“Revolution devours its own children” doesn’t apply here. It would if Jews were destroying other Jews in a mad frenzy of purity spirals. But Jewish Power, both ‘liberal’ and ‘conservative’, tend to remain united through thick and thin. The Tribe remains intact. In this case, Jews all across the ideological spectrum closed ranks to denounce an uppity Negress who dared to point out that Jewish Power historically operated at elite ranks of society. The Holocaust wasn't about powerful white Germans oppressing weak Jewish whites but about powerful German whites versus powerful Jewish whites. But Jews are invested in portraying themselves as victims, all the better to justify their immense power and supremacist grip on the West, thereby the Rest as well. So, it's hardly surprising that virtually all Jews joined in solidarity to dump on Whoopie.
Indeed, it’s been the case that Jews generally don’t destroy other Jews(with some notable exceptions like Norman Finkelstein and David Cole). Jews stick together. In contrast, goyim tend to devour fellow goyim in radical times. Why? Because whereas Jews put identity before ideology, goyim(generally possessing weaker identities) tend to put ideology first and foremost, thereby getting sucked into purity spirals. So, Russian communists destroyed so many fellow Russians. Chinese communists destroyed so many fellow Chinese. In contrast, Zionism was the Jewish Left and Jewish Right united by identity over ideology. Jews are smarter that way. Also, Jewish communists were less likely to be outright murderous toward Jewish capitalists and vice versa.
Specifically, Goldberg, who is no critic of Jews or Israel and is as willing to submit to proskynesis before Zionist force majeure as anyone in the entertainment industry, said “Let’s be truthful, the Holocaust isn’t about race, it’s not. It’s about man’s inhumanity to man, that’s what it’s about. These are two groups of white people.”
Goldberg’s statement makes sense within the more recent American context where all peoples of European descent, including European-Jewish, have been categorized as ‘white’. After all, Anglo-Americans, German-Americans, Irish-Americans, Polish-Americans, Italian-Americans, Ukrainian-Americans, Greek-Americans, and etc. all simply became ‘white’. And Jews counted as ‘white’ too, though with special exemptions(like the burden of 'white guilt'). So, Whoopie’s American-centric view failed to appreciate the significance of ethnicity in the Old World. Ethnic distinctions also mattered in the American Past, but most peoples of European origin just melded into ‘whiteness’, just like black Africans of various tribal origins simply became 'black', which also includes mulattos.
Of course, this poses problems of its own. For example, it means even white Americans of Polish origin with no history of colonizing Africa, practicing the Atlantic Slave Trade, and owing slaves in the South — if anything, Jews were more involved in that — must bear the burden of ‘white guilt’. Also, there's no sense of Poland's history of oppression under Russians and Germans. Or, you could be of Lithuanian origin, but there's no special regard for Lithuanian tragedy in the great wars and under Soviet domination — most Lithuanians, like many Europeans, had a far more difficult time in the 20th century than most blacks in America. The moment any Lithuanian's foot sets down in the US, he too counts as 'white' (in the American sense of the term) and is associated with 'white privilege'. You could be a recent immigrant from Romania, and you too would be stained with ‘white guilt’ despite having no roots in America. In contrast, you could be an African immigrant whose ancestors actually captured and sold black slaves to white slave ships, but your blackness automatically becomes associated with cotton gins, Jim Crow, and Civil Rights Movement. So, your identity is aglow with special consideration merely for being black and instantly showered with all sorts of Affirmative Action advantages. THAT is the real idiocy of racial politics in the US. Recently arrived black Africans whose ancestors massively profited from the slave trade are lumped into the Black American Narrative, and white ethnic groups(with tragic horror stories of their own) who arrived post-Civil-War and had nothing to do with the oppression of black Americans are lumped in with America's 'racist' past. And it's almost always about blacks. Take Scandinavian-Americans in Minnesota who, if they have some blood on their hands, played a role in the expulsion of the American Indians. One thing for sure, they had nothing to do with black American history, yet, their primary moral responsibility is toward blacks, much like the people of Sweden have been goaded into playing savior for all of Africa, even at the risk of losing their native land to migrant-invaders.
At any rate, as Whoopie is ignorant of European History, her 'provincial' black-American mind lumps all peoples of European origin into the generic category of ‘white’. She’s unaware of the powerful ethnic hatreds and resentments throughout European History, which ebbed since the end of WWII but flared up in fracturing Yugoslavia of the 90s. Worse, ethnic hostilities have recently been stoked in Ukraine, pitting one bunch of Slavs against another. Jewish-controlled US that controls EU made it fashionable for Western globalists to hate Russians(and Hungarians) for rejecting the cult of Globo-Homo and for reinvigorating traditionalism and ethno-preservation.
In a way, the deracinated ‘deracists’ are now the most hostile people in the West toward other whites. ‘Deracist’ whites in the US hate white patriots(deemed as 'racist') for having retained or revived some semblance of ethnic or racial identity and pride, and ‘deracist’ whites in Europe hate nationalist whites who regard mass immigration and great replacement as existential challenges.
Of course, deracination or ‘deracism’ is really a tool of Jewish Supremacism as it's directed at goy whites, not at Jews. Though white dummies or whummies take it to heart as virtue, most Jews are careful not to drink the 'deracist' kool-aid themselves. After all, even as white ethnic identity has been shamed and subverted, Jewish identity has only been further emboldened. But then, Jews will opportunistically encourage ultra-ethnic politics among goyim IF it can be directed against another bunch of goyim on the shit-list of Jewish Power. So, even as Jews denounce moderate Hungarian nationalism, they fan the flames of ultra-right nationalism in Western Ukraine against the Russian population in Eastern Ukraine. It's also why Jews, who generally deride goy nationalism, support Kurdish nationalism as it is useful against Arab, Persian, and Turkish rivals of Israel. There is no principle to Jewish Power. It’s always a matter of “Is it good for Jewish Power?”
While the Shoah was clearly about man’s inhumanity to man, it was also an extreme reaction to Jewish inhumanity to goyim. If Jewish behavior hadn’t been so excessive, would the National Socialists have come to power in Germany? No, one-third of Germans bit the bullet and voted for National Socialism in 1933 because they just about had had enough with bad Jewish behavior. (Some may argue George Soros and his ilk act destructively toward the West to avenge their fallen tribesmen in the Holocaust, but many Jews acted the same way BEFORE World War II, which is what paved the way for men like Hitler in the first place. Furthermore, Jews act the same way toward non-Western goyim. Soros sure raped the economies of Asia, and Neocon Jews concocted foreign policy to rain down maximum pain upon the Arab World.)
Of course, even those who voted for Hitler didn’t vote for war and genocide. The fact that the Nazis went out of their way to hide the horrors in the killing fields and certain concentration camps is proof that they understood all too well that mass killing was too much even for most ‘anti-semites’. Likewise, the Soviets and their useful idiots denied the Great Famine. Even as millions of Ukrainians perished, the official line was the New Order resulted in bountiful harvests and more food for everyone than before.
That said, both National Socialism and Communism were extreme reactions to real problems. Jewish Power was understandably hated for its exploitative, subversive, parasitic, and supremacist ways. And the appeal of communism owed to real problems of class exploitation under either aristocratism or capitalism.
Still, there were more rational and sensible ways to deal with the problems, as opposed to the radical way, which ends up committing great evil in the name of fighting a great evil. Sadly, when people are driven to the edge, they tend toward extremism. A good lesson would be “don’t drive people to the edge”, but it's a lesson self-aggrandizing Jews never seem to learn as, time and time again, they're hellbent on driving goyim to the edge once again, whereupon goyim can submit and fall into the abyss and take the last stand with zealous fury. It must be said rational, moderate, and sensible opportunities were often lost in addressing the Jewish Question/Problem because Jews refused to meet the other side halfway. If one side does wrong and infuriates other sides, it's usually helpful if the former acknowledges accountability at least in part. Then, a series of negotiations can take place where lessons are learned and the problem is settled more or less. But when Jews refuse to admit any wrong and are utterly intolerant of any criticism of Jewish abuses, the wronged party may conclude there is no rational, moderate, or sensible option when dealing with Jews. It becomes a zero-sum game of Jews win and take all OR goyim win and take all. The radical will of Jews had a way of radicalizing the other side. Will Jews ever admit that German radicalism under National Socialism owed in part to utter lack of Jewish accountability in regard to the woes of Weimar Germany and Bolshevik conflagration in the East? If anything, Jewish sense of moral culpability has grown only worse following World War II. Full of themselves as the Holy Holocaust People, their every abuse is laundered as a righteous expression of "Never Again".
So, there's no discussion of the murderous Jewish role in communism. Jews whine about Joe McCarthy and HUAC but ignore Jewish role in Soviet espionage. Jews pushed a total lie about USS Liberty and never came clean. They pull every trick in the book to get the worst Jewish crooks pardoned by puppet-presidents. Jonathan Pollard for one is sitting warm and cozy in Israel giving a big fat middle finger to the US. There's been zero accountability about Nakba and the Neocon Wars that killed so many. Or, what Jews did to Russia in the 1990s, which led to Putin's rise. Jews never admit any wrong and blame everything on 'Russian aggression'. No Neocon Zionist, whose foreign policy proposals have turned out to be disastrous, has paid a professional price or expressed any contrition. If anything, they've been placed in elite positions in the media to spread more lies in service to Jewish Supremacism. When Jews act this way, even those who desire a moderate, sensible, and rational solution to the Jewish Problem is pushed to extremes because Jews themselves are extreme. If someone burns your house down and admits no guilt(and if anything sends you the medical bill for the burns he suffered while torching your house), the chances are you're going to become 'anti-semitic' and counter-extreme against the vile extremism of the Jew.
The problem with the Holocaust Narrative is it assumes that Jews were wholly innocent pure-as-snow angels but set upon by crazed Anti-Semites for no reason at all. This is utter BS, rather like arguing Japan and Germany were smashed in WWII just for the hell of it.
If another Jewish Holocaust were to happen now, it’d be a horrible crime, BUT once again, it would have been an extreme reaction to vile and obnoxious behavior by Jewish Power: financial shenanigans, murderous foreign policy, medical tyranny, political subversion, cultural degeneracy, and etc. One may argue NOTHING justifies genocide, but people driven to the edge tend towards the extreme. It's just part of human nature under duress or in a state of outrage. Take the Morgenthau Plan. Henry Morgenthau the Jew was understandably appalled by Nazi atrocities and wanted revenge on the Germans. Look at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. US went crazy from the war. Palestinian terrorism has been reaction to Jewish Nakba, and Israeli bombings of Gaza are extreme reaction to Palestinian harassment via constant rocket attacks.
In his autobiography, Woody Allen wrote of his sympathy with black rage and commendation for any amount of black violence against whites, however extreme. Blacks have the right to attack whitey. (Predictably, the book was much praised by cucky National Review.) Allen’s moral logic is hardly different from that of antisemitism. If blacks, feeling so terribly aggrieved, are justified in committing extreme violence on whites(even indiscriminately), then one could argue Germans and their collaborators felt similarly justified in their anti-Jewish violence in reaction to Jewish perfidy.
The lesson of the Shoah should not only have been “genocide(especially of Jews) is a great evil” but “try not to act in a manner that stirs up great hatred against your kind.” The tragedy of the Holocaust Narrative is it taught one lesson at the expense of the other instead of emphasizing both. Paradoxically, it has effectively turned Jews and their cuck-collaborators into the New Nazis as the Holocaust Narrative unwittingly(or maybe wittingly) became synonymous with Jewish Supremacy. If Jewish-Gentile History is about totally innocent Jews being set upon by totally loathsome goyim, it means Jews are innately noble and therefore could never have done wrong, which further indicates that any anti-Jewish expression or action among goyim must ENTIRELY be their fault and never the fault of Jewish attitude or behavior. The presumption that says Jews can be wronged but can never do wrong is essentially supremacist because it stems from the conceit of Jewish moral perfectionism, as if every Jew is a little jesus.
Such outlook can only further Jewish arrogance and supremacism. After all, Jews would feel that they, as a race of Anne Franks, must always be right while those at odds with their identity or interests must be 'anti-semitic' reprobate scum. Then, is it any wonder that Jewish Power in the 21st century has waged wars that have led to the deaths of so many? Jews, being a race of Anne Franks, feel they have the license to judge, sentence, and kill, and it's the way things should be because Jews are never do wrong and can only be wronged.
Palestinians sure know how this game works. Jews can encroach ever more into remaining Palestinian territory, but Jews have the total support of US and EU under the spell of Anne-Frankism. As for Palestinians, they are a bunch of ‘terrorists’ and ‘anti-semites’ for resisting Jewish occupation and colonization.
And in the US, Jews, as the Perfect Race, can wage endless wars on whites and whiteness. As Jews are deemed to be morally perfect, their murderous hatred toward whites not only gets a pass but underpins the national narrative and curriculum as a 'moral' imperative. Jewish supremacist contempt is deemed as 'justice', whereas white desire for identity and heritage are condemned as 'far right' hatred. But if you call out on Jewish hatred against your kind, YOU are an ‘anti-semite’ who deserves to be dehumanized and destroyed.
The Holocaust Narrative would have done real good if the lesson were, “Jews must act better because bad behavior can lead to the rise of demagogues like Hitler.” Instead, Jewish Power led Anne-Frank-worshiping goyim to concur that Jews have always innocent(and right and noble), and all tensions between Jews and goyim had entirely been the fault of the latter. But without criticism, bad Jewish behavior only becomes worse. And today, it is utterly rotten. Who would have thought US foreign policy would come to be dictated by harridans like Victoria Nuland and US domestic policy would be directed by lawfare gangstoids like Merrick Garland who pushes anti-white CRT down the throats of white school children?
“The Holocaust was about the Nazi’s systemic annihilation of the Jewish people — who they deemed to be an inferior race. They dehumanized them and used their racist propaganda to justify slaughtering 6 million Jews. Holocaust distortion is dangerous.”
While it’s true that Nazism was rife with contempt and hatred for the Jewish People, there was also fear and anxiety about Jewish superiority. While Nazis were loathe to admit Jewish superiority in anything, they had genuine trepidations about predatory Jewish Power. Germans had a strong dose of Jewish Craziness in the Weimar Period. Germans learned of what Jewish Bolsheviks had done in Russia. Also, Germans hated the fact that World Jewry gained considerable influence over Anglosphere and steered its peoples toward intense animus toward Germans, their racial cousins. Also, speaking of racial supremacy, Anglo World was hardly different from the German one, and World Jewry worked hand-in-glove with Anglo global supremacism to penetrate all corners for the world for control and exploitation.
Nazis most likely wouldn’t have pushed for outright genocide IF World Jewry hadn’t declared war on Germany. Indeed, the preferred policy was mass expulsion than mass extermination. But as Jewish Power had used its influence to turn Anglo World against Germany and as German war efforts seemed doomed in Russia, Nazis decided to pull all stops in their war on Jewry as revenge and last chance at 'victory'. Fated for defeat, Germans would take down as many Jews as possible with them, a kind of Nazi Samson Option. (Jewish mentality isn't all that different. Israel has hundreds of nukes and is dedicated to nuking all of Europe if Israel were to fall, EVEN IF Europeans didn't cause the fall. The way Jews see it, whites exist to serve Jews and ensure the survival of Zion. So, if whites fail in this, Jews should wipe out as many whites as possible as Israel falls, presumably to Arabs/Muslims.) Same happened in Rwanda where the genocide got especially heated it seemed Hutus would be defeated by the Tutsis. Kill as many Tutsis before the Tutsis wipe the floor with the Hutus.
Little Marco denounced “upscale liberals who control the media” in a tweet and was immediately attacked for “the anti-Semitic trope that Jews control the media,” which of course they do, but an ardently pro-Israel Rubio surely was not suggesting anything like that.
If the perception of “Jews control the media” is ‘antisemitic’ and if Jews do indeed control the media, isn’t Jewish Behavior ‘antisemitic’ as it fulfills an ‘antisemitic trope’? If “Jews controlling the media” is antisemitic, then Jews should relinquish their control of the media because it’d be ‘antisemitic’ for Jews to control the media.
It’s like, if the statement “Italians are prominent in organized crime” is anti-Italian, then Italians are ‘anti-Italian’ because they are indeed disproportionately involved in organized crime, thereby fueling an 'anti-Italian trope'. But then, none of this is about truth or principles. It’s about power. Jews got the power and decide what we can and can’t say. That’s about it.
(Sarah) Silverman has been on a roll complaining about the paucity of “Jewfaces” displayed playing obviously Jewish characters on television or in movies…. she is particularly incensed that a non-Jewish woman Helen Mirren is playing Golda Meir in an upcoming movie. Silverman is enraged that anyone but a Jew should be cast in roles “in which Jewishness is an inherent and substantive component.”
Her outrage is fake, and she knows it. She’s feigning outrage to portray the Jews as poor little victims. She knows Hollywood has been Jewish-controlled and that goyim have often been cast as Jews for pro-Jewish reasons. One reason is ‘Aryan’ types are deemed more attractive. It was more glamorous to have Charlton Heston play Moses and Ben-Hur. Indeed, even big Jewish stars often looked rather ‘Aryan-ish’, like Kirk Douglas, or was half-‘Aryan’, like Paul Newman.
Jews figured their public image would be improved by Aryan-types playing Jews. If Jewish characters look more Aryan, goy whites are more likely to identify with the Jews. Like Aidan Quinn as a Jew in Barry Levinson's AVALON. Ingrid Bergman played Golda Meir in an earlier TV show. Jews worry that Jewish characters played by very-Jewish-looking characters will elicit less sympathy and identification on the part of goyim. So, goy-playing-Jew, far from being a marginalization of Jews, has been a calculated move to make Jewishness more attractive and palatable to goyim. Silverman surely knows this, and so her complaint is full of shit. Take the film JULIA directed by Fred Zinnemann based on the life of Lilian Hellman. Hellman wasn’t an attractive woman, and guess who played her? Jane Fonda. But this decision was made by Jews, not by goyim. But will Silverman blame the Jews? Of course not. The vile Jewess only seeks to create the impression that poor little Jews are being denied roles in Hollywood because of… ‘anti-semitic discrimination’. ROTFL. Never mind the only roles that Arabs got from Hollywood were as subhuman terrorists.
Jesse Owens(who won four golds in track & field in the 1936 Olympics) as an example of racial equality is laughable. He was idolized as a model of 'anti-racism' for having destroyed the myth of Aryan Supremacy. But, the Narrative would hold water ONLY IF he'd tied with the German/white runners. Then, he would have proven, black or white, it doesn’t matter, because races are equal in abilities and differ only in skin color, hair texture, and appearances. But did Owens' feat prove that races are equal in track and field? No, Owens ran markedly faster and, if anything, proved black racial superiority in the sprint and jump. Even if Owens destroyed one racial myth, that of 'Aryan superiority' in athletics, he established another, that of black African superiority in the sprint and jump. (Incidentally, even though Adolf Hitler and National Socialists rooted for their own race/team, they didn't necessarily believe that the 'Aryans' were superior in sports. Indeed, Hitler didn't like to attend track & field events because he knew blacks would likely win.) Joe Louis proved much the same as Owens. In beating all those white boxers(and especially demolishing Max Schmeling in their second encounter), his victories didn’t prove racial equality but black advantage in fighting ability.
But PC logic dictates that ‘racism’ be pegged to supremacism or superiority only when pertaining to whites. So, anything that suggests or indicates white edge, advantage, or superiority in any field is deemed ‘racist’, a terrible myth that is ripe for busting. In contrast, any evidence of white inferiority(and especially black superiority) is lauded as ‘anti-racist’. But, if a black guy is deemed better than whites at sports, isn't that a clear sign of black superiority? As it points to racial differences, isn't it 'racist' or race-ist? Apparently, the same rules don't apply to blacks. In other words, any evidence of black lording over whites in certain fields is wonderfully 'anti-racist', whereas any evidence of whites lording over blacks in other areas is terribly 'racist'. Some may believe that apparent white advantages deserve more criticism and skepticism(as well as condemnation) because such could be the legacy of past discrimination and bigotry, i.e. as whites were traditionally on top and socially favored, they inherited positions and privileges, whereas blacks had to climb up from the bottom against race-based obstacles. So, even if black advantages really do exist, they must be the truth for having been demonstrated against the odds. In contrast, how can we be sure that whites are really better than other races in anything when they'd been favored in the West for as far as anyone can remember? And yet, such line of thinking is not only fallacious but disingenuous. It's a fallacy because white social advantage in the past doesn't disprove white genetic advantages in certain fields and, furthermore, white superiority in IQ over blacks has been carefully researched and documented in countless studies and data over decades and across continents. For example, if blacks were historically favored over whites and enjoyed certain privileges over whites, it still doesn't mean that blacks aren't naturally better at running and jumping. Men were certainly socially advantaged over women through most of history, but only an idiot would argue that past inequality accounts as to why men are bigger and stronger than women. Also, regardless of how blacks demonstrated their superiority, the evidence still has to be regarded as race-ist for having disproven the 'anti-racist' myth of racial equality, one of the most pernicious ideas to come out of the 20th century. But in our Politically Correct times, any sign of black racial superiority is celebrated as 'anti-racist' and 'progress' whereas any evidence of white superiority is condemned as lingering legacy of 'racism' and 'so much still to be done'.
Similar dynamics exists between Jews and whites. It’s perfectly fine for Jews to wail about white privilege and white over-representation, especially compared to blacks(and browns). Too-Many-Whites in any given field is proof of ‘racism’. But whites better not notice Too-Many-Jews in elite institutions and prized industries even though Jews, at only 2% of the US population, are the most disproportionately powerful and privileged people in the country. Even though whites have lost so much ground vis-a-vis other races due to meritocracy and/or 'affirmative action', any sign of white success or wealth is evidence of how so much more has to be done about 'white privilege'. In contrast, no matter how richer, more privileged, and more powerful Jews become, that is just awesome and Jews can never be too rich, too powerful, or too privileged. Of course, Jews control the academia & media and rigged the game so that blacks and Jews can never have enough whereas whites always have 'too much'. Whites may be smarter than blacks, but they are dumber than Jews; and this has resulted in white awe of Jewish Genius(supposedly suffused with tragic wisdom of the Holocaust) and earnest reverence for Jewish admonishment and advice. There was a time when whites knew intelligence isn't synonymous with honesty & truth and were rather skeptical of Jewish claims and tactics, but the Jewish control of media + cult of the Holocaust led to what amounts to White Worship of supposed Jewish Wisdom, indeed to the point where to be a Doubting Thomas of the Jewish Agenda is to be reviled as an 'Anti-Semite', 'hater', 'Neo-Nazi', 'white supremacist', or 'extremist'.
At any rate, it’s stupid to blame ‘white supremacism’ for white superiority in modern history. It’s like putting the cart in front of the horse. More likely, whites developed supremacist attitudes because they gained superiority first. And the superiority came about by a complex set of factors that were cultural, historical, geographic, and genetic. (Besides, it was only a handful of white groups that came to world dominance whereas most did not and some, like the Byzantine Greeks, experienced steep decline and even total defeat.)
Supremacism per se doesn’t guarantee supremacy or superiority. Chinese had supremacist attitude about being part of the Middle Kingdom, but if anything, their arrogance ran up and crashed against the reality of European Superiority in science, technology, and organization. Muslims thought they were supreme as the favored of Allah, but their faith didn't do any good against the objective superiority attained by the West in production and military domination. Great White Hopers had supremacist delusions that white guys would beat black guys like Jack Johnson. But wish didn’t come true, and white boxer after white boxer got crushed by Johnson. Supremacism sometimes arises from but isn't the guarantor of superiority. Muhammad Ali was great not because he said so, as any boxer could boast he's the 'greatest', but because he had the natural advantage to take his words to the bank.
An essential necessity for the future well-being of mankind: The Holocaust Narrative must be turned on its head. It is most necessary because the biggest threat to world peace and justice is unrestrained Jewish Power that is now just as supremacist as Nazism was, if not more so. Like the Nazis who thought any number of Slavs and lesser folks were worth sacrificing for the creation of Greater Germany, powerful Jews feel any number of Arabs/Muslims and goyim in general may be sacrificed on the altar of "Is it GREAT for Jews?" (Apparently, "Is it GOOD for Jews?" is no longer good enough.) Of course, Nazism was overtly supremacist whereas Jewish Power is covertly supremacist, but if we appraise Jewish Power by its walk than its talk, it is undeniably in supremacist mode. After all, it's actions that count, not words. If someone says he would never steal but steals, he's a thief. If someone says he didn't commit murder but did, he is a murderer. We need to bypass the 'sayology' and take a good hard look at the 'do-ology' of Jewish Power. Never mind what Jews say. Judge them by what they do.
Given the events of the past fifty years, one would have to be jaded, blind, or dishonest not to have noticed that Jews feel a single Jewish life is infinitely more precious than countless goy lives. It isn't just Madeleine Albright saying it was worth it to kill half a million Arab kids. Jews have pushed for various Wars for Israel in which countless Arabs and Muslims have been traumatized, displaced, maimed, or killed. And, many American soldiers have died or returned with broken bodies or souls; and the conscientious among them have to live with the fact that they took part in Jewish-Supremacist Imperialist ventures that destroyed entire nations.
But, Jews feel zero guilt and, if anything, feel justified because it was goyim sacrificed in the interests of Jews, the superior race. So, despite what they say about 'liberal democracy' and anti-supremacism, Jews are utterly supremacist in what they actually DO, and in the end, it is the doing, not the saying, that counts. (But with monopolistic control the media, Jews can hoodwink a lot of people. Too often, the Power of the Word > Reality of the World. So, even though Israel has hundreds of nukes aimed at other nations, the alarmism in the Western Media is about Iran getting nukes even though it hasn't a single one and US intelligence services have yet to prove Iran has a viable nuclear weapons program.) It is actually worse than that. If Jews preferred good Jews over bad goyim, that would be one thing. Even if they preferred good Jews over good goyim, that too would be somewhat understandable as many folks favor their own kind over others. Then, Jews would have some degree of moral credence. But based on what Jews really DO, it's evident Jews believe even BAD Jews are superior and possess souls/bodies more precious than those of GOOD goyim. A moralist favors the good of the other kind over the bad of his own kind. A tribalist favors the good of his own kind over the good of the other kind. A supremacist, in contrast, favors even the bad of his own kind over the good of the other kind. Who can deny that Jewish Power is now in the third mode, that of utter supremacism? How many Jews protest the pardoning of Jonathan Pollard by Barack Obama and Donald Trump? It was reported that the biggest funeral in Israel was for a Rabbi who said Jews are so superior to goyim that the latter exist like cattle to serve Jews. Apparently, even secular Jews who may not consciously think that way nevertheless FEEL that way given the character of Jewish-dominated domestic and foreign policies emanating from the US.
If we judge them by their actions, secular and 'liberal' Jews feel that even the lives of bad/guilty Jews are more precious than the lives of good/innocent goyim. The attitude is not unlike how we humans regard the animal world, i.e. we favor even bad humans over good animals. Even criminals have rights and are kept alive in prison whereas perfectly innocent animals are slaughtered for meat. If an animal kills a human, even when provoked, it faces extermination. But if a nasty human kills an innocent dog or cat, the punishment is relatively minor. If we judge Jews by what they do, they are supremacist. SCHINDLER'S LIST quoted a piece of spiritual wisdom that goes like, "To save a single life is to save the world", but apparently, that single life must be Jewish. Jews really practice, "Better to save a single Jewish life than the world of filthy inferior goyim." How else can we explain all these pardons under Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump? Jews have been applying pressure to have some of the worst Jews go free, and Jews on both sides of the aisle are totally fine with this. Democrat Jew or Republican Jew, it all comes down to "We Jews are so special and superior that we are above the laws that apply to inferior goyim." So, even though many goyim who committed far lesser crimes rot in prison, some of the worst Jews that ever lived go free(and are soon making big fortunes again in the bosom of the Jewish community). Jonathan Pollard sold US secrets to Israel which then traded them with the USSR, the arch-enemy of the US at the time. The information led to executions of scores of double-agents behind the Iron Curtain. So, Pollard wasn't only a spy and traitor but effectively a murderer as well. But Jews don't care. He goes free, and there is NO OUTRAGE among Jews. Obama set him free, and Trump(despite getting rump-humped by Jews) lets the bastard fly off to Israel. And Netanyahu greets and hails the traitor as a hero, and not a single US politician, general, or intelligence officer expressed any outrage, probably out of fear of being targeted by Jewish Power that operates like the mafia; even if Jews don't have you destroyed outright, they can pull all sorts of strings to prevent you from being promoted and favored within the Deep State because all goy politicians and operatives live in fear of being associated with anyone who dared to voice opposition to What-Jews-Want.
Even after the Pollard-Netanyahu stunt, we are told over and over by both parties that Israel is our greatest ally. Why not just say "Israel is our god", therefore whatever Jews do is sacrosanct and must be obeyed? When it comes to blind worship of all things Jewish, the US is hardly different from North Korea: Jews are Kim Jong-Un and the goyim are the mindless dogs. The sheer obeisance borne of fear, awe, sentimentality, and rapture on the part of goyim, from politicians to voters, is hardly distinguishable from the slavish servility of North Koreans toward their Supreme Leader. Following victory in the Pacific War, US preached to the Japanese about liberty, rationalism, and rule of law and imposed a Liberal Democracy on those grounds. Japan was to reject Emperor Worship, Hirohito declared himself a man and not a god, and there would be no more of that atavistic attachments at odds with modernity. That was the US then, but now, the US is an insane, irrational, and quasi-spiritual metropole of blind worship of vile Jewish Power, vain globo-homo, and vicious black thuggery, one where the likes of George Floyd are spun into saints. Jews control the gods, and we must shut our eyes/ears and turn off our minds to any thought that goes against what the Jewish-controlled gods say. Americans worship Hirohitowitz
When Jews have done so much to bring down Donald Trump but his main priority is to curry favor with Jews by threatening Iran some more, pardoning a bunch of Jewish crooks, and letting Pollard fly off to Israel, the US is already 'North Korea' in the 'spiritual' sense. Jews own goy souls because Jews control the gods. If Jews really believe in what they SAY about human rights and liberal democracy, they would have expressed outrage over Jewish pressures upon Obama to pardon Pollard and upon Trump to let him move to Israel, the very nation that enabled the espionage. (On the other hand, as long as all US politicians repeat the mantra "Israel Is Our Greatest Ally" over and over, any espionage that benefits Israel cannot be treason, I guess.) But, there is only glib silence among Jews who are only too happy to see one of their own be released regardless of his crimes. Jews, 'right' or 'left', believe even a guilty lowlife Jew is more deserving of freedom & opportunity than any bunch of subhuman goyim.
Consider the Jewish historiography about the so-called Red Scare. What was it a reaction to? It was to expose the many communist spies embedded in various US departments. Some Jews even sent nuclear weapon secrets to mass killer Josef Stalin, the arch-communist who'd grabbed all of Eastern Europe after World War II. But notice the MAIN THEME about the era is not about what those Jewish traitors and spies did but what Joe McCarthy did. So, never mind widespread Jewish treachery in service of a communist mass killer. Just focus on how McCarthy prevented some people from working in Hollywood for a several years. Of course, Jews were especially offended because a good number of blacklisted writers and directors were Jewish. Some Jews being blacklisted for their communist ties or sympathies is a bigger outrage than Jewish traitors spying for mass killer Stalin. Furthermore, the pseudo-tragedy of the Hollywood blacklist and etc. got far more historical attention and condemnation than the far greater injustice of over 100,000 Japanese-in-America dispossessed and 'interned' during World War II. (One wonders if Jews supported US government reparations to the Japanese-Americans because they grabbed much of the confiscated wealth. Without the government paying off the Japanese-Americans, Jews might have been sued to return the properties.) And how did ADL get started? Jews felt a Jewish rapist-murderer's life was too precious for goy justice. Why should a Jew die for raping and killing a subhuman goy girl? To the Jewish mind, a Jew facing goy justice is like a man being tried by apes. Jews even used pressure to have Nathan Leopold sprung from jail despite his horrid crime. He was sentenced to life in prison and 99 yrs for kidnapping, but he was released during his lifetime. And of course, Jews have done everything to ensure Roman Polanski remains free despite his vile crime.
Cold-blooded Nathan Leopold who got lifetime sentence and 99 yrs but was sprung from jail in his lifetime. It's good to be Jewish.
If we judge Jews by what they DO, they are totally supremacist and believe Jews are God's or History's MADE MEN who should be above the law, at least vis-a-vis goyim. Jews think a Jew killing a goy is like a man killing an animal. The punishment shouldn't be too harsh as a superior being killed an inferior being. Goyim in this equation are rather like blacks on the Southern Plantation where a white killing a black wasn't as bad as a white killing a white(and of course a black killing a white). The New Slavery is invisible to most people because it's not based on goyim being denied the Rule of Law but on Jews being Above the Law. There are two forms of slavery: One is where some are denied the Rule of Law, and the Other is where some are not bound by the rule of law. So, even though we are not slaves in the technical sense, we are bound by the Rule of Law whereas Jews are Above the Law(or they rule the law). This arrangement effectively turns us into slaves of Jews because WE must obey the rules whereas the Jews and their allies do not. In 2020, why were Antifa and BLM able to run riot and loot and burn? Because they had the blessing/protection of Jews & the Jewish-controlled Deep State, they could do the violent bidding of Jews hellbent on getting rid of Trump and punishing America for having elected him(and for daring to re-elect him). James Field, whose crime was infinitely less grave than what Jonathan Pollard did, will rot in prison forever.
If blacks in the past wanted to be equal under the law, Jews want to be above the law. (Of course, blacks today want what Jews got and are no longer interested in equality under the law. Fish rots from the head, and Jewish above-the-law-ism has infected the mega-egos of homos and blacks as well.) In a sense, slavery is relative. Even if no one is technically a slave in the classic sense, the system is essentially a slave state IF some people are NOT bound by laws that apply to the rest. If I get to cheat, steal, and murder but am not judged like everyone else under the law, I'm essentially a master over others. Of course, some Jews do end up in prison, but how long did it take for Bernie Madoff to finally get caught? And he was offered as scapegoat only to deflect public view from similar crookedness by Wall Street on a far larger scale. And how long did it take for Harvey Weinstein to finally meet some justice? (And how long before he is pardoned too?) And why did Jeffrey Epstein get so many sweetheart deals before he finally got locked up for real. And what really happened in his prison cell? And why aren't journalists pursuing these questions? But then, why would they? Many are Jewish, and even non-Jewish ones work for Jewish owned corporations.
Relativity of freedom posits that the Rule of Law is liberating and empowering IF everyone is bound by the law. So, for those who are not protected by the Rule of Law, it is a step up IF they too gain the protection. It doesn't mean they get to do as they please, but it means the system will protect them from those who dare to do as they please. Rule of Law is like a key for everyone to the door of justice. However, in an order where some are allowed to be Above the Law, the Rule of Law becomes repressive and enslaving. It becomes a chain. Why should people be bound and tied to the Law when others are allowed to do as they please and not only not be punished but rewarded?
Paradoxically, Jewish Evil flows from (the cult of) Jewish Sainthood, the Holocaust Narrative. The Narrative would have us believe that because Jews suffered so horribly at the hands of the most evil regime(and its many collaborators) that ever existed, they must be noble, holy, and totally innocent. After all, Evil attacks the Good, and if the Nazis were the most evil people that ever existed, they surely went after the most wonderful, wise, and noble people that ever lived. So, as the Holocaust Narrative says Jews are so good(and as Jews have bought into their own myth), whatever they do must be good or at least forgivable whereas anyone who condemns or criticizes Jews must be evil... because only 'nazis' would hate such a good people. So, even though the true lesson of the Shoah should be anti-supremacism, it has only cleared the way for Jewish moral supremacism that justifies whatever Jews do.
Now, if Jews were a powerless or middling people, such conceits wouldn't be so dangerous. But when Jews are the most powerful people in the US(therefore the world), it poses a grave danger to humanity to have such a people dominate the US as the lone superpower. And this is why we need to revisit and revise the Holocaust Narrative for the good of both Jews and ourselves because the Holocaust Card has become a get-out-of-prison license for Jews regardless of what they do.
And for that reason, it is important that we try to turn the Holocaust Narrative on its head. No, don't be like lunatic deniers and say it didn't happen or Jewish deaths were all just an accident. Even if the 6 million number is surely bogus, there was a Plan and millions of Jews perished(though I'd guess many Jews died like goyim caught up in the war than exterminated by the Nazis; when bombs fall, they don't discriminate between Jew and Goy). We need to reject the deniers and instead put the Shoah in a more meaningful context. It would be monstrous to say the Jews deserved it, but it'd also be foolish to say Jews were white-as-snow innocent angels who were set upon for no reason by crazy lunatics who just hallucinated the evils of Jewish power, influence, and activities. The Shoah was an extreme backlash that went off the rails, but it was an evil reaction to very real Jewish evils. (Evil can clash with Evil, as in the war between the Nazis and Commies in WWII. Fighting the Other Evil doesn't make your side Good.) Also, given the Jewish roles in the events that led up to WWII, one could argue Jews were more deserving of the horror than many groups in the 20th century who got smashed to pieces for no fault on their part. Any Central/Eastern European nation/people that happened to be located between Nazi Germany and Commie Russia got crushed in WWII. They were like innocent mice caught between two raging elephants. Or, consider the fate of Laos and Cambodia that suffered horribly because they happened to be 'caught between' North Vietnam and the US. Vietnamese used their territories to reach South Vietnam, and the US dropped tons of bombs on them, weakening the ruling regimes and driving many to the communists. The peoples of Laos and Cambodia had nothing to do with the global forces that led to the Cold War, but so many got ground to dust.
But Jews were different. Jews played a decisive role in the events and developments that led to World War II that killed many more goyim than Jews(though Jews may have died the most in per capita terms, though one could argue the Ukrainians got it worse in the 20th Century because they were mass-killed by Bolsheviks & radical Jews, destroyed by Nazi Germany, and then punitively crushed by Soviets for collaboration). Jews usually blame not only Germany but other nations as well. They say the entire civilized world bears guilt one way or another. European nations were guilty of either neutrality or allying with Nazi Germany. And too many ordinary European collaborated with the Germans in rounding up Jews. And Russia was guilty of the Nazi-Soviet Pact. US and UK were guilty of dragging their feet to fight the Nazis, and they didn't sufficiently bomb the railroads used for shipping Jews to death camps. So, most goyim were either killers, collaborators, cowards, feet-draggers, or simply didn't care enough. So, by varying degrees, all goyim are guilty for what happened to the Jews. So, all the world must get on their knees and pray and pay, offer hollers and dollars. Some have to pay more, with rich Germany at the top of the list. But UK and US must also pay because they didn't do enough. And besides, Jews argue that the Shoah was more-or-less a culmination of the entire history of antisemitism in Europe. So, ALL OF WESTERN HISTORY must atone for its crimes against Jews.
But, that is only one way to look at it. But there are other ways to connect the dots.
Another way is to demand that Jews feel some guilt toward all humanity for their prominent role in the events and developments that led to crises that finally exploded in World War II and destroyed so many people, mostly goyim. Jews should look in the mirror and take a honest assessment of their place in history. It's like Japanese are right to mourn what happened in the firebombings of Tokyo and the nukings of Hiroshima/Nagasaki, but those horrors didn't just happen because the US decided to go bat-shit crazy and cross the Pacific to kill whole lot of 'Japs' for the hell of it. Granted, the US should look in the mirror and realize it too played a role in the developments that led to the Pacific War. After all, it had been US and UK that emboldened Japanese imperialism as leverage against Imperial Russia and counterweight to slowly-but-surely waking China. It was disingenuous for the US to enable Japanese Imperialism in Asia and then suddenly pull out the rug and play the good guy opposed to imperialism. (After WWII, the US aided French Imperialism against the Viet Minh.)
While it'd be absurd and cruel to blame ONLY JEWS for the events that led to WWII, one could make a solid case that the war and its horrors would not have taken place IF Jews had been less radical, irresponsible, greedy, and arrogant(and so utterly lacking in self-awareness, not least by projecting their pathologies onto others).
First, there was the Jewish role in the communist putsch in the Soviet Union. Also, most communist movements in Germany and Eastern Europe were led by Jews. Why did Jews have to push something so radical? Moderate socialism was gaining ground in Europe. Even conservative elites accepted some degree of socialism as compromise with the working classes. Many Christian groups believed socialism is more aligned with Jesus' teachings than capitalism is. People like Bismarck had negotiated with socialists. But communists were different. They were for radical violence, and their vision frightened the bourgeoisie and the old order; it even alienated much of the goy working class that wanted better pay and conditions, not tyranny under a radical regime. Would fascist and other hard-rightist movements come to power in Italy, Germany, and other nations IF NOT for the threat of communism and other forms of radicalism in which Jews were prominent, either as activists or theorists?
Besides, this fear wasn't just some fantasy cooked up by the 'far right'. Communists in the USSR pioneered modern totalitarianism and mass terror on an unprecedented scale. Jews were vastly over-represented in the secret police and rounded up countless people. Millions ended up dead in gulags or by summary execution. Many were tortured and traumatized for life. All property and wealth were looted by the state. And Christians fared especially badly at the hands of communists, and Jews played a big part in this bloody orgy. 50,000 churches were destroyed in the USSR. So much of culture and tradition was wiped off the map. In time, the word of these tragedies reached the West and drove many Christians to the right against the left, indeed even the far-right because the far-left in the USSR showed what it was capable of. Who could deny that Jews played a huge role in communism? The failed German communist putsch was led by Jews. If it hadn't been for the threat posed by communism, would Europe have fallen under fascist and hard-right dictatorships? It certainly would have been less likely. While Jews were not the only monsters of far-left radicalism, they played a key role that alienated so many goyim and hardened their hearts to Jewish suffering later.
But it wasn't just the Jewish radicals of the far-left who made things worse for themselves and mankind. It was Jewish capitalists and cultural perverts, especially in Germany following World War I. Germany had just gone through the ordeal of war and faced massive challenges of rebuilding the economy and creating a whole new political order. The Versailles Treaty had already made things very difficult, and national tensions were bound to be high as certain territories with German-majority populations were handed over to Poland and Czech nation.
Still, most Germans swallowed their pride and bore the brunt of post-war hardships and supported the new republic. During this most crucial time, Jews could have played a constructive, healthy, and patriotic role. But what did so many Jews do? They took advantage of German weakness and worked with International Jewry to financially fleece Germany and pick it to its bones. Just when Jews had a great opportunity to show themselves to be good patriots and fellow-citizens, they took advantage of German weakness to rig financial institutions and make off like bandits while the bulk of the German population saw their lifetimes savings wiped out overnight by hyper-inflation. But there was even more, indeed as if the worst among the Jewish population simply couldn't resist showing their true colors. For a nation in dire straits, the best remedy is morality, unity, and sobriety in culture and values. The US in the throes of the Great Depression got culturally more sober and conservative. (If, by the time FDR took office, the US had been in deep depression for three years, Germany had been in a depression for fifteen years when Hitler took power in the same year. Naturally, the German solution turned out to be far more radical, as well as vengeful, than the American one. The Jazz Age happened in the US when the times were good. In contrast, something far more decadent and downright degenerate befell Weimar Germany during a Depression that was far worse than anything that hit America.) But, just when Germans were most desperate and destitute, Jews led the way in promoting the very worst of soul-befouling Weimar Culture. While Weimar Period was not without cultural ferment and genuine achievement in modernism, much of it was sick, grotesque, demented, and pathological.
Worse, the timing was all wrong. In the real estate business, there's a saying, "Location, Location, Location". In history, it's "Timing, Timing, Timing". Much of Weimar Culture was the last thing Germans needed at the time. When a people who'd been defeated, humiliated, and dispossessed couldn't help but notice that Jews were among the biggest spreaders of cultural pollution, why should anyone be surprised that it led to a massive anti-Jewish backlash? (In the US, Japanese-Americans had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor, but the lot of them were dispossessed and packed off to internment camps. In contrast, Jews of various stripes — radical leftists, financial sharks, organized criminals, and cultural perverts — had played leading roles in the degradations of the Weimar Period. If angry democratic Americans could do such a thing to an innocent population, is it surprising that Germans reacted far more extremely against Jews whose actions had really caused harm to Germany and Europe via financial thievery, radical ruthlessness, and cultural degeneracy?) Such fury at capitalist decadence was certainly not limited to the Far Right. The Communists also railed against the self-indulgent Decadents when so many fellow nationals were suffering. Indeed, Jewish Leftists themselves denounced the greedy elites and the bourgeoisie for their oysters, champagne, and parties while The People couldn't find work. Consider the films of Sergei Eisenstein and other radical Jewish directors who depicted the elites as either corrupt aristocrats or greedy capitalists reveling in pleasure and piggery while the people had no bread.
Then, why should it be surprising that the National Socialists would score big with a similar narrative because, after all, Jews in particular fared far better than your average German during the Weimar Years? Jews were not only over-represented among the bourgeoisie but in the financial sector that was more parasitic and vulnerable to rigging. Furthermore, rich Jews were culturally more 'liberal' than most goy members of the bourgeoisie who, furthermore, were more involved in making things than manipulating currency. As Karl Marx had already stated in the 19th Century, capitalism brings out the worst in Jews; but then, did Marx know that communism would also bring out the worst in Jews in another way. Either way, Jews gained tremendous power and/or wealth at the expense of goyim in both Soviet Russia and Weimar Germany. No wonder both Stalin and Hitler thought something had to be done. Communists didn't name the Jew, but the heavily Jewish Trotskyite elements were purged. In Germany, the Jew was named, but unfortunately not only for which they were responsible but just about everything. (It is in this regard that Hitler's view of Jews was, in more ways than one, a counterpart of Jewish view of goyim. After all, Jews aren't content to blame only the Germans of the National Socialist Era for what befell the Jews. Instead, many Jewish scholars have argued that Germans have long had dark souls, especially about Jews, and this pathology finally erupted in WWII, i.e. there was Evil Incarnate in the German soul, history, and/or culture. Jews went even farther and argued that ALL of European History was somehow responsible for the Shoah, which was no accident but the inevitable culmination of the sickness at the heart of Western Civilization. In other words, European-Christian Civilization, given its innate evil, was predestined to commit such a crime against the wise and noble Jews. And of course, Jews have gone even beyond that in the current West where whiteness has been made synonymous with deviltry. While Jewish rhetoric isn't exactly eliminationist so far, it is certainly 'humiliationist' and 'dissolutionist', i.e. the only way whites can be good is by groveling before Jews and their favored allies and, furthermore, offering white wombs to create black babies than white ones. In a similar vein, Hitler was convinced that the Jewish Problem went far beyond what rotten things the Jews did in his time. Jewish role in bloody radicalism, financial looting, and cultural degeneracy were all manifestations of a deeper sickness of the Jewish soul, one that could be resolved preferably by expulsion from European lands or, if push came to shove, eliminationist means. Hitler vs the Jews was a war of one supremacism vs another, both with an over-arching theory as to why the other side is so cursed that it must be defeated, humiliated, and, if need be, eliminated.)
If Jewish radicals said to goy masses, "You suffer because the piggy elites exploit you and party all night long; therefore, rise up and destroy them", it's hardly surprising that 'Anti-Semites' resorted to similar tactics: "You live in misery because Jews rob you and corrupt you; rise up and take back what's yours." (These days, Jews suppress not only racial politics but class politics among whites. Racial politics are okay only if directed against whites and sometimes at Arabs. There was a time when a good number of Jews belonged among the working class or hungry scholars and felt betrayed by capitalism that appeared to favor an alliance of rich Jews and rich goyim at the expense of All-Jew-Unity. No wonder they turned to socialism or communism, even against Jewish capitalists who seemed eager to assimilate to gain status than stick loyally with the Tribe. But now, with so many Jews being super-rich, rich, or affluent in the US and, furthermore, due to All-Jew-Unity premised on Zionism and Pride of Hegemony among all within the Tribe, most Jews are agreed that the best way forward is the formula of Jewish tribalism, supremacism, and capitalism to be shielded by a rebranded 'left' that poses as 'radical' but really serves to promote globo-homo and protect the vast wealth and privilege of Jews. Jews got burned by National Socialism but also lost out under communism in the long run, and so, Jews have decided to bury both racial politics and class politics among the white population. No wonder Bernie Sanders took a dive against Hillary and Joe Biden. He didn't really want to win because he's a Jew first and 'socialist' second. Better to have a goy toy as total puppet of Jewish Power than be put in a position where he is expected to choose socialism over tribalism.) If Jews hadn't acted the way they did after World War I, there would have been far less likelihood of National Socialism gaining power. After all, the two major European countries that were deemed 'most notoriously antisemitic' were Russia and France, not Germany, where Jews had generally fared better in the 19th century, especially under Bismarck.
Then, why did so many Germans come to hate Jews in the interwar period? Just when Germans were trying to climb out of the purgatory of history, too many Jews acted like capitalist pigs, radical nuts, or cultural psychos. The program of the Jewish Left was no consolation as it alienated the majority of Germans. Communism, while claiming to be for social justice, had already reared its ugly head in Russia. If Jewish degenerates degraded culture with filth, Jewish communists waged a different kind of culture war to create the New Man. Too many Jews robbed Germany, and too many Jews polluted the culture, dominated organized crime, and vices of all kinds. And the 'social justice' Jews on the Left seemed more obsessed with power and control than in tune with the values of most Germans.
Because Jews, in all their egotism and ethnocentrism, never seem to own up to their injustices done to goyim, repeated the same thing all over again in Russia of the 1990s, which paved the way for Vladimir Putin who thankfully is no Hitler. But Jews, with megalomaniacal neurosis to match that of the HAL-9000 computer, admit to no faults of their own and just insist Putin is New Hitler and it was entirely Russia's fault that the 'reforms' didn't pan out in the 1990's. Never mind what Russian Jews did, and not with just a little collusion from World Jewry centered in the US. Jews are so full of themselves as wiser, smarter, and superior that they're deathly afraid of admitting wrong, especially to inferior goyim.
It's like the pride of authority that adults have in relation to children. Even when the adults are clearly in the wrong, they're loathe to admit as much because it would not only expose a fault but erode their aura of respect and authority. Whether parent or teacher, his authority over children rests on the shared perception that he knows best and they must take orders from him. Greater the arrogance of authority, bigger the anxiety of authority. The more a figure of authority denies fallibility, the more he fears being proven wrong. It's no wonder HAL-9000 computer takes extreme measures to wipe out all evidence that it may have been wrong. Jewish Power is now this way. Jews believe themselves to be not only smarter and not only wiser but pretty much all-knowing.
They also believe themselves to be holier and entitled to unconditional sympathy because of 'Muh Holocaust', which is remembered less as a mass killing of a people than the mass-murder of gods, with every Jew being a little jesus; in other words, European Christians are the real christ-killers since every Jew is like a little christ and 6 million of them were killed. Combination of super-arrogance and super-anxiety has made Jews virtually incapable of admitting wrong and arriving at a sounder power arrangement with other groups. They are right even when wrong, and you better believe it. So, the very Neocons who pushed for the Iraq War are still going strong in the institutions, the very crooks who brought about the financial meltdown are still raking in billions on Wall Street, and Jonathan Pollard isn't just a free man but a HERO in Israel, America's Greatest Ally. So, since Jews are never wrong, if the world is becoming a more dangerous place, the fault is entirely with the world of goyim than anything Jews may have done. In the case of Russia, if Jews had sense, they would be thankful that Putin is no Russian Hitler and, if anything, has been good to Jews who've supported his regime. But Jews got super-egos and must have everything their way. Because Putin isn't a total whore to Jewish Power, he must be targeted for destruction.
If it weren't for Jewish radicalism(and the Bolshevik horrors in the USSR) that horrified the capitalists & conservatives(and even some liberals), Jewish finance capitalism that robbed Germany and left so many destitute, and Jewish cultural pollution that repelled so many Germans in search of moral and spiritual guidance in hard times, it is highly unlikely that Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Party would have amounted to much, let alone come to power. Even though Hitler among others over-stated the case of Jewish Evil, much of what they said had more than a kernel of truth for many Germans who'd witnessed and/or experienced various evils of the Weimar Period stemming from Jewish perfidy. Also, most Christian Churches and organizations would not have warmed up to Neo-Pagan National Socialism but for the fact that they came to associate Jews with Godless communism that butchered countless Christians in Russia and with Weimar degradation that turned culture into a cesspool.
True, Italian Fascism came to power BEFORE National Socialism, but Benito Mussolini was not particularly anti-Jewish and his movement was hardly a world-shaker. Besides, Mussolini initially expressed loathing for Hitler and formed an alliance with Germany only when it emerged as the indisputable strong horse in Europe. Though Hitler took some inspiration from Italian Fascism, it was not the main catalyst for National Socialism's eventual triumph in Germany. It was the Depression and the failed democracy. The Depression was made far worse by Jewish financial predation on the economy, and the democratic project could hardly thrive in a culture of dissipation brought upon by degeneracy. As Jews played a key role in the deprivations and degradations of Weimar Germany, they deserve much, if not all, the blame for the rise of National Socialism.
While National Socialism was the last thing the Jews wanted, Jewish behavior made its rise almost inevitable. It's like the last thing a homo wants is AIDS but if he keeps getting rammed up the ass, he's likely to get it. The last thing a criminal wants is to be arrested, but if he keeps stealing he'll end up behind bars. The Nazis proved to be the bad cops of history, indeed arch-criminals to boot, but the rise of the Nazis was in large measure a reaction to Jewish venality. Now, it may well be that the majority of middle class German Jews were decent folks, but then, power is always defined by the elites, and Jewish elites of money, culture, and politics gave a terrible account of themselves that affected goyim's perception of the Jewish community in general. Fair or not, people were apt to think, "If most Jews are good, why don't they do something about the bad ones? Because they agree with the bad Jews!" Or maybe most Jews weren't so bad but supportive of bad Jews out of pride of tribal power and influence. It's like many Germans who weren't particularly keen on Hitler nevertheless supported him as the champion of German restoration and pride. It's like most white Southerners didn't own slaves and had no role in the slave trade, but the decisions of the elites tainted all the American South, just like the decisions of the Japanese elites in WWII led to ruination of the whole populace. Elites matter. When the elites stink, all the people suffer.
Ironically, despite National Socialism's antipathy toward Jews, its success depended on insane levels of Jewish Perfidy. Likewise, Jewish evils in 90s Russia paved the way for Putin and his gang. Jewish Evil is the manure that fertilizes the growth of 'antisemitism' and SJPH, or Stuff Jewish People Hate. Had Jews acted responsibly in Russia of the 1990s, maybe a working democracy and economic system would have sprouted on Russian soil, and it would have gone a long way to build trust and confidence between Russians and Jews. But no, Jews simply couldn't resist raping the entire economy down to the last kitchen sink. Their tribal arrogance and personal egotism, plus their bottomless contempt for dumb drunken Slavs, made it nearly impossible for Jews to hold themselves back, any more than Dracula could at the sight of blood. And what are Jews trying to do today around the world? Spreading globo-homo pornographics as the new faith and the looting of entire national economies.
At any rate, Jews didn't just ruin it for themselves but for all the world. By rousing the Teutonic Dragon and provoking a far-right backlash that led to Hitler's rise to power, not only did the Jews themselves suffer from the evils of Nazism but so did many more among the goykind, especially the Slavs. Jews made it bad for everyone by provoking what should have been left alone. In that regard, it's the Jews who need to apologize to all of humanity, not vice versa. It's like someone who plays with fire may not only burn himself but burn down the whole village. Imagine a scenario where there's a hideous creature called the Dark Soul Beast that lurks beneath ground. This is a fearsome monster but generally avoids the surface. But, once above ground, it can do serious damage. So, most people in town know not to mess with the monster. Just leave it be in its own dark domain. But suppose a visitor in town keeps doing things to provoke the monster. He throws rocks into tunnels leading to where the beast resides. He pisses into the hole leading to the monster's lair. He tosses rotten food into the hole. The townsfolk warn the visitor to stop because the beast might be aroused, but the visitor tells them to just fuc* off and keeps doing stuff to provoke the Dark Soul Beast. And one day, the creature had just about enough of the provocations and crawls out and tears the visitor limb from limb. But then, the monster is so furious that it begins to attack the whole town like it's King Kong or something. So, not only did the visitor suffer terribly but the town got wrecked too. In a sense, the visitor is a victim, but he is not an entirely innocent victim. He provoked and roused something that should have been left alone. Furthermore, in infuriating the monster with his antics, he also made the whole town suffer.
And it is in this sense that Jews must bear some responsibility not only for the Shoah but also for the tens of millions of goyim who perished in World War II. If certain Jews hadn't been so radically unhinged, if certain Jews hadn't been so wantonly greedy, and if certain other Jews hadn't been so grossly perverted, there was a good chance that the dark Teutonic soul would have remained in slumber, and the Weimar Democratic experiment might have worked. And then, not only would millions of Jews not have died in the Shoah but tens of millions of goy lives that perished in WWII also would have been spared. Will Jews ever face up to this, that they played a key role in bringing about WWII by provoking the dark Teutonic soul? (Even though Germany suffered far worse in WWII than in WWI, the quick recovery and successful democratic experiment may have partially owed to there having been virtually no Jews to mess up the rebuilding project as they'd done following WWI. But ever since Jews took over the US and applied pressures on EU to embrace Diversity and Multi-Culturalism, the democratic project has gone terribly wrong in every European nation. Also in recent years, Germany invited Jews to immigrate, and these Jews are acting just like the Jews of the Weimar Period. They never seem to learn, but this time, it could be that Jews may well fully realize the total racial and cultural demise of Germany that has become castrated and deracinated, thereby incapable of offering up any resistance.) Jews learned nothing, and they will learn nothing as long as goyim submit to the obnoxious Holocaust Narrative of wholly innocent Jews mass-murdered by Evil Nazis and their goy collaborators who just went batshit crazy for no good reason or just for the hell of it.
What lies ahead for the world in the 21st century if Jews don't face up to their history & failings and if so many goyim go along with Jews out of ignorance, naivete, worship, cowardice, opportunism, or insanity? How many people realize that the US is the lone superpower that is utterly obeisant to Jewish Power gone megalomaniacal and psycho? People talk of how North Korea with nukes is run by lunatic Kim or how Iran is ruled by evil Ayatollahs. If so, just think how far more dangerous things are when the lone superpower that can blow up the whole world many times over is ruled by Jews-gone-wild and with total submission from both political parties and goy cuck elites, or the Soy Cuck Club? If what has happened to the Middle East in this century is any harbinger for events to come, we are in big big trouble unless people begin to courageously address the Jewish Question and Jews begin to make a more honest assessment of themselves and their history.
Indeed, not only did Jewish Evil, in conflict with German Evil and in conjunction with Soviet Evil, bring about the cataclysmic World War II, but Jewish Evil has been the driving force behind the many horrible events since the end of the Cold War. Jews call for War-on-Terror but more often than not work with terrorists to destabilize secular Arab nations and modernizing Muslim nations. Jews denounce the Nazis but were more than willing to recruit quasi-nazis in Ukraine to topple the government there, one that despite its corruption was democratically elected. Just about everything said about Iraq, Libya, and Syria were lies, all in furtherance of Jewish Supremacism.
Jews are not only partly responsible for WWII but for involving the West in the grievous crime of destroying the Palestinian people. As Jews couldn't steal Palestine on their own, they used the West as partners-in-crime. Those who aid and abet in a crime are also criminal, and the West is guilty of complicity in the destruction of the Palestinian people whose fate forewarned the coming of White Nakba under Jewish hegemony. So much for "Never Again", which apparently means Never Again only for Jews but 'Never Mind' for the rest of humanity. Never Again a Holocaust for Jews, but when Jews create mini-holocausts all over the Middle East, just Never Mind. As Madeleine Albright said, it's worth it to kill hundreds of thousands of Arab children. As the Yinon Plan laid out, it's in the interest of Jewish Supremacism to provoke bloody wars all over the Middle East. So, terrorism is wonderful as long as Israel and the US can arm & supply neo-medievalist anarcho-Muslim terrorist to blow things up in nations like Syria and Libya. The Jewish-controlled US and Israel start the fires but then pretend to be the world's firemen putting out the fires. Arsonists larping as fire-fighters. Norman Podhoretz wrote of "World War IV", but it never seems to have occurred to him that Jewish Power is the new nazism. But what do Jews care? If, at the very least, they suffered along with the rest of humanity in WWII, they've arranged things so that Jews remain untouched and enjoy life like effendi while the goyim do all the dying, getting maimed, getting displaced, and getting replaced. Middle East and North Africa get ravaged by wars, and the populations get displaced. Meanwhile, the native white peoples of Europe get replaced, and if any nation, such as Hungary, says NO to the 'refugees' of the Wars for Israel, it must be targeted for destruction by whatever means. Holocaust of goyim is amusing to Jews and perfectly fine AS LONG AS Jewish lives remain safe and secure. Never Again for Jews, Never Mind for goyim.
What is in store for humanity in a world where Jewish Power is not named and exposed? Just think. Russia and China are both nuclear-armed nations, and their interests and ambitions are regional and limited. In contrast, Jews want to use the US to rule the world. Also, tensions between US and Russia are worse now than during the Cold War solely because Jews hate Russians for taking their country back from Jewish oligarchs. How insane is that? And while Jews work with the Chinese to undermine White America, they also find the 'Chi-Com' trope useful because angry white Deplorables are likely to blame everything on China without ever waking up to Jewish Evil. So, we have half the country, the libby-dibs, blaming Russia-Russia-Russia for everything, and we have the other half the country, the conzo-wonzos, blaming China-China-China for everything. Such tensions can be resolved IF people speak the truth and expose Jewish Power as the real machinations behind most global tensions. But ironically, so many Americans worship Jews like the German masses once revered Hitler. Blind, mindless, and crazy. If this madness goes on, 21st century could blow up worse than the 20th century. And even more than in the first half of the 20th century, Jews will have played a big role in it, indeed by far the biggest. After all, whereas Jews constituted only one of the great powers that gambled with history in the first half of the 20th century, they are by far the most dominant power in this century.
Now, suppose the worst possible scenario happens and a war worse than WWII breaks out some time in the 21st century. Things get so out-of-control that suppose 3 million Jews die and many more goyim die, anywhere from 30 million to 50 million. What will Jews say then? Will they bitch and moan about 'Muh Holocaust II' and ignore the many more dead goyim? Will they blame the goyim for yet another horrible war and their failure to save the Jews once again? Will they do that without ever facing up to the fact that Jewish Power would have played the biggest role in turning goy nations against one another and triggering a world conflict? Given the current state of Jewish character, I wouldn't be surprised.
Justice, especially political justice, is a matter of who/whom: Who has the power and which groups have 'sacral' worth? This is also true of individuals — notice how certain Jews tend to get pardoned more than people of other groups, and consider how the Law pretty much allows black thugs and shoplifters/looters to walk free — but especially true at the political level. In Central America during the Cold War, the white-led right-wing regimes could employ 'death squads' and mow down countless indigenous brown folks suspected of being sympathetic to Marxist guerrillas. That was 'justice' in those parts, with the acquiescence of US power. In communist nations, the secret police could arbitrarily arrest anyone and charge him of treason, espionage, or 'bourgeois' thought crimes. The accused could be sent to prison camps or shot dead in basements. That was 'justice' under communism. So, justice is usually the tool of the power. It is what the Power wants and says it is.
Under liberal systems, there developed the idea that justice should be impartial, fair-minded, based on strict adherence to laws(applicable to all), and protective of the 'universal rights' of all citizens, rich or poor, regardless of color or creed. Though liberal systems were far from perfect in the practice of administering justice, it could be said that, more or less, the West was moving toward greater impartiality and fairness up to the 1960s. This mode of justice was based on individual rights. But the Civil Rights Movement wasn't just about the right of blacks as individuals but as a group, and that agenda, along with other trends, provided the groundwork for a different kind of justice. If traditional rightist justice favored the upper classes and certain races over others and if the radical leftist justice favored the notion of 'social justice' that trampled on individual rights in favor of the supposed good of the collective, the classic liberal notion of justice emphasized the rights of individuals. But the New Liberal theory tended to be both more collective-utilitarian(though not to the extent of communism) and special-interest-oriented in the name of reversing past injustice. Collective-utilitarian notion of justice was at the heart of the New Deal. And special-interest notion of justice animated the Great Society program of LBJ and the rise of Holocaust Cult. By emphasizing the problems of black history, the idea was that blacks as a group deserved special recognition. And because Jews suffered the Holocaust, supposedly the greatest evil act in all of history, they were deserving of special sympathy and consideration. (Initially, pro-black & pro-Jewish attitudes and policies were based on sympathy, but the rising cult of their Noble Suffering and their spectacular success in 'idolic' fields of brains & brawn led to idolatrous worship of them as the Truly Superior Races.)
This came to function as a template for other groups as well. Noticing how blacks and Jews gained so much by pushing for justice on grounds of special interest than individual rights, many groups in the US began to develop their own form of Identity Politics. Identity Politics was different from national chauvinism of old that was premised on the conviction of one's own people being somehow superior and/or more powerful than others. In contrast, Identity Politics was based on the cult of victim-hood. Your people could be said to be more special if they suffered more than others. As Identity Politics emerged when the white West pretty much dominated all the world — even the Soviet Union was mostly white, something Red China exploited in its appeal to the non-white world during the Sino-Soviet Rift — , the general impression was of White Dominance and Non-White Victim-hood. Still, as the scales of victim-hood were still determined by the Power, it all came down to who/whom/when/where as emphasized by the Narrative, the product of media & academia. Victim-hood mattered more if the villains were white and if the victims were non-white or Jewish. And it mattered MORE if the oppression happened IN the West, especially the US or Northern Europe. And it was mostly about the 19th and 20th century. As blacks were oppressed in America by whites, they had a good claim. As Jews suffered in Europe in World War II, they too had an easy claim. But much less sympathy goes to non-white victims of whites in non-white lands. More blacks and Hindus were mowed down by whites in Africa and India, but there is far more outrage about far fewer number of blacks who were killed by whites in the US. As for all the violence among non-whites, they don't matter. Who cares about what's been happening in Kashmir? Even as anti-whites claim to call for 'de-colonization of the mind', they are hopelessly 'West-centric' in emphasizing what happened/happens in the West uber alles. (Furthermore, these 'de-colonizers' are desperate to depart from their own native lands to go live in the West. It's as if they still consider the West to be the only Metropole that matters. And of course, even most anti-Western rhetoric has been cooked up by self-hating Westerners whose minds were colonized by Jewish Power and fueled by post-Christian need for absolution by some other means. So, anti-white politics is essentially about non-whites adopting the politics of white self-loathing, and as such, non-whites are still under white mind-control, albeit that of self-loathing whites. And the fact that many of these non-whites prize Jews, blacks, and/or homos over their own kind suggests that they're still totally 'colonized' by Western Powers that now happens to controlled by Jews.) A truly de-colonized mind would stop seeing the West as the source of all good and evil — the paradise to emigrate to and the hell to denounce — , but such is the state of your average non-white & anti-white mind.
Because of the Rules of Identity Politics, various non-whites groups must demonstrate their worthiness of sympathy by emphasizing their victim-hood at the hands of whites in the West, especially in the 20th century(and maybe 19th century). But as many of these groups are relatively recent immigrants, their experience of oppression under whites happened mostly in non-Western lands, and that means their suffering counts for less than that of Jews and blacks. (Even as globalism attacks the notion of national territorial rights, the tragic worth of any history is largely determined by WHERE it happened, i.e. if the police kills a black man on US soil, that is an outrage, but if the US military kills scores of innocent civilians abroad, it doesn't matter. The logic of Tragic Dirt.) Shoah happened in Europe, and black slavery happened in the US, and as such, they matter more. (Oddly enough though, their cults of suffering are transferable to all others of their kind. So, even though American and Anglo Jews were safe during WWII, indeed infinitely more so than white goyim in Europe who died in greater numbers than the Jews did, they too can invoke 'muh holocaust' as fellow Jews. Likewise, recently arrived black African immigrants in US and Europe can also invoke BLM nonsense and 'muh slavery' even though their ancestors captured and sold black slaves to Arabs & whites and even though black-on-black oppression & violence in black nations are far beyond anything whites have done to blacks in recent years. Also, the fact that American Indian experience doesn't count for much in the Narrative shows that the rules of Identity Politics are not set in stone. If a certain group tends not to be vocal and exhibits no special talent in the 'idolic' fields, it is mostly ignored regardless of its tragic history at the hands of whites. Today, American Indians, the people with the biggest claim to victim-hood in American History, get less attention than Asian-Indians who are always talking and balking.) Identity Politics is based on victim-hood points, but over time, it has fused with the All-American culture of winner-takes-all. Jews and blacks began their Identity Politics by wailing abut their victim-hood but, in good ole American fashion, gained special consideration because of their success with money, humor, arts & culture, athletics, & entertainment. So, over time, Identity Politics became more like Idolatry Politics. In other words, 'muh victim-hood' wasn't good enough. What really mattered was 'muh victor-hood to accentuate muh victim-hood'. In other words, if a group could demonstrate superiority in some key field, its victim-hood was to be considered MORE TRAGIC on account of injustice having been done to something better. It's like it's deemed worse to kill a gorilla than a baboon or to kill a giraffe than a gazelle.
So, what we now call Identity Politics is essentially Idolatry Politics. We don't have mass parades in favor of Palestinians where everyone shows up and waves the BDS flag. But we do have 'Pride' Parades where peoples of all colors sing homosannas to fruits and trannies draped in 'rainbow' colors. Of course, Jews want it this way because an Identity Politics where all groups have equal worth — or where all non-white groups have equal worth — would be threatening to their Zionist-globalist supremacist agenda. Indeed, what would happen to Jewish Power if Americans were to give equal hearing to Palestinians, Syrians, and Iranians as to Israelis and their Jewish-American enablers? Also, so many groups around the world have had unpleasant experience with Jews, be they blacks in South Africa or the peoples of Latin America. And European History wasn't only of Antisemitism but Jewish chicaneries, some of which came to do great harm. This is why Jews are wary of all-out Identity Politics. It's like Ben Shapiro denounces it because it means groups such as Palestinian-Americans can have their day in the sun as a victim group as well.
As far as Jews are concerned, the only kind of Identity Politics that is acceptable is an Idolatrous one where Jews get to decide the who/whom. So, Jewish Identity and Jewish Suffering are special and must serve as the basis of goyim making amends to Jews by doing whatever Jews demand. And Jews have especially chosen homos and blacks as fellow Idolatrous Groups, not only because both are highly profitable to Jewish industries in fashion & entertainment but because blacks can be used to bait 'white guilt' and homo-celebration can be used to replace Christianity with Queertianity. (Deep in their hearts, Jews still regard Jesus and Paul as renegade Jews, and there is no 'hate symbol' more 'triggering' to Jews than the Christian Crucifix. Of course, as the West was overwhelmingly Christian for over a millennia, Jews couldn't say that outright, but their big dream was always to destroy Christianity and banish the Crucifix. They tried this by destroying churches in the USSR, but it didn't work, and so they are now working to spiritually corrupt Christianity with Anno Sodomini and worship of Magic Negro or Fentanyl Floyd.)
There can be no true justice or impartial justice with idolatry, which is a cheap form of theology. Idolatry may not be deep, but like religion, it is about blind or mindless worship/faith. As such, US justice system is essentially theocratic or 'idolocratic'. Just like religious folks cannot question, blame, or condemn God or gods(no matter what), the idolocratic US cannot condemn sacred Jews and holy blacks(and homos) no matter what they do. The ONLY time Jews, blacks, and homos come under fire is when they insult or attack one another. So, Donald Sterling the Jewish oligarch had to be denounced because he said unkind things about blacks. So, Nick Cannon has to be bitch-slapped back into 'sense' for having said nasty stuff about Jews — never mind what he said about whites. It's perfectly okay for Jews to insult, defame, and smear whites. It's okay for blacks to denounce whites as the devil. No matter how much abuse is heaped on them, whites must keep their mouths shut, do nothing as their symbols & monuments are vandalized by mobs or removed by the establishment, take the knee, and cuck out. Or, whites can go into brainwashed Janissary mode like Antifa goons or the likes of John Bolton & Dan Crenshaw and join with Jews against the Culture War on whites and nationalism. How can true justice operate in such a world?
The fate of Arabs and Muslims in the current order is a sure sign that Idolatry Politics has rendered Justice into a tool of special groups, namely Jews, blacks, and homos. BLM means black lives are precious, white lives are not. And, it's always who/whom. When blacks kill blacks, never mind. As blacks are special, they may kill other blacks, just like gods may fight gods. But how dare these inferior low-life white mortals dare to kill a black god like Fentanyl Floyd or Gentle Giant Michael Brown? Blacks have been robbing, raping, assaulting, and murdering whites in alarming numbers since the 1960s, but who cares? The god-race may attack the mortal-race. Gods are deemed immortal, and blackness has been immortalized in the sense that the black tragedy of American Slavery has been essentialized to apply to all black folks and all of black history. (Also, electronic recording means that all future generations of whites get to worship Otis Redding and Bob Marley as immortal gods of pop culture.) After all, the so-called 1619 project applies even to black African immigrants, the descendants of blacks who captured and sold slaves. So, all of blackness from time immemorial to all the future is to be defined by tragic suffering at the hands of whites. So, never mind Bantu genocides against other Africans. Never mind Zulu atrocities. Never mind the likes of Idi Amin and all those nasty black thugs in the US and elsewhere. All of blackness through the eons is now about 'muh slavery' and ennoblement by suffering under white 'racism'. 100,000 yrs of blackness is to center around 200 yrs of slavery in America. And Jews have done the same with 'muh Holocaust'. All of Jewish Identity and History are to be associated with that tragedy. It's as if all of Jewish-Gentile history led up to that point and all of Jewish-Gentile future must revolve around that memory that condemns whites while consecrating Jews. So, it doesn't matter if Jewish history is full of bad Jewish behavior and if Jews do terrible things now or in the future. Jewish Identity has achieved Moral Immortality via the Holocaust Cult. Of course, in practice, Moral Immortality can only be a monstrous immorality as it's downright demented for any human group to act like they're eternally hallowed and sacred, thus above the rules that apply to other groups.
What does Moral Immortality for blacks and Jews mean in practice? Consider the fate of Muslims and Arabs. There was the photograph of the Muslim man whose business was destroyed in the aftermath of the Ferguson riots. He'd done no wrong. He was strong-armed and robbed by Michael Brown, and later big bully Brown attacked a police officer and got killed in the altercation. But the ONLY narrative that mattered was 'black lives matter' or Negrolatry. The livelihoods or the lives of Muslim businessmen didn't matter at all. The Jewish Media pushed Idolatry Politics of blacks uber Muslims. And one wonders how many Muslim businesses were destroyed this time around following the death of Fentanyl Floyd? To the New American Mind, only Jews, blacks, and homos have starring roles as the good guys while whites have the starring roles as villains. All other groups have supporting roles(at best) or exist only as blurry extras in the background. In movies, we don't care how many people get killed as long as the main characters survive. In INDEPENDENCE DAY, who cares if the entire city blows up as long as the key characters are alive and well and get all the glory? I'm assuming many more Muslims had their lives ruined as the result of riots following the death of Fentanyl Floyd, but no one cares. So, blacks have a righteous right to riot, burn, loot, and attack people. Their lives(and lusts) matter, but others don't matter. This proves the utter hollowness of all this 'liberal' yammering about Diversity and Equality. Not only are immigrant groups being slated to pay the bulk of 'reparations' to blacks but all these 'nice white liberals' show no sympathy for people such as Muslims who were attacked by black violence.
But it is even worse with Jewish Power and its use of Mass Murder Inc, aka the US military. When Neocons smeared the 'Arabists', what were they really attacking? An American policy of blindly favoring Arabs over Jews? No, so-called 'Arabists' were calling for a more fair and balanced approach to the Middle East by considering Arab/Muslim interests as well as those of Zionists. If anything, your average 'Arabist' was nevertheless more pro-Zionist than pro-Arab. Still, he wasn't 100% pro-Zionist and willing to lend an ear to the other side, especially in service to American Interests. But, that wasn't good enough for Jews, for whom it had to be 100% pro-Jewish and the hell with Arab/Muslim interests. In other words, US foreign policy must be totally JEWIST, but of course, all the cuck-shills of Zion aren't called that. Idolatry Politics means Jews are special, wonderful, and oh-so-admirable in every way. Jews being so great, how can anyone oppose any Jewish demand? So, whatever the problem or consequence, the US must always favor Jews EVEN IF these policies lead to wanton destruction of countless Arab/Muslim lives. Jewish Lives Matter, Arab Lives Don't. Jews can wipe out Palestine off the map, but never mind, and Long Live Israel. Instead, focus on paranoid fantasies of how Iran is going to 'wipe Israel off the map'. Israel ignores international standards and has 300 nukes with stolen technology and material from the US while Iran has no nukes and has caved to every international demand. But never mind. Shower Israel with billions in aid while starving Iran and subverting its economy, making millions suffer. And if Jews cheer on Saudi Arabia's genocidal war on Yemen on grounds that it's good for Jews and bad for Iran, that's great too. And even though Mossad is carrying out terrorist attacks in Iran(and aiding the most demented terrorists in Syria), ignore all that and just accuse Iran of being the #1 terrorist nation, as worthless Donald Trump does all the time as the pathetic dog of Zion. So-called 'liberals' are so into idolatry(of Jews, blacks, and homos) that they are incapable of fair-mindedness. And for all their bleating about injustice, they are such craven cowards who dare not offend Jews lest they lose their precious jobs in elite institutions and industries. As for 'conservatives', their hierarchical mindset means they will kneel before whomever has the most power and privilege. Whether it's Sean Hannity praising Amazon or Rich Lowry cucking before his Jewish donors, 'conservatives' are following in the grand tradition of sucking up to the royal court. As for some others on the right, cheering for White Jews over Brown Arabs is a subliminal way of White Pride. It's ironic of course. Jews prohibit white identity and white agency, but Jews wink-wink urge white rightists to cheer for white Jews and Israel(as outpost of Western Civilization) against those Sand Ni**ers. If you can't have Apartheid and Jim Crow anymore, you can at least cheer for Jim Crowitz and IDF death squads mowing down those brown women and children. The likes of David French will virtue-signal by denouncing Old America but cheer on Israelis defending the border and shooting women and children in Gaza. A truly surreal case of whites, having had their own 'racism' canceled by Jews, must outsource their 'racist' fantasies to 'white' Jews who, being Moral Immortals, have the license to mow down brown people in the old ways of colonialist-imperialist wars.
Moral Immortality means Jews and blacks get to loot the world. Jews, being smart, used financial trickery to rape the Russian economy. Jewish banksters in Wall Street got massive bailouts and grew even richer during the Great Recession at the expense of Main Street. Ever more billions are poured into the coffers of Israel while coffins multiply in the Muslim World. The likes of Paul Singer and George Soros can loot entire nations. Blacks, being stupid and childish, loot in the savage-barbarian way of smashing windows and running off with the goods. And beating up or shooting anyone in their way. Outwardly, blacks seem to do far more damage, but the amount they steal is a pittance compared to cargoes of Jewish Booty. At most, blacks will destroy a part of town. Jewish oligarchs and sharks loot entire economies. Not for nothing was George Soros called 'the man who broke the Bank of England'. But just like most black looters get to walk away scot-free with their loot, Jewish globalist sharks are allowed to keep their ill-gotten loot and look to steal more and more.
But, Jewish Power isn't only about white collar crime. By controlling cuck-politicians of the US, Jewish Power gets to employ Mass Murder Inc, aka US military, to wage Wars for Israel, thus destroying entire nations with invasions, bombings, drone attacks, and blockades. The death tolls abroad from such ventures are far beyond the murder and mayhem committed by blacks. But what do Jews and blacks care? Even when they are caught doing bad stuff, they usually get a slap on the wrist or get pardoned. Most black looters will walk free, and so many bad Jews are never investigated, and even those who get convicted serve in minimum-security prisons or get pardoned. Such is justice in Idolocratic America. Justice follows the theocratic mode of worshipful attitudes toward certain groups who can almost never do wrong even when they do wrong, whereas certain other groups, especially whites, Palestinians, Russians, and Iranians, are always deemed wrong even when they do right. But what would be right-and-wrong in a world of 'gay marriage' and 'trannies are women' logic that has inverted all sense of reality?
