How the Nexus of Jewish-Dominated Media and Jewish-Led or Jewish-Funded Watchdog Groups Really Operate - Paul Nehlen and Kevin MacDonald

Consider this news story. Wisconsin candidate Paul Nehlen has recruited Kevin MacDonald to be a spokesman for his campaign. Nehlen is a Christian patriot and a free-enterpriser. But he also loves his own race, culture, and history... just like Jews love their own. Recently, Nehlen learned of the true nature of Power in the US. Thanks to open sharing of information on the internet, he was able to draw his own conclusions about what’s really going on. After all, it must be pretty strange for a White Conservative in America to make sense of GOP logic. Republicans say white Americans, indeed ALL Americans, must stand with Israel(unshakeably too) and praise Jewish people, culture, and history to high heaven... but the fact is most Jews are Democrats, anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-morality(at least for gentiles who are to be turned into cattle), and scapegoat white gentiles all the time. While Jews sometimes tell their non-white allies(of convenience) that they, as Jews, aren’t really white-white, they blame gentile whites for all the power, privilege, and abuses of Jewish whites. Jews push causes like #OscarSoWhite because it distracts people from the fact that Hollywood is really totally Jewish. Jews also run Wall Street, Las Vegas, Silicon Valley, Ivy League universities, the Legal institutions, and the Deep State, but if anything goes wrong or if people complain about too much concentration of Power, Jews just blame it all on ‘white privilege’.

Paul Nehlen may not be the brightest bulb in town, but he has what most politicians don’t have: Curiosity and courage. It wasn’t enough for Nehlen to just make money and get along with the Power. He asked questions and drew his own conclusions. And he arrived at the irrefutable fact that the US is controlled by Jews, that Jews are tribal & loyal mainly to Judea(aka World Jewry) than to fellow Americans, and that Jews are a hostile minority that seeks to usurp power from the majority via (1) control of media, propaganda, and the narrative (2) vilifying and dehumanizing the gentile majority and, if possible, instilling them with ‘guilt’ or self-loathing (3) gaining financial monopoly and cutting off funds and loans to groups counter-hostile to Jewish nastiness (4) Diversity by mass immigration-invasion that turns the majority population into a minority. "With Jews, We Lose."
Indeed, the destruction of Palestine was a dress rehearsal for what Jews have in store for all white people. There was a time when Palestine was mostly Arab-Palestinian. Initially, a few Jews trickled into Palestine here and there, and they hardly seemed like a threat. But rich and powerful Jews bought off politicians of great powers like the British Empire. With the backing of imperialist might, Jews undermined Palestinian resistance against further invasive-immigration. As more and more Jews arrived, Arabs grew alarmed and beseeched the British to stop letting Jews in. Arabs got so angry that the British felt compelled to restrain the Jewish invasion somewhat. How did Jews respond? They used ultra-violence to attack the British and indeed pioneered modern terrorism. And when the British Empire was exhausted by WWII, the Jews went to the Americans and Soviets to back the Zionist project. Against the will of the Palestinians(who were still the much bigger majority), Palestine was cut in two and one-half was given to the Jewish minority. Naturally, the Arabs rose up, but Jews had it all planned out to carry out massive ethnic cleansing of the Arab population known as Nakba to the Palestinians. Thus, Jews(who bitch about other peoples trying to ‘wipe Israel off the map’) wiped Palestine off the map. To this day, there is no Right of Return for Palestinians whereas any Jew can move to Israel. And Jews continue to occupy West Bank and use forced segregation(or apartheid policies) to keep the ‘peace’ through threat of violence. What Jews did to Palestinians, they are now doing to the West. If Jews themselves could take over Palestine, Jews don’t have the numbers(enough of their own kind) to take over the West. So, they use non-white invader-immigrants. Since Jews let them in, these non-whites side with Jewish globalism even though they don’t much like Jews. Some, especially Arabs and Muslims, hate Jews, but they still side with Jewish globalists(even though Jews destroy Muslim nations) because their main dream is to gain access to the West for material advantage. In the end, most people are organisms above all, and they will do anything(even betray principles or their own kind) for more comfort and convenience. Since white gentiles(especially people of Northern European stock) made the nicest societies, non-whites want access to them as shortcut to the Good Life. Since Jewish elites control the whore-cuck-politicians who let them in, the non-white immigrants(even anti-Jewish ones) vote for globalist candidates.

Some people argue that because non-whites have less guilt about Shoah and don’t care for Jews as much as whites do, the rise of non-white demographics will be bad for Jews in the long run. This may be somewhat valid in European nations that are filling up with too many Muslims. But Muslims will never be a major force in the US. They will always be dwarfed by other peoples, and most Muslims don’t have the brains to rise very high to challenge Jewish power. Also, even if non-Muslim minorities aren’t particularly reverential toward Shoah and Jews, they tend to see White People as the main enemy, especially as Jews control the media, academia, and whore politicians. (Non-whites hate whites because they love white societies. They want to live in nice white nations built by whites, but in order to do so, white defenses must be lowered, and this is done by vilifying whites and instilling them with 'white guilt'. It is ironic that the main purpose of anti-white rhetoric is to bring non-whites closer to whites than away from whites.)
California is full of Diversity, but the academia and media raise kids of all color to hate white people. Jews manipulate blacks, browns, yellows, Hindus, and Muslims to hate white people uber alles. And because most people are stupid sheeple, they just go along with the Jew-run Narrative. And of course, whore politicians, Jewish or non-Jewish, play along too. Jews are for Jews and non-Jewish politicians are for Jews. Since every society needs a scapegoat, Jews have made the White Majority the voodoo doll to stick needles into by all groups.

Also, even if we were to suppose that all the diverse groups were anti-Jewish, they are also likely to be anti-each-other. Thus, they won’t be able to unite to challenge and topple the supremacist power of Judea that has sunk its claws into America. Jews remember the Austro-Hungarian Empire in which many groups distrusted and disliked Jews but they couldn’t unite against the Jews since they were divided among their own kind.

Now, most white people have been friendly and supportive of Jews in the US, especially after WWII and double-especially since the 1960s when whites were made to feel especially guilty for ‘racism’ and ‘atone’ for their 'historical sins'. So, most white people became especially mindful of black and Jewish demands. And both political parties made it taboo to say anything critical about Jews. Virtually all Christian Churches praised Jews and pledged total support of Israel, Israel, Israel. White Christians slobber over Jews like dogs over their masters.

But Jews are nothing if not prophetic and forward-looking. Jews figure this pro-Jewish sympathy may not last forever. Why not? Because excessive Jewish success, power, and privilege may lead to whites noticing who the real masters are. But the bigger reason is that Jews know of their own insatiable greed and hideous nastiness. Jews know they can’t help being arrogant, abrasive, contemptuous, and vicious jerks. The likes of Albert Brooks, Jordan Belfort, Anthony Weiner, Sarah Silverman, Tim Wise, Bernie Madoff, James Toback, Bill Maher, Howard Stern, and etc. can’t stop being what they are. It’s just too much a part of their DNA. So, Jews figure that no matter how much white people try to like Jews and no matter how much sober Jews like David Brooks try to admonish his Tribesmen to act less obnoxiously, too many Jews will act like appalling a**holes and alienate everyone. Also, because Jewish DNA evolved as merchants and hustlers, one side of Jewish DNA tends to be craven and cowardly despite all the chutzpah. Even though Jews are aggressive and pushy to get things their way, when their whole scheme blows up, as with Wall Street or Iraq War, they blame everyone and everything but themselves. It’s like Dark Helmut blaming the other guy for the accident in SPACEBALLS. Jews simply don’t have a honor culture that defined the European gentile aristocrats. Of course, there were plenty of aristocrats who were heinous, nasty, dishonest, corrupt, vile, and craven, BUT, it was part of the aristocratic culture to maintain a good reputation and a sense of honor... and be willing to put one's life on the line to defend one's honor, which is why duels were so important among them. If a man was dishonored, he had to defend his honor. (Granted, proving one’s honor by shooting or stabbing is kind of stupid, but it still required courage and nerves.) Another reason why white gentiles had a higher sense of ideal was Christianity, the moral teachings of which were simple, pure, and consistent.

In contrast, Jews evolved as merchants, and those with haggly-waggly merchant-like genes were favored over those without. Also, Jewish theology was different from the Christian kind. Even though there were plenty of Christian liars, apologists, and propagandists, it preached sincerity, honesty, and earnestness as the highest virtues. Indeed, the fact that Christians failed to live up to these principles is what continues to haunt their conscience. In contrast, Jewish theology was about Jewish chauvinism and "Is it good for the Jews?" Also, like Arabs, Jews in the Middle East evolved in a far more tribal and clannish environment than people did in Northern Europe. So, Jewish theology didn’t instill Jews with virtues of sincerity and purity-of-heart. Rather, the Talmudic-minded Jews learned to twist logic, play word games, and use whatever tricks available to fool the goyim. And over time, Jews with such intellectual personalities were favored as Rabbis, and they came to define the Jewish Way. Though honesty is ideal in Judaism, it is permissible to harm other groups through deception and trickery IF it is good for the Jews. Thus, Jews feel no guilt about having used morally dubious means to get the better of goyim. Jews are like high-IQ gypsies in some ways.

Because of the Jewish Way and its tendency toward deceit, trickery, corruption, and nastiness, Jews fear that it will only be a matter of time before whites tire of Jews and even come to hate them. After all, deep down inside, Jews must know that Jewish expulsions from so many places couldn't have been entirely the fault of gentiles. Of course, the Official Narrative of the Jews is that Jews were guiltless and goyim were entirely to blame, but among themselves, Jews must know that simply can’t be true. It’s like adults will tell children one thing, but among themselves they know the truth isn’t so simple. Jews must know that they have a natural tendency to be obnoxious, abrasive, insulting, and exploitative. It partly owes to the tradition of the Covenant that said Jews have a special contract with God. But in modern times, it has to do with the combination of Jewish intelligence, Jewish spark/brilliance, and Jewish chutzpah/neurosis that led to tremendous amounts of wealth, prestige, and power. Objectively speaking, it’s fair to say Jews have been, pound for pound, the most accomplished people on Earth in the past 150 yrs. Now, Jews feeling pride over this is no problem. But pride can turn into arrogance and, worse, contempt for the less accomplished. Such arrogance can be self-defeating because those who are snubbed and made to feel inferior will hate the snotty a**holes. And this is why Jews pretend to care for the poor ‘victims’ around the world. Paradoxically, because Jews win so much as the Top Victors, they need to associate themselves with the Biggest Losers. That way, Jews launder their supremacist arrogance with ‘good work’, made all the easier by making the LGBTQ community, which is joined at the hip with Jewish Power, the favorite ‘victim group’. If Jews were high IQ but had personalities of Episcopalians, they would just be seen as rich people. But because of their nastiness and contempt, Jews could eventually come to be seen as something like super-rich Puerto Ricans. A people with all the money but no honor. Imagine Representative Luis Guiterrez with the IQ of Episcopalians, and there you have Anthony Weiner, the repulsive a**hole whose excessive behavior was so out of control that even Jews had no choice but to dump him. Or consider Lena Dunham and Emma Sulkowicz, both of whom are half-Jewish and utterly blind to their utter foulness. And even gentiles who come under Jewish management turn out crazy. Consider Miley Cyrus, a goy girl raised more by her Jewish handlers than by her trashy father who’s bad enough, by the way.

Jews no longer believe they can control their behavior. Their chutzpah is out of the bag and running wild. Jews pioneered pornography in the US, and Jewish porn-performers like Ron Jeremy saw America as just a white pussy. Oliver Stone, half-Jewish, projected the Jewish feelings about America on Tony Montana who says it is like a ‘big fat pussy just waiting to get fuc*ed’. To Jews and their black allies, white women are just pussies waiting to get fuc*ed by their dongs and white wombs exist to hatch Jewish or black babies.

And that is why Jews need Massive Immigration-Invasion of Diverse Non-Whites from all over the world. Without Diversity that Jews can manipulate with divide-and-rule strategy, a majority population will eventually rise up against Jews because Jewish attitudes and behavior are too appalling, indeed so much so that even Jews carried out a holocaust against other Jews like the Edward G. Robinson character in TEN COMMANDMENTS.

Of course, non-whites will come to hate Jews too, but they come from all over the world, and as such, they won’t be able to unite against the Jews either. Indeed, what do Mexicans, Hindus, Chinese, Turks, Iranians, Filipinos, Guatemalans, Colombians, Brazilians, Palestinians, and etc have in common? Nothing. Now, if ONLY the Muslims poured into the US, Jews might think twice. After all, plenty of Jews in EU are wondering if it was wise to support Muslim immigration, especially as the European Left is forging an alliance with the Muslim community to hate on Israel and Zionism. But American Jews have no such fears because most immigrant-invaders to the US are NOT Muslim, indeed far from it.

Anyway, Paul Nehlen noticed mounting evidence of Jewish BS, and after awhile, he did his own research and came to the OBVIOUSLY true conclusion that (1) Jews are the real ruling elites of America (2) Jews despise white goyim as cattle (3) Jews are carrying out massive ethnic-cleansing of whites in EU and US via endless invasive-immigration (4) Jews promote ACOWW(or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs) on the premise that white wombs don’t belong to the white race but to blacks and Jews (5) Jews use massive censorship to shut down dissident voices willing to speak truth to power.

Nehlen sticks out because he is so different from the cuck white politicians who fill up elite institutions. Because Jews rule the US and because Jews dictate the terms of admittance to the Elysium club, whites with craven and cowardly genes are favored. In time, white elites will grow ever more craven and cowardly due to genetic selection. Whites who tend to have courage and conviction will be shut out by Jews. Jews will ban Courage genes and favor Cuck genes. So, those with Cuck genes will be allowed into the elite world, and they will marry others with cuck genes and their kids will be born with cuck genes. In contrast, whites with Courage genes(like Nehlen) will be kept on the outside. Richard Spencer and Paul Nehlen have too much Courage genes in their DNA to take the thirty pieces of silver and sell out... like that fake former-southern-avenger Jack Hunter the dork whose career choice is wussier than his squeaky cuck voice. Jews weed out the cocky and favor only the cucky. Men like Joe Biden, Bill Clinton, Jeb Bush, and Lindsey Graham will say and do anything to get ‘what is mine’. They are useful to Jews as cucky-wucks. But Jews hate, hate, and hate Donald Trump because he’s cocky than cucky. But given the immense Power of Jews, even the Donald has to suck Jewish cock(though he only pretends to swallow). Jews know that the Donald spits out the Jew cum after sucking the Jewish Cock... unlike guys like Clinton, Biden, Bush, and Graham who not only swallow but plead, "Can I have a little more?" like Oliver Twist. And then, you have super-cucks like Paul Ryan who not only sucks and swallows but pleads, "Can you please fuc* me in the ass to Hava Nagila?" (There are four kinds of goyim in relation to Jewish Power. There are the Swallowers who not only suck the Jewish Penis but swallow the cum. Most goyim in high position are Swallowers. John McCain, Paul Ryan, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Jeb Bush, and etc not only suck but swallow. Then, there are Spitters who suck the Jewish Cock and pretend to swallow but spit it out. They are like Randall McMurphy in ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO’S NEST who takes the pill only to spit it out later. Jews get awful antsy with Spitters who are, however, tolerated as long as they don’t rise up too high in the ranks. Jews are angry with Trump because a Spitter became president. Trump does a lot of sucking of Jewish cock, but he later spits out the jism. And then you got the Swatters who swat the Jewish Cock away and refuse to suck it. Jews hate these people like a Pimp hates a whore who won’t do as told and suck. Just like pimps beat up prostitutes to make them suck, swallow, and spread, Jewish Power uses all its muscle to punish those who swat the Jewish dick away and won't suck. This is why Jewish Power punches hard at Swatters like Paul Nehlen who slaps the Jewish cock away and says, "Ewww, gross, I ain’t sucking it." And then, there are the Slicers. Slicers feel that it’s not enough to say NO and swat the Jewish cock away. Jews will never stop coming after goyim, just like Harvey Weinstein wouldn’t say NO to women who rebuffed him. They had to watch him, suck him, and fuc* him. He had the power, and this ‘god’[according to Meryl Street] demanded that women around him be suckers and Swallowers. And for that reason, Slicers believe that Swatters aren’t enough to deal with the Jewish Cockuestion. Just like Zeus dealt with Cronus by cutting off his balls, the Slicers believe that the Evil Scrotum of Jewish Power must be sliced open. Nehlen isn’t yet a Slicer but he is an adamant Swatter.)


Anyway, Nehlen, with the aid of scholars like Kevin MacDonald, felt the scales fall from his eyes, and he saw the truth of Jewish Power. So, he recruited MacDonald to be his spokesman. Nehlen won’t back down even though he was censored and then even banned by Twitter that works with Zionist-imperialist Jewish-supremacist organization ADL to shut down patriotic voices. (Granted, what Jews fear most isn’t someone like David Duke whose reputation has been sullied long time ago by association with the KKK but someone more mainstream and respectable like Jared Taylor and Nehlen who don’t have that ‘white supremacist’ baggage. Jews target such people and then hang the label of ‘white supremacist’ on them. Unlike Jared Taylor who totally cucks out on Jews despite being dehumanized and deplatformed by the Tribe, Nehlen will name the Jew.) Though one may disagree with certain details or theories of MacDonald’s thesis, it is no longer tenable to deny the fact that Judea, aka World Jewry, controls the US(that controls the world) and that Jews are working overtime to destroy white identity, white pride, white power, and white unity... all the while brainwashing or coercing whites to support Jewish supremacism, Jewish identity & interests, and Jewish-Zionist imperialism over Palestinians and across the Middle East. Jews are also behind the ‘new cold war’ with Russia, all the sicker since Jews financially raped Russia in the 90s and bought-and-sold countless Russian and Ukrainian women as whores in a vast White Slavery ring all around the world.

So, how do the media react to Paul Nehlen’s partnership with Macdonald? The Talking Points Meme article linked below is an prime example of Jewish-Supremacist mendacity and perfidy made possible by their incestuous nexus between Jewish-run media and Jewish-funded-or-controlled ‘watchdog’ groups. Since the Jewish media cannot refute the factual claims of MacDonald and Nehlen, they try to discredit them by appealing to the ‘expertise’ and knowledge of ADL. In other words, Jews in media outsource final judgement to Jews who run a watchdog group lavishly funded by Jews. Imagine if Arab-Americans ran the Media and, faced with controversy that might undermine Arab-American power, just call on some Arab-funded organization to provide Final Say on the matter. It’d be ludicrous, right? But that is exactly what the Jewish Nexus of Power does. Jews in media collude with Jews in organizations funded by Jews. It’s Jews talking to Jews talking to Jews. Now, these Jews will hire cuck gentiles, aka shabbos goyim, to break the news, but then, these gentile journalists hired by Jews better report the news as Jews demand... or else they are OUT. The media are supposed to be skeptical, but on key racial issues, the media just call on SPLC(aka $PLC) and ADL, both mostly funded by Jews, to act as the final arbiters on the truth. Just like Jews fixed the World Series in 1919, Jews fix Free Speech with three-strikes-you're-out on Youtube. Of course, Jews get to play referee in calling strikes. They never call strikes on Jewish supremacism and go after whites who reject White Submissivism to Jews.

Now, what can be said about Nehlan and MacDonald? And what about MacDonald’s claims about Jewish agenda and power? Since looking into the claims of men like Nehlen and MacDonald might uncover inconvenient truths, the media just call on ADL(or SPLC) to offer their ‘expert’ opinion. Now, since ADL is a blatantly Zionist-supremacist group and since SPLC is funded mainly by Jews, what do you think their ‘advice’ and views will be? Of course, the usual platitudes about ‘antisemitism’, ‘white supremacism’, ‘hate’, and etc. In other words, if whites don’t go into White Submissive mode before their Jewish masters, they are ‘white supremacists’.

Consider this article in Talking Points Memo: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/paul-ryan-challenger-hires-anti-semite-spox

It says:

A controversial Republican candidate challenging House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) announced Friday that his campaign hired Kevin MacDonald as its spokesperson, a former professor at California State University, Long Beach who is widely recognized as an anti-Semite.

Widely? By whom? Oh yeah, the Jews who control the media and academia who see gentiles as dogs to train than as individuals with independent minds. It’s all the funnier since Jewish media people and academic personnel are filled with all kinds of hatred, hostility, and vitriol against whites. But if someone notices Jewish viciousness toward whites(and a long history of it), he is an ‘anti-Semite’. Of course, Kevin Macdonald didn’t just wake up one day to ‘hate’ Jews. Rather, he couldn’t help noticing social and political trends wherein increasing Jewish power piled on more and more hatred on the white race. MacDonald noticed that Jews act as a tribe with a group strategy. ADL is supposed to be ‘anti-defamation’ but it is actually a PRO-defamation league. It defames any white patriot, Russia, Iran, Palestinians, or any people who won’t bend over backward to Jews. Also, its definition of ‘antisemitism’ is a complete joke. Anyone who notices Jewish power and realizes that what-is-good-for-Jews can be bad-for-my-people is an ‘anti-Semite’. Anyone who notices that Jews have power far beyond their numbers is an ‘anti-Semite’.

Now, Jews may argue that Jewish success and wealth owes to hard work and intelligence, but then, it’s ‘antisemitic’ to surmise that Jews may have higher IQ. Also, Jews who defend meritocracy for Jews excoriate whites for having too much power and wealth. Worse, ‘white privilege’ is invoked to mask what is really Jewish privilege. Do ‘whites’ really run Hollywood? According to ADL, America is ‘antisemitic’ unless it agrees 100% that American Interests are exactly the same as Jewish and Zionist interests. Jews claim to be ‘progressive’ and side with the underdogs against the Power, but they refuse to admit that they have The Power in the US, and they smear as ‘antisemitic’ anyone who notices the truth of Jewish power and realizes that what-is-good-for-Jews could be harmful to his own people. So, a Palestinian is also an ‘anti-Semite’ for realizing that Zionism led to Nakba pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map and reduced Palestinians into a permanent refugee population living under IDF terror and Jewish apartheid. And a white person who realizes that the Jewish Agenda is Ethnic Cleansing for whites in the US and EU is also an ‘anti-Semite’. A more accurate term would be Anti-PhiloSemite. Philosemitism is blind and childish worship and admiration of anything Jewish. A Philo-Semite looks upon Jews like a dog looks upon his master. A Philo-Semite acts toward Jews like the servant to his master in TWELVE CHAIRS.

Kevin MacDonald is an Anti-Philosemite, and that is why Jews hate him so. MacDonald has expressed admiration for Jewish intelligence and achievements, but he is not is fetishist of ability or the Other. Macdonald believes that white people's positiveness toward Jews should be conditional. If Jews are good to whites, whites should be good to Jews. But if Jews do bad to whites, whites should reciprocate in kind. White-Jewish relations mustn't be unconditional like between dog and master. But Jews demand exactly that kind of dynamics. Even when Jews beat on the goy dog, the latter is supposed to honor Jews.
We are supposed to revere Jews as a superior breed because of their great achievements, but power, wealth, and ability don’t necessarily mean truth, meaning, morality, and honor. Nazi Germany was a powerful nation with many men of talent and ability, but it was evil just the same. George Soros is a wizard at making money, but wealth doesn’t make him better or wiser as a human being.

Philosemites worship Jews for their wealth and power. It has little to do with Shoah or ‘guilt’. If Jews have an average IQ of 90 and achieved precious little since WWII, how many white Americans would be mindless Philosemites worshiping Jews? All this Jew-worship is really a nihilistic fandom of money and power. To be sure, Jews have cleverly used the Shoah narrative to fend off any criticism or challenge to their power. Jews just say, ‘Nazi’ or ‘anti-Semite’ as they do to MacDonald and Nehlen.

Unfortunately, this Jew worship is found on the White Right as well. Jared Taylor is so enamored of Jewish money and power that his dream is to have Jews come over to his side. Bill Buckley gave Neocons everything they demanded but Jews still didn’t come over to the American Conservatism. So, what chance is there that Jews will join with Jared Taylor? Taylor is like Sal in THE GODFATHER who hangs his hopes on Barzini whose power threatens to eclipse the Corleones'. Because Taylor knows a few Jewish HBD individuals, he seems to think some kind of Jewish-White alliance is possible. But it’s comical because Jews used all their might to smear Taylor, kick him off Twitter, ban him from Paypal, and etc. Jews can smell weakness. A chutzpah-istic people, they can only be dealt with counter-chutzpah. Any good will on the part of gentile is seen by Jews as a vulnerability, a hole through which Jews can worm in and take over. Also, Jews can spot craven opportunism when they see it. Jews know that most politicians praise Israel, Israel, Israel out of careerism than conviction. They know that these goy politicians are a bunch of cucks. Politicians are their whores. Even as Jews take care of such people, they feel utter contempt for them. What Jew respects a total wussy boy like Mitt Romney or Lindsey Graham? Or Paul Ryan? They are total wussy cucks who suck and swallow for doggy biscuits from Jews. They are like goy actors and crew in Hollywood who work for Jewish bosses.

Talking Point Memo cannot refute anything Nehlen or MacDonald have said, so it does what the rest of the media do: It refers to ADL:

According to the Anti-Defamation League, MacDonald was first recognized for his anti-Semitic views when he wrote a series of books arguing that Jews are “a hostile elite” in the U.S. whose goal is to undermine America’s European ties and “destroy Europeans.” He is also the leader of the American Freedom Party, a white supremacist group whose goal is to “to restore and preserve the legitimacy of White identity, White heritage, and expressions of White interests,” according to the ADL.

That’s how journalism works in the US. On any issue or subject that involves Jewish Power and their critics, just ask the ADL and it’s sure to give an unbiased opinion, right? And notice how white identity and white interests are conflated with ‘white supremacism’. According to Jew-run media, any white person who refuses to kowtow to Jewish Supremacism, i.e. rejects White Submissivism, is a ‘white supremacist’. This is how the Smear Media, or Smedia, operates. Jew-run US journalism is just a Jew-run operation that consults Jew-run ‘watchdog groups’ for 'expertise' and opinion. (Jew-run media and Jew-run watchdogs scratch each other's back. As the go-to-voice by Big Media, groups like ADL gain prestige as a 'respectable' organization. And since such 'esteemed' organizations cater to Big Media, the media is bestowed with respectability in turn. It's mutual reinforcement society. It's like how the financial bubble began in the US with all these Jew-run-institutions and organizations patting each other on the back. This is also how Jews get to say a certain view is 'widely discredited'. They create all these dummy front organizations that mutually reinforce each other's biases and interests. So, there's no need to actually think about Kevin Macdonald's thesis. Just have all these Jews and cucks in their front-organizations spout the same line and fire anyone who refuses to do so. And it is also how Jews make something 'valuable', like those financial derivatives during the Housing Bubble. Since Jews control so many industries and financial rating firms, they all wink-wink reinforced one another. Same thing with Russia-Hacking nonsense. Jews had no truth but created the illusion of collusion by having all the institutions that they control to spout the same Narrative points. Jews really colluded to create the illusion of collusion between Trump and Russia. And Jews also did this with BLACK PANTHER, creating a climate where ALL critics were obligated to praise it to high heaven. Well, if so many 'experts' say it is super, it must be. Jews just create an echo chamber where only their voices reverberate and are heard. Now, it's not like Jews call everyone up to tell them what to do. Because Jews control so much of media and academia, they cultivated and conditioned everyone to pick up the Correct Signals and act accordingly.)

Now, imagine if the Media on a host of controversial issues just called on the American Freedom Party(instead of ADL) for its views, advice, and expertise? How fair and objective would that be? Not very.
And yet, the media see no problem in just relying on ADL and SPLC to offer the final say on a host of matters. ADL and SPLC are the High Priesthood of Jew-run Political Correctness. Indeed, the media don’t even provide the reader with a disclaimer that ADL is a Zionist-imperialist organization funded by Jewish globalist supremacists. But then, if the media were truly honest, they would also remind readers and watchers on a daily basis as to WHO really own and control the media operation. But if they did, we would wake up to the fact that Jewish supremacists control the US.

Jews Galore in the Jew-run media

Yes, that is how the corrupt Jew-run Media operate. Jews bitch about how Russia, Iran, and China don’t have free press, but the US doesn’t either. All the media and platforms are owned and run by Jews. Jewish publishers and moguls hire Jews to run the operations, and if gentiles want to be part of the team, they better serve Israel and say NO to BDS. Don't be like Rick Sanchez who noticed Jewish domination at CNN, and don't be like Helen Thomas who called on Zionists as European Jews who stole land from Palestinians.
So, as with politicians, the Courage & Conviction genes will be weeded out among media gentiles. Only those who are Craven & Cowardly will be hired and promoted, and those Craven & Cowardly gentiles will produce the cuck-elites of the future. The US has freedom of speech as enshrined in the Constitution, but the only speech and expression that really matter are Power Speech that is EXPENSIVE as hell. It takes billions of dollars to own media operations.

Jews rigged the game so that they can work for Jewish identity, interests, and power. Consider AIPAC. Judeo-Nazis can have Nuremberg Rallies for Israel. Look at ADL. Jews can unite to oppose criticism of Jewish power. And no matter how disproportionately Jews are represented in elite institutions and industries, you better not say anything lest you be labeled as an ‘anti-Semite’. If you’re a gentile and want IN to the elite institutions that Jews control, you better be like Nikki Haley or Amy Chua. Even Jordan Peterson, who has courage to stand up to trans-gender freaks and Marxists, goes weak in the knees at the mere mention of Jews.

Jewish censorship, paranoia, and hysteria have grown only worse for two reasons: Donald Trump’s presidency and internet open forum. Trump sucks Jewish cocks, but Jews know he’s a spitter than a swallower. And this makes Jews angry as hell. They demand total subservience to Jewish supremacist power from goyim. Jews demand that white elites serve Judea’s globalism and morally ‘identify’ with People of Color. It’s like Bill Clinton, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Jeb Bush, and John McCain praise Jewish oligarchs and speak for Diversity but NEVER EVER speak for the white middle class, white working class, and white poor. NEVER! Jews fear that if white elites connect with white masses, the organic reunion will constitute a force that will weaken white elite’s submission to the Jews. Consider what happened to Moses in TEN COMMANDMENTS when he reconnected with Jews. He no longer served the Egyptians and returned from exile to save and lead the Jewish people from bondage. Jews are the Pharaohs of the US, and white people are, ironically, the New Hebrews waiting for a savior and prophet to lead them to the Promised Land. This is why Jews hate Trump. Even though Trump is no white Moses, Jews see him as awakening something in White America... just like Napoleon feared the awakening of the Chinese dragon: 'China is a sleeping giant. Let her sleep, for when she wakes she will move the world.' Jews feel the same way about White People. Jews want white people doped out on TV, drugs, porn, and pop culture. Jews want white elites to grovel for thirty pieces of silver. It is to keep white elites as compradore-cuck-collaborators of Jews. And if white elites serve Jews, they won’t lead the white masses. And the masses on their own without leadership will always dissipate and decay and lose their way. That's what Jews want, and white masses are to be replaced by Diversity Helots or Helottery.

The other reason why Jews are freaked is that Open Internet empowered independent voices. Suddenly, an ordinary middle class person could offer his views on Youtube and gain an audience as big or even bigger than those for Jew-run mega-media conglomerates. Though Pewdiepie is not an ideas or news person, his super-success with a simple Youtube channel demonstrated the power of the internet. Jews also fear that these independent voices have one key advantage over hired journalists. They don’t have Big Jew looking over their shoulder. While many journalists in the profession are smart, experienced, and have impressive credentials, the fact is they must stick to the Narrative dictated by their Jewish supremacist globalist masters. As such, much of their intelligence and research go to waste because their editors will say NO. Worse, they can’t have any real integrity as reporters of truth.

In contrast, independent voices on the internet may be less credentialed, less experienced, and less erudite, but they have integrity in speaking their minds on issues they care about. This is why Jews began to freak and shut down & censor content on the internet. As Jews control most of the platforms and have the support of Media, Wall Street, and Deep State, they can get away with it. Some people blame the ‘left’ for the censorship, but Jews also go after BDS Movement that is generally associated with the Left. Also, Ryan Dawson is not part of the Alt Right, but his Youtube channel has also been nixed because Jews at Google work with ADL Zionist supremacists to shut down dissident pro-Palestinian voices. As for craven academics like George Hee-Hawley, he’s too busy bitching about ‘white supremacism’ and ‘racism’ to notice that it’s Jews who have supremacist power in the US. America doesn’t face a threat from Neo-Nazis but from Judeo-Nazis as it’s the Jews who now act like Nazis and have Nazi-like Powers. GAP, or Go Ask the Palestinians.

Granted, just because Jews act like Judeo-Nazis doesn’t mean the White Right should condone Neo-Nazism or some such. It’s true enough that Kevin Macdonald has been associated with such people, but then, losers can’t be choosers. When your voice is shut down and your kind are exiled, the chances are you’re going to make common cause with other exiles, even if they’re extreme. So, it’s true enough that MacDonald has regrettably been associated with certain despicable Neo-Nazi elements. Robert Griffin who writes for OCCIDENTAL OBSERVER is especially contemptible as a soft-Hitler-apologist. Furthermore, Occidental Observer can be pretty censorious too. When I tried to post the following comment to rebut Griffin's fanboy article on Adolf Hitler, it was rejected.


Hitler can't be understood apart from his temperament, character, and personality.
Some of Hitler's ideas were valid, some were invalid, some were nutty. Granted, even many of the ideas and attitudes of the Progressives of the time would be appalling to many people today. Woodrow Wilson, the icon of post-WWI reconstruction, had no love for blacks. Winston Churchill was a bigot about Hindus. Eugenics caught the imagination of many Liberals and progressives. The US media ran anti-Japanese propaganda as a Race War. The Yellow Folks were totally dehumanized... as the Japanese had dehumanized Americans.
So, not everything that seems extreme about Hitler was so extreme within the context of his times.
Then, why did Hitler cause so much trouble?
It was his personality, character, and temperament.
I would wager a man with sound personality, character, and temperament with BAD ideas is less dangerous than a man with foul personality, character, and temperament with GOOD ideas. Notice demented people made foul use of even a loving religion like Christianity. Jim Jones for instance.
In contrast, had National Socialist Germany been led by someone more sound and stable like Albert Speer, I don't think it would have led to WWII and Shoah. Speer was a not a psychopath. He took up National Socialist ideology but wasn't a pathological gambler who would have played fire with history.
Same in China. Mao had a crazy personality and used communism to tear China apart. Deng also grew up believing in communism, but he had a more moderate and cooperative personality. He was willing to compromise and go easy. So, Mao used communism to wreck China. Deng used communism to restore China and even adopted other ideas in a spirit of pragmatism.
Some of Hitler's ideas were horrible. But if Hitler had the character and temperament of someone like Kemal Ataturk or Franco, he wouldn't have gambled so recklessly. He would have acted more cautiously and soberly.
And he wouldn't have been so utterly heartless in his wars of conquests that were meant to ultimately raze Moscow to the ground, kill tens of millions of Slavs, and turn all surviving Slavs into slave helots for the German master race.
Problem with Hitler was he not only had some bad ideas but a crazy personality that was willing to gamble everything. It was classic megalomania. Also, Hitler's grand vision was beyond crazy.
In war, every side does crazy things. UK and US bombed entire cities in Germany. Japan was nuked. All sides committed horrible atrocities. But the US, upon winning the war, used peace to restore order and sanity in the world. Soviets were more brutal in their victory over Germans, especially in the mass rapes. But when the dust settled, Soviets regarded Germans as fellow comrades. Soviets didn't deny the humanity of Germans, Poles, Czechs, and etc. The Iron curtain was repressive, but the governing ideology regarded all peoples are comrades and fellow humans.
In contrast, had Hitler won in Russia, the Peace would have been total genocide and enslavement for the Russians. Unlike Italian Fascism and Spanish Fascism, the German variant of fascism had some truly insane ideas about race that envisioned and justified mass extermination and enslavement of entire peoples.
And that makes Hitler a very evil man.
Now, one could argue that Hitler had some good sides. And there were wonderful things about National Socialism that surely would have worked HAD it remained national and not turned imperialist.
But because his pathological side was so dark and because his crimes were so heinous, the evil totally overshadows whatever was good.
Imagine if someone comes to your house, rapes and murders your entire family after torturing them. But then, suppose he pets and feeds the dog and waters plants in the garden. Sure, he's nice with the dog and good with gardening. So, is he 50/50 good and bad?
But those are irrelevant considerations when compared to the gravity of the crime.
Hitler loved animals and appreciated nature. But he had a murderous contempt for Slavs. And even though he began as a German patriot, he came to regard himself as bigger than Germany. He saw himself as God. As Hess says in TRIUMPH OF THE WILL, Germany is Hitler and Hitler is Germany. In other words, German people exist to serve him, glorify him, obey him. And when Germany was falling in the end, did Hitler blame himself? Did he apologize to the Germans who'd followed him like dogs? No, he blamed them for failing him. He ordered Albert Speer to blow up everything. He wanted Germans to be wiped out for their failure to fulfill his vision. Hitler's punishment for the Germans went far beyond the Morgenthau Plan. Hitler also ordered Paris to be blown up. But thankfully, Speer disobeyed him. And his officers in Paris also disobeyed him. Maybe they shared his ideology but they didn't share is pathology. Personality matters, and from childhood, Hitler was born 'evil'. In that sense, can we really blame him? If a child is born with extreme pathological personality, is it his fault?
Today, it's the Jews who've gone pathological. Any people have its share of extremist personalities. And any people can be misled by lunatics. It happened with Germany and Japan in WWII.
Now, Jews are intoxicated with power and going nuts, restarting a new cold war with Russia and using US power to wage Wars for Israel that have destroyed millions of lives. And Jews are engineering total lebensraum for the West whereupon white nations will be flooded with non-whites to be used as Janissary by Jewish lunatics.
Jews suffered greatly under Hitler, but they are the new Hitlers.

But then, let’s not forget Barack Obama was chum-chummy with Louis Farrakhan, Bill Ayers, and Zionist supremacists, but that was no disqualification for him to be President. And let’s keep in mind CNN hired avowed communist Van Jones. And Howard Zinn was good friends with Bob Avakian who, to this day, admires mass-killers Stalin and Mao. So, MacDonald is hardly alone in having some extreme associates. If anything, it’s no big deal for those on the ‘left’ to be associated with all sorts of extremists. NYU hired a professor who was fired from Drexel university for calling for ‘white genocide’. And Nikki Haley and Amy Chua are cheerleaders for Jewish globalist power that have destroyed millions of lives in the Middle East and crushes the hopes of Palestinians. So, for globalist snakes to accuse people like MacDonald of ‘extremism’ is disingenuous to say the least. If the elites don't want extremism, maybe they shouldn't have let the colleges be taken over by insane Jewish Supremacists, Homo degenerates, and anti-white lunatics.

Americanism as Betrayal — Anglo-American Way vs the Jewish-American Way — Jewish-American Way over the American Way — The Shame of German-America and the Need to Revive Germanism

Jews have made sure that Jews don’t fight other Jews, neither in the West nor around the world. American History is one of betrayal from the beginning. Anglo-Colonists sided with the French and fought against the Mother Country and the loyal Anglo-Colonials. German-Americans were pressured to turn on Germany and fight and kill other Germans. Same with Italian-Americans. Japanese-Americans, though interned and dispossessed, volunteered to fight for America, even against Japan that had been baited by FDR's administration into attacking the US navy. Muslim-Americans join the US military and drop bombs on other Muslims. Russian-Americans must kill Russians if the Jewish-controlled US declares war on Russia. Chinese-Americans must fight and kill Chinese if the Jewish-controlled US declares war on China. And so on. Whatever patriotism Russians feel for Russia in Russia, it evaporates almost immediately upon coming to America. Chinese may be patriotic in China but toss away Chinese Pride upon landing in US or Canada. They become insta-potential-traitors with loyalties switched to the new country.

Given America’s history of betrayal at the founding and the betrayals of immigrant groups against their countries of origin, Jews knew they could fall into the same pattern: Jewish-Americans being encouraged, cajoled, nudged, or badgered into working against Jews in other countries, or World Jewry. This is why Jews reacted so violently to the Red Scare. Though Joe McCarthy and HUAC didn’t turn their anti-communist campaign into a Jewish Issue, many who came under suspicion were Jews. The pressure on Jewish Americans to take a strong stand against International Communism could also turn against World Jewry, not least because Jews were vastly over-represented in radical movements worldwide, even with capitalist Jews working with socialist Jews at times for common tribal interests, e.g. over the Palestine Question. So, Jews took up the banner of civil liberties, which they didn’t really care about — look how Jews got the power now and do everything to suppress civil liberties and constitutional rights — , to go on the counter-attack against anti-communists who came to be smeared by Jewish-controlled media and Liberal Academia as 'paranoid' instigators of unfounded 'witch hunts'.

One thing for sure, given America’s tireless sermonizing about ‘human rights’(which are often invoked as justification for US action), Israel would make an ideal target for US intervention on behalf of Palestinians(whose plight is many times more dire than that of Uighurs in China). Of course, Jews absolutely cannot tolerate such an outcome, one where their adopted country would be at war with Jews in some other part of the world and where All Good Jewish-Americans would be expected to stand with all decent Americans against Evil Israel, just like All Good German-Americans were expected to side with the US against their nation of origin, Deutschland. And so, Jewish-Americans spent tons of money and used their media monopoly, as well as Holocaust moral blackmail, to drum into American minds the mantra “Israel is our greatest ally, Israel is our greatest ally, Israel is our greatest ally…” to the point where it has become one of those truisms that no one even dares to question. They wake up and fall asleep with the mantra “Israel is our greatest ally” reverberating in their minds.

If something like a 'civil war' existed in the Jewish community, half the Jews would call on the US government to be fairer to Palestinians. Now, such Jews do exist but mostly on the bottom of the power totem-pole, not at the top where it really matters. In the commanding heights, both Neocon Jews and Neolib Jews are agreed that goyim must be drilled to repeat, “Israel is our greatest ally” like it's their second nature.
The ‘Jewish Civil War’ scenario is a pipe-dream of people like Donald Trump and ‘conservatives’ who wish to pry away pro-Israel Jews away from anti-Israel Jews, but the truth is even most Democratic Jews, especially at the top, are totally pro-Zionist and make sure most Democrat goyim fall in line on the Middle East issue. Even Barack Obama’s Iran Deal wasn’t about going soft on the Islamic State but an attempt to splinter it apart from Russia and China. Also, it was highly successful in halting the uranium enrichment. Even most Jews who are critical of Israel only focus on the occupation of the West Bank, not the greater crimes Israel has committed against neighboring Arab countries in pursuit of the Yinon Plan. (Zionism has become Yinonism.) By the way, if Trump and the Evangelicals really believe that they, as Christians, care more about the Holy Land than Jews do, shouldn't they go into Crusader mode and claim the Land for Christendom? What's the point of supporting Jewish domination over the Holy Land when Israel has become Sodom and Gomorrah with massive 'gay pride' parades? How can any decent Christian support such desecration of the Holy Land? Given Israel's deviltry with globo-homo, so-called Christian Zionists should really be called christian sodomists because they honor the Tribe that chose to associate holiness with homo bungholes. If Arab Muslims/Christians had kept control over the Holy Land, such perversion would never have been allowed to sprout there.

Jewish hypocrisy is truly outrageous… but in a way, Jews are the most admirable group in the US because they alone among all the groups remained true and loyal to their deep origins. Jewish History is 3,500 yrs old whereas American History is a mere 250 yrs. The idea of prioritizing a new thin citizenship over a deep rich heritage is shallow. The idea of turning one’s back on a tribal community with a 3,500 yr pedigree in favor of a political proposition going back 250 yrs is for the birds or boy scouts. It also means being enticed by ‘money’ and ‘liberty’ to turn one’s back on a deep history and community. Sure, the US offered opportunities to newcomers, and immigrants should try to be good citizens and get along, but should one favor this ‘Americanism’ over one’s deeper identity and culture? Roots going back many centuries, even millennia, discarded in favor of a green card?

More crucially, who determines what Americanism is? Who decides what course of political action is 'patriotic'? Who decides what foreign nations are allies and which ones are enemies and on what basis? It was never the people, most of whom were decent folks minding their own business, who decided. It was always the ruling elites with the power to sway and control the sucker masses for their own often devious ends.
For proof, look at the state of America from the moment it went from Anglo-Christian hands to Jewish hands. Jewish elites got to decide what Americanism is. It’s now about ‘gay marriage’, or so the new elites say, and most American dummies fall in line and nod along. It’s about Wars for Israel, the new elites say, and most Americans don’t object to their shabbos goy politicians shilling for Zion. In 2020, Jews say Americanism is about the blackity-black anti-white 1619 project and about BLM thugs burning down cities while politicians take the knee and the cornered Trump eulogize George Floyd as a black angel. THAT is Americanism because the new elites say so. Jews say Americanism is about targeting parents who oppose CRT as ‘domestic terrorists’. Meanwhile, Israelis can spy on America at every level. It won’t be long before Jonathan Pollard is revised as a great American hero, and US politicians will be apologizing for their country for ever having convicted and locked him up. So, while Americanism at the common level just means American citizens doing their best to be good neighbors, Americanism at the political level is a matter to be decided by the ruling elites. Jews rule America, and their core conviction comes down to "Is it good for Jews?", not "What is good for most Americans, 98% of whom are goyim?" So, while Jews do everything to ensure that Americanism never directs its ire at Israel or World Jewry, they more than gladly turn Americanism into a cudgel against whatever goy country they happen to revile at the moment. Thus, while Jewish-Americans need never worry about being pressured to hate on World Jewry or Israelis, Iranian-Americans must often decide between (Zionist-ruled) US and their homeland of Iran. And Russian-Americans must choose between (Jewish-ruled) US and mother Russia. Because Jews control Americanism to their ends, 'patriotism' will never entail hostility toward Jews in other parts of the world, whereas for Iranian-Americans and Palestinian-Americans, being 'patriotic' Americans means they must stand with pro-Zionist US foreign policy that stomps on the Arab/Muslim World with an iron boot.

Jews among all the immigrant groups figured it out, i.e. the so-called ‘patriotism’ is a ploy used by the ruling elites to hoodwink and control the masses. While most European immigrants came under the spell of the Wasp elites, Jews kept with their deeper identity and loyalty. This is why Jews remained free of Wasp control and, over time, grew in power as a tribe with an identity far deeper and richer than being an 'American'. While Anglo-Americans prided their place in US history for having turned against the 'tyrannical' mother country, Jewish-Americans took pride in the connection between themselves and their brethren in other parts of the world through all of history, past and future, culminating in their insistence that the fates of US and newly established Israel be joined at the hip. No wonder even capitalist Jews at times worked with socialist Jews in Russia and Europe. Beneath the ideology, they valued the identity.

Now, consider the idiot German-Americans contra Jewish-Americans. Prior to World War I, they had their own communities. Many spoke German as well as English. They had German-language newspapers. They were proud of their German culture and identity. But World War I came along, and the Anglo-American elites persecuted the German-American community as disloyal. Anti-German campaigns broke out all across America. German-Americans were often suspected of treason or being ‘un-American’. They got cold feet and went out of their way to demonstrate their 'patriotism' before their vicious Anglo-American persecutors.

But it was neither Germany nor German-Americans that were guilty of treachery. It was the Anglos in UK and US. Germany didn’t want war with UK, which could easily have stayed out, in which case the war would have been over in less than a year with German victory over France and Russia. But Anglo-Brits were paranoid about German power and aided the French. It led to countless and needless deaths. Germany was forced to fight UK. It was the UK that entered a war that wasn’t theirs. That was the real treachery. (And I don’t want to hear about UK siding with fellow democratic France against autocratic Germany. UK and France were allied with far more autocratic Russia.)
But even worse were the Anglo-American elites. If Germany didn’t want war with UK, it most absolutely didn’t want war with the US. And German-Americans were loyal to both their mother country and to the US, which they rightly saw as having no good reason to enter the war against Germany. So, neither Germany nor German-Americans were anti-American. Rather, it was the Anglo-American elites who joined with Anglo-Brits in their deranged Anti-Germanism. It was they who manipulated events so that Germany and US would butt heads. It was they who acted with treachery and disgraced Americanism by promoting Anti-Germanism as a precondition for 'patriotism', just like Americanism in the current year requires us to hate on Russia, Iran, & China and kicking Palestinians in the teeth(because Jews as ruling elites want it that way). But back then, the Anglo-Americans were the ruling elites with the power to sway the sucker masses, and so war fever took off, and it became the most fervently 'patriotic' thing to hate on Germany and to pressure German-Americans to abandon German culture & identity and become mindless minions of the Anglo-American empire and march off to war to kill their own ethnic brethren.

Jews know of this history, of how the weak identities of goyim meant that immigrant-goyim could easily be manipulated to go fight and murder their own ethnic brethren in the home countries.

So far, there have been two kind of Americanisms:

1. The Anglo-American way is for all newcomers and immigrants to become ‘good Americans'(defined by ruling elites) and turning against their nations of origin. Even though this required non-Anglo immigrants to speak English and adopt social norms rooted in English tradition, it also entailed Anglo-Americans favoring a comprehensive Americanism over their own racial-tribal identity. Non-Anglos would adopt certain Anglo ways while Anglos would drop their Anglo identity and just become 'American'.

2. The Jewish-American way is for all newcomers and immigrants to become friends of Israel and the loyal puppets of the Jewish ruling elites. Immigrant politicians are more likely to pontificate about their love of Israel than for their own countries or cultures of origin. So, while all goy groups must favor Jew-SA over their own tribal identities, Jewish-America's main loyalty is allowed to remain with World Jewry and Israel. Indeed, from the Jewish perspective, America is so great and awesome not because it treats all groups the same way but because it makes all goy groups the same in favoring Jews and Israel uber alles. If Anglo-Americans melded with non-Anglos who melded into the Greater America, Jewish-Americans remain outside the melting pot, which is stirred to turn all goyim into kosher soup. Thus, so-called 'multi-culturalism' was a fraud. It wasn't about each identity favoring its own above others but all identities favoring Jews(and blacks and homos) over not only whites but their own. If Democrats are truly 'multi-cultural', how many of them would praise an Iranian-American for siding with Iran, his mother country, over Israel and Jewish-supremacist interests? Zilch and nada.

The Anglo-American Way(1) is now useless, especially because WASPS betrayed their own principles. The very people, who had pressured German-Americans, Italian-Americans, and Japanese-Americans to turn against their own tribal-ethnic origins in the name of 'patriotism', ended up handing elite levers of power over to the group that most resolutely refused to turn their backs on their own kind around the world. Yes, the Jews.

So, how do you like that? Anglo-Americans had been telling all newcomers to change their loyalty from their mother countries to the new country on the basis of freedom, democracy, and patriotism; after all, Anglo-colonists had done just that in the founding of America when they worked with Monarcho-France to overthrow British rule in the colonies. But if this was the Iron Logic of Americanism, why didn’t Anglo elites make sure Jews conformed to it as well? Given that Jews refused to, why did Wasps pass their power to the Tribe, the very people who most defied the rules of Americanism? Ironically, Anglo-American Way ended up handing the top prize to the very group that did most to defile the Iron Law of Anglo-Americanism.

Of course, one may argue that the biggest rule of Americanism really boiled down to winner-takes-all; and Jews being smarter, stronger-willed, more united, and more devious, just happened to beat out the Anglos. To be sure, Jews used trickery, often reviling the Anglos for their 'racism' and failure to live up to universal ideals of equality, thus lending the impression that greater Jewish Power would lead to a more colorblind and just system for all.
Well, fast forward to today, and Americanism is all about blind support of Zionist Wars, Jewish Supremacism, dehumanization of Palestinians, and anti-Russian hysteria. It is also about homos uber alles as Jews regard 'gays' as their closest allies and agents. Homos are bored with 'gay rights' and now demand Gay Rites as the new mass cult. It also means blacks, as profitable and symbolic assets of Jews, get to romp around and rob & beat up people while White America kneel before the portraits of George Floyd. The Jewish Media hardly cover stories of the victims of black thuggery; they might as well be Palestinians in the West Bank. Some equality.

If the Anglo-American Way is toast, what about the Jewish-American Way(2) that currently serves as orthodoxy? It totally sucks because it’s about shabbos goyim groveling at the feet of Jews. It’s embarrassing. Jews are praised for their tribalism or putting Jewishness uber alles, BUT goyim would be reproached for even thinking to favor their deeper identity over the New Americanism that isn’t even about generic citizenism but about how all must bow down before Zion and hate whatever that happens to be on the Jewish shit-list. Hate Russia and Iran! Turn your back on the Palestinians! Who cares about all those dead Arabs/Muslims from the Wars for Israel? And maybe China is also on the shit-list, so hate it too!

Any goy who falls for this is an idiot.

So, is there a Third American Way? Yes. It calls upon all groups to emulate the Jews, at least to a degree, and favor their own deep identities and histories over the Anglo-American Way(now defunct as Anglos betrayed their own principles by sucking up to ultra-tribal Jews) and over the Jewish-American Way(that hypocritically says Jews get to favor Jewishness uber alles while all goy groups must put Jewish-controlled Americanism over their own identities and cultures).

The only way forward is for American goy groups to rediscover and reconnect with their own roots and kind. So, if you’re Russian-American, choose Russia over Jewish-dominated US. If you’re Iranian, choose Iran over the Jew-SA. If you’re Chinese, favor China over US as the Zion King. If you’re Mexican, the hell with gringos-who-cuck-to-Jews. (Or should it be 'gringx' since it went from 'Latino' to 'Latinx'?)

As for the German-American community, it must revive what was so rudely interrupted and forsaken during World War I. Bring back German language, culture, pride, and heritage. And rewrite the World War I narrative. It wasn’t Germany and German-Americans who turned on the Anglo World but vice versa… with grave consequences for all the world. Anglos must bear blame for their perfidy, especially against their racial cousins. German-Americans must first and foremost become Germans uber alles.

And if any milquetoast conzo or libby-dib whines, “But what about colorblind Americanism?”, just ask the idiot, “If you care about Americanism as a universal proposition, why does it revolve around Jewish Supremacism?”

For Anglo-America to have handed the throne to ultra-tribalist Jews but then insist that "all goy groups must favor generic colorblind Americanism over their own tribalism" is truly rich in irony, hypocrisy, and cravenness toward Zion. If they really believe this, they should begin with Jews who are the premier violators of the principle. But current Americanism is a stupidism that is incapable of saying what must be said.

FALSE FLAGS: THE SECRET HISTORY OF AL QAEDA — PART 2: 9/11 - The Corbett Report

Response to James Lawrence's Nonsensical Piece of Misdirection on the Real Problems of Jewish Power: "AN ANTIDOTE TO THE JEWPILL (PART 2: ANTICHRISTIANITY)"

https://affirmativeright.blogspot.com/2021/12/an-antidote-to-jewpill-part-2.html

Why would anyone bother to argue with E. Michael Jones' political theology? It is absurd because Jones conflates spirituality with rationalism, i.e. Jesus represents objective truths of the universe. The looniness is right there. If people want to accept religion as faith, prophecy, or imagination, that's fine. But anyone who claims religion = reason has no understanding of either.

Jones is useful to our side because, in his shotgun approach to Jewish Power, he sometimes hits the right targets. Same with Rick Wiles of TruNews. Even Neo-Nazis are useful in this regard. It's like radical leftists got so much of history wrong, but their anti-Americanism and anti-capitalism sometimes hit the right targets, the rottenness of the US empire and globalist-capitalism that needs to be exposed.
Otherwise however, there's no point in addressing E. Michael Jones' worldview. He's essentially a Paleo-Catholic crank who can't tell logos apart from bogus. But then, this 'James Lawrence' sounds rather too much like Nathan Cofnas larping as a 'Christian'. But whereas E. Michael Jones is clearly and sincerely nutty, there's something weasely and disingenuous about Lawrence's piece. It reads like misdirection that boils down to "Don't blame the Jews. Goyim started it, and Jews just followed, rather haplessly."

In Europe, it was the French revolution that emancipated the Jews, not the Jews who unleashed the revolution. In America, it was the Progressive and New Deal movements that raised them into the governing elite, and set the stage for everything that MacDonald describes in The Culture of Critique. Even Zionism, contrary to popular belief on the Dissident Right, was a 19th-century Protestant religious obsession (called ‘restorationism’) before it was taken up by Jewish nationalists like Emma Lazarus and Theodore Herzl.

First of all, only a moron rightist believes that everything revolutionary is bad and caused by Jews. Only a moron rightist thinks that everything leftist is wrong and that everything right is somehow noble. True, there are moron-rightists who still dream of monarchs & aristocracy and feel triggered by anything that hints of 'revolution'. In a way, such position has more to do with the likes of Bill Buckley — National Review ran countless articles on how the French Revolution was a dress rehearsal for 20th century radicalism, not only communism but Fascism — than with Alt-Right or the New Right, many of whom see the value of socialism and the positive role that revolution and social reforms played in the development of the Modern West. After all, what distinguished the West from the Rest? West accepted and even accelerated changes, revolutions in so many areas. This dichotomy also applies to the Christian West and Christian East, especially Byzantium. While the former grew and grew, the latter declined and fell under the Ottoman Muslims. If Christian logos is a sure formula of truth and power, why did Byzantium fail? It was far more 'theocratic' than the Christian West that broke free of Medievalism and gained much from neo-paganism of the Renaissance. What really made the Modern West was the fusion of neo-paganism(that sparked creativity in the arts and Hellenistic approach to logic and science) and Christian prophecy. The 'problem'(if it is a problem) with paganism is it lacks a unified vision of the universe and the future. According to paganism, there are many gods, therefore there is no single direction to history but a contest of competing forces, like with the gods in THE ILIAD. In contrast, Christian monotheism says there is one force, God, that leads history to fulfill a certain prophecy. Thus, the Christian mindset is more committed to a linear theory of progress. Now, Christianity alone could mean Byzantine enervation or Medieval ascetism that hardly moves history forward. But when fused with neo-pagan creativity and spark, the combination could open new horizons.

Anyway, only a fool would argue that the revolutionary spirit was necessarily bad for the West. If anything, it is what made the West, relative to the far more conservative Rest(and Byzantium). Pro-Western people don't have a problem with revolution per se. Rather, the problem has been with impatient radicalism rooted in the cult of rationalism. (Radicalism isn't content with organic pace of change and seeks to bring about utopia in single leaps. Granted, change and progress aren't necessarily organic. Rather, they must be encouraged and pushed. It's like plants need sun and nutrients to grow. Children need to be pressured by parents to study. Coaches must drive athletes hard. Inertia is often the natural state of things. Leftism in sane doses can prod society to move a bit faster, hastening the pace of change. There are limits, of course. A child can learn only so much in a week, and an athlete can improve his ability only so much in a season. Leftism sometimes pushes good ideas too fast, but it is truly fatal when it blindly pushes bad ideas as the answer, like with communism.) While the emergence of rationalism was a great thing for the West(especially in science, technology, medicine, etc), it also led to the hubris that mankind could figure everything out and know, based on 'science', what must be done. The result was Marxism(with its supposed 'scientific materialism') and, more recently, Covid Nuttery.
Science is of immense value, but it also spawned 'scientism', the conceit that one's worldview or ideology is foolproof for being based on 'science'. Such Iron Rationalism actually undermines real rationalism. This usually applies to the human sciences. At one time, the 'scientistic' element favored the 'scientific racists' who were so sure of their theories of race. Today, the 'scientistic' element favors the 'scientific anti-racists' who, based on incomplete evidence or willful self-delusion, insist that race is just a social construct. In both cases, true science is clouded by 'scientism' that really amounts to misuse of science for what are ideological purposes. ('Scientific Anti-Racism' will be far more harmful to the West as it will argue that 500 million black African immigrants won't make any difference to Europe because people are just people. 'Scientific Racism' led Europeans to mistreat or murder some peoples or groups, but 'Scientific Anti-Racism' can only lead to wholesale murder of Europe.)

Maybe some extreme Anti-Jewite or ultra-rightist believes every revolutionary movement was bad(and that we should be living in the Middle Ages) or that Jews were the key players in all these events. But that's mostly a red herring because it misses the essence of the current criticism of Jewish Power among today's white nationalists or white-centrists, most of whom don't care what happened 500 yrs ago, let alone 1000 or 2000 yrs.
Of utmost importance is what is happening NOW, and who can deny that Jewish Supremacism rules the West? Furthermore, who can deny that, what Jews push onto white goyim doesn't apply to Jews themselves. If indeed ideology controls the Jews, they would judge themselves by the same yardstick with which they judge whites. But they don't. A case in point. If the ideology of 'anti-racism' is indeed dominant in the West, Jews would not only be bashing whites for past discrimination against blacks but for white support of Jewish tyranny over the Palestinians. But the very Jews who decry white treatment of blacks insist and demand that whites support whatever Israel does to Palestinians(and Arabs in outlying territories). But 'James Lawrence' is rather like Nathan Cofnas on this issue. He'd rather sweep it under the rug while yammering about some Christian theological controversy from 1000 yrs ago. Like who cares about that crap? Maybe E. Michael Jones cares, but even most people who value Jones' criticism of Jewish Power don't care to read his books or lend any credence to his notion that Logos = Worshiping Jesus. I'd argue that most white nationalists or white-centrists are, at heart, neo-pagan, and good for them!

Also, what do we mean by Jews in the historical sense? Your average Jew throughout history didn't amount to much. The real movers and shakers were elite Jews, often the bankers and others with close ties with European elites. These individuals were most certainly manipulating events for Jewish interests. FDR, for example, had the overwhelming support of Elite Jewry. It's true that Jews were absorbing lots of ideas and attitudes from Anglo-Protestants and even following their lead, but it's also true that Jews were playing a prominent role in steering Anglos toward certain goals, like war with Germany. Sometimes, Anglo and Jewish interests overlapped, but more than any other group, Jews steered events in the interests of their tribal interest. Who can deny this? Jews were pro-Soviet at one time because Jews played a key role in the Russian Revolution and because Soviet Union fought Hitler's Germany. After the war, many Jews spied for the Soviet Union. But as the Soviet Union turned more pro-Arab and anti-Israel, even so-called 'leftist' Jews grew hostile to communism, and Neocons joined and even came to lead the anti-communist crusade in the 1980s. Who doesn't see a tribal angle to this?
And if ideology matters so much to Jews, how come all those 'liberal Jews' don't condemn ultra-rightist Israel? Why are they silent about Jewish oligarchs allied with Naziesque forces in Ukraine? If they're such good 'secular liberals', why do they turn a blind eye to Israel's support of ultra-religious ISIS and other crazy Jihadists working against secular Assad of Syria? Never mind what happened 500 or 1000 yrs ago. Why can't 'James Lawrence' address the world today? Why is he misdirecting our focus from the obvious truths in the here-and-now to some mumbo jumbo theological debates centuries ago?

Alas, this theory contradicts the central dogma of white nationalism: that racial self-interest is primary, and truths, doctrines and ideas are secondary. WNs want to live in a dark fever-dream, where every race except the white one is strategising for its self-interest under a cynical veil of ideals – and we need only become paranoid enough to perceive the hidden strategies, and deceptive enough to conceal our own self-interest in the same way. They do not want to live in the light of consciousness, where ideals really motivate individuals, and solidify the cohesion of groups – because in this reality, their own dream is reduced to a narrow and paltry ideal, a cult of biological race.

What a lying piece of turd. White Nationalists don't say racial self-interest IS primary. They know it from White Decline all around. If racial self-interest were primary, whites wouldn't be in this mess. What they say is that racial self-interest MUST BE primary. In other words, it can't be taken for granted and must be embraced as a consciousness. They say identity must dictate ideology, not vice versa. Why? History shows time and again that identity has greater resilience and longevity than ideas or ideology or whatever. Any people who forget this are fated to fade away and die.
Also, white-centrists don't believe in some 'dark fever dream' where whites must conceal their own self-interests. No, they are for exposing the Jewish self-interest and for OPENLY and HONESTLY exhorting and exercising white self-interest.

Being pro-identity doesn't mean one is anti-ideological. Rather, it means ideology must complement identity. History bears this out. Every religion came to be a tool of power, of a people or an order. Thus, Catholic kingdoms fought other Catholic kingdoms. One Arab tribe, though Muslim, fought another Arab tribe, also Muslim. Russia and China were both communist, but Russian communism served Russia, Chinese communism served China. Russian history is a clear case of identity outlasting ideology, i.e. Russia was Russia before communism, during communism, and after communism. Any people, culture, or civilization can weather the rise and fall of ideologies or political systems AS LONG AS the people remain intact. It is when the people are replaced that it's really game over. The fall of Imperial Tsarist system wasn't the end of Russia. The fall of communism wasn't the end of Russia either. But if Russians were to be replaced by another people, it'd be the end of Russia regardless of ideology. This is why 'muh democracy' is so dumb. "Gee, I don't care if white nations become 90% non-white as long as it still has free markets and elections."

 
The course of current Western History goes to show that racial self-interest doesn't come naturally or first-and-foremost among a people. A people can be brainwashed to welcome their own destruction in the name of false gods of ideology. Or a people can be conditioned to believe their purpose is to serve another people. The lower castes in India were made to feel this way about members of higher caste. In the past, blacks in the South were made to believe their lot was to serve whites because, on their own, they'd just be crazy dumb ni**ers. It's like dogs can be trained to favor the interests of the master over their own dog-hood.
But any people that wants to survive into the future better put race/identity before ideology or make ideology bend to identity. China adopted universal communism but molded it to serve the Chinese people. Iran practices universal Islam, but this doesn't mean it rejects Iranian national interest. Nicaragua practices democracy, but it's a national democracy than one that bends to the US globalist world order.

According to 'James Lawrence', the cult of biological race is a 'paltry ideal'. The white race, or any race, is the product of 100,000s or at least 10,000s of yrs of evolution. White race was forged by survival through all sorts of climates and terrains. It came into existence even before white civilization. Before there was white culture/society, there was the white race. In other words, race came before all else. What we call 'history' is maybe 5,000 yrs, or at most 6,000 yrs. 'History' and high civilization came to Northern Europe much later. Perhaps, Northern European history is 1,500 or 1,200 yrs, much shorter than Egypt's, Persia's, India's, and China's. Long before the rise of European civilization, there was the European race forged by struggle in ice and fire over many eons. This is a rich biological heritage that has value regardless of ideology. After all, a European's primary value is his European being, not whether he's a 'Christian', 'atheist', 'anarchist', 'socialist', 'capitalist', 'libertarian', and etc. This isn't to discount the importance of ideas but to state the obvious: being precedes believing. So, the most valuable ideology is one that places Being before Believing. European race came into existence long before Christianity or any other idea-system. And yet, for 'James Lawrence'(a larping version of Nathan Cofnas?), white consciousness of rich and deep racial history is a 'paltry ideal'. Maybe 'Lawrence' feels this way because he happens to be a paltry specimen of the white race: an ugly stupid dork idiot.

Now, it's true that one can read too much into the supposed Jewish Plan. It can get rather silly, like with Adam Green's theory that Jews cooked up Christianity and spread it to goyim to gain power over them. Green, like E. Michael Jones, is useful as a critic of Jewish Power because he sometimes hits the right targets. But the grand conspiracy theory of Christianity is just ludicrous.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Hbt65YdfHwSi/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/bAsucAXXFbZM/

According to Green, Jews turned goyim into Christian Anti-Semites who oppressed Jews so that Jews could, 2000 yrs later, guilt-bait goyim into serving Jews. ROTFL and LOL rolled into one. It'd be like saying blacks cooked up the slave trade so that blacks could one day guilt-bait whites into kissing black ass. And maybe Japan actually planned to lose WWII to become an ally of the US and gain access to US markets.

This is where grand-theorizing can easily jump the shark. Now, there is a kernel of truth to Adam Green's view. Jews are big thinkers and tend to be more strategic than other races. Jewish personality can be glimpsed in Isaac Asimov's FOUNDATION series where some Big Mind prophesies future events and sees what the normal mind doesn't see. Stanley Kubrick's films were also conceived on the Big Think principle. Jews have been obsessed with chess, a game of strategy where the winner is usually the one who computes more moves ahead. Now, some might argue this is merely the result of higher intelligence, but intelligence isn't necessarily interested in Big Ideas or grand concepts. Anglos have been an intelligent people but their mental skills were focused on empiricism, things that could be observed, collected, and studied. Plenty of very smart people are narrowly focused on a single topic or task. Intelligence per se doesn't strive for the grand theory of everything or the grand prophecy of what will be(or what must be). In other words, most intelligent economists weren't like Karl Marx with a grand theory of history, one who tried to tie together all the past with all the future, the science with the theory of justice. So, the Jewish mindset isn't merely the product of high intelligence. Rather, it's part of the Jewish prophetic tradition(which is more accurate than the 'revolutionary spirit'). Now, what came first in a chicken-or-egg way? Jewish personality or Jewish prophecy? Was there something in Jewish personality that favored propheticism? Or did the culture of propheticism favor those Jews who claimed to be farther-seeing and more profounder in reach? I don't know.

Now, does this mean that Jews long ago looked into the future and brought about events that led to the 20th century? No. While Jews are more strategic and farther-seeing than most peoples, no people(however intelligent or strong-willed) can look into the future and plan events that happen centuries, let alone millennia, later. Kubrick's films are about 'perfect plans' that always fail due to some unforeseen X-factor. There are lots of X-factors and/or black swans in history. Karl Marx based his prophecy on economic trends in his time. He failed to see how those trends would change with new developments in science and technology. Also, he underestimated the element of individual will and the power of the irrational. Furthermore, prophecies tend to undermine themselves because they not only serve as vision of the future but alarm that wakes the enemy. Marxist prophecy forced capitalists to wake up and amend their ways and make compromises with moderate socialists lest growing unrest and radicalism lead to real revolution. Thus, most prophecies are self-defeating by alerting the enemy to what's up ahead unless something is done(to suppress the movement or to win over the moderate voices within it).

Jewish History cannot be understood apart from goy history as most of it is about Jews co-existing with the far more numerous and powerful goyim. Thus, Jews lacked the autonomy that the Persians, Hindus, and Chinese had. Persians had their dominant space. Hindus had their own cosmologically ordered society. Chinese had their own Middle Kingdom. In contrast, Jews had to exist alongside goyim, and this meant they could never practice the kind of centrism of the great goy powers.
Now, if Jews were simply aiming to assimilate and do business, this would have been no big deal. Plenty of minority cultures assimilated and became part of larger cultures. Most of the tribes mentioned in the Bible no longer exist. They became part of Persian folks, Arab folks, Turkic folks, European-Christian folks, and etc. It could have been the same with Jews but for the fact that they came up with the most powerful religious concept and the idea of the Covenant that set themselves apart from goyim. So, even as goyim were more numerous and more powerful, Jews held this conviction that, ethno-spiritually at least, they were the best because of the Covenant with the one true God.

But because Jews insisted on serving their own JEWISH interests despite lacking a secure world of their own, they had to be more esoteric, clever, shadowy, and devious in their thinking and approach. They had to latch onto goy systems, values, fashions, and trends while somehow manipulating them to favor Jewish interests. Of course, Jews themselves were profoundly impacted by these goy values and systems(though, with something like Christianity, one could debate til the cows come home as to whether it's 'semitic' or 'aryan' because it's 'semitic' as foundation but 'aryan' as edifice). But no matter how much Jews adopted goy ways and ideas, they eventually made them serve Jewish identity because the very foundation of Jewishness is the ethno-spiritual Covenant; this core concept of Jewishness is so essential that it even defines secular Jews.

In contrast, Christianity is about weakening one's tribal identity in favor of universal values. To become a better Christian, you favor fellow Christians of all color over your own kind on the basis of blood. However, to be a good Jew means to stick with the Covenant and to believe in the fusion of spirit and blood, the Jewish blood. Thus, even if Jews and white Christians adopt the same 'universal' values, they eventually go separate ways. White Christians try to make themselves less white and more universal because the core principle of Christianity is to unite all of humanity as brethren under Jesus. In contrast, given the nature of Judaism, Jews use the same 'liberal' or 'universal' ideals to serve Jewish identity and interests because the core function of Judaism is preservation of the race on account of its sacred blood.

Look at Jewish Liberals and Wasps Liberals from the New Deal era. After WWII, with each passing year, white liberals became less race-centric, less tribal, and less nationalist, whereas Jewish liberals became more race-centric, more tribal, and more nationalist(even to the point of supremacism). If the power of ideology is paramount, white liberals and Jewish liberals would have ended up the same way. But today, white liberals denounce Hungary for trying to preserve itself while Jewish 'liberals' not only support ultra-right Israel but work with neocon Jews to make sure ALL US POLITICIANS totally support Israel while kicking Palestinians into the dirt. What do Jewish 'conservatives' in the US and Jewish 'conservatives' in UK have in common? Do they care about the preservation of the white race or Christian heritage in either country? No, it all comes down to "Is it good for Jewish Power?" The fact that there is far less animus between Jewish 'left' and Jewish 'right' than between white 'left' and white 'right' goes to show that Jews put identity before ideology, whereas whites put ideology before identity, a fatal development. Now, one could argue that the relative tribal unity among Jews stems from the anxiety of minority status, but it's the same in Israel where Jews are the solid majority.

There are two reasons why Jewish Identity is easier to utilize as the basis of political conviction. Jewish ethnicity has been sacralized via the Covenant. So, according to Judaism, Jewish pride isn't based on tribal arrogance alone but on the very word of God. In contrast, there's nothing in Christianity that bestows specialness on the white race. Thus, while white Christians could feel the glow of sanctity as Christians(though not so much anymore because Jews associated the history of Christianity with 'antisemitism', 'racism', and cultural repression), they can feel no such merely as whites. In contrast, the mere fact of being Jewish means God is watching over you. He chose your kind. (This is why the only solution for whites is to forge their own covenant with the power of the universe. White blood must be sacralized, but this requires the emergence of white prophecy. Christianity, in contrast, means that your blood is hopelessly tainted with sin and can only be cleansed with infusion of Jesus's blood. Covenant binds. Goy way was to divide goyim into aristocrats and subjects. Elites and peons. Because white elites looked down on white peons, Jews could manipulate the division by aiding the goy elites in the exploitation of goy masses. In contrast, the Jewish Covenant says even the blood of the lowliest Jew is equal to that of the richest Jew in the eyes of God. One good thing about National Socialism was it valued every German as part of the national volk.)

The other reason why Jewish Identity is politically justified is ironically due to Christian morality and its emphasis on victimology as basis of virtue. Jews ran with the Holocaust Narrative and made themselves to be the biggest victims in history... at the hands of the Christian West no less. (Some will say the Nazis were neo-pagan, but Jews argue that the entire history of Antisemitism, beginning with the Christian kind, led to the horror in WWII.) Thus, Holocaustianity guilt-baits white Christians with a twist on Christian morality. Jews are suddenly the new jesuses crucified by White Gentiles/Christians as the New Romans.
This guilt-consciousness has been the Achilles Heel of Christianity, at least IF non-Christians were to gain control of the Narrative. In contrast, Muslims are immune to such psycho-emotional manipulation because Muhammad told his followers to do some Jihad, kick butt, never apologize, and convert infidels(or kill them if they get in the way). You don't see Muslims groveling before Jews or bending down to wash stinky Negro feet. Islam can be plenty repressive and dogmatic but it's not sanctimonious like Christianity with 'turn the other cheek' spiel. Muhammad told his followers to kick the other (ass) cheek of the enemy, not turn the other cheek for the enemy to slap. Of course, Christians hardly turned the other cheek and preferred to wage war and kill lots of people, but this could eventually be used to guilt-bait Christian conscience IF the enemy were to gain control of the Narrative. And Jews gained control over the Narrative, which is why the New Western or Schwestern Values are based on a litany of white historical sins, especially to Jews and blacks(as Jews don't want whites to feel sorry for what they did to Arabs and Palestinians).

Now, it's true that what we call Jewish Power is the result of interaction of Jews and goyim. It's like Jews in Italy were different from Jews in France were different from Jews in Britain were different from Jews in Russia were different from Jews in Brazil were different from Jews in America from Jews in Iran and so on. If the Anglo World never existed, Jews would not be ruling the world. Anglos were super-ambitious and highly talented as world conquerors, and Jews rode on that white horse to world power. Also, even though certain Jewish elites had considerable influence throughout Western history, it's only recently that Jews gained anything like supreme power via the Anglos, especially Anglo-Americans who, at some point, decided to get on all fours and play white horsey to the Jewish rider.
So, Jewish worldview always changed and adapted in accordance to shifting historical landscapes. It's not as if a cabal of Jews in the 12th century were planning the Bolshevik revolution of the 20th century or globo-homo parades of the 21st century. Still, whatever Jews were faced with through history, there has been a running thread of bending and twisting things to serve Jewish interests, not least by suppressing criticism of Jews while amplifying criticism of their rivals or enemies.

 
Take Hollywood. One could say Jews didn't invent motion pictures. Jews weren't the first to start the movie business. But once they gained dominance in the industry, they were mindful to make it Jewish-friendly. Of course, Jews had to make compromises. In the early 20th century when Christians and moralists(and anti-Jewish elements) had lots of power, Jews had to agree to stuff like the Hayes Code and appease the Catholic Church. Jews were also mindful not to offend the American South. Still, Jews made sure Hollywood made lots of anti-German movies in the 1930s. And Jews in Hollywood did everything to blacken Joe McCarthy's name because HUAC at one time forced Jewish Hollywood to blacklist certain Jewish writers and directors. And Hollywood also made stuff like EXODUS while not making a single pro-Palestinian movie. So, while, in one way, Hollywood is just another American Capitalist success story, it's also been a Judeo-centric enterprise. Who can deny that Jewish control had a profound impact on how so many Americans(and global audiences) came to see the world? Via Hollywood movies, countless people around the world came to see Islam as synonymous with terrorism. Via Hollywood movies, countless Europeans came to regard white Americans as mindless gun-toting 'racists' who lynch blacks at the drop of a hat.

In a way, Jews are too smart for ideology or fashion trends even as they pretend to go along or get swept up for awhile. In the Sixties, Jews and goyim alike took part in the Counterculture. But whereas many simpleminded white goyim gave themselves fully to the hippie culture and the like, many Jews soon realized how silly it was. And there was too much money to be made than rolling in the hay, wearing flowers in your hair, and searching for Indians to touch. Better to organize rock concerts and rake in the profits than wear tie-dyes and waste your days as a 'deadhead'. Be like David Geffen.

Jewish intelligence can't help but seeing goyim as dumb. Suppose someone with 100 IQ found himself among those with 80 IQ. Would he want to take orders from the dummies? Would he consider them as his equal? He might pretend to because he's outnumbered. It'd sure be dumb for the 100 IQ guy to say to the 80 IQ crowd, "You guys sure are dumb. I'm smarter, I deserve to rule, so do as I say or kiss my ass!" Even dummies will take offense and kick his ass. So, what should he do? He pretends to be for 'equality' and act in interest of the common good while slyly gaining power over them. He may also guilt-bait the 80 IQ crowd by saying they are 'privileged' over the 60 IQ crowd even though he, with 100 IQ, is the most privileged among them all.

Higher IQ simply wants to rule over lower IQ. It's just human nature. It's like blacks, being tougher, want to be the alpha race over others. Blacks will not say it but feel it just the same. Indeed, blacks would be far less anti-white IF whites were equally tough. Suppose whites were just as good at fighting and sports. Suppose NBA and NFL were majority white and blacks made up only 13% of the players. Blacks would actually respect whites and have far less problem with whites having lots of good stuff. But blacks, being obsessed with fighting and sports, look upon whites as inferior wussy fa**oty race of slow white boys. Whites are inferior, so why they gots more than blacks? This infuriates blacks who believe they, as the alpha race, should rule. Jews feel the same way but on the basis of higher intelligence.

But it's not just about brawn or brains. After all, there are big tough guys who are mellow in temperament. And there are smart people who are nice and kind. So, their superiority doesn't make them especially nasty or hostile. But blacks are naturally oogity-boogity due to evolution alongside hippos, hyenas, and lions. They be nasty. And Jews are naturally pushy-wushy due to reasons of evolutions stemming from rabbinical and merchant competition. Thus, there are lots of Jews with personalities of Albert Brooks, Alan Dershowitz, Sarah Silverman, and Howard Stern. No wonder then that black brawn consciousness often leads to jive-ass thuggery, and Jewish brain consciousness often leads to sneering contempt, so evident among the likes of Chuck Schumer, Jerry Nadler, Adam Schiff, Jennifer Rubin, Rob Reiner(meathead), John Podhoretz, and etc.

This is why Jews and blacks sort of see eye to eye. Being advantaged in different areas, they often fear or resent the other, but they also take pride in having extra juice for causing havoc for the rest of us. Terms of Jew-Black Alliance goes as follows: "Jews will use all their might to browbeat and guilt-bait whites into elevating blacks as the gods and idols of the New US, and blacks in turn will dump on whites and 'white supremacism' but will not call out on Jews and Zionist tyranny over Palestinians."
But then, Jews get away with such anti-white crap because whites worship Jews as either the Chosen(Christian Zionists), Holy Holocaust People, Endearing Comedians, or High IQ Geniuses. Indeed, even HBD-sphere is worshipful of Jews. Why does Jared Taylor remain silent about the very people who've done most to de-platform him? It's because he's so enthralled with Jewish Greatness. People like Taylor and John Derbyshire are not hoping for equal partnership with Jews. Rather, they are willing to be servants and sidekicks of Jews in return for Jewish tolerance of white interests. "We white goyim will serve you superior Jews, the true master race, IF you Jews permit our white interests." But why would Jews agree to that? If Jews are the master race, it's only fitting for Jews to serve their own interests, not allow white interests. Now, what if some whites argue that Jewish interests and white interests are totally aligned... like the notion of Judeo-Christian? But Jews are not stupid. They know Christianity began as an anti-Jewish religion. Also, Jews and Europeans had a long troubled history, and all of sudden, Jews and whites are Best-Friends-Forever? No way. Besides, even if whites turned over a new leaf and are sworn to be nice to Jews henceforth, Jews know it's only a matter of time before 'antisemitism' resurfaces. Why? Because bad Jewish behavior will get out of control again. Jews know this. There are good Jews who prefer to play fair and decent, but there are also bad Jews who use every dirty trick in the book. The problem is, given the nature of Jewish Identity, if good Jews had to choose between good goyim and bad Jews, they will go with the latter. It's just a tribal thing. And so, bad Jews go unchecked and give Jews a bad name, and this leads to 'antisemitism'. Good Jews may not want bad Jews to act so badly, but they just can't make themselves side with good goyim against bad Jews. So, Jews have decided to destroy every last vestige of white identity and unity because, then, there won't be any white resistance no matter how badly the bad Jews act and how much the good Jews cover for bad Jews. (Of course, if good Jews aid bad Jews, they too become bad Jews.) Besides, good Jews figure, as nasty as bad Jews are, they(the bad ones) got bigger cojones to do what good Jews wouldn't dare do. Thus, sometimes, it's the bad Jews who really make things happen, from which even good Jews can profit... like the spread of gambling and Zionic scramble for world domination.

 
It's like good Anglos often relied on the ambition and adventurousness of bad Anglos to gain more territory and loot. But whereas whites reached a point where good ones called out on bad ones, good Jews dare not call out on bad Jews. Same with blacks. There are some good blacks, but in the name of 'brotherhood', they stick together and the good ones don't call out on bad ones... which makes black behavior worse, which can lead to more 'racism'. Even though good whites are far more likely to call out on bad whites, there's a limit to white conscience(as it lacks agency). In their worship of Jews and blacks, good whites dare not call out on bad Jews or bad blacks. Why, that'd be 'antisemitic' or 'racist'. It's a vile and vicious cycle of moral blindness and hypocrisy that the West has fallen into.

THE END OF TWITTER?, MAXWELL FIX IS IN, HANUKKAH CELEBRATION, JEWS SAY SANTA IS TOO WHITE - Know More News - Adam Green