Charles Murray's FACING REALITY ignores how an Invisible Affirmative Action for Jewish Supremacism boosts Jewish wealth & power way beyond Merit — Black Power is downstream from Jewish Power, or Jews use the Black Bullwhip to reduce Whites into a Race of Cuck-Maggots

Cry, the Beloved Country JAMES THOMPSON - Review of FACING REALITY by Charles Murray - https://www.unz.com/jthompson/cry-the-beloved-country/

This matters deeply, because he has a strong case, and at a personal level has earned his status as the American de Tocqueville. He might smile wryly at this, remembering that aristocrat’s cutting observation about American majority thinking: "The majority has enclosed thought within a formidable fence. A writer is free inside that area, but woe to the man who goes beyond it... he must face all kinds of unpleasantness in every day persecution."

How about Cucqueville? The bald-headed Mr. Magoo fool is one of the biggest ass-smoochers of Jewish Power. Ever notice he NEVER mentions the Jewish role in the Anti-White Agenda? What kind of a genuine social scientist has a blind spot that big? Which group has controlled the media and academia? Which group has bought off most of the whore-politicians? Which group did most to marginalize him after THE BELL CURVE? And all this despite his having sucked up to Jewish Neocons all his life. So-called 'liberal' Jews(who privately know all about racial differences) attacked him viciously, and his Neocon friends mostly stood by.

Also, the problem didn't begin as a Majority Thought. The majority-thought of the US used to be pretty awesomely race-ist. Even up to the 1970s, the majority of white Americans didn't like interracism. The New Majority Thought began as a Minority Thought, mostly of Jews who, with their control of academia and media, spread anti-white propaganda far and wide, indeed to the point where most whites came to internalize 'white guilt'. But notice Murray doesn't address the factors that led to a fundamental change in Majority Thought. There was once a time when Murray's book would have been greeted as welcome debate and the ideas of Kendi X would have been laughed at, along with the likes of Robin DiAngelo of 'white fragility' nuttery. But just how did the New Majority Thought take morons like Kendi X seriously? Because Jews control the electronic media(that permeates into every home and consumer) and the academia(that has formative influence over Americans, most of whom hardly read anything after graduation). The Corleones in THE GODFATHER films won because they recognized the source of the moves against them. Vito Corleone figured out it was Barzini all along. Michael suspected correctly that Hyman Roth gave the go-ahead to the Rosato Brothers(and used Fredo against him). But Murray, for all his reputation for independent thinking, goes totally blank when it comes to Naming the Jewish Power. He can't hit the bull's eye, so he goes about aiming for the outer circles. Murray is like a doctor who is terrific at finding the symptoms but never dares to mention the CANCER as the source. Thus, Murray-ism is palliative than curative.

Murray should get a respectful hearing. His sympathies are with small town America, and with the average guy in an average job... Like any true Scot, he would rather be respected by his clan than to suck up to the lairds.

No, he's not. All said and done, Dr. Magoo is a status-conscious sucker-upper to the 'better kind of people'. For example, why did he change his views on 'gay marriage'? Get this. He has these fancy-pants highly educated 'gay' friends. And they got 'married' and adopted some child. Rich successful homos using big bucks to raise a kid, of course with the blessings of the 'right kind of people' who themselves, being soulless, look to prevailing elite fads and fashions to keep up with the Jonesewitzes.
If Murray had real spine and guts, he would have stood with truth and principle. It is foul to associate marriage with what homo-fecal-penetration and tranny-penis-cutting. And even if two homos are nice & caring and spend big money on some orphan, the arrangement is whacky. Family isn't just about affection and privilege. It's about moral meaning and mental health. The idea of 'two daddies' is sick. An orphan needs to be placed with a substitute dad and substitute mom(as all children are the products of father and mother), not two 'parents' who bugger each other. But such meanings have no place in Murray's 'cosmopology'. He's all about class and privilege. He looked at two rich homos raising a kid, and his statistical mind figured, "Hey, that will work." You see, it's all nickels & dimes and test scores with Dr. Magoo. Besides, he might be disinvited to cocktail parties when the Neocons themselves decided that 'gay marriage is a conservative value'. Murray is a vile piece of scum. He is what's on the bottom of your shoe after you step on dog shit. Murray gave his roots the boot and lays down for the lairds. He also married some Asian chick. So much for sticking with his roots. He's just some globo-cosmo tard.

The book is crystal clear: aggressive affirmative action is poisoning American society. Standards have been corrupted, and trust has been lost. Admitting those facts, and ceasing to reward one race over another, is the minimal step which needs to be taken to get out of the quagmire.

But Murray doesn't mention that the poison didn't begin with favors for blacks but with favors for Jews. There are two kinds of 'affirmative action' or special favors. With blacks, the role of AA is obvious because they lag behind in academics and job performance; therefore, they get special treatment in many areas.
In one way, especially in regard to blacks, AA can be defined as MORE for those who can't make the cut. But another facet of AA can be defined as MORE for those who CAN make the cut. In terms of meritocracy, Jews make the cut in brainy areas more than most groups. But Jews are also massive beneficiaries of AA because they get much more, indeed way beyond what they are warranted due to meritocracy.

Consider. Suppose two guys toss free throws with basketballs. One guy hits only 20 out of 100 while the other guy hits 80 out of 100. Suppose 20 pts are added to the first guy to make it more 'fair'. So, even though he hit only 20, he's given a score of 40. The effect of AA would be obvious. Now, the guy who hit 80 did very well. But suppose 20 pts are also added to his score to make it 100. Because he did so well meritocratically, people may fail to notice that his score has also been boosted.
In the US, both blacks and Jews get MORE than what they deserve in terms of merit. Take a lowlife second-rater like Ben Shapiro. Or all those Neocons who've become so prominent in the GOP(and the Democratic Party). Are these really geniuses, brilliant thinkers or statesman-like personalities? No, they are lowlife weasels, but their being Jewish is a big boost. Look how all the Jewish creeps responsible for the debacle of the Iraq War never faced negative consequences where their careers were concerned. If anything, they were favored to become editors of journals or leaders of think tanks.

By merit alone, Wall Street Jews should have taken a huge hit in 2008, but they got richer with Obama's bailouts while Middle America sunk. The US imposes sanctions on many nations for 'human rights violations', but Israel not only gets pass-over protection but is showered with gazillions in cash. Given that Israel is the economic powerhouse of the Middle East and that Jews in the US have more than enough to support Israel on their own, you'd think the American taxpayer would be spared. But nope, Jews make sure that all US tax-payers contribute to Israel. And Jewish crooks get pardoned by Democratic and Republican politicians. Jonathan Pollard stands next to Netanyahu and gives the US a middle finger, and all we hear from both parties is "We stand with Israel." Jews can rig elections and cook up Russian Collusion Hoax. No one pays a price. This is all part of AA culture. Jews have license to lie, cheat, steal, and kill. What applies to us doesn't apply to them. If a white person says, "It's Okay to be White", the FBI is hunting him down. If Jews hold AIPAC rallies where Jewishness and Zionism are hailed more loudly than Der Fuhrer in the Germany of the 1930s, that's all so wonderful.

So, Murray is a dumbass cuck to focus only on the AA for the bottom. The real problem began with AA for the top. When Jews were allowed to steal more, lie more, cheat more, and corrupt more without repercussions, it was AA for the top and had profoundly corrosive effect on the American System. Everything came to be geared more and more in terms of "Is it good for Jews?" It fueled Jewish arrogance and megalomania.
Now, initially whites may have been sympathetic toward Jews due to historical tragedy, especially in World War II. Or maybe it was genuine admiration for Jewish talent and skills. Or out of sentimentality of Jews as the Chosen. Or, in the hope that Jews will one day become normal and well-adjusted Good Decent Americans if accepted into the bosom of America. But Jews regarded all such overtures as signs of weakness, much like Adolf Hitler grew bolder with the conciliatory gestures of the so-called liberal democracies. Jews came to regard white earnestness as either naively childlike or a put-on to fool the Jews. Jews also sensed fear among white goyim, i.e. whites, cognizant of the rapid ascendancy of Jews, wanted to be on their good side. One thing for sure, Jews could not be satiated with enough. The fruits of meritocracy wasn't enough for them. They wanted more and more until they had everything. Notice how Jews got so much in Russia but aren't satisfied because they don't control everything. Ronald Reagan said of the Cold War, "We win, they lose." That's how Jews see the goy world. Jews rule, goyim obey, and nothing else is tolerable to the Tribe.

White attitude toward Jews went from sympathy to anxiety to fear to worship(to hide the fear). If Jews want it, they get it. Why can't American Conservatives stand up to craziness like the tranny-lunacy? The main reason is they know Jews are behind it. Without Jewish backing, the tranny-business would be mocked and dismissed, reduced to mince-meat. Indeed, globo-homo and 'gay marriage', not to mention the pronoun-proliferation, couldn't have gotten far. But because it was understood that Jews were behind it and would be very displeased at those who said NO to the Agenda, even so-called conservatives backed down. In contrast, everyone piles on BDS because the Jewish Message is, "We want it crushed." So, whether it's Democratic NY or Republican Texas or Democratic California or Republican Florida, it's "You can't make it in business if you express any sympathy for BDS."

Black AA is duper-AA. It's AA for those who can't make the cut. Jewish AA is super-AA. It's AA for those who can make the cut, and this makes it far more perverse. Giving a poor person a bit more is far more excusable than giving a rich man a lot more. And yet, cucks like Murray who bitch about duper-AA for blacks are totally silent about super-AA for Jews. Due to his cuckish and mindless worship of all things Jewish, Murray and his ilk have convinced themselves that Jews are so smart, so special, and so awesome that they earned every cent of what they have. Never mind all the deep state monopolist machinations between Jewish Wall Street, Jewish Big Tech, whore politicians, and rigged courts. Of course, whereas blacks officially benefit from a program called Affirmative Action(which makes it all very visible), the super-AA for Jews is invisible because Jews get their special favors through their behind-the-scenes manipulations of institutions and industries. Besides, who's going to say NO to Jewish demands given the political, social, and/or economic consequences of displeasing Jews who act like gangsters?

Martin Scorsese's GOODFELLAS as sociology is a nostalgic look at organized crime before the Feds finally clamped down hard. But as metaphor, it's about the Deep State today. Jews and their cuck-crook collaborators laugh at the Constitution and get their jollies from knowing that they are 'made men' and have license to do anything and get away with it. The mafia was vulgar-AA for Italians via muscle and crime. They got a little more that way. And the super-AA for Jews works the same way. Who cares about the rules when you got the power? Also, those with the power get to rewrite the rules. Lawyers become judges, and they set the new laws. Notice how 'libertarians' and 'conservatives' say monopoly social platforms and banks can deny you service because they're 'private companies' but then are totally silent about the Jewish use of the STATE to shut down BDS. All super-AA for Jews.

Blacks didn't become powerful on their own. Black power owes to Jewish Power. Jews keep lit the flame of Emmet Till and milk 'white guilt'(for 'cool' and 'badass' blacks) to maintain control over whites, without whom Jewish Power would crumble overnight. The real problem isn't the legacy of the Civil Rights Movement and what it did for blacks. It was what happened BEFORE the 60s when whites conceded too much to Jews, paving the way for super-AA for Jews and their supremacist-nihilistic behavior. Just how did Jews get away with USS Liberty? Just how did Jews get away with pushing 'anti-racism' and anti-imperialism on the West while demanding that the West defend Zionism's tyranny over Palestinians? (And today, whites in the West are treated no better than Palestinians in West Bank. White patriots, millions of them, are called 'domestic terrorists' by Jewish gangsters who use Joe Biden as puppet-dog.) Just how did Jews manage to get a Holocaust Museum built in D.C. when the only 'genocide' that happened in the US was the destruction of the native American Indians?

Black power has ebbed and flowed in accordance to Jewish wishes. When Jews had had enough of black crime in NY, they got tough on crime and made the city a lot safer. But just like the perfect plan fails in Stanley Kubrick movies, what couldn't happen happened in 2016 with the election of Donald Trump. To discredit Trump, stir up 'white guilt', and embolden the blacks, Jews unleashed the George Floyd riots and funded BLM to the max. Jewish-controlled legal system allowed Antifa and BLM scum to rampage, riot, and loot. Jews were the Hyman Roths behind the BLM-Antifa Rosato Brothers. People like Ta-Hinesi Coates and Kendi X would be NOTHING without the support of Jewish Publishing. (Jews also exert power to force Amazon to ban certain books and ideas.)
Murray, the Dr. Magoo cuck, will mention the Rosatos but will not the Roth. He will rag on the visible duper-AA for blacks but will remain silent about the far more insidious invisible super-AA for Jews, which has pretty much ended US as a democracy. It is an ethno-oligarchy gangster state of the Empire of Judea. Just look at Joe Biden's administration. It is Jewish Supremacism Galore. Are all those Jews(especially mental health expert Rachel Levine) really so deserving? No, they are beneficiaries of super-AA. There was a time when one had to be a Jew of some talent, like Henry Kissinger, to make it to the top. Nowadays, lowlife scum like Victoria Nuland get to shape key foreign policy abroad. Look at Congressional Hearings, and it's always a game of white cucks deferring to Jews who look upon them with smiling contempt. It's all so disgusting. Here's something funny. Though Charles Murray and Jared Taylor disagree profoundly on lots of things, they are totally agreed in shoving their faces into the unwiped ass of Jewish Power and licking.

If you look at ability differences within professions, a rational rule of thumb for people of all races, entirely based on documented ability levels would be, if possible, to avoid black doctors and nurses, because they will probably be less able to care for you at European levels.

Hey, how about a rule whereby all white progs must see black doctors, especially if they need brain surgeries. If they say NO, we should demand, "Why not? What are you, racist or something?" LOL.

K-12 teachers are a full standard deviation below European ones, so all parents, black and white, should avoid those for their children.

That doesn't seem to be the real problem. When it comes to K through 10, you don't need much intellect on the part of teachers. Also, the real problem is politicization of curricula. For example, why are they pushing globo-homo on kids? What is that a part of? Math? Science? History? Home Economics? English? Foreign Language? Why would 'gay' stuff be part of any schooling? Thinking back on my years in grade school, I can't think of a class that would have included globo-homo stuff. We were just learning basic stuff, not being fed degenerate propaganda. What does the fact that some weirdo guys wear dresses and want a surgery to have their dongs removed have to do with learning? As for Critical Race Theory or CRT, the stupid thing isn't even critical. It's dogma pushed as truth, and if anyone critically ask the wrong questions, he or she is ostracized and reviled.

General Milley said the military should look into CRT because he himself has studied all sorts of ideologies, such as Maoism. But he's missing the point(and rather willfully). I got nothing against military schools looking into CRT and trying to understand what it's about. But CRT isn't being offered as a topic of study but as official dogma. If CRT were brought up in a social science class for consideration and debate, it might lead to interesting discussion. But the agenda isn't to discuss and debate CRT but to use it as the guiding principle of the American Ideology. It's one thing to read Marx, Lenin, and Mao in schools, military or otherwise. It'd be another thing altogether to push Marxism, Leninism, or Maoism as the official ideology of the school. Such is the objective of CRT, and Milley is either a liar or a fat stupid cuck.

AMERICA'S WAR ON WHITE CHRISTIANS - Brother Nathanael

Based on what he saw in America in 1831 de Toqueville believed that the assimilation of black people would be almost impossible.

The policy of both EU and US is now ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs, or 'Asseximilation'. Social assimilation between whites and blacks as equal citizens is impossible. What is possible(and happening at ever greater scale with sure-to-be dire results) is the jungle-feverization and cuckization of the White World. It's happening in Japan as well as yellows imitate whites who take their cues from Jews. Japanese women reject timid dorky Japanese men as inferior and have kids with Negro men, and their kids dominate Japanese sports, and Japan's corporacracy hails it the face of New Japan, thus emboldening even more Japanese women to have have kids with Negroes who will take over Japanese sports and be revered as national heroes. Though only a small number of Japanese are half-black, the cancer is bound to grow rapidly in that soulless deracinated nation. If you destroy the native idols of a nation(that serve as its official face) and replace it with foreign ones, the nation is doomed. If it's happening to Japan, a distant nation, imagine what is happening in UK, France, Netherlands, and of course the US.
Look how Confederate monuments are defaced and then removed in the South, and whites don't even stand up for their heritage. They hunker down and wait for college football season so they can cheer for black athletes who hump white cheerleaders. White guys are total cuck-maggots. So, who needs assimilation when more white wombs will be sexually colonized by blacks and produce black babies? In the Current Year, everything white is either up for sale, confiscation, or conquest by others. White women? Go to black men. White lands? Go to non-white immigrants. White institutions? They belong to Jews. White Churches? They belong to globo-homo. White History? To be re-narrated with 'Diversity'. Whiteness has become a welcome mat for the muddy boots of non-white masses led by the Jewish Mob.
Meanwhile, white guy cuck-maggots hail jungle fever and interracism as 'anti-racist' and 'progress'. Of course, the Afro-junglization of the White World will turn the West into something like one big North Africa, but whites worship blacks, along with homos and Jews, and most whites seem to welcome it as their minds are putty in Jewish hands. Could this trend be reversed? Sure, if awesome race-ists gained control of institutions and industries, but Jews have control over them and shower white cucks with carrots while using the full force of stick on those who say NO. But then, almost no white says NO. Even Trump and his supporters are pretty cucked on race. They applaud interracism of ACOWW and worship Jews & Israel. They will bitch about Cuba, Iran, China, or Ben & Jerry Ice Cream but, just like lowlife Charles Murray, will not name the Hyman Roth power that has them in its cross-hairs.

INVASION OF THE NATION SNATCHERS - Brother Nathanael

Jews who control the gods control Big Tech and Corpocracy that attack Trump and Populism — The Need for the INNER-WARRIOR among white patriots

People talk of Big Tech censorship and 'corpocracy' and the like, but it is Jewish Power that pulls the strings. In THE GODFATHER PART 2, Michael Corleone asks Hyman Roth about who had Pantangeli killed. Roth says the Rosato Brothers. But then, Michael asks, "But who gave the go-ahead. I didn't." In the world of organized crime, you couldn't just go around killing anyone on a whim, especially IF the target happened to be of some prominence. You needed permission, the go-ahead. So, Michael knew it was highly unlikely that the Rosato brothers would have just acted on their own. They needed the approval and assurance of higher authority. Roth was behind it all. And in the THE GODFATHER, Vito Corleone realizes the Tataglia wouldn't have gone so far without the backing of a bigger crime boss, Barzini(who was forming an alliance with the Five Families to bring down the Corleones). We need to know the Hyman Roth Rule in why what happens happens.

It's true that Big Tech and the Corporations have loads of cash, and money = power. But money on its own lacks compass or direction. Money is like gunpowder. It can make lots of explosions and shoot off countless rounds. So, obviously, the side with money has lots of raw power. But then, who gets to decide how that power is used. Who gets to choose what gets blown up or in which direction the guns are pointed? In WWII, Germany had lots of tanks and planes, and Russia had lots of tanks and guns. That was only raw power. It was the personalities(Hitler and Stalin) and ideologies(National Socialism and Soviet Communism) that decided the direction of gunfire. Soldiers, tanks, and planes do not wage wars on their own.
Consider the Military-Industrial-Complex. We've been told it is the most dominant force in government. Certainly, military contractors have their lobbyists and spread lots of cash all over D.C. They are war profiteers with boundless greed. But if it were only about money, MIC would be pushing for war with ANY country. Surely, war on Israel would be just as profitable as war on Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, or whatever other nation. And given the facts of Israel's creation(via imperialism, ethnic cleansing, and what amounts to 'genocide' by UN definition of the term), occupation, apartheid policies, aid to terrorists, covert role in 9/11, espionage on the US, financial theft, and possession of nukes(made from stolen US material), a strong case can be made to sanction, bomb, invade, and occupy Israel. US could protect the Palestinians as the 'New Kurds' or 'New Kosovo Albanians'. And MIC could make tons of cash from Shock and Awe on Zion.

If indeed money is the main motivating force in D.C., then MIC would have steered US into many more wars, especially against Israel. It would have made billions from such a war. But how come such a prospect isn't even remotely conceivable. War on Israel? Why, Israel is "the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful nation I've ever known in my life." So, even though MIC is about money(and the egotism of power), it lacks inner compass. Its aggression must be turned toward certain targets by a higher power. So, MIC can be turned against Russia, Iran, China, Venezuela, Libya, and etc., but no one would dare to turn it against Israel(or any nation looked upon favorably by Jews, such as Saudi Arabia even though it is by far the #1 terrorist-sponsoring nation in the Middle East after Israel). So, those who control the gods control those who live by money and/or power egotism. MIC makes money by targeting countries hated by Jews. And military brass flexes its muscles against those hated by Jews. Jews control the gods, and money and muscle follow the gods. Why did the US military go from a right-wing institution to a crusader of globo-homo, Jew-worship, and Afromania around the world? Because having all those guns and bombs doesn't mean you got vision and direction. No, like hunting dogs, the military doesn't pick its own agendas or its own fights. It is directed by the higher powers, those who control the gods. And Jews control the gods. Military-Industrial-Complex stands down to the Jewish Tribal-Spiritual Complex that creates and controls the gods for whom people must work, pray, live for, and die for.

So, when we look at Big Tech de-platformings and Big Corporations denying service to certain groups, it isn't enough to say the problem is with corpocracy and Silicon Valley. And, money isn't the primary decider in all this. If it were, retail companies would have slammed BLM and Antifa for what the 'mostly peaceful demonstrators' did over last summer. Walmart and Target would have denied service to Democrats who encouraged the riots. They would have made announcements denouncing black thuggery. And they would have cut off services to progs and libby-dibs who fanned the flames. But, even after their stores were ransacked by black thugs fueled by BLM lunacy, the companies made announcements to the effect that they sympathized with the rage and hatred behind the violence and mayhem. They took the knee to the Negro because Jews control the gods and made Afromania one of the three gods of the new trinity. While cucking to Jewish gods will lead to loss of money, refusal to cuck will lead to total disgrace and downfall. Big Business figures it's better to lose half by cucking than lose all by not cucking.

People think Jack Dorsey is now more powerful than the US president, but that is total nonsense. If anything, Dorsey and Trump are in the same situation. They must do as the Jews say. Notice every time Jews kick Trump in the rump, he takes his frustrations out on Iran, China, or some other country. (A Jew-White Boxing match would be one where the Jew hits the white, and the white hits the Russian. Jew hits the white again, and the white hits the Chinese. Jew hits the white yet again, and white hits the Iranian. Jew hits the white once again, and the white hits the Palestinian. MAGA could not win despite its energy because it never dared to hit back the Jew.) It's like, when a master kicks the dog, the dog goes attacks the cat or rabbit or another dog.

If Dorsey is truly all that powerful, imagine the following scenario: Suppose Dorsey was so angered by BLM riots instigated by Obama in 2016 that he decided to ban POTUS from Twitter. Could he have gotten away with it? No way. The whole Hyman Roth of media complex, deep state, elite groups, and true believing prog masses would have attacked him. He would have faced legal sanctions and serious consequences.
Or suppose following last summer's riots and mayhem, big corporations decided to ban all Democrats and prominent figures who aided and abetted the riots and violence(against police and civilians alike) by encouragement, donations, lawfare, and the like. Would big business have dared to take such action? Would they have gotten away with it? No. They are just Money Power, and money has no inner compass. Money follows the gods, and Jews control the gods. Indeed, the $$$ shouldn't say "In God We Trust" but "We obey the gods controlled by Jews".
So, control of the gods is key. It's no wonder Jews used their power to erect the Holocaust Museum in Washington — given US history, the group most deserving of a prominent genocide museum is the American Indians, but leave it up to Jews to be obnoxious and occupy morality like they occupy West Bank — and then did everything to prevent the construction of Communist Horror Museum. The ghosts of countless dead goyim killed by Stalin, Mao, and etc. would compete with the gods of the Jews, especially as Jews played such a prominent role in communism as agents, killers, smugglers, propagandists, and spies.

So, who gave Jack 'Rosato' Dorsey the go-ahead to take out Trump? Who assured Dorsey that he wouldn't suffer any repercussions(and if anything, has much to gain) if he were to kick Donald Trump down the stairs? Of course, Jewish oligarchs in Big Tech don't need permission as they are among the people who control the gods. But goyim like Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, and Tim Cook(the crook) need the go-ahead by 'Hyman Roth'. If Jewish Power didn't want Trump taken down, Dorsey wouldn't have done so. Without Jewish approval(and insistence), Amazon and Apple wouldn't have moved against Parler. Super-rich white goyim have tons of money, but they don't control the gods. As such, they are busy appeasing the gods controlled by Jews. They live in a world where Jews, blacks, and homos are holy but where whites are defamed as having demon-possessed souls. So, white money today is 'spiritually' like the money of organized crime. It is dirty and has to be 'morally' laundered and cleansed by the Holy People. Jews are like the money-changers at the gates of temple. Rich whites can be redeemed only in service to Holy Jews. It's the only way 'dirty' white money becomes 'clean' money. Those who control the gods decide which money is 'clean', which is 'dirty'. No wonder the US is always eager to send billions over to Israel. Jews are holy, so when US sends big cash to holy Zion, it's as if American Wealth is symbolically cleansed. "As president, I pledge 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, etc billions to Israel"... Cheers and cheers, the $$$ have been cleansed.

Now, some may argue that rich white goyim AGREE with Jews on most matters, and therefore, it isn't so much a case of them obeying Jews but agreeing and working with Jews. But why do they think and feel that way? Because they were educated in Jewish-heavy elite institutions and get most of their news from Jewish-run media. So, the images, sounds, idols, icons, narratives, and mantras that fill up their minds have been formulated by Jews. Jews have long been masters at this. After all, they wrote the Bible, the Book of Everything that combine history, philosophy, mythology, story-telling, genealogy, poetry, law, and even humor. To create and control the gods, it's not enough to specialize in any one field. Rather, you must 'bring it all back home' like Bob Dylan's album said. After all, if Karl Marx had just focused on economics, he would have been a number-cruncher, a historian-accountant. Instead, he pulled together the various threads of philosophy, economics, history, morality, neo-spirituality, science, and prophecy all into a single package. As Jews combine images, stories, icons, and etc into one package through their control of institutions and industries, they effectively own the electronic bible of 'sacronics'. Hollywood is the new vatican, Ivy League is the new seminary of Jewish Gods Learning, such as how to worship globo-homo and magic negro(and how to shut up about Jewish Power or else be labeled an 'antisemitic' heretic).

Because Jews control the gods, they have the crucial leverage. Suppose there are two banks, one run by white conservatives and one by Jews. Suppose the Jewish Bank decides to deny services to a group for its 'white supremacist' ties, and suppose the White Bank decides to deny services to a group for supporting Israel and its terrorist activities. Suppose both banks are equally big. Now, which one will emerge unscathed and which one will face ruin? As whites are the devils in the New World Order where Jews control the gods, Jews can label anything as 'white supremacist' and deny it service. But, as Jews are the forever holy holocaust people, even the denying of service to Jewish terrorism and supremacism is taboo. So, the White Bank will come under media attack, lose customers(who are brainwashed), and lose partners. Jews control the gods, and that is crucial. But what do most whites do? They don't create and control their own gods but worship the gods of the Jews. Even Trump and his Trumpeteer morons are always yapping about 'Muh Israel' and 'Record Low Unemployment for blacks' even after Jews deny whites service and blacks go around beating up whites in riots. And organizations like TPUSA worship globo-homo and promote the tranny Lady Maga.

If white folks are to control the gods, there needs to be the rise of white prophets. Some called Trump the 'Todd-Emperor', but he was just a charlatan-hustler whose gods were all controlled by Jews even as he appealed to white votes. He was essentially a 'todd-jester'. Now, the white prophet doesn't have to be anti-Christian. Muhammad wasn't. If anything, Muhammad had great respect for Jesus and the Old Prophets. He saw himself as furthering the Prophecy.
A new prophecy is necessary in the West because it's obvious that Christianity has run its course. Catholicism is just lavender mafia homo club. Mainline Protestant churches are now run by lesbian crypto-atheists. Evangelicals are just dogs-of-Zion who believe in Noah's Ark. And Orthodox Christianity is just a mausoleum religion in Russia. More churches are built but stand empty. The fire has gone out of Christianity, and I doubt it can be relit. And yet, it was a great religion worthy of remembrance and still has inspirational, if not 'salvational', value.

And whites must learn to become inner-warriors. In the end, inner-warriors survive and can win because they have resilience and persistence. They have inner life, internal source of conviction and passion. In THE GODFATHER PART 2, Michael Corleone knows well enough that the Cuban military has more guns and supplies than Castro's men. They are supported by the US and Big Money. But, a guerrilla is willing to give his own life for the cause. He has inner fire whereas the Cuban military are mere mercenaries who take orders. So, Michael later tells others that the guerrillas can win. They certainly did in Cuba and Vietnam.
The outer-warriors have no inner conviction. They just do as told. They are willing to kill but unwilling to die for anything. White mentality is that of the outer-warrior. No wonder conservatives are so into honoring military men and veterans, the outer-warriors with guns who merely follow orders and do as told. But are these soldiers inner-warriors? Do they have core conviction?
Now, consider the Jews. If the US waged war on Israel or Jewish Power, Jews wouldn't go along. Jews are inner-warriors whose core loyalty is about Jewish Soul, Pride, and Power. But if white soldiers were ordered to fight useless Wars for Israel or turn their guns on fellow white folks, they will do just that. It's like the white police, total outer-warriors. Ordered by superiors to allow Antifa to beat up Trump supporters, the white police doesn't lift a finger. Ordered by superiors to attack and arrest Proud Boys, the white police does just that. It's the outer-manhood of holding clubs & guns and just doing as told. They are like dogs with no inner compass. Dogs will attack ANYTHING as ordered by the master. Only the inner-warrior is truly free because his sense of loyalty and rightness is independent of what the Power says. He is a soul-warrior than merely a body-warrior. Outer-warriors may have big swords or big guns, but their sense of war doesn't extend beyond what they're ordered to do.

Perhaps, whites make such poor inner-warriors because they had less need to develop an inner-warriorhood. After all, most of white history was about whites in white lands being led by white rulers. So, it was just understood and taken for granted that being an outer-warrior was synonymous with the well-being of white folks. In contrast, Jews had to master their inner-warrior-ness precisely because they lived under goyim for so long. Whether it was the Egyptians, Assyrians, Romans, or Christian Europe, the rulers and the masses were goyim, sometimes hostile to Jews. So, even as Jews pretended to go along and get along outwardly, they had to keep the Jewish fire burning within their hearts. They mastered the art of keeping the fire alive in the dark cellar. It's like the final scene of Martin Scorsese's THE SILENCE where it's implied the priest didn't really relinquish his faith in God/Jesus. The fire was kept alive in some hidden corner of his heart. In a way, his place in Japan is like the Jew's place in Christian Europe. The fire had to keep burning in some secret place.

In contrast, Europe, especially Northern Europe(and historic America is an extension of Northern Europe), became so powerful, rich, expansive, and dominant around the world that whites took it for granted that the outer manifestations of Western Power were in sync with the heart and souls of white folks. But then, the institution and industries fell into Jewish hands one by one. Also, as Jews gained control of the gods, they began to switch on anti-white neon signs within white souls. Whites watched TV & movies made by Jews, and their hearts became aglow with holy homo and Magic Negro.

Because the outer-power of the West traditionally looked out for white interests and was founded on white identity, there had been no need to develop a strong inner-self among white folks. By the way, Western Individualism isn't the same as having an inner-self. Individualism means the individual's freedom to do whatever, with his main objective being 'happiness', which in our time means videogames, food, and lots of trivialities. In contrast, an inner-self is deeper than any whim of an individual.

After a forest fire, everything looks dead and extinguished on the surface, and indeed those organisms that exist only above surface will have been totally destroyed. But why do plants sprout again and grow into trees? Because the roots deep inside the soil were untouched by the fire. Those plants have the inner-warrior.
Why did Romans fade from history whereas Jews survived as a people/culture? Roman Empire was entirely formulated as an external power. It was great as long as it could win wars and dominate others. But there was precious little sense of the inner-Roman. The Jews got demolished worse by the Romans than Romans by the Germanic Barbarians, but Jews survived and took over the world because they perfected the art of the inner-warrior. And the US will eventually leave Afghanistan because the Taliban, as ragtag and backward as they are, do have an inner sense of Jihad and tribal pride. In contrast, the mostly white soldiers in Afghanistan are mere mercenaries of Jews, and America's interests are purely political than spiritual.

Whites need their own Jihad mentality as inner-warriors. This way, even when the enemy takes over outer-power and scorches the landscape of patriots, the white inner-warriors will still believe in what they are, still hate the enemy, still carry on the fight, and wait for The Day of Reckoning.