An Open Letter to a Globo-Homo Freak who Badmouths Ethan in John Ford's THE SEARCHERS

http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/01/22/john-ford-and-the-politics-of-the-western/

Are you so-called 'lefties' capable of saying anything other than 'racism, racism, racism' about THE SEARCHERS? 

And I find this passage hilarious. Andrew Stewart: 

"He wishes to kill his own family for inter-ethnic coupling. When Ethan speaks the wretched words he does, it is vital to remember that Wayne was saying on screen what a whole generation of fathers were saying in private about the idea of their precious white daughters going to school and perhaps one day dating African teens. The film’s literal Indian War is a deep analogue for the culture war that was going on at the time.... y understanding that Wayne’s Ethan is as psychotic and sexually-confused as De Niro’s Travis Bickle, it is possible to see the earlier film on a psycho-analytic level that otherwise escapes today’s viewers."  

You describe yourself as 'queer'. Ain't it funny that a guy whose idea of 'sex' is fecal penetration with other men would make a fuss about OTHER people's psycho-sexual hang-ups. 

Maybe you haven't heard but sexuality is DARK. It is animal. It is about territory, pride, possession. It isn't something so genteel and refined like a tea party. It isn't lovey dovey in its essence despite the romantic trimmings(but then, is the art of courtship even alive anymore in the West?)

The reason you don't get THE SEARCHERS is because you 'lefty' types see everything through the simplistic prism of 'racism'. Also race-ism is Truth insofar as different races and racial differences exist. Race-ism, properly defined, should mean belief in the reality of race and racial diversity/differences. After all, '-ism' means belief, and there is no reason why race + ism should automatically mean racial hatred or supremacism or prejudice. 

But first, to get a better grasp of THE SEARCHERS, suppose we remove the racial element. The emotional dynamics would be more or less the same though, of course, the factor of race amplifies the tension. It's like this: If a black guy kills a black woman, the family members of the slain victim will feel vengeful toward black killer. But the rage will be greater IF the killer is white. Then, it will be seen as a white-on-black-murder. Indeed, the whole BLM outrage is predicated on the race-rage that young black men are being killed by WHITE cops. Why were Americans so angry when Pearl Harbor was attacked? Because the 'Japs' done it. Jewish media and FDR(that wanted US entry into WWII) were ecstatic because the anger toward the yellow 'Japs' would rile up Americans, even isolationists, into entering the war. 

So, race makes it more intense, but sexual dynamics are pretty dark and brooding on its own. Take THE ODYSSEY. The hero comes back and kills all the suitors. He also kills the female servants of the house who sexually serviced the suitors. Odysseus is about manly pride. He ruthlessly reinstates his authority as man of the house. He kills other Greeks, but the rage isn't different in kind from that of Ethan Edwards. Though the element of race raises the rage level in THE SEARCHERS, Ethan's blood thirst is driven at least in part by healthy manly pride. Maybe you, being a queer, lack an understanding of real manhood. Maybe you are used to other men sticking their dongs into your bung. Maybe you like to play bitch to the stronger Negro. Maybe, maybe not. But real men are like Ethan, a true hero on the Greek scale. And it's not just about race, race, race. Suppose his brother's family had been killed by Liberty Valance and his gang than by Indians. Ethan would be just as furious and vengeful. He would hunt them down and kill them.

As for his willingness to kill Debbie, it's dark but understandable. Ethan wanted to save her but also feared that she'd grow up to become a breeder for the Indians. Imagine that. A tribe of 'savages' murdered his brother and his brother's children. The woman Ethan dearly loved was raped and butchered. Same was done to the older daughter soon after. OF COURSE, Ethan is angry as hell. 

Suppose I'm a leader of a gang, and my gang did such to YOUR family. Wouldn't you be enraged? Wouldn't your bloodlust be PERSONAL? It's like in THE GODFATHER. After the attempt on his father's life, Michael felt compelled, indeed obligated, to kill the Turk and the police captain. And the young Vito Corleone(DeNiro) eventually returns to Sicily to take revenge on the man who'd killed his family long ago. Vito had a calm exterior but always longed for vendetta. And Hyman Roth is committed to taking out Michael because of the death of Moe Green, who was like a little brother or even son to him. Jews may act 'liberal', but they are intensely clannish deep inside and never forget. They still want to destroy Germany for revenge sake. Maybe you don't understand such sense of revenge, pride, honor, and family/clan loyalty as you're a deracinated white queer 'lefty' who prefers abstract and bogus ideas of 'social justice' divorced from reality. 

If Ethan's brother's family had been spared and if Jorgensen's place had been raided instead by the Comanches, Ethan wouldn't have been so obsessed. The issue here is PERSONAL. Ethan really loved Martha. It was bad enough that he'd lost her to his brother(just like Marty nearly lost Laurie to the guitar strummer). But to find her body raped and killed by Indians? That was some bad shit. Ethan loves Debbie and wants to save her. But he knows that as the years pass, she will become part of the very tribe that raped and butchered her family — Ethan's brother and Martha. She will be serving the very people who committed horrors against her own kind. Of course, we and even Ethan know that it's not Debbie's fault. She was taken as a child and the Indians came to accept her as their own. But it means she will make red babies who will grow up to kill white people. THIS is what Ethan cannot tolerate. But your queero PC mentality can only see 'racism, racism, racism'. You don't understand true manly pride cuz you're globo-homo. 

But surely, even a homo can have feelings like that of Ethan. Suppose my gang wiped out your family. Suppose my gang is ultra-right-wing and hate 'progressives' such as yourself. Suppose my gang took your young sister(whom you dearly love) and plan to use her womb to create ultra-right warriors who will attack and kill more 'progressives'.  Wouldn't you be livid with rage? Wouldn't a part of you wish your sister was dead than join the enemy(like Patty Hearst, topic of the Paul Schrader movie) and attack you and your kind? 

Indeed, suppose we flip the SEARCHERS. Suppose it is about a bunch of white cowboys that attack an Indian village. Suppose these imperialist & 'genocidal' white men rape red women and kill almost everyone. But they take one Indian boy and raise him as 'honorary white' and teach him to hate and kill Indians. Suppose the Indian father or uncle of that boy wants to rescue him. But suppose the years pass and the abducted boy has joined the ranks of white invaders-settlers to fight Indians. Wouldn't it at least be understandable why the Indian father and uncle would want to see him dead? 

Do you know about the Ottoman Turks? They ruled over Greece for 300 yrs. They took many Greek Christian boys, brainwashed them, and turned them into Janissary trained to fight and destroy Christendom. Many Greek fathers and mothers would have preferred that their sons die than be taken and turned that way. Does your queer mind at least understand such mindset? Or would you accuse those Greek mothers of 'racism'? 

Indeed, Greek mythology and folklore are filled with such stories. What is the main musical form in US today?  Rap music which is about tribal blacks yapping about how their life be all about fighting and fuc*ing and how they finna blow away anyone who done dis they's pride. You 'progressives' are okay with the violent sexuality of Rap Culture, yet you bitch about how Ethan is enraged over his brother and family having been mutilated and rubbed out in the most gruesome manner. You're too much of a pansy PC ideologue to understand human psychology and instinct. Sure, Ethan is angry, even unhinged at times, but his feelings are understandable and all-too-human. And on some level, it is virile and healthy. Man is, at the root, an animal driven by survival, sex, territory, and pride. It is YOU who are sick because you lack such healthy instincts. Instead, you have the anti-instinct of decadence and racial suicide. 

Now, I'm not saying men should always act out their rage. The World would blow up like in DR. STRANGELOVE. But those instincts are natural and of the essence. There is a powerful bond within the race and between parents and children. 

Why does the black woman in BELOVED(by Toni Morrison) kill her own baby? She would rather have the baby be 'murdered' than grow up a slave.  To Ethan, Debbie has become a sex slave of the very people who raped and murdered her family. And from her womb will come more warriors to kill whites. To him, that isn't 'being alive'. 

Of course, you know and I know that the history of the West was tragic for the Indians. From their point of view, they were defending their own land from white invaders. Indians had their own reasons and pride. The Walter Hill movie GERONIMO is a magnificent tale of a man who fights for his race, land, and pride. Sure, he does horrible things and kills 'innocent' white folks, but it is war, and war brings out the 'worst' in people. After all, it was the democratic powers that economically blockaded Germany in WWI, thereby driving many German children to starvation. It's like Ethan shooting bison to starve the Indians. And the Jews who control the US forced sanctions on Iraq in the 90s, killing by some estimates 500,000 women and children. Ethan has nothing on the Jews when it comes to mass killing. And it was democratic Harry Truman who nuked Japan and killed all those babies. And Jews used Barack Obama to aid terrorists in Syria to bring down Assad. It's amusing how so many progs bitch about how 'racist-wacist' the fictional Ethan is but are totally okay with Jewish-Zionist mass murder around the world. 

Anyway, we need a better understanding of the dynamics of male pride, its dark side but also as a source of courage and inspiration. After all, what is the catalyst of events in SEVEN SAMURAI. One of the farmers had his wife taken by the bandits. He was helpless to do anything and feels shame as a man. His wife is being raped by scum, but he's impotent to do anything about it. He feels the kind of rage that Ethan feels. But I'll bet you're the sort of PC pansy who'd accuse the farmer of 'psycho-sexual hang-ups'.  Or consider Angel in THE WILD BUNCH. He returns to his village and finds out his father was murdered by General Mapache. And his woman was taken... or worse... she freely went off with the very man who killed Angel's father and pillaged the village. So, when Angel encounters Teresa and she mocks him and laughs, of course he's angry as hell and shoots the 'puta'. It is a barbaric act in a barbaric world but understandable. A man's pride can take only so much humiliation. Akira Kurosawa understood this. Sam Peckinpah understood. So did John Ford. But all you can do is bitch about 'racism, racism'. 

Also, you say Ethan's fear of miscegenation is some kind of sickness. Why? If a white man has a white daughter, he naturally wants the girl to look up to her father and marry someone like him. It's part of human nature. If she goes with a man of another race, it means she finds Other Men to be racially-sexually superior. She would be sexually betraying her own kind. 

During Southern slavery, black men sometimes felt this way. Some black women happily gave themselves to white massuh. White master had the whip hand, and the black ho wanted the white man's seed than of the Negro slave. Imagine how humiliated the Negro male must have felt. 

In today's world, white women are finding out that black men are more muscular and bigger-donged. They look down on white males as 'slow white boys'. So, it is only natural that many white men would feel hurt and offended by this. Why wouldn't white men feel like Japanese men after WWII? Bigger and beefier white and black GI's were turning Japanese women into whores, and Japanese women flaunted their relations with American occupiers in front of defeated yellow men. Of course, Japanese men were wounded in pride.  Races are different. Black men are more muscular and tougher than white men. So, it is NATURAL for white men to feel threatened in racial/sexual/masculine in relation to blacks, just like Japanese men felt belittled and humiliated by American men sexually conquering Japanese women. And there is a whore element in womenfolk. Women are naturally into hierarchy. They are not egalitarian in their sexual preferences. They want winners with more money, more muscle, and/or bigger dongs.  So, Japanese men were bound to lose out to American men, and white men are bound to lose out to black men.  It's like French women threw themselves at Nazi German victors upon French surrender. Given that France was defeated, you'd think French women would have stuck with their own men out of national loyalty. But many French women didn't give a damn about that. They saw German men as winners and French men as losers.  French women acted like Teresa in THE WILD BUNCH. Like Arletty said, "My heart belongs to France but my ass belongs to the world."  Women are natural whores who will always go with Power.  Women like power and look down on 'losers'. Women may be politically on the 'left', but their sexual preferences are hierarchical. They want to put out to the Best and reject all the Rest. 

Historically and socially, white men had the advantage over blacks, who'd been historically oppressed. But white men were right to fear that, once social discrimination were removed, black men would gain over white men. Tougher black guys would beat up white guys, and white girls would look upon black men as racially-sexually superior. You see, race-ism is TRUE. Races are not the same. Get rid of social 'racism' and you end up NOT with equality but natural 'racism' that picks new winners and losers. Look at sports. Social race-ism of Yesterday favored whites as blacks were kept out of sports. But natural race-ism of Today favors blacks and discriminate against whites, browns, and yellows. We say US is so diverse, but NFL and NBA are almost all black. 

So, white fathers were understandably worried about their daughters going with Negro men. It meant racial-sexual defeat of white males, not colorblind racial equality. 

Such white girls(as 'mudsharks') were not opting for racial equality but rejecting white men as less manly than mandingo-like Negroes. We hear of the cuckold fetish among white liberals. Why is it racially so unequal? We don't hear of white couples inviting Mexican, Hindu, or Asian men to their bedrooms. It is usually the Negro. And we don't hear of black guys inviting white guys to do their women. Tyrone don't say, "Hey, white Wilbur, hump my Yolanda and humiliate by black ass."

And what does Rap music tell us about black sexuality? Negro rappers say, "da only thing on my mind is fuc*ing and fighting and whupping faggoty ass white boys and banging white girls." 

I find it amusing that white Libs condemn D. W. Griffith's THE BIRTH OF A NATION for saying that black men are a bunch of sexual beasts, but when one looks at rap culture, sex/porn industry, sports franchises, and much else(all controlled by Jews and Liberals), the message is black men are wild studs, white girls should put out to them, and white boys should accept their wimpy secondary status and be cucky pussyboys.  White Libs SAY one thing but they CELEBRATE another. They say all races are the same and race is just a myth, but they really celebrate black superiority as athletes, singers, sex beasts, mandingos, and studs. And the music industry is run by Lib Jews and 'progressives'. Not by KKK or by D.W. Griffith. But their favored depiction of Negroes is as badass thugs and sex lunatics. And blacks themselves lead all the other races in promoting thug behavior, skank culture, and whore attitude. So, it seems THE BIRTH OF A NATION wasn't entirely wrong about blacks. Its fears about blacks were dismissed by Progs as 'irrational', but the favored Prog image of the Negro is as the thuggish sex stud or gangsta mandingo. Lib Jews control sex industry and own music industry, and the prevailing image of Negroes is a wild studs who have nothing on their mind fuc*ing white women. The ONLY difference between Griffith and Lib Jews is Griffith saw this as a bad thing, a threat to the white race, whereas Lib Jews welcome it because they want to castrate white males so that the white race will never regain the pride and unity necessary to challenge Jewish power. Indeed, consider the Old Spice advertising: It says Negro is the sex stud who is racially-sexually superior to the cuckish white boy. It's the same logic as in THE BIRTH OF A NATION. Difference is Griffith called on white race to resist the looming black sexual imperialism. But cucks like you and Ken Burns celebrate your own racial-sexual demise as beta-male wussies before the macho black man. You guys are like the pansy-ass male Eternals in ZARDOZ. You have lost your male instinct to fight and survive. You guys really hate Ethan because he, like Geronimo, is a warrior for his race. You are collaborator cuck dork wimp. You can hide behind all this talk of 'social justice', but you have surrendered to Jews and blacks. 

https://www.facebook.com/wahgwaanmediatv/videos/257359648033355/

Anyway, sexuality is dark and brooding. It's like what Camille Paglia said. We have to start from nature. Nature is at the root of everything, and nature is 'unfair' and 'unequal'. It made men stronger than women. Nature is sex-ist because it created stronger men who can beat up women. Nature is also race-ist because evolution made Jews smarter to rule over us all and made blacks stronger to beat up other races. 

https://newrepublic.com/article/77727/groups-and-genes

https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/jewish-genius/

Indeed, if US had imported small Vietnamese as slaves, would we have the same problems? No. White males wouldn't be afraid of shorter and scrawnier yellow males. But whites bought powerful muscular blacks from Africa, and once the blacks were freed, they began to whup white guys who became wussified and afraid. White women lost respect for white guys and more of them go with Negroes. You see, this is not equality. It is the new inequality. More social freedom means nature will play a bigger role in sex and crime. Since blacks are stronger and more aggressive, social equality between the races means blacks will beat up other races. This is why white folks want guns. Man to man, a white man is likely to get whupped by a black guy who will then rape the white guy's wife.  In fact, white guys are so demoralized that they now invite black guys to fuc* their wives. White guys are into cuckold fetish. Do you see black guys invite white guys to fuc* black women? 

http://conservative-headlines.com/2014/12/the-truth-about-interracial-rape/

Take STRAW DOGS? Sexuality sure can be disturbing. Dustin Hoffman's character got the girl because he's smart and successful. Girls like winners with careers who can provide, like Hoffman's David. But girls also like studs, and studs resent and look down on successful geeks or nerds who lack 'genuine manhood'. So, the sexual dynamics in STRAW DOGS get all confused. That's how nature works. But you are too PC priggish and neo-puritanical to have the requisite empathy to understand. Instead, you hysterically shriek, "Oh, that is so racist, that is so sexist, that is so... blah blah blah." You will never fully appreciate art and reality if you are such a neo-victorian PC pussy boy. 

Yes, all the characters in STRAW DOGS are sexually anxious and/or 'hung-up',  but that is natural. You see, all guys are anxious on sexual matters in one way or another.  A big strong ugly guy can attract a girl with his toughness, but he is jealous of the handsome guy and smart guy. It's like Jake LaMotta in RAGING BULL. He got the girl cuz he's a tough boxer. But he is outwitted by old gangsters, and he is intensely jealous when his wife says Tony Janiro is good looking, something LaMotta is not. Or a guy may be handsome and attract girls. But he may be anxious cuz he can be whupped by strong ugly guys. And a smart guy can get a girl with his money, but he may be anxious cuz she might be attracted to strong guys and handsome guys. It's like that Eagles Song 'LYING EYES'. 

Surely, you know about The Iliad. That was about a woman.  A war for Helen. But then, what do men live and fight for? Land and pussy. That's what matters most. Before there are ideas, there has to be life. And life is created through man and woman. So, if man loses the woman, he is lost. No children, no lineage. And if he has no land, he is vulnerable. This is why Jews obsessed about race for 3,500 yrs. Unless Jewish women had children for Jewish men, the Jewish race would face extinction. Today, there's lots of intermarriage among Jews, BUT most Jews insist that mixed-children be raised as JEWISH and goy partners usually go along because Jewishness has prestige as identity(whereas whiteness is vilified as 'racist' and yellowness is derided as weak). And even after 2,000 yrs of exile, Jews found a way to take back the land with the creation of Israel. Even the most Liberal Jews supported this massive ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.  Also, blood matters a lot to Jews. Take the Moses story.  Like Debbie was raised by Indians, Moses was raised by Egyptians as one of their own. But he rediscovered his roots. He sided with Jews, and to defend the Tribe, he worked with God to kill all the first born of Egypt. Jews still celebrate that murderous event as Passover. That is how Jews survived for 3,500 yrs. There was a bit of Ethan Edwards in all of them. 

Such is the way of life. Ethan is like a little Moses. He fights for his people. And it's understandable why John Wayne stuck up for Ethan. Wayne's remark about the Indians in your article is valid and invalid. Wayne said the Indians were greedy for having all that land for themselves. He was right in the sense that the US as a nation couldn't have become a reality if a few million Indians had all of it. There would have been no roads, factories, schools, hospitals, universities(favorite bastions of progs), and etc. UNLESS white man took over and settled the land. Besides, the moral logic of Wayne's pro-white-settlement account is now used by Progs. They say US is so big and bountiful that Americans must share the land and wealth with people all around the world. They say whites mustn't hog it for themselves, just like Wayne once said it was wrong for Indians to have sole claim to the land. These progs who feign outrage over Wayne's remark don't seem terribly interested in reviving Indian communities or returning much of the land to them. Instead, they call for even more mass invasion-immigration so that the remaining Indians will lose their ancestral hunting grounds to ALL THE WORLD.

For those who believe in the American enterprise, Wayne's sentiment has much validity because the Indian Way had to go to make way for civilization modeled on European achievements. After all, what has America been but a vast social experiment where white peoples, under leadership of Anglo-Americans, were given a virtual blank slate of land and freedom to show the world what they are capable of? At the time, no other people, provided with the same resources and opportunities, could have done as much. Not even close. 
But Wayne's argument is also invalid because, for the Indians, it wasn't just a matter of economics or politics or 'social progress'. The land under their feet was sacred and mythic, spiritually alive to them. Their folklore and identity were wedded to this land. And even though red 'savages' couldn't build a great modern nation like the Anglos did, they lived in brutal and rough balance with nature, and there is something to be said for nature and wildlife.  America built by whites is a tremendous achievement, but so much nature had to be destroyed to make way for farms and factories. We modern folks don't wanna live like savages, but Indians had a deeply meaningful relation to the land, and it was tragic that it was lost in the progress of industry and science and etc. Progress is good but came at a price. 

So, you see, there are always two ways to look at things. Even what you say of MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE misses the point.  On one level, it is true that the man's career was built on a lie. But it was also built on a truth. While it's true that Wayne's character of Doniphon was the man who really shot Valance, it is no less true that the James Stewart character showed remarkable courage when he picked up a gun to take on Valance. So, his career was built on a half-lie, not a total lie. He mustered the will to stand up to Valance and prove his manhood, all the more admirable because he's no gunman. If Stewart's character had ran from Valance but taken credit for having killed him, that would really have been a lie. But he did show incredible courage in challenging Valance. 

One thing for sure, Ethan is very different from Travis Bickle of TAXI DRIVER(written by Paul Schrader, directed by Martin Scorsese). Ethan is one tough hombre, a leader of men. He is man among men. An alpha. He becomes enraged because of what happened. He can be sociable and in sync with the world around him. He is a good reader of people's character and motives; he's a good leader of men. In contrast, Bickle is really messed up in the head. You can tell he is sort of like Norman Bates crossed with one of Robert Bresson's characters.  

Also, we are talking of two entirely different worlds. In THE SEARCHERS there is civilization vs savagery. Though Ford is somewhat sympathetic to the Indians, the coming of progress means savagery must make way for churches and rule of law. In contrast, TAXI DRIVER is more disturbing because it is set in the heart of civilization, New York, the greatest city on earth. Yet, the decadence and degeneracy are worse than savagery. It is savagery at the core of civilization. 

Some say Bickle is 'racist' cuz he fears black thugs. But this is so dumb. I mean how could any honest person NOT have noticed black thuggery and crime in NY, especially in the 70s? Things got so bad that even 'liberal' NYers finally got Republican Rudy Giuliani to clean things up. NYers also elected centrist Jewish-Supremacist Michael Bloomberg three times to get tough on blacks through stop-and-frisk(the 'nigger'). So, in a way, Bickle's fears were shared by Libs themselves. You surely have it too. If not, go live in Detroit or the black parts of Baltimore. It's easy for you to talk the Lib talk while refusing to walk the Lib walk.  Indeed, look at all the biggest Liberal cities.  They've been gentrifying to drive out dangerous blacks. San Francisco is only 6% black.  Housing projects have been torn down in Chicago to make way for posh condos for white and Jewish 'progressive' yuppies. And for all those 'nice libs' voted for Clinton who locked up tons of Negroes. So, while all you Libs put down Bickle, your ACTIONS confirm his fears. 

In the original screenplay of TAXI DRIVER, the pimps were black. Some say Bickle is 'racist' cuz he tries to save  a white girl from black thugs. What in the hell is wrong with that?  Suppose a black taxi driver saw a bunch of white pimps exploiting black girls. Would it be wrong for him to feel racial rage? 

Weren't Vietnamese men angry that whites and blacks were turning their women into a bunch of whores? Viet Cong men were a bunch of Travis Bickles who were trying to end sexual imperialism by the US. Bickle wants to save a white girl from black sexual exploitation. 

If a bunch of Arab men sexually exploited Jewish women, Jewish men would be angry as hell. And good thing too. Suppose Arab men exploit Jewish women in the way that Jewish men exploit Slavic women as sex slaves in Israel and Ukraine. Suppose Arab men control pornography and get mostly Jewish women to have sex with Negroes for money. Jewish men would growl with rage. Any man who is okay with men of another race exploiting the women of his race is a pussy-bitch(like what the Japanese have become since the end of WWII).  

Anyway, sexuality is dark matter. It brings out the murderer in us. Consider what OJ did to Nicole Simpson. Or consider what happens in Othello. In Romeo and Juliet, the two young ones commit suicide or murder themselves for love.  
Sex also creates family and new dynamics of bonds and hatreds. When Agamemnon had Iphigenia sacrificed to the gods, his wife got so angry that she waited for him to return and then had him killed. And then her kids killed her. All very dark and crazy stuff but also very understandable since humans are driven by dark passions. But I'll bet you're the sort of PC pansy freak who can only think in terms of 'that's racist', 'that's sexist', or 'that's homophobic' when it comes to the arts. 

This is why humanities have come to suck so bad. Too many ideological freaks like you reduced art to a set of buzz words. You don't know the true nature of passion. Consider Marty in THE SEARCHERS. He comes across the voice of reason through much of the movie, but when he finds out Laurie his love is about to marry the guitar-strummer, he turns all 'savage', and the 'Indian' side of him emerge. For a moment, he seems even more unhinged than Ethan as he even bites the groom in the ear. You as a homo should know this since the homo community is filled with all sorts of obsessive freako people who are so vain, narcissistic, possessive, and even socio-pathic. But so lacking in self-awareness.

Deforestation of the Mind — Uprooting of the Western Soul and the Globalist Deluge

We've all heard of stories from around the world where hills stripped of trees surrender their soil to mudslides. Without roots to hold the dirt in place and without leaves to soften the pummel of rain, hills without trees invariably wash away in mudslides that do great damage to outlying areas. This is why, since childhood, we've all been instructed of the importance of nature and forests. If nature is despoiled for short-term gain, the damage can be irreparable as the loss of trees unleashes a chain-reaction of destruction. Not only are the trees gone but all the animals, plants, and other organisms that depend on them. And then, other organisms that depend on those organisms also become endangered, and many perish. As humans ultimately rely on nature, what had been short-term gain turns into long-term loss, even destruction for mankind. Indeed, entire civilizations perished because of their short-sighted exploitation of nature.

What goes for nature also goes for the mind. Human souls can be destroyed just like nature. When something essential, fundamental, and true is removed from the life of the mind, it sets off a series of 'mental events' that reverberate far and wide. The impact is not limited to the initial loss but gradually or even dramatically expands to other dimensions of the mind. It's like the removal of an organ affects the entire body, which begins to fall apart like dominoes. What is true of body is also of mind. When the mind is 'deforested' of what makes us essentially human, moral, philosophical, spiritual, and/or cultural, the human soul doesn't hold together. Having no deep meaning, sound standard, richness of reference, and true conviction, the mind turns into mud and can be molded into anything. The mind goes from precious metal to malleable plastic.
Such fluidity of mind is rarely, if ever, the facilitator of true freedom and individuality. Mud-minds and plastic-brains are almost always molded by the Power that, in our world, favors fashion over tradition because slaves to fashion are so easy to manipulate with the latest craze or outrage. Because their conscious(and subconscious) spaces are not held together by forests of the mind with roots in family, culture, history, and spirituality, their thoughts, feelings, and actions are like so many mudslides or mental diarrhea. A properly cultured mind is not only about education. Indeed, if education turns into indoctrination dishing out the latest 'intellectual' fads, especially to impressionable young ones with single-mothers or soulless parents whose idea of culture is Pop Culture and whose idea of values come from the corrupt Jewish-monopoly media(elite and mass), then it can do more harm than good. Given the sheer mindlessness and mendacity that pass themselves off as intellectual thought or ideological commitment in the Current West, it's quite evident that intelligence and knowledge alone won't save anyone's mind and soul.
Intelligence is merely a tool and often caves to emotions. Intelligence seeks the truth only when directed towards it. When people with intelligence are instilled, especially at impressionable times in their lives, with strong emotions in relation to falsehoods or disingenuous narratives, the element of sheer passion overrides facts and reason. For example, just how did so many intelligent people come to believe in the divinity of Jesus for so many years? Because Christianity had such emotional, cultural, and spiritual power over them. Why did so many highly intelligent people become so swept up with Marxism/Communism? It wasn't only the conceit of partaking of an ideology that supposedly figured everything out and unified all relevant knowledge but the radical conviction that one was on the side of angels or historical justice. And yet, given the nobility and depth of Jesus' teachings and the power of Karl Marx's vision, those who wholeheartedly accepted the Christian Faith or Communist Destiny were not necessarily deforested of mind, at least not entirely so. Whatever harm the religion of Christianity or ideology of Communism may have done to the human psyche, it also planted new seeds that could grow into new trees of meaning, understanding, redemption, and/or justice. Neither was animated by nihilism, hedonism, or degeneracy.

But take a look at our world. We see women with green, purple, or pink hair. And, they are not merely silly teens trying to be 'different' but women who are middle-aged, even old. Why would an adult do that to her hair? If a 10 yr old girl did funny stuff to her hair to look like Cyndi Lauper or some anime figure, it might be 'cute'. But why would full-grown women, especially one with college degrees and professional responsibilities(and with family and children) go about doing stupid things to their hair? (Granted, such ladies tend to be 'cat ladies' than family women, but then, there are plenty of stupid mothers.) Why would so many people, parents and children, besmirch and sully their bodies with ugly tattoos? What goes on in their minds when they decide on such acts of folly? Don't they have a larger sense of life, i.e. what is 'cool' today maybe 'fool' tomorrow. And even if they are capable of only thinking of the Moment, why would anyone with sense believe that he or she looks better with body graffiti that are invariably ugly, vulgar, and trashy? Now, I can understand some primitive tribes where tattoos have some cultural significance. Or I can tolerate someone who's been to hell and back in war and got a tattoo to signal his camaraderie with his band of brothers. But what exactly is the meaning of tattoos to the fools who decide to splatter their bodies with in-erasable ugliness?
While such is done to the body, it is decided by the mind, and one wonders why so many people in the West(and their cultural colonies) have fallen into the habit of harboring dumb thoughts and preferences that lead to disastrous results. (What tattoos are to skin, meth is to inner organs. Substitute kicks and highs for those with no sense of meaning.)

Obviously, both stupid 'cat ladies' with funny-colored hair and morons addicted to tattoos have mud-minds. They are putty in the hands of globalist Jews because their minds can be washed away so easily with the latest fads and fashions. Unlike status-anxious whore-politicians who just go along with the latest Official Line decided by the power(the Jews) out of opportunism, so many of so-called 'woke' community really seem to hysterically believe in the latest crusade or outrage with zero awareness that, only a few years or even moments ago, they hadn't a care or a clue on the subject or issue. Their ex-lax minds seem to slide and flow with whatever BS is cooked up by the Media Machine. In their formative years, their minds were not seeded and planted with meaningful trees providing them with a lifetime worth of meaning. Instead, PC uprooted what was nascent & normal, decent, and healthy in them and 'seeded' their mental soil with ideological salt(that prevents organic growth) and planted plastic saplings that has the semblance of trees but no means to spread its roots. ('Gay marriage' is to real marriage what a plastic tomato is to a real tomato. No, 'love is love' is not true love. Homo fecal-penetration is not equal in worth, meaning, and purpose to true sexuality that produced all the life in the world.) As such, the generations especially from the Boomers(and gone full-retard with the Millennials) have the kinds of minds that can be mud-slid away with ease. Nothing that is deep, meaningful, and true seems to stick with them. Their minds seem vulnerable & defenseless, so very gullible, and elope with the latest stupidity. (Today's 'liberals' might as well be called 'gulliberals'.) How else can one explain monstrosities such as 'gay marriage', dementia of Afrophilia(as if blacks, the most criminal race, is the most angelic race), ludicrousness of Jew-Worship(as if Zionists need protection from the countless Palestinians and Muslims Jews have terrorized and killed), and the clown-world notion that a man is a 'woman' simply because he feels like it.

What are the elements that hold a mind together and keep it resistant to the decadent, even degenerate, fads and fashions that now define so much of the 2 PC's, pop culture and political correctness? What allows for a healthy eco-system of the mind, a kind of psycho-system, one that can weather and survive the winds, rain, and hailstorms of the Corrupt and Venal Power? A strong sense of individuality is surely one but not in the libertarian sense that each individual should consider himself/herself as the center of the universe. No, every individual is part of a link, an inheritor of a legacy. After all, most of our lives are filled with things that we, as individuals, didn't create. While we are more than ants in a colony, we are like ants in that we are nothing all by oneself. We need individuality, but as individuals, we need to understand and appreciate that we are part of a family, culture, history, spirituality, and a sense of place. Even for the non-religious, certain spiritual notions can be beneficial in restraining excesses of hubris or hysteria. For the intellectuals and brainiacs with a know-it-all tendency, the concept of God can be like a contract among them that there is a power and truth beyond their capacity for discovery and understanding in their all-too-short lifetimes. The concept of God can also be beneficial to those who with heavy tendency toward sensualism: A contract among sensualists that there must be something more meaningful and deep than the pleasures of the flesh and tingles of sensory nerves. Without the concept of God or something equivalent, too many people are prone to self-worship, arrogance, mammon, or fervor of the moment(aka the Current Year).
Global Warming Hysteria is one such example. While global warming caused by CO2 may indeed be a real problem, the sheer absolute certainty bordering on quasi-millenarianism among its proselytizers is truly a sight to behold. Instead of offering up better science and data with cool minds, they act as though they are 100% certain that UNLESS things go their way, it's End of the World for sure in a few decades. If anything is heating up real fast, it's their self-righteousness. While serious concern for the environment is laudable, especially as humans have despoiled the planet enough, the sheer arrogance of certitude bordering on megalomania(or 'megalogaia') among the save-the-worlders who spout the most hysterical and self-serving form of global-warming mania suggests that what is sadly lacking in their lives is a true sense of spirituality.

The forest of the mind needs real connection to family(even bordering on sentimentality as it is only within the family that one is allowed unabashed emotions that are essential to life), and this means having a man who knows what it is to be a father and a woman who knows what it is to be a mother. And this familial sense must be expansive as the concept of the nuclear family, though useful in the modern setting, tends to over-emphasize one's own family's separateness than relatedness to kinfolk. The nuclear family is convenient and desirable in that each family wants its free space and agency. Just like we, as individuals, want our private spaces, every family wants to mind its own business. Still, family bonds within and without are much richer when there is a larger sense of connection and communication among relatives including grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, nephews, and nieces. There need be ways of communication, meetings, gatherings, rituals, and remembrance that remind everyone that he or she isn't alone in the world or primarily part of some faddish subculture but part of a deep lineage. This used to be taken for granted in the past, but with so many children being only-child-ren, raised by single-parents(or even grandmothers or foster homes), and addicted to pop culture(and deracinated by PC), we can no longer take for granted the sense of belonging and obligations that come with Familial-Consciousness.

The forest of the mind also needs true spirituality. There are several true religions of great reach and depth. If one finds it impossible to literally believe in God or gods in the modern era(and this would include myself), we can still appreciate the old religions and mythologies for their imagination, searching, meaning, revelation, and lessons. One doesn't have to be Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, or Greco-paganist to draw inspiration from the faiths and fables that served as the visionary and spiritual bedrock of entire civilizations. While it is only natural to seek new meanings in our world of rapid change, one mustn't confuse the latest fad or fervor as worthy substitutes for the great religions and myths of the past. While it's possible that there will be new prophets and revelations in times to come, they most certainly won't be the products of the Current Power whose main(even sole) priority is to hog all the wealth and privilege for itself. Then, it's no wonder that the Power has been so hard at work in deforesting the minds of modern people so that their hearts-and-soul will wash away like mudslide under the barrage of globalist PC and Pop Culture.

The forest of the mind also needs real culture and true sensibility, just like the body needs real food with real nutrients. While we may enjoy candy, doughnuts, and ice-cream once a while as snack, we know we cannot survive on them for long. We need real food with proteins and vitamins. Similarly, a civilization with pop culture as its main culture is like someone who mainly gorges on junk food and candy as his/her main food. Why is our culture so sick(and sickly), fatuous, disgusting, imbecile, retarded, infantile, and/or excessive? It's due to the decline in sensibility, indeed to the point where even or especially the (so-called) experts can't tell what real culture is anymore. Consider the rise of Pop Art in the art world. Consider how superhero comic book movies have come to dominate the discourse about cinema. Consider how the biggest literary events are stuff like HARRY POTTER, HUNGER GAMES, TWILIGHT, FIFTY SHADES OF GREY, or some teen or teen-inspired fiction. A people who don't know real culture from junk culture have lost the forest of the mind. Their minds are like the hills of Haiti that's been stripped of trees and flows with mud whenever it rains.

Much more can be said on this subject, and this is only a start. But one thing for sure, we need an Arbor's Day for the mind. We must spread the seeds of truth, meaning, culture, and justice within our psyche. And by 'truth', I don't mean the Narrative foisted upon us by the capitalist-globalist Jewish-monopoly media. And by 'justice', I don't mean the official dogma of the Holy Three that elevates Jews, Homos, and Negroes as the only sacred groups whom all others must worship and serve. What is SJW(social justice warrior) or JJ(Justice Junkie) dogma really about? It's not about justice based on truth, facts, reason, and reciprocity but about hysteria based on idol-worshiping of certain groups(Jews, blacks, and homos) as the sole fountains of wisdom and holiness. It's a form of inverted supremacism that, while denouncing 'white supremacism', goes full blast in promoting Jews, blacks, and homos as more worthy than other groups. Just ask the Palestinians.

We must desalinize our minds of the poison salt of PC. We must remove the fake plastic plants of pop culture. And in their place, we must plant the trees of true wisdom, depth, meaning, passion, and connection. Otherwise, our minds will just be piles of mud that will not hold firm against the deluge of globalist pap and rot. And we need self-realization and self-actualization more than ever because even the institutions of true religions are now in the hands of globalist agents, witting or unwitting, who are aiding and abetting in the deforestation of the mind to turn all our minds into one collective mud-flood flowing into the nowhere land of mammonite idolatry of Jews, homos, and Negroes. Donald Trump may be useful as a wrecker of globalism, but he too is a depraved creature of depraved times, one where even the majority of so-called 'conservatives' are okay with 'gay marriage' and pander to the worship of the Holy Three. In the age of mud, we have 'gulliberals' and 'cuckservatives'. We need a garden of true liberals and true conservatives who need each other for both preservation and progress of a sane and sound society. And such a mind garden can only be created out of a true forest with real trees of knowledge and remembrance. In this age of degenerates, we need the re-emergence of the regenerates.

PMB Factor or Why Jewish Psychology Makes It Nearly Impossible for Non-Jews to Co-Exist Alongside Jews in Good Faith. PMB = Pedestal, Mirror, and Buttplug. GOMB or Get Off My Back, a Necessary Message to Jews from Whites.

It should be obvious by now to all honest and sensible people that Jews are a deeply problematic people. Now, all peoples are problematic because life itself is problematic, a matter of chaos, confusion, struggle, and survival. Just like all organisms have developed their own specialties to gain an edge in their niche, every human group has had to be more than 'nice' and kind to survive in what has mostly been a harsh world. Still, just like some organisms are more threatening than others, certain human groups are more difficult than others. African honey bees, for instance, are far more aggressive than European honey bees. African elephants are more aggressive and dangerous than Asian elephants. Weasels are feistier animals than muskrats. Some snakes are venomous, many are not. Dragonflies and butterflies are mild compared to hornets. Among dogs, some breeds are more dangerous than others. Among cats, orange tabbies tend to be more aggressive than long-haired black cats. Then, it shouldn't surprise us to realize that some human groups are more problematic than others. This is largely a matter of personality but also linked to levels of intelligence, aggression, strength, neurosis, and/or psychopathy. It also has to do with general egotism within the group.

Two racial/ethnic groups that are most problematic are Jews and blacks. To be more specific, it's the Ashkenazi Jews, ones who are half-European, who are more problematic than other kinds of Jews. Not only do they have problematic personalities but they have advantages and deficiencies that drive many of their members half-mad. Jews are rightly seen as pushy, feisty, and weaselly, but the problem is compounded by the fact that they're more intelligent and less attractive. (Being more intelligent, Jews think they should rule the world but resent the fact that too many goyim regard them to be unattractive and unappealing.) Blacks are rightly seen as loud, crude, and obnoxious, but things are made worse by the fact that they are tougher and less intelligent. (Being tougher and louder, blacks think they should rule the world but resent the fact that their limited IQ prevents them from rising to the top of everything.) And then, there is the matter of egotism that runs wild in both communities that do not lack for know-it-all bigmouths. The egotism also blinds many Jews and blacks to their shortcomings and failings.

In a way, Jews and blacks are mirror-opposites of one another, and in a hypothetical world composed of only Jews and blacks, they would not get along at all. Blacks will try to beat up Jews and rob/rape them, and Jews will use their wits to devise means and ways to enslave and even exterminate blacks. But because both groups rely so much on parasitism on Whitey as the commonly shared host, they've developed a symbiotic relationship. Also, having developed in close proximity with whites, both groups have suffered under whites and gained so much from the complex relationship. Consider what blacks gained under other blacks or under Arabs compared to what they gained under whites. Consider what Jews gained under/with Arabs or other-non-whites to what they gained under/with/over whites, especially Northern European whites.
Indeed, Jewish Global Power is inconceivable without its hooks deep into Anglos and Germanics. While Jews gained great advantages all throughout Europe and Middle East, their power was always limited within the bounds of ability of the host. In other words, while Jews in the Ottoman Empire did better than many groups, they could not surmount the limitations of Turkish civilization. Same goes for Jews in Russia. Jews could rise to the top in Russia, especially in the early stages of Bolshevism, but their worldwide influence was hampered by the problems of Russian national character(and failings of communism, of course). Jews gained a great deal in Italy and France, but both nations were surpassed by Anglo and Germanic nations that really came to define the future of the West. It's like a rider, no matter how talented, is only as good as the horse he is riding. If the horse is weak, no amount of experience and knowledge on his part can turn it into a great horse. Worse, if he has no emotional or moral connection to the horse, he may decide to exploit and abuse it for all its worth and dispose of it sooner than later. Jews understood that the strongest horses in the West were Anglo and Germanic. It was the UK, Germany, and the US. German Jews gained more than all other Jews with the exception of those in the UK and US. This is why Jews reacted to badly to National Socialist Germany's rejection of World Jewry. Would Jews have reacted so violently to a lesser nation saying NO to Jews? After the creation of Israel, many Arab nations expelled their Jews, but World Jewry didn't mind at all. They were happy to have those Jews come to Israel. Furthermore, they didn't see it as a great loss because Jews in Arab nations wouldn't have amounted to much because Arabs could never amount to much. So, Jews in Arab nations were atop weak horses. Jews see goyim as in terms of strong horses or weak horses. That's the esoteric meaning behind Steven Spielberg's WAR HORSE.

How Jews see the white race.

Just like Jews know that blacks are the superpowers in sports, and therefore, Jewish-owned teams in NBA and NFL must recruit top blacks to have championship teams, they know that Northern Europeans, especially Anglos and Germanics, are the most formidable civilization-builders, nation-enrichers, and imperial managers. Thus, Jewish Power relies on access to Anglo and Germanic nations. This is why Jews fear the rise of white identity and white interests among Anglos and Germanics. Even though Nazism turned out to be evil and monstrous, it had many positive sides as well, and one was the theme of liberation and emancipation(from maniacal Jewish control) before the movement turned into one of enslavement and extermination of the peoples of other nations. Before National Socialism went off the rails as Germano-Supremacist Imperialism, its main appeal was the hope of national liberation from World Jewry who, during the Weimar Years, exploited and debauched the German nation. If Adolf Hitler had the sense of limits of Kemal Ataturk or Vladimir Putin, he would have been one of the greatest men of the 20th century, indeed in all of European history. But he betrayed the initial hopes of National Socialism by igniting wars to conquer and exploit other peoples. But then, one problem of National Socialism was it was a radical Germanic version of Jewishness. In the fight against the Jews, Germany would use many of their tactics.

Anyway, the reason why Jews reacted so hysterically to the rise of National Socialism was because they regarded Germany as one of their prize horses. If a weak horse throws off the rider and runs away, it's no great loss. But if a strong prize horse throws off the rider and flees, it's a huge loss. It's the difference between a fisherman losing a sardine and losing a marlin. It's like there's a big difference between losing a plain lover and a beautiful lover. Now, if Jews have such problems with Germans and Anglos, why don't they just leave and go live with other peoples? The thing is, despite the problems, Jews know deep down inside that Jewish Power could only have risen to global greatness atop the backs of Anglo and Germanic prowess. It's like a Jewish owner of the NBA or NFL cannot hope to win the championship without black players. If blacks are the prize horses of Jews in American sports, whites folks(esp Anglos and Germanics) are their prize horses in the global struggle for hegemony. This is why Jews fear the awakening of white consciousness that wants to be free of the JSP(or Jewish Supremacist Power) on its back. When Jews rant about 'white supremacy', it is pure projection because what they're really about is ensuring White Submissivism to Jewish Supremacism. What Jews fear most is White National Liberation and White Global Liberation. White Liberation will save not only the white race but the whole world that is being trampled and destroyed(militarily and immorally) by the Jewish rider atop the white horse. Just consider Libya and Syria under the hoofs of the white horse ridden by JSP. White Liberation will not only save whites from vicious Jews but will spare the whole world from the misuse of the white horse in the hands of Jews. White people must stop being horses of the Jews and become human again. White people must tell the JSP or Jewish Supremacist Power, "Get Off My Back!" It isn't right for Jews to use white folks as their prize horse and war horse. GOMB or GET OFF MY BACK must be the mindset of white folks when it comes to Jewish Power.

Now, the question of why Jews are so difficult. The main reason is the PMB Factor, or Pedestal-Mirror-Buttplug Factor. It is why no amount of goodwill and kindly gestures on the part of whites is likely to change the atrocious Way of the Jew. Many white people believe that Jews will reciprocate in kind if whites treat them real nice. The thinking is that white Christians had wronged Jews for many centuries and then there was the Shoah, and that's why Jews are still overly sensitive, suspicious, and a bit paranoid. Therefore, if whites change their ways and shower Jews with love and kindness, Jews will eventually mellow out and learn to love whites as well.
Granted, there are some whites who are slavish to Jews out of sheer awe. This awe could be religious, as with Christian Zionists who believe Jews are the Chosen of God, and therefore, those who suck up to Jews shall be blessed while those who mistreat Jews will be condemned. Well, whites have been sucking up to Jews since the end of World War II, and what has been the result for the West? Rise of Sodomania as the new faith, anti-white dehumanization, monstrous wars for Israel, and massive demographic replacement.
Now, these Christian Zionists may feel more fortunate than Arabs and Muslims whose worlds have been torn asunder in recent years. They may feel whites are better off than Arabs because whites suck up to Jews whereas Arabs give the middle finger to Jews. God rewards whites, punishes Arabs. But until late modern history, Arabs had been kinder to Jews, but it was the 'antisemitic' white world that rose to greatness. And the reason why Arab nations have been smashed in recent years is because venal Jews have exploited the power of the white horse to trample on other nations. Even though white nations don't lay in ruins like Arab nations, their fate will be far worse than that of Syria or Iraq in years to come because Jews are pushing for mass Afro-Islamic invasion of Europe. But because Christian Zionists are so in awe of Jews, they don't have the wherewithal to speak the truth and name the Beast.
But not everyone in awe of the Jews is a Christian Zionist. Plenty of them are libertarians, materialists, and status-seekers who naturally look up to whomever happens to be the richest and most powerful. These cuck-collaborators will betray anything and even sell their mothers down the river for their slice of the pie. They are like Ned Beatty in SUPERMAN angling for a piece of California as 'Otisberg'. Indeed, what is a political libertarian but someone who worships the rich and powerful as the Best Individuals? While social libertarians are mainly concerned with freedom to indulge in sex & drugs, political libertarianism is all about sucking up to money. Its archetypal practitioner is the cucky-wuck Paul Ryan who bows down before the JSP(Jewish Supremacist Power) and kisses its ass because he is so in awe of Jewish money and power. As its pet, he gets doggy biscuits for which he is oh so grateful. Most college-Republican organizations are grooming centers for political libertarians whose main aspiration is to be useful for Jewish-Power-and-Wealth that they hold in awe. If the richest and most powerful people in the US were Iranian-Americans and not Jews, these cucky-wuck libertarians would prostrate themselves at the feet of globalist Iranian power.

Anyway, what Christian Zionists and Political Libertarians have in common is the faith that if white folks are ever-so-nice to Jews, Jews will mellow out and pay back the love and affection. This is where both groups are wrong because they fail to understand the Jewish Bio-Cultural Character. The truth is it's highly unlikely that Jews will act in good faith because of the PMB or Pedestal-Mirror-Buttplug Factor. What is meant by the Pedestal. It refers to higher Ashkenazi Jewish intelligence. Even though many Jews deny it, they privately believe their own kind to be smarter than the dimwitted, hapless, and/or one-dimensional goyim. So, Jews place themselves upon the pedestal as the superior race, indeed the master race. Sure, Jews always use such terms in relation to Nazis & 'white supremacists' and pretend as though they themselves are for equality and justice. For example, Jews often excoriate white people for not being 'welcoming' or 'inclusive' enough to the non-white hoi polloi around the world. Thus, one might get the impression that white people want to preserve their 'white privilege', whereas Jews want to share their goodies with all the world. But this is bogus for two reasons. For starters, while one can make a powerful case that white people should not invade and rule over non-white folks — that would indeed be a case of White Privilege — , it's absurd to argue that white people must share their own homelands with all the world. No civilization can maintain itself with open borders, aka Open Invasion. Indeed, Jews themselves have ensured that only Jews get to immigrate to Israel. Jewish tightly guard their own Jewish state while offering up white-majority nations to the world; Jews are being 'generous' with what doesn't even belong to them; imagine someone feigning 'generosity' with YOUR money. Anyway, Jews know full well that if any bunch of people can move to Israel, it will lose its majority-Jewish demography sooner than later. True White Privilege would be a matter of whites having their way in non-white lands. In contrast, whites defending their own homelands and nations is NOT any kind of 'privilege'. It is a duty, and it should be called White Duty, or White Priority. After all, it must be the duty and priority of every people to guard and defend their own homeland, especially if it's deeply ancestral. So, when Jews smear White Duty and White Priority(of defending and preserving white nations) as 'white privilege'(or even 'white supremacy'), it is a dirty trick.

Jerry Nadler the vile and vicious Jew 

Jewish BS is bogus for another reason. Increased Diversity doesn't lead to greater equality but greater inequality, what with Jews getting richer over the rest. First, how can all the diverse immigrant-invaders compete with Jews who are not only more intelligent but so well-connected? Also, the Jewish lie of promised equality should be obvious to anyone, especially given how Jewish Power has rigged the American System to favor Jews uber alles. If Jews and their allies were really into equal justice, would they be insisting that the US must regard Israel as its closest ally while turning a blind eye to the plight of Palestinians? Furthermore, Diversity makes Jews(and their globalist allies) even richer because it undermines the national middle class & working class. So, while wages drop for the white middle/working classes, the profits rise for the upper-crust made of Jews and other globalists. And of course, Jewish Power grows ever more powerful under the Diversity regimen because the diverse groups of goyim simply can't get their act together to form an effective coalition against Jewish Power. Not only do the Jewish Media and Jewish-paid whore-politicians pit the various goy groups against one another(whereas 'leftist' and 'rightist' Jews work as a team) but the elites of goy groups are vetted and paid for by the Jewish oligarchs who own them like so many nickels and dimes in their pockets. So, whether the politicians or 'leaders' are whites like Paul Ryan or Lindsey Graham OR blacks like Al Sharpton or Barack Obama, all they ever really do is suck up to Jews. It's rather remarkable in the case of Sharpton because he once used to be a tireless Jew-baiter. But Jewish Money goes a long way, and the rambunctious jive-ass bunny has been sucking up to Jews over the years.

Anyway, not only are Ashkenazi Jews possessed of higher intelligence but they know it. Therefore, they regard non-Jews as inferiors or untermensch who must serve the smarter Jews. Jewish attitude is much like the pig attitude in George Orwell's ANIMAL FARM, which today is most relevant as a HBD(Human Bio-Diversity) allegory. It's made more problematic due to the Jewish Covenant-mentality. If Jews were mainly libertarian, their sense of superiority would mostly be individualistic, i.e. they'd believe only the smart Jewish individuals deserve all the money and privilege they got. But because of the tribal Covenant-mentality, Jews think that they, as a group, should rule over other peoples. While white libertarian elites will side with smart and/or rich non-whites against non-smart and/or non-rich whites, Jewish 'covenantarian' elites will primarily side with even lesser Jews even against white elites who are the socio-economic peers.
It's been said Episcopalians are just as smart as Jews, even a bit smarter. Then, why did Jews come out on top over Wasp Episcopalians? It's because Jews not only used their superior IQ in individual terms but drew strength from their sense of tribal unity and destiny, whereas Episcopalians came around to thinking only in terms of atomized individualism or collective universalism. People who act merely as individuals may gain great wealth, but they cannot amass power as a group. As for those who seek to include all of humanity in their tent, they end up with a morass of deracination, confusion, and chaos. 'Rightist' Wasps only thought in terms of 'me, me, me', and 'leftist' Wasps thought only in terms of 'world, world, world', encompassing all of humanity. Both sides lost out to Jews who, even as they've exploited the advantages of individualism and universalism, opted for 'we, us, ours' as their central mindset. So, if one bunch of Wasps veered off into one direction while another bunch of Wasps veered off into the other direction, Jews remained on track to push their ethnocentric agenda. Jews used individualism to the extent that highly talented Jewish individuals came to amass great fortunes. Jews also used universalism to the extent of persuading white/goy nations to open up to the entire world in the name of shared humanity, and such open vulnerability allowed Jewish power and wealth to penetrate so many nations and sink its hooks into them. Jews regard individualism and universalism as mere tools, whereas so many goyim have been 'intellectually' hoodwinked into accepting them as the core tenet of existence and justice. What really animates Jews is their form of ethno-spiritual tribalism that might be called 'covenantarianism'. Ideology is like air, identity is like matter. While all people need some degree of ideology(or beliefs based on creed), it is too thin as a civilizational core to sustain them through history. It is identity(or one's sense of belonging based on breed) that wins in the long run. A people must be careful not to embrace too strongly an ideology that undermines their sense of identity. Also, while small identities may unite with other identities of similar race-and-culture to form a bigger and stronger identity, it is game over if a people allow their identities to be diluted, erased, and even replaced by others. When similar identities unite, it is like flames coming together to build a bigger flame. When certain identities are overwhelmed by very different and even hostile identities, it's like flames being put out by fire.

Anyway, white people must understand that Jews will never regard them as equals because Jews believe themselves to be more intelligent and holier in the eyes of God(or History). In a way, modern Jewish identity might be called Achievement-Identity, or Identity-of-Pride in having produced so many geniuses, neo-prophets, artists, business titans, and etc. The New Republic, over several decades, was like the journal of Jewish Achievement Identitarianism. White people mustn't expect to be treated as equals by such a people. Jews feel entitled under the eyes of God and/or History to rule over goyim, and white people are their prize horse. Jews value whites as property, not as humanity. Whites are good in the eyes of Jews AS LONG AS they serve Jews. Now, some white people may figure that Jews will treat them nice IF whites do indeed honor and serve Jews as the superior race. Just like a master treats a dog kindly, maybe the Jewish Master will treat the White Dog nicely if the latter dutifully does the bidding of the Jews, fetch, roll over, and wag its tail. Such an attitude is self-debasing but also delusional. White cuckery doesn't fill the Jewish heart with gratitude but contempt. Upon seeing the once great race debasing itself at their feet, Jews feel even more contempt and just want to spit on white servility even as they demand it. Jews may gauge and value white cuckery for what it's worth in political and economic terms, but they feel ZERO RESPECT for it.

Another reason why Jews can't be expected to have kindly attitude toward white goyim is the Mirror Factor. If the Pedestal Factor instills Jews with Superiority Complex, the Mirror Factor imbues them with Inferiority Complex. Everyday, when Jews like Anthony Weiner wake up in the morning and look in the mirror, they see a funny-looking Jew staring back. Now, there are many good-looking Jews, and I don't necessarily mean Jews with substantial European blood. There are Semitic-looking Jews who are handsome in their own way, just as it's true of Arabs. But as Jewish evolution favored brains, money, zealotry(which went from spiritual to ideological in the 19th century), and pushiness above all other considerations, it didn't favor the traits of beauty. Among European noblemen, there was the dream of the handsome prince marrying the beautiful princess and having many good-looking kids together. Among Jews, the main consideration in marriage was money and/or mind. As such, many Jews ended up looking nerdoidean or haggly-waggly. Now, some Jews have a sense of humor and don't mind other races being better-looking. But many Jews, especially because of the Pedestal Factor, have been deeply resentful over the fact that some races, especially the 'Aryans', are generally more attractive than Jews. I mean, how did that happen? If Jews got the Covenant with God, shouldn't they be the fairest race?

In the past, white 'Anti-Semites' made a big deal of Jewish looks, especially with caricatures with hooked noses and sloping foreheads. But then, out of sensitivity over Shoah, fear of Jewish power, and/or influence of Jewish media, most whites decided they must be effusively nice to Jews. Over time, the only people commenting negatively about Jewish looks became Jewish comedians. Consider how Woody Allen beds only 'Aryan' women in STARDUST MEMORIES and then mocks ugly Jewish women. White people decided to remain mum about Jewish looks and, if anything, cheered white/Jewish sexual pairings.

Now, did such massive shift in goy attitude lead to Jews finally developing nice and kindly thoughts about whites? No. The fact is no matter how much whites praise, honor, and even adore Jews, Jews wake up every morning, look in the mirror, and feel like the wicked queen in SNOW WHITE. "Mirror, mirror on the wall, why does staring at myself make me run to the Wailing Wall?" Remember Cinderella was nice to her ugly 'sisters', but it was to no avail. The fact is the ugly sisters continued to hate her because she was beautiful while they were not. Indeed, their hostility toward Cinderella was compounded by the fact that she was their social inferior. Why should the inferior have the superior looks? Likewise, Jews, especially the women, wonder why the lowly goyesses should have the better looks? It fills them with envy, resentment, and even hatred. If Jewish men are eager to get their hands on blonde 'shikses', Jewish women want to carry out 'beauticide' by encouraging white women to mate with black men. Then, the kids that incubate in white wombs will have nappy hair, broad noses, and fat lips. Thus, 'Aryan' beauty will be destroyed, and then, even Jewish women will look better than the mulatto-ized white race. Now, of course, most white people aren't all that good-looking, but when it comes to beauty, people tend to think of the cream of the crop of any race, and justifiably or not, white beauty has become the World Standard. For that reason, the Mirror Factor will make Jews feel hatred toward the white race in the foreseeable future.

Finally, there is the Buttplug Factor. Ever notice that Jews have some of the worst personalities in the world? They really take the cake when it comes to being a**holes. One might say they act like they got buttplugs up their bungs. Jews are irritating and irritable. Now, Jewish comedians made this aspect of their ethno-cultural personality somewhat endearing through the use of humor. Who hasn't laughed at Don Rickles and Rodney Dangerfield? Or at Woody Allen and Mel Brooks? And yet, just like the use of 'camp' has really been a crutch for nasty, vicious, and narcissistic homos, Jewish humor is often the velvet glove that conceals a tight wound-up fist. Indeed, humor is partly therapeutic to Jews because if they didn't learn to laugh, they would hyperventilate and blow up with neurosis, hostility, and biliousness. It's like the Marx Brothers. They drive everyone and themselves crazy. If not for the humor as safety-valve, they'd probably go totally nuts and turn half of humanity into raving petite-hitlers or 'petitlers'.

Now, one may wonder how Jews developed the Buttplug Personality, and it probably has to do with their history of Rabbinical studies and middleman/merchant practices. To be a successful religious scholar, Jews had to verbally out-argue others, often over hair-splitting matters. And to be successful as businessmen, Jews had to be haggly and contentious. And so, Jews developed the kind of personality that many goyim might find to be unappealing, hostile, ugly, and even offensive. Just like some organisms evolved to be especially aggressive and problematic, the Jewish personality developed to cause a lot of problems. And yet, in its tireless energy, it has also been the source of many great achievements by Jews. Generally, greatness is the product of extreme, not mild, personalities. Richard Wagner and Ludwig van Beethoven were 'Aryans', not Jews, but both had very difficult and demanding personalities.

Anyway, the problem with Jews is with the sum of the three factors: Pedestal, Mirror, and Buttplug. After all, a people can be pretty intelligent and not be so unpleasant. A people can be plain-looking and even ugly and not so destructive. Australian Aborigines are considered to be on the 'ugly' side, but they are causing problems around the world. And people can have temperamental or nasty personalities and be limited in the harm they do. Greeks and Southern Italians have been known to be hot-headed and confrontational, but they don't endanger the world. But because of Jewish intelligence amasses great power and gives vent to Jewish resentments, the combination of ability and hostility can do great harm to the world.
Indeed, why was Nazi Germany so dangerous? There was the combination of awesome German talent and the pathology of the ruling elites headed by unstable Adolf Hitler. Because Jews gain so much with their intelligence and ability(and feel great arrogance toward goyim due to their tribal Covenant with God and History), there is a lot of firepower behind resentments of Jewish Inferiority Complex and the temper tantrums of Jewish Irascibility. Indeed, one reason why Jews hate Donald Trump so much is he has his own kind of 'chutzpah', which makes him go off script and howl like a wolf than bark like a dog at the behest of the master. Jewish intelligence enables Jewish hostility, and Jewish hostility fuels Jewish intelligence. It is a venomous combination, and one needs to be cold-eyed and clear-headed about the Jewish character as we move into the future where Jewish Power and Wealth will keep expanding. When faced with such cohabitant, competitor, or enemy, one must NOT give into naivete, sentimentality, or wishful thinking. One must know the truth. You must know your Jew.