Jewish Facebook to Ban White Nationalism. Imperialism Hates Nationalism — Then, It’s No Wonder Why Jewish Imperialism Hates, Defames, & Attacks White Nationalism, aka White National Liberation

http://www.unz.com/anepigone/black-nationalism-a-reaction-to-americas-institutionalized-white-supremacy/

Black nationalism’s alleged hatred for whites is described as a “predictable reaction to white supremacy” while its reported antipathy towards Jews isn’t quasi-rationalized in a similar manner.

I can accept the justification of black nationalism as a reaction to white imperialism that conquered the Americas and shipped over slaves from Africa.

Nationalism has been a reaction to Imperialism, and for most of modern history, whites were the leading imperialists. Granted, white imperialism led to great discoveries, integrated the entire world, spread knowledge far and wide, inspired revolutions, and created vast new wealth & opportunities.
But it was also destructive and devastating to many peoples and cultures on every continent.

Naturally, the weaker peoples whose lands, cultures, and autonomy are threatened or crushed by an imperialist power are going to move into nationalist mode to defend and preserve what they have. That much the whole world must respect of all nationalisms.

As blacks were under white imperialist domination in the US, it’s understandable that there was a movement to define, preserve, and protect blackness as something other than a tool of the white power structure. Black nationalism was one aspect of this struggle by blacks to define their own identity and history.

But times change. White Imperialism came to be usurped by Jews around the time of the End of the Cold War. In time, the US became less a superpower nation than a super-colony or super-puppet of an even greater power, the Empire of Judea, a worldwide network. And this Jewish supremacist imperialist power has been compelling white people to participate in Judeo-centric hegemonic ventures to destroy Russia & Iran, wage Wars for Israel, support Israel’s eradication of all vestiges of Palestinian nationhood, and etc. Because the dominant world power is now Jewish Imperialism, we need white nationalism or, more precisely, white national liberation movement to break free from this supremacist bondage.
The world may regard white Americans as having immense power and wealth, and it is true that many white Americans have much more of everything than most peoples of the world. Still, there are even greater powers over the power. Just like prosperous Japan and Western Europe, despite their great wealth and considerable power, are under the thumb of the even more powerful USA, prosperous white Americans, despite being the most successful and powerful gentile group in America, are under the thumb of even more powerful Jews. Just because someone or some people are rich and powerful doesn't mean that they are dominant and independent. It's all relative. The rich and powerful have to be mindful of those who are even richer and more powerful. Donald Trump is a very rich man but nothing compared to true oligarchs like Sheldon Adelson and others. Also, the power of the President isn't much compared to the combined force of the Deep State and its connections in Media and Courts.

It has been a Constant in History: Imperialism hates all nationalisms except for its own(in certain cases). British Empire promoted British nationalism and patriotism but crushed the nationalist aspirations of subject peoples. It said NO to Indian nationalism, even resorting to ruthless means on occasion to suppress it. French empire suppressed Vietnamese and Algerian nationalisms, and it took prolonged bloody wars for the French Empire to finally recede from those parts.
Feudal Japan found itself in nationalist mode when threatened by British and American imperialism, but as it modernized into a major power(and was accepted into the imperialist club as ‘honorary whites’), the Japanese made imperialist moves on continental Asia. Japanese empire did all it could do to suppress Chinese and Korean nationalism(and then Filipino and Vietnamese nationalism as the empire expanded). Nazi Empire trampled on Polish and Czech nationalism and sought to crush Russia nationalism. Soviet Imperialism suppressed Polish and Hungarian nationalism.

Hungarian National Liberationist Uprising against Soviet Imperialism. It was also a rebellion against Jewish Communists who'd been installed by Stalin.

Imperialism hates all nationalisms except for its own(in certain cases). Roman imperialists ruthlessly suppressed Jewish nationalism. Of course, Romans took pride in Roman power and glory, but non-Romans had to suppress their own pride of identity and instead serve & honor Rome as the metropole of the empire. Soviet Empire was somewhat different because it suppressed Russian nationalism along with other nationalisms… though, over time, Russian national component of the empire did come to the fore.

Why do Jews hate white nationalism? Jews vehemently conflate white nationalism with white supremacism, but that’s mostly BS. White nationalism has actually been far less aggressive than White imperialist Liberalism. Throughout American history, white nationalism emphasized America’s need to mind its own borders and affairs(at least once the continent was taken and tamed). It was white liberalism and white progressivism that wanted to expand and dominate the world. Since late 19th century, US began to shift increasingly into imperialist mode as all the US continent was united and settled. White Imperialism came to dominate over white nationalism. But because the world was dominated by great European empires, American imperialism pretended to be for self-determination for all nations. In truth, American imperialism was only trying to invalidate existing empires so that it would gain hegemony over the ‘liberated’ nations. The US defeated the Spanish Empire in the name of liberating its exploited subjects, but the US essentially acted as the New Boss in Cuba and Philippines.
However, sour feelings after the failure of the world order in the aftermath of World War I made Americans look inward. For a time, it seemed as 'isolationism' would prevail over 'expansionism'. Then, the double whammy of WWII and the Cold War turned the US into a full-fledged world empire, though in counterbalance to another empire, the ‘evil’ one of the Soviets.

With the end of the Cold War, US could have retreated from imperialism and minded its own business, but the business opportunities of Free Trade and spectacular rise of Jewish power changed all that. Jews preferred expanded imperialist-globalism over nationalism because Jewish power owes more to horizontal networks around the world than vertical elite-mass unity in any nation(except in Israel). The main loyalty of Jews was to the Network, the Empire of Judea, than to the US or any particular nation(except Israel). As Jews gained dominant power in the US, the so-called lone superpower essentially became a colony of the Jewish Empire, like India was the Jewel in the Crown of the British Empire.

Precisely because Jews don’t have the numbers, they need gentile support and obeisance to Jewish supremacist imperialist power. And among all the goyim, whites are most crucial because they are most numerous, capable, and talented. Jews may be the overlords, but they need white managers, engineers, generals, negotiators, lawmen, and etc. to do the heavy lifting to keep the empire going. But the ONLY WAY to ensure that whites will do as told is IF they are denied white identity and white nationalism, aka white agency. After all, if whites think as white nationalists, they will focus on ‘what is good for whites in our white nation’ than serve the identity and interests of another people(especially one that feels so much hatred and contempt toward whites). They will be less likely to support Jewish supremacist agendas around the world such as hatred toward Russia, Iran, Syria, and endless Wars for Israel. And this is why Jewish Imperialism must suppress white nationalism or white national liberation. Nationalism tends to be rebellious, defiant, and uppity against the empire, especially if it’s of an alien people.
Imperialism hates all nationalisms except for its own(in certain cases). Jews love Zionism and Israeli nationalism. Jews love to promote and glorify Jewish identity(as synonymous with nobility). Jews, who’d once been nationalist resisters against Roman imperialism in ancient times, are now the New Romans, and they regard whites as the ‘new Jews’ to suppress and control(or threaten to destroy and scatter to the winds if they disobey Jewish Neo-Roman power).
Just like Jewish Imperialism can’t abide by Palestinian nationalism, it can’t tolerate white nationalism. Both threaten Jewish imperialist hegemony, the Jew World Order. Palestinians in West Bank demand independence from Zionist Imperialist Occupation. And white nationalists want white liberation and emancipation from Jewish imperialist globalism. White national liberationists want OUT from the globo-homo empire and more Wars for Israel. This is what Jews fear. This is why Jews smear white nationalism as ‘white supremacism’ when, if anything, it is anti-supremacist in its call for collective white disobedience to Jewish Imperialism. What Jews really want is for white cuck-collaborators to keep supporting Jewish imperialist hegemony around the world. Jews are projecting their own supremacism onto white nationalists. But then, Jews, who'd created Israel through use of extensive terror, blame Palestinians as a race of terrorists. (It's also interesting that, even as Jewish Imperialists deny agency to white collaborators, they blame whites for everything wrong in the world as if whites are the ONLY ONES with agency. Even the disaster of the Iraq War was dumped entirely on gentiles Dick Cheney and George W. Bush by Jewish Hollywood in VICE. Just pretend it was War for Oil than War for Israel.)


Now, why are Jews okay with black or non-white nationalism in the US? Because they don’t really see it as a threat. Black nationalism is mostly angry noise. Browns are too mediocre to gain dominant power. Yellows hardly exhibit any nationalist sentiment in the West. (If anything, they are more likely to stick up for other peoples such as Jews, blacks, homos, or blurred mass called 'immigrants'. Even though the US has gotten incredibly diverse as the result of mass-immigration-invasion, only a few identities matter, and most groups rally around those few tent-pole groups who happen to be Jews, blacks, and Homos, aka the Holy Three.) Besides, Jewish Empire relies far less on black ability and talent. While black success in sports and music is very profitable to Jews, it is white talent and ability that are crucial in managing and running the Empire as engine and warship. So, it is far more important for Jews to make whites submit and obey.

Also, black nationalism can be used to guilt-bait or morally condemn whites for past history. White guilt paralyzes white pride, and an ashamed people are more likely to cuck. Indeed, even as imperialism generally hates nationalisms, it may tactically support one nationalism against another nationalism(deemed a bigger threat) or a rival empire. It’s like the Empire of Judea is supportive of Ukrainian nationalism against Russian nationalism(which is seen as a bigger obstacle to total Jewish world hegemony). Jews regard black nationalism as akin to Ukrainian nationalism. A useful tool for the moment against white identity and pride. (Jews do fear black nationalism in South Africa however because blacks are the overwhelming majority and can burn down the entire system if things get out of hand, especially in opposition to Jewish economic imperialism. One problem with black national liberation is that, once the imperialists are gone, blacks are unable to run or build an economy of their own.) Remember that Japanese imperialism supported Manchurian nationalism(through puppet 'emperor' Puyi) against Chinese nationalism that began to resist Japan and demand the return of  Manchuria.

Now, was there a history of white nationalism that was supremacist? In a way, yes, but it was still less belligerent and dangerous than white liberal imperialism and Jewish imperialism. White nationalist rule in the past did treat non-whites as second-class citizens or worse, BUT white nationalism had a limiting effect on the despoilment of America by the Whole World. By limiting immigration mostly to whites, American Indians lost their land mainly only to Europeans(and to blacks brought over by whites). Had America not been white nationalist and allowed open door immigration from the very outset, American Indians would have lost all their lands to all the world in no time. And much more of nature would have been destroyed. White nationalists did defeat and conquer the indigenous folks, but their noble race-ism still allowed some space for Indians and their narrative.
Furthermore, white nationalist race-ism served as a check on black biological supremacism and imperialism. As blacks were brought as slaves, they were socially oppressed by whites. But because of their superior muscle power, greater natural aggression, rowdier butt energy, and bigger dongs, they could easily become biological imperialists and supremacists over the weaker white race. In a state of nature, blacks will dominate over whites. If you take 200 whites and 200 blacks and strip them naked and put them on an island, blacks will beat up white guys and hump white girls. So, white race-ism and nationalism against blacks were both supremacist and defensive against black natural supremacism.


Anyway, the most destructive, evil, and venal power in the world today is Jewish Imperialism. Look what it did to Russia in the 90s. Look at its spread of demented globo-homomania. Look at its Wars that leveled so many nations in Middle East and North Africa. Look at its economic destruction of Iran. Look at its demographic policies against US and EU. Look at how it makes white soldiers wreck Muslim nations and then pushes Muslims into the West. Look at how it spreads anti-white hatred in media and academia and Hollywood. Look at how the Sacklers acted like Sassoons who sold opium to the Chinese.

Indeed, if white nationalists could pry themselves free of Jewish imperialism, the world would be a much nicer place. After all, without white cuck-collaboration with Jewish imperialist power, Jewish power and influence would do far less harm to the world. Suppose if whites(in national liberationist mode) had said NO to all these imperialist Wars for Israel. Middle East would be in one piece, and millions would have been spared death and displacement into other nations(esp in the West). And, there could be justice for Palestinians finally. US would not be in another ridiculous and immoral ‘cold war’ with Russia. And back in the 90s, the US(one that is free of Jewish power) might have been constructive and helpful toward Russia than merely rapacious as the ‘shock doctrine’ turned out to be the shylock doctrine of looting the entire economy to enrich the Tribe. Anglo-elites were somewhat more honorable than Jewish elites.
The world should welcome white nationalist liberation from Jewish Globalist Imperialism like the world celebrated the national liberation of India from the British Empire. 'Ding Dong, the witch is dead.' To Jews, a white national liberationist who refuses conscription into the Jewish Empire is like an uppity slave who says NO. He must be whipped. White National Liberationists must say “Hell No, We won’t go” and “Globalists suck, we won’t cuck.”


But then, the reason why so many in the non-white world participate with Jewish Imperialism against white nationalism is because white nationalism says “We want our white nations to remain white”, whereas Jewish imperialism says, “We will hand out free tickets to you non-whites to come to white nations IF you, as ‘new Europeans’ or ‘new Americans’, support OUR agenda.” Non-whites will do ANYTHING to come to richer and nicer white nations. So, they collaborate with Jewish Imperialism in the demographic imperialism against the West. Non-whites want access to white riches and to have sex with fairer whites. Black African males want white women, and Asian females want white men.

Imperialism produces resisters but also collaborators. When the British empire ruled quarter of the world, many Hindus and Chinese took advantage of Anglo hegemony to spread out across the globe for business opportunities. Most people will do JUST ABOUT ANYTHING for whatever that improves their lives materially. Materialism often trumps tribalism.

Paul Gottfried’s Opposition to White Nationalism as Basis for Conservatism/Rightism.

Paul Gottfried, formerly a mentor to Richard Spencer, has remarked ‘white nationalism’ shouldn’t be the basis for the New Right. Gottfried argues that white identity doesn’t have a thematic history in Conservatism. Rather, it is an artificial made-up category, like ‘black nationalism’ in America when, in fact, no such thing as ‘black identity’ existed in Sub-Saharan Africa where people identified along tribal or clan lines than on racial ones. After all, it was blacks who enslaved other blacks and sold them to Arabs or European slave-traders.
Gottfried argues that Rightism in the West has essentially been about Christian values, ethno(as opposed to racial)nationalism, heritage & memory, traditionalism, and culture. In contrast, the notion of racial identity is a radical departure from everything that was genuinely traditional on the Right. Ramzpaul the Youtube personality has also repeatedly said that Europeans don’t identity by race but by narrower categories of ethno-national identity, e.g. Hungarians don’t see Romanians and Russians as their ‘brothers’ on the basis of race.

It was in America that race became a group identity. If black Africans had been divided along tribal or clan lines, black Americans developed a common racial identity based on skin color, genetics, shared historical experience as slaves and second-class citizens. Thus, the identity of race in America, especially among blacks, came to be associated with anti-conservatism. Blacks united to resist and destroy the system that ensured white superiority over blacks. Yet, black movement was paradoxical in that it was about black racial unity whose stated goal was to fight ‘racism’. Officially at least, blacks didn’t come together to favor blacks or uphold narrow black interests. It was to overcome the notion of race so that all Americans will be judged by ‘content of their character than the color of their skin’. So, the Civil Rights Movement was both a black racial movement and an anti-racial movement. Its goals were to break down white racial privileges so that all races could live under equal justice under the law. But if such were its ultimate mission, was the Civil Rights Movement anti-black as well as anti-white? And this issue was the basis for the divide between figures like MLK and figures like Elijah Muhammad & Malcolm X. MLK and his cohorts argued for ultimate integration and assimilation of white and black. In contrast, Muhammad and X argued for black identity and black nationalism as the ultimate objective of black politics. Both sides agreed on the need to resist white power, but one side wanted to merge with white community on the basis(at least officially) of color-blindness whereas the other side wanted to create a separate realm of black power in body and soul. To be sure, even the assimilationist and integrationist blacks could never let go of their racial identity, and their politics became one of race-baiting ‘whitey’. Still, MLK and his values were esteemed by both white and black integrationists as the shining ideal for a color-blind society. Even race-specific Affirmative Action has been rationalized, at least officially, as remedial than racially permanent, i.e. it is to ultimately end when blacks have caught up to white standards.

Anyway, there was an element of black identity in both black integrationists and black separatists. But neither side was associated with American Conservatism. Even black nationalists, despite their racial consciousness(and even black-supremacist tendencies), were seen as the enemy of the American Right. Malcolm X has always been more revered on the Left despite his black racialism.
As for black integrationists, black identity politics was always implicit and even explicit at times. Still, they spoke the words of Christianity, Social Justice, and Universal Progress than black nationalist politics. On those grounds, Paul Gottfried is right that racial consciousness has not been a powerful factor on the American Right? What about the KKK and Neo-Nazis? The KKK was not about white identity but about Southern Anglo-Protestant interests against perceived threats from blacks and eventually Jews. Religion and Cultural heritage were just as important as race, and KKK’s racialism didn’t reach out to white ethnics. If anything, the Southern Anglos of KKK were opposed to mass immigration from non-northern-European nations. They didn’t feel a broad white identity with the entirety of the white race. As for Neo-Nazis, they never amounted to anything in America despite the huge German-American population. They hardly mattered to the core themes of American Conservatism that were centered on religion, heritage, economic policy, family values, and anti-communism.

Therefore, Paul Gottfried finds the notion of race-based ‘radical traditionalism’ on the Alt Right a meaningless idea. He just doesn’t see white racial identity as part of any traditionalism in the West. There was a heavy dose of radical racism in National Socialism, but it was not a traditionalist movement. It was racially radical than traditional, especially as it was about a bunch of ‘Aryan’ whites at war mostly with other ethnic groups of whites. So, where is the history of white identity as part of traditionalist Right in America and Europe?

Gottfried makes much good sense, and it’s true enough that the term ‘radical traditionalism’ is a willful oxymoron. However, the rise of White Racial Identity may be more viable in the future due to common threats faced by ALL whites in both the Old World and New World. New crises birth new consciousness. What had been implicit or irrelevant suddenly seem essential and meaningful. Contexts change consciousness. Consider the notion of Asian-American interests in the US. In Asia, there is no such thing as united or common Asian interests. Japanese, Chinese, Koreans, Vietnamese, Thais, Malays, etc. don’t see eye to eye on much. Each think more in terms of national identity rooted in history, culture, and religion. However, when these groups come to the US, they all find themselves to be minorities and suddenly a shared Asian Identity gains meaning... just like shared common black racial identity gained meaning in the US because all blacks, regardless of their tribal origins, experienced the same story of slave ancestry and dream of emancipation. In black Africa, blacks didn’t have to think about ‘blackness’ since everyone was black. It was a given. And blacks were the only people that most blacks knew. Most black Africans had never seen a white man or non-black. They thought their little world was the entire world and all peoples were black. So, it made no sense for black unity. Black unity against what? Rather, it made more sense to belong to one tribe of blacks against other tribes of blacks. In contrast, blacks in America were faced with the power of whites. Since there was another race that had power over them, blacks couldn’t help but develop BLACK racial consciousness. Likewise, Asian-American identity that unites various Asian groups makes sense in America because they all constitute yellowness in contrast to other races. This is also true of today's American Indians. Prior to the arrival of the white man, notion such as 'Native American' or 'indigenous people' made no sense to Indians. They had no concept of any world beyond their own, and their world was about constant warfare among various hunting tribes. Their core identity was tribal, not 'Indian'. It was the threat posed by whites that gradually led to a common Indian consciousness even though Indians failed to form a united front against the white man(and other immigrant groups heralded by imperialist Emma Lazarus). Today, separate 'Native American' tribes remain and preserve their cultures, but there is also a shared and common sense of Indian-ness among them all since they have the shared experience as indigenous peoples who got defeated by the same enemy: Pale Face and Lazarus' Immigrant-Invaders.
Whether such consciousness is ‘left’ or ‘right’ is ultimately irrelevant. Because the ‘left’ is usually associated with minority interests, even non-white racial interest and tribalism will often be associated with the Left. In contrast, because white majority power is associated with conservatism, even anti-racial white libertarians who call for color-blindness will be associated with the Right. The point is racial consciousness depends on racial context. If America were to suddenly become an all-white nation, racial identity would be moot. What would be the point of discussing race when all Americans are white? The dividing factors in politics will be economic theory, religion, social values, or ethnicity than race, e.g. Polish-American vs Italian-American vs Irish-American. It’s like air. We don’t think about it because it is freely and abundantly available to all. But suppose air were to become scarce and had to be rationed to people for survival. We would all be air-conscious in debates over which groups should receive more air.

For most of American History, white dominance was a given. Whites had power over non-whites. And when ‘too many’ non-whites, such as Chinese, seemed to be arriving, immigration was shut down. So, whites could take White America for granted. Even when the 1965 Immigration Act passed, most white Americans didn’t much care since they only knew a white-dominant America and couldn’t conceive of an America that would eventually become white-minority. Whites were like the Hare in the race against the Tortoise. The Hare, so certain of its victory over the slow tortoise, couldn't even conceive of losing. Hares are faster than tortoises, so hares will naturally win. True enough IF the hare finishes the race. But it just took a nap and the tortoise passed it by.

Anyway, we live in different times, and white consciousness will have to grow in both the US and Europe. White Americans can no longer take their majority status for granted. Non-white colonization is out of control, and PC has mentally colonized countless white minds into welcoming the Great Replacement. And things are changing in Europe too. When Europe used to be virtually all white, it made little sense to unite over whiteness. What was the point when everyone was white? So, the divisions were over ethnicity, religion, ideology, or sense of heritage or historical narrative. But with the rapid rise of non-white populations all across Europe, various European groups are waking up to their shared white-Europeanness and feeling the urgency to work together to beat back the tide. Also, when EU now says even Africans and Arabs are ‘Europeans’ or ‘New Europeans’, race will come to matter more. In the past, to be German meant that you had German ancestry and blood. Now, an Iranian, African, Turk, or Pakistani can be ‘German’. In a nation like Poland or Hungary, national identity still has meaning as the basis of identity & unity since most Poles are ethnic Poles and most Hungarians are ethnic Hungarians. But today, being ‘German’ is increasingly meaningless since Germans with German blood must regard masses of invaders as ‘New Germans’. Germans are to believe that an African ‘German’ or Arabic ‘German’ has more in common with European-Germans than Poles and Russians have with Germans. Since national identity has been rendered meaningless, there is only race left as the unifying theme for Europeans. After all, even if PC argues a black African is a Frenchman, Englishman, or German, it cannot and will not argue that he is a white person. Thus, race is the only thing that can resist PC’s redefinition of national identities.

With the increasing browning of Europe and North America(and Australia), white people will realize that their race has to be the core tenet of their identity. Only when the West is once again made all white can there be meaningful national identities and divisions among whites based on religion, culture, and history. In nations like France, UK, Sweden, and Germany, national identity no longer makes sense. Today, French have to believe that millions of Africans and Muslims are fellow Frenchmen. British whites have to embrace tons of Pakistani Muslims as fellow Englishmen. Swedish have to welcome countless Somalis as fellow Swedes. National identity used to be associated with ethnicity. It is no longer. It is now just an ‘idea'. Jews first turned Americanism into an abstract ideal and then exported this notion to Europe. Western Europe has been thoroughly Judeo-Americanized. Eastern Europe resists, but for how long when the Western side holds all the purse-strings that bribe politicians into collaboration and cuckery?

Granted, the term ‘white nationalism’ is a misnomer since whiteness transcends national boundaries. The Alt Right is for the preservation of distinct white nations with their particular heroes and histories, but it also calls on all whites in Old World and New World to develop another layer of consciousness because all whites, in yrs to come, will be met with the same challenges. After all, anti-white-ness in the US doesn’t discriminate among Scots-Irish, Polish-American, German-American, Italian-American, and etc. They are all seen as part of ‘evil white privilege’. And the invasion of Europe will not spare any nation. Globalists are not content to flood only Sweden and France. They also target Poland and Hungary. And the local elites, eager to win approval and prizes from Glob Central, do the bidding of George Soroses of the world.

Consider the evolution of Jewish consciousness in the Modern World. Though there were Jewish networks all over the world, many diaspora Jews felt little affinity with other Jews. Many Western European Jews sought to assimilate and snubbed Eastern European Jews as vulgar, uncouth, and ill-mannered(like how the refined Anglo elites felt about loud-mouthed braggart Hitler). And European Jews felt little in common with Middle East Jews. And American Jews and Russian Jews went separate ways in their ideologies and strategies. So, what finally brought all those Jews together? One might say the Shoah, but it was really Zionism. It was Zionism that became the focal point of Jewish identity and power. Even though Jews in NY have the most power, Jews in Israel have the most prestige, and Israel was founded as a homeland for ALL Jews regardless of their national backgrounds: Polish, German, Russian, Hungarian, Iranian, Syrian, Yemenese, Egyptian, etc.

Alt Right is not opposed to ethno-nationalism, but it believes white people now need something extra. In the US, whites of all ethnic backgrounds share whiteness as the focal point, just like blacks rally around blackness as they’ve lost their tribal links to Africa. Unlike in the US, whites in Europe mainly identified along ethno-national lines, and this was a plus and a minus. It was a plus in that Europeans retained a deeper sense of roots and heritage. It was a minus in preventing Europeans to pull together their resources to develop into a great world power. After all, WWI , WWII, and Cold War were about divisions among Europeans leading to self-destruction or mutual distrust.
In this time in history, all Europeans face the common threat of massive Third World Invasion. Just like all Christian Europeans felt compelled to put their ethnic & sectarian differences aside and unite in their fight against the Ottoman Turks, Europeans today must realize that all of them face the same threat from both Jewish globalist elites and the Third World. (The one time all Greeks were most united was when faced with the Persian invasion. Even Athenians and Spartans united as fellow Greeks against foreign invasion.)
Jews and their cuck-collaborators have undermined national identity — globalists say anyone can be a ‘New European’ — , and Third World masses aim to colonize Europe and feed on white-wealth-as-beached-whale.
It is in times like this that all Europeans must realize that they are not only members of a nation but members of a race and continent facing the same doom and demise if they fail to unite as a people.