Main Formula for Civilizational Destruction in the 21st Century — Difference between 'Liberalism' and 'Conservatism' in Relation to Jewish Power — Covid Panic as Another Wedge to Divide the White Race

Darren Beattie won’t name it…

but the real formula for civilizational decay, at least in the 21st century are as follows:

1. Allowing Jewish Power to gain the controlling stake in your country. Why would this matter? It's because Jews(in supremacist mode) use their smarts and money to push mass immigration, great replacism(and celebration of it), racial self-loathing along with rejection of identity & heritage among the native goyim, and the destruction of national autonomy. Jewish power also drives a wedge between the goy elites and the goy masses(while also insisting that goyim praise and champion Jewish identity, heritage, nationalism and even Jewish supremacism, and etc.) Jews also promote goy-vs-goy hostility, using media power to direct Western rage at Russia or China or Iran or Venezuela.

Jewish Power also promotes two other especially dangerous groups. Blacks and Homos. Indeed, they now function as the main allies of Jewish Supremacism.

2. Blacks do great damage because they evolved to be tougher and more aggressive. Therefore, blacks commit lots of crime and degrade society with savage-like behavior. Also, black men beat up white guys in schools, streets, and sports. Thus, native male pride goes down the drain. White guys in Great Britain become beta-male wussy sidekicks of blacks OR take up gender-confusion as coping mechanism, i.e. “I have no manhood to lose because I’m a pan-tran-wan-sexual.”
Despite all the harm caused by blacks, because of their domination of sports & pop music whites celebrate and revere blackness regardless of its destructive potential and impact. Blacks destroyed Detroit, but Eminem took up gangsta rap, and he became an idol of ‘whigger’ culture that spread like wildfire in the US. Top it off with jungle fever, and white society is almost over.

3. Homos do great harm because they are nasty, narcissistic, hissy, vain, and neurotic. They indulge in perverted quasi-sexual behavior, weird and gross, but their sneering pride simply cannot admit to this fact. To hide the putridity and grossness of their behavior, they use weasel words(like ‘gay’ and ‘pride’) and ‘rainbow’ symbols to cover up their true nature, thus emboldening a culture of lies. Furthermore, they are always in revenge mode against society(even when society comes to tolerate homos) because, no matter how much their ‘sexuality’ is accepted or celebrated by the straight-normal community, it can only be a gross and pale parody of the real thing. The Globo-homo cult depends on a culture of lies and misdirection.

Combine Jewish Power, black savagery, and homo degeneracy into a single package, and it is the perfect formula for civilizational decay in the 21st century. Not only is it anti-conservative but is also anti-liberal. It not only impugns the richness of tradition and heritage but reviles free-spirited speaking truth to power that may de-legitimize the official dogma, which today is the 'woke' Tridolatry(tri-idolatry) of Jew-Worship, Black-Reverence, and Homo-Celebration. Consider what has become of Free Speech in the West under Jewish Supremacist Influence. Jews insist that all serve Zion or be purged. Blacks demand all agree to BLM or be blacklisted. Homos demand all celebrate globo-homo or be exiled. So much for Liberal Democracy. All three groups routinely victimize other groups but always pose as precious victims. Just ask the Palestinians.

In a nutshell, Jewish Power will destroy the white mind, Black Prowess will destroy the white body, and the Homo Pride will destroy the white soul. Just look all around. Prince(ss) Harry is the embodiment of this rot.

Jewish Power is so dominant that it’s not only about mindless support for Israel. It is whatever Jews demand, with which goyim must go along... or else. Jews are the ones pushing the Tranny Craziness, and guess what? Goyim just go along.

In a way, the main difference between ‘liberals’ and ‘conservatives’ is as follows:

‘Liberals’ support not only Jews & Israel but also non-Jewish agendas favored and promoted by Jews, such as globo-homo and tranny-wanny. So, if Jews say trannies should compete in women’s sports, ‘liberals’ go along, in addition to supporting Israel.

In contrast, while ‘Conservatives’ totally support Jews and Israel, they aren't too enthused about many of the non-Jewish agendas pushed by Jews. But this leads to disfavor from Jews who want goyim to not only support Jews/Israel but endorse all the non-Jewish agendas dear to Jews.
Because ‘conservatives’ relatively drag their feet on non-Jewish-agendas-pushed-by-Jews, they try to compensate by cucking for Jewishness and Zionism even harder. But this hardly works because the Democratic Party is utterly committed to Jewishness and Zion. There isn’t much that the ‘conservatives’ can do to outdo the ‘liberals’ on mindless cucking to Israel and Jewish supremacism.

We must also remind ourselves that divide-and-rule is essential to Jewish Supremacism.

Even though Jewish Power is pushing for universal 'vaccination', it also sees advantage in the goy population splitting into the 'vaccinated' and the 'unvaccinated'. It provides yet another reason for the goy masses to be divided than united. After all, the last thing Jewish Power wants is unity among goyim. Mutual distrust and enmity within a goy population(the more extreme the better) are ideal for Jewish Supremacism. So, one bunch of goyim believe the 'unvaccinated' are anti-science lunatics whose 'hesitancy' will spread the disease and kill everyone. At the other end, another bunch of goyim fear the 'vaccinated' are going to drop dead like flies. Divide and Rule for Jewish Power.

Of course, the three most effective wedges driven into the white race by Jewish Power have been sexual, generational, and class/economic. Via feminism, Jewish Power made white women revile white men as 'patriarchal' oppressors and date-rapists while regarding men-of-color as ideological allies. Via jungle fever and interracism, Jewish Power has convinced many white women that they should reject white men and have mulatto babies. White Race is doomed without the sexual unity of white men and white women who produce white children to secure the white future.
And via generational politics, Jewish Power manipulates every new generation into distrusting and blaming everything on earlier generations, thereby severing the ties between generations; it really took off with the boomers. No race can survive without a sense of reverence, continuity and heritage.
And via class politics, Jewish Power maintains a deep rift between the white elites and white masses. White mass anxiety is stoked against white elites as snobby and arrogant cold-blooded Wasps, while white educated elites are instilled with contempt for the white masses as 'white trash' or redneck' subhumans, aka the 'deplorables'.

Whereas Neolib Jews and Neocon Jews are united behind closed doors and, furthermore, younger Jews respect the memory of elder and bygone Jews, white goyim are fatally divided in myriad ways. Jews don't fall for the white bait to divide Jews, but whites so easily fall for the Jewish bait to divide whites. It seems Jewish Identity is just more powerful than the white goy kind that, over the millennia, has been deracinated by Christianity. And now, Covid serves as yet another divider among the whites. All these white dummies or whummies.

Millennial Woes - MILLENNIYULE 2021: ROBYN RILEY

Critique of Eugyppius(blogger)'s Mis-Characterization of 'Wokeness' as a Decentralized Movement of Nutters when, in truth, It has been Directed from Above by Jewish Supremacism

https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/there-isnt-one-plan-there-are-fifty/

eugyppius: "Before I fled, I endured two pretty difficult years, navigating tidal of waves of nonsense and trying to stay uncanceled. In the midst of it all, I had plenty of time to study the institutional workings of the Woke."

But it all depends on which part of the elephant one is touching. Eugyppius saw the outward manifestations, not its innermost infestations. Cultural Revolution looked different in the streets with rampaging Red Guards than in the minds of Mao and his cohorts, for whom it was less about ideological purity than political machinations.

eugyppius: "The fundaments of their dogma were laid by specific critical theorists long before I entered graduate school"

But who got to favor and promote such dogma? Any academic can cook up some theory, but why are certain ideas favored over others? Who does the favoring and why? Also, some ideas are concocted specifically to serve an agenda. Thus, the theorist is less concerned with the idea itself than its utility to the bigger agenda, which may actually be irrelevant to or even opposed to the theory in principle. For example, does Jewish Power push 'anti-racism' because Jews are really committed to combating 'racism' and loving black people OR because 'anti-racism', as currently conceived in the West, has a way of deracinating whites into moral paralysis and submission, which is useful to Jewish Supremacists who then control whites toward supporting Zionism in the Middle East over Arabs/Palestinians and Muslims in general? If Jewish pushers of 'anti-racism' were truly sincere in their dogma, they would condemn not only white 'racism' but Jewish Zionist supremacism over Palestinians. But that isn't the case at all. Also, the very same Jews who howl about 'nazi, nazi, nazi' have no qualms about working with naziesque elements in Ukraine.

Another notable phenomenon is that all those delirious sincere wokesters almost never think or feel beyond the narrative/dogma handed to them from above. There is almost no connecting the dots on their own. They must be TOLD and DIRECTED as to how 'wokeness' should operate. For example, if racial violence is wrong, then Zionist terror against Palestinians and black crime/violence against whites & non-blacks should be condemned. But 'wokeness' lacks consistency of logic. Rather, it's based on a hierarchy the holies and unholies. Paradoxically, precisely because whites are in the unholiest camp, they must be most 'woke' to gain holy-redemption points, which explains why some of the most obnoxious 'woke' types are whites. And of course, the easiest way for whites to gain 'holiness' is by waving the globo-homo banner, which explains the popularity of 'gay' stuff among white progs.

If 'wokeness' has inner logic beyond the control of the elites, how many churches have been seen with BDS or pro-Palestinian signs? I haven't seen any. I've only seen globo-homo and BLM signs, both favored by Jews. US neo-imperialism under Bush to Obama to Trump to Biden has destroyed millions of people in the Middle East. Where is the 'woke' outrage about that? Your average 'woke' moron cares more about some black criminal like George Floyd than millions of Muslims bombed to oblivion or starved to death.

This goes to show that 'wokeness' is totally orchestrated and controlled; it is not to be confused with the True Left that, ideologically misguided or not, tries to be morally consistent in its critique of Power. So, Aaron Mate, like him or not, will call out on the horrors of US neo-imperialism in Ukraine, Venezuela, Syria, and West Bank. Oliver Stone will defend Edward Snowden for exposing the Deep State. In contrast, to the delight of Jewish Supremacists, 'woke' morons are more obsessed about the sacralization of George Floyd(useful to Jews in white moral paralysis) and how some fat ugly hairy guy should be addressed as 'she' or 'they'. In other words, while 'wokesters' may cause headache for the sane and moderate, they do no harm to the Power, which is Jewish and dedicated mostly to guilt-baiting whites and confusing categories so that no united front, right or left, can emerge.

The rise of 'woke-ism' is a death knell to the real left. The True Left, again like it or not, gained power by unity in organization and purpose. It was about the masses or the workers led by disciplined leadership. Or it was about national liberation struggles in Cuba or Vietnam. In contrast, 'wokeness' is about division and atomization of so-called 'progressivism' into countless tiktok lunatics, mostly yammering about 'gender', which now comes in how many flavors? 500? Trannies make up less than 1% of the population, but 50% of 'woke' discussion seems to center on how many gender-splitting can be achieved under a microscope. And the Power(Jewish) has pushed this among the impressionable young, and in the UK, 50% of young people don't believe they're either male or female, and 40% of young idiots in the US have followed suit. This kind of nuttery poses NO THREAT to the power. Yes, it's frustrating(and even terrifying) to decent scholars in academia who want to remain sane and do good work. The Power isn't interested in principles or virtues of the honest academic but in maintaining its own supremacy. Jewish Power is especially nihilistic because it looks upon goyim as less-than-human, in other words expendable. Thus, when Jewish Power uses 'wokeness', all it cares about is "Is it good for Jews?" Even if wokeness undermines the quality of academia, it's 'worth it', just like Madeleine Albright said it's worth it to kill half a million Arab kids because, well, it's good for Israel. Of course, she didn't name Israel, but why has Jewish Power steered US foreign policy toward smashing nations in the Middle East? It's about 'any means necessary' for Zionist supremacy.

eugyppius: "People tend to believe things that further their personal interests, and universities are no exception."

People looking out for their personal interest has been a constant throughout history and in all places. It's no different in Iran, Russia, China, Brazil, Italy, North Korea, Japan, Israel, and Mexico. People have been looking out for their personal interests in Ancient Greece, Pagan Rome, Catholic Poland, and etc. But the question is, "Do most people define their own personal values?" Did European Christians arrive at the Faith like Saint Paul who wrestled with his own soul? No, the religion gained political dominance, and being pro-Christian became synonymous with personal advancement. Likewise, personal interest in communist nations became synonymous with believing in Marx and Lenin. So, while countless communist professionals in the Soviet Union were indeed working for personal interests, their personal beliefs were imposed or implanted by the Power. This is where the political becomes personal. Most people don't have imagination to come up with their own ideas of what's right.
So, the question is WHO or WHAT has been most responsible for cooking up the current brew of 'wokery' and making it mandatory medicine for all those seeking professional advancement. Take the military. I'm sure many there still despise 'wokery', but most are silent from top to bottom because they know they can be purged and ruined for going against it. But did 'wokery' spontaneously arise from the ranks or was it foisted on the military from above?

eugyppius: "Wokification succeeded largely because it gave a lot of different people a lot of different things that they wanted. It gave the increasingly powerful university administration a reason to hire more administrators to manage diversity and ensure its forward march. Self-propagation is the highest goal of administrators everywhere. Wokeness also became a useful tool in ongoing turf wars between administrators and faculty. Diversity is a simple metric via which the administration can interfere with faculty hiring and academic operations; new diversity hires know who is buttering their bread and remain loyal to the administrators whose policies brought them in. For the increasingly mediocre and incapable faculty who now teach at even the most august American schools, the woke circus has its own attractions."

But that doesn't distinguish 'wokery' from any other factor intrinsic to professional competition and advancement. The real question should be, "Why did wokery become the basis of advancement and empowerment?" After all, Iran works on the same principles but with different themes; there, you have to be pro-Islamic to get ahead. And in China, even those skeptical of communism must sing paeans to Mao to move up the political ladder. There will always be 'turf wars', whether 'wokery' is around or not. Trotskyites vs Maoists. It's like the Jets vs the Sharks.
What's most astounding about the rise of 'wokery' is how something so absurd could have gained so much traction; in other words, it didn't happen organically. We can understand why so many youths(and even academics) in college campuses became anti-war during the Vietnam War. Many were morally outraged by the slaughter. Some didn't want to be drafted. College professors were convinced the war was unwinnable. Also, good many were sincerely inspired by Marxism that seemed to speak for the oppressed. In contrast, 'wokery' is about what? At least 50% of it is about celebration of sodomy as the second coming(or cumming) and 'gender' pronouns. Rest is about how fat hairy guys with penis and balls are 'women', tattoos and piercings, and calling everything 'nazi' or 'white supremacist'.
And its only racial theme seems to be the holiness of blacks. While 'wokery' atomizes the so-called 'left' into basket-case inanities, it's not true that every gripe or complaint is equal in Wokedom. There is a very strict hierarchy. Blacks over whites and nonblacks. Endless tears for dead black thugs but zero sympathy for victims of blacks. Trannies over feminists and lesbians. Also, while Karenism is encouraged and rewarded against anyone deemed 'conservative' or 'unvaccinated', it is suddenly a great crime when it calls out on bad black behavior. Also, while Antifa is encouraged to attack and terrorize whatever movement hated by Jews, it never shows up at pro-Zionist events. Given that Zionist power is the product of super-capital and Jewish racial supremacism, one would think the 'leftist' and 'woke' Antifa would violently protest AIPAC rallies. But there's no such. Antifa doesn't march through campuses calling for sanctions on Israel. Notice 'wokery' comes with a pass-over clause. The fact that most 'woke' people comply with such rules shows that they're either (1) too stupid to connect the dots and think for themselves or (2) too craven to be consistent in their morality and just remain within the allowed perimeters of outrage.

eugyppius: "It provides distraction from the unrelenting demands of objectivity and originality, and permits a pleasing, self-righteous indulgence in moral scolding. In Woke Studies, the answers are always predetermined and it is very easy to get anything published, provided you say the right things."

Yes, but this didn't originate with 'wokeness'. This kind of behavior is quite evident among 'conservatives' as well. If Donald Trump and his 'conservative' followers were into objectivity and facts, they would have to admit that Jewish Power was most instrumental in 'fortifying' the 2020 elections. Indeed, Jewish Power in media and deep state did much to orchestrate the Covid Hysteria(to rig elections and tip economics in favor of oligarchs) and the BLM riots of 2020 to intimidate America, but all you get from Trump is 'Muh Israel', and the likes of Mike Lindell, Michael Flynn, Steve Bannon, and Sidney Powell are blaming China, Iran, and Venezuela for the election fraud. Their logic, either idiotic or craven, is hardly different from 'wokeness'. It's premised on the idolatry or dogma that Jews are never wrong, Israel is holy, and the American Right must suck up to Jewish Power no matter what. Trumpism can be characterized as Jewish Power f***king him in the ass, and him turning around and pleading to his violator, "Can I suck your d***?" Or consider Israel's role in USS Liberty and the coverup by the US government. Objectively, Israel should have been called to account. And Jewish American Power should have been exposed for favoring tribal interests over objective truth and justice. But, American 'conservatives' have been acting against objective truth in its fear of Jewish Power and the hope that if they appease Jewish Power just enough, many more rich, powerful, and verbally gifted Jews will come over to the American Right. And of course, 'conservatives' feel a moral deficit and want Jews-as-Holy-Holocaust-People to join them and automatically wash the Right with Anne Frank Soap.

Morality in the US isn't based on ideology but idolatry. It's a matter of WHO than WHAT. So, Jews, permanently canonized as Holy Holocausters, can do no wrong. They can act like Nazis toward the Palestinians and even work with Naziesque types in Ukraine. They can fund and arm ISIS and other terrorist types to cause grave harm to secular modernizers like Assad of Syria. The American Right has gone along with this irrational and crazy kind of 'morality' where Jews are always right because of some historical association to WWII. Likewise, it's not just the 'woke' but the 'conservatives' who subscribe to the notion of eternal black holiness because of the slavery narrative and MLK cult. When has Trump or any prominent 'conservative' called out on black thuggery and violence? No, they yammer about Mexican rapists and Muslim terrorists, but, when it comes to blacks, it's all about how the GOP cares more for Noble Negroes.
'Woke' lunacy isn't just the product of idiot degenerates and the Jewish Power that favors and funds them. Much of the blame must also go to craven 'conservatives' who, in their mindless mania to appease and win the approval of Jews, were silent about the increasing arrogance, hatred, and dementia of Jewish Supremacism. If, after what Jewish Power did to the US in 2020, one is still dreaming of Jews-seeing-the-light-and-coming-to-the-Right, it's truly pathetic(and irrational as hell). At any rate, one so irrational and delusional should not be accusing the 'woke' of nuttery. One should look in the mirror.

eugyppius: "In Woke Studies, the answers are always predetermined and it is very easy to get anything published, provided you say the right things."

Predetermined by whom? If some 'woke' type wants to work in Hollywood and proposes a movie about the evils of Zionist terrorism and 'racism' against Palestinians, how far would that person go? If some 'woke' type proposed a movie exposing the evils of Zionist-led US neo-imperialism in facilitating ISIS and other terrorists in Syria, would he get a green light in 'woke' Hollywood? Of course, hardly any such 'woke' type exists because 'wokery' has been devised by Jews from the beginning. A genuine leftist or even rightist might propose such ideas in Hollywood, but 'wokesters' are LINO, or leftist-in-name-only. The Power created a movement that favors infantile outrage and celebrity-vanity over honesty, principles, and thought. It's like dogs love to bark and bite but hardly get to decide the target. They will bark at and bite anything they are directed to. People with autonomy of thought and values cannot be so easily manipulated. The Power favors emotions over ideas and ideas over facts. The Power not only recruits young ones like Greta Thunberg but encourages childish emotions among adults. Children don't care what they're eating as long as it's sweet. They don't care what they're doing as long as it's fun. And infantilized adults, the 'woke', don't care what they're chanting about AS LONG AS it gives them the euphoric high of self-righteousness. They don't care what they are barking at AS LONG AS their adrenaline is fired up in righteous rage. And the Power can spin ANYTHING to energize the 'woke'. When Donald Trump spoke of ending US occupation of Syria, the Jewish-run media spun it as 'Trump is betraying all those noble Kurds to the butcher Assad', and that was enough for 'woke' tards to get hysterical(even though they'd hardly given any thought to the conflict over there). They very 'woke' idiots who were howling about 'kids in cages' in the Southwest border under Trump's presidency are now indifferent to the same or worse problems. Why? The Power directed their energies elsewhere. Lacking a sense of autonomy — these morons would be totally lost without the company of likeminded minions — , the 'woke' always need to be on the latest outrage bandwagon, and it's almost always chosen by the Power. Notice how BLM is suddenly hot, then it's not. For several yrs, it was relatively muted but then it came out big in 2020 when Jewish Power needed all the firepower against Trump and to intimidate America with muscle and (false) morality.

As for trannies, Jewish Power finds them useful enough. But tranny nuttery could be ended overnight if Jews so decided. Trannies are less than 1% of the population. Also, tranny reputation can go south instantly if the Jewish-run Media spilled the beans on all the dirt and scumminess in the tranny closet. Lots of famous trannies are deeply compromised characters with history of drug abuse, child abuse, and sexual crimes. If Jews really wanted to crush trannies, all they need to do is air the dirty laundry. Trannies didn't make themselves powerful, no more than Greta Thunberg did.
There is the Power and the empowered. The Power has autonomous support systems of maintenance. Jews control media, banking, academia, deep state, real estate, whore politicians, and etc. In contrast, the empowered need the favors of the Power. It's like Hitler Youth needed the support of the National Socialist Party. Red Guards needed the go-ahead from Mao. So much of 'wokeness' could be ended overnight by the Power if it directed the money and energies elsewhere. The notion that green-haired tattoo-riddled freaks on Tiktok and Twitter and gender studies department in universities are dictating matters is too funny. No, the gender lunacy was pushed by Jewish Power to foster confusion not only between the Right and the Left but within the Left, to the point where the Left is now useless in its decadence and degeneracy. Just think what would happen to China or Russia or Iran if it were overcome with gender pronoun lunacy and tranny nuttery, the kind pushed by Jewish-run deep state all over the world? It would become like deracinated South Korea where the national culture revolves around fruity gay-pop K-pop pansies. Furthermore, spread of global BLM instructs goyim in every country to prioritize black identity(as holy) over their own. It further leads to deracination and weakening of national pride and autonomy. This is why Jews push such garbage all over the world. And it's why Jews are furious at Russia and China's saying NO to globo-homo and gender-garbage. It's not about the spread of 'liberal democratic' values but about the spread of Jewish Supremacism by other means.
Now, some will say Jews themselves face problem with 'wokery' within their own ranks, but here's the crucial difference. As globo-homo is the Jewish weapon(and as homos are utterly loyal to Jews as their masters), Jews feel a sense of domination when they wave the homo flag; it's an expression of victory of the Jewish Will. In contrast, goyim feel submission when they wave the homo flag; it's an act of surrender to the Jewish Will. It's the difference between a British Imperialist waving the Union Jack and a subject of the British Empire waving it.
Also, unlike idiot goyim, Jews don't undermine their own power over bitter ideological strife. Israel is both globo-homo central and orthodox Jewish central. It puts on massive homo parades as the metropole of globalist dominance but also put on the biggest funeral in its history for a rabbi who said goyim exist only to serve Jews. Jewish 'woke' don't wage war on the Jewish Right. If anything, they are united on grounds of "Is it good for Jews?" Do you see 'liberal democratic' Jews in the US attacking Israel for its rightist-nationalist policies? How many Jewish Democrats denounced Israel for honoring a rabbi who said goyim are no better than cattle and it's even justified to take the organ from a goy so that a holier Jew can live? If anything, even Democratic Jews pressured Obama to bow down to Netanyahu and offer even more aid to Israel. We are told of the anti-Israel 'squad' in Congress, but they are merely FOUR, with AOC shedding crocodile tears for Palestinians while doing the bidding of AIPAC. Joe Biden is a total puppet of his Jew-heavy administration, but how come the 'woke', supposedly into 'inclusion' and 'diversity', aren't outraged by the vastly disproportionate Jewish makeup of Biden's regime, which should be called the Jewish Regime with Biden as senile-Brezhnev-like puppet?

eugyppius: "For students, Wokeness has still other attractions—as a font of easy coursework, as an opportunity for social networking, and as a locus for the periodic ritual entertainment of false moral outrages and protests."

Not very convincing on easy coursework. Long before 'wokeness', colleges have turned into party schools. Students could do minimum work and still graduate. Also, college professors learned to grade on a very generous curve system long before 'wokeness'.
As for 'false moral outrage', it's human nature to want religion, and in the absence of old faiths, there is a need for new ones. As the modern mind has been shaped by fashion, celebrity culture, and vanity, 'wokeness' is appealing because it's packaged as the latest fads and trends in moral outrage.

eugyppius: "All of this is to say that Wokeness was selected from many aspiring ideological and intellectual programs, because it gave the right things to the right people."

No, for all its yammering about 'diversity' and 'inclusion', most of 'wokery' revolves around three themes: Blackity Blackness, Globo-Homo genderist nuttery, and Shut-Up about Jewish Power(by fixating on fantastical threats from White Supremacy and the Autocracy of Russia & China, all the while pretending the West is about 'liberal democracy'). Suppose you're from Bolivia and want to raise awareness about the plight of Bolivians and the beauty of Bolivian pride. You can try, but you won't get very far. Wokeness isn't about diversity for diversity's sake but for diversity revolving around blackness, homo-ness, and anti-whiteness(and anti-Russia/China-ness) as diversion from the fact of Jewish Supremacist control of the West. There's more ink spilled in favor of trannies than for all the diverse ethnic/national groups around the world among the 'wokesters'. If you aren't homo or black, the only chance of gaining a bit of attention for your kind is to associate it with globo-homo or BLM. In other words, a Vietnamese-American for Vietnamese pride gets nowhere, but he or she might get some attention by associating his/her identity with support of homos or blacks, or by denouncing 'white supremacism' as the biggest evil in the world(even though a yellow person is far more likely to be terrorized by a black criminal or thug). And of course, he or she better shut up about Jews. That's 'wokery'. It's not about a hundred flowers contending for hundred interests but about hundred identities coalescing around few favored themes imposed from above: Globo-Homo, Noble Negro, and Blame-Whitey(and ignore Jewey).

eugyppius: "The donors, the trustees, the tenured faculty, the powerful committees – none of these hold the reins either. Wokery is a self-organising decentralised movement."

Nope. Donors may not hold the reins but they provide the water. It's like the ones who control the dam don't control the sails and rudders on the boats in the lake, but they can turn off the water supply, in which case the lake will go dry and the boats will be rendered useless, regardless of who controls the sails and rudders. The relative ups and downs of BLM owed a great deal to Jewish Money and Jewish Media Control, a multi-billion-dollar enterprise. There are plenty of Christians all over America, but they get nowhere because they don't have donors. Why did the GOP steer toward globo-homo, 'gay marriage', and even tranny nuttery? Because the big donors favor cuck-minions who never oppose the agenda. Donors matter a great deal. Even without the donors, 'woke' idiots can go on being 'woke', but they will no longer have any traction.

It's like the Alt Right. In 2016, the media decided to shine a light on it, not all of it negative. So, Richard Spencer got his 15 min of fame and celebrity. Even as a 'villain', everyone seemed to know him and talk about him. The fool thought his fame or infamy came naturally. But when the media shut him out, he was suddenly a zero. Most white 'woke' morons don't have minds of their own. They lack agency to come up with their own dogmas, narratives, and gods. So, they rely on orders and decrees from above. Jewish money was behind globo-homo and tranny nuttery from the beginning, and it helped that Jews control the media. Also, Jews in Wall Street and Hollywood figured globo-homo would be great to Jewish Power that no longer cares for class struggle as most Jews are rich. Just make white 'progressives' expend most of their energies in favor of vain homos and trannies who are happy to gain favors from Jews and work with the US deep state.
Indeed, look how globo-homo is the new missionary arm of US imperialism. A navy ship named after Harvey Milk. Given US aggression around the world, one would think the 'woke' would be outraged at homo cooperation with the deep state. Or, one would think the 'woke' would be outraged that the black general Lloyd Austin is a commander in US military aggression. But no, the very people who weep about George Floyd don't care about the innocents murdered in Afghanistan or Syria. They aren't outraged by US bombs painted with BLM signs that are dropped all over Muslim lands. 'Wokeness' isn't true leftism. It is the Jewish Supremacist appropriation and perversion of Leftism to serve what is really an ultra-rightist Jewish Supremacism. It's like European empires twisted the meaning of Christianity to turn Jesus Christ into some warrior-god who justified the conquests and plunders of so-called Christendom. 'Wokeness' is to leftism what Prosperity Gospel is to Jesus's teachings.

eugyppius: "Importantly, Wokeness is also self-radicalising, in the way that many university-incubated ideologies turn out to be. Administrators or department chairs are constantly in danger of being outflanked on their left, and so they must adopt and endorse the most radical line to maintain their position."

It's more self-Fadicalizing than radicalizing. Because 'wokery' is based more on idolatry than ideology, it has limits to which it can radicalize. Ideas can be radicalized into greater purity, aka purity spiral. In contrast, idolatry throws the monkey wrench in ideological purification because it favors certain tribal identities over others. For example, ideology of equality would call for ever greater application of equal treatment. But because Jews have been idolized, equal justice for Palestinians hardly gets anywhere. Also, the idolatry of BLM makes purity in racial equality impossible. If indeed the ideology says all races must be treated equally, then not only would anti-black violence be condemned but the violence committed by blacks(as thugs in the streets or as US soldiers in the Middle East dropping bombs on Muslims). But the black idolatry of BLM doesn't allow for ideological purity because of blackness uber alles. Likewise, if ideology of equality were to apply to homos, they should be held accountable for the troubles they cause. But the globo-homo idolatry makes ideological purity impossible because homos, like Jews and blacks, get pass-over rights and aren't held accountable for all the social malaise they cause through spread of disease and cultural decadence.
Indeed, just ask the Palestinians about what 'wokeness' has done for them. Despite all this talk of equity, has the NY Times been pressure to 'include' a Palestinian-American columnist? Is the Democratic Party under pressure to include some Palestinian/Arab/Muslim people in Biden's administration? Is there outrage that so many college presidents are hardline Zionist, thereby either dismissive or suppressive of BDS movements on campus?

'Wokery' is misunderstood because it's really an ultra-right ideology cloaked in faux 'leftism'. 'Diversity' really means diverse peoples must coalesce at the supremacist feet of Jews, blacks, and homos. 'Inclusion' means Jews get to include more of their allies to mute criticism of Israel and Jews while everything is blamed on 'white supremacism'(or Russia and China). 'Equity' means More for Blacks where they're deficient. It certainly doesn't mean treating Jews and Palestinians equally in US media, government, or institutions. Tell me WHO in Hollywood or TV-land has insisted on more pro-Palestinian programming to make things more equitable? Hollywood already made EXODUS the movie, and the US news media feature countless Jewish voices. WHO among the 'woke' is demanding a movie about Nakba for 'equity'-sake? Who? If anything, 'wokesters' know full well that they won't have a chance in Big Tech, Hollywood, Wall Street, and Ivy League if they open that can of worms. Some time ago, Cornel West complained of how he'd been targeted by Jews in Harvard for his pro-Palestinian stance, and furthermore, even most Negroes didn't come to his aid because they know they got more to gain by groveling at the feet of Jews than by standing by a brotha. Blacks do enjoy supremacist advantage under 'wokeness' but IF AND ONLY IF they don't try to apply rules of 'equity' to Jewish Power.

eugyppius: "While Wokeness provides many personal incentives for true believers, it is destructive for the institutions that foster it. Those schools that have advanced very far down the woke path face semi-regular hate speech hoaxes and student protests, hordes of incapable hostile junior faculty, and massive curricular disarray."

True, but as Jewish Power rules the US and its top priority is "Is it good for Jews?", it doesn't matter if 'wokeness' is harmful to institutions. If harming institutions secures more power for Jews, that's all that matters. It's like the Sacklers knew that their drugs were destroying many goy lives. But they didn't care because all they cared about was More Money. Jews know that Neocon policies did irreparable harm to Middle East nations, but again, what do they care? Their Jewish supremacism only cares about what's-good-for-Jews, so who cares if millions of Arabs/Muslims suffer? And who cares if the West is inundated by millions of refugees as the result of Wars for Zion? Did Jews care about the harm done to countless Russians in the 1990s when shock-doctrine capitalism concentrated 50% of Russian wealth overnight in the hands of Jewish oligarchs working in cahoots with Global Jewry? No.
It all depends on priorities. Perhaps, Jews would like to have the cake and eat it too where they get both Jewish Supremacy and excellent institutions. But if they feel the choice is between Jewish Supremacism and the health of institutions, they will go with the former. Jews favor power over principles. Look how the Jewish-heavy ACLU is no longer about Free Speech as Jews got the power and don't want to be criticized. Look how Jews who once spouted principles about civil liberties(violated by Joe McCarthy) are totally into blacklisting and deplatforming people today. Bari Weiss didn't leave NYT because it purged the likes of her but because it didn't purge enough of the people she hated. (She was unhappy in a paper that is heavily weighed in favor of Jews against Palestinians. But for the idiot 'right', she is the face of 'free speech' against 'wokeness'. LOL) Whether it's 'liberal' Chuck Schumer or 'conservative' Jennifer Rubin, it's really about Jewish supremacism.

Woke mobs are decentralized at the bottom, but the directives come from above. Most woke idiots are incapable of generating their own ideas, themes, or narratives. Such must be handed down to them. It's like blood hounds may wander all over the place and appear free-ranging, but it's in service of pursuing the scent provided to them. They are 'freely' fixated on that one scent provided by the Master.

Without elite academic culture, what is the likelihood that so many 'woke' morons would be into creative pronouns and 100 genders? Are we to believe, all on their own and in decentralized enclaves, they came up with the notion of 'they' for a man-posing-as-woman in all fifty states(and even in foreign countries)?

Here's a typical case of woke mob-mentality and how it's directed from above. The elites said Covid is a killer, and Trump is to blame. All must be locked down because Covid will kill, kill, kill. Woke mobs were saying, STAY INSIDE or else you'll die!!

But then, the Power decides racial violence is just the thing to drive a wedge between blacks and Trump(who made some inroads), and all of sudden, the very woke types who'd been acting so scared of Covid are suddenly out in force in the streets and running riot. And the media don't call foul on this because they're the instrument of the Power that gave the go-ahead to the mass riots and 'mostly peaceful protests'.

Now, if Covid is really a mass killer, wouldn't 'woke' protests lead to countless deaths among progs and blacks? Not very conducive to the objective of 'black lives matter', is it? But for the duration of the riots, it was as if the Covid went on vacation and spared all those proggies and blacks. Wink wink between elites and woke mobs.

And if wokeness has a logic all its own and keeps spreading on the basis of radical equal justice, when has anyone seen a blue city street painted with 'Palestinian Lives Matter' sign? When?

eugyppius: "Alas, this doesn’t matter either. Nobody, not even Kimberlé Crenshaw, can redirect or modulate Wokeness any longer."

This 'wokery' will continue to be about idolatry of blacks, homos, and Jews. It hasn't been anything but a Noble Negro cult, Globo-Homo reverie, and Jews-are-Anne-Franks-no-matter-what-they-do. That is all 'wokeness' is. It hasn't been anything else and will never be.

eugyppius: "All of this matters, because American universities aren’t just eager sponsors of racial hysteria. They have also emerged as some of the most radical centres of Corona containment in the world. Their students endure all manner of unreasonable hygiene measures."

Again, this is a Jewish thing. Just play a mind game. Suppose it was Trump and his gang that wanted to push the Covid panic. Suppose Trump and his ilk had something to gain from Covid mania and its fallout. But suppose the Jewish-run media, the deep state, college elites, medical community, and big tech all chose to poo-poo Trump as fear-monger, a medical nazi, and power-hungry demagogue. Suppose Fauci was on air assuring the public that Covid is no big deal and that Trump is off his rocker. Suppose the Jewish-heavy medical community and media favored methodologies that minimized the number of Covid deaths. Would this Covid thing have gained traction? Jews control the institutions and infrastructure whereby certain ideas, agenda, and manias are quickly disseminated from top to bottom. Take the Russia Collusion Hoax. It was utter nonsense from day one for anyone with sense, but Jews have such total control over the institutions and media industries that those raised to be 'good little progressives' readily fall for the BS. It's like there's still plenty of idiot 'conservatives' who knee-jerkedly salute the flag and regard soldiers as 'heroes' no matter the war. People don't think. The very 'liberals' who've been going on and on about the bad ole days of the 'Red Scare' and paranoia suddenly became far nuttier than Joe McCarthy and his supporters about the specter of Evil Putin. What does this tell you? It's not about ideology, let alone ideological purity. It's about suckers whose 'ideology' is totally at the mercy of Jewish manipulation. This Covid nuttery can end overnight if Jews want it to end. It never would have become a thing if the orders didn't come from the top. Fauci would have never come to prominence if he wasn't useful to the deep state. His career was carefully constructed despite so many failures.

In a way, 'wokeness' is like a strange mass-conspiracy. It's not like all the 'wokesters' getting in a smoke-filled room with the globalist elites to hatch a plan. Still, much of the 'woke' mentality is the sense that the 'educated progressive' types are 'in the know' and working for 'human evolution' that requires the concentration of power in the right kind of people. Thus, 'wokery' has a double appeal. Among the earnest dummies, it's really real, like the morons in George Orwell's 1984 who really believe Eurasia, once a forever friend, is now a forever enemy. But among the conceited smarty 'woke', they believe they are 'in' on the grand scheme of historical power. In other words, they sense or know that much of 'wokery' is baloney but nevertheless go along because it is subversive of reactionary forces that must be destroyed by any means necessary. It's like adults or 'grown-ups in the room' don't tell kids the truth but what-is-good-for-them because it's agreed that kids simply can't handle the truth. Just like smarter Jews look upon goyim as children, smarty 'wokesters' look upon humanity as one big sheeple to manipulate. Smarty 'wokesters' believe in power and the agenda, and ANYTHING, however false, is justified if it furthers the agenda. One thing that Project Veritas exposed was that many in the Woke Industry don't really believe in their own hype. Rather, they keep up with the facade because of its political utility. This adds an element of adventure and romance to 'wokery'. It's like playing spy or secret agent. After all, in war, hot or cold, you don't use honesty to gain the upperhand. You use deception and subterfuge. So, while plenty of 'woke' idiots actually believed in Russian Collusion Hoax, many pushed it cynically just to hurt Trump. And even though some 'woke' morons are really into gender nuttery, others push it as just another weapon against normative conservatives. It makes them feel like Lawrence of Arabia or even 007 in a game of strategy.

So, whereas the church-wokesters actually believe in the nonsense handed to them from above, war-wokesters merely treat it as a manual of combat, rather like 'Rules for Radicals' by Saul Alinsky. As such, even though they aren't privy to the inner-workings of the Power, they feel they are on the same mental wavelength as those in conspiratorial circles. But such mentality exists on the 'right' also. Q-Anon morons think they are in on some secret, a 4-D chess that is being played by Trump. So, even Trump's defeat in 2020 was part of The Plan to, wink-wink, expose the Deep State. ROTFL.

eugyppius: "People raised up as leaders and heroes of emerging movements are almost never its directors, but merely expressions of all the separate beliefs and aspirations of those involved. Ultimately it’s just extremely difficult for any confined group of people, no matter how wealthy or powerful, to implement any kind of coherent agenda in heavily bureaucratised modern states."

If this is true, how come 'wokery' almost never deviates from the Tri-Idolatry of Jews, blacks, and homos? Sure, feminists and stuff like MeToo are thrown a bone now and then when it's useful to the Power, but what other themes have been expressed by 'wokeness'? Also, even if there are many voices and interests in 'wokeness', nothing gains traction and momentum without favoritism from above. Suppose a 'wokester' calls for ending mass immigration because the American Indians were victims of 'genocide' caused by mass invasions from the Old World. What chance is there of powerful institutions amplifying such concerns? In 2020, streets were painted with BLM signs, but how many streets were painted with PLM or Palestinian Lives Matter signs? BLM was painted outside Trump tower. Will 'wokery' leads to PLM signs on the streets outside Jewish centers in NY or Hollywood? Fat chance. If any 'wokester' painted such, he or she'd be arrested and locked up.

eugyppius: "These constraints don’t exist in every country, but in the world of liberal democracy, this is very roughly how governance happens."

US is a liberal democracy? Really? A nation where Jews, 2% of the population, have ethno-supremacist stranglehold over so many industries and institutions but are NEVER CALLED OUT ON IT? A nation where the Power allows Antifa and BLM to run riot but unleashes brutal police force on any patriot that fights back? (Unlike racial violence in the 1960s that spiraled out of control, the 2020 racial violence was orchestrated by the deep state. It was the Power concentrated in Jewish hands waging war on the nation as punishment for Trump's presidency. It was far worse than Pearl Harbor and 9/11, which also had a Jewish Hand.)

The US came closest to liberal democracy in the 60s and 70s when Wasp power was waning, and the power was up for grabs among various groups and voices. Back then, Jews were not assured of their supremacist position and supported free speech to defend their right to compete for influence. Since then, Jewish Power has risen like Mt. Everest over all others, and the US today is properly an ethno-supremacist oligarchic gangster state. What we see with Political Correctness and 'wokery' cannot happen in a true liberal democracy. Rather, what has happened over the years is that principled liberals have lost ground to pushy, nasty, vicious, and supremacist Jewish ethno-supremacists who bitch about 'white privilege' but cry 'antisemitism' whenever someone calls out on Jewish Power. Even libertarians are full of BS. They will defend Jewish Big Tech's censoring of conservatives on grounds that private companies can do as they please. Okay, but isn't it wrong for the state to suppress BDS, an expression of free speech in favor of Palestinian rights? But there is total silence on this matter from most libertarians.

Jewish Supremacism, Not Leftism, is the Real Mover of Current Events — Globo-Homo as Extension of Jewish Power — The Real Long-Term Conflict is between Right vs Right, not Left vs Right

"You have to give the Left credit. They never take a day off. The eye of Sauron never blinks. They are frenzied and relentless in their attempts to overthrow our civilization. They softened us up for a long time, rotting away our character and identity by promoting vice, cynicism, and nihilism—all while playing the victim."

No, it's the Jews. It's the Jews, not the Left.

Two main ways by which our side has continued to stumble are:

1. Blaming the 'left' for problems since the End of the Cold War.

2. Using 'racist' as epithet.

Globo-Homo is 'leftist' only in label. In fact, it is the proxy of ultra-right Jewish Tribal Supremacism. The current 'left', totally dominated by Jews, is not True Leftism. It's really just a peekaboo game of ever-changing 'leftist' tropes to serve what are ultimately the ultra-right agenda of Jewish Supremacists.

Indeed, the current struggle is not about Right vs Left but Right vs Right, except that the Jewish Ultra-Right hides behind 'leftist' and 'progressive' labels to lend its agenda a 'universalist' sheen of 'liberal democracy', 'human rights', and 'equal justice'. But really, just ask the Palestinians and those who support BDS, aka justice for Palestinians.
In truth, there is no real difference between the likes of Trevor Lynch and the Jewish Power. Both are motivated by ultra-rightism and tribal supremacism. Lynch has Nazi sympathies(even while being critical of aspects of Nazism), whereas Jews are hellbent on world domination and tribal supremacy. If 'white nationalists' are less despicable, it's because they are honest in their tribalism whereas Jewish supremacists put on 'progressive' masks. That said, the Jewish Right is far more forthright in Israel where Jews make up a solid majority. There, Jews feel secure in their power & numbers and openly yammer about how they're #1. They even have openly ultra-nationalist politicians in government. But as Jews are a minority in Goy Nations, they know it'd be foolish to candidly air their core ultra-rightist convictions. So, they masquerade as 'liberals' and even 'leftists'. But it's all a fraud because the very Jews who shriek about 'white supremacism' do everything to suppress BDS and to pressure every goy politician into supporting Zionist-centrist US foreign policy that turns a blind eye to the plight of Palestinians and other victims of Jews. And the very Jews who call just about any white conservative a 'nazi' in the US will readily work with quasi-nazi elements in Ukraine. It call comes down to the tribal question of "Is it good for Jews?" And these supposedly compassionate Jewish Liberals who stand for modernity will support the most retrograde extreme Islamic terrorists against secular modernizers like Assad of Syria. Jews use 'leftism' much like the US used Red China against the USSR. Nixon met with Mao not to approve of the Chairman's ideology but to use China as leverage against the Soviet Union(even though Soviet Communism was, at the time, moderate compared to the virulent Maoist kind).

By characterizing this ultra-right Jewish Supremacism as 'leftist', our side is actually doing our enemies a favor. The last thing Jewish Supremacists want is to be is outed and exposed as ultra-rightist tribalists, which is what they really are. Jews may support homos coming out of the closet but remain very much in the closet as Jewish Supremacists. The face they show is that of 'Jewish Liberals' and 'Jewish Progressives'. But, it has always been tribalism-uber-alles with Jews. Why were Jews worried about Joe McCarthy? Too many suspected of radicalism were Jews. The very Jews who bitched about the Red Scare and the blacklist had NO problems with the much bigger blacklisting of pro-German individuals in Hollywood and culture; and of course, Jews didn't lift a finger for Japanese-Americans who were dispossessed and 'interned'.

Jews love being called 'leftist'. It gives cover to their ultra-tribal-rightism. It fools so many into believing that the great struggle is between reactionary rightists vs progressive leftists. Furthermore, super-capitalists — the top 1% is now richer than the entire middle class — also love being tagged as the Left because the last thing they want is for us to notice how super-privileged they are(and getting even super-richer). In the current retarded discourse, we have the middle class(and working class) being reduced to penury but attacking their super-rich neo-aristocratic overlords as 'leftists', or even as 'socialists' and 'communists'. The super-rich are cracking up at this. It's like some sadist beating someone with a stick but being accused of being a 'pacifist'. Billionaires like Bill Gates, Sergei Brin, Michael Bloomberg, and George Soros are 'leftists', ROTFL.

The True Left is hardly alive. No one in any position of power believes in universal justice or equal rights anymore because idolatry has replaced ideology. In a truly leftist system, people would be equally outraged by victimization at the hands of black thuggery as of white violence. But the idolatry favors black tribal supremacism. Blacks can do no wrong. Long ago, the Civil Rights Movement did run on leftist values: equality for whites and blacks under the law. But that was then, this is now. Today, blacks are deemed right simply because they're black. After the most thoroughgoing investigation of the Michael Brown case, it became obvious the white cop acted in self-defense against loathsome Brown. But to many people, Brown is still a saint while the white guy will never work as a policeman again; and no one pleads his case. This isn't leftism but tribal supremacism in favor of blacks. It is ultra-rightist, just the flipside of white supremacism. Of course, because of past history of racial discrimination and the Civil Rights Movement narrative, blacks still manage to disguise their tribal supremacist agenda with rhetoric about 'equal justice', but blacks, like Jews, are for idolatrous supremacy. They believe themselves to be the new thug-version of aristocrats: above the law.

You have to give the Left credit. They never take a day off.

Such hasn't been the history of radical leftism. After the initial stages of violent campaigns and purges, the leftist system turned into rigidity and dogmatism. By the time Stalin consolidated power, leftism became a matter of the same old same old. Soviet Union was a mummy state under Brezhnev. It was like a broken record playing the same tune over and over. Socialism became static and resistant to change.

Restlessness is the product of capitalism, and what is called 'leftism' in the West reflects the fashion-obsession of consumerism. Just like popular culture pursues one fashion craze after another, Western consumer pop-politics is mostly about the latest fad, the hot thing. 'Pussy Hats' today, 'Migrant Kids in Cages' tomorrow, 'Saint George Floyd' the day after, etc. No wonder Big Capital is so in cahoots with this kind of bogus 'leftism'. I think Jean-Luc Godard called it 'Marx and Coca-Cola'. Antonio Gramsci and Calvin Klein.
It's not about class warfare against the global-capitalist oligarchs but about new vanity hysterics, mainly of homos and blacks, both in the pockets of Jews who control most institutions and industries. Even the so-called 'communist' Antifa got most of their ideas from pop culture: punk music and grunge. And they emulate pop icons and rappers. And by their very nature, homos tend toward narcissism, nihilism, aristocratism, and preening snobbery. No wonder Big Capital loves homos. No wonder just about every 'leftist' agenda or movement is branded with globo-homo symbols at the behest of the Big Jew who provides the funds for these movements. Just like all foods must be kosherized, all of politics must be homosherized. And, it's hardly surprising the Deep State is welcoming of homos because they've proven to be the most ruthless, cunning, nihilistic, and cold-blooded bunch of killers for the System. Homos cater to power, and they've been among the most loyal servants of Jewish Hegemonism that recruits and favors homos all over the world to serve Jewish Supremacism against national autonomy.

Once they have finished destroying us in effigy, the next logical step is destroying us in person, i.e., open genocide against whites, rather than the stealth genocide they instituted in the 1960s with multiculturalism and race-replacement immigration.

Not going to happen. If whites were gone from the face of the earth, Jewish Power would vanish also. Jews use 'leftism' against whites to make whites serve Jews. Sure, Jewish Power wouldn't mind killing millions if it had to, but it would be to teach a lesson, not to wipe whites out. Jewish Bolsheviks were ruthless and worked with Stalin to kill millions, but it wasn't to wipe out the Slavs but to teach them who's boss. It's like what Jews have done in the Middle East(with white goy support). Jews have waged Wars for Zion that have led to the destruction of millions of Arab/Muslim lives in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and etc. Jews are capable of mass murder, but their plan is not to wipe out the white race but to subjugate it.

But Leftists don’t just tear down idols. They are also both shameless and tireless in molding new idols from human excrement. George Floyd is just the latest and most ludicrous in a long line of fake heroes, saints, and martyrs: Lenin, Stalin, Martin Luther King . . .

This is absurd. Why would anyone compare George Floyd to Lenin or Stalin, or even MLK? Lenin was a highly intelligent revolutionary who devoted his life to the cause. Stalin was a tireless worker and transformed Russia into an industrial and military powerhouse. One could argue Lenin was evil and Stalin more so, but they were not molded from excrement. They were extraordinary human beings who changed history.
In contrast, George Floyd is a total joke because he did nothing in life. He was just some street scum turned into a saint by the Jewish-run media. He's even lower than Horst Wessel. Lenin and Stalin were genuine historical giants. They weren't nobodies molded into somebodies. Even MLK, for all his gross failings, had vision and skill as a movement leader and world shaker. It's like, however one may loathe Mussolini and Hitler, they were remarkable men of immense power and vision.

Jewish gay rights advocate Harvey Milk (1930–1978) is one such figure.

No, the Milk Cult has nothing to do with Lenin or Stalin. Or even MLK. As much as I loathe MLK and dislike blacks, they had a compelling case during the Civil Rights Era. In contrast, Harvey Milk was a second-rate scuzzo turned into a big deal by the Jewish-supremacist gangster state of mass advertisement, a total clown world. Whatever one thinks of Lenin or Stalin, one cannot overestimate their place in history. Milk, in contrast, would be nothing without the hype. His cult is a demonstration of the power of advertising and celebrity culture. The Milk Cult is really an expression of ultra-right Jewish Supremacism. Jews push globo-homo to recruit 'rainbow'-collaborators all over the world to work against their own nations/cultures. In addition, Jews favor homos-uber-alles because it's a case of minority-elite-supremacism, one that complements Jewish minority hegemony over goyim. Also, homos came to prominence under hyper-capitalism that encourages vanity, narcissism, privilege, greed, and neo-hierarchy. As homos are disproportionately energetic, ruthless, devious, and cunning in their ambition, even rich Republicans have become dependent on homo aids and agents.

Finally, this wholesale attack on the Left is self-defeating. The whole point of fascism is to combine the Right and the Left. Mussolini began on the Left and moved to the Right but never became a reactionary seeking to turn back the clock. Adolf Hitler was the head of Nationalism + Socialism. Instead of falling for the fatal dichotomy of Right vs Left, the new way forward must be neo-fascist in fusing the good of the left with the good of the right as neither side offers all the answers or holds all the secrets to History.

And let's remember that it's the Jews than the Left who are tireless. It could be Democratic Jews or Neocon Jews. It could be Jews who pretend to be 'liberal' like Jerry Nadler or Chuck Schumer. Or it could be the openly ultra-rightist Netanyahu, a very tireless Jew. Notice Jewish 'conservatives' are more tireless than white goy liberals, and Jewish 'liberals' are more tireless than white goy conservatives. It's an ethnic thing. It's like homos are generally more energized than straight people. And blacks are louder and more aggressive than non-blacks. Genetics. Alan Dershowitz has drifted from liberalism to conservatism but is the same tireless Jew. Many Neocons were Jews who went from Left to Right, but they never lost their energy and soon enough took over the GOP, purged all 'Arabists', and steered US foreign policy toward serving Wars for Israel and Jewish hegemonism.

Now, there are some genuine leftists in the West, but they don't have much power. They tend to support BDS but get nowhere. They are as hopeless as MAGA people. Tulsi Gabbard had the most leftist anti-imperialist foreign policy among the Democratic candidates, but she was soon booted out by the power(and regular 'progressives' mostly ignored her).

One thing for sure, most goy 'leftists' today are completely without agency. For them, what counts as 'justice' or 'sacred' must be handed to them from above by the Jews. Take the 'gender pronoun' thing. Goy 'leftists' couldn't have cooked up such nonsense on their own. They became obsessed with it because Jews concocted and hyped the nuttery via media and academia(and statist institutions).
This points to a deeper problem among goyim. They lack the autonomous power of prophecy and vision. They want to feel passionate about something but lack the inner fuel to start their own fires. So, they rely on others to supply the heat. Consider the spread of Christianity in Europe. All those white folks failed to create their own lasting god(s) and came to rely on a Jewish source.

If whites are to be free of Jewish Supremacism, they must learn to ignite a prophetic fire within their own hearts. Today, as even Christianity has run its course and gone cold, so many Christians turn to the new gods of globo-homo and BLM. Look at the churches with BLM and globo-homo symbols. Why? Because having lost the messianic and missionary zeal of the Faith, white Christians are drawn to the warmth of the new fire(or flashing lights): Holy Homo and Noble Negro.

Comedy offers a glimpse into the Jewish Way. No entertainment format requires as much nonstop energy as comedy does. Sitcoms must produce laugh-a-minute. Stand-up comic must always keep the audience laughing(just like salesmen must 'always be closing' in GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS or do something else). In the long run, leftism was too earnest and humorless(and even relatively witless) for Jewish Energy that needs constant outlet. No wonder then that real Jewish Global Supremacy came not by the way of communism but capitalism. Whereas communism is highly charged in its early radical phase, once the system is in place it's all dogma and stability, like a religious theocracy. In contrast, capitalism is always about rolling the dice, the constant process of creative destruction. In the end, Jewish Energy is more Marx Brothers than Karl Marx. And as long as Jews control 'leftism', it can't be about equality because who in his right mind believes Jews want to be equal with goyim? Just ask the Palestinians.

In the long run, all struggles are about Right vs Right than Right vs Left. While leftist ideology can burn like wild fire and transform the world, eventually ideology gives way to identity. Ideology is about what's in the mind. It's like air and lacks grounding. In the end, ideas must serve something, which is why Russian Communism, Chinese Communism, Yugoslavian Communism, Vietnamese Communism, and Cuban Communism all turned nationalist. When tensions flared up between Russia and China, it was really about identity/territory despite the ideological rhetoric about the other side being 'bourgeois'.
Likewise, while many Jews did indeed become genuine leftists in the late 19th century and first half of the 20th century, their ideals eventually burned out or attached to identity: Many early Zionists combined nationalism with socialism, even with communism. They were even willing to work with their ideological enemies, Jewish capitalists, because they shared commonality in identity. And when communist China punitively struck communist Vietnam in the late 70s, it was partly to avenge the persecution of Chinese capitalists in Vietnam. Identity over ideology. So, the larger arc of history is really about Right vs Right. And that is precisely the true nature of the conflict today. It's about Jewish ultra-right(in 'leftist' or 'liberal' clothing) vs the rightisms(or identity-centered politics) of goyim, such as Palestinians, Syrians, Russians, Hungarians, Poles, and now, even China, as Jews figure Yellow Peril is useful in distracting Americans from the truth of Jewish Supremacist Rule over America.

TRUMP SAYS 'ISRAEL LITERALLY OWNED CONGRESS' | KMN LIVE W/ ADAM GREEN & CHRISTOPHER JON BJERKNES

Correctly and Honestly Naming the Source of Our Woes is the First Step in the Road to Recovery from the Current Madness — Question is DO YOU HAVE THE COURAGE TO NAME THE JEW? If Not, Why Not? Sentimentality? Cowardice? Opportunism?

The woman in the video above can throw all the tantrums she wants. It won’t make a difference. Actually, NOTHING will make a difference unless people begin to Name the Jew. Indeed, Jews prop up stuff like globo-homo and tranny-tyranny partly to (mis)direct people's outrage at ANYTHING but themselves. Thus, globo-homo is a win-win for Jewish Power. When accepted by goyim, it has a weakening and deracinating effect on them. When resisted by goyim, it fixates moral outrage at homos and trannies than at Jews, the real puppet-masters behind globo-homo. This is why people must expose the Jew. They must name the Jew for blame. If a puppet hits you, should you direct your rage at the puppet or at the puppet-master? While homos and trannies do everything to further their agenda, they never would have amassed the kind of power and privilege without the backing of Jews who control finance, media, academia, entertainment, law firms, and courts. If you want real change, you must name the Jew. If you are unwilling to do so out of philosemitic sentimentality, craven cowardice, or mere opportunism, just give it up. You are hopeless.

Why must the Jew be named? Imagine the following scenario. Suppose there's this nasty spoiled-rotten kid Billy. Billy is causing a lot of trouble — spraying graffiti, throwing trash, making loud noises through the night, setting things on fire, kicking dogs, stealing property, smashing windows, puncturing car tires, and etc. — , and wreaking havoc all over the place. Now, what must the good people of the neighborhood do in order to end the madness? One thing for sure, Billy will not stop with his rotten behavior unless HE is named and blamed. If people get angry and mention all the bad deeds without naming Billy as the miscreant, why would he stop? Even when his actions are condemned, he himself would be spared any culpability. Worse, suppose all the neighbors flatter and fawn over Billy even as they detest all the bad things he does. If someone kicks you and you denounce the kick but don’t name-and-blame the kicker, what good will it do? Worse, suppose you complain about the pain in your arse but shake the hand of the very person who kicked you and praise him highly. You can be sure he will do it again and again and again, just like the Marx Brothers never stop tormenting their hapless goy victims.

Globo-homo and tranny-tyranny are proxies of Jewish power. Jews fund them(and also BLM). Jews control academia & publishing and favor certain 'intellectual' trends and ideologies for promotion. Jews have in their pockets all those whore politicians who dare not voice any criticism of Jews, even though Jews are tireless in their anti-white tirades. (At most, some conzos will make a big show of standing up to some Jewish-backed agenda, only to back down in due time and revert to the role of ‘beautiful losers’. They'll just shrug their shoulders and mumble about how it is now 'law of the land', and there's nothing that can be done about it.)
And Jews always feel smug and arrogant in the knowledge that, even as their agendas may be opposed and condemned, they themselves will never be. Take the Jewish attacks on the Second Amendment. Jews are the main force behind disarming white goyim, and many conservatives passionately resist such measures. But, for all their fuming and fist-shaking, even the most vociferous defenders of the Second Amendment dare not name the Jew as the force behind Gun Control. If anything, even as they denounce the Jewish-led-and-funded agenda, they praise Jews as the most wise & wonderful people on Earth and dream like a silly little girl about winning Jews over as allies. (Or, they will say they need guns to protect Jews from 'Nazis' and Muslims even though, LOL, it's the Jews who want to take away their guns and leave them defenseless against black thugs, Antifa nuts, and deep state goons.)
Likewise, many conservatives who oppose the agenda of tranny-tyranny(and 'wokeness' in general) dare not name the Jewish Power as the main wind behind its back. So, unless Jews are named as the pushers of globo-homo and tranny craziness, they have nothing to fear and will gleefully continue in their ways.

Now, think of how much things could change if people did begin to name the Jew. Imagine if people called it what it is. What if, instead of relying on misleading labels and brands, they called a spade a spade or a bagel a bagel. Take the media landscape. It's so full of fake news and BS all around. But nothing changes because the controllers of the media are never named and blamed, therefore, they never feel the heat for what they really are. Most people refer to it as ‘mainstream news’ or ‘liberal news' or 'leftist media' or whatever. There's no mention of the crucial fact of Jewish monopoly control. Why would Jews stop with their bad behavior when they are not named and blamed for all the fake news, anti-white vitriol, warmongering, race-baiting, and deep state propaganda?

After all, idiot conzos prefer to blame anything but Jewish Power. Some even refer to the media as 'communist', as if mega-corporations are managed by adherents to Marx and Engels than by globalist Zionist Jewish supremacist super-capitalists. What morons! No wonder Jews run circles around such fools. (Or idiot conzos like Alex Jones will pretend China controls US news and Saudis control Hollywood.) Behind closed doors, Jews laugh at them and indeed they're deserving of the mockery.
If we are truly serious about waking people up to the truth, we must attach the accurate label of ‘Jewish’ or 'Jewish-Supremacist' to the industries and institutions of power. Then and only then will people come to realize and understand the real power equation in the US. And then and only then will Jews feel the heat as the most powerful group in the US. As of now, even when Jews do terrible things, they never get blamed as JEWS. No matter what evils they perpetrate, they know the aggrieved will blame anything but the Jews: The Left, the Liberals, the Communists, China or Russia, the Globalists, the Neocons, or Wall Street or Hollywood as the bastion of 'white privilege', LOL. Only if we Name the Jew will Jews take notice, and then and only then will they think twice about being so vile because their evil deeds will reflect badly on their Jewish identity. Angry with Big Tech collusion and censorship? Don't just call it Big Tech; call it Jewish-dominated Big Tech. Angry with Finance Sector robbing the world with insider trading and denying service to patriots while lending total support to Zionist Supremacists? Don't just call it Wall Street or the finance sector, but call it Jewish-controlled Finance Sector. Outraged over Deep State corruption and abuses of power? Always mention that these deep state operators are cuck-minions of Jewish supremacists.

While the Deep State has immense power, most insiders just go with the flow and do as told. Every nation has its own deep state. Deep State on its own has no agenda but is just a bundle of power/control centers. Its overall direction is decided by whichever group that happens to control the money, the ‘science’, and the ‘gods’. If Muslims controlled the US deep state, its agenda would be very different from what it is now. Jews control the Deep State, and we have the current mess resulting from the bad behavior of Jewish Supremacism. This power must be properly named.
If a tiger is traumatizing a community, would it make sense to blame any animal but the tiger? Suppose people blame the buffalo, the sloth bear, the elephant, the heron, the turtle, wild boar, and etc. but never mention the tiger. They express outrage over the harm caused by the tiger but never ever name the tiger, and so, the tiger is allowed to roam freely and kill or maim people. People go on naming scapegoats but never the tiger. Unless the tiger is named, it is a doomed community. It's like hating and treating the symptoms of a disease but loving and nurturing the disease.

In the current US, even those who denounce Jewish policies feel obligated to praise Jewish identity. It's akin to praising the murderer of your family even as you lament the actual murders. The relation between Jews and whites is akin to one between god(s) and man than between man and man. Even if mankind loathes what the gods do, they must revere and honor them as wiser and superior beings. Likewise, even when white goyim detest what Jews do, they must praise Jews and Israel as the best of the best. Not a winning formula for white goyim… and Jews know it. Will whites ever?

The fact that Jews push all this censchwarzship suggests that they've given up on being Good Jews. After all, if Jews were committed to being good and fair, they could easily get along with most goyim who only want happy co-existence with Jews. Why would most goyim hate Jews if most Jews acted good? Goyim will grow increasingly hateful toward Jews ONLY IF Jews continue to act badly or even worse. The fact that Jews feel a need to push more censorship and implement more social controls suggests that they aren't committed to good behavior and mutual respect between Jews and goyim. Rather, they look upon goyim as subhuman cattle that exist to be exploited and abused by Jews. Naturally, when goyim are treated that way, they will come to hate Jews. To counter such hatred, Jews push for more censchwarzship and use their power of media/academia to instill goyim with 'white guilt', as well as mindless servitude and blind faith in Jewish sanctity and awesomeness. Enough already.

DEFENSE CHIEF TOUTS PRIDE FILTH - Brother Nathanael

Empire vs Alliance: The World Significance of Jewish-controlled US Empire at odds with the Alliance of Sovereign Nations, especially Russia, China, and Iran — Why Europe became more servile to an America taken over by Jewish Supremacist Power

The key difference in the current global affairs is it comes down to Empire vs Alliance.

On one side, there is the US empire and the countries under its iron wing. Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan are mere puppets of this empire in the East. And EU is the puppet in the West. The empire has only one power center. The advantage of this arrangement is the concentration of power and easily understood command structure. US and its 'partners' are like Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact nations during the Cold War. There is a clear chain of command. US gives the orders, the rest follows.
If the rest was less willing to follow Donald Trump, it was because the Deep State had the real power and Trump was regarded as a nuisance(soon to be gotten rid of by means fair and foul). Of great significance is that American power isn't only military, monetary, material, 'mammonic', and market-oriented but moral(and spiritual), especially because Jews control the gods. All of the empire are united in worship of the same gods: The icons, idols, & narratives of the Jews, blacks, homos, and 'diversity/inclusivity'(as defined by Jews, of course, as Israel is allowed to be ultra-nationalist and even supremacist).
Western Europe was less reverential to the US when the latter was ruled by Anglo-Americans, aka Wasps. While Wasps had pride, power, and prestige, they didn't go around making themselves out to be holy saint-victims innately possessed of sanctity. They represented earthly power and could be challenged and expected to be. So, even though Europeans were subordinate to Anglo-American Power for military, monetary, and material reasons, they didn't feel morally(or spiritually) inferior to White Americans; indeed, the Ugly American(which usually meant White Christian American) tropes were common in Europe among all classes.
Sure, America bailed out Europe after WWII and defended it from the USSR, but it was seen as morally marred by the history of 'genocide'(of the American Indians), slavery, 'racism', and neo-imperialism. Indeed, Anti-Americanism was vogue among Europeans during the Vietnam War when the US was lambasted as the New Nazi-like power. Anglo-Americans were giants but not gods; they were supremely powerful but not sacred. Sanctity was bestowed upon the seemingly pitiable Jews.

During the Cold War, Europeans didn't think too much of the sacralization of Jews. After all, WWII & the Shoah and exodus to Israel(and America) had greatly reduced the number of Jews in Europe. Thus, special sympathy for Jews seemed mostly a matter of sentiment, a luxury that Europeans could afford. And besides, the two great empires, US and USSR, following WWII were ruled by white goyim, and no one thought Jews would come to control either. Western Europe spearheaded the sacralization of Jews at a time when the Jewish Community seemed an object of pity. And White Americans also shared in this sacralization without foreseeing the future of Jewish Power in America.
When a powerless people are sacralized, it may be indulgent and naive, but it can't do much harm if they remain powerless. Sucking down to the powerless, as opposed to sucking up to the powerful, can't do much harm. After all, American Indians were sort-of-sacralized in the 60s, but it was inconsequential as Indians lacked to means to gain power. We could sacralize Eskimos or Australian Aborigines, but it'd come to nothing as those people will never amass power.

But, when whites in Europe and US sacralized Jews at their moment of weakness, they utterly lacked foresight as to future consequences. If you take pity on a little baby bunny, at most it will grow into a harmless rabbit. But if you dote on a tiger cub, it will grow into a giant predator. Jews with their higher IQ, pushy personality, vengeful memory, and covenant-based supremacism, had the potential of (re)gaining tremendous power and taking control of the West. When Europeans sacralized Jews as helpless Holocaust Survivors. And they thought the US, the master over Europe for the foreseeable future, would be ruled by Anglo-Americans or White-Christian Americans. As long as the US-as-lone-superpower was ruled by white Christians, Europeans could hold their own in terms of moral discourse and argument. While Europeans felt a certain degree of gratitude toward White Americans, they felt zero guilt toward them.
But because Europeans had sacralized Jews as a race of saint-victims(premised on heavy European guilt as mass-murderers or collaborators in the mass murder), they were poorly position to say NO to American Power were Jews to becoming the ruling elites of the US. Wasps were giants but not gods, but Jews came to control the gods. As Europeans chose to worship Jews as an eternally tragic and holy people, they felt compelled to cave to whatever gods controlled by the Jews. Saying NO to Jewish demands was a no-no, tantamount to heresy. If Jews said 'You celebrate Diversity', Europeans said 'We celebrate Diversity'. If Jews said 'You Cuck to Negroes', Europeans said 'We Cuck to Negroes'. If Jews said, 'You bend over to globo-homo', Europeans said 'We bend over to globo-homo'.

Plans for Holocaust memorial next to UK parliament

Jewish-controlled US has infinitely more power over the EU than Anglo-America ever did during the Cold War. Jews are deemed holy whereas Anglo-Americans never were. Europe in the Cold War had to shine Anglo-America's shoes, but EU today has to kiss the Jewish-America's toes, just like cucky whites grovel at the feet of blacks and wash them. In this sense, the so-called 'free world' is really like a theocracy. The US empire of old ruled by White Christians was admired and feared for its money and military, or earthly matters. But US empire ruled by Jews is obeyed as the new Vatican. "Oh holy Jews, please tell us what gods to worship next." If Jews say, "Men with wigs are women", the cucks in US and EU fall all over themselves to recite the catechism of "Men are women". There is a kind of quasi-spiritual unity in the empire as all are expected to worship the same gods. They got homo parades in Japan, BLM marches in S. Korea, and pro-empire Poles are totally into globo-homo and Great Replacement for Poland. Winning plaudits and approval from divine Jews, holy homos, and noble Negroes is their highest sense of good.

The disadvantage of the current Empire is that the puppet states, while servile and pliable, lack any real sense of innate pride and purpose. They are like mercenaries or puppets always taking orders or looking over their shoulders with no internal sense of worth. They are parrots than patriots. And even though Jews control the gods, the current idols are more of fashion and fancy than substance and meaning. Indeed, if Jew-run US were to vanish overnight, so many minions in the Empire would be completely lost as they utterly lack agency as individuals and pride as sovereign nationals. They would be like TV sets that no longer receive the signals. Instead of pulling up moisture from the roots, they grab vibes from the air.

On the other side, there is the Alliance. Russia and China are independent and sovereign. Russia doesn't own China, China doesn't own Russia. They are allies out of common interests and mutual understanding. Far weaker is Iran, but it too is no puppet. It has an independent government with its own course of action. Iran chooses to work with Russia and China out of shared interests, not out of servility. Russia doesn't tell China what to do, China doesn't tell Russia what to do, Russia doesn't tell Iran what to do, China doesn't tell Iran what to do, Iran doesn't tell Russia what to do, Iran doesn't tell China what to do. Rather, they understand they face similar challenges and coordinate efforts. There is real strength in this as each nation has its pride and sovereignty. The weakness, however, is the three nations can never be as united as the empire with its single command center.

Not only are Russia, China, and Iran(and nations like Venezuela) independent in government, military, and monetary policy but they control their own gods. Russian government has its own gods centered on Russian history & culture, China has its own gods rooted in Chinese history & CCP mythos, Iran has its own gods based on Islam & Persian history. Venezuela has its own narrative of the Bolivarian Revolution. They are truly diverse in the proper meaning of the word. Not only diverse as different races but in values and narratives, and they respect the right of others to have their own gods. China doesn't tell Russia to revere Confucius and Mao, and Russia doesn't tell China to build Orthodox Churches or monuments to Alexander Nevsky.

In contrast, the US empire requires all its puppets to bow down to Globo-Jewgromo, or globalist worship of Jews, Negroes, and Homos. Indeed, all countries within the empire must elevate Jews, Negroes, Homos, and Foreigners/Immigrants above their own people, culture, and history. Whether it's France, Germany, Sweden, Japan, Taiwan, Canada, Australia, or whatever, the Globo-Shlomo Empire demands that they suppress nativism(in favor of invasivism), national pride, & unity-heritage-memory, and instead favor foreigners/immigrants, celebrate the minority homos, adulate the Negro, and remember the Holocaust. In a broad sense, the Alliance is 'polytheist' as each nation has control over its own gods, whereas the Empire is 'monotheist' as all within the empire are required to worship the gods controlled by Jews.

Janus-like India is the big outlier in this. On the one hand, it plays along with the US empire, especially in its stance against China. But when push comes to shove, it often chooses an independent path that is unthinkable for Japan or Germany, even for France and UK. Another outlier is nations like Hungary. Though part of EU, it insists on nationalism and its own cultural values.

Nations that side with the Alliance are accepted as sovereign nations. In contrast, nations that join the empire(or have been forced into it) must cuck to Jews, wave the homo flag, hail the Negro, and welcome the Great Replacement.

The biggest problem for the empire is it's an empire-empire, which makes everything far more complicated. In the past, most of America was White Christian, and American Empire reflected White Christian power, pride, and values. White men were tough, hardy, proud, and ready to fight. Today, the US is controlled by Jews, i.e. white christians are totally cucked to Zion. On the one hand, Jews need whites to be hardy managers and soldiers for the Empire, but on the other, Jews need whites to be guilt-ridden toadies without white pride. Jews both weaken whiteness and expect it to carry the burden of empire. It's like castrating someone and then adding more load on his back.
Still, white christians are found at all levels of the US empire, and to a naive outsider it may still seem as if the US is a White Christian Power. After all, Joe Biden is said to be a catholic. But in truth, all these whites are hapless and sappy cucks to Jews.

Also, unlike White Christian American elites of old, Jews don't primarily identify as American but Jewish, i.e. they feel closer to World Jewry than to goy Americans. Thus, Jewish Power that rules the US isn't really American but Zionist and supra-nationalist. So, the American Empire serves a bigger empire, the Empire of Judea or EOJ.
And yet, because the US pretends to be a 'liberal democracy' and a protector of the 'free world', white cuck christians must pretend they are animated by 'human rights', 'democratic principles', and 'muh constitution' when, in fact, their only modus operandi is "Will it please the Jews and win me more pokemon points for being such a good cucky-wuck?" Also, as part of the so-called 'free world', the satellite nations in Asia and EU must also carry on with the pretense that they are free & independent and happily & willingly embracing globo-homo when, if anything, they are puppet-democracies where the elites have little choice but to follow the Washington Line(just like International Communism once obeyed the Moscow Line) and promote decadence, degeneracy, and 'diversity' on their own peoples. While the Jew-run US doesn't usually send in tanks like the Soviets did with Poland, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia, it has ways to destroy the reputation, stability, and marketability of any satellite nation by coordinated efforts of media and finance. Furthermore, as so many young ones in satellite nations were either educated in the US and/or brainwashed the 'Western Media', they are more than willing to collaborate with the Empire against their own nation and people.

BIDEN WHITE HOUSE CONFUSION WITH IRAN AND CHINA POLICY