How Negrolatry or Afromania among Silly Whites parallels the Transformation of Worship from Pagan Cults to Judaism to Christianity — The Problems of White Psychristianity — Nature vs Nurture in the God-Myth

BASIC FACTS ABOUT RACE IN 13 MINUTES - American Renaissance

The history of the transition from paganism to Old Testament to New Testament is instructive in an understanding of how whites came to bow down to Negrolatry.

Though there were many kinds of paganism, the pagan gods weren't generally high on the moral scale. Some were downright cruel and murderous, like the gods of the Aztecs. Human sacrifice was also practiced by certain paganists of Ancient Near East. Pagans feared and worshiped power for power's sake. Their spiritual vision was far from moral. It was all about might. The gods were like the forces of nature. Floods, earthquakes, volcanos, drought, pestilence, and etc. Good or bad, it didn't matter. It was fearsome and frightening. Nature could be on your side or against your side. All you could hope for was good fortune. Hopefully, nature will favor you, and you had to do whatever necessary to earn those favors. As gods controlled nature(or nature = gods), you had to pay them tribute. It could even be in the form of ritual human sacrifice if indeed it was deemed the only way to placate and appease the gods. Gods were powerful. They were the forces behind or within nature. It was presumptuous of man to expect, let alone demand, that gods be moral and caring about feeble and flawed mankind. Gods were gods, super-beings of great power. And they did as they pleased, and the most mankind could hope for was easing their wrath(or direct it at enemy tribes). Maybe then, the gods won't kick your butt too badly. Maybe the gods will spare your kind and take out their fury on some other hapless tribe. Paganism was spiritual nihilism. Might was right.

Then arose the Jewish religion(as well as other religions that sought to morally justify, as well as bind, the spiritual forces). It winnowed the spiritual realm into the universe of one God. Judaism went even beyond 'holocausting' all the other gods. Instead of Yahweh prevailing over all other gods, vanquishing them into extinction, it argued there was never any other god than the one and only God. So, all other gods never existed. They were false, figment of the imagination, whereas Yahweh was the one true God from(or before the) beginning. Jewish Spirituality was a revolution in thought. At once, it elevated the conception of God to levels unknown to mankind. The Jewish God wasn't just the one and only God but the all-powerful and all-knowing God. Among pagan gods, some were more powerful than others but no god was all-powerful and all-knowing. But the Jewish God was the one supreme being. Jews made their God into a singularity, more powerful than all the other conceptions of gods combined. And yet, Jews also hamstrung their God more than any other people did. By moralizing their God as not only all-powerful and all-knowing but good and wise, the end-result was God that was allergic to the nihilistic temptation of might-is-right.

So, even though the Jewish God was more powerful than any god imagined before, He couldn't even demand that Abraham kill the kid. Sure, as the one and only God, it was His right to demand that Abraham sacrifice Isaac. But, if He'd really made Abraham carry out the blood ritual, He would have revealed Himself as no different from the pagan gods. So, the Jewish God was at once the lone superpower of the spiritual realm and morally owned by the Jews. (In a way, Jews played a similiar mind trick on the Anglos. Jews flattered the Anglos as not only the mightiest people in the world but also the noblest. Thus, Anglos were goaded into believing their great power must be morally justified, especially in Jewish eyes. Their might had to be right. Of course, what constituted 'good' in Jewish eyes was on the basis of "Is it good for Jews?" As Anglos became ever so mindful of Jewish sensitivities, their godlike power came to cuck to Jewish agendas, whereupon Jews eventually took over as the new gods.")

Even though Jews moralized spirituality and conceived of the one and only God(who is not only all-powerful and all-knowing but all-wise and all-just), God of the Old Testament retained some of the darker characteristics of the cruel pagan gods. The ever-fluctuating Jewish concept of God ranged from wise, caring, and compassionate TO cruel, ruthless, and murderous. Jewish God seemed to be kind of schizoid. Too often, His wrath seemed unbalanced and disproportionate to the crime of the wrongdoers. Or, his violence seemed arbitrary as far as the human mind could fathom.

Also, there was a seemingly insurmountable contradiction within the Jewish moral conception of God. On the one hand, Jews praised Him as the all-powerful, all-knowing, all-wise, and entirely just Deity. On the other hand, they wanted Him to favor the Jews uber alles. One interpretation of the Covenant was that Jews would be favored by God if and only if they sincerely aspired to be BETTER than other peoples. In other words, Jews would strive to be wiser, fairer, and more moral than other peoples, thereby deserving the special blessing of God. This was the kindlier take on the Covenant. But, there was another interpretation that implied God would/should favor the Jews uber alles simply because Jews got Jewish blood. At best, this was rank tribalism, and at worst a kind of supremacist nihilism.

At any rate, it was frustrating for Jews that despite the manner of their deeds, good or bad, they remained weak relative to other tribes. Was God holding back his full blessing because Jews weren't good enough? Or did God intend Jews to remain politically and militarily weak because their true destiny was to formulate a new kind of power that conquers souls with words than lands with swords? By developing their spirituality, Jews would master the art of survival despite their military setbacks. Thus, while other peoples that concentrated on physical conquest would rise to greatness with victory but fade into oblivion with defeat, Jewishness would outlast all of them because its essence was soul-bound to God regardless of victory or defeat in battle. It helped that the Jewish God couldn't be represented in idol form, which would have led to at least the symbolic desecration of His Being by the enemy's sword and hammer. It's harder to destroy a mystery than a representation. (On the other hand, mystery remains dark and anxiety-inducing.) Still, it was tough-going for Jews to be surrounded by empires far more powerful than their tribe. Even if Jews licked their wounded pride with self-assurance that they alone possessed the formula for survival and longevity, even a mere century seemed like forever to the people living in anxiety and turmoil.

When Jews prayed for the Messiah under Roman Occupation, they envisioned him to be a super-warrior-prophet who would vanquish the Romans(and all other enemies of Jews, as well as collaborator-Jews) and restore Jewish independence(and maybe even bring about Jewish hegemony). But, other Jews conceived of different possibilities, and one of these led to the birth of Christianity. In a way, the Warrior-Messiah template was fulfilled by Muhammad some 600 yrs later, but he was an Arab who, in his own way, universalized Hebraism(and its link with Hellenism via Christianity).

There has long been the Utopian dream of starting anew. A new beginning without the stain and imperfections. A kind of New Eden. Even God is tempted in this direction, as when He sent the flood to drown out the wicked so that humanity could begin again with the virtuous Noah and his family... but things went badly once again.
Some of the most radical firebrands in the modern era wanted a new beginning, a kind of Year Zero experiment. Reform and even moderate revolution weren't good enough because they tolerated too many of the Old Imperfections. Instead of eradicating all old evils and starting anew, reform took a gradualist approach upon a corrupted order and succumbed to reactionary pressures and opportunistic tendencies. Instead of cutting off the hand of the Devil, reformists shook it and contracted the disease of accommodation in the name of craven pragmatism.

Communism swore to stamp out the old and oppressive in one clean sweep and replace it with the new and just. It led to Stalinist collectivization, Maoist Cultural Revolution, and most frighteningly the Year Zero experiment in Cambodia. At the root of communist theory was the idea that one could not compromise with the Old Way. Social-Democrats were denounced for having succumbed to 'moderate' bourgeois temptations. Leninism and Maoism waged war not only on the evils of the Old but on the Old itself as an evil that must be eradicated in its entirety to make way for the New. (Granted, Classic Marxism wasn't so much an attack on the Old as on the New. It believed capitalism was doing an awesome job of eradicating the old way and making way for the new, except that its contradictions and imbalances couldn't possibly be the basis for a stable social order as too few would end up with too much at the expense of everyone else.)
The shining New Order needed not be grasped for in the dark. It was not something that would gradually come into view through trial and error, steps forwards and backwards. No, this New had already been envisioned in the mind of Karl Marx. Like Zeus's head birthed the full-grown Athena in her full glory, Marx had seen the Future, how it would happen and what it would be about. For this prophecy to be fulfilled, the Old(or the Bad New)simply had to make way for the New or the Good New(that would be premised on justice prophecy than on just profits). It wouldn't be yet another chapter in the customary historical process of the old constantly ceding to the new(which becomes the new old ceding to the new new and so on) but the end of the Old for good and beginning of the New forever. It would be the End of History and the Beginning of the Future.

But seeds of such thought were there in Christianity itself(though its Utopian vision was directed toward Heaven). It imagined God born anew. For Christians, the birth of Jesus was like spiritual Year Zero. Anno Domini. In a way, it was the human equivalent of what God had attempted with the Flood but in spiritual reverse. Mankind had proved to be a disappointment, and the Flood was meant to wipe out everyone but the good man Noah and his family so that humanity would have a new flowering without the weeds.
Likewise, God turned out to be a big disappointment for many Jews though, whereas it seemed only right for almighty God to air His grievances about man, it was unthinkable for man to do likewise about God. Why were the Jews so weak? Did God fail to live up to His end of the bargain? Or was the fault with the Jews? Besides, if Jews worship an all-wise and all-knowing God, why was the Torah so full of contradictions? Why are there so many suggestions of God's imperfections even though He is supposed to be perfect? Why does God have so many contrasting 'personalities'? How come the various great prophets disagree with one another as to the nature of God and His design for the Jews and mankind?

Of course, Jews couldn't admit that the fault was with God. They couldn't say it but they nevertheless felt it. There was something wrong with God, and there was too much contradictory and bewildering baggage in the Torah. If God failed to fix the world with the Flood and the new beginning with the good man(Noah), perhaps the answer was a new beginning with the good God. A Year Zero for spirituality. But how could Jews reject the Old God when He was the one and only God, the all-perfect and all-wise Being? That would have been blasphemous. The renegade Jews who comprised the Early Christians had an idea. How about the Son of God? Even though the Narrative is that He suffers and dies for the sins of man, the crypto-narrative could be He does penance for the sins of His Father. Such can't be said because God is supposed to be perfect. But if indeed the Old God is perfect, why a need for the Son of God as the equal of God and the founder of a new religion? Why a need for the face of God(in human form) who heretofore didn't have a face to show to mankind? Ultimately, Abram was spared from having to sacrifice his son, but according to Christianity, God had to sacrifice His Son to bring about the New Faith, the ultimate one, and the Redemption. But only of man or of God Himself as well? Upon closer examination, the Jesus Narrative is about penance of both man and God.

Via creation of the Jesus Myth, spiritual Year Zero could conceive of God without the old baggage. Unlike the Old Prophets who consulted the Jewish Tradition and History to grasp God's meanings & intentions and build upon earlier wisdom(or delusions), the new prophecy of early Christians would be written on a blank slate. The newly birthed (Son of)God could be all about love, peace, and forgiveness, conceived of only the highest virtues and in a manner far more consistent than the Old Testament narrative. He would signify the end of the Old Covenant that bound volatile God to the troublesome history of the Jews. The New Covenant wouldn't be bound to any history or custom. It would be based on Faith and purity of heart and open to all mankind. Jews were so fearful of their God. God was good and just but also ruthless and terrifying. God was a helping hand but also a clenched fist. The Messiah of Christianity had bleeding hands. Christ, having felt the fleshly pain and suffering of mankind, would understand. He would be of a bleeding heart(though not the sappy kind of the 'liberals'). Furthermore, there would be not one but two Year Zero narratives around Jesus. His birth in Bethlehem heralding a new promise and the Resurrection where He would defeat death and enter into the Kingdom of Heaven.

This way, mankind could hope for a more humane and loving God. Jews believed God existed before the world, long before the First Man, who only came into existence through the will of God. God created the world and always exerted a patriarchal and masterful authority over humanity. So, it wasn't the role of mankind or the Jews to mold God's nature. God molded them, and mankind could only hope to understand God a little better.
But with Christianity, mankind could nurse Christ-as-baby in their arms. Mankind could have a parental role over Christ as starchild. Mankind could mold Jesus in His formative years. Jesus, though God by nature, was Man by nurture. (Moses spent his formative years as an Egyptian but as a man turned full-Jew and destroyed many an Egyptian. In contrast, though Jesus would come to realize He is God than mere man, He would forever feel indebted to the good people who loved, nurtured, and taught Him.) Mankind, in imagining its role in the maturation and education of Jesus, could assure themselves that the Son of God as the new face of God would be fundamentally different from the Old God of the Torah who was unpredictable like the weather. Jesus would be more like the weatherman looking out for mankind.

Now, what can this teach us about the development of Negrolatry in the West? First, we must acknowledge that even modern secular white folks still think and feel in terms of Idolatry and 'psychristianity'. Even if no longer religious, a part of them is into idol-worship of all things thrilling & titillating(especially as modern culture is mostly about sports and youthful enthusiasm, with most people growing older not with pride of wisdom but resignation to irrelevance), while another part cannot shake off the guilt-complexes and redemption narratives inherited from Christianity that governed Europe for over a millennium. Also, Northern European Protestant types have long been craving for Idolatry or at least iconography that had been purged from their culture in rejection of semi-pagan Catholicism. At least German Protestants compensated for their lack of spiritual color with the power of music. Anglo-Protestants were especially vulnerable to the temptations of Negrolatry because of the dryly literary insistence of their culture.

From the white perspective, there are parallels between the developmental stages of Negrolatry AND the evolution of paganism into Jewish Religion and then the transformation of Judaism into Christianity, the universal faith, one that especially came to conquer/convert the white heathens of Europe. (From the black perspective, it could be they are aiming at something resembling Islam, a secular faith for whites where blacks-as-gods thrive less on kindly virtue than on fearsome power. If Black Muslims of the Nation of Islam seek racial separation[at least in theory], much of so-called Critical Race Theory or CRT is about whites worshiping and obeying blacks because blacks are good simply for being black.)

Like Ancient Religions and Cults, the crudest and most elemental forms of Negrolatry have to do with paganist fear-and-trembling before raw power, the might-is-right thing. This is Negrolatry #1. Before the emergence of higher moral/spiritual concepts and codes, mankind worshiped gods simply for their awesome power. Never mind right or wrong. Just bow down before the terrifying might that can smite your butt. No wonder so many tribes, in both Old World and New World, made human sacrifices to the gods. (Today, so many whites are willing to sacrifice so many whites and other non-blacks to appease the black gods. White victims are presented as sacrificial offerings to black thugs, criminals, leeches, and crooks via reduced sentencing or 'affirmative action'. Of course, stuff like BLM ends up killing more blacks due to reduced police presence, but the holy god of black egotism matters more than the mere flesh of black bodies riddled with bullets. This has to be seen as a kind of neo-human-sacrifice - https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/exclusive-lawsuit-filed-wake-forest-university-coach-killed-man-one-punch/ )

In a similar vein, Negrolatry in its most primitive form is about white awe of the bigass megaton Negro. Even in the old days when blacks were slaves in the South, whites noticed that 'dem ni**ers' could carry heavy loads and holler up a storm while picking cotton. It's like Ancient Folks held powerful animals in awe and even worshiped them: Hippos among Egyptians, bulls among Persians, and etc. Negro was beastly, and even though high spirituality is at the opposite spectrum of beastliness, spirituality initially grew out of worship of beastly power. Even as gods and God evolved into higher spiritual/moral conceptions, they could never lose the element of great power if they were to hold sway over mankind; indeed, the Jesus Narrative couldn't have become a religion without the Resurrection Myth as His Death would have signified ineffectiveness than the triumph of goodness. History of both man and god(s) is about power turning good than good gaining power. Power is always the first consideration. Most people admire bad power over good weakness, though they wish for the good-and-powerful. Admiration is reserved first for power, and then comes the wish for power to be just.

It's like the crude gods preceded the more complex gods in Greek mythology. It's like refined fuel originates from crude oil. And so much of pop music, despite their complexity and sophistication, draw their core energy from wailing/hollering blues and the like.
So, even though civilized white man considered black slaves to be of a beastly lesser race, that very beastliness also impressed the white man for its raw prowess. So, on some subconscious level, white man felt about the Negro like a primitive tribe about a volcano. It's like modern man, for all his collective power and dominion over nature, still feels a certain awe when pondering a bear, lion, rhino, elephant, or killer whale. Or a hurricane or earthquake. And kids feel awe about dinosaurs, especially the T-Rex.

But just like Jews moralized spirituality from a might-is-right cult to a right-is-might faith, there was another side to white man's formulation of Negrolatry. This was the foundation of Negrolatry #2. White do-gooders wanted to regard black soulfulness as akin to spiritual grace. Blacks in the South were like Jews in bondage in Egypt. They needed a Moses to lead them to the Promised Land. This Moses figure could be black(like Frederick Douglas and later MLK) or white(John Brown or Abraham Lincoln). The beastly was idealized as priestly. According to Negrolatry #2, blacks loved to sing-and-dance not because they are a bunch of savage jive-ass bunners but because their hearts are bursting with passion for freedom, equality, and dignity.
White folks, especially of Abolitionist bent, projected their own dreams and hopes onto the Negro. These Northern folks had little first hand knowledge of the jivers and their ghastly racial nature. But they knew a lot about the Bible and projected Biblical narratives upon the Negro. Of course, the South also consulted the Bible to justify slavery. They said Ham saw his father Noah naked, and God punished him by turning him into a Negro condemned to slavery under other races.
Jews, yet to develop a universalist mentality that came with 'emancipation' of their own(in Europe), were okay with the Southern explanation as to why blacks should pick cotton for whites(and Jews). It was because Ham saw Noah naked. But the fanatical Christian Abolitionists in the North weren't satisfied with Old Testament explanations alone. They were into sanctimony and holier-than-thou-ness. And what better way to feel piety and self-righteousness than by denouncing slavery, especially of the Noble Negro? UNCLE TOM'S CABIN even has a Noble Negro as christ-like figure dying for the sins of white folks. Of course, sympathy for the Negro had an element of condescension as well. Many Northern whites thought it was bad enough to be Negro with dark skin, nappy hair, and fat lips. Why make it worse for such an unfortunate people by using them as slaves as well? Also, many whites in the North thought blacks would always remain childlike dependents and sidekicks of the white race. They had no idea they were lighting a powder keg full of gunpowder.

But UNCLE TOM'S CABIN notwithstanding, whites weren't ready to confer unto the Negro the role of Christ in the American Narrative between the Civil War Period to the Civil Rights Era. Rather, the road from slavery to freedom was deemed akin to the Exodus story, albeit one led by white saviors or White Moses, especially in the figure of Abe Lincoln. Whites, especially the do-goody types in the North, wanted to believe that Negroes had noble souls and would be grateful and use their freedom wisely. Many whites in the South thought otherwise for reasons of firsthand knowledge and/or prejudice. While many were bigoted against blacks for racial reasons, they also instinctively sensed that Negroes could abuse their newfound freedom by terrorizing white folks in a reversion to oogity jungle nature.

This phase of Negrolatry lasted roughly from the Civil War to the Civil Rights Movement. The latter made a difference in that MLK took on the mantle of Black Moses who would fulfill the unfinished project of the White Moses Abraham Lincoln. But, his death turned him from a dead moses to resurrected christ. Negro Narrative went from a struggle for freedom to stairway to heaven.

But then, there is a reason why whites so desperately cling to the Cult of the Black Christ or Blackrist. It somewhat akin to why some Jews deviated from the Old Religion to formulate a new one that became Christianity. God of the Jews seemed at once unstable and tempestuous AND indifferent and uncaring. He could suddenly send floods, pestilence, and disasters out of the blue. Or He could be silent and distant just when the Jews need Him most. The Jews who would become the Early Christians wanted a more consistent and principled God. Also, they wanted to feel His nearness and what better way than by imagining Him as the Son of God who lived among mankind, died, and was resurrected to be one with the Father, God Himself. It was more soothing to believe in the Christian God. While the God of Judaism was a high concept God, the Torah's spiritual vision spanned the development of gods from might-is-right to right-is-might, which is why God in the early part of the Old Testament resembles the deities of the frightful pagans. He even makes a pagan-like demand on Abraham to make a blood-sacrifice of his son, only to 'change' His mind at the last minute. Thus, God presented Himself to Abraham as a moral God. Even so, God in later parts of the Old Testament never quite shed the vestiges of terrifying pagan gods. One can never be certain with the Jewish God, as Job found out the hard way. Then, it's no wonder that certain Jews dreamed of the Year Zero God, the one who could be conceived almost from scratch with only the good qualities minus the torrid and terrifying aspects in the Torah.

There is a parallel between the renegade alt-Jews(who became the early Christians) and today's whites who dream of a Better-Blackness. They've been enthralled with black prowess and associated it with the Noble Negro Narrative... but blacks by and large haven't conformed to the Narrative, remaining ignoble or 'nignoble'. While black problems have been a tenaciously cursed element of American History, blacks were more or less kept in 'their place' until the 1960s. The South had Jim Crow laws. And the North had its own subtler means of keeping whites over here and blacks over there. There were all sorts of discrimination against blacks in the North and the West. Jews in Hollywood had their own ways of keeping the lid on blacks.
Because of white social pressures and political muscle, blacks had no choice but to at least pretend to be a 'credit to their race'. Of course, plenty of blacks were louts and thugs. Norman Podhoretz's essay on the Negro Problem shows that, even before the Civil Rights Movement and the riotous 60s, black thugs had been harassing, beating, and robbing non-blacks, Jews included. Still, white society, both liberal and conservative, had been overwhelmingly on the side of preserving white spaces denied to blacks and dealing with blacks as second-class citizens or a can-of-worms to be kicked into the future. With such odds stacked against them, blacks couldn't go totally crazy, and whites in their safe white spaces could cling to the dream of the Noble Negro doing his best and in need of white sympathy and support. The Civil War Narrative held that blacks were freed and were on the gradual path to equality and justice. It would take time but blacks would eventually reach the Promised Land. But the Civil Rights Narrative spun a counter-argument. The Emancipation had been betrayed and the Negro had yet to break free. White Moses Abe Lincoln failed, and black Moses MLK would finally finish the job and make it to the mountaintop and lead his people to milk-and-honey.

Given the actual nature of the Negro, race-ist white skeptics had reasons not to fall for the Dream. But America is nothing if not naive and idealistic in some stupid(and inspired) way. Also, most skeptics were too genteel and inhibited to spell out in graphic and grisly details as to why the Negro Experiment wouldn't work. For some reason, White America chose to forget all about Jack Johnson and propped up the cult of Joe Louis, the nice BROWN(than black) Bomber. Apparently, Louis was such a nice guy, and it was only by accident that he knocked out all those white guys who just bumped into him. It was like the 'bum of the month' was really a 'bump of the month'. He didn't want to do it, but those clumsy uncoordinated white guys were haplessly walking into his fists and falling down.
As the raw truth remained unsaid even by the race-ists, white dreamers got the upper hand with the Narrative. The Dream would be MLK would finish the job and at last America would fulfill its mission. Of course, many chose to believe the mission was derailed by the assassination of MLK, but in fact, race problems got out of control while he was alive. Massive riots broke out in 1965, three years before MLK's death and by 1968, many blacks weren't even heeding King's advice and getting more rowdy-radical.

Because of the moral-spiritual investment of so many white folks(especially the wiberals) in the Noble Negro Narrative, they were willing to make excuses for mounting black rage and violence. After all, you can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs. And hadn't whites also rioted in the past? So, maybe it was black people's turn to rebel and turn over the apple cart. But the difference was that, while white folks made even more progress upon gaining freedom(via means violent or peaceful), black folks got even worse with more freedom. It was as if blacks-and-freedom was like drinking-and-driving. Freedom inspired white people to shoot for the stars. Freedom drove black people to dive for the mud.

In time, even do-good wiberals joined the White Flight. Jews joined the Jew Flew. (And Asians joined Chu-Too, and Mexicans did Brown-Not-Stick-Around.) It was getting ever harder to maintain the Noble Negro Narrative. White Flight was the result of Black Blight. Too much crime, too much craziness, too much ghastliness. And for those in the know, Abraham Lincoln actually had little sentimentality about blacks. His idea of playing White Moses was to lead blacks OUT of America. And MLK, for his all hammy but inspiring oratory, was a lout, punk, thug, and beast. Had he lived, he would have become just another Jesse Jackson... or worse a kind of Al Sharpton. Indeed, most Civil Rights Era blacks became crooks, thieves, and/or charlatans. It was his death that led to the myth of the Blackrist.

Now, if whites had sense and shook off the Noble Negro Narrative for good and saw the Real Negro at last, there would have been no more of this nonsense. But mental habits die hard, especially when the Jewish-controlled Media and Academia have been doing everything to elevate MLK into god-status and instill whites from cradle with Negrolatry. For most white young ones, the four most sacred people are MLK, Harriet Tubman, Oprah, and Obama. White parents have been made anxious about their kids becoming 'racist' at the age of three. According to Jewish Media, white kids have a natural inclination to turn 'racist'. It's almost as if the 'original sin' of 'racism' is hard-wired into the white DNA. Therefore, white parents must train their kids to be 'anti-racist' from the earliest age possible, and that means feeding them Negrolatry from the cradle.
So, most white kids come to awareness believing that any pro-white consciousness is evil while any pro-black consciousness is sacred. Stuff like Diversity-Inclusion-Equity training is not about instilling and/or reinforcing the same virtues of diligence, honesty, integrity, courage, and responsibility on ALL people regardless of race but about conflating goodness with certain identities. Being black, Jewish, or homo/tranny makes one automatically good, and the less fortunate groups without magic identities can only attain a measure of goodness by being especially partial to Jews, blacks, and homos/trannies. In other words, it's a total perversion of morality. Jews, blacks, and homos/trannies are good even if they act bad because their identities are 'good'. In contrast, even whites who are most diligent, honest, conscientious, and courageous are morally suspect because their identity is associated with all sorts of evils and failings throughout (selective)history. Instead of promoting 'diversity, inclusion, and equity'(or DIE) among whites(but then notice how this never calls for Jewish Guilt and Atonement for the mistreatment of Palestinians who are certainly NOT INCLUDED in the American Debate), society would do much better to promote accountability, appreciation, honesty, and humility among blacks. What US needs is not DIE but AAHH.

So, despite all the troublesome facts about blacks, whites cannot shake their 'psychristian' complexes about them. And yet, it's hard going to keep up with the pretense of the Noble Negro in a world where blacks act so ignoble. White people want to believe that black fevers of the soul, passion, and even rage are essentially driven by righteous hunger(or lust) for justice and goodness. It's like the Jews in the Old Testament are far from perfect but more blessed than other races because they got God on their side. Also, even though the Old Testament God is sometimes terrifying and unpredictable, He is the source of all that is good, as well as ultimately the great redeemer. And yet, the rise of Christianity suggest that enough Jews could no longer accept the anxiety-inducing uncertainties of the Old Narrative. Given the dire events of history, certain Jews agonized and strove for a new explanation, the Year Zero option where they could conceive of God from near-scratch.

We see something similar in the Third Phase of Negrolatry, that of the Blackrist. This is Negrolatry #3. Is it any wonder that so many whites have adopted black babies? Just like God was conceived anew through the narrative of Jesus as Baby God, molded and nurtured in part by man(and woman), white folks dream of the black starchild by way of white nurture. Negroes may be noble and all, but they are too fearsome and unstable, often scaring white folks half-to-death. So, how about if they adopt a black child and mold him to be the Noble Negro more in harmony with white fantasies? Just like the rise of Christianity tamed God into a more loving figure with a closer ear to man's problems, the cult of Blackrist seeks to 'fix' the problem of the broken Noble Negro Narrative. If blacks left to their own devices cannot live up to the Dream, whites must somehow intervene and replace the Old Negro with the New Negro.
Some do it by adoption, but it's also done by ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. Thus, the white woman carries the Noble Negro seed, much like Mary carried Jesus in her womb. Unlike a Negress who, though 'naturally noble', is too wild and funky for motherhood, the white woman would birth and nurture the mulatto kid to conform to the White Dream of the Noble Negro. No wonder so many whites greeted Obama as akin to black jesus. He was birthed by a white mother and raised by whites.
Another way is by Mass Immigration of Africans. Europeans have Noble Negro cult of their own. They believe America failed the blacks who turned out criminal and violent ONLY because of white tyranny and oppression traumatized the Negro soul. In contrast, Europe would welcome black Africans and treat them nice and show the world how naturally noble the blacks are. It's a variation on the Year-Zero-Negro, or Year Zegro. Europeans feel that American blacks became problematic solely due to mistreatment. It's like believing a tiger in captivity is dangerous because of abuses suffered at the hands of its owner and convincing oneself that a tiger would make the most wonderful pet if treated nice from infanthood. While it's true that a well-trained tiger raised from cub-hood can be friendly with humans, it can never be a proper pet because its very nature is wild & predatory and, furthermore, it is many times stronger than man.

Of course, there is one big difference between the transformation of God from the Old Testament to the New Testament and the transformation of Noble Negro Narrative from Troublesome Black Moses to Transcendent Black Christ. Whereas God isn't real whether one believes the Jewish version or the Christian version, blacks are all-too-real. There are tens of millions of them in the US, millions of them now in Europe, a billion of them in Africa, and there will be billions more in decades to come. Even though idea of God is a powerful concept, maybe the most powerful ever, it is still a matter to be pondered and debated. God doesn't exist in the real world. So, whether one is 'right' or 'wrong' about God, it is really a matter of theory.

In contrast, being wrong about Negroes is dangerous(and maybe fatal for Western Civilization) because countless blacks exist in reality and in ever increasing numbers, and they are by far the most aggressive, destructive, and dangerous race. Turning Negrolatry #1 into Negrolatry #2 was a big mistake. Whites noticed the raw power of blacks in muscle & music and conflated them with morality. Jack Johnson was about might-is-right, or 'we blacks be badass cuz we whup you white boys'. Upon noticing this fact, whites should have done everything to bring about permanent racial separation. But whites went with the cult of Joe Louis: the Nice Negro who uses his power as a credit to his race; he beats whites but is almost apologetic about it and, above all, wants to be liked by whites and be an American Hero in service of patriotism. But that Narrative fell apart in the 60s when blacks gained full confidence to riot and loot and scare whitey half-to-death.
But instead of waking up from the nightmare-mistaken-as-dream, whites ended up reaching for Negrolatry #3, whereby they came to fantasize about reinventing the Negro in their mind's eye. So, how did the Obama thing turn out? How are all these black kids created either by ACOWW and/or adoption turning out? Colin Kaepernick anyone? Is he the blackrist?

Can whites ever wake up? Perhaps not because of the 'viscerality' of black advantages. Jared Taylor detailed how blacks are better at certain things(like basketball) while Asians have their own niche advantages(like math and science). So, why can't people accept that blacks are better with balls and worse with ballpens? After all, most white people don't expect Asians to be good at basketball because they are better in math. White people aren't upset with Asian underperformance in America's most popular sports, and that's okay. So, why are whites upset with blacks not exceling in everything? Why not just say Asians are better at math and blacks are better at running/jumping? if whites can accept Asian inferiority in basketball, why not accept black inferiority in calculus or physics?

It is because math/science isn't visceral or exciting. In school, all the attention is on athletes, not on mathletes(even though the latter generally do better in life). So, the fact that Asians are good in math doesn't generate much excitement or convulsion about them. They are just seen as nerds.
In contrast, sports is visceral, and black dominance leads to white hero-worship of blacks as demigods or titans. Thus overwhelmed by excitement, whites have come to wish the best of their hero-race of blacks. (Likewise, white obsession with Jews has less to do with Jewish wizardry in math and science than their humor, forceful personalities, and prophetic reach that seem 'sexy'. Ayn Rand was no looker but her powerful big-think won over lots of acolytes.) This goes to show that Rationalism was bound to fail.

The perverse thing about the Cult of George Floyd is it managed to fuse Negrolatry 1, 2, 3 into a single package. He was beastly, a career thug, criminal, and druggy. He even had a stint in pornography. His fearsome beastly prowess made him like one of the crude pagan gods of dark nature. Negrolatry #1. But the Noble Negro Narrative spun his biography into something like a one-man exodus story. You see, he wasn't simply a lifetime criminal wandering across America to rob and cause more havoc. No, he was on a spiritual journey of self-discovery, in search of his milk-and-honey in a land mired in 'systemic racism'. A lone black moses in the tradition of the fugitive slaves on the run for freedom and dignity. Negrolatry #2. (Never mind Floyd was a free man and used his freedom badly. On the one hand, the Negrolators say it was a great evil to deny blacks equal rights and freedom in the past. On the other hand, Negrolators seem to imply that blacks + freedom is a bad mix because historical traumatization culturally or epigenetically drove blacks to be angrier and more dangerous; therefore, we can't expect blacks to use their freedom as sensibly as whites and non-blacks.) But then, Floyd died one day. How and why? He imbibed too much fentanyl, but the Jewish-controlled media and their minion-disciples, in a perverse variation of the feat pulled off by renegade Jews(who turned Jesus' tragedy into triumph), created the magic-myth of how Saint George Floyd was murdered by a 'white supremacist' centurion but overcame defeat and death by rising to heaven and gaining his place in the firmament. Thus, Floyd became blackrist. Negrolatry #3. We sure do live in crazy times.

COMING UP | THE GREAT DEBATE: E. MICHAEL JONES VS. JARED TAYLOR - Guide to Kulchur

Why did Capitalism go 'Woke'? — Idolatry, so intrinsic to Capitalism, led it toward the promotion of Jewish Supremacism, Negromania, and Globo-Homo — Political Correct Capitalism as the Neo-Catholicization of the New World Order

During the Cold War, there was the sense that the West was about freedom, about having a good time and being 'cool'. Not everything had to be politicized. In contrast, the communist world was seen as overly political, with ideology shaping and coloring just about everything. This was especially true of Stalinist USSR and China of the Cultural Revolution. So, while everything had to be Marxist-Leninist in the communist world, one could be just cool and happily apolitical in the West. You could have fun and be left alone by the state, commissars, or activists. It's like that movie NINOTCHKA. Garbo as Soviet commissar is staunchly ideological, so hardline. She is humorless and stern. But when she begins to laugh, she begins her transition to capitalism and freedom. She learns one doesn't have to be uptight and upright all the time with radical commitment. One could take it easy and enjoy life. And unlike communist propaganda devised to shape one's politics and worldview, capitalist advertising had only one thing in mind: To sell stuff. It was about profits for the company and fun/convenience for the consumer(as king or queen). The appeal of capitalism was its apolitical character. It was about products and services. It was about money for the company and happiness for the consumer.

So, even though the West was plenty political and ideological during the Cold War with its own propaganda and messaging, one could nevertheless ignore all the humorless and heavy-handed stuff in the world of capitalism, consumerism, and entertainment. For sure, Americans weren't dragged to ideological sessions. One's involvement in politics was voluntary, not mandatory. One didn't drink Coca-Cola to be political. One didn't watch a Disney movie for ideology. One didn't watch a 007 movie for propaganda. Even when James Bond took on the Russkies, it was more about fantasy and romance than politics. One didn't read Archie comics for 'moral' instructions or guidance. Indeed, the West often portrayed itself as apolitical compared to the Communist East. The dreary notion was that people behind the Iron Curtain, from cradle to grave, were molded into 'good communists' and everything was politicized. If you were politically suspect or heretical, you could be hounded, persecuted, or even executed. But in the West, the capitalists didn't care about your ideology. They just sold you stuff and services. And when you took part in capitalism, it was to buy something of convenience or pleasure. You didn't purchase it for meaning or commitment. When Richard Nixon met Nikita Khrushchev in the 1950s, the message was that Americans were consumers with freedom and money to buy what they wanted without meddling of the state. And when China opened up in the late 70s, one of the famous images was of Chinese youths wearing sunglasses and drinking Coke. The appeal of sunglasses and Coca-Cola wasn't ideological. They were consumer products. At most, they had 'idolic' value. Cola meant easy pleasure, cold drink on a hot day. Sunglasses meant looking 'cool' and stylish.
During the Cultural Revolution, sunglasses had been banned as a product of 'Western Decadence'. And in the Soviet Union, body building was frowned upon(if not illegalized) as a form of vanity and narcissism. And indeed, one of the Western attractions for people in the communist world was the sense of apolitical freedom, especially in America. In the movie MOSCOW ON THE HUDSON(by Paul Mazursky), the Russian exile(played by Robin Williams) encounters many problems in the US, but he still chooses to remain because he's left alone and free to do his own thing. There isn't a commissar breathing down his neck 24/7. He could say to the Power, "It's none of your business", something disallowed in a communist system. You don't lose your job over politics(unless it's truly grievous).

So, the idea was that capitalism is fun, cool, easy-going, tolerant, individualist, and apolitical whereas communism is radical, fanatical, censorious, repressive, dogmatic, and conformist. This contrast is illustrated in THE UNBEARABLE LIGHTNESS OF BEING where pro-Western Czechs act in libertine fashion whereas the Communist Order is presented as rigid and heavy.

So, what happened? Why did capitalism in the West turn 'radical' in the current 'woke' form? Why is it so incessantly activist and pushy with its constant messaging and propagandizing? Why are people being fired or demoted or censured over some tweet years ago? Why are they being denied products and services over matters of personal creed, politics, and values? Why do capitalists fund, propagate, and lend support to views that smack of 'radical' nuttery? When Coca-Cola made inroads into China in the 1980s, it was the apolitical drink of the world. The idea was its dominance owed to quality and service, not to any idea or message. But now, Coca-Cola is the promoter of the cult of White Fragility. Burger King constantly reminds us of the sanctity of homos, as if it wants to rebrand itself as Bugger King. What does sodomy have to do with burgers? But then, why did Homosher take off as the new kosher? Why are Oreo Cookies packaged in homo colors? What do cookies have to do with guys sucking each other's pud? Why are capitalists pushing BLM the big lie when surely anyone with a sense of reality knows that blacks mostly kill one another(when not attacking non-blacks) and that the number of innocent blacks killed by cops is negligible, if existent at all? It's bad enough that capitalists are taking part in politics(when they are all about products and profits). What's worse is they willfully take the ideological or idolatrous line than have any real concern for the truth. They go with what is politically advertised than what is true in the real world. It used to be capitalism was like the Beach Boys(fun, fun, fun), whereas communists were like the Red Guards. Now, capitalism funds and supports 'woke' mobs and pushes 'radical' dogma through their public announcements and advertising. Also, they fire and intimidate their own work force on the basis of ideological correctness and idolatrous sanctity. How did things become this way? It's almost as if capitalism has taken on the attitude of Jewish Bolsheviks in the 1920s. 'Wokery' is doing to business what Neocons did with American Conservatism. It's in selective purge mode, condemning whiteness while enabling Jewish Power to grow ever bigger.

1. Surely, the ascendancy of Jewish Power is a major factor in this as Jews are the top capitalists and have an obsessively supremacist mentality. Jews love money, but their top priority is tribal supremacism. Having abandoned socialism, Jews are now totally capitalist and determined to use their monopoly power to shape the narrative and direct the course of history to secure their supremacist position. Mass media are part of Jewish capitalist enterprise, and Jews use their near-monopoly lock on news and information for tribal supremacist's sake. So, for Jews, capitalism isn't just a cash cow but a political weapon of mind-control. Jews especially feel vulnerable despite their vast riches because they are only 2% of the population. For Jews, capitalism is useful as both a political and apolitical tool. As an apolitical instrument of hedonism, leisure, fun, and entertainment, capitalism turns the masses into complacent and infantilized bunch of mindless consumers. Better to have goyim obsess about sports, video games, movies, and gambling than gain independent political consciousness that might realize that Jews control just about everything.
But an apolitical order never stays that way. In a vacuum of political meaning, some force enters the scene to offer meaning, direction, and sense of purpose. Man doesn't live on bread alone, not even on bread-and-circus alone. In the past, Jews used capitalism for profit-making and used socialism & radical politics for meaning. Jewish capitalists made the profits, and Jewish leftists served as the prophets. But genuine Jewish leftist have all vanished. Most Jews are capitalist and pro-rich. They are for more money and more privilege for the Tribe and have lost interest in Humanity. Thus, Jews have bundled profit and prophet into one package. For example, in the past Jews made some movies and TV shows for fun and nothing but fun. They hardly had any politics and were made to be as uncontroversial as possible to make the audience complacent and happy. But Jews also made other kinds of movies, usually scripted by leftists, radicals, and subversives, that were meant to push a message. These movies generally made less money and even lost money. Still, they had political and propagandistic value.
Today in contrast, even mindless entertainment is likely to be loaded with politics. Advertising is often heavily politicized or in service of ideology or idolatry of certain groups, especially Negroes and Homos, the holy icons of commercialism. The way things are going, even slot-machines of the future might be politicized with ideological symbols. Jews control advertising, entertainment, and news media, all of which are capitalist enterprises. And as the #1 priority of Jews is Jewish Supremacism, they are hellbent on using whatever means, even consumer-capitalism, as a tool of power. As Jewish Power relies most essentially on the cuckery of white goyim, Jews use capitalism to spread images, ideas, and narratives that gaslight, shame, or paralyze white identity and interests.

2. The corruption of Gramsci-ism. When Antonio Gramsci spoke of Cultural Hegemony, he hardly had stuff like 'gay' Oreo Cookies or BLM-narcissistic fests in mind. His idea wasn't to take over capitalism to spread idolatry in favor of certain groups. Rather, the idea was for leftists and socialists to gain cultural influence to win over hearts & minds. His idea of Good Culture would have been something like BICYCLE THIEVES or the films of Roberto Rossellini. For him, Marxist cultural hegemony was to destroy capitalism, not to take over capitalism and indulge in narcissistic hedonism as proper platform for good ideas and values. If socialism must have dignity, it must be conveyed through serious and noble manner. In contrast, today's neo-hegemonists indulge in the culture of excess and use such means to convey supposedly important messages. It's like radicalism expressed through a strip-tease.

If Gramsci looked forward to winning hearts and minds with a new cultural paradigm, the neo-hegemonists are perfectly fine with capitalist excess, self-indulgence, narcissism, vanity, and infantilism... as long as those are loaded with the favored idolatry, mainly of Jews, homos, and blacks. So, it's great to 'twerk' as long as it's for BLM or Globo-Homo. It's okay to indulge yourself with wild-partying and girls-gone-wild and wanton hedonism AS LONG AS you remember to pay tribute to Jews, blacks, and homos.

This has obvious appeal to Neo-Hegemonists who are more Cultural Marx Brothers than Cultural Marxists. There is precious little that is Marxist or even mildly socialist about them. They are total capitalists even if they make some obligatory noises about the dangers of 'greed' and the 1%. Indeed, the neo-aristocratic globalists fixed it so that leftism would be changed from a movement of laboring masses and lesser-haves to a movement centered on vanity, celebrity, narcissism, freakdom, and mental illness(as the new normal). Leftism went from the voice of the majority to that of favored minorities, Jews-blacks-homos. This bogus 'leftism' is not about basic justice or equality but the look-at-me obsessions of those infected with 'celebrititis'. It's not about homos asking for tolerance but demanding they be celebrated by the entire world, even in places of worship. It's not about blacks struggling for justice but howling to be the center of attention and affection REGARDLESS of how they act. It's not about blacks condemning white bigotry and violence against blacks but about them bitching and yapping about how it's unjust for blacks to be brought to justice for bad deeds and criminality. The Civil Rights Movement ran on, "Don't hurt us", but today, it's more about "Shut up when we hurt us." And of course, this is partly due to the fish rotting from the head. Jews are the ruling elites of the West, and they rigged things so that they have license to kill, steal, and feel(the shikses). With Jews having such power and privilege, why wouldn't blacks and homos, two especially self-centered groups, demand similar affection, deference, and privilege? The new 'leftism' is about the nihilism of Jews, blacks, and homos intoxicated with idolatrous megalomania.

Jewish supremacists and globalist elites studied history. They know why the French King lost his head and why the Russian Tsar was mowed down. Them fellers were at least honest in their relation to the masses. They ruled over their subjects. The neo-aristos of Jews and globalists also rule over us, and in more ways than one, they are even more powerful and privileged than the kings and emperors of old. And they know the people may rise against them IF they are seen as the over-privileged ruling elites. And so, they decided to appropriate, indeed confiscate, the cult of leftism for their own uses. This way, they can have the power of ultra-kings and uber-emperors BUT be shielded by their professed 'leftism'. In actuality, they work against the people, but their mantle of 'leftism' creates the impression that they are for 'progress' and 'justice'.
This is why today's capitalists and globalists love it when idiot conzos call them 'communists' and 'leftists'. Imagine that, conzo losers with little or nothing calling super-duper capitalists and their well-funded flunkies a bunch of 'communists'. The right would do much better to adopt socialism, and why not? Nationalism is intrinsically socialist in this sense. It says, regardless of private property, a nation belongs equally to all its people. It doesn't matter how rich or poor someone is. The nation belongs equally to the rich and the poor. Therefore, the rich national must make common cause with the poor national, at least as fellow patriots. He may be rich while the other is poor, but they are fellow nationals, and as such, there is a bond and obligation that goes beyond dollars and cents. But globalist capitalism tells people that the Nation is an outdated and archaic idea. The only thing that matters is a system of global networks whereby the elites of the world all collude with another. The rich national has no obligation to fellow nationals. Of course, this doesn't apply to Jews. While Jews push ultra-individualist libertarian deracination for white goyim, they themselves have a sense of Jewish brotherhood and sisterhood. Even as they pressure whites to give up every last vestige of white identity and interest, they press upon whites to support Jewish identity and interests. Jews even got Jonathan Pollard sprung from prison, and the freed Jew is now in Israel urging fellow Jews all over the world to betray goy nations for Jews Uber Alles. No wonder Jews grow stronger as a group while whites are dividing into successful white individuals and unsuccessful white individuals(who are derided by successful whites as 'losers'). Rich Jews look out for lesser Jews, but rich whites sneer at have-less whites as 'losers' who should use opiates and die. If rich whites care for anything other than themselves, it is in accordance with the gods controlled by Jews. So, white goy elites sing paeans to Jews, homos, blacks, and even illegal immigrants while spewing venom at the 'deplorables'.

3. Another factor is the catholicization or 'christmasization' of capitalism. Look back into Christian History. Christianity was not a happy creed. It was about self-denial, sacrifice, poverty-as-virtue, turn-the-other-cheek, and other righteous deeds & values. In contrast, paganism was a lot more fun and colorful. Paganism indulged in pleasure, appreciated beauty, celebrated life as a circus, and had space for vanity, narcissism, and egotism. The Greeks and especially the Romans knew how to have a good time. Christianity looked upon much of paganism as sinful, wicked, demonic, satanic, and degrading. Christianity was severe and spartan in its mode of life and expression. It was deeply ideological. And yet, the Catholic Church didn't want pure Christianism. It was too gloomy, depressing, and judgmental. And so, the Church found ways to fuse the spiritual righteousness of Christianity with the colorfulness of paganism. This way, the Catholics could have the cake and eat it too. Practice Christianity but in a colorful pagan way. Make the faith more festive and cheerful. Of course, the Church was careful to reject the more licentious aspects of paganism and shape paganesque expressions into something holier and sanctimonious. Still, Christianity in its spiritual purity was too stark and depressing for the Catholics who found a way to fuse Christian ideology with pagan idolatry. If pagans, lacking deep spiritual grounding, were drawn to Christianity's profound faith, it was the case that Christians, lacking color and cheers, were drawn to the excitement offered by paganism. While some pagans rejected Christianity to the end while some Christians denounced all vestiges of paganism, the Catholic Church arrived at a synthesis of faith and festival. And this has been especially true of Christmas. Ostensibly a somber observance of the birth of Christ, it has turned into a kind of pagan bacchanalia of materialism, partying, and hijinks. Jesus and Santa.

In our post-Christian age, people of the West have been clamoring for new 'spiritual' meanings, and of course the Jews, as controllers of media, academia, and entertainment, get to choose the new gods. And the new gods are the globo-trinity of Jew Worship, Negro Reverence, and Homo Devotion. This new trinity constitutes the new faith. But just lamenting the Shoah, crying about Slavery, and recalling how homos used to be called 'fags' wouldn't be much fun. They need color and excitement, sass and zing.
This is where the symbiotic partnership with 'pagan' capitalism comes in. Capitalism, often characterized as crass and trashy, is redeemed by its association with Sacred Jews, Noble Negroes, and Holy Homos. And in turn, the Jewish cause, black cause, and homo cause are made cool and fashionable by capitalist color. Consider the marketing that goes into AIPAC conferences. It's like the freaking Emmy Awards night. Jews hire publicity firms to put on a big show with fanfare and razzle-dazzle. Indeed, what is the Academy Awards ceremony all about? Hollywood is mostly about marketing crass entertainment, but once a year to burnish its image Hollywood puts on a big show about how it cares about art, quality, meaning, and values.
Even though the moralists and activists may resent the power of money, they are also dependent on and grateful for the money that comes their way. So, if Marxists sought to totally do away with capitalism, the neo-catholicist 'left' is happy to form a symbiotic relationship with Big Money. The Golden Calf is also the golden goose for the activist community. Same goes for the so-called Green Energy movement. It's really bait-and-switch. It's about Jews invoking environmental concerns to replace goy-owned fossil-fuel industry with Jewish-owned fossil-fuel industry, except that the latter has been packaged with 'green energy' credentials when, in fact, most of the Jewish-backed industries are overwhelmingly run on fossil-fuel. (As for nuclear energy, Jews oppose its proliferation because other nations might, like Iran, have the potential to develop nukes. Whatever is good for Israel.) So, the Jewish oligarchs of 'green energy' aim to take over entire sectors of the energy industry, and the 'green' activist community is flush with donations. Even though the latter are mere tools, they like being in the limelight in their roles as the saviors of the planet. But then, the clergy played much the same function in European history. They mostly served the ruling elites but got housed in nice big churches and hogged roles as spiritual-moral voice of the community.

4. In a way, the fanfare around LGBTQ and BLM makes sense in accordance to the logic of capitalism. The favoritism for homos and blacks owes more to capitalist logic than socialist/Marxist logic. After all, capitalism is far more idolatrous than communism is. Granted, there were massive Stalin and Mao cults in Soviet Union and China. But the monopolization of iconography by Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and other top leaders meant that everyone else had to remain on the human level. In Cuba, Fidel Castro and Che Guevara were like gods but everyone else was merely human, equal to others. And when Soviet Union did away with the cult of personality after Stalin's death, it was mostly humanist. It was a repressive and restrictive form of humanism but humanism just the same. Humans had value as humans, neighbors, comrades, fellow citizens, and etc. Not as idols, icons, stars, and divas.

And in a way, the West was wrong to assume that the communist world was about nonstop propaganda. While propaganda could be overbearing and shrill at times, most of the arts, culture, and entertainment in the communist world was humanist than ideological. They were about people faced with daily problems, something anyone in any part of the world would recognize. So, on one level, communism vs capitalism wasn't entirely about radical propaganda vs apolitical pleasure.
It was also a matter of humanism vs stardom-ism. When youths in communist nations hankered for blue jeans, rock n roll records, and Western fads, they weren't merely seeking escapism from ideology and dogma. They were bored with humdrum humanism and were besotted with the narcissism and celebrity-cult of the West. While some resisted communist ideology in favor of Western freedom, others rejected social humanism in favor of capitalist idolatry, i.e. they weren't so much striving to be free as to fall under the spell of Western excess of vanity and diva-cults.

Apart from elevating Marx, Lenin, and some local ruler to high heaven, communism offered humanism as the proper mode for most people. Accept and appreciate people as people, as fellow workers, patriots, and comrades. Don't put on airs like you're something special. Don't be aloof and 'cool' like you're above the fray. In contrast, especially with the rise of youth culture around Elvis Presley, James Dean, Marilyn Monroe, and the Beatles, capitalism turned into a mass idolization of celebrities, stars, and divas. Nihilo-Narcissism pushed humanism aside in the West. The French New Wave got started with the humanist 400 BLOWS by Francois Truffaut. But on the eve of May 68 disaster, Jean-Luc Godard was already pondering the emergence of youth centered on 'Marx and Coca-Cola'.

But over time, people forgot about Marx altogether, and if there are young Marxists today, they got it from The Clash or Rage Against the Machine, except the Machine could easily appropriate the 'rage' that was never anything more than moral narcissism to parade onstage by shallow divas.

If the current order was truly about 'cultural marxism', then it would certainly not favor homos who are natural materialists, narcissists, egotists, and aristos. Homos have always been deferential to the rich, privileged, and/or famous. No wonder the US deep state is teeming with homos who work for NSA and CIA to smash other nations. And globo-homo agenda isn't about tolerance for homos(a good thing) but compulsory celebration and deification of homos and trannies as new angels, even new messiahs.
As for the Negro agenda, one could argue it is more in line with 'cultural marxism'. Negroes, after all, have roots in slavery, and many of them toiled in low-end jobs on farms and factories. But is that the reason why Negroes get so much attention? No, if that were so, how come browns don't get much attention? Browns were conquered by whites and mostly toiled as peons and servants in South and North Americas. Even when white libby-dibs feigned outrage over Trump's "kids in cages", it was less about the illegals than about JEWS, i.e. border security reminded all these libby-dibs of Jewish Refugees during the Holocaust, LOL. (And now that Biden's administration is putting the kids in 'cages', they aren't cages anymore according to the Jewish-run media.) And if 'cultural marxism' is about the oppressed, there is precious little discussion of the American Indians, the most tragic people in the world who permanently lost their homeland to foreign invaders. And there's hardly any talk of Palestinians and Arabs destroyed by Wars for Israel cooked up by Zionists.

So much for 'cultural marxism'. So, the reason why blacks get special love is due to 'cultural capitalism', not 'cultural marxism'. It owes less to the history of slavery or Jim Crow than black success in the idolatrous fields of capitalism, mainly in sports and pop music. It also helps that Jews own the media and much of sports industry and have much to profit from black ability and talent. And of course, Jews associate 'white guilt' with blackness because blackness is most potent in paralyzing white agency and unity. After all, people feel more guilty about having done wrong to the superior than to the inferior. It's like there's more outcry over someone killing a grand elephant than a lowly warthog. As whites idolize Negroes as rappers, athletes, and super-studs in the capitalist-hedonist order, it was only natural that so-called 'woke' capitalism would come to favor blacks and BLM mainly due to the higher idolatrous value of the Negroes.
So, in a way, capitalism's promotion of globo-homo and BLM isn't so much a fusion of 'right-wing capitalism' with 'leftwing ideology' but the logical outcome of capitalism's obsession with vanity and idolatry, finally leading to the moneyed apotheosis of whatever has the most 'idolic' value. It's hard to think of two groups more narcissistic and exhibitionist than blacks and homos, and not surprisingly, under Jewish media orchestration, BLM and LGBTQ symbols are often displayed side by side. This is 'cultural capitalism'.

“THE LIE OF LIMITED GOVERNMENT” MIKE PEINOVICH, APRIL 10, 2021

Beware of the J-Ray or the Jew-Ray of the Mass Electronic Media — J-Ray enables the Gay-Ray — The Need for White Light and Right Light — The Jewish Hustle in the Takeover of Goy Mass Media and Monopolization of High-Tech

God and Light

Prometheus and Fire

Since the beginning of time, mankind has been fascinated with the Light. Egyptians worshiped the Sun god. The Sun is central to Japanese mythology. Indeed, it’s difficult to think of a people or culture, ancient-medieval-modern, that hasn’t been profoundly inspired by the Sun in art, mythology, and science. Before there was a division of astronomy and astrology, two were one and the same. Astronomy moved from geocentrism to heliocentrism. And astrology has strange relationship with the Sun. Without the Sun, there would be no life on earth, no humans to gaze at the sky and read the stars. But then, the stars are visible only to the side of the Earth turned away from the Sun. The effect of the Sun from dawn to dusk is not unlike the effect of monotheism. The Sun is so bright and dominant that every last vestige of the starry sky vanishes soon after sunrise. The impact of the rise of universal-monotheism(derived from Judaism), especially of Christianity and Islam, has had a similar effect on the spiritual imagination of humanity around the world. Across Europe and Middle East(as well as what became ‘Latin America’), so much of pagan cultures and gods has been wiped out. But just as stars always return in the night to the side of the Earth that is asleep, perhaps there was something to what Carl Jung said about how the pagan gods and spirits are still within our buried psyches. Though vanquished from the conscious mind by the coming of the One God, they lingered in the hidden corners of the mind, re-emerging at times to inspire creativity and vision, as during the Renaissance and the Romantic Era. It’s like what Merlin says in EXCALIBUR: "The days of our kind are numberèd. The one God comes to drive out the many gods. The spirits of wood and stream grow silent. It's the way of things. Yes... it's a time for men, and their ways." And then later... "You(Arthur) brought me back... Back to where you are now. In the land of dreams."


Just like there will always be nights brimming with stars, there will always be an unconscious realm independent of conscious will & knowledge; and in this world of dreams, the dead, exiled, or forsaken gods whisper in our ears once again. Some people partake of prayer, meditation, or, exorcism to purge this deeper realm of the mind as a kind of ‘hell’ inhabited with demon spirits, i.e. apparently, it wasn’t enough to slay the pagan gods and hurl them into the dark pits of one's soul; the dark areas of one's soul must be scoured of the every last trace of paganism or ‘demonism’, not unlike what a doctor does with radiation and chemotherapy to destroy as many cancer cells as possible. But what may be deemed as cancerous or wicked by some is the very stuff of creativity, vision, poetry, and imagination to others. Indeed, is it an accident that the three great creative eras of the West since the Fall of Rome had to do with either the re-emergence of paganism and/or the fading of monotheism’s grip on the culture? Renaissance, Romanticism, and Modernism. Monotheism has done wonders for prophets, but polytheism or paganism has been more friendly to poets. And yet, oddly enough, the rise of Modernism, though seemingly most at odds with Monotheism, eventually led to a kind of neo-monotheism or secular-monotheism. One reason is Judeo-Christo-Islam and Science/Math have one thing in common in seeking the one-and-only truth. Monotheism requires one to believe that God is the only True God. If other gods are also valid, then Monotheism has no legitimacy. Likewise, science seeks the one truth. Unless there is a single set of universal laws of nature that governs the cosmos, science becomes pointless. While there have been many competing scientific hypotheses, they have all sought to discover which one is true, thereby proving all others false. For example, the Lamarckian hypothesis lost out to the Darwinian one, and certain elements of Darwinism have been discarded over the years by theories backed with more advanced experimentation. Because science has gained such prestige, even non-scientific fields have sought to imitate scientific methodology and terminology, resulting in an intellectual phenomenon called ‘scientism’, which isn’t really science but has its outward appearance. (The most dangerous quacks speak the language of medicine.) Then, it is not surprising that everyone from Karl Marx to Josef Stalin to Sigmund Freud to Carl Jung to Herbert Spencer to Adolf Hitler all claimed to speak in 'scientific' terms. Since science is about rejecting all false assumptions and hypotheses in search of the one true theory, such mental habit also came to define the rationalist scientism of ‘social sciences’ and modern ideologies. Then, it is no wonder that Modernism was both liberating and limiting. Initially, it led to the explosion of freedoms unthinkable earlier. But in its imitation of science, so much in the arts, architecture, music, literature, and social commentary came to insist that a certain form, method, or narrative was THE true one. Even though such attitudes emerged in opposition to the old dominant Idea or Narrative, the New Way was less about freedom than about the replacement of the old dogma with the new doctrine, even at the expense of eradicating future freedom to think differently and independently. Then, it’s hardly surprising that so much of the humanities is now more about technical jargon and 'correct' consensus than about personal and individualistic thinking on various matters. Even in discussion of popular entertainment, consider that so many critics now have a box-mentality that obliges them to praise certain works because of their subject matter and ideology. They might as well all be programmed NPC's. Possibly, the counter-appeal of Nietzsche and Heidegger owes to their rejection of quasi-objectivism that took hold of so much since the advent of science and technology. Objectivity, so essential to science, contracts, legal justice, and journalism, is easily corrupted in areas that are inherently subjective. When English Department that largely deals with fiction & poetry adopts an all-knowing ideology of PC, it creates the illusion that literature must be neatly divided into ‘correct’ and ‘incorrect’, i.e. those in line with the official PC ideology is ‘good’ while those outside it are ‘bad’. Over time, this ideological ‘objectivization’ leads academics to favor bad literature that is ‘good’ over good literature that is ‘bad’.
Even as the humanities came to reject traditional standards and ‘conventional’ criteria of what is good or bad, it came to adopt ideological standards(as a form of new objectivism) of what is approved as opposed to what is ‘unacceptable’. This has affected general discussion as well, which is why anyone who speaks the truth about black crime or racial differences between blacks and non-blacks — just ask James D. Watson — is relegated to pariah-status, whereas total fantasies such as Wakanda(of BLACK PANTHER), BLM hysteria(that evil white cops are gunning down random blacks), and Hate Hoaxes(usually as acts of anti-white defamation carried out mostly by Jews and blacks) are approved, promoted, and even ‘sacralized’. But then, we live in a world where we are to believe that homo fecal-penetration is just as biologically legit as real sex between man and woman involving proper interaction of relevant organs; we are also to believe that if a man puts on a wig and says he’s a ‘woman’, then he is indeed a ‘woman’, but if few months later, he changes his mind and says he’s a man again, he’s a man.
It was bad enough when objectivism affected fields that are, by and large, subjective. While art cannot thrive without standards and some degree of consensus, there is no objective scientific law that can prove that Beatles REVOLVER is better than Rolling Stones’ AFTERMATH. Now, most people with good sense would know the Beatles were better than Herman’s Hermits, but their reasoning must still be made from a subjectivist viewpoint because so much of art appreciation has to do with one’s personal and emotional responses. Also, even though we know that a well-trained classical violinist is a better musician than some high-school violinist, art is more than about technical skills. Indeed, a less conventionally good singer may do more for a song. Maybe Celine Dion could have sung "Landslide" in a ‘better’ way, but Stevie Nicks, with a voice so uniquely bewitching, owns that song as composer and performer.

So, the realm of humanities should never have been infected with ideological objectivism, especially one as confused as PC that, on the one hand, claims to be committed to multiple perspectives against the Mono-Narrative, but then, on the other hand, insists that all perspectives must be converge on globo-homo-ism and be ‘intersectonal’, which really means that all groups must express themselves in ways that lionize Jews, homos, and/or Negroes while blaming all the bad stuff on ‘cis-gender white males’.
But something even stranger happened following the ‘objectivization’ of the humanities and English Department. Because Movies and TV do so much to convey an impression of shared reality and because so many journalists start out as English Majors, subjectivism(the stuff of art and fiction) has also seeped into what should be the objectivity of journalism and the law. Just consider: Today, Arts & Entertainment must conform to the mono-objectivism of PC. This goes from the haute Art World down to comic books for kids. So, we have Art Galleries selling million-dollar piles of junk about ‘patriarchy’ or ‘my liberated vagina’, and we have Archies comic book where the hero sacrifices his life to save a saintly homo from a deranged ‘homophobe’. Once the subjective humanities were turned ‘objective’ via PC ideology, they became a socio-political tool. Since journalism is about objective coverage of world events and trends, it began to take cues from the humanities that now claimed to have an objective grasp on society, justice, politics, and truth. Subjective was made ‘objective’, and in turn, objective was made ‘subjective’. It’s on wonder that so much of what passes for journalism today is about ‘muh feels’ that are now baked into the hearts and minds of anyone who attends college. Just consider: Obama as ‘the one’, Homomania as new faith, ‘gay marriage’ as legitimate, a man with wig is a ‘woman’, Russian Collusion Hoax, Trump is ‘literally Hitler’, Wakanda is truth, New STAR WARS is better than ever because ‘diversity’, ‘hate speech’ is not free speech, and etc. It’s gotten so ludicrous that even some on the Political Left are beginning to dump on the Lunacy:


(Jimmy Dore’s denunciation of the Russia Hysteria or Russysteria is most welcome and necessary, but he runs the same tired narrative on Joe McCarthy. While McCarthy was reckless and reached too far, a vast Soviet Network had sprung up in the US in government and cultural spheres during the FDR years. That was no joke, no fantasy. Even big shots like Harry Dexter White and Alger Hiss were communist spies. Rosenbergs and Morton Sobell funneled atom bomb blueprints — the most carefully guarded secrets in the US — to Stalin’s empire, the destroyer of millions of lives and occupier of Eastern Europe. And there were real communists and Soviet spies in media, entertainment, and academia. So, why have so many influential Jews, especially in academia and media, attacked McCarthy and the ‘Red Scare’ over the yrs ? Because many of the radicals and Soviet spies were Jews. That is why even non-communist Jews circled the wagon for the sake of Tribal Solidarity and spread the counter-hysteria that the ‘Red Scare’ had all been paranoid ‘hysteria’ when, in fact, there had been an extensive communist cabal in the US that funneled tons of secrets to Stalin’s government. Today, Jews are doing the opposite. If Jews of yesteryear denounced anti-communism as mostly paranoia, they now concoct and spread utterly bogus hysteria about Russia. Why? Even though the tactics have changed, they both serve the same core objective: Tribal Jewish Power. In the past, Wasps controlled the US, and Jews even sided with communists to discredit the Establishment. Jews worked with subversives to decry the Establishment’s anti-radical measures as ‘rabid and virulent’. Today, Jews are the Establishment and fear any dissent against or subversion of their power. Jews work with the Deep State to silence, shut down, and blacklist any courageous dissenting voice as ‘hateful’, ‘divisive’, or ‘Russian’. Funny that these Jewish elites who show zero solidarity with the Nationalist Folks of America insist that the latter must stand in solidarity with the former. "You suck our dick while we cut off your balls." Why do Jews now hate Russia so much? In the 1990s, Jewish globalists economically looted Russia and nearly owned that country. But Vladimir Putin restored some national sovereignty and locked up a handful of super oligarchs who happened to be Jewish. THAT is why Jews hate Putin and Russia. It’s not about ‘liberal democracy’ but Tribal Supremacism. Jews think they should own and rule Russia like they’ve come to own and rule US, UK, and Canada. Also, Russia, along with Iran and China, is one of the few nations on Earth that remains somewhat independent of US that is controlled by EOJ or Empire of Judea. And so, Jews fear Russia as a model of goy Nationalist Resistance against Jewish globo-homo Hegemonism. That is why the Jew-run Media have cooked up this nonsense about Russia Hysteria. Indeed, isn’t it funny that the very Jew-run Media that berate Donald Trump as a puppet of Russia, a foreign nation, have no problem with his truly servile attitude toward Israel, another foreign nation? What does that tell you? It means Jews demand that white Americans prioritize Jewish interests above all else. And yet, there is a paradox. Even as Jews increasingly dump on white conservatives as the unifying object of hatred for Jews and People of Color, they also increasingly rely on white conservatives to support Jews and Israel because Grievance Politics among POC often turn against Jewish privilege and Zionist tyranny. With there being less support for Israel and growing criticism of white-Jewish privilege among the growing non-white base among Democrats, Jews will have to depend more on support for Israel among white conservatives. Jews will have to increasingly rely on the very people they denigrate most in the media. But can Jews expect continued support among white conservatives when the latter is beginning to wake up to the fact that most virulent forms of anti-white-ism originates from Jews?)

Anyway, here we are in the 21st Century following the tumultuous 20th Century, the most notable developments of which was (1) Rise of USA as the premier world power and (2) Jewish takeover as the premier elites of the US. So, the 21st Century began with the legacy of the 20th that Jews on top of the world. It began with Jews controlling the US that controls the world. And one key feature of that control is the Mono-media-ism or Mono-mediantics of the Jews. Jews control the media like the Sun itself. Especially in the age of electronic media, most people get the news, info, ideas, data, entertainment, and messaging through rays from movie screens, TV screens, smart-phone screens, computer screens, and etc. We are constantly exposed to these rays. There are over 330 million people in America — many more if we include illegals — , and everyone has one or more TV’s, PC computers, laptops, smart-phones, and other such devices. And Hollywood still rakes in billions every year because so many young people flock to theaters with its giant electronic screens. And cities are increasingly covered with electronic advertisement.

Now, because we purchase and possess our own devices, there is a sense of autonomy and independence. After all, you watch your program on your TV, and I watch my program on my TV. You look for your news on your computer, and I look for my news on my computer. And yet, all these devices are useless on their own. They are merely hardware designed to relay or play something made by someone else. And for most of us for most of the time in most places, everything we are watching is made by a handful of people in NY, LA, and few other key centers. A handful of corporations controlled by oligarchs of a Certain Tribe get to decide who gets hired, what gets written, what gets made and who makes them, and how they are marketed. So, paradoxically, the fact that we own our devices has turned all of us into mental-sensual-and-emotional slaves of a handful of corporations controlled by World Jewry and their Homo agents. (Tootkins have gained much because they are experts of subtle finger-work in an economy that is increasingly less dependent on brawny arm-and-leg work of the working class. Appreciation of finger-work is in inverse proportion to depreciation in arm-and-leg work. There is still, however, some use of handiwork.) We own the devices, but Jews control the light that comes through them. Thus, we are all exposed to the Jew-Ray or J-Ray. Jewish Power owes much to their control of the Light of Modernity. Prior to electricity and rise of modern mass media, most goyim relied on local community for values, ideas, and information. Also, as there was far less centralization of society and nation, there were many media outlets, and often, local news and affairs took precedence over the Grand Narrative. Furthermore, news and ideas didn’t travel instantly and uniformly. But with the rise of electronic media, everything began to change. Those who controlled the signals could reach millions upon millions, then tens of millions upon tens of millions, then hundreds of millions upon hundreds of million, then billions upon billions... and uniformly and instantly. It began with sound with the advent of radio. Cinema emerged before radio, but one had to actually go to the movies. It didn’t follow one home. Also, even though cinema depended on electricity, film reels had to be physically transported from theater to theater. In contrast, the radio was in the house, possibly in every room. And then came the TV that combined sound & image and soon found its way into every home, then just about every room. Everyone owned his or her own TV but had NO control over what he or she saw. He or she became spellbound with the rays emanating from the screen. Through those rays, he or she found much entertainment and joy. He or she received much essential information and news. Through documentaries, he or she learned about other parts of the world. So much was for the good. But he or she came under the spell of those who monopolized the Light and turned them into rays that would alter minds and transform(or deform) souls all across the world. In DIE NIBELUNGEN, the Jewish-like dwarfs gain control of the Rhine Gold and then fashion a Ring of Power out of it to control the world.

Jews have gained supremacy with money, gold, and diamonds. But their power over us has to do with their control of Light. Prior to the rise of electricity, Light belonged to the Sun, the stars, and man's control of fire. Nighttime was lit by torches, firewood, or candles. For a time, city streets were lit with gas lamps. And then, with the coming of electricity and the light-bulb, nighttime became universally lit for everyone, at least in the First World. Humanity no longer depended on the Sun or on unreliable & often dangerous fire for radiance. With a flick of the switch, nighttime could be as bright or even brighter than the day. But, electricity didn’t merely light up the night or run machinery. It could be processed into signals to transmit enticing semblances of sound and image. And with the radio(and later with TV), these signals could travel through the air without wire. There was no longer the need for cumbersome infrastructure, as with telephones prior to the advent of the Cell Phone. A media center with powerful antennae could transmit its signals to millions upon millions of people. And with satellite technology, a single media center could reach the entire world. Beatles’ performance of "All You Need is Love" was the first globally transmitted TV broadcast via satellite, but its real lesson was All You Need Is Light. Beatles sang the song, but Jews came to control the light, the rays emanating from the screens of countless TV screens all around the world.


It didn’t matter if your TV was made in US, Germany, or Japan. On its own, a TV set is nothing. It exists only to relay the Light transmitted via signals, and the power to create that Light for all the world came to be controlled by Jews. Jews understood that control of Light was more powerful than control of Gold.
In Greek mythology, Prometheus steals fire from the gods and gifts it to mankind. In Judeo-centric Historiography, St. Paul ‘stole’ the spirituality light of the Jews and passed it onto goyim. Zeus was angry with Prometheus and punished him forever(though the story of Heracles says he freed Prometheus from the torment). And we know that Jews never forgave Jesus and St. Paul for passing the Jewish God to the Gentiles. Likewise, as with Zeus and religious Jews, modern secular Jews are determined to maintain monopoly ownership of the Light. Jews want all of us to remain spellbound by the J-Ray. Jews also use Gay-Ray, or Propaganda of Homomania, to serve the J-Ray. Not only are homos the most loyal and zealous servant-partners of Jewish Power but Homomania complements Jewish Supremacism as both are predicated on Minority Elite Supremacism. If Jewish Light is the Sun of the Mass Media, Homo Light is its ‘rainbow’. Like the Sun vanquishes all the stars in the sky, Jewish Media Power works tirelessly to blot out and silence all alternative and counter-narratives. And the Jewish Sun seeds the clouds to produce cultural conditions conducive for the 'gay rainbow’, which has been associated with men who do homo fecal-penetration or tranny penis-cutting.
In a way, each of us is living in a TRUMAN SHOW. Our Jewish Master uses the power of Light to control our beliefs, values, and perimeters of what-is-permissible. We are trapped in two ways, like people in Peter Weir’s movie. Truman is trapped because he’s been duped into believing that his bubble-world is real. But then, people who are addicted to watching Truman are also trapped because, even though on the outside, their lives revolve around the life shaped and manipulated by Media Central. They are as addicted to Truman as Truman is anchored to his fake world. And even as they root for Truman’s escape, it all takes place within the bubble, and even after Truman's liberation, the viewers demand yet another show. It’s like they’ve been robbed of the inner light and inner life because they’ve become so accustomed to artificial worlds beamed to them on their TVs. Again, they own the TV’s but not what comes through them. Of course, as the movie was made by Hollywood, the villainous media mogul who would be god is a goy, but in the real world, we know that such figures are Jews.


We are bombarded with J-Ray, not the White Light. In all the religions and mythologies, God or gods own and control the light. Mankind could only hope to harness some of that light. Or it had to contend with unstable and dangerous fire that produced smoke or burned out of control... or was difficult to reignite in wind and rain. Just as mankind enviously eyed the magical flight of birds, it was filled with fear and awe of the power of God or gods over the Light. Indeed, consider the cultures that sacrificed so many innocents to appease the Sun god. Just like God or gods held tremendous sway over mankind that believed in Light as a divine source, Jews now have godlike power over us as they control the electronic light that transfixes virtually all of humanity. Even in nations where Jews don’t directly own and control the media, so many people demand more J-Ray from Hollywood and US mass media. After all, however vile and wicked Jewish Power may be, the fact remains that Jews are talented in creativity and, with their vast financial resources, scoop up talents from around the world. Jewish Hollywood makes a lot of crap, but it’s expensive good-looking crap, and that sure beats cheap-looking crap made by the rest of the world. The New STAR WARS is crap, but with a budget over $100 million, it looks better than space fantasy movies made for few millions, which is what the rest of the world can barely afford. With control of the Electronic Media, it’s as if Jews control the Sun of Modernity. Media might as well be called Sunstein.

Close Encounters of the Third Kind

Close Encounters - Mothership

Compared to the J-Ray of Sunstein media, dissident voices are like stars in the night. There are so many of them but disconnected from one another. Though there have always been dissident voices in a controlled democracy like the US, most remained invisible and unheard. Those that garnered some degree of attention did something outlandish, like anarchists who threw bombs at the police, individuals who assassinated politicians, extremist groups that either rioted or practiced strange rituals, and radicals-of-convenience selectively & momentarily exploited by the power. (Jew-run Mass media promoted the Westboro Church to defame anti-homo-agenda people as a bunch of deranged lunatics.) Obviously, if ‘fringe groups’ or extremist individuals do something really far-out or outlandish, they will get attention. But the Power will sometimes use certain radical individuals or groups as subversive or corrosive agents against rival Powers. A famous case of this was the Right-Wing German government use of Lenin and Bolsheviks to undermine the nationalist government in Russia. Germans, in their short-term interests, figured communist takeover of Russia was worth it if it assured German victory on the Eastern Front. Generally, the Power seeks to maintain respectability and avoids appearing extreme, unseemly, or dirty. So, it will use the shadow government — CIA, FBI, NSA, etc — to do the dirty work under the cover of ‘official business’. Or, esp in Third World nations(but also in first ones), the Power will use its ties with the underworld to carry out certain deeds. CIA had ties with the Mafia, and Zionists worked with gangsters like Meyer Lansky to pull strings. Or, the Power will selectively favor certain radicals to do its bidding while claiming plausible deniability. We see this in how Jewish Power uses Antifa to shut down dissident voices on the Right. Even as the Power denies direct links between itself and Antifa thugs, it pulls strings to ensure that the police and courts will go lightly on Antifa gangs. Thus, Antifa has essentially become the para-military force of the globo-homo power.

Jewish Power also works like the mafia in this regard: It runs an Extortion Racket as a Protection Program. But of course, you must pay off the Jews and/or serve them in order to have protection from none other than them. Jews make you an offer you can’t refuse. Jews use para-gangster organizations like SPLC, ADL, and AIPAC as moral covers to do their bidding. These groups veil their activities in the guise of Moral Crusade to pressure politicians, social critics, artists, entertainers, and businessmen into sucking up to Jews and supporting Israel. If anyone refuses to go along, the groups work in tandem with the Jew-run media to smear the American Refusenik as a ‘hater’, ‘extremist’, ‘white supremacist’, ‘anti-Semite’, and etc. Jewish Power has been so effective in this that cucking to Jews has become almost second-nature among prominent whites. Just look at Mitt Romney, the worthless dog of the Jews. Donald Trump pumped himself as a proud and tough white man, but look at him recently. He has Zionist cum drooling down the side of his lips. He looks like he’s been rammed in the ass by Chuck the Buttfuc* Schumer.

Anyway, whereas Jewish Media Power is like the powerful Sun whose rays cover all the world and own all the sky(as stars and the Moon are rendered invisible), dissident voices are like the dispersed stars in the sky. There are so many stars in the night, but the sky remains dark because there is no unity among the stars. Due to the internet, there are now more stars than ever. Unlike in the past when few corporations controlled all the media, anyone has the chance to become an known entity via the internet. As such, he or she can disseminate ideas disapproved by the Power. Indeed, this is the crucial difference between Established Electronica and New Electronica. With TV, the flow of images and sounds was only in one direction. It was from Media Central to all of us. We received but never returned information(except through ‘letters to the editor’). Also, there were limited means by which people could communicate with one another and form their own networks. Mostly, people talked to friends and family on the phone or sent letters. It was just person-to-person. But with the rise of the internet, a single voice on the internet can win over numerous fans. And there are eccentrics like PewDiePie who has tens of millions of followers on Youtube. Thus, in some ways, the stars in the sky are getting brighter and brighter. Meanwhile, the Sunstein seems to be dimming as more and more people, especially young ones, tend to rely more on peers and personalities on the internet for information than on official sources or establishment figures that, especially for people on the Right, have lost so much credibility, mainly because being so subservient to Jewish Power and addled with PC dogma has rendered most journalists into mere tools of the Power. One would have to be dumb, dishonest, demented, or deranged with worship of power-for-power’s-sake to take anything by the so-called mainstream media seriously. It’s just more Jewish globo-homo propaganda. In contrast, despite their limited resources and access to sources, many dissident, eccentric, or unique people on the internet can speak their minds and offer frank assessments of what may be REALLY going on.

Thus, Sunstein is dimming while the stars are burning ever more brightly. Still, the balance of power is with Sunstein. Also, the internet, like big media, has fallen into the hands of Jewish globo-homo supremacists. How did Jews manage to take over the internet? They used the Old Hustle Trick. You know how the hustle works. Some guy pretends to be not so good at billiards and loses a few games. The other guy gains confidence and plays for higher stakes. And then, the hustler shows his true colors and cleans up.
Jews used the same trick with takeover of the internet. But then, Jews pulled the same stunt in their takeover of mass media. If Jews, prior to media takeover, had revealed their true intentions — that, with media power, they intend to promote anti-white hatred and infect whites with ‘white guilt’ and ‘white self-loathing’ — , would they have been allowed to take over? Of course not. So, what did Jews do? They pretended to be Good Americans who love to compose Christmas songs and make patriotic war movies & all those Western movies that pay tribute to white menfolk and womenfolk who conquered and settled the West. So, most whites came to see Jews as Good Patriotic Decent Americans and didn’t oppose Jewish takeover of the media. But when Jews finally had monopoly control of the media, they showed their true face and pushed one anti-white agenda after another.
Jews did much the same to take over the internet. Platforms, Search Engines, and Social Networks controlled by Jews gained dominance by claiming to be neutral. Remember Google’s motto used to be "Don’t Be Evil". It created the impression that Google would be fair to all and not rig things to favor certain groups or agendas over others. Indeed, if Google and Facebook had stated at the very outset what their ultimate agenda would be — favor globo-homo progs over conservatives, effectively censor search results(or ‘censearch’), use monopoly power to smear certain individuals and groups while protecting others with far more power and record of evil, etc. — , at least half of America would NEVER have signed up to use their services. But Google, Facebook, and other such platforms hustled us and sucked us all in with promise of neutrality and fairness. But once they gained monopoly control, they went about favoring certain figures, ideas, and agendas over others. Also, while Jew-run Google and Facebook shut down or shadow-ban any courageous white voice who speaks truth to power, certain groups are ‘protected’ from the same standards.

Jews would have us believe that these groups need special protection because they are so vulnerable, but it’s all bogus. It’s really about Protected Supremacisms. What honest person can deny that the main supremacisms in the US are Jewish, black, and homo? Jews control just about all elite institutions and industries that matter. Blacks use their superior muscle power to dominate sports and beat up whites all over in streets and schools. And homos have been elevated to neo-angel status in America. Queertianity has become a defacto compulsory neo-religion for all those who want to succeed in life. Also, it’s hilarious when Jews claim to oppose anti-Muslim speech because it’s ‘hate speech’. It was Hollywood Jews who made all those movies with Muslims-as-Terrorists that convinced so many Americans that 'Muzzies' are subhuman psychos. It was Jewish groups that pressured Americans into supporting Israel that has terrorized and tyrannized so many Palestinian Muslim lives. It was Jewish Neocons and Liberal Zionists who used Deep State and Big Media to make the US wage Wars for Israel that has destroyed millions of Muslim lives in Middle East and North Africa. Jews pull all this shit, but they got the gall to pretend that they are protecting vulnerable Muslims from ‘haters’. These are the same Jews who used mega-money and media power to make Congress pass the unconstitutional anti-BDS laws. Jews are truly vile and hideous in their hyper-hypocrisy. Sometimes, I wonder if Jews are simply disgustingly dishonest... or are they so full of themselves as the smartest, wisest, richest, most successful, most tragic(‘muh holocuast’), and most ‘progressive’(always pushing some nuttery as the new moral panic of the year) that they’ve become blind to their own perfidy and venality. Consider a vile lowlife scum like Bari Weiss:

Via the Hustle, Jews gained monopoly control of the internet. Granted, not all platforms are owned by Jews, but as even Big Goyim in Big Tech rely on Jewish finance, Jewish lawyers & judges, Jewish academia, Jewish-controlled Deep State, and etc., they have no choice but to play along. Just look at Jack Dorsey’s dorky cuck-face. He always looks weak and wussy like Brad Pitt after he was castrated by Hollywood and Angelica Jolie. He’s always looking over his shoulders to see if anything he says has the approval of ADL, a Jewish ‘protection racket’ that is always "making an offer you can’t refuse".

Jack Dorsey the Dorky Horsey

Or consider the pussy-wussy goy-boy at Cloudflare who denied service to Daily Stormer in hope of obtaining more shekels from Jewish Finance. Now, Andrew Anglin and Daily Stormer are shit, BUT when we look at the state the world is in, WHO did all the damage? Anglin the clown who posts ridiculous headlines on his site or Zionist globo-homo scum and their goy cuck-puppets who used financial trickery to rob trillions and waged Wars for Israel to wreck entire nations? And who has promoted all the ugly gangsta rap music that encouraged urban violence? Andrew Anglin never killed anyone. Timothy McVeigh killed 150. Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright starved and killed 100,000s of Iraqi children in the 90s in service of Zionist Supremacism. And yet, the Jew-run media and their cuck-puppets would have us believe that the good citizens of Silicon Valley are working so tirelessly to shut down ‘hate’ that may destroy lives. This is funny coming from Google, a company that has major centers in Israel, a nation created via Nakba pogroms, a imperialist power that still occupies West Bank. Cuck-Duck Donald Trump says US troops will remain in Syria to protect Israel, but who is endangering whom? When was the last time Syria attacked Israel? In contrast, Israel has shot so many missiles and dropped so many bombs on Syria. Israel aided so many terrorists in Syria. Like the saying goes, "Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you."

If Trump wants to remain in Syria to protect it from Israel, that would make some sense. In fact, he keeps US soldiers in Syria to pin it down so that Israel can attack it more, but Trump and the Jew-run Sunstein media spin it as "US is protecting Israel from Syria and its allies." With Jews, you lose. I’m not the one to deny or disbelieve the core facts of Shoah or the Holocaust, but I’m beginning to see the need for Holocaust Realization. A Holocaust Realizer would be someone who finally realizes why something as horrific as Shoah befell Jews. Based on observations of Jewish supremacist behavior in the past 50 yrs, it isn’t difficult to understand why so many people were ‘antisemitic’ and hated Jews. While it’s possible that Jews of yesteryear were totally different from Jews of here-and-now, that is unlikely. Recent Jewish behavior strongly suggests why ‘antisemitism’ was so prevalent throughout European history. These Jews just don’t know when to quit. Pushy, deranged, contemptuous, and hateful, they are vicious and sadistic. Given them an inch, and they will go about totally destroying you and your people. Jews are essentially like Gypsies with higher intelligence. Also, the neuroticism arising from conflict between Jewish tribal supremacism and secular-universal moralism seems to have literally driven a third of them insane, a third of them cynical, and a third of them nihilistic.

Jews control the internet like they control the media, but there is, of course, one key difference. Given the nature of the internet, Jews cannot maintain total monopoly as with the Old Media. While Youtube can ban and censor many voices, it can’t suppress all voices. Also, the more that Big Tech companies censor or rig algorithms, word gets around that Jewish Geeks are up to no good, and this increases anti-Jewish animus and distrust among goyim. Also, the Jewish Monopoly’s censorship of elements of the Left that supports BDS is making more people(across the political spectrum) wake up to the hypocrisy of Jewish Power that claims to be ‘progressive’ and for the ‘little guy’ but is actually indistinguishable from the ugly Zionist supremacism of Sheldon Adelson and Thomas Friedman.
Also, because it’s less expensive to start an internet company than a traditional media company, even small players can enter the market and pose some degree of challenge to the big players. If Youtube censors too much, it will be a huge boost to a site like Bitchute that mostly eschews censorship. And despite all the Power’s effort to shut down Gab.ai as Free Speech alternative to Twitter, it’s still going and growing. And the reaction to Patreon’s banning of Sargon of Akkad goes to show that people have some power to push back against Big Tech in ways that readers and viewers didn’t have with Print and TV media.


Hopefully, the dissident stars in the night will burn ever more brightly as the Sunstein media dims and becomes overcome with sunspots. Sure, it has solar flares now and then to get people like Alex Jones de-platformed from every major site. Jewish Monopolies have the ultimate kill-switch on much of the internet. Furthermore, Jews use their control of Payment Processing to effectively silence voices and destroy lives by cutting off funds. Just like Zionist conquerors in the West Bank cut off water-supplies to Palestinians, Jewish monopolists cut off money supply to goyim they hate.


Jews also use Narrative Tyranny to have people they hate fired. In the current US, if someone is labeled as ‘alt right’ or ‘white nationalist’, he can be fired from any job. But if someone is an open Zionist supremacist who supports Wars for Israel, hatred against Russia & Iran, defamation of white people, and oppression of Palestinians, he faces no job risk. If anything, his Jewish supremacism will do wonders for his resume in climbing the corporate ladder or working for the Deep State.
Indeed, the US government passed a law that not only supports Zionist tyranny but penalizes anyone who supports BDS and justice for Palestinians against Zionist-supremacist-imperialist tyranny. In the current US, a sicko like Sheldon Adelson who called for the nuking of Iran gets to rake in billions of dollars and buy off whore politicians. But if you’re a white person who says, "It’s Okay to be White", Jews, their Antifa goons, and Anti-Fact shills in Cuck-Media will harass, bully, and threaten your place of employment to get your fired. THAT is how Jews behave. Just ask the Palestinians. If Jews treat a people as powerless and blameless as the Palestinians as subhuman, why would they treat YOU any differently? Jews wanted Palestinian land, and so, they pulled off all sorts of dirty tricks to dispossess Palestinians and humiliate them. Dirty Jews use the smokescreen of 'progressivism' and 'compassion for the disenfranchised' to hide their supremacism. It's just another manifestation of "Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you." By making so much noise about protecting the powerless, Jews hope that we won't notice that they are the Powerful who oppress the powerless. Just ask the Palestinians. Jews want total supremacy over the US and want whites to be their cuck-dogs forever. So, why would Jews with their monopoly power treat whites with ANY fairness or decency? Since when does a master treat a slave as an equal? Again, just ask the Palestinians, and they will tell you what Jews do to you once they gain supremacist power over you and your kind.

Is there a way by which the dissident stars can pull their lights together to form a Counter-Sun to the Sunstein Media? The White Light against the J-Ray? It won’t be easy, and truth be told, too many people on the Alt Right and Dissident Right lack the kind of prophetic vision, inspiration, and theory of justice to create a movement that pools all the lights together. What Lawrence said of the Arabs may apply to the Alt Right and Dissident Right as well: "...so long as the Arabs fight tribe against tribe, so long will they be a little people, a silly people, greedy, barbarous, and cruel, as you are." To lead a great movement, there has to be men of drive and ambition, but it can’t just be about ME, ME, ME. For awhile, people thought Richard Spencer might be the one to lead, but his spiled-brat selfishness as a player made it impossible for him to recruit and keep men of quality around him. He just ended up with second-raters or far-right lunatics.
But then, no great movement can be led by gentlemen. Jared Taylor is a respectable persona to those who know him, but a man who dares not to get his feathers ruffled won’t have what is necessary to form an army of true-believing warriors. When the right man finally arrives on the scene, maybe all the disparate and dispersed white lights in the sky will come together to form a light so bright and powerful that it will illuminate a new path for the white race. One wonders what might have been possible if Adolf Hitler and National Socialists had served as a bridge between the West(mainly UK and France) and the East(mainly Russia and Slavic nations). He could have been one of the greatest man that ever lived. Instead, by picking on Poland, he drove a wedge between Germany and UK/France. But he had a second chance as Germany prevailed over France in an easy victory. Hitler could still have worked to serve as bridge between the West and Russia, then an ally. But he turned on Russia, and that was the end of the dream. No man had so much of world history in the palm of his hand and then lost everything. But then, Hitler was born with a pathological personality, and maybe there was nothing to stop the madness in the long run. Men of inspiration tend to be eccentric and extreme in some way... but they must be fundamentally sane and sound of mind and spirit if they're to make a positive mark on humanity.