Logic of 'Antisemitism' would Indicate Powerful Jews are Most 'Antisemitic' for their Actions Exhibiting Obscene Levels of Jewish Power and Influence

Is Alan Dershowitz an Anti-Semite for saying Jews indeed do possess disproportionate power and influence?

ALAN DERSHOWITZ SAYS JEWS SHOULDN’T APOLOGIZE FOR THEIR POWER

Jewish commentators and social critics often argue that Antisemitic Stereotypes or Tropes never seem to go away. What are their examples of 'Antisemitism'? The perception that Jews control the mass media. The suspicion that Jews control banking and finance. The accusation that Jews have inordinate controls of elite institutions of society and abused their power to make the US fight Wars for Israel. The impression that Jews are more loyal to other Jews around the world and to Israel than to the particular nation in which they reside. And there are other matters too: Jews control vice industries such as gambling. Jews promote drugs, illegal and legal, to demoralize and even destroy goy peoples. Jews push for Mass Migration-Invasion to increase Diversity to play divide-and-rule among fractured and contentious goyim. Jews promote prostitution, pornography, and sex slavery to exploit goy women as sexual commodities. Jews are two-faced and play both sides. Jews favor minority elitism over majority power. Jews are rank hypocrites in insisting that goyim support Jewish identity, territoriality, and nationality while doing everything to undermine national autonomy & sovereignty among gentiles. Jews seek to drive a wedge between goy men and goy women to weaken organic unity within the goy population. Jews invoke universal principles not to partake of them but to cynically disarm goy nationalists while strengthening their own identity and tribalism. While Jews are perfectly fine with well-armed tribal brethren in Jewish-majority Israel, Jews seek to take away the guns of American goyim so that the Jewish-controlled state will have monopoly of arms over the populace. And so on.

Now, if all such inklings, suspicions, impressions, perceptions, accusations, and convictions are 'antisemitic' and if we push its moral logic to conclusion, then one would have to admit that those who PRACTICE acts and behaviors that support 'antisemitic' THEORIZING are most guilty of 'antisemitism'. After all, if John commits murders and if I suspect that he is committing murders, who is more guilty of anti-Johnism, that is IF 'anti-Johnism' is defined as an unwarranted negative view of John as wicked character despite his virtue, nobility, and innocence? If John is indeed innocent and a wonderful fellow but if I suspect him of being a cretin and a killer, I would then surely be guilty of anti-Johnism. But suppose there is hard evidence that John is a serial killer and goes around murdering people. And suppose my suspicions/accusations are based on that evidence. Then, who is the real anti-Johnist? Isn't John the Killer the true anti-Johnist because his actions have destroyed the pro-Johnist position that John is a good guy and wouldn't hurt a fly? Actions speak louder than words, or Actions SHOULD speak louder than words(though too often they don't), and moral logic would place the burden of anti-Johnism on John's shoulders if he is the one who committed acts that betrayed the spirit of pro-Johnism that contends that John is a jolly good fellow.

Then, the same logic applies to the issue of antisemitism. If our perceptions of Jewish wealth, power, influence, corruption, abuse, crimes, perfidy, and nastiness aren't supported by evidence, then we would indeed be guilty of 'antisemitism', which is defined as irrational fantasizing and hyper-exaggeration of Jewish impact on society, much of it negative. To clarify this matter, let us consider Eskimos. We know Eskimos or Inuits have no power over us. They may be good at constructing igloos, walking on snowshoes, and lifting stuff with their ears, but they have no control of media, finance, Deep State, gambling, Hollywood, the Military-Industrial Complex, pornography, music industry, real estate, law firms, the courts, the universities, and etc. So, if we were to spread rumors about Eskimo power and how it harms society, we would indeed be delusional. We could be said to be Anti-Eskimoan, in this case defined as "Casting irrational and fantastical aspersions of power, influence, and problems on the Eskimo community." Now, if Jewish influence was on the level of Eskimos(or the Amish or West Virginia hillbillies), I could agree with those who sound the alarm about 'antisemitism'. It'd be ludicrous to ascribe so much of social, economic, and political phenomena to Jews when Jews are so feeble and ineffectual as a group. But seriously, are Jews comparable to Eskimos and the Amish? ROTFL. Of course not.

Jewish Power is real, and it is vastly disproportionate to their share of the population. Jews are only 2% of Americans, but Jews are seriously over-represented in elite institutions, upper echelons of finance, top law firms, Ivy League universities, State Department, most influential think-tanks, Big Tech monopolies, uppermost courts, vice industries of gambling-drugs-and-pornography(which should be called E-Prostitution or Electronic Prostitution, very useful to Jews after they lost the business of pimping to the lowly blacks), Big Pharma(such as the sinister Sackler Family, the 21st century counterpart to the Jewish Sassoon Family that dominated the opium trade in China), and etc.
Now, Jewish Power isn't necessarily evil or wicked. Power, like fire, can be used to do good or bad, and indeed, positive Jewish contributions to humanity in many fields such as medicine, arts & literature, philosophy, science, math, and etc. have been nothing less than astounding. Most human groups have been inconsequential, and only a handful have been consequential, and Jews have been among the most consequential if not the most. But as with all great consequential peoples, there has been much that was bad as good. No one would say Romans were all bad or all good. No one would say the Chinese or Hindus, very consequential in Asia, were all good or all bad. Same goes for the British, French, Germans, and Arabs(who spread Islam). Great power is such that it can never be about only the good. Just like the Force in STAR WARS has a dark side, all forms of Great Power are open to abuse and exploitation, and all great peoples and empires have done their share of wicked things. Then, this would apply to Jews as well.

Personally, I believe the concept of Antisemitism has moral validity if defined as follows: (1) Blaming Jews for just about everything, even for things they are not guilty of. (2) Noticing only the negative side of Jewishness and Jewish history without acknowledging the positives.
But 'antisemitism' is not defined thus in our age. Rather, the mere noticing of Jewish Power is said to be 'antisemitic'. Criticism of Jewish power & influence and even the state of Israel is said to be 'antisemitic'. The notion that Jews have been bad as well as good is also 'antisemitic'. We are to believe Jews have always been noble innocent victims even when they were the villains, bad actors, or oppressors. For example, Palestinians are accused of denying the right of Israel to exist while there's hardly any mention that Israel was created as a denial of Palestine to exist. We are bombarded with endless scare stories about how Iran is on the verge of getting nukes while ignoring Israel has 300 nukes(made from uranium stolen from the US), most of them aimed at Iran that could be wiped off the map by Zionist nuttery. We are also to believe that Holocaust Holiness passes down through the generations(as if in accordance to Old Testament logic). So, even descendants of European Jews of the World War II period are paid reparations from the German government. And it doesn't matter how nasty Jews may be as individuals. Never mind what they do. The mere state of BEING Jewish means they are washed of their sins. So, Jonathan Pollard was sprung from jail even though his treason led to the deaths of many. Jeffrey Epstein the pervert-psychopath is walking as a free man. And white-collar Jewish crooks can have their own luxury prisons whereas white goyim must be stuck in cells with Negroes who fuc* them in the ass. Such social arrangement would suggest that Jewish Semites are now Supremites, or Supremacist-Semites who believe that they, as the Chosen People or Holy Holocaust people, are god-men over us and live as VIP with a separate set of rules that privilege their ilk uber alles. In a way, it's as if the world is divided between Jews & 'Meta-Jews' and Palestinians & 'Meta-Palestinians'. Jews and 'Meta-Jews'(or'Other Jews') — groups favored by Jews, such as Homos/Trannies and American Negroes — are above the law and get special treatment... like Jussie Smollett recently. In contrast, white Americans and white Europeans are essentially the 'Meta-Palestinians'(or 'Other Palestinians') as their future has been ordained to follow the fate of Palestinians who were destroyed by dehumanization, deplatforming, unperson-ization, and mass-migration(of Jewish Zionist imperialist-immigrants). What is called 'antisemitism' in the current era is really Anti-Supremitism as those who call out on Jewish Power are not opposed to Jews or Jewishness per se but against Supremacist-Semitism or Supremitism.

Jewish obnoxiousness on this matter is made all the worse because Jews hysterically indulge in the kind of hysteria, paranoia, and lunacy they accuse others of. Jews complain that Jewish Power is exaggerated, but it's the Jews who keep alive the fantasy that the KKK or Neo-Nazis have any power or influence in America. They do this by funding the SPLC and ADL that cook up mostly fake news about various KKK-sightings and incidents that turn out to be 'hate hoaxes'. Or, the cleverer Jews use the terminological net of 'white supremacism' in an 'inclusive' way to drag just about every Donald Trump voter into the 'Nazi' camp. Jews insist that even "It's Okay to be White" is 'white supremacist'. Jews also use guilt-by-association. So, since A is somehow connected to B who is connected to C who is connected to D who is connected to E, A must be in league with E. Using this logic, it's all too easy(and easier) to connect anyone in the Democratic side with extremists and radicals. If anything, Barack Obama had direct ties to Bill Ayers, and powerful Liberal institutions did much to rehabilitate some of the worst scoundrels of 60s radicalism. Certain cop-killers were hidden by their radical associates for decades. And given Jewish-American ties with Neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine, one can easily connect many influential Jews with extremists in Kiev. And given Thomas Friedman's close ties with Israel that has ties with ISIS, game of connect-the-dots can easily accuse Friedman of ties to terrorism. Or course, invocation of principles doesn't matter if you don't have power. Jews got the power, the megaphone for themselves and the mute-button for others, and they get to decide what is what... and too many people are sheeple and dummies to realize what is really happening.

The great irony of our era is that Jews, as the 'New Nazis', employ quasi-'antisemitic' tropes against certain peoples as the 'New Jews'. Jews do everything they accuse 'Anti-Semites' of doing to Jews. Notice how Jewish power often blames EVERYTHING on white goyim, the main scapegoat or scapegoy for all that is wicked in the world. If something is wrong, blame white men, white women, white this, or white that. It's as if whiteness is a disease and can only cured by extinction by non-breeding, race-mixing, or even murder(as in South Africa). Pathological Jewish Scholars push 'whiteness studies' that would have us believe that there is something innately sick or perverse about white identity and white consciousness.
Jews say it was wrong, even evil, for white Christians in the past to try to convert Jews, but Jews are hard at work converting whites to Political Correctness, 'Wokeness', Globo-Homomania(Queertianity as the new chrisianity), and white self-loathing as the only white virtue worth being proud about: "I'm proud of being ashamed of being white." But, it's not just whites, of course, who come under pathological Jewish ire. Jews also target Iran & Syria and spread all manner of hysteria, hatred, and paranoia on the basis of "Is it good for the Jews and Israel?" Scratch the ticket of any Jewish argument, and it comes down to "Is it good for Jews?" Why is non-Jewish immigration bad for Israel? Because it would demographically erase the Jewish State. Why is mass-immigration good for Hungary? Don't Hungarians have a right to preserve their territory and identity? No, because such right for Hungarians would undermine Jewish Power to use divide-and-rule to take over Hungary. George Soros apparently wants to play Sith Lord around the world, and that is just wonderful to Jewish Power as Jews stick up for other Jews.
To understand the psychology of Jewish and Goy relations, imagine a meeting between Yahweh and pagan gods. Suppose pagan gods of various peoples and cultures want to meet Yahweh halfway and arrive at a compromise. Would Yahweh accept? No and why not? Because Yahweh believes Himself to be the one and only God, the one true God whereas all other gods are false gods or wicked idols that must be destroyed. To the extent that spiritual space constitutes the mental landscape of a people, we need to remind ourselves that the Jewish Mind is essentially Yahwehisitic. And this mental habit is alive and well even among secular atheist Jews whose obsession is Mono-Tribalism and Mono-Nationalism for Jews. Even secular Jews will accept the validity of identity, territory, and history for Jews Only. Jews reject poly-nationalism and poly-tribalism that argues that every people have a land, legacy, and lineage worth preserving. As far as Jews are concerned, Jews and only Jews are deserving of uniqueness. In contrast, the goyim must be universalized in their worship of the Great Jews as Holy Holocaust neo-messiahs. Jewish body and blood are real. As for goyim, their identities are to be treated as baseball caps and t-shirts: Soulless objects, interchangeable and commodified. If white men controlled pornography and used Jewish women as sex meat for Arab men, how would Jews react? Jews would call it defamation and sexual imperialism. But Jews see nothing wrong with turning white women into sex meat for other men to be traded. If anything, Jews will deem it evil for white men to demand that Jews stop trading in white women as white meat.

One thing for sure, Jews are not to be trusted. Just consider the Russia Collusion hysteria spread by their control of media, academia, and Deep State. Jews claim that Russia has historically been guilty of antisemitism, but Jewish anti-Russianism seems to be many times worse(and eternal). Also, Jews don't believe in the middle ground or meeting people halfway. Alexander Solzenhitsyn, in his book TWO HUNDRED YEARS TOGETHER, called for both Russians and Jews to atone and bury the hatchet, but Jews have ignored the gesture because they want to own all of righteousness and dump all the blame on the Russkies whom they regard as subhumans who exist only to serve Jews. Like their God Yahweh who insist He and only He is the one true God, Jews must have it all. Jews may appear to haggle for compromise, but they're always aiming to have it all eventually. They are always plotting for total control. This is where Anglo-Americans miscalculated and failed in relation to Jews. They thought they could meet ascendant Jewish Power halfway, i.e. if declining Wasps welcome rising Bugs(Busy Urban Globalist Semites), then Jews would embrace Anglo-Americans as their bosom buddies. It'd be win-win for both sides. Jews didn't see it that way; they were out to make themselves the New Masters and turn Wasps into their running dogs... and that is the state of the world today. Russians learned the same thing in the 1990s. They thought Jews would act with honor and decency if given the reins over the economy, but Jews, whether Russian or American, conspired to take over just about everything and turn Russia into their fiefdom. The current Jewish hatred of Russia has NOTHING to do with past pogroms or Cossacks running wild. It's because Russia managed to thwart the Jewish Plot to take total control of Russia. Jews today aren't anxious about survival but obsessed about supremacism that they regard as their global right. Of course, the Jewish War on Russia isn't over, and it will never be over until Jews have it all. As long as Jewish Supremacism exists, it will seek to gain control of every part of the world, directly or indirectly. Jewish promotion of Globo-Homomania has one purpose: To weaken the moral and national integrity of every nation in favor of elite minority privilege. Homo elite-minorities in all nations love to hook up with elite-minority Jewish Power, especially as Jewish Power showers prizes on vain homos who choose to collaborate with Jews against their own national folks.
Jews, like white Europeans, have an adventurous spirit. When white man looked at the peak of the tallest mountain or the Moon, he didn't give up the dream of getting to the top, no matter how impossible it seemed. No matter how long it took, he was going to find a way to fulfill the dream one way or another. But if whites lionized physical feats of courage and daring, the Jewish dream was always more cerebral. Jews weren't excited by risking life and limb to accomplish the 'impossible'. Unlike Anglos and such folks, they weren't clamoring to climb mountains or make it to the North Pole. Rather, they found ways of wit to make other peoples do the bidding of Jews so that Jews could both keep their limbs and inherit the world. Consider the Wars for Israel. In the 1980s, who would have thought the events of the 90s and 21st century would come to pass? But Jews pulled the strings of media, finance, and government to make them happen. And Jews made OTHER peoples kill and die for the Jews. In the opening of the movie PATTON, the great general says that wars are not won by dying for one's country but by making the other 'poor dumb bastard' die for his country. Jews got it even better: They win wars by making one bunch of poor dumb goy bastards slaughter another bunch of poor dumb goy bastards while Jews rake in the dough and turn white women and Arab women into a bunch of whores. (Jews turned white women into sex toys for Jews and black men, and Wars for Israel have forced so many Arab women, especially Christians, into prostitution.)

Anyway, even if we play the rules of 'Antisemitism' as defined by Jews themselves, honest moral logic would suggest that Jews are the biggest 'Anti-Semites' because their actions provide ample evidence for those who notice patterns of Jewish power and influence that increasingly grows abusive and corrupt because, as they say, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews control the mass media, then Jews who DO control the mass media must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Media Control. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews control much of Wall Street, then Jews who DO control financial industries must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Money Control. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews control Silicon Valley, then Jews who DO control companies like Google and Facebook must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Big Tech Control. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews control pornography, then Jews who DO control the porn industry must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Porn Dominance. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews use their power to nefariously suppress freedom and liberty, then Jews who DO push for censorship must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Speech Control. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews control foreign policy, then Jews who DO control the State Department must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Israel-First Policy. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews corrupt public morals and spread degeneracy, then Jews who DO spreads Homomania and Sexualization of children must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Moral Decrepitude. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews subvert Christianity & other spiritual-moral systems, then Jews who DO push 'gay rainbows' into Christian churches must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish War on Christianity. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews commit genocide and wage wars, then Jews who DO oppress Palestinians & spread wars in Middle East & North Africa must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish World Violence. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews seek to replace goy national populations, then Jews who DO push for mass immigration & great replacement must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish strategy of demographic imperialism. (Soros must be one big Anti-Semite for making 'antisemitic tropes' come alive.) If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jews use their power to destroy the Second Amendment, then Jews who DO push for gun-banning must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish Disarmament of goyim. If it is indeed 'antisemitic' to say that Jewish minorities in goy nations are more loyal to their own Tribe than to their fellow goy countrymen, then Jews who insist on Zionist & Jewish-First Policies must be 'Anti-Semites' because they provide evidence for the perception of Jewish In-Group Preference. Consider US foreign policy. Is it equally fair to both Jews and Palestinians? And look how the mass media endlessly remind about the 'plight' of Jews around the world while turning a blind eye to all the whites robbed, raped, and/or murdered by non-whites. In terms of what Jews DO, they are the biggest Anti-Semites because their policies and practices all illustrate the vast, venal, and abusive power of the Jews. Zionists say Israel is the victim of double-standard that doesn't apply to other Western Democracies, but this is more Jewish mendacity. Israel is fully supported by US and EU despite its direct support of terrorism, illegal possession of nukes, occupation of West Bank, and overt racial-supremacist ideology whereas all European democracies aren't even allowed to defend their nations on the basis of identity, history, and territory.

Of course, the greatest irony is that Jews can insist that we pretend they have no power precisely because they got the most power. In history, Jews were sometimes the mouse trying to survive among elephants. Today, Jews are like the elephant that insists on being noticed as a mouse. The effect on society has been downright surreal. It gets even more surreal and twisted when so-called 'Antisemitic Tropes' are easily converted into Philosemitic Tributes via verbal trickery. For instance, if you said Jews played a key role in pushing the 'gay agenda' sometime ago, you would have been smeared as an 'antisemitic conspiracy theorist'. But now that elevation of Homomania or Queertianity as the neo-religion of the West is considered fait accompli, what with worship of Holy Homo being the most important faith in so many people's lives, there are now Jews who brag that their ilk had indeed done most to push the agenda. And it's okay for Joe Biden to say that, yes of course, Jews did play the most important role in the triumph of holy-and-wonderful 'gay agenda'. So, thumbs go up or down on whether something is 'antisemitic' or philosemitic depending on one's attitude toward Jews. If you say Jews control Hollywood and spread much filth, you're an 'Anti-Semite'. But if you say Jews control Hollywood and deserve much praise for their ingenuity and enterprise, then you may be deemed Philosemitic. As nervous as Jews are about goyim discussing Jewish power, it's permissible in some cases IF you praise Jews for their wise and wonderful use of their influence. Whether something is 'antisemitic' or Philosemitic also depends on who/whom and who-said-it. So, if Alan Dershowitz says that Jews indeed have lots of power and DESERVE TO HAVE IT, all is fine and well. But if someone like Kevin MacDonald notices the same power, he must be delusional and having hallucinations. Powerful Jews? Where? The fact that Jews can lie so much and get away with it goes to show that most people are dupes or idiots.

Granted, Jewishness always posed a great contradiction. Even as a mouse-people, they worshiped an elephant-sized God. In contrast, the pagan empires, even as elephant-powers, worshiped mouse-sized gods. Much of Jewish history is about a weak people with a strong God surrounded by strong peoples with weak gods. The Covenant is a powerful thing. In more modern times, Jewish History has been about people with weak bodies but strong minds surrounded by peoples with strong bodies but weak minds. In the end, the minds win over body. Man controls horse, not vice versa. And all goyim need to be mindful of that.

Following the logic of today's 'Antisemitism', Steven Pinker must be a rabid 'Anti-Semite' for noticing so much Jewish power, privilege, wealth, and representation:

LINO or Liberalism in Name Only — How Globalists mask Hate Actions with Vapid Talk of Combating 'Hate Speech' — According to Zionist-Globalists, the Youtuber Soph is a Bigger Threat to the World than Mass-Murderers like Madeleine Albright and Jewish-Supremacists Propagandists like Thomas Friedman

Liberalism can be about Thick Skins and Free Speech for all. That is true liberalism. Or it can be about Thin Skins and Control of Speech. But as not all groups have equal power, the one with the Most Power gets to decide what kinds of speech shall be controlled, suppressed, or forbidden. In the Jewish-run USA, hateful homosexual contempt and blasphemy against Christianity are allowed as 'free speech', but Christian denunciation of homo degeneracy is condemned as 'hate speech'. And blatant homosexual and/or tranny disregard for nature is deemed as 'science' and 'truth' — apparently, a homo anus is as much a sex organ as a vagina, surgery can turn a penis into a 'vagina', and a child can have 'two mommies' or 'two daddies' — , but honest speech about the truth of there being two sexes, male and female, is deemed 'homophobic' or 'transphobic', thereby 'hateful' and 'unhelpful'(as if it some kind of virtue to lend a help to degeneracy and lunacy).
The second kind of Liberalism, Thin Skin & Control, is LINO or Liberalism in Name Only as it relies on illiberal control of speech to maintain its hegemony. LINO is the dominant kind of Liberalism in our globo-homo era with Jewish Supremacism as the lord of all. (We are told religions are dying and that ours is a secular age, but the decline of Great Religions has led to rise of superstitions, witchcraft, cults, taboos, and manias. People's need for the sacred and 'spiritual' has been filled by the New Holy-Schmolies. While spirituality or sacro-consciousness can be a positive thing, it is problematic to the extent that sacrosanctness blinds people to the dark side of what they deem to be sacred and to the [partial]validity of what they deem to be sacrilegious. This is evident in the mindless celebration of laws allowing abortion UP TO childbirth. It's one thing to argue for abortion under certain circumstances and up to certain stage of the fetuses' development, but what's with the happy celebration over laws that allow unborn child be killed even when it's a fully developed baby about to be born? It's because the "The Woman's Right to Choose[to kill her own unborn child]" has been turned into a sacred mantra in our culture. It's so sacrosanct or secular-sanct that it must be totally good, indeed holy, to expand that 'right' to the fullest extent possible. And if the 'choice' is so holy, what does it matter that a 9 month unborn baby will be killed and mutilated? If anything, as the child-to-be-born stands in the way of the secular-sanct 'right to choose', the notion that it should be protected and allowed to live is deemed unholy and evil. Just like certain pagan cultures were blind to evils of child sacrifice because they were so sure of the holiness of the gods they worshiped, today's Abort-Again Child-Killers are so worshipful of Women's Choice that they don't even regard the deaths of fully developed unborn babies as tragic. Likewise, PC elevates certain groups upon the pedestal of holiness to such extent that even free speech, true speech, and honest speech must be sacrificed lest those godlike groups take offense or be blasphemed. Even humor must be proscribed, as with New York Times doing away with Political Cartoons in their global edition because too many opinion-makers around the world find Israel's behavior appalling.)

But more troubling in our Globo-Homo-Shlomo Supremacist Age is that so much of Hate Actions is covered up by the conceit of Anti-Hate Speech. This is especially telling with the mind-tricks of Jewish-controlled foreign policy. US foreign policy, heavily Zionist-imperialist, is clearly hateful and murderous toward many Arabs and Muslims. US policies have destroyed untold numbers of Arab/Muslim lives in the Middle East. They've been motivated by ethnic hostility and are indeed acts of hatred. And yet, they are not deemed as 'hateful' because the spoken US rhetoric has always been about 'spreading democracy', 'liberal values', 'fighting terrorism', and etc. These shameless globalist mass-killers of Arabs/Muslims will claim to have respect for Islam, Muslims, and Arabs, and they will condemn overt anti-Muslim speech as 'hateful' and even 'Islamophobic'(though Hollywood is never called out on all its movies and TV shows depicting Muslims and Arabs as little more than terrorist psychos). In fact, their actions are hateful and murderous, but their rhetoric is measured and diplomatic(even flowery at times). The end-result is the monstrous hateful actions of the Zionist-controlled US are veiled by its smiley-handshake rhetoric. In some ways, this is more dangerous than what the Nazis did. Nazis were overt in their hatred and contempt for certain nations and peoples. They were out to conquer and destroy, esp. certain Slavic nations. Nazis didn't hide much. Their hateful actions were backed by hateful rhetoric. In contrast, the so-called democratic empires have had a habit of masking their hateful actions with happy talk of how they are all about spreading peace and justice around the world.

To expose this state of affairs, we need to discuss the Hate Actions of the Globalist Empire. Take Google. It's owned by hateful Zionist Jews who work hand in glove with hateful Zionist Israelis who kill Palestinians in Gaza, occupy West Bank and steal more land, enforce Apartheid policies against Arabs, and sponsor terrorism in Syria & other nations. Google's Jewish oligarchs are hateful Zionists joined at the hip with murderous and tyrannical Zionist imperialists of Israel. Google Jews are the kissing cousins of Israeli Jews who dehumanize Palestinians and wreak murderous violence on its neighbors. Google has tons of operations in Israel that uses IDF death squads to mow down Palestinian women and children in Gaza. Furthermore, Google Jews work with Jewish-controlled Mass Media to promote deranged, hysterical, paranoid, and hateful foreign policies against Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Syria, Yemen, and other nations that won't obey the Empire of Judea. In private, Google Jews must know that they themselves are a bunch of supremacists, hegemonists, imperialists, and mass-killers. They are not harmless geeks but globalist overlords of corporate monopolies. (As for most journalists, they are just a bunch of corpornalists. After all, they are hired and can be fired by a handful of corporations that oligopolize most of the media in the West. Incidentally, notice how clever Google Jews got themselves a Hindu shill Sundar Pichai to serve as the Face of the company to create the impression that Google's dirty tricks are the brainchild of the People of Dot.) Google Jews are not innocents. They are world hegemonists. They know they got blood on their hands. They've worked with Deep State to spread Zionist-US imperialism all over. They've spread globo-homo propaganda to weaken national sovereignty around the world. They've worked intimately with Israel, a terrorist-tyrannical imperialist state that has forsaken sensible nationalism and decided to embark on the Imperial Project of Greater Israel by totally wiping out Palestine.

So, how do these Google Jews hide their true character? How do they distract us from their Hateful Actions against the World Community? How do they divert our attention from the fact that Google has extremely close ties with imperialist and now near-genocidal Israel? How do they suppress the fact that Jews control the US as lone superpower to carry out foreign policies designed to destroy any nation or people on the basis of "Is it good for the Jews?"
This is how: Google Jews, along with ADL and SPLC, make a big fuss about how they are fighting 'hate speech'. So, even as they are engaged in hatefully destroying Muslim nations and Arab peoples in ACTUAL DEED or ACTION, they pretend they are trying to protect powerless peoples from 'hateful speech'. But how many Arabs or Muslims died because someone on Twitter or Facebook used the term 'muzzie' or 'raghead'? Or 'camel jockey'? People like Madeleine Albright, Max Boot, Paul Wolfowicz, Richard Perle, William Kristol, Cass Sunstein, Thomas Friedman, Paul Krugman, and etc. will never use a term like 'Sand Ni**er', but they support the kind of policies that really destroy populations and wreck entire nations. They are the ones with blood on their hands, and their ACTIONS are motivated by Jewish Supremacist hatred and contempt for goyim, be they Arabs(to be killed) or white Christians(to be used as cannon fodder). But notice how they pretend to be innocent and indeed virtuous because they oppose 'hate speech' of some Youtubers or Twitterers who have No power and Zero influence in US government or foreign policy. Apparently, a goofy girl named 'Soph' poking fun at Islam is MORE DANGEROUS than Jewish-controlled US foreign policy that turned Libya, Syria, and Yemen into wastelands.

BE NOT AFRAID by Soph: https://www.bitchute.com/video/OdaUDeAGIck/



In the video below, look at the disgusting Tranny interviewing Sundar Pichai. The vile Tranny never mentions the fact that Google is very close with murderous Israel that is in the process of wiping West Bank off the map. There is no mention that Zionists have been using US foreign policy to destroy Arab nations and Muslims. No mention of US support of Zionist supremacism and its hateful policy against Iran, a nation with no nukes even as it is targeted by 200 nukes by Israel. Instead, his/her/its focus is on someone like Soph, a youtuber who made a funny video about Muslim culture and practices. The trashy tranny pretends to speak up for Muslims and against hateful 'Islamophobia', but it never occurs to the idiot that Globo-Homo is anti-Islam(as well as hateful against Christianity and all other great religions and to morality, sense, and normality). Even if homos and trannies don't explicitly say "Muhammad sucks" or "We hate Muslims", the kind of garbage they promote and disseminate is deeply offensive and contemptuous of great religions, sanity, and normality. Globo-Homo means never having to say you're sorry. You can ACT hatefully as long as you window dress your vile hateful & contemptuous actions with friendly TALK. It's like rednecks in the South being allowed to freely lynch blacks as long as they don't say 'ni**er' and instead sing praises to blacks.


Indeed, if we focus on Hate Actions(as opposed to wussy 'hate speech', most of which are silly and/or harmless 'memes' on the net), Jewish supremacists are the masters of HATE. (By the way, when it comes to Russia, even outright paranoid Hate Speech is allowed, what with NYT and WAPO running articles suggesting that it's in the Russian DNA to lie and cheat. Jews go into 'antisemitic' mode against certain non-Semites with special fervor. Past Russian operatives who wrote the Protocols of the Elders of Zion were amateurs compared to the Jews who came up with the "Trump is Putin's Puppet" paranoia and Russia Collusion hysteria.)
In truth, Youtube Terms of Service have been violated most by powerful Jews if we judge people by their ACTIONS. Google itself, by cooperating with the Deep State and Zionist-imperialist Israel, has indulged in tons of hateful, dehumanizing, and murderous policies. Youtube allows and encourages tons of Zionists, Deep State shills, and MSM to spread their propaganda, conspiracy theories, hysteria, and disinformation. Zionists and Zionist-Christ-cucks are all about Jewish supremacism. Deep State takes its orders from Jewish oligarchs and commissars. Media are almost totally run by Jewish globalist-supremacists. Much of academia is Jewish-controlled as well, and too many Jewish academics are hardly honest players.

Actions speak louder than words, or at least they should. In reality, however, so much of Action goes hidden by Words. Those who control the Words(and Images & Idols) can hide the Action. We have a Jewish supremacist Zionist-terrorist elite that rules the US, and it goes about using Hate Actions to wreck entire nations and peoples or increasing hostility against nations that insist on their sovereignty. If Google's Terms of Service are anti-hate, they should focus more on Actions than on Words because Actions get things done. And what have the Jewish Supremacists have done in Action and Deed? They've committed mass murder, brought about the destruction of nations, and spread the culture of drugs, pornography, and cultural degeneracy(esp with homos and trannies). If Google is opposed to hate, it should ban all those whose actions have done so much harm to the world. But as long as these Hate Actors carefully dress their rhetoric with flowery speech about 'spreading democracy' and 'justice'(and combating 'hate', such as silly humor by Soph and her ilk), they are guaranteed full access to platforms and financial services. In the US, a mass-murderer who professes to love humanity gets special treatment whereas a non-killer who calls a mass-murderer a mass-murderer is denounced and silenced for 'hate speech'. Take Google and other platforms' constant censorship of Ryan Dawson whose apparent crime is he's been calling out on Zionist tyranny and terror.
So, Jewish supremacists can go on killing and destroying as long as they mask their actions with nice speech. But if you call out Jewish Supremacists for what they are and denounce their murderous actions, you are guilty of 'hate speech' or 'antisemitism' against Jews(who pretend to be weak and vulnerable) and must be shut down, shadowbanned, deplatformed, or destroyed in one form or another. Same logic operates with Antifa and SPLC, both Jewish-funded outfits. As long as those hateful and deranged organizations mask their Hate Actions with righteous speech about 'fighting hate' and opposing 'nazis', they can literally get away with murder. Word conceals Sword.

And notice how Google protects those of 'immigrant status' but not those of indigenous or native status. Why? It's an imperialist enterprise, and migrations & immigrations are forms of invasion, colonization, and replacement. It was so when white Western Imperialists did it on a massive scale in Africa, Asia, and the New World(leading to 'genocide' of native American Indians and other indigenous populations). Immigration was demographic imperialism that replaced Palestinians with Zionists. The idea that immigrants are to be favored over natives is a pro-imperialist screed. It deceptively portrays the invaders as the 'victim' class, much like the American Western Narrative where the White Man encroached on the land of the Red Man but presented Indians as 'hostiles' and whites as mere 'victims' resisting Indian savagery. And of course, Zionists pulled the same trick. Even as they wiped Palestine off the map to create Israel, they accuse Palestinians of trying to wipe Israel off the map and not recognizing Israel's 'right to exist'. Total inversion of truth.
Now, America and Israel are political realities and must be recognized as national entities. We can't turn back the clock and undo mega-history. And one may find much that is impressive and admirable about those two nations. But both were founded on the tragic history of mass immigration and great replacement. Given the tragic side of immigration-invasion, one would think the post-imperialist world order would be opposed to Mass Immigration as policy or ideal in favor of national independence and sovereignty.

But Jews took over the West and figured it'd be better for them to increase Diversity to play divide-and-rule among goyim. Given how Jewish Power has done so much harm to gentiles of all stripes, one would hope whites and non-whites would form a Gentile Alliance against Jewish Power, but the Invade-Invite strategy has made this difficult. White elites, with their imperialist legacy, are so addicted to world power & hegemony that they will gladly cooperate with Jewish globalists to indulge in neo-imperialism. And non-whites are so obsessed about making it to white nations to improve their material lot(by leeching off White Wealth) that they will happily cooperate with Jewish globalists in mass-migration and great replacement in the West. This is why Gentile Liberation from Jewish Power is hard to come by. White elites are addicts of Big Powers gamesmanship, and non-whites(elites and masses) are obsessives about migrating to the West as the Land of Milk and Honey.

The First Step toward National Liberation is the Realization that Whites are the New Palestinians — When Jews Want Something, They Will Do Anything to Eventually Get What They Want

To understand what is really going on, whites must realize they are the New Palestinians. One of the reasons why Jewish Power got so arrogant and aggressive is because it was allowed to get away with the destruction of Palestine. Here was an innocent people minding their own business and never having done anything in the 20th century to wreck other peoples' nations. By 'innocent', I don't mean Palestinians are angels. Like rest of humanity, there are good and bad among Palestinians on the individual level. Instead, as a people, Palestinians have not constituted one of the major consequential powers of the 19th and 20th centuries. Their contribution to the world, positive or negative, has been nil. In contrast, Germans and British were very consequential, for both good and evil in the two centuries; same could be said of Jews.

Anyway, there were the Palestinians, minding their own business. They had nothing to do with European wars or imperialism. If anything, Arabs(Christian or Muslim) in that part of the world were under Ottoman domination until early 20th century when the British Imperialists took over. In the last century, Palestinians had nothing to do with World War I, Communism, rise of Fascism, Western Imperialism, World War II, and the Cold War. And yet, they were targeted for destruction simply because Zionist Jews wanted the land. Why Jews wanted it was understandable given its historical and spiritual significance. Even early Zionists who were non-religious or anti-religious understood that the support from World Jewry for a Jewish Homeland would be greater IF the main theme was about reclaiming the Holy Land for the Jews.

When the Zionist enterprise began, it was hardly a certainty that Palestine would one day become Israel. But when Jews fix their minds on a goal, they look for countless ways to achieve it against all odds. They don't give up until they get what they want... like Charles Grodin's character in THE HEARTBREAK KID won't give up until he gets the blonde goyess.
But then, with their massive fortunes and influence, Jews also had plenty of odds on their side. All manner of trickery and manipulations were used. Arabs in Palestine were assured that Jews would not replace them. Arabs were assured that Jews were coming in peace and merely wanted to co-exist as friendly neighbors. Jews courted Arab collaborators to the Zionist cause with massive bribes. Jews pleaded with Big Powers such as UK, USSR, the US, and even Nazi Germany to aid Jews in the gradual-to-dramatic takeover of Palestine. Jews manipulated Christians into believing that Jewish victory would constitute a Modern Crusade, reclamation of the Holy Land by the West(as Israel would be a 'Western Liberal Democracy' controlled by white European Jewry). Jews also milked the Shoah theme to guilt-bait the West into supporting the Jewish State, said to be a necessary bulwark against Another Holocaust. (But if Jews were concerned about survival above all, it's rather odd that their homeland would be situated as an island in a sea of resentful Arabs/Muslims as Israel was created by oppression and mass expulsion of Palestine's Arab/Muslim/Christian population.) So, the impossible dream became a potential plan and then an inevitable program. This is how Jews think. They ask themselves, "What do we want really badly? How difficult is our goal? If very difficult, what can we do to circumvent or overcome the obstacles to get what we want?" Most peoples, when faced with an impossible task, just give up and decide to live and let live. But when Jews really really want something, no matter how impossible it may seem, they maniacally go about looking for ways to finally achieve it by any means necessary. This is how Jews turned impossible into real with Zionism. Jews also did this with the Bolshevik Revolution. Jews also did it with the takeover of America's elite institutions. In the early 20th century, Jews dreamed of taking over the US from Wasps, but it was just a hope. But they never gave up and became the new masters. And who would have thought US would come to worship Globo-Homomania as the new religion? Few decades ago, people would have laughed at the notion of 'gay marriage', bakers destroyed for refusing to bake 'gay wedding cakes', hysteria of 'pride month', and entire cities shut down to celebrate homo fecal-penetration and tranny-penis cutting as rainbow pageants. (Jews have powerful personalities with hooks. Once they get a hold on something, they never let go. Could St. Paul and early Jewish Christians have achieved the seemingly impossible task of promoting and spreading the new religion if not for their powerful personalities that could never take NO for an answer? Even as they preached 'turn the other cheek', they insisted on preaching into every ear. Today's Jews preach 'turn the other ass cheek'.) But Jews wanted Homomania, and they went about pulling every dirty trick in the book to make it happen. They bought off all the politicians. They threatened and blackmailed philosemitic cuckservatives into obeisance. Jews not only got power of finance and media but have lots of intelligence(dirt) on everyone, and we know most GOP politicians have skeletons in their closets. Again, Jews made the impossible possible and then made it real(and then even holy). Now, Jews are targeting 1st Amendment and 2nd Amendment. Those are to be AINO or Amendments in Name Only. The Florida Law and many others that target BDS are clear violations of the First Amendment, but Jews got the power and the means to circumvent just about anything. Also, with Jewish monopoly of media and internet platforms(by direct ownership, financial favoritism, or moral threats/blackmail), Jews are shutting down free speech on Facebook, Google-Youtube, Wordpress, Twitter, and Amazon. Twitter and Amazon(and Apple and Microsoft) are not Jewish-owned but have Jewish ADL and Jewish-funded SPLC breathing down their necks.
Also, Jews have recruited the vain, fussy, and relentless homos to do their bidding. Tim Cook(of the 'my gay bung is adored by god' school) will collaborate with Jews who stoke the vapid narcissism of homos who want to be adored as fairy-gods over us all. Lately, ACLU seems to be pretty silent about all the shutdowns. So much for Jews being principled defenders of Free Speech and Civil Liberties. It all depends on Who/Whom.
By the way, this 'libertarian' talk that private companies have the right to shut down free speech is just a lot of hokum. First of all, different rules apply to monopolies. Second of all, the rules are not fair across the board but target mainly the dissident right, maverick conservatives, Palestinians, and whomever Jews & homos don't like. Notice Antifa is left alone to spread filth and bile on Twitter and Facebook. And FBI and local police departments let Antifa run amok. Certain groups are allowed to spew hatred. Again, it's a matter of who/whom. If blacks denounce whitey, that's okay, but if blacks denounce Jewish Power(as Nation of Islam has done), those 'crazy ni**ers' must be shut down, as with Amazon's banning of books by Farrakhan.
Furthermore, would any libertarian support an American company that denies service to Zionists on grounds that Israel is a terrorist state founded on ethnic cleansing and one that practices tyranny and mass-murder(directly against Palestinians and indirectly by spreading Wars for Israel)? Would David French and other such cucky ilk support any Arab-American owned monopoly that denies service to Jewish supporters of Zionism and Wars for Israel? Suppose Paypal were owned by Palestinian-Americans who claim that Zionism is hate speech and banned the likes of Bret Stephens and Jennifer Rubin from using the service. How many 'conservatives' and 'libertarians' would support such censorship or denial of service on grounds that private companies can do as they want? It's all bull.

Given the Jewish record of tenaciously, ruthlessly, cunningly, and deceptively doing all they can by any means necessary to get what they want -- ethnic cleansing of Palestinians & creation of Israel, Bolshevik Revolution, takeover of the US, rape of Russian economy in the 90s, promotion of Homomania, mainstreamization of pornography, spread of PC, mass replacement in Europe, the New Cold War with Russia, Globo-Homomania as the new cult of the West, Shoah from historical tragedy to neo-spiritual dogma, proselytization of interracism(or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs), vilification of whiteness as Evil(unless redeemed by cucking to Jews, homos, Negroes, and immigrant-invaders), Wars for Israel, and etc. -- , we should NEVER underestimate the Jewish Will to Power. Jews never give up. Even when they seem peaceable, they are like dormant volcanoes burning with hot lava underneath. So, if Jews want to destroy Free Speech and Gun Rights -- and they've already done so halfway in the US -- , they may well get their wish.

Now, why do Palestinians matter so much in this equation? Because Jews got their first taste of achieving the impossible with the Zionist project. Some may argue that the Bolshevik Revolution was the first great Jewish victory in the modern era, but despite the significance of the Jewish role, it wasn't entirely a Jewish project, and some Jews paid a price under communism. In contrast, Zionism was a very Jewish project, and Jews were, incredibly enough, able to garner the support of the great gentile powers, both pro-Jewish and anti-Jewish, to make their dream come true. Also, the endless US and European support of(and eventually servility to) Zionism and Israel all through the years emboldened Jews to believe that they can do just about anything but still rely on the unconditional support of Western powers. Whether it was the Six Day War, USS Liberty attack, or myriad other malfeasance by Israel and its lobbying groups in US and Europe, Jews came to expect that they can get away with murder and still get all the prizes. They could be like Jack the Ripper and win the Jackpot at every turn. And the Zionist project was fulfilled at the expense of Palestinians, an innocent people.

So, that begs the question: If Jews are capable of doing such a terrible thing to such an innocent people, what are they capable of doing to YOUR KIND? All peoples must ask this question as Jews control the US as the sole superpower with its hooks and claws into all parts of the world. If Jews treat Palestinians like shit, why would they treat your people any differently? And if they used deceit, terror, and tyranny(with lots of hypocrisy) against Palestinians, why wouldn't they do the same to your people? Jews at one time smiled at Palestinians and assured them that Zionism would NOT replace Palestinians with Jews. What a lie that was. Jews accuse Muslims of terrorism, but Israel was created by terrorist pioneers. Jews bitch about white 'racism', but Israel has been practicing Jim Crowitz and Chutzpartheid forever. Jews bitch about Nazis and Warsaw ghetto, but Gaza is an ghetto and IDF death squads mow down women and children. Incredibly, Jews say Africans and Muslims may replace Europeans and take over as 'New Europeans'(even though blacks and Arabs have no historical roots in the West), but Palestinians don't have the right to return to their lost homeland in what is now Israel.

To Jews, there are only two kinds of non-Jews: Palestinians and New Palestinians. All non-Palestinian gentiles are potentially New Palestinians. Granted, Jews will form alliances with some groups against others, but it's all in the name of "Is it good for Jews?" So, Jewish globalists will simultaneously encourage Polish and Ukrainian nationalism against Russia while, at the same time, using globo-homomania and Mandingo/Mandela Complex to undermine genuine ethno-nationalism in those nations. So, Polish and Ukrainian nationalisms are okay as long as they are anti-Russian but they cannot truly be pro-Polish or pro-Ukrainian against the forces of globalism. While they are encouraged to push against Big Bad Russia, they must put out to homos, blacks, and Jewish Power. In the end, all gentile nations are to be betrayed and discarded when the time comes... just like the Pigs in George Orwell's ANIMAL FARM send the horses to the glue factory after using them for all they're worth. The notion that Jews have any feeling for Ukrainians, Poles, or Saudis is a joke. They are all just temporary allies, just like Jews at one time used Christian Fundamentalists and Southern 'rednecks' as useful idiot supporters of Israel. But with globohomo as the new faith in the West, Jews are dumping on Christian Fundies and Southern Neo-Confederates. Jewish message to white southern Christians is "Help us erect our monuments to Jewish supremacism over the bones of Palestinians while we Jews aid blacks, Antifa, and Diversity to destroy Southern monuments to the Confederate dead.")

Even though Palestinians are more oppressed than whites as New Palestinians, in some ways the former are freer. Why? Because Palestinians have no illusions about Jews and Jewish Power. They've experienced it firsthand. They were lied to by Jews. They were victims of terror, war, Nakba Pogroms, and Chutzpartheid. They are slaves in body but free in soul. In contrast, even though whites as New Palestinians are physically & materially infinitely better off than most Palestinians(esp those in Gaza), they are mentally enslaved and pathetically shuck-and-jive before their Jewish massuhs like Negroes of the Old South.
One key difference between Jews and Whites-As-New-Palestinians or WANPs(as WASPs are finished and over) is that Jewish 'sympathy' for goyim is conditional and strategic, whereas WANP sympathy for Jews is blind and total. It's like master and dog. Jewish 'sympathy' is Kissingerian. Jews will even feign sympathy with Ukrainian Neo-Nazis or Muslims. Even as they berate the rise of 'white supremacism', they work with Neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine to hurt Russia. Even as they use Wars for Israel to destroy Muslim nations, they pretend to care for poor poor Muslims as victims of evil Nazi Trump. So, Jews can shake your hand or break it. It all depends on "Is it good for Jews?" In contrast, WANPs are unconditional in their slavish sympathy for Jews. Even when Jews do most to shut down conservative speech, white pride, moral decency, Christian values, and equal justice for all, WANPs are first and foremost all about "muh Israel, muh Holocaust, muh holy shmoly Jews". And whatever Jews want and demand, WANPs comply and give. If Jews say Negroes are magical and ACOWW(Afro-Colonization of White Wombs) must be the future of white race, WANPs are happy to be cucky-wucks. It's incredible that White Americans who take so much pride in how America has come a 'long way' since the bad ole days of Jim Crow are now so blind to the all the anti-white hysteria spread by Jews(and anti-white violence carried out by black thugs) and the US support of Jim Crowitz in the West Bank and Gaza. Also, a nation that takes so much pride in having played a role in crushing Evil Nazism is fully behind near-genocidal Wars for Israel that have turned much of Middle East into what looks like battlegrounds of World War II. But then, how about that Madeleine Albright who recently wrote a book called 'Fascism'? This is the same woman who said killing 500,000 kids was worth it. There you go. American Morality under Jewish Power. To condemn Hussein for his human rights abuses, the US was right to push policies that destroyed half a million kids(by some estimates). Of course, if US forced sanctions on Israel for its human rights violations & warmongering and IF just a 100 Jewish kids died, it'd be called the New Holocaust. Apparently, Jewish lives count for more than Arab lives. Sounds a lot like Nazi Aryan Supremacism. It's almost like Semites are Supremites.

It should be obvious by now that Jewish Liberalism is a myth. Jews are Triberals, not true Liberals. Jews use Liberal lingo to push what is essentially a Tribal agenda. End of History hasn't been the triumph for Liberalism but for Triberalism, esp that of Jews. When Jews push universalism, they don't intended it to serve as a template for both Jews and non-Jews. Rather, universalism is used to weaken tribalism among non-Jews so that they can be made to support the mono-tribalism of the Jews, apparently the ONLY People worthy of identity, territory, and history. If one were to deconstruct Jewishness and argue that all Arabs-as-Semites should be allowed to move to Israel because there is no clear racial or cultural distinction between Jewish Semites and Arab Semites, one would be condemned as 'antisemitic' by Jews. But these very same Jews argue that there is no such distinction as an Englishman or Frenchman. The English might as well believe that blacks were always a big part of Britain. And guess what? The Middle Ages in Europe wasn't white or European. It was multi-culti. Notice how Jew-run media feature great European men of history as blacks or non-whites. It was crazy enough for Sub-Saharan blacks to claim that Ancient Egyptians were black, but now, the New Historiography is claiming that even Northern Europe was filled with blacks and other such folks. In a way, Jews know that people are naturally tribal. So, when people's natural tribalism of ethnicity is removed, they clutch for neo-tribal identities. Once whites are made to believe that it's NOT okay to be white, they reach for new identities. They either go for globo-homo which is deracinating and demoralizing OR they identify with Zion and cheer on the Jews as God's Chosen People. Or they go with jungle fever and cuckery and put out to blacks as the new Master Race. Or they lionize Immigrant-Invaders as the New Hope, as people who are 'more American than Americans' or 'more European than Europeans'.

But, if there is any people Whites should identify with, it is the Palestinians. Whites have most to learn from Palestinians because the latter suffered the greatest setback at the hands of Jews. They lost their land. They were denied their right of identity and history. They were scattered to the winds. They are poised to lose even West Bank. If Jews could do such a thing to Palestinians, whites really need to ask why Jews wouldn't do it to whites or any other bunch of gentiles.

Also, whites need to identify with Palestinians as penance and atonement. While white sympathy for Jews after WWII made good sense as Jews suffered terribly at the hands of Nazis, support for Zionism as redress for the Shoah made NO SENSE because Palestinians had NO part in World War II and Nazi mass killings. White people who were entirely responsible for WWI, WWII, and their associated horrors just dumped the Burden of Guilt on the Palestinians who never did anything. Given all the empty land in US, Canada, Australia, and Latin America, it's interesting that white people couldn't offer a piece of territory for Jews to have a homeland in those huge land masses. No, it had to be Palestine. Granted, Jews basically took over New York and other power centers as New Jerusalems, and in some ways, the US is like greater Israel whose new anthem should be the Carly Simon song:


Anyway, white people need to wake up. They must realize that they are the New Palestinians. In some perverse ways, whites are also the 'New Jews' in the sense that they are blamed and scapegoated for everything. David Cole wrote as much in a Takimag article: https://www.takimag.com/article/the-whites-are-our-misfortune/

What Cole leaves out is the question, "IF whites are like the 'new Jews'(the new 'Christ Killers' as the new christs are Jews of Shoah), THEN who are the New Nazis?" Ironically, Jews are the New Nazis as anti-white venom and vitriol are mainly the product of Jewish academics, media people, bankers, gangsters, psychopaths, and globalist agents. Some Jews hate whites so much that they want white lands to be Carthagenized with mass invasion, mass replacement, and colonization of white wombs by blacks. Those Jews are like Nazis in genocidal mode. Other Jews(such as David Cole) aren't so hostile. While not pro-white, they see the value of whiteness as crucial support system for Jews. Their attitude is like that of Nazis toward Hungarians, Italians, Croatians, and Romanians: Not as good as Aryan-Germans but useful and even essential as satellites and support system for Germany as the 1000 YR REICH. Some Jews as New Nazis look upon whites as New Jews to be effectively 'genocided' by Great Replacement and Race-mixing. Other Jews as New Nazis look upon whites as a lesser but useful race to keep the Jewish World Hegemony going. Jewish Power is divided between Jews who see whites as New Jews(deserving of dehumanization and destruction) and Jews who regard whites as Nazis regarded Romanians or Hungarians. Either way, Jewish attitude is supremacist. One bunch of Jews mean to destroy whites, and another bunch of Jews mean to use whites.

In the Israel/Palestine conflict, Jews are the New Nazis and Palestinians are the New Jews. (Granted, the notion of Old Jews or Real Jews of Old as pure-as-snow victims of white Christian evil is a cartoonish over-simplification. Contrary to David Cole's piece, there were legitimate reasons why Jews were hated in Europe. Not only did Jews play a role in the slave trade that sent countless Europeans to Muslim lands but Jews collaborated time and time again with Muslim invaders.) When we say 'New Jews', we refer to the condition of Jews when they were indeed punished and victimized beyond the breadth of their sins/crimes. Nazi excesses did place Jews in a position of special victimization. Though, in retrospect, much of antisemitism in the past seems somewhat valid and justifiable -- if Jews act the way they do today, there's a good chance they acted likewise in the past -- , Nazi horrors, like the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, were clearly disproportionate and crazy. Granted, it was only in the late 20th century and 21st century that we've come to see the Real Jew at last. It is when people have great power that they reveal their true face. Notice how Hitler pretended to be moderate and reasonable at times and showed his true face only when he'd amassed great power. Mao often presented himself as a humble 'agrarian reformer' to useful idiots of Western Journalism. But with great power, he eventually showed his true face with the Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution. And with their dominant position in the world, Jews are now showing their true face. It's like the Bob Dylan song, "Seeing the Real You at Last". Jewish arrogance backed by awesome power is showing the Real Jew at last, what with globo-homomania, war on Christianity, war on whites, total takeover of West Bank, destruction of Middle East, new Cold War, total pornification of society, spread of gambling, finance as just a huge casino, and endless movies promoting anti-Muslim hatred and dehumanization so that duped whites will fight Wars for Israel.

The most effective way to resist Jewish Power is to go on the moral offensive. And the Palestinian issue is key to putting Jewish Power on the moral defensive because there was NO justification whatsoever for what was done to the Palestinians. While Jews suffered more in WWII than Palestinians did in the Nakba, in some ways the crime against Palestinians was worse. Why? Because Jews, along with many others, got burned for playing with fire. In the first half of the 20th century, nations such as Germany, Britain, France, Russia, US, and Japan were playing a dangerous game of empire. And Jews were among the great powers. Though they didn't have a nation of their own, the Jewish World Network was extensive from New York to London to Paris to Berlin to Moscow. As Jews played financial games, pushed radical movements, and spread degeneracy during the Weimar period, they were key players in the events that led to great wars and destruction. Same goes for the Japanese. They played with fire and got burned real bad. So did the Germans.
But what did the Palestinians do? They did nothing but lost their nation and were dehumanized. Worse, as if to rub salt in Palestinian wounds, most Americans, both conservative and liberal, fully supported Zionism against Palestinians who were treated as a bunch of faceless nobodies. And even now, in states red and blue, Palestinian-Americans are denied rights and dismissed from jobs because they won't pledge to support Israel's oppression of their people.

The Palestinian issue will expose the supremacist character of Jewish Power. The question, "If Jews treat Palestinians that way, why would they treat your people any differently?" Another question, "If your people support Jewish dehumanization of Palestinians, an innocent people, what right do they have to complain when Jews do the same to them?" It all began with Palestinians. When whites allowed, enabled, and encouraged Jews to murder Palestinians and get away with it, Jewish blood-lust just grew and grew and began to target the rest of humanity as New Palestinians.
Saying NO to Jewish dehumanization of Palestinians is the first step for whites to seek national liberation from Jewish supremacism. Also, by recognizing that they are the New Palestinians, whites will come to realize their true status in the world, i.e. they are not seeking 'white supremacism' but white national liberation from Jewish globalist hegemony. In some ways, Jewish supremacism is most problematic because Jewish Power tends to be hidden, ironically by the fact that Jews control the media that are supposed to serve as the window to the world and truth. But Jews have gained power of windows, screens, and tablets to project falsehoods on a massive scale. As Niall Ferguson wrote in his book about the square and the tower, the Elites are now working to shut down the Voice of the People.
It's elitism uber populism. (Only nationalism can bridge elitism and populism, but Jews deny nationalism to goyim.) Of course, Ferguson, being an ardent pro-Zionist cuck, will not mention that Jews control the Tower. Still, Jewish Power is in a precarious state despite its awesomeness. On the one hand, it has to sensationalize White Power/Privilege as the real danger to the world(when not hyperventilating about Iran, Russia, and China as yellow peril), and yet, without white support and servility, Jewish Power has no legs to stand on. How to keep the white horse strong and sturdy but also mindlessly obedient and hostile to the idea of its own freedom. Jewish Power has indoctrinated whites into believing 'slavery is freedom'. Whites have been made freephobic. Why? Because PC says whites are innately born 'racist' and evil, and therefore, white freedom will lead to white evils. Therefore, the only way to ensure white goodness is by making whites cucking to Other peoples as the Master Race.
On the other hand, we shouldn't fall for notions such as White Altruism, pathological or not. White people are not really more altruistic. That's just a myth. Rather, they are servile suckers to the power. Notice how so-called white altruism always operates in accordance to what the Power dictates. Where has white altruism been for Palestinians? Why is white altruism in the current year all about being pro-immigrant but almost nothing about American Indians? Hasn't white altruism figured out that mass immigration led to 'genocides' that wiped out the native indigenous cultures of the New World? If white altruism were real, whites would feel sympathy for all non-whites equally, but this isn't so. White sympathy is totally molded by the Power. Where was white altruism when Obama was killing all those Muslims? German Guilt is also a myth. Now, it may well be that many Germans are sincerely guilt-ridden over WWII and Holocaust, but it has nothing to do with innate white altruism or genuine individual conscience. One thing for sure, Germans were certainly without altruism during World War II. German Guilt is purely the product of mass indoctrination by the powers-that-be. If German Guilt was real, then why are Germans so lacking in guilt about Russians and Poles? Germans killed more Russians than Jews. Poland was ravaged by Germany. But while Germans suck up to Jews, they work with the West to destroy Russia and feel no guilt about doing so. And Germans berate Poles to be invaded by Africans and Muslims. So much for German Guilt. Germans are just sucking up to Power that is now Jewish... just like East Germans once sucked up to the Soviets. When black slaves were under white rule, many were raised to believe that they exist to serve the Great White Master. Back then, blacks seemed 'pathologically altruistic'. It was just social control.

But then, race-ism, in one form or another, is baked into everything. So-called 'progressives' or progs are really just a bunch of 'progracists'. They too have their 'intersectional' hierarchies of which groups deserve more Pokemon Points. Jews are favored over Arabs by both Democrats and Republicans. Nancy Pelosi says even if Congress were to burn to the ground, US will be there for Israel. She hasn't uttered a word about Palestinians. Trump and Trumptards suck up to Jews and dump on Palestinians even as Jews treat them like New Palestinians. Jungle Feverists and Cucks worship blacks as the master-mandingo race while Ken Burns and his ilk worship Magic Negroes as a race of Nelson Mandelas. No such sympathy exists for Arabs and Arafat, even though literally 100,000s of Arabs have been killed by Wars for Israel(what with Christian Arabs getting it especially bad). Black crime is terminologically whitewashed because truth about blacks is 'racist'. Apparently, blacks are so holy that news media must pretend blackness had no relation to heightened criminality. Jews denounce Old White America as 'racist' & 'white supremacist' and celebrate New America as an equal place for ALL, but then they say ALL Americans must support Israel Uber Alles and never criticize Jewish Power even as Jews never stop badmouthing Russians, Iranians, Palestinians, whites, Christians, and etc. Liberal Jews bitch about Trump's 'Islamophobia' while filling the airwaves and movie screens with anti-Arab tropes that depict Muslims as little more than crazed terrorists. Too Many Blacks in sports or entertainment is never a problem, but Too Many Asians in certain academies in NY is a huge problem to progracists. Progracists laugh, talk, and act like rednecks of old in their mindless progotry that would have us believe that they are more 'woke' because they worship a penis into the bung, penis cut off to make for fake 'vagina', or black supremacist emasculation of whitey. As for Jews, they see white women as sexual commodities that exist to be bought and sold among Jews, blacks, and non-whites than loyal members of the White Racial Family as wives and mothers. Jewish-run BBC promote the New 'Idealatry' of Black Male and White Female. And, Jews regard white men as just mercenaries to be used and expended in Wars for Israel, that is white men insist on being manly. For other white men, cuckery is the only option. Jews promote Miley Cyrus-ism and ACOWW to white girls. White males are supposed to cuck before black guys; the only way they can be manly is by putting on army boots and fighting the nations and peoples hated by Jews. Jews look upon white men as dogs. Like John McCain, they may bark and bite at Iran and Russia(or anyone hated by Jews), but they mustn't ever bark at the Jewish master. If they do, they are to be muzzled. Fight the Muzzie over there and be Muzzled over here. The Muzzie-Muzzle Decree. Anyway, Jews say it's 'supremacist' for whites to believe that it's okay to be white. Whites must be submissivist to Jewish supremacist. White men exist to cuck to Jews. White women exist to offer their wombs to black seed. White lands exist to be colonized by blacks, Muslims, Hindus, yellows, browns, etc. White wealth exist to be squeezed mostly by Jews and their Diversity allies. Even white history doesn't belong to whites. Ancient Greece, Middle Ages, Renaissance, and European History were never white but belong equally to all other races. Yeah, Amazonian Indians, Japanese, and African Bushmen had a huge role in the development of France and Britain!

Progracism isn't about racial equality but merely replaces old hierarchies with new ones where some groups are more equal than others. And the biggest progracists are Jews who, while endlessly denouncing white supremacism, demand that Jewish supremacism never be questioned and that all Americans must support Zionists over Palestinians. Google Jews and Youtube Jews bitch about 'hate' but they work hand-in-glove with Zionist killers, tyrants, and terrorists. And they work with Deep State to spread hate news and hate mania against Russia, Iran, Syria, and White Christians. And what is globo-homomania but a hate campaign against normality, decency, morality, nature, health, balance, and sense. It's one thing to tolerate homos and trannies and let them do their thing, but it's quite another to compel the whole world to participate in the worship of homo fecal penetration painted with rainbow colors.

It's not enough for truth-tellers to defend Free Speech as such a position is morally defensive. After all, free speech can allow good speech and bad speech, some of it gross and vile. What white national liberationists must do is demand the right of True Speech. They need the freedom to speak truth to power. And as offense is the best defense, they should call for banning of Zionist speech as hate speech against Palestinians and other Arabs/Muslims. They should call for banning of hateful conspiracy theories against Russia and Iran. Russia Collusion was a fantasy of Deep State and Jewish Media. And all this nonsense about Iran being a year away from having the Bomb and planning to wipe Israel off the map is defamation and conspiracy theorizing by Netanyahu and AIPAC. Only when Jews are put on the moral defensive and fear for their own speech will they value free speech for all.

Communism's Appeal to the Third World & Russia prior to post-WWII New Capitalism that Allowed Greater Participation of the Non-West

https://www.unz.com/ldinh/plastic-recycling-and-jousting-jews/

Craig Nelson's Comments are highlighted in Yellow:

Communism had its dark and evil side but also its uses as a weapon of resistance. It led to unification of Vietnam and independence of Cuba from American imperialism.

Correlation does not equal causation.

Back then, it seemed sensible for non-white thinkers, patriots, and leaders to consider communism as a viable option. For example, immediately upon victory, Bolsheviks in Russia were the first to denounce Western Imperialism and call for national liberation around the world. It’s no wonder even non-communist Sun Yat-Sen of China leaned toward the Soviets who seemed to treat Chinese as fellow brethren than as semi-colonial subjects as was the case with European Imperialists(and to lesser extent by the Americans). Also, keep in mind that one of the reasons for capitalism's failure in Russia was due to the role of the British Empire, the dominant player in world trade in the 19th century. Though Russia was allied with France and UK against Germany in World War I, the power that had done most to undermine Russian modernization and development had been the British Empire. Naturally, with the failure of capitalism and disaster of war, many Russians turned toward Bolsheviks who offered communism as the new hope. Just as Jewish-controlled West tries to undermine capitalism in today's Russia, the top capitalist power in the 19th century did all it could to sabotage Russia's move toward modernization. Capitalists don't necessarily help other capitalists if the latter threaten their hegemony.

It was only after WWII with US as the new capitalist superpower that non-white nations were allowed to take part in capitalist development on a near-equal level. Prior to that, capitalism was almost synonymous with imperialism of Western Liberal Democracies. The game was rigged so that Western Nations hogged the industry whereas the non-West was used as supplier of raw materials. For example, French Imperialists suppressed national capitalist development among the Vietnamese who were assigned the role of supplying rubber to France.

So, naturally, many non-whites back then valued communism as the most potent weapon/instrument against capitalist-imperialism. Indeed, in the first half of the 20th century, many non-white leaders spent their formative years in a period when the power of World Capital clearly meant the West over the Rest. Capitalism was nearly interchangeable with imperialism.

But after World War II, with the US as the new ascendant hegemon, the rules changed so that even non-white nations could play a sizable role in world trade and develop their own economies(and even heavy industries and high-tech sectors in direct competition with First World economies). Partly, it owed to the US being somewhat more idealistic as it’d come into existence against European Empires. But the bigger reasons were political, opportunistic, and pragmatic. In seeking to dethrone Britain and France from world affairs, the US presented itself as a friend to anti-imperialist voices everywhere. Furthermore, with the Soviets championing World Liberation(from capitalist-imperialism), the US had no choice but to present itself as a generous and progressive world power committing to spreading freedom and opportunities to ALL peoples around the world. If the Soviets stuck to the Old Narrative of Capitalism = Imperialism, the US posited the New Narrative of Capitalism = Freedom.

Still, due to the realities of the first half of the 20th century, many Third World leaders were convinced that capitalism = imperialism. In the case of Cuba, US imperialism had its fingerprints all over the island. As for the Vietnamese nationalists, they couldn’t help but regard American power as inheritor of French colonialism, esp. as the US had supported the French against the Viet Minh and then divided the nation to keep the south as a satellite.

That said, the new template of allowing non-white nations to profit from capitalism gradually eroded the prior Third World view that capitalism = imperialism. Chinese realized this by the late 1970s as they figured China had much to gain by doing business with the West. After all, capitalist US had allowed the industrialization and enrichment of Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, and S. Korea(even at the expense of US industry). US and the revamped Europe operated differently from Old Imperialists who’d arrived on Chinese shores in the 19th century with gunboats.

Though history has judged communism to be ultimately unworkable, it was useful for a time when capitalism was synonymous with imperialism. Back then, non-white nations could not get a fair shake from the capitalist so-called liberal democratic West. After all, UK and France were said to be democratic but were the biggest imperialist powers, and they rigged matters so that their non-white colonial subject-territories could barely industrialize. Since world capitalism was gamed and controlled by the West, many non-Western intellectuals and rising leaders turned to communism or socialism(in the case of India under Nehru).
Also, communism was cheap and available to all. It could be adopted for peanuts by any group. It was like an instant hammer as a means of organization, unity, and fighting spirit. In contrast, while capitalism eventually creates a bigger economy, it takes time to develop. Capitalism is like growing a tree from a seed to produce lots of lumber. It's rewarding but takes time. Communism is like an instant club to do battle with. Capitalism can never be an instant form of power and unity. Furthermore, world capitalism was controlled by the imperialist West(that lost its empires only in the decades following WWII), and that fact made capitalism unappealing as a means of national liberation for non-white folks whether they were under direct imperialist control or not.
As for fascism, it requires a middle class and some degree of development, something Italy and Germany had. But as non-white nations were so backward and poor, they lacked the basis for fascist support(that happens to be lower-middle class). In contrast, communism made instant sense to many poor folks: Attack the Greedy Rich and Drive out Imperialists. So, while communism ultimately failed, it was useful and effective for a time for certain peoples and places.

Furthermore, it’s not necessarily a bad thing to have communism as a moral basis for a capitalist economy. A society that is all capitalist only knows individualism and greed. But a capitalist society that has a communist foundation has some kind of thematic balance: Capitalism drives individuals toward wealth, but communist themes remind people of the nobility of work, unity, camaraderie, and etc. This is why current China and Vietnam, in some ways, have a sounder foundation than Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea do. China and Vietnam are now capitalist and allow free enterprise, BUT the foundational communist themes do serve as a reminder that there is more to life than money and greed. It’s like the role played by Christianity in the West. It provided balance to the secular and materialist aspirations that stressed individual interests above all else. In the US, the Protestant Work Ethic and Reform Moralism offered balance to individualism, greed, and ambition. Now that such ethos have eroded away, all that is left is globo-homo degeneracy and a piggish culture of excess. Capitalism is effective in providing incentives and boosting productivity but has to be balanced by moral and spiritual themes. Without such, a materialist-consumer society gives in to decadence and degeneracy whereupon the new morality becomes worship of the holy homo bung and negro rapper dong.

In WWII, the totalist organizational methods of Stalinism allowed triumph over Nazi Germany.

So “totalist organizational methods” are unique to the communist? Further could not Russia have defeated Germany except under a whip?

Yes, the only truly totalitarian societies were communist. Benito Mussolini first used the term ‘totalitarian’, but he didn’t mean anything like Stalinist USSR or Hannah Arendt came to mean by 'totalitarianism'. He meant a society where all sectors would be linked and coordinated into an organic national whole. It wasn’t about total control of everything by the state but about the state as mediator of the totality of societal needs and interests. As for Nazi Germany, it was more authoritarian than Fascist Italy but still not totalitarian in the strict sense. Much of the economy was in private hands. Adolf Hitler had a hands-off policy on many issues. He let the Churches do their own thing. While National Socialist themes were at the forefront of politics and ideology, it was possible for most Germans to pursue personal interests without undue interference of the State.

It was in the USSR under Stalin that a real kind of totalitarianism sprung into existence. Nearly all of the economy was in statist control. The state controlled all of education, took over all of culture, shut down churches, and gained control over just about anything it could get its hands on.
Now, totalitarianism is most unfortunate, and Stalin was a mass killer. But against a threat like Nazi Germany, totalitarianism served USSR well in uniting the whole nation to tighten into one fist and fight back.

And yes, Russians needed a whip to be shaped into a unite fighting force. Russians are naturally lazy, messy, and confused. Without a strong leader to drive them toward action and sacrifice, most Russians will just dance on tables, wrestle bears, and swill vodka. Look how Russia continues to be the top underachiever in the world despite all the land and resources.

Communism also shielded Eastern Europe from vagaries of the capitalist West.

I suppose, kinda in the same way the incarcerated are generally shielded from tax hikes.

If the sickness of the West has been just about excessive tax hikes(as some libertarians would have us believe), Craig Nelson's point would be valid. But the West, esp following the May 68 lunacy, has been about total racial and cultural extinction. It’s been about blind worship of Jewish supremacists and their Holocaustianity as the New Faith for the white race. It’s been about Afro-Colonization of White Wombs or ACOWW. It’s been about Homomania and other forms of degeneracy. Better to be incarcerated and healthy than be ‘free’ to get syphilis and hand over one’s house and spouse to African invaders and Muslims, or Jungle and Jihad. Better to be incarcerated and remain sober than be ‘free’ to turn alcoholic and blow one’s homeland in the Multi-Culti roulette in which the white man cannot win.

Would you rather keep your daughter in prison and force her to learn core knowledge and morals OR allow her to be ‘free’ to get tattoos, piercings, celebrate globo-homo, and use her womb to produce black kids with a string of rapper trash? Look at London today. It is globo-homo central where Afro-Colonization of White Wombs or ACOWW is the highest value. Or look at Stalin's granddaughter. If that is freedom, who needs it? Freedom is good only for free-thinkers. Most people are natural slaves, the herd-hordes, and their use of 'freedom' just means caving to the latest fads and fashions pushed by the monopoly institutions and industries. How else could something as trashy and crazy as Homomania have spread so fast? As herd-hordes, most people can be whipped into being either sane and decent or insane and degenerate. In either case, it's not really their choice. Most people do not freely choose the good or the bad because they are not free-thinkers but monkey-see-monkey-doers. Liberal Capitalism failed because most people cannot break out of the state of natural slavery. Even with freedom, they need to be told what to believe, what to think, how to feel. And as capitalism is controlled by monopolies, the deep state and corporate forces mold the minds of the masses.

Worse, the West has now even lost its freedom. At least during the Cold War, the West could say, “We got freedom even if we use it stupidly or trashily.” Now, the West doesn’t even have the freedom. Under PC controls, even a twitter comment can lead to fines and jail time. Speaking truths about Jewish Power or the problems of Africans can land you in jail in France. So, what did End of History’s ‘liberal capitalist democracy’ amount to? It led to the 'freedom' to be degenerate(as promoted by the Power) but also led to No Freedom to oppose degeneracy and destruction of the West. Free to be degenerate and a slave of Jews, homos, and Negroes BUT unfree to say NO to all of that and call for regeneration against the degeneration. How can a society that allows freedom for degenerates but no freedom for regenerates survive for long? It's like allowing someone to use bad drugs but denying him the freedom to say NO and eat well and exercise to regain his health.

And in the Cold War, communism offered some kind of counterbalance against US hegemonism.

The depravity and bloodlust of the Bolshevik revolution, and all that followed, only served to strengthen American hegemony by offering such a repellent alternative.

The most contemptible human is the full-throated communist sympathizer. Especially now, when there really is no excuse.

Soviet Union after Stalin was repressive but no longer murderous on a massive scale. Also, the killings and repressions weren’t on the same level in all communist nations. Cambodia saw the worst kind of psycho-communism, but most Eastern European nations had death tolls in the 1,000s. They weren’t any worse than UK, France, Germany, or Sweden today where you are denounced as an extremist if you oppose mass-invasion and Great Replacement. Likewise, not all fascist regimes were equal in their degrees of repression. Nazi Germany went furthest in mayhem(at least with the onset of the wars), but Fascist Italy was rather mild. Spain's Franco, after ruthlessly punishing the Left after the Civil War, was a rather benign leader(though some will argue he wasn’t really fascist). Juan Peron was hardly a bloody despot. Just like fascist leaders varied from murderous to mild, so did communist regimes(though, on average, communism was more repressive than fascism).
Also, mass killings happened under all imperialist powers; neither communists nor communists hardly monopolized violence and repression in modern history. French and British did their share of killings around the world to maintain the empire. The US could be utterly ruthless in wars, some of which were near-genocidal. US also backed bloody regimes in Latin America that became notorious for their 'death squads'. And under Jewish-control, the US has destroyed millions of lives in the Middle East and killed 100,000s by invasion and starvation and man-made famine. US human-rights record in foreign affairs since the end of the Cold War is far worst than Soviet's from death of Stalin to the fall of Gorbachev.

Bolshevism now has to be remembered as a crime against humanity, but we have to see things in context. When the Bolsheviks came to power, capitalism was synonymous with imperialism, and most of the world was ruled by empires that resorted to ruthless violence to maintain hegemony. Back then, it's understandable why communism appealed to many peoples around the world for whom the main force denying them the right of national independence and sovereignty was the capitalist-imperialist West.

Stalin's Granddaughter. The product of Capitalist 'Freedom'.