'Communists' and 'Fascists' as the Tools of Capitalists — Why Jewish Capitalists in Israel are allied with 'Fascists' while Jewish Capitalists in the West are allied with 'Communists'

The thing about capitalists is it's difficult to find people to fight for you. After all, capitalism is about rule by rich oligarchs. While people will fight and use violence to protect their own property, most people won't go out on a limb to defend the privilege and wealth of oligarchs and uber-bourgeoisie. You buy guns to protect your own home and family, not to defend Bill Gates or Warren Buffett.

Now, what will people fight for other than for their own family and property? People, especially those with rightist inclinations, will fight for blood & soil, nationalism, and tribalism. People, especially those of leftist inclinations, will fight for the cult of justice or messianic ideology. Rightists prefer the sacred, leftists prefer the sanctimonious. Rightists will fight for their hole in the ground, leftist will fight for holier-than-thou. Neither rightists nor leftists want to fight, kill, and die for the sake of rich people.
And this is why capitalists need 'fascists' or 'communists' as shock troops. It's like the rich oligarchs and Jewish globalists needed 'Neo-Nazis' in Ukraine to pull off the Maidan coup. This is why the oligarchy and deep state in the US recruit Jihadis and ISIS to fight in Syria. Not because the oligarchs and religious nuts believe in the same thing but because the oligarchs know that only Jihadis have the balls/nuttery to fight to the death.

So, there has been the history of fascism and communism but also the history of 'fascism' and 'communism' as the tools of capitalists, i.e. capitalists used those ideologies/movements as tools and weapons than as desired objectives or goals. Generally speaking, the goy conservative capitalists supported 'fascists' to fight radical revolution and Jewish Power to keep their privilege and maintain order. Though there were Jewish oligarchs who also supported the 'fascists', especially in Italy, many more Jewish capitalist oligarchs funded the 'communists'. Not because they wanted the communists to really win and take over but to serve as shock troops against the 'fascists' and 'anti-Semites' supported by the goy conservative oligarchs.
Now, given that fascism is far more tolerant of capitalism than communism is, one might think most Jewish capitalist oligarchs would have supported the 'fascists'. After all, Italian Fascism and National Socialism made peace with capitalists whereas the communists who gained total power wiped them out. But Jewish oligarchs were loathe to support the 'fascists', especially in Germany, because fascist elements were so anti-Jewish whereas the communists, though anti-capitalist, were opposed to 'antisemitism' and had a large Jewish contingent. Jewish oligarchs thought, "The communists may take away our property but they won't kill us." Of course, they hoped that the 'communists' would never really take power. They figured the 'communists' would be too busy combating 'fascists' to ever get around to toppling capitalism.

But in Israel, the Jewish oligarchs have united with the 'fascists' because 'fascists' there are Jewish. The alliance of Jewish fascists and Jewish capitalists in Israel is akin to the alliance of German fascists and German capitalists under National Socialism. The fascist-capitalist alliance is more natural/organic than the communist-capitalist one for obvious reasons as fascists seek to control capitalism whereas communism seek to eradicate it. The main reason why many Jewish capitalists supported communists(as the lesser of the two evils) against the fascists is because most fascist movements in Europe(and its crypto-types in the US) happened to be anti-Jewish. But in the case of Israel, we see a very natural alliance of Jewish capitalists and Jewish fascists.

In the US, the most visible 'fascist' elements are anti-Jewish. They are opposed to capitalism to the extent that the current incarnation is 'woke', but they are not anti-capitalism per se. If capitalism were pro-fascist, most fascists would be okay with it. In contrast, communism is intrinsically opposed to capitalism for what it is. So, we'd expect capitalists to prefer fascists over communism.
In a similar vein, communists in the US should be more anti-capitalist than anti-fascist. After all, communism emerged BEFORE fascism as a war against capitalism. Classic Communism even argued that fascism is just a tool of capitalism. In other words, capitalism is the ROOT of fascism: the hammer used by capitalists to beat down workers and prevent communist revolution: No capitalism, no fascism. Then, the communists should be mainly attacking the capitalists as the very source of fascism, a mere manifestation of capitalism. But Antifa and other supposedly radical leftist elements have been mostly serving the all-powerful capitalists in their hunt for mostly imaginary 'nazis' and KKK. If Antifa and such types are communist or radical leftist, why do they overlook the real and growing power of their core ideological enemy, the capitalists, while chasing after Nazi or KKK unicorns? And if Antifa and communists are the main ideological enemies of capitalism, why is US capitalism either supportive or at least tolerant of them against the 'fascists' who would welcome an alliance with capitalists as long as they aren't 'woke' or anti-white?

It's because identity trumps ideology. Just like Hollywood capitalist Jews protected and used Hollywood Jewish communists, Jewish capitalists and Jewish handlers of Antifa see eye to eye on the main threat to Jewish Power: White Liberation and White Agency. In Israel, Jews have no need for Antifa and the like. Over the years, the Jewish Left has been losing ground in Israel because Jews there face no threat from the Goy Right. Thus, Jewish capitalists are better off promoting Jewish fascists. But 'fascism' in the West is dominated by goyim who tend to have hostile views toward Jews. So, Jewish capitalists must clamp down on 'fascism' in the West by supporting the 'communists'. (But Jews will then support 'fascists' in Ukraine against Russian interests. Jewish power does indeed play it by ear.) And as Antifa has been infiltrated and guided by Jewish agents, its main agenda is always to batter down any vestige of white identity or white liberation in the name of fighting 'nazism' and KKK when, in fact, it's to keep whites cucked and servile to Jewish Power.

Via ADL as intermediary, the US police force has been trained by Israeli agents who've mastered the science of crowd control.

Now, one may ask why goy capitalists in the US, even conservative ones, are tolerant of Antifa and the 'radical left' while always virtue-signaling against any sign of white identity or interests as 'Nazi', 'KKK', or 'white supremacist'? Why aren't they like the German Conservative Oligarchs who supported the National Socialists? It's because, since the end of WWII, Jews-Blacks-Homos have become the holy trinity of the West. Shoah-MLK-GloboHomo are so revered in the West that even goy rich go along, sincerely or cynically. Just like there was a time when one had to be Christian to gain prominent positions in European society — the main reason why certain Jews converted to Christianity — , anyone who wants to be someone in the neo-'spiritual' order must profess fidelity to the Holy Three of Jews, Negroes, and Homos. Also, as whiteness is the New Devil of the West, even goy conservative capitalists dare not touch it with a ten foot pole.

The Irony of Jewish Moral Outrage and the Axis of Jewish Neurosis

It's all very ironic.

Zionists make so much noise about Iran(and North Korea) having the Bomb. They say everything must be done to stop Iran getting nukes. An EVIL REGIME or ROGUE NATION like Iran doesn't deserve to have the Bomb.

Well, the ironies...

1. Due to the continuing Occupation of West Bank(and building of new settlements with full approval of the US), much of the world sees Israel as the Rogue Nation. Israel has nukes, lots of them. And if any nation has been acting 'rogue' around the world, it is the US, usually at the behest of Zionists and globalists. It's amusing that the US should be accusing Syria of torture and human rights violations. Yes, the Syrian government has carried out torture, but the US did Abu Gharib. US also used extensive torture in the 'war on terror'(and has aided Jihadi terrorist elements in Syria and is still shielding such groups). And Israeli torture of Palestinians has long been documented even though Israel insists the practice has been ended.

2. Jews have often said that Apartheid South Africa was the worst nation in the world since end of WWII, but Jews overlook the inconvenient fact that its main ally was Israel(which currently enforces apartheid policies in West Bank). Also, Israel supplied South African with Atom Bomb Technology. Imagine that. Jews, who say rogue nation Iran must NOT have the Bomb, once looked the other way while Israel was funneling nuke secrets to South Africa.

3. The most closely guarded secret in the early part of the Cold War was the Bomb. In the beginning, the US was the ONLY nuclear power. Stalin desperately sought the Bomb, and he finally got it through a pro-Soviet espionage network with lots of radical Jews. Among the key players were Julius Rosenberg and Morton Sobell. So, Josef Stalin, one of the biggest killers and tyrants of the 20th century, got the Bomb thanks to certain key Jewish figures.

https://newrepublic.com/article/61271/red-dusk

When the extent of radical Jewish involvement in Soviet espionage became undeniable, the Jews in the media and academia went into hyper-drive and put the anti-communists on the ethical defensive by framing the Cold War in terms of 'Red Scare', 'right-wing fear-mongering', 'paranoid style of American politics', and etc. That way, the attention was diverted from the fact of REAL JEWISH INVOLVEMENT in espionage and the passing of nuclear secrets to the USSR. Liberal and even Conservative Jews closed ranks with leftist Jews who had betrayed the US and aided/abetted a mass killer and tyrant(whose empire stretched over all of Eastern Europe) in the worst possible way.

4. We are now living in the post-Cold-War age when Russia wants peace with the world. It has no ideology for World Revolution. And yet, Jews fear the current much-diminished Russia more than the Soviet Union of the Cold War era. Why? Because Russia is for limited national sovereignty for itself and, as such, serves as a model for other nations that also want emancipation from Jew-dominated globalism.
Why would Jews fear a Russia whose ambition is far more limited and restrained than during the Cold War? Paradoxically, limited Russian nationalism is more threatening than boundless Soviet expansionism to the Empire of Judea(or EOJ) because nationalism is the most potent force against imperialism and empire-building. Jewish power is globalist-imperialist, and Jews fear that Russian nationalism might inspire nationalism among many peoples around the world.
Current Russian 'ideology' simply amounts to Russian control over Russia. If Russia minds its own business and respects(and even supports) the sovereignty of other nations, why should Jews feel so threatened(especially when Russia has good relations with Israel)? What is wrong with each nation minding its own business and protecting(than projecting) its own national interests?
It is because national sovereignty is the most effective barrier against Jewish Globo-Homo intervention, penetration, subversion, and inversion-of-values. After all, Jewish Power is globo-hegemonist, not nationalist(except in Israel).

The current Russian example doesn't say all nations should be like Russia. During the Cold War, the Russians-as-universal-Soviets championed the Soviet model as the correct one for the entire world. Not surprisingly, many peoples around the world resisted and rejected this model(even though some peoples aspired to emulate it, usually with dire results). So, international communist revolution was bound to fail. But the current Russian-ism is not universalist(as in 'all nations should adopt the Russian model') but particularist(as in 'each nation should define its own interests and future'). Under the nationalist logic, Iran should be Iran and preserve Iran-ism. China should be China and preserve China-ism. Hungary should be Hungary and support Hungary-ism. Real blood-and-soil ideology is the best formula. It certainly works for Israel(if we subtract the problems in West Bank where Jews violate the blood-and-soil principles of remaining Palestinian territories).

People who associate Nazi evil with 'blood and soil' totally miss the point. National Socialist Germany had a sound policy with blood-and-soil. It simply meant Germany for Germans and unification of German peoples on German soil. Hitler initially took back Rhineland, part of Germany. Then, Germany united with Austria as both nations wanted it that way. They were both German peoples. And then, Hitler took Sudetenland because it was mostly German. This blood-and-soil part of National Socialism was sensible and led to greater stability in Europe. But then, Hitler began to violate the blood-and-soil principles of other nations: Czech Republic, Poland, and most fatally, Russia. And if any force rolled back Nazi imperialism(as well as Japanese imperialism and then, after WWII, French imperialism and British imperialism), it was the blood-and-soil nationalism of the native folks. Poles resisted the Germans to save their blood-and-soil nation. Russians drove back the Germans for blood-and-soil Mother Russia. Chinese resisted the Japanese based on blood-and-soil defense of China. And then, Asian, Arab, and African nations began to roll back Western Imperialism on blood-and-soil principles. So, true blood-and-soil nationalism has meant defense and preservation of one's own nation.

If anything, it is imperialism and globalism that violate the blood-and-soil principle of each nation. Hungary isn't trying to push Hungary-ism on the world. All it is saying is that Hungarians have a blood-and-soil right to their own nation. But globalist Jews say NO, your nation must be swamped with endless waves of African and Muslim 'refugees' and immigrant-invaders, and you must encourage Hungarian wombs to be colonized by seeds of non-white men, especially black Africans. So, Hungarian wombs should belong to invading races and produce kids for them than produce Hungarian kids. Invasivism is at the heart of the Globo-Homo-Zio Soros Project(that is now sold as the European Project). Globalism is for Womb Colonization, like what Spanish did to native wombs in South America on a massive scale.

Now, NO Jew would push such a policy on Israel, which by the way takes in ZERO 'Syrian' or other kinds of refugees. Jews support the blood-and-soil concept of Israel as sacred, but they denounce any blood-and-soil nationalism of non-Jewish country(even when totally defensive) as 'ugly' and 'far right'.

Now, why do Jews hate national sovereignty except in Israel? Because, with the exception of Israel, Jewish power around the world is held by minority-elites. Jewish power is 'mino-cratic' outside Israel: Rule by Minority. And for Jews to maintain their supremacism over other nations, they must deactivate nationalism, deracinate native goy identity, and promote globalism(essentially dominated by Jews and their proxies homosexuals) as the highest good. So, if you're Swedish, put Swedish ethnicity and heritage in the back-burner, and instead, wave the 'rainbow' flag in delirious worship of homos & trannies and, better yet, reject white men and instead offer your wombs to black men and have black babies.(If you refuse, you're a 'nazi' and 'racist'.) To understand this dynamics, look at the fate of George Soros in nations that restored national sovereignty. His power has been reduced or blocked. They've had enough of his penetrative, disruptive, and subversive acts masked by NGO's tagged with bogus labels of 'freedom', 'democracy', and 'human rights'. In fact, it's just globo-oligarchic greed and power-lust hiding behind nice-sounding cliches. Soros has a much easier time gaming and taking over nations without sovereignty and autonomy. But he's pushed back in nations with blood-and-soil defensive nationalism.

Anyway, the irony screams at us. Jews, who'd been most responsible for passing atomic secrets to one of the biggest killers and tyrants of the 20th century(Stalin), are now making the biggest stink about Iran and the Bomb. Also, these very Jews are freaking out about Russia when Russia no longer pushes World Revolution and global domination. Jewish Logic is incredible.
According to Jewish Logic, when Jews gave nuke secrets to Stalin the mass-killer during the height of the Cold War, it was the anti-communists who were extreme, ignorant, rabid, virulent, paranoid, fear-mongering, and crazy. (Robert Oppenheimer, a communist-sympathizer, who wanted to share US atomic secrets with his beloved USSR came to be portrayed as a saintly dissident for world peace.) But now, when the Soviet Empire is no more and Russia is ruled by a mild nationalist who upholds national sovereignty as a model for all nations, Jews are freaking out, frothing at the mouth, screaming about Russian hacking & interference, and Russian aggression. Such reaction is supposedly 'rational discourse'.
But where is the evidence of Russian aggression? Did Russia invade Iraq? Did Russia level Libya? Did Russia foment the coup d'etat in Ukraine? (Russia annexed Crimea only in retaliation of US-engineered coup, but then Crimea has historically been part of Russia.) Are Russian tanks encircling the US from Canada and Mexico? It's the Jew-run US that pushed NATO up to the Russian border and mobilized soldiers and tanks into Poland and Estonia. It's the US that used Neo-Nazis in Ukraine to pull off the coup. It's the US that cooked up lies to destroy Iraq and Libya. It is the US that worked with Saudis and Turks to aid crazy Jihadis against secular Assad who protects Arab Christians in Syria. The saying, "Jew screams in pain as he strikes you" is most apt here.

The real problem for the world is the Axis of Neurosis, mostly Jewish. The world is on the precipice of another war because of Jewish neurosis of globalist domination and hegemony. The notion that each nation should be autonomous and sovereign is anathema to Jews who see gentile nationalism as a barrier to Jewish financial, ideological, and military penetration and takeover. Of course, much of this is done with bribery. With immense wealth, Jews try to buy off the elites of every nation to collaborate with globalism than defend one's own nation. It's no wonder so many nations wave the homo flag. Want a good trade deal with the US? You have to let US imperialists plant the homo victory flag in your country. Carrots & Bribes OR Sticks & Sanctions(or even Bombs).

It makes no sense for the whole world to revolve around the Axis of Jewish Neurosis that demands that all nations bow down to Jewish supremacist interests over their own national identity and interests. Jews denounce true nationalism as 'blood and soil' so as to associate it with Nazism, but this is disingenuous because the best thing about National Socialism was blood-and-soil nationalism up to 1939, and the WORST thing about Nazism was its imperialist violation of the blood-and-soil of other nations. If National Socialist Germany had been true to the principles of blood-and-soil, it would have united only German peoples in German lands -- just like Israel sought to unite Jews from around the world in Israel. In the end, both Germans and Jews failed because they went from nationalism to imperialism. Hitler wanted more than German lands, and Jews grabbed West Bank in 1967 and never let it go. Worse, via the US(which came under total Jewish power under Clinton), the Zionists have been exerting their hegemonic ambitions all over Middle East and North Africa, causing so much havoc as a result.

Nationalism is blood-and-soil. Imperialism is a bloody takeover of other people's soils. It was when Hitler moved into imperialist mode that his project was doomed. His aggression awoke blood-and-soil rage in other nations that refused to live under the German heel. When Bismarck unified Germany, his goal was to forge German peoples in German areas into one nation. He wasn't interested in violating the blood-and-soil of other peoples; he advised the Kaiser against emulating the French and British imperialists in grabbing other parts of the world that belonged to other peoples. If Hitler had kept his nationalism on the Bismarckian level, WWII would have been avoided.

In our world, 'Russianism' means every nation should preserve itself and be itself. It doesn't mean all nations should be like Russia or imitate Russian values. It means, "just as Russia preserves Russian-ness, other nations should preserve their own unique identities and heritages." THIS is what most threatens Jewish globalists because the rise of non-Jewish nationalism in each nation means more barriers to Jewish penetration and takeover(not least with the proxies of homosexual globalists who seek to plant the homo-globo victory flag in every nation; also, when homos take over the culture of a nation, they promote the ideal of the pansy-wussy male, which undermines national masculinity that serves as bulwark against foreign threats. Europe, having been wussified, cannot even defend itself from US bullying and Muslim/African invasions. Jews want it this way).

The Dirty Canard of Conflating Blood-and-Soil with Nazism

One of the biggest canards in the current discourse(approaching hysteria, or hyscourse) is that Blood and Soil is about Nazism.

If Nazism was really about Blood and Soil, there wouldn't have been WWII. Germans would have been proud and content to be German in their own beloved nation-state. And there would have been peace with other nations. The very notion of Blood and Soil didn't begin with Nazis. It goes back to the 19th century when Modern Germany was coming into being under the leadership of Bismarck. And blood-and-soil was a sound formula for creating a nation. The idea was that Modern Germany should incorporate territories populated by German peoples. It meant Germany should lay claim to German territories, no more and no less. Granted, it didn't work out perfectly as some Germans remained in non-German lands and Germany had some non-Germans, but the core vision was valid on moral, political, and pragmatic grounds. It was nationalist, not imperialist. Blood and Soil meant Germans of shared blood should unite German territories. It didn't make claims on Spain, Italy, Balkans, Greece, Russia, and etc.

If anything, the troubles that set off WWI, the Great War, began in Austro-Hungarian Empire that dismissed the blood-and-soil guidelines. In the end, the troublesome Diversity made it more like bloods-and-the-crips.
As Austro-Germans ruled over different peoples, there was a lot of resentment and hostility(that went both ways). It was hardly surprising that Hitler was the product of Austria than Prussia.

Blood-and-Soil is a great idea. When practiced by the Japanese, there was peace with Asian neighbors. But as a new imperialist power, Japan invaded China. In other words, Japanese imperialists violated the principle of blood-and-soil by invading and colonizing other nations. Chinese anger boiled over, and Asia blew up. And what were the Chinese fighting for? Why did the KMT and CCP, though bitter political foes, come together? Because despite their ideological differences, they were united in the blood-and-soil patriotism of China for Chinese.
And the great postwar anti-imperialist struggles were all about blood-and-soil. Kenyans and Indians told the British to go home. Algerians and Vietnamese told the French to do likewise. Indonesians told the Dutch to get lost. Granted, some of these new nations were the inorganic geographic creations of European imperialism beset with problems of diversity, but they all wanted the European imperialists to go home. And both the US and USSR, as supporters of national liberation and anti-imperialism, appealed to the Third World. Indeed, the US accused the USSR of crushing the nationalist dreams of Hungarians. And the USSR accused the US of imperialism against the Vietnamese patriots.

So, the universal consensus was that the Third World peoples have a right to organize their own nations on the basis of blood-and-soil. And as the European imperialists returned home, they were also back into the blood-and-soil mode. And this was great template for world stability and peace.

The idea of fatherland and folk is nationalist. Even though Nazis invoked those concepts, Germany was not not destroyed by them nor were other nations invaded & destroyed in their name. Those concepts were not the basis for the wars, invasions, and genocide.
When Hitler was taking back Rhineland, it only seemed right. It was Germans reclaiming a part of Germany. When Austro-Germans wanted to unite with Germany, it was Germans unifying with ethnic Germans, and the vast majority of Austrians supported it. When Germans gained control of German-heavy Sudetenland, the world could see justice in that. The problem began when Hitler got crazy with ambitions beyond the fatherland and was no longer content with being fuhrer of his folk. He wanted the fatherland to rape the motherlands of other nations. And his empire would rule over other folks who were not German and had their own identities and heritages.

The association of WWII with nationalism and blood-and-soil is a canard that must end. If anything, Nazis were defeated by the true nationalism of other nations. All resistances to Nazism were essentially nationalist. Czechs wanted to be free again. Poles hated German rule. Russians feared being wiped out and losing motherland forever. This was a time when even the left was fiercely nationalist.

In Poland, the resistance was mostly right-wing because the rightist government refused to collaborate with Germans. Germany invaded Poland, and then leftist Soviets invaded too. So, the Polish Right became the main patriotic fighters. But in other nations, the right-wing regimes collaborated with Germany, and so, the resistance was bound to come from the Left. But even this Left that gained power after WWII was essentially nationalist, especially after suspected Internationalist-Zionists were purged in the late 40s and 50s.

This attack on blood-and-soil is ironic because the detractors, mainly Jewish, are totally for blood and soil in Israel. Zionism is about blood-and-soil. To emigrate to Israel, one has to be of Jewish blood. And Israel has pro-Jewish natal policies. And Jews wanted to reclaim that piece of territory because it's holy to them on grounds of history and religion.

So, why do Jews, who zealously support blood-and-soil in Israel, oppose it so rabidly and virulently when it comes to gentile nations? Consider the sheer hatred and hostility directed at Poland and Hungary for their simple insistence that Poland belongs to Poles and Hungary belongs to Hungarians. Now, who, in his right mind, thinks that such blood-and-soil sentiments are going to lead to WWIII and massive genocides? I mean seriously.
 It was imperialism and universalism that led to wars and conquests. Imperialists wanted to rule over other peoples to exploit resources and expand their own power. Universalists like communists wanted to spread the radical fire all over the world. Soviet Union was an empire based on a universal idea. Who grieves its passing from history?
The breakup of the Soviet Empire was all about blood-and-soil. Non-Russians got weary of living under the Great Russian yoke. And didn't the US praise the fall of the Soviet empire and the rise of new national republics?

So, why this hostility to blood-and-soil when Jews love it for Israel. Not only do they support it themselves but demand that all goyim in US, EU, Canada, and Australia also support the Right of Israel to survive as a Jewish State.

Of course, we know why. It's not because Jews fear another Shoah or WWIII. It's because they are now the great imperialist power in the world via networks of finance, media, academia, entertainment, and deep state and their control of US as superpower. So, even as Jews love blood-and-soil for Israel, they see such as a barrier and obstacle for Jewish-globalist penetration and takeover in other nations. Deep in their hearts, Jews feel that they, as the smarter and prouder people, should have elite control of other nations, especially in the White World.

WWII turned uglier and uglier because of Hitler's imperialist and ultimately genocidal Lebensraum idea. German ambition to rule over non-Germans set Europe on fire and led to the massive conflagration.
Today, if any power is acting Nazi-like, it's Jewish globalism. Why can't Jews see this? Are they so morally full of themselves as Eternal Victims of the Holocaust that they've become blind to their own evil? Are they so power-hungry that they've become nihilistic and amoral?

Let's look at recent history. Was blood-and-soil the basis of the terrible economic Rape of Russia in the 90s? Was blood-and-soil the basis of wars in Iraq, Libya, and Syria? (As I recall, 'no blood for oil' was closer to the truth.)

No, if those nations had maintained their sovereignty, the ensuing tragedies could have been avoided. It was globalist imperialism, disproportionately controlled by Jewish elements, that led to one disaster after another. Disasters that destroyed millions of lives.

Now, it's somewhat understandable why Jews want America to be a world power than a mere nation. The Jewish Narrative says Jews were helpless under the Nazis because the world wouldn't do anything to defeat the evil Nazis. So, 'isolationist' America First meant Americans minding their own business while the Nazi empire expanded over Europe and hunted down Jews. (But then, Jews never insisted that the US must do something to save Ukrainians from Stalin or Armenians from the Turks. And I can't imagine Jewish parents sacrificing their sons to fight in wars to save OTHER peoples. Indeed, isn't it telling that so many American Jews would rather serve in the IDF than in the US military? If they must kill or die, it's for Israel.) So, the Nazi Empire could only be defeated by other empires. If US remained in nationalist mode, it might not meddle in world affairs and do something about the evil Nazis. Only in empire-mode would the US act as a hegemon and take on other empires, such as that of Nazi Germany. And indeed, it was the rise of US as a military-industrial empire that allied with the USSR to defeat Nazi Germany.
But Jews are overlooking one crucial point. Germany became dangerous not because of its blood-and-soil or fatherland/folk mentality. It was the shift to imperialist mode that turned Germany from a nation to an empire. So, even if it's true that Imperial US defeated Nazi Germany, it was not a war on German nationalism but on German imperialism. In other words, if Germans had remained in nationalist mode, there never would have been a need for the the clash of empires to set things straight. Furthermore, the US had to revive German nationalism to some degree in the postwar era to push back against Soviet imperial power.
Also, what got Americans into the war? It was nationalist passion, not imperial ambition. Americans got riled up with patriotic fervor only when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor.
After the war, if not for the Cold War, most Americans would have preferred return to nationalist America where 'business of America is business'. It was the Cold War that transformed the US into an Empire, so much so that even after the Cold War, the US kept cooking up new rationales to keep Empire Inc. going. And what has this led to? Disasters in Korea and Vietnam. Bad blood with Iran and Central America. Big headaches in Latin America. And total disaster in the Middle East. A crazy 'new cold war' with Russia that would make no sense but for the egotism of a certain ethnic group and gluttony of the War State.
Sometimes, "you are what you defeat".
The great irony is the America that moved into empire mode to defeat the Three Evil Empires of Japanese Militarism, Nazism, and Soviet Communism ended up becoming intoxicated with its own power. And especially when Jews became the new ruling elites and couldn't resist riding the Iron Horse of America to run roughshod over the world, America in the 21st century became, sad to say, an Evil Nation, or worse, an Evil Empire. When the Cold War ended under the tutelage of two great men, Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev, it could have been the dawning of a great era. But America, which had reluctantly moved into imperial mode to defeat or contain the Evil Empires, gloated in its triumph and began to see the entire world as its backyard. It went from seeing empire as a necessary evil to an essential feature of Americanism. America became what it defeated. And people like John Kerry and Hillary? Counterculture became The Man.

Anyway, while we can understand why Jews see the American Empire as the essential savior of Jews from both Nazis and ultimately the Soviets(who turned against Zionism) -- a more complicated matter because so many Jews had been initially pro-Soviet and against the Anglo-Right-wing 'paranoia' that set off the Cold War against the USSR, the great power that defeated the Nazis, until they realized that mediocritist communism doesn't do much for Jews -- , it's foolish to analyze the present and future based on past realities. Jews no longer need America to save Jews from horrors around the world. Despite Neocon scare-mongering, the world is not full of 'new hitlers' and 'new stalins', and even if such exist, Jews are not in their harm's way.

Jews are now addicted to America-as-empire to gain dominance over other peoples. And if so many gentiles, especially Muslims, get mangled and slaughtered due to American aggression, Jews don't care. And if many Russians are harmed by sanctions, again, no concern among Jews. 'Save Soviet Jews' was somewhat understandable due to blatant discrimination against Jews and also because there wasn't much freedom for anyone in the communist system. But Jews have it so nice in the Current Russia where Putin goes out of his way to ensure the well-being of the Jewish community. So, why is there more hostility against Russia today than in the past? Because Jews are no longer worried about survival. They are addicted to power like crack or cocaine. They want the American Empire not as a stretcher to save Jews but as a hammer to threaten or crush any nation or people standing in the way of Jewish hegemony.

Trumpism, if not so much Trump(who keeps shape-shifting), is about America as a nation than empire. Considering that both Germany and Japan become most dangerous as empires than as nations, it would seem that the lesson of WWII is that a nation should take care of itself, mind its own business, and meddle less in other nations.

Also, if it's wrong to invade and colonize other nations, it's worse to allow the invasion of one's own nation. This massive immigration-invasion wasn't wanted by the American people. It was imposed from above as decree. When people rejected the invasion by votes, the elites used the power of courts run by whores of globalism and commissars of PC.
SOME non-white immigrants add to the color of a nation. But TOO MANY is a full-blown invasion. It's like SOME Jewish settlers in Palestine made the place more interesting. But TOO MANY Jews turned Palestinians into People 1.0 to be replaced by People 2.0. If it was tragic for Palestine, why wouldn't it be for Europe and America? And I don't want to hear this stuff about America being different because it was founded as a proposition. If so, why are the globalists pushing the SAME PLAN on Europe and even Japan? But not on Israel?

The lesson of WWII is that Germans failed morally & politically and committed great horrors because they betrayed the ideal of blood-and-soil, of fatherland and folk. They should have minded their own business in their own blood-and-soil nation. Instead, they stole the soils of other people and bloodied them all over.

Gee, I wonder which nation acts like that today? Poland? Hungary? Iran? Which nation could that be? And who are the ruling elites of that nation?