Beware of Nominalism — Why Russian & Chinese National Fascisms are Necessary Bulwarks against Jewish-Gangster-Globalist-Fascism — Paradox of How the US destroys true democracy around the world by promoting its parasitic brand of deep state Imperial Democracy

Michael Lind: "Another answer is that members of the establishment are almost all nominalists. That is to say, if they give something a name, it takes on real existence in their minds. The Afghan National Army offers a perfect example. Because we called it an army, gave it lots of American money, equipment and training, and knew its order of battle, it was an army. But it wasn't."

'Democracy' is a word game in our political culture of nominalism, or judging things by name or brand than what it really is.

Fascist Theory of Power is true. All things of power turn 'fascist'. Ideology gives into the true dynamics of power, and the winners(or at least survivors) subscribe to all or most of the pillars of power-essentialism.

Jews used to be socialist, anarchist, communist, liberal, libertarian, or etc. Today, Jews are overwhelmingly tribal. They are now focused on power, not principles. Of course, they tirelessly invoke principles but only to twist and bend them to the needs of power, not the other way around. Fascist theorists understood this nature of power and human nature. In time, all things, at least those with the will and wherewithal to survive and gain in strength, turn fascist. A movement can start from the right or the left, but the end result for survivors and winners is the intersection where fascist truths converge. It's been said fascism was defeated in WWII, but only a kind of fascism met such fate. What we've seen since is the rise of new fascisms but guised as something other. Indeed, all post-WWII fascisms have postured as 'anti-fascist'. Even fascists hate the label because it's too candid and forthright about the nature of power. Just like people wear clothes to conceal their nakedness, most forms of power cloak themselves with rhetoric about 'higher principles', 'freedom', 'social justice', or 'the people'. Indeed, even Italian Fascists and National Socialists did this with their overripe reliance on myths and cult of personality. It was to hide the essentially gangster nature of those in power who, far from embodying the noblest qualities of their civilizations, gained position by a good measure of cunning opportunism and backroom compromises.

Supposedly, the end of the Cold War was also the End of History, with liberal democratism and free markets triumphant all over the world. But Francis Fukyomama got it all wrong. The passing of the Ideological Age didn't lead to the rise of the Individual Age but to the Globo-Tribal Age, one where a group(Jews) that refused to abandon its tribal identity &power urged upon all others to do just that. Following WWII, the ideal had been universal nationalism or universal tribalism: Each nation would embrace nationalism but against imperialism as a violator of national independence. Indeed, both the US empire and Soviet empire during the Cold War justified their hegemony as the guarantor of nationalism against the imperialism of the other side, e.g. USSR supported Cuban and Vietnamese nationalism against American Imperialism, and the US supported Polish and Hungarian nationalism against Soviet Imperialism.

But following the end of the Cold War, the new mantra wasn't nationalism-for-all but one-world globalism, or the (not-so)gradual erasure of all nationalism to bring about a New World Order with US as the lone superpower guaranteeing freedom of individuals and markets all over the world. According to Fukuyama, the future was about universal individualism for all nations under the protective power of the US as the great post-national empire, one that used its might not to dominate and exploit others but to emancipate them and open them to opportunities.
Whatever one thinks of this idea, pro or con, the people who gained dominance in the West had other ideas. While Jews pushed deracinated globalist individualism to everyone around the world, they themselves stuck to Jewish supremacist tribal-nationalist-imperialism. Thus, the New World Order was really Jew World Order, with one set of rules for most of the world and another set of rules for the Jews. This contradiction has perhaps been best exemplified by the diabolical figure of George Soros.
Jewish aim wasn't to simply join the global humanity but to rule as the master race over the rest. Notice Jewish Power has been about mass migration for all nations but NOT for Israel. Jews insist on white deracination but demand that whites praise and champion Jewish Power and Zionism. As such, the agenda of universal individualist-globalism was deeply marred(and even doomed) because its most fervent proponents, the Jews, refused to apply it to themselves. It's like the Sacklers pushing opioid junk on goyim. As far as Jews were concerned, globo-individualism was for goy suckers, not for themselves. It was to weaken goyim and bring about their dissipation into atomized individuals, all the while Jews would empower their networks and embolden their identity. (True, many Jews intermarry with goyim, but the children are raised as Jews, just like black-white pairings lead to 'black' kids. In any race-mixing, one race gains dominance over the other. It's like all those mestizos are labeled as Latino, a European-derived identity.)

So, the New World Order after the Cold War was a two-faced beast. On the one hand, as Fukuyama pontificated, it was about the spread of post-ideological and post-national global-universalism of individualism, free trade, and rule of law. (Rule of Law is problematic in a world where a tiny cabal uses its legal and financial dominance to rewrite any set of laws. While goyim are expected to obey the laws, Jews get to rewrite them as they please. Rule of Law used to mean defense of free speech as a Western principle, but with Jewish rewriting of laws, it now means the police can arrest you for speaking truth to Jewish power, Homo idolatry, or Black thuggery. Worse, Rule of Law is useless when Jewish-controlled US, as the lone superpower, does as it pleases around the world. US is illegally occupying the oil-rich parts of Syria but gets away with it. So much for Rule of Law.)

Now, post-national globo-individualism is anathema to many on the Right(and some on the Left who oppose capitalism), but it was doomed to create havoc because of Jewish supremacist hypocrisy. Perhaps, the globalist agenda would have panned out better in Russia had Jewish advisers been more principled and dedicated to fairness and justice. Instead, Jews exploited the opportunity to rape Russia... which turned most Russians against globalism. And in the US, Jewish Power grew ever greedier. Via ethically dubious machinations of finance and big tech, Jews got richer and richer. By suppressing BDS, Jews created a system where Jews can call for boycott of any political group or any Muslim nation but no one can call for boycotts against Jews and Zionism. Jews in power get to decide what is 'terrorism'. When Israel does it or supports it, it's never called 'terrorism', but false-flag events in Syria, of which Assad isn't guilty, are labeled as such. Even non-existent crimes of Assad are deemed 'terrorist' by US State Department and Jewish-controlled mass media, whereas Israel's endless terror-bombings of Syria and its support of ISIS goons never are.

What Jews did to Muslims, they've also done to whites who are now being denied platforms, free speech, and financial services. Samuel Huntington wrote about the Clash of Civilizations, but the most important one was not between the West and the Muslim World. It was between the West and the Jews, but people failed to see this because (1) there were too afraid to speak truth to Jewish Power (2) they were too philosemitically beholden to Jewish Power (3) Jews are regarded as part of the West because of assimilation.
Huntington spoke of Western Values vs Muslim Values, but the main threat to Western Values came from Jews who'd penetrated deep into Western institutions. While tolerance for homos can be said to be a part of Western Value, since when was Celebration of Sodomy a Western Value? Since when was Western Values about fifty genders and the fantasy that a fat guy with penis and balls is a 'woman'? Since when was the deification of black thuggery and Afro-savagery as neo-sainthood a Western Value? Since when was Jungle Fever and White Male cuck-maggotry a Western Value? No, all these sicknesses had no roots in Western Civilization but were planted as poison seeds by Jews. But Huntington focused on Muslims. Sure, Muslim values are at odds with Western values, but why were there so many Muslims in the West in the first place? Why did Europeans become so accepting of the Great Replacement and Diversity? (For most of European History, the West was about defense of the race, preservation of Classical Civilization, faith in Christianity, and/or Rationalism & Enlightenment. What passes for 'western values' in the Age of Globalism is anything but.)
And why did the West stir up the hornet's nest in the Middle East with interventions, wars, and support of terrorists(usually against Arab secular regimes war with Islamic fanatics who were mainly funded by Saudis, key allies of the West)? Granted, Huntington expounded his views before the West went fully 'woke' with globo-homo and BLM nonsense. Still, the main flaw of his thesis resulted from fixating on Muslims than on Jews. Even 9/11 wouldn't have averted if the US, under Jewish pressure, hadn't gotten so mired the Middle East, especially beginning with the Gulf War under George H.W. Bush. 9/11 was essentially blowback with the winds fanned by the hidden hand of Zionist gangsterism. Idiot Muslim terrorists were the sailboat, and Jewish Power was the gods blowing the winds in certain directions. Just like how the gods guide men vs men in THE ILIAD.

The Jewish refusal to surrender to globo-individualism(that was really meant for goyim) doomed the principled foundations of globalism. Whether one supports or opposes globalism, one could at least acknowledge its principled universalism had it demanded the same of ALL peoples. But for Jews, it was a case of 'you goyim take the medicine while we Jews play doctor'. Russians woke up to this, and globalism failed in Russia. But there was another factor. China, like the Jews, took part in the business-aspect of globalism but clung to its nationalism under the leadership of CCP, the only Asian government, apart from that of Vietnam, that wasn't created more-or-less under US neo-imperialist domination.

So, while white cucks in the West became totally spellbound by Jewish Power, Chinese(and Russians and of course Iranians) kept their independence. In a way, this explains why white cucks(libby-dib or conzo-wonzo) are so angry with Russia and China. Why should Russian and Chinese goyim remain independent of Jewish Power when whites in the West have totally groveled and cucked to it? The anger is partly based on ideology and partly on envy. Many white cucks sincerely believe they are the 'most evolved' people on the planet because they are into self-debasement, Negro Worship, cuckery to Jews, and globo-homo mania. They really believe this. But, on the subconscious level, they feel envious of Russians and Chinese who say NO to Jewish globalist authority. White cucks can't help sensing that Russians and Chinese are more like defiant wolves while they themselves are totally obedient dogs. John McCain barking at Putin was so much like a dog barking at a wolf. It was in total servility to the Jewish Master but also in envy of Putin's relative independence from him.

White cucks will say they hate Russia and China because those two states reject 'liberal democratic' values, but if that's the case, why are white cucks so supportive of Jewish supremacism, Zionist tyranny over Palestinians, and Black megalomania? It seems white cucks also have their tribal favoritism: Blacks over non-blacks and Jews over Palestinians & Iranians. And it seems white cucks believe that Muslims, such as Afghanis, have human value ONLY WHEN they adopt 'gender studies' and globo-homo. Are white cucks even aware of their hypocrisy? Cold Hypocrisy of cynical politicians is bearable because so many people say one thing while doing another. But, white cucks are into Hot Hypocrisy, the kind where passions are at odds with principles. If we tend to despise religious hypocrites more than political ones, it's because politics is about cold hypocrisy of saying whatever to get elected. In contrast, when religious types invoke God and morality but then act like louts, thieves, and perverts, it comes across as far worse. Because 'woke' craziness has all the fervor of a religious movement, the hypocrisy is hot and beneath contempt. And of course, Jews are among the hottest hypocrites, always sermonizing about 'hate', Holocaust, 'racism', and 'white supremacism', all the while acting like Zio-Nazis or Jewzis. Just ask the Palestinians. Also, Jews who, for so long, never tired of denouncing 'McCarthyism' as the darkest period in US history are now 100x worse than the anti-communists. The former bitchers about 'red-baiting' and 'anti-communist hysteria' are into white-baiting, Christian-bashing, Constitution-smashing, and free-speech-attacking. Jews also warned people of how the Nazis used medicine as cultural metaphor and political tool, but now Jews use medical tyranny to lend the impression that those who say NO to the 'vaccine' are germs that must be stamped out.

21st century has been about the resurgence of fascism even though all these new forms of fascism hides behind the nominalism of 'liberal world order', 'democracy', 'socialism', or what have you. While some governments admit to being nationalist, a term less toxic in the globalist-controlled discourse, none dares to admit it has anything to do with fascism. It goes to show that World War II still casts a long shadow on the future. Because the peak of Soviet/Russian prestige came with the defeat of National Socialist Germany and full independence for China followed the total defeat of Japan(an ally of Germany), both the Russians and Chinese carry on the charade that they've been the main victims of and victors over fascism. And because Jews met their greatest enemy in the German fascism of National Socialism, Jews have since postured as the biggest anti-fascists in the world(though it hasn't restrained them from supporting quasi-nazi elements in Ukraine).
Of course, the main reason Jews denounce fascism is they want to keep its magic formula for themselves. After all, fascism fuses rightist and leftist elements, whereas other ideologies pit right against left, thus creating division, distrust, and general havoc among a people — indeed, whites are so divided because they reject fascism and opt for ideological partisanship(or even purism) as a 'blue-stater' or 'red-stater', whereas Jewish neo-cons and neo-libs work together to make both rightism and leftism serve the Jews. It's why the secret to power for whites isn't found in the new right or the dissident right but in the left-right, which was the source of success for Adolf Hitler and FDR — Hitler adopted leftist elements into German rightism, and FDR adopted rightist elements into American leftism; and if communism had a saving grace, it fused socialism with nationalism.

Now, there is no guarantee that a nation will be good and decent because it is fascist. Fascism, like any ideology, can be used in bad ways — democracy too can be a disaster, like Russia of the 1990s, South Africa under black majority rule, and all Anglosphere 'liberal democracies' today that have facilitated the rise of Zio-globo-oligarcho-gangsterism. Fascism can lead to brazen rule by gangsters, a case of Machiavellianism. While fascism as theory of power brings us closest to the true nature of power, the moral worth of fascist rule depends on how those lessons are reflected upon and practiced. After all, the truth can be used for good or ill, just like a gun can be used to protect or rob people or chemistry can be used to create medicine or poison. Just because fascism makes us better understand the nature of power doesn't mean we will be better people with power.

Despite the problems of corruption and general abuse of power in China and Russia, it's fair to say their use of fascism is preferable to that of Jews. Besides, paradoxically enough, the biggest enemy of democracy around the world is the Jewish-controlled US as the most fervent promoter of 'democracy'. True democracy must organically grow from the soil of any nation. American democracy worked relatively well because it developed independently of foreign meddling. It was democracy by Americans for Americans. In contrast, whenever some nation around the world tries to open up and liberalize, the US takes advantage of the freedom to infiltrate its institutions & networks and subvert its sovereignty & integrity as a unique homeland of a people and culture. It was Yanqui meddling that undermined attempts at democracy in Latin America, especially in Guatemala. Whether democracy succeeds or fails in some Latin American country, it should be up to the people there, not for Americans to interfere and decide what's what. If anything, things have gotten worse ever since Jews took over the US. In the past, white Americans, being the national majority and imbued with sound values, had no problem with majority rule and true morality. If anything, the core values of White Christian America weren't all that different from those of the Non-West; the only major difference was more tolerance of deviance and more individual liberty in the West. In contrast, Jewish-Americans seek to undermine majority authority and moral sanity in every country by spreading globo-homo and Afromania, the idea being that all European and Asian nations should elevate homo minority over the majority and care more for black thugs than their own peoples. Of course, such minority-privilege and moral inversion is means by which Jewish Power gets to sink its hooks into other nations. Jews think any nation that elevates homos and blacks over their own majority population no longer has a strong sense of national identity & security and is therefore ripe for Jewish globalist picking. Because of Jewish-controlled US meddling, democratic experiments have failed everywhere. The only kind of 'democracy' that the US and its EU satellite will tolerate is one that bends over to the Jewish-controlled afro-globo-homo-schlomo agenda. Whenever freedom and democracy lead to a system that has other ideas and says NO to the afro-globo-homo-shlomo agenda, the US does everything to undermine that country. It's like the US was for the Arab Spring until free elections brought Muslim Brotherhood into power. Then, the US backed the Egyptian military in the coup against the rightfully elected government. And Jewish-controlled US recruited thugs and stirred up mob violence to unseat the democratically elected leader of Ukraine. In other words, US support of democracy is really a kind of 'demockery'. It's not about the freedom of peoples around the world to choose their own values and destinies but about the US exploiting freedoms in other countries to infiltrate, subvert, corrupt, and prop up puppet regimes onboard with the afro-globo-homo-shlomo agenda. In other words, it's not about spreading true democracy or freedom but propping up puppetocracies. It's a form of Imperial Democracy, the cloning of 'new democracies' around the world to serve as shills of Jewish-controlled US as the Imperium. If all the houses in the neighborhood agree to keep their doors unlocked, such openness can work ONLY IF everyone agrees not to trespass onto other people's homes and steal stuff. Whenever a nation around the world unlocks its door, the US trespasses and rearranges everything in the house and even steals stuff. Naturally, the doors must be locked again to keep out the Americans(who now do the stealing for the Jews). So, even though freedom is preferable to autocracy, some measure of the latter is necessary to maintain national sovereignty in a world where the US, as the tool of Jews, promotes freedom not to bolster but to destroy national independence. It's like Jews promote youth culture not to make young people more free and independent but more dependent and addicted to junk culture and dumb fads pushed by Jews. 'Liberal Democracy' has come to mean conformity to the demands of Jewish Globalists. Of course, any honest person would notice that what Jews demand of goy nations, they never demand of Israel. What is good for Israel is not good for Hungary. What Jews demand of Hungary, they never ask of Israel. This is why the national fascisms of China and Russia are, at least at this moment in history, laudable as bulwarks against Jewish Supremacist gangster-fascist-terrorism.

21st century is turning out to be about three dominant fascisms, those of China, Russia, and the Jews. Chinese rule China, Russians rule Russia, and Jews rule US, EU, Anglosphere, and its cuck satellites(like Japan). China has arrived at a fascist equilibrium. Confronting Western Imperialist aggression in the 19th century, China was like a turtle that hid deeper into its shell of ultra-conservatism and reaction. It only kept China weak when faced with the challenges of modernity. Then, as if to compensate for its long decay under rigid traditionalism, China embarked on radicalism under Mao, but this war of culture and ideology led to great havoc and destruction. Then, China embarked on what seemed like a pro-market-oriented neo-liberal path, but the fates of Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan under US ideological and idolatrous hegemony have proven to be culturally hollow, dissipating, and suicidal. Therefore, China seeks a balance of tradition and change, of international relations and national sovereignty. Same could be said of Russia. If rule under the Tsars was too reactionary, the rule by Bolsheviks was too radical and traumatizing. Also, mere communism held back initiative, enterprise, and economic growth, and then, following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the surrender to unfettered globo-capitalism led to Jewish economic rape, which dwarfed even the horrors of the Weimar Period in Germany. Vladimir Putin, for all his faults and limitations, have tried to steer Russia toward a balance of tradition and modernity, of markets and socialism. His method too is essentially fascist though he would be loathe to admit it in public.

At any rate, what Russian and Chinese neo-fascisms have in common is the conviction that power must be consolidated and constructed toward nationalist goals. Power must ultimately be about what is good for the nation and the people, not only for here and now but into the future. Therefore, even though Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin can act like gangsters at times, they do have some qualities of statesmen and genuine national leaders with a sense of patriotism and common good. Putinism is about what-is-good-for-Russia in Russia that is overwhelmingly Russian, and Xi-ism is about what-is-good-for-China in China that is overwhelmingly Chinese. Those are national-humanist fascisms. In contrast, Jewish supremacist fascism is purely tribal-gangsterist, indeed even worse than British and French rule over their colonies.

Nominalism(useful term invoked by Michael Lind) explains why so many people are fooled about the true nature of what's really happening. They are fooled by labels. Take 'gay rights'. It gives the impression that the globo-homo agenda is about allowing homos the right to be 'gay' and do their 'gay' thing. But that is not what the Agenda is about. It's about forcing everyone to celebrate and revere homos and even trannies. It's about official promotion of Anno Sodomini as the new faith for the educated elites, the 'more evolved'. Nominalism is used alongside symbolism, e.g. the 'rainbow' homo flag. So, even though homosexuality is about gross bung-donging inside the dark and dank anus, many people associate it with bright colors.

So, all this talk of 'democracy' vs 'autocracy' is BS. The current world is really about autocracy vs autocracy, except that Jewish Power hides behind labels of 'democracy', 'liberalism', 'tolerance', 'diversity', 'equity', and 'inclusion'. Right, Jews are so into diversity that New York Times is full of Palestinian-American writers - not. Jews are so into equity that.... now, that is too funny. Jews, the richest and most privileged people into equity, ROTFL. As for 'diversity', what is it really about? It's about White Preferism, Capitalist Greed, Jewish Supremacism, and White Cuck Saviorism.
It's White Preferist in that non-whites prefer to move to white nations and live with white majorities than with their own kind. If Diversity is so great, why don't browns stay put as all of Latin America is pretty diverse? India is said to be very diverse along cultural, ethnic, and linguistic lines, but all these Hindus wanna move to white nations. Diversity is White Preferism.
As for businessmen, they just want cheap docile workers who complain less than native folks. We can understand why they'd rather hire newcomers than blacks, but it goes much further. Big Business would rather hire cheaper inferior foreign workers to superior American ones just to cut costs.
There is also a Jewish Supremacist angle: Increase non-white numbers and use them against whites. Also, more diversity among goyim means more division among them... which ensures Jewish Power.
As for white cuck savior complex, so many whites are not only stupid enough to fall for Jewish Diversity BS but subconsciously hanker for a kind of white supremacism. They feel that nonwhites are too dumb to take care of themselves and must live under paternal white guidance to see the light and enjoy the fruits.

So, beware of nominalism.

After all, what is 'racism' really about. It's not about treating all races equally and rejecting racial favoritism. No, it means the 'moral' necessity and even sanctity of treating blacks as our superiors in every way. In reality, blacks are the biggest thugs and pose the gravest threat to white people, but in stupid Hollywood horror movies, whites are hunted down by space monsters or flesh-eating goblins(or Evil White Males) and must rely on heroic and/or saintly blacks as their protectors or saviors. ROTFL. When Paul McCartney was accused of possible 'racism' for having badmouthed Pakistanis in the UK, his defense was he can't be 'racist' because his favorite people are blacks. If 'racism' is racial favoritism, isn't it 'racist' to favor blacks over others? But then, the agenda around 'racism' is to favor blacks for sympathy and consideration, even admiration and reverence. It's not about racial equality but superiority of blacks.

And what is politics around 'antisemitism' about. It's not about treating Jews the same way as the rest of humanity. No, it's about the obligation that Jews be treated better, always be favored, always be forgiven, always preferred. It's not about treating Jews and whites the same way. No, it's about Jews dictating to whites as to what's what, what is right or wrong; and whites must nod along without debate. It's not about treating Jews and Palestinians the same way. No, it's about letting Jews act as they wish with Palestinians. Even when Jews are clearly in the wrong, we must support them over Palestinians, and to say otherwise is to be an 'anti-semite'. So, the politics of 'antisemitism' is really about Jewish Supremacism, not about the need to treat Jews like everyone else, i.e. neither more deserving nor less deserving of justice and fairness.

But people are blind to this because of nominalism. 'Racism' gives the impression that it's opposed to ALL forms of racial hatred. But if so, why is there total silence about non-black victims of black mayhem and violence? 'Antisemitism' gives the impression that Jews are especially targeted by irrational haters and that we need to treat Jews as human beings deserving of equal justice. But 'antisemitism', as framed by ADL, SPLC, and Jewish-run media & deep state, really boils down to Jews having the divine right to control everything and do as they please as the 'made men' who cannot be questioned. In other words, its actual practice is Jewish Supremacism. The hell with nominalism and say yes to ACTUALISM.

We need to reject nominalism and accurately describe and name what is really what and what is really happening. The problem isn't 'racism' but black-thug-supremacism. The problem isn't 'antisemitism' but Jewish supremacism and Zionist gangsterism. The problem isn't that homos are denied 'gay rights' but that Gay Rites are pushed as the new mandatory cult in the West and that anyone who won't bend over to this devil-god and take it up the ass is blacklisted and destroyed by the Power.

CHINA'S WAR AGAINST "SISSY-MEN," GAMERS & WESTERN HYPOCRISY

Autocracy of Nationalism is Preferable to Plutocracy of Liberalism — National Democracy is Ideal, Liberal Democracy is Doomed to Fail — Globalism Renders 'Liberal Democracies' vulnerable to Jewish-Supremacist infiltration and Foreign Penetration — Need for National-Constitution

America’s Social Credit System Is Worse than China’s by Gregory Hood

Social Credit system sucks anywhere, but it is of course worse in the US than in China. Not because it's more stringent in the US but because of its coding and character. China is ruled by a national(ist) government; therefore, the social controls are meant to boost national security and patriotism. In contrast, the US is ruled by Jewish globalist supremacists; therefore, social controls are meant to shame the white majority into cucking to Jewish Supremacist Power. Even though the Communist Party has a bloody history in China(especially under Mao), the silver lining was a political system was put into place that was entirely independent of foreign interference. For all its epic failures, the founding principles of CCP were idealism and nationalism.

Tyranny isn't good, but tyranny in service of patriotism is still better than tyranny in service of treason. As the US is ruled by Jewish globalists, it is now increasingly resorting to tyrannical social controls to make whites commit mass treason against their own race. (White elites go along with Jewish Power out of craven opportunism and/or 'spiritual' possession, the result of PC education. Not only do they expect big carrots by obeying their Jewish masters but have been conditioned from cradle to believe the greatest evil is 'racism' and 'white supremacism'. Therefore, if White Guilt, White Demise, and White Nakba are necessary to defeat 'racism', so be it. Besides, what does it matter when they, as white elites, get the carrots than the sticks in the game of Defame-Whitey? For most whites, 'spiritual' possession by Jews leads to dispossession of white power, land, and wealth. Jewish Message to whites is "Whites must keep paying and paying to right whatever wrongs invoked by Jews, blacks, and their allies." White soul-debt for 'white guilt' means permanent payouts to Jews, blacks, and etc. Thus, all of the white race has been 'Germanized' as, of course, Germany must pay the Jews forever and ever and ever for what are now called 'epigenetic' reasons.)

This is why democracy devoid of nationalism is bound to fail. A national democracy, such as the one in Israel, is relatively strong and stable. In Israel, both the 'right' and 'left' are patriotic and committed to Jewish Power. Such might be called a 'fascist democracy'. Even though people have the freedom to vote, their minds are united in ethno-patriotism. The true worth of democracy is measured by how well it serves a nation and people. Democracy is supposed to serve the people than the other way around. If democracy serves to defend a nation and its people, it has worth. If it subverts a nation and people, it has failed(no matter how democratic it may be in terms of liberal principles); if Israeli democracy were to abandon its nationalist content in favor of pure liberal principles and bring about the demise of Israel as a Jewish state, it would be a failed democracy as it failed to protect a nation and people. When nation serves democracy than the other way around, the assumption is the nation must favor abstract principles over tangible realities EVEN IF they cause grave harm to the nation. (Such mindset governs mainstream conservatism of the National Review crowd. They don't care if White America is lost as long as the future is about 'muh liberty'. Never mind that a non-white majority America means goodbye to the US Constitution as most non-whites don't care for Free Speech and Gun Rights. And, how amusing that these die-hard adherents to Universal Principles are so supportive of Jewish Nationalism and even Jewish Supremacism in Israel and around the world.) Jews understand this, which is why Israel puts Jewish-Nation-hood above abstract principles of democracy. Democracy there is coded to serve and defend Israel as a Jewish State. And why are Jews chipping away at the US Constitution? Because the First Amendment allows open criticism of any power. Therefore, Jews seek to change the Constitution with 'hate speech' laws whereby they get to label and ban any speech they don't like as 'hate'. Of course, they mean to target speech critical of Jewish Supremacist Power and Israel. Jews support principles only to the extent of self-interest.

In contrast, a liberal democracy de-emphasizes and even disparages any notion of national unity based on blood-and-soil, race, ethnicity, culture, and/or history. Thus, it's primarily about the personal liberties of individuals. But individuals as dispersed members of society don't amount to much. It's like there can be no sun if particles of matter don't come together to form a mass. Liberal democracy, in weakening ethno-nationalism, makes it less likely for the ethno-majority to unite as a real force. They are too busy being individuals. Such dispersal of power without a concentrated core is easy to penetrate and manipulate. It's like an army is useless if soldiers are spread out as individuals and not working as combined force.
This is why Jews and globalists promote 'liberal democracy' all over the world. It is to deny other nations a concentrated core of mass consciousness that allows for the preservation of national sovereignty and political unity. When a nation adopts the formula of 'liberal democracy', it means the leaders no longer invoke blood-and-soil themes to inspire and unite the people. They just talk about 'muh liberty' and 'muh money'. It becomes a game of everyone for himself(or herself). Then, the globalists can easily buy off the elites who operate merely as deracinated and rootless individuals. Easier to buy off opportunistic individuals than genuine leaders of nations. And under liberal democracy, everything becomes privatized and globalized, and that means Jewish/American/global money can buy up all the media and spread Afromania, Globo-Homo, and DIOS(or diversity-is-our-strength, with 'our' being mostly Jewish).

The ideal bulwark against globalist hegemony and Jewish supremacism is a National Democracy or Fascist Democracy. The problem for many nations is it takes time for democracy to develop and come into fruition. Furthermore, if Europe provides any lesson, even nations with deep history of democracy can be taken over by Jewish Globalists, as attested by UK and France.
For many newly minted democracies, the institutions are weak, and that means lots of corruption, as in Russia of the 1990s. Under such circumstances, it is easy for Jewish supremacists and globalists to take over the system. It happened in Ukraine recently. Ukraine is now praised as a 'liberal democracy', and it has globo-homo parades(as tell-tale sign of Jewish domination). But there is no national unity, no national security. Everything is up for sale to the Jews.

In that sense, the autocratic systems in China and Russia(and Iran) are preferable. Not because they are ideal but because they serve as more effective barriers and bulwarks against the hegemonic ambitions of the Lone Superpower, the US that is under Jewish Supremacist Control that seeks to undermine every nationalism EXCEPT that of Israel.

All patriotic White Americans must wake up to the fact that a country run by plutocrats will lead to certain demise for the historical-racial majority. In the past, the US was a de facto national and racial democracy, and that meant white elites cared for the white masses; there was a concentrated core of white unity and Christian power. But as the US turned into a liberal democracy, white power became dispersed and spread out into tiny individual units. Jews pushed for this, all the while tightly concentrating their own power, influence, and authority. Concentrated power will always beat dispersed power. Why do lions feed on wildebeests? If wildebeests all united and fought as one, they could wipe out the lions. But when lions appear, wildebeests disperse and run off in multiple directions. So, a handful of lions ALWAYS kill and devour the wildebeests that number in the hundreds. No wonder then that Jewish Power has been devouring whites. Jews combine into one whereas whites disperse into many directions. Five fingers that combine into a fist will defeat a thousand fingers that function individually.
Rich Jews are concentrated into Jewish Power. Rich whites are dispersed when it comes to white power. If white oligarchs do come together, it is to serve the Jews but NEVER to do anything good for the white race.

This is why Putin and Xi are relatively good guys in the current world. Their political controls limit the power of capitalists, most of whom are soulless materialists and craven status-anxious opportunists. Capitalists remain patriotic only if the Order demands nationalism. Jewish capitalists are tribal-nationalist about Jewishness because the Jewish Community demands it. Also, as Jews control the media and elite institutions, they coded things so that it is perfectly okay, even noble, for them to be proud of Jewishness and serve Jewish interests. In contrast, the coding says that even a sentiment such as "It's Okay to be White" is totally unacceptable and worthy of investigation by the FBI.

So, all those American patriots and 'rightists' who denounce Vladimir Putin as autocrat or Xi Jinping as dictator should really re-examine their own situation. They would be better off if they had an American Putin or a White Xi. If there is no national democracy to protect your people, it's better to have a strongman or even a 'tyrant' than what goes by 'liberal democracy' that almost inevitably leads to lack of unity and then demise of race and nation.
Indeed, if Trump were a true patriot and had the power of Xi or Putin, the US would be in a much better situation. Instead, US is ruled by Jewish-globalist oligarchs who use the likes of Jack Dorsey and Jeff Bezos as their tools. The coding says Jews are holy for being Jewish whereas whites are unholy for being white. Thus, even the richest white person can be justified only by serving the holy, such as Jews, blacks, and homos, the three groups that have permanent membership in the Sacred Council — other groups must take turns in the council, usually on the basis of "Is it good for Jews?"

This would be less of a problem if most democracies were nationally organized and ordered. But as things stand in a world of the Lone Superpower, to have a democracy means your nation/domain is more exposed to foreign interference by globalists, people like George Soros and Paul Singer. While some rich foreigners just want to do business with your nation/domain, others(especially the supremacist Jews) seek not only financial access but 'spiritual' control with stuff like globo-homo, which is meant to serve as proxy-worship-and-obedience to Jewish Power. If Russians and Chinese merely want to do business with your nation, Jewish Power wants to spread its globo-homo and Holocaustianity tentacles into your domain so as to morally and 'spiritually' manipulate you. And if your people say NO, as Russia did with Globo-Homo, Jewish Power throws fits and pulls all sorts of dirty tricks. When Jews extol 'liberal democracy', they are really telling your nation to undress and put out. Spread the legs for the Jewish Supremacist Portnoic lust and bend over to take it up the arse from globo-homo. Globalism is really the Jewish pornographics of power. Jewish Power as the pimp and goy nations as the prostitutes.

Naturally, a sound nation will push back against such foreign infiltration and meddling. It needs concentration of power in a nationalist context that may have to clamp down on certain liberties that invite infection and takeover by globalist power. It's like Soros operations are banned in some parts of the world. But then, globalist Jews denounce such a nation as 'anti-democratic'. Of course, Jewish Power never mentions that it's their infiltration and corruption of other nations' political processes that necessitates more autocratic measures. Imagine a drug pusher and a parent & child. As the pusher tries to sell drugs to the child, the parent needs to be tougher and restrict his child's freedom to do as he pleases(like indulging in drugs). But then, the pusher accuses the parent of tyrannical control over the child and calls on the child to rebel and seek 'liberation'. The pusher never mentions the fact that the parent must be tough to protect his child from none other than the pusher. If some goy nation sought to infiltrate Israel and turn Jewish kids into druggies and whores, of course, the fascist-democracy of Israel would take tough measures to stop such. But when Jews seek to corrupt other nations, they better spread their legs wide open to the Zionic thrust. Such total hypocrisy.

For a national-democracy or fascist-democracy to succeed, its core constitution must prioritize racial-cultural-territorial integrity above all else. Freedoms are fine AS LONG AS they don't violate or undermine the right of the nation to survive and maintain its integrity. Furthermore, it must severely limit foreign ownership, and its elites must be educated within the domain. If the elites are trained in places like Harvard, they are likely to be shills of the Glob. And it must emphasize themes over leaders. The problem with Italian Fascism and National Socialism was they were essentially premised on Cult of Personality and whims of the Great Leader. The danger of dictatorship. The rule must be Dictatorship of Themes, not of Personalities. This way, no matter who is in power, he must rule in accordance to the National Theme, a particular than a universal principle. The future of Russia and China will be determined by the National Themes inherent in their Constitution. Without the dictatorship of such themes, the whole system may change with new leadership.

PATRIOTIC WEEKLY REVIEW - JARED TAYLOR - Mark Collett

Relativity of Treason — How Donald Trump is both a Traitor and a Patriot

Following the summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, the Jew-run Mass Media have gone bonkers in smearing Trump as some kind of unprecedented traitor. This was to be expected because the entire Russia-Collusion-Hysteria had been engineered from the get-go to prevent the meeting of Trump and Putin. But Trump being Trump, he decided to meet with Putin and discuss important matters as World Leaders. Trump knows(and we know and even enemies of Trump know deep in their hearts) that the Russian Collusion thing is the biggest hoax in US history. It was essentially concocted by Jews and MIC(military-industrial-complex) to prevent a rapprochement between the US and Russia. There are reasons why Jews and MIC want to antagonize Russia. For Jews, it’s ethnic hostility rooted in historical animus and tribal greed. As Jews control the media and Deep State, they control the Narrative and get to define ‘American Interests’ which essentially comes to "Is it good for Jewish supremacism?" and "All Americans must like whatever Jews like and hate whatever Jews hate." Jews get to decide our loves and hates, and that means we are to be denied Emotional Autonomy. We must be like dogs that take emotional cues from their master. As for the MIC, they need Russia as the Evil Enemy in order to justify their budget for warmongering. There are other anti-Russian elements too. Globo-Homo degenerates hate Russia because of its restoration of nationalism and traditionalism. Pathologically vain self-worshiping Homos and Trannies want all the world to honor, celebrate, and praise their fussy-fancy ilk. And power-porn elite-educated mafia just love the game of power, and they figure Russia is the most credible rival in the world, especially as Jews have given green light to hate and revile Russia. For them, what counts is the sheer nihilism of playing The Game.

Anyway, the question of Treason is never a simple one because the logic of Treason and Loyalty is always relative. Consider the film CHARIOTS OF FIRE. The Olympic runner must choose between God and King. In choosing God, he is seen by some as snubbing and disrespecting the king. But to the sprinter, it is a higher loyalty. Similar conflict unfolds in the film BECKET where Richard Burton as the eponymous character must choose between loyalty to his friend & king AND a higher sense of duty.


James Comey himself reiterated the problem of treason with his book HIGHER LOYALTY. Comey violated FBI rules and conspired against the President. As such, he is a traitor to the Bureau and to the President. But Comey insists he acted out of a higher loyalty. To what? Truth and justice? To globo-homo agenda? Or to the nihilism of Deep State wrapped in bogus moralizing? In the film THE WILD BUNCH, Pike Bishop(William Holden) defends his estranged ex-friend Deke Thorton(Robert Ryan). Though Thorton is on the hunt for his former outlaw partners, he’d given his word to the Law. Dutch Angstrom(Ernest Borgnine) counters Bishop’s defense of his old friend by insisting that the ‘word’ isn’t enough; it’s whom you give it to.

In RAN by Akira Kurosawa, there are multiple layers of meaning whereby apparent treason might be a deeper loyalty and seeming loyalty could be concealed treachery. The youngest son who’d spoken bluntly against his father was the loyal one. The older sons who spoke with devotion and respect were out for their own power and even willing to destroy their own father. The biggest traitor may be Lady Kaeda who conspires to have the (Hidetora) Ichimonji clan destroyed from within. But in another way, she is also the most loyal character as she’d remained true to her own clan that had been vanquished by the Ichimonjis. As the wife of lord of the Ichimonji clan, her machinations were clearly treasonous. But she’d never forgotten or forgiven the fact that the clan she’d married into destroyed her own family.

And in NIXON, Oliver Stone dramatizes how there are competing factions behind any politician, and each faction represents its own vision of what America should be. And as a politician relies on support from various factions with conflicting interests, his loyalty to one can easily appear as betrayals to others. Especially a nation as big and complex as the US cannot have a single easily definable formula of ‘America’ or ‘American Interests’. Usually, those at the Top(especially in media, academia, law, and politics) get to decide what America is all about. Indeed, Americans cannot even agree on the heroes and villains of history. If Jews can help it, all the monuments to White Southerners will be torn down while all white people must be made to worship MLK, the Negro who sold out the Palestinians because Jews filled his pocket with money.


So, what is Treason? What is Loyalty? It’s all relative. Take Benedict Arnold, denounced as the biggest traitor of the American Revolution. But couldn’t one argue that the Revolution itself was an act of treason against the Mother Country of Britain and to the King? From that perspective, Arnold's treason was an act of loyalty to the Crown. (The Spanish Civil War was especially confused because the Leftists who were 'loyal' to the Power were radicals hellbent on turning Spain upside down with communism and anarchism, whereas the rebel forces were committed to maintaining Spanish Tradition.) Of course, the Founding Fathers argued that their higher loyalty was to independence, freedom, and dignity of man. Some have argued such were mere rosy words to cosmeticize what was essentially a naked power grab by the landed gentry of the Colonies who wanted supreme power in their own hands. Granted, the example of George Washington shows that the Founders weren't out to be the New King. Rather, what they envisioned was a new kind of aristocracy, the ‘natural aristocracy’, that would be made up mostly of themselves and their descendants who were deemed to be superior in intellect and knowledge. Though Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson are usually seen as ideological opposites, both were elitist in their own unique ways. The difference was Jefferson’s style was that of an agrarian aristocrat whereas Hamilton was more urban in his disposition and preference. Jefferson thought more like a nobleman whereas Hamilton thought more like a monarch. (Oddly enough, the two styles would be wedded together by Andrew Jackson, a crude man of low origin.)
The rise of modernity and rapidity of change made the issue of loyalty and treason increasingly more difficult to resolve. It's difficult to be loyal to anything when so much is changing so fast all around you. Constancy became obsolete.
The French Revolution was a rebellion against the King. Obviously, the Revolutionaries were traitors to the monarch, the nobility, and the Church that had defined France and French culture for so long. But the Revolution argued that the rulers no longer possessed the right to rule. The Enlightenment had revealed a higher form of justice. Also, rulers must serve the people than vice versa. To the extent that the Tradition made the French people serve the king, aristocrats, and the church(that were unresponsive to the needs of the people), it was in violation of the true Theory of Justice. Thus, treason against the Old System was necessary to bring forth a New System that was worthy of the loyalty of the people who were to be liberated and elevated. They would no longer be subjects and instead become free citizens of a republic. And then, of course the Revolutionaries fell into the lethal habit of accusing one another of treason to the spirit of the Revolution, a tragedy avoided by American Revolutionaries who were less radical and less threatened by foreign powers. Later, Russian Revolution would lead to tragedies that made the French Revolution’s failures look like a picnic.

Anyway, it isn't easy to ascertain who is traitorous or loyal because it depends on one’s perspective. Indeed, everyone could be said to be both traitorous and loyal. One’s loyalty to the Old Order is treason against the New Order, and one’s loyalty to the New Order is treason against the Old Order. And as the New Order soon becomes the Old Order, it also insists on blind loyalty and commitment. The issues of loyalty and treason have still not been resolved around the American Civil War. Though the North won the war, many in the South never accepted the Northern Narrative. Also, there had been a prolonged period when the North decided to effectively bury the hatchet and make cultural peace with the South, i.e. the North would maintain its favored Narrative and the South would its own. Live and let live. Let the North honor Lincoln and Grant. Let the South accept the fact of the Union but still honor men like Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson. This noble understanding was subverted by Jews who, in seeking to totally cuck-castrate the white race into submission, have waged Total War on the Southern Narrative(which is ironic since Jews in the South had been mostly pro-Confederate).

So, what about Donald Trump? Is he a patriot or a traitor? If he is a traitor, we need to ask what he is a traitor to? Which America? After all, there is no single America. Surely, Palestinian-America differs from Jewish-America. Jewish-America sees BDS as traitorous, but Palestinian-America sees US support of Zionism as a betrayal of what 'America' should be about. And black-America hardly sees eye-to-eye with white America that has much at odds with Mexican-America. Many blacks revere men like Malcolm X who had harsh words for White America. And many whites in the South still feel affection for the Confederate flag that symbolized the South's rebellion against the Union. And whites and Mexicans(even Mexican-Americans) will remember the Alamo differently. Feminists, with the backing of Jew-run media, claim to represent Women's Interests. So, if women speak, act, or vote against the policies favored by Feminism Inc, they are said to be traitors to womynkind. Feminists say women must be more loyal to the Sisterhood than to their families. In reality, Power Feminists(like Elizabeth Holmes and Sheryl Sandberg) have more in common with Elite Men(especially Jews and globo-hustlers) than with lower class women without fancy careers, wealth, and privilege. The real conflict is between elite men/women and mass men/women. Feminists aren't out for equality. They want to rise high to be with and marry elite men.
And even within the same racial or ethnic community, there can be a wide divergence of interests. This is especially true among whites, among whom 59% generally vote Republican while the rest vote Democratic.Some white Republicans might see white Democrats as traitors to the race, while many white Democrats might see white Republicans as traitors to 'history' that will end when every corner of the world has been globalized with diversity and made Homo-Mulatto. Also, even though the US is a nation of 325 million people, only a relatively tiny share of the population has control over the media, academia, upper echelons of government, and the like. And they are the ones who usually get to decide what is what. They decide what ‘American Interests’ are. And they theorize what ‘America’ or ‘American values’ or ‘Western values’ are all about, and then they foist this formulation on all Americans via the mass media that are controlled mostly by Jews. Indeed, so much of the 'American' label is just a stamp or sticker for JEWISH power, privilege, and passions.
When we consider the people with the most power in the US(the Jews and Homos) and how they choose to define ‘America’, Trump is indeed a traitor to that ‘America’. The globo-homo elites are bored with nationhood. It's too petty and small for them. They want to play with and own all the world. They want the US to be not a fortress but an aircraft carrier. For them, Manifest Destiny continues with new wars, new propaganda, Homomania as the new missionary-crusade, Afro-worship as the New Cool, demographic imperialism, and spread of Jewish hegemony(with Anglos and Homos as favored sidekicks). Globalist elites of many nations pool their resources to gain control over the world, and all the masses of the world become mixed-up peons and helots with no right of identity, territory, or history. (Only Jews, especially in Israel, are to have that right.) The elites don't need a specified identity, territory, or history because they got what gives them the most jollies: Wealth, connections, privilege, and VIP status wherever they go. The elites speak of 'equality' and 'inclusion', but it's really just 'elititude', an invocation game of certain agreed-upon symbolism not unlike the practice of Christianity in aristocratic Europe; all those kings and noblemen hardly led lives that could be construed as genuinely Christian, but they didn't have to because they carried on with the symbolic rituals of sanctimony that shrouded them with the aura of piety. Elititude. Today, all those Western elites don't have to give up their wealth and rub shoulders with the wretched of the earth to be 'progressive'. They merely need to take selfies at a ceremony commemorating Nelson Mandela. How do you like them photo-ops by Bono with African children? After playing Pop Christ, he goes back to live in his mansion.

This ‘America’ that is favored by the Mass Media is not a sovereign nation but a jewel-in-the-crown of the real superpower in the world, the Empire of Judea(or EOJ) that has neo-imperialist globo-homo networks all over the world. Jewish power is connected via New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Atlanta, Chicago, San Francisco, Boston, London, Paris, Berlin, Warsaw, Moscow, Buenos Aires, Mexico City, Tel Aviv, and etc. Jews have powerful presence even in nations that are deemed as the enemies of the US. Jews are so powerful that even Russia, a nation that is constantly defamed by vicious Jews, must allow a bunch of Jews to hold great wealth and power. (Russians are spectacular underachievers who are so lazy, stupid, and incompetent that a handful of Jews have run circles around them time and time again. Indeed, consider the difference between the Russian Revolution and the German Revolution. Both turned out to be evil, but German Revolution of the National Socialists gained power for Germans against the Semites whereas the Russian Revolution led to the Semitic & non-Russian minority domination over vast numbers of Russian Slavs. Germans, being more capable, outmaneuvered the Jews, whereas Russians, being drunk and stupid, came under the rule of Jews who made up a tiny cabal. Alas, even though Germans were more capable, their recklessness led to WWII and their downfall, and Germans have never been able to regain their footing since. In a way, German conscientiousness came to be a thorn on its side. Though conscientiousness is generally a good thing, the relative lack of such among Russians seems to maintain their resistance to the Jews. Ironically, both Germany’s choice of National Socialism and Shoah-Guilt[or National Shame-ism] were the product of German conscientiousness. Overwhelmed by mounting poverty and degradation during the Great Depression, National Socialism seemed to offer an opportunity for Germans to rise up and do something hard and constructive to repair and rebuild the nation. It was National Will in action, and a people without conscientiousness couldn’t have chosen such a path. Germans, unlike stupid and lazy Greeks in the financial crisis several years back, were not bitching and asking for easy fix. They were willing to unite and work hard to restore German greatness again. This called for lots of work, unity, and collective sacrifice, and Germans were up to the challenge. So far so good. But then, the man the Germans put in charge, Adolf Hitler, turned out to be a mad visionary and degenerate gambler with history. Hitler exploited the conscientiousness of the Germans. He promised them a New Beginning based on hard work, sacrifice, and unity. Germans trusted him, and things seemed to be going well... until Hitler decided on imperialism, and then all hell broke loose. After the war, Germans chose the path of conscientiousness once again. They came to realize that their blind trust in Hitler-as-savior-of-Germany had led to a catastrophic war that not only destroyed millions of German lives but millions of non-German lives as well. Among the great horrors was Shoah, the killing of millions of Jews. So, Germans decided to be mindful and redeem themselves. If in the 1930s they’d put all their trust in Hitler, after WWII Germans increasingly put their trust in Jews as a holy people. When Jews didn’t rule the world, it didn’t much matter, but as Jews increasingly became the masters of the US, the most powerful nation in the world, Germans came under greater pressure to prostrate themselves before Jews as the Holy Holocaust Race that must be obeyed and worshiped like gods. And as Jews gained even more power, they went from rulers of the US to the rulers of the Empire of Judea, of which the US was the main prize. Flush with all this power, Jews are now in supremacist Judeo-Nazi mode, and they’re rabid with power.)

Given who really rules America and gets to decide what is ‘American’ or what are ‘Western values’, one could say Trump is indeed a traitor to this ‘America’. In the Brother Nathanael video above, it’s obvious that many anti-Trump voices in the media are Jewish. But then, the media are owned mostly by Jews. It’s an incestuous and inbred Jew-owned-and-run Media that hire lots of Jews to tell us that whatever Jews hate, we must hate too. Whatever Jews like, we must like to. Jews dictate to us what to hate, what to love. If Jews say it is American-as-apple-pie to support IDF death squad's killing of Palestinian protesters(calling attention to the fact that 2018 is the 70th anniversary of Nakba Pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map thanks to Jewish mass migration-invasion), then cheering for Zionist killers must be red, white, and blue(or red, white, and Jew). The so-called Mass Media offer us endless ‘two-minutes of hatred’, and according to Jews, Putin is the New Goldstein or Goldputin. According to the PC Narrative, one's willful deviance from this Agenda constitutes 'treason'. It's like a master shaming a dog as 'bad doggy' for refusing to fetch the ball or fight another dog.

Basically, the Mass Media is Hate News against whatever Jews hate and is Love Media for whatever Jews love(or thinks is useful to their supremacist power). All this Russia brouhaha is so much nonsense, and the ONLY reason it exists is because Jewish globo-homo imperialism hates nationalism or national autonomy/independence/sovereignty of goy peoples, especially whites. Jews are viciously hostile toward white Americans whereas Putin & Russia feel no such hostility. Jews are also hostile toward Russians. Because Russia refuses to obey Jewish Supremacists, Jews feel that Russia is 'hostile' to the Jewish Agenda; therefore, all of us(as obedient dogs) are also supposed to see Russia as hostile to us. According to Jewish logic, refusal to obey the Jewish globo-homo agenda is 'hateful' and 'hostile'. It's like Harvey Weinstein's sexual logic. Any woman who said NO to him was offending him than he was offending her. Like they say, "Jews cry out in pain as he strikes you." Jews lie about Russian Collusion when, in fact, they are the ones who colluded with Deep State and EU to get Hillary, their bitch-whore, elected. According to Jews, the only approved 'allies' of the US are its bitch-whore puppets like Japan, Canada, UK, France, Sweden, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and etc. Any nation outside the orbit of US hegemony is friend or enemy depending on how JEWS feel about it. Jews are the final judge of which nations the US can be friendly with. Jews say Israel is America's closest ally, and that must be true because... Jews say so. Jews say Russia is the #1 enemy, and it must be so because... Jews say so. Jews are masters, we are dogs. Woof. Imagine someone who says he gets to decide who gets to be your friends or enemies. If you decided to find your own friends, he calls you a traitor to yourself. Jews are like the insane jealous lover in PLAY MISTY FOR ME who tries to claim the Clint Eastwood character all to herself. A truly vile people. Jews need to own the white race in order to sustain Jewish supremacism.

After all, Jewish supremacism depends on whites serving as horsey to the Jewish rider. Jews are to serve as the mind, and whites are to serve as the obedient body. Though Russia isn’t free of malevolent Jewish influence, it is freer than the US is. Paradoxically, Russians both fell under and resisted Jewish power more fully than White America did. If German conscientiousness made Germans both radically anti-Jewish under National Socialism and excessively pro-Jewish after WWII — in both cases, the Germans were trying so very hard to do the Right Thing — , the Russian lack of conscientiousness made them easily fall under Jewish Bolsheviks and later bluntly irreverent to Jewish power. After the fall of the Tsar and under the rule of the Provisional Government, the only thing Russians cared about was ‘land, bread, and peace’, or ‘what is in it for me?’ Most had no idea what was happening or didn’t care. They just wanted ‘my little thing’. So, Russian masses were willing to throw their lot with the Bolsheviks even though the latter was calling for national defeat to the Germans. Russian masses couldn't care less. They just wanted "what’s mine". Russian moral and intellectual laziness led to this morass, something that energetic and radical Jewish Bolsheviks took advantage of. Lack of Russian conscientiousness could be manipulated by Jews. But then later, this very trait worked against Jews. Upon Stalin's outmaneuvering the Jews and later when his heirs promised More Stuff to the Russians at the expense of Jews, the Russians readily accepted the bargain. Russians didn’t care if Soviet version of ‘affirmative action’ hurt smarter Jews. They were into "What’s mine?" than for higher principles and meritocratic fair play. Also, being less conscientious, Russians are harder to guilt-bait. Besides, communism made it difficult to guilt-bait most Russians. After all, communism said capitalism is evil. Most Russians never got to practice capitalism. If anything, even communist Jews had more savvy for enterprise and came to be associated with stuff like black markets. Also, WWII meant Soviet/Russian victory over Nazism. So, that meant Russians deserved moral pride over having defeated Nazi Germany. Against such mule-headed bluntness, it was difficult for Jews to guilt-bait and manipulate. It’s more constructive to work with ‘conscientious’ dogs than with boorish bears.
Post-Soviet Russia repeated this pattern once again. Because Russians were so lazy, stupid, and slovenly, clever and greedy Jews found it easy to manipulate the Russian economy and loot much of it in the 1990s while too many Russians were drunk on vodka or imitating American pop culture. If Russians had been more conscientious, like Germans or Japanese after WWII, it would have been more difficult for Jews to pull off such a stunt. But then, Russian boorishness and crudity turned into an advantage beginning in the 2000s. Emotionally gruff and rough-n-tumble in sensibility, Russians decided to say hell with Jews and their homo puppets. They said hell to 'liberal democracy' and what the globalists were hailing as the New Normal in the 'most evolved' progress. (Paradoxically, Anglos and Germanic types can fall for immorality-as-the-new-morality more easily because they are more conscientious. Most people don't think hard about right-and-wrong. They outsource such meanings to the elites and are mainly concerned with seeming to do the right thing in the eyes of the official power. They are more concerned with Moral Approval than Moral Thought. So, if the Power says 'gay marriage' is 'more evolved', Anglos and Germanic types try so very hard to appear More Moral and win status approval. In contrast, Russians, being less conscientious, are less concerned about seeming More Moral. So, they tend to be more oblivious to the latest Official Line. And yet, this outlook maintains genuine morality because it is less sensitive about keeping-up-with-the-joneses of morality-as-fashionable-virtue-signaling.) Russian rejection of globo-homo agenda was a morally important decision but not one that was made morally. Russians stumbled into moral action because things got so bad with Jews at the helm. They wanted a strong hand to rein in the oligarchs and gangsters, and that man was Vladimir Putin. Most Russians didn’t care what Putin did as long as he made things better. Lucky for them, Putin turned out to be rather sane and sound leader with good sense for things. Anyway, because Russians tend to be neanderthal in their ways and emotions, they are harder to psychologically or morally manipulate. Jews found it easier to gain power over lazy and stupid Russians but also more difficult to maintain control over them for the long haul because Russians are so disorganized, lazy, incompetent, and lacking in conscience. In contrast, Jews found it far more difficult to gain power over Anglos and Germans, a talented hardworking people with strong sense of moral pride. But once Jews gained an edge over them, they found it easier to manipulate them psychologically and morally because Anglos and Germans really care about the principles of right and wrong(or are obsessed about seeming to care about such things as a matter of status). In the short run, it was easier for Jews to take power in Russia but, in the long run, it was harder for Jews to keep the power because Russians just wouldn't play along as they’re too lazy, childish, boorish, and difficult. In contrast, Jews were met with truly stiff competition from talented Anglos and Germans. Thus, Jews required far more energy to gain dominance in their world. Jews gained supreme power in Russia in 1917. Jews gained comparable power only in the 1980s in the US. But once Jews gained power in the US, it was easier to keep because Anglos and Anglo-ized whites did a very good job of keeping things running for their Jewish masters.
After all, the very craziness of Russia in the 90s that enabled Jews to steal so much also led to the downfall or exile of many Jews. It’s one thing to grab a lot of loot, but unless there is law and order, it’s difficult for the looters to keep all their loot. Certain Jewish oligarchs of the 1990s met a fate similar to that of Jewish Bolsheviks in the 1930s in the Great Purge. Even though Jews grabbed so much power so fast in Russia following the October Revolution, the sheer lack of Rule of Law meant that what the Jews took violently and unscrupulously could be taken from them in the same manner by someone even more cunning and ruthless than them, and that man happened to be Josef Stalin the Georgian. Russia has always been a land of bandits, peasants, gamblers, and bear-wrestlers. Jews could get such people drunk and steal their wealth, but drunken mobs can easily turn on the very people who supplied them with the drink. Jews always played on lack of conscientiousness among Russians to gain power over Russians. Jews always saw Russians as idiots and boors to whom to sell vodka, either literally or metaphorically in the intoxication of the Revolution(communism) or Riches(privatization). But the danger was that Russians-as-boors might get pissed and go 'pogrom' on the nasty Jews.
In contrast, the US was the nation that once came up with Prohibition. And the Brits, even as they allowed the Jew David Sassoon to sell opium to China, banned the sale of opium in Britain itself. Therefore, if Jews played on lack of control and conscientiousness among Russians, they played on the strong sense of self-control and conscientiousness among Anglos and Anglo-Americans. Jews did the hustle on the Anglos. Initially, Jews were full of praise for White Anglo America. Jews flattered the Anglo-Americans for having created a nation better and more just than any in Europe. But that was a bait. After all, if the US was supposed to be so wonderful and great, why did it have such-and-such problems and why did US fail to live up to all its promises? So, what began as Jewish praise turned increasingly into Jewish condemnation of White America's failure to fulfill its true 'proposition'. And Anglo-Americans, especially the Episcopalian elites, being so conscientious and sensitive about their self-image as Good People, turned into moral putty in the hands of Jews(who rarely applied similar kind of critique on their own kind and power). Anyway, even though it was far more difficult climb for Jews to take over the US(than a nation like Russia), the victory has been more complete and total because (1) white Americans can maintain a system of Rule of Law that Jews can manipulate to their own advantage and (2) white Americans are earnest about their conscientious redemption and atonement to be ‘good people’ as, of course, to be defined by Jews who control the academia, media, and pop culture(which is the only remaining culture).

When we consider the US as a vassal of the real superpower in the world, the Empire of Judea, Trump is indeed a traitor. His rapport with Putin was an act of Treason to the ‘America’ as a prized colony of the Empire of Judea(or EOJ). While there are plenty of non-Jews who also denounce Trump’s summit with Putin, most of them take their talking points from Jews. In other words, Jews lead, others follow. If Jews were to change their tune tomorrow and say Russia is no longer a problem, most of these non-Jewish dogs will stop barking. In any power system, we must distinguish who’s the master and who’s the dog. In Stalin’s Soviet Union, it would have seemed that Stalin and all his men were equally united in their passion for or against something. But was it really a consensus? Or was it Stalin’s hatred that others had to agree with. So, if Stalin hated A, his henchmen also had to hate A. If Stalin then decided to love A and hate B, his henchmen would do likewise. Same logic applies to the US. Don’t mind the barking dogs. They lack agency. They will bark to the tune of their masters. As Jews rule the US, they get to decide what is to be hated. Jews hate Russia and Putin at the moment, so ALL OF US are supposed to hate along. And because most non-Jews in the Deep State and Mass Media won’t have a career unless they obey Jews, they also spout along. Sure, they sound sincere in their hatred, but so did the henchmen of Stalin and Mao. And of Hitler. Whatever the Fuhrer said, the Nazi henchmen had to go along with. Just about everyone in the American Deep State and Media has to APPEASE their Jewish Masters if he wants to have career, reputation, and status.

The rise of Russian Nationalism led to the slipping of Jewish monopoly power in Russia. The Russian masses decided to support Putin and Russian nationalism. Putin then lent special support to the Russian Church. Jews were alarmed by this and sought to counter the development with Pussy Riot and Homomania, but Russia said Nyet. This infuriated the Jews. In contrast, Jews were able to guilt-bait, castrate, browbeat, brainwash, and heart-worm American whites(and Western Europeans) into worshiping Magic Negroes, embracing cuckery, rejecting their own racial/cultural identity, remembering Holocaustianity, and celebrating Homomania. American Whites were told they have no identity or culture of their own, and even if they did, it must be bad because whiteness is ‘racist’ and must be destroyed. But Donald Trump, the Alt Right, and Populism began to turn the tide on the Jewish Supremacist Power. More Americans began to wake up to the Globo-Homo agenda. They came to be more aware of Jewish power. And even conservative white Americans who continue to have warm feelings for Jews and Israel increasingly said NO to social and political agendas favored by Jewish elites. And this is why Jews are all panicked about Russia. Jews are no longer worried about survival. They are addicted to supremacism. After all, Russia is friendly to Jews, and lots of Jews are fabulously rich there. Even as Jews denigrate Russia and spit on Putin, Russia and Putin have been nice, welcoming, and protective of Jews. While Putin moved against the nastiest Jewish oligarchs, he kept some of them around, and if anything, he’s come down hard on outspoken anti-Jewish elements in Russia. But that’s not enough for Jews who must have supremacism. Jews believe non-Jewish nations belong to them. Since Jews cannot take them over demographically like they took over Palestine, Jews promote mass invasion-immigration on all goy nations so that the native peoples will, under the Diversity regimen, lose their sense of identity, territory, and history. And then, Jewish globalist elites will find it much easier to penetrate and take over nation after nation, not least by exploiting the art of divide-and-rule among Diversity created by mass invasion-immigration.

While Trump is clearly a traitor to the Empire of Judea, he could be seen as a patriot to America that has been envisioned as a sovereign nation with a specific history, core demography, core cultural themes(mostly rooted in Europe), and well-established borders. According to this view, the Core Americans are the European settlers who conquered, founded, and built the nation. While non-whites did their part in the development of the US, America is essentially an extension of European Civilization, and in order for the US to remain that way, its core must be white-European, especially Northern European. Patriots believe that this America must be preserved. After all, America was not founded and built by the world. Rather, it was founded by a specific group of Europeans, and later, other kinds of Europeans adapted and assimilated to this Core America that was essentially Anglo-Germanic. It has been this success story that made the US a magnet for the rest of the world that was far less successful in creating nice societies. If indeed the US belongs to all the world and must become all the world, why should people of the world have to come to the US? If the US is not a specific nation but The World, then people around the world should just stay put because US, as the World, would hardly be different from the rest of the world. On the one hand, the globo-homo-pushers say the US is an ‘exceptional’ nation, but then they say the US must become like the rest of the world. If US is so exceptional, why must it become so much like the rest of the world? Or are they saying the world is made better if they come to the US and become ‘Americans’? But what would this ‘American’ be? If US no longer has a core demography, no core culture, and no core anything and if US is always reinventing itself with more and more Mass Immigration, what would make it so ‘exceptional’? Indeed, the US narrative went from 'immigrants from the world must assimilate to American-ness' to 'American-ness must assimilate to the world'.
Of course, Jews have it all figured out. The reason why Jews welcome more Mass Invasion-Immigration is because they believe themselves to the be smartest people. If Jews really believed that newcomers could take power from them, they would say NO to more Mass Immigration. Suppose Mexicans and Muslims have an average IQ of 130 and very pushy personalities. Suppose they were to come to the US, outsmart the Jews, and take over as New Elites. Would Jews really want More Immigration then? Of course not. Jews welcome more Mass Invasion-Immigration because they know the newcomers will only be their helots, servants, and new voters. Jews know the newcomers won’t be able to compete with Jews. Asians are smarter than most immigrant groups, but East Asians are too dull-in-personality to win against Jews-with-chutzpah. And Hindus are too exotic and weird for most Americans to accept as the New Elites. Indeed, Jewish Power works a perverse duality vis-a-vis whites. On the one hand, Jews berate and shame whiteness. Jews tell whites to know their place and not act uppity. But Jews also count as ‘white’, and that means they are more acceptable to whites as elites than other groups are. So, even though many whites may increasingly sense that Jews are pretty nasty toward them, they still regard Jews-in-power as whites-in-power since Jews officially count as whites. But many whites wouldn't feel likewise if a bunch of Hindus took elite power in the US. Hindus are just too exotic. And of course, Jews understand this psychology, which is why they don’t fear Hindus very much. And Hindus understand this too. They know that whites(and blacks and browns) are less likely to accept the 'dotkins' as New Elites. For one thing, it would be seen as cutting in front of the line as most Hindus in the US are relative newcomers. So, Hindus stick close to Jews in their attainment of power and privilege. They dare not try to gain the upper-hand over Jews. In this Jewish vision of America, more and more ‘immigrants’ means more underlings of Jews. While Mexicans can out-compete ‘white trash’ and Asians can out-compete white middle class, neither will be able to out-compete Jews. Jews are too smart. They are too well-connected. They are too tribal and viciously chutzpahstic. Also, even if they shit all over whites, whites would still prefer Jewish masters than non-white masters. At the very least, white Christians can remind themselves of Judeo-Christian Values and go on pretending that Jews and White Christians are brothers-under-the-skin even though Jews continue to kick them in the balls. Jews as New Elites seem like an alien power but not entirely because Jews and white Christians go back a long time. But if the US were to come under the power of non-whites, there would be far less support for the new elites among whites. Whites will take shit from Jews(and from blacks as Magic Negroes) but not from any other people. Even as Jews berate whites for not being sufficiently welcoming to MORE non-white immigration, they aren’t looking for to parity and equality between Jews and non-white immigrants. As far as Jews are concerned, the non-whites are merely Diversity army to be used against whites. Now, what if whites side with non-whites against Jews? Jews figure that won’t happen because whites, especially white conservatives, will always favor white Jews(no matter how nasty they are) to non-whites. This is the conundrum facing the American Right. Its racial consciousness leads to preference of ‘fellow white’ Jews over non-whites, but no group is as hostile and vicious toward whites in the West than Jews are. It’s like black bears siding with brown bears in the spirit of fellowship-of-the-bear against wolves and coyotes but being attacked most by brown bears that also welcome coyotes and wolves to beat on black bears too. Jews denounce white-consciousness as 'racist' but also rely on this 'racism' as it makes whites favor Jews over others. After all, most white conservatives tend to see Israelis as WHITE Jews and Palestinians as BROWN 'ragheads'. And it is why whites generally favor Jewish power over other kinds of power. Whites aren't bothered by College admission policies that favor Jews over Asians because Jews are seen as fellow whites. So, Jews are playing a contradictory game. They revile white consciousness as 'racist' but also subtly appeal to it to keep whites favoring Jews over non-whites(such as Palestinians in the Middle East and Asians in competition for colleges).

One thing for sure, Trump’s meeting with Putin sure smoked out the true nature of the Deep State. It is so totally Jewish or cucky-wuck. All this alarm about ‘evil Putin’ and Trump’s treason is about Jewish Supremacists demanding that the US remain as part of Empire of Judea than regain independence as a sovereign nation, like Russia and Iran. Jewish supergroup supremacist imperialism hates Russian nationalism and American nationalism because nationalism is anti-imperialist. Nationalism seeks autonomy and independence from imperialist domination. The Thirteen Colonies once belonged to the British Empire. When the Colonies declared independence, the British Crown and Parliament howled TREASON. The Colonies relied on the aid of the French to fight the British. (If Russia wants to help American patriots like the France aided the American Revolutionaries, why should we care? Did the Founding Fathers say NO to French aid on the basis that France was a monarchy?) At this point, the US is no longer a free nation. After the Cold War, Jews cemented their power as the supremacist element in the US, and they steadily and surely incorporated the US into the Worldwide Network of Jewish Supremacist Power. The US is now a colony of the Empire of Judea just as the Thirteen Colonies were once the possession of the British Empire. Just as the British Empire was furious with the uppity daring of the American Revolutionaries who declared independence, Jewish supremacists are freaking out over the fact that Trump and patriotic Americans(who’ve emerged from Jewish hypnosis) are effectively demanding independence and emancipation from the Jewish Supremacist Imperialism. According to Jews, ‘America’ must remain in the Image of Jewish Power. America must obey Jews. And especially White Americans must hate their own race & culture and cuck out to blacks and be ‘inclusive’ of unceasing non-white mass invasion that will reduce the historic core population of the US into a permanent minority. This is the Jewish vision of America, and it can only see Trump’s effort at rapprochement with Russia as a threat to Jewish domination. After all, Russia was once a part of the Empire of Judea but managed to tear itself free(though not entirely) from Jewish claws. If Russia could do it, why not the US? Why not the nations of the EU? If Russia is no longer a part of EOJ, why should the US remain a vassal? EOJ, more than NATO and EU, is the real curse of the world. Though Trump is coming under lots of fire, the sheer hysteria of the Jews is giving us a clear picture of who really rules America and what their real agenda is.
All patriots must be willing to be treasonous to the Empire of Judea. To be loyal to one's nation and people requires one to commit treason against the alien overlords. For Gandhi and Nehru to be loyal to the idea of Indian Independence, they had to be treasonous to the British Empire and refuse to serve as subjects and agents of British Imperialism.

Indeed, imagine the chutzpah of these Jews who make up 2% of the US population but deign to define what is 'America' and shove this concoction down our throats and up our anuses. These Jews, so nasty and lacking in self-awareness, seem to believe that America exists to serve Jewish vanity. Any vision of America that says NO THANKS to Jewish domination is deemed as 'treason'. Well, loyalty to nation calls for treason against globo-homo empire. Such is true patriotism. And we must praise Donald Trump for having tried against all odds against the vile and vicious Jews. He is wrong on many things, but his counter-chutzpah can be amazing.

A Most Useful Slogan: "West Bank and Gaza are America’s Greatest Ally" or "Palestine is America’s Closest Ally" — An Effective Way to Expose the Most Important Fact of America: It is a Jewish-Supremacist Colony

The Left-Right(aka National Humanists or Neo-Fascists) should oft-repeat a message for all to hear: "Palestine is America’s Greatest Ally" or "West Bank and Gaza are America’s Closest Ally". What for, one may ask? For the simple reason that, before anything is possible, we must expose and examine the fundamental truth about the current state of the US, namely that it is essentially a Jewish-Supremacist colony. If politics is a struggle for influence, authority, and power, then one must clearly identify the nature of the power. It is like a doctor treating a patient. Unless the doctor correctly and honestly diagnoses the disease, he won't save the patient. Imagine if someone is dying of cancer, but the doctor treats him for everything but cancer. No matter how much money and medicine go into the treatment, the patient will surely die. Indeed, less money spent based on the correct diagnosis will be more effective than all-the-money-in-the-world spent on the wrong diagnosis. Suppose someone is suffering from a heart disease that can be treated relatively easily and inexpensively. But suppose the doctor comes up with a series of diagnoses that call for expensive treatments that never get to the core of the problem. Now, if the doctor is truly incompetent, his diagnoses may at the very least be the result of ‘honest mistakes’. He may have made the patient sicker or even killed him but didn't meant to do any harm. But suppose the doctor is a wicked creature who willfully mis-diagnosed the problem? He’d be like a crooked auto mechanic who could fix a minor problem at small cost but informs the owner of the vehicle that a lot more work needs to be done. Now, if the crooked doctor or auto mechanic did identify and fix the actual problem despite the overall fraudulence, at the very least the problem would have been dealt with. But what if a truly wicked doctor willfully mis-diagnosed the patient and made lots of money by carrying out elaborate and expensive procedures(that overlooked the real sickness) that ultimately did nothing to save the patient? It would really be a form of murder. What goes for medicine also goes for politics. A nation or society is like the human body. It is always in a state of birth and death, growth and decay, health and sickness. Just like the body regulates itself, nation or society has internal mechanisms that make sure things run right. Farmers produce food, truckers transport materials, factories make products, disposal services remove waste, fresh water is brought to residents and foul water is sent to sewage-treatment plants. But when the system breaks down, then people-with-power must take the extra-step to identify what is wrong and fix them. Every society has criminals. Every society has accidents, mistakes, and natural disasters. Every society has the problem of corruption. So, even though we prefer most problems to be solved by socio-economic factors that maintain equilibrium, there are times when the system breaks down and requires the strong hand of the government as the national physician. Think of the problems following the Great Depression of 1929. Or following the financial crisis of 2008.

The main problem of the US is that most people have no idea what kind of people has the real power. Unless people come to realize this, they won’t understand why there are certain serious problems that never go away and, if anything, get worse... just like, if you don’t know the disease, you won’t know why you’re getting sicker and sicker(despite your best efforts to regain health). It’s like Future America of IDIOCRACY couldn’t fix the crop failure because everyone from top to bottom was so convinced that Brawndo(an energy drink), being all-around elixir, couldn’t possibly do any harm to anything. So, even the crops were watered with the stuff.

So many Americans have a Brawndo-mentality. Just like the mindless confidence(bordering on faith) in Brawndo prevented people in IDIOCRACY from realizing that it is not a fixer-upper for all problems, most Americans have their own ‘brawndos’ that keep them from waking up and seeing the real truth. Many Americans believe the US is a ‘liberal democracy’ based on Rule of Law and rights protected by the Constitution. Or, if they find much that is wrong with the US, they believe that the solution to all problems is the ‘brawndo’ of Diversity and Inclusion. And they believe that Evil resides in the neo-Satan of Hate(or Hatan) that supposedly infects only the hearts of white people or right-wingers. So, even though the implosion of much of California clearly owes to Mass Invasion by non-whites, too many Americans fail to see the obvious problem as the real problem because Diversity and Inclusion are ‘brawndo’ to their ears.
There has also been horrible cultural and moral degradation of America, much of it owing to decadence of Homomania, neurosis of Jewish culture, and savagery of black culture. But, how can they be problems when we’ve all been told, day in and day out, that Homos are wonderful angels, Jews are eternal saints, and blacks are Magic Negroes? We don’t have real morality in the US that is about individuals with conscience learning to be self-critical, self-aware, and self-reforming. True morality is about personal integrity of choosing moderation, balance, and restraint over greed, gluttony, lust, pride, envy, wrath, and laziness. But capitalism, especially in the expansive US where everything seemed possible, made a mockery of favoring virtue over vice. In a world of rags-to-riches fantasies, dreams of celebrity, and universalization of pleasure, why hold anything back? Even if you are capable of delaying gratification to win the bigger prize, you are expected to indulge yourself once you are awash in money and power. So, we have shameless rich or powerful people who indulge themselves. ‘Greed is good’ because it fuels ambition. And why not go for El Dorado in the nation of Hollywood, Disneyland, and Las Vegas? Make more money, buy more, indulge more. And why not enjoy food to the fullest? So what if you grow fat. Be body-positive or sue your doctor if he tells you that you need to lose weight to regain health. And why restrain your sexuality? Lose your virginity as fast as possible like it’s a disease. Go to Spring Break and have sex with lots of strangers. Don’t worry. There are birth-control pills, contraceptives, day-after pills, penicillin, and abortion. Why deny yourself anything? You must eat and have sex to the fullest. And who said laziness is a sin? Why not be like a pothead and use lots of drugs and be like Brad Pitt’s character in TRUE ROMANCE? It’s ‘cool’. And who says anger must be checked? Be like Antifa and just attack anyone whom you deem a ‘nazi’. Or be a rapper or punk rocker and spew endless filth like degenerates. As for sin of pride, not only is it good but it can apply to any vice. So, sluts and prostitutes deserve pride. And homos into fecal penetration and trannies into penis-cutting might as own the term itself. In such a cultural climate that urges everyone to indulge shamelessly to excess, personal integrity and morality are no longer possible. If anything, vice is the New Virtue. We even have ‘mainstream’ journals and news outlets urging people to commit adultery in ‘open marriages’ or take up ‘cuckolding’. Wall Street sharks not only got to keep their vast stolen wealth after 2008 but were allowed to rake in billions more. They say fish rots from the head, and the three most exalted groups in the US are Jews, blacks, and Homos. They wallow in Vice-as-New-Virtue. With a culture that tells people that you’re a ‘loser’ unless you are having the most fun, it’s no wonder that most people watched THE WOLF OF WALL STREET not as a cautionary tale but a celebration of greed, lust, pride, envy, gluttony, sloth, and wrath all rolled into one. American Culture is now all about the Grasshopper. Even people who still work in the mode of Ants believe in Grasshopper values, i.e. they believe they must make the money to have the means to live like Grasshoppers. Even though Counterculture boomers loved to blame it all on the Reagan Yuppie 80s, the attitude really began in the 1960s when even radical leftist politics became inseparable from Sex, Drugs, and Rock & Roll. Even though the hippies claimed to be for ‘love and peace’, they were selfish jerks who thought it was their birthright to party all day and night long, while mooching off others. It’s like what Albert Brooks said of the guys in EASY RIDER. They sold cocaine to pay for their carefree self-indulgences. In time, the flaky pretensions faded away from the 60s Youth Culture, leaving only hedonism and shamelessness for later generations. Already in the bicentennial year of DAZED AND CONFUSED, the Richard Linklater film, the young ones are into partying and having a good time with little concern for ideals. As Americanism came to be about shameless hedonism and self-indulgence, personal integrity(the only basis for real morality) was no longer possible and was replaced with bogus group-idolatry and ideo-fanaticism. As Jews, blacks, and homos were sanctified the most, they were deemed to be good simply on the basis of their identities. Whatever Jews did, no matter how foul, they could invoke the Holocaust as get-out-of-jail card. And blacks only needed to cry ‘racism’ and do the Magic Negro BS. And Homos merely needed to wave the ‘rainbow’ flag and claim ‘pride’ as their own. As for the others, their primary sense of goodness derived from PC fanaticism. Being fanatical, they didn’t need to contemplate or question anything. They simply needed to drink the Kool-Aid and chant favored slogans about ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’, about ‘racism’ and ‘homophobia’. They came to be about as stupid as Red Guards mindlessly quoting from Mao’s Little Red Book.

Now, being quiet inside a library is a virtue. It’s about being mindful and respectful of others who are reading or studying. It takes self-awareness and respect for knowledge. It’s about mutuality. Others respect you and you respect others in the spirit of learning and good manners. But such real morality means nothing to blacks and the PC mob. Blacks, for the simple ‘virtue’ of being black, think they have the right to disrupt a library and howl like gorillas because they, as blacks, be so sacred, magical, cool, badass, and shit. And non-black PC idiots will join along and feel so holier-than-thou because they always claim to be fighting ‘racism’ or some other ‘evil’(and are rubbing shoulders with the sacred Magic Negroes). It’s a hysterical and hyped War Morality. In war, military-morality works differently from civilian morality. In order to win the war by beating the ‘bad guys’(the other side is, of course, deemed ‘evil’), the military-morality allows all sorts of mayhem and mass-killing of even innocents that would be unthinkable in peace-time. We were led to believe that Shock and Awe in Iraq and other mass bombings were ‘justified’(even though many innocents died or were wounded) because the US was working toward the higher good of removing an evil tyrant and planting a democracy in the Middle East. PC tells its foot-soldiers that, because history is on their side against the forces of Evil, whatever they do is justified by the delusional nobility of the cause itself. These people really have mass-murder in their hearts, and they must be countered accordingly.


Anyway, the main fact of American Power is that Jews control just about everything that matters. Indeed, one could even say the US is a Jewish-Supremacist colony. How? In so many respects depending on how we define ‘supremacism’. If we define supremacism as ‘wildly disproportionate power’ held by a certain group, then Jewish Power is indeed supremacist because no group comes near Jews in having power, wealth, and influence that far exceed their share of the population. Recent census shows that Jews make up 1.7% of the US population. Now, suppose Jews controlled 10% of Wall Street, Hollywood, Las Vegas, Silicon Valley, Real Estate, Top Law Firms, Ivy League schools, Big Media, Deep State, and etc. Jews would be vastly over-represented with the 10% figure. But in fact, Jews control 95% of media and almost all of Hollywood and Las Vegas. Jews control most of the biggest players in Silicon Valley. And Jews control at least half of Wall Street. Jews control the Ivies. Jews control Deep State and foreign policy. Jews control most politicians who’ve been bought and sold by Jewish money and know that Jewish media can make or break them. Jews control most of the top law firms that even engage in Lawfare against dissident voices. And not only do Jews have all this power and wealth, but they interact and coordinate with one another across the industries and institutions. After all, look how people like Richard Spencer and Jared Taylor have not only been deplatformed and sued but denied financial services by monopoly industries controlled by Jews. In the current USA, American citizens are denied basic services of communication and consumption(of products and services) by globalist-imperialist Jews who’ve occupied much of America. And Jewish media work with Jewish Deep State and Jewish finance to ‘dox’ and destroy the livelihoods of anyone who cares about his own people. So, while a total scumbag like Marc Rich was pardoned by Bill Clinton and a lowlife weasel like Jonathan Pollard was pardoned by Obama and handed a plush job upon release, good decent patriotic white Americans who refuse to serve Jewish Supremacism get labeled as ‘white supremacist Nazis’ who aren’t allowed to enact financial transactions or communicate with people freely.
In theory, anyone can be fired for his ideological views, but in truth, it doesn’t work this way. After all, if someone is fired for being Alt Right or ‘white nationalist’, the employer suffers no consequences. But suppose a company fires someone for being Zionist or a Neocon supporter of Wars for Israel. Suppose the employer finds the person’s views to be Judeo-Nazi. Or suppose Twitter has a new policy(of working with BDS than with ADL) that favors Palestinians and denounces & bans Zionist speech as ‘hate speech’. In theory, it'd be allowed, but the Power will come down so hard on the employer or Twitter that neither would dare take any actions against Zionists EVEN IF he/it sincerely believed Zionism is evil or that Jewish Power around the world is murderous and supremacist.

To continue, Jews can be said to be ‘supremacist’ in more ways than one. Jews certainly have disproportionate power way beyond what their demographics would warrant. But suppose we argue that Jewish over-representation owes strictly to meritocracy. In other words, Jews haven’t sought supreme power but accidently ended up with it because they are naturally smarter and more studious. Still, by rules of PC, that doesn’t cut the mustard. After all, even the argument that whites do better than Sub-Saharan-West-African-Americans(or SWAA) and Meso-Americans on merit isn’t good enough. What matters is Results according to the theory of Disparate Impact. So, it doesn’t matter if whites, blacks, and browns all agreed that the tests are fair. If whites do considerably better than blacks and browns, it is an act of ‘injustice’ that perpetuates ‘white supremacy’. So, following that logic, Jewish Power would have to be condemned as ‘supremacist’ EVEN IF it was entirely based on individual merit.

But of course, Jewish Power isn’t just the result of individual talent. While many highly talented Jews did gain great success through intelligence and ability, less bright Jews have also gained lots of traction in academia, business, law, government, and other areas due to Tribal Networking. In other words, smart powerful Jews have worked together to favor their less-bright tribal brethren over more deserving non-Jews, especially European-Americans and Asians. Also, when equally smart Jew and non-Jew must go head-to-head, the Power will favor the Jew. There’s little doubt that Jewish entrepreneurs got favorable funding from banks on big projects. Also, Jews are advantaged because they have the Moral Shield. As a Holocaust People, they can’t be disgraced or destroyed no matter what they do or say(unless they offend blacks, who are deemed equally holy, as Donald Sterling learned), whereas non-Jews, especially whites, must always be careful. Furthermore, it’s far easier for non-Jews than Jews to be destroyed for this very reason. Suppose some Jewish guy said awful things about Iran, Russia, Syria, Palestinians, or whatever. Suppose he said something as crazy as Sheldon Adelson’s proposal of nuking Iran. A Jew can openly justify the Israeli death squad’s killing of Palestinian protesters. He will not lose his job, standing, or wealth. But what would happen to any goy politician, businessman, or some such IF it’s revealed that he once said something mildly critical of blacks or Israel? He could be fired, demoted, or denied funding. Rick Sanchez and Helen Thomas were gone in no time for mouthing criticism of Jewish power or Zionism. So, while goys, especially whites, must walk on eggshells and live in fear of being outed as an ‘anti-Semite’ or ‘racist’, Jews can spew any kind of filth about Palestinians, Russians, Iranians, Arabs, whites, Christians, and etc. The only people Jews must be careful about are blacks(and to a lesser degree, Homosexuals). So, there’s clearly no equality at work in how the power operates in the US. If we look into the ‘kitchen’ of power, what really happens is so different from what is presented in the dining area. Just like Anthony Bourdain’s book KITCHEN CONFIDENTIAL detailed what really happens among the chefs and owners, the more inquisitive journalists and maverick ex-insiders have been trying to inform the public about the Power Kitchen Confidential. John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt even wrote a book called THE ISRAEL LOBBY. But even among journalists and whistle-blowers with more spine, there’s been a tendency not to rock the boat on the Jewish issue. Even Wikileaks was most restrained in spilling the beans on Jewish or Israeli secrets. I guess Julian Assange knows something about what Jewish power could really do to him if it wanted to.

There is yet another layer of Jewish Supremacism. Not only are Jews vastly over-represented in elite industries & institutions and working in cahoots with one another to favor the Tribe over other groups but the sum of Jewish Power is hyper-actively working in supremacist mode in the West and the Rest(especially pertaining to the Middle East and Russia). The so-called ‘new cold war’ is Jewish War on Russia III. (Bolshevik Revolution was Jewish War on Russia I, and the Jewish economic looting of Russia in the 1990s was Jewish War on Russia II.) Jew Matthew Yglesias says American conservatives, who’d been fiercely anti-Soviet, are warming up to Russia because it’s become the center of White Nationalist Politics. The real reason is Russia managed to regain some degree of national sovereignty from Jewish supremacist domination. According to Jews like Yglesias, it is outrageous that Russians should own and control their own nation. Jews must control Russia even though they make up only 0.2% of the population. Even with such a small number, 20% of the richest people in Russia are Jewish, and they are well-protected by Putin and Russian government. If anything, they are favored over most groups. But even that isn’t enough for Jews who seek total domination. Also, American conservatives once feared the Soviet Union because it was expansive. It supported communist movements all over the world. Also, in the 40s and 50s, lots of Soviet spies in the US(many of them Jews) sent bushels of top secret material to the USSR. Jews even sent to mass-killer tyrant Stalin the secret of the Bomb. Why did Jews do this? Back then, Jewish-Americans saw the Soviet Union as the main base of Jewish Power as the so-called Russian Revolution had largely been a Jewish Revolution. And even though Stalin won out over Trotsky, there were still many Jews in the upper echelons of power in the USSR that also defeated Nazi Germany. Jewish-American support of the USSR wasn’t purely ideological or idealistic. It was tribal, especially as Stalin was initially a more fervent backer of the Zionist project. Before there was the Space Race, there was the Jew Race between USSR and the US. Stalin hoped to gain the support of World Jewry by backing Zionism, but when Israel was founded, the Jewish state threw its lot with the US that was richer and more promising in the long run as capitalist hog-heaven for Jews. That is when Stalin really turned against Jews and Zionism, and relations gradually worsened between the USSR and Jews as years passed.
At any rate, why do we need a new ‘cold war’? Unlike Jewish-Americans who actively aided and abetted the USSR, American conservatives just want peace and better relations with Russia. That’s it. All this Russian Collusion is the fetid fever-dream of Jews who are prone to projecting their own conspiratorial madness onto other peoples. According to Jews, the hunt for REAL Soviet spies in the US was a ‘witch-hunt’ and ‘Red Scare hysteria’ — Rosenbergs and Morton Sobell really were agents of Stalin — ,but the utterly bogus Trump-Russia collusion fantasy warrants each and every one of us to look under our bed for Russians, Russians, Russians. Also, Putin’s Russia is less about whiteness than about Christianity, traditionalism, and nationalism. Also, unlike the US that goes around claiming to be ‘indispensable’ and ‘exceptional’ nation that has some God-given right to invade, sanction, and destroy any nation, Russian foreign policy isn’t so ambitious. Russia didn’t lift a finger while the Jew-run US was ravaging the Middle East. Russia had to swallow the fact that Jewish-Americans colluded with Russian Jews to economically rape Russia in the 1990s. Russia stood by helplessly as the US and allies reduced Libya to a rubble. And it is Jew-run US that is aiding Saudi Arabia’s destruction of poor Yemen. Putin finally came to the rescue of Syria because the Jew-run US was using Alqaeda and ISIS to take down secular Assad. Also, Putin reacted to the US-funded coup in Ukraine that even recruited neo-Nazi elements. Imagine that, Jewish-Americans working with neo-Nazi elements to bring down a government. These ‘progressive’ types used to lament what the US did to Salvador Allende, but they have no problem with US backing forces to take down democratically elected governments in Ukraine and Egypt(that is once again ruled by the military). There’s a saying, "Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you." No truer words have been spoken. It is not Russia that has the missionary complex. It is the Jew-run US that has the crusader-missionary aggression to remake the world in its image. Russia is building Churches, but it’s not trying to force its Orthodox Faith on other nations. If anything, it’s the Jews and post-Christian Americans who are trying to spread Homomania as Jewish-Satanic-substitute-christianity around the world. Russia doesn’t try to force US cities to have Orthodox Church processions. It is the Jew-run US that tries to turn every national capital into Victory March grounds for Globo-Homomania as new religion of the West. Jews now control the West and decided to replace Christianity with a new faith of their own making. But Yglesias the Jew strikes out in pain as he punches Russia and American conservatives who simply want peace and mutual respect. Peace between US and Russia is triggering to Jewish supremacists like Yglesias who fear that the Russian example may spread to other white-majority nations. Is Putin’s Russia trying to spread ‘white supremacy’? Well, Putin has a strange way of carrying out such agenda. In Russia, neo-Nazi speech is strictly curtailed. If anything, it’s the Jewish globalists who are allied with neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine. Also, Putin has gone out of his way to maintain good relations with Muslims, and he’s been especially protective of Jews. Indeed, just about any Jew can travel to and invest in Russia, but many Alt Right figures would be banned there. Also, Putin’s Russia has good relations with non-white nations like China, Iran, and Syria. If anything, all the virulent anti-Arab and anti-Persian sentiments are coming from the Jewish community. But then, of course, THAT is the problem. Russia supports Syria and Iran. That is why Jews hate Putin. So much for Putin’s ‘white nationalism’. When the Jew-run West decided to sanction Russia, Putin moved closer to China and Iran. How is that ‘white nationalism’? Also, keep in mind that Poland and Hungary chose on their own to say NO to ‘refugees’ who were uprooted by the millions due to Wars for Israel instigated by Jew-run US. Jews are devious in using their bogus sympathy for ‘refugees’ to mask the fact that Wars for Israel created those ‘refugees’ in the first place. Imagine a Jew who burns down someone’s house and then feigns sympathy for the destitute family; then, the Jew insists that YOU take in the family-made-homeless by Jewish arson. And if you say NO, the Jew calls you a heartless ‘nazi’ or ‘supremacist’. Israel and its rabid backers in the US have been most instrumental in spreading wars and mayhem in the Muslim World that led to so many ‘refugees’, but notice how no one expects the Jewish nation to take in any ‘refugees’. Indeed, Israelis still illegally occupy Golan Heights and West Bank where Arabs live under Apartheid conditions. But you won’t hear much about that from Matthew Yglesias who is just another devious Jew. It’s no wonder Jews were hated universally all over the world. What is most disgusting about Jews is they bitch on and on about ‘white supremacism’, but all their favored immigration destinations have been places made by ‘white supremacism’. Indeed, Jews have supported ‘white supremacism’ when it was to their benefit. Consider how Jews celebrate the US as a ‘Nation of Immigrants’. Now, from the vantage point of American Indians, all those ‘immigrants’ were invaders whose arrival meant more westward expansion and more loss of territory to newcomers. But Jews only care about their interests. Since Jews arrived as immigrants and grew rich and fat off what the white man conquered from the Red Man, Jews celebrate the history of invasion-immigration in the US. Anyway, the reason why Jewish Supremacists like Yglesias hate Russia and American conservatives so much is because both peoples are nationalist than imperialist. Russia is for Russian national interests, and American conservatives are for American national interests. But both sides understand how they can co-exist in peace, trade, and respect one another. Jews hate national sovereignty among goy nations because it means resistance to Jewish globalist neo-imperialism. Jews believe that they, as the supreme race, should have the right to stick their noses into the affairs of all nations. Jews now see themselves as god. Just as God was said to see and know everyone and everything in the world that all belongs to Him, Jews feel they have some divine right to penetrate anywhere, lay claim to anything, and decide what is right for anyone. (Jews say Homo-Worship is compulsory for all peoples now.) What Jews once regarded as the outlook of God has become their own outlook because they no longer believe in God. There's no more need to project Jewish personality onto God. By outsourcing their neurosis to God, Ancient Jews had gained a measure of humility. (God was like a scapegod. Jewish arrogance and megalomania were pushed onto God who burned brightly with Jewish fury. Worshiping their own megalomania as a collective spiritual entity, Jews found a measure of peace. But in the absence of belief in God, Jewish arrogance remains within the Jewish soul and burns out of control.)

Jews are now a self-worshiping bunch of a**holes who thinks all nations and peoples exist to serve Jews. This is why Jews hate American conservatives and Russia. American and Russian nationalisms, though humbler, are more resilient and stronger because they know their limits and duties. American nationalism is supposed to serve Americans, and Russian nationalism is supposed to serve Russians. Why does this idea trigger Jews? Because Jews think Americans and Russians ought to serve Jews. This is why Jews spread Homomania all around. Homos are the proxies of Jews who favor the New Normal of elite minority supremacism. And this is why Jews say existing Americans are less American than Americans-yet-to-be by never-ending waves of Mass Invasion-Immigration. If existing Americans really felt they owned the nation, they would have a clearer sense of what is good for most Americans who are not Jewish. Jews hate the idea of Russians, Americans, or white people caring primarily about themselves. It’d mean they would put their own interests above those of Jews. So, Jews push any mentality and outlook among goyim to make them think less about themselves than of the Other. And since Jews are the most powerful group among the Other, they take the lion’s share of the white cucking out for the Other. One thing for sure, white Christian American concern for the Other sure favors Jews over Palestinians.

There is no doubt that Jewish power is nakedly supremacist. Jews surely control the Narrative with their ownership of the World Media. That is why, to this day, so many Americans have no idea that Jewish communists carried out mass-killings in the USSR and ruled over goyim-as-cattle. They have no idea that it was Jews who raped Russia in the 90s and led millions to die of destitution. Jews also carried out massive White Slavery by turning countless Slavic girls into sex-slaves in Israel and other parts of world networked by the Jewish mafia. Also, the wars of Bush II and Obama/Hillary were all Wars for Israel. Isn’t it funny how Jews say it’s all about spreading ‘human rights’ and ‘democracy’, but Jews have no problem working with Saudi Arabia, hiring neo-Nazis in Ukraine, and aiding Alqaeda and ISIS in Syria. Surely, the likes of Matthew Yglesias know all this, but their vile Jewish personality and tribalism apparently trump everything. Their Jewish-supremacist imperialism simply cannot tolerate the humble nationalism of nations that want to retain or regain their national sovereignty and work with other similar nations in a spirit of truce and respect. It’s like Russia and China. There’s mutual respect and sense of limits. Russia doesn’t interfere in Chinese affairs, and vice versa. Each seeks its own national interest but finds areas in which they have mutual interests. And they learned to get along. And we can have the same between US and Russia. But nasty Jews won’t have it because they want all nations to serve Jews. Jews bitch and lie about how Trump is servile to Russia when, in fact, they are really pissed because he isn’t wholly servile to Jewish Globalist Power. According to Jewish Logic, US wanting good peaceful relations with Russia is ‘appeasement’. These vile Jews invoke the language of 1939 even though they are the ones who are allied with real neo-Nazis in Ukraine, practice Apartheid in West Bank, and use IDF death squads to kill Palestinian women and children who want to see their stole homeland again. Not being servile to Jews is being servile to Russia. Any honest observer would note that if the US government is servile to one thing, it’s is Jewish Power and Israel that now operates as a vicious Judeo-Nazi state that guns down innocent Palestinians who were forced into refugees status by the Nakba Pogroms in 1948. As if that wasn’t tragic enough, Jews instigated a war in 1967 and stole West Bank and Golan Heights as well. And of course, Jews expect Americans to support their acts of warmongering and imperialism. The real servility is to Jewish Supremacism, but the likes of Yglesias are either blind or dishonest in their refusal to call out reality like it is.

Anyway, the reason why we should spread the ‘meme’ of "Palestine is our greatest ally" or "West Bank and Gaza are our greatest ally" is it makes the scales fall from our eyes and make us realize how duped and brainwashed by Jews we are. Initially, those who hear the utterance will find it absurd. They’ll think, "What? Palestine our greatest ally? West Bank and Gaza our best friends?" But then, it will provoke people to consider the slogan, "Israel is our greatest/closest ally." After all, isn’t the sentiment just as ludicrous as "Palestine is our greatest ally?" Besides, WHO said Israel is our greatest ally? Most Americans are not Jewish. So, what does Israel matter to us? Why should the passion of 1.7% of Americans be the passion of all Americans? Perhaps, Greek-Americans love Greece, but do they make us say, "Greece is our greatest ally?" Do Turkish-Americans make us say, "Turkey is our greatest friend or closest ally?" If the US and Israel are very close, it has nothing to do with what most of us really feel. It’s because Jews rule the US and used their supremacist power to favor Israeli and Jewish-globalist interests over all others. In other words, this ‘closeness’ narrative between US and Israel has been imposed by Jews. Imagine if Iranian-Americans had control of 95% of media, owned Wall Street and Hollywood, dominated Ivy League, and bought up most politicians. Suppose they tell us over and over and over through puppet politicians and front-men, "Iran is our closest ally, greatest friend, and etc." For that to be the case, Iranian-American would have to have supremacist control over us. After all, most of us being non-Iranian, there would be no reason for us to be ecstatic about globalist Iranians and their wildly out-of-proportion interests.

Granted, there is widespread American support for Jews and Israel, but then why? This also owes to Jewish supremacism. It was Jewish control of media and academia that filled so many minds with the notion of Good Jews and Evil Arabs. Hollywood gave us all those Arabs-as-terrorists movies. Hollywood has yet to make a film about the Nakba pogroms, just like it has never made a movie about the murderous Jewish role in communism or about how Jewish-American agents sent Bomb secrets to Stalin. Instead, we get stuff like ANGELS IN AMERICA where Ethel Rosenberg is some saint while anti-communists are scum. It’s all tribal. Jews defended communist agents and vilified anti-communism because so many Jews were on the radical left back then. Of course, Christianity itself spread the supremacism of the Jewish Narrative. Even though Christianity was often anti-Jewish, it disseminated the Bible, the Old along with the New, all over the world, and this came to favor the Jewish Narrative over all others when it came to the Holy Land. So, many Christians supported Zionism as a kind of neo-crusade to take back the Holy Land from the Muslims. Jews were seen as the proxy. But the kind of American Christian Zionism is really disgusting and ultimately pathetic and pitiful. It’s really about low-IQ ignoramus white Evangelicals being hoodwinked into supporting Israel despite the fact that most American Jews despise and hate Evangelical Christians. A poll few yrs back revealed that most Jews prefer even Muslims over Evangelicals. So, those white Christian dummies are being taken for a ride. They are being manipulated by Jewish money that bought up these whore politician who never shut up about ‘muh Israel, muh Israel’.

Jews constitute the most supremacist power in the US but, via their control of the media and academia(and whore politicians), they’ve created the impression that they are the main force of resistance against ‘white supremacism’. Of course, what Jews deem as ‘white supremacism’ is really just White Emancipation from White Submissivism to Jewish supremacism. Jewish masters find it incredibly uppity for whites to say NO to Jewish demands. So, if whites no longer want a ‘new cold war’ with Russia that only perpetuates Jewish supremacism, that is deemed as ‘white supremacism’ by Jews. If whites no longer want to fight more Wars for Israel and kill Muslims or get killed, that is ‘white supremacism’. No more Wars for Israel will surely end the ‘refugee crisis’, but what do Jews care? They only pretend to care about ‘refugees’ without ever addressing the fact that their Zio-supremacist wars led to the violence that uprooted so many peoples. If white people say NO to Homomania, the proxy neo-satanic-christian religion concocted by Jews, that too is ‘white supremacism’ because, for some reason, it is ‘nazi’ to feel that homo fecal penetration and tranny penis-cutting don’t have the same biological value and moral pedigree as real sex and real love & marriage. Using Jewish moral logic, the US must have been a ‘nazi’ nation before Jews made ‘gay marriage’ law of the land. People weren't truly human prior to becoming 'more evolved' by associating homo fecal penetration and tranny penis-cutting with rainbows and marriage. What a truly gross, disgusting, and vile people, these Jewish supremacists.

Even more outrageously, these Jews, who constantly berate white Americans for having favored their own kind over others in the past, zealously insist that Jewish and Israeli interests must take front seat over all others. Should Israel and Iran be treated equally? After all, if the US favored Iranian interests over Israeli interests, wouldn’t that be supremacist? If US is to be a totally fair global power, it would treat all nations and peoples equally. It would not play favorites. If the US were to favor one nation over another, the ONLY justification would be national interest. Now, what national interest does Israel have for the US? Does the well-being, security, survival, or prosperity of the US depend on the existence of Israel? Suppose Israel had not been founded in 1948. Would the US today be less wealthy or powerful? If anything, US relations with all of the Middle East might be much better. So, if anything, US sacrificed much of its national interest to favor Israel, the ethno-megalomanical project of Zionist Jews.

Another proof of Jewish supremacism is that Israel and only Israel among ‘Western Nations’ has sovereignty and full control of its borders. All other Western nations have no such authority. Hungary and Poland have decided to protect their borders, but they’ve come under tremendous pressure and denunciation from the Jew-run EU. But hardly anyone mentions that Israel has the toughest border walls in the world. When we look back on the imperialist histories of Britain, France, Nazi Germany, and the USSR, it’s obvious that the supreme power had the ‘right’ to go anywhere and also to keep Others/Foreigners out of the home-nation. So, the British imperialists could freely move into India, Africa, and Asia. And they could move millions of people from one place to another. They could ship blacks from Africa to West Indies. They could colonize a million Asian Indians in Africa and other parts of Asia. And Indians couldn’t say NO to British intrusion into India, and Africans couldn’t say NO to British relocation-migration of many Hindus to work as coolie labor. But, the British could keep non-British out of Britain itself. Brits could protect their home-base like Jews protect Israel from the rabble of the world. But today, both the US and EU have come under the power of the Empire of Judea, or EOJ. The US and EU are to the EOJ what India and Africa were once to the British Empire. As such, Americans and Europeans cannot say NO to the mass-migration-invasions of peoples. Indeed, their so-called leaders are not real leaders but cuck-collaborators of Jewish globalism. And via the media and academia, the Jewish Empire has even convinced the masses that ‘Diversity’ and ‘Inclusion’(another word for Invasion) are holy and healing for them. It’s like Puerto Ricans have been convinced that they should totally give up on national independence and just be part of the US empire.
But Israel is allowed the full right to accept JEWISH IMMIGRATION ONLY and to strictly patrol the borders and keep out ‘infiltrators’.
So, who has the real power? Those who have control over their own destiny have power. If they have control over their own destiny and over the destines of others, they have supremacist power. Jews not only have control over Israel but have control over US and EU. In Israel, Jews do everything to keep Israel a Jewish State. In US and EU, Jews do everything to turn them into polyglot properties of the Empire of Judea. Jews want to own those imperial possessions forever, and they know Diversity and race-mixing are the key. After all, what ended European imperialism in Africa and Asia? A united people rose up against the imperialists. Blacks united to kick out whites. Browns in India united to kick out Brits. Yellows united in Vietnam to kick out the French. In contrast, why are the white elites still in power in Latin America? Because the extensive race-mixing led to confused identities that can’t unite. Mestizos don’t identify with native folks. Also, the arrival of black slaves led to even more diversity and mixture. So, whites still rule in Latin America.
This is why Jews hate goy unity and goy nationalism. It may rise up against the EOJ and say NO to stuff like Sorosism. Just like the British moved tons of Hindus into Africa to mix things up and dominate via divide-and-rule, Jews are now pushing mass-migrations all over the world to mix up populations so that they won’t be able to unite against Jewish globo-infiltration and takeover. This is obviously a form of Jewish supremacism.

So, to wake people up to reality, we should say to everyone, "West Bank and Gaza are America’s greatest ally" or "Palestine is America’s closest ally." It’s a way of triggering people. By making them conscious of the ludicrousness of the statement, they can be led to deal with the slogan repeated by politicians and pundits, "Israel is our greatest/closest ally." Well, who said so? And just how is it more valid than "Palestine is our greatest ally?" Are Palestinians less human than Jews. Are Jews superior to other peoples? Are Jewish lives more precious than Palestinian lives?

And if the US is a ‘nation of immigrants’ that is equally open and friendly to all peoples and nations, why does it favor Jews and Israel over all others? If it was wrong for white Americans to favor fellow white nations & peoples in the past, how is it any better for the current US to favor Jews over Arabs and Iranians?
Also, if the US is about ‘human rights’ and the ‘poor huddled masses yearning to be free’, why does it favor the Judeo-Nazi state of Israel that uses IDF death squads to gun down Palestinians yearning to be free? And if Jews claim to be about justice and concern for the oppressed, why don’t Jews use Hollywood to make movies about the Nakba pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map?
Also, given the Jewish globalist project of trying to Palestinianize the White Race and other peoples, it’s about time white goyim said, "We are all Palestinians now". Jews raped the Russian economy in the 90s and palestinianized the Russians. Jews used Clinton to force sanctions on Iraq that killed 100,000s of women and children. Iraqis were palestinianized. Jews used 9/11 as excuse to invade Iraq and bring about a massive civil war. More palestinianization. Jews used Obama and Hillary to destroy Libya, once the best nation in Africa, now a nation in total tatters. Libyans were also palestinianized. And Jews used Obama/Hillary to arm Jihadis and terrorists in Syria to turn that place upside down. 400,000 were killed, many more were wounded, and millions were displaced. Syrians were palestinianized. And then, Jewish power pushed all these ‘refugees’ into Europe so that Europeans would lose their ancient homelands to mass invaders. They too would be palestinianized. When we look at the doings of Jews, it’s obvious why most peoples didn’t want to take in Jews. And those that took them in soon regretted it. Jews are arrogant, megalomaniacal, and supremacist. No matter where they go, they try to take over and lord over others. They try to make others serve them while they live and eat like Effendi.

So, say it over and over and over: "West Bank and Gaza are America’s greatest and closest ally."