White Awe of Black Prowess nullifies White Awareness of Black Criminality — White Awe of Jewish Riches nullifies White Awareness of Jewish Perfidy — The Low Crimes of Blacks and High Crimes of Jews collaborate against White People and American Nationalism

https://www.takimag.com/article/violent-victimizations/ by Steve Sailer

Would a Biden administration make it harder for citizens to access data on crimes committed by blacks versus whites? ...Back during the Bush administration, the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics posted homicide count graphs online in convenient HTML format... Under the Obama administration... that was deep-sixed and only the much more awkward PDF format remained. PDFs... are pretty useless for informing the general public.

Does it matter? Everyone, truly EVERYONE, knows that blacks commit the most crime. Even those who chant BLM slogans know deep down inside that blacks are the top criminals — how can blacks in da Hood not know this as they're killed by other blacks and call the cops on other blacks? Gentrification is predicated on 'blacks are dangerous and must be migrated elsewhere.' The data may be suppressed and it may be taboo in respectable(or even in general) circles to discuss the Black Problem, but black crime has been a well-known fact since the 1960s(and prior).

The real problem is contextualization, the narrative, and the idol-factor. US and Allies committed lots of war crimes in World War II, but they're generally overlooked within the contextual narrative of the Good War. Maybe US and UK(and the USSR) did bad things, but the enemies were so evil and beyond the pale that the Allies were Heroes who crushed the Villains.
What is the reigning Narrative of the US(and its empire)? The evil of 'white supremacy' and 'systemic racism'. So, it doesn't matter that blacks commit lots of crime. It's regarded as the result of poverty caused by 'systemic racism'. Or black crime is a crude form of rebellion against 'white supremacism', or Nat Turner Redux. In other words, 'By Any Means Necessary'. Such views were especially fashionable in the radical chic 60s, but things went south so fast in big Liberal Cities that there was a 'counter-revolution' of sorts with the victories of Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan. It reverberated well into the New Democrat Clinton 90s with the tough anti-crime policies. But because of the Civil Rights iconography and vilification of 'racism', even those who woke up to the reality of black criminality and violence were loathe to speak honestly. The 'conservatives' were just as disingenuous as the 'liberals'. Accordingly, the problem was never with blacks, genetically or culturally. Rather, it was the Great Society programs that replaced blacks in plantation-mentality. Or it was lack of libertarian principles in Detroit. Just like white 'liberals' blamed white 'conservatives' and never blacks, white 'conservatives' usually blamed white 'liberals' whose policies failed blacks. So, either way, blacks were guiltless and victimized, either by 'lingering racism' or with 'good intentions' that paved them over with dependency. And this dichotomy is still the dominant political narrative. Granted, Donald Trump did it better than previous 'conservatives'. He made the case that US should slow down immigration and hire more blacks. He argued employment-policy is what blacks need. As the Democrats got too deep into mass immigration and foreign labor, they had difficulty countering Trump's offer. So, they decided to let blacks loot and get free stuff. "We can't offer jobs but we can offer loot." The idea was that blacks would loot the immigrant-stores, but blacks got over-ambitious and decided to also hit the tonier parts of town, resulting in broken glasses in posh districts as well. (The employment argument was also undermined by Covid hysteria devised by globalists to empower the state against populist nationalism.)

Given the contextualization and narrative, blacks are never blamed. And due to taboos around 'racism', which is focused mainly on harm to BLACKS, no one dares to mention genetics. (To be sure, it's okay to mention genetics when it comes to black superiority. No one gets in trouble by saying blacks dance better or sing louder. Or run faster. It's when people notice blacks inferiority in IQ and pathology in crime that the cry of 'racism' is heard.) So, it doesn't matter if data on black crime is more available or less. Indeed, even without such data, people know about black criminality from shows like THE WIRE and rap culture that exults in thuggery. And yet, THE WIRE has made so many white viewers empathize and even sympathize with black pathology. It's more realistic than most TV shows but also contextualizes everything within the history of American Inequality. So, the ultimate message one takes away is 'we still have a long way to go'. As for rap thuggery, it has actually made blacks more appealing with the 'cool' factor. It's like something outstanding is called a 'bad boy' than a 'good boy'. The association with the mafia never hurt the Italian-American community. If anything, it made Italian-Americans more popular than, say, Swedish-Americans or Estonian-Americans who are more law-abiding. People came to adore the Corleones, even the Sopranos.
So, black criminality is seen positively as well as negatively. No one wants to be a victim of black crime or see one's property values decline, BUT many people are enthralled with the notion that black criminality has the cachet of 'bad boy coolness'. (Also, there is the difference between knowing from afar and knowing up close. Whites who feel safe in their own communities may learn about black criminality, but as it doesn't affect them directly they don't take it 'personally'. It's like Michael Corleone knew about police corruption but got involved only when it affected him personally. People not 'mugged by reality' are more likely to go with the prevailing explanation, such as 'systemic racism'. People become less naive or gullible as they get closer to the violence. However, if one gets too close to the violence, a Stockholm Syndrome kicks in and results in cucking to the violence: "I'll kiss your ass, so please don't kick mine.") People are more likely to be killed by lions and tigers than by warthogs and wildebeest, but lions and tigers are romanticized far more. The reptilian part of the human brain admires thugs as natural predators. It's like audiences side with King Kong against humans. The cultural phenom of KING KONG is instructive when it comes to blacks. Pauline Kael in her review of the 1976 movie said all the black men she met liked the idea behind the movie. King Kong represented pop-Othello-in-gorilla-suit. In a way, it's a king/victim narrative. King Kong is the natural king of the jungle. He is awesome. But he is captured and shackled by puny little humans. He is a superior creature unnaturally placed in an inferior position. This leads to both admiration and sympathy in the viewer. King Kong, the naturally supreme beast of power. King Kong, the poor ape put in chains by greedy humans. A similar view applies to black violence. No one wants to be victimized by it, but, especially through rap music and the like, so many people associate black thuggery with the awesome power of natural predators, i.e. blacks are like tigers, the natural predators over natural prey races. Just like lions have a 'right' to kill wildebeest, blacks have a 'right' to prey on the weaker 'lame' races. People don't say this outright or even think it consciously, but it's somewhere in their reptilian part of their brains. So, the idea that more data about black criminality will somehow make people more aware and sensible about the black problem isn't necessarily true. So much of white(and non-white) mentality about blacks is irrational, a strange mix of sensuality and spirituality, or king-kong-christ, or Martin-Luther-King-Kong Syndrome: MLKKS.

With Philadelphia now being looted to defend the black man’s inalienable right to resist arrest... What does the future hold for this trove of impolitic data? Maybe rather than delete crime statistics outright, a Biden administration would merely append a warning saying: “If your race gets violently victimized by blacks a lot, that just proves you need to reflect very, very hard upon why you folks had it coming.”

That sounds like a case of chickens coming home to roost. US foreign policy for more than 100 yrs has been "If your nation gets violently victimized by the US a lot, that just proves you need to reflect very, very hard upon why you folks had it coming." Look at world statistics, and there's been far more US aggression than aggression against the US. But the empire keeps marching on. US encircles, sanctions, subverts, corrupts, and even invades other nations, but US is always the 'exceptional' and 'indispensable' nation. There was no serious reflection about Cuba, Philippines, World War I, Korea, Guatemala, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, and etc. There was some about Vietnam, but with Zionists in power in post-Cold-War Era, who cares about all those dead Vietnamese and dire effects of war? It's time for empire. There was some anti-war rhetoric when Bush II decided to invade Iraq — the protests were predicated on it being a great success, thereby bolstering the power of Christian Zionists —, but when Obama expanded wars and conflicts even more, there was silence among 'progressives' and hardly a protest from 'conservatives' who, prior to Donald Trump, were supportive of just about any US aggression. US can drop bombs, carry out coups, engineer 'color revolutions', use sanctions to destroy countless lives, and invade nations, but the US is never to blame. Rather, the OTHER nations must genuflect and contemplate why they deserved to be punished by the empire. US encircles Russia, but Russia is called the aggressor. US allows Israel to load up with nuclear weapons but blames Iran for trying to get the Bomb. US and Israel aided terrorist psychos in Syria, but Assad is the 'tyrant'. Palestinians were clearly wronged by Nakba and Zionist Occupation, but US attitude has been, "Suck it up, you scum." White Americans supported all this madness, and now THEY are the targets of Jewish Power that controls the US. Now, THEY realize what it means to live under Occupation. And they have candidates like Joe Biden, a spineless collaborator and puppet of Zion. Biden is to whites what Karzai is to Afghanis, what Mahmoud Abbas is to the Palestinians. Trump also belongs to Zion, but he played with fire with 'white populism', and Jews can't forgive him, and he must go.

One thing for sure, the current black mess has been engineered and can be easily disappeared. It's like ISIS and reconstituted Al-qaeda wouldn't have messed up Syria IF NOT for the the backdoor intervention of US and its allies, especially Israel, Saudis, and Turks. And there would have been no Maidan mayhem if not for US dirty tricks in Ukraine. While black criminality is here to stay, weaponized black violence is often(if not always) an engineered event. If not for the media and institutions, the death of George Floyd would have led to limited riots that would have abated sooner than later. But we had city mayors throwing gasoline on the fire. There were top Congressmen kneeling at the altar of Floyd. 'Woke' Capital hoisted BLM signs. Oligarchs were washing black feet. It was all to make blacks hate "Trump's America" and to energize white 'progressive' anger.
Antifa thugs are a pathetic lot. They can be easily contained and controlled if arrested and prosecuted, but they were allowed to run riot in cities. It was all part of the plan by globalism against nationalism. Sure, some businesses suffered from the riots and violence, but globalists see it as a gambit. Lose a little to gain a lot by dumping Trump. "Mostly Peaceful Protesters" indeed. Paradoxically, this all happened precisely because 'literally hitler' Trump is president. If Hillary had won in 2016, the chances are there would have been no mass censorship on the internet. And the Power wouldn't have allowed Antifa to run riot. Under Biden, Antifa violence will swiftly be suppressed. Cops will be ordered to arrest the lot, and the book will be thrown at them. And the media will be silent about it. Antifa scum was coddled only because they are anti-Trump. They are useful, just like ISIS and Alqaeda were useful in Syria(and quasi-nazi types in Ukraine). Fools are tools.

Just like Trump presidency led to more black violence and Antifa craziness, the chances are Biden presidency will lead to less of both. Black leaders, who are mostly opportunists, will urge the black community to calm down as Biden, their guy, is the president. Also, Jewish media will NOT urge blacks to act crazy as their puppet is in 'charge'. Kamala Harris doesn't care about blacks or the underclass. She happily exploited prison labor in San Francisco. All such people pretend to care only when it's expedient. It's like the US elite class and 'progressive' opinion were suddenly so concerned about the noble KURDS when Trump threatened to pull out of Syria. Kurds, who never meant anything to anyone, were suddenly the holy reason why the US must remain in Syria.
In a way, the Democratic Party has been silently threatening all of America: If you don't make Biden president, we will give you more Covid-hysteria and more street violence. And as Jews control media, politicians, money, and institutions, they can pull off just about anything, like the wholly bogus Russia Collusion nonsense that hobbled Trump for three years. And just when that silliness faded, there was Covid and BLM-on-steroids, funded by globalists. With Biden in the Oval Office, funds to BLM will dry up. Antifa will be marginalized and locked up if it gets out of hand. Never mistake tools for trends. BLM and Antifa have no innate power or agency. They are mostly made up of second-rate idiots who are switched on or off by the Power.

Biden presidency can do things that Trump cannot. It's like Nixon and Clinton. Nixon could go to China and deal with Soviets because of his anti-communist credentials. (Its far-reaching impact on US politics was it fundamentally altered the Republican attitude from one of confrontation to conversation with the communist world.) And Clinton could get tough on crime and do welfare reform because he was the 'first black president'. So, the globalists know Biden is useful to shut down Antifa and calm blacks down once Trump is gone. Antifa will no longer be useful and without Trump will be less energized. Also, with Democrats in power, black 'leaders' will work with Jews and Biden to pacify the blacks. Blacks being stupid, most will go along. Black crime will go on, but there will be less black riots and mass protests. If another 'Floyd' dies under Biden, there will be far less media hype. Jewish-controlled Media will be less likely to sensationalize black deaths at the hands of cops. And white 'progressives' will just go along because their souls have been hollowed out. Their idea of good vs evil is purely a matter of control from above. And Covid will dramatically fade with Biden presidency. It was all a stunt.

In US discourse, there are 'Jews', 'Palestinians', and 'Nazis'. 'Jews' are whichever group that is deemed holy at the moment. 'Palestinians' are people who don't matter; they might as well be invisible. 'Nazis' are villains of the Current Year. In the first year of Trump's presidency, the Illegal Immigrants were the 'Jews' and those in favor of border control were the 'Nazis'. When Trump threatened to pull out of Syria, Kurds were suddenly the 'Jews'. With BLM raging, blacks are the 'Jews' whereas immigrants and other victims of black violence are the 'Palestinians' who don't matter in the Narrative. White Americans are, at best, the 'Palestinians' whose voices and interests don't matter. All those hapless whites(or browns or yellows) attacked by black thugs or fleeced by Jewish financiers are 'Palestinians'. All those whites dead of opioids peddled by the Sacklers are also the 'Palestinians'. Whites who voted for Trump are the 'Nazis'. So, whites either don't matter or they're evil. The notion of whites as 'Jews' is inconceivable in current politics. Whites can be scapegoated and hated like Jews were in Nazi Germany, but the anti-white haters are the 'Jews' and whites are the 'Nazis' who are stuck in a Nuremberg Trial with no end in sight. And Jewish Power is behind this madness. And it will go on because of the perverse dynamics between Jews and whites: When Jews are displeased with whites, they hit whites even harder, but when Jews displease whites, whites hug Jews even more. If whites say, "We don't want more wars in the Middle East", Jews do everything to make whites into lowlife 'Nazi' scum. If Jews say, "Whites are scum who must be blamed for everything", whites say, "We must remember the Holocaust and support Israel and hate Iran." Guess which side is winning? The nasty side or the dumb side.

Just like there's a need to consider black genetics and black criminality, there is perhaps a link between Jewish genetics and Jewish pathology. Could it be that Jewish history/culture bred a kind of nasty personality so obnoxiously on display by the likes of Jerry Nader and Chuck Schumer? Or Tim Wise and the creeps who make up ADL, SPLC, and NYT? If Jews were poor and powerless like gypsies, it wouldn't matter. But given the power of Jews, it should matter that Jewish genetics may incline Jewish personality more toward pathology. What happens when people with personalities akin to that of Sabrina Rubin-Erderly become Supreme Court justices or deep state operatives? What was the Russia Collusion Hoax but one giant 'rape hoax' pulled off by Jewish Media: Putin raped America on shattered glass? And the WMD lies. And the stuff about 'Assad gassed his own people'. And Jewish pathology can bolster black pathology because Jews won't hesitate to use black violence to threaten and intimidate white people. Summer of Floyd was really another mega-hoax engineered in large part by Jewish Pathological Power.

There are two kinds of criminality. The low kind and the high kind. Blacks are the kings of low-level criminality as thugs, hoodlums, robbers, rapists, looters, murderers, and etc. And we do need more useful data on this kind of crime. But Jews dominate high-level crime, and there is far greater need for data on Jewish power and criminality(wrapped in legal garb). Now, power isn't the same as criminality, but more power means more magnitude of abuse. It's like men are stronger than women, but that doesn't mean a strong man is a criminal and a weak woman is a victim. A strong man can be good, and a weak woman can rob and murder. But because men are stronger, they can do more damage to women; and unsurprisingly, most inter-sex crimes are male on female. Same goes for race. Blacks being physically bigger/stronger doesn't mean they are all criminals. But black thugs can do more damage precisely because more of them are built like Mike Tyson and George Foreman. And this factor must be addressed. Same goes for Jews. A rich, influential, or powerful Jew need not be a bad person. But he has far greater means to do evil with real impact on world affairs. US foreign policy has essentially become a Zionist gangster-operation. It destroys entire nations hated by Israel/Jews and has even been near-genocidal at times. The mechanism of this power and its victims need to be exposed and explored as data and statistics. Too many people are in the dark about what Jewish gangster-capitalists did to Russia and how many people suffered as a result. If people knew this, they wouldn't be so hostile to Russia or regard Putin as 'Putler'. Many people don't know that Israel has hundreds of nukes and that Iran has none. Many are in the dark as to the extent to which Jews on Wall Street fleeced the entire world. Many still don't know anything about White Death from opioids and how it's tied with the Sacklers.
In 2020, the high-level criminality of Jews allied with the low-level criminality of blacks to bring us the Summer of Floyd. Blacks loved it because they got to loot and have a big party, all the while being heralded as 'mostly peaceful protesters' on the side of angels. And Jews loved it because they could ignite yet another Anti-Trump campaign. (Still, in the long run, it may have done more harm to Democrats as the craziness went way out of control. It was the Covid nonsense and its impact on the economy that really undid Trump.) Anyway, with Biden in office, Jews will cut off funds to low-level blacks. As most black 'leaders' are puppets paid for by Jews, they will go along with whatever Jews cook up once their boy is in the White House.

Whites have a fatal attraction to blacks and Jews. Part of it has to do with 'white guilt', but white cuckery is the bigger reason. For one thing, 'white guilt' has no agency or true conscience. If it did, whites would feel the most guilt about the American Indians, but it's nowhere to be found. Whites would feel guilt about what they did to Palestinians by supporting Zionism. But when have whites, 'liberals' or 'progressives', called for a memorial in Washington D.C. to commemorate Nakba? The only 'genocide' that happened on US soil is that of the American Indians, but the Indian museum in the mall is bland and dull while all the moral authority is hogged by the Holocaust Museum, an odd thing as Jews are only 2% of US population and the Shoah didn't happen in America. So, 'white guilt' is mostly bogus. Whites do feel it, but it's not something that naturally flows from within the wells of their conscience but something implanted by mass media as the latest outrage. But more than feelings of guilt is the timeless tendency of humans to suck up to the powerful. Whether it's French collaboration with the Germans during WWII or Japanese collaboration with the US after WWII, it's a case of weak sucking up to the awesomely powerful. As US is all about Money Power and Music/Sports Mania, most whites are in total awe of rich smart Jews and tough loud blacks. And that partly explains why data on black crime or Jewish abuse of power doesn't matter to many whites. They are so in awe of Jews and blacks that they will just carry on in their fatal-attraction mode, even if the obvious sign on the wall is white doom. Ironically, even though whites are called 'Nazis' by Jews, the mentality behind white cuckery isn't all that different from German mentality that went down with Hitler in WWII. Germans had become so spellbound with Hitler as demigod that they cucked to his iron will and were willing to follow him to hell itself. Now, whites follow and obey Jewish Power as the New Hitler.

TED CRUZ DESTROYS JACK DORSEY ON CENSORSHIP AS THE HUNTER BIDEN COVERUP CONTINUES

Jews are Hypocritical as Universal Moralists but Consistent as Tribal-Nihilist-Supremacists — Jewish Supremacism = Black Supremacism — Palestinian Nakba = White Nakba

https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/hypocrisy-thy-name-is-zion/

Jewish Behavior is hypocritical or consistent depending on how one looks at it.

IF Jewish attitudes claim to be anti-supremacist and if Jews contend that they are championing the cause of downtrodden blacks against White Supremacism, especially as embodied by White Police Brutality, then they are indeed hypocritical, not to mention anti-factual, as there is no white supremacist 'genocide' being carried out against blacks and, furthermore, the racial violence and animus in the US is mainly black-on-white, black-on-non-black, and yes, black-on-black. Still, supposing that most Jews in the US are indeed 'liberal' and 'progressive' and that they're truly invested in the well-being of blacks as a historically oppressed group, one would think they'd have similar sympathies about other unfortunate groups all around the world. You'd think Jews would oppose the West's cruel sanctions against Iran and Syria that have cost so many lives and livelihoods. You'd think Jews would call on the West to distance itself from Saudi Arabia's truly genocidal war in Yemen.
But we don't see or hear any such. Though there are Jewish individuals who condemn Jewish/Zionist abuses, the bulk of Jewish Power and Population are indifferent or even downright hostile to the aforementioned nations and groups that are being destroyed by machinations of the West. Also, most Jews seem oblivious to or totally supportive of Zionism's cruelty and violence toward Palestinians. How could this be IF INDEED most Jews are 'liberal' and 'progressive', for the little guy, the underdog, the wretched of the earth? How could Jews claim to care so much for blacks in the US but then be so uncaring about other non-whites around the world who are truly crushed by the weight of Western Neo-Imperialism? How many unarmed blacks are killed in the US every year? A mere handful, and most of them provoked the police. By comparison, how many Arabs/Muslims have died in the Middle East and North Africa due to Western invasions, occupations, sanctions, and unconditional support for Israel? Too many to count. According to Madeleine Albright, even killing 500,000 Iraqi children was 'worth it'. Where is the Jewish sadness and despair? So, on those grounds, Jews would seem hypocritical. If indeed we conflate the Palestinians with blacks while conflating Jews/Zionists with whites(as the privileged and powerful folks), then Moral Logic would dictate that Jews condemn both White Supremacy over blacks and Jewish Supremacy over Palestinians. The Jewish hypocrisy should be most blatant and blaring.

And yet, Jewish attitude and behavior are consistent if seen within a different context. If we regard Jews as supremacists, then they are being totally consistent, even if publicly dishonest(as they claim to be 'liberal' — in a way, Jewish Liberalism, even where it exists, is founded on a basis totally different from White Liberalism. If White Liberalism is an outgrowth of white power, privilege, security, generosity, conscience, and magnanimity, Jewish Liberalism is an outgrowth of Jewish insecurity, anxiety, paranoia, defensiveness, and tribalism. White Liberalism is based on, "We whites are secure, powerful, and rich enough to make things more equal and fair with other groups", whereas Jewish Liberalism is based on "We Jews must stick together and work to undermine the solidarity of OTHER groups so that we Jews can prosper and gain more power." White Liberalism is about letting go of 'too much' white power, whereas Jewish Liberalism is about accumulating and consolidating more Jewish Power, which is never enough. Same goes for so-called Black Liberalism. Jews and Blacks are fixated on "What's in it for us?" whereas White Liberalism is about "What's in it for OTHER groups?" Now, this was understandable at one time as Christian White Power was truly dominant and there were discriminatory policies, often official in nature, for non-whites. Ideally, the powerful use liberalism to be more fair-minded and generous whereas, naturally, the weak look to liberalism to get a larger share of the pie. But things aren't so simple in our world where Jews are the MOST POWERFUL group in the West and when blacks enjoy so many legal favoritism and are nearly worshiped as a god-race. Indeed, White Liberalism went from one of generosity to one of obeisance. Jewish Demands destroyed whatever had been noble-if-naive about White Liberalism. It used to be White Liberalism tried to be fair to ALL non-white groups, and that included not just blacks and Jews but also Arabs, browns, yellows, and etc. There was a time when America tried to be fairer with the Palestinians. Even though the US fatally threw in its lot with Zionism in 1948, there were attempts by John F. Kennedy, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton to broker some kind of deal for Palestinians. And there was a time when whites were as concerned about the plight of American Indians as about blacks. But as the Power in America shifted from whites to Jews and their main political allies, blacks and homos, the New Dominant Liberalism was less about white fairness to all than white/goy obeisance to Jewish demands, black megalomania, and homo vanity. Liberalism went from ideology based on principles to idolatry based on special identity. As Nancy Pelosi said, even if Washington D.C. burns to the ground, US will be there for Israel. As so many GOP cucks have pledged to AIPAC, they eat, drink, and think for Israel, Israel, Israel. And even as Jewish Power rams Donald Trump in the ass, his main plea is, "Can I suck your dic* that's been up my arse?" It's truly a sad state of affairs.) The CONSISTENCY of the Jewish position on BLM becomes clear when we regard Jewish power as supremacist. What fails as moralism succeeds as nihilism. Indeed, what Jews value about BLM is not that it is a genuine movement for black justice, which it most certainly is not, but that it is a black supremacist position partnered with the supremacist positions of Jews and homos.

Jews control the media and invert the truth into lies. Even though Blacks and Antifa minions, as allies of Jewish Power, destroy the cities, the Jew-run media and outlets push the Narrative of 'White Supremacist' Violence. It goes to show that Jewish Power is ugly and has no sense of honor or integrity. Jews as like gangster-lawyers.

Now, what do all three groups have in common despite their great differences? (Jews and blacks are very different, and if the two groups were placed on an island, they would not get along.) The commonality is their dependence on White Submissivism for them to get their goodies. Without white submission and support, Jews cannot use the West as the vessel for Jewish Hegemony. Without white submission and support, blacks can't have it so good. Indeed, compare blacks in the US with blacks in Africa. Why do all those blacks intend to move to US or EU? Because living with whites is an instant-ticket to a better life. But if, in the past, blacks just hoped to live UNDER whites, they now love lording OVER whites. Even though majority of blacks are economically below that of majority of whites, they enjoy superiority over whites in key ways. As top athletes, they are seen as 'heroes'. As music stars, they are seen as 'divas'. As sexual objects, they are seen as super-studs or super-ho's. And the historical narrative of black slavery, Jim Crow, and etc. makes blacks out to be the only equals of Jews in the White Guilt sweepstakes. (Of course, one could argue that blacks gained more under whites in a few centuries than on their own through the eons and, furthermore, other groups suffered even more under whites — especially the American Indians who lost their homelands forever and experienced something like 'genocide' — , but 'narratives' are not objective accounts but subjective and highly politicized storytelling to push a specific agenda.) So, both Jewish Supremacism and Black Supremacism are invested in belittling, berating, insulting, degrading, threatening, intimidating, and attacking any sign of white identity, white interests, white consciousness, white pride, and white okay-ness as UPPITY.

In a way, the current Jewish-Black attitude toward whites is not unlike that of white slave-masters over black slaves. Blacks were not supposed to be assertive; any black with a noticeable sense of self was deemed 'uppity'. At one time, Jews and blacks may have hoped for white kindness under white domination. Then, they may have hoped for equality with whites. But over the years, they've grown accustomed and addicted to supremacy over whites. In the past, Jews and blacks denounced white supremacist attitudes. Today, they demean ANY kind of white consciousness as 'nazi' or 'supremacist' or something to do with 'white fragility' borne of 'white privilege'. In other words, it's not enough for whites to call for equality among the races. Instead, whites must accept an inferior role vis-a-vis Jews and blacks(and homos). This is why even "It's Okay to be White" or "All Lives Matter" is threatening to Jewish and Black power. (One thing for sure, even most 'liberal' Jews do NOT want white Americans to be equal in their feelings toward Jews and Palestinians or toward Israel and Iran. For Jews, Zionist Lives Matter infinitely more than Arab/Muslim lives, as Madeleine Albright made so clear so eloquently.) Even white call for equality-for-all is deemed as 'uppity' from the perspective of Jewish/Black master-mentality. Whites must accept and celebrate their INFERIORITY before Jews and blacks.

Of course, it's complicated by history. Many Jews and blacks may sincerely believe they are for 'progress' and 'justice' because they'd been historically wronged by the White Christian/Gentile community. Even though things are so different now, the official narrative colors how people see the world around them. It's like Christians took over Europe and did horrible things to pagan heretics, but they kept with their official narrative of Christians being fed to the lions by the Roman pagans. The moral narrative of pagans killing Christians made Christians morally blind to their killing of pagans. (In our time, Antifa goons are blind to their own 'fascistic' behavior because they hunt down 'nazis'.) And even though Christian Europe often kept Jews down, the official Christian Narrative fixated on Jesus, the Son of God, murdered by Jews as a bunch of Judases. People live in the present but 'feel' in the past, or the Official Past as kept alive by the Narrative.
Indeed, this was also why whites in the past were more accepting of black slavery. Even though they knew that slavery went against American Principles, the official narrative of blacks-as-savages-being-elevated-by-white-stewardship sweetened the existence of the ignoble institution. It wasn't merely a case of People A enslaving and exploiting People B but a case of People B being elevated by enlightened enforcement by People A who knew better. Even in the 1960s, the National Review and William F. Buckley opposed the Civil Rights Movement on those grounds: Blacks were NOT READY for full participation in US power because they still had some ways to go in social and cultural advancement. Because Christians fixated on their own history of victimization under Jews and Romans, they became blind to their own supremacist oppression of others. And because of the American Narrative that white folks were creating a new and better world, even the 'genocide' of the American Indians and slavery of blacks seemed partly justified as contributing to the creation of the City on the Hill. Ends would justify the Means. Sure, the Indians had to be pushed aside and blacks would have to pick cotton, but all would benefit from white triumph in the end as, on their own, non-whites would be mired in their own savagery, backwardness, or childishness.

Do white goyim have minds of their own? Jews lead, goyim follow. To be 'educated' and 'informed' in a world of Jewish academia/media control means your minds are just clay to Jewish Hands. So, if Jews say 'gender' is 'fluid', and anyone can be anything, all these rootless and deracinated whites just go along like a bunch of kids believing in Santa and the Tooth Fairy. We laugh at the Middle Ages for ignorance and superstition, but the current era is truly ridiculous. Education = Indoctrination into Jewish Fantasies. 

Incidentally, the power-neuroses of Jews and blacks are different vis-a-vis whites because Jews got too much power whereas blacks feel they got too little. Paradoxically, Jews are more anxious and paranoid especially because they are richer and more powerful than ever. In some ways, such power makes Jews arrogant and confident, but it also makes them fearful that they will be found out and seen(and criticized) as the New Ruling Elites of the US and Empire. Jews want the dominant role but want to remain behind the curtains, much like Jewish Hollywood moguls run the place but use mostly goy actors as the Face of Hollywood. Most of Washington D.C. is like Jewish-run Hollywood with goy politicians as 'actors' reading scripts written by Jewish handlers. The excessive power of Jews has made them both paranoid and arrogant or 'parrogant'. Jews got so much money, control media and big tech, dominate finance, own Las Vegas, and control much of real estate. They dominate elite academia and think tanks that mold both elite minds and mass mentalities.

In contrast, blacks are especially bitter because they feel they don't have the wealth, power, and privilege that should be rightfully theirs as the superior race. Blacks don't care about equality and justice for all. If they did, why would they burn down the businesses and properties of immigrant groups, many of whom are not white, whenever "there's a riot going on"? Why do blacks join the US military when it invades and destroys other nations? How many blacks are like Muhammad Ali during the Vietnam War when he said, "Viet Cong didn't call me no ni**er"? Most blacks don't mind serving in the US military as long as they get money and promotions. Blacks don't care about non-blacks, and blacks don't care for socialism. Blacks make 'socialist' noises not because they want equality but because they are resentful that not all blacks can live like Obama, Oprah, and rich rappers. Blacks feel that they be the kangz, and therefore, everything should be given to them-as-natural-royalty. Blacks got the Meghan Markle Mentality. Even as she makes noises about 'justice', she married a prince and lives like a pig. If blacks are truly socialist, they should be denouncing rich blacks, but they can't get enough of other blacks having all the blings, mansions with swimming pools, limos, and the like. The problem is blacks succeed most in fields where ONLY A FEW can win. Sports is winner-takes-all. In pop entertainment, only a handful make all the dough while the rest barely make a living performing at small clubs. For every successful rapper or actor, there are countless others with nothing. Blacks have done well in government, but at the uppermost echelons, they serve as tokens to Jews, homos, and even white cucks.
The childish black mentality, being fixated on song-dong-strong-wrong, feels that blackness is the greatest thing in the world that should be revered and served by all other races, but black weakness in brainy fields keeps them far behind others who succeed in science, math, law, technology, medicine, business, and etc. ('Song-dong-strong-wrong' or SDSW refers to black fixation on rappers, sex, sports, and the narrative.) Now, the reasons for black failures in certain key fields is due to genetics and culture. Blacks are generally less intelligent and more impulsive. Also, black culture emphasizes acting the fool. But, black egotism or Negrotism makes it difficult for most blacks to be like Jesse Lee Peterson and reflect on the possibility that maybe not all black problems are due to 'dem honk*y-ass mothafuc*az'. So, even though most blacks die from black violence, everything is blamed on whitey. And of course, Jews encourage this by coming up with terms like 'systemic racism' — never mind the biggest form of 'systemic racism' in US is the unconditional support of Israel and turning a blind eye to every black degeneracy; black problem is more endemic than systemic, i.e. blackity-ness is inherent in blacks and makes them more impulsive, aggressive, funky, and jivey in a manner that isn't conducive to modern society. Something in the black gene pool makes them feel more along the lines of 'sheeeeeeeiiiiiit'.

In the Current West, the group that is most criminal and destructive, the blacks, are revered as paragons of  justice. The group that is most vapid and vain, the homos, are worshiped as 'spiritual' agents. And the group that is most supremacist and corrupt, the Jews, are praised as wise men. But then, in a world when men can claim to be 'women' and where marriage is a celebration of homo-fecal penetration and tranny-penis cutting, what else is new? 

Now, why do Jews encourage such blackity-ness? Why do Jews tell blacks to blame it all on whitey? Is it because Jews really care about blacks? Now, some Jewish women got jungle fever, and some Jewish guys make big bucks off black sports, music, sex, and comedy. But, privately, many Jews fear blacks and know the 'schvartzes are crazy'. But Jews go along with the Jewish-Black alliance charade because it's good for the Narrative and Maintenance of Jewish Supremacism over whites. While there is the Holocaust Narrative, which is mostly about 'white guilt', it is bolstered by White Guilt about Blacks. Besides, having blacks as symbolic allies gives moral cover to what Jews have done to Arabs and Muslims. As Jews love to say, MLK was pro-Zionist and friends with Jews. So, that settles it! Ironically, the more Jews treat Palestinians the way whites once treated blacks in the past in the US South and South Africa, the more they cling to blacks as symbolic allies. Jim Crowitz in West Bank and neo-imperialist violence in Gaza are given moral cover by Jews emoting about Emmett Till for the umpteenth time.

Though the Narrative is victimological in nature, it is to give moral support to Jewish Supremacism in the Present. By making Jews and their black allies into Eternal Moral Paragons who suffered under 'antisemitism' and 'racism', it has become nearly impossible to criticize those two groups and put them under any kind of fair-minded scrutiny. Why, that would be 'antisemitic' or 'racist', the two greatest sins in the present(along with 'homophobia')!! Just like the peons couldn't criticize kings and noblemen, whites as neo-peons cannot criticize Jews and blacks. When a group cannot be criticized, it is enjoying a supremacist position in society. Of course, Jews get richer while many blacks become even poorer, but Power isn't about most people but about the elites exploiting symbolism to gain more power for themselves. It's like the communist 'dictatorship of the proletariat' didn't mean the actual proles got the power. They remained peons while the intellectual class ruled as representatives of the Workers of the World; they were like the pigs in ANIMAL FARM. So, Jews don't care about most blacks. Deep down inside, most Jews know that black problems are intractable because of black genetics. The only thing that matters is Jews preserving their own supremacist power by radicalizing the politics of 'white guilt'. By blaming 'systemic racism', Jews make blacks and white cucky-wucks fixate on White Evil as the source of all problems. This means blacks(and Jews and homos) get to make more demands on whites while whites must keep groveling and wash/kiss the stinking feet of Negroes. Jews and blacks make-believe that Fentanyl Floyd was some kind of a saint, and white cucks get on their knees and go boo-hoo-hoo and cry like babies while babbling, "Saint George, I wish you were alive so I could kiss your sacred black ass."

In the Current West where Jews control the media, whore-politicians, think-tanks, and internet platforms(that censor people for speaking the truth), 'reality' is whatever Jews say it is. We are all like Palestinians trapped in a Jewish Supremacist version of Alice in Wonderland.

Of course, unlike the situation of Palestinians, blacks in the US are not facing any kind of racial violence. If anything, the police, especially white ones, are extra-mindful not to mistreat blacks lest there be another riot. Also, if blacks are getting gunned down, it's by other blacks who are into gangsta culture, egotism, and drug trade. As blacks know they are stronger and tougher than other races, the interracial violence is usually black-on-non-black, even against Jews, but Jewish Power overlooks black-on-Jewish violence to maintain what they deem to be far more crucial to the perpetuation of Jewish Supremacism: White Obeisance fueled by 'white guilt', especially regarding blacks. So, it's the Jewish Gambit: Indulge black stupidity and destructiveness, which even harms Jews on occasion, to make blacks blame Evil Whitey, therefore keeping whites morally ashamed and browbeaten(and redemptive and 'saved' ONLY WHEN they revere and serve the Other).
If Jews and whites were to pool their resources to be honest about the Black Problem, blacks might come under pressure to behave better and wreak less havoc, but it would also mean the ebbing away of 'white guilt', and that would mean whites would be more assertive of their own identity, leading to whites asking, "Why should we whites be subservient to Jewish identity and interests when we have our own?" That is what Jews fear most, and so, they carry on with the politics of black lunacy and stuff like 1619 Project, Emmett-Till-Forever, and BLM propaganda to keep whites feeling morally paralyzed with 'guilt'. Of course, such has the added advantage of steering black rage from Jewish Power to 'white privilege'. It's like Jewish Power pushed the Russia-Russia-Russia Narrative to distract Americans from the fact that the main 'alien' interference in US politics is Jewish Globalist Power.

Many on the Real Left tend to think in terms of Blacks = Palestinians / Whites = Zionist Jews. But most Jews in supremacist mode see it differently: Whites = Palestinians / Jews = Blacks.
Just like the existence of Israel as a Jewish-Supremacist State depends on Jewish domination over Palestinians and Arabs/Muslims cowering in fear or accepting of inferior roles, the continuation of Jewish Supremacism in the West depends on white submission, obeisance, and inferiority.
In the Middle East, Jews send a clear message to Palestinians that the latter is a subject people who must do as the Jews say. Jews constantly bomb Syria and threaten Iran. And Jews use their control of the US to pressure key Arab nations like Saudi Arabia and UAE to suck up to Israel. And of course, the Arabs/Muslims are too divided among themselves to unite against Jewish Supremacism. Saudi Arabia is anti-Iran, not anti-Israel.
In the West, Jews use their media, legal, financial, and political power to send a message to whites, "If you don't kiss our Jewish ass, you are toast." Also, Jews use the 'spiritual' power of the Narrative to tag whiteness with forever-holocaust-guilt and forever-slavery-guilt. Whites who strive for individual success and status play along and go along. And their children come under Jewish influence via media and academia. No wonder then that so many young whites are going boo-hoo about Fentanyl Floyd as one of the greatest saints of all time. And like the Arabs/Muslims, whites are so divided along 'liberal' and 'conservative' lines, though to be sure, the feckless and craven 'conservatives' are useless while the 'liberal' ones, for all their anti-supremacist rhetoric, seem invested in the elevation of only three groups at the expense of all else: Jews, blacks, and homos. Has any bunch of 'liberals' painted their streets with 'Palestinian Lives Matter' or held up placards with 'End Wars for Israel and Say NO to Zionist Genocide of Palestinians'?

Of course, in the Age of PC, to be 'educated' means to be indoctrinated in the superstitious voodoo of Holy Jew-Worship, Globo-Homo Celebration, and Magic Negro Idolatry. Critical Thinking is dead in media and academia. There is only mindless regurgitation of 'woke' cliches.

Jews and blacks share in their supremacist attitudes toward whites, and that's why, despite essential differences between them, they are natural allies AS LONG AS they live in a white majority nation. In an island with only Jews and blacks, they would NOT get along. Jews feel superior for being brainier than whites, blacks feel superior for being brawnier than whites. And both have staked their collective identities on the Narrative of Evil Whitey. Polls show that for most Jews, the Shoah is what defines them most in the 'spiritual' sense. And blacks, increasingly even in Europe and Africa, center their identity on the American Experience(as if savagery, slavery, and other horrors didn't exist in black Africa). Black African Immigrants in the US immediately adopt the Black American attitude of victimization(even though their own ancestors captured and sold black slaves to whites and Arabs); black African actors take up roles as historic American blacks. Black Africans listen to rap and pick up Black American attitudes about Whitey. And blacks in Europe assimilate less to European values and culture than to Black American ones based on rap music, gangsta culture, and the evil of 'white racism', esp of the KKK kind. But then, even white European values of late are parallels or reflections of white American cuckery to blacks, homos, and Jews. The current Irish are like a bunch of globo-homo 'whiggers' invested in remaking Ireland into Afro-Homo-Diversitopia. They have little sense of Irish history, culture, or values except for being lame. U2 songs might as well be anthems of New Ireland.

So, when Jews feel that both whites and Palestinians must be morally browbeaten and even physically beaten to keep them intimidated and submissive to Jewish Domination, there is great consistency in the Art of Jewish Supremacism. The truly outrageous hypocrisy and even greater stupidity are with whites who are treated like Palestinians by Jewish Power but identify far more with Jews than with Palestinians. Likewise, so many white 'conservatives' are so anti-socialist and pro-capitalist when it is the Jewish-dominated capitalist class that is so heavily invested in anti-white vitriol, anti-white campaigns, anti-nationalism, anti-populism, anti-tradition, anti-morality, anti-normality, and etc. While whites should reject communism, it would make more sense than ever for whites to adopt a nationalist version of social-democracy. White 'conservatives' are so dumb because they (1) abandoned all socialist principles and (2) were abandoned by the capitalist class that is for LGBT, BLM, ADL, and SPLC. If at least white conzos gave up all vestiges of socialism in exchange for support from the capitalist rich, it wouldn't be so bad. But whites gave up social-democracy and state power only to be insulted, demeaned, deplatformed, and blacklisted by Big Capital also. Given the nature of Jewish Power and its influence on Big Capital and Elite Institutions, the vast majority of whites would have done better with a nationalist version of social-democracy — without the nationalist element, Social-Democracy turns into worthless cuckery of Sweden and Minnesota — and with identifying with Palestinians who've been resisting Jewish Power since the great tragedy of Nakba. But even as whites face White Nakba, the great majority of them from Donald Trump to some MAGA-hat wearing 'white trash' are into "Muh Israel" and "Socialism sucks".

Behind the facade of Jewish Moral Hypocrisy, there is the consistency of Jewish Supremacism. And it plays it smart, which is why it wins against the Great White Stupidity that still favors capitalism over socialism and favors Jews/Zionists over Palestinians/Syrians/Iranians.

Jews as moralists are a total fraud. Jewish morality, unlike white morality, is almost never about "Did we do something wrong to others?" but invariably about "How OTHERS wronged us." True morality is about both being wronged and doing wrong. Jews only fixate on being wronged, all the while fixating on what wrongs whites and Arabs/Muslims did to Jews. Same with Russian History. Jews will go on and on about the pogroms and 'antisemitism' but hardly discuss Jewish role in Bolshevism and 1990s pirate-capitalism that destroyed countless Slavic and other lives. True morality requires consistency. If group A does something and if it is bad, it is also bad when group B does it. But according to Jewish morality, apartheid policy was wrong in South Africa but is A-Okay in West Bank. Israeli Police can use any amount of brute force against Palestinians, but the US police is to be condemned for 'racism' even when blacks are in the wrong. Also, when Stop-and-Frisk was used in Jewish-dominated NY to bring down crime rates, Jews were hardly outraged. But the same Jews were throwing fits about what happened to Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, even though it was 'gentle giant' Brown who attacked the white police officer. Jewish morality is that of crooked lawyers and card sharks. It is worthless.

But Jews aren't realists either. Realism has problems, and some see it as a form of gangsterism in its Machiavellian extremes. But in a world where so many nations and peoples, the West included, often overlook or violate the rules(or where agreed-upon enforceable rules hardly exist), people must be pragmatic and realistic on grounds of "what's in it for us?" For example, US foreign policy should forsake utopian dreams for the world, especially when US itself has tons of failings and problems. But to play this game of realism, the US must be honest with itself and the world. Honest, that is the saving grace of realism. Oftentimes, a honest gangster is easier to deal with than a hypocritical sermonizer. But even that isn't possible in the US because national interest and the majority no longer matter. The question is never about what is good for America as a nation or for Most Americans because US is Jewish Supremacist and Jews make up only 2% of US population. Just like India under British Imperialism could not be about "What is good for most Indians?" as the priority was "What was good for the British Empire?", the US cannot hope for any kind of realist policy as the politics, finance, and military are all fixated on "Is it great for Jewish Supremacist Power?"

Under this conditions, any white person, even if on the Dissident Right, is useless UNLESS he makes White Liberation from Jewish Supremacism the primary goal of white folks, especially by exposing the true extent of Jewish Power and condemning all forms of Jewish supremacist hatred, arrogance, and murderousness, especially against Palestinians, Syrians, and Iranians. What has cucking to Jewish Power ever done for White Americans? "Cuck! What is it good for? Absolutely Nothing." Denazification will end when whites push for De-Zionazification. Whites must push back and dig into all the dirty laundry of the Jews and their history. Fight fire with Fire. Against White Nakba, whites need the policy of White Mitzvah. Hunt down Jewish criminals, Jewish gangsters, Jewish supremacist killers. And expose all that is evil and dirty about Jewish Power.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/1LjdeEnFOt1b/