It's Not Enough to Blame Anarcho-Tyranny for the Current Mess — Name the Power Wizard behind Anarcho-Tyranny, and It is AnarKOSHER-Tyranny

Anarcho-Tyranny? Okay, but controlled by WHOM?

After all, anarcho-tyranny doesn’t mean total breakdown of order but selective use of ‘anarchy’ by the tyranny that directs the wild energies.

Take the Cultural Revolution in China. At first look, it may have looked like total mayhem and anarchy, but there was a guiding iron hand behind it: Mao Zedong and the Gang of Four. The Red Guards attacked Old Culture and ‘capitalist roaders’ targeted by Mao. They didn’t attack Mao and the Gang of Four.

So, it’s not enough to say ‘anarcho-tyranny’. One must ask, WHAT is the tyrannical force that is directing the ‘anarchy’? To whom/what are US ‘leaders’ of both parties beholden to?

How come there is so much moral outrage over Fentanyl Floyd and a handful of black thugs killed by police every year but total silence about the countless dead Arabs, Muslims, and etc. slaughtered by US military men who are hailed as ‘heroes’ by both parties? US police are boy scouts compared to the US military, the Murder Inc. around the world — not because US soldiers are evil by nature but because their violence is orchestrated by vile and venal globalist elites.

Notice there are no murals about PALESTINIAN LIVES MATTER. There is no outrage about how blacks rob, rape, assault, and murder, often white victims.

Instead, there's the Antifa allowed to run riot to beat up patriots like Michelle Malkin, and there's BLM to keep whites paralyzed with fear & ‘guilt’ and thus subservient to the Other(that holds the power).

So, what is this power? Unless Malkin and others are willing to loudly name and blame Jewish Power, this madness will never abate. Just calling out ‘anarcho-tyranny’ is like calling out WAR during World War II without naming Germans and Japanese as the main instigators.

What we’re witnessing is Jewish-supremacist-orchestrated anarcho-tyranny. It’s better labeled Zionarcho-Tyranny or Anarkosher-Tyranny. Jewish Power uses PC education and Pop Culture to spread anti-white hatred. This way, the ire of Diversity is directed against whites than on Jewish Power, and furthermore, many whites become burdened with ‘guilt’ and feel that the ONLY way whites can be righteous is by hunting down imaginary ‘nazis’ and screaming ‘racism’ 24/7. Jewish-controlled media are certainly spreading anti-white propaganda more murderous than anti-Jewish propaganda spread by National Socialists in the 1930s. Jews are trying not only to instill guilt among whites but to strike fear into their hearts. Jews are telling whites, "We've spread anti-white hatred so much among blacks, non-whites, and brainwashed self-loathing whites that you white goyim better obey us... or we will unleash violence against you and your children."

https://www.bitchute.com/video/aupVFLym1uA/


Also, don’t be ashamed of hate speech. Hate can be liberating. A slave must hate his master to seek freedom. A slave who only speaks love for his master will remain a slave. It is when he feels and speaks hatred about the master that he begins the path to freedom. When Jewish masters say that whites-as-cucks must only speak loving words to Jews-as-their-masters, it's a formula for white enslavement. White Liberation from the shekel-shackle begins with defiant hate speech against the Jewish Master Class. Did Poles love the Nazi invaders? Did Hungarians love the Soviet occupiers? Did Algerians and Vietnamese love the French colonizers? Did socialists love the exploitative capitalist oligarchs? No, they felt hatred, and it was hate that was liberating and led to resolve & action. White Liberation requires white hatred for Jewish supremacism. Just like Jews have a right to feel hatred about anti-Jewish oppressors, whites have every right to hate Zionarcho-Tyranny or AnarKosher Tyranny.

Now, Jewish Supremacists will say whites are not oppressed but the oppressors. Historically, a case can be made for this, but history is never static. It’s like the Romans, once conquerors over the Germanic tribes, became conquered by them. It’s like Mongols were once rulers over Russians, but later the Soviets dominated Mongolia. Muslims conquered large swaths of Europe and were once the oppressors but later they were conquered and oppressed by the Technological West. Latin Americans feel oppressed by Gringos, but Latin American societies are about the oppression of browns by mestizos and oppression of mestizos by blancos, generally speaking. Jews are now in the supremacist master race position over goyim. As they are such terrible masters and elites, they must be hated if whites and goyim are to find liberation. Palestinians sure hate Zionist oppressors, and why shouldn’t they? For the oppressed, hate speech is the most potent kind of free speech. It speaks truth to power. Moses sure spoke a lot of anti-Egyptian hatred in TEN COMMANDMENTS when he said, “Let my people go.” We need white moseses filled with righteous and liberating hatred.

Oppression is relative. Those who oppress can also be oppressed. French oppressed the Vietnamese who historically oppressed the Cambodians. During the Nazi Occupation, the French oppressors were oppressed by the Germans. Europeans oppressed the Manchu ruling class that was oppressing the Chinese. It’s like a bully can be bullied by a bigger bully.
So, while it’s true that whites are in a oppressive position vis-a-vis certain peoples, they are also in the oppressed situation vis-a-vis Jewish Supremacists. It’s like Asian Indians had an oppressive caste system but were oppressed by the British. Oppressors can also be oppressed.
So, whites need to stop oppressing whomever they are oppressing but also end the oppression over them by Jewish supremacists. As long as there is no white liberation, whites will be stained with oppression over others at the behest of Jewish supremacists. It’s because whites are such pathetic cucks to Jews that they serve as Janissary oppressors over Arabs and Palestinians who are seen by Jews as less-than-human. Jewish Supremacists oppress whites into oppressing Palestinians who never did any harm to whites.

Mentioning Anarcho-Tyranny without mentioning Jewish Power is like mentioning Brown Shirts without mentioning Hitler & Nazis or like mentioning the Janissary without mentioning the Ottoman power behind it. Or, it’s like mentioning the Sikhs without mentioning British Imperialists who employed them as the warrior wing.

Michael Tracy should have said, "I will say Black Lives Matter IF you say Palestinian Lives Matter and End Zionist Genocide of Palestinians."

We must name the source of the 'anarcho' violence. Jewish capitalists fund and direct ‘Marxist’ goons to attack white patriots who dare to gather. At Charlottesville, white nationalists did NOTHING WRONG but were shut down and exposed to violent mobs of Antifa goons and black thugs who had the protection of the police. Following Fentanyl Floyd’s death, Antifa and BLM mobs have been on the rampage but with total support of Deep State Power and with hardly any condemnation from Republicans who are ALL pathetic puppets of Jewish Donor Class. Antifa scum gets away with lots of crap because they are protected by the Power just like Jewish 'settlers' are in West Bank. The 'settlers' can terrorize Palestinians, but if Palestinians touch one hair on the Jewish Settlers, the IDF comes after the Palestinians, and Israeli courts almost always favor the Jews. Jews perfected lawfare over Palestinians.

Thank you @tuckercarlson for reporting on #DenverAnarchoTyranny & amen @PatrickForCO -We need @realdonaldtrump federal intervention. Stand down orders by mob-coddling @denverpolice & other PDs are brazen civil rights violations that endanger law-abiding.https://t.co/kISfKISMrH

— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) July 23, 2020

In a way, white Americans are now reaping what they sowed when they allowed Jews to get away with murder in the creation of Israel. Most Americans didn’t think much of it, but it sent a message to Jews and whites that Jews are above the law… because of whatever, such as ‘muh holocaust’. By aiding and abetting the total destruction of the innocent Palestinians, white leaders/people set the template that (1) Jews get whatever they demand (2) Jewish lives are more precious than non-Jewish lives (3) Jews live by a different set of standards (4) Jews can do ANYTHING to goyim.

Of course, whites didn’t realize the full boomerang implication of this because it was Jewish terror directed against Arabs. But once Jews were emboldened with such attitude and power, they could then eventually direct it against OTHER peoples as well. And whites couldn’t say NO because they’d agreed to the New Template that said Jews are holy and above human standards and must be treated like gods.

So, here we are today. There is now the insane phenomenon of White Nakba. Jews encourage blacks, Diversity mobs, and white Janissary or Antifanissary to attack any sign of white identity, patriotism, or resistance. Any notion of white territory, white race, white history, white pride, white heritage, white unity, and etc. must be expunged. Whites must open their nations to Diversity, obey Jews, worship blacks, and celebrate homos. White lands are no longer white lands. White wombs are no longer for white seeds. White history for others to pilfer and appropriate. Whites must not 'steal' from other cultures, but non-whites have the 'human right' to take all they can from whites.

When Jews made demands about Palestine back in the 1940s, American Power should have been firm and sent a strong message to Jews that their identity and interests will not be favored over others, especially the Palestinians who never did any harm to the US or the West. In other words, while Jews shall be treated fairly, they shall not be favored over others just because Jews demand it be so. Jews will abide by the same principles governing all nations and peoples.
But whites relented under Jewish Pressure, and the perverse covenant between Jews-as-god and whites-as-cucks became “Jews demand, whites serve.” It began with whites helping Jews destroy Arabs and Muslims, but now, the Jewish agenda of White Nakba targets the entire West. But how can whites say no when the terms of relation with Jews is “Jews are holy, and all their demands must be served.” (Of course, Jews maintain their supremacism by BIG stick and BIG carrots. If you go against Jews, you will be totally crushed and destroyed. But if you cuck to Jews like Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham, you shall be rewarded most handsomely. The choice is between starvation and feast, and most white elites go for the grand buffet. If the choice were between little stick and BIG carrots, more whites will be less fearful and defy Jews. Or if the choice were between BIG stick and little carrots, more whites might choose not to cuck because the reward isn't worth it. But when it's heaven if you cuck but hell if you don't, most white elites go for 'heaven'.)

In a way, things will be worse for whites than for Palestinians. At least, Palestinians never bought into the Zionist lie and knew they were going to lose everything under Jewish Power. Even in physical defeat, Palestinians still retained soulful pride as an identity. Jews failed to make Palestinian hate Palestinian-ness. In contrast, Jews are not only destroying whites physically but making whites feel disgusted over their own whiteness. We have ‘conservative’ Rich Lowry cucking to Jewish Power and cheering the destruction of Confederate heroes.

Well, at least there is a kind of poetic justice to this. Whites cheered on Jewish Terror and jeered at Palestinian plight. They cackled with hideous glee at the Palestinian tragedy while sucking up to Zionist gangsters. Well, how does it feel that the same is being done to whites? It’s like the refrain in the Bob Dylan song, "Like a Rolling Stone".

How does it feel?
How does it feel?
To be on your own
With no direction home
A complete unknown
Like a rolling stone?

By the way, why back the blue? Police in the US are like police everywhere. Mere attack dogs of the Power. Under Hitler, German police did the bidding of Nazis. Then, under Soviet domination, the very people who’d served the Nazis served the commies.

US political process is about white cucks taking orders from Jewish supremacists. So, if cops are ordered to stand down and let Antifa thugs(the Janissary of Jews) attack white patriots like Michelle Malkin, cops aren’t going to do anything about it. Malkin the Filipino is hopelessly romantic about White America. White America is now, from top to bottom, totally enslaved by Jewish Power and enthralled with mindless Negro Worship.
So, it's no surprise that Michelle Malkin and Gang got Charlottesvilled in Denver, and the police did nothing to protect them, and if anything, was complicit in the violence. US police and US laws are now totally controlled by Jewish supremacists. Just like US military goes and murders Arabs and Muslims left and right because it's all about following orders, the US police is no different. If the Power orders the police to stand down and let the mob attack patriots, the police won't do anything. Malkin must drop her faith in White America and the police, the dogs of the Power.

Finally, Anarcho-Tyranny need not be anti-white. If white supremacists controlled the US, they could use anarcho-tyranny against the Left. What was Kristallnacht but German supremacist anarcho-tyranny against Jews in Germany? Right-wing regimes in Central America allowed ‘death squads’ to carry out anarcho-tyranny on the indigenous populations. Rape, rob, and terrorize them into submission. In China, Mao used anarcho-tyranny to attack his rivals, the ‘capitalist roaders’. In South Vietnam, mercenary troops served as anarcho-tyrannists over villages suspected of harboring Viet Cong guerrillas. In Ancient Greece, Spartan youths routinely went on rampages to terrorize and frighten the helot population to keep them in line. So, anarcho-tyranny is a tool, not a particular ideology. As Shane said, a gun is only as good as the man using it. If someone is beaten with a hammer, you don’t blame the hammer but the man who used the hammer. Anarcho-Tyranny in the US is the hammer of Jewish capitalists.

So, it’s not enough to say ‘anarcho-tyranny’. It’s too fuzzy and vague. We need 20/20 vision and must see with clarity who/what is pulling the strings of anarcho-tyranny in the US and West, and it is Jewish Power that provides protection and lawfare for Antifa. It’s AnarKosher-Tyranny.

Notice how these 'leftist' types have no sense of honor. They use violence and terror against the 'system' but cry like a baby the moment they get hurt and even lie about it. A real man fights and licks his wounds. These 'leftists' use ugly violence but play 'innocent victim' the instant they get hurt. And contrary to fighting the 'system', they are enabled by the Deep State as part of coup attempt Trump. But don't expect dummies to realize they are tools.

As for faux-communist larpers like Antifa, they’re just grungy spoiled brats without elite prospects getting some thrills as 'radicals' because they can’t make it as studs and athletes. And they are funded and protected by Jewish capitalists who use them as Janissary against white patriots. German conservatives used anti-communist Nazis against Jewish Power, and Jewish Power uses ‘anti-fascist’ communists against the prospect of White Power. This has led to the odd phenomenon of capitalists supporting communists against fascism. It’s odd because fascism was willing to work with capitalism whereas communism sought to destroy it. But for Jewish Minority Power, white ‘communists’ are more reliably anti-white than white fascists, and, furthermore, Jewish Power altered the terms of Leftism into being more about globo-homo and idolatry of certain groups(blacks, Jews, and homos) than about class struggle and hate-the-rich. So, even if Antifa may be anti-rich, their primary animus against 'nazis' means that Jewish capitalists can goad them into attacking 'white supremacists'(even fantastical ones, as so many Antifa morons are on drugs) than ever getting around to attacking capitalists. In Israel, Jewish capitalists side with Jewish fascists because fascism in the Zionist context is pro-Jewish. But as fascism in white nations tend to be pro-white and even anti-Jewish, Jewish capitalist must form a symbiotic alliance with the 'communists'.

The What-If-Most-People Game: An Easy Way to Tell if YOUR IDEAS & VALUES are Sound and Valid for Most of Society

What would be the simplest way to test as to whose ideas, values, attitudes, and mindset are best or most ideal for society as a whole? One of the easiest way would be to theorize as to what society would be like IF most people think, feel, and do as YOU do. After all, while any society can tolerate, weather, and overcome some degree of bad behavior and destructive tendencies, NO society can last for long if too many people indulge in wrong kinds of behavior. So, a sane, sound, stable, and healthy kind of society is one where most people do what is good, right, responsible, and constructive.

For example, suppose there are two people: Bob and John. Bob doesn't use illicit drugs whereas John is into drugs. Now, which is better? Not using illicit drugs or using them? Bob says it's better to forsake drugs. John says it's better to use them. So, who is right? First, imagine a society where most people are like Bob and don't use illicit drugs. Then, imagine a society where most people are like John and use plenty of illicit drugs. I think most of us can agree that a society where most people don't use drugs functions better than one where most people indulge in drugs. Does anyone want to live in a society full of meth-heads, heroin addicts, and the like? Even most druggies will likely admit that they don't want to live a society run by druggies. Even as they argue for legalization of many drugs, they surely don't want engineers, managers, and other essential workers to be druggies.

Now, take gambling. Is gambling good or bad for society? Suppose Jerry doesn't gamble and finds it to be wrong. Suppose Billy thinks gambling is awesome. What would be better? A society of Jerrys or a society of Billies? Would it be better if most people don't gamble or do gamble? My guess is that even people into joys of gambling would agree it wouldn't be such a great idea to have a society where MOST people gamble. Gambling is not only a vice but mass theft by oligarchs(who in the US happen to be Jewish) from the middle class and working class(and even from senior citizens and poor folks who don't know any better and become addicted to the habit).

Or take prostitution. Suppose Sarah is against it while Skankura is for it. Who would be right? Would society be better if most women are NOT prostitutes? Or would society be better if most women are prostitutes. Even among proponents of legalization of 'sex work', can they honestly say that a society where most women are involved in the sex industry would be better than one where most women aren't? Would it be good for families if most mothers were hookers on the side? Would it be good for society if fathers raised their daughters to be slut-skank whores? Would it be a better society if your mother, sister, cousin, aunt, niece, and daughter were into stripping, porn, prostitution, or S&M for money? Seriously? While we can understand the logic of libertarians who argue for legalization of 'sex work' on grounds of individual choice and free enterprise, surely even most of them know full well that it would NOT be good for society if most women were skankass whores.

Now, take homosexuality and tranny-stuff. Granted, this has less relevance to reality since most homos were born that way and only a handful of kooks are trannies. The fact is most people will never be homo. Even with all the gender-confusion pushed by MSM and academia, most men and women are not going to declare themselves homo. Still, there is the PC notion that homosexuality and trans-genderism are just as valid as real-natural-normal sexuality. They insist that 'heteronormativity' is some kind of mentally sick social construct. They say 'gender is fluid' and anyone can declare himself or herself to be anything, and all these various 'genders' are equal in value and validity. Okay, that being their premise, suppose there is Cary and Nico. Cary is real-sexual and believes a society where most people are proudly real-sexual is best for society. In contrast, Nico is a homo and believes his fruitishness to be just as valid as real-sexuality, aka heterosexuality. Nico believes homo fecal penetration is just as valid and 'natural' as real-sexuality between men and women. So, who is right? Imagine Cary's Society where most people are straight real-sexuals where men and women procreate to produce kids. Then, imagine Nico's Society where most people are fruitkins who bugger each other in the ass or tranny freaks with their dicks and balls cut off and equipped with fake vaginas. Seriously, which society would be better? Which society has better chance of mental health, moral equilibrium, and chance for continuance & survival? Is it really true that all 'genders'(as social constructs) are equally valid? (Also, if 'gender' is a social construct, why does PC say homos are biologically born that way? Is there any consistency in the logic of so-called 'woke' folk?)

How about gluttony? Some argue for 'Body-Positivity' Movement. They say that being a fatty fatkin is glorious and a badge of pride(and lard of honor). But is it really good to eat like a pig and be grossly obese? Suppose Jack believes in eating moderately, exercising, and staying slim. He believes a good society is one where people watch what they eat and watch their weight. In contrast, Otis believes people should eat all they want and there's no shame in being a fatty fatso. So, which society would be better? A society of Jacks or a society of Otises? One where people eat healthy and stay slim, or one where people eat grossly like hippos and look like hippos as well? Again, the answer should be obvious. Then, one wonders why the media, via fashion magazines and the like, push the notion that Fat is Beautiful and just as okay as being slim and trim around the weight?

How about Open Borders? Would it be better for society for most people to oppose the Great Replacement or welcome it? Would it be better for Hungary if most Hungarians were against the Hungarian Nakba or if most Hungarians were for it? For those who are unfamiliar with the term 'Nakba', it was the national tragedy that befell Palestinians when they were colonized, expelled, and replaced on their native territory by European Zionist-Immigration-Imperialists. (As you all should know, Endless Immigration = Genocide or Nakba. If just a trickle of Jewish Immigrants had entered Palestine, Palestinians would still have owned their land and would have tolerated a small Jewish minority. But Jewish Immigration was endless and came to replace the Palestinians... just like endless non-white immigration turned whites in California into a minority. Endless immigration also turned native Hawaiians into a minority in their native ancestral islands.) Anyway, suppose there are two Hungarians. Viktor is opposed to the Hungarian Nakba. He says NO to Endless Immigration, or Replacement Immigration. He believes Hungary will fare best if MOST Hungarians agree with him. Against him is Miklos who sucks up to Jewish globalists like George Soros and welcomes Endless Immigration, one that is sure to lead to the Hungarian Nakba where the native folks are turned into a minority in their own ancestral lands by Africans, Arabs, Muslims, Asians, and others. Miklos wishes MOST folks would agree with him and welcome the Hungarian Nakba. Now, which Hungary will be better off? One where most people think like Viktor or one where most people think like Miklos? If most people think like Miklos, the fate of Hungary will be like the fate of Palestine where the native Palestinians were replaced by European Zionist-immigration-imperialist Jews.

How about Jew-Worship? Would it be better for society if most people said NO to Jew-Worship or if most people said YES to Jew-Worship? Suppose there are Kevin and Lindsey. Kevin thinks it is dangerous for goyim to mindlessly worship and obey Jews who, though smart and creative, tend to be cunning, hostile, vicious, nasty, contemptuous, and exploitative over 'dimwit goyim'. Kevin thinks society would do best if most goyim, while not going full-Nazi, remained wary and cautious about Jewish narratives, agenda, and power. Don't dehumanize Jews but don't deify them either.
In contrast, shabbos goy Lindsey says Jews are oh-so-wonderful-great-awesome-wise-holy-oustanding-and-etc. in every way and then some. Jews are the most sacred, most tragic, most tremendous race of noble folks that ever existed on the face of this planet(and maybe the entire cosmos). If Jews want it, we must give it. If Jews demand, we must fulfill. If Jews command, we must obey. Lindsey believes goy society will be best off if MOST goyim were committed in blind faith to serving, honoring, and appeasing Jews on grounds that what Jews want for themselves and for us must be the BEST thing.
Now, which society would fare better? One where most goyim are like Kevin and remain skeptical of Jewish claims and criticize Jewish abuses OR one where most goyim are like Lindsey and grovel at the feet of Jews as the god-race? Especially since the end of the Cold War, the US embarked on Lindsey-ism and look at the results. Have they been good? The Wars for Israel, bailouts of Jewish banksters, the pornification of mainstream culture, the spread of interracism-jungle-fever-and-ACOWW(Afro-Colonization of White Wombs), anti-white PC propaganda, feminist wedge between white men and white women, Christianity replaced with Globo-Homo Queertianity, White Nakba & Replacement Immigration, new 'cold war' with Russia, and etc.? Has Lindsey-ism been a blessing for America?

And we can go on and on with the game of What-If-Most-People. Given that the health of society depends on what MOST people do, a good society is one where most people do what's right while a bad society(soon to be no-society at all) is one where most people(or enough people) do what's wrong. Needless to say among those cognizant of HBD(human bio-diversity) truths, this isn't only a matter of morality but biology. Some races are more prone to do the wrong thing given their genetic inclinations. Blacks, having evolved to survive in a state of savagery, are hardwired to act against civilizational norms. So, freely left to their own devices, most(or too many) of them will act wrongly and turn once-fine cities like Detroit into hell-holes. White people are genetically hardwired to make more civilized choices while blacks are genetically hardwired to make more savage choices. Whites tend to Europeanize, blacks tend to Africanize. So, a healthy modern society is one where most people are white than black; indeed, blacks in the West can enjoy modernity ONLY BECAUSE they leech off whites; even black achievements under slavery in the Americas owed to white supervision as, after all, black slaves under black rule in black Africa wielded no great results. Though, hypothetically speaking, it's possible for a society made up mostly of black people to have righteous Negroes who act responsible and moral, real-world results invariably show that too-many-blacks lead to 'savagerization'. Likewise, while we can hypothetically imagine a society full of Japanese where most act like jive-ass jiggerish savages, the likelihood is that a society full of Japanese will act in a cooperative and stable manner.

Another factor to consider is that one mustn't confuse 'most' with 'all'. While society is best off if MOST people act in a certain way in accordance to certain values and norms, it wouldn't necessarily be good if ALL people or each-and-every-person acted that way. This is especially true in science and the arts. Certain talents and abilities are inseparable from certain neuroses and eccentric(and often troublesome) tendencies. Many great artists tend to be half-mad or nutty in some way. So, while it wouldn't be good for society if most people had the personalities of Beethoven, Richard Wagner, Brian Wilson, Bob Dylan, and John Lennon, creativity and artistry have benefited from the presence of a small minority of mavericks, rebels, outcasts, and eccentrics. Indeed, this is why homosexuality has been beneficial to civilization as a creative outlier. While homosexuality is biologically useless, morally troublesome, and culturally problematic, the 'gay' sensibility has a way of seeing things that has contributed greatly to the arts, design, and perspectives. So, just because society is best off if MOST people act such-and-such, it doesn't mean ALL people should be that way. Certain social rewards are inseparable from the problems that surround them. It's like there's no honey without the bee stings, there's no championship in boxing without getting hit many times. The good can be attained only through the bad.

Still, for MOST people, there are certain values and standards that are best for society-as-a-whole, and it is essential that the great majority of people adhere to certain values and attitudes. But in our sick, decadent, and degenerate order, such sane-majoritarianism is looked down upon. Fashion magazines push fatties as idols of beauty and health. Cities put on massive globo-homo parades and children are read to by trannies on the premise that 'gay is sacred'. The once-Christian West totally bows down to the demands of Jewish Supremacism as if Jews are deities than flawed humans. Once proudly white nations welcome the Great Replacement or White Nakba. Even though blacks are the most destructive race(by their genetics), the White West worships blacks as demigods and celebrates ACOWW. Even though drugs are harmful for the most part, they are pushed on everyone as soma, soma, soma. Gambling went from a vulgar vice to a 'moral' industry that provides 'reparations' to American Indians. Women get their values from shows like SEX AND THE CITY and GIRLS by Lena Dunham. Skankery has been made the New Normal by Disney run by Jews. Under Jewish Power, society is made to push MOST people to choose the Wrong over the Right. Apparently, Jews fear any notion of majoritarian morality because they are a minority-elite and, as such, fear majority values as threatening to Minority Privilege. So, Jews are hellbent on making the majority accept minority-deviance as the New Normal. This is a terrible thing for the West(and the Rest that still looks to the West to lead the world).

Twitter, Cravenly Toeing the ADL-SPLC Line, Bans Andrea Vlahos for Speaking Truth to Yinon-ist Jewish-Supremacist Globo-Homo Power

According to Twitter, the company run by Jack 'Dorky' Dorsey, it is a THOUGHT CRIME to point out the pathological villainy of Jewish Supremacist Power currently implementing the Yinon-ist Plan to wreak havoc all across the Middle East in service to insatiable ambitions of Greater Israel. According to Twitter, it is 'sacrilegious' to point out that Homomania or Queertianity is the Proxy Cultural & Quasi-Spiritual Imperialist War against Christianity, Normality, Moral Majority, and Autonomous Gentiles. While Twitter, unlike Google and Facebook, isn't owned by Zionist Jews who share the tribal interests of their venal brethren in Israel and around the world, its head Jack Dorsey is a gutless wussy hipster-dipster who sheepishly rolls over & plays fetch to appease the Jewish financiers of Wall Street and for the approval of deracinated uber-privileged urban elites who hog all the wealth and status points. Twitter claims to ban 'hate speech', but guess who gets to decide what is 'hate' on Twitter? None other than Jewish supremacists who push for more Wars for Israel & New Cold War with Russia and narcissistic homosexualists who demand that the entire world kneel before the diva-mentality of 'gay' neo-aristos and tranny exhibitionists. Twitter pretends as if precious little globo-homo elites need PROTECTION from the mob but, if anything, serves the illiberal masters of nihilism who've cornered the market on money, information, privilege, and power. Even as Twitter pretends to be for EVERYONE, it has degenerated, especially since Donald Trump's election, to little more than a monopoly instrument of the neo-aristocratic class whose idea of 'free speech' is to narrow the narrative to blind submission to the 3 Holy Idols of the Current Era: Jewish Supremacists, Homo Neo-Aristos, and the Myth of the Magic Negro. And it is for this reason that Globo-Stalinist Twitter, like Facebook and Youtube, cannot tolerate a truth-teller like Andrea Vlahos.