A Preliminary Argument: WHITE LIBERATION(from Jewish Supremacism) WILL SAVE THE WORLD

https://counter-currents.com/2020/11/stolen-election-redpill/

Why is 'white liberation' a better term than 'white nationalism'? Fairly or unfairly, people associate 'white nationalism' with aggression and conceit of superiority. It gives the impression that whites got the power and want to show it off by rattling their sabers.

But the West is now under Jewish control like India was under British control, like Algeria and Vietnam were under French control. So, the emphasis must be on the need for whites to free themselves from Jewish Power. The theme of liberation is more appealing and justified than theme of mere power. After all, the great theme of the post WWII era was NATIONAL LIBERATION all across Asia, Africa, Middle East, and Latin America from European Imperialism or American Hegemony. And as the theme of WWII was the 'free world' vs the aggressive imperialism of Germany and Japan, it was difficult for the great powers after the war to justify their rule over others.

So, 'white liberation' is preferable to 'white nationalism', at least for the time being. Now, if skeptics ask, 'liberation from what?', whites can say from Jewish Supremacist Power, which can be amply demonstrated with data and facts. Jews do control the West. Jews not only got money power but made themselves into the new messiah-race. It's one thing to remember the Shoah as a great tragedy but quite another to permanently affix Jewish Identity with that event. Such implies Jews are always a race of 'holocaust victims' no matter what they do. So, even if Jews act like Nazis toward Palestinians, we are supposed to see them as a bunch of poor poor Anne Franks.

Anyway, 'white liberation' will highlight the fact of Jewish Power, an absolute must for real change to take place. (How can there be any reform if the most powerful group is not identified and criticized? Can a cancer victim be properly treated without acknowledging the cancer?) 'White Nationalism' can mean the need for white unity & power. Or it can mean white power as the basis for world domination. Nationalism need not be imperialist but often took an imperialist turn in the past when a nation became very powerful.
In contrast, 'liberation' emphasizes the need for whites to seek emancipation from the current power that dominates the West and the World... which is Jewish Power. (Even 'white national liberation' sounds better than mere 'white nationalism'.) White Politics that only focuses on whites and white power is less likely to be appealing than White Politics that seeks freedom from the actual tyranny that rules the world: Jewish Supremacist Power or JSP.

Also, whites can argue that White Liberation will lead not only to white emancipation from Jewish Evil but will save the world. Why? Because Jewish Supremacist Power would dwindle overnight if white folks chose WGTOW or whites going their own way. If whites refused to serve the Jews, no more Wars for Israel against Arabs and Muslims. No more support for Zionist 'genocide' of Palestinians. No more 'new cold war' with Russia. No more whites acting like dumb dogs who bark and bite whatever their Jewish Masters hate. When whites say NO to Jewish Supremacism, peace will prevail around the world as whites will no longer do the bidding of hateful supremacist-imperialist Zionist Jews. And far less need for 'yellow peril' hysteria about China-China-China to distract Americans from the fact that Jews are the main enemy of the white race and goyim in general. Just ask the Palestinians about the nature of Jewish Power.

Think of 'Israelis' and 'Palestinians' as meta-memes. 'Israelis' would be the winners and tyrants, and 'Palestinians' would be the losers and the tyrannized. It is the dream of many whites to be 'Israelis', fellow winners alongside rich and powerful Jews. Jewish identity/pride united with white identity/pride. But this is a dumb dream. Jews will NEVER accept whites as equals. Even as white praise and acknowledge Jewish identity & pride, Jews will denounce white identity and promote white shame/guilt. Thus, the ONLY way whites can rise in the Jew World Order is by turning race-traitor and cucking as collaberals or cuckservatives. All the Bidens and Romneys of the world. And Jared Taylor the deluded fool isn't much better.

Given that Jews regard whites as 'Palestinians' than fellow 'Israelis', whites should identify with Palestinians, that is unless they enjoy being race-traitor cuck-collaborators. (There are, of course, Palestinian collaborators who get rich while serving Zionists.) While Jews are free to gain power as an identity and group, whites can only gain riches as individuals, ones that cravenly collaborate with Jewish Supremacists. No white man with any self-respect and dignity should choose this path.

Now, the key to the success of White Liberation will be the emphasis on humanism & justice than nihilism & supremacism. (Kurosawa Way than Mishima Way.) The problem with people like Greg Johnson and Richard Spencer is they oppose Jewish Supremacism by associating themselves with forms of White Supremacism. Johnson wrote glowing things about Adolf Hitler who brought upon unprecedented disaster for the white race with his Aryan-Germanic supremacism, and Spencer blabbered endlessly about his vision of a new world-white empire. How stupid is that? You get zero moral points by opposing one form of supremacism in defense of another. It's like denouncing a robber just so you could steal yourself. The only convincing argument is NO ONE should steal — indeed, the dirtiest secret of Jewish Power is that it denounces white supremacism not as a principle against supremacism per se but to make browbeaten whites serve Jewish supremacism, a bait-and-switch; this is the dirty secret that needs to be exposed by the White Liberationist Project.
Unfortunately, David Duke, Greg Johnson, and Richard Spencer all soiled themselves with association with KKK, Neo-Nazism, or Anglo-Imperialism. (Of course, it should be acknowledged that imperialism has long been a part of human history, and it did good as well as bad, spreading ideas and expanding trade routes along with the violence and tyranny. So, to the extent that Western Imperialism united the world and spread modernity all over, it did a lot of good that balances out the bad. However, as the world has been so thoroughly united via technology, there should be no reason for further imperialism and supremacism. And it seemed all the world was agreed, except that American triumphalism and Jewish ascendancy after the Cold War led to a new age of empire, one that has been utterly worthless except as conduits for Zionist madness, Afromania, Globo-Homo and mass deaths across the Middle East and North Africa, as well as mass migration into the West from the Third World.)

David Duke could have done so much more without his KKK association. He will forever be smeared as a former-KKK member. Greg Johnson of late seems to reject Hitlerism in his personal formulation of 'white nationalism', but the Hitler-stain is like the Mark of Cain. Spencer is proof that smarts isn't enough. Lack of character, emotional imbalance, and megalomania(personal and racial) spell disaster.

This is why white liberation or white national liberation should be founded on humanism and justice. Universal Nationalism is justice because it acknowledges that all peoples deserve their rightful portions of history, heritage, and territory. Globalism wages war on this sense of justice EXCEPT WHEN IT COMES TO ISRAEL — Jewish Exceptionalism as always. According to Jewish-controlled globalism, all the world should support Jewish-Israel's right to exist BUT every goy nation should be remade with mass-migration and mass-miscegenation, especially with the Negro.

Too often, 'white nationalism' has been associated with neo-nazis, skinheads, KKK, and overly paranoid militia movement types. (True, whites have much to worry about, but more guns are not the solution when most of the culture war, idol war, and ideological war are done with the pen, mikes, and cameras than with guns and bullets. Militia movement emphasizes guns than lenses.) 'White Liberation' can be associated with humanism that acknowledges the worth of all races and groups.

And even though White Liberation would mostly be about freedom from Jewish Supremacism, it should also address the need for white independence from black supremacism. The problem with white folks who opposed the Civil Rights Movement was they spoke and acted as if blacks were not good enough for whites. A far more effective argument would have been that blacks are superior in certain attributes, and these make blacks arrogant and aggressive against whites, the weaker and slower race who, upon racial integration, often fall victim to black supremacist thuggery; and white men get jack-johnsoned into wussy cucks as tougher blacks kick their butts, and that means the white race loses its human right to manhood, its right to have its own heroes and idols. And this argument is something that other non-black races may understand as well, as most interracial violence is not only black on white but black on brown, black on Asian, black on Muslim, black on etc. Even black on Jew despite all the money Jews give to blacks to hate on whitey.

White Liberation should also argue against non-white mass-immigration into white lands as a perverse form of non-white white-supremacism. Why would it be non-white white-supremacism? Because mass migration of non-whites from their own nations to white nations implies that non-whites see whites as superior and prefer to live with and under whites than with their own kind. This is bad for whites and non-whites. It's bad for whites as it leads to the Great Replacement and violates the right of white folks to have their own homelands. But it's also bad for non-whites because, instead of using their energies and abilities to improve their own nations, they just run off to white nations to leech off whites as short-cut to success. It's especially bad as it leads to brain drain from non-white world to white world. This is why White Liberation will save the world.

"MY FELLOW JEWS" by Brother Nathanael

The Total Implosion of Richard Spencer — It's Absolutely over for Richard Spencer — Richard Spencer vs Nick Fuentes

I once cut Spencer a lot of slack because he seemed like an intelligent, insightful, and thoughtful(and much misunderstood) spokesman for the cause of white consciousness.

But later he made noises about bringing back the great imperial game… as if the world is a STAR WARS universe. If he were living in the 19th century, such talk might have carry some weight. But this is the 21st century when white worlds can barely maintain their demographic and cultural integrity. In such a time, what kind of person would dream of being King over Africans? It's good to dream big dreams, but Spencer seems to have no sense of reality. His idea of the Alt Right is making himself futurist Tarzan in Darth Vader mask, leader of the 'fashes' and lord of the apes.

Near the end of THE VIDEO ABOVE, we hear a spitting mad Spencer hyperventilating with frustration over the fact that the world doesn't regard him as Napoleon of All Eternity. The world and all its powers don't see him the way he sees himself. Oh, what cosmic injustice! Now, given what happened at Charlottesville, I can understand the rage, invective, and even racial epithets. After all, what the city did was a clear breach of Constitutional Rights(something which Spencer doesn't believe in anyway). There's no question that the Unite the Right event was sabotaged by the powers-that-be, and we can understand the anger of the attendees. But, the problem is not Spencer's fury. Rather, the substance of his rage amounts to what can only be characterized as the most poisonous kind of white supremacism, one that is hardly different from crazy nonsense spouted by KKK and Neo-Nazi types. All of Spencer's deflections of being smeared a 'white supremacist' now ring false. He didn't come to the event to defend Southern Heritage or to speak on behalf of valid white interests. His big 'dream' was to create a New Empire where people like him hold the whip-hand over rest of humanity. If his dream could be realized, his dark vision would at least have the element of awesomeness. But in the 21st century when the white race is struggling to survive all over the world(even in their ancient homeland of Europe), Spencer's 007-Darth-Vader rhetoric just sounds stupid and ridiculous. It's like the babytalk of a child in a superhero costume on Halloween. Is Spencer living in reality or stuck inside a Batman costume? At any rate, there's no doubt that his agenda was never White Liberation from Globo-Homo-Shlomo supremacism but to become 'what he is', which is ubermensch(ling) stomping his boot on the face of humanity. What petulant sense of entitlement. He should have been spanked more as a child. He acts like a brat who wants to hog all the toys. He's like a girl bawling over lost candy. He’s like Dark Helmut playing with dolls in Mel Brooks' SPACEBALLS

Spencer fooled good people who trusted and followed him. He really is a piece of shi*.



A CURIOUS commenter:

Spencer has always struck me as controlled opposition. He has never had any real base. It’s interesting to note that he always somehow survived the purges. He gets to not only keep his Twitter account but even gets verified. He gets invited to the MSM to pontificate from time to time. He is the Hillary Clinton of the Alt Right. Popularised and favoured by ZOG, but has little support on the ground.

The Jew-run Media tried to exploit him, casting him as the baddie, a role the 'enfant terrible' side of him relished playing. He was also the go-to-guy because he could be charming and congenial when he wants to be. In turn, he was hungry for publicity and saw his chance. As most people in Conservatism Inc. were a bunch of sorry 'cucks', he enjoyed playing the 'bad boy' who dares to violate PC shibboleths. And for a time, he was very good at it, pacing and measuring himself like a smart boxer against a hostile but fascinated media.
Indeed, the media panicked when Spencer appeared to have genuine star power and seemed to be outwitting them at every turn. Were they creating than destroying a monster by placing him in the limelight? At the very least, he came across as intelligent, articulate, and handsome. It was as if Spencer was playing the media than the other way around, and many were genuinely, if reluctantly, impressed. So, whatever the media meant to do, it initially backfired on them because Spencer as media creature appeared bright and capable, even charismatic. Great fortune landed on Spencer’s lap. Alt Right was suddenly a thing, the talk of the town. It even had a cool edgy brand. And Spencer could have run with this.

But the man-child made a series of catastrophic decisions. It's usually the case that the rash and reckless side of the man emerges AFTER he's gained great power. Adolf Hitler and Mao Zedong were cautious strategists before they amassed supreme power, with which they then carried out disastrous decisions like Operation Barbarossa or the Great Leap Forward. In contrast, Spencer seemed to lose all sense of pragmatism and proportion the moment he became top dog of what was still a political subculture. It was as if Donald Trump's victory anointed him as the true ruler of the US, the world, the cosmos. He went totally TREE-OF-LIFE almost overnight.
Incredibly, he encouraged his fanboys to give Hitler salutes at a conference in honor of Donald Trump’s victory. This was not a closed event but a very public one with the national media present. The whole freaking world was watching, and his minions instantly trashed the event(that had gone very well) with Sieg Heil theatrics. And then, the man-child decided to have long conversations with clown Andrew Anglin of Daily Stormer. And he linked up with Neo-Nazi Malt-Right fatboy Matt Heimbach. He also interviewed David Duke. Now, while it's true that Duke has changed over the years and has done some important work, no sensible Alt Right activist with an eye to the future would have associated himself with man with Duke's baggage. But Spencer was increasingly full of himself, as if he was bulletproof no matter what he did. Spencer also got increasingly drunk and erratic, losing left and right the people who joined his movement out of genuine commitment. He could not keep quality people, and some of his associates were just as childish, bratty, and stupid as he is. Like Kyle Bristow for instance.
Then, there was roster of the Unite the Right event. When it was announced, I didn’t know much about the individuals slated to appear on stage, but in retrospect, a worse bunch of morons couldn't have been assembled. Heimbach is a fat fuc* who belongs on Jerry Springer, especially in light of what he did with his father-in-law's wife. Chris Cantwell is nuts and should be institutionalized. Others were hardly better. Now, it’s true that the Jewish mayor and the black police chief were mainly to blame for the melee, but Spencer drove Alt Right into the ground by associating it with nutjobs and morons. It’s like he was handed the coolest train set for Christmas but wrecked it with sheer lack of self-control and appreciation.

That said, it’s not true that he was spared the Purge. He was banned from EVERYTHING except Twitter. His new Alt-Right site was shut down. He couldn’t raise money. He couldn’t book venues. He’d been regularly invited by MSM as the voice of the Alt Right in 2016, but he was hardly called upon since Charlottesville.

The tragedy is he could have played it smart and shaped Alt Right into an important, even outstanding, movement, but his petulance, vanity, and egotism got the better of him. But then, he is philosophically a nihilist, which means he has no core morality other than power-worship, the fist-clenching of Darth Vader in EMPIRE STRIKES BACK. If he were a fresh 17 yr old who read Nietzsche and Ayn Rand and got over-heated with excitement, it’d be understandable, forgivable. But for a 40 yr old to gush about how he’s the rightful master of the universe, it is downright pathetic and embarrassing. People who hear Spencer's post-Charlottesville rant are more likely to laugh than be struck with fear. Ooh, he's the fuc*ing ruler, the king, the lord, the master of the universe. ROTFL.

A CURIOUS commenter:

His comments against Nick Fuentes is also reeking of bitterness. What is clear is that the Alt Right, or whatever you want to call it, is not dependent upon a small set of people. It isn’t Spencer’s pet project and it never was.


Nicholas Fuentes has an edge over Spencer, and it is consistency and commitment, as well as sobriety. He started a show called America First and has kept at it day in and day out, gradually building up an audience. In contrast, Spencer doesn’t know the meaning of tenacity and persistence. He conceived of grandiose plans and made big declarations, but he hasn't finished anything he started. He’s all sprint and no marathon. He created a site called Alternative Right with considerable fanfare but soon gave up. Then he set up Radix Journal, and it faded. It was supposed to have a print version, but it took forever to publish a single edition. He made the second-rate Crypto-Nazi Alex Kurtagic his right-hand man. He said he’s going to do regular podcasts or videos, but it was all off-and-on, never on schedule.
Nicholas Fuentes has his own set of problems. He’s young & brash and tends to fly off the handle(which at least has entertainment value). He’s smart and well-read for a young man, but his temperament precludes depth. He has interest in politics and history but lacks genuine curiosity and empathy. He has the panache to ask inconvenient questions and be contrarian against official dogma & narrative but is too quick to jump to his own simple-minded conclusions. Still, he’s young and a work in progress, and only time will tell if he will become a real player in the field of American Opinion. His positive asset is he keeps at whatever he’s doing, which is so different from Spencer who cooks up big plans but serves them half-baked... or totally burnt.


A CURIOUS commenter:

I wouldn’t even call Fuentes Alt Right. He is like the Alt Lite, but with the exception that he and his group are much less friendly to globohomo and Israel, and this scares TPTB. If people like him gained the upper hand, we’d see symbiosis, not conflict, with the more radical elements of the Alt Right like TRS.

Fuentes is neither Alt Right nor Alt Lite. He’s a ‘zoomer’ revamped with Paleo-Con fundamentals. He’s closest to Pat Buchanan, a Catholic conservative patriot with racial consciousness.

A CURIOUS commenter: 

Anglin, as another puppet, will of course try to sabotage everything as he usually does by promoting infighting and drama. But he is also rapidly losing relevance.

I don’t know why anyone would take Anglin seriously. Daily Stormer is only good for laughs, dumb and retarded but with an outrage humor like Adam Sandler movies or Three Stooges shorts. The proper thing is to just let Anglin do his thing. DO NOT invite him to serious debates. Consider Daily Stormer's take on the Nick Fuentes and 'Groypers' challenge to Charlie Kirk and TPUSA. It's only for laughs. Enjoy if you must but do not take seriously. The problem was never Anglin per se but that too many people in the Alt Right and Dissident Right regarded him as anything more than a clown. https://dailystormer.name/dear-everyone-you-get-what-you-fucking-deserve/

Finally, why is Spencer really really over? Because he sold the media the persona of a sane and rational 'white nationalist' who went against the grain/stereotype of the demented 'white supremacist' so often spread by the media. Spencer's brand had value as long as he could persuade people that his true self had no relation to the cartoonish image created by the Jewish Media of the KKK and Neo-Nazis. The Spencer shtick was most effective when the Media said "Look, evil scary white supremacist monster" but Spencer smiled and presented himself as a smart guy who cares about his race and culture. Because of Spencer's privileged background and educational credentials, respectability mattered more to his image than to anyone else on the Alt Right. Sure, he could be a bit edgy and do the enfant terrible thing that could be funny.
But the post-Charlottesville rant exposes Spencer as a truly contemptuous, deranged, vile, and vicious piece of turd who feels he is entitled to rule over the world because his childish self wants all the toys for himself. Just like virginity, once lost, cannot be regained, there is no way Spencer can persuade and regain the trust/respect of anyone of good will and rationality. In some ways, it's a good thing because imagine if a far more persuasive and sociopathic Spencer had indeed succeeded with a movement by concealing his truly ugly self that finally emerged when he amassed considerable power. Spencer is not a man of sound mind and body. He's borderline bipolar and semi-sociopathic. It's like the nutty character by Keir Dullea in BUNNY LAKE IS MISSING who seems sane throughout the movie only to be revealed as batshit crazy. Spencer is not clinically crazy but batshit stupid. Spencer once argued that the enemy sees 'white nationalists'(and even conservatives) as worse than wrong; unapologetic whites are seen as worse than evil, irredeemable. Well, at least in Spencer's case, he has proven the enemy right. He really is a pile of shit. Well, at least he has that going for him: The pride of being a stupid amoral bastard.

Jewish Facebook to Ban White Nationalism. Imperialism Hates Nationalism — Then, It’s No Wonder Why Jewish Imperialism Hates, Defames, & Attacks White Nationalism, aka White National Liberation

http://www.unz.com/anepigone/black-nationalism-a-reaction-to-americas-institutionalized-white-supremacy/

Black nationalism’s alleged hatred for whites is described as a “predictable reaction to white supremacy” while its reported antipathy towards Jews isn’t quasi-rationalized in a similar manner.

I can accept the justification of black nationalism as a reaction to white imperialism that conquered the Americas and shipped over slaves from Africa.

Nationalism has been a reaction to Imperialism, and for most of modern history, whites were the leading imperialists. Granted, white imperialism led to great discoveries, integrated the entire world, spread knowledge far and wide, inspired revolutions, and created vast new wealth & opportunities.
But it was also destructive and devastating to many peoples and cultures on every continent.

Naturally, the weaker peoples whose lands, cultures, and autonomy are threatened or crushed by an imperialist power are going to move into nationalist mode to defend and preserve what they have. That much the whole world must respect of all nationalisms.

As blacks were under white imperialist domination in the US, it’s understandable that there was a movement to define, preserve, and protect blackness as something other than a tool of the white power structure. Black nationalism was one aspect of this struggle by blacks to define their own identity and history.

But times change. White Imperialism came to be usurped by Jews around the time of the End of the Cold War. In time, the US became less a superpower nation than a super-colony or super-puppet of an even greater power, the Empire of Judea, a worldwide network. And this Jewish supremacist imperialist power has been compelling white people to participate in Judeo-centric hegemonic ventures to destroy Russia & Iran, wage Wars for Israel, support Israel’s eradication of all vestiges of Palestinian nationhood, and etc. Because the dominant world power is now Jewish Imperialism, we need white nationalism or, more precisely, white national liberation movement to break free from this supremacist bondage.
The world may regard white Americans as having immense power and wealth, and it is true that many white Americans have much more of everything than most peoples of the world. Still, there are even greater powers over the power. Just like prosperous Japan and Western Europe, despite their great wealth and considerable power, are under the thumb of the even more powerful USA, prosperous white Americans, despite being the most successful and powerful gentile group in America, are under the thumb of even more powerful Jews. Just because someone or some people are rich and powerful doesn't mean that they are dominant and independent. It's all relative. The rich and powerful have to be mindful of those who are even richer and more powerful. Donald Trump is a very rich man but nothing compared to true oligarchs like Sheldon Adelson and others. Also, the power of the President isn't much compared to the combined force of the Deep State and its connections in Media and Courts.

It has been a Constant in History: Imperialism hates all nationalisms except for its own(in certain cases). British Empire promoted British nationalism and patriotism but crushed the nationalist aspirations of subject peoples. It said NO to Indian nationalism, even resorting to ruthless means on occasion to suppress it. French empire suppressed Vietnamese and Algerian nationalisms, and it took prolonged bloody wars for the French Empire to finally recede from those parts.
Feudal Japan found itself in nationalist mode when threatened by British and American imperialism, but as it modernized into a major power(and was accepted into the imperialist club as ‘honorary whites’), the Japanese made imperialist moves on continental Asia. Japanese empire did all it could do to suppress Chinese and Korean nationalism(and then Filipino and Vietnamese nationalism as the empire expanded). Nazi Empire trampled on Polish and Czech nationalism and sought to crush Russia nationalism. Soviet Imperialism suppressed Polish and Hungarian nationalism.

Hungarian National Liberationist Uprising against Soviet Imperialism. It was also a rebellion against Jewish Communists who'd been installed by Stalin.

Imperialism hates all nationalisms except for its own(in certain cases). Roman imperialists ruthlessly suppressed Jewish nationalism. Of course, Romans took pride in Roman power and glory, but non-Romans had to suppress their own pride of identity and instead serve & honor Rome as the metropole of the empire. Soviet Empire was somewhat different because it suppressed Russian nationalism along with other nationalisms… though, over time, Russian national component of the empire did come to the fore.

Why do Jews hate white nationalism? Jews vehemently conflate white nationalism with white supremacism, but that’s mostly BS. White nationalism has actually been far less aggressive than White imperialist Liberalism. Throughout American history, white nationalism emphasized America’s need to mind its own borders and affairs(at least once the continent was taken and tamed). It was white liberalism and white progressivism that wanted to expand and dominate the world. Since late 19th century, US began to shift increasingly into imperialist mode as all the US continent was united and settled. White Imperialism came to dominate over white nationalism. But because the world was dominated by great European empires, American imperialism pretended to be for self-determination for all nations. In truth, American imperialism was only trying to invalidate existing empires so that it would gain hegemony over the ‘liberated’ nations. The US defeated the Spanish Empire in the name of liberating its exploited subjects, but the US essentially acted as the New Boss in Cuba and Philippines.
However, sour feelings after the failure of the world order in the aftermath of World War I made Americans look inward. For a time, it seemed as 'isolationism' would prevail over 'expansionism'. Then, the double whammy of WWII and the Cold War turned the US into a full-fledged world empire, though in counterbalance to another empire, the ‘evil’ one of the Soviets.

With the end of the Cold War, US could have retreated from imperialism and minded its own business, but the business opportunities of Free Trade and spectacular rise of Jewish power changed all that. Jews preferred expanded imperialist-globalism over nationalism because Jewish power owes more to horizontal networks around the world than vertical elite-mass unity in any nation(except in Israel). The main loyalty of Jews was to the Network, the Empire of Judea, than to the US or any particular nation(except Israel). As Jews gained dominant power in the US, the so-called lone superpower essentially became a colony of the Jewish Empire, like India was the Jewel in the Crown of the British Empire.

Precisely because Jews don’t have the numbers, they need gentile support and obeisance to Jewish supremacist imperialist power. And among all the goyim, whites are most crucial because they are most numerous, capable, and talented. Jews may be the overlords, but they need white managers, engineers, generals, negotiators, lawmen, and etc. to do the heavy lifting to keep the empire going. But the ONLY WAY to ensure that whites will do as told is IF they are denied white identity and white nationalism, aka white agency. After all, if whites think as white nationalists, they will focus on ‘what is good for whites in our white nation’ than serve the identity and interests of another people(especially one that feels so much hatred and contempt toward whites). They will be less likely to support Jewish supremacist agendas around the world such as hatred toward Russia, Iran, Syria, and endless Wars for Israel. And this is why Jewish Imperialism must suppress white nationalism or white national liberation. Nationalism tends to be rebellious, defiant, and uppity against the empire, especially if it’s of an alien people.
Imperialism hates all nationalisms except for its own(in certain cases). Jews love Zionism and Israeli nationalism. Jews love to promote and glorify Jewish identity(as synonymous with nobility). Jews, who’d once been nationalist resisters against Roman imperialism in ancient times, are now the New Romans, and they regard whites as the ‘new Jews’ to suppress and control(or threaten to destroy and scatter to the winds if they disobey Jewish Neo-Roman power).
Just like Jewish Imperialism can’t abide by Palestinian nationalism, it can’t tolerate white nationalism. Both threaten Jewish imperialist hegemony, the Jew World Order. Palestinians in West Bank demand independence from Zionist Imperialist Occupation. And white nationalists want white liberation and emancipation from Jewish imperialist globalism. White national liberationists want OUT from the globo-homo empire and more Wars for Israel. This is what Jews fear. This is why Jews smear white nationalism as ‘white supremacism’ when, if anything, it is anti-supremacist in its call for collective white disobedience to Jewish Imperialism. What Jews really want is for white cuck-collaborators to keep supporting Jewish imperialist hegemony around the world. Jews are projecting their own supremacism onto white nationalists. But then, Jews, who'd created Israel through use of extensive terror, blame Palestinians as a race of terrorists. (It's also interesting that, even as Jewish Imperialists deny agency to white collaborators, they blame whites for everything wrong in the world as if whites are the ONLY ONES with agency. Even the disaster of the Iraq War was dumped entirely on gentiles Dick Cheney and George W. Bush by Jewish Hollywood in VICE. Just pretend it was War for Oil than War for Israel.)


Now, why are Jews okay with black or non-white nationalism in the US? Because they don’t really see it as a threat. Black nationalism is mostly angry noise. Browns are too mediocre to gain dominant power. Yellows hardly exhibit any nationalist sentiment in the West. (If anything, they are more likely to stick up for other peoples such as Jews, blacks, homos, or blurred mass called 'immigrants'. Even though the US has gotten incredibly diverse as the result of mass-immigration-invasion, only a few identities matter, and most groups rally around those few tent-pole groups who happen to be Jews, blacks, and Homos, aka the Holy Three.) Besides, Jewish Empire relies far less on black ability and talent. While black success in sports and music is very profitable to Jews, it is white talent and ability that are crucial in managing and running the Empire as engine and warship. So, it is far more important for Jews to make whites submit and obey.

Also, black nationalism can be used to guilt-bait or morally condemn whites for past history. White guilt paralyzes white pride, and an ashamed people are more likely to cuck. Indeed, even as imperialism generally hates nationalisms, it may tactically support one nationalism against another nationalism(deemed a bigger threat) or a rival empire. It’s like the Empire of Judea is supportive of Ukrainian nationalism against Russian nationalism(which is seen as a bigger obstacle to total Jewish world hegemony). Jews regard black nationalism as akin to Ukrainian nationalism. A useful tool for the moment against white identity and pride. (Jews do fear black nationalism in South Africa however because blacks are the overwhelming majority and can burn down the entire system if things get out of hand, especially in opposition to Jewish economic imperialism. One problem with black national liberation is that, once the imperialists are gone, blacks are unable to run or build an economy of their own.) Remember that Japanese imperialism supported Manchurian nationalism(through puppet 'emperor' Puyi) against Chinese nationalism that began to resist Japan and demand the return of  Manchuria.

Now, was there a history of white nationalism that was supremacist? In a way, yes, but it was still less belligerent and dangerous than white liberal imperialism and Jewish imperialism. White nationalist rule in the past did treat non-whites as second-class citizens or worse, BUT white nationalism had a limiting effect on the despoilment of America by the Whole World. By limiting immigration mostly to whites, American Indians lost their land mainly only to Europeans(and to blacks brought over by whites). Had America not been white nationalist and allowed open door immigration from the very outset, American Indians would have lost all their lands to all the world in no time. And much more of nature would have been destroyed. White nationalists did defeat and conquer the indigenous folks, but their noble race-ism still allowed some space for Indians and their narrative.
Furthermore, white nationalist race-ism served as a check on black biological supremacism and imperialism. As blacks were brought as slaves, they were socially oppressed by whites. But because of their superior muscle power, greater natural aggression, rowdier butt energy, and bigger dongs, they could easily become biological imperialists and supremacists over the weaker white race. In a state of nature, blacks will dominate over whites. If you take 200 whites and 200 blacks and strip them naked and put them on an island, blacks will beat up white guys and hump white girls. So, white race-ism and nationalism against blacks were both supremacist and defensive against black natural supremacism.


Anyway, the most destructive, evil, and venal power in the world today is Jewish Imperialism. Look what it did to Russia in the 90s. Look at its spread of demented globo-homomania. Look at its Wars that leveled so many nations in Middle East and North Africa. Look at its economic destruction of Iran. Look at its demographic policies against US and EU. Look at how it makes white soldiers wreck Muslim nations and then pushes Muslims into the West. Look at how it spreads anti-white hatred in media and academia and Hollywood. Look at how the Sacklers acted like Sassoons who sold opium to the Chinese.

Indeed, if white nationalists could pry themselves free of Jewish imperialism, the world would be a much nicer place. After all, without white cuck-collaboration with Jewish imperialist power, Jewish power and influence would do far less harm to the world. Suppose if whites(in national liberationist mode) had said NO to all these imperialist Wars for Israel. Middle East would be in one piece, and millions would have been spared death and displacement into other nations(esp in the West). And, there could be justice for Palestinians finally. US would not be in another ridiculous and immoral ‘cold war’ with Russia. And back in the 90s, the US(one that is free of Jewish power) might have been constructive and helpful toward Russia than merely rapacious as the ‘shock doctrine’ turned out to be the shylock doctrine of looting the entire economy to enrich the Tribe. Anglo-elites were somewhat more honorable than Jewish elites.
The world should welcome white nationalist liberation from Jewish Globalist Imperialism like the world celebrated the national liberation of India from the British Empire. 'Ding Dong, the witch is dead.' To Jews, a white national liberationist who refuses conscription into the Jewish Empire is like an uppity slave who says NO. He must be whipped. White National Liberationists must say “Hell No, We won’t go” and “Globalists suck, we won’t cuck.”


But then, the reason why so many in the non-white world participate with Jewish Imperialism against white nationalism is because white nationalism says “We want our white nations to remain white”, whereas Jewish imperialism says, “We will hand out free tickets to you non-whites to come to white nations IF you, as ‘new Europeans’ or ‘new Americans’, support OUR agenda.” Non-whites will do ANYTHING to come to richer and nicer white nations. So, they collaborate with Jewish Imperialism in the demographic imperialism against the West. Non-whites want access to white riches and to have sex with fairer whites. Black African males want white women, and Asian females want white men.

Imperialism produces resisters but also collaborators. When the British empire ruled quarter of the world, many Hindus and Chinese took advantage of Anglo hegemony to spread out across the globe for business opportunities. Most people will do JUST ABOUT ANYTHING for whatever that improves their lives materially. Materialism often trumps tribalism.

Are Progs acting in Good Faith when they say Corporate Monopolies have the Right to Dismiss and Blacklist White National Liberationists who say NO to White Submissivism demanded by Jewish Supremacists?

So many people associated with ‘white nationalism’ or ‘white supremacism’ have been demoted, fired, or blacklisted. Even physically attacked. And the internet deplatforms entire sites devoted to White Identity and White Interests.

We are told that this is constitutional since Freedom of Speech doesn’t apply to private companies. In other words, private companies can hire and fire whomever they want based on whatever.

But I just don’t buy this line of argument.

Just consider the following scenario. Suppose a company has a president who reads about Israeli treatment of Palestinians. Suppose he is appalled by Zionist behavior. Suppose he comes to see Zionism as a form of imperialism and supremacism. On that basis, suppose he purges any worker who is associated with Zionism or support for Zionism.

Would ACLU, ADL, SPLC, and American Jews(who control most media) just accept this as OKAY since private companies can hire or fire whomever they want?
Now, the hypothetical company didn’t fire anyone simply because he or she is Jewish. The company fired people, Jews or gentiles, who are known to have explicitly supported the project of Zionism. (After all, there are anti-Zionist Jews.) So, would the Establishment, Jews, and globalists be fine with this since it targeted not race but the creed/credo of workers?

Or suppose a company decides that BLM is a Hate Movement based on lies that promotes intimidation, violence, and thuggery. Suppose it decides to fire anyone, white or black or whatever color, who is associated with support of BLM and its agenda.
Or suppose capitalist corporations adopt a policy of firing anyone associated with Marxism on the basis that communist ideology is anti-freedom, anti-property, anti-individuality, and anti-liberty, all in the name of state tyranny based on delusional theory of justice that the world must be made into a proletarian prison-state to ensure equality for all?
Would ACLU, ADL, SPLC, and NAACP — and NYT and MSM — just accept it as the Right of private companies to hire or fire whomever as they please based on their own criteria of what is ‘acceptable’?

Or suppose Paypal is bought out by Arab-Americans who are appalled by Zionist mistreatment of Palestinians. Suppose their new policy is to deny Paypal service to any proponent of Zionism. Would the Jewish community and Mass Media accept it as the right of private company to do as it pleases?

I don’t think so. I’m sure all the ‘experts’ will find LEGAL reasons to oppose such company decisions. If anything, the powers-that-be will summon any means possible to make sure that such a company will be destroyed for practicing its supposed constitutional rights.

If Youtube were owned by Hindus, Chinese, or Arabs and went about deplatforming Zionist vloggers as ‘hateful’ or homo vloggers as spreading ‘degeneracy’, I highly doubt if Jews, globalists, and progs would defend the rights of private enterprise to do as it pleases. After all, if progs care so much about Free Enterprise and Business Rights, why do they call for socialization of medicine?

Or can you imagine Youtube hiring BDS to root out Zionist vloggers as murderous, genocidal, imperialist, and/or exclusionary? If anything, American Jews are using money and influence to pass laws that will criminalize speech and actions that are in favor of BDS.

The Right must push for laws that make it illegal to fire anyone for political or ideological views away from work. That is discrimination based on creed. If it’s wrong to fire someone for being pro-Zionist, it is wrong to fire him for being pro-Europeanist. All workers must follow professional codes AT WORK, but his private and personal beliefs or activities shouldn’t be grounds for dismissal from work.
And that is the very argument that the Progressives once made. They decried the firing and blacklisting of so many communists and leftist sympathizers(many of whom were Jewish) during the ‘McCarthy Era’. But they’ve now shown their own face. It was never about principles but about protecting their own. If McCarthy had been a leftist who went after far-right people, I’m sure the Lib Narrative would remember him as a hero.

Leading Two Peoples is as Pointless as Serving Two Masters

Just as it’s difficult to serve two masters, it’s difficult to lead two peoples.

Why are so many white working class and underclass folks so lost and confused? Why are they so lacking in moral compass? It is because they get no leadership: politically, socially, culturally, historically, spiritually.

In the past, white leaders felt a racial-cultural-national connection with white masses and led them. White body was guided and watched over by the white mind. The white mind had a clearer sense of right and wrong, and it prodded the white body to act accordingly… like Moses leading the Hebrews.
But now, the white body has no leadership because the white mind no longer feels a direct connection with the white body. The covenant between the white elites and white masses has been broken. Jewish Globalists insist on the separation of white mind and white body.
Jewish academics inculcated white elites with ‘white guilt’ and promised them redemption ONLY IF they were to dump the Archie Bunkers of the world. Also, the Jewish Globalists, via control of mass entertainment, vulgarized the white masses with junk culture and Jerry Springer-ism so that they’d be deaf to sound advice if they ever heard it.

Today, white leaders/elites are expected to represent and care for ALL peoples than feel especially responsible for fellow white folks. But the interests of blacks, browns, yellows, Hindus, Muslims, and etc. are different from those of white folks(as well as from one another). When white leaders are supposed to represent Diversity than whiteness — esp when whites must bear the brunt of ‘white guilt’ — , white masses get no leadership. Also, as ‘white privilege’ is deemed evil, white elites(who still retain privilege) try to justify their own tainted privilege by cucking out to non-whites and especially Jews who, despite their super-privilege, flash the Shoah Card of Eternal Victimhood. (It must be said that the Current Order requires white elites to serve Jewish Globalist uber alles, and so it gives the lie to the notion of ‘anti-racism’. Jewish Power banished white identity from respectable discourse not so much to make white elites color-blind but to make them serve Jewish supremacism. After all, if Jews really want white elites to care for all groups equally, why do they push Palestinian-American interests to the back-burner in favor of Jewish-American interests.)

A man who tries to serve two or more masters will end up confused, betraying all the masters as well as himself in the absence of meaningful integrity of loyalty.

A man who tries to lead two, three, or more divergent peoples behold an impossible task. Imagine if Moses had tried to lead Egyptians, Hebrews, and Canaanites.

Even a figure as inspired as Gandhi couldn’t, in the end, represent both Muslim India and Hindu India and had to relent to the partitioning of British India into a Hindu majority nation and a Muslim majority nation, Pakistan. (Notice Netanyahu doesn’t pretend to represent Palestinians as well as Jews. He is a Jewish leader of Jews through and through.)

In time, the would-be leader of multiple peoples just becomes jaded and cynical. His pompous talk about Diversity degenerate into self-serving machination of careerism. As he finds it impossible to lead many peoples, he is resigned to serving himself and the one master: The Zionist-Globalist elites.
Even as the current white elites are dazed and confused in their failure to represent and lead all peoples, they are focused on serving ONE uber-master, the Glob. It’s easier to serve one master than lead many peoples. Currently, the West has only one master that counts: Jewish Globalism. No wonder then that so many politicians opt to serve the Jewish globalist uber-masters. Easier to serve the one than to lead the many.

Ideally, white elites would stop serving the Glob(aka globalist supremacism) and start to serve the white masses once again. Let non-white groups rely on their own non-white leaderships.

Anyway, the white race needs to think like blacks with NAACP and Jews with AIPAC. Even apart from electoral politics, blacks and Jews are represented by organizations that explicitly cater to their identities and interests. And Hispanics have La Raza, lately renamed to something else.

Whites need something similar. Of course, this pro-white organization that ALWAYS is geared to represent white identity and interests(regardless of winds of political fortune) must be sane and responsible. Unfortunately, explicit White Identity has been associated with KKK and the like, not least because the Jewish-run media and Jewish-funded watchdog groups like ADL and SPLC have created this impression that anything related to white or European consciousness must be associated with the ‘far right’ and the ‘Nazis’.

A National Humanist White Organization is most necessary. One that is moral and responsible.

Because most whites only rely on electoral politics, they feel represented or unrepresented depending on who wins elections. But if whites have powerful and well-organized socio-cultural organizations to represent them apart from politics, they will always feel empowered regardless of shifting political fortunes. It’s like Jews have ADL and AIPAC working on their behalf regardless of who is president, senator, or governor.

Paul Gottfried’s Opposition to White Nationalism as Basis for Conservatism/Rightism.

Paul Gottfried, formerly a mentor to Richard Spencer, has remarked ‘white nationalism’ shouldn’t be the basis for the New Right. Gottfried argues that white identity doesn’t have a thematic history in Conservatism. Rather, it is an artificial made-up category, like ‘black nationalism’ in America when, in fact, no such thing as ‘black identity’ existed in Sub-Saharan Africa where people identified along tribal or clan lines than on racial ones. After all, it was blacks who enslaved other blacks and sold them to Arabs or European slave-traders.
Gottfried argues that Rightism in the West has essentially been about Christian values, ethno(as opposed to racial)nationalism, heritage & memory, traditionalism, and culture. In contrast, the notion of racial identity is a radical departure from everything that was genuinely traditional on the Right. Ramzpaul the Youtube personality has also repeatedly said that Europeans don’t identity by race but by narrower categories of ethno-national identity, e.g. Hungarians don’t see Romanians and Russians as their ‘brothers’ on the basis of race.

It was in America that race became a group identity. If black Africans had been divided along tribal or clan lines, black Americans developed a common racial identity based on skin color, genetics, shared historical experience as slaves and second-class citizens. Thus, the identity of race in America, especially among blacks, came to be associated with anti-conservatism. Blacks united to resist and destroy the system that ensured white superiority over blacks. Yet, black movement was paradoxical in that it was about black racial unity whose stated goal was to fight ‘racism’. Officially at least, blacks didn’t come together to favor blacks or uphold narrow black interests. It was to overcome the notion of race so that all Americans will be judged by ‘content of their character than the color of their skin’. So, the Civil Rights Movement was both a black racial movement and an anti-racial movement. Its goals were to break down white racial privileges so that all races could live under equal justice under the law. But if such were its ultimate mission, was the Civil Rights Movement anti-black as well as anti-white? And this issue was the basis for the divide between figures like MLK and figures like Elijah Muhammad & Malcolm X. MLK and his cohorts argued for ultimate integration and assimilation of white and black. In contrast, Muhammad and X argued for black identity and black nationalism as the ultimate objective of black politics. Both sides agreed on the need to resist white power, but one side wanted to merge with white community on the basis(at least officially) of color-blindness whereas the other side wanted to create a separate realm of black power in body and soul. To be sure, even the assimilationist and integrationist blacks could never let go of their racial identity, and their politics became one of race-baiting ‘whitey’. Still, MLK and his values were esteemed by both white and black integrationists as the shining ideal for a color-blind society. Even race-specific Affirmative Action has been rationalized, at least officially, as remedial than racially permanent, i.e. it is to ultimately end when blacks have caught up to white standards.

Anyway, there was an element of black identity in both black integrationists and black separatists. But neither side was associated with American Conservatism. Even black nationalists, despite their racial consciousness(and even black-supremacist tendencies), were seen as the enemy of the American Right. Malcolm X has always been more revered on the Left despite his black racialism.
As for black integrationists, black identity politics was always implicit and even explicit at times. Still, they spoke the words of Christianity, Social Justice, and Universal Progress than black nationalist politics. On those grounds, Paul Gottfried is right that racial consciousness has not been a powerful factor on the American Right? What about the KKK and Neo-Nazis? The KKK was not about white identity but about Southern Anglo-Protestant interests against perceived threats from blacks and eventually Jews. Religion and Cultural heritage were just as important as race, and KKK’s racialism didn’t reach out to white ethnics. If anything, the Southern Anglos of KKK were opposed to mass immigration from non-northern-European nations. They didn’t feel a broad white identity with the entirety of the white race. As for Neo-Nazis, they never amounted to anything in America despite the huge German-American population. They hardly mattered to the core themes of American Conservatism that were centered on religion, heritage, economic policy, family values, and anti-communism.

Therefore, Paul Gottfried finds the notion of race-based ‘radical traditionalism’ on the Alt Right a meaningless idea. He just doesn’t see white racial identity as part of any traditionalism in the West. There was a heavy dose of radical racism in National Socialism, but it was not a traditionalist movement. It was racially radical than traditional, especially as it was about a bunch of ‘Aryan’ whites at war mostly with other ethnic groups of whites. So, where is the history of white identity as part of traditionalist Right in America and Europe?

Gottfried makes much good sense, and it’s true enough that the term ‘radical traditionalism’ is a willful oxymoron. However, the rise of White Racial Identity may be more viable in the future due to common threats faced by ALL whites in both the Old World and New World. New crises birth new consciousness. What had been implicit or irrelevant suddenly seem essential and meaningful. Contexts change consciousness. Consider the notion of Asian-American interests in the US. In Asia, there is no such thing as united or common Asian interests. Japanese, Chinese, Koreans, Vietnamese, Thais, Malays, etc. don’t see eye to eye on much. Each think more in terms of national identity rooted in history, culture, and religion. However, when these groups come to the US, they all find themselves to be minorities and suddenly a shared Asian Identity gains meaning... just like shared common black racial identity gained meaning in the US because all blacks, regardless of their tribal origins, experienced the same story of slave ancestry and dream of emancipation. In black Africa, blacks didn’t have to think about ‘blackness’ since everyone was black. It was a given. And blacks were the only people that most blacks knew. Most black Africans had never seen a white man or non-black. They thought their little world was the entire world and all peoples were black. So, it made no sense for black unity. Black unity against what? Rather, it made more sense to belong to one tribe of blacks against other tribes of blacks. In contrast, blacks in America were faced with the power of whites. Since there was another race that had power over them, blacks couldn’t help but develop BLACK racial consciousness. Likewise, Asian-American identity that unites various Asian groups makes sense in America because they all constitute yellowness in contrast to other races. This is also true of today's American Indians. Prior to the arrival of the white man, notion such as 'Native American' or 'indigenous people' made no sense to Indians. They had no concept of any world beyond their own, and their world was about constant warfare among various hunting tribes. Their core identity was tribal, not 'Indian'. It was the threat posed by whites that gradually led to a common Indian consciousness even though Indians failed to form a united front against the white man(and other immigrant groups heralded by imperialist Emma Lazarus). Today, separate 'Native American' tribes remain and preserve their cultures, but there is also a shared and common sense of Indian-ness among them all since they have the shared experience as indigenous peoples who got defeated by the same enemy: Pale Face and Lazarus' Immigrant-Invaders.
Whether such consciousness is ‘left’ or ‘right’ is ultimately irrelevant. Because the ‘left’ is usually associated with minority interests, even non-white racial interest and tribalism will often be associated with the Left. In contrast, because white majority power is associated with conservatism, even anti-racial white libertarians who call for color-blindness will be associated with the Right. The point is racial consciousness depends on racial context. If America were to suddenly become an all-white nation, racial identity would be moot. What would be the point of discussing race when all Americans are white? The dividing factors in politics will be economic theory, religion, social values, or ethnicity than race, e.g. Polish-American vs Italian-American vs Irish-American. It’s like air. We don’t think about it because it is freely and abundantly available to all. But suppose air were to become scarce and had to be rationed to people for survival. We would all be air-conscious in debates over which groups should receive more air.

For most of American History, white dominance was a given. Whites had power over non-whites. And when ‘too many’ non-whites, such as Chinese, seemed to be arriving, immigration was shut down. So, whites could take White America for granted. Even when the 1965 Immigration Act passed, most white Americans didn’t much care since they only knew a white-dominant America and couldn’t conceive of an America that would eventually become white-minority. Whites were like the Hare in the race against the Tortoise. The Hare, so certain of its victory over the slow tortoise, couldn't even conceive of losing. Hares are faster than tortoises, so hares will naturally win. True enough IF the hare finishes the race. But it just took a nap and the tortoise passed it by.

Anyway, we live in different times, and white consciousness will have to grow in both the US and Europe. White Americans can no longer take their majority status for granted. Non-white colonization is out of control, and PC has mentally colonized countless white minds into welcoming the Great Replacement. And things are changing in Europe too. When Europe used to be virtually all white, it made little sense to unite over whiteness. What was the point when everyone was white? So, the divisions were over ethnicity, religion, ideology, or sense of heritage or historical narrative. But with the rapid rise of non-white populations all across Europe, various European groups are waking up to their shared white-Europeanness and feeling the urgency to work together to beat back the tide. Also, when EU now says even Africans and Arabs are ‘Europeans’ or ‘New Europeans’, race will come to matter more. In the past, to be German meant that you had German ancestry and blood. Now, an Iranian, African, Turk, or Pakistani can be ‘German’. In a nation like Poland or Hungary, national identity still has meaning as the basis of identity & unity since most Poles are ethnic Poles and most Hungarians are ethnic Hungarians. But today, being ‘German’ is increasingly meaningless since Germans with German blood must regard masses of invaders as ‘New Germans’. Germans are to believe that an African ‘German’ or Arabic ‘German’ has more in common with European-Germans than Poles and Russians have with Germans. Since national identity has been rendered meaningless, there is only race left as the unifying theme for Europeans. After all, even if PC argues a black African is a Frenchman, Englishman, or German, it cannot and will not argue that he is a white person. Thus, race is the only thing that can resist PC’s redefinition of national identities.

With the increasing browning of Europe and North America(and Australia), white people will realize that their race has to be the core tenet of their identity. Only when the West is once again made all white can there be meaningful national identities and divisions among whites based on religion, culture, and history. In nations like France, UK, Sweden, and Germany, national identity no longer makes sense. Today, French have to believe that millions of Africans and Muslims are fellow Frenchmen. British whites have to embrace tons of Pakistani Muslims as fellow Englishmen. Swedish have to welcome countless Somalis as fellow Swedes. National identity used to be associated with ethnicity. It is no longer. It is now just an ‘idea'. Jews first turned Americanism into an abstract ideal and then exported this notion to Europe. Western Europe has been thoroughly Judeo-Americanized. Eastern Europe resists, but for how long when the Western side holds all the purse-strings that bribe politicians into collaboration and cuckery?

Granted, the term ‘white nationalism’ is a misnomer since whiteness transcends national boundaries. The Alt Right is for the preservation of distinct white nations with their particular heroes and histories, but it also calls on all whites in Old World and New World to develop another layer of consciousness because all whites, in yrs to come, will be met with the same challenges. After all, anti-white-ness in the US doesn’t discriminate among Scots-Irish, Polish-American, German-American, Italian-American, and etc. They are all seen as part of ‘evil white privilege’. And the invasion of Europe will not spare any nation. Globalists are not content to flood only Sweden and France. They also target Poland and Hungary. And the local elites, eager to win approval and prizes from Glob Central, do the bidding of George Soroses of the world.

Consider the evolution of Jewish consciousness in the Modern World. Though there were Jewish networks all over the world, many diaspora Jews felt little affinity with other Jews. Many Western European Jews sought to assimilate and snubbed Eastern European Jews as vulgar, uncouth, and ill-mannered(like how the refined Anglo elites felt about loud-mouthed braggart Hitler). And European Jews felt little in common with Middle East Jews. And American Jews and Russian Jews went separate ways in their ideologies and strategies. So, what finally brought all those Jews together? One might say the Shoah, but it was really Zionism. It was Zionism that became the focal point of Jewish identity and power. Even though Jews in NY have the most power, Jews in Israel have the most prestige, and Israel was founded as a homeland for ALL Jews regardless of their national backgrounds: Polish, German, Russian, Hungarian, Iranian, Syrian, Yemenese, Egyptian, etc.

Alt Right is not opposed to ethno-nationalism, but it believes white people now need something extra. In the US, whites of all ethnic backgrounds share whiteness as the focal point, just like blacks rally around blackness as they’ve lost their tribal links to Africa. Unlike in the US, whites in Europe mainly identified along ethno-national lines, and this was a plus and a minus. It was a plus in that Europeans retained a deeper sense of roots and heritage. It was a minus in preventing Europeans to pull together their resources to develop into a great world power. After all, WWI , WWII, and Cold War were about divisions among Europeans leading to self-destruction or mutual distrust.
In this time in history, all Europeans face the common threat of massive Third World Invasion. Just like all Christian Europeans felt compelled to put their ethnic & sectarian differences aside and unite in their fight against the Ottoman Turks, Europeans today must realize that all of them face the same threat from both Jewish globalist elites and the Third World. (The one time all Greeks were most united was when faced with the Persian invasion. Even Athenians and Spartans united as fellow Greeks against foreign invasion.)
Jews and their cuck-collaborators have undermined national identity — globalists say anyone can be a ‘New European’ — , and Third World masses aim to colonize Europe and feed on white-wealth-as-beached-whale.
It is in times like this that all Europeans must realize that they are not only members of a nation but members of a race and continent facing the same doom and demise if they fail to unite as a people.