Mayor Peter Buttegieg & the Blacks of South Bend — Pathologies of Identity-Idolatry & Self-Worship — Idolatry renders Ideology, Left or Right, Useless

Try watching the first 5 minutes of the video below:


TV News Reader:

"At an emotional Town Hall last night, South Bend Indiana mayor Pete Buttigieg heard from angry constituents after a police-involved shooting left a black man dead last night."

Pete Buttegieg:

"We have tried but not succeeded in increasing Diversity in the police department, and we need help."

Angry Black Man:

"You have racism inside your police department. How are we supposed to trust you."

Angry Black Woman:

"I’m raising a 7yr old grandson, and when he sees the police, he is afraid. That is not what’s supposed to happen."

TV News Reader:

"Racial tensions flared last week after a WHITE South Bend police officer shot and killed a BLACK man who was allegedly holding a knife. The officer was wearing a body camera, but it was not turned on."

Pete Buttegieg:

"If anyone who is on patrol is shown to be a racist or to do something racist, in a way that is substantiated, that is their last day on the street... Did you ask me ‘Do black lives matter?’ Of course, black lives matter." (Shaky emotion-laden voice)

Angry Black Woman and Pete Buttegieg:

"So, my question is, ‘are you really here cuz you care for the blacks, or are you here because you want to be the president?’... What WE gonna do? What YA gonna do. Don’t just talking. Be about it. Give us proof you can really do something about it."

"I’ll work on that."

"You running for president, and you want black people to vote for you. That’s not gonna happen."

The introductory segment of the video above is truly a wonder to behold. It’s a concentrated form of idiocy that should be rare but is all too common in the currently demented America where honesty, integrity, courage, and truth have been rendered taboo on matters where the Narrative and Iconography have been pre-written into holy writ, or Poli-Writ. Vague terms like 'Diversity', 'Inclusion', and 'Tolerance'(as defined and manipulated by Jewish Globo-Homo supremacists who see nothing wrong with the Zionist tyranny over Palestinians and the persecution of Christian bakers who refuse to bake 'gay wedding' cakes or those celebrating tranny penis-cutting) fill the air when what we really need is a social order where the paramount virtues are Honesty, Integrity, Truth, Courage, and Reality: HITCR.
As we all know, religions are both inspiring and infuriating because they don’t play by rules of facts and logic. While religious folks use reason to explain, justify, and/or reform their belief system, the ultimate source of their truth remains mysterious, a matter of blind conviction. At some point, faith is required in one’s devotion to the Power deemed to be great, wise, and eternal. Such convictions have elevated man’s imagination and given him hope & meaning. But religions have also led to willful blindness, pigheadedness, ignorance-as-pride, and holier-than-thou dogmatism. However, even in its negatives, the one saving grace of religion is that the holy and sacred are invested with God or gods, forces or beings deemed to be infinitely above the ways of man. Thus, in making the spiritual being the focus of faith and devotion, religions have had the way of suppressing the apotheosis of man or group of people as the beholders of ultimate truth, justice, and wisdom. In Judaism, a man can be a prophet, but even the greatest prophet is but a flea in the presence of God. Perhaps, Jews hated Christianity for elevating a Man to status of God, but Christians don’t believe Jesus was a Man who became God but was God who was born a Man. According to Muslims, Muhammad was the greatest and the final Prophet, but even the great one was a mere messenger of Allah, the one true God. Hinduism’s concept of holiness differs from the monotheistic Abrahamic Faiths in that gurus, via intense and prolonged meditation & virtuous life, can gain a kind of holiness. But because this path is open to any would-be-guru who seeks spiritual enlightenment, holiness cannot be hogged by one individual or a particular group. Even those who are born as Brahmins must undergo intensive training to be worthy of the caste; if they fail in their allotted roles, the souls within them could be demoted in the NEXT life. Also, in order for Brahmins to go beyond priestly duties and gain yogi status, they must make an even greater effort on the individual level to embark on the path of higher truth. It's not easy nor a given. Furthermore, the notion of reincarnation imbues the Hindu faithful with humility because, no matter how virtuous one’s soul may be in THIS LIFE, there is the chance that it will fall from grace in later manifestations... though there is always the hope that it may claw itself back to grace in further lives down the line. Furthermore, gaining holiness in Hinduism is a most arduous process requiring adherence to proper rituals, rejection of worldly pleasures, and intense commitment to meditation & self-purging. It has to be earned, like the tough climb to the top of the mountain.

The West is now in the post-religious era, but the result hasn’t been the triumph of reason, logic & facts, critical thinking, skepticism, and freedom of conscience. The problem is of modernity is that, even the fading of religious authority, the ‘spiritual’ nature of man remains, and this means a tireless & desperate search for ‘new gods’. Also, reason, logic, and facts are merely the tools of man. On their own, they have no will or agency. Will arises from ego, ambition, and lust for power. Men with stronger egos will gain over those with weaker egos, and groups that have more strong-willed individuals will gain dominance over groups with weaker-willed individuals. In many cases, a less-intelligent man of stronger ego gains advantage over more-intelligent man of weaker ego. The reason why the Jonathan Pryce character feels so helpless vis-a-vis the Al Pacino character in GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS owes less to difference in intelligence than in will. And the reason why the stupid woman in OLEANNA gains the upperhand over the smarter professor is because her newly chosen ideological commitment imbues her with a strong collective will.

Some individuals have powerful individual will, but those with weak individual wills often compensate by joining a cause or movement that imbues each member with special meaning and sense of mission. It’s like what Tom Conti’s character says of the Japanese in MERRY CHRISTMAS MR. LAWRENCE. The Japanese, being weak of personal will, couldn’t do anything on their own as individuals; they had to surrender to the collective hive-mind to gain the courage to become a major imperialist power in the Pacific. Needless to say, many on the Religious Right and many on the ‘Social Justice Left’ have weak individual wills and feel confused by independent inquiry and thought. They need to belong to a church or some organization committed to a neo-holy crusade. What makes Jews so formidable is they have the combination of strong individual will and high intelligence — and furthermore, a powerful collective mentality rooted in the Covenant that fuses identity, history, and spirituality(as well as territoriality via Zionism) into a bundled fasces. Even though Jews gained much by the use of reason, logic, and facts, they aren't primarily about principled Liberal commitment to Free Speech and Free Thought. Their core essence is about Obsession with Tribal Power and Prestige, and this means Jews will mold and distort ‘liberalism’ in any shape or form to serve, first and foremost, the agenda of Jewish Supremacism.

This accounts for the current Jewish-Orwellian contortions of logic and meaning. It’s as if Jews are pulling Houdini-mind-tricks. They come up with stuff like "We believe in free speech, but ‘hate speech’ is not free speech." Or they claim to denounce supremacism, all the while demanding that every politician in the US and Europe support the Zionist supremacist erasure of Palestinians and Wars for Israel that have decimated 100,000s of Arabs(who are regarded by Jews as subhuman). And Jews play Kafkaesque mind-games with us. Just like Joseph K. had no idea what he was being tried for and why, many people on the Social Platforms are confused as to what the rules are, who are to be allowed or denied service. In a way, Jews are using ambiguity as a weapon to keep everyone guessing because clarity allows people to readjust their expressions so as to comply with the Terms of Service. If Google offers only vague-sounding rules & regulations, it means you or anyone could be the next to be disappeared from Youtube, Facebook, or Twitter(overseen by ADL, a Zionist-Supremacist outfit). Through much of the 20th century, scholars interpreted Franz Kafka’s THE TRIAL and THE CASTLE as about the alienated Jewish consciousness in an elaborate & hostile world, one that seeks both more modernity and arch-preservation of old privileges. (As modernity with its populism and meritocracy undermines the Old Order of privileged hierarchy, the Power has to seek ever more 'esoteric' means via bureaucracy and laws to keep the castle gates closed to all but a few.) But given the developments in the 21st century whereby Jewish Supremacism has come to define so much of finance, foreign policy, media, and law & courts, one is tempted to see Kafka’s works as esoteric neo-Machiavellian manuals on how to exercise power by keeping those-without-power anxious, confused, and disoriented. When Jews didn't have the ultimate power, Kafka's works were their manifesto of protest; but now that they do have the ultimate power, Kafka's works have become manuals of privilege for the Jews. When one is rendered constantly off-balance, one doesn’t know which way to turn, in which case he must look to the Power for advice and guidance. Of course, the Power never gives the full game away. As the Pacino character says in GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS, "You never open your mouth unless you know what the shot is." The Power will nudge you here and there. It will intimate that some things are more 'right' and some things are more 'wrong', but there is no final say or clear instruction on anything. After all, the trick of Power is to monopolize meaning, memory, and message. Consider how Jews sprung the vile Jonathan Pollard out of jail, furnished him a plush job, and sunk the whole sordid affair into a memory hole; meanwhile, James Field who, in a state of panic, plowed his car into a bunch of violent proglodyte thugs is sentenced to over 400 yrs behind bars. If meanings were clear and understood equally by the powerful and the powerless, then the powerful themselves would have to stick by the rules in the eyes of the powerless who would clearly understand right-and-wrong. But if the rules are never certain, the powerful get to change the goal-posts as they please and offer up legal jargon shrouded with banality such as ‘inclusion’, ‘hate’, ‘diversity’, and ‘social justice’(as defined by them, of course; notice how the Jewish Power ignores all the livid hatred among Jews and Zionists). The powerful are often arbitrary in their use of rules, but they also know the simpleminded can be led by the nose with sophistry and sacraments. Consider the countless opportunities of making some issue or cause seem noble and necessary by associating it with struggle against ‘racism’. (In the 1990s, the hot item was associating 'environmentalism' with 'racism'. Anything gets more traction by being deemed 'racist'.) Or how the term ‘Diversity’ has become such a catch-all mantra among the Proglob that anything, even the craziest policy, can be justified as its agent.

Even post-religious and anti-religious modern people have ‘spiritual’ longing for the sacred. The most important thing among today’s so-called ‘Liberals’ is not the objective neutrality of free speech, free inquiry, logic & facts, rationalism, individualism, or freedom of conscience. Many ‘liberals’ may be interested in ideas, intellectualism, and culture in a dry cerebral way. What really wets them with meaning is righteousness or self-righteousness of being holier-than-thou over others, especially those deemed by the Power to be Wicked and Deplorable. Reading about ideas & culture satisfies their curiosity and staves off boredom(and may tweak their egos as hipster-sophisticates), but there is no great moral or ‘spiritual’ satisfaction to be had from engagement with mere intellect and/or senses. For full emotional satisfaction, they must play angels against the devils of the age. As most of them are weak of will & agency, they out-source the definition of Good vs Evil to the Higher Powers, and of course, Jews control the ivory tower of media, academia, courts, and the Deep State. Jews are the hands, and ‘liberal’ goy minds are the clay.
For Jews, the most important thing is not universal freedom or justice. This goes for Jewish ‘liberals’ too. Just ask the Palestinians. They get the same shit from Jews, whether it’s ‘conservative’ William Kristol or ‘liberal’ Chuck Schumer. Whether it’s Max Boot or Ezra Klein, Jews regard ideology as a mere weapon/instrument of the deeper agenda that is Power for the Tribe. And this is why a Jewish-controlled Liberalism cannot last for long as true liberalism. Sooner than later, it turns into Liberalism-In-Name-Only or LINO as Jews come to violate too many Liberal Principles to serve what is essentially their Tribal-Centrism. Furthermore, true liberalism will also crumble with the neo-spiritualist cravings of Political Correctness or ‘Wokeness’ that will happily sacrifice Liberal Principles in favor of Raptures of Righteousness. Passion overrules Principles, just like water can wet a dry towel but a dry towel cannot dry the water; it can only absorb the water and become wet itself. Another threat to Liberalism comes from the rise of celebrity and idolatry — worship of famous people as demigods or superstars — that promote vulgarity, immaturity, and stupidity that degrade the culture of intellect, reason, and critical thought, all of which rely on self-control, balance, and sense of responsibility.

Anyway, if the saving grace of religion is that holiness is with God or gods than with Man, the problem of post-religious Political Correctness or ‘Wokeness’ is it has elevated certain individuals and certain groups to holy status. Worse, no effort is necessary among members of the ‘blessed’ group to retain their sacredness and indulge in uncritical, unreflective, & unexamined self-worship. At the very least, Hindu yogis must undergo long years of study, struggle, and self-denial to gain holy status as enlightened ones who've found the pathway to the divine. In contrast, no effort is required if you happen to be Jewish, black, or homo according to the current Idolatry-Ideology or ‘Idology’ of PC. (According to LGBTQXYZ logic, you can be Divine just by donning a wig and dress and shaking your fat butt.)

You could be the most rotten Jew but still be holy because you’re one of the Holy Holocaust Tribe. Especially as the meaning of ‘Holocaust Survivor’ has become so comprehensive and ‘inclusive’ over the years — any Jew who lived in German-Occupied Territories during World War II can claim to be a ‘Holocaust Survivor’ even though he or she wasn’t anywhere near a Nazi concentration camp or in the Eastern blood-lands — , so many Jews today can claim to have some relative who was a ‘Holocaust Survivor’. And with the rise of Christian Zionism, there are plenty of Christian dummies who near-worship Jews as the Chosen People. As a self-anointed and self-deified holy people(as Jews control PC that bestows special blessings on peoples), Jews don’t need be good or even try. No matter how much money they steal, how many wars they instigate, how many Palestinians they kill, how many nations they subvert, and how many cultures they corrupt & destroy, Jews are to be revered and worshiped as the most tragic people of all time. Post-religious modernity didn't so much reject sacredness as realign it with worldly matters. Whether it was the Nazis or Jewish supremacists claiming moral immunity for their Special Kind(triumphant or chosen), it was a new kind of magical thinking. Though Nazi ideology was rooted in the cold science of Darwinism, it was also premised on Racial Romanticism of the Nietzschean Ubermensch. Jews also had their own racial-supremacist consciousness that goes way back to the concept of Chosen-ness, but Jewish ethno-arrogance was partly tempered or obfuscated by the moralism of their religion. Nazis claimed the right to conquer and kill simply because their kind was deemed superior. In contrast, Jews developed the habit of tirelessly rationalizing their power-moves and struggles for dominance as the will of God at odds with the sinfulness of mankind, usually more among the goyim than among the Jews. Thus, if the Nazi race war was clearly a race war, the Jewish race war was spun as something else, a moral-spiritual crusade by Jews against goyim who’d sinned in the eyes of God. This is why Jewish Supremacism has lasted for so long. Jews moralized and spiritualized their Will to Power and Acts of Conquest. Jewish racial agenda was given cover via references to the moral-sounding God. Jews today continue in this time-tested vein as their TALK(of 'Tolerance' and 'Inclusion') is really a moralistic means to cover up their WALK(of 'Is it good for Jews?').

Blacks and Homos are also members of The Blessed in our Age of PC as dominated by Jews. Like Jews, blacks don’t need to make an effort at being good. They are sacred simply because they are. Being Black means never having to say you’re sorry. You see, "it’s a black thing and you wouldn’t understand." It be magic and shit. As with Jews, the bestowal of sanctity to blacks has been most troublesome because blacks, like Jews, are among the most problematic peoples on Earth. Same goes for homos who constitute a group with neurotic levels of narcissism — how else can we explain the ass-o-ciation of the term ‘pride’ with homo fecal penetration, aka Poo-Ride. Now, if a group known to be nice, gentle, and kindly were elevated to sacred status, it would hardly matter to the world. Suppose Americans had very high regard for the Amish. Amish are a group that wants to be left alone and to leave other peoples alone. Thus, even if they were put atop the pedestal by rest of America, the chances are they would not try to exploit their vaunted status to rule the world. Suppose there's Nice Nancy and Nasty Nicole. Even if Nice Nancy were showered with love and affention, she is likely to remain nice; but if Nasty Nicole got the love, she would take full advantage and strut around as diva. Who/whom matters in social psychology. Unlike the hypothetically adulated Amish, Jews-as-new-messiahs demand that all of us suck up to them. Blacks demand that we see them as neo-pharaohs or something. And homos now display neo-aristocratic attitude toward the NSMFR — Normal, Straight, Male, Female, Real — folks who are most people. Homos see themselves as princelings who should lord over the straight peons, the ‘breeders’. Homo attitude is "Straight people undergo the drudgery of making life, and we homos cruise the dream-ship of enjoying life." And if homos want to play ‘family’, they take life created by heterosexuality and pretend that THEY, as homos, made life. It’s like humans take puppies from mother-dogs and pretend they are the ‘parents’ of the pupper. The way homos see it, straight people are chained to animal biological processes, whereas homos are ABOVE such essentialism. Homo ‘reality’ is as they imagine it, fantasize it, and dream it. Tranny fantasism is an offshoot of the homo stuff. This is why it’s dangerous to elevate such people to such high MORAL(and even spiritual) status. At least in traditional Judaism, the prophets were humble before God even as they talked like they knew more than everyone else. At least in Christianity, the most blessed people are the saints whose lives are about humility, selflessness, and piety. Sainthood can only be attained individually. It can’t be shared communally or passed down among relatives or friends. It doesn’t matter if someone in your community is a saint. You could still be a creep. It doesn’t matter if your uncle or best friend is saint. It doesn’t mean you get to share in his blessedness.
In contrast, in our post-God world, certain groups with particular strong egos & wills have made themselves into the new gods on an unconditional and collective basis. Without God above them, they think they are the center of the world. Indeed, even those who profess to be religious or ‘spiritual’ practice a kind of egocentrism or ethnocentrism whereby god revolves around them than other way around. For instance, anyone who is slightly acquainted with the Bible knows that it is NOT pro-homo and certainly not pro-Sodomite, but we have disgusting & vile homos like Buttegieg and Tim Cook of Apple saying that god blessed them with perverse desires to have penises rammed up their bungs and to suck other men’s penises. As for blacks, their reading of the Bible seems to amount to "God say white folks and all other folks better give us free stuff cuz we be da best and shit." And according to Jews, the entire world has to rotate around the axis of Jewish neurosis and megalomania. They have no understanding of humility. Homos see the whole world as their ass to buttfuc*. Blacks see the whole world as their hippo to hunt. Jews see the whole world as their milk-and-honey to be harvested by goy peons. Also, the neo-sanctity of Jews, blacks, and homos doesn’t operate like Christian Sainthood where individuals must follow the righteous path to attain the blessings of God. Instead, individual virtue be damned. All Jews, all homos, and all blacks are holy, sacred, and blessed according to ‘Wokonography’ & ‘Wokology’ simply for BEING Jewish, black, or homo.

Such has imbued all three groups with excessive, indeed noxious, levels of self-regard and arrogance, made all the worse by most Americans bending over backwards to suck up to one, two, or all three groups. Of course, it was the Jews who got to decide the holiness levels among various groups, and the result is Jews, blacks, and homos as the most emblematic or ‘talismanic’ identities. As other groups lack innate holiness, they must seek it from the radiance of others who have it, much like planets depend on the Sun for light and heat as they lack autonomous radiance.
In Catholicism, the faithful sought the relics(of holy saints) as spiritual vitamins. Christians, as sinners burdened with imperfection and compromise, worship the Perfect Being in the figure of Jesus Christ. People enter churches as holy spaces, something their own homes are not. In spirituality, few are 'warm-blooded' while most are 'cold-blooded'. God, Jesus, and angels don’t need humanity to be holy, but humanity needs God, Jesus, and angels to be blessed with holiness. God, Jesus, and angels have 'warm-blooded' spirituality that is self-generated. In contrast, humans are spiritually 'cold-blooded' and need the warm radiance of God, Jesus, and angels to be led on the righteous path, hopefully even to Heaven. Warm-blooded mammals generate inner-heat even in the cold. In contrast, fish, amphibians, and reptiles are cold-blooded and rely on outside environment to supply the heat, which is why we see turtles and snakes basking in the sun.

According to PC, the Holy Three of Jews, blacks, and homos are ‘spiritually’ warm-blooded, whereas most other groups, especially white folks, are cold-blooded. Jews don’t need the approval or adulation of others to be holy. Blacks are magic as Sun Folks. And for homos, ‘pride’ doesn’t have to be demonstrated and earned. A homo doesn’t have to find the cure for cancer and win the Nobel Prize to claim a bit of pride. All he has to do is prance around waving the homo ‘rainbow’ flag and take ‘pride’ in his practice of poo-ride, aka homo-fecal-penetration.
In contrast, other groups, especially whites, range from lukewarm-blooded to cold-blooded to ice-blooded. Muslims/Arabs, for instance, can be deemed as lukewarm ‘holy’ vis-a-vis ‘racist’, ‘xenophobic’, and ‘Islamophobic’ whites, but they are seen as dead-soul-cold vis-a-vis the holy Jews. Their ‘holiness’ is conditional and situational unlike the unconditional holiness of Jews, blacks, and homos according to Wokology. Because Jews, blacks, and homos are deemed to have intrinsic warmth whereas other groups(especially whites) do not, there is this obsession among whites and other groups to suck up to Jews, blacks, and homos to soak up some of the PC radiance. (Maybe Jews should come up with Philo-Semitic Soap for goyim. Rub your filthy goy body with some of that Jewish holiness.) This is why we see the phenomenon of NJBH(non-Jewish-black-homo) groups in America desperately trying to ally with Jews, blacks, and/or homos or to draw parallels between their own ‘plights’ or ‘struggles’ and with those of the JBH(Jew-black-Homo). So, pro-immigration-invasion advocates will say that illegals are the Southern Border are like the New Jews being persecuted by Nazis. Or various non-white NJBH groups will insist that their problems in the US are akin to blacks in the Civil Right Struggle. Sometimes, it gets kinda amusing, as when Palestinian-Americans argue they are the New Jews being tyrannized by Israeli Jews as the New Nazis.
If various lukewarm-blooded or cold-blooded NJBH & non-white groups seek alliances or associations with JBH to bask in the holiness, they also portray themselves as worthy of sympathy, compassion, and even a bit of extra serving of holy sunshine on the basis of their victimhood at the hands of Evil Whites. If Wokology says Jews, blacks, and homos are especially holy, it also says whites(especially if straight, male, and ‘right-wing’) are especially wicked. If some folks must be gods or angels, others must be made the Devil or demons. Thus, it’s morally advantageous to not only associate one’s own kind with JBH but to depict them as victims of EW or Evil Whitey. In religion, the devout seek salvation from God and delivery from the Devil. God is seen as life, Devil is seen as death. This is so EVEN IN CASES where God does the killings while the Devil offers shelter or sanctuary. The Bible is filled with stories with God killing lots of ‘innocent’ people and with Satan offering the temptation of relief. But even when God acts the ‘tyrant’, the devout seek the favors of God while denouncing the Devil. In the end, devotion > data. Even if the data showed that God killed more than Satan did and demonstrated the objective worth of Satan's offers, the devout must choose God because He is holy whereas the Devil, no matter how ‘generous’, is wicked and evil. This factor is what white folks never seem to understand about Wokology. It doesn’t matter how generous and good-hearted they are. It doesn’t matter how many overtures they make to other groups. The fact is Wokology paints whites as especially wicked and evil. So, even if white people give and give a lot, the takers will merely see the offerings as the gift of the Devil. In their hunger and greed, they will take the gifts of the White Devil but immediately denounce Evil Whitey just the same. Just look at the attitude of Somalis who’ve taken so much from whites but spit in the white face. Look how Jews act toward white Americans. Without Anglo-America, Jews would not control the world, but Jews feel nothing but contempt for Wasps. If a woman sees one man as handsome & wonderful while seeing another as ugly & gross, she will still want to be with the former than the latter, even as the latter offers her more gifts. She will take the stuff but still rebuff him. Love isn’t about materiality. One can love someone passionately even if he or she isn't objectively a 'good' person. One could find him or her to be especially beautiful, stylish, or dazzling. In contrast, one will not fall in love with someone who is gross but bears lots of gifts. Now, a woman may marry a rich gross man, or a man may marry an ugly gross daughter of a rich family, but there is no love there. One’s heart will never be with the gross person who offers plenty of stuff. Indeed, in such marriages, one is marrying the stuff than the person.

At any rate, wokology imbues certain groups with holiness and certain groups with wickedness. Of course, white People need not have become the Devil of the World. They became such because Jews took power of media/academia and because whites decided to suck up to Jews who hate them. Over time, a kind of Cycle of Contempt took hold in the Jewish-White relationship. The more Jews insulted, mocked, and berated whites, the more whites sucked and cucked up to Jews in the hope that, by demonstrating their fealty and devotion, Jews would stop being nasty and start loving whites. But white cuckery only emboldened Jews to be even nastier and more contemptuous toward whites. Then, whites tried even harder to cuck and suck up to Jews to gain their favor, and this made Jews feel even MORE contempt for sappy wussy whites. If you tell someone to lick your boot and if he does so, will you respect him all of a sudden because he sucked up to you? No, you will look down on him even further. Then, if you told him to open his mouth and peed into it, would you finally appreciate him because he is so loyal and servile to you? No, you would despise him even more. This is what whites fail to understand in their relation to Jews. The Cycle of Contempt must be broken IF Jews are to respect whites. Jews understand power, and unless whites make Jews fear White Power, Jews will continue to tell whites to open their mouths for golden showers and open up their bungholes for flagpoles bearing the Israeli flag.

Even though, Jews, blacks, and homos get to ‘morally’, ‘spiritually’, and ‘IDOL-ogically’ lord over the rest of humanity in the ‘Western’-Narrative-dominated World, things get a bit tricky and even testy when differences bubble up between the three holies, though the tensions are generally Jews vs blacks and Homos vs blacks than Jews vs Homos(as both groups are close and proximate in sensibility, outlook, profession, and cosmopolitanism). Jews and homos are also complementary in the way God and the Angels are. Jews are clearly many times more powerful than homos, but homos have their own advantages. Jewishness is fixed to Jews, and this factor limits the reach of Jewish power around the world. But every people have their share of homos, and in that sense, homo power is inherently more global than Jewish Power. Jewish Diaspora is worldwide, but there are many nations(even important ones)without a significant Jewish contingent. But even such nations have their homos who often feel bigger bond with homos around the world than with their own national kin. Unlike straight people whose real sexuality is about creating new life to carry on with culture and heritage, homos are all about indulging in a form of pseudo-sex — sodomy or homo-fecal-penetration — that can never produce life. So, homosexuality(or ‘inversexuality’ as homos invert all that is real) merely turns into a search of wild pleasure without thought of consequences. What does it matter into whose bung you stick your dong when sodomy cannot produce any life? So, if a lot of real-sexual or straight people approach sex as a means to mate with someone to produce children who will carry on with culture and heritage, homos approach their pseudo-sexual activity as a game of pleasure, or Game of Bones. It’s like Milo and Andrew Sullivan are perfectly happy with big black homo dongs up their soft white bungs. But because sodomy cannot produce life, homo identity is rather shallow.

While homos are horizontally advantaged over Jews because homos can be found in every nation, they are vertically disadvantaged because there is no such thing as homo lineage. Most homos are the children of straight parents, most of whom didn’t want to have homo children. (Today’s prog parents make a big fuss about how they are SO PROUD to have a son who takes dongs up his bung, but such strained enthusiasm suggests repression of their natural desire for non-homo kids. It’s like making an effort to enjoy spinach because you really don’t.) Not only are most homos the products of real sexuality by straight people, even when a homo man and a homo woman(lesbian) have a kid together, there is a much greater chance that the kid will be straight. As such, homo identity is more like mushrooms than trees; you never know where they will appear, and there’s no guarantee that new mushrooms will grow again on that spot. In contrast, the Jewish Community has a deep identity of Jews having Jewish kids who themselves grew up to have Jewish kids for thousands of years. Homos are like fungal spores, whereas Jews are like roots in their historical and ethnic consciousness. Thus, Jews wield more solid power. They have a clear sense of origin, place, and path. Jews and Homos are like Zeus and Hermes. Granted, Jews have been a mercurial people as well, and homo pagan-idolatry can be downright quasi-fascist & ‘Apollonian’ in vision, but Jewishness is rooted in patriarchy & continuity whereas queerness is flighty with pleasures of the moment. Thus, homos are useful to Jews in ways that angels are useful to God, or Hermes to Zeus(and Apollo). Jews are the prophets, and homos are the messengers. Jews are the producers, and homos are the players. But the relationship is as problematic as it is symbiotic, in the long run at least. After all, prior to the late modern era, it’s hard to think of a people who were more anti-homo than the Jews. If ‘reparations for homos’ ever become a thing, Jews should dole out most of the dough because because Judaism laid the foundation for the stringent anti-homo values of both Christianity and Islam. It was the Jews who regarded homosexuality as not merely weird, wrong, or gross but an abomination in the eyes of God Himself. But as Jews became post-religious and Jewishness became more about ethnicity than spirituality, Jews came to focus more on strategy for power and privilege than adherence to any higher moral value or spiritual command. Therefore, when Jews realized that a Judeo-Homo Axis could be very profitable(and even spawn a neo-religion in the form of cuckoo Globo-Homomania to push Christianity out of the nest of the West), they got over their traditional hangups. It’s also possible that homosexuality is more prevalent among Jews precisely because they were so anti-homo. In less anti-homo cultures, homos might have been allowed to do their homo things and not have children. But in the Jewish Community, being outed as a homo could lead to serious consequences, even death. So, Jewish homos likely gritted their teeth, got married, and had kids, thereby passing down their genes with homo tendencies.

What about Jews/Homos and blacks? Surely, there are complementary factors here as well. Jews run most of music industry, sports franchises, and mass media, and this means they have much to profit from blacks. In turn, as blacks are bigger in brawn than brains, they rely on Jewish smarts to succeed as rappers or athletes. Also, Jews and blacks cleverly use the White Guilt Trope and combine their Narratives of Holocaust and Slavery to make it seem like white folks are especially stained with sin for having caused harm to the two holiest groups in the world, the Desert Tribe and the Jungle Tribe. In a way, a reason why so many white folks took to Globo-Homomania is that a WHITE GENTILE PERSON can be one of the Holy People by wanting homo dongs up his bung. Of course, as most whites are not homo, only a relative few get to claim this holiness, but it’s still exciting for white folks that a white gentile can own holiness simply on the basis of BEING... a fruiter. It’s like Jimmy(Robert De Niro) and Henry(Ray Liotta) can never be ‘made’ in GOODFELLAS because they are half-Irish, but they are so happy that one of the crew, Tommy(Joe Pesci), has been chosen to be a Made Man. White people are so ecstatic about Globo-Homo because one of their own can be ‘made’ by taking a Negro dong up his bung. Consider how the Boston Straight Pride chose none other than Milo(of all people) to be its man of the hour.

Homos and blacks also have common interests. Homos are obsessed with idolatry, and because blacks dominate sports and music, many homos are totally enthralled with blackness, and many white homo men’s main desire is to take Negro dongs up their bungs. Also, as blacks are likely the most self-centered, self-aggrandizing, and megalomaniacal people on earth, they appreciate how homos in fashion and pop culture have done so much for the Black Image.

Still, there are major tensions between Jews/Homos and blacks as well. Jews and Homos tend to be intellectual, cultured, and sophisticated, whereas blacks tend to be rough, brutish, and wild. Jews and Homos prefer the Black Image over the Black Reality. They like to take aspects of blackness and fashion them into an idealized-idolatry, or ‘idealotry’, and indeed, much of the world knows blackness mainly in this ‘idealotrous’ form(via Hollywood, Music Industry, and Sports Celebrity) than in its raw form in the streets, which is usually ugly and demented(as tirelessly documented by Colin Flaherty). Jews and Homos prefer the Negro on TV than Negro in Reality, not least because Jews and Homos get to mold the Black Image in the media whereas blacks of raw reality insist on being unruly & ghastly and resist attempts to 'ennoble' them). Jews and Homos are experts at white-collar crime and cultural decadence, but they are not thugs in the streets, and they don’t destroy cities with rioting and looting. When it comes to crime, blacks are tops because evolution in hot Sub-Saharan Africa favored the hunter-warrior gene. So, despite the rhetorical unity among Jews, homos, and blacks, the fact remains that many Jews and homos fear black thugs and don’t want live in places with Too Many Blacks. Also, as blacks are often wild and unruly, their demented rages at whites in general can sometimes turn against Jews and homos, not least because both groups are seen essentially as ‘white’ by blacks. Furthermore, lack of black reflectiveness has them enraged over the fact that Jews and white homos are so much better off than blacks. (Of late, increasing numbers of blacks are envious and resentful of the fact that the elite-favored homo idolatry has knocked a few pegs off black holiness.) As far as blacks are concerned, they should have the most of everything since they be so ‘bad’ and ‘cool’ in stuff like sports and rapping, the ONLY things most blacks care about. Blacks think in primitive hunter-warrior terms. Among savages, the toughest warrior who can chuck the spear the farthest gets the most booty. Black view of reality is one-on-one. For hunters in a state of savagery, it’s Me and the Kill. In the modern world, things are far more complicated as it takes lots of brains, organizational skills, and expertise to write laws, manage enterprises, and maintain elaborate systems. The Negro mind has no patience for such things. It just thinks, "I’s the baddest mofo, so I’s deserve the most blings and shit." But Jews and homos have more gold than Negroes do, and this makes a lot of Negroes angry. While Negroes approach Jews and Homos as useful allies for the time being, they nevertheless regard them as The Enemy(and Whitey). As a result, Jews/Homos and Blacks often don't see eye to eye, made worse by the fact that blacks, especially in colleges, have plenty of ‘cold-blooded’ white supporters who, lacking self-generated heat of holiness, lean on ‘warm-blooded’ blacks to bask in the sunshine. Whenever blacks flip out, even to the detriment for Jewish power & privilege, white progs join in the stampede of rage and fury. In a way, these white progs are as vampiric as subservient vis-a-vis blacks. Because blacks are seen as ‘moral’ & ‘spiritual’ superiors, white progs get all sappy & servile at the feet of blacks as holy icons. But precisely because their cold-blooded selves lack innate sanctity, they try to absorb the holy heat of the Magic Negro. If white women got jungle fever, too many whites(even conservatives) need the Jungle Blanket to warm up their souls. Thus, many whites think nothing is more righteous than siding with holy blacks on ANY issue. Whenever there is another Hate Hoax, white progs are among the first ones to throw themselves into the fray, sometimes with bad results:

With the reality of black thuggery/criminality and the preponderance of ‘hate hoaxes’, one would think white progs would wake up to reality, but apparently, being ‘woke’ means to fall under hypnotic spell of Negro Worship as if everything is a 'civil rights struggle', the holiest event in US history that today's millennials missed out on and can relive only through new 'injustices' to fume over. Hate Hoaxes with the usual props of nooses and swastikas are part of the Halloweening of the Civil Rights Narrative. The psychology of spirituality is such that even all the evidence in the world cannot override one’s need for faith. Kevin Michael Grace is a smart and erudite person, but he feels a need to believe in the Gospels and their supernatural narrative of the Resurrection. There have been so many Catholic hoax-miracles, but the faithful were always eager to dispense with the latest fraud and witness the next miracle. Hate Hoaxes are like 'Smearicles'
that are meant to prove once again that Jews, blacks, and homos are pure-souled saints, angels, and gods who must be protected from Evil Whitey or Evil 'Homophobe'.
The psychology of holiness, like the psychology of hedonism, can easily overcome any supply of reason and facts. Gambling addicts rationally know the odds are against them, but they keep playing in the hope that the Next roll of dice will be the Big One, the jackpot miracle. Likewise, even when the faithful are presented with science(that disprove religion) and informed of the many frauds & corruptions of the church, they hold steadfast for the next miracle. In a similar vein, the reason why so many white progs are so blind to reality is they’re under the spell of magical thinking. From an early age, they’ve been instilled with the ‘idology’ of the Magic Negro, Holy Homo, and Wise Jew. Thus, they are incapable of holding rational views on the Holy Three of Jews, Negroes, and Homos. No matter the latest revelation of Jewish crookedness, black thuggery, or homo degeneracy — and no matter how many ‘hate hoaxes’ come our way — , their magical thinking continues to HOPE for the ‘miracle’ or 'smearicle' that confirms their faith that Jews, blacks, and homos are so holy-schmoly.
Of course, this allows Jews, blacks, and homos to doubly victimize the rest of the populace. Consider the Jews. Jews can do us wrong and then attack us of ‘antisemitism’ for noticing that they did us wrong. Thus, not only do Jews get to do us wrong but get to wrong us again by accusing us of feeling wronged by them, the Jews. Imagine that. Suppose Bob not only gets to steal from you but gets to condemn you for noticing that he stole from you. You’d be doubly wronged by Bob. Given the official holiness of Jews, blacks, and homos, they get to doubly do us wrong. Blacks commit lots of crime but also accuse us of ‘racism’ for noticing that they commit a lot of crime. So, not only are lots of whites victimized by blacks but they are forced to pretend they were not victimized by blacks. Call the thugs ‘teens’ or ‘youths’ or chant along to ‘Black Lives Matter’ when, in fact, too many blacks see no value in the lives of others, black or non-black. Jews can rob us blind and push for the Great Replacement. Indeed, Jews sometimes even brag about how they are at the center of demographic transformations in the West. But, lest you speak up about Jewish role in financial malfeasance and demographic imperialism, you are condemned as potentially ‘antisemitic’ if you dare entertain the thought of Jewish role in all this. So, you must suffer silently. You are victimized doubly by Jewish deed and Jewish decree. Jews not only get to burn your house down but get to shut you up lest you dare say Jews did it(which would be 'antisemitic'): As Jews are deemed holy, they couldn’t have done such a thing even if they did it. If a Jew burns your house down, the real crime according to Wokology is not that he torched your house but you might have noticed that HE, the Jew, did it. After all, if Jews are holy, then they can’t do unholy things, and that implies only an ‘irrational Anti-Semite’ would dare accuse the Jew. Or, if Jews do admit they burned the house, it must have been most justified(and even noble) because, being holy, whatever Jews do must be good and righteous. Then, it is not surprising that, on the issue of the Great Replacement, we get two narratives from Jews: "Only crazy Anti-Semites would believe that Jews engineered the Great Replacement of whites in the West" and "Yeah, we Jews did push for the Great Replacement, and it is most justified because you evil white Christian scum deserve to be conquered, humiliated, and owned." As for the holy homos, we have to pretend that they were NOT responsible for the HIV disaster since the 1980s. If anything, we have to tell our selves that homos were innocent victims of both HIV and uncaring ‘homophobia’. And of course, we have to pretend that the gross, sick, and ugly displays of ‘gay pride’ every year are akin to blessings from heaven. It’s all so demented.

When it comes to Jews-blacks-homos AND everyone else, the holy trio has the upperhand. It’s like kings and serfs, gods and mortals. But what about the intra-acrimony that sometimes flares among the Holy Three? It is like a parody of the war of the gods or the clash of the titans. A Jew can easily shut others down as ‘antisemitic’, blacks can shut down others as ‘racist’, and homos can shut down others as ‘homophobic’. The three cardinals sins according to PC are ‘antisemitism’, ‘racism’, and ‘homophobia’. But what happens when Jews, homos, and blacks are at loggerheads?

Consider the Zionists vs Ilhan Omar debacle. How was it ultimately resolved? By blaming WHITE PEOPLE in Congress over the feud between Jewish Zionists and Somali-black-Muslims. Generally, Jews and homos get along, but things may change as Homo Power goes from white to non-white. As the Muslim World remains mostly anti-homo, Homo power is mainly with Jews, but if non-whites become more prominent around the world in defining the Pink Agenda, the result may be a homo-tug-of-war whereby both Jews and their enemies will claim the right to the ‘rainbow’ banner. So far, Jews have found globo-homo very useful as a lubricant in their power game. Indeed, imagine a world without globo-homomania. Jews would have to exert their power AS JEWS upon goyim, and many peoples around the world would recognize this Power Move as JEWISH and ALIEN. While Jew-Worship is holy writ in the West, it has far less traction in the Non-West. Furthermore, many non-white nations have no taboos against bashing Jewish power and Zionism. Then, it’s no wonder Jews craved and concocted a proxy means to use their influence around the world, and their strategy was to ‘sacralize’ the homos in every nation and then use them as quasi-angels, heralds, and envoys of the Jewish god-men. But just like Christianity went from a Jewish thing to a Gentile thing, it’s possible that the Jewish-created Globo-Homo may truly go ‘universal’(or ‘buniversal’) and come to see Jewish Power as problematic. Already, there are homo Muslims in the US who denounce Zionism. And Ilhan Omar, despite her devotion to Muhammad, is an eager-waver of the globo-homo flag, though it could just be a case of opportunism.

Anyway, the Blacks vs Buttegieg confrontation was one of the most amusing instances of the ‘clash of the titans’. We know Buttegieg(who looks like a cross between Anthony Perkins, Bob Denver, and Howdy Doody) thinks he’s hot stuff simply because he’s a homo. He has imbibed homo-narcissism so fully that he believes even the Biblical God must revise His sacred laws to appease the homo community. Imagine that. Homos expect god in heaven to say, "Yes, I designed your anus, aka fecal hole, to be used as a sex organ, and there are few things more wonderful than the sight and smell of a ‘gay’ penis that’s been up the poopchute of another man." I suppose cancer is also a blessing because God meant us to have it. One cannot have a reasonable conversation with men like Buttegieg who are so full of themselves. With the backing of Jews as godmen, homos now have an easy time condemning and destroying anyone who is suspected of the heresy of ‘homophobia’, but, and it’s a Big But, things aren't so easy when a homo is confronted with the supposedly Noble Negroes. Just like homos think they’re hot stuff simply because they’re homo, blacks think they’re magical simply because they’re black. After all, the media, education, and state propaganda remind us constantly to love, respect, revere, and near-worship the Negroes because they are most magical-and-tragical-and-badassical-and-most-musical. Blacks have soaked this all up and filled themselves to the gills with boundless self-regard, and this means they never have to face the music or look in the mirror to understand their failings and realize what they must do to rectify the situation in places like St. Louis and Baltimore. Then, it’s hardly surprising that the blacks who confronted Buttegieg and the South Bend police department weren’t capable of thinking or expressing anything but "We totally right" and "You totally racist." Blacks bitch about ‘racism’ in the police department while overlooking the fact that most black deaths are at the hands of other blacks who are equally thug-like. A black grandmother yaps about her grand-kid being scare of cops, but why is SHE raising the kid? Where is the mother? The father? And of course, kids will believe anything they’re told. As too many black adults are idiots and morons, they tell their kids that white KKKops are out to kill them when, if anything, black-on-black murder rates go UP when the police retreat from black communities. And notice how the blacks always demand that OTHERS fix the problems that blacks caused. Now, it’s possible that MORE could be done by the government and society-at-large for the black community, but it is impossible when so many blacks just keep acting crazy and pathological even when more aid and programs come their way. Just consider the attitude of black students in well-funded schools with good teachers and high-tech equipment. Most of them just want to fool around and howl like apes.
In a sane and rational society that cares about the truth, we should be able to discuss these problems, but ours is not a sane/rational society but one with a perverted secular-sense of neo-spirituality that decided to elevate certain key identities as the new gods. Blacks being one of the god-races, they never need to examine themselves and their failings. Why should they? Blacks have been told over the years that they’re holy, magical, and awesome in every way. So, if anything goes wrong, it MUST be the fault of others. What a sick state of affairs. When the most pathologically savage race has been elevated to the highest spiritual status(along with Jews and Homos), it was bound to lead to all sorts of problems. Of course, this was one reason why Mass Immigration was welcomed as a buffer against dangerous blacks. Even as blacks were elevated ‘spiritually’, cities got worse with black gang/criminal activity. If whites had honesty and courage, they would have acknowledged the truth of racial differences and sought some kind of separation of the races(as Abraham Lincoln proposed), but the Magic Negro trope became so sacrosanct that, even after the L.A. Riots and OJ Simpson fiasco, whites refused to face the reality and continued to believe in the holiness of blacks, incredibly even as they took to white flight from black areas; it just goes to show the power of idolatry over reality. Besides, no matter how much crime and violence blacks commit in any given year, there is the new Rap hit, the new Oprah episode, the new PBS documentary about MLK & Civil Rights, the new basketball and football seasons that have countless whites screaming at the top of their lungs for their black gods and heroes. And white women came down with jungle fever, and white men got used to cuckery and even came to see it as necessary to bring about racial reconciliation via the Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs or ACOWW.
Besides, gods are supposed to be above the law, right? The laws of man don’t apply to the gods who live with their own laws. The rise of celebrity culture centered around a**hole-athletes and thug-rappers especially led to the notion that morality and laws are for little people, the lame losers. As blacks are the ‘cool’ god-race, they don’t have to play by ‘white’ rules, and indeed their transgression is all the more ‘badass’ for its taunting nigga-nihilism. It’s a kind of ‘Nigzscheanism’. And Jews and homos feel the same way. Jews now think and act like god-men with the power and right to subvert, loot, destroy, and/or transform any society by whatever means available. Consider the creep George Soros or the monster Sheldon Adelson who says a nuke should be lobbed at Iran. According to Jews, Israel can ignore international inspections and make nukes whereas Iran, a nation with no nukes, must be sanctioned and wrecked economically. As for Palestinians, just forget about it. Jews are holy, Palestinians are shit, and as far as Jews are concerned, white folks in Europe and US are just More Palestinians to degrade, dehumanize, and exploit. And we are all familiar with how nihilistic the homo and tranny communities are. For them, ‘morality’ or the ‘good’ is whatever that flatters and celebrates them as the new angels. They even took over many churches that now have clergy with homo colors preaching that Jesus died on the Cross so that homos can claim sodomy as godly and trannies can cut their dicks off & read stories to young children.
Then, it is most fascinating to observe the clash of nihilisms among groups that would be gods. Buttegieg, who is so full of himself(when his howdy-doody bung is not filled with homo dongs), walks around straight white people like he’s the second coming or something — after all, being homo makes him holy whereas straight white people are without innate sanctity — , but he finds himself perplexed, disoriented, and even afraid among blacks, the other god-race. If angry whites got aggressive with him, he could just dismiss them as ‘homophobes’ or ‘bigots’, but he’s flustered among Noble Negroes(even though blacks act noble only in Hollywood movies). On the one hand, as a white homo, he has achieved much more than most blacks, many of whom are poor and even desperate in the run-down black parts of South Bend. Also, he is the darling of powerful Jews and the elite class. In contrast, the blacks who are hollering at him in the video are the dregs of society with no prospects. And yet, because they are black and what blackness symbolizes in the American PC discourse, Buttegieg’s magical powers as a holy homo is much diminished in the presence of angry, nasty, and unruly Magic Negroes(who act more like Manic Niggaz). Blacks in South Bend won't south-bend-over to Buttegieg's homo holiness. In some ways, it’s even funnier than Ilhan Omar vs the Zionists on Twitter over who has more Wokemon Intersectional Points. Especially hilarious is the moment when Butt-Plug is grilled by blacks as to whether he believes 'black lives matter', and the butter-butt-boy's voice cracks with emotions like he wants to cry or something. It reminds us of George W. Bush saying that the WORST moment of his presidency was when trashy Kanye West said Bush doesn't like black people. Never mind blacks don't value the lives of fellow blacks. Whether in black Africa, Haiti, Jamaica, UK, or US, blacks love to kill other blacks because the core mentality among blacks is not "Is it good for the blacks?" but "Is it good for ME?" As cunning and lowdown as Jews can be, at least they hold onto the value of Honor Among Jewish Thieves. Blacks will destroy other blacks just to get 'what is mine'. While Bush could have done more in the wake of Katrina, the real problem was blacks either sat around for OTHERS to solve all the problem or, worse, went on looting rampages and reveled in chaos during the crisis. For blacks, 'never let a crisis go to waste' means rob, rape, and rampage all you want while the lights are out. And based on reports of the death in South Bend, it seems to be another case of the police taking drastic measures to put down a crazed thug or criminal. But, it never registers among blacks that maybe-just-maybe their behavior is at the root of these problems. And the Jew-run media that follow the PC script portray blacks as perennial victims even when they're the perpetrators of most of the violence in America. And jerks like Mayor Buttplug and George W. Bush are more triggered and distraught by accusations of "You don't care about black folks"(that has the effect of "You don't believe in God" in a devout religious community) in our dumb-dumb culture that takes cues from the church of wokology. If Mayor Buttplug had real integrity in a society that valued it, he would have shot back to the blacks, "Look, you blacks wallow in trash culture, threaten each other, act like thugs, and do the most slaughtering of blacks in this town and across the country. So, why don't you black shits stare in the mirror and face the music for a change instead of twerking your asses to trashy rap music." In current US, blacks act like apes but we are supposed to see them as angels. Ape-Angels or Apegels are what blacks have become.

This really has to end. We can’t have an honest and truthful debate about things that really matter in a nation where certain groups get to play gods over the rest. It is disconcerting and dangerous, not to mention deeply corrupting, not least because Jews, blacks, and homos are especially problematic groups. Jews, with their higher IQ, strong personality, & tribal heritage, are favored by circumstances to gain great wealth and power. Such a powerful and influential people must be scrutinized and criticized honestly, or their power will grow cancerous and pathological, as it certainly has already in our world. And blacks, with their greater aggression and muscle power, can cause lots of harm as thugs, criminals, bullies, and lunatics. Unless we discuss the Black Problem honestly, we’ll just end up with more Fergusons. Screaming BLM when blacks are the ones who are committing the most robberies, rapes, and murders is a sign that the US has fallen into the vortex of inverse reality. And homos have special talents in arts & design, and many of them have become rich and powerful. But their vanity can get the best of them, and we now live in a world where homos aren’t satisfied with tolerance & individual freedom but demand and mandate that we all bend over to their self-image as new angels of some ‘rainbow’ fantasy world. It’s like we’ve all been sucked into the fantasy dream of Liberace and Michael Jackson through the cocaine-laced anus of Elton John. Homos not only claimed the term ‘gay’ but ‘pride’, and the West allowed this to happen without any moral, political, and spiritual resistance because our world has been so corrupted by the lies, egos, vanities, and sick prides of devious Jews, demented blacks, and degenerate homos.

We need HUMANISM that sees all peoples as humans with potential for good and bad. Being human doesn’t mean you’re innately good or bad. It means you can be good, you can be bad. At any rate, you must try to understand the world and yourself. And everyday, you must make an effort to be a good person and learn to be self-critical as critical of the world around you. Nazism and Communism failed because they both rejected or failed humanism. Nazism elevated the Aryan-Europeans as the Noble Superior Race, and that meant they were above the norms of rest of humanity. So, just like Jewish supremacists so full of themselves think any number of Palestinians, Arabs, Muslims, Russians, and white people may be sacrificed at the altar of "Is it good for Jews?", the Nazi Aryanists believed than any number of Slavs in Russia could be sacrificed to make way for the superior Teutons. Ironically, what Jewish Hegemonists and Nazis have in common is the conceit of Racial Supremacism. Jewish globalists claim to be anti-supremacist, but all their berating of ‘white supremacism’ is to distract us from the undeniable fact that US essentially operates as a Jewish-Supremacist warship. If indeed Jews are all about equality, why don’t they support BDS and demand that the US government treat Israeli Jews and Palestinians equally? Why don’t Jews demand that Israel be sanctioned for having nukes while Iran be rewarded for NOT having nukes? Why don’t Jews complain that Jews are vastly over-represented in elite industries and institutions? Jews use the ‘social justice’ Talk to hide the tribal-supremacist Walk.
Anyway, whether it’s the Nazis honestly yapping about racial supremacism and practicing it OR Jewish globalists dishonestly yapping about racial equality while practicing the opposite, the notion of the holy races is deeply corrupting to humanity, morality, and public discourse. Just like serfs could never talk freely with kings, the less holy or unholy peoples cannot speak honestly with or about holy peoples because anything deemed offensive to the holies is TABOO. The result is the scenario in "Emperor’s New Clothes". It is anti-humanist. Now, humanism doesn’t say all humans, as individuals or groups, are equal in intelligence, ability, or integrity. However, it does say that even the lowest human is still human and deserving of some recognition as a member of the human species. Also, it says even the smartest and/or most capable person in whatever(science, arts, athletics, philosophy, spirituality, etc.) is ultimately nothing more than human. He may be an impressive human but still a human, not a god or superhero. Humanism grounds us in reality. It reminds us that even humans with seemingly godlike powers -- Beethoven, Shakespeare, Newton -- were, in the end, mortal, limited, and flawed. The Germans and Japanese in World War II got to thinking and behaving as if they were made of god-dust. Nazis relied more on pseudo-science whereas Japanese relied more on myth, but the end-result was the same. Both vastly overestimated themselves and underestimated the rest of humanity. Now, communism, in its emphasis on the justice for the proles, had something of a humanist streak, but it failed because genuine humanism was compromised and swept asunder by the deification of History as embodied by the Great Man(such as Stalin or Mao as god-men). As communism had little use for the individual, it had a tendency to see humanity as a mass than a collection of fragile and vulnerable persons. In the name of history, it came to regard humanity as cannon fodder for the revolution, which explains why Stalin and Mao were willing to expend millions of lives to realize their grand visions. While humanism doesn’t reject grand history, it never loses sight of individuals who make up humanity. These individuals are fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, sisters, brothers, cousins, friends, neighbors, and comrades. They are not mere pawns in some sick game of power played by men who would be gods.

Humanism and Nationalism go together because they both understand the need for limits. Beyond humanism is the nihilism of god-ism or Divinism, which is most dangerous because humans can never be gods. (We’ll leave it up to Cuckoo Michio Kaku to cook up some technology to turn us into ‘gods’ like in the AKIRA anime.) Beyond nationalism is imperialism where one nation comes to regard itself as so great and awesome that it has a might-is-right claim to conquer and dominate other peoples. Humanism and Nationalism are the Goldilocks Rule between the extremes of high and low. Below humanism is animalism, an outlook that says humans should surrender to the most vulgar and base desires of the Id. Paradoxically, god-ism and animalism seem to reinforce each other in the modern world. Why would this be if one aims high while the other one aims low? When people regard themselves as godly, they feel they are above the law and get to do as they wish. After all, what is the point of being gods if you can’t indulge in your power? So, those who regard themselves as godly come to indulge in all sorts of piggish vices that make the animal-like. This was a problem with both Greek and Germanic gods. Zeus and Odin were great noble gods, but all that power also led them to indulge in all sorts of vices and pleasures, especially in wooing lots of women to the fury of their wives. It was when men like Stalin, Hitler, and Mao gained godly amounts of power that they became most dangerous as brute-tyrants. Nazis and Japanese regarded themselves as quasi-divine races, but this led them to carry out some of the most barbaric acts in World War II. Why would godly men do such things? Because being godly, they are above the law and free to indulge in their arrogance and powerlust. So, feeling godly can be the pathway to acting like animals. It’s also true the other way around. Consider the trashy rappers who shamelessly indulge in crude, ugly, and vulgar animalistic behavior. But being so lowly, why would they be so full of themselves as the demigods of our age? Because animalism is all about unfettered aggression and domination, and this leads to mad adrenaline rushes to be the ‘baddest mothafuc*a in the world’. Winning at boxing surely got Muhammad Ali to thinking he is the ‘greatest’.

We don’t need animalism or god-ism(or Divinism). We need humanism. And we need nationalism as the Goldilocks Rule between insane individualism or petty tribalism(on the clan-kin-gang level) AND imperialism that has no sense of limits. If imperialism is too arrogant & ambitious, individualism/tribalism is too small-minded and limited to serve as the basis of a complex modern society. But it seems our age is ill-suited to accept the Golden Middle as ideal for most peoples and the world. Eric Hobsbawm’s book on the 20th Century was called THE AGE OF EXTREMES, and the 21st Century seems like an Age of Excesses. The idea of ‘middle’ is attacked from all sides. Anti-Middle-ism is the rule of the day. Middle Class is to be sacrificed on the altar of globalism. Nationalism as Middle-Political-Arrangement is to be swept aside to make way for the excesses of globalist-imperialism and tribal-animalism. Look at the US and EU, and we see the rise of both intensified globalism and increased tribalism. London has become more globalized under Jewish globo-homo imperialist hegemony, but it’s also becoming more animalized & tribalized with black crime, ethnic tensions, social distrust, and gang behavior.

Same in France, a post-nation that is more globalized by the day but also torn asunder by religious, ethnic, and class divisions. Even though the Hungarian Model of the nation-state is the sane middle-position, both the globalist-imperialists and animalist-tribalists denounce it as ‘far-right’ and ‘extreme’. Apparently, the Sorosian Jewish-globalist model of radical macro-demographic transformations and the Neo-African model of invading other nations to practice micro-animalist behaviors such as ‘twerking’, running around with machetes, and tossing acid at people’s faces is the New Normal. (When Europe was homogeneous, the reactions against the middle by the extremes of left and right might have fueled greater progress. Left pushes society forward, and the right offers necessary respite that stabilizes society for another round of revolutions. The stabler 80s were necessary for the nation to recover from the excesses of the late 60s and 70s. The constant push and pull between the left and right led to more dynamism. The social pendulum of Modern Europe was more active than in the Traditional East that favored the notion of the Middle Road that grew overly static and stagnant. In a homogeneous nation, the forces of both right and left can be as infuriating as inspiring, but there is one constant in that both the right and the left share in the national identity, history, and territoriality. Left or Right, it's national vs national. But when globalism diversifies a nation, the back-and-forth swing between left and right is no longer a family affair but becomes a game of the Other vs Us, and this is bound to be destructive than constructive. The 'pendulic' swing on the national level between left and right gave the West an advantage over the Middle-centrist Orient, but the anti-middle-ist mode may prove to be fatal to the West because the ideological debate is not between 'leftism is better for OUR people' and 'rightism is better for OUR people' but between 'others should take over our nation' and 'we should keep our own nation'. Swedish left vs right used to be about 'good for Swedes' vs 'good for Swedes'. If two nations are both nationalist-homogeneous, the one with left-right dynamism may gain over the middle-stable one as creative sparks are more likely to result from friction of controversy than inaction of conformity. But when the left-right dynamism is about whether a people should keep their nation or surrender it to foreigners, especially black-African savages, that nation is in real danger, and the safer bet is the nation that seeks the middle-ground despite its stasis. Of course, neo-fascism offers a formula of left-right friction on the national level.)
Homos can’t stand the Golden Middle either. There used to be a time when it seemed possible that society could meet homos halfway. Let homos be homo and do their own thing and let us tolerate them for what they are. But that was not enough for homos. With the backing of Jews, homos demanded that they be elevated to god-status and be celebrated. Entire city blocks had to be shut down for mass ‘gay pride’ parades. Homo flags and colors had to be shown on massive buildings. Churches must fly the homo flag, and if you don’t bake the ‘gay wedding’ cake, you must be destroyed by lawfare. The lesson to take from this is that you can arrive at the Goldilocks Rule ONLY WITH people who have a sense of limits and give-and-take. Just like Hitler was impossible to negotiate with since he wanted everything his way, one should be careful about negotiating with peoples such as Jews, blacks, and homos who are naturally disposed to be egotistical, megalomaniacal, narcissistic, and/or vain to the max. In a way, it’s most fitting that our age has seen the destruction of much of the Middle East, the cradle of civilization from which so much history, culture, and arts emanated. The middle of the world between north and south, east and west, could not be left alone. It had to be destroyed and turned upside down at the behest of Jews who are now addicted to excessive megalomania.

To regain equilibrium in the world, we need to demote the new would-be god-races of Jews, homos, and blacks. If we are to deal with them as humans, as people, we must take away their mythic ‘made’ status as holy groups who are above the laws and norms that apply to the rest of us. It’s telling that Jussie Smollett is a Jewgromo, a Jew-Negro-Homo. He has so many holy-schmoly Wokemon points that he could pull off a obvious hoax, be showered with sympathy from celebrities & politicians, and then have his case dismissed after his stunt was indisputably exposed as a hoax meant to defame the white race. The end result of the deification of the Holy Three of Jews, Negroes, and Homos is the Folly of Jussie Smollett. In him we saw Jewish perfidy, black obnoxiousness, and homo vanity. As Jews, blacks, and homos have tremendous power of one kind or another over the US that controls the world, we cannot allow them to keep playacting as gods above us. What sane person wants to kiss the ass of Jussie Smollett and his ilk? And yet, that is what the US does and makes the rest of the world do. Needless to say, the Jewish supremacists at Google rigs search results to suppress stories about Smollett's shameless hoax. Divinism among Jews, blacks, and homos means that they play by their own rules in contemptuous disregard for the truth.

Whites, Jews, and Blacks — Need for White Race-ist Unity — Whites must be like Asian Indians if they're to avoid the Fate of American Indians

https://buchanan.org/blog/the-new-systemic-racism-that-is-coming-138889

A commenter asked in reply to the Patrick J. Buchanan article:

"I still don’t get how all this happened… Whites aren’t dumb or weak… Where did it all go wrong?"

'Dumb' and 'weak' are relative terms. In relation to whom and what?

If Jews never came to the US, whites would still be on top and would be setting the narrative and agenda. Sure, there would be liberal whites, but they would be in balance with conservative whites. Both liberalism and conservatism have value, and one provided reform and novelty while the other provided stability and continuity, sense of heritage and roots. But Jews came along and used their power to tip the scale in favor of Liberalism. Thus, white liberalism came to be severed from white conservatism. (American History went from reconciliation and mutual respect between Northern whites and Southern whites following the Civil War to such condemnation of white identity & the American South that even white Southerners now do nothing to defend their heritage from feral blacks and PC radicals egged on by Jews who, at the same time, demand that white Southerners support Jim Crowitz in the West Bank. Dixie Chicks just calling themselves Chicks is typical of total Southern cuckery to Jews and the mob.) Liberalism without roots finds itself adrift. Liberals may bitch about conservatism, but liberalism without conservatism is like trees severed from roots. After all, liberalism is an outlook, and it needs a vantage point, i.e. it has to be liberal on a conservative foundation. Liberalism is like the sails on a boat, which would be like conservatism. Without the boat, the sails are useless. Or liberalism is like wings on a plane.Without the main body, the wings are useless.
Therefore, when white liberalism was severed from white conservatism, it had to serve another root-foundation, and this is where Jews made it serve Jewish Power aided and abetted by Jungle Fever/Faith & eventually Globo-Homo. As for white conservatism, it faced difficult times because Jews and their white liberal cucks said whiteness is problematic, then bad, then evil. So, white conservatism could no longer preserve white pride. For white conservatism to be viable, it had to drop the 'white' and just be conservative. Conservative about what? For some, conservatism merely meant conserving wealth(property values) or, paradoxically, the engine for change. (Consider David French whose idea of 'conservatism' is preserving the social forces that led to drag-queen story hour. In other words, American Conservatism = Conservation of forces that bring about the most rapid change.) But conservatism must conserve something other than 'muh money'. If whiteness is no longer worth preserving because of 'white guilt', then white conservatism, having dropped the 'white', had to serve another identity and culture, and again Jews made whites serve Jewish identity that was deemed noble because of Holy Holocaust Cult and its great heritage. If white liberals became subservient to Jews mainly on the basis of Jewish victim-hood, white conservatives became reverent of Jews mainly on the basis of Jewish heritage — Paul Johnson, one of the premier cuckservatives of the Cold War era, often made the case that Judaism is essentially conservative and so, Jews will eventually come around to the political right; the fool overlooked the fact that Jewish 'conservatism' is about maximizing Jewish Power by any means necessary, even by pushing deracinating liberalism on whites, which explains why so-called Neocons worked with Jewish Liberals to undermine white identity and pride. The Neo-Con-Federacy alliance didn't last long. White Southerners supported Zionists, but Zionists took a big dump on white 'racism', just like Apartheid South African support of Zionism didn't prevent most Jews from reviling white-ruled South Africa as the worst thing possible. At any rate, adopting Jewish Identity as the main theme of American Conservatism was bound to be devastating to white conservatism because the main villains of the Shoah were 'white supremacists'(though, to be sure, Nazi Germans were 'Aryanists' whose greatest crimes were against other whites, especially Slavs and Jews, if counted as 'white'). Jewish victim-narrative essentially blames whites and Christians for everything.

Now, Jews could pull this off because they are smarter than whites by one standard deviation. But what about Episcopalians whose IQs are comparable to Jews? Their religion was weak, they were more about class & privilege than blood-spirituality(or ethno-religious identity of Jews), and over time, their values just became bloodlessly following the latest fashion among trendy elites. Also, Jews have stronger and pushier personalities than Episcopalians who would rather lose a fight against feisty Jews than get down and dirty. Jews were especially effective in subverting white power because of their passive/aggressive nature. If Jews were ONLY aggressive, whites would have told them to screw off. But Jews would approach whites with sappy eyes and plead for sympathy for Anne Frank and 'muh holocaust'; and whites, out of Christian magnanimity and conscience, ceded to Jews the notion that the Holocaust was the greatest evil in world history and therefore ANY negative aspersion about Jews is 'antisemitic', therefore akin to Nazism. Whites thought they were being nice to poor pitiful Jews, but Jews were planting a moral trap underneath the white ass, especially as the history of 'antisemitism' was mainly a white European/Christian thing. Once that premise was accepted as part of Official White Morality, it meant that Jews could dump on whites all they want but whites better not dump on Jews in kind because it'd be so awful and hurt the feelings of those poor pitiful boo-boo-baby Jews. Fast-forward to today, and NYT & other Jewish-run media dump on whites endlessly but whites dare not say anything back in kind to Jews. Jews dredge up all the dark past about white history, but whites dare not do the same about Jews. If anything, both white 'liberals' and 'conservatives' compete with one another on who is more pro-Jewish. Jews kick white ass, but whites are eager to kiss Jewish ass. Kick-Ass-Kiss-Ass is the dynamics between Jews and whites. And of course, to consolidate white cuckery and submission, Jews also pushed the Noble Negro cult to guilt-bait whites for all eternity. So, Jewish-run NYT and other media outlets feature black and yellow bitches dumping on white women as abettors of white male terrorism against blacks, but white men say nothing about how countless white women had been robbed, beaten, raped, or murdered by blacks. Tally up the numbers of white women robbed, beaten, raped, or murdered by blacks, and it far dwarfs the number of black thugs lynched by white mobs in a hundred years. But white men, 'lib' and 'con', are a bunch of maggoty wussy boys.
But then, there's another reason white men don't defend white women. Too many white women, being mental clay in Jewish hands, are into white self-loathing and anti-white hysteria as virtue-signaling. Indeed, consider how most of these 'Karens' who are denounced by Ugabundas and Skankishas happen to be urban 'liberal' proggy bitches. To many on the dissident right, there is a certain schadenfreude in watching these insipid whores get their just desserts, a taste of their own medicine. These deracinated slutty lowlife white traitor bitches watch TV shows and movies where white female characters go with Negro men and where white men are presented as creeps or dorks, and their worldview conforms to Jewish Hollywood propaganda. But when they are confronted with black thuggery and vileness, the first thing they do is CALL THE WHITE POLICE. Now, one may ask why did their parents raise such insipid kids? Because white parenting, especially beginning with the boomers, was 'anti-racist', but a people are finished without race-ism. Jews are race-conscious and gain in power. Blacks mess up everything but still gain in power because they are race-conscious. Whites lose and lose because they lost their race-ism. As boomer parents think there is nothing worse than 'racism', they raised their kids to worship Fartin Poother Bling. And these kids grew up to madonna the muddy skank and rap music and sexting each other photos of Negro dongs. And all they heard in schools is 'white racism', 'white supremacism', 'evil of antisemitism', 'evil of homophobia', and etc. But on some subconscious level, they grew up feeling uncomfortable because it's not natural to hate your own kind. It's no wonder the 'gay' stuff spread like wildfire among whites, even with 'conservatives', because it's like the last expression of 'whiteness'. And it's no wonder that blacks eventually caught onto this and are insisting on making June the month of Homeys than Homos. Sheeeeeeiiiit, Juneteenth be da thang.
BLM and LGBT marching together is funny as hell because, despite the outward show of solidarity, they are expressions of opposing trends. BLM is about blacks doing as they please with roughhouse reparations of looting and burning, whereas Globo-Homo is about gentrification and yuppie-regeneration of the 'inner-city', code-word for parts of the town plagued with black crime and violence. Granted, there is a connection between blackness and homo-ness as plenty of white 'gay' buns crave black dongs — the butt-cucks — , but generally speaking, homo community caters to high-earners and the fancy-pants crowd than to hood rats.

Now, the 'weak' part. Again, it's relative. Without Jews and blacks, whites would be on top of the world in the West. Mentally, whites are strong against all groups except Jews. Some may say yellows have IQ comparable or even slightly higher than whites, but the difference isn't all that notable. Also, as yellows happen to be docile and dog-like, they are incapable of gaining power and authority as a minority. Chinese are successful minorities in Southeast Asia but in a precarious than prestigious position — it's no wonder Chinese would rather settle in New Zealand, Australia, Canada, and the US where they face less animus and violence from the majority. If recently yellows are berating at and bitching about whiteness, it's only because they are dutiful and servile dogs of the prevailing ideology set by elite Jews. They are following orders as good little boys and girls.
So, only Jews could make whites seem 'weak' of mind. Jews have noticeably higher IQ, strong identity rooted in blood & spirituality, and pushy personalities, along with sneaky passive/aggressive strategy. The only other people who make whites look weak are, of course, the Negroes, especially as American Culture is mainly about pop music and sports. Rock music has black roots, but moreover, blatantly black rap overtook rock as the most popular musical form, and what is rap about the thuggish cult of black aggression? Also, Americans worship sports, and who dominate? Blacks do. NFL culture is rather odd in its current configuration, and it's no wonder that it is in a state of crisis. Most players are black, and the game is getting even blacker. These black guys rose up the ranks by thumping white guys in high school and college, and they hump tons of white women. BUT, the majority of the fans are white males, and many white male fans of football happen to be 'conservative'. So, you have a game that is mostly about Democratic black guys dominating the field and humping white women that is cheered on largely by white males, the majority of whom are 'conservative'. White male 'conservatives' have 'evolved' to the 'anti-racist' position along the lines of, "Look, we cheer for you awesome black guys, and you whupped our pathetic white butts and you can hump my wife and marry my daughter, but please oh please, show some respect to the red, white, & blue and stand during the national anthem." That's Rush Limbaugh 'conservatism'. But black players feel differently. They feel, "Sheeeeeeeiiiiit, we be badass mofos who be da kangs of dis here sports, and we done whup fa**oty white boys and hump white girls, and dem white boys in da stands just a bunch of punkass pussies who be begging fo' our autographs while dey's girlfriends be lustin' after our dic*s." Yep, that is how black players see the game, and why not? Suppose Germans were taken as slaves to Japan, and suppose they came to dominate the sports by beating up scrawny yellow Japanese men and were humping the yellow girls. Would these Teutonic giants feel any respect for yellow dorks begging for their autographs? Would they pay respect to the Japanese anthem and identity for long? No, they would be feeling, "We be Vikangz".
For better or worse, sports is at least 1/2 of American culture and identity. So, who dominates sports comes to shape the image of America. Without blacks, whites would dominate sports in the US, and the racial-national perception would be very different. Indeed, look at the harm done to French identity and pride as the result of black domination. Sure, the white French pretend they are all beyond race and that Frenchness has no color, but blacks notice color. They know they are kicking white French ass and France is being Africanized.

Now, one may argue that white people as a unity are more powerful than any other. After all, white imperialists took over all of Africa at one time. British fleet defeated China in two Opium Wars. Spanish took over all of what is now Latin America. This is true, but white power depends on unity of identity, and that means race-ism. Without white race-ism, there can be no white unity. Then, whites can only compete as individuals, and then they will lose mentally to Jews with higher IQ & nimbler verbal skills and lose to blacks who are more muscular and athletic. This is why 'anti-racism' is the most fatal thing to happen to whites. But with white unity, whites could easily push back against Jewish Power. And whites as a unity can kick black ass. In the movie ZULU, each black warrior is more muscular and faster than whites, but whites work as a disciplined team and mow down the savanna bunners with awesome race-ist efficiency. This is why only race-ism can save the white race or any race. This is why any white person who uses the term 'racist' as epithet is part of the problem and hardly better than fools who yammer "Democrats are the real racists."

Ultimately, the great tragedy of American History is that American Indians didn't have the personality and wiliness of Asian Indians. American Indians were a stoned-faced stone-age people who put up a fight against men with guns and wagons, then later trains. They had no hope of military victory. They fought bravely and have been honored as such, but their defeat was a foregone conclusion, and following their surrender, they just remained on Reservations and lived on bacon, tobacco, and firewater. They were 'dumb' like the big 'Injun' in ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST.
But imagine if American Indians were more like Asian Indians. After a few setbacks with fighting the white men, they would have put down the bows & arrows and try to deal with whites with words & wit. After all, white folks were far less likely to shoot a people who are always talking and balking than shooting off arrows or hurling tomahawks. Through incessant talk, the hindu-like American Indians might have wore down the white men on the matter of immigration. A compromise might have been reached where white Christian immigration is okay to a certain point, but come on, let's leave something for the Indians. And then, the hindu-like American Indians might even have convinced whites to send the blacks back to Africa on account of America being the land of the Indians, not of the Africans who have their own gigantic continent to themselves. Hindu-like American Indians might have argued incessantly, "Look, you white people come here and take so much. But, you built stuff and we Indians benefit too. But why did you bring all those blacks? It's bad enough we lost this land to you whites but should we lose it to blacks as well?" And hindu-like American Indians might have gotten better deals from whites with contracts. The real American Indians just trusted the white man, smoked the peace pipe, and went back to their teepees... only to discover that Pale Face was just fooling them. But hindu-like American Indians surely would have pressed upon whites to keep the word. "Look, we remember you people buying Manhattan with bead necklace. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me, and no shame on me this time."

In DELIRIOUS, Eddie Murphy says you got to SING to get the girls. In SEVEN BEAUTIES, Pasqualino says, "More you pee, more you live." In our world, the more you talk, the more power you got. Even when they try to silence you, you have to keep talking and talking and talking. You have to join the conversation but not on their terms because PC is all about them talking while your side only listens or chants along or barks according to orders.




It's been observed by some that whites are like the NEW American Indians. Then, the lesson whites must learn from the fate of American Indians is that whites must act like Asian Indians to survive. American History could have been very different if American Indians fought less and talked more. Indeed, one reason why white folks in the South lent a certain ear to blacks was because the Negroes were always talking, like Jim in HUCKLEBERRY FINN. It's like the white massuh played by Chuck Connors in ROOTS has a fondness for Chicken George who always be talking. Frederick Douglas was full of talk, and of course, Fartin' Poother Bling was nothing without talk. And, you don't even need a boombox voice. Gandhi sounded like a geek, but he talked and talked and drove the British nuts like Groucho Marx with the Wasp characters.

It's incredible that Jews of all people hold such a vaunted MORAL position in the American Narrative. After all, if any people experienced something like 'genocide' and destruction on American soil, it was the American Indians, all the more tragic because they have roots here going back eons, tens of thousands of years. And yet, there is the Jewish Holocaust Museum in Washington D.C. than one commemorating the 'American Holocaust' of the Red Man. And even though mass immigration did in the Indians, the Statue of Liberty as symbol of immigration is so highly prized and celebrated. Also, the US has been nothing but a blessing for Jews. They didn't face the kind of discrimination they did in the Old World, and furthermore, Jews took part in slavery/slave trade and sold supplies to whites who rubbed out the Indians. So, Jews took part in the 'American Holocaust'. And yet, Jews hold the high moral ground in America. Why? They never stopped talking. In the end, talk determines 'truth'. If Bob did wrong to John, but if Bob does all the talking while John sulks and sits in the corner, everyone will go with Bob's word. He sets the narrative. It's like the scene in GOODFELLAS where Martin Scorsese's mother tells a joke about a man who never says anything.



How did Christianity became a great religion? The Early Christians faced persecution, but they never stopped talking and eventually caught the ears of some powerful and influential folks. In the end, it wasn't a case of "meek shall inherit the Earth" but "speak shall inherit the Earth". And this is why white Americans, as they face a demise similar to that of the American Indians, must not make the same mistake. Instead of being like the noble but 'dumb' Indian in ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST, they must be like Asian-Indians who never shut up. They must be like Babu(of THE SIMPSONS) or Ben Kingsley as Gandhi who's always talking and talking, even when he's sent to jail time and time again. To reiterate this point, white Americans should speak with a Hindu accent. Doing so will remind them that, unless they keep gabbing like Hindus, they will end up like the Red Man.
Whites should start with the topic of creating the white leagues in sports on the basis that white athletic inferiority needs is own space from blacks who make it virtually impossible for any other race to play, especially certain positions. So, let blacks have NBA and NFL, but let there be the white leagues. And why not? Blacks got their own chess tournaments as they can't compete with Jews. Now, the Powers-that-be will say NO, but whites should still keep talking and never drop the issue and should re-package it in so many ways. After all, the US has said NO to reparations-for-blacks so many times, but it's still on the menu because blacks never stop talking about it. (Whites should demand Realization among blacks. Realization over reparations. What would this Realization be? That, even though blacks got less than whites in the US, they got so much from contact with whites than they would have on their own if left alone in their own savagery of bongo drums and chucking spears at hippos. Sure, the argument of the Realization would be condemned as 'racist', but one must never stop talking. Even if the other side says NO, you keep making your case and drive home the point. It's like even a brick wall eventually breaks if you keep picking at it. In those prison movies, inmates eventually make a hole with a spoon. Why? They never give up picking at the wall. Words wear down the opposition only if you must keep on talking.) If whites give up on certain issues and stop talking, they lose. Even if there are setbacks, one must keep talking. Like 'gay marriage' for instance. Don't just accept it as 'the law of the land' but keep talking against it. Chip away at it bit by bit by bit. If the power of words made the Roman Empire eventually succumb to Christianity, the religion of pesty Jewish heretics, it can do wonders for whites in the long run but only if they keep talking. If the idea of White Leagues is rejected and banned, should whites give up on the idea? No, they should keep pushing for it with new arguments. Did homos and Jews give up on 'gay marriage' when the courts initially said NO? No, they pushed on. Meanwhile, American cuckservatives began to say NOTHING in opposition. When one side talks while the other side remains mute, the talkers win. So-called 'culture war' was really a game of Culture Words, and Jews and the 'left' talked more. In contrast, the 'conservatives' said close to nothing or took orders from Jews and merely said, "Muh Israel" and "Democrats are the real racists", thereby undermining the need for race-ism among whites.

Say the word and you will be free. There's a song by the Bangles, "Walk like an Egyptian", but the real lesson is "Talk like an Asian-Indian". And use their dotty accent to always remind yourself that if you don't keep talking, you will end up like the American Indians. In a way, it's ironic that American Conservatism is in such sad state despite having dominated Talk Radio. They sure did a lot of talking... but about what? 'Muh Israel', inanities about 'Feminazis', cheerleading for more Middle East Wars, Russia-bashing, Chicom-bashing, and 'Democrats are the real racists'. In other words, total BS and nothing about real issues, real truths, and real needs. White folks need to speak the truth of HBD in hindu accent. Talk truth, not nonsense.

Colin Flaherty RIP — BLM = WOM, or White Obedience Matters — Why It Matters that Jews Control the Gods — Power of Sacraments & Taboos

"This Was A Man"—RIP Colin (“Crime Is the New Black Entitlement”) Flaherty, September 21, 1955-January 11, 2022 - https://vdare.com/articles/this-was-a-man-rip-colin-crime-is-the-new-black-entitlement-flaherty-september-21-1955-january-11-2022

Colin Flaherty did great work in reporting on the epidemic of black crime, but alas, he was just another useless ‘boomer’. He would usually ban any commenter on the Jewish Question or denounce anyone as ‘Anti-Semite’ who noticed the obvious. His page on minds.com was especially censorious.

Stuff like BLM(or Black Lives Matter) isn’t really about blacks. It’s about whites. Jews don’t care about black lives, anymore than they care about Palestinian or Iranian or Russian lives. Indeed, if the world had no white people, would Jews push BLM? Of course not.

It really boils down to the formula: Black Lives Matter = White Obedience Matters. Or, BLM = WOM.

White Obedience Matters to what or whom? To Jewish Supremacist Power. How can Jews maintain White Obedience? By White Guilt and White Shame, which fosters to White Submission and White Hope for Redemption.
Jews used the Holocaust Card, and it’s been very effective in Europe but less so in the US with its triumphalist pride of ‘We beat the Nazis!’ So, against white Americans, Jews use the Black Card. Again, it’s not because Jews care about black lives. Jews promoted gangster rap that encouraged violence in the black community, leading to more deaths. Jews pushed all manner of social licentiousness that led to family break down, which has been especially devastating to blacks. Also, it was Jewish Power decided to lock up record number of blacks beginning with Bill Clinton when 'inner-city' pathologies were threatening to undermine big cities and boost support for White Conservatism.

BLM is really just a tool directed at whites because Jews fear worsening conditions will begin to awaken white consciousness in search of autonomy from Jewish Authority. Jews fear white awakening like Catholic Church feared the rise of Protestantism, like the British Empire feared the awakening of Indian National Independence Movement.

Jews have been disadvantaged in Russia because they don’t have something comparable to guilt-bait Russians with. Sure, there’s the thing about pogroms, but Russians can fire back and point to Jewish role in communism that killed many more lives. Besides, Russians were the main destroyers of Nazi Germany. So, if anything, Jews owe the Russians. And besides, Russians remember what was done to their country in the 1990s by Jewish 'oligarchs'. (Furthermore, as Russian sports and popular culture are dominated by national folks, Russians are less enamored of the Other as 'heroes' and 'idols', whereas white Americans have come to idolize blackness in sports and music. No wonder then that Jews can manipulate white feelings about blacks.)

At any rate, Jewish Power ultimately depends on control of White Americans. Jews feel they must control the gods that decide what is sacred or profane in the US. This is absolutely crucial because it’s the sacraments and taboos that decide the character of a civilization. Power and wealth aren’t enough. After all, we can badmouth Bill Gates even though he’s super-rich. We can insult Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos. We can also put down Mark Zuckerberg as a billionaire geek but never ever as a, guess what? A Jew!
So, being rich isn’t sacred in the West. Wealth can be attacked, and rich people can be mocked. But being Jewish is sacred. Indeed, putting down a super-rich oligarch is less dangerous than putting down a Jewish plumber. If a politician impugned a super-rich hedge-fund shark or Big Tech oligeek as a greedy a-hole, his career will remain intact. But if he muttered something negative about the ethnic traits of a Jewish non-entity, he would be in Big Trouble. It’s like the FBI and Justice Department can go after someone for being rich and corrupt but better not touch anyone or anything associated with Jewishness. So, Ghislaine Maxwell has been convicted of sex charges but shhhhhhh about her Israeli-Jewish connections.
Jewishness is like the Kim Clan in North Korea. As long as Jews control the gods in the West, Jewishness is sacrosanct. And in order to control and subdue whites, Jews also made blackness sacrosanct. Again, it’s not because Jews care about blacks but because they see the advantage of using blackness to milk ‘white guilt’. BLM is really about controlling whites. Because blackness has been sacralized, the death of some lowlife black punk like George Floyd or Arbery gets more attention than the deaths of affluent non-blacks murdered by black criminals.

If Jews care so much about human lives, why hasn’t there ever been a Palestinian Lives Matter campaign?

Look at this weasel Jon Lebovich Stewart:

JEW JON STEWART SAYS JEWS & BLACKS SHOULD COME TOGETHER & GET WHITEY

If Jews talk of Jews and blacks uniting against whites, isn’t it about time whites talked of whites and blacks(or any bunch of goyim) uniting against Jews? But, as Jews control the gods, that would be ‘antisemitic’ because Jewishness is inviolably holy. Jews can put down whites and whiteness, but no one better put down Jewishness. Jews can recycle so many anti-goy tropes of rednecks, ‘racists’, Christ-tards, and etc., but woe to anyone who dares say anything suggestive of ‘antisemitism’.

Who controls the gods is of utmost importance. Consider: In the Jewish community, you could badmouth Jesus all you wanted because He wasn’t holy among the Jews. If anything, He was much reviled and it was even obligatory to demonize him. But among Christians, Jesus was the holiest of the holy. Now, how could Jesus, a Jew who was killed long ago, exert such power over the Christian West? Why did even kings and generals bow down before Him? How come anyone could be burned at the stake or tortured horribly for having blasphemed the name of Jesus? Jesus, while alive, had no worldly power and was humiliated in the worst possible way before being put to death. Yet, He came to reign over the West as the King of kings. Why? Because He was worshiped as God.

Secularism turned out to be a fraud in most cases because so-called secularists merely sought out new gods. So, Stephen King put down the Bible and Old Religion but worshiped at the feet of some Magic Negro/Negress of his befouled imagination. MATRIX also sacralized Negroes as holy, as founts of spirituality and wisdom. All those ‘well-educated’ whites who never go to church will get all weepy at the thought of St. George Floyd and volunteer to wash stinky Negro feet. They will look upon Anne Frank as the new madonna. It’s all so tiresome.

At any rate, the human mind shall always remain ‘spiritual’, and this is why it’s of utmost concern as to who controls the gods. Jews present themselves as secular and ‘liberal’, but they are really neo-theologians and propped up ‘wokeness’ as the new faith. And BLM, along with globo-homo, is meant to be the new faith for goyim. Jewish message to all goyim is “Worship blacks and homos(whom we control and fund) above everything, even your own kind.” And it’s especially directed at whites as Jewish Power relies on white obeisance.

So, next time BLM is promoted, remember that it’s really WOM or White Obedience Matters.

BLM = WOM.

The history of India illustrates how crucial it is to control the gods. The Ancient Aryans who invaded India made sure they controlled the gods. They made themselves the Brahmins, the elite spiritual caste to revered and consulted by the rest. Thus, their authority over the brown natives wasn’t merely military, economic, or political but spiritual. Likewise, the Spanish remained as overlords in Latin America because they converted the brown natives to Catholicism. The browns came to worship the God brought to them by whites, who also dominated the clergy.

In contrast, the British ruled over India with political, economic, and military might. Spiritually, the British allowed for Hindus to remain Hindu and for Muslims to remain Muslim. So, while the natives admired and feared the British for worldly/material reasons, they didn’t look to the British as holy. Unlike the Ancient Aryans, the British didn’t make their authority SACRED in the eyes of the natives. And so, it was only a matter of time before they were expelled.

This is why Jews are so eager to control the gods, to weaken white identity and undermine Christianity. They must colonize the SOULS of goyim, especially of whites.
In Soviet Russia, Jews went about wrecking churches. In the US, Jews destroy Christianity by rotting its soul with BLM and globo-homo, whereby the faith is associated with worship of punkass Floyd and reverence for homo bung-donging. Any religion that goes that way becomes soul-dead. A religion losing its soul is worse than losing its body. After all, Jesus was killed in body but not in soul. Soviet Russia killed Christianity in body but not in soul. But under Jewish control, Christianity is turning into cucktianity where the new clergy put on globo-homo garb and praise trannies who cut their dicks off.

Jews seek to spiritually colonize white souls with globo-homo and BLM. And what’s truly shocking is how many whites fell for this. It goes to show that White Individualism was largely a myth. Whites were mostly conformist and obedient. Individualism only mattered at the top among the talented and creative. Most whites were suckers and schmucks. Just look at the Covid hysteria, especially among Anglos. What a bunch of cuck-tard conformists.

US is a ‘liberal democracy’ in name only. It’s a mere shell. At its core, it’s an Ethno-Oligarchy. Even if we can’t do anything about Jewish supremacist power(for the time being), we need to see it for what it is. US is a Jewish Ethno-Oligarchy, an empire of lies. And despite all the Jewish-fomented crises since 2000, things will only get worse unless the Jewish Power is named and outed for what it is. The key motivating factor behind so many recent disasters was insatiable Jewish Supremacist greed and ethno-mania. Jewish Power will never stop unless it is called out for what it really is.

If Jews bitch about ‘antisemitism’, it needs to be pointed out that their behavior gives most credence to ‘Anti-Semitic’ tropes. With so many lies spread by Jewish Power, it’s only a matter of time before people begin to question the Holocaust. If Jews lie so brazenly about so much, who's to say they didn't lie about the Shoah as well? Should we trust Jews on history when they pushed the Russia Collusion Hoax, Covid Hysteria, and BLM bullshit?

PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY JEWISH ZIONIST WARS | WHO'S BEHIND PNAC HISTORY OF ARAB SPRING

"Jewish Leftist" is a Misnomer — Jewish Power is Ultra-Rightist, Supremacist, and Imperialist — How Jewish Power Re-Coded the West from Pro-White to Anti-White and the Dire Consequences

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2022/01/07/my-paper-on-jewish-influence-blows-up/

If Jews call MacDonald a ‘white supremacist’, why doesn’t he react in kind and call them ‘Jewish Supremacist’ like David Duke does? Jews are clearly tribal-supremacist. Just ask the Palestinians.

Also, can we just drop the habit of calling these Jews ‘leftists’ or ‘radicals’? If so-called Jewish ‘leftists’ have been profoundly Jewish and put Jewishness uber alles, they should be regarded as essentially rightist or even ultra-rightist. Calling them ‘leftist’ because they held some leftist views or ideas in the past(or pretend to in the present) would be like arguing National Socialism was LEFTIST because of the ‘socialism’. (Of course, some idiots make that very case, though I think it's acceptable to designate fascism as left-right, which is what works best; for proof, look to Jewish Power that combines leftism and rightism than sets them against one another.)

Now, were there genuine Jewish leftists? Yes, and many of them sincerely abandoned Jewishness and joined with humanity. Many Soviet Jews just race-mixed with goyim and became part of Russian folks. And over history, some Jews became Muslims or Christians.

But plenty of Jews affected leftist outlooks as a means to weaken goy racial identity. Stanley Kauffmann the famous theater/film critic said he gravitated toward communism in the 30s because, during the Great Depression, the future seemed headed to either communism and fascism. For Jews, communism seemed the safer bet even if not ideal, not least because Jews played a prominent role in the Soviet Union whereas fascism became associated with Antisemitism with the rise of National Socialism — Italian Fascism in its original incarnation wasn't anti-Jewish.

Jews rule the West, and their power needs to be exposed. Jews hide the power by pretending to be ‘leftist’, and depressingly, so many rightists and white advocates actually do Jews a favor by using that label, thus creating the impression that people like George Soros, Chuck Schumer, and Hollywood bigshots are ‘leftist’.

No, Jews are ultra-rightist imperialists, and their so-called ‘alliances’ are just a means to fool, manipulate, and exploit goyim. Just like the British Empire and French Empire used one set of subjects against others, Jews do the same. British used Hindus in Africa, French used African troops in Vietnam. Likewise, Jews use White Christian Soldiers to invade Muslim lands but also use BLM thugs to attack and intimidate whites. For sure, Jews push Diversity because it weakens goyim while strengthening themselves. Just like the British Empire exploited divisions in India, not least between Hindus and Muslims, to maintain its dominance, Jews use Diversity the same way. More divisions among goyim means Jews get to toy with them. Diversity is undermining of ideology, and Jews want it that way because their top priority is power, not principles. By playing divide-and-rule, Jews can override any ideological concern.

We come closer to the truth ONLY IF we call most Jews what they really are: ultra-right Jewish supremacists in ‘leftist’ or ‘progressive’ clothing. Jews are for ‘equity’? ROTFL.
That must be why Merrick Garland, who calls white Trump voters ‘terrorists’, is all about equal justice for Israeli Jews and Palestinians – NOT! No, Jewish attitude toward whites is akin to their attitude toward Palestinians. Both are seen as subject peoples, and if they resist, they are labeled as ‘terrorists’.

Would true leftists do such a thing? Leftism has a lot of faults, but its one saving grace is universal values and equal justice. There is NOTHING in current Jewish Power that is for equal dignity and respect for all of humanity. The likes of Jerry Nadler and Adam Schiff are ultra-rightist Jews who hide behind ‘progressive’ facades. And Jews use BLM just like British Empire used foreign troops to subjugate people in the colonies.

In the massacre scene in GANDHI, those soldiers firing at the crowd of protesters are not local Hindus. Today, Jewish Power uses white soldiers in similar manner to destroy the Middle East, and Jews bring in tons of immigrant-invaders as replacist hordes against whites.

The real fight isn’t between the White Right and the Jewish Left. WE NEED TO STOP USING THAT TERM, 'Jewish Leftist'. The real battle is between white(or goy) right vs Jewish ultra-right. White Right, most of it anyway, is nationalist and wants white homelands for whites and, furthermore, respects the national rights of other peoples, i.e. let nonwhites defend their own homelands. Most white rightists will side with nonwhite nationalists against Western aggression. Unlike most Jews who support all manifestations of Jewish Power and Jewish hegemonism over all the goy world, the white right has a very limited view of white power, i.e. it should be dominant only in white lands, and let other peoples determine their own destinies. Thus, white right is anti-ultra-rightist.

Ultra-rightism is supremacist, predicated on the notion of "We are so superior that we have some divine right to rule over all of yous", and currently it is Jewish Power that fits this mold. Jews not only impugn white identity and white territoriality but those of others as well. Look what Jewish Power has done to Libya, Syria, Iraq, and etc. Their lands have been smashed and their peoples have been pushed into the West that's been guilt-baited into taking in 'refugees' created by Wars for Israel. Consider how Jewish Power compels all Americans to sanction Iran while also forcing them to send their taxes to Israel, a nation with illegal nukes that continues to occupy Palestinian territories. And notice how BDS is suppressed all over the US. Even the Constitutional right to boycott Israel is denied to Americans. So much for Jewish leftism and liberalism!

White Right wants whites living peacefully in their own lands and Arabs/Muslims living peacefully in their own lands. Jewish Ultra-Right wants whites to be replaced in their own lands and for white cucks to fight Wars for Israel to destroy any nation or people hated by Jews/Israel.

Jewish morality is garbage. So, Jews will say Russia is aggressing in Ukraine when it was Jews who engineered a coup in Ukraine and created the crisis in the first place. Jews will say there is ‘genocide’ in Xinjiang as a human rights issue, but NO ONE better say anything about the Zionist ‘genocide’ of Palestinians in Gaza and West Bank. One thing for sure, China tries to do more for Uighurs than Israel for Palestinians.

Using ‘Jewish’ and ‘Left’ together is music to Jewish ears. Jewish Power loves to hear that word-melody because it lends the false impression that Jewish Power is ‘progressive’ and at odds with ‘far right white supremacism’.
What Jews fear most is being outed as ULTRA-RIGHTIST IMPERIALIST SUPREMACISTS. Instead of calling Jewish Power ‘leftist’, call it ‘left-masked’ or ‘left-larping’. It’s a con-game, like what goes on in David Mamet’s films.

There were true Jewish leftists in the past, but most of them either melded into goy society through assimilation or intermarriage, returned to tribalism via Zionism, or came to love capitalism out of Jewish Pride(as it was capitalism that made Jews the masters of the world).

Even now, there are genuine Jewish leftists like Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate. Though misguided on many issues, they seem principled and sincere. But such Jews have zero power.

Jewish Power in the Democratic Party and GOP is totally ultra-right imperialist supremacist.
So, how about we stop using the ‘left’ label to describe Jewish Power?

I don’t care if Stephen Gould grew up sitting on the laps of his Marxist father. He was a Jewish supremacist through and through from the looks of it. His ‘anti-racism’ was just obfuscation to misdirect people from the reasons for Jewish Power, ie. there is a genetic factor. And the same goes for Richard Lewontin as well.

But as long as Jewish Power goes on being called ‘leftist’, it will go on humming along with the support of all those idiot 'progressive' white cucks.

Imagine you’re a Satanist who pretends to be a Christian to serve the Dark Lord, but your enemies keep referring to you as a ‘Christian’. Wouldn't you just love it?

It can begin with a new policy at Occidental Observer. No more calling Jewish Power ‘leftist’. Start calling Jewish Power ultra-rightist, imperialist, and supremacist. That will give ADL panic attacks. Nothing will freak out Jewish Supremacists like being labeled as FAR-RIGHT, thereby undermining the pretense of their uniting humanity against 'racism' or 'white supremacism'.

What distinguished Europe, Canada, and Australia from the US was they were far more white, indeed almost entirely so. This was once a point of pride, especially because, for all their own problems, they didn't have the debilitating Race Problem of the US.

But Jews took over the US and made 'white' a dirty word. As the US was the premier power over the Western World, its ideas influenced all others. And because blacks gained stardom as athletes and singers in the US, the rest of the West eyed the US with envy and wanted cool/badass blacks of their own. Finally, as they were under the economic and military domination of American power, they looked to the black issue as the one chance with which to gain moral upper-hand over Americans, i.e. US may be great in many things but is tainted with the sin of SLAVERY and 'racism' against blacks. So, Canada, Europe, and Australia would show the world how decent they are by welcoming blacks and treating them so nice... unlike those gun-toting, lynch-mobbing, and bigoted redneck Americans. But of course, they are ending up with the SAME PROBLEMS because, contrary to the PC narrative, the Black Problem in the US isn't primarily due to past 'racism' and mistreatment of blacks but to BAMMAMA or blacks are more muscular and more aggressive(due to evolution). Europe can welcome tons of black Africans with open arms and smiley faces, but the end-result will be pretty much like Detroit and Baltimore.

But as long as Jews control media, academia, and the deep state in the West(and as long as they find the black whip effective as a means to guilt-bait whites into subservience), the false narrative will carry on. In the long run, it will destroy not only the US but the West. As the European Continent is right above Africa teeming with crazy Negroes, it may go bad BEFORE the US and Canada. This is the most horrible Mass Psychosis Formation to ever hit the West.

Ideas and idolatry do matter in that they have the power to reprogram a civilization. It's like the re-coding of the Roman Empire from Pagan to Christian led to profound changes: It went from mercilessly hunting down Christians to smashing Pagan Temples and forcing everyone to worship Jesus. Change the code, and the ship turns around and goes in the other direction. Consider Russia. Once it was re-coded as Marxist, the very people who used to worship God and Jesus were blowing up churches and turning monasteries into barns. Code-changing is fundamental because the New Idea/Idol is internalized by the masses, most of whom are incapable of thinking for themselves. The destruction of pagan temples in Rome and the destruction of churches in Bolshevik Russia weren't the doings of few enforcers. Indeed, they couldn't have been carried out if the masses still clung to the old gods. Rather, the iconoclasms were mass endeavors in which many took part because their minds had been re-coded to reject old gods and accept new ones. Likewise, there is mass support for the defacing and dismantling of Confederate statues and monuments. In the past, white Southerners would have reacted angrily and taken violent actions but, having been re-coded by Jewish-and-cuck-controlled media and academia, most white Southerners either support the removal or cravenly hunker down lest they be labeled as 'racist' if they were to protest.

The West's turn from pro-whiteness to anti-whiteness has led to profound changes. Once Jews coded anti-whiteness as the New Idea and coded Diversity(especially Blackness) as the New Idolatry, white civilization went from promoting white pride and defending white lands to cursing white identity and welcoming the Great Replacement. The West went from awesome race-ism to pathetic replacism.

America always had serious race problems because of the black issue, but it was still whiter than Latin America, and this used to be a matter of pride, i.e. North America is more united, cohesive, and productive because it is solidly majority white whereas white-minority Latin America is mired in division, distrust, and instability because of its diversity.
When awesome race-ism was coded into the American Way, white Americans took pride in their race-based superiority over Latin American countries, i.e. US was better off because it was whiter than Central and South America.
But once the coding was changed, so many white Americans became so eager to turn the US into just another Latin-America-like country, and California is supposed to be template for the rest of America: Jewish oligarchs and their white/Asian cuck collaborators ruling over brown peons, with the once prominent white middle class squeezed into irrelevance. Of course, Jewish media mavens will blame all problems on 'white supremacism' while white dummies or whummies will continue to sing hosannas about 'Muh Israel'. Things are even worse. Not only has 'Western Values' been re-coded but Western Historiography has been re-colored, where it's now commonplace for TV shows and movies to cast blacks in the roles of white historical figures.

Letting Jews re-code the West was a grave mistake, indeed a crime. There is no hope for the West unless re-coded to free itself from Jewish Supremacism. It's no wonder Jewish Power hates Russia and Hungary that rejects Globo-Homo-BLM regimen and have re-coded themselves along Nationalist and Christian Lines.

MY COVID DICTIONARY - Brother Nathanel

Notes on Spencer Quinn's "Jewish History, Jewish Religion: A Review(of Israel Shahak's Book)" — Problem with Kevin MacDonald's Theory of Northern European Individualism

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2022/01/05/jewish-history-jewish-religion-a-review/

This book review leaves the impression that the problem is less with Jews than with idiot goyim who allowed themselves to be played.

Jewish ethnocentrism is problematic for being extroverted than introverted. If Jews want a world of their own, fine. The problem is they also want the whole world as their empire, an ambition that can be realized only by Palestinianizing World Goyim. To create the Jewish State, there had to be Nakba against the Palestinians. Tragic, but if Jews had stopped there, no big deal to the rest of the world. But what is now happening in the West is White Nakba, and it's largely engineered by Jews who've gained control of white elites via bribery, brainwashing, and browbeating.

But then, maybe Jews wouldn't have turned out this way if Europeans had just left them alone. If Rome hadn't invaded Judea and pushed them into exile, Jews might not have spread all throughout Europe, which might have remained gloriously pagan. Also, the European spirit of discovery and world conquest didn't originate with Jews who nevertheless were useful as money-lenders and investors in the vast enterprises. So, Jews got a taste of World Power via Europeans.

In the Ancient World, Southern Europeans, esp. the Greeks and Romans, were most aggressive and adventurous. Later, it was the Northern Europeans, without whom Jews wouldn't have gained World Hegemony. Shahak's book details how Jews threatened by fellow Jews sometimes sought refuge in the world of kinder white Gentiles governed by more enlightened values and more humane application of the law.
On the other hand, these very goyim also recklessly drove Europe over the edge in World War I. Some will say the Jewish Hand played a role in the Great War, and I'm sure that was true, but whites often had a compunction to slaughter one another over what now seems like trifles. Granted, some historians say this was the reason for European advancement. Unlike most parts of the world that either remained sparsely populated or came under overwhelming imperial power, rough parity ruled among the European kingdoms/states, and this led to many more wars that fostered innovation in warfare and various technologies; it's like warring Japan was most open to new ideas when each clan sought superior weapons from European traders. But it also means Europeans got into the habit of treating war as some kind of sports. Most of these wars were resolved quickly, but when the warring parties were well-matched, things got awfully bloody like the matches between Ali and Frazier.

Kevin MacDonald argued that Jews gained over Anglos and other Europeans because the latter are more individualistic, but I'm not so sure. While modern concepts of individuality and liberty were advanced in the Anglo world(and Netherlands), those societies weren't governed or defined by principles of individualism but by class, obedience, respect, and conformism. For all practical purposes, individualism had significance only for certain thinkers, adventurers, innovators, and the like. Most people were concerned with fitting in, being approved, seeking validation. Northern Europeans weren't as clan-based or kinship-oriented as the Greeks and Southern Italians, but they still thought socially and communally than as individuals. If they served as a crew member on a ship, they did as the captain ordered. They were loyal to the firm they worked for, like Bob Cratchit to Ebenezer Scrooge in A CHRISTMAS CAROL. And they were mindful of the class they belonged to. And they were anxious about their respectability and standing in society. Thus, individualism in the Anglo World was rather constricted. Given liberty and individuality's tendency toward social chaos, social discipline and fear of disapproval were paradoxically the necessary conditions for the increase in freedom. The anarchic urge within liberty had to be tempered by manners and rules. In other words, individuality and liberty had to be merited by a sign of superiority, intelligence, wit, and/or skills.
Thus, individualism was essentially elitist, and most people, deemed mediocre and uninspired, were expected to just fall in line and conform, do what was necessary to gain approval and avoid opprobrium. The end result was a society where a relative few were deemed superior and worthy of admiration; they deserved more 'social credit' in liberty and individuality; the rest should just shut up, fall in line, and obey, which was pretty much the rule in British boarding schools.

Of course, Britain eventually loosened up, especially with the rise of Youth Culture popularized by the Beatles, Rolling Stones, and the like. Later, there was the explosion of Punk culture that took it to a whole new (lower)level, especially appealing to Brit youths eager to smash the remaining vestiges of class culture. But, old habits refused to die. Anglo-Britain(and Canada and Australia) remained very much places where most people remained deferential to authority as the best and 'expert'. Of course, authority came to wear the face of 'liberal democracy' and even came to be associated with hipness. It presented itself as 'lightened up', disdainful of old hierarchies and snobberies. After all, the Establishment embraced the Beatles, the Royal Family opened up to vulgar celebrities, and the ruling class came to indulge in the same popular culture as the hoi polloi. Still, the formula still remained, "the Best know and the Rest follow".

Now, what would constitute the Best? When UK was ruled by awesome race-ists(as the Best of the nation), most Brits fell in line and supported the racial-national agenda. But, if the Best were altered, the Rest would naturally fall in line PRECISELY BECAUSE most Brits never had real individuality of their own — and even popular culture, which felt so joyous and liberating, fostered collective emotions and 'thought', the crowd mentality that could be shepherded by the Power; it was more about mass idolatry of godlike celebrities than autonomy of the individual. Is it then surprising that New Britain was hardly more individualistic than Old Britain and in some ways even less so?

Just look at the rise of 'woke' culture and Covid-mania in the UK. A truly individualist society wouldn't get so crazy. People would ask questions and show some skepticism. But when the Best say so-and-so in the UK, most people just follow along like sheep. They lack the pride and confidence of individuality. What is truly insidious about 'woke' ideology or political correctness is it gives the false impression that it's about the voice of the People and the Powerless. Thus, the brainwashed sheep being led by the nose are fooled into believing they're struggling against the system. Wow, they knocked down a bloody statue of some past figure who sold slaves! What awesome rebellion against tyranny!
In truth, UK is now ruled by Jews who, via financial and media control, define what is Best. Jews push 'wokeness' to weaken white pride, resolve, and autonomy, all the better to make whites serve ANOTHER power. But because 'woke' ideology creates the illusion that 'white supremacy' still rules or infests the West, the idiot mobs think they're fighting the Power by vandalizing old statues. It's like the moronic Red Guards of the Cultural Revolution who were led to see themselves as rebels when, in truth, Mao merely used them as shock troops to get rid of his political rivals. Contra Kevin MacDonald, individualism wasn't the dominant mindset among Anglos and Northern Europeans. Rather, it was the individuality of the Best that was respected and rewarded while the Rest were pressured to obey and follow along.

In contrast, while it's true Jews have been profoundly tribal, their power also derived from a strong sense of personal individualism, i.e. self-centered pride of individuality has been more common among Jews than among Anglos. While Anglos were into 'Yes, sir' and 'No, sir' before their superiors, Jews were more likely to be distrustful of their own kind, evento the point of irreverence. It could be Jews were sometimes overzealous to kill/murder other Jews precisely because too many Jews were overly defiant and strong-minded; it's like, for all the black bitching about 'racism', they are most prone to beat up or kill other Negroes cuz the only thing black egomania fears is an ass-whupping.

It's also worth noting that Jewish Tribalism wasn't based on loyalty to a clan leader but to God. Tribalism based on leadership crumbles along with it. It's about follow-the-leader, so when the leader goes, so does the tribalism. In contrast, tribalism based on the Covenant means everyone within the Tribe is equally blessed by God or some great force; it's a matter of blood and spirit regardless of who is leader. Anglo tribalism was based on leadership. So, if the leadership lost prestige(with the fall of empire) or cucked to a foreign entity(the Jews or whatever), the whole system came to be fatally compromised. As for Christianity, a universal faith, it wasn't something the Anglos could claim for themselves. It was only a matter of time before other peoples invoked the Christian God and Jesus to throw back the sermons at the British Imperialists.

Shahak begins by demonstrating how the Jewish state of Israel exists to serve the interests of Jews first and foremost.

Well, a Jewish State should serve Jews first and foremost.

He also describes the financial incentives Israel provides for its Jewish citizens to return to Israel after they leave, while not making similar offers to its non-Jewish citizens in similar circumstances.

Nothing wrong with that.

Shahak connects this double standard to the closed society many religiously zealous Jews want Israel to be.

Jewish problem is less about double standards than duplicitous standards. Every national entity must have double standards. If Japan is to remain Japan, it must favor Japanese over others. Still, a principled people would not only use double-standards in their favor in their own domain but respect similar practices by other peoples in their own domains. So, if Japanese use double-standards to favor Japanese in Japan while respecting Iran's use of double-standards to favor Iranians in Iran, there's no real problem.

But, Jews play a different game. For some reason, not only should Jews use double-standards in favor of Jews in Israel but THE WHOLE WORLD must be made to endorse such behavior, all the while pledging to favor the Other(especially Jews) over their own kind in their own countries. So, while Hungary must praise Israel for being an ethnocentric Jewish State, it mustn't favor Hungarians in Hungary; Hungarians must abandon any notion of a historical homeland with deep roots and meanings for Hungarians.

Imagine that. Hungarians have no global ambition and merely want to preserve Hungary as their little nation. In contrast, Jews not only have Israel but use neo-imperialism to smash neighboring Arab nations. Jews also control US and EU and use them as goy attack dogs against Russia, China, and Iran. And yet, these Jews are lecturing the Hungarians about decency and morality. It's like a billionaire gangster lecturing about the evils of greed to a peasant with a plot of land. Jews want all the goy world to be blackrocked. Jewish supremacists are cretins through and through, but no less disgusting are the goy cucks who grovel at their feet.

One of Shahak’s main contentions regarding classical Judaism is its totalitarian nature. He mentions how eighteenth-century Jews burned books, persecuted dissidents, banned non-Jewish education, and were absorbed in mysticism.

I wouldn't hold this against Jews of that period. We shouldn't judge past peoples and cultures with today's values. Were things any more enlightened among Hindus, Muslims, Chinese, Japanese, Ottomans, and etc.? Back then, censorship and authoritarian measures were de rigueur all throughout Europe. Besides, Jews couldn't have survived for so long as a culture and people without certain restrictions, be they legal, cultural, spiritual, racial, and/or spiritual. Japan was an isolated island-nation but, prior to the arrival of Commodore Perry's black ships, had done everything to keep Japan sealed tight. Such isolationism kept Japan from progress but also preserved and fostered a unique culture.

He states bluntly that when Jews were liberated or emancipated throughout the nineteenth century, they were in many case freed from “the tyranny of their own religion” rather than from any gentile oppression.

Nothing unique in history. Roman Empire was brutal and ruthless but also created Pax Romana in which many people lived in relative peace & prosperity and also gained freedoms and privileges under Roman military and legal protection. It's like that MONTY PYTHON'S LIFE OF BRIAN scene about "What did the Romans ever do for us?"

Empires can be liberating on some level. A people may be free of foreign rule but found themselves under crushing autocracy. North Korea is politically independent whereas South Korea is a US satellite, but it's far more repressive. Hong Kong was a British colony until 1997, but it was freer there than in Mao's China, which was liberated from foreign rule but crushed under the Chairman's fat arse. Western Imperial rule over the Muslim World was much resented but also led to modernization. Hindus no doubt gained a lot under British Imperialism. And American Indians(victims of 'genocide') and American blacks(shackled under slavery) gained access to ideas and things they never would have on their own. Black moral rage about slavery, for instance, is an adoption of white values as black African culture never had a moral issue with bondage. Also, Jews will say Palestinians shouldn't complain so much because, all said and done, Arabs living in Israel are better off materially than most Arabs in Arab-ruled countries. Palestinians get less than Jews but still get more than most Arabs elsewhere.

We can understand why many Jews felt liberated from their own tradition by the Emancipation, but I can also understand why conservative Jewish elements among tried to keep the tradition and community together. After all, no matter how rich and free one becomes, a Jew is no longer Jewish without a powerful sense of blood and culture. Indeed, this is borne out by what's happened to the white race. Whites got rich and comfy. They came to favor materialism and hedonism as the two pillars of their existence. Result has been utter deracination and decadence. Whites are now so without an identity or loathe the one they have that they pledge fealty to other identities, especially Jewish or Black. Some pretend to be 'American Indians'. For others, racial self-flagellation is a kind of anti-identity. White 'conservatives' prefer to label themselves as Christians, Civil Nationalists, or Libertarians. They are afraid to be True Race-ists, the only way to be free.

Shahak characterizes pre-emancipated Jewish societies as “sunk in the most abject superstition, fanaticism and ignorance” and describes how in the first Hebrew work on geography (published in 1803), the authors complained about how a great many rabbis were still denying the existence of America.

Purely from a scientific point of view, this would be true enough. After all, certain Christian folks who still reject evolution and insist the world is 10,000 yrs old come across as ridiculous. But, a culture isn't only about objective truth but a sense of soul, myth, roots, and cosmology. Culture is essentially irrational and if a people were to totally reject their culture for its irrationality while wholly embracing science/rationalism, they would be lost because humans are more than walking calculators. Worse, even though science is an infinitely superior means for man to reach the moon or cure some disease, it too is the tool of power, evinced by the Covid regimen. Science is a great tool but not The Answer. Also, it doesn't define a people. It's agreed that the world is round in Syria, Russia, Japan, Turkey, Mexico, Yemen, Iran, and etc. It's agreed by all peoples that aspirin reduces pain. But what does that have to do with their sense of who they are as a people and culture? The law of gravity or the chemistry of Vitamin C doesn't make Jews distinct from Turks or Turks distinct from Iranians.

Shahak describes how before emancipation, rabbis continually subverted Christian censorship whenever Christians became aware of virulently anti-gentile passages in the Talmud and other writings.

From the perspective of free speech and honesty, that's bad stuff. But Jews were hardly alone in that kind of censorship. Through much of US history, most people didn't know of all the racy and controversial things said by Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln. In the public lore, Jefferson was Mr. Enlightenment who said 'all men are created equal'. And Lincoln was portrayed as the Great Emancipator. Most didn't know what Lincoln really felt about blacks. Historians used to focus on Woodrow Wilson the Progressive, or Mr. Democracy, than on Wilson the 'racist' — he was indeed awesomely race-ist. A lot of people don't know about what Winston Churchill said of the various non-white races and even about Jews(before they bought him off). So much has been bowdlerized or airbrushed out of history. Jews were surely no different. But given Jewish activism in Free Speech and Civil Liberties Movement of the 50s and 60s, Jews do come across as a bunch of lowlife hypocrites and cretins.

And as for anti-gentile language, there is a lot of it, and not just in the Talmud.

This is what kills me. The white/Christian world came up with tons of epithets for Jews and nonwhites but in the vernacular, not in canonical writings. In contrast, the sacred texts of Judaism are filled with slurs as if Don Rickles wrote them. Imagine opening up some Christian text and reading stuff like, "you know them Christ-killing money-changing kikes are up to no good", "we gotta get the ni**ers to believe in Christ as a means to suppress their jungle jiggity uga-buga nature", or "we need more missionaries in China to convert the lot of them slanty-eyed yellow bastards". Christian texts might put down other peoples as 'heathens' but on the basis of their ignorance, not on their blood. If white Christians said unkind things about nonwhites, it was outside the context of religion. But it seems Jewish sacred texts were into racial name-calling. The Talmud must be full of stuff like, "Get a load of them dumb Polacks. Let's go exploit them and screw their shikse bimbo whores."

In Maimonides’ Guide to the Perplexed, Blacks and some other nomadic races are likened to “mute animals” and “are not on the level of human beings.”

Maybe Maimonides wasn't all bad.

There is a morning prayer in which Jews thank God for not making them gentiles.

That doesn't bother me. I think Jewish men also had a practice of thanking God for being men than women... though with tranny business these days, maybe some new passages have been added to the New Talmud that says, "Thank you for removing my balls and giving me a fake 'vagina'." If Jews felt pride in being born Jewish, nothing wrong with that.

they pressured the Catholic Church during the mid-20th century to remove the line about God forgiving Jews in one its Good Friday prayers

Catholic Church complied, so who is the cuck? We can't blame Jews or any people for acting in their self-interest, but we can blame whites/Christians for cucking time and time again in the hope that they will be forgiven and loved by Jews. White dummies or whummies need to wake up. If they won't or can't, they are beyond hope.

On the proscription against milking cows on the Sabbath, Shahak writes—hilariously—that according to Zionist rabbis:

Jewish Logic is pretty ridiculous, but there is something to be said in its favor. First, it is for Jewish interest as they do get the milk on the Sabbath. Also, given the ridiculousness of Sabbath rules to begin with — one isn't allowed to milk the cow even? — , it seems Jews needed to concoct some ingenious means to circumvent the law. In other words, if the law itself is ridiculous, come up with counter-ridiculous ways to go around it. Now, why couldn't Jews just do away with the law? It was ordained by God.

In our time, what is most appalling isn't the Jewish abuse of laws or legalism to get what they want. It's vile and rotten, but at the very least, it's a case of Jews messing with laws to their advantage. Their self-interest makes it somewhat rational.
What is truly astounding is that so many white goyim go along with it even though it does nothing for the white race. Jews milk 'ridiculousness' to get the cream. Whites go along to emerge empty-handed. Granted, we can understand why white cuck elites choose to collaborate. They are taken care of, like the John McCains and Lindsey Grahams of the world. But what about all those white 'deplorables' who get NOTHING out of this? Why are they so into "Muh Israel" and "We Luv Jews, Jews, Jews"? Jews are bad, but whites must be DUMB, like Lone Star.

Jew-on-Jew murder is a capital sin, but Jew-on-gentile murder is not, and is therefore not punishable by any Jewish court

This wasn't much different from the racial laws in the American South. White killing a white was a big deal and a Black killing a White was a very big deal, but white killing a black, not so much. And in the West, Whites had to kill Indians to make way for civilization. Of course, today things are reversed. Blacks killing whites or non-blacks(excluding Jews) is no big deal, but whites killing a precious black is a big big deal. The only acceptable murder of a black is by another black, apparently because it's all in the family. Likewise, the reason why Jews reacted so hysterically to the cases of Leo Frank and the Rosenbergs was they simply couldn't abide by the notion of inferior goyim killing Jews. In the American South, it was a taboo for even a good black to kill a bad black. Blacks simply weren't allowed to kill whites. Jews feel likewise about goyim. They feel as the massuhs while all goyim are really a bunch of schvartzes of various colors. But just like blacks once internalized their own inferiority and dutifully served at the feet of the white massuh, it appears so many white goyim internalized their inferiority as well vis-a-vis Jews. To most white Americans, it's perfectly okay for Jewish Power to use the US military to smash the skulls of millions of Arabs/Muslims, but how dare anyone touch a hair on a single Jew!

One thing for sure, most whites/Christians believe Jews/Zionists have every right to slaughter Palestinians/Arabs/Muslims, but heaven forbid any Jew get killed by a non-Jew. Zionists killing 100,000s of Arabs is just 'Israel defending itself', but if some Muslim kills a Jew in Europe, it is ANTISEMITISM.

In some ways, things have changed a great deal since the time of Woodrow Wilson. But structurally speaking, not much changed. It's not that the US is less 'racist' but that it's 'racist' about other things. Back in Wilson's day, it was okay to be 'racist' against blacks and even let the KKK march in DC. Today, when Robert E. Lee monuments are being removed in Southern States, a KKK march would be unimaginable. BUT, it's okay to allow BLM thugs burn down entire parts of DC, vandalize, loot, and randomly attack people. Ostensibly, it's in the name of 'anti-racism', but it's really an expression of black savage-supremacism with the blessing of Jewish Supremacist Elites who use blacks as the bullwhip against whites emotionally and physically. Use black muscle to intimidate whites, use black narrative to guilt-bait whites. But it's really about Jewish supremacism and black supremacism working hand in glove. So, the current US is really just as 'racist' as it was a hundred years ago. The content is different but the structure is the same.

https://mondoweiss.net/2022/01/pompeo-at-zoa-gala-israel-is-not-an-occupier/

And consider US foreign policy. US military is given green light to drop bombs on the Middle East and kill countless 'sand-ni**ers' at the behest of Jewish Supremacism, the new ideology of America. While apartheid in South Africa was deemed an absolute evil, Jim Crowitz policies in West Bank must either be supported or ignored. So, the US didn't go from 'racism' and 'imperialism' to 'anti-racism' and 'anti-imperialism' but to 'neo-racism' and 'neo-imperialism' with new saints and monsters. In 2020, invoking 'George Floyd' gave blacks a free pass to rob, loot, burn, and murder. They could act 1000x worse than the KKK ever did, but as Jewish Supremacists rule America and as Jews need blacks to guilt-bait whites, black supremacist savagery is A-Okay.

For example, a Jew would not be allowed to shove a gentile down a crevice, but if the gentile is already in the crevice, the Jew is under no obligation to pull him out.

That's not a bad rule. It's like the US shouldn't go around hurting other nations, BUT it is not the role of US to save or bail them out. Let them fix their own problems. The problem is the US goes around the globe claiming to help other peoples while actually causing them great harm, especially in the Middle East and places like Ukraine.

One crass and recurring example of this was how Jewish doctors would be encouraged to treat wealthy gentiles, including kings, nobles, lords, and the like. But poor gentiles, never.

But there's a LOL case. Some Jewish doctor treated Adolf Hitler's mother, and Hitler was thankful later in life and allowed the doctor safe passage.

According to one of greatest Jewish scholars of all time, a Jew has license to murder, rape, and molest children as long as the victim is a gentile.

That's terrible but Japanese are worse. Even a cursory look at Japanese culture suggests that Japanese regard other Japanese as prostitutes and toy-like playthings. Jews treat goyim as whores, whereas Japanese treat their own kind as whores.

Gentiles are forbidden to bear testimony in rabbinical courts, since all gentiles are presumed liars.
Jews must not offer gifts to gentiles.
Jews must exact interest when lending money to gentiles.
Jews must never return items lost by a gentile.
Jews shall not deceive other Jews in business, but may practice “indirect deception” when doing business with a gentile.
Jews shall not steal without violence from anyone, gentiles included. However, there are certain circumstances under which they may steal with violence from gentiles under their control.
Jews are forbidden to sell unmovable property (i.e., structure and land) to gentiles in Israel.

You know, those would be perfectly good laws for whites if 'Jews' were replaced by 'whites' and 'gentiles' were replaced by 'non-whites', especially Jews and blacks. Whites need to learn from Jews. Whites need the White Talmud. If any Jew complains about it, just tell him, "We drew inspiration from YOUR culture, and we're acting just like you."

Shahak states further that Judaism is imbued with both hatred and ignorance of Christianity, and that this is largely independent of any Christian persecution of the Jews.

Jews are right to abhor Christianity as it blasphemes Judaism. What's rather sad is whites failed to develop their own religion and mythology upon the fall of Rome. They had to rely on heretical Jews. In the long run, Christianity turned out to be an albatross around the white neck. Time has come to move beyond it, especially when a total creep like Devil Pope Francis can rise to the highest authority.

West Alarmed as US Prepares for Key Talks with Russia With No Negotiating Strategy & Divided Allies by Alexander Mercouris