Shirley Jackson's short story "The Lottery" is More Relevant than ever in Our Time of Human Sacrifice at the Altars of Jewish Supremacism, Negrolatry, and Globo-Homo

There is a short story called "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson(published in 1948) that was assigned in both high school and college. The story begins with what seems like just another community gathering in a small town. All the families are there. Old folks, parents, and children. And village leaders and the like. Everything seems normal. People are gathered for a lottery, and it hardly seems unusual. You'd think maybe it's for a prize turkey or some such. The shocker comes at the when it's revealed that lots were drawn for human sacrifice. The chosen must be stoned to death, and there's no two ways about it. Even the family of the doomed must accept the outcome. Of course, the shock derives from its occurring in the modern world. Though rural and folksy, it's still part of the 20th century. And yet, human sacrifice is practiced by people like 'you and me'. Is it a remnant of hidden tradition within a religious minority, or did it arise as an act of desperation in times of bad harvest? A similar story, indeed even creepier(and lot more entertaining), is the British film THE WICKER MAN where an islandic community carries on with updated version of pagan practices, even human sacrifice. Supposedly, Stephen King(and others, literary or genre) took inspiration from Shirley Jackson, and it's evident enough in King's short story THE MIST(seen it, haven't read it) where panic unleashes the darker aspects of humanity. The difference is King's universe is one rife with spirits and/or sci-fi monsters, which rather undermines his (cheap)shots against the religious mindset. (If the world can be full of demons or frankenstein-science, why not imbued with God and Biblical truth? Perhaps it's because King's idea of holiness amounts to some mountain-sized Negro who wuvs a wittle white mouse or some grey-haired Negress full of folk wisdom. King attacks one kind of irrationality to push an even sillier one.) At any rate, if "The Lottery" and THE WICKER MAN are more unnerving, it's precisely because they take place in the 'real world', without recourse to suspension of disbelief. They go to show that the 'monster' is really in us, though THE WICKER MAN is more ambiguous in a mix of horror and reverie at the pagan ways that finally reduce the priggish Christian inspector to a pitiful sack of tears babbling prayers to God to no effect.

The authoress Shirley Jackson was likely a leftist. She was married to a Jewish literary critic who seemed to have been an adherent(and even a pioneer) of a branch of Critical Theory in the arts, though the intellectualism of the time was surely more serious and sober(and would seem even 'conservative' today) than the vulgarized and pop-culturized garbage that passes for 'critical theory' today. The story probably has been a favorite among Liberals as a swipe against the reactionary, conservative, and narrow-minded small town mentality that, instead of seeking rational solutions, clings to custom and rituals out of dark fear and superstition. At the time when the story was written, there was a much bigger divide between the cosmopolitan city and the 'backward' small town. Today, radio-TV-and-the-internet have profoundly altered the cultural landscape of rural areas. In the age of Fentanyl and White Death, it no longer makes sense to speak of small town ways and values in contrast to city slicker life. There was a famous Life magazine photo of a small town community encircling foxes egging on a smiling boy clubbing them to death. At the other end, there was Norman Rockwell with his rather bucolic and picaresque depiction of small town life.

Fast forward to now, and "The Lottery" is more relevant than ever. Not only has there been a rise in the occult, voodoo, witchcraft, astrology, and 'crystals' among educated types(especially with the fading of religious authority and the negative association of science/enlightenment with 'dead white males'), but colleges, the very bastions of reason and critical thinking, have turned into centers of dogma, ones that see the world in terms of not only heroes and villains but of saints and demons, gods and monsters. It seems Stephen-King-ism has taken over the 'woke' mind. Kingism replaced the bigotry of the Old Religion with delusions of the new cults of the Magic Negro and the like. Same can be said of Joyce Carol Oates, another fan of Shirley Jackson. The war that modernity and rationalism waged on traditional irrationalism didn't lead to the triumph of facts & reason but of the new idolatry, mainly of Jew Worship, Negro Idolatry, and Homo Celebration.

The 'woke' mentality is similar to the one in "The Lottery". It is geared toward human sacrifice to placate and appease the new gods. In their worldview, Negroes are innately divine and sacred. To the wokemons, George Floyd wasn't some lowlife punk who died of drug overdose under the knee of a police officer(the factual truth) but some Negro Angel who died for the sins of 'systemic racism'. And for this reason, billions of dollars of damage against American cities has been justified as an offering to the black gods? Derek Chauvin must be human-sacrificed on the altar of Floyd Rapture.
The 'woke' passions during the Kyle Rittenhouse trial also reeked of human-sacrifice mentality. To any sane person, it was obvious Rittenhouse wasn't out to kill people but used his gun for self-defense. But, to the 'woke' types, justice isn't based on facts. It's based on symbolism and cult mentality, in the blind faith that the US is crawling with evil nazi goblins who must be destroyed by any means necessary by the heroic Antifa and BLM mobs with the blessing of the Power and the Deep State. Even as more 'woke' types are into witchcraft, they are also increasingly into the witch-hunt mentality.
When truth is sacrificed, humanity is sacrificed. All those who denied the murderousness of Stalinism gave moral cover to Stalin to kill many more. Those who give moral cover to 'woke' lunacy give moral and legal cover for mobs to do more damage, even leading to the deaths of innocents. The end result is hardly different from human sacrifice. In any endeavor, there are winners and losers; in favoring one, we disfavor the other. Still, one can favor one without dehumanizing the other. But, when only one perspective is allowed(and even sacralize), result is total blindness to other perspectives, even to the point of dehumanization. The current mania of Negrodolatry turns a blind eye to all the victims of black thuggery, be they white, brown, yellow, and even black. BLM mendacity has actually led to More Dead Blacks, but it's ignored because it undermines the faith in the Noble Negro who wuvs a wittle white mouse but is oppressed by 'systemic racism'.

Worse, in the age of Covid Nuttery, forget about being saved by one's reliance on principled science. While there are plenty of brilliant Jews in many elite fields, who can deny that most Jews are motivated by tribal(supremacist) interest than the objective truth and will cook the books in favor of power over principles? This is evident in the Jewish change of opinion on free speech. In the past, the great majority of Jews were for Free Speech, and one might have assumed Jews, whatever their tribal biases, placed universal principles higher on their list of priorities. In retrospect, it seems Jews favored Free Speech in the past because they needed its protection to out-compete other groups. Now that they have the supreme power, they not only use private companies to restrict free flow of ideas and information but are amassing an army of lawyers, judges, academics, and pundits to do away with the First Amendment.
After all, the Bill of Rights are only as good as what the courts say. Incredibly, the judges decided the US Constitution is about enforcing 'gay marriage' in all fifty states. Why would the Jewish shift on Free Speech be an exception than the rule? It seems part of a larger pattern where Jewish Power, motivated mainly by tribal dominance, will twist and turn anything to maximize its dominance. Of course, such behavior is found in any power, be it Turkish, Chinese, Iranian, Russian, and etc. Still, the US is the lone superpower, and what happens in the US has far greater consequences all over the world. Also, while Anglos have shown at times to be capable of choosing higher principle over(or at the expense of) tribal interest, this is rarely the case with Jewish Power these days. Anyone who hasn't noticed a coordination(if not outright conspiracy) among the Jewish-dominated institutions and industries of law firms, mass media, finance, big tech, big pharma, and deep state is just fooling himself. One really has to be a moron at this point to earnestly and sincerely put his/her trust in Anthony Fauci as Mr. Science. He got to where he is as the useful shill of far more powerful forces, the ones that also foisted Bill Nye on young ones as the 'scientific' authority on sexuality and 'gender'.

At any rate, the 'science' of Covid-mania has turned into a kind of human sacrifice. Not because the 'vaccines' are particularly deadly(they aren't though far more so that earlier vaccines, the real kind) but because so much sanity has been sacrificed in the blind service to this Narrative pushed by Jewish Supremacist Power. Many people died or lost their minds because utterly irrational lockdowns prevented necessary medical treatments or forbade social interaction so integral to mental health. But all such sacrifices were deemed necessary to combat the greatest disease of all time, whether it was blamed on Trump, China, or bats(though when BLM riots were deemed useful against Trump, the lockdowns were suddenly de facto suspended for the 'mostly peaceful protesters'). Just like one's eyes can spot mud on others' faces but not his/her own, those startled by what happens in "The Lottery" are likely to remain blind to how their own world eerily bears some similarities.
The key difference is the sacrifices are made to a different set of gods and beliefs, often deemed as 'science', 'reason', 'justice', or 'progress' but operating at the emotive level much like the gods of old.

While science and rationalism are great in and of themselves, they're often tools of the Power. It's just the way the world is. It's like a democracy should ideally be Rule by the People, but it rarely works out that way. Ideally, the free press should dig into facts objectively and speak truth to power, but more often than not, the media are controlled by the powerful that use it to further their own power at the expense of others. Just ask the Palestinians. Media lies(or perhaps they should be called voodoo superstitions) about black criminality and thuggery(and racial truths in general) have led to something akin to human sacrifice. Recently, some crazed Negro willfully plowed into white folks celebrating the holiday season in Wisconsin with an SUV, but the media pretended it was all just an accident and had nothing to do with race. Thus, black lunacy is swept under the rug and more blacks feel emboldened to act crazy, leading to more deaths.
Of course, the motivations of Jewish media folks and goy media folks differ. For Jewish Power, Negrolatry is key to guilt-baiting white goyim, whose submission is key to Jewish Supremacism, and so, the Big Lie is employed cynically as a power-strategy. Among goy media types, there are other reasons. Among blacks in media, it's just self-aggrandizement as blacks seem to have no limits to their self-adulation. Among whites, there are those who know what's really happening but go along to further their careers, and there are those white cucks who are really stupid enough to have swallowed whole hog the tenets of political correctness.

One kind of modern human sacrifice, endorsed and practiced by both sides of the political aisle, is the product of mindless worship of Jewish Power. Perhaps, it was best encapsulated by Madeleine Albright's statement that it was 'worth it' to sacrifice half a million Arab children for the New World Order. Okay, Hussein was a bad guy who turned Iraq into a brutal place, but one could have made the same case for Israel, a nation that came into existence via terrorism & ethnic cleansing and maintained its grip by subverting neighboring nations, especially Lebanon. Since Albright spoke those chilling words in the 1990s, Zionist power has managed to spread far more terror throughout Middle East and North Africa. Entire nations have been wrecked by direct invasion, crippling sanctions, ceaseless bombing, or use of terrorist proxies rebranded as 'moderate rebels'. US instigated the War on Terror after 9/11, only to end up arming those very terrorists to tear Libya and Syria apart even though Gaddafi gave up what little WMD he had and even though Syria is a modern Arab nation, far more westernized than others, such as Saudi Arabia, the favorite ally of the US that preaches modernity but seeks to undermine as much modern development in Arab/Muslim nations as possible at the behest of Israel that seeks monopoly of modernity in the region.

Consider all the dead or crushed Palestinians, Arabs, and Muslims human-sacrificed at the altar of Jew Worship. Most Americans don't care because of their blind worship of Jews and Israel. Even when Israel crushes the people in Gaza, there is nonstop bloviation among politicians(even by relatively unconventional Rand Paul) about the need for more support for Israel, more funds for the Iron Dome. It's like George Foreman beating up a little kid and everyone howling about how Big George needs more protective padding from the little 'bully'. In honor of, service to, and worship of Jews as the New Gods, the US foreign policy has effectively turned into rituals of human sacrifice. Anything to appease Jews-as-gods no matter the human cost. Even when Jews did most to destroy Donald Trump's presidency, all you get from the Orange Man is "I need to be back in office so that AIPAC will totally control Congress, like it literally used to and deserve to." One thing Trump and Pelosi agree on and will hug each other over is in their total deference to Jewish Power and not an ounce of sympathy for the Palestinians who continue to lose whatever remaining territory they have in the West Bank.

The Sackler Family did so much harm to white working class Christians. Imagine if some Baptist family targeted the demographic that includes lots of Jews and killed scores of them with false advertising and corruption of the medical community. Jews would do everything to underline the ethnic character of the injustice, but even white communities worst impacted by Sackler evil dare not speak up and, instead, are into the dimwit support-the-troop mentality(at a time when the US military is nothing but a globo-homo neo-imperialist instrument of Jewish Supremacism that not only wages war on the Arab/Muslim world but plays with fire with Russia and China; the military does nothing to secure US borders to prevent White Nakba but is instead destabilizing the Middle East and North Africa, thus pushing even more non-white 'refugees' into the West, all to the delight of the likes of Blinken, Merrick Garland, and of course Jennifer Rubin).
Support-the-Troops is a human sacrificial mentality. It suckers American families into believing their sons should surrender their lives for imperial ventures in the name of 'liberal democracy' or some such when the military's primary purpose should be national defense. Also, the sons are invading and occupying other countries not for 'liberal democracy' but for imperial hegemony, now controlled by Jewish Power for Zionist-centrist reasons. Worse, it leads to the human sacrifice of foreigners who end up dying in far greater numbers than US troops armed to the teeth, and for what? Why are US troops in Syria?

The idea that US troops should sacrifice their lives abroad fighting one bunch of foreigners in defense of another bunch really took hold with the narrative arising from World War II. How many times have we heard that US didn't enter the war fast enough to take out Germany TO SAVE JEWS? While we can understand Jewish concerns for fellow Jews in other parts of the world, the moral logic is appalling because it argues goyim should sacrifice their own lives for the sake of Jews. After all, US entry into the war meant bushels of American deaths. Why should white Americans sacrifice their own sons to save Jewish sons? The argument would at least be somewhat honorable if Jews had mutual feelings, i.e. the willingness to sacrifice Jewish sons to save goy sons. So, how many Jews were willing to go to Cambodia and fight the Khmer Rouge to save Cambodian lives? (During the Vietnam, it seems Jewish families were mostly concerned about seeking deferments for their sons, not signing up to save South Vietnam and/or Cambodia from communism. Also, ending the draft meant future soldiers would mostly come from middle and lower class backgrounds.) How many Jews were just revved up to join the military and be shipped off to Rwanda to end the slaughter there? Or, in a twist of irony, how many Jews would be willing to push for war against Israel and join the US military to invade West Bank to save Palestinians from further ethnic cleansing pushed by Jewish Israelis? How many American Jews were willing to send their own sons to defend Ukrainians from being starved to death by Josef Stalin and Lazar Kaganovich? If anything, plenty of Jews back then in the US and Europe were supportive of the Bolshevik killing machine. In other words, Jews demand goy human sacrifice to save Jews but would never ponder sacrificing Jewish lives for filthy goyim. Heads we win, Tails you lose. (Take SAVING PRIVATE RYAN by Steven Spielberg. Though Ryan isn't Jewish, he's meant to serve as an ersatz Jew. Because he lost his brothers, he's a special case and OTHERS must put their lives on the line to save the last remaining Ryan. As sentiments go, it's understandable. Now, through private Ryan, Spielberg is emotionally suggesting that goyim should have sacrificed more of their own kind to save Jews who, like Ryan, got hit especially hard by Nazi tyranny. The moral logic would be halfway plausible but for the fact that Jews did most to exasperate Europeans in general and provoke German fury and, furthermore, have used their power since World War II to destroy so many innocent lives all in the service of Jewish Supremacism.)

When we see all that's happening around the world and in the streets of America where monuments of George Floyd are erected even as crazed Negroes go on ever bloodier rampages, it seems the human sacrifice in "The Lottery" is total amateur hour, small potatoes. After all, the community kills only one person per annum. In contrast, how many innocents have been sacrificed in the Wars for Israel, Sacklers' poisoning of White America, Covidian perversion of science, and the Summer of George Floyd of 2020? But maybe the 'woke' can gaze into crystals for the truth, and maybe the 'right' can restore meaning by shouting, for the umpteenth time, "Uh duh, support the troops!"

NO TO MERCK'S NEW COVID PILL - Tulsi Gabbard

Critique of Eugyppius(blogger)'s Mis-Characterization of 'Wokeness' as a Decentralized Movement of Nutters when, in truth, It has been Directed from Above by Jewish Supremacism

https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/there-isnt-one-plan-there-are-fifty/

eugyppius: "Before I fled, I endured two pretty difficult years, navigating tidal of waves of nonsense and trying to stay uncanceled. In the midst of it all, I had plenty of time to study the institutional workings of the Woke."

But it all depends on which part of the elephant one is touching. Eugyppius saw the outward manifestations, not its innermost infestations. Cultural Revolution looked different in the streets with rampaging Red Guards than in the minds of Mao and his cohorts, for whom it was less about ideological purity than political machinations.

eugyppius: "The fundaments of their dogma were laid by specific critical theorists long before I entered graduate school"

But who got to favor and promote such dogma? Any academic can cook up some theory, but why are certain ideas favored over others? Who does the favoring and why? Also, some ideas are concocted specifically to serve an agenda. Thus, the theorist is less concerned with the idea itself than its utility to the bigger agenda, which may actually be irrelevant to or even opposed to the theory in principle. For example, does Jewish Power push 'anti-racism' because Jews are really committed to combating 'racism' and loving black people OR because 'anti-racism', as currently conceived in the West, has a way of deracinating whites into moral paralysis and submission, which is useful to Jewish Supremacists who then control whites toward supporting Zionism in the Middle East over Arabs/Palestinians and Muslims in general? If Jewish pushers of 'anti-racism' were truly sincere in their dogma, they would condemn not only white 'racism' but Jewish Zionist supremacism over Palestinians. But that isn't the case at all. Also, the very same Jews who howl about 'nazi, nazi, nazi' have no qualms about working with naziesque elements in Ukraine.

Another notable phenomenon is that all those delirious sincere wokesters almost never think or feel beyond the narrative/dogma handed to them from above. There is almost no connecting the dots on their own. They must be TOLD and DIRECTED as to how 'wokeness' should operate. For example, if racial violence is wrong, then Zionist terror against Palestinians and black crime/violence against whites & non-blacks should be condemned. But 'wokeness' lacks consistency of logic. Rather, it's based on a hierarchy the holies and unholies. Paradoxically, precisely because whites are in the unholiest camp, they must be most 'woke' to gain holy-redemption points, which explains why some of the most obnoxious 'woke' types are whites. And of course, the easiest way for whites to gain 'holiness' is by waving the globo-homo banner, which explains the popularity of 'gay' stuff among white progs.

If 'wokeness' has inner logic beyond the control of the elites, how many churches have been seen with BDS or pro-Palestinian signs? I haven't seen any. I've only seen globo-homo and BLM signs, both favored by Jews. US neo-imperialism under Bush to Obama to Trump to Biden has destroyed millions of people in the Middle East. Where is the 'woke' outrage about that? Your average 'woke' moron cares more about some black criminal like George Floyd than millions of Muslims bombed to oblivion or starved to death.

This goes to show that 'wokeness' is totally orchestrated and controlled; it is not to be confused with the True Left that, ideologically misguided or not, tries to be morally consistent in its critique of Power. So, Aaron Mate, like him or not, will call out on the horrors of US neo-imperialism in Ukraine, Venezuela, Syria, and West Bank. Oliver Stone will defend Edward Snowden for exposing the Deep State. In contrast, to the delight of Jewish Supremacists, 'woke' morons are more obsessed about the sacralization of George Floyd(useful to Jews in white moral paralysis) and how some fat ugly hairy guy should be addressed as 'she' or 'they'. In other words, while 'wokesters' may cause headache for the sane and moderate, they do no harm to the Power, which is Jewish and dedicated mostly to guilt-baiting whites and confusing categories so that no united front, right or left, can emerge.

The rise of 'woke-ism' is a death knell to the real left. The True Left, again like it or not, gained power by unity in organization and purpose. It was about the masses or the workers led by disciplined leadership. Or it was about national liberation struggles in Cuba or Vietnam. In contrast, 'wokeness' is about division and atomization of so-called 'progressivism' into countless tiktok lunatics, mostly yammering about 'gender', which now comes in how many flavors? 500? Trannies make up less than 1% of the population, but 50% of 'woke' discussion seems to center on how many gender-splitting can be achieved under a microscope. And the Power(Jewish) has pushed this among the impressionable young, and in the UK, 50% of young people don't believe they're either male or female, and 40% of young idiots in the US have followed suit. This kind of nuttery poses NO THREAT to the power. Yes, it's frustrating(and even terrifying) to decent scholars in academia who want to remain sane and do good work. The Power isn't interested in principles or virtues of the honest academic but in maintaining its own supremacy. Jewish Power is especially nihilistic because it looks upon goyim as less-than-human, in other words expendable. Thus, when Jewish Power uses 'wokeness', all it cares about is "Is it good for Jews?" Even if wokeness undermines the quality of academia, it's 'worth it', just like Madeleine Albright said it's worth it to kill half a million Arab kids because, well, it's good for Israel. Of course, she didn't name Israel, but why has Jewish Power steered US foreign policy toward smashing nations in the Middle East? It's about 'any means necessary' for Zionist supremacy.

eugyppius: "People tend to believe things that further their personal interests, and universities are no exception."

People looking out for their personal interest has been a constant throughout history and in all places. It's no different in Iran, Russia, China, Brazil, Italy, North Korea, Japan, Israel, and Mexico. People have been looking out for their personal interests in Ancient Greece, Pagan Rome, Catholic Poland, and etc. But the question is, "Do most people define their own personal values?" Did European Christians arrive at the Faith like Saint Paul who wrestled with his own soul? No, the religion gained political dominance, and being pro-Christian became synonymous with personal advancement. Likewise, personal interest in communist nations became synonymous with believing in Marx and Lenin. So, while countless communist professionals in the Soviet Union were indeed working for personal interests, their personal beliefs were imposed or implanted by the Power. This is where the political becomes personal. Most people don't have imagination to come up with their own ideas of what's right.
So, the question is WHO or WHAT has been most responsible for cooking up the current brew of 'wokery' and making it mandatory medicine for all those seeking professional advancement. Take the military. I'm sure many there still despise 'wokery', but most are silent from top to bottom because they know they can be purged and ruined for going against it. But did 'wokery' spontaneously arise from the ranks or was it foisted on the military from above?

eugyppius: "Wokification succeeded largely because it gave a lot of different people a lot of different things that they wanted. It gave the increasingly powerful university administration a reason to hire more administrators to manage diversity and ensure its forward march. Self-propagation is the highest goal of administrators everywhere. Wokeness also became a useful tool in ongoing turf wars between administrators and faculty. Diversity is a simple metric via which the administration can interfere with faculty hiring and academic operations; new diversity hires know who is buttering their bread and remain loyal to the administrators whose policies brought them in. For the increasingly mediocre and incapable faculty who now teach at even the most august American schools, the woke circus has its own attractions."

But that doesn't distinguish 'wokery' from any other factor intrinsic to professional competition and advancement. The real question should be, "Why did wokery become the basis of advancement and empowerment?" After all, Iran works on the same principles but with different themes; there, you have to be pro-Islamic to get ahead. And in China, even those skeptical of communism must sing paeans to Mao to move up the political ladder. There will always be 'turf wars', whether 'wokery' is around or not. Trotskyites vs Maoists. It's like the Jets vs the Sharks.
What's most astounding about the rise of 'wokery' is how something so absurd could have gained so much traction; in other words, it didn't happen organically. We can understand why so many youths(and even academics) in college campuses became anti-war during the Vietnam War. Many were morally outraged by the slaughter. Some didn't want to be drafted. College professors were convinced the war was unwinnable. Also, good many were sincerely inspired by Marxism that seemed to speak for the oppressed. In contrast, 'wokery' is about what? At least 50% of it is about celebration of sodomy as the second coming(or cumming) and 'gender' pronouns. Rest is about how fat hairy guys with penis and balls are 'women', tattoos and piercings, and calling everything 'nazi' or 'white supremacist'.
And its only racial theme seems to be the holiness of blacks. While 'wokery' atomizes the so-called 'left' into basket-case inanities, it's not true that every gripe or complaint is equal in Wokedom. There is a very strict hierarchy. Blacks over whites and nonblacks. Endless tears for dead black thugs but zero sympathy for victims of blacks. Trannies over feminists and lesbians. Also, while Karenism is encouraged and rewarded against anyone deemed 'conservative' or 'unvaccinated', it is suddenly a great crime when it calls out on bad black behavior. Also, while Antifa is encouraged to attack and terrorize whatever movement hated by Jews, it never shows up at pro-Zionist events. Given that Zionist power is the product of super-capital and Jewish racial supremacism, one would think the 'leftist' and 'woke' Antifa would violently protest AIPAC rallies. But there's no such. Antifa doesn't march through campuses calling for sanctions on Israel. Notice 'wokery' comes with a pass-over clause. The fact that most 'woke' people comply with such rules shows that they're either (1) too stupid to connect the dots and think for themselves or (2) too craven to be consistent in their morality and just remain within the allowed perimeters of outrage.

eugyppius: "It provides distraction from the unrelenting demands of objectivity and originality, and permits a pleasing, self-righteous indulgence in moral scolding. In Woke Studies, the answers are always predetermined and it is very easy to get anything published, provided you say the right things."

Yes, but this didn't originate with 'wokeness'. This kind of behavior is quite evident among 'conservatives' as well. If Donald Trump and his 'conservative' followers were into objectivity and facts, they would have to admit that Jewish Power was most instrumental in 'fortifying' the 2020 elections. Indeed, Jewish Power in media and deep state did much to orchestrate the Covid Hysteria(to rig elections and tip economics in favor of oligarchs) and the BLM riots of 2020 to intimidate America, but all you get from Trump is 'Muh Israel', and the likes of Mike Lindell, Michael Flynn, Steve Bannon, and Sidney Powell are blaming China, Iran, and Venezuela for the election fraud. Their logic, either idiotic or craven, is hardly different from 'wokeness'. It's premised on the idolatry or dogma that Jews are never wrong, Israel is holy, and the American Right must suck up to Jewish Power no matter what. Trumpism can be characterized as Jewish Power f***king him in the ass, and him turning around and pleading to his violator, "Can I suck your d***?" Or consider Israel's role in USS Liberty and the coverup by the US government. Objectively, Israel should have been called to account. And Jewish American Power should have been exposed for favoring tribal interests over objective truth and justice. But, American 'conservatives' have been acting against objective truth in its fear of Jewish Power and the hope that if they appease Jewish Power just enough, many more rich, powerful, and verbally gifted Jews will come over to the American Right. And of course, 'conservatives' feel a moral deficit and want Jews-as-Holy-Holocaust-People to join them and automatically wash the Right with Anne Frank Soap.

Morality in the US isn't based on ideology but idolatry. It's a matter of WHO than WHAT. So, Jews, permanently canonized as Holy Holocausters, can do no wrong. They can act like Nazis toward the Palestinians and even work with Naziesque types in Ukraine. They can fund and arm ISIS and other terrorist types to cause grave harm to secular modernizers like Assad of Syria. The American Right has gone along with this irrational and crazy kind of 'morality' where Jews are always right because of some historical association to WWII. Likewise, it's not just the 'woke' but the 'conservatives' who subscribe to the notion of eternal black holiness because of the slavery narrative and MLK cult. When has Trump or any prominent 'conservative' called out on black thuggery and violence? No, they yammer about Mexican rapists and Muslim terrorists, but, when it comes to blacks, it's all about how the GOP cares more for Noble Negroes.
'Woke' lunacy isn't just the product of idiot degenerates and the Jewish Power that favors and funds them. Much of the blame must also go to craven 'conservatives' who, in their mindless mania to appease and win the approval of Jews, were silent about the increasing arrogance, hatred, and dementia of Jewish Supremacism. If, after what Jewish Power did to the US in 2020, one is still dreaming of Jews-seeing-the-light-and-coming-to-the-Right, it's truly pathetic(and irrational as hell). At any rate, one so irrational and delusional should not be accusing the 'woke' of nuttery. One should look in the mirror.

eugyppius: "In Woke Studies, the answers are always predetermined and it is very easy to get anything published, provided you say the right things."

Predetermined by whom? If some 'woke' type wants to work in Hollywood and proposes a movie about the evils of Zionist terrorism and 'racism' against Palestinians, how far would that person go? If some 'woke' type proposed a movie exposing the evils of Zionist-led US neo-imperialism in facilitating ISIS and other terrorists in Syria, would he get a green light in 'woke' Hollywood? Of course, hardly any such 'woke' type exists because 'wokery' has been devised by Jews from the beginning. A genuine leftist or even rightist might propose such ideas in Hollywood, but 'wokesters' are LINO, or leftist-in-name-only. The Power created a movement that favors infantile outrage and celebrity-vanity over honesty, principles, and thought. It's like dogs love to bark and bite but hardly get to decide the target. They will bark at and bite anything they are directed to. People with autonomy of thought and values cannot be so easily manipulated. The Power favors emotions over ideas and ideas over facts. The Power not only recruits young ones like Greta Thunberg but encourages childish emotions among adults. Children don't care what they're eating as long as it's sweet. They don't care what they're doing as long as it's fun. And infantilized adults, the 'woke', don't care what they're chanting about AS LONG AS it gives them the euphoric high of self-righteousness. They don't care what they are barking at AS LONG AS their adrenaline is fired up in righteous rage. And the Power can spin ANYTHING to energize the 'woke'. When Donald Trump spoke of ending US occupation of Syria, the Jewish-run media spun it as 'Trump is betraying all those noble Kurds to the butcher Assad', and that was enough for 'woke' tards to get hysterical(even though they'd hardly given any thought to the conflict over there). They very 'woke' idiots who were howling about 'kids in cages' in the Southwest border under Trump's presidency are now indifferent to the same or worse problems. Why? The Power directed their energies elsewhere. Lacking a sense of autonomy — these morons would be totally lost without the company of likeminded minions — , the 'woke' always need to be on the latest outrage bandwagon, and it's almost always chosen by the Power. Notice how BLM is suddenly hot, then it's not. For several yrs, it was relatively muted but then it came out big in 2020 when Jewish Power needed all the firepower against Trump and to intimidate America with muscle and (false) morality.

As for trannies, Jewish Power finds them useful enough. But tranny nuttery could be ended overnight if Jews so decided. Trannies are less than 1% of the population. Also, tranny reputation can go south instantly if the Jewish-run Media spilled the beans on all the dirt and scumminess in the tranny closet. Lots of famous trannies are deeply compromised characters with history of drug abuse, child abuse, and sexual crimes. If Jews really wanted to crush trannies, all they need to do is air the dirty laundry. Trannies didn't make themselves powerful, no more than Greta Thunberg did.
There is the Power and the empowered. The Power has autonomous support systems of maintenance. Jews control media, banking, academia, deep state, real estate, whore politicians, and etc. In contrast, the empowered need the favors of the Power. It's like Hitler Youth needed the support of the National Socialist Party. Red Guards needed the go-ahead from Mao. So much of 'wokeness' could be ended overnight by the Power if it directed the money and energies elsewhere. The notion that green-haired tattoo-riddled freaks on Tiktok and Twitter and gender studies department in universities are dictating matters is too funny. No, the gender lunacy was pushed by Jewish Power to foster confusion not only between the Right and the Left but within the Left, to the point where the Left is now useless in its decadence and degeneracy. Just think what would happen to China or Russia or Iran if it were overcome with gender pronoun lunacy and tranny nuttery, the kind pushed by Jewish-run deep state all over the world? It would become like deracinated South Korea where the national culture revolves around fruity gay-pop K-pop pansies. Furthermore, spread of global BLM instructs goyim in every country to prioritize black identity(as holy) over their own. It further leads to deracination and weakening of national pride and autonomy. This is why Jews push such garbage all over the world. And it's why Jews are furious at Russia and China's saying NO to globo-homo and gender-garbage. It's not about the spread of 'liberal democratic' values but about the spread of Jewish Supremacism by other means.
Now, some will say Jews themselves face problem with 'wokery' within their own ranks, but here's the crucial difference. As globo-homo is the Jewish weapon(and as homos are utterly loyal to Jews as their masters), Jews feel a sense of domination when they wave the homo flag; it's an expression of victory of the Jewish Will. In contrast, goyim feel submission when they wave the homo flag; it's an act of surrender to the Jewish Will. It's the difference between a British Imperialist waving the Union Jack and a subject of the British Empire waving it.
Also, unlike idiot goyim, Jews don't undermine their own power over bitter ideological strife. Israel is both globo-homo central and orthodox Jewish central. It puts on massive homo parades as the metropole of globalist dominance but also put on the biggest funeral in its history for a rabbi who said goyim exist only to serve Jews. Jewish 'woke' don't wage war on the Jewish Right. If anything, they are united on grounds of "Is it good for Jews?" Do you see 'liberal democratic' Jews in the US attacking Israel for its rightist-nationalist policies? How many Jewish Democrats denounced Israel for honoring a rabbi who said goyim are no better than cattle and it's even justified to take the organ from a goy so that a holier Jew can live? If anything, even Democratic Jews pressured Obama to bow down to Netanyahu and offer even more aid to Israel. We are told of the anti-Israel 'squad' in Congress, but they are merely FOUR, with AOC shedding crocodile tears for Palestinians while doing the bidding of AIPAC. Joe Biden is a total puppet of his Jew-heavy administration, but how come the 'woke', supposedly into 'inclusion' and 'diversity', aren't outraged by the vastly disproportionate Jewish makeup of Biden's regime, which should be called the Jewish Regime with Biden as senile-Brezhnev-like puppet?

eugyppius: "For students, Wokeness has still other attractions—as a font of easy coursework, as an opportunity for social networking, and as a locus for the periodic ritual entertainment of false moral outrages and protests."

Not very convincing on easy coursework. Long before 'wokeness', colleges have turned into party schools. Students could do minimum work and still graduate. Also, college professors learned to grade on a very generous curve system long before 'wokeness'.
As for 'false moral outrage', it's human nature to want religion, and in the absence of old faiths, there is a need for new ones. As the modern mind has been shaped by fashion, celebrity culture, and vanity, 'wokeness' is appealing because it's packaged as the latest fads and trends in moral outrage.

eugyppius: "All of this is to say that Wokeness was selected from many aspiring ideological and intellectual programs, because it gave the right things to the right people."

No, for all its yammering about 'diversity' and 'inclusion', most of 'wokery' revolves around three themes: Blackity Blackness, Globo-Homo genderist nuttery, and Shut-Up about Jewish Power(by fixating on fantastical threats from White Supremacy and the Autocracy of Russia & China, all the while pretending the West is about 'liberal democracy'). Suppose you're from Bolivia and want to raise awareness about the plight of Bolivians and the beauty of Bolivian pride. You can try, but you won't get very far. Wokeness isn't about diversity for diversity's sake but for diversity revolving around blackness, homo-ness, and anti-whiteness(and anti-Russia/China-ness) as diversion from the fact of Jewish Supremacist control of the West. There's more ink spilled in favor of trannies than for all the diverse ethnic/national groups around the world among the 'wokesters'. If you aren't homo or black, the only chance of gaining a bit of attention for your kind is to associate it with globo-homo or BLM. In other words, a Vietnamese-American for Vietnamese pride gets nowhere, but he or she might get some attention by associating his/her identity with support of homos or blacks, or by denouncing 'white supremacism' as the biggest evil in the world(even though a yellow person is far more likely to be terrorized by a black criminal or thug). And of course, he or she better shut up about Jews. That's 'wokery'. It's not about a hundred flowers contending for hundred interests but about hundred identities coalescing around few favored themes imposed from above: Globo-Homo, Noble Negro, and Blame-Whitey(and ignore Jewey).

eugyppius: "The donors, the trustees, the tenured faculty, the powerful committees – none of these hold the reins either. Wokery is a self-organising decentralised movement."

Nope. Donors may not hold the reins but they provide the water. It's like the ones who control the dam don't control the sails and rudders on the boats in the lake, but they can turn off the water supply, in which case the lake will go dry and the boats will be rendered useless, regardless of who controls the sails and rudders. The relative ups and downs of BLM owed a great deal to Jewish Money and Jewish Media Control, a multi-billion-dollar enterprise. There are plenty of Christians all over America, but they get nowhere because they don't have donors. Why did the GOP steer toward globo-homo, 'gay marriage', and even tranny nuttery? Because the big donors favor cuck-minions who never oppose the agenda. Donors matter a great deal. Even without the donors, 'woke' idiots can go on being 'woke', but they will no longer have any traction.

It's like the Alt Right. In 2016, the media decided to shine a light on it, not all of it negative. So, Richard Spencer got his 15 min of fame and celebrity. Even as a 'villain', everyone seemed to know him and talk about him. The fool thought his fame or infamy came naturally. But when the media shut him out, he was suddenly a zero. Most white 'woke' morons don't have minds of their own. They lack agency to come up with their own dogmas, narratives, and gods. So, they rely on orders and decrees from above. Jewish money was behind globo-homo and tranny nuttery from the beginning, and it helped that Jews control the media. Also, Jews in Wall Street and Hollywood figured globo-homo would be great to Jewish Power that no longer cares for class struggle as most Jews are rich. Just make white 'progressives' expend most of their energies in favor of vain homos and trannies who are happy to gain favors from Jews and work with the US deep state.
Indeed, look how globo-homo is the new missionary arm of US imperialism. A navy ship named after Harvey Milk. Given US aggression around the world, one would think the 'woke' would be outraged at homo cooperation with the deep state. Or, one would think the 'woke' would be outraged that the black general Lloyd Austin is a commander in US military aggression. But no, the very people who weep about George Floyd don't care about the innocents murdered in Afghanistan or Syria. They aren't outraged by US bombs painted with BLM signs that are dropped all over Muslim lands. 'Wokeness' isn't true leftism. It is the Jewish Supremacist appropriation and perversion of Leftism to serve what is really an ultra-rightist Jewish Supremacism. It's like European empires twisted the meaning of Christianity to turn Jesus Christ into some warrior-god who justified the conquests and plunders of so-called Christendom. 'Wokeness' is to leftism what Prosperity Gospel is to Jesus's teachings.

eugyppius: "Importantly, Wokeness is also self-radicalising, in the way that many university-incubated ideologies turn out to be. Administrators or department chairs are constantly in danger of being outflanked on their left, and so they must adopt and endorse the most radical line to maintain their position."

It's more self-Fadicalizing than radicalizing. Because 'wokery' is based more on idolatry than ideology, it has limits to which it can radicalize. Ideas can be radicalized into greater purity, aka purity spiral. In contrast, idolatry throws the monkey wrench in ideological purification because it favors certain tribal identities over others. For example, ideology of equality would call for ever greater application of equal treatment. But because Jews have been idolized, equal justice for Palestinians hardly gets anywhere. Also, the idolatry of BLM makes purity in racial equality impossible. If indeed the ideology says all races must be treated equally, then not only would anti-black violence be condemned but the violence committed by blacks(as thugs in the streets or as US soldiers in the Middle East dropping bombs on Muslims). But the black idolatry of BLM doesn't allow for ideological purity because of blackness uber alles. Likewise, if ideology of equality were to apply to homos, they should be held accountable for the troubles they cause. But the globo-homo idolatry makes ideological purity impossible because homos, like Jews and blacks, get pass-over rights and aren't held accountable for all the social malaise they cause through spread of disease and cultural decadence.
Indeed, just ask the Palestinians about what 'wokeness' has done for them. Despite all this talk of equity, has the NY Times been pressure to 'include' a Palestinian-American columnist? Is the Democratic Party under pressure to include some Palestinian/Arab/Muslim people in Biden's administration? Is there outrage that so many college presidents are hardline Zionist, thereby either dismissive or suppressive of BDS movements on campus?

'Wokery' is misunderstood because it's really an ultra-right ideology cloaked in faux 'leftism'. 'Diversity' really means diverse peoples must coalesce at the supremacist feet of Jews, blacks, and homos. 'Inclusion' means Jews get to include more of their allies to mute criticism of Israel and Jews while everything is blamed on 'white supremacism'(or Russia and China). 'Equity' means More for Blacks where they're deficient. It certainly doesn't mean treating Jews and Palestinians equally in US media, government, or institutions. Tell me WHO in Hollywood or TV-land has insisted on more pro-Palestinian programming to make things more equitable? Hollywood already made EXODUS the movie, and the US news media feature countless Jewish voices. WHO among the 'woke' is demanding a movie about Nakba for 'equity'-sake? Who? If anything, 'wokesters' know full well that they won't have a chance in Big Tech, Hollywood, Wall Street, and Ivy League if they open that can of worms. Some time ago, Cornel West complained of how he'd been targeted by Jews in Harvard for his pro-Palestinian stance, and furthermore, even most Negroes didn't come to his aid because they know they got more to gain by groveling at the feet of Jews than by standing by a brotha. Blacks do enjoy supremacist advantage under 'wokeness' but IF AND ONLY IF they don't try to apply rules of 'equity' to Jewish Power.

eugyppius: "While Wokeness provides many personal incentives for true believers, it is destructive for the institutions that foster it. Those schools that have advanced very far down the woke path face semi-regular hate speech hoaxes and student protests, hordes of incapable hostile junior faculty, and massive curricular disarray."

True, but as Jewish Power rules the US and its top priority is "Is it good for Jews?", it doesn't matter if 'wokeness' is harmful to institutions. If harming institutions secures more power for Jews, that's all that matters. It's like the Sacklers knew that their drugs were destroying many goy lives. But they didn't care because all they cared about was More Money. Jews know that Neocon policies did irreparable harm to Middle East nations, but again, what do they care? Their Jewish supremacism only cares about what's-good-for-Jews, so who cares if millions of Arabs/Muslims suffer? And who cares if the West is inundated by millions of refugees as the result of Wars for Zion? Did Jews care about the harm done to countless Russians in the 1990s when shock-doctrine capitalism concentrated 50% of Russian wealth overnight in the hands of Jewish oligarchs working in cahoots with Global Jewry? No.
It all depends on priorities. Perhaps, Jews would like to have the cake and eat it too where they get both Jewish Supremacy and excellent institutions. But if they feel the choice is between Jewish Supremacism and the health of institutions, they will go with the former. Jews favor power over principles. Look how the Jewish-heavy ACLU is no longer about Free Speech as Jews got the power and don't want to be criticized. Look how Jews who once spouted principles about civil liberties(violated by Joe McCarthy) are totally into blacklisting and deplatforming people today. Bari Weiss didn't leave NYT because it purged the likes of her but because it didn't purge enough of the people she hated. (She was unhappy in a paper that is heavily weighed in favor of Jews against Palestinians. But for the idiot 'right', she is the face of 'free speech' against 'wokeness'. LOL) Whether it's 'liberal' Chuck Schumer or 'conservative' Jennifer Rubin, it's really about Jewish supremacism.

Woke mobs are decentralized at the bottom, but the directives come from above. Most woke idiots are incapable of generating their own ideas, themes, or narratives. Such must be handed down to them. It's like blood hounds may wander all over the place and appear free-ranging, but it's in service of pursuing the scent provided to them. They are 'freely' fixated on that one scent provided by the Master.

Without elite academic culture, what is the likelihood that so many 'woke' morons would be into creative pronouns and 100 genders? Are we to believe, all on their own and in decentralized enclaves, they came up with the notion of 'they' for a man-posing-as-woman in all fifty states(and even in foreign countries)?

Here's a typical case of woke mob-mentality and how it's directed from above. The elites said Covid is a killer, and Trump is to blame. All must be locked down because Covid will kill, kill, kill. Woke mobs were saying, STAY INSIDE or else you'll die!!

But then, the Power decides racial violence is just the thing to drive a wedge between blacks and Trump(who made some inroads), and all of sudden, the very woke types who'd been acting so scared of Covid are suddenly out in force in the streets and running riot. And the media don't call foul on this because they're the instrument of the Power that gave the go-ahead to the mass riots and 'mostly peaceful protests'.

Now, if Covid is really a mass killer, wouldn't 'woke' protests lead to countless deaths among progs and blacks? Not very conducive to the objective of 'black lives matter', is it? But for the duration of the riots, it was as if the Covid went on vacation and spared all those proggies and blacks. Wink wink between elites and woke mobs.

And if wokeness has a logic all its own and keeps spreading on the basis of radical equal justice, when has anyone seen a blue city street painted with 'Palestinian Lives Matter' sign? When?

eugyppius: "Alas, this doesn’t matter either. Nobody, not even Kimberlé Crenshaw, can redirect or modulate Wokeness any longer."

This 'wokery' will continue to be about idolatry of blacks, homos, and Jews. It hasn't been anything but a Noble Negro cult, Globo-Homo reverie, and Jews-are-Anne-Franks-no-matter-what-they-do. That is all 'wokeness' is. It hasn't been anything else and will never be.

eugyppius: "All of this matters, because American universities aren’t just eager sponsors of racial hysteria. They have also emerged as some of the most radical centres of Corona containment in the world. Their students endure all manner of unreasonable hygiene measures."

Again, this is a Jewish thing. Just play a mind game. Suppose it was Trump and his gang that wanted to push the Covid panic. Suppose Trump and his ilk had something to gain from Covid mania and its fallout. But suppose the Jewish-run media, the deep state, college elites, medical community, and big tech all chose to poo-poo Trump as fear-monger, a medical nazi, and power-hungry demagogue. Suppose Fauci was on air assuring the public that Covid is no big deal and that Trump is off his rocker. Suppose the Jewish-heavy medical community and media favored methodologies that minimized the number of Covid deaths. Would this Covid thing have gained traction? Jews control the institutions and infrastructure whereby certain ideas, agenda, and manias are quickly disseminated from top to bottom. Take the Russia Collusion Hoax. It was utter nonsense from day one for anyone with sense, but Jews have such total control over the institutions and media industries that those raised to be 'good little progressives' readily fall for the BS. It's like there's still plenty of idiot 'conservatives' who knee-jerkedly salute the flag and regard soldiers as 'heroes' no matter the war. People don't think. The very 'liberals' who've been going on and on about the bad ole days of the 'Red Scare' and paranoia suddenly became far nuttier than Joe McCarthy and his supporters about the specter of Evil Putin. What does this tell you? It's not about ideology, let alone ideological purity. It's about suckers whose 'ideology' is totally at the mercy of Jewish manipulation. This Covid nuttery can end overnight if Jews want it to end. It never would have become a thing if the orders didn't come from the top. Fauci would have never come to prominence if he wasn't useful to the deep state. His career was carefully constructed despite so many failures.

In a way, 'wokeness' is like a strange mass-conspiracy. It's not like all the 'wokesters' getting in a smoke-filled room with the globalist elites to hatch a plan. Still, much of the 'woke' mentality is the sense that the 'educated progressive' types are 'in the know' and working for 'human evolution' that requires the concentration of power in the right kind of people. Thus, 'wokery' has a double appeal. Among the earnest dummies, it's really real, like the morons in George Orwell's 1984 who really believe Eurasia, once a forever friend, is now a forever enemy. But among the conceited smarty 'woke', they believe they are 'in' on the grand scheme of historical power. In other words, they sense or know that much of 'wokery' is baloney but nevertheless go along because it is subversive of reactionary forces that must be destroyed by any means necessary. It's like adults or 'grown-ups in the room' don't tell kids the truth but what-is-good-for-them because it's agreed that kids simply can't handle the truth. Just like smarter Jews look upon goyim as children, smarty 'wokesters' look upon humanity as one big sheeple to manipulate. Smarty 'wokesters' believe in power and the agenda, and ANYTHING, however false, is justified if it furthers the agenda. One thing that Project Veritas exposed was that many in the Woke Industry don't really believe in their own hype. Rather, they keep up with the facade because of its political utility. This adds an element of adventure and romance to 'wokery'. It's like playing spy or secret agent. After all, in war, hot or cold, you don't use honesty to gain the upperhand. You use deception and subterfuge. So, while plenty of 'woke' idiots actually believed in Russian Collusion Hoax, many pushed it cynically just to hurt Trump. And even though some 'woke' morons are really into gender nuttery, others push it as just another weapon against normative conservatives. It makes them feel like Lawrence of Arabia or even 007 in a game of strategy.

So, whereas the church-wokesters actually believe in the nonsense handed to them from above, war-wokesters merely treat it as a manual of combat, rather like 'Rules for Radicals' by Saul Alinsky. As such, even though they aren't privy to the inner-workings of the Power, they feel they are on the same mental wavelength as those in conspiratorial circles. But such mentality exists on the 'right' also. Q-Anon morons think they are in on some secret, a 4-D chess that is being played by Trump. So, even Trump's defeat in 2020 was part of The Plan to, wink-wink, expose the Deep State. ROTFL.

eugyppius: "People raised up as leaders and heroes of emerging movements are almost never its directors, but merely expressions of all the separate beliefs and aspirations of those involved. Ultimately it’s just extremely difficult for any confined group of people, no matter how wealthy or powerful, to implement any kind of coherent agenda in heavily bureaucratised modern states."

If this is true, how come 'wokery' almost never deviates from the Tri-Idolatry of Jews, blacks, and homos? Sure, feminists and stuff like MeToo are thrown a bone now and then when it's useful to the Power, but what other themes have been expressed by 'wokeness'? Also, even if there are many voices and interests in 'wokeness', nothing gains traction and momentum without favoritism from above. Suppose a 'wokester' calls for ending mass immigration because the American Indians were victims of 'genocide' caused by mass invasions from the Old World. What chance is there of powerful institutions amplifying such concerns? In 2020, streets were painted with BLM signs, but how many streets were painted with PLM or Palestinian Lives Matter signs? BLM was painted outside Trump tower. Will 'wokery' leads to PLM signs on the streets outside Jewish centers in NY or Hollywood? Fat chance. If any 'wokester' painted such, he or she'd be arrested and locked up.

eugyppius: "These constraints don’t exist in every country, but in the world of liberal democracy, this is very roughly how governance happens."

US is a liberal democracy? Really? A nation where Jews, 2% of the population, have ethno-supremacist stranglehold over so many industries and institutions but are NEVER CALLED OUT ON IT? A nation where the Power allows Antifa and BLM to run riot but unleashes brutal police force on any patriot that fights back? (Unlike racial violence in the 1960s that spiraled out of control, the 2020 racial violence was orchestrated by the deep state. It was the Power concentrated in Jewish hands waging war on the nation as punishment for Trump's presidency. It was far worse than Pearl Harbor and 9/11, which also had a Jewish Hand.)

The US came closest to liberal democracy in the 60s and 70s when Wasp power was waning, and the power was up for grabs among various groups and voices. Back then, Jews were not assured of their supremacist position and supported free speech to defend their right to compete for influence. Since then, Jewish Power has risen like Mt. Everest over all others, and the US today is properly an ethno-supremacist oligarchic gangster state. What we see with Political Correctness and 'wokery' cannot happen in a true liberal democracy. Rather, what has happened over the years is that principled liberals have lost ground to pushy, nasty, vicious, and supremacist Jewish ethno-supremacists who bitch about 'white privilege' but cry 'antisemitism' whenever someone calls out on Jewish Power. Even libertarians are full of BS. They will defend Jewish Big Tech's censoring of conservatives on grounds that private companies can do as they please. Okay, but isn't it wrong for the state to suppress BDS, an expression of free speech in favor of Palestinian rights? But there is total silence on this matter from most libertarians.

Nothing Good and True is Possible in Western Discourse UNLESS People Name and Blame Jewish Power as the Driver of the Worst Trends around the World — Failure to Honestly Diagnose the Root Cause is Fatal

We see Jewish-Israel-Zionist-globalist connections everywhere, but no one, on both the mainstream 'left' and mainstream 'right', says anything. If someone on the dissident right notices patterns of Jewish Power, he is a 'nazi'. If someone on the dissident left notices similar things, he is an 'anti-Semite'. But even most dissident voices across the spectrum would rather not discuss Jewish Power.

Nothing, and I mean nothing, is possible in the West until Jewish Power is identified, exposed, and criticized(and ultimately condemned). As with cancer, you will not fix the problem IF you only focus on the symptoms. Weight loss, nausea, aches, fever, fatigue, skin problems, indigestion & bowel issues, appearance of sores, or etc. cannot be dealt with on an individual basis when there is an underlying cause. Now, one can feel nauseous without having cancer. Everyone suffers from indigestion on occasion. But there are times when symptoms are a manifestation of a deeper problem. They arise from something serious and must be diagnosed and treated in the most effective and honest manner. Also, existing minor problems can be severely exacerbated by a grave illness like cancer. Suppose someone has long suffered from a chronic but manageable problem, one that was inconvenient or painful at times but far from deadly. Such a problem can grow far direr when a person succumbs to cancer. Or to something like HIV. Many people have problems with minor infections but get over them or manage them throughout their lives. But if a person is infected with HIV(and left untreated), the immune system will break down and then even minor infections grow out of control and pose a serious threat. Consider how the chronic black problem had been more or less controlled in the US before Jewish Power began to kill the proud white cells that had kept black fever in check. Today, the power of white cells is so weak that even nasty yellow bitches in NYT can strike a blow against White America. Whiteness can be trampled on even by some over-educated Suzie Wong.

This is why anyone who whines and groans about the problem of America(the empire of the world) shouldn't be taken seriously IF he or she won't address the central issue of Jewish Power as a cancer of humanity. Surely, even some Jews notice this and want an end to Jewish Supremacism, just like some Germans realized the cancerous nature of Nazism. Sadly, sensible Germans didn't have the numbers, the means, and the power to stop Adolf Hitler before he caused serious damage. (To be sure, Nazi madness arose in concert/contention with other forms of madness, especially communism, Jewish supremacism, Japanese imperial fanaticism, and the utter neurosis of Anglo hypocrisy.) The ONLY way Nazism could be defeated was by overplaying its hand and forcing other nations to unite to crush it. There were Good Germans but not enough of them. And at this point, it's reasonable to say there aren't enough Good Jews and they lack the sufficient influence to stop the madness of Jewish Supremacists who are pushing the world to the brink of disaster(though many would argue the world is already there). If Jews can't manage their own cancer, then other peoples must... just like if Imperial Japan couldn't limit its own ambitions, others had to do it for them.
Now, some people(such as Susan Sontag) would argue that Anglo-Americanism(and Western Power in general) had long been cancerous in its seemingly limitless expansion around the world. But while there's no doubt that Western Power has wrought great destruction around the world — not only through invasions and wars but by technological innovation that, while making life easier for countless humans, befouled or entirely erased entire ecological systems — , there was also tremendous construction as well. So, the West was in a way the great cancer but also the great chemo/cure of humanity that lifted the rest of mankind from the chronic disease of backwardness, superstition, and tyranny. (Tyrannical power of the Imperialist West was necessary to break the grip of local tyrannies that had defined most of humanity from time immemorial, i.e. even though the British Imperialists were exploitative and even ruthless at times in India and China, those non-white civilizations started a new chapter of progress and understanding only under the revolutionary influences from the West. The West also abolished slavery around the world, a kind of mega-civil-war among humanity that dwarfed the American Civil War. If Union Imperialism justified itself by ending slavery in the South, couldn't one make a case that Western Imperialism waged wars for the liberation of mankind, especially in the Global South where slavery was hardly considered a 'sin'? Of course, the West had also greatly profited from the slave trade, was often hypocritical & inconsistent, and often invoked virtue & progress as rationales to justify imperial rule, but the grand arc of modern history leaves no doubt that the predominant concept of 'human rights', 'liberty' and 'justice' all arose in the West and spread outward. In other words, it's ironic how those who call for 'de-colonization' are actually products of Western moral-and-cultural colonization. But precisely because they are ignorant or repressive of history, their ideology can only be rabid and insane. They're incapable of grasping the complex threads of history, thereby unable to give credit where it's due. At any rate, modern Western History could be seen as either the cancer or the cure of humanity, and only time will tell if, in the end, it was all worth it. Currently, the way things are going, it seems the entire Western Enterprise is falling into disaster not only for the West but for the world. And yet, the main reason for this is not due to White Power but its defamation and demise, thereby making white ability, talents, and skill be used manly to promote Jewish supremacism, Negrolatry, and Globo-Homo-mania, all of which have no redeeming facet as opposed to Western Imperialism of yesteryear that, despite its failings and abuses, also spread principles of rule of law, property rights, ideals of liberty, Christianity, science & technology, individual conscience, and art as personal expression. In contrast, Jewish Supremacism is essentially Judeo-Nazism. Negrolatry means we must worship Negroes as idols of trash culture. Globo-Homo-mania says it isn't enough to allow homos to be free to bugger one another because the whole world must be compelled to celebrate... homo fecal penetration and tranny penis-cutting.)

Take recent events, and they make no sense without mentioning Jewish Power. Also, nothing could really be done about them because JQ is OQ, or Jewish Question is Out of the Question. Therefore, even those who condemned certain events or trends in the strongest terms eventually came up empty because they didn't address the SOURCE of the problem. For example, condemning MIC or the Military-Industrial-Complex only goes so far because its policies are shaped under Jewish Supremacist Power. Just think. If MIC is simply about warmongering so that weapons-industry can reap more profits and so that hawks can have fun playing games on the global chessboard, why doesn't the US ever target Israel or Jewish interests? After all, ANY war or act of aggression can be profitable or 'fun' for those of MIC. Yet, Israel and nations like Saudi Arabia are never targeted even though both had something to do with 9/11 whereas Iraq and Iran had NOTHING to do with it. Also, if 'War on Terror' is what US policy is about, why did it turn a blind eye to Israel and Turkey aiding ISIS & Alqaeda terrorists in Syria? Why did the US back the Jihadis in Libya? While MIC does exist and is about profits and gamesmanship, it is not the ultimate arbiter of US foreign policy. US is ruled by Jewish Supremacist Power, which decides and directs what is permissible for the MIC. Think of MIC as a hunter who loves to kill animals. If MIC could do it as pleases, it would try to bag ANY animal. But suppose MIC can only hunt what is permitted, and suppose that is decided by the power higher than MIC. Surely, if the hunting grounds have bears, tigers, leopards, wolverines, boars, and elk BUT if hunters can only go after bears and tigers but not leopards, wolverines, board, and elk, then we can't say the hunters have the final say in what gets killed and what gets spared. If hunters could do as they please, they'd likely shoot anything that moves. MIC is like the hunter, but it only gets to hunt what is allowed. And that decision is made by Jewish Supremacists. MIC doesn't care as long as it gets to HUNT something. It's like the mindset of hunting dogs. The canines want to hunt something but don't really care WHAT as long as they're allowed to track and maul something. John Bolton, CIA goons, most military generals, and weapons industry are content as long as they're given something to threaten, encircle, and/or destroy, something to reap massive rewards from in profits and positions. John McCain was a very good dog to the Jewish Supremacists. MIC is like athletes in a sports team. They don't really care whom they play against as long as they get to play.

This is why anti-war positions that failed to discuss the Jewish Element were bound to fail. It's like denouncing hunting dogs without mentioning the hunter who directs the dogs to attack certain animals. During the invasion of Iraq, Tucker Carlson(who supported the invasion) interviewed Patrick Buchanan and, while conceding that Buchanan had every right to uphold his anti-war position, sniped at him for having made 'antisemitic' remarks about the Jewish Lobby. But how could anyone make sense of the Iraq War without mentioning the role of Jewish influence? Today, Carlson is much lauded by even those on the Dissident Right for saying it like it is, but the common thread has been the unwillingness to address the JQ. Now, some will say Carlson won't have a job for long if he broaches that topic, but then, none of what he says will matter because the heart of the matter is Jewish Supremacist Power. Carlson can rail about this, that, and everything under the sun, but unless he mentions, exposes, and shames Jewish Supremacist Power, it will go on creating new problems for America and all the world. Carlson can blame 'leftists', 'liberals', 'globalists', antifa, BLM, greed, the 'elites', and so on and so forth, but it only amounts to noticing the symptoms of cancer but never mentioning the cancer.
If Bobby is throwing water balloons, setting things on fire, shooting spitballs, tossing firecrackers, and other naughty deeds, will he stop acting badly if HE isn't called out and named as the culprit? Suppose everything he does is condemned but he himself always goes unmentioned. So, throwing water balloons, setting fire on things, and etc. are recognized as bad behavior, but they are never connected to Bobby the bad kid. Why would Bobby stop acting badly when, even when his actions are condemned, he himself is never named and, if anything, is coddled and praised. (It's like there is so much talk of blacks as victims of violence, but there's far less mention about blacks being the perpetrators. Whether in Africa, the US, or the UK, we hear so many stories of blacks as victims but not as perpetrators. Thus, the effect is more sympathy for those poor poor blacks but no pressure on blacks to stop acting like savages.) Tucker Carlson will never name the Jew when it comes to US open borders policy, but he will praise Israel for its own tight border policy. Now, some will say that Carlson is, wink wink, naming the Jew by making such connections. But such pussyfooting won't go far, not least because many idiots won't pick up the dog-whistling and no one in the conservative movement will get the memo that there needs to be a serious change in the narrative. As long as Jewish Power goes unmentioned, it will continue to act badly because it is never blamed for anything. Even when what they do is disapproved, the responsibility never falls on their lap. In 2016, Donald Trump seemed to do the unthinkable, especially in the rah-rah-military GOP, when he condemned the Middle East wars, but he never mentioned Jewish Power even though it was the main force behind the disasters. If anything, Trump sold himself as Israel's best friend and reviled Iran, a nation that had NOTHING to do with 9/11. And even as Trump called for improved ties with Russia, he said nothing as to why US-Russia relations got strained in the first place. The failure of diplomacy resulted from Jewish rage about Russia not fully cucking to globo-homo Empire of Judea. While Trump failed to mention the obvious Jewish Factor in the animus between US and Russia, Jewish Supremacism went all out to smear Trump and Vladimir Putin with false accusations of collusion. So, Jews can name and target Trump, Putin, Russia, Iran, and White America(as 'white supremacist' central) with vitriol, but no one better name the Jews as being the primary force behind global tensions. If Jews are to be mentioned, it is only as Eternal Holocaust Victims, Forever Victims of Antisemitism, the Most Wise & Wonderful People on Earth, and the Noble People of Israel. Only praise and no criticism of Jews. This means Jews have a power over the West not unlike what Hitler had over Germany or Stalin over Russia. You could name them and talk about them but only in the most positive and glowing manner, and NEVER in a critical, let alone condemnatory, manner. And of course, this has set the template for other aspiring groups, especially blacks and homos. If you want to talk about blacks, it better be in praise, sympathy, awe, or rapture but NEVER in a critical tone. If you want to discuss homos, it better be in mindless celebration of 'rainbow' sodomy and penis-and-balls-cutting(among trannies). Of course, blacks and homos enjoy such protections because Jews control the media, academia, & the deep state and have all the politicians in their pockets. As for capitalists who only care about money, they have no ideas or values other than More Profits and Good Publicity. Rules of publicity are shaped by media and academia in the West and by the reigning power in many non-Western nations. So, companies are eager to present themselves as all about BLM and globo-homo in the West while the very same companies dare not push globo-homo in places like Saudi Arabia. It's like McDonalds, the main cow-killer around the world, will only sell lamb-burgers in India. That's the essence of capitalist morality.

John Mearsheimer in The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities says the reigning ideology that drives the US is 'Liberal Hegemonism', but if so, why are most US politicians all about tribal Israel? Why is the US closer to theocratic Saudi Arabia than to more modern and secular Arab states like Syria? Why is US 'liberalism' opposed to border security for Hungary but totally for it for Israel? Why is the 'liberal establishment' in the US less hostile to China than to Russia despite the latter being less repressive? And if 'liberalism' is about more freedom, why are the elites for more censorship and more suppression of free speech? And if postwar 'liberalism' is about more equality, why are the 'liberal elites' not bothered by the rise of super oligarchs like Jeff Bezos who do the bidding of ADL and Sergei Brin & Mark Zuckerberg who are Zionist-Jews? And if 'liberalism' is about colorblind recognition of all, why does the US care so much about black lives while turning a blind eye to all the victims of black crime and violence? So much for 'liberal hegemony'. This is all the more surprising coming from someone who wrote about the Israel Lobby. Did he suddenly get cold feet and change his tune, like that worthless whore Amy Chua? In truth, the problem of American foreign policy isn't the preponderance of 'liberal hegemony' but the contradictions between Jewish supremacist hegemony(as the real power in the US & West) and the 'liberal' masquerade(as smoke-and-mirrors to fool the world that US is about 'muh freedom' than 'muh Israel'). US is a nation where both parties totally cuck to the Zionist demand that BDS be suppressed while pretending American Values are about justice for all. The Jewish Mayor of Minneapolis was seen kneeling and bawling before the coffin of George Floyd the Fentanyl Groid, but when did he or his ilk get on their knees for all the Palestinians killed by IDF death squads and all the Arabs starved, bombed, or otherwise killed by US war machine that takes its marching orders from Jewish Supremacists?

We cannot fully understand the aftermath of 9/11 without naming the Jew. Even 9/11 cannot be fully understood without considering the Zionist angle, something that has been suppressed far more than 9/11's connection to the Saudis. The financial meltdown of 2008 owed largely to policies pushed by Jews, but Jews got to blame dumbass Bush II and install Obama the 'socialist' as puppet who, surprise surprise, bailed out the big banks and then later unleashed more Wars for Israel in the Middle East. (And of course, globo-homo was a Jewish proxy from the beginning, and it came to full tutti-fruition under Obama, another proxy of the Jews.) Cuck Culture and Jungle Fever owe largely to Jewish control of media, entertainment, and narrative, and it has been devastating to the white race. Jewish advertising and propaganda are pushing the Afro-Colonization of White Wombs, and white women and white men go along as they're little more than mental slaves of Jewish Supremacist manipulation. Since the election of Donald Trump, it's been Jews, Jews, Jews pulling the strings, but no one mentions this most crucial and obvious fact in the institutions and industries that matter. While plenty of people, especially on the 'right', dismissed or denounced the Russia Collusion Hoax, they dared not tie the smear-campaign with Jewish Power. They blamed Democrats, 'liberals', MSM, 'progressives', the deep state, and so on, but they never said anti-Russian hysteria is almost entirely a Jewish Thing. (It's like blaming 'Democrats' and 'socialism' for the demise of Detroit in a criminal hellhole.) Seriously, if any people other than Jews controlled the US, would there be such bad feelings between Russia(that actually wants good relations) and the US(where all the goy cuck politicians are so afraid of Jews that they dutifully bark at Russia while being kicked in the ass by Jews?) So, even as the Russia Collusion Hoax has been exposed as false, nothing will change and more such nonsense will be created out of the thin air because the main culprit, Jewish Supremacist Power, was not named and shamed. (Similarly, will anyone mention Israel and Jewish Power as the force behind Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell? Of course not, so Israel and Mossad will just find OTHER people to create honeypots to trap and blackmail others.) As for Ukraine-gate, the Jewish Hand in it was so obvious that there were murmurs of a Jew D'etat, but of course, the Jewish-run MSM was busy attacking such notions as 'paranoid' and, yes, 'antisemitic'. Jews conspire and act like negative Jewish stereotypes but then blame others for daring to notice. As usual, it was the dissident elements that did most of the noticing while most of 'mainstream' media just toed the line yet once again.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EmPIZNCXDNNQ/

Then, take the Covid Hysteria. Sure, it's a real disease, but there's no question that the Jewish-run media way over-hyped it to shut down the economy, thereby dampening the only thing going well for Trump. If Covid had hit the US during Obama or under Hillary, would there have been such massive coordinated shutdowns? No way. And then, there was the BLM fiasco, the logical outcome of Jewish fanning the flames of the '1619 project' in the pages of NYT in concert with other PC nuttery. Jewish Power is Mao-like. It is never blamed for anything. Mao Zedong's Great Leap Forward devastated the Chinese economy and may have led to the deaths of over 30 million, but he got little if any blame. If anything, he was able to pull off another nuttery with the Cultural Revolution. Likewise, the very Jewish supremacists who gave us the Iraq Disaster and the financial disaster got to pull off more disasters with Libya, Syria, and Ukraine. And then, as if sanctioning Russia and Syria was not enough, Jewish Power chose to sensationalize Covid and sanction the entire Western economy because it didn't like the trends toward nationalism and populism. Lock everyone down under the power of 'experts'. And then, Jewish Power set off a variation of Cultural Revolution via BLM-Antifa riots and craziness. Why was Mao able to pull off another act of nuttery? Because he wasn't named and blamed for the Great Leap Forward. Because the extent of his megalomania was underestimated. Why doesn't Jewish Power ever stop in its vileness? Because it is never named and blamed and because people are unwilling to acknowledge the sociopathic nature of Jewish neurosis. Sure, some people will denounce Antifa, BLM, deep state, the 'liberal media', and etc., but they still won't connect the dots and arrive at a full picture that shows Jewish Supremacism as the reigning power of the West, the power behind the power. As such, Jews will continue to act the Bad Mao, or Maoitz.

Of course, just like the excesses of the Cultural Revolution came back to bite Mao, the mayhem of BLM and Antifa has caused damage to some Jews as well. But the fact is the Jewish-run Democratic Party, Jewish-run media, and Jewish-run deep state coordinated the protests/riots as yet another attempt to bring down Trump. It doesn't matter that Trump is a shameless shill for Zion because, as far as most Jews are concerned, he is the voice of white populism that calls for nationalism than globalism. Also, as US is the metropole of the world empire, Jews figure that what happens in the US has seismic effect on the rest of the empire. So, with both Covid and Floyd-mania, the crisis was orchestrated into a Scylla and Charybdis affair. Put Trump between a rock and a hard place. No lockdown, and Trump gets blamed as a murderer of every death. Lockdown, and the Trump economy vanishes into the thin air. Take action against BLM-Antifa rioters and terrorists, and Trump is attacked as dictator, tyrant, and mass killer. Do nothing and he is seen as weak and wussy by his own supporters.
This is why you must name the Jew. It's like the fortunes of the Corleones in THE GODFATHER reversed ONLY WHEN Vito Corleone realized it had been Barzini all along. Without that knowledge and counter-moves based on that knowledge, the Corleones were surely finished. Who is the 'Barzini' behind all the recent BS and madness? It sure ain't the Eskimos. But white people don't think or act like Vito Corleone. They are more like that worthless Fredo who will sacrifice his own family for 'something for me'. Take Mitt Romney, who can also be compared with Senator Geary that lowlife scum. But it may be worse than that. Too many whites are like Mr. Martini(Danny De Vito) in ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST. Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones talk big, but if you ask them to mention who has the real power, they turn all Martini-like in the following scene: White race, now a bunch of Martinis who can't even say the obvious truth.


These days, whites are cucked beyond belief. White women have been indoctrinated to hate white men and are into jungle fever. And white men, so cucky-wucked, are either willing to hand their women to Negroes or unwilling to lift a finger to defend white women. But then, what's the point of defending your women when they spit at you as a bunch of weak, wussy, white 'racists' while celebrating interracism? White men are demoralized on both 'left' and 'right'. On the 'left', you got cucky-wucks so eager to display their proggy bona-fides by celebrating the Great Replacement and the Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. On the 'right', you got white guys who figure it's futile to stand up for the white race and defense of white women as any expression of whiteness is 'racist' and as many white women will attack you for implying that white men and white women should be part of a unity and that white women need protection by evil white men. So many white women get their worldview from TV and movies where white women are protected from venal disgusting white men by noble-minded Negroes. Of course, reality says otherwise, but people prefer fantasy over reality, just like people prefer drug-induced states than sobriety. White Fantasy, not White Fragility, is the real problem.

Recently, vile black and Asian bitches in NYT and other media outlets have written awful things about white women, but who owns and controls NYT and publications like Time? Who hired those nasty bitches whose voices were given a platform? Do Hawaiians control NYT? Never mind the small potatoes. Who is the big rotten apple behind them all? Barzini was the power behind the Tataglias, and Hyman Roth was the power behind the Rosato brothers. Who are the power behind the nasty NYT 'woke' bitches? It is, of course, the Jews, but all we hear from the 'right' is, "Dear Jews, those wokesters are coming for us whites today, but they will come after you wonderful Jews some day, and we whites don't want to see that because we wuv you Jews sooooooooooooooo much." How utterly pathetic and craven considering it was the Jews who set those wokesters on the whites. It'd be like the Corleones trying to protect Barzini from the Tataglias whom Barzini is using against the Corleones. So, these white cuckservatives do nothing as BLM and Antifa destroy white statue and monuments, but they raise a fuss about the rare BLM march in D.C. that was anti-Israel.

Anyway, the nasty black, yellow, and other bitches in the media attack white women over the fact that white men used violence against blacks to protect their own women. In pure Hollywood fashion of White Fantasy, the narrative goes that some shrill deranged white woman falsely accused an innocent black man of rape or something, and then white mobs descended on blacks and lynched half of them. While white-on-black violence was indeed part of US history, only a fool would believe that white women were all liars and black men accused of rape were all innocent.
Furthermore, if we tally up the numbers of all the white women robbed, assaulted, raped, and/or murdered by blacks, it's pretty astronomical especially since the 1960s. So, the violence was far from a one-way street. True, there were explosions of white violence and even what might be called pogroms against black communities in the US, but there has also been the problems of black crime and violence against whites in the South, North, Midwest, the West, and all over. Blacks even rape girls in Okinawa. But why is there no outrage about all the black-male-on-white-female violence? All the beatings, rapes, robberies, murders? Also, what about the violence by black girls on white girls? Just like tougher black guys usually beat up and humiliate white guys, tougher black girls usually beat up white girls. And yet, all the moral outrage is about precious black lives, all the funnier when blacks are the main killers of blacks. Black Lives Matter More because Jews control media, academia, & entertainment and elevated blacks to higher moral status. Also, in a nation as sports-sex-and-pop-music-crazed as the US(and the modern world in general), many people have come to see Negroes as the most awesome. The combination of pop idolatry, black megalomania, white search for replacement-spirituality(with demise of Christianity), and Jewish supremacist control of media/academia has led to a kind of black supremacism. So, even though interracial violence has often been about black men against white women, the only concern is what might have been done to black men because of white men acting in defense of white women. (This is funnier when blacks will often kill each other over someone saying something about someone's mama.) US history used to be about prizing white lives over non-white lives — though whites were free to slaughter one another in duels, gun-fights, and wars — , but social reforms led to the need to regard the lives of all Americans equally.

But then, something happened. Jewish Power emerged to favor Jewish lives above all others. So, it was Zionists over Palestinians. It was about berating the Christian West for 'antisemitism' and other crimes against humanity while never discussing the Jewish role in the history of wars, mayhem, exploitation, and invasions. Jews were only to be regarded as wise men or wonderful entertainers OR the most tragic victims of 'antisemitism' and the Holocaust. So, thousands of Jews killed in Cossack pogroms in Ukraine mattered more than millions of Slavs killed by Jewish Bolsheviks. A handful of Jews killed by Muslim terrorists mattered more than an entire people crushed and destroyed by Zionists and Wars for Israel. Thus, the filthy lies of BLM are following in the footsteps of Jewish Supremacism that, instead of insisting on equal worth of all Americans, nudged the US toward favoring Jews uber alles. Jews came to hate the notion of colorblindness because it would mean Jewish Power should be scrutinized just like white power. It meant Zionist Israel should be shown no favor over Palestinians or Iran. Jews, with their higher IQ, wealth, and arrogance, didn't want to settle for being equal with the rest of mankind. They insisted on their special vaunted status. Of course, Jews couldn't brazenly spell out their supremacism like Hitler and the Nazis did. Just like Wall Street bundled bad loans with good loans via derivatives, Jews bundled their supremacism with all the lame talk of 'liberalism', 'spreading democracy', 'fighting racism', 'combating white supremacism', 'remembering the Holocaust', and etc. Jews have certainly used Antifa thugs and lawfare as their proxy goon force to shut down any expression of white populism. And Jews push BLM to give the impression that 'white supremacism', not Jewish globalism and urban elite gentrification, has been the animating force behind tougher policing and increased incarceration. Instead of talking about Bill Clinton's new policies and Michael Bloomberg's Stop-and-Frisk, let's talk about the 'legacy of centuries' of whites being so eeeeevil. And let's not discuss how the Israel military and police treat Palestinians 100x worse than how blacks were treated by white police in apartheid South Africa.

No Honesty, No Truth. No Truth, then no True Justice. Anyone who rags on and on about this or that issue without naming the Jew simply cannot be taken seriously. Akin to worthless doctor who notices the outward symptoms but never names the deeper disease, those who criticize and/or condemn recent problems but refuse to name the Jew are close to useless. Fish rots from the head, and the head ain't Eskimo or Hawaiian.

Now, will all problems dissolve into the air IF Jewish Power is exposed and dealt with? Of course not. Humanity will always have problems, and all parts of the world were plagued with problems with or without Jews. So, there will always be more problems and other problems. But, the main problems facing the West cannot be understood apart from Jewish Supremacist grip on so many key institutions and industries. And the agenda of this power is nothing less than the total humiliation and destruction of the white race. Jews told white women to hate white men, and so many white women did. But now, they are being set upon by Jews, blacks, and yellows but no longer with the protection of white men whom they forsook or denounced. And white men watch all this anti-white-female violence, physical or verbal, but do nothing because they are either afraid or figure what's the point when so many white bitches are into jungle fever or spew hatred at white males. And what power molded the minds of white folks, especially since the 60s? It was 'Barzini' all along.

Now, some whites pray for rich and powerful Jews finally seeing the light and forming an alliance with whites as Diversity, especially blacks, turn on Jews. It's been the great white dream of William F. Buckley, John Derbshire, and Jared Taylor. But, it won’t happen. Jewish-black tensions go way back, but Jews always managed to buy off blacks. If Jews can buy off all whore politicians of both parties, why not blacks? Look at Al Sharpton. He’s a 'house nigger' now working on the Jewish Plantation. Also, black Jew-baiting is tactical than principled: It is merely a way for blacks to demand for more stuff from Jews. For example, blacks will pretend to care about Palestinians… but then fall back in line when Jews give them more stuff. It’s the same old song. The real question is why isn't there a fraying between whites and Jews? Could it be that whites still haven't figured out that most Jews despise them, not least because of the wussy cuckery? The more whites cuck, the more Jewish Power dic*-slaps them as weak and pathetic.

Also, despite Jewish-black tensions, both sides have the eye on the prize, and it’s all about milking whitey. Jewish supremacism is premised on white submission, and so, Jews must promote ‘white guilt’ to make whites subservient to Jews. And Jews use jungle fever and jungle faith to promote ‘white guilt’ and white cuckery. So, even though blacks may beat up some Jews and rob/loot some Jewish communities, that’s all small potatoes to Jews, the cost of 'doing business'. Even a few Jewish eggs must be broken to make the Jewish Supremacist Omelet. Jews want to control the world, and that totally depends on the obeisance of whites as the subservient managerial class. Whites must be to Jews what the German managerial class were to Hitler.

Blacks also know that black supremacy depends on 'honkeys' as White Atlas as supportive shoulders for black Negrolympian-ism. Without whites, blacks would be jungle buffoons beating on bongo drums and chucking spears at hippos. It was through whites that blacks gained access to all the good stuff of modern economics, science/technology, medicine, sports, pop music, and etc. Of course, black pride simply can’t accept those facts, but deep down inside, blacks intuit they be nothing without white folks. And so, blacks also rely on the promotion of ‘white guilt’ to keep whites bowing their heads to blacks, so blacks can keep leeching off whites.

Now, whites should be speaking truth to power, but most white 'conservatives' are like the ever-faithful battered girlfriend in relation to Jewish Power. Imagine some Jewish guy fooling around with other girls while routinely beating up and insulting his white girlfriend who, however, prays that her undying loyalty will finally pay dividends when the Jewish boyfriend goes from prodigal punk to faithful husband. To such a person, we'd say, "Yeah, keep dreaming." Sadly, that is the White Dream regarding Jewish Power.

Now, it's well-known why it's so difficult to name, let alone blame, the Jew. Jews are immensely powerful and can destroy just about anyone. But Jews not only have money power & influence but 'spiritual' power as the Holy Holocaust People. They've sacralized Jewishness as synonymous with the highest morality on grounds that NO PEOPLE suffered as much as the Jews did. So, even as Jews are pitiless against their enemies, rivals, and anyone they don't like, the current West is infected with bottomless pity for those poor, poor, helpless Jews, oh boo hoo hoo. Jews learned the art of Christianity, which served as the moral shield for the expansionist West, i.e. the mighty use of swords and guns to conquer the world while invoking Jesus and the Early Christians who faced persecution and death; so, even as Western armies invaded and conquered through violence, they put on a passion play of being the martyrs of history. Thus, the West got 'spiritual' cover for their temporal deeds. This was why Jews were so eager to replace Christianity with a new mass cult in the West, and it was Holy Holocaust Worship, along with Queertianity and BLM. Holy Holocaust Worship was mainly designed to make Europeans and Christians worship Jews as the newly sacrificed christ-figures who died for the sins of white folks. Globo-Homo is to replace Easter and Christian festivities with celebration of sodomy and tranny-degeneration that defile Christian values. And BLM is to infect white Americans with forever 'white guilt', thereby being too cucky and browbeaten to stand up for white identity and interests. Jews were behind all three.
So, the problem for many people is not merely the monetary influence of Jews but their moral prestige that was concocted with Jewish control of media, academia, and whore politicians. Money and might alone won't secure long-term power. Money is about buying influence, and might is about ruling with fear. While power by money and might can last, it has no real respect among the people who, when the opportunity arises, may rise up in rebellion. Consider the fall of the Shah of Iran. He had money and might(via the secret police) but no respect from the people. And that is why Jews worked not only at making lots of money but creating a moral cult of Jews as Holy Holocaust People. Thus, anyone who notices Jewish Power in a critical manner is denounced as a 'nazi' even though Jews now got all the power and money while critics of Jewish Power simply want a fairer reckoning with history.
But however difficult it may be to overcome internal psychological pressures and external social pressures, people of the West must break out of the conditioning and begin to honestly address the problems of Jewish Power. Unless this cancer is exposed, there is no hope for truth, reform, and restoration of sanity & balance. During the Cold War, there was a journal called Problems of Communism. Today, what we need most is the Problems of Jewish Supremacism. Just don't counter Jewish supremacism with a supremacism of your own. Just because so many Jews are a**holes doesn't mean that anti-Jewish a**holery, like that of Hitler and the Nazis, was justified.