regarded them as 'safe'. And despite rising corruption and expanding privileges of those in the inner circle, there were limits to how much one could enrich oneself as long as the communist system remained in place. It was with the fall of communism that piggishness really ran wild in the USSR. If there was communist ideology to restrain individual greed and material self-interest in the 1920s and 1930s, the 1990s were an era of hog-wild for the New Russia. Granted, there was the new ideology of the End of History that said Russia was ripe for ‘liberal democracy’ and ‘free markets’ that would supposedly lift all boats in an era of privatization and profiteering for all the Russian folks, but that didn’t happen. Most of the wealth went to a handful of Jewish oligarchs who were supported by Global Jewry mostly centered in the US. So, what happened in the 1990s of New Russia more closely resembles what happens in the final part of ANIMAL FARM. It was all about the smartest people in Russia, the Jewish pigs, slurping up all they could find and then some. It didn’t matter that some of these Jews had been communists or had communist ancestors. They invoked ‘liberal democracy’ and ‘privatization’ as cover to rake in as much as they could for themselves. And like the utterly cynical pigs at the end of ANIMAL FARM, the Jews of the 1990s had only one thing in mind: "We Jews grab and loot everything." Say what you will about Stalin the mass killer and tyrant. The fact remains that he and those around him were mostly True-Believers in communism. That’s one thing you can’t take away from Stalin. He died a communist. He may have violated all sorts of Marxist principles, but he didn’t take power just to pig out for personal gain. But that is precisely what happened in the Russia of the 1990s. And if Stalin favored loyalty and mediocrity, Russia of the 1990s favored the most ruthless and nihilistic kind of Jewish smarts & greed to run wild. Of course, Jews did much the same in the US with the Dot.com bubble and Housing bubble, but thankfully the US economy and system were sturdy enough to withstand Jewish greed gone hog-wild. Unfortunately, Russia was too weak, dazed, and disoriented after the fall of communism to weather the piggish Jewish onslaught that ravaged Russia 100,000x worse than any band of Cossacks who, at most, ransacked one village at a time. Jewish Globalists were like Mentally Advanced Cossacks or Mongols who’d devised global strategies to descend upon any vulnerable nation like a swarm of locusts to devour as much as they could until they set their sights on a new target. These Jews are like George Soros the vulture-hawk who is perched high above and looking for the next kill. When Jews spot the next prey, they all coordinate their actions and move in for the kill and take all they can. Jewish globalists are glocusts.

But then, Jews pose a problem to all societies because they are most pig-like in their intelligence(higher) and appetite(voracious and insatiable). Indeed, Karl Marx said as much about Jews, and if anything, argued that one of the reason why capitalism must be destroyed is because it enables Jews, the kings of capital, to go crazy with greed and mess up all the world. Letting Jews practice capitalism is like letting pigs loose on the farm; they will dig up and eat everything. It’s like taking fat black women into an all-you-can-eat fried chicken joint. It’s like homos entering a bathhouse. Jews just can’t help it. They see that money, and they go crazy. They got to have more and more and more... like in THE WOLF OF WALL STREET.

Jewish personality and Jewish intelligence are a marriage made in hell. Jewish personality is arrogant, sneering, pushy, contemptuous, rabid, and virulent. Jews often say ‘anti-Semites’ are ‘rabid and virulent’, but so-called antisemitism is a strong counter-reaction to Jewish foulness. Jewish intelligence is restless, tireless, and obsessive. Jewish personality and Jewish intelligence conspire to act like pigs with locust-wings. Jews are like a swarm of flying locusts. Just like pigs dig up and devour the roots of all plants, Jewish pigs gnaw at the roots of all cultures and sever a people from their identity, territory, and roots. Jewish pigs have been digging up and destroying the roots of European folks. Jews are now even going so far as to change European mythological and historical figures into blacks. So, Lancelot and Achilles are made black. So is Julius Caesar. And white cucks go along as they worship the Holy Negro, and blacks love it because they believe that their innate ‘badassness’ makes them the superior race, and that means everything great and noble must be associated with blacks even if blacks had nothing to do with it. The logic goes as follows: PC says blacks are great, so if there was a great European figure, his greatness should be conflated with blacks because blacks are great. Blacks = Great, just like Homos = Pride.

Flying Jewish Pig with voracious appetite about to devour a city

Flying Jewish Pig with restless intelligence figuring out how to take over the world

Even though the pigs don’t spell it out in ANIMAL FARM, they seem to be especially angry at humans for having forced them to be equal with the lower animals. How dare the humans to have treated pigs the same as all the other creatures that aren’t possessed of high intelligence, cleverness, and the power of will? So, even as pigs lead the dumb animals, they feel contempt for them. They feel the insult that the humans had regarded them, the smart pigs, as hardly better or higher than ducks, chickens, and sheep. Pigs, with their ambition and ability, want to be like humans. But because of the history of human oppression of animals, including pigs, they also want to destroy humans. Pigs wage war on humans but to become the New Humans. They claim to represent the animals, but they find it insulting for their kind, the superior pigs, to be associated with dumb animals. In a way, pigs are not the villains of ANIMAL FARM. In the end, they are following their own nature. It’s not so much that they choose to be evil. It’s that the power of biology and nature inevitably drives the pigs farther away from the rest of the animals that simply aren’t all that cunning and capable of brain power. Granted, pigs become evil in the sense that they betray their stated ideology, but the principles were an accidental product of certain conditions. Because humans oppressed all animals more-or-less equally, pigs found themselves in the same straits as the rest of animal-kind. And since they needed collective effort to overthrow the humans, pigs embraced egalitarianism. But once the humans were no longer around to impose and enforce the equality-of-oppression on the animals, nature took its course and favored the smarter and more cunning pigs to rise higher than the rest of the animals. Sure, the pigs lie and cheat a lot, but then, being smart is about finding ways to run circles around the less intelligent. Take gambling. Why is it such a big industry? Because smart people dupe so many pathetic dummies into giving up their money. If a Jew told some guy, "How about you give me $1,000", the guy would give the Jew the middle-finger. But if the Jew shows the guy a machine with lots of flashing lights that offers the promise of a jackpot, the guy may happily blow his $1,000 that ends up with the Jew. The clever Jew took his $1,000, but the guy thinks he had a swell time because of the fun machine with flashing lights. (How pathetic that the GOP relies so heavily on Las Vegas for funds. So much for the Family Values party.)

Anyway, we can learn much about Jewish psychology by considering the pigs of ANIMAL FARM. Why were Eastern European Jews so bitter? While some Jews became fabulously rich, especially in Western Europe, many Eastern European Jews faced limited opportunities and hard times. Though smarter than the goyim, many had to toil as working-class folks and small-time peddlers. Many couldn’t rise much higher than the poor goy sods who toiled the fields or factories. And this drove many Eastern European Jews toward various forms of radicalism ranging from anarchism to communism. But subconsciously, just like the pigs of ANIMAL FARM, they must have felt resentment that they, the smart and special Jews, had to rub shoulders with the dimwit goyim. The People of the Book had to make common cause with people-who-couldn’t-read-books. Being tireless, restless, and intelligent, many Jews made able revolutionaries, and they were instrumental in exploiting the crisis of WWI to take power. Because of their experience of oppression and deprivation, many Jewish Bolsheviks were sincere in their commitment to communism, at least consciously. But Yuri Slezkine’s THE JEWISH CENTURY indicates that, early on, the victorious Jewish communists began to realize that the upper echelons of the New Order was filled with Jews. Even though they dare not say it openly, there was a sense that they, as smarter and more capable commissars, should take control of the USSR. And as they began to gain dominance in the elite institutions, they grew ever more distant from the rabble, the masses. All that had been denied to Jews under the Tsarist system was suddenly open to them. There was no institution, however high, that shut its doors to Jews. Jews could enter the innermost sanctum of power under the New System. And they took full advantage. The more they did this, the more they realized, at least subconsciously, that they are not part of the rabble, the dimwit toiling masses. They were meant for higher and better things. They were becoming the new elites, the new aristocrats. And yet, because they came to power in the name of the Revolution devoted to equality, they tried to square elitism with egalitarianism. Just like the pigs in the early stages of the revolution in ANIMAL FARM, Jewish elites sincerely wanted to believe that they deserve special privileges because people-of-the-mind must think and strategize without the distractions of the daily grind. And yet, what happens when one’s elite position becomes entrenched? And when one marries someone of similar intelligence & ability and raises one’s own kids to also be part of the system?

In the US, Jews are the most powerful and the richest people. They are the least equal and most privileged. And despite Jewish feminist bitching, Jewish women make more money than goy men. Jews got almost all the media, much of Wall Street, almost all of Hollywood & Gambling, the biggest prizes in Silicon Valley, and etc. Most politicians are bought-and-sold whores of Zion. Jews control elite academia and mold the minds of young goyim who will manage the West according to the wishes of Jewish oligarchs and neo-prophets. And yet, because of Jewish perception of history wherein they were oppressed along with the rest of humanity, especially by Europeans/whites, Jews still act like they’re in rebel-egalitarian mode. Of course, Jewish historical perception is seriously warped. While it’s true that there were periodic outbursts of violence against Jews in Europe, Jews also did things that understandably pissed off many Europeans. Jews collaborated with Moors who occupied Spain. Jews later aided the Turkish takeover of Constantinople. Jews were heavily involved in slavery and the selling of millions of Slavs to North Africa and Middle East. Also, Jewish financial power funded much of Western imperialism, and it was Jewish David Sassoon who was the main seller of opium to the Chinese. And in the American West, Jews sold guns to white people to kill Indians with. So, Jewish historical perception is perversely selective and bogus. Because Europeans sometimes bashed Jews, Jews would have us believe that they were of kindred spirit with black slaves and non-white subjects of Western Imperialism. More often than not, Jews were funding the black slave trade. They were working with Western Imperialists in the colonization of non-white lands and profiting most handsomely. Yes, there was Shoah, but Nazi madness was a historical reaction to horrible Jewish behavior in the Soviet Union(where millions died under Bolshevism) and in Weimar Germany where Jews acted like Russian & American Jews in the 1990s. Shoah, horrible as it was, didn’t just happen out of blue for no reason at all. Rather, like Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it was an extreme reaction to extreme actions. Just like Japanese bad behavior led to events that spiraled out of control and led to the mass-bombing of Japan(and the deaths of many innocents as well), Jewish bad behavior led to massive reaction that went mad and committed a horrific genocide. Nothing justifies the Shoah, but Jews got burned by playing dangerously with fire. If you piss off enough people, don’t be surprised if things get out of control and you get burned twice as bad as you deserve. Angry people lose all sense of limits. Jews have a way of pissing people off, and Jewish behavior today in finance, media, culture, and politics really makes us wonder if ‘antisemitism’ was irrational or unjustified. I can’t imagine how any sane person could not be anti-Jewish in today’s mad climate of Jews gone rabidly and virulently hog-wild.

Just like the pigs, Jews seem to harbor a two-front hostility. On the one hand, they continue to see the White Race as the Eternal Goy Enemy, the people who, as Christians, persecuted Jews for over 1,000 yrs and carried out the Holocaust. Jews want to get back at whites as much as possible. Jews want white nations to be inundated with non-whites. Jews want white wombs to be colonized by blacks and want white men to become castrated cucky-wucks. Jews still see themselves as champions of progress against the forces of White Reaction and ‘Racism’. As the leaders of the movement, Jews see themselves as allied with the wonderful and noble People-of-Color, especially the blacks. But on the other hand, Jews seem to be resentful that past white denial of equal opportunity to Jews forced Jews to identify with the inferior and lower orders of society such as ‘white trash’ working class, blacks, browns, yellows, and etc. The smarter and superior Jews were put in a situation where they had to make common cause with the dummy rabble of the world. But just like pigs needed the other animals to overthrow the humans, Jews have needed allies as they simply don’t have the numbers. In the USSR, they eventually lost out because their quality of power was so overwhelmed by the quantity of power of non-Jews. And in the US, the Jewish-favored Democratic Party kept losing elections from the Nixon Era to the Bush I era. Thus, Jews relied on Mass Invasion-Immigration whereby the contract between Jews and non-white immigrants would be (1) Jews would keep pushing for more non-white mass entry into US and (2) non-whites would vote for the Democratic Party to keep Jewish elites at the helm. But how do Jews really feel about jive-ass blacks, mediocre Mexicans, lame-personalitied Asians, swarthy Muslims, and grubby ‘dotkins’? Deep down inside, Jews wanted to be with the white race. But the white race’s response ranged from "You can’t join our country club" or "You can’t marry my daughter" to the Holocaust. Or, that’s how Jews remember things.
Of course, whites have now changed their tune and want Jews as allies against the darkies. The White Conservative proposition to Jews is, "We will embrace you Jews as fellow whites, indeed as superior and best kind of whites, on condition that you work with us and for us against all those darkies." But why should Jews take the bargain when they got even more power, privilege, and prestige than the whites? Whatever appeal such an offer may have had many decades ago, it’s hopeless when Jews already got just about everything that counts in the US. Jews have gained Jewish supremacist power in the US, and their main obsession is to keep whites in Submissivist mode to serve Jewish supremacism. Jews no longer see white elites as superior people to aspire to or model themselves after. Jews respect only one thing, and it’s smarts. Once Jews figured that they are smarter than whites, their attitude has been, "You dumb whites serve us Jews or shut up." It’s like blacks measure everything by physical toughness, and once they realized that they could beat up whitey, their respect for the white man went down the toilet. Blacks had more respect for whites in the distant past when they feared the white man as a frightful character. But upon watching all those white boys knocked out by black boxers, blacks came to see white boys as ‘slow faggoty-ass mofos’. Blacks see white males in the way that white males see Hindu, Mexican, or Asian males. Not seriously.
At any rate, Jewish hatred for whites isn’t just about memory of past injustice or contempt for dimwit white goyim. (Imagine how William Kristol must have been laughing to himself when he used to tell the world that Dan Quayle was the most credible candidate for the 1996 election.) It’s about Jewish self-image. Rightly or wrongly, Jews feel incredibly ugly. They feel God gave them a raw deal in offering the Covenant but denying them beauty. While there are plenty of attractive Jews, the general idea is that Jews, by and large, are gross and ugly. Jews really feel this way even if they may not admit it. Some Jews react to this self-image with humor and mockery: Woody Allen, Mel Brooks, Howard Stern, Marx Brothers, Don Rickles, Albert Brooks, etc. Some turn to sexual extremism, like Philip Roth in some of his novels, and the likes of Harvey Weinstein with their perversions(that largely set off the #MeToo mania). In some ways, this is what angers Jews the most, why they hate whites the most. It is bigger than history or any theory of justice. It is bigger than intelligence. It’s like the character of PORTNOY’S COMPLAINT is many times smarter than the shikses he bangs, but he feels powerless before them. And in CASINO, the super-smart Jew, who calculates every move, gambles everything on the blonde shikse whore. Also, Nazism was essentially an aesthetic movement to preserve Aryan Beauty from the clutches of Jewish ugliness. What troubles Jews is that even as they rail against the Beauty Cult of the Nazis, they can’t help acting according to Nazi stereotypes. PORTNOY’S COMPLAINT and other such Jewish tales in books and movies do indicate that Jews believe in racial hierarchy in beauty. Jewish men want to stick their dongs into ‘Aryan’ shikses and generally dislike the looks of Jewish women. (Lately, Jewish women have formed their own cunt-covenant or clit-covenant or clitonant with history, and they’ve decided to let their pussy-craving dictate their behavior, and this has led to massive Jungle Fever among the Jewish American Princesses.) The fact is even if all whites denounce Nazism forever and profess their sympathy for Jews, Jews will continue to resent the white race for superior beauty that makes Jews look ugly and gross in comparison. Now, we can’t blame whites for being more attractive as such would be irrational. After all, white beauty is not the creation of ‘anti-Semites’. Still, like the envious three sisters in CINDERELLA, ugliness resents beauty. Even beauty resents beauty, as in SNOW WHITE where the Queen is offended that there is a woman who is prettier than she. Just like ancient Jews called for the smashing of all false idols, modern Jews want to desecrate white beauty that keeps reminding Jews of their inferior looks and ugliness. Jews have pride of higher intelligence and stronger personality. But one must make an effort with intelligence and personality to achieve things. In contrast, beauty is effortless in attracting attention and affection. And Jews hate this about whites even though it’s not whites’ fault that they are prettier. So, how do Jews handle this? Some Jews just marry whites. But other Jews seek to desecrate and destroy white beauty through promotion of miscegenation, especially with blacks. This is why Jews promote Jungle Fever among white girls. Especially Jewish women who feel great envy for blonde ‘Aryan’ women want white wombs to produce children with flat noses, fat lips, and kinky hair. They want white wombs to produce kids that look like baby monkeys.

Jews promote ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs so that white women will give birth to kids that look like this. Jews, who are so envious and resentful of white beauty, seek to destroy it by having it mixed with other races, especially blacks. Jewish girls will celebrate with joy when the beautiful white girl whom they've envied all their lives go with blacks and produce some kid who looks half-simian. Jewish feminists used to bitch about sexualization of women into objects, but they no longer do so because so much of sexuality in pop culture now promotes Jungle Fever that will encourage more white women to destroy the posterity of their beauty by going with 'groids' and producing from their wombs kids who identify as 'black' and work against the white race. Of course, Jew-run media give special attention to such race-traitor whores.

Though Jews tend to moralize their gripes against whites, the fact remains that the MAIN reason for Jewish hostility toward whites is aesthetic. Indeed, suppose your average Jew looked like Clint Eastwood or Paul Newman(a very handsome half-Jew) whereas most whites looked like Ralph Kramden or Rosie O’Donnell. Jews would be happier, more at peace with themselves, and less hateful of whites.
Jewish God is a jealous God, and this jealousy was a projection of Jewish personality, the most jealous personality in the world. Jews feel they must have everything. Jews are jealous of Russians for having all that land. Jews want it for themselves. Jews want to own and control the US, the lone superpower. Jews want control of all of media. But one area in which Jews lose out is in looks, and this makes them furious. Consider the very semitic-looking actress in MULHOLLAND DR.(at 42 sec of the video below). Even though she’s an insignificant character in the movie, people who look like her are all over Hollywood. Imagine what is going through their minds whenever they see some pretty shikse. I don’t know if the actress Kate Forster is Jewish, but David Lynch clearly made her out to look Semitic with frizzy hair. Also, it’s strange that she is introduced as ‘lovely Martha Johnson’ when she is clearly made out to look unfeminine and ‘alien’, hardly waspy like ‘Johnson’. Jewish self-image fuels much of the neurosis that drives Jews to act crazier, more reckless, and more pathological in world affairs. It wouldn’t matter if Jews weren’t powerful, but they are very powerful, and just like Hitler projected his pathology onto the world, Jews are doing much the same, and this bodes ill for mankind. Some Jews have maintained that Wasps are all looks but no soul whereas Jews are no looks but all soul, but what if Jews are no looks and no soul? Not many seem to have entertained that possibility. In BROADCAST NEWS, the Jewish guy lacks looks and grace but speaks much truth and stands for principles whereas the wasp guy is nice-looking and likable but so shallow and without scruples. But the fact remains that Jews have maintained total control of much of the media, and with each passing year, they’ve exhibited less and less principles and integrity. Things got worse with the rise of Boomer Jews. At least older Jews grew up with some culture of restraint and dignity. Boomer Jews who grew up with permissive individualism and insatiable egotism have no inner brakes in using media or whatever instrument at their disposal as their personal sex toys.



Anyway, what can we say about the future when Jews, the least equal people on Earth, insist on carrying on as the champions of equality and fairness? What can we say about Jews who bitch about ‘white supremacism’ but then demand that all whites go into submissivist mode and support Jewish Supremacism all around the world, even the IDF death squad’s shooting down of hundreds of Palestinian protesters commemorating the 70th anniversary of the Nakba pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map, surely an act far more grievous than Japan’s invasion of Manchuria or Germany’s takeover of Czechoslovakia. When Jews sound the alarm about ‘white supremacism’, they are not denouncing supremacism per se but rather demanding that whites must suppress any sense of white identity and interests if they are to serve as agents and puppets of Jewish Supremacism. After all, why would a people who primarily care about their own race and culture prioritize the serving of ANOTHER people? If slaves began to put their own interests first, why would they serve the master? Jews are triggered by something far less than real white supremacism. I can understand Jews being freaked out by genuine neo-Nazis(though Jews don’t seem to mind forming an alliance with such ilk in Ukraine), but Jews fear run-of-the-mill white identity even more. While neo-Nazism can easily be discredited, white identity and interests that call for limited white nationalism in white nations is NOT supremacist and, if anything, anti-imperialist. Such white people are saying white/Western nations should NOT meddle in the affairs of non-white nations, and in turn, non-whites have no right to demographically inundate and invade white nations. It sounds reasonable, and that is why Jews are trying to smear such views as ‘far right’ and ‘nazi’. Because if white people gain sensible nationalism and mind their own business, they will be far less likely to sign up to serving Jewish globo-homo supremacist imperialism.

In the Animal Farm of the future, what we need is separate nationalism for each species of animals. Let horses have their corral, let ducks have their pond, let chickens have their coop, let cows have their pasture, and etc. Let all animals get along but also respect each other’s spaces. And all animals must tell the pigs to keep to their own pigsty. Let pigs do their own thing. Sure, pigs, being smarter, can do much for other animals, but due to their piggish nature, pigs will just manipulate and abuse others for their own aggrandizement; it's just part of their nature; they lack nobility of heart despite their superiority of mind. So, it’s best for other animals to be wary of the pigs. And lest pigs use dogs to frighten and pressure other animals, the Animal Farm of the Future needs to re-train dogs to regain their autonomy as free dogs and not serve as lackeys and Janissary of the pigs.

Of course, on some level, Jews know that equality is no longer tenable given their great power and privilege. Why would Jews want equality? In a truly equal world, Jews as 2% of the population should make up only 2% of media, academia, law, Hollywood, high-tech, and etc. What Jew would want such equality? Jews love and cherish their immense power. This is why Jews came to favor Diversity over Equality or try to trick people into believing that Diversity is the New Equality when, in fact, Diversity leads to even more inequality as it brings together different peoples with wide-ranging variances in ability and talent. Not for nothing is California the most diverse and the most unequal state. But Diversity among goyim means they will be too busy squabbling among themselves to be able to unite against the Jews who will just 'eat like effendi'.