Jewish Power controls not only White Minds but White SOULS — Soul Control is far more powerful than Mind Control — INVISIBLE MAN(2020) is a Prime Example of INVERSION NARRATIVE under the domination of Jewish Supremacism

Jean-Luc Godard spoke of the Generation of Marx and Coca-Cola. Now, it's the generation of BLM and Fried Chicken.

White bodies seek refuge from black violence and pathology, but white minds are affected by the Jewish-dominated Narrative that pushes the Inverse of Reality. Worse, white souls have been poisoned with Jungle Faith, which is downstream from Jungle Fever. When white minds receive false information, that isn't as fatal as the mind is a rational faculty that uses facts and logic. So, if white minds marred with false info are confronted with facts and data, they may come around to the truth. For example, if you believe margarine is good for you but are presented with evidence otherwise, you may well change your mind. But when white SOULS are poisoned with falsehood, it is difficult to change the hearts of such whites. It's like no amount of factual info about beef will convince a Hindu that it's okay to consume meat derived from cows because the Asian-Indian soul, as opposed to his mind, feels that cows are 'sacred'. Same goes for pork. No amount of nutritional information about pork will convince Muslims and Orthodox Jews that it's okay to eat pig-meat. Their soul-sense is repulsed by pork as SPIRITUALLY dirty. (The real reason not to eat pork is pigs are smarter than dogs and, as such, are our brothers and sisters.) The soul-sphere transcends reason or operates in the area of sub-reason. It's more about dreams and faith than facts and logic. This is why Jewish Power relies so much on sensory-driven propaganda, much like the Catholic Church with its iconography and music. If Jewish Power were to engage only the white mind, the faculty of facts and logic, it could lose control IF the white mind were presented with counter-Narrative facts. And that'd be doable as the Jewish-controlled Narrative is based on lies about history, biology, race differences, and so many things. This is why Jews feel they must go past the white mind and infect the white soul, the nether-region that is impervious to reason, facts and logic. It's like a truly devout religious person, no matter how well-educated and knowledgeable of science, still clings to God. It's a matter of faith and holiness, and as such, rejection of God would be tantamount to sacrilege. Of course, some religious folks overcome this and do become atheist or at least agnostic. But, it's an agonizing process to reject or let go of something so emotionally and spiritually important to oneself. Still, given the impact(of depth and meaning) that faith once had, the chances are the newly irreligious person still craves for something else to fill the void. It's no wonder that so-called atheists are so eager to latch onto some secular cult like Globo-Homo, Save-the-Planet, 'Muh Israel', or Magic Negro.

The recent BLM lunacy has demonstrated how deep the Jewish Power has sunk its fangs into the white soul and injected it with pseudo-spiritual venom. So many whites seem quasi-religious about BLM as Tucker Carlson pointed out. Despite(or precisely because of) higher education(much of which is PC indoctrination), some of the best-educated(or indoctrinated) white people are the most devout followers of 'wokeness'. Education didn't make them more factual or logical but made them more dogmatic of PC and idolatrous of certain groups, especially Jews, Homos, & Negroes. It's like the secular religion of Marxism produced generations of dogmatists than critical thinkers(despite Marxism being touted as 'scientific materialism'; it was more like spiritual materialism). It is because so many whites have been affected in the soul-region that they seem utterly unperturbed by facts such as Fentanyl Floyd most likely died of drug overdose, white cops are NOT committing genocide on blacks, most blacks are killed by other blacks, blacks are the biggest thugs & destroyers of American society, Liberals are hypocrites because they don't care about all the Arabs & Muslims killed by Wars for Israel — there's no PLM or Palestinian Lives Matter — , Jews control the media and spread endless lies, black pathology is the product of evolution that made blacks more muscular and more aggressive, and etc.
If Jews had affected only white minds, truth would win out sooner than later as the faculty of facts and logic prefers correction over falsehood. But when white souls come under Jewish control, it is far more difficult to bring them to sense. When someone is lost to a cult(Manson Family or Jim-Jones-town), it's hard to pull him out because he or she believes on the soulful level, even if demonic. His faith/commitment, no matter how loony, has become sacred to him. This is why sane discussion about the Shoah is near-impossible. It's very likely that the 6 million number is bogus, and the number could be half that. But so many people have been instilled with Shoah-Worship that anything less than 6 million is Denial, akin to rejection of the holy spirit, or holy number. It's more numerology than statistics. (But then, there is a Denier Cult that won't accept anything other than "Handful of Jews died of typhus and, if anything, Nazis were trying to save Jewish lives.")

In the end, idolatry and iconography win out over ideology among most people. Most Christians were more about idolizing Jesus than following His teachings. Jesus told people to love their enemies, forgive, and be humble. But your average Christian was willing to hate, torture, and murder anyone who blasphemed. The theme of SILENCE by Shusaku Endo(made into film by Martin Scorsese) is the choice between Jesus as Icon and Idea. What is worse? To desecrate the image of Jesus or to disobey His teachings? If Jesus was willing to sacrifice His body for mankind, is it okay to let mankind be tormented so as not to defile the image of Jesus? For many Christians, the teachings of Jesus were secondary to Jesus as the iconic King of Kings. They never would have dared to insult Jesus or desecrate His image, but they were more than willing to disobey His teachings and slaughter millions for whatever reason, especially if the mission or crusade was said to be in His name. So, Jesus was more a sacred war banner than the teacher of mankind.
And such mentality was bigger among Catholics because they put such great emphasis on iconography and spectacle. In contrast, Protestantism suppressed sensory manipulation and focused on the meaning, and that may have been why there was more moral progress and advancement of conscience in Northern Europe. In the South, you could act like a lout but then perform certain rituals before certain icons, and you felt cleansed. In the Protestant North, you had to wrestle deeper with your demons; you couldn't just put on a clean shirt without showering to remove the filth from your own body. But even so, when push came to shove, the North was also about using Jesus as poster-child for Power and Aggression.

How did the Church reach out to souls? Oratory, spectacle, music, rites & rituals, iconography, and narrative. Oratory is different from discourse or dialogue. A man of charisma speaks to spellbind and gain power over other souls. Spectacles are meant to be magnificent, awesome, and overpowering. They override reason and sense of proportionality. Music obliterates facts and logic. Even a secular person can be deeply moved by Bach; even an anti-communist has to admit the Internationale and Soviet Anthem are powerful stuff; even Jews have to admit Richard Wagner was one helluva of composer; even people with distaste for youth culture had to admit Beatles were driving teenyboppers crazy. Rites and rituals, by their very repetition, remind people of what is most deserving of attention or affection. It's like birthday parties, Christmas, and Easter(that goes ignored by Google Jews who prefer 'Pride Month' as new easter or beaster). Globo-homo is celebrated yearly, even monthly. There is blackness this, blackness that. People generally tend to forget unless they are reminded over and over and over. This is why Jews have turned Holocaust Remembrance into a ritual with more TV shows, movies, educational programs, speeches, and reminders that there are Neo-Nazis just around the corner. Iconography and the more vulgar idolatry sensationalize and amplify certain images and figures over all others. They become shared images, much like statues of gods in Greco-Roman times. The Narrative is less a factual telling of events than a selective hagiography devised to idolize certain figures and groups at the expense of others who are dehumanized or vilified. The Bible is the greatest of its kind. There is a good deal of history there but skewed in favor of the Jewish Story over those of all other tribes who are often presented as villains, monsters, or scum who deserved to be rubbed off the face of the Earth; and many Jewish holidays celebrate the extermination of goyim. Most authorized biographies are hagiographic narratives. And of course, most official biographies of world leaders are Narratives than true histories. Even if everything in the Narrative is a verifiable fact, it's been selected and connected(often speciously) with other facts to create an idealized impression. But, more often than not, the facts are padded with falsehoods. Jews have such power in the West that they were able to take a total lie, the Russian Collusion Hoax, and float it as the dominant narrative for 3 years of Trump presidency. And the thing is to GET THEM WHILE THEY'RE YOUNG, just like they get you when you're asleep and dreaming in THE INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS. Kids can be made to believe in Santa Claus, and it was easiest for the USSR and Red China to mold the minds of the young. And Adolf Hitler understood this, and there was Hitler Youth. This is why Jewish Power pushes globo-homo, Magic Negro, and KKK monster tropes on white children. There was a time when the Catholic Church had such powers. Even though the Vatican didn't have the military or political prowess to match the power of kingdoms, it had the power of spiritual narrative, and that went a long way to maintain its prestige. It's no wonder why the Catholic Church felt so threatened by the rise of Protestantism. It meant a good chunk of Europe, possibly all of it, may grow independent of the spiritual Narrative Monopoly held by the Catholic Church. Not having political, economic, and military domination over Europe, the power of narrative and iconography was the only things that kept the Vatican relevant.

These days, Hollywood is the new vatican, but then, Jews also control finance, vice industries like gambling(and now pot), news media, tons of retail & real estate, big pharma, and Big Tech. Jews control elite academia that sets the tone for the rest of education, from state universities to community colleges to high schools to grammar schools to kindergartens. And libraries a month ago across the nation had BLM messages on their websites. Jewish Power got it all, which means the Jewish Elites got goy politicians in their pockets like so many nickels and dimes, as Sollozzo the Turk might say. Just about NOTHING gets done without Jewish Approval, and freedom in America is hanging by a thread due to the Constitution which is, for all practical purposes, close to a dead letter. For all the libertarian types who say Big Tech is private enterprise and can censor anyone, what do they have to say about suppression of BDS by the STATE? Also, I thought libertarians understood that monopolies must operate under different rules, especially if monopolies are in bed with the government. In truth, libertarians speak their BS because they're funded and controlled by Jews.


Jewish Power as the new vatican and much more has taken over the SOULS of whites. Paradoxically, Jewish control of white souls means that whites don't have souls. Imagine that. Jewish Power accesses white souls to convince whites that there is mostly hollowness within white hearts and what little exists is mostly 'racism', 'antisemitism', 'misogyny', 'homophobia', 'xenophobia', and etc. Because white souls are so soulless and infected with a variety of evil viruses, the only correct path for whites is to surrender to Jewish holistic healing(really a kind of quackery) that would eradicate evil germs and fill the empty white heart with meaningful convictions such as 'muh Israel', Holocaust-cult, Magic Negro worship, Jungle Fever/Faith, Globo-Homo-mania, and Diversity celebration, all of which are meant to destroy the white race, white identity, white interests, and white survival.
As Jewish Power brainwashes white parents, white parents brainwash their own kids. And in cases where white parents neglect their parental duties, the kids grow up with TV and electronic devices as their substitute parents — besides, Pop Culture is the main culture in the modern world — and come under Jewish programming as Jews control most of entertainment, news, and platforms. As every other kid has a smartphone from a young age, Jewish Power gets them when they're young. Is it any wonder that the duopoly of Google and Apple won't allow services like Gab and Bitchute? Jewish Power knows that the internet has changed the game where anyone can find dissident views, and therefore, Jewish finance and Jewish Big Tech work together to make sure that Jews remain the gatekeepers. And gangster organizations like ADL strong-arm goyim like Jeff Bezos, Jack Dorsey, and Tim Cook to follow suit. And of course, politicians of both parties do NOTHING as they're nothing but Jewpets, or the teacher's pets of Jewish Power.


This is why it's so difficult to approach so many white people with facts and logic. Jewish Power has gotten hold of something deeper than their minds. Jewish Power has accessed their souls and instilled them with 'woke' cults and 'white guilt'. Just like Christians are deeply moved by the Passion of the Christ, so many white people FEEL the Passion of White Guilt about Holy Homos, Sacred Jews, and Magic Negroes. It's no wonder whites set up shrines to George Floyd in Minneapolis. And even sucker-soccer-moms were bawling about St. George, and many of these women are atheists or agnostics. Even though the Narrative on Michael Brown(of Ferguson Notoriety) has been exposed as a sham, plenty of people still carry on with the “Hands Up, Don't Shoot” bullshit and with full approval of the Jew-controlled media — but then, white souls infected with Jew Worship are prone to praise and revere Jewishness no matter what Jews do. White Souls infected with faith in Magic Negro cannot properly use their minds as faculty of reason and sense. Even dumbass Donald Trump was eulogizing about Fentanyl Floyd as an angel looking down on us. (Most likely, angels had their knees on his ass and kicked it down to hell but then, I doubt even the devil wants him.) It's like the pod-people in INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS are capable of facts and logic — they have minds equal or superior to humans — , but it doesn't matter. Though seemingly emotionless, they have one overriding passion(to the point of hysteria), and it is to SAVE everyone by turning him or her into a fellow pod person.



A good example of Hollywood-as-new-vatican's Inversion Narrative can be seen in the 2020 movie INVISIBLE MAN. Though its depiction of social-racial dynamics is the exact opposite of reality, it will affect many white people, especially white women, because the power of art/entertainment, especially through a medium as spellbinding as cinema, is so overwhelming. So, never mind actual factual reality and FBI crime stats & all that. What matters is that so many white people sat glued watching the movie with their emotions manipulated by the new vatican's tropes of a white damsel finding liberation and empowerment by killing an evil white man with the support of a Noble Negro. Such sensory manipulation bypasses the white mind and goes right to the white soul and molds the white heart to feel revulsion at white males(as the source of all evil) and idolize black men as the noble defender of white damsels against Evil Whitey.

The movie begins with a white woman fleeing a rich guy's mansion. This rich guy is like a arch-comic-book villain. He has invisible-man-suit-technology. The white woman just barely flees from his clutch and finds refuge in the home of a Noble Negro who is also a crime-fighting detective. Now, I'm not one to say that just because blacks commit lots of crime, all black men should be presented as thugs or criminals. There are good black cops who work hard to protect communities, and there are plenty of white male creeps so full of themselves. White men have killed white women, and good black cops have been involved in solving the case. But, INVISIBLE MAN isn't dealing with real-life characters but with archetypes. The villain isn't just a bad individual but the Evil White Male, and the black guy isn't just another cop but Noble Black Man who's there to protect white damsels from Evil White Males. (It's like how Sabrina Rubin Erderly and Jewish Media sensationalized stories about how Evil White Frat Boys are raping white girls, all the while suppressing the truth about white sluts being raped by black gangs. And never mind all the black women raped by black men, and all the brown women raped by brown men; just focus on the White Frat Boy.)
Now, reality is never as simple as ALL WHITE MALES ARE GOOD and ALL BLACK MALES ARE BAD. But, the general truth is that white women are far safer with white men than with black men. White women are far more likely to get hurt in relationships with black men. And there are plenty of black-on-white rapes. Also, white men are more likely to be dependable family men. In the movie, the Evil White Guy is an ultra-narcissist who's too into himself to have a family and kids. He just likes to OWN things. In contrast, the black guy is a wonderful father with his daughter. In reality, so many black men don't raise their kids. So, as archetypes go, INVISIBLE MAN is peddling total BS.

As it turns out, there doesn't seem to be a sexual relationship going on between the white damsel and her black friend, but the message of the movie is White Woman should look to Black Man for protection from White Man, which is like saying a rabbit should look to coyotes for protection from other rabbits. In reality, black thugs intrude into white homes. But in the movie, white guy(in Invisible Suit) is the intruder into the sanctity of the black family and does violence on blacks. At the end(spoilers alert), the white woman uses the Invisible Suit to slit the throat of the Evil White Guy, and then, just right outside the door, she meets with the black guy who makes sure all is well. And she walks toward us with a smile of relief on her face as the Evil White Man has been killed, and she is free. So, the triumph of good in this movie is a white man with a slit throat in his own house and the white woman and black man affirming their bond and friendship right outside the door. And this movie wasn't made by a black guy, as GET OUT was, but by a white guy, Leigh Whannell who seems to be a Australian-Anglo.
Now, why would an Anglo-Australian make a movie that extols the fantasy Noble Negro while vilifying a fellow white guy? Why is he such a worthless cuck-jesuit of the new vatican? It's because the new vatican has infected white souls not only in America but in Canada, Australia, Europe, Asia, Latin America, and etc. White souls now believe there is a hole in their souls and it can only be patched with confessions of 'white guilt' and healing by Noble Negro(when not globo-homo and Jew-worship). If E. Michael Jones pushes Logos Rising, the new vatican pushes Bogus Rising. After generations of such brainwashing by Jews in TV, movies, and academia, we now know why so many whites are so 'woke', brain-dead with political correctness, and soul-feverish with 'white guilt' that seeks expiation by kneeling before Sacred Jews, Holy Homos, and Magic Negroes. And yet, even the Dissident White dutifully puts on Occam's blindfold and, uh gee, wonders why the 'left', 'communists', 'progressives', and etc. are defaming the white race. They look at the puppets but refuse to name the puppet-master, which is Jewish Power.

Commentary on “Mayor Pete Butt-Gig and the Crackup of Christianity”(by Pat Buchanan) – Religions vs Religiosity

https://buchanan.org/blog/mayor-pete-and-the-crackup-of-christianity-136855

In some ways, religiosity is stronger than ever. Indeed, paradoxically enough, the reason for the decline of traditional religions is because they no longer offer the moral high and high ground of religiosity. People are abandoning them not because they are rejecting religiosity but because they can find it or more of it in something else.

Now, religiosity is not the same thing as religion. Religiosity is the state of strong commitment, righteousness, and/or moral outrage. Religiosity can be gotten from anything, even non-religions. Marxists and Maoists were surely riding high on religiosity as they firmly believed that history, humanity, truth, and morality were on their side.

A religion has power only if it retains the element of religiosity. Consider so many religions that have fallen by the wayside. Zoroastrianism for example. Today, it is mostly a matter of scholarly, mystical, and/or theological interest. Almost no one gets worked up over it.
Some people seek out Eastern Mysticism, but it will never gain power because it lacks religiosity. Buddhism, Taoism, and such religions are about peace of mind, the search for the Way, the harmony. This was one reason why the East was less dynamic than the West, the culture of which was driven by Greco-dialectics and Judeo-monolithics. According to the Greeks, if there is A and B, the two must duke it out. Thus, the philosophical and historical pendulum swings violently back and forth, left and right. It causes a lot of friction and even trouble, but it also sets off lots of sparks. If both A and B remain viable, the dialectics continues and keeps shooting off sparks, some of which are destructive, some of which are constructive. But if A or B were to overcome the other or arrive at synthesis, it goes up against a new force: C, D, E, etc. As for Judeo-Monolithics, it says the ONE idea is absolutely true and all the power must be exerted to spread that idea far and wide. This is the core of Western Messianism and puritanism. Greco-dialectics made for dynamism, and Judeo-Monolithics made for commitment, aggression, and expansion. The Crusading or Jihad Mentality.

In contrast, Taoism and Buddhism seek to rise above conflicts. Taoism seeks the Way, or the hidden harmony behind all chaos. It urges people not to involve themselves directly in world conflicts and instead to recede and contemplate with a cup of tea. Buddhism says everything is an illusion, and people should meditate to reach Nirvana and eternal extinction. With such spiritual outlooks, it's no wonder the East was less dynamic(though it allowed for longer stretches of peace and stability, albeit of the repressive kind by today's standards).

Modern religiosity thrives on psycho-cultural legacy of Greco-dialectics and Judeo-monolithics. Pat Buchanan loved politics all his life as a kind of sports. Political season is like sporting season. And so many people see the world in terms of 'we are right, and you are wrong'. Most people don't seek the middle-ground or the Way. They savor the dialectical bloodsports of politics. This owes to the pagan Greco-dialectical tradition. But Greeks and Romans, with their many gods, weren't really into the cult of self-righteousness. Through endless discourse, they believed somethings were more right than others, but they didn't believe there was anything or any people that was the holiest in the world for all eternity. They regarded everything, even the great gods, being in a state of flux.
In contrast, Jews did see the world in absolutist and monomaniacal terms. They weren't just another tribe, but the Tribe, the Chosen, and their God was the only true God, and they were blessed by the true God. So, Jews were filled with sanctimony and (self)righteousness, and this mindset flowed to the West via Christianity. If Greeks politicized conflicts, Christians spiritualized and moralized them. In the Athens vs Sparta conflict, both sides knew that it was all about power, economics, and influence. Sure, each side called on their gods for favors, but it was a conflict of 'mighteous' than righteous. It was dialectical politics. In contrast, infused with the mindset of Judeo-monolithics, Christians saw their conflicts in strongly moral and spiritual terms. So, there was a greater sense of moral outrage in conflicts involving Christians(which is why the US tries to morally justify everything it does around the world, a factor that blinds so many Americans to the true nature of what is really going on). Each side among Christians was totally holier-than-thou, even though many of the wars were triggered by political or economic factors than spiritual or moral ones.
The Thirty Years War was even more destructive and harrowing than the Peloponnesian War because of the sense of spiritual outrage. If Spartans and Athenians were merely seeking political advantage over the other, Catholics and Protestants, armed with Judeo-monolithic moral outrage, was trying to totally crush the other for all time. When Spartans finally won, they let Athens survive. But if either Catholics or Protestants had gained total victory, the losing side would have been totally crushed and rubbed out. But as it happened, the stalemate finally led to some kind of understanding, and the art of Greco-dialectics prevailed over Judeo-monolithics. Catholics and Protestants would have to co-exist in lively conflict and not try to crush the other totally in the spirit of moral/spiritual absolutism.

Why did Christian religion lose its religiosity in the 20th century?

We know the usual suspects. The rise of science undermined religion, especially among the elites. Around the time the US was founded, many of the most intelligent people in both Old World and New World still believed in God, sought meaning in God, attended religious schools, and spread the Gospel. Religion back then had spiritual and moral authority, from top to bottom.
But with the rise of modernity, most intelligent people abandoned religion, and if they did remain religious, it was on the personal level than on moral, spiritual, and social one. With best and brightest eschewing the religious life, the leadership came increasingly from the less intelligent segments of the population. Also, as religious authority lost prestige, fewer men were willing to give up worldly happiness for God. Back when the Catholic Church was like the Harvard of the West, many intelligent men were willing to sacrifice sex and good times to serve God. As priests, they had much respect in society. But when society no longer regarded priests as anything special, what was the point of giving up sex, marriage, and good times? So, an increasing number of priests came from eccentrics, derelicts, perverts, and homos. Some homos sought repentance for their sinful ways by serving God. Other homos figured they would take over the Church and make it 'gay' to serve toot-toota-loop homo vanity.

Mainline churches replaced saving souls with saving the world with good work. But what is 'good work'? As worldly matters and issues were defined by secular forces, Mainline church's idea of 'goodness' came to be defined by academia and media. Then, it's no wonder than Mainline churches now think god is all about the 'gays'. After all, Ivy League, Hollywood, and NYT said so. Evangelicals were more traditionalist and moralistic, but they were dumb, and dummies lose out to smarties. Being dumb and childlike, Evanjellies could easily be manipulated by the Power. It's no wonder so many Evanjellies are into 'muh Israel' and 'Jews are holy' even though Jews despise them and turned the Holy Land into Sodom and Gomorrah. Also, Evanjellies put emotions before dogma. It's all about the FEELS. Then, it is no wonder that homomania is making inroads even among childlike Evanjellies. Also, as most Evanjellies, like Mormons, suffer from inferiority complex of status and class, they tend to suck up to the rich and powerful. Look how Mormons are changing full-steam ahead toward homomania because the rich and powerful now worship it as their main cult. And many Evanjellies are suckers for televangelists whose shtick is 'god made me rich' and 'Jews are great cuz they are so rich'.
As for the Catholic Church, it shot itself in the foot by the reforms of the Second Vatican Council. While some of the reforms were good and necessary, others presented the Church in the position of weakness, especially via Jews and modernity. The main mode was of concession and contrition, and this put the Church on the moral defensive than offensive. Instead of judging the world with the One True Faith, it sought forgiveness from the world. Thus, being a Catholic came with less religiosity and more perplexity.

While people may be drawn to religions for metaphysical or philosophical reasons, religion has power ONLY WHEN it has the element of religiosity. Religious or secular, people are more prone to organize, unite, and rally IF they the run the fever of religiosity. This is why the anti-homo voices tended to come from the religious. There are non-religious people who oppose the homo agenda, but they feel less worked up because they just believe it is wrong, not an affront to God. There are secular people who are anti-abortion, but again, they see it as ugly and wrong, whereas religious people see it as a grave sin. Because of their element of religiosity, the religious often united to push for or against certain issues.

This is what Jews hate about Christian religiosity. (They hate Islamic religiosity too, but at least in the West, they make alliances with Muslims against Christians.) Those armed with religiosity are more likely to leave the house, meet with others, gather together(esp in churches), and protest. Even when people dislike or oppose something, the chances are they are not gonna do anything about it unless they are armed with religiosity. They see it as a personal matter -- "I don't like it" -- than as a grand moral/spiritual one -- "It is an affront to God".
But Jews fear Christianity far less now because it's either been bled of religiosity or infected with neo-religiosity of PC, e.g. all those churches that are now all about Diversity, Globo-Homo, Anti-Whitey, Holy Negro Worship, and Jew-Worship. Catholic Church is no longer a force of religiosity because it's in cucky-wuck apologetic mode. "We are sorry so many of our priests buggered boys". "We are sorry for having aided and abetted imperialism, genocide, etc." "We must fill up Europe with Africans and Muslims because Christians have so much to atone for." There is no moral pride or spiritual authority. It now even has what looks like closet-homo pope, aka the Poop, who says Europe must be Afro-Islamized as fast as possible. Because the Church is still officially opposed to 'gay marriage' and abortion, progs still eye Catholicism with disgusts and trepidation. But because it is so cucked and wussy, traditional Catholics feel nauseous about sticking with the Church. There is hardly any real religiosity found in Catholicism anymore.

But people love religiosity because it's like a drug. It gives them the high of moral sanctimony, the rush of holier-than-thou rage, and a sense of unity with 'history is on our side'. The thing is religiosity can be gotten from anything: Ideology and 'Idology'(or idolatry as ideology).
Those Red Guard lunatics during the Cultural Revolution were surely filled with righteous religiosity. Incidentally, the Cultural Revolution showed that religiosity had little to do with truth and more to do with control of information and indoctrination. After all, Mao's policies had killed tens of millions in the Great Leap Forward. He should have been disgraced forever based on historical facts, but with control of propaganda and the military Mao and his gang were able to instill countless young people with fever of religiosity and set them loose to smash 'class enemies' in ruthless abandon and righteous rage.



It's like no amount of destruction done by Black Savage Reversion, Crazy Jewish Supremacism, and Nutty Homo Perversion has made any real dent in the holiness of those three groups. Given all the black crime and thuggery, one might think Americans would have wised up to the fact that blacks are the crazy savage race, but Jews control the media and they keep rerunning the Emitt Till and MLK narrative over and over. And come Superbowl season, white cucky-wucks are back to worshiping blacks as sports hero demigods. And given what Jewish Power has done to the US in terms of financial distress and foreign Wars for Israel(that created WWII situations in Middle East), you'd think people would have wised up to Jewish power by now. But every year, it's Holocaust this, Holocaust that, and "Jews are eternally holy holocaust people" and "If you notice Jewish power, you're an anti-Semite." So, even 'literally Hitler' Trump spends most of his time with his lips wrapped around Netanyahu's pud. And given the HIV mess caused by deranged homos, you'd think people would have woken up to the danger of homo influence and practice. But Jews(who run the media) 'sacralized' homos in movies, TV shows, and advertising. And Jews associated homos with the 'rainbow', and whore politicians just can't get enough of pontificating about how the New Normal of morality is all about celebrating homo fecal penetration and tranny-penis-cutting.

If Rob punched you but has the megaphone and says that you punched him while he makes himself out to be the poor poor victim, people will side with Rob and denounce you and maybe even punch you. Worse, even people who saw Rob punch you may not come to your aid because Rob's megaphone can attract many more people to his side. Or, even those who witnessed Rob punching you may believe you deserved to be punched because you're a bad person. This is what Jews are doing with 'punch a nazi' meme. They are saying that if Jews, Antifa, or blacks attack whites who happen to be 'nazi', then the righteousness belongs to the puncher because 'nazis' are evil and deserve it. This is how religiosity works. It's not so much about objective definition of right or wrong or legal or illegal. It's about holy vs unholy. It's about blessed vs the wicked. Just like Christians in their hyper-religiosity could be inspired to carry out violent acts against heathens, the PC crowd can be driven to rages of religiosity to attack any people and feel good and righteous about it.

As Jews control academia, media, entertainment, and whore-politicians, they control the levers of religiosity. Academia writes the sacred texts, the canons of officialdom. Media relay them as 'news' and sermons. Entertainment turns certain figures and narratives into idols. And whore-politicians use oratory to push the acceptable narrative.

People are leaving the church and flocking to PC, Homomania, and Afromania because most of the hottest religiosity is now to be found there. PC slogans and chants about 'Diversity' and 'Inclusion' are the new mantras and catechisms. And 'gay rights' became Gay Rites, a neo-religion. There was a time when NO ONE was worked up over homo issues. At most, some supported the legalization of homosexuality because they figured homos were born that way. Also, they figured homos are deserving of individual rights too. It was a legal matter, not a moral one. No one thought there was innately holy about being a homo. No one felt he was holier or more righteous because he was pro-homo.
But Jewish media spun the HIV crisis to make homos out to be victims of something akin to a holocaust even though homos did it to themselves by acting like a bunch of butt-bang-boys in bathhouses. Movies like PHILADELPHIA and BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN made homo lust the highest and most tragic kind of love. Homos were made into saintly icons. Such ploy would have been thought outrageous when the US was more religious and moral, but in Boomer-dominated America of the 1990s and 2000s, it went over with post-religious people and young people raised on degeneracy. Also, as Bush II was such an awful posterboy of the Christian Right, young people turned away from religion. Furthermore, what with religions being so cucked & apologetic while AND homomania got more judgmental & aggressive, young people realized that there was more religiosity points to be found on the holy-homo side than on the religious side. While homomaniacs are passionately and aggressively sure of their cause and position, the Religious Right seemed confused, cowardly, and castrated. As Jews came to dominate the GOP and bought off most top church leaders, NO ONE on the Right mounted any counter-attack against homomania. They kept their heads down like the worthless Rich Lowry lest they offend Jews as allies of holy homos. Also, young people, raised on celebrity culture, were addicted to the cult of the cool. So, what some pop star or famous actor said mattered more to them than what some crusty religious type said. Mormons for one are really a bunch of Mammonites who will sell their mothers down the river for thirty pieces of silver. Look at those worthless piles of shit Mitt Romney and Harry Reid.

Now, it may well be that the current religiosities of PC may blow away. After all, where is Maoist religiosity today? Where is Stalinist fervor? Secular forms of religiosity have short-shelf lives because history proves them wrong. History proved communism wrong. All the icons and altars to Marx and Lenin came to mean nothing to Eastern Europeans with the fall of the Iron Curtain. Hitler, who was once the much revered icon of glory among Germans, has been disgraced. In contrast, God cannot be deposed and may yet win again in the long run. That said, in any given MOMENT in history, those with more religiosity win over those with less. And the fact is religions have lost the fire of religiosity either because people lost faith or because the religions have become cucked and apologetic. There was a time when to become a Christian was to be filled with a sense of salvation, glory, and pride. Now, joining the church means you should kneel before a homo and apologize for the church's 2000 yrs of 'homophobia' against guys like Butt-gigs who thinks dicks-up-my-ass is great because 'god made him gay'. Using such logic, a fatso should take pride in his gluttony since god made him want to pig out like a hippo. And I suppose a drunken Irish can argue that his alcoholism is a wonder to behold because god made him want to hit the bottle.

Ideologies can be full of religiosity because they offer a formula for understanding history and fixing humanity. As such, they are more than mere ideas but a worldview of 'what REALLY happened' and 'what must happen'. It has an element of prophecy, and so, ideologues are armed with religiosity. In time, ideological religiosity may fade as people get tired of the same-old-same-old and/or because the promises don't come true. This was true enough with communism.
Or, even if the ideology does succeed -- such as the Americanist individualist-capitalist ideology -- , it can lose its righteous luster if critiqued endlessly by radicals and subversives. Notice how the very founders and makers of the American nation have been so drastically 'discredited' by Jewish use of PC that now says MLK is the true 'founding father' while all those 'dead white males' were a bunch of hypocrites who owned slaves. (Never mind Jewish bankers funded much of 'white supremacist' imperialism around the world, and Jewish immigrants worked alongside whites to wipe out Indians and enslave & exploit blacks.)
In our increasingly post-literate age or what Christopher Hedges calls the Empire of Illusion, the power of 'idology' or neo-iconography may now matter more than ideology. Why are so many people reverential toward rappers even though all they ever say is 'muh gun', 'muh dick', 'muh bling', 'muh ho', and etc? Because idolatry makes them look cool and badass, and that's enough for neo-worship in our deracinated and degenerate age. But then, because of the narrative and iconography of the Noble Negro as victim of 'white racism', the image of black cool is fused with image of black tragedy, and this makes them even more potent as idols for young people to worship and that means a lot of religiosity points in the 'idolic' worship of the Negro. And of course, nothing is holier to SWPL crowd than the holy holy of the 'rainbow' valley. Compared to that, what does the current Church have to offer except butt-hurt apologetics and "I'm sorry".