Logic of 'Antisemitism' would Indicate Powerful Jews are Most 'Antisemitic' for their Actions Exhibiting Obscene Levels of Jewish Power and Influence

Is Alan Dershowitz an Anti-Semite for saying Jews indeed do possess disproportionate power and influence?

ALAN DERSHOWITZ SAYS JEWS SHOULDN’T APOLOGIZE FOR THEIR POWER

Jewish commentators and social critics often argue that Antisemitic Stereotypes or Tropes never seem to go away. What are their examples of 'Antisemitism'? The perception that Jews control the mass media. The suspicion that Jews control banking and finance. The accusation that Jews have inordinate controls of elite institutions of society and abused their power to make the US fight Wars for Israel. The impression that Jews are more loyal to other Jews around the world and to Israel than to the particular nation in which they reside. And there are other matters too: Jews control vice industries such as gambling. Jews promote drugs, illegal and legal, to demoralize and even destroy goy peoples. Jews push for Mass Migration-Invasion to increase Diversity to play divide-and-rule among fractured and contentious goyim. Jews promote prostitution, pornography, and sex slavery to exploit goy women as sexual commodities. Jews are two-faced and play both sides. Jews favor minority elitism over majority power. Jews are rank hypocrites in insisting that goyim support Jewish identity, territoriality, and nationality while doing everything to undermine national autonomy & sovereignty among gentiles. Jews seek to drive a wedge between goy men and goy women to weaken organic unity within the goy population. Jews invoke universal principles not to partake of them but to cynically disarm goy nationalists while strengthening their own identity and tribalism. While Jews are perfectly fine with well-armed tribal brethren in Jewish-majority Israel, Jews seek to take away the guns of American goyim so that the Jewish-controlled state will have monopoly of arms over the populace. And so on.

Now, if all such inklings, suspicions, impressions, perceptions, accusations, and convictions are 'antisemitic' and if we push its moral logic to conclusion, then one would have to admit that those who PRACTICE acts and behaviors that support 'antisemitic' THEORIZING are most guilty of 'antisemitism'. After all, if John commits murders and if I suspect that he is committing murders, who is more guilty of anti-Johnism, that is IF 'anti-Johnism' is defined as an unwarranted negative view of John as wicked character despite his virtue, nobility, and innocence? If John is indeed innocent and a wonderful fellow but if I suspect him of being a cretin and a killer, I would then surely be guilty of anti-Johnism. But suppose there is hard evidence that John is a serial killer and goes around murdering people. And suppose my suspicions/accusations are based on that evidence. Then, who is the real anti-Johnist? Isn't John the Killer the true anti-Johnist because his actions have destroyed the pro-Johnist position that John is a good guy and wouldn't hurt a fly? Actions speak louder than words, or Actions SHOULD speak louder than words(though too often they don't), and moral logic would place the burden of anti-Johnism on John's shoulders if he is the one who committed acts that betrayed the spirit of pro-Johnism that contends that John is a jolly good fellow.

Then, the same logic applies to the issue of antisemitism. If our perceptions of Jewish wealth, power, influence, corruption, abuse, crimes, perfidy, and nastiness aren't supported by evidence, then we would indeed be guilty of 'antisemitism', which is defined as irrational fantasizing and hyper-exaggeration of Jewish impact on society, much of it negative. To clarify this matter, let us consider Eskimos. We know Eskimos or Inuits have no power over us. They may be good at constructing igloos, walking on snowshoes, and lifting stuff with their ears, but they have no control of media, finance, Deep State, gambling, Hollywood, the Military-Industrial Complex, pornography, music industry, real estate, law firms, the courts, the universities, and etc. So, if we were to spread rumors about Eskimo power and how it harms society, we would indeed be delusional. We could be said to be Anti-Eskimoan, in this case defined as "Casting irrational and fantastical aspersions of power, influence, and problems on the Eskimo community." Now, if Jewish influence was on the level of Eskimos(or the Amish or West Virginia hillbillies), I could agree with those who sound the alarm about 'antisemitism'. It'd be ludicrous to ascribe so much of social, economic, and political phenomena to Jews when Jews are so feeble and ineffectual as a group. But seriously, are Jews comparable to Eskimos and the Amish? ROTFL. Of course not.

Jewish Power is real, and it is vastly disproportionate to their share of the population. Jews are only 2% of Americans, but Jews are seriously over-represented in elite institutions, upper echelons of finance, top law firms, Ivy League universities, State Department, most influential think-tanks, Big Tech monopolies, uppermost courts, vice industries of gambling-drugs-and-pornography(which should be called E-Prostitution or Electronic Prostitution, very useful to Jews after they lost the business of pimping to the lowly blacks), Big Pharma(such as the sinister Sackler Family, the 21st century counterpart to the Jewish Sassoon Family that dominated the opium trade in China), and etc.
Now, Jewish Power isn't necessarily evil or wicked. Power, like fire, can be used to do good or bad, and indeed, positive Jewish contributions to humanity in many fields such as medicine, arts & literature, philosophy, science, math, and etc. have been nothing less than astounding. Most human groups have been inconsequential, and only a handful have been consequential, and Jews have been among the most consequential if not the most. But as with all great consequential peoples, there has been much that was bad as good. No one would say Romans were all bad or all good. No one would say the Chinese or Hindus, very consequential in Asia, were all good or all bad. Same goes for the British, French, Germans, and Arabs(who spread Islam). Great power is such that it can never be about only the good. Just like the Force in STAR WARS has a dark side, all forms of Great Power are open to abuse and exploitation, and all great peoples and empires have done their share of wicked things. Then, this would apply to Jews as well.

Personally, I believe the concept of Antisemitism has moral validity if defined as follows: (1) Blaming Jews for just about everything, even for things they are not guilty of. (2) Noticing only the negative side of Jewishness and Jewish history without acknowledging the positives.
But 'antisemitism' is not defined thus in our age. Rather, the mere noticing of Jewish Power is said to be 'antisemitic'. Criticism of Jewish power & influence and even the state of Israel is said to be 'antisemitic'. The notion that Jews have been bad as well as good is also 'antisemitic'. We are to believe Jews have always been noble innocent victims even when they were the villains, bad actors, or oppressors. For example, Palestinians are accused of denying the right of Israel to exist while there's hardly any mention that Israel was created as a denial of Palestine to exist. We are bombarded with endless scare stories about how Iran is on the verge of getting nukes while ignoring Israel has 300 nukes(made from uranium stolen from the US), most of them aimed at Iran that could be wiped off the map by Zionist nuttery. We are also to believe that Holocaust Holiness passes down through the generations(as if in accordance to Old Testament logic). So, even descendants of European Jews of the World War II period are paid reparations from the German government. And it doesn't matter how nasty Jews may be as individuals. Never mind what they do. The mere state of BEING Jewish means they are washed of their sins. So, Jonathan Pollard was sprung from jail even though his treason led to the deaths of many. Jeffrey Epstein the pervert-psychopath is walking as a free man. And white-collar Jewish crooks can have their own luxury prisons whereas white goyim must be stuck in cells with Negroes who fuc* them in the ass. Such social arrangement would suggest that Jewish Semites are now Supremites, or Supremacist-Semites who believe that they, as the Chosen People or Holy Holocaust people, are god-men over us and live as VIP with a separate set of rules that privilege their ilk uber alles. In a way, it's as if the world is divided between Jews & 'Meta-Jews' and Palestinians & 'Meta-Palestinians'. Jews and 'Meta-Jews'(or'Other Jews') — groups favored by Jews, such as Homos/Trannies and American Negroes — are above the law and get special treatment... like Jussie Smollett recently. In contrast, white Americans and white Europeans are essentially the 'Meta-Palestinians'(or 'Other Palestinians') as their future has been ordained to follow the fate of Palestinians who were destroyed by dehumanization, deplatforming, unperson-ization, and mass-migration(of Jewish Zionist imperialist-immigrants). What is called 'antisemitism' in the current era is really Anti-Supremitism as those who call out on Jewish Power are not opposed to Jews or Jewishness per se but against Supremacist-Semitism or Supremitism.

Jewish obnoxiousness on this matter is made all the worse because Jews hysterically indulge in the kind of hysteria, paranoia, and lunacy they accuse others of. Jews complain that Jewish Power is exaggerated, but it's the Jews who keep alive the fantasy that the KKK or Neo-Nazis have any power or influence in America. They do this by funding the SPLC and ADL that cook up mostly fake news about various KKK-sightings and incidents that turn out to be 'hate hoaxes'. Or, the cleverer Jews use the terminological net of 'white supremacism' in an 'inclusive' way to drag just about every Donald Trump voter into the 'Nazi' camp. Jews insist that even "It's Okay to be White" is 'white supremacist'. Jews also use guilt-by-association. So, since A is somehow connected to B who is connected to C who is connected to D who is connected to E, A must be in league with E. Using this logic, it's all too easy(and easier) to connect anyone in the Democratic side with extremists and radicals. If anything, Barack Obama had direct ties to Bill Ayers, and powerful Liberal institutions did much to rehabilitate some of the worst scoundrels of 60s radicalism. Certain cop-killers were hidden by their radical associates for decades. And given Jewish-American ties with Neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine, one can easily connect many influential Jews with extremists in Kiev. And given Thomas Friedman's close ties with Israel that has ties with ISIS, game of connect-the-dots can easily accuse Friedman of ties to terrorism. Or course, invocation of principles doesn't matter if you don't have power. Jews got the power, the megaphone for themselves and the mute-button for others, and they get to decide what is what... and too many people are sheeple and dummies to realize what is really happening.

The great irony of our era is that Jews, as the 'New Nazis', employ quasi-'antisemitic' tropes against certain peoples as the 'New Jews'. Jews do everything they accuse 'Anti-Semites' of doing to Jews. Notice how Jewish power often blames EVERYTHING on white goyim, the main scapegoat or scapegoy for all that is wicked in the world. If something is wrong, blame white men, white women, white this, or white that. It's as if whiteness is a disease and can only cured by extinction by non-breeding, race-mixing, or even murder(as in South Africa). Pathological Jewish Scholars push 'whiteness studies' that would have us believe that there is something innately sick or perverse about white identity and white consciousness.
Jews say it was wrong, even evil, for white Christians in the past to try to convert Jews, but Jews are hard at work converting whites to Political Correctness, 'Wokeness', Globo-Homomania(Queertianity as the new chrisianity), and white self-loathing as the only white virtue worth being proud about: "I'm proud of being ashamed of being white." But, it's not just whites, of course, who come under pathological Jewish ire. Jews also target Iran & Syria and spread all manner of hysteria, hatred, and paranoia on the basis of "Is it good for the Jews and Israel?" Scratch the ticket of any Jewish argument, and it comes down to "Is it good for Jews?" Why is non-Jewish immigration bad for Israel? Because it would demographically erase the Jewish State. Why is mass-immigration good for Hungary? Don't Hungarians have a right to preserve their territory and identity? No, because such right for Hungarians would undermine Jewish Power to use divide-and-rule to take over Hungary. George Soros apparently wants to play Sith Lord around the world, and that is just wonderful to Jewish Power as Jews stick up for other Jews.
To understand the psychology of Jewish and Goy relations, imagine a meeting between Yahweh and pagan gods. Suppose pagan gods of various peoples and cultures want to meet Yahweh halfway and arrive at a compromise. Would Yahweh accept? No and why not? Because Yahweh believes Himself to be the one and only God, the one true God whereas all other gods are false gods or wicked idols that must be destroyed. To the extent that spiritual space constitutes the mental landscape of a people, we need to remind ourselves that the Jewish Mind is essentially Yahwehisitic. And this mental habit is alive and well even among secular atheist Jews whose obsession is Mono-Tribalism and Mono-Nationalism for Jews. Even secular Jews will accept the validity of identity, territory, and history for Jews Only. Jews reject poly-nationalism and poly-tribalism that argues that every people have a land, legacy, and lineage worth preserving. As far as Jews are concerned, Jews and only Jews are deserving of uniqueness. In contrast, the goyim must be universalized in their worship of the Great Jews as Holy Holocaust neo-messiahs. Jewish body and blood are real. As for goyim, their identities are to be treated as baseball caps and t-shirts: Soulless objects, interchangeable and commodified. If white men controlled pornography and used Jewish women as sex meat for Arab men, how would Jews react? Jews would call it defamation and sexual imperialism. But Jews see nothing wrong with turning white women into sex meat for other men to be traded. If anything, Jews will deem it evil for white men to demand that Jews stop trading in white women as white meat.

One thing for sure, Jews are not to be trusted. Just consider the Russia Collusion hysteria spread by their control of media, academia, and Deep State. Jews claim that Russia has historically been guilty of antisemitism, but Jewish anti-Russianism seems to be many times worse(and eternal). Also, Jews don't believe in the middle ground or meeting people halfway. Alexander Solzenhitsyn, in his book TWO HUNDRED YEARS TOGETHER, called for both Russians and Jews to atone and bury the hatchet, but Jews have ignored the gesture because they want to own all of righteousness and dump all the blame on the Russkies whom they regard as subhumans who exist only to serve Jews. Like their God Yahweh who insist He and only He is the one true God, Jews must have it all. Jews may appear to haggle for compromise, but they're always aiming to have it all eventually. They are always plotting for total control. This is where Anglo-Americans miscalculated and failed in relation to Jews. They thought they could meet ascendant Jewish Power halfway, i.e. if declining Wasps welcome rising Bugs(Busy Urban Globalist Semites), then Jews would embrace Anglo-Americans as their bosom buddies. It'd be win-win for both sides. Jews didn't see it that way; they were out to make themselves the New Masters and turn Wasps into their running dogs... and that is the state of the world today. Russians learned the same thing in the 1990s. They thought Jews would act with honor and decency if given the reins over the economy, but Jews, whether Russian or American, conspired to take over just about everything and turn Russia into their fiefdom. The current Jewish hatred of Russia has NOTHING to do with past pogroms or Cossacks running wild. It's because Russia managed to thwart the Jewish Plot to take total control of Russia. Jews today aren't anxious about survival but obsessed about supremacism that they regard as their global right. Of course, the Jewish War on Russia isn't over, and it will never be over until Jews have it all. As long as Jewish Supremacism exists, it will seek to gain control of every part of the world, directly or indirectly. Jewish promotion of Globo-Homomania has one purpose: To weaken the moral and national integrity of every nation in favor of elite minority privilege. Homo elite-minorities in all nations love to hook up with elite-minority Jewish Power, especially as Jewish Power showers prizes on vain homos who choose to collaborate with Jews against their own national folks.
Jews, like white Europeans, have an adventurous spirit. When white man looked at the peak of the tallest mountain or the Moon, he didn't give up the dream of getting to the top, no matter how impossible it seemed. No matter how long it took, he was going to find a way to fulfill the dream one way or another. But if whites lionized physical feats of courage and daring, the Jewish dream was always more cerebral. Jews weren't excited by risking life and limb to accomplish the 'impossible'. Unlike Anglos and such folks, they weren't clamoring to climb mountains or make it to the North Pole. Rather, they found ways of wit to make other peoples do the bidding of Jews so that Jews could both keep their limbs and inherit the world. Consider the Wars for Israel. In the 1980s, who would have thought the events of the 90s and 21st century would come to pass? But Jews pulled the strings of media, finance, and government to make them happen. And Jews made OTHER peoples kill and die for the Jews. In the opening of the movie PATTON, the great general says that wars are not won by dying for one's country but by making the other 'poor dumb bastard' die for his country. Jews got it even better: They win wars by making one bunch of poor dumb goy bastards slaughter another bunch of poor dumb goy bastards while Jews rake in the dough and turn white women and Arab women into a bunch of whores. (Jews turned white women into sex toys for Jews and black men, and Wars for Israel have forced so many Arab women, especially Christians, into prostitution.)

Anyway, even if we play the rules of 'Antisemitism' as defined by Jews themselves, honest moral logic would suggest that Jews are the biggest 'Anti-Semites' because their actions provide ample evidence for those who notice patterns of Jewish power and influence that increasingly grows abusive and corrupt because, as they say, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews control the mass media, then Jews who DO control the mass media must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Media Control. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews control much of Wall Street, then Jews who DO control financial industries must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Money Control. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews control Silicon Valley, then Jews who DO control companies like Google and Facebook must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Big Tech Control. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews control pornography, then Jews who DO control the porn industry must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Porn Dominance. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews use their power to nefariously suppress freedom and liberty, then Jews who DO push for censorship must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Speech Control. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews control foreign policy, then Jews who DO control the State Department must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Israel-First Policy. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews corrupt public morals and spread degeneracy, then Jews who DO spreads Homomania and Sexualization of children must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Moral Decrepitude. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews subvert Christianity & other spiritual-moral systems, then Jews who DO push 'gay rainbows' into Christian churches must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish War on Christianity. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews commit genocide and wage wars, then Jews who DO oppress Palestinians & spread wars in Middle East & North Africa must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish World Violence. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews seek to replace goy national populations, then Jews who DO push for mass immigration & great replacement must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish strategy of demographic imperialism. (Soros must be one big Anti-Semite for making 'antisemitic tropes' come alive.) If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews use their power to destroy the Second Amendment, then Jews who DO push for gun-banning must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Disarmament of goyim. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jewish minorities in goy nations are more loyal to their own Tribe than to their fellow goy countrymen, then Jews who insist on Zionist & Jewish-First Policies must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish In-Group Preference. Consider US foreign policy. Is it equally fair to both Jews and Palestinians? And look how the mass media endlessly remind about the 'plight' of Jews around the world while turning a blind eye to all the whites robbed, raped, and/or murdered by non-whites. In terms of what Jews DO, they are the biggest Anti-Semites because their policies and practices all illustrate the vast, venal, and abusive power of the Jews. Zionists say Israel is the victim of double-standard that doesn't apply to other Western Democracies, but this is more Jewish mendacity. Israel is fully supported by US and EU despite its direct support of terrorism, illegal possession of nukes, occupation of West Bank, and overt racial-supremacist ideology whereas all European democracies aren't even allowed to defend their nations on the basis of identity, history, and territory.

Of course, the greatest irony is that Jews can insist that we pretend they have no power precisely because they got the most power. In history, Jews were sometimes the mouse trying to survive among elephants. Today, Jews are like the elephant that insists on being noticed as a mouse. The effect on society has been downright surreal. It gets even more surreal and twisted when so-called 'Antisemitic Tropes' are easily converted into Philosemitic Tributes via verbal trickery. For instance, if you said Jews played a key role in pushing the 'gay agenda' sometime ago, you would have been smeared as an 'antisemitic conspiracy theorist'. But now that elevation of Homomania or Queertianity as the neo-religion of the West is considered fait accompli, what with worship of Holy Homo being the most important faith in so many people's lives, there are now Jews who brag that their ilk had indeed done most to push the agenda. And it's okay for Joe Biden to say that, yes of course, Jews did play the most important role in the triumph of holy-and-wonderful 'gay agenda'. So, thumbs go up or down on whether something is 'antisemitic' or philosemitic depending on one's attitude toward Jews. If you say Jews control Hollywood and spread much filth, you're an 'Anti-Semite'. But if you say Jews control Hollywood and deserve much praise for their ingenuity and enterprise, then you may be deemed Philosemitic. As nervous as Jews are about goyim discussing Jewish power, it's permissible in some cases IF you praise Jews for their wise and wonderful use of their influence. Whether something is 'antisemitic' or Philosemitic also depends on who/whom and who-said-it. So, if Alan Dershowitz says that Jews indeed have lots of power and DESERVE TO HAVE IT, all is fine and well. But if someone like Kevin MacDonald notices the same power, he must be delusional and having hallucinations. Powerful Jews? Where? The fact that Jews can lie so much and get away with it goes to show that most people are dupes or idiots.

Granted, Jewishness always posed a great contradiction. Even as a mouse-people, they worshiped an elephant-sized God. In contrast, the pagan empires, even as elephant-powers, worshiped mouse-sized gods. Much of Jewish history is about a weak people with a strong God surrounded by strong peoples with weak gods. The Covenant is a powerful thing. In more modern times, Jewish History has been about people with weak bodies but strong minds surrounded by peoples with strong bodies but weak minds. In the end, the minds win over body. Man controls horse, not vice versa. And all goyim need to be mindful of that.

Following the logic of today's 'Antisemitism', Steven Pinker must be a rabid 'Anti-Semite' for noticing so much Jewish power, privilege, wealth, and representation:

Play the Game of AAJ or Ask-A-Jew - Then See the World Anew as Scales Fall Off Your Eyes - It’s Most Necessary Because the Fall of Wasp Power was even More Momentous than the Fall of Communism

Play ASK A JEW with Jennifer Rubin

Play ASK A JEW with Max Boot

The game of ASK A JEW. It’s a simple game that anyone can play, even a child. Its purpose is to understand the true nature of the People who rule over us. (For tips on how to play this game, skip most of this post and go to where it says *How to Play ASK A JEW*.) Why did the world begin to change so fast and so much since the End of the Cold War? The main reason was not the Fall of Communism but the fall of White Gentile Power, especially in the US. By hogging all the news, the fall of communism masked a far more important, momentous, and significant fall: The Fall of Wasp Power, White Christian Power, and Catholic Power. If, following the fall of the Soviet Union, the United States had remained under White Christian Power, we would not have witnessed the crazy accelerated transformation of so much of the world.
Since the end of WWII, Western Europe has essentially been the vassal of the U.S., but this wasn’t such a bad thing because, for most of the Cold War, the US was controlled by Wasps and White Christians. Conservative or Liberal, they had no problem with Europe being the domain of Europeans. They had no problem with European nationalism as long as European nations got along together instead of instigating new wars for hegemony. (The trauma of WWII, the fear of the USSR, and the reliance on the US made Western Europe emphasize mutual respect and cooperation above all else.) Also, the US stoked nationalism in Eastern Europe to inspire resistance there against the Soviet Empire. The European political norms of the 1980s were essentially moderate-nationalist. German citizenship was still based on blood and ancestry. UK, France, and Sweden had not yet gone utterly crazy with PC and Diversity. Jews and radicals had already spread such seeds, but the US, as the superpower, didn’t press upon European nations to adopt those ideas as sacrosanct.

So, how did the political norms of the 1980s come to be regarded as ‘far right’ and ‘extreme’ in today’s world? If someone in the UK today espoused views that were common in the 1980s, he’d be sent to jail. If German citizenship based on blood(that was still operative in the 1980s) were proposed for re-introduction today, it’d be denounced as Neo-Nazi. The crucial difference between then and now is that the US currently presses on EU and all its vassals to undergo vast social, cultural, and ideological changes to discredit, undermine, and transform the very meaning of what it means to be European and Western. When the US had been ruled by Wasps and White Christians, there was far greater respect for the national norms and local customs of other nations. The idea of the US using its power and money to spread Homomania and African-as-New-European would have been unthinkable back then. Even though the US was a kind of empire after WWII and throughout the Cold War, it wasn’t hellbent on forcing other peoples to become like Americans(who, by the way, were not the degenerate morons they came to be beginning in the late 60s). Sure, US sold consumer products and exported Hollywood movies and American music all over the world, but it was up to each and every nation to formulate their own national policy to deal with such influence. And those were considered as unserious popular culture.

Some might argue that the US got more arrogant after winning the Cold War. As the lone superpower, it couldn’t resist spreading its power, ideas, and (anti)values all over the world. But would this have been so IF the US hadn’t come under the control of Jews? Would US have fought those Wars in the Middle East if not for Jewish influence? Would US have been so hellbent on crushing Iran if not for Jewish power? Would the US be waging this ridiculous ‘new cold war’ with Russia if not for Jewish Power. Would the US be spreading Homomania as a neo-religion all over the world if not for Jewish Power? Would the US be forcing the Cult of Diversity into every nation if not for Jewish Power?

In the 80s, the US didn’t press upon Japan and Germany to become diverse. The US elites back then would not have shamed Poland and Hungry for wanting to preserve their national integrity. If anything, the US urged Eastern European peoples to reassert their national identity and interests to gain independence from the Soviet Union.
Bill Clinton has been called the ‘first black president’, but as the first boomer president who’d especially come under Jewish influence, he was really the first Jewish president(and Bush II was the first Neocon Jewish president, and Obama was the second Jewish president).

When Wasp and White Catholics ruled the US, there was no American animus against European patriots and nationalists. The American Empire following WWII was mostly a live-and-let-live affair. It didn’t even have the messianic passion of the first wave of overseas American imperialism beginning in the late 19th century that sought to Evangelize the world. The international contract of Pax Americana following WWII was that the US would offer protection and markets to certain nations that would, in return, pledge allegiance to the US against the Soviet Union or any new power that might aspire to challenge the World Order of the postwar era. Now, the marketing of US consumer-capitalism was aggressive all over the world, but Americans never pretended that it had moral or spiritual value. Coca-cola was good to drink, Marilyn Monroe was good to see, and Elvis Presley was good to dance to. But they were not serious. But things are now so different. Globalist culture promotes trashy rappers as quasi-prophets, skanky sluts as idols of female empowerment, and homos/trannies as saint-angels whom young children should look up to. If, in the past, America marketed pop culture as just fun, entertainment, and recreation, the New America promotes pop culture as inspiration and salvation. So, people around the world are supposed to watch something like BLACK PANTHER and really dream of Wakanda. Or kids around the world are supposed to embrace Diversity and Interracism because the New Star Wars movies say they’re cool.
At least in the past, Hollywood tried to make adult-oriented movies to spread loftier themes and values. Think of TEN COMMANDMENTS, BEN-HUR, and THE LONGEST DAY. These days, the kinds of movies that get the most buzz even from the shakers and makers of cultural opinion are often based on superhero comics and childish fantasies.

Back in the day when Wasps and White Catholics ruled America, Jews who controlled much of movie-and-music culture had to watch themselves. If they promoted something too crazy and trashy, especially as message or propaganda, there might have been a white or Christian backlash. This is why Jews were savvy in promoting the notion of ‘antisemitism’ and tie it with Shoah(or the Holocaust). That way, if Jews did something slimy and sleazy and if whites called out on Jewish foulness, Jews could just yell ‘antisemitism’ and associate critics of Jewish influence with ‘Nazis’. This is how Jews got around to legalizing filmed pornography. Jews were the main forces behind it, but Wasps and Catholics were too afraid to name the Jew because of the Jew Taboo. Fast Forward to today, and Jews have weaponized pornography against the white race. Indeed, Jews weaponized everything: media, education, advertising, finance, the law, and even free speech(with the notion that ‘hate speech’ — speech hated by Jews — is not free speech and must be banned). Because so many gentiles get their ideas, idols, and icons from media, academia, and entertainment controlled by Jews, they become rabid true-believing lunatics, just like so many young impressionable Russians were turned into diehard communists almost overnight under Bolshevik Rule.
But Jews also use the stick as well as the carrot. By ruthlessly punishing groups like the Alt Right and BDS, Jewish power sends a message that anyone who deviates from the Official Narrative will be taken out. And it can happen even to those ensconced in the Establishment. Jason Richwine was a member of the 'esteemed' Heritage Foundation before he was purged at the behest of vile Jewish bitch Jennifer Rubin. Rick Sanchez used to work for CNN before he was banished for having noticed and blabbed about Jewish power. Even a veteran journalist like Helen Thomas couldn’t save herself when she said European Jews in Israel should go back to Europe. She died soon after being fired and dragged through the mud by the vile Jewish Power machine.

Anyway, what Jews did to the White America has been the template for what they did to Europe also. It’s no accident that exactly what Jews did to White America also happened to the EU at the same time. The cult of diversity & multi-culturalism, the rise of Homomania, the notion that one’s country is a ‘nation of immigrants’, the objective of economically destroying Iran(or any other nation hated by Israel), and the hysteria for ‘new cold war’ with Russia. Why is it that both the US and EU have been acting in tandem since the end of the Cold War? We need to understand that Jews see Europeans differently from how Wasps and White Catholics used to see them. White Gentiles in America saw Europeans as fellow racial and cultural brethren. They harbored no animus or hostility toward them. White Americans just hoped that Europeans would stop fighting one another and learn to live in peace. Also, white Americans respected European histories & cultures and didn’t want to mess with the narratives and symbols. If anything, there was a widespread feeling among White Americans that, even though there was something instantly appealing about Americanism, European histories and cultures have greater depth and that white Americans should respect and learn from this. In contrast, Jews always views the Christian West with hostility. Even though they found the US, another white Christian civilization, far more welcoming, they still regarded white Christians with resentment, hostility, and envy. So, if the Wasp hegemony over Europe had been live-and-let-live, Jewish hegemony became one of "do as I say... or else you are Nazi". So, if Wasp America’s power in Europe had mostly been political and military-related, the Jewish-ruled American power in Europe has been ideological and neo-spiritual. Jews want to penetrate, alter, and own the souls of Europeans.

Another key factor as to why Jewish domination of the US proved to be far more dangerous than Wasp domination ever was due to the Jew Taboo. Wasps were feared and respected but were not seen as a holy people. So, if Wasp America was perceived as doing bad, Europeans could push back a little and denounce American Power and Influence. The reason why Europeans were so hard on George W. Bush was he came across as a big dumb American cowboy trying to ride the world like a horse at a rodeo. Granted, he was controlled by Jews, but he was seen by Europeans as the archetypal Ugly American. Anyway, when the US was perceived as being ruled by Wasps, there was some push-back from Europe. There was no taboo against calling out against Anglo elites, Cowboys, Uncle Sam, and Yankee Doodle Dandy.

But as it became more evident that the US is a totally Jew-dominated nation, it became ever more difficult for Europeans to push back against the US. (Ever the fervent European opposition to Bush II focused on his cowboy image, not on the vampiric JEWS around him. And of course, when the Iraq War went badly, the Jew-media conveniently placed all the blame in Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld.) It was one thing to denounce American foreign policy devised by Wasp Cold Warriors. But the ‘new cold war’ with Russia is a Jewish thing, and no one dares to remove the mask and say it like it is... lest he be accused of ‘antisemitism’, the biggest sin in Europe where Holocaust has been made a virtual religion(and not just in Germany). Also, the rise of American financial power and high-tech power since End of the Cold War has been spectacular, and those sectors are dominated by Jews. That means much more Jewish money greasing the entire institutional apparatuses of Europe where many bureaucrats, activists, and journalists are really little more than paid shills of Jews like George Soros.

Also, because of the Jewish transformation of both the US and EU, it is more difficult for Europeans to feel ideologically purer or more virtuous. During much of the Cold War, Europeans loved to turn the tables on the US for being a ‘racist’ nation of rednecks, stupid nation addicted to vulgar pop culture, greedy nation of uber-materialists, and reactionary nation of ignorant religiosity, but especially since the end of the Cold War, the US and EU have been merging into one. Most young people in the EU are now an anti-intellectual and addicted to trash culture as American youth are. Also, even though majority of Americans still claim to be religious, the power of religious institutions has vanished in the US. Christianity not only couldn’t stop Homomania but bent over to it. The Civil Rights Era is now a thing of the past, with rap music, black-dominated sports, interracist pornified TV being the culture of America. Also, the US even got a black president... which means Europeans could no longer accuse the US of ‘racism’. Also, with massive invasion-immigration, the US is fated to become white majority faster than any European nation. As the US turns less white, it will be deemed politically incorrect to condemn it because Diversity is worshiped as holy. This is why Europeans feel most free to disparage the US when it's ruled by cowboy types like Reagan, Bush II, and Donald Trump. Despite facing an existential threat from Mass Invasion from Africa and the Muslim World, the European Soul following WWII has been instilled with the notion that Historical Sin is uniquely a White Thing,and therefore, the ONLY approved way to score moral points is by attacking other whites for moral failings. (Granted, it's still OK to invade and destroy non-white nations IF the green light comes from Jews, especially with black president as a front. So, too bad for Libya and Syria.)
As for Europe, it is now as addicted to pop culture as America is. Its young people in UK, France, Sweden, and Germany are vapid trashy whores who worship crass celebrities and bling-strapped rappers. And with ‘gay marriage’ being the law of the land in the US(even before in some European nations), Europeans can’t wave the 'gay' flag to feel holier-than-thou with homomaniacal virtue-signaling. And with US universities now being a net exporter than importer of PC, Europeans can hardly feel more ‘radical’ or ‘progressive’ as they used to in the Age of Jean-Paul Sartre and Michel Foucault.

It used to be that Europe was a vassal of Wasp-ruled US. Because Wasps had a special relationship with Anglo-Brits, Continental Europeans used to see US-UK as a separate political-cultural entity: Anglosphere vs Eurosphere even as they made common cause against the USSR during the Cold War. Also, there used to be some pushback against English as the common language for all Europeans. There was a time when French and German had special prestige in Continental Europe. But that was then, this is now. All Europeans have surrendered to English, especially the American kind, as the new lingua franca. So, Americanism has spread all across Europe like wildfire as Europeans grow up immersed in everything associated with American English, which these days is mostly about worship of Jews, Negroes, and Homos. After all, Jews control media in the Anglosphere and Rap is the #1 musical genre in America. So, English, though Anglo in origin, is now the instrument of Jews and blacks.

Paradoxically, it's precisely because English has become such a world language that Continental Europeans are less resistant to it. When it used to be associated with Anglo-British Power and Anglo-American Power, Continental Europeans associated it with the domination of Brits and Wasps. The Narcissism of Small Differences made Continental Europeans feel resentful and envious of the Greater Power spawned by the troublesome Island Nation across the English Channel. But once English came to be regarded as a World Language that no longer belongs to Anglos but also to Jews, blacks, Hindus, Arabs, Chinese, and anyone who wants to do business and smoke the PC pipe, the use of English among Continental Europeans was no longer seen as triumph of Anglos over other Europeans.

If it used to be the case that Europe was under the thumb of Wasp-ruled America, the new reality since the end of the Cold War has been that BOTH Europe and the US(along with Canada and Australia) are under the rule of Judea, the most powerful empire in the world. When Jews took over the institutions of America, they didn't see themselves as the owners of American Power. They saw themselves as members of Judea or World Jewry, for whom America is the biggest prize, the Jewel in the Crown. It was like Alexander the Macedon was not content with the conquest of Greece. Though Hellenized and the new ruler of Greek peoples, Alexander didn’t see himself as First among Greeks. He saw himself as the Ruler of the World. He saw himself as lord of not only Macedonia and Greece but over Egypt, Persia, Afghanistan, and parts of India. Likewise, Jews are not content with being the New Elites of America. Their main identification is not with American Power but with World Power as Judea has networks all over the world wherever there are Jews, and this means in Israel, Europe, Russia, Latin America, and even in Iran. With Jewish men marrying Chinese women, Jews also aim to sink their influence into China itself.

This is why PC has accelerated all over the West. It is the Jewish weapon of castrating white power and enforcing White Submissivism in both the US and EU. So, we have White Submissivist cuck-collaborator elites denouncing nationalism in Europe as being ‘far right’ and ‘nazi’. So, we have cuck-dogs like John McCain never denouncing the mass invasion of Germany and UK — but then, he never opposed the Mexican invasion of Southwest territories either because Jews would be angry with him — while growling at Russia, a nation whose advice to Europeans is that they should defend and preserve their borders, race, and cultures. Because Jews are so little in number, they know that their power is OVER the minute white people begin to reject White Submissivism. Currently, most whites are under the impression that white folks wanting to defend their nations, peoples, and cultures from non-white mass invasion is ‘white supremacist’ when, in fact, it’s the non-whites who are aggressively conquering white lands and replacing whites who are left to drop dead like flies from opioids and other excesses urged upon them by the Jews. But there is always a chance that whites will wake up, especially in the age of the internet when even whites without establishment power can get their ideas and images across. This is why Jews go all out to infect whites with PC from the youngest age. Jews urge white parents to start the brainwashing in the crib lest the kids turn out, oh my god, ‘racist’! To condition white minds to cucky-wuck defenseless, Jews promote Homomania that idolizes wussy white men(as nobler than masculine white men) and lionizes trannies who make white people accept degeneration and disorientation as the New Normal. If a nation believes ridiculous-looking men with dicks and balls are ‘women’ because they wear wigs & dresses, then it can be made to believe in just about anything. It’s the infantilization of adults. It’s like kids who can be made to believe in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy can be made to believe in whatever.

Even so, Jews know that the power of PC is all in the mind. If whites were to eject PC from their minds, they could abandon White Submissivism and stand up to vile Jewish Supremacism and smash it. It's like, once the character in THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE is disinfected of the mental virus, he can see everything clearly.

So, the ONLY sure way for Judea to rule over the West forever is to create massive Diversity, whereby they can play divide-and-rule among so many different gentiles who can never agree on anything. And even if all those gentiles were to dislike Jews, they would also dislike and distrust one another and thus fail to form a united bloc against Jewish supremacist power. Even if every white person were a razing Nazi, he couldn't do anything if his race made up only 30% of the population.

Now...

*How to Play ASK A JEW*

Jewish Power is up to no good, but Jews love to put white gentiles on the defensive by accusing White People of ‘supremacism’ whenever white folks insist on their identity, inheritance, history, and right of territory. Jews don’t want white folks to have autonomy of history because it is natural for all groups to be ‘ethnoistic’, just like it’s natural for individuals to be egoistic. Every person wants to feel that his or her version of events is most correct and most justified. Even when people do wrong and know it, they seek emotional justifications for why they did what they did. Consider the Akira Kurosawa film RASHOMON where each of the three characters admits to the murder(or suicide) but passionately justifies what he/she did on emotional and egoistic terms.
This is why, to control memory means to control the world. Because all individuals and all groups tend to shape their memory, personal or political, to justify their actions and deeds, people who gain control of others’ memories gain control over them, and people who lose control of their memory to another people become owned by them. Indeed, NOTHING is more important than control of memory that serves as the basis of the Narrative that validates an individual, a group, or a people.
If a man has memory and 10 million dollars, he is a lucky man. Now, what would be worse? For him to keep the 10 million and lose his memory OR for him to lose the 10 million but keep his memory? Of course, the latter. Money is precious but memory is priceless. None of us would know what or who we are without memory.

Also, there is another side to memory. It’s the management of memory. Memory itself doesn’t ensure pride and power. It all depends on how the Memory is Managed. For example, Jews committed massive pogroms to expel Palestinians to create Israel. All Jews now know this part of Israeli history. So, why aren’t they filled with shame and guilt? Because Jews have Management over their Memory. Even as Jews admit to what they did to the Palestinians, they manage and spin the memory in such a way that justifies their actions. Now, imagine what would happen to Israel if the Palestinian minority were to gain control of most media & academia and bought up all Jewish politicians to do the bidding of Palestinian power. Suppose Palestinian elites gained control of Jewish memory and its management. Suppose they suppressed any memory that makes Jews look good and Palestinians look bad. And then, suppose they managed the memory of the founding of Israel in such a way that makes Jews look especially vile and evil. It won’t be long before Jews lose pride & confidence and turn into putty in the hands of Jews. Unless Jews wake up and regain their memory and its management, they are sure to be a doomed people who, year after year, will lose out to the Palestinians who will gradually take over Israel and turn it back into Palestine, especially with Right of Return instituted as historical redress.

Jews sure love to mess with white/gentile minds. Jews do it so well that so many white Progs and Liberals are convinced that Jews are so noble, saintly, wise, and wonderful. They’ve been brainwashed by Jews to believe that Evil is something almost unique to whites(and Russians, Iranians, and Chinese). They look up to Jews as knowing more, understanding more, and being morally superior. But are Jews really this way? Indeed, what are they really like and what are they really about? To access that truth, it’s best for these white progs and white cucks to play the game of ASK A JEW. Now, what kinds of questions should they ask to the Jews?

Here are some suggestions. Just look Jews straight in the eye and ask them to answer the following questions:

1. Is it true that you Jews want Hungary and Poland to be mass-invaded by Muslims and Africans while Israel gets to protect its borders and preserve its Jewish ethnic identity and cultural integrity?

2. Is it true that you Jews believe that gentiles, especially Europeans, have NO identity based on blood, history, and territory? So, Irishness, Italianness, and Germanness have no roots and lineage? They are just pieces of paper that anyone can apply for to become, virtually overnight, New Irish, New Italians, and New Germans? If so, should Jewishness be defined the same way in Israel? Anyone who wishes to be ‘Jewish’ should have the right to move to Israel and claim identity as 'New Jews'?

3. If you Jews believe that race is just a social construct, why do you not notice that all those sports teams owned by your kind are dominated by blacks due to factors of real racial difference? After all, if race is a phony social construct and peoples of all races are the same in everything but skin color, why are Ashkenazi Jews far more likely to make big bucks and own sports teams while blacks are far more likely to dominate sports and make big bucks that way?

4. If you Jews believe that American History was stained because it favored whites over non-whites, why do you insist that the New and Improved America should favor Israel over Iran and favor Zionists over Palestinians? And if the US, as a Nation of Immigrants, should have equal respect for all nations and all peoples, why do you Jews command us to chant "Israel is America’s greatest ally"? And where is the evidence that the US needs Israel for security or prosperity?

5. If you Jews love Immigration, why do you stay put in the West? Why don’t you take up immigration again and emigrate to Africa, Asia, or the Middle East? Why stay put in places like NY, Los Angeles, Las Vegas, and Miami? Why not get back in nomadic gear and immigrate to other nations? After all, you Jews say all Nations are ‘nation of immigrants’ since all of them were created by invasions and migrations. Since all nations are ‘nations of immigrants’, isn’t it about time you Jews moved to, say, Africa? Or how about Latin America? You Jews say it’s great that whites will be a racial minority in the future. You say Diversity is awesome. Well, if that’s true, shouldn’t you move to Latin America where whites are already minorities in very diverse nations made of all sorts of mixed races? Why do you stay put in the West?

6. You Jews decry inequality and call for 'fair' representation. If so, why do you Jews freak out whenever people point out that YOU JEWS are over-represented in many elite institutions and industries? And if white people should try to hire non-whites as much as possible to promote Diversity, why are you Jews so prone to hiring and especially promoting fellow Jews in Hollywood, Las Vegas, Media, Academia, Law firms, and Deep State?

7. Why do you Jews oppose gun ownership in the US but support the right of Jews to have assault weapons in Israel? Is it because Israel is majority Jewish and that means an armed Jewish majority with the firepower,esp against the Arab minority? In contrast, because the US is mostly gentile, maybe you Jews fear all those gentiles with guns? Since you Jews control the government, you want guns to be monopolized by the state so that the people won’t be able to resist when the Jewish-controlled government comes after them, right?

Surely, we can come up with many other questions for Jews. Anyway, it’s a fun game for the whole family and all your friends. Just look at the discrepancy between what Jews say and what Jews actually do. Don’t be a dummy and remain silent. Come up with questions and ASK A JEW. One thing for sure, it’s better to Ask-a-Jew than Ass-Kiss-a-Jew.

Maybe we can even have an Ask-A-Jew March where many people hold up placards with QUESTIONS FOR JEWS(as the dominant power in the world). It’s smart to pose questions to the most powerful power, which is currently Judea. It’s dumb to just obey the ultimate power and never ask questions. And if you remain mute out of fear, then it’s just craven cowardice.

Why George Zimmerman Is the Best Argument for Gun Ownership.

One of the biggest news stories of 2012 was the killing of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman, and the facts surrounding that incident--and how it was treated by the powers that be--should serve as a reminder to every white American as to why they need guns. The Martin-Zimmerman affair has gone down the memory hole ever since the truth emerged that Zimmerman had justifiably used his gun for self-defense against a black thug--just like the Duke Lacrosse 'rape' case was suddenly dropped by the media once it became known that the black 'victim' had concocted the whole story. Everything that happened in the Martin-Zimmerman case--from the altercation and its social contexts to the media spin and government reaction--demonstrates why white people can only rely on themselves and guns.
Indeed, the main reason why Jews--who really control America--wanna take away our guns is not to protect us but to render us helpless against the power of government controlled by Jews. Jews want to Palestinian-ize us. Why are Palestinians utterly helpless to stop armed Jews from encroaching on their lands, building walls and fences to keep them out, robbing them of their rights and freedom, and evicting from their own lands and homes? Because Jews have guns--and tons of other military material provided by American tax payers--while Palestinians do not. So, Palestinians are at the mercy of Jews.
Jews in America wanna put white people in the same condition, but of course, Jews are loathe to admit the true nature of their agenda. And so, they use their media monopoly to fool us that liberals are only trying to save us from bad people with guns. Jewish-controlled media vilify the NRA and blame it for all the gun violence. In fact, gun control is a fact in America. Even in the reddest states, not just anyone can buy a gun at any time. And where the Sandy Hook massacre took place, stringent gun laws were on the books and enforced. NRA cannot be blamed for what Adam Lanza did since Connecticut had some of the toughest gun laws in the nation. If someone is crazy enough, he will do crazy things, and nothing can really be done about it. If laws could stop all violence, there wouldn't have been something like the Los Angeles riots either. If blacks wanna take tanks of gasoline, pour it all over the city, and light it on fire, how can they be stopped? If I'm crazy and were to take a SUV and run over a whole bunch of school kids playing in the yard, how can I be stopped? Who are you gonna blame? AAA motor club? So, all this media hysteria is just a disingenuous attempt to play on our emotions to take our guns away. Using the logic of the anti-gun argument, all guns should have been taken away from the government after the Waco massacre where men, women, and children were either murdered or driven to suicide by a powerfully armed government. If the government didn't have so many guns, it wouldn't use its power so arbitrarily in America and especially around the world. But you didn't hear any such demand from the media.

Anyway, why is the Martin-Zimmerman case so crucial in helping us to understand the issue of guns and gun control? First, there is the racial factor. It should be obvious to all honest people that there are indeed racial differences. This doesn't mean that every member of one race is better at something than all members of another race. But there are general differences among the races, just like there's general differences between the sexes. Though not all men are stronger than all women, men are generally stronger than women, which is why most sexual violence is male on female--generally poor male on poor female. Same dynamic occurs among the races. The stronger race beats on weaker races. So, most racial violence in America is black on white, black on Hispanic, black on Asian, black on gay, black on Arab-American, black on Hindu-American, and etc. To be sure, it's mostly poor black on poor non-blacks. Most affluent white liberals can afford to be blind to the true nature of interracial violence since they live in their affluent communities with very low crime, and the kind of blacks they dilly-dally with are educated, safe, and 'clean-cut'. So, if you're a Harvard liberal hanging with the likes of Obama, it's different from a white trash being stalked by a black thug like Radio Raheem or Mike Tyson.
White liberals enjoy ridiculing poor whites for the latter's fear of blacks, but affluent white liberals don't face the same social problems that poor whites do. And though affluent white liberals push 'affirmative action' and government enforced racial integration--via Section 8 programs--, the main victims of such policies are poor, working class, and lower-middle class whites.  Rarely are Section 8 housing built near the richest communities in America. And 'affirmative action' favors rich and well-connected whites--especially Jews--over poor, rural, and/or conservative whites. So, rich white liberals take all the moral credit for supporting such policies but the price is paid mostly by poor and working class whites. The Kennedy Clan, Clinton Clan, and other such ilk never have to worry about black crime or 'affirmative action'. Their families and kids are well-protected, well-favored, and well-covered.

Anyway, there should no longer be any argument about racial differences when it comes to physical power and toughness. Blacks usually kick the asses of non-blacks. Generally speaking, non-blacks are no match for blacks, and I can vouch for this as I spent my childhood in an integrated city where most racial violence was black on non-black. I witnessed so much of it with my own eyes, and what I heard from other people from other places tell the same story. And this racial dynamic hasn't changed an iota over the years. Biological fact is biological fact. Similarly, despite all the new laws for sexual equality, most sexual violence is still male on female because men are stronger than women. While most men are not rapists or woman-abusers, bad men are more likely attack women than bad women are likely to attack men. Bad men can beat up women whereas bad women cannot beat up men. Also, men are naturally more aggressive than women.

Similarly, though all races can be aggressive, some are more aggressive than others. Also, if some races can be aggressive as a group--like Germans and Japanese in WWII--, blacks tend to be far more aggressive on the individual level, which is why there's so much violence within the black community itself.
It is for this reason that non-blacks have a need to own guns. When faced with black thuggery, their only chance for self-defense is to use the gun--if you rely on the police, you and your family could be be dead by the time they arrive. If a black thug invades your home, the only effective way to protect yourself and your family is with the gun. Otherwise, it's gonna be like Jack Johnson destroying white boys. It's like be like a big black lineman sacking the white quarterback. Indeed, why are most defensive linemen in football black while white guys tend to be on the offensive line? Because the defensive linemen play the more aggressive role of trying to break through the offensive line to sack the quarterback and stop the running back. Blacks have more fast twitch muscles that give them more explosive power. This is also why blacks make better sprinters, better jumpers in basketball, faster/harder punches in MMA, and better running backs and receivers in football. Though there are more Hispanics than blacks in America, there are almost new mestizo athletes in the NBA and NFL. Why is that? Your average mestizo is no match for blacks.

And we saw this play out in the Martin-Zimmerman incident.

1. Blacks are more likely to be criminals. Zimmerman was on guard duty since there had been a rash of home burglaries carried out by black criminals. So, he was just looking out for possible criminals on that fateful night. Can we fault him for that?

2. Martin was acting suspicious, and it turns out the guy has a record of burglary. He had stolen items in his school locker. That Martin was planning a robbery that night is something we'll never know. But he was on drugs and acting strange, and Zimmerman had every right to be suspicious. And so, Zimmerman followed and watched him. Can we fault him for that?

3. Zimmerman was following Martin, but Martin turned the table on Zimmerman. By the time Zimmerman returned to his car to drive back, Martin was all over him. Zimmerman didn't pull out the gun and just shoot Martin--as the liberal media had people believe. Instead, Martin jumped on Zimmerman and a fight ensued. Zimmerman the 'white Hispanic' was no match for the faster and tougher Martin. The black thug knocked Zimmerman to the ground and was pounding Zimmerman's face. Zimmerman saved himself by pulling out his gun and shooting Martin. If ever a use of gun was justified, this was it. Can we fault him for that?

What happened on that night was the best case example of why Americans need guns. They are physically no match for black thugs, and indeed, if we look at what white liberals do--as opposed to what they say--, they too seem to agree with this as most white liberals try to live apart from most blacks. Blue states are even more segregated than red states.

Given the fact of how his gun may have saved Zimmerman's life, you'd expect the powers-that-be to side with Zimmerman. But that didn't happen.  What did happen?

1. Mass media spun the story as cold blooded 'white guy' killing an angelic black teen 'armed with only skittles'. If Mike Tyson had a bag of cookies, would you say he was 'armed only with cookies'?  Just ask his opponents in the ring about what Tyson did with his two fists. People have died in the boxing ring from being hit with PADDED gloves. Imagine what bare black fists can do.
The media are supposed to speak the truth, indeed speak truth to the powers-that-be. One of the most crucial powers-that-be in American society is the black fist. So much of American social reality has been determined by the power of the black fist. Entire areas of cities have been destroyed by the black fist. Since the economically more productive and more intelligent non-blacks have been driven out of entire areas as a result of their fear of the black fist, the power of the black fist has ruined many cities. Blacks bitch about why no one's investing in their communities, but no one has the guts to say why this has been so. Even liberal whites fear the black fist. Sure, from a safe distance, liberal whites can romanticize the black fist as a liberating force against 'racism'--as in Ken Burns' UNFORGIVABLE BLACKNESS--, but the dire fact of American social reality is that the power of the black fist has created a climate a fear all across America. Indeed, the main reason for white flight has been the fear of the black fist. Real estate prices are super high in San Fran and Portland but dirt cheap in Detroit or black areas of St. Louis. But why do white liberals go to SF or Portland--where rent or mortgage eats up so much of their earnings--and not to Detroit or in the black areas of St. Louis where they can live cheaply? Because they don't wanna be robbed, raped, beaten up, or murdered by tougher blacks with harder fists.

Given the power of the black fist and how Zimmerman barely survived its assault, you'd think the media would be on the side of Zimmerman. But not only was the media unsympathetic to Zimmerman, the media tried to dehumanize him. The media ran photos of a cherubic 12 yr old Martin(who was 17 at the time of his attack on Zimmerman) alongside the worst possible photo of Zimmerman(from yrs ago when he was fat slob). So, the impression sent out over the airwaves was that of a fat disgusting slob shooting a helpless little black child for no other reason that the kid was 'armed with skittles'.

Also, Zimmerman is only half-white. His mother was a mestizo Hispanic. But, the media initially made him out to be only 'white'. Given the vilification of 'whiteness' by 'anti-racists', it made the incident even more racially charged--and it led to black mobs across the nation attacking and beating up on whites, a fact covered up by the mass media.
So, all across America, many people were fed the idea that some evil white guy killed a helpless little black kid. This is how the supposedly truth-seeking media ran the story.
The media are supposed to be the fourth estate and speak truth for the rights and freedom of the people, but what the big media did with Zimmerman was hardly different from the lies and manipulations of communist or Nazi propaganda. Indeed, even Zimmerman's phone conversation on the 911 call was altered to make it sound as if he was looking for some black guy to kill that night.

Given the nature of the media--controlled by Jews and monopolized by politically correct liberals--, the American people should know they cannot rely on the news for truth, freedom, and liberty. Instead, the news media are just a propaganda wing of the Jewish oligarchy and its control over the institutions of America. Just look at how the media created Obama. Just look at how the Zionists in the media led us into the Iraq War. Just look at how the media covered up the fact that Mossad knew of the looming 9/11 attack but refused  to share information with us. Just look at how the Jewish-run media have no problem with Israel having 300 illegal nukes but wants Iran destroyed even though it has no nukes. Just consider how the media spread the lies about the Iranian government wanting to 'wipe Israel off the map'. Just consider how the media have no sympathy for the plight of Palestinians who are being oppressed far worse than blacks in South Africa ever were. Just look how the media were complicit in railroading the Duke Lacrosse players even before they were proven guilty.

There is no free press in the US. Journalism schools are Jewish-controlled indoctrination centers, and 95% of the media are controlled by Jews who decide who is promoted and what is news. And if you bring up the issue of Jewish power in the media--as Rick Sanchez did--, you're blacklisted and gone forever.

2. Well, if you can't trust the media, the last defense of liberty is the American government, right? Of the people, by the people, for the people?  Think again. Big money and big media control government. And big academia guides government policies. And all those are controlled by Jewish oligarchs. As Jews said of Obama, "We made him."  And George W. Bush was just a shill of Jewish neocons.

Given how Zimmerman had been wronged by the media, you'd expect the government to come to his aid and protect his rights. Wrong again. Instead, even though it was clear that Zimmerman had acted in self-defense, he was charged with second degree murder by a black prosecutor in government. Even Obama chimed in on the case, making Martin out to be a helpless victim of a white murderer. Obama said, "If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon Martin." Obama's words inspired random attacks on white by black thugs across America.

What did Zimmerman do on that night? He was guarding his community from criminals who were breaking into homes. He saw a suspicious black guy and followed him for a few blocks. As he was about to return home, he was jumped by the black thug who beat his face into hamburger meat. Zimmerman did what any sane person would do. He pulled out his gun and shot the man who was assaulting him. It was self-defense, but he was vilified by the media and persecuted by the government.

So, can white Americans trust the media? Can they trust the government? Though Zimmerman is only half-white and looks very 'Hispanic', he was white enough for the powers-that-be. They set out to destroy him and even now, the powers-that-be are out to get him.

When the Sandy Hook massacre happened, all white conservatives condemned it. But they also realized that it was the act of a lunatic that no law can stop. Sure, if all guns could be confiscated from all Americas, what happened in Connecticut wouldn't have happened. And in a perfect world, a world without guns would be a wonderful place. But there is the Second Amendment that protects out rights to own guns. And more importantly, there is the fact that US is not a democracy but a Jewish-controlled oligarchy where the media and government are NOT of the people, by the people, for the people but of the Jewish elites, by the Jewish elites, and for the Jewish elites. In Israel, Jews want guns in the hands of Jews but not in the hands of Palestinians. Media and government conspire to take your freedoms and rights away.

In the US, Jews want guns only in the hands of the government that they control but they don't want guns in the hands of Americans, especially white Americans who might finally awaken to the fact of what the Jewish elites had done to them.

Do you wanna be Zimmermanized? Do you wanna be Palestinianized?
Though the bloody incidents of Columbine and Sandy Hook are horrible, the real danger in America comes not from oddball loonies(who will always be among us) but from the fact that so much of real power--legal, political, financial, intellectual, academic, media, etc--are controlled by Jews. As it's been said, the pen is mightier than the sword. TV controls the minds, indeed 100s of millions of them. It was the power of TV that made 80% of Americans to support the invasion of Iraq. It's the power of TV that made so many Americans hate George Zimmerman though all he did was protect himself.
What really should be disarmed is the Jewish control of American institutions. But most liberals are so brainwashed by political correctness fed by the Jewish media machine that they only know how to bark like mad dogs at the behest of their Zionist-globalist masters.

The video below demonstrates why Americans need guns. You cannot rely on the media nor on the government. They are out to get you. Even if you save your own life from a black thug, YOU are made out to be subhuman bad guy.