In the Post-Ideological Age, It All Comes Down to REALITY vs IDOLOGY(idolatry-as-ideology) — American Preference of Savagery over Slavery — 'Social Justice' American Style favors the Winners over Losers — China's Fusion of Reality and Idology

What we have now is...

Idology(idolatry-as-ideology) vs Reality.

The cold truth is that blacks kill blacks, and cops have been saving black lives over the years by coming between blacks and blacks. Without presence of cops, blacks kill more blacks and nonblacks as well in the bargain. That is the Reality.

But in 2020, Jews needed extra black support to unseat Donald Trump and ran with the super-idology of noble sacred black bodies being murdered by ‘racist’ whites in Trump’s America. As with Covid-19 Hysteria, Trump was caught between a rock and a hard place, or Scylla and Charybdis. On Covid, if Trump went with the lockdown, his economy would be ruined. But if he opposed the lockdown, the Jewish media would say he’s responsible for MASS MURDER.
As for the black issue, if Trump stood with the cops, he could lose whatever gains he made among black voters. But if he praised George Floyd to high heaven, he would lose some credibility with his base, and indeed white male support for Trump’s dipped in the 2020 election. So, BLM was useful to Jews in 2020. Trump couldn't win either way, Jews couldn't lose either way, especially as Trump is so afraid of Jewish Power that he pleads to suck Jewish penis after it's been rammed up his arse.

Jews also find Negrolatry useful in perpetuating ‘white guilt’. Jews know that whites really feel guilt only for what is deemed superior and don’t feel much sympathy for ‘losers’. It’s part of American DNA. Winners over Losers, as Patton said. “Americans love a winner and will not tolerate a loser.” Even American ‘social justice’ that ostensibly cares about the ‘losers’ is geared toward favoring the winners. After all, why do Americans care so much about Jews as holy holocaust people but care NOTHING about Palestinians? Jews are rich and successful, or winners. Palestinians are poor and backward, or losers.
Same logic applies to blacks. The reason why whites feel a special thing for blacks is because blacks have become so dominant in what Americans care about most: Sports, Pop Music, and with pornification of pop culture and sexting via smartphones(from a young age), sex. In other words, if Jews try to bait white guilt about most groups, whites wouldn’t much care no matter how much the said groups may have suffered. Brown natives of the Americas suffered a great deal, but the basic white attitude toward them is "mow my lawn", "pick my lettuce", and "change my kid’s diapers".

Indeed, it’s interesting that American Indians got more respect in the past despite the fresh memories of their threat to whites. Back then, blacks were slaves while Indians were savages. A white man was far more likely to get killed by a savage red man than by a slavish black man. So, even though there was much white fear and hatred in regards to Indians, there was also a good deal of grudging respect for them as warriors and hunters and badass killers. Savages could be cruel and crazy but they were also wild and free, thus acting like natural winners. In contrast, blacks-as-slaves were conditioned to act like losers. Blacks were cotton-picking shuffling toms.
But over the years, Indians went from savages to de facto ‘slaves’. Once proud warriors riding wild and free over the prairies, they eventually became ‘slaves’ in reservations, defeated and docile. Meanwhile, blacks went from slaves to ‘savages’. In time, they became wild and free, feral and aggressive, winning in sports and taking over streets and acting as they done please.

And oddly enough, white respect went from Indians(who went from savage to ‘slave’) to blacks(who went from slave to ‘savage’, or neo-savage). Especially since the 1960s, blacks have been acting like how Indians used to act: attacking whites, whooping & hollering, and taking trophies of white women. Watching all this black dominance in sports and rap music, whites have become accustomed to seeing blacks as the superior race, the natural warrior savage winners.
Thus, ‘social justice’ American style is just another form of winners uber alles. It isn’t really about favoring the underdog but honoring the new top dog. Blacks fail in many areas but succeed in what matters most to Americans. White Americans feel, “If blacks are tops in the coolest fields, it’s only right and just that they should be best in everything.” The fact that blacks aren’t good in everything seems an injustice within this context.
Especially with the rise of youth culture and black-inflected popular music, American Society has gotten more shameless and uninhibited over the years. Even as the rational fields of science/technology have continued to advance at breakneck pace, the culture has gotten more savage, often led by trends spearheaded by blacks. In a way, paradoxically enough, technological breakthroughs have made mankind even more savage or neo-savage. Electronic devices amplify and disseminate wild & orgiastic expressions of celebrities, deviants, and perverts. Geeks make the gadgets, and studs, skanks, cucks, and dorks all indulge themselves in the Age of Jeffrey Epstein.
It used to be civilization and order were valued as the means by which to rise above savagery and slavery. But many feel that civilization long enslaved the natural savage energies that make us free and liberated. Thus, Western Civilization and its creation of order were tantamount to a form of slavery of one kind or another. If blacks were slaves picking cotton, whites were slaves imprisoned by their own repressions. Thus, the only way of liberation is by unleashing the savage energies of blacks as the driving force of world liberation.
Of course, such delusions are possible only because Western Civilization created the material means by which people can have enough food and necessities, indeed in abundance. Even as the neo-savages scoff at Order, their fantasies would evaporate without it. In nature, there is sober savagery. All creatures are savage but know the savage world is filled with dangers. It is a wary kind of savagery. If a baboon chose to wiggle its ass all night long in a state of drunken savagery, a leopard would ambush it for dinner. But neo-savagery need not be sober because it can indulge itself in a world of plenty made available by order. It's like all those kids at the Woodstock Concert had enough food(produced by farmers), could go back home(thanks to the car industry and those who work to maintain roads), and receive medical attention if need be(thanks to doctors and nurses). And Negroes could riot, loot, and destroy businesses because there is enough order and supplies in the US to fill up the store again and return to business-as-usual. But those into the convulsion of neo-savagery hardly think about the conveniences made possible by an orderly system. And of course, blacks understand this least because they are most childish, least reflective, and endlessly indulged by White America stuck on 'white guilt' and 'white fever' for all things black(to the delight of fiendish Jews).

Jews know this about white psychology, and this is why Negrolatry is key to the perpetuation of ‘white guilt’, without which it’d be difficult for Jews to control whites. Stuff like BLM wouldn’t have gotten far without Jewish media and deep state pulling strings. Unlike past riots, the deep state encouraged more rioting and looting. Just when blacks were burning and rioting, the authorities were ordering city officials to paint BLM signs on streets and fly BLM banners(along with homo flags). Just like globo-homo wouldn’t have gotten so big without Jewish power and deep state, same goes for BLM. Jews lead, goyim follow, especially because white goyim have lost their cultures, customs, traditions, and values over the years. The only thing that the goyim have left is a bundle of fads and fashions, cultural or ‘intellectual’, that are controlled by Jews.

The main Jewish priority is to control whites and subdue them into obeisance, without which Jewish Supremacism cannot be maintained. Jews use blacks to do this. Jews use the black body to intimidate and subdue the white body. Jews tell white boys and girls that black bodies are more muscled, bigger-donged, and more booty-licious, and this fills white girls with jungle fever and white boys with sappy cuckery. Movies like GET OUT spread such notion. It's damned if you do, damned if you don't. If you don't like blacks and want to live apart from them, you are 'racist' and have no reason to live. If you love blacks too much, you are guilty of appropriating blackness and 'racist' in your own 'liberal' way, and it'd be no loss if blacks slaughtered you. Such is the black-body-politics as used by Jews.
But Jews also use black souls to berate white souls. It goes like this: Blacks have sun-souls while whites have ice-souls, and the cold frigid evil white soul must be warmed and redeemed by the sunny black soul. George Floyd was useful as both black body and black soul. He was a big man, powerfully built. But he was also in a state of debilitation as he'd swallowed lethal dose of fentanyl. So, despite his bigness, he seemed powerless and (hep me! hep me!) helpless under the knees of four police officers. Jews spun the narrative that saint George Floyd died for the sinful souls of white folks. But it’s been in the works with movies like 12 YRS A SLAVE, THE HELP, BUTLER, DJANGO UNLEASHED, BLACK PANTHER, and etc. The very Jews who crush Palestinians and kill countless Arabs in the Middle East put on moral airs in the West by promoting Noble Negro myths.

Such is the ‘idology’ of the Negro as used by Jews to control whites. But it’s utterly at odds with Reality. So, what is the reality? What is really up and what is really happening in the West? Two key truths are as follows:

1. Jews got the power because they are smarter. Also, they abuse their power because they are supremacist and nasty, filled with vicious contempt for goyim. And they shamelessly use every dirty trick in the book to get what they want, as demonstrated by the mad events of 2020, many of which were engineered or orchestrated by Jews.

2. Blacks are that way due to evolution in hot Africa alongside crocodiles, hyenas, lions, wild dogs, leopards, hippos, buffalos, elephants, gorillas, baboons, and etc. Blacks drove the animals crazy and vice versa. Negroes chucked spears at hippos, and hippos ran after Negroes to stomp/chomp them to death. So, animals in Africa got more vicious and aggressive, and Negroes also got tougher and nastier. Blacks and animals drove each other crazy along the evolutionary chain. That’s why blacks be the way they be.
And so, blacks act like predators in the modern world alongside other races. They look upon other races(that are weaker and slower) like how hyenas or leopards eye prey animals. Such is the reality, but whites cannot face the truth for four reasons.

A. Jews control the media & academia and push the ‘white guilt’ narrative.

B. Christian tradition among whites focus on guilt & redemption and derive some kind of masochistic delight with self-flagellation and holier-than-thou virtue-signaling.

C. Jungle fever and Afrophilia due to sports, music, and sex makes whites blind to the dangers posed by Negroes. Or worse, it makes whites excited by the danger as sexy and awesome. Even with blacks burning down cities, white women go with Negroes and have Negro kids and white boys cuck to BLM signs.

D. White male pride has been loathe to admit white guys got their asses handed to them by blacks in sports, schools, and in the streets. Even HBD types prefer to discuss IQ(where whites are superior) than delve into PQ(physical quotient) where blacks have the advantage. So much could have been different after Jack Johnson beat up all the white boxers IF white men had been honest about the black threat and reacted accordingly. But nope, white male pride couldn’t face up to it.

In the war between Idology and Reality, which will win? Of course, in the long run, Reality always wins, but that doesn’t mean your side will win for having accepted reality for what it is. After all, the HBD argument won in Detroit. HBD says blacks are naturally prone to criminality and various pathologies, and the fate of Detroit is a testament to that argument. But still, even if HBD has been validated, blacks took over the city and ruined it. The most HBD types can say is, "I told you so" as consolation.
Even when Reality wins, it won’t necessarily save your side. Suppose you speak the truth, “Heroin will ruin your health and lead to early death.” Suppose the heroin user says, “Bull! Heroin is great and makes me feel good. It does me no harm.” In time, you will be proven right. In reality, the heroin user’s health goes down the tube, and he ends up dead at a young age. You were right, but he still wasn’t saved. Reality validated your view but still failed to save a life. Likewise, HBD can be right as observation but still lose out as solution IF most people decide not to heed its warnings and instead choose to go over the cliff like so many lemmings.

Of course, there are cases where both Idology and Reality can win. China is one example. In reality, Mao Zedong was a frightening figure. He not only unleashed the Great Leap Forward that took tens of millions of lives but the Cultural Revolution that ravaged the entire nation. So, despite all the official Mao-worship by the Red Guards, the Reality was Maoism Sucks!
And after Mao died, China embarked on a new path more attuned to Reality. Market-guided economics, a degree of pluralism, more rational foreign policy, pragmatism, appreciation of expertise over ideological fervor, and etc. On that score, Reality won out. And yet, the ‘idology’ of Mao remains as a unifying and justifying symbol of New China and its government. Mao is still the top icon in a nation that acts in accordance to reality.

THE FUTURE OF NATIONALISM | INTERVIEW WITH FRÓÐI MIDJORD

New York Times 1619 Project is Jewish Globalist-Supremacism by Other Means — Why is Black Slavery a Bigger 'Sin' than American Indian 'Genocide'? — Idolatry of Black Supremography

https://www.unz.com/article/the-1619-project-devours-its-liberal-parents/

Some thoughts on the article by Robert Hampton on New York Times 1619 Project:

We can't fully understand the NYT-1619 project without taking into account the Jewish Factor. Jewish Hegemonists at NYT are pushing this mainly to prop up Jewish Supremacist control of the US. It is a roundabout way of justifying and perpetuating Jewish globalist imperialism & Jewish control of guilt-ridden white cucks. In 1776, the British were imperial overlords over the American colonies. Back then, 'Americans' were subjects of the empire though, being white, had more rights and privileges than non-white subjects. White Americans existed mainly to serve and support the empire. The British could foresee how the American colonies would keep expanding and then it was only a matter of time before Americans would outnumber the British. Thus, in order for the empire to remain intact, the British would have to preserve their authority over a larger number of White Americans as loyal colonists. This authority had to be moral and emotional as well as military because it'd be difficult to maintain control over a growing entity with brute force alone. It's like a lion or bear trainer needs something more than fear to keep the beast under control. The beast must be made to FEEL that the human, though weaker and smaller, is its emotional master deserving of respect.

British minority-elites sought indefinite domination over American majority-masses. But White Americans, at least one-third of them who supported the Revolution, developed an independent streak and identity of their own. They decided to break free of the empire. It was the first case of America First. And so, the British lost the empire(though, of course, the French played a key role). One can argue til the cows come home whether the Revolutionaries were in the right or wrong. Many historians think British taxation was valid given the huge costs of the French and Indian Wars, which was triggered by colonial demands by the way. Also, the destinies of Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, none of which fought for independence, suggest that the British would have been fair, just, and humane rulers over the American colonists had there been no Revolution. But still, the American Revolution, justified or not, was led by men of great talent, intelligence, and vision. And even though British subjects of Canada and Australia came to enjoy freedoms and rights much like those of white Americans, freedom in America had a romantic element because of the founding myth of resistance and liberation. Freedom was granted to white Canadians and Australians, whereas freedom was WON by white Americans, and that made a huge psychological difference.

At any rate, Jews are nervous about the rise of white populism all around the world. Jews are most worried about the US, the center of the Empire of Judea, or EOJ. Indeed, under the current globalist regimen, US isn't so much the sole superpower as the main aircraft carrier & bank of the Empire of Judea that pan across the continents. Jews do have their own nation in Israel, but their real power rests in American Power or, more accurately, in the interconnected-ness of the globo-homo empire. Jewish power rests on hegemonism. If all white nations were to go primarily into nationalist-populist mode, the majority in each nation would ask, "What's in it for us?" Poles would put Poland first, Hungarians would put Hungary first, Germans would put Germany first, French would put France first, Brits would put Britain first, and etc. That means the primary goal of each white nation would be to serve the interests of its majority population than pander to the elitist-supremacist-minoritarian demands of Jewish globalists.
And so, Jewish hegemonists today are like the British Imperialists of old. Just like the British dreaded the rise of national consciousness in the American colonies and demands for national independence/liberation among Asian-Indians, Jewish imperialist-supremacists fear sentiments such as 'America First' or Russia First, Hungary First, Poland First, Britain First, and etc. Jews want all white folks in all white nations to chant 'Jews First', 'Israel First', and etc. And of course, AIPAC, ADL, and other Jewish groups are hard at work pushing for Jewish and Zionist interests. But Jews fear that this can lead to a backlash if they push too far. If everything turns into a matter of 'honor Jews', 'serve Jews', 'obey Jews', 'worship Jews', 'apologize to Jews', and etc., then white goyim may get tired of the shtick or, at the very least, begin to murmur, "Wow, Jews really do control everything." So, Jews seized on seemingly non-Jewish issues to push what is essentially a Jewish Interest. Globo-Homo-mania is a prime example of this. World Queery is just a proxy of World Jewry. Jews have been its main funders. Jewish-Homo alliance is close, not least because top homo movers and shakers are Jewish. Homo elite-minority supremacism of the neo-aristo variety complements Jewish elite-minority globalist supremacism. Also, homos and trannies turned leftism from Mayday to Gayday, thereby emphasizing the demands of urban haute elitists over the needs of middle and working classes. Jews and homos easily work hand-in-hand because both are overly represented in certain key elite institutions and industries.

With the 1619 Project, Jews are merely using blacks in the same way. By pushing the narrative that American National Independence sprung from a pro-slavery agenda, Jews are slyly arguing in favor of empire/imperialism over nation/nationalism. In other words, American colonies would have been more just and humane IF they had remained within the empire. It's like Jews rail against America First and American Nationalism on grounds that the US, as sole superpower, must maintain the New World Order... or else the world will blow up!! The US must embrace its neo-imperial destiny. Funny that nations like Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Ukraine were wrecke precisely because of US intervention, but never mind. Jews are in imperialist mode. They now control the US that controls the EU and UK. (UK would be better with Brexit from Zionist-American Empire than from the EU.) Canada and Mexico are mere puppet-extensions of the US, and Japan and the so-called 'tigers' are little more than dogs of the US. China is independent, but it too has become overly reliant on US markets. Still, China, Russia, and Iran represent a solid bloc of nations that have pushed back against the empire. Jews almost had Russia in the 90s but lost it when Vladimir Putin consolidated power, and Jewish imperialists have been plotting all sorts of machinations to turn Russia into just another globo-homo colony.

Though Jews gained the greatest success in America and developed a certain sentimentality about the America as myth, they never cared for America as an independent and sovereign nation. The most famous Jewish American poem by Emma Lazarus defines America not a self-contained nation but one that opens its arms to other Jews(though Lazarus cleverly whitewashed her Judeo-Centrism with talk of immigrants-in-general, the wretched refuse and blah blah). As Jews were scattered across many nations, as Jews in America wanted to bring more Jewish Immigrants, and as Jews around the world sought to forge a vast network of Jewish Power, the notion of an autonomous and independent American nation was ultimately anathema to the grand Jewish plan. Jewish Power could operate more effectively in a world defined by American Imperialist Power.
Of course, American nation itself had developed as part of an empire, and the Westward expansion had the features of imperialism, colonization, and hegemony, though completed easily enough because the native savage 'Indians' were relatively few and far between. Wherever Anglo-Americans expanded, Jews found new opportunities to sink in their claws. Lands taken by whites from the Indians could lead to real estate bonanzas for Jews. Would there be Hollywood in Los Angeles if Anglos hadn't taken California from Mexico? In Jewish eyes, Anglo-Americans were a marvel because (1) despite their 'racism', they considered Jews as fellow whites (2) despite their Christianity, they were far less 'antisemitic' than Old World whites, not least because many White Americans considered America as a kind of New Jerusalem and prided themselves for their relative lack of religious prejudice (3) they practiced Rule of Law that, while not perfect, was fairer than anything else in the world and (4) they were an enterprising and capable people who opened up new frontiers for Jewish opportunity. Anglos were useful to Jews also but Anglo-Americans were even better for their relative lack of class snobbery and greater directness, which suited Jewish interests as Jews tended to be pushy, brazen, and vulgar, traits that might be disdained in Europe but rather admired in rags-to-riches America of "Go West, Young Man".
Now, if Jews were merely appreciative & grateful and latched onto White America as the best of all possible worlds, they might have joined with the American Nation. But despite the value they saw in Anglo-Americans, their main loyalty was still with other Jews around the world. Also, despite Anglo heritage and Anglo-American dynamism, Jews still regarded themselves as a superior, wiser, deeper, more profound, and ancient people. Consider the exchange in the Western movie CIMARRON(based on a novel by Jewish authoress Edna Ferber).

A white character says: "One of my ancestors was a signer of the Declaration of Independence."
A Jewish character says: "That's all right. A relative of mine, a fellow named Moses, wrote the Ten Commandments."

So, across time and space, Jews can never respect any goy nation as self-contained. Ultimately, they all exist to play a role in the realization of the Jewish World Hegemony. Goy concept of time and space is too petty for Jews. For Jews, ancient history is still relevant to future history. When Jews turn back the clock from 1776 to 1619, they are really wink-wink turning the clock as far back as 1619 B.C. or 1776 B.C. Jews seek to control the boundaries of 'America' and its time-frame. So, according to Jewish globalism, America is all of the globo-homo-shlomo empire. Americans have a right to invade and occupy the Middle East(as extension of the empire), and non-whites all over the world have the right to come to America. Indeed, anyone who wants to come to America, legally or illegally, is an 'American' or a 'dreamer' according to Jewish Political Geography.
As for the historical time frame of America, by pushing the 1619 Project, Jews are effectively saying WE get to decide the real timeline of America. And why not? Jews get to decide what marriage is by legalizing and celebrating 'gay marriage'. Jews now even decide what Christianity is, which explains why so many churches now fly the 'gay' flag. Jews lead, goyim follow. Jews got Big Think, goyim got Small Think. Jews are prophets, goyim are props. And with their control of mass media, Jews effectively plant our memories. In BLADE RUNNER, we learn Rachel's childhood memory is really an implant. When it comes to historical remembrance, our collective memory is implanted by the mass media with its selective collage of images and sounds, idols and narratives.
Now, if goyim were to awaken to the nature of this machination, it'd be much harder to fool them. But too many people still haven't figured out a way to see through the curtain at the man behind the Wizard(of Oz). Once the spell is broken, it's broken for good. It's like once a kid realizes that adults lied to him about Santa Claus, no amount of pro-Santa propaganda can make him believe again. Once you realize that a magic trick is bogus, no amount of new magic tricks, however dazzling and impressive, can fool you they're real. Even if you don't know how it's done, you know it's only a trick. Likewise, if people realized what kind of people control the media and how they operate and why, they would much less likely be fooled. So, the first step toward understanding the man behind the curtain of the 1619 Project is to smoke out its Jewish Supremacist angle. Indeed, isn't it odd that the 1619 Project doesn't have much to say about Jews despite the fact that Jews played a huge role in the slave trade, especially in South America that took in many more slaves. (By the way, if black slaves = prosperity, shouldn't Brazil be 10x richer than the US since it took in 10x the slaves? And since Africa had black slaves forever before the white man ever landed on the continent, shouldn't it be one big giant Wakanda? Funny how slavery turned out so profitable under management of Anglos but not so much under others.) Jews played a key financial role in the Southern Slave economy, and most Jews supported the Confederacy. What does NYT have to say about that?
Also, it's more than a bit amusing that slavery is made out to be America's greatest 'sin' when we've been led to believe there is nothing more evil than genocide. After all, doesn't the Shoah have a special place in tragic historiography because it was a case of genocide? Slaves at least get fed and are allowed to live. Now, if genocide is far worse than slavery, then it seems NYT should focus mainly on the 20,000 B.C. Project to commemorate the true beginning of America via the arrival of proto-Asiatic hunter-gatherers from across the Bering Sea. But Indians who suffered something like a 'genocide' are given short shrift by NYT. That gives the game away that NYT is concerned less with morality and justice than power and control. That's the first lesson we must take from any moral hysteria generated by Jewish Power. Jewish morality is selective in service to Jewish interests, not principled universal justice. Indeed, the very Jews who bitched about bad ole Joe McCarthy have been pushing the most insane paranoia about Russia. They very Jews who decry the Nazis have forged an alliance with Nazi-esque organizations in Ukraine. We saw from the Syrian War that Jewish Morality is purely about "Is it good for Jews?" So, Jews had no problems with Obama/Hillary pulling strings to turn Syria upside down, but when Trump muttered something about pulling troops out, Jews in media were up in arms about all those poor poor Kurds.
Same goes with selective narratives about blacks and Indians in the US. Or Palestinians for that matter. Why doesn't NYT have a 1881 Project about how the first Jewish immigration to Palestine set the grounds for Nakba pogroms, thereby paving the way for endless Middle East conflicts? Why hasn't NYT hired a single Palestinian-American journalist in the name of Diversity of views and as a voice of the oppressed Palestinians? To the Jews, the American Indian Narrative is just too inconvenient for their globalist control of the world. Why? The fate of American Indians suggest Mass Immigration = Genocide or Replacement of Native folks. Given what mass colonization followed by mass immigration did to the native indigenous folks of the Americas, Jews obviously don't want to go there. To be sure, there was a time when certain Jewish Leftists in the 1960s made an issue of the American Indians because Diversity then wasn't the mantra it has become today. Back then, Jews sought to associate 'genocide' of the American Indians with what the Nazis did. But since then, people are more likely to associate the fate of American Indians with the effects of mass immigration. Immigration = Genocide, thus undermining Emma Lazarus as the voice of justice. Also, more than a few people have drawn parallels between what whites did to American Indians and what Zionist colonist-imperialists did to the Palestinians. Besides, the 'genocide' of Indians might compete with the Shoah narrative, especially because unlike the Jewish Tragedy, the mass deaths of Indians happened here in this country — Shoah is a Jealous Genocide and there shall be no other genocides before it. And so, slavery has become a bigger injustice than genocide in the American Moral Narrative. If it's inconvenient to Jews, just never mind.

At the very least, Jews might be less obnoxious if white people shot back. After all, contrary to the Jewish Narrative of the Tribe always having been hapless victims of Christian goyim, Jews played a sizable role in Western Imperialism. Jewish financiers bankrolled many ventures of conquests, plunder, and slavery. Jews were the main sellers of opium to the Chinese. Jewish merchants sold guns and ammo to whites to kill Indians with. Jews ran much of Southern finance. And Jewish agents, managers, and moguls exploited and ripped off countless black singers, athletes, and other talents. Also, the increasing tension between Jews and blacks in New York suggests many Jews regard blacks as a nuisance at best and thugs at worst while many blacks regard Jews as super-white people who grab all the loot. No wonder Jews at NYT are pushing the 1619 Project to distract people from the very real problems between Jews and blacks. Of course, the problem is made worse by the relatively poorer religious Jewish community. Whereas most secular Lib Jews are affluent enough to live safely apart from blacks and work in institutions/industries that don't deal directly with them, there's the Hasidim and certain Orthodox communities who live in proximity with blacks. These Jews manipulate real estate to squeeze blacks out of their historic neighborhoods. Also, they dislike blacks because Negroes commit lots of crime and act wild and crazy. Unlike secular Lib Jews in the 50s and 60s who made their money and joined the White Flight or Jew Flew from blackening areas, these ultra-religious Jews seem stuck in their ghettos(and in a ghetto-mentality) that keeps them in closer proximity with wild and crazy blacks. But all such goes against the BS narrative about Noble Negroes and Holy Hebrews in a sacred alliance against white 'racists' and 'nazis'. So, Jews have to keep pulling out Emmett Till stories and now this 1619 circus out of their arse to sustain the illusion of Jews and blacks united against Evil Whites.

Of course, reasons as to why Jews favor blacks over American Indians have to do with numbers, profitability, idolatry, and potency. There are many more blacks than American Indians, and so black concerns get more hearing. But then, why do blacks get more attention than 'Hispanics' who are now bigger in number? Also, don't 'Hispanic' browns have a tragic history that is even worse than black history? Historians say the arrival of Europeans led to the demise of over 90% of the natives, and this was especially tragic in what became Latin-America as something like 55 million out of 60 million perished, mostly of diseases. Also, unlike blacks and yellows who still have their own nations, browns of Latin America lost possession of their ancient lands forever under the Diversity-regimen. Indeed, it's telling that the #1 issue in Latin American politics is whether to go with 'Latino' or 'Latinx' instead of asking why the brown folks of Mexico, Central America, and South America should be referred to as 'Latino' or 'Hispanic' when they have identities and histories going back many thousands of years prior to the arrival of whites. Even with 'Hispanic' numbers eclipsing black numbers, the Jewish Hegemonic Narrative is fixated on blacks than on browns. Now, one might say it's because black history is American History whereas brown history isn't(until relatively recently), but then, why does the US make such a big deal of Zionism, Israel, Shoah, and European 'antisemitism' when those are NOT part of American history?
Again, it all comes down to "Is it good for Jews?" While black numbers matter a lot, they are also profitable to Jewish merchant-kings of sports, music industry, and entertainment. Blacks, being better athletes and louder singers, gain top slots in athletics and popular culture, and Jewish moguls rake in billions in profits by recruiting and promoting blacks. Black success in pop culture and sports have imbued the black race with power of idolatry(or 'idology' or idolatry as ideology) that has great sway among whites, even conservatives. So many whites revere and near-worship blacks as awesome demigods. So, naturally, Jews understand that blacks, as the god-hero-race, have far greater sway among white folks spellbound by black awesomeness in sports, music, and sexuality. Psycho-spiritually, people tend to feel most guilty when they feel they've wronged something superior. It's like Americans are more outraged by a white hunter killing a lion than a skunk(or by a Japanese vessel killing a whale than a slaughter house killing a million pigs). Lions and whales have iconic power, skunks and pigs don't. If Jews tried to make whites feel guilty about American Indians or short brown people from south of the border, it wouldn't be as effective. Even if white minds were made to consciously understand that red folks and brown folks suffered a lot at the hands of whitey, something within the white psyche wouldn't feel all that tragic. Even as they think, "what a tragic people", they'd feel, "a bunch of mediocrities who deserved to lose."
Granted, the tragedy of the Indian once had greater traction when (1) the American Narrative was controlled by Anglo-Americans (2) there was still the memory of Indians as tough worthy foes — in that regard the American Western did the Red Man a favor by featuring him as a fearless and fearsome hunter-warrior — and (3) American values were more stoic and inhibited, thereby more admiring of the Indian temperament. As Anglo-America was forged from confrontations between white settlers and Indian tribes, a certain respect was due to the people who were here first and put up a brave fight. Also, when the making of America was still fresh in the minds of Americans(and when blacks had yet to reach domination in sports), the image of hunter-warrior prowess was owned by the American Indians. Even Indians who'd savagely killed white folks, such as Geronimo, came to be included in the pantheon of American Mythology. They were deemed worthy warriors who fought for their land, culture, and honor.
But that was then. Anglo-American narratives have fallen by the wayside, replaced by Jewish-favored ones. Especially with the fading of the Western genre, most Americans have no more sense of Indians than of Cowboys. And the American Popular imagination has been taken over by black rappers, black athletes, and handful of whites who aspire to sing black or just hang on in sports where blacks rule. Jews understand that Progressivism isn't enough. It supplies (self)righteous vibes and a set of ideas, but ideology isn't enough to get people excited. Jews understand the power of idolatry, and so, they combine Progress with Prowess. Progressivism is about the Idea(usually supplied by Jews), and Prowess-ivism is about the Idol(usually supplied by blacks as top-dog-stars of sports, pop music, and sexuality). In other words, it's not enough to bait 'white guilt' but to switch on 'white thrill' that, esp since the time of Elvis Presley, has centered on acting the White Negro. So, Jews understand that blackness has the potency to make whites cower to black power. Even whites who roll their eyes at talk of Progress tune into the Superbowl to drool all over Black Prowess, which means White Pro-Wuss. Now, if American Indians were the toughest race while most blacks were like Gary Coleman or Emmanuel Lewis, the current Narrative might work differently, but blacks dominate the idols. It's like what Al Pacino's Schwarz says to DiCaprio's character in ONCE UPON A TIME... IN HOLLYWOOD, "... playing punching bag to every swinging dick..., that's gonna have a psychological effect on how the audience perceives you... Down goes you, down goes your career as leading man." In other words, the Image matters. When black men began to beat up white men in sports and took over as symbols of manhood, it had a profound impact on mass psychology and perception of Americanism. It wasn't just a matter of black individuals beating white individuals but blacks as new idols smashing the white idols of manhood. Of course, cucks like Ken Burns and Quentin Tarantino are okay with this and even celebrate it, but its effect on the white race has been far more damaging than knocking down Confederate statues. (More than not, 1619 Project is less about blacks as founders than blacks as idol-champs that came much later. Having come to dominate American Idolatry late in the game, there is a retroactive effort to make blacks crucial from the very beginning.) Indeed, if white men dominated sports but lost all Confederate statues, they would be in a much better position. Though ONCE UPON A TIME... IN HOLLYWOOD has almost no blacks and the violence is between whites vs whites(and a bit of pitter-patter between Brad Pitt's character and 'Bruce Lee'), it is cognizant of the power of idols and how fantasy idols serve as compensation for defeat in reality. When whites lost in boxing, they looked to Rocky who was fantasy-champion in the movies. And yellows looked to Bruce Lee as fantasy hero who could beat up not only Japanese but big Russians and towering Negroes. Tarantino, no stranger to fantasy and ludicrous violence(esp in KILL BILL and INGLORIOUS BASTERDS), seems in ONCE UPON A TIME... IN HOLLYWOOD to be more thoughtful about the dichotomy between real violence and movie violence. Anyway, when whites lost to blacks in sports and felt threatened by black music, they looked to white heroes in movies and adopted black music to create White Rock. That way, whites maintained the semblance of domination. But now, even movies are awash in Jungle Fever, and black rappers took over as top musical acts. Whites are totally under cultural colonization of blacks. Blackness has potency over whites(and even over NBA-worshiping Chinese), and this is NYT uses blackness to toy and mess with not only White Guilt but White Thrill.

On the matter of black labor building Early America, there is much truth to this, but what's appalling is blacks want all the credit, like they want all the grammies, as if all plaques must be for blacks. There were plenty of white farmers in the North and South as well, and they did grueling labor day in and day out. And most factory workers and coal-miners were white. Also, if black labor, especially slave labor, has such a magical impact on the economy, why didn't the countless slave economies of Africa result in growth and development? It's been said slavery began in Africa 10,000 years ago, but blacks seemed not to have gained much by using black slaves. Besides, slavery was common all over Arabia, India, and East Asia. Yet, it didn't lead to development of modern economies. And black slavery in Latin America failed to produce first-rank economies. In contrast, Canada-Australia-New-Zealand became successful economies without black slaves. And if black slavery was key to the rise of modern economy in the US, how did the Germans, Japanese, Swedes, and rest of them manage to build prosperous modern economies without black slaves?
So, while it's true that black labor played an important role in southern agrarian economies in Early America, it seems absurd to insist that it was THE most important factor. If America hadn't brought over a single slave, its economy would surely have been slower to develop, but it would have been better in the long run as the US would have averted the Civil War, problems of racial tension, black violence, and black pathology that turned Detroit from a city of the future into a city of Jafric lunacy. And look at black blight in Baltimore, Philadelphia, Chicago, St. Louis, and etc. Blacks-in-America proved to be a short-term gain, long-term loss. Imagine Detroit without blacks. It'd be a first-rank city. But blacks messed up Detroit worse than atomic bomb did Hiroshima, at least in the long run. Afrotomic Bomb is the most horrible thing in the world.
Furthermore, let's consider South Africa. Why did its economy come to be bigger than all of black Africa combined during the Apartheid Era? Because whites were the ruling and guiding hand over black labor. Blacks can provide labor but don't have much to offer in terms of brains, vision, organization, or persistence. Black-ruled African nations had as black labor as South Africa or even more, but they weren't able to get anything done because blacks made incompetent leaders, owners, governors, and managers. Indeed, the fact that all those black Africans want to scramble for Europe and live under whites is proof enough that black labor can't do anything on its own.

At any rate, an economy isn't just about labor and physical power. All European and Asian nations had horses and cows, but certain European nations did far more with them than others did. Horses and cows surely played a very important role in the development of the American economy. Horse power facilitated travel and communication(prior to the telegraph) and cow power plowed the earth. But horses and cows on their own couldn't have built an economy. It all depended on how they were used by humans. And the same goes for black labor. Africa had plenty of black labor and lots of slavery, but Africans never came up with a good way to use black physicality except to beat bongo drums, chuck spears at hippos, and run like a mofo. And Hispanic and Jewish slave-holders in Latin America were far less efficient than white American slave-masters. Given the numbers of black slaves in Brazil, Colombia, and Venezuela, those nations should have been first-rank economies if we follow the logic of the 1619 Project. It was White Americans who came up with more efficient(and humane) ways to use black slave labor for maximum results. Whites came up with the Whips-and-Watermelons methodology of Governance over Negroes. If Negroes acted all jive-ass and uppity, they got the whip. But if they picked cotton and called the white man 'massuh', they got an extra helping of watermelons. In Latin American nations, there was too much whip and not enough melons. And as whites were smaller as share of the population or mixed-in-race with native browns in Latin America, there was a more confused identity and sense of purpose among the owners and elites.

None of this is to diminish the contribution of black labor to the development of Early America, but it has to be seen in a proper context. Black labor was efficient in America ONLY BECAUSE whites knew how to harness its power. Also, one of the features of Western Civilization, especially since the rise of capitalism, was the constant advancement in science and technology, and this was entirely a white thing. Did blacks invent or make the ships that sailed the oceans or the cotton gin? And did blacks invent the machines that finally rendered slavery outdated and burdensome? But blacks are blind to all this because their jungle nature tends to be more aggressive, abrasive, self-centered, proud, and full of jive. This is why stoking black vanity is like serving more alcohol to a wino or adding more gasoline to the fire. The natural megalomania of blacks need deflating, not inflating. Of course, Jews inflate black megalomania against whites, and this is why whites should react in kind and inflate black megalomania against Jews and point out all the bad things Jews have done to blacks. But then, Jews will whine about 'antisemitism'. They encourage blacks to hate whites, but whites better not encourage blacks to hate Jews. As whites are such worthless cucks at the feet of Jews, they will go on suffering this humiliation instead of manning up and fighting back in kind.

As for blacks who say their struggle helped to improve American Democracy, this is both true and untrue. In a way, there was genuine inspiration in the American struggle to end slavery and recognize blacks as fellow humans and Americans. And there was genuine greatness to the Civil Rights Movement. But wouldn't American Democracy have been better IF not a single black had been brought to the Americas? There would have been no slavery, no war between the states, and no ugly racial tensions. And blacks wouldn't have suffered as slaves in America and would have no reason to bitch endlessly about 'honkeys'. After all, European nations evolved into democracies just the same WITHOUT racial problems. Wasn't it more pleasant for them than for Americans who had a huge racial challenge to surmount? Did Australian democracy suffer for the lack of blacks? If anything, recent African immigration to Australia seems to have resulted in all manner of crime and pathology.
American democracy would have evolved faster and more naturally without blacks. After all, the reason the North advanced faster in most areas than the South was because it was all white and felt more secure to welcome change. If anything, blacks held back the advancement of democracy because of racial tensions. Also, the problem wasn't entirely with whites. Blacks were not white people with black skin. Racial differences are real. Blacks were naturally the meaner, more aggressive, more thuggish, more psychopathic, and less intelligent race. They posed a real threat to white security and safety. Though KKK was excessive in its actions, there was reason for white fright over blacks. The black rampage since the Civil Rights Movement of the 60s is a testament to this fact. Though white nationalists or white advocates fixate on IQ differences between whites and blacks, that is the least important factor behind race problems. Far more crucial is the Song-Dong-Strong or SDS Factor. Black voice has sirenic power over whites, so much so that even after blacks terrorize whites and cause more problems, whites are yet again lulled and seduced by black vocality. Bigger dongs of black men lead to jungle fever and cuckery of white men. And tougher muscles of blacks lead to much criminality and victimization of whites, which is why whites need guns for safety. If whites and blacks were same in everything but intelligence, it would hardly matter. After all, Mexicans are said to be somewhat less intelligent than whites, but as they aren't tougher or more aggressive than whites, their only problem for whites is demography. Mexicans don't harm whites physically or threaten white idols or symbols of white prowess.
It's often been said Demography Is Destiny, but Supremography also matters. After all, if numbers decide history, why is it that Jews who are only 2% of the US have such total power over the nation? When the US was 89% white Christian and only 2% Jewish, the Law of Demography-Is-Destiny would have secured white rule over Jews. But Jews gained mastery over whites despite their deficiency in numbers. Why? Jews were superior to whites in IQ, stronger in will & personality, larger in vision, and more shameless in deviousness. And why are blacks gaining such prestige, reverence, and power in the West despite being minorities? Blacks are 13% in the US and fewer percentage-wise in Canada and European nations, but they dominate much of the idolatry as athletes, singers, 'twerking' skanks, and studs. Also, as Jewish-controlled US academia and media serve as model for all of the West, many whites in Europe look to MLK and Mandela as the premier saint-prophets. As far as Europeans are concerned, they themselves are frigid and frozen Ice People who were thawed and given warmth by Negroes as the sun god(and homos as the 'rainbow').

Anyway, even if the black story added something to the progress of American Democracy, blacks themselves gained higher morality and concept of human rights only through the white man. While blacks, like Asian Indians led by Gandhi, held the Western Moral Mirror up to the Hypocritical White Face that said one thing but did another, the values that they espoused came from whites, not from their own cultures. After all, what was indigenous black African values but oogity-boogity and jungle-jivery. Indeed, look how blacks have been reverting to their true nature once they gained total freedom in the US. Black culture is now about Rap thuggery and 'twerking' skank-ass-ho behavior. So, while it's true that through blacks and other non-whites, the Christian-Enlightenment West became aware of their shortcomings and hypocrisies, it's no less true that non-whites gained higher values and advanced political morality from contact with whites. Frederick Douglas and MLK didn't get their ideas from the Dark Continent but from Western Civilization.

As for blacks claiming cultural ownership over the very civilization that enslaved them, changed their names, and erased their cultures, it seems absurd but is also indicative of how history works. And we see this all across the West. The very blacks who used to yell, "Hey Hey Ho Ho, Western Culture's Got to Go" are now claiming not only America but Europe as 'African' or 'Always Diverse'. And white cucks are aiding in this: BBC made several shows about past British history with blacks in white roles. Even Finland made a TV movie where a black guy is the national hero who fought the Russians. Blacks realized that the West is too good to let go. Too rich, too advanced, too impressive. But since the West has been white than black, blacks(and their enablers) are altering true history to push the myth that Europe was always multi-racial or that Middle Age Europe wasn't white.

But then, didn't the Germanic barbarians do something similar in adopting the culture and partially even the identity of the very people who'd done so much to conquer, enslave, and kill the Germanics? The Roman Empire at its height invaded Germanic lands and slayed tons of people and enslaved even more. And yet, it was so impressive that many Germanics adopted Roman Imperial identity. Indeed, the myth of Roman Might was such that even after the fall of Rome, various Germanic kings sought to revive it as a Germanic thing. The sackers of Rome claimed to be heirs of Rome. And even though the monotheistic religion of Christianity that arose from Semitic Jews came to destroy the indigenous European pagan cultures in one of the greatest 'cultural genocides' ever, the white 'victims' of this cultural erasure adopted the New Faith as if it had always been their highest value system. History and humanity are funny that way.

------------------------------

200 years from now, when an honest historian asks, "Why did the West fall?", the main reason will be white people in the late 20th century and 21st century came to most revere, admire, and worship the people most antithetical to civilization. Blacks-and-Civilization is like drinking-and-driving. But due to the combination of 'White Guilt' and White Thrill, whites became spiritually and sensually owned by blacks.

Are there grounds for 'white guilt'? Not really. True, blacks suffered under whites, but history has always been about one people clobbering another. Consider what the Bantus did to other blacks(and to other Bantu Tribes) in Africa. Consider what Romans did to Germanic barbarians and ancient Britons. Mass killings and mass enslavement. Consider what Mongols did to Russia and Persia. Consider what whites did to natives of the New World. Consider the bloody history of the Aztecs. It's all tragic and sad, but no single people had a monopoly on horribleness.
So, why the special hysteria about black suffering? US empire killed millions overseas in the 20th century while a mere thousand blacks were lynched by whites, but there is more outrage about one dead Negro than many millions dead among non-whites. It's like Romans killed so many people by way of crucifixion, but Christians only care about the Crucifixion of Jesus. Why? As the Son of God, He was deemed the Superior Being wronged by inferior humans. Thus, Jesus's suffering matters infinitely more in the hearts of Christians. Once blacks were lionized as the Magic Negro and Macho super-dude, inferior-feeling whites looked upon blacks as the superior race, and that accounts for the excessive 'white guilt' about blacks, the psychology of which Jews understand and exploit to their benefit in order to control and own whites. After all, the most effective way to take away a people's pride and autonomy is by 'guilt' and 'thrill' for the Other. 'White Guilt' paralyzes white pride and white assertion. Whites in atonement mode seek moral redemption by serving the Holy Other, namely Jews and Blacks. And white thrill for the Other in sports and pop music becomes a kind of addiction, like to drugs. Even as it harms whites, they keep sniffing the glue.

Whites need to realize two things.

(1) While white history is certainly not without 'sin', this is true of ALL peoples. Black Slavery was hardly unique as a historical wrong. If there is one advantage to the fall of the Liberal Paradigm, it's that people may regard the US as just another nation with the same kinds of historical crimes and problems, not some 'city on a hill' that should be judged by ludicrously high standards. In a perverse sort of way, all this 'white guilt' stuff is paradoxically the product of excessive white pride. White Americans were so full of themselves in pride of having created an exceptional nation of liberty and justice that they became extremely sensitive and upset to evidence to the contrary. Therefore, instead of romanticizing America as the beginning of freedom and justice, it makes more sense to see America as an extension of human history with warts and all: Wars, conflicts, oppression, exploitation, and etc. Then there would be far less reason to be so 'triggered' by the fact that the American Nation was drenched in 'sin'... like the rest of humanity in all parts of the world. So, hell with the Liberal Paradigm. As for blacks who point to all the faults of white history, whites should shoot back and point to all the vile things of black Africa, black race in general, and black culture. True pride must be based on the mud-pie of human reality, not the pie in the sky of impossible idealism. American Pride should be based on American Achievement, not American Perfection. What people have been perfect?

(2) Whites need to realize that the very things that most excite them about blacks also represent the greatest threat to the white race(and to other races because Western Worship of the Black is having a global impact; White West is still the model for the world, and so, if whites go 'black', so will other peoples to their own detriments). Are blacks better athletes? Yes, but what are the implications of this fact? Tougher blacks in schools, streets, buses, and elevators can beat up whites with impunity. Whites need to learn to connect the dots. It's like a stupid baboon cheering on a leopard will realize soon enough it will be next on the leopard's menu. In other words, any white guy who cheers on a black football player might as well be cheering on blacks beating, robbing, raping, or murdering weaker whites. (While we can all be impressed by the prowess of anything or anyone, we also need to ask, "What does this prowess or power imply for me and my side?" After all, while Iranians may marvel at US military prowess, it would be stupid for them to cheer for it as it could very well turn Iran into rubble. We can be amazed by the power of a lion, tiger, or grizzly bear, but we'd be stupid to cheer for its prowess when it's charging right at us.) It means white manhood will be lost to blacks, and it just so happens that a race without manhood and respect of its womenfolk is a dead race. Just look at the spread of Afro-Colonization of White Wombs in US, EU, and UK as the result of the demise of white manhood at the feet of Negroes.
We see this in Japan as well. Even though Japan is, as yet, still mostly homogeneous, Japanese men have lost their pride of manhood under globalist pressure. Japanese youths grow up watching Mongols sumo monsters toss away Japanese wrestlers like ping pong balls. Japanese MMA shows feature whites and blacks destroying Japanese runts. The demented sexual culture of Japan have encouraged the women to grow up as clubbing whores who latch onto foreign men. The result? Not long ago, Japan put forth a mulatto as Miss Japan, and its most revered athletes are mulattoes in tennis and track, products of Japanese women and a black men. Even before demography is messed up, the psycho-national health of a nation can be crippled by the destruction of symbols of national manhood. We see the same thing all across Europe. France is an extreme case where blacks dominate sports almost 100%. But even in nations with far fewer blacks, the black takeover of sports has led to countless whites looking to blacks as representatives of national heroism. Now, one could argue athletes are not heroes and just physically talented sportsmen, but the fact is so many people the world over look to athletes as their champions, demigods, and superstars.

If white folks realize the dangers of 'White Guilt' and 'White Thrill' and act accordingly, they might survive. But at this point, it seems rather hopeless. Whites, both Libs and Cons, gushingly worship the Negro. Donald Trump too is just a cuck to Negrohood. And what did George W. Bush say was the worst day of his presidency? When god-man Kanye the ass said Bush doesn't like black people. Vaginal EU is now wide open to countless millions of black Africans. In US and Canada, the masses have black sports and black music as their main entertainment while Elite Institutions like Harvard and Deep State go the extra step to elevate blacks to highest positions regardless of merit on the premise that nothing imbues an organization or institution with holiness as Having-Our-Magic-Negro. Of course, because the elites can choose the Nice Smiley-faced Negroes for themselves, they can carry on with the illusion that blacks are so obammy-whammy. But things get pretty hairy at the lower levels of society where the less fortunate whites must integrate with ghastly Negroes. COMING APART means Upper Whites get the Nice Negroes while the Lower Whites get the Nasty Ni**az. But if two types of whites have one thing in common, it's that both elite white men and lower white males are willing to be worthless cucks to the blacks who take their women.

So, 200 yrs from now, when an honest historian wonders WHY THE WEST FELL, it would have been because the combination of White Guilt and White Thrill prevented whites from waking up and taking tough measures to save the West from the blacks, especially as whites were mental minions of Jewish Supremacist Power that used blacks to keep the lid on white pride of identity. Better to die worshiping the Magic Negro than be accused of the heresy of 'racism'.

Muslim-Jewish Alliance Owes to Immigration -- Muslims will betray anything to gain access to the West and the Easy Life

How amusing to witness the rise of Zionist-Muslim alliance in the Democratic Party.

http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/u-s-election-2016/1.753161

I find this curious. Donald Trump, sincerely or not, condemned Bush's WMD lies and Iraq War. He condemned Obama and Hillary as destroyers of Libya and enablers of ISIS in Syria. He said he would strive for greater stability and peace in the region(though it must be said his record in Yemen, as continuation of Obama's policy, has been disastrous; and his Iran Policy has been worse than Obama's). In other words, less Invade, less Intervention.

In contrast, Hillary, as the Democratic candidate, was threatening WWIII with Russia over Syria, which means Middle East will blow up even more. Also, she and her globo-feminist cohorts were largely responsible for the chaos and destruction in Libya and Syria.

Now, you'd think most Muslims would side with Trump over Hillary and Deep State Democrats. Granted, the GOP has been just as belligerent(if not more so) than the Democrats when it came to the Middle East, but Trump ran in 2016 as the most anti-war candidate, thus alienating many Neocons in the GOP. And as President, despite his sometimes volcanic rhetoric, he restrained the hawks when it came to North Korea and Syria. For these reasons, one would expect Muslims to be more favorable toward Trump as the politician who is less likely to spread more hell-fire and brimstone in their homelands in the Middle East. And I think they would have been... if not for the issue of immigration.

Suppose the US has had a zero-immigration policy since 1965 and took in no one from the Middle East, North Africa, and Muslim nations. Then, Muslims would have no hope of entering the US. Under those circumstances, I think most Muslims living in their home nations would have preferred Trump over Hillary(and Democratic Deep State hawks). Their worldview would have more-or-less run parallel to the position of the Alt-Right and Paleo-Con types who call for no more wars. They would have reviled Neocons, Zionists, and Liberal Interventionists.

So, why do so many Muslims(there and here) side with the very Americans(Neocons, Liberal Zionists, Democracy-pushers, hawks, New-Cold-Warriors, etc) who are most hellbent on wreaking more havoc in the Muslim World? Why do they fear America First more than America Thirst(for oil and domination)?

Because... even though the Alt-Right, Paleocons, and America-Firsters are more likely to be for peace and non-intervention, they are also likely to be more anti-immigration-invasion.
For Muslims, entry into the West is like a drug. They crave it and dream of it, indeed so much so that they will side with the very people who are doing most to destroy the Muslim World, the very homelands of Arabs and Muslims.

In a way, America/West has a narco-drug effect on all the world. These non-white folks seeking access to the West will join with ANY SIDE that serves the role as the PUSHER-of-the-'dream'. It's like an addict will neglect his own house, family, and kids to get another fix of that smack or crack from the dealer.

The desire to go where the mammoths are(white wealth is mammoth meat to the migrant-hunters of the world) distorts all values. It was the desire to go to America that made Fabrizio betray Michael in THE GODFATHER. He didn't personally hate Michael or his bride. But he wanted to go to America so badly that he was willing to betray the very people who'd hired him and trusted him.

This craving for the Invite-Immigration-Smack makes Muslims form an alliance even with Zionists and Neocon War-mongers. Also, despite their noises about Islamic values and Middle Eastern pride, they privately prefer rule by whites than by their own cousin-humping kind.

People do care about tribe and culture, but they are still organisms and prefer the Good Life, the place where the mammoths are. This is true of anyone. Suppose one had to choose between one's homeland where it's hot, dry, and requires lots of work to get by AND another land where the temperature is nice and where fruits grow in abundance. One's cultural sense might cling to the homeland out of loyalty and heritage, but one's organismic self will want to go to the land of mangoes. This is true of animals in the wild. They go where the plants, game, and water are. Among humans, it's somewhat different because humans don't just live off nature like their primitive ancestors did. Humans build their own economies, and it just so happens that whites have proven most adept at creating the best economies and most functional systems. (Even if non-whites were to face discrimination in the West, they'd still live in a stabler and more orderly system where whites do things better than non-whites do in their own lands. So, even left-overs and crumbs from whites are more than what they get in their own homelands where they may not be subjected to discrimination but have so little because people are so corrupt, inept, and do a crappy job of running things.) Indeed, it's amusing that so many Third Worlders head to Sweden, a cold dark part of the world with long winters(much of it in total darkness). So, why go there? Because Swedes build, manage, and run good economies, whereas non-whites are dysfunctional even in nicer lands with more natural resources, good climate, and etc. One thing for sure, the non-whites are not going to Scandinavia for the weather. They are going to feed off white mammoths. (As a result, whites may go extinct just like the mammoths that couldn't survive the onslaught of migratory hunters.)

Because whites developed the Midas-touch, they were drawn to primitive and backward places in the Age of Empire and could make a positive difference. Whites could go to South America, Australia, New Zealand, Africa, Asia, and etc. and build something from nothing. Even the great Chinese civilization was amazed by what the British could do with Hong Kong almost overnight. Turn a muddy island into a booming city in a short span. But the Age of Empire eventually came to an end. And whites were forced to go back to Europe from many parts of the world that they'd colonized. And for a time, non-whites believed they could do just as well as whites by building up their own nations... but only a handful of nations succeeded in this. And so, lacking the Midas touch, the ONLY way they could have the good life was by migrating to white nations. So, we are now in the Age of Demographic Imperialism. Reverse-imperialism, this time the migration of non-white peoples without the Midas touch heading to the lands of white people with the Midas touch. If, in the Age of Empire, white colonizers made something out of nothing in non-white lands, non-white reverse-colonizers will make nothing out of something as they leech off whites in ever greater numbers. Also, ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs will create destructive black kids out of white wombs. Black leech-sperms will feed off white wombs to create horrible Negrolets.

The notable exception has been Israel. If the post-war West has been mostly about non-white migration-invasion to white nations, Israel was a concerted effort among Jews to favor cultural obligations over organismic wants. Materially, any Jew is better off in Europe or US than in hot and dry tiny Israel. But the call of culture inspired many Jews to settle in the Holy Land and defend it. But then, Jews, like white gentiles, are another people with the Midas touch, able to create something out of nothing. Jews know this, and Jews know others want what they got, so they erect barriers to keep their mammoths to themselves. But Jews in America fear that their mammoths might be taken by non-Jewish whites one day. So, Jews welcome more immigrant-invaders so that diverse gentiles will squabble over the white mammoth meat than salivate after the Jewish mammoth meat.

Things were much simpler right after WWII. Back then, neither the US nor Europe allowed mass immigration-invasion from the Third World. So, people in the Third World thought in terms of 'kick out imperialists' and 'do whatever is necessary to boost our power and sovereignty'. But ever since the West opened its door to immigration-invasion by non-whites, the priority of so many in the non-West is going to the West for easy mammoth meat than fixing their own nations and farming their own mammoth.

It's like how the slave trade distorted the economies of West Africa. While slave trade had always been a fixture among black Africans, the tremendous amount of wealth to be made from the Atlantic Slave Trade made so many blacks drop everything to go capture other blacks to sell to whites. Things got so bad that the Africans sacrificed humans to crocodile gods to stall the decline.

It's also like any gold rush. People hear about get-rich-quick opportunities and drop everything to look for gold. All these non-whites are addicted to White Rush. White lands are where the mammoths are, and it is the quickest and easiest way for them to attain anything in life. It might take a lifetime or many generations(or never) for many parts of the non-West to achieve anything approaching Western levels of success. But if you go to the West, they offer you sanctuary, benefits, favors, protection, housing, welfare, and etc. Also, there are lots of self-hugging white assholier-than-thouists who will defend you and even elevate to saint status.

In the US, Jewish power is undeniable. Jewish power may be less extensive in the EU, but Shoah Worship is stronger there than here. Also, EU nations are essentially servant-states of the US, and their intellectuals and bureaucrats take cues from ideas emanating from Harvard and Yale and US media.

Anyway, all this highfalutin talk of 'liberty', 'inclusion', 'diversity', 'proposition', and etc. are BS. It is really about nonwhite craving for white mammoth meat. It is organismic. Nonwhites pressure the white world to live up to 'high ideals' not because they prize principles but because they want access to easy white mammoth meat. If all of the US was one giant Detroit, would Jews or Muslims or any other people care if US was a 'proposition nation' or not? No one would want to come here, just like no one wants to move permanently to Africa.

Elementary Truth about Black Nature and Character — Evolution and the Negro — NFL and the Knee-Gro

The main thing we need to understand about blacks is their reactions/responses tend to be brutally elementary. They evolved in close proximity with wild animals, and their mode of being is survival than existence, let alone the meaning of existence. Blacks don’t think, “To be or not to be, that is the question” or “I think, therefore I am.” They sense, “I be if I outrun a hippo, I not be if it done catch my ass and stomp me upside my head.” They feel, “I run(like a mothafuc*a), therefore I be.”

For many thousands of yrs, white folks evolved in environments with reduced contacts with direct threats and dangers. So, there was more room for thinking and pondering. More space for security that favored a calmer disposition.
In contrast, blacks evolved in a world of constant struggle for survival against lions, hyenas, baboons, buffaloes, elephants, crocodiles, hippos, warthogs, leopards, gorillas, cobras, mambas, tse-tse flies, and etc. And because this mode of survival made blacks savage and wild, it was aggravating for Negroes to rub shoulders with other Negroes.

So, black emotions and responses tend to be very elemental and ill-suited for reflection, contemplation, introspection, empathy, and self-awareness. Wrapped tightly in their own egotism, blacks are rarely willing to consider other or opposing points of views. In order for blacks to have survived in harsh Africa, they had to obsess about numero uno or ‘my ass’. And such attitude also fueled a lascivious sexual culture that had black males and females calling most attention to themselves to attract the most mates. It’s no wonder that much of black dance forms have degenerated into stuff like bumping-and-grinding and ‘twerking’. In the black African world, survival depended more on fast-twitch reactions against threats and dangers. It was about instantaneous responses to ‘save my ass’ or ‘kick your ass’. Such emphasis on self-preservation led to self-centrism that, in social expression, came to be all about ‘muh bling’, ‘muh booty’, and ‘muh dick’.

Imagine an antelope or some animal in Africa. Suppose it sees something threatening, which could indeed turn out to be fatal. If it ‘thinks’ or ruminates about the problem, it could end up dead, killed by the predator that lunges at it without mercy. So, its survival depends on the immediate response of fight or flight, not momentary hesitation and earnest curiosity. Blacks developed much the same survivalist modes as other creatures of the African wild. If they saw a lion or hippo, it was about fight or flight. Chuck a spear or chuck your ass out of there. There was no time for calm assessment of the situation, let alone contemplation or meditation.

So, there developed a kind of brutally primitive ‘wisdom’ in black emotional reactions. It’s like Beavis and Butthead are ‘wise’ in an idiot-savant way precisely because they are so dumb. Lacking intellect and penchant for reflection, they opt for the occam’s razor of what seems most obvious, like ‘boing’. And they are right half the time with such simple rule of thumb.


Likewise, there’s an elemental truth in how blacks see the world. It may not be deep or profound, but it immediately gauges the brutal stakes of survival… like ‘run like a mothafuc*a’ upon catching the first whiff of danger: "Don’t think about it. Just run and save your ass." Or "the nigga’s craaaazy!" There is no need to psychoanalyze the Negro. Just ‘jungloanalyze’ him.

So, blacks are very adept at elemental survival… but when it comes to complex issues of history, society, ethics, morality, and such, their elemental reactions and responses fall short. Their responses to such matters are uselessly fight-or-flight. Many of them fail to grasp that complex mental tasks cannot be performed if one remains in hunting or playing-basketball mode.

Indeed, the black habit of yelling ‘racist, racist, racist’ is just a verbal form of spear-chucking. It isn’t real thought. It’s “Here’s a spear for your ass, whitey. I wants more gibs-me-dat.” It’s a manifestation of the hunting instinct. Or, it’s a form of flight-panic when blacks are caught doing bad stuff. Unable to morally justify their behavior when found out, they just go into baboon-ish panic mode and holler ‘racist, racist, racist’. The response is essentially same as apes or baboons freaking out when caught in a tough or dangerous situation.

https://www.facebook.com/Fox32Chicago/videos/10157012464860348/



In the black mind, the core of existence is about a b/w stark struggle of fight or flight. To the 'groids', the world is less a stage(let alone a classroom) than a boxing ring. When it comes to white power, a lot of blacks feel, “If we don’t keep chucking more spears at the big white elephant, it will charge and stomp our ass and turn us into slaves again.” The world is not about compromises and contracts but confrontations of win all or lose all.

Some say blacks fail at complexity because of lower IQ, but blacks with higher IQ have similar attitudes and the same ‘moral’ failing. Why? Their emotions outrun or out-ape their intelligence. So, even if certain blacks are just as smart as whites or even smarter, their emotions remain stuck in ‘chuck a spear’ or ‘run like a mothafuc*a’ mentality. This is why even smart blacks like Cornel West and Michael Dyson tend to emote like rappers. Indeed, rap music is useless as a vehicle of meaning because its meanness tramples all over meaning. And in black churches, sheer volume trumps the content of the sermon.

White and black history in the US is highly complex. There was much tragedy for blacks, but there was also much triumph due to contact with white civilization, the most advanced in the world. Indeed, what would blacks have achieved if not for contact with whites? Even today, if there are to be solutions for blacks and Africa, such will have to be devised and developed by whites as blacks lack the necessary temperament to emerge from the primitive mindset of fight-or-flight. Blacks generally lack the emotional qualities that can handle complexity(that call for empathy).

Whites are far more adept at dealing with complex issues. But whites also have their own pathologies that may prevent them from dealing with reality in a truthful way.
One is intellectualism. Sometimes, the danger is so obvious and palpable, but many whites prefer intellectual interaction over decisive action to deal with the pressing problem. Intellect can suppress or deny the urgent needs of the body. The preference for higher intellect has its counterparts in the conceit of higher morality or spirituality. If misapplied, higher morality can favor sanctimony over survival. It’s no wonder that so many whites will risk the very survival of the West just to attain some illusory ‘higher state of being’.

Consider the creature in Howard Hawks’ THE THING, the original movie. The alien monster is clearly a danger to mankind, but the scientist-guy is willing to risk everything to communicate with it(as a higher being) than working with fellow humans to kill the damn thing. And he even turns higher-moralist and believes that, given the choice between saving inferior humanity by killing the superior creature AND saving superior creature by sacrificing inferior humanity, the right course of action is to favor the creature. Today, many whites are willing to sacrifice the West just to appease blacks as the magical god-race. In other words, even if the Africanization of Europe will lead to downfall of Western Civilization, it'd be worth it as a tribute to Black Greatness. White tragedy in service of the Great Negro is to be favored over White triumph in defense of the West against the ghastly 'groids'.


See how foolishly a ‘liberal’ white scientist could act in such a situation? In such a scenario, an elementary-minded Negro would more likely do the right thing: Chuck a spear or run like a mothafuc*a.

*********

https://twitter.com/v_of_europe/status/913455534505897985



Look how the weaker white man is being mauled in his own homeland(Italy) by the stronger and tougher Negro from black Africa. Look how black thugs beat up weaker whites in America.

All white folks must understand the BAMMAMA Factor, or Blacks Are More Muscular And More Aggressive. Knowing that truth, whites must ask, "Why allow a stronger & more savage race of people into our nation?"

In the video above, white onlookers are afraid to intervene because they know blacks are tougher and will kick their butts. If they try to save the white guy from the black guy, they too could end up being beaten by the black guy.

BAMMAMA leads to ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs. As blacks beat white guys, white women lose respect for white men and lust after black thugs. White manhood cannot co-exist with black thuggery.

This is why it made good sense to support the KNEE-GROES: Negro athletes who took the knee and alienated their white fanbase. NFL should be about Knee-groes run amok as such will antagonize and alienate whites and hopefully wake them from their cuck stupor. There is no reason white males should be watching NFL that is about BAMMAMA and ACOWW. It is anti-white, and whites need to wake up. So, I support Negro hostility that wakens whites into Race-ism, aka Race Realism.

Fast-and-Easy Path to American Citizenship Has Universalized Treason around the World

Hegel and Marx expounded on the dialectics of history. It seems ‘digestics’ is what animates America. A hyper-materialist society, America has turned consumerism as a metaphor for everything. According to Americanism, not only do people primarily exist to consume-dispose-consume-dispose-consume-some-more but they themselves are to be consumed and disposed with ceaseless intakes of new peoples of different races and cultures. The elites don’t see rooted, established, and existing Americans as a special people with history, heritage, and meaning. They see existing Americans as stale old masses to be replaced by endless servings of New Americans. So, historic European-Americans are just pieces of meat in a melting pot to be digested and excreted to make room for servings of New Americans.

Especially since individualist-materialist consumerism fixates Western attention on hedonism and vanity, it is assumed that white peoples in the West cannot sustain themselves. They are too much into fun & feasting to prioritize family & future. So, let white people have a good time and then make way for New Arrivals since white people (1) don’t have enough kids and (2) no longer care for their roots and heritage anyway.
Of course, in time, even immigrant groups and their children will be 'Westernized' and experience plummeting birthrates as their main priority will be short-term self-interest than racial-cultural survival. In time, even non-whites in the West will go the way of whites. (Such a view would indicate that the modernity is a success in creating things but a failure in creating life. Since modern nations can make things but can’t make life, they rely on non-modern nations to produce life for export to the modern world. But then, immigrant groups, upon being modernized, will also become deficient in creating life and will have to be replaced by waves of newer arrivals. To be sure, there’s a good chance that non-whites, due to lower IQ and other problems, won’t become properly modernized, in which case they will either continue to produce life but not things or fail to produce both life and things.) On that basis, the elites insist that the only way to sustain the population is to bring in more New Peoples. The message for Europeans and Americans, especially white ones, is that they shouldn’t bother about marriage and children if such get in the way of fun, career, or self-fulfillment in tune with latest fashions. White women should fixate on careers, make money, and blow it all on themselves on shoes, travel, fancy food, and loose sex. Men should forever remain boys hooked on video games, hobbies, and recreation. The main purpose of jobs is to make money to spend, spend, and spend. And nothing has any lasting value. New items are soon old items to be tossed out to make room for newer items.
And what goes for TVs, appliances, and clothes also goes for peoples. Americans no longer have any identity or history. (If there is a historical narrative, the message is 'America is all about immigration', i.e. American history is about replacing existing peoples with new ones. This history is not remembrance of things worth preserving but reminder that everything must be replaced or reinvented.) They are just consumers who live for fun, work for fun. Old people are warehoused in nursing homes while the grandchildren grow up identifying with pop idols and celebrities as ‘role models’ or demi-gods. For spirituality and uplift, there is Homomania or Queertianity. For truth and ‘poetry’, there is Rap music and Magic Negro cult. For ideas, there are PC slogans to chant for the hive-minded.

When it comes to consumerism, of course we want things to be fast-and-easy. Who wants to stand in long lines for ice cream or hamburgers? Who wants to go through hassles and complications to buy a TV or a car? But at some point in American history, the consumerism went from convenience(a good) to compulsion. (Consider the shopping habits or rituals of Americans during Black Friday sales.) People have to have it NOW and more of it. If you don’t have the money, use credit. Borrow and buy more. And don’t buy things because you really need or want them but simply for the thrill of buying. The ideal American according to the globalist formula is the shopoholic who shops until she drops and then shops some more. A shopoholic is addicted to the rush of acquiring new things. The things themselves matter less than the excitement of acquiring things. It doesn’t matter that what were bought goes unused, neglected, or forgotten. They are either pushed back in the closet and forgotten or tossed out to make room for new stuff and then newer stuff.

This kind of consumerism is vapid and shallow. It may be ‘good’ for the economy, at least if people can really afford the stuff instead of borrowing and spending what they can’t pay back. But it can’t be good for the soul because it’s a life fixated on flash and fashion. If rampant consumerism is bad for the soul, it is immeasurably worse when applied to people themselves? It’s one thing to regard Americans as insatiable consumers but quite another to see them as consumer items than as a people with a culture and history, which are priceless than about price tags. The current elites have a shopoholic attitude about the core European peoples of America. They see established or existing Americans as stale Americans. They are enthralled only with the prospect of acquiring ‘fresh’ peoples. Elites are no longer interested in established groups of Americans. Indeed, what need for groups and collective identities/memories when everyone is seen as an atomized individual disconnected and unbound to anything related to ethnos, history, or culture? A people are no longer unique; they are just units, like the 1's and 0's of digital coding. There’s no longer any nobility and passion in representing, defending, and preserving white Americans as a people-and-culture since they are seen as meaningless units and the same-old-same-old, just like a shopoholic woman has lost interest in shoes already stacked away in the closet. Her mind obsesses on getting New Pairs. Likewise, elites feel excitement only when salivating over New Americans to acquire.

The idea that there once was nothing but then something with the founding and construction of America, a magnificent creation deserving to be preserved in its essence, has faded from the narrative. European-America that had been envisioned and maintained was to be utterly transformed by endless waves of non-whites from around the world with the passage of the insane 1965 immigration law that handed over the keys of America to vicious Jews. That was the Trojan Horse moment in American History.

Statue of Liberty that used to represent (1) sharing of the light of freedom with the world and (2) offering opportunity to Europeans & Jews in the 19th century has come to represent the shopoholic mania of a soulless vapid America. There’s also the tear-jerking mendacity about ‘huddled masses’ and ‘refugees’.
After all, most immigrants today are not desperate people. They were not starving in their homelands. And many from Asia are well-educated and had decent jobs there. Also, as democracy has become dime-a-dozen around the world, most immigrants come from nations with free elections and basic human rights. They are not running from tyrants. And most of these nations have sufficient freedom for peoples there to fix problems and make progress.
But then, why would these people go through the hassle of improving their own nations when they can just get on a plane and fly to America for instant material improvement? Even if they overstay their visas, they can find ‘sanctuary’ in Treason Cities.

And why would the elites care about ‘tired and boring’ existing Americans when they snort New Americans like cocaine. The elites say the non-white immigrants are the Future, as if America can’t have a future without Future Peoples. I guess the elites have forgotten that new life can be created from wombs of existing Americans. Even with zero immigration, existing Americans have a future ahead of them if they are encouraged to favor family and life.
But then, women as mothers will work less and spend more on babies than on themselves. And men as fathers will save more for the family than spend and spend. Bad for consumerism as far as the elites are concerned. Besides, the cult of Diversity has infected elite minds with the notion that nothing is more fabulous than more colors and odors. Since most of the immigrants are non-white, it’s like elites shopping for different-colored shoes. And remember, more restaurants!!

Now, if the ‘naturalization’ process in America were a long and arduous, the elites wouldn’t be so thrilled in their shopo-demo-holism. It’s like consumers wouldn’t turn into shopoholics if it were difficult and painstaking to purchase items. It is because it’s so fun and easy to shop that people become addicted to shopping.
Likewise, it’s because the path to citizenship has been made so easy that the elites have become addicted to shopping for more immigrants, especially since the Current Year reverberates with chants of ‘Diversity is our strength, diversity is our strength, etc’. If diversity is indeed our strength, then nothing is more fab than for politicians and elites to ‘shop’ for New Americans. It’s like buying new stocks. The elite’s socio-political and moral status rises with their competitive bidding for more New Americans. With Diversity as the highest value, one can burnish one's reputation by advertising for more New Americans. After 9/11, America was all about shopping for more stuff and shopping for more New Americans. Cult of Diversity made the Yet-to-be-Americans more valuable than stale Been-here-done-that-Americans.
And this bug also infects Canada where elites compete to gush about how they welcome diversity more than the next guy does. Justin Trudeau isn’t a leader of his people. He’s a shopoholic for New Canadians. Canadians, as they’d come into existence since the founding, no longer matter. They are regarded as old, boring, and tired. It doesn’t matter if they’re young. All white people are deemed ‘old and boring’, and they have no right to defend their identity and territory. With Diversity as the religion of the land, the only purpose of whites is to increase Diversity like a dairy farm is to increase the production of milk.

Now, what makes sense in one realm doesn’t for another. We all want ease and convenience in commerce. We want stores and services to be quick and efficient. But when the same logic is applied to humans themselves, it spells doom for culture and civilization. Consider the film KOYAANISQATSI where people as consumers seem indistinct from what they consume. A society so obsessed with cycles of consumption and disposal comes to regard consumerism as metaphor for everything, even everyone. As Americans are now regarded mainly as consumers and disposers, eaters and shitters, they too have no meaning outside such processes. As such, they themselves are regarded as existing to be consumed and disposed. As far as the elites are concerned, the ‘old and tired’ white Americans had their turn. They are not people with culture and heritage worth defending and prolonging. They are like people at McDonalds or a movie theater who must clear the seats so that new customers or audience will take their place. They are like burgers being digested into fecal matter to be shat out. As the logic goes, if hamburgers have no right to stay in the stomach forever and must pass through the bunghole to make way for future burgers, why should white Americans hold onto America as their homeland? Elites just see it as clogging the system. Globalism says whites had their fun, the jig is up, and it's time for others to take their place. Or whites are to be distracted with mindless fun while they’re replaced by New Americans who supposedly deserve their turn at careers and leisure until they too are replaced by Newer Americans and so forth and so on.

For Globo-America to run smoothly, amnesia is crucial. If Americans don’t know or care about their history and heritage, they won’t feel that they have anything worth defending or preserving. As for basic historical lesson, just poison the well of memory and invalidate the white saga so indispensable to America’s founding and development. Thus, whites feel guilt than pride about their history, resigning themselves to collective suicide to redeem the legacy of ‘white privilege’.
Needless to say, Jews don’t feel this way about their own identity, history, and heritage. Jews do retain a sense of history linked to a sense of prophecy. The reason why Jews push amnesia onto white goyim is to control them. After all, humans with memory control animals without memory. Why is the devious detective able to run circles around the tragic hero in Chris Nolan’s MEMENTO? Because the cop has a functioning memory whereas the hapless hero couldn’t store new memory since his wife’s murder. Granted, some Jews are getting high on their own supply and may end up self-destructing like the rest. But as of now, Jews have the advantage because they insist on identity, heritage, and history. Even as Jews urge gentiles to become a globalized mass of zombie-like consumers(or consumbies), they guard their blood-narrative, soil of Zion, and seal of Covenant.
Indeed, the reason why Jews push amnesia on gentiles is because any people with autonomy of identity and narrative will define and defend their own sense of history, urgency, and destiny. Imagine if cows had intelligence and memory of their own. Would they take orders from ranchers who use them as cattle? Cows don’t know whence they came and where they’re going. Likewise, would so many white people act like cattle if they weren’t spellbound with amnesia(via pop culture) and ‘white guilt’(via Political Correctness)? White masses are corn-fed on mindless pleasure and cattle-prodded with PC. Fixated on fun and guilt, they fail to see the big picture.
It’s also paradoxical that Jews would push so much fun and pleasure on a people deemed so guilty and undeserving. If indeed whites must atone and be punished for their sins, why should they be encouraged to indulge themselves at movies, concerts, casinos, malls, eateries, etc.? Shouldn’t the People of Guilt be punished with pain and deprivation, like criminal convicts in prison? And yet, Jews tell whites to have as much fun as possible.
Why? For two reasons. One is white consumption makes Jews richer because Jews control much of finance, commerce, and vice industries like gambling and drugs. The other reason is a people addicted to revelry and pleasure are like stupid children primed for manipulation. If white people were sober, disciplined, and moral — as Anglo-Americans once were — , they might unite and stand as a brick wall against Jewish filth and deviousness. But if white people are given to debauchery like Lola in BLUE ANGEL, they can be bought and sold with money. And those tempted by the seductress will succumb to disrepute and even end up destitute, with Jews holding all the cards in the end. Consider what happens to the professor in the Josef von Sternberg's film.

But the negative effect of mass replacement by endless immigration isn’t only on white Americans. After all, the New Americans will, in turn, become Old Americans when their time is up and then be chewed out and replaced by Yet Newer Americans. Furthermore, because the US is the land of amnesia and hedonism, the children of the New Americans will grow up as soulless zombies who favor leisure of the now over longevity between past and future. They will treat sex like fast food. Also, the New Americans, in speedy exchange of their own identity for the soulless neo-American consumerism, will be relinquishing their roots and culture for naked material interests, albeit masked with the faux-culture and pseudo-values of PC.

Now, let us imagine how things might have been more meaningful for everyone IF the process of ‘naturalization’ had been arduous, demanding, challenging, and difficult. It would have been better for the pride and security of white Americans as the founders and builders. And it would have been better for non-white wanna-be-Americans since they would have been made conscious of the full implications of their decision to abandon their own lands, peoples, and cultures for America.

Suppose the path to citizenship required 20 yrs than mere 5 years. And suppose every would-be immigrant, prior to arriving in the US, must answer 10 questions pertaining to their born identities & loyalties and new identity and loyalty as ‘Americans’.

These Questions would be devised to make the would-be-immigrant think twice about emigration. After all, permanently moving to another nation is essentially an Act of Treason. You’re basically abandoning and rejecting your original/born identity, culture, lineage, and loyalty to take on a new identity and pledge new loyalties. Especially if you’re moving from a nation/civilization with deep culture and tradition, you’re surrendering something so rich and meaningful to adopt a new identity of a wholly different nation. In the case of the US and the modern West, the only theme is the Cult of Fashion(of the New) than Concern for Tradition. The Current Americanism requires all peoples to favor amnesia over memory. The only exception is the Jews, who’ve manipulated the system so that all goyim will be turned into blank slates while they themselves remain a people of the written scroll that reaches back into ancient times.

When people do trivial things, it doesn’t require much thought. For instance, if you want to buy an ice cream cone or watch a movie, it doesn’t much matter because you’re just seeking momentary pleasure. But in deciding to permanently move to another nation where your descendants will be born and dissolve into a 'melting pot', one has think deep and hard about the move. It’s like people should really think twice about having an abortion or getting tattoos. An abortion is far more serious than getting a haircut or having nails clipped. You’re killing a human life growing inside you, and there may be emotional scars later, that is if you’re a person of conscience. And getting a tattoo means you are stuck with that ugly stuff forever. Do you really want to do something that will mark or define you for life? Or consider gender-assignment surgeries. It’s such a drastic undertaking that the patient must be absolutely sure what he or she is getting into. It isn’t a decision to make lightly. Or it’s like changing religions. Surely, if a Christian wants to become a Muslim or vice versa, he should really think hard about what he is doing. It’s not just a mind game but a fundamental shift in spiritual beliefs, commitments, and loyalties. It should never be done lightly. This is why Evangelicals who push Jesus onto others like candy are shallow idiots, not unlike the globalists who want to pass out American Citizenship like flyers. While we can understand why Evangelicals want to save souls and bring others to the love of Jesus, they should also be mindful of the fact that there are other rich, deep, and meaningful spiritual systems. So, if non-Christians are to convert to Christianity, Evangelicals should at the very least inform potential converts of the profound changes that will follow. It’s like marriage or divorce is not something to be handled lightly. Marriage means you are committed to the person for life. And divorce could mean emotional scars, legal complications, and worst of all, trauma for the children.
Some things don’t require fundamental shifts or change of commitments. Deciding to buy a new music CD is nothing compared to, say, deciding to join the military. The latter requires tough training, years of duty, and the possibility of killing other people and being killed or being crippled for life. Some decisions should not be made lightly. And yet, immigration is now treated like the most easy, fun, painless, and natural thing. Not only are globalist Western elites calling on non-whites to come in droves but non-white elites are telling their own people to flock to other nations. Now, if the elites of a nation are proud of their identity and tradition, why would they encourage their own people to give up their own nations, move to other nations, and pledge loyalty to other governments(that could even be enemies)?

For the longest time, neither China nor Japan allowed foreigners to enter or their own people to leave. They saw foreigners as invaders, and they didn’t want their own people to go to other lands and work for the enemies/rivals. Japanese didn’t want their own people to become New Chinese and possibly serve China against Japan. And Chinese felt the same way. But then, Western Powers forced China and Japan open, and both nations realized that they must learn new ideas from the West and build their own technologies to defend themselves. So, ideas and goods should move freely, but the nation-states should still maintain border controls. But this wasn’t so easy, especially as imperialist nations began to carve up China. With China being unable to keep foreigners out, they got into the habit of moving to foreign lands. Also, due to pressures of increasing population, there was the temptation to dump the poor folks to the wide open spaces of the New World.

The modern world gave rise to both nationalism and anti-nationalism. With centralized state power, mass communication, and public education, more people could be brought together under a shared national identity. Thus, Russian peasants who’d only known their local village and customs began to think more in terms of their shared Russian-ness with other Russians. And the rise of Turkey owed to modern political influences from the West. So, more people than ever before gained shared/collective pride as member of a nation.

But modernity also facilitated movements of peoples via ships and then airplanes. The world grew smaller. And people being organisms, they were tempted to move to other places IF they could have better material lives. Modern Turkey is very nationalist, and yet, so many Turks have left Turkey for Germany and other European nations because they want more money and welfare. And the Turkish government, like the Mexican government, promotes both nationalism and immigrationism, a great irony. If indeed Turkish elites are so proud of being Turks, why would they want Turks to abandon their own nations and move, often permanently, to other nations? Won’t these Turkish emigrants be abandoning their own identity and culture? If indeed Turks become ‘New Germans’ and if Germany and Turkey end up in a war, won’t the Germanized Turks be fighting against Turkey? But then, Turks may feel that Turks who emigrate to Europe will likely retain their identity. In other words, they aren’t so much immigrants in Germany but colonizers. As white Europe is aging, dying, and losing faith in God and nation, why shouldn’t the more virile and vital Muslim folks move and take over?

Same kind of double-think may operate among Mexican elites. In a way, it makes little sense for proud Mexicans to encourage Mexicans to move to Gringo-Land and serve goddamn Gringos. But, Mexicans can smell the blood that Gringo has lost his mojo-ez. Gringo is cucked out and decadent. So, Mexicans who move to the US aren’t so much switching loyalties and siding with Gringos against Mexico but carrying out Reconquista of the lands back from Gringos who’d humiliated the ‘tacoheads’ in the Mexican-American War and been making Westerns were Mexicans are usually ridiculous, albeit endearing, characters like Ramon in THE BIG COUNTRY and Pedro in RIO BRAVO.

Anyway, moving to another nation is not something to be taken lightly. The reason why it’s become a New Normal is because globalism has undermined nationalism and patriotism. It has severed identity from its roots. Globalism says no people, except Jews, have an organic connection to their ancestors, lands, cultures, and traditions. All identities are just like baseball cards to be traded back and forth. Identities are to be traded like currencies or bought and sold on the demographic stock market. We don’t trade in slaves anymore but in entire peoples. Even though people feel free in having easier access to other parts of the world, they’ve become a new kind of 'slaves' because they’ve lost the meaning of who they are really are. They’ve been cut off from their roots and chained to migratory patterns where the ONLY consideration is material interest, hedonism, and self-indulgence. So, if you live in Nation A and if moving to Nation B will make you richer, your identity and loyalty easily shift to Nation B.

Paradoxically, the only people who resist such mindset, the Jews, are the ones who are pushing it most fervently on other peoples. Why? Because Jews want gentiles to be adrift as rootless economic units whose loyalties can be sold to the highest bidder. Since Jews got the most money, they can buy the loyalties of most people. Look at the minions of George Soros al over the world. With their mega-stash of gold, Jews can dish out thirty pieces of silver to so many gentiles who, having been culturally hollowed out by Pop Culture and intellectually reprogrammed by PC, are easily sold to the money changers.

Now, let’s consider a hypothetical where every would-be-immigrant is fully warned of what he is committing to IF he decides upon permanent emigration to another nation. He would be informed of the profound implications of his decisions on the political, cultural, and even spiritual level. And it wouldn’t be just about him but his ancestors and descendants. After all, if he adopts the identity and narrative of another nation, his descendants will likely drift from his identity & culture and forget his ancestors in the ‘old country’.

So, what would the questions posed to the would-be-immigrant be? As follows.

1. Are you proud of your people, culture, and history? Do you feel a deep attachment to your people and land? If so, why do you want to abandon your nation and come to live in America where your culture and identity won’t be central and will likely be rejected, neglected, or forgotten by your children and grandchildren? If you’re non-white, do you find white people to be superior? Why do you want to move to a nation envisioned and built by white pioneers? Do you believe white people do everything better, whereas your people, being inferior and hopeless, will never achieve the levels of wealth and success found in Anglo-built America?

2. What is your main motivation for wanting to permanently move to another nation and replace your existing deeply rooted identity with a new one based largely on consumerism, careerism, and recreation? Are you motivated by idealism or materialism? Are you willing to abandon your own identity, people, and culture just to have better material life in America?
Or do you value individualism and freedom that you believe are enshrined by Rule of Law in America? But if you long for more freedom and individualism, why don’t you struggle for them in your own nation? Are you and your people incapable of working together for greater liberty and rule of law? Are you and your ilk so lazy, cowardly, craven, and stupid that you people can’t attain those things on your own and must move to white-founded-and-built nation to enjoy them?
Or if your nation is free and democratic but saddled with rampant corruption, why don’t you get together with your countrymen to organize movements for reform? Why do you shirk your responsibilities at home while you seek to shunt off to America to enjoy the fruits of what other peoples, especially whites, have accomplished? If you admire the American Way, why don’t you do something to realize similar improvements in your own nation? A true idealist doesn’t run away from the problems of his own people to enjoy paradise built by another people. He rolls up his sleeves and struggles to make things better for his own nation and people. The West didn’t become rich and successful because white people ran to success created by others. It was because men and women of values and ideals acted on their convictions to construct something out of nothing, thus transforming a wilderness into a civilization. But you don’t want to serve or improve your own nation. You just want to run from problems to easy solutions in America created by other peoples. You don’t want to do the homework for your own people in your own nation. You want to go to America and live off the homework done by whites. Are you ashamed of yourself? What kind of shameless craven tard are you anyway?

3. Are you aware that America was created by taking land from the native populations? If childish Indian savages were the original owners of America, then why do you want to join the white race in furthering the conquest of America and render Indians into yet a smaller minority. If it was tragic for Indians to lose their lands to Europeans, isn’t it doubly tragic for Indians to lose their land to peoples from all over the world? If whites took land from Indians, isn’t the moral obligation of whites to take good care of Indians than open up the New World to yet more invasions from all over?

There’s a good chance that your people had also been colonized by Europeans although not ethnically pogrom-ed off the land as Indian were. Aren’t you relieved that your people regained your homeland and were liberated of foreign imperialism. As it stands, Indians lost their land and will forever live under ‘foreign’ white rule. So, why would your kind want to move to America and participate in an Eurocentric race-ist order that has permanently extinguished the hope of Indian Liberation?

Furthermore, even though our official creed is now ‘Diversity Is Our Strength’, the fact is Diversity is really the product of imperialism, conquest, mass rape, slave trade, and waves of invasive immigration. In North and South Americas, Diversity was forced on the natives by imperialists. And the presence of blacks to further the Diversity was the result of centuries of Slave Trade. So, if you come here to celebrate Diversity, you are participating in the Imperialist Saga.

4. Are you aware that the US not only developed as an imperialist power across the American continent but expanded its imperial reach overseas as well? Do you know that US imperialism and intervention in world affairs led to the deaths of millions in Asia and Middle East? Consider the US support of Japanese imperialism before the two empires butted heads in World War II. Think of US invasion of Philippines, US wars in Korea and Vietnam. Think of US actions in Guatemala and Iran. The invasion of Panama. Think of US colonial grab of Puerto Rico. Think of how the CIA and US mafia ran Cuba before Castro liberated it from Hyman Roth. And have you already forgotten the US invasion of Iraq and Libya that led to destruction of entire cities and deaths of 100,000s of lives? The US also aided terrorists in Syria to either topple or cripple the secular modern Assad regime. The US, being controlled by Jews, also supports the seemingly never-ending Zionist oppression and dispossession of Palestinians. Given the history and direction of US power and its imperialism, why do you want to move to America, work for the US economy, raise your kids to serve in the US military, and pay taxes to the US government when the US will use the added might(of immigrant labor and revenues) to expand its empire to terrorize and destroy more peoples and nations all over the world? Do you want to participate in American Imperialism? Do you want to work and pay taxes to fund the US empire that has caused so much harm in every corner of the world? Are you some kind of amoral freak? Haven’t you read Paul Craig Roberts? Or are you the kind of tard who got all your information from Jew-run CNN?

5. Are you a decadent or degenerate freak? If not, why would you want to come to America? Don’t you know that the current religion of the US is Homomania and Queertianity? Don’t you know that Americans now celebrate fecal penetration among homos? Don’t you know that America now fires, fines, and blacklists people who won’t acknowledge Bruce ‘Caitlyn’ Jenner as a ‘woman’? Don’t you know that US companies are obliged to use 50 gender pronouns? Don’t you know that Washington D.C., the capital of the US, is 10% homo and virtually all politicians are shills of heinous Jewish globalists? Why do you want to bring your children to America to be indoctrinated in public schools and by mass media(all controlled by Jewish globalists and their homo proxies) to praise, celebrate, and even worship homos and trannies? What kind of parent are you that you are willing to turn your children’s hearts, minds, and souls over to the devil of decadent and degenerate globalism just because you want to make more money, drive a fancy car, and live in a McMansion? You must be some kind of turd to expose your children to such filth. And do you know what American pop culture is? It is about keeping men boys forever, addicted to video-games and comic book culture. And it’s about turning girls into whores or ‘thots’ at the youngest age possible. The US influence will turn your son into an immature dork or a fruitkin. And your daughter will likely throw away her virginity at 15 and screw around like the disgusting Lena Dunham and Emma Sulkowicz. You must be some kind of degenerate freak yourself to want to come to America and expose your children to that kind of filth.
Aren’t you proud of your own history, culture, and values? Or are you already ersatz-Americanized via globalist media that are beamed into homes all across the world? Are you already a tard whose idea of culture is tattoos, piercings, and the umpteenth comic book movie? Are your kids already into rap or some other trashy music? Is your son already an Americanized idiot who imitates rappers and demented celebrities? Is your daughter already a thot-in-progress? You must be one lowlife shithead of a father. So, you couldn’t resist the worst aspects of American Pop Culture even in your nation and you want to come to America to wallow whole hog in degeneracy and filth. US may be rich, but it has a shithole culture, and you want to eat from it like a pig. Apparently, you have no feeling or connection to your own culture and history because, if you did, you would want to preserve it and defend it from the foulness of globalist US influence that is spreading like a plague all over the world. If you come to the US, a nutjob like Michio Kaku will just see you as a worker-consumer-tax-payer whose only purpose is to keep the economy running so that megalomaniacal geeks like him can invent technology to turn themselves into ‘gods’, like how Mason became Largo in BUBBLEGUM CRISIS.

6. Despite all the official crap about ‘equality’, do you know that the US is really about the royalty of the holy three: Jews, blacks, and homos? Both political parties must honor and praise Jews no matter what they do. Jews are the most powerful people in America and must be obeyed at every turn. And we must turn a blind eye to Zionist oppression of Palestinians. We must not protest our tax payer money going to Zionist tyranny. Do you want to take part in this evil? Don’t you have any sympathy for Palestinians? No? Why you dirty heartless bastard. Crazy Jews run the US, and moving to the US to serve Jews is like moving to Nazi Germany to lend support to the Wehrmacht. If Jews want more Wars for Israel, America must deliver. If Jews want to wreck the economies of Iran and Russia, all Americans must comply because all politicians are shills for Zion. Why would you want to participate in this monstrous system? Not only was the US created by ‘racist’ imperialism against childish Indian savages and not only did it develop by slave labor, but the US continues to be an aggressive nation hellbent on world domination. If anything, it is worse today because at least the Anglo-American elites of yesteryear had some conscience, some sense of honor, some sense of limits, some sense of magnanimity, some sense of Christian grace. Also, they didn’t deny their power and listened to criticism and were self-critical. In contrast, the current Jewish elites are utterly neurotic, psychopathic, sociopathic, megalomaniacal, egotistical, chutzpahlsy, and delirious. Even though they cause the most harm around the world, they pontificate like they’re moral paragons or eternal victims of the Shoah. If you come to the US, you will be serving this evil power. Do you even know WHY the Jews are ‘welcoming’ non-white folks like you? They just want to set goyim against goyim. If you’re Muslim, you know Jews are making White Christians in the military bomb your nation and make your life hell. But these same Jews then ‘invite’ your kind to America and make you hate White Christians. It’s pure misdirection. It’s the Jews who make whites hate, invade, and destroy Muslim nations. Jews run Hollywood and made all these movies and TV shows with ‘Muzzie’ baddies. But when you come to America, Jews will pretend to love you and set you against white gentiles as 'Islamophobes'. Why do you want to be played and manipulated by Jews? You must be a freaking idiot to want to come to America and be used as globots by the heinous Jewish imperialists.
And then, there are the blacks or Negroes. They are the other people deemed holy by the American Narrative. But in fact, blacks commit the most crime, destroy entire cities, degrade academic standards, holler like lunatics, and tell lies upon lies. Even though most blacks have most to fear from other blacks, the insane BLM movement made believe that innocent law-abiding blacks were being gunned down by ‘racist’ white supremacist police. If you want to run some store in a big city, there’s a good chance some crazy ‘groids’ will loot it like they did in Ferguson in the name of justice for Michael Brown, a fat thug who got shot for charging a police officer who was only doing his duty. As blacks are revered as ‘kangz’ in America, rappers are treated like poet laureates and prophets. But all they yammer about is ‘biatches’, ‘muh gun’, ‘muh bling’, ‘muh dick’, ‘muh attitude’. Why would you want to bring your kids to a nation and raise them to imitate crazed blacks who imitate drunken apes?
And then, there’s the Homos. Maybe you know that some people are born homo and like to do ‘gay’ stuff. Okay, live and let live, I guess. But in the US, Jews via control of media-academia-finance-entertainment, have turned homos into the angels and saints of America. Even though HIV epidemic spread because homos were buggering one another in bathhouses from coast to coast, Americans are forced to believe that homos were just hapless and innocent victims, oh boo hoo hoo. And if you open a pastry shop, you better bake a cake to service a ‘gay wedding’. If you don’t, you will be sued and destroyed financially. And Antifa thugs will attack you in the streets while hideous Jews giggle with glee like the demon girl in Fellini’s TOBY DAMMIT. Do you still want to come to America? If yes, you must be some kind of disgusting freak yourself.

7. Do you care about the environment? If you do, why do you want to come to America, consume more energy than you are now, and add to the carbon footprint to the planet? Studies show that when people come to America, they drive bigger cars like SUV’s and live in McMansions. They use more energy of all kinds and add more CO2 into the air. Don’t you care about the planet? Also, as an American, you will likely eat a lot of beef, and that means more cattle, and that means more cow fart which adds lots of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Why would you want to become a stupid fat American eating all those burgers, driving an SUV, and living in a McMansion? It’s bad enough we have enough stupid Americans messing up the planet. Why would you want to be yet another fat stupid American? Why don’t you do us a favor and stay in your nation and live within your means and be more environmentally-minded. We have enough gross fat Americans who use excessive energy and befoul the planet with auto exhausts and cow flatulence.

8. Do you know that financial sector is the biggest share of the US economy? The US has manipulated, abused, and fleeced the world with Wall Street fraud and Dollar supremacism. If you come to America and if your kids do well in school, there’s a good chance they too will work in the financial sector and facilitate more predatory fraud around the world. Why don’t you stay in your own nation and make money the honest way than coming to America and goading your kids to go to business school, join Wall Street, learn dirty tricks, and make lots of money by making or producing nothing? The last thing the US needs is more financial sharks. It needs more Real Economy. The problem is immigrants come to the US and work to expand stupid bubbles that distort the economy for everyone. Consider all the Hindu dotkins who played a key role in the Dot.com Bubble in the 1990s. And the Housing Bubble that nearly KO’ed the world economy owed much to providing easy loans to tons of immigrants and even illegal aliens who bought houses they couldn’t really afford. The US economy is seriously distorted and, in turn, distorts the entire world. The fact that you want to join this bubble economy means you’re sick in the head. Why don’t you want to stay in your own nation and build up some honest industries?

9. Do you want to aid and abet in Jewish Supremacism and oppression of Palestinians? While the US has many groups, some are more equal than others, and no group is as ‘more equal’ than the Jews. Jews use their great power to force all groups to support the Zionist Occupation and Oppression of Palestinians. What kind of lowlife sicko are you that you want to come to the US and aid in the oppression of Palestinians and other peoples? Why do you hate the Palestinians? Why do you want to work in the US and pay taxes into the system that funds the terrible Zionist tyranny over Palestinians. You must be a sadistic bully with a hole where there should be a soul. So, you’re the kind of lowlife who’s willing to come to America and pay taxes to support the oppression of Palestinians just because you want your SUV, McMansion, and 5 burgers per serving. Have you seen a spiritual counselor recently? You should because you are willing to take thirty pieces of silver and oppress Palestinians.

10. Why do you want to kill your own people? If you’re Chinese, there’s a chance that US and China will be at war. If that happens, you will have to support the US as it drops bombs and murders countless innocent dog-eaters and cat-torturers. Are you a Muslim? Then, you must surely know that Jewish-run America uses its military and economic sanctions to target, subvert, and destroy any Muslim or Arab nation hated by Israel. Are you some lowlife Muslim cuck(with brains rotted from too much cousin-mating) who takes pleasure in coming to America and paying taxes to support a system that drops bombs on Muslims, forcing them into refugee status?
Or if you’re from Latin America, you must know of the long US history of exploitation of nations and peoples south of the border. Look what Hyman Roth did to Havana in THE GODFATHER PART 2. Jews and Anglo-Americans have been using Latin America as their backyard. They’ve been invading, bullying, and exploiting Latin America. And yet, your dream is to come to the US and work for gringo and pay taxes into the Yanqui Empire so that the US will continue pushing around Latin American nations? Are you loco?
And if you’re African, why do you want to run from fellow blacks and come to a white-built nation? Are you a ‘racist’? In America, ‘racist’ whites take flight or white flight from black areas. That is deemed discriminatory or bigoted. And yet, you want to take flight from fellow blacks and come to white Europe or white-founded America. Are you a self-loathing black ‘racist’ who runs from fellow blacks and come to live with ‘whitey’? Are you really that disgustingly ‘racist’? If you got talent and brains, why don’t you work to improve and fix your ‘shithole’ nation? If you got shit all over, clean it up. Don’t run from your own shit. Are you too lazy to fix your own problems? Then, you are reinforcing ‘racist’ stereotypes of blacks being lazy, indolent, and irresponsible. There’s a ‘racist’ stereotype that black men are prone to getting women pregnant and then shirking their duties and running off to hump more whores. Do you see your own nation as a ‘whore’ to run from? Do you want to confirm the ‘racist’ stereotype of blacks as carefree ‘groids’ who won’t be their brothers’ keepers?

*Bonus Question. If you believe that white Americans should be replaced by non-white New Americans, do you support the same fate for your own nation? Should foreigners take over your own nation and fundamentally change its demography? Do you mind if that happens? What? You’re not worried about that since your nation sucks and no one wants to come to it anyway?

Anyway, if after considering all the above questions, if your answer is still, "Yes, I want to come to America", then our decision is NO, YOU CAN’T COME because the fact that you still want to come to America after being so warned means that you’re a trashy, shallow, and disgusting person. As the US has enough trashy, shallow, and disgusting people, it doesn’t need MORE.
So, stay home and fix up your own nation.